GRATEFUL. THE BEAT WITH ARI MELBER STARTS RIGHT NOW. HI, MELBER STARTS RIGHT NOW. HI, ARI. ARI.

>> HI, NICOLE.

>> HI, NICICOLE.

>> THANK YOU. WELCOME TO THE

>> THANK YOU. WELCOME TO THE BEAT. BEAT.

>> I'M ARI MELBER, AND.

>>>> THIS WEEK. PRESIDENT TRUMP

>> THIS WEEK. PRESIDIDENT TRUMP IS. IS.

>> SPOTLIGHTING HIS S WAR DIPLOMACY.

>> WHILE T THE. REPUBLICAN

>> WHIHILE THE. REPUBLICAN CONGRESS. CONGRESS.

>> PRESSES ON WITH ITS EPSTEIN

>> PRESSES ON WITH ITS EPSTEIN PROBE.

>> A PARTIAL.

>> R REBUKE TO TRUMP'S DEMANDS O

>> REBUKE TO TRUMP'S DEMANDS TO DROP THE ISSUE. CONGRESS DROP THE ISSUE. CONGNGRESS DEPOSING TRUMP. ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR.

>> WHO WAS IN.

>> CHARGE WHWHEN EPSTEIN.

>> CHARGE WHEN EPSPSTEIN.

>> DIED IN CUSTODY. AND TONIGHT

>> DIED IN CUSTODY. AND TONIGHT WE. WE.

>>>> ACTUALLY START OUR.

>> ACTUALLY START OUR.

>>>> PROGRAM WITH A NEW.

>> PROGRAM WITH A NEW.

>> SPECIAL REPORORT. FOR YOU.

>> SPECIAL REPORT. FOR YOU. TRACING THTHE. TRACING THE.

>> S SORDID PATH OF.

>> SORDID PATH OF.

>> CRIMES.

>> INVESTIGATIONS.

>> CORRUPTION DEALS WIWITH.

>> CORRUPTION DEALS WITH.

>> GOVERNMENT INSISIDERS.

>> GOVERNMENT INSIDERS.

>>>> OFTEN REPUBLICANS. THE

>> OFTEN REPUBLICANS. THE SUSPICIOIOUS DEATH OF EPSTEIN A. SUSPICIOUS DEATH OF EPSTEIN AND.

>> CUSTODYDY OF THE TRUMP

>> CUSTODY OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S.

>> FIRST TERM.

>> THE SECRETITIVE.

>> THE SECRERETIVE.

>> RESPONSES WE'VE. .

>> BEEN SEEING.

>> FOROR YEARS.

>> FOR YEARS.

>> ACROSS THESE ISSUES.

>> WE'RE GOINGNG TO SHOW YOU THE

>> WE'RE GOING TO SHOW YOU THE NEW. .

>> BEAEAT TIMELINE.

>> THAT. WE'VE CREATED,

>> THAHAT. WE'VE CREATED, REPORTING FOR THE FIRST TIME REPORTING FOR THE FIRST TIME TONIGHT. RAISING FRESH QUESTIONS TONIGHT. RAISING FRESH QUESTIONS FOR TRUMP AND OTHER GOVERNMENT FOR R TRUMP AND OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. WE ARE GOING TO OFFICIALS. WE ARE GOING TO EXPLAIN THISIS. WHAT YOU SEE HE, EXPLAIN THIS. WHAT YOU SEE HERE, COMING UP IN THIS FIRST SEGMGMET COMING UP IN THIS FIRST SEGMENT OF THE SHOW, A TIMELINE THAT OF THE SHOW, A TIMELINE THAT ACTUALLY WILL MAKE MORE SENSE. ACTUALLY WILL MAKE MORE SENSE. WE THINK, WHEN YOU RECALL THE WE THINK, WHEN YOU RECALL THE FACTS, HOW EPSTEIN FIRIRST FACTS, HOW EPSTEIN FIRST PRESENTED AS AN ELITE, WEALTHY PRESENTED AS AN ELITE, WEALTHY PERSON WITH TIES TO OTHER PERSON WITH TIES TO OTHER IMPORTANT PEOPLE, BUT THEN HIS IMPORTANT PEOPLE, BUT THEN HIS WHOLE FACADE SHOWED SUDDEN WHOLE FACADE SHOWED SUDDEN CRACKS WHEN LOCAL POLICE CRACKS WHEN LOCAL POLICE INVESTIGATED A REPORT OF EPSTEIN INVESTIGATED A REPORT OF EPSTEIN MOLESTING A 14 YEAR R OLD, LEADG MOLESTING A 14 YEAR OLD, LEADING TO GOVERNMENT PLANS TO CHARGE TO GOVERNMENT PLANS TO CHARGE HIM, WHICH WERE THEN WATERED HIM, WHICH WERE THEN WATERED DOWN INTO A LESSER CHARGE UNDER DOWN INTO A LESSER CHARGE UNDER A SECRET DEAL WITH A REPUBLICAN A SECRET DEAL WITH A REPUBLICAN APPOINTEE, ALEX ACOSTA. APPOINTEE, ALEX ACOSTA.

>> JEFFREY EPSTEIN WENT TO.

>> JAIL JUST BEFORE.

>> TEN THIS MOMORNING. HE PLEADD

>> TEN THIS MORNING. HE PLEADED GUILTY IN N OPEN COURT. GUILTY IN OPEN COURT.

>> THERE IS NO. ARGUGUMENT THAT

>> THERE IS NO. ARGUMENT THAT EPSTEIN GOT AN. EXTRAORDINARY EPSTEIN GOT AN. EXTRAORDINORDINARY BREAK. E

>> A BACKROOM DEAL. SOME HAVE DESCRIBED IT. DESCRIBED IT.

>> WHAT WAS SO I IMPORTANT TO TE

>> WHAT WAS SO IMPORTANT TO THE GOVERNMENT THAT SEX CRIMES GOVERNMENT THAT SEX CRIMES DESCRIBED IN THIS AGREEMENT WERE DESCRIBED IN THIS AGREEMENT WERE TREATED SO LIGHTLY. TREATED SO LIGHTLY.

>> BECAUSE OF.

>> APPARENTLTLY SOME VERY HIGH

>> APPARENTLY SOME VERY HIGH POWEWERED ATTORNEYS. POWERED ATTORNEYS.

>> THEY'VE TREATEDED MR. EPSTEIN

>> THEY'VE TREATED MR. EPSTEIN MUCH DIFFERENTLY. MUCH DIFFERENTLY.

>> VERY DIFFERENTLY. THE BUSH

>> VERY DIFFERENTLY. THE BUSH PROSECUTOR WHO DID THAT LARGELY PROSECUTOR WHO DID THAT LARGELY LET THE COCONSPIRATORS THAT WERE LET THE COCONSPIRATORS THAT WERE UNDER INVESTIGATION GO AND UNDER INVESTIGATION GO AND EPSTEIN OFF THE HOOK WITH A EPSTEIN OFF THE HOOK WITH A BRIEF SENTENCE, THAT PROSECUTOR BRIEF SENTENCE, THAT PROSECUTOR LATER PROMOTED BY TRUMP. WE'LL LATER PROMOTED BY TRUMP. WE'LL GET TO THAT. BUT THE EVASION OF GET TO THAT. BUT THE EVASION OF ACCOUNTABILITY THERE UNDER ACCOUNTABILITY THERE UNDER PUBLIC PRESSURE WAS A PROBLEM. PUBLIC PRESSURE WAS A PROBLEM. AND SO AS THE PRESSURE BUILT AND SO AS THE PRESSURE BUILT LATER CAREER PROSECUTORS IN DOJ, LATER CAREER PROSECUTORS IN DOJ, ONE OF WHOM WHO WAS LATER FIRED ONE OF WHOM WHO WAS LATER FIRED BY TRUMP, THEN BROUGHT THE CASE BY TRUMP, THEN BROUGHT THE CASE DURING TRUMP'S FIRST TERM, WHICH DURING TRUMP'S FIRST TERM, WHICH CHANGED EVERYTHING. AND THEN WE CHANGED EVERYTHING. AND THEN WE HAD EPSTEIN SUDDENLY DYING IN HAD EPSTEIN SUDDENLY DYING IN FEDERAL CUSTODY. FEDERAL CUSTODY.

>> NBC NEWS HAS LEARNED THAT

>> NBC NEWS HAS LEARNED THAT DISGRACED. FINANCIER JEFFREY. DISGRACED. FINANCIER JEFFREY.

>> EPSTEIN IS DEAD.

>> HIS BODY IN THAT VAN YOU SEE

>> HIS BODY IN THAT VAN YOU SEE THERE, SEEN HEADING FOR THE THERE, SEEN HEADING FOR THE MEDICAL. MEDICAL.

>>>> EXAMINER'S OFFICE.

>> EXAMINER'S OFFICE.

>> FOUND DEAD BY APPARENT

>> FOUND DEAD BY APPARENENT SUICIDE IN HIS. SUICIDE IN H HIS.

>> JAIL CELL. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S

>> JAIL CELL. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ATTORNEYS QUESTIONING G WHETHER ATTORNEYS QUESTIONING WHETHER HIS DEATH. HIS DEATH.

>> W WAS A SUICIDE.

>> WAS A SUICIDE.

>>>> WHATEVER HAPPENED.

>> WITH.

>> JEFFREY EPSPSTEIN.

>> JEFFREY EPSTEIN.

>> IN PRISON.

>> BACK IN MID-JULY.

>> STILL.

>>>> STILL.

>> HAS NOT BEEN FULLY EXPLAINED.

>> THAT DEATH HAS SPURRED MORE

>> THAT DEATH HAS SPURRED MORE QUESTIONS AND THEORIES THAN JUST QUESTIONS AND THEORIES THAN JUST ABOUT ANYTHING IN THISIS CASE, D ABOUT ANYTHING IN THIS CASE, AND MANY OF THE QUESTIONS ARE VALID. MANY OF THE QUESTIONS ARE VALID. THE TRUMP DOJ WAS IN CHARGE. THE TRUMP DOJ WAS IN CHARGE. EVERYONE KNEW EPSTEIN WAS A EVERYONE KNEW EPSTEIN WAS A NOTORIOUS HIGH PROFILE NOTORIOUS HIGH PROFILE DEFENDANT, AND YET HE DIEDED. TE DEFENDANT, AND YET HE DIED. THE TRUMP DOJ PRISON, THEIR SYSTEM, TRUMP DOJ PRISON, THEIR SYSTEM, THEIR LOST. THE KEY VIDEO THEIR LOST. THE KEY VIDEO FOOTAGE OF EPSTEIN'S CELL DOOR. FOOTAGE OF EPSTEIN'S CELL DOOR. IT'S NEVER BEEN RECOVERED. THEY IT'S NEVER BEEN RECOVERED. THEY ALSO OVERSAW OTHER BLATANT ALSO OVERSAW OTHER BLATANT FAILURES, COMPOUNDED BY MORE FAILURES, COMPOUNDED BY MORE SECRECY FROM THE TOP ALL THE WAY SECRECY FROM THE TOP ALL THE WAY UP TO TRUMP AND THEN TRUMP. AG UP TO TRUMP AND THEN TRUMP. AG BARR TOLD EVERYONE TO TAKE HIS BARR TOLD EVERYONE TO TAKE HIS WORD THAT EPSTEIN HAD JUST WORD THAT EPSTEIN HAD JUST KILLED HIMSELF. . THAT DIDN'T KILLED HIMSELF. THAT DIDN'T SILENCE THE QUESTIONS THTHAT SILENCE THE QUESTIONS THAT BUILT. AS YEARS WENTNT ON, AND BUILT. AS YEARS WENT ON, AND TRUMP CAMPAIGNED FOR HIS SECOND TRUMP CAMPAIGNED FOR HIS SECOND TERM, BASICALLY RUNNING AGAINST TERM, BASICALLY RUNNING AGAINST HIS OWN EPSTEIN SECRECY IN HIS HIS OWN EPSTEIN SECRECY IN HIS FIRST TERM, AG BARR'S SUCCESSOR FIRST TERM, AG BARR'S SUCCESSOR VOWED TO FIX THE TRUMP DOJ'S OWN VOWED TO FIX THE TRUMP DOJ'S OWN PAST SECRECY. PAST SECRECY.

>> WOULD YOU DECLASSIFY.

>> THE EPSTEIN FILES?

>> YEAH.

>>>> YEAH, I WOULD.

>> YEAH, I WOULD.

>> WELL, THAT REALLY HAPPENED.

>> IT'T'S SITTING.

>> ON MY DESK RIGHT NOW. THIS IS

>> ON MY DESK RIGHT NOW. THIS IS NOT THE BREAKING NEWEWS THAT YOU NOT THE BREAKING NEWS THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT. WOULD EXEXPECT.

>> THE FBI AND JUSTICE

>> THE FBI AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SAY THEY FOUND NO DEPARTMENT SAY THEY FOUND NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF AN CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF AN INCRIMINATING CLIENT LIST. INCRIMINATING CLIENT LIST.

>> EVERYBODY KNOWS WHAT CAME

>> EVERYBODY KNOWS WHAT CAME NEXT. TRUMP, DOJ BREAKING ITS NEXT. TRUMP, DOJ BREAKING ITS VOW TO RELEASE MORE MATERIAL, VOW TO RELEASE MORE MATERIAL, THEN TRYING TO DISTRACT BY THEN TRYING TO DISTRACT BY RELEASING AFTER THE MEMO THERE RELEASING AFTER THE MEMO THERE AN ALTERNATIVE HALLWAY VIDEO, AN ALTERNATIVE HALLWAY VIDEO, WHICH HAS BEEN CRITICIZED. BUT WHICH HAS BEEN CRITICIZED. BUT OF COURSE, WASN'T THE ORIGININAL OF COURSE, WASN'T THE ORIGINAL VIDEO THAT REMAINS MISSING. ALL VIDEO THAT REMAINS MISSING. ALL OF THAT STOKING G THE MORE RECET OF THAT STOKING THE MORE RECENT QUESTIONS WE'VE HEARD THIS YEAR. QUESTIONS WE'VE HEARD THIS YEAR. TRUMP'S EPSTEIN SUMMER WITH TRUMP'S EPSTEIN SUMMER WITH BLOWBACK FROM THE MAGA BASE, BLOWBACK FROM THE MAGA BASE, ELECTED REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS, ELECTED REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS, VICTIMS, ADVOCATES. SO NOW LET'S VICTIMS, ADVOCATES. SO NOW LET'S APPLY THE FULL FACTS SO THAT WE APPLY THE FULL FACTS SO THAT WE CAN LOOK AT THESE QUESTIONS. I'M CAN LOOK AT THESE QUESTIONS. I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU A TIMELINE GOING TO SHOW YOU A TIMELINE HERE AND WHAT WE ARE LEARNING. HERE AND WHAT WE ARE LEARNING. IN THIS CASE, WE'RE GOING TO IN THIS CASE, WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT THE RECENT SECRECY, THE LOOK AT THE RECENT SECRECY, THE FAILURES BY THE TRUMP FAILURES BY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, WHY THIS CASE ADMINISTRATION, WHY THIS CASE HAS BEEN A FAILURE FOROR JUSTICE HAS BEEN A FAILURE FOR JUSTICE AND GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPAREREN. AND GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY. AND THE HISTORY HELPS REVEAL AND THE HISTORY HELPS REVEAL LINKS TO THE CURRENT ISSUES, THE LINKS TO THE CURRENT ISSUES, THE QUESTIONS FACING TRUMP AS QUESTIONS FACING TRUMP AS PRESIDENT AND AS A CIVILIAN, PRESIDENT AND AS A CIVILIAN, BECAUSE BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT, BECAUSE BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT, HE HAD A SORDID HISTORORY WITH HE HAD A SORDID HISTORY WITH EPSTEIN. AND WHEN WE'RE DONE EPSTEIN. AND WHEN WE'RE DONE WALKING YOU THROUGH THIS WALKING YOU THROUGH THIS TIMELINE, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE TIMELINE, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE WHY SO MANY QUESTIONS ENDURE WHY SO MANY QUESTIONS S ENDURE UNTIL OFFICIALS LINKED TO TRUMP, UNTIL OFFICIALS LINKED TO TRUMP, TO OFFICIALS CARRYING OUT HIS TO OFFICIALS CARRYING OUT HIS PRIORITIES AT DOJ, ALL OF WHICH PRIORITIES AT DOJ, ALL OF WHICH HAS DRAWN THIS BACKLASH. HAS DRAWN THIS BACKLASH.

>> THE CURRENT.

>> DOJ UNDER PAM.

>> BONDI IS COCOVERING UP CRIME,

>> BONDI IS COVERING UP CRIMES, VERY SERIOUS CRIMES. VERY SERIOUS CRIMES.

>> BUT LAST.

>> WEEK.

>> SHE PUT OUT A TWO.

>> PAGE MEMO.

>> EFFECTIVELY DECLARING.

>> THE EPSTEIN.

>> CASE CLOSED, WHICH.

>> IS CONVENIENT.

>>>> GIVEN THE SPECULATION.

>> GIVEN THE SPECUCULATION.

>> THAT TRUMP MIGHT.

>> BE IN T THE SO-CALLED. CLIENT LIST.

>> THREE TIMES.

>> THREEEE TIMES.

>> I.

>> VOTEDED FOR THIS MAN.

>> VOTED FOR THIS MAN.

>> THIS IS.

>> BY FAR THE BIGGESEST FUMBLE F

>> BY FAR THE BIGGEST FUMBLE OF THE ADMINISTRATION. THE ADMINISTSTRATION.

>> THEY'VE HAD THUS FAR.

>> IT'S JUST IT'S INDEFENSIBLE.

>> IT'S INDEFENSIBLE THAT THE

>> IT'S INDEFENSIBLE THAT THE ANSWERS AREN'T THERE. ANSWERS AREN'T THERE.

>> WHEN SO MUCH WAS PROMISED.

>> HE AND HIS ADMINISTRATION.

>> KEEP ACTING.

>> ACTING.

>> LIKE.

>> THEY'VE GOT SOMETHING TO

>> THEY'VE GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE. HIDE.

>> THE EPSTEIN CASE HAS MANY

>> THE EPSPSTEIN CASE HAS MANY DETAILS AND OPEN QUESTIONS. OUR DETAILS AND OPEN QUESTIONS. OUR TIMELINE TODAY FOCUSES ON THE TIMELINE TODAY FOCUSES ON THE KEY FACTS AND DEVELOPMENTS KEY FACTS AND DEVELOPMENTS STARTING IN MARCH 2005, WHEN STARTING IN MARCH 2005, WHEN LOCAL POLICE IN PALM BEACH, LOCAL POLICE IN PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, BEGAN A PROBE INTO FLORIDA, BEGAN A PROBE INTO EPSTEIN INVESTIGATING REPORTS OF EPSTEIN INVESTIGATING REPORTS OF ABUSING VICTIMS AS YOUNG AS 14. ABUSING VICTIMS AS YOUNG AS 14. THE LOCAL CASE LED TO EPSTEIN'S THE LOCAL CASE LED TO EPSTEIN'S INDICTMENT FOR A SINGLE COUNT OF INDICTMENT FOR A SINGLE COUNT OF SOLICITING PROSTITUTION IN 2006, SOLICITING PROSTITUTION IN 2006, NOT THE MORE SERIOUS ALLEGED NOT THE MORE SERIOUS ALLEGED CONDUCT. IN FACT, THE LEAD CONDUCT. IN FACT, THE LEAD DETECTIVE IN THE PALM BEACH DETECTIVE IN THE PALM BEACH OFFICE REFERRED THE CASE TO THE OFFICE REFERRED THE CASE TO THE FBI TO LOOK AT THE MORE SERIOUS FBI TO LOOK AT THE MORE SERIOUS CRIMES, AND THOSE FEDERAL CRIMES, AND THOSE FEDERAL INVESTIGATORS BEGAN PROBING INVESTIGATORS BEGAN PROBING ALLEGATIONS. IN 2008, EPSTEIN ALLEGATIONS. IN 2008, EPSTEIN REACHED A DEAL WITH THE BUSH REACHED A DEAL WITH THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION'S FEDERAL PROSECUTORS TO TAKE THATAT LOCAL PROSECUTORS TO TAKE THAT LOCAL FLORIDA CONVICTION FOR FLORIDA CONVICTION FOR SOLICITING PROSTITUTION WITH AN SOLICITING PROSTITUTION WITH AN ADULT AND A MINOR, EPSTEIN GOT A ADULT AND A MINOR, EPSTEIN GOT A LENIENT SHORT PRISON SENTENCE LENIENT SHORT PRISON SENTENCE AND AN UNUSUAL AGREEMENT THAT AND AN UNUSUAL AGREEMENT THAT THE BUSH DOJ WOULD NOT PROSECUTE THE BUSH DOJ WOULD NOT PROSECUTE EPSTEIN FURTHER, OR FOUR OF HIS EPSTEIN FURTHER, OR FOUR OF HIS COCONSPIRATORS OR ANY OTHERS. COCONSPIRATORS OR ANY OTHERS. BUSH DOJ PROSECUTORS ALSO AGREED BUSH DOJ PROSECUTORS ALSO AGREED TO KEEP THE DEAL SECRET AND NOT TO KEEP THE DEAL SECRET AND NOT INFORM EPSTEIN'S VICTIMS ABOUT INFORM EPSTEIN'S VICTIMS ABOUT IT. A JUDGE LATER FOUND THE BUSH IT. A JUDGE LATER FOUND THE BUSH DOJ SECRECY DEAL WAS ILLEGAL, DOJ SECRECY DEAL WAS ILLEGAL, VIOLATING THOSE VICTIMS RIGHTS. VIOLATING THOSE VICTIMS RIGHTS. SO THE FACTS SHOW FROM THE SO THE FACTS SHOW FROM THE START, EPSTEIN GOT THIS UNUSUAL START, EPSTEIN GOT THIS UNUSUAL PROTECTION FROM THE GOVERNMENT. PROTECTION FROM THE GOVERNMENT. AND THIS P PERIOD, A REPUBLICAN AND THIS PERIOD, A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION. BUSH AND EPSTEIN ADMINISTRATION. BUSH AND EPSTEIN WAS A RICH, POWERFUL FIGURE. HE WAS A RICH, POWERFUL FIGURE. HE HAD TIES TO PEOPOPLE IN BUSINESS HAD TIES TO PEOPLE IN BUSINESS AND POLITICS. HE HIRED A AND POLITICS. HE HIRED A REPUBLBLICAN CONNECTED LAWYER, EN FORMER INDEPENDENT COUNSEL KEN STARR, AND SERVED JUST ONE YEAR STARR, AND SERVED JUST ONE YEAR IN THAT DEAL. NOW, ANOTHER NINE IN THAT DEAL. NOW, ANOTHER NINE YEARS WENT BY, AND THEN THE YEARS WENT BY, AND THEN THE MIAMI HERALD REPORTED EPSTEIN MIAMI HERALD REPORTED EPSTEIN EXPOSÉ ON THE ALLEGATIONS OF HIS EXPOSÉ ON THE ALLEGATIONS OF HIS CONDUCT AND THAT BUSH ERA CONDUCT AND THAT BUSH ERA PROSECUTOR WHO CUT THE PROSECUTOR WHO CUT THE SWEEEETHEART DEAL. THAT SWEETHEART DEAL. THAT INVESTIGATIVE REPORT GAINED INVESTIGATIVE REPORT GAINED TRACTION PARTLY BECAUSE OF A TIE TRACTION PARTLY BECAUSE OF A TIE TO TRUMP, WHO PROMOTED THE VERY TO TRUMP, WHO PROMOTED THE VERY PROSECUTOR, ALEX ACOSTA, TO HIS PROSECUTOR, ALEX ACOSTA, TO HIS CABINET. THE HEADLINE AT THE TIME HAMMERING HOW A NOW TRUMP TIME HAMMERING HOW A NOW TRUMP OFFICIAL GAVE A SERIAL SEX OFFICIAL GAVE A SERIAL SEX ABUSER THE DEAL OF A LIFETIME ABUSER THE DEAL OF A LIFETIME AND THAT PUBLIC PRESSURE FROM AND THAT PUBLIC PRESSURE FROM THE HERALD DROVE A NEW FEDERAL THE HERALD DROVE A NEW FEDERAL PROBE. INTERNAL DOJ REVIEWS PROBE. INTERNAL DOJ REVIEWS WOULD SHOW ACOSTA HAD POOR WOULD SHOW ACOSTA HAD POOR JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, AND THAT JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, AND THAT THE BLANKET IMMUNITY OFFERS FOR THE BLANKET IMMUNITY OFFERS FOR EPSTEIN AND OTHERS WERE JUST EPSTEIN AND OTHERS WERE JUST INDEFENSIBLE, LEADING TO A INDEFENSIBLE, LEADING TO A FAIRLY SWIFT FEDERAL INDICTMTMET FAIRLY SWIFT FEDERAL INDICTMENT OF EPSTEIN ON FAR MORE SERIOUS OF EPSTEIN ON FAR MORE SERIOUS SEX TRAFFICKING CHARGES. AND THE SEX TRAFFICKING CHARGES. AND THE PRESSURE DROVE THE ORIGINAL PRESSURE DROVE THE ORIGINAL PROSECUTOR. TRUMP HAD PROMOTED PROSECUTOR. TRUMP HAD PROMOTED ACOSTA TO RESIGN AROUND THIS ACOSTA TO RESIGN AROUND THIS TIME, AND IN A KEY DECISION, A TIME, AND IN A KEY DECISION, A JUDGE DENIED EPSTEIN BAIL, JUDGE DENIED EPSTEIN BAIL, FORCING HIM TO BE INCARCERATED FORCING HIM TO BE INCARCERATED BEFORE ANY TRIAL. IT WAS JUST BEFORE ANY TRIAL. IT WAS JUST OVER A MONTH LATER, AUGUST 2019, OVER A MONTH LATER, AUGUST 2019, WHEN EPSTEIN WAS FOUND DEAD IN WHEN EPSTEIN WAS FOUND DEAD IN HIS CELL. THE SITUATION WAS HIS CELL. THE SITUATION WAS SUSPICIOUS. OFFICIALS THERE SUSPICIOUS. OFFICIALS THERE BROKE SEVERAL PROTOCOLS. EPSTEIN BROKE SEVERAL PROTOCOLS. EPSTEIN WAS A HIGH PROFILE DETAINEE. WAS A HIGH PROFILE DETAINEE. HE'D BEEN PLACED ON SUICIDE HE'D BEEN PLACED ON SUICIDE WATCH, WHICH WAS THEN QUICKLY WATCH, WHICH WAS THEN QUICKLY LIFTED. GUARDS FAILED TO DO LIFTED. GUARDS FAILED TO DO REQUIRED INSPECTIONSNS THE VERY REQUIRED INSPECTIONS THE VERY NIGHT OF HIS DEATH, AND A LOT OF NIGHT OF HIS DEATH, AND A LOT OF QUESTIONS WERE HANGING OVER ALL QUESTIONS WERE HANGING OVER ALL OF THIS. SO LET'T'S GO EVEN OF THIS. SO LET'S GO EVEN FURTHER AHEAD, ALL THE WAY UP TO FURTHER AHEAD, ALL THE WAY UP TO 2019. AND WHAT HAPPENED AFTER 2019. AND WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THAT? BECAUSE KEY VIDEOS WENT THAT? BECAUSE KEY VIDEOS WENT MISSING. TRUMP, ATTORNEY GENERAL MISSING. TRUMP, ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR EVEN ADMITTING THE PRISON BARR EVEN ADMITTING THE PRISON MADE MISTAKES THEN, BUT CLAIMING MADE MISTAKES THEN, BUT CLAIMING THAT HE PERSONALLY REVIEWED THAT HE PERSONALLY REVIEWED PRISON VIDEO WHICH SHOWED NO ONE PRISON VIDEO WHICH SHOWED NO ONE ENTERING THE CELL. AND WITH ENTERING THE CELL. AND WITH EPSTEIN DEAD, PROSECUTORS TURNED EPSTEIN DEAD, PROSECUTORS TURNED TO A COCONSPIRATOR WHO MIGHT TO A COCONSPIRATOR WHO MIGHT HAVE BENEFITED FROM THAT HAVE BENEFITED FROM THAT ORIGINAL FLORIDA CASE BEBEING ST ORIGINAL FLORIDA CASE BEING SHUT DOWN. WHAT I TOLD YOU ABOUT THEY DOWN. WHAT I TOLD YOU ABOUT THEY WENT AHEAD AND INDICTED WENT AHEAD AND INDICTED GHISLAINE MAXWELL FOR HELPING GHISLAINE MAXWELL FOR HELPING EPSTEIN SEX TRAFFICKING, A CASE EPSTEIN SEX TRAFFICKING, A CASE BROUGHT BY A CAREER PROSECUTOR. BROUGHT BY A CAREER PROSECUTOR. MAURENE COMEY, DAUGHTER OF MAURENE COMEY, DAUGHTER OF FORMER FBI DIRECTOR COMEY. AND FORMER FBI DIRECTOR COMEY. AND HER WORK CONTINUED ON WHEN THE AND HER WORK CONTINUED ON WHEN THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TOOK OVER. BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TOOK OVER. SHE WON MAXWELL'S CONVICTION, SHE WON MAXWELL'S CONVICTION, AND THIS 20 YEAR PRISON AND THIS 20 YEAR PRISON SENTENCE. THEN, DURING THE 2024 SENTENCE. THEN, DURING THE 2024 CAMPAIGN, THE QUESTIONS AND CAMPAIGN, THE QUESTIONS AND THEORIES ABOUT EPSTEIN'S CRIMES THEORIES ABOUT EPSTEIN'S CRIMES AND SPECIAL TREATMENT WERE AND SPECIAL TREATMENT WERE HEATING UP ON THE RIGHGHT. IT WS HEATING UP ON THE RIGHT. IT WAS A PROBLEM FOR TRUMP, GIVEN THAT A PROBLEM FOR TRUMP, GIVEN THAT HE PROMOTED THE E ORIGINAL HE PROMOTED THE ORIGINAL PROSECUTOR, THAT HE OVERSAW THE PROSECUTOR, THAT HE OVERSAW THE DOJ, WHICH FAILED TO ANSWER DOJ, WHICH FAILED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS OR HAVE TRANSPARENCY QUESTIONS OR HAVE TRANSPARENCY ABOUT WHATEVER HAPPENED IN THAT ABOUT WHATEVER HAPPENED IN THAT PRISON CELL. SO TRUMP TRIED TO PRISON CELL. SO TRUMP TRIED TO GO ON OFFENSE, VOWING TO GO ON OFFENSE, VOWING TO DECLASSIFY AND RELEASE EPSTEIN'S DECLASSIFY AND RELEASE EPSTEIN'S FILES, AND HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL FILES, AND HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL TOOK OVER THAT MESSAGE AND TOOK OVER THAT MESSAGE AND ADVANCED IT IN OFFICE, NOW ADVANCED IT IN OFFICE, NOW INFAMOUSLY CLAIMING THAT SHE HAD INFAMOUSLY CLAIMING THAT SHE HAD THE CLIENT LIST ON HER DESK, THE CLIENT LIST ON HER DESK, WHICH SHE LATER CONTRADICTED WHICH SHE LATER CONTRADICTED BECAUSE SHORTLY AFTER THE DOJ BECAUSE SHORTLY AFTER THE DOJ RELEASED AN ALTERNATE VIDEO FROM RELEASED AN ALTERNATE VIDEO FROM THE PRISON. BUT THE E KEY VIDEO THE PRISON. BUT THE KEY VIDEO THAT SHOWS EPSTEIN'S CELL DOOR THAT SHOWS EPSTEIN'S CELL DOOR IS EITHER LOST OR HIDDEN. ITIT'S IS EITHER LOST OR HIDDEN. IT'S NEVER BEEN RELEASED, AND BONDI NEVER BEEN RELEASED, AND BONDI RELEASED THE NOW INFAMOUS MEMO RELEASED THE NOW INFAMOUS MEMO THAT SAID THEY WOULDN'T PROVIDE THAT SAID THEY WOULDN'T PROVIDE ANY OTHER EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS. SO ANY OTHER EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS. SO BONDI WENT FROM SAYING THERE WAS BONDI WENT FROM SAYING THERE WAS A CLIENT LIST TO THERE WASN'T. A CLIENT LIST TO THERE WASN'T. SHE WAS LYING THEN OR LYING NOW. SHE WAS LYING THEN OR LYING NOW. THE DOJ MEMO THEN SAID THERE WAS THE DOJ MEMO THEN SAID THERE WAS NO OTHER EPSTEIN INFO THAT WAS NO OTHER EPSTEIN INFO THAT WAS GOING TO BE RELEASED, WHICH GOING TO BE RELEASED, WHICH IGNITED THAT FIRESTORM OF IGNITED THAT FIRESTORM OF CRITICISM WE ALL LIVED THROUGH. CRITICISM WE ALL LIVED THROUGH. AND GIVEN THE BROKEN VOWS THAT AND GIVEN THE BROKEN VOWS THAT COULDN'T HOLD, TRUMP SOON COULDN'T HOLD, TRUMP SOON CONTRADICTED HIS OWN DOJ MEMO CONTRADICTED HIS OWN DOJ MEMO AND SAYING HE WOULD TRY TO GET AND SAYING HE WOULD TRY TO GET GRAND JURY MATERIAL RELEASED. GRAND JURY MATERIAL RELEASED. BUT THOSE E ARE LIMITED BUT THOSE ARE LIMITED TRANSCRIPTS. A LOT OF THE BIG TRANSCRIPTS. A LOT OF THE BIG EPSTEIN INFORMATION IS IN THE EPSTEIN INFORMATION IS IN THE TRUMUMP DOJ. THEY COULD RELEASET TRUMP DOJ. THEY COULD RELEASE IT ANY TIME. ONE JUDGE HAS DENIED ANY TIME. ONE JUDGE HAS DENIED THIS. AND AS THE TRUMP THIS. AND AS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S CONTRADICTING ADMINISTRATION'S CONTRADICTING CLAIMS DREW MORE HEAEAT ON ITS CLAIMS DREW MORE HEAT ON ITS SECRECY, THE DOJ THEN SENT THIS SECRECY, THE DOJ THEN SENT THIS FORMER TRUMP CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMER TRUMP CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY TO INTERVIEW MAXWELL IN ATTORNEY TO INTERVIEW MAXWELL IN PRISON AND THEN TRANSFERRED HER PRISON AND THEN TRANSFERRED HER TO A BETTER PRISON, AN APPARENT TO A BETTER PRISON, AN APPARENT REWARD FOR THE ONE PERSON DOING REWARD FOR THE ONE PERSON DOING ANY TIME FOR EPSTEIN'S INDICTED ANY TIME FOR EPSTEIN'S INDICTED FEDERAL CRIMES. IN JULY, TRUMP'S FEDERAL CRIMES. IN JULY, TRUMP'S DOJ ALSO FIRED THE TOP DOJ ALSO FIRED THE TOP PROSECUTOR WHO WON THE CASE PROSECUTOR WHO WON THE CASE AGAINST MAXWELL COMEY, AN AGAINST MAXWELL COMEY, AN UNUSUAL OUSTING OF A CAREER UNUSUAL OUSTING OF A CAREER PROSECUTOR WITH NO PUBLIC PROSECUTOR WITH NO PUBLIC EXPLANATION. SO WHAT DOES THIS EXPLANATION. SO WHAT DOES THIS TIMELINE SHOW? THAT EPSTEIN GOT TIMELINE SHOW? THAT EPSTEIN GOT HELP AND SPECIAL TREATMENT AND HELP AND SPECIAL TREATMENT AND SOMETIMES UNLAWFUL BENEFITS FROM SOMETIMES UNLAWFUL BENEFITS FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT CLAIM TO BE INVESTIGATING HIM? CLAIM TO BE INVESTIGATING HIM? IT HAPPENED UNDER THE BUSH IT HAPPENED UNDER THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, WITH OFFICIALS ADMINISTRATION, WITH OFFICIALS LALATER PROMOTED BY TRUMP. THE LATER PROMOTED BY TRUMP. THE TRUMP DOJ ONLY PICICKED UP THE TRUMP DOJ ONLY PICKED UP THE CASE IN THE FIRST TERM AFTER CASE IN THE FIRST TERM AFTER JOURNALISTS REPORTED THOSE JOURNALISTS REPORTED THOSE REVELATIONS. EPSTEIN'S UNUSUAL REVELATIONS. EPSTEIN'S UNUSUAL DEATH MET WITH TOTAL SECRECY BY DEATH MET WITH TOTAL SECRECY BY THE FIRST TRUMP TERM AND THE THE FIRST TRUMP TERM AND THE PROSECUTOR WHO BUSTED EPSTEIN'S PROSECUTOR WHO BUSTED EPSTEIN'S COCONSPIRATOR OUSTED IN THE COCONSPIRATOR OUSTED IN THE SECOND TERM. WHILE TRUMP AND SECOND TERM. WHILE TRUMP AND OTHER OFFICIALS MADE FALSE, OTHER OFFICIALS MADE FALSE, SOMETIMES KNOWINGLY FALSE, SOMETIMES KNOWINGLY FALSE, STATEMENTS ABOUT THIS PUBLIC STATEMENTS ABOUT THIS PUBLIC HISTORY. THIS IS A DAMNING HISTORY. THIS IS A DAMNING ACCOUNT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP'S ACCOUNT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP'S APPROACH TO THIS CASE IN APPROACH TO THIS CASE IN GOVERNMENT. NOW, THIS IS A GOVERNMENT. NOW, THIS IS A SERIOUS GOVERNING PROBLEM FOR SERIOUS GOVERNING PROBLEM FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE DOJ. AND PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE DOJ. AND OBVIOUSLY THE IMPACTED VICTIMS. AND OBVIOUSLY THE IMPACTED VICTIMS. EVEN IF WE LEARN NOTHING ELSE EVEN IF WE LEARN NOTHING ELSE ABOUT THIS, IT'S AN OPEN SCANDAL ABOUT THIS, IT'S AN OPEN SCANDAL FOR THIS ADMINISTRATION. AND FOR THIS ADMINISTRATION. AND THEN THERE ARE THE GLARING AND THEN THERE ARE THE GLARING AND INCONVENIENT FACTS THAT GO BACK INCONVENIENT FACTS THAT GO BACK EVEN FURTHER. BEFORE TRUMP WAS EVEN FURTHER. BEFORE TRUMP WAS IN GOVERNMENT, BEFORE THE IN GOVERNMENT, BEFORE THE LENGTHY TIMELINE WE JUST SAW, LENGTHY TIMELINE WE JUST SAW, BECAUSE AS A CIVILIAIAN, TRUMP D BECAUSE AS A CIVILIAN, TRUMP HAD A LONG RELATIONSHIP WITH A LONG RELATIONSHIP WITH EPSTEIN, WHO HAD BOUGHT PROPERTY EPSTEIN, WHO HAD BOUGHT PROPERTY NEAR MAR A LAGO, S SOCIALIZING NEAR MAR A LAGO, SOCIALIZING WITH TRUMP, ENGAGING IN WITH TRUMP, ENGAGING IN ACTIVITIES, AND BOTH MEN THEN ACTIVITIES, AND BOTH MEN THEN REFERRING TO EPSTEIN'S SEXUAL REFERRING TO EPSTEIN'S SEXUAL CONTROVERSIES. THE TWO MEN CONTROVERSIES. THE TWO MEN PARTIED TOGETHER. THEYEY APPEARD PARTIED TOGETHER. THEY APPEARED IN PUBLIC AND BEFOFORE CAMERAS. IN PUBLIC AND BEFORE CAMERAS. THIS IS FOOTAGE FROM A MAR A THIS IS FOOTAGE FROM A MAR A LAGO EVENT. IN 1992. EPSTEIN LAGO EVENT. IN 1992. EPSTEIN WENT TO TRUMP'S WEDDING IN 1993, WENT TO TRUMP'S WEDDING IN 1993, AND WHILE TRUMP FAMOUSLY LIKES AND WHILE TRUMP FAMOUSLY LIKES HIS OWN JET WITH TRUMP BRANDING, HIS OWN JET WITH TRUMP BRANDING, HE FOUND THE TIME AND REASONS TO HE FOUND THE TIME AND REASONS TO FLY ON EPSTEIN'S PRIVATE JET AT FLY ON EPSTEIN'S PRIVATE JET AT LEAST SEVEN TIMES. PER THE NEW LEAST SEVEN TIMES. PER THE NEW YORK TIMES. TRUMP PHOTOGRAPHED YORK TIMES. TRUMP PHOTOGRAPHOGRAPHED WITH EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL IN WITH EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL IN 2000, AGAIN AT MAR A LAGO, AND 2000, AGAIN AT MAR A LAGO, AND THE JOURNAL REPORTED ABOUT HOW THE JOURNAL REPORTED ABOUT HOW TRUMP DREW THOSE BODY SEXUAL TRUMP DREW THOSE BODY SEXUAL REFERENCES IN A BIRTHDAY CARD REFERENCES IN A BIRTHDAY CARD FOR EPSTEIN, CITING, QUOTE, FOR EPSTEIN, CITING, QUOTE, WONDERFUL SECRETS. TRUMP DENIES WONDERFUL SECRETS. TRUMP DENIES THIS AND IS SUING THE JOURNAL THIS AND IS SUING THE JOURNAL OVER IT. HE NOW CLAIMS HIS OVER IT. HE NOW CLAIMS HIS EPSTEIN FRIENDSHIP WAS S SHORTER EPSTEIN FRIENDSHIP WAS SHORTER THAN REPORTETED, THAT THEY CLASD THAN REPORTED, THAT THEY CLASHED OVER AN EMPLOYEEEE EPSTEIN HAD OVER AN EMPLOYEE EPSTEIN HAD POACHED FROM MAR A LAGO, W WHILE POACHED FROM MAR A LAGO, WHILE OTHER ACCOUNTS SAY I'VE SEEN WAS OTHER ACCOUNTS SAY I'VE SEEN WAS A MAR A LAGO MEMBER UNTIL 2007. A MAR A LAGO MEMBER UNTIL 2007. OVER A YEAR AFTER THAT ORIGINAL OVER A YEAR AFTER THAT ORIGINAL INDICTMENT, WE SHOWED YOU TRUMP INDICTMENT, WE SHOWED YOU TRUMP BREAKING THE VOW TO RELEASE MORE BREAKING THE VOW TO RELEASE MORE EPSTEIN FILES, BUT HE'S ALSO IN EPSTEIN FILES, BUT HE'S ALSO IN THEM, ACCORDING TO RECENT THEM, ACCORDING TO RECENT JOURNAL REPORTING. AND AS FOR JOURNAL REPORTING. AND AS FOR EPSTEIN, HE WAS SECRETIVE ABOUT EPSTEIN, HE WAS SECRETIVE ABOUT ANY TIME THAT THE TWO MEN MIGHT ANY TIME THAT THE TWO MEN MIGHT HAVE SPENT WITH MINORS. WHEN HAVE SPENT WITH MINORS. WHEN PRESSED UNDER OATH. PRESSED UNDER OATH.

>> HE EVER.

>> SOCIALIZED WITH. DONALD TRUMP

>> SOCIALIZED WITH. DONALD TRUMP IN THE PRESENCE OF. IN THE PRESENCE OF.

>> FEMALES UNDER THE AGE OF 18.

>> FEMALES UNDER THE AGE OF 18. THOUGH I'D.

>> LIKE.

>> TO ANSWER.

>> THAT QUESTION.

>> AT LEAST.

>> TODAY I'M GOING TO HAVE TO

>> TODAY I'M GOING TO HAVE TO ASSERT MY FIFTH, SIXTH. ASSERT MY FIFTH, SIXTH.

>> AND 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

>> AND 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. SIR. SIR.

>> LEGALLY, THESE SOCIAL LINKS

>> LEGALLY, THESE SOCIAL LINKS ALONE ARE NOT EVIDENCE OF A ALONE ARE NOT EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. THEY ARE EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. THEY ARE EVIDENCE OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THE KIND CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THE KIND OF LINK THAT REQUIRES A JUDGE OR OF LINK THAT REQUIRES A JUDGE OR PROSECUTOR TO RECUSE FROM A PROSECUTOR TO RECUSE FROM A CASE. BUT TRUMP HAS BEEN DOING CASE. BUT TRUMP HAS BEEN DOING THE OPPOSITE, COMMENTING AND THE OPPOSITE, COMMENTING AND INTERVENING. HIS DOJ'S ACTIONS INTERVENING. HIS DOJ'S ACTIONS ON EPSTEIN REPEATEDLY PUTTING ON EPSTEIN REPEATEDLY PUTTING SECRECY OVER FACTS, POLITICS SECRECY OVER FACTS, POLITICS OVER ACCOUNTABILITY. AND AS WE OVER ACCOUNTABILITY. AND AS WE SAW IN THE RECENT CONTROVERSY, A SAW IN THE RECENT CONTROVERSY, A SPECIAL TRANSFER AND LENIENCY SPECIAL TRANSFER AND LENIENCY FOR AN ACTUAL SEX TRAFFICKER FOR AN ACTUAL SEX TRAFFICKER OVER JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS. OVER JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS. THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF TALK THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF TALK ABOUT EPSTEIN, AND AT THE CORE, ABOUT EPSTEIN, AND AT THE CORE, THIS IS A CASE THAT MATTTTERS SO THIS IS A CASE THAT MATTERS SO MUCH TO THE MANY PEOPLE, MANY MUCH TO THE MANY PEOPLE, MANY VICTIMS WHOSE LIVES WERE FOREVER VICTIMS WHOSE LIVES WERE FOREVER ALTERED BY EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL. ALTERED BY EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL. BUT YOU DON'T NEED EVEN MORE BUT YOU DON'T NEED EVEN MORE EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS, THOUGH PEOPLE EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS, THOUGH PEOPLE ARE PURSUING THEM, OR MORE FACTS ARE PURSUING THEM, OR MORE FACTS TO UNDERSTAND THE RAW OUTLINE OF TO UNDERSTAND THE RAW OUTLINE OF THIS CASE. SOME OF IT PREDATES THIS CASE. SOME OF IT PREDATES TRUMP, WITH BUSH ERA PROSECUTORS TRUMP, WITH BUSH ERA PROSECUTORS CUTTING A DEAL WITH A POWERFUL CUTTING A DEAL WITH A POWERFUL PERSON AND CUTTING OUT THE PERSON AND CUTTING OUT THE VICTIMS FROM EVEN LEARNING ABOUT VICTIMS FROM EVEN LEARNING ABOUT IT. BUT MUCH OF IT INVOLVES IT. BUT MUCH OF IT INVOLVES TRUMP, FROM THE PERSONAL SOCIAL TRUMP, FROM THE PERSONAL SOCIAL LINKS TO A GOVERNMENT THAT H HES LINKS TO A GOVERNMENT THAT HE IS OVERSEEING, THAT AFTER ALL OF OVERSEEING, THAT AFTER ALL OF THE TALK AND CLAIMS FOR JUSTICE THE TALK AND CLAIMS FOR JUSTICE AND DEMANDS FOR TRUTH IN THIS AND DEMANDS FOR TRUTH IN THIS SEX TRAFFICKING CASE, THE BIG SEX TRAFFICKING CASE, THE BIG THING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION THING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS DONE IS CONTINUE THE HAS DONE IS CONTINUE THE SECRECY, CONTINUE TO CUT THE SECRECY, CONTINUE TO CUT THE VICTIMS OUT, AND MOST VICTIMS OUT, AND MOST ASTOUNDINGLY, HELP AND SERVE AN ASTOUNDINGLY, HELP AND SERVE AN EPSTEIN SEX TRAFFICKING RIGHTS WERE.

>> JEFFREY EPSTEIN, NOW

>> J JEFFREY EPSTEIN, NOW DECEASED, REFUSED TO ANSWER DECEASED, REFUSED D TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY SUCH QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY SUCH SOCIALIZING ALLEGEDLY INVOLVLVIG SOCIALIZING ALLEGEDLY INVOLVING DONALD TRUMP ARE TWO EXPERT DONALD TRUMP ARE TWO EXPERT GUESTS ARE ON HAND TO RESPOND TO GUESTS ARE ON HAND TO RESPOND TO OUR NEW TIMELINE. WE WALK OUR NEW TIMELINE. WE WALK THROUGH WHAT WE HAVE SEEN FROM THROUGH WHAT WE HAVE SEEN FROM THE VERY FIRST INVESTIGATION AND THE VERY FIRST INVESTIGATION AND SPECIAL TREATMENT AND GOVERNMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT AND GOVERNMENT CONNECTIONS THAT ULTIMATELY CONNECTIONS THAT ULTIMATELY BENEFITED FIRST EPEPSTEIN AND BENEFITED FIRST EPSTEIN AND LATER MAXWELL IN THIS TRUMP ERE. LATER MAXWELL IN THIS TRUMP ERA. FOR A SPECIAL DISCUSSION ON THIS FOR A SPECIAL DISCUSSION ON THIS NEW REPORT, WE'RE JOINEDED BY NEW REPORT, WE'RE JOINED BY NANCY ERIKA SMITH, A CIVIL NANCY ERIKA SMITH, A CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNENEY WHO'S RIGHTS ATTORNEY WHO'S REPRESENTED VIVICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AND HARASSMENT, AND FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR AND FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR AND CONGRESSIONAL COUNSESEL JOHN CONGRESSIONAL COUNSEL JOHN FLANNERY. WELCOME TO YOU BOTH. FLANNERY. WELCOME TO YOU BOTH. NANCY, GIVEN YOUR EXPERIENCE IN NANCY, GIVEN YOUR EXPERIENCE IN THIS AREA, WHAT DOES THIS NONOW THIS AREA, WHAT DOES THIS NOW FULLER TIMELINE TELL US ABOUT FULLER TIMELINE TELL US ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENED? WHAT'S HAPPENED?

>> WELL, IT TELLS.

>> US THAT V VICTIMS OF SEXUAL.

>> US THAT VICTIMS OF SEXUAL.

>> ABUSE. EVEN PEDOPHILIA.

>> DON'T MATTER IN OUR JUSTICE

>> DON'T MATTER IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. AND THEY NEVER HAVE, SYSTEM. AND THEY NEVER HAVE, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE PERPETRATORS ESPECIALLY WHEN THE PERPETRATORS ARE RICH, POWERFUL, CONNECTED, ARE RICH, POWERFUL, CONNECTED, POLITICALLY. THE LAW LAW POLITICALLY. THE LAW LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY HAS ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY HAS IGNORED. VICTIMS SINCE THE IGNORED. VICTIMS SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME AND CONTINUES BEGINNING OF TIME AND CONTINUES TO DO SO. AND EVEN IN THIS TO DO SO. AND EVEN IN THIS STORY, THE VICTIMS, EXCEPT FOR STORY, THE VICTIMS, EXCEPT FOR WHAT YOU JUST DID, ARE RARELY WHAT YOU JUST DID, ARE RARELY EVEN COMMENTED ON. EVEN COMMENTED ON.

>> IT'S THE.

>> INTRIGUE OF WHAT HAPPENED TO

>> INTRIGUE OF WHAT HAPPENED TO EPSTEIN AND WHO WAS INVOLVED. EPSTEIN AND WHO WAS INVOLVED. BUT IT DOESN'T. I HOPE IT BUT IT DOESN'T. I HOPE IT MATTERS. THE REASON IT MATTERS MATTERS. THE REASON IT MATTERS IS BECAUSE A LOT OF TRUMPERS IS BECAUSE A LOT OF TRUMPERS WENT DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE OF WENT DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE OF QANON AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES QANON AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES ABOUT DEMOCRATS BEING PEDOPHILES ABOUT DEMOCRATS BEING PEDOPHILES AND HAVING A PEDOPHILIA RING IN AND HAVING A PEDOPHILIA RING IN SOME. SOME.

>> POLITICAL PIECE.

>> LET ME JUMP IN AND HAVE YOU

>> LET ME JUMP IN AND HAVE YOU CONTINUE THAT THE POLITICAL CONTINUE THAT THE POLITICAL PART, IN A WAY, HAS BOOMERANGED PART, IN A WAY, HAS BOOMERANGED ON ONE PARTY, AND YOU SAY IT ON ONE PARTY, AND YOU SAY IT SOMETIMES DOESN'T MATTER. THAT'S SOMETIMES DOESN'T MATTER. THAT'S CLEAR. OTHER TIMES IT COULD CLEAR. OTHER TIMES IT COULD MATTER. WE'LL SHOW THE SOME OF MATTER. WE'LL SHOW THE SOME OF THE TIMELINE AGAIN FROM THE VERY THE TIMELINE AGAIN FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. THE FIRST DEAL CUT BY BEGINNING. THE FIRST DEAL CUT BY THE BUSH FEDERAL PROSECUTOR, THE BUSH FEDERAL PROSECUTOR, LATER PROMOTED TO THE TRUMP LATER PROMOTED TO THE TRUMP CABINET THAT YOU SEE THERE ON CABINET THAT YOU SEE THERE ON THAT FAR LEFT, WAS CUT A AS A THAT FAR LEFT, WAS CUT AS A SECRET DEAL WHERE THE VICTIMS SECRET DEAL WHERE THE VICTIMS WERE NOT EVEN INFORMED. AND MANY WERE NOT EVEN INFORMED. AND MANY OF THEM FEEL AND SAY THEY FEEL RETRAUMATIZED BY THE LAST FEW RETRAUMATIZED BY THE LAST FEW MONTHS, WHERE MAXWELELL AND OTHR MONTHS, WHERE MAXWELL AND OTHER ACTIVITIES HAVE GONE DOWN WITH ACTIVITIES HAVE GONE DOWN WITH THIS TRUMP ADMINISTRATIOION AGA, THIS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AGAIN, WITHOUT THEM. NANCY. WITHOUT THEM. NANCY.

>> YEAH.

>> YEAH.H.

>> AND ALL.

>> VICTIMS OF SEXUALAL VIOLENCE

>> VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND PEDOPHILIA ARE DAMAGAGED HE, AND PEDOPHILIA ARE DAMAGED HERE, NOT JUST EPSTEIN VICTIMS WHO ARE NOT JUST EPSTEIN VICTIMS WHO ARE CLEARLY DAMAGED BY WHAT'S GOING CLEARLY DAMAGED BY WHAT'S GOING ON HERE. I MEAN, MAXWELL ENDS UP ON HERE. I MEAN, MAXWELL ENDS UP AT CLUB FED. IT'S OUTRAGEOUS. IT AT CLUB FED. IT'S OUTRAGEOUS. IT VIOLATES EVEN THE PRISONS VIOLATES EVEN THE PRISONS SYSTEM'S OWN RULES. BUT YOU SYSTEM'S OWN RULES. BUT YOU KNOW, KARL ROVE I THINK, STARTED KNOW, KARL ROVE I THINK, STARTED IT, ACCUSED THEM OF WHAT WE'RE IT, ACCUSED THEM OF WHAT WE'RE DOING. SO THEY SWIFTBOATED A WAR DOING. SO THEY SWIFTBOATED A WAR HERO FOR A DRAFT DODGER. AND NOW HERO FOR A DRAFT DODGER. AND NOW THEY'VE ACCUSED DEMOCRATS OF THEY'VE ACCUSED DEMOCRATS OF PEDOPHILIA WHEN THEY'VE REALLY PEDOPHILIA WHEN THEY'VE REALLY COVERED UP AND PROTECTED ONE COVERED UP AND PROTECTED ONE SINCE FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS. SINCE FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS.

>> JOHN FLANNERY, WE'LL PUT THE

>> JOHN FLANNERY, WE'LL PUT THE TIMELINE BACK UP AND TELL US TIMELINE BACK UP AND TELL US WHAT YOU THINK IS IMPORTANT WHAT YOU THINK IS IMPORTANT HERE, BECAUSE AS WE'VE DONE IN HERE, BECAUSE AS WE'VE DONE IN PAST, REPORTING WITH YOU, THE PAST, REPORTING WITH YOU, THE FACTS SOMETIMES ARE COVERED UP FACTS SOMETIMES ARE COVERED UP AND LIED ON, BUT THEY CAN STILL AND LIED ON, BUT THEY CAN STILL BE POWERFUL WHEN PRESENTED. BE POWERFUL WHEN PRESENTED.

>> TRUE. I THINK THAT THE

>> TRUE. I THINK THAT THE SYNTHESIS THAT YOU PUT TOGETHER SYNTHESIS THAT YOU PUT TOGETHER IS AMONG THE INVENTORY OF IS AMONG THE INVENTORY OF BREAKING NEWS STORIES THAT BREAKING NEWS STORIES THAT YOU'VE ORGANIZED IN THE PAST, YOU'VE ORGANIZED IN THE PAST, AND I THINK THAT WHAT THE ANSWER AND I THINK THAT WHAT THE ANSWER TO NANCY IS THAT SHE MAKES A TO NANCY IS THAT SHE MAKES A DIFFERENCE. WE ALL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. WE ALL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. WHENEVER WE CLEAR DIFFERENCE. WHENEVER WE CLEAR OUT THESE PEOPLE WHO TAKE

Get Our Mobile App

Trump & Epstein EXPOSED: New timeline on DOJ’s secrets, lies & help for traffickers (Melber report)

Transcription