Transcription
Put yourself in the shoes of Peter Marks. You've gone ahead under pressure, probably granted the emergency use authorization for these COVID injections. Now you're watching VAERS and you are seeing VAERS deluged with adverse events, right? The contractor that inputs VAERS reports had to hire 290 additional people just to clear the backlog. So you're freaking out. You just approved this thing, it's killing people, it's disabling people.
You know that the COVID vaccines are toxic and that they cause a way amount of adverse events, more than any other vaccine that's been recommended. In fact, let me just play you a 30-second clip here to explain this to you. Listen.
Swine flu vaccine, 1976. There was one serious adverse event per 100,000 people vaccinated, and the vaccine was withdrawn. This is good because the principle is we should do no harm, and the vaccine should be good for the individual that receives the vaccine. So, the vaccine was withdrawn. Rotavirus vaccine, Rotashield, 1999. One to two serious adverse events per 10,000 people given the vaccine, and again, rightly, the vaccine was withdrawn. At the moment, COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, there's one serious adverse event per 800 people that are vaccinated, and the vaccine is officially promoted. Now, some of you might be a little confused about this. Um, join the club, so am I.
So, someone's doing something about it, or at least trying to shed light on it. It's Senator Ron Johnson. He's a Republican US Senator from Wisconsin, and he's currently serves as the chair of the permanent subcommittee on investigations, and he's been holding hearings on the COVID-19 vaccine. Welcome to the show, Senator Ron Johnson.
Well, Jimmy, first of all, thanks for having me on, uh, because the majority of the legacy media is completely ignoring what I consider the greatest government scandal in my lifetime. And I love that you had that clip of Dr. John Campbell. He's been doing great work, as have you, in terms of the trying to bring the truth to the American public. So, thanks for having me on.
Oh, it's my pleasure. And you actually have a report, "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Towards COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals." And you, you, you explain how they did masking. And, um, I just want to tell, what is masking? It occurs when data about side effects from multiple vaccines are added together. This mathematically hides signals that are attributable to any one specific vaccine. It's a known flaw, and it was especially problematic when a new vaccine that is being administered to hundreds of millions of people is analyzed. And of course, someone at the FDA caught this. Dr. Sharsman, she developed a method to address this problem, and her analysis found approximately 25 previously undetected safety signals. And she didn't keep it to herself. Beginning in early 2021, she shared her findings with the FDA officials who are responsible for monitoring the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. They largely ignored her and eventually told her to stop. And so, this is what your report talks about, this masking and this using mathematical mumbo jumbo to hide the the adverse events. Isn't that what's happening?
Right, Jimmy. And Jimmy, 'cause we have some time, if we can back up and just kind of lay some foundational information for your audience. Uh, the VAERS system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, was established in 1990. Prior to 2021, on average, VAERS reported about 280 deaths associated with various vaccines, 280 deaths. You know, anaphylactic shock, that type of thing. In 2021, with the advent of the COVID injections, they reported 21,000 worldwide deaths. So, 280 on average to all of a sudden 21,000. Now, prior to the COVID injection, you, when, when you, when you got all this data, you're trying to sift through the data, and so they, they needed some sort of mathematical algorithms to analyze the data. And so, FDA, CDC used something called proportional reporting ratio. So, they're looking for disproportionate adverse events as a signal for a drug or for a vaccine. So, remember that, PRR, that's what CDC used. The FDA used something called empirical Bayesian analysis. So, two different analytic analytical algorithms for looking at all this data, you know, these thousands of reports that come in. So, now, now fast forward to the end of 2020 when they got the emergency use authorization for the the vaccines. I can quickly explain what masking is. Uh, 21,000 deaths in 2021. So, we had Moderna. These are rough figures. We had Moderna, let's say 10,000 deaths associated with the Moderna vaccine, and you had the Pfizer, about 21,000 deaths associated with the associated with the Pfizer vaccine, and then 280 deaths with all of the vaccines. So, if you look at Pfizer, you look at 10,000 deaths, and you compare that to Moderna, 10,000 plus 280, there's no, there's nothing disproportionate about that, right? It's, you know, equally safe, equally dangerous. Then you look at Pfizer, compare that to Moderna, 10,000 versus 10,280. Again, nothing disproportionate, equally safe, equally dangerous. But you and I, we didn't need a sophisticated algorithm in 2021 when you went from 280 deaths per year to 21,000.
So, so now let's talk about what we have discovered because of Bobby Kennedy's commitment to radical transparency. We got 11 million pages. You know, the, the, the FDA, CDC was not cooperating with us or or Kennedy. Kennedy finally said, "No, give them this, you know, data dump." So, 11 million pages. We discovered that Peter Marks, the head of CBER, this is the division within FDA that approves vaccines and then surveils for safety, was warned by Dr. Ana Sharsman that their algorithm is going to hide and mask safety signals. 26 days later, they developed a new algorithm, and they showed Dr. Marks and senior FDA officials 25 safety signals on things like sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell's palsy, different types of strokes. For three consecutive months, they kept doing data runs showing more adverse events. And do you think Peter Marks and, and the officials of FDA pinned a medal on her badge and said, "Thank you, God, this is what we're looking for. We were searching for needles in the haystack. We were trying to find those little signals so we could warn doctors, we could inform the public so they had informed consent." No, they did the exact opposite. They told her to cease and desist. They said, "We, we didn't ask for this. This isn't your job. Quit giving us these data runs." We, we talked to Dr. Sharsman, she said she was viewed as a pest. So, understand, on March 1st of 2021, FDA officials already knew the algorithm they were going to use was going to hide safety signals. They clung to that algorithm. They didn't use the new one. So, they go lie to the American public and say, "We're not seeing safety signals." Okay, that's, that's the basic, you know, main part of the story. There's more details. Go to CDC. They're using PRR. We found about out that about that in our oversight, probably late 2021, late 2022. A bunch of us, including Children's Health Defense, uh, uh, ICAN, myself, uh, Epoch Times. We, we did FOIA requests. We did, I wrote oversight letters. I wanted that PRR data 'cause again, I'm seeing the VAERS explode with these adverse events and deaths. I want to see, you know, what do you know about it, CDC? What do you know about it, FDA? They refused to turn over the PRR data. That's the only thing we knew about. Finally, under pressure, probably from the Epoch Times, they turned over the the PRR data. And there were, I mean, there were over a hundred safety signals showing that data. But they explained to us, "No, no, no. This is all noise. This is junk. PRR is a, is a bad system." Just like they, by the way, dumped on VAERS. "We're going to use a more sophisticated empirical Bayesian model that the FDA uses." That's the one that Peter Marks was warned was going to hide safety signals. Again, this is unbelievably corrupt. I know this is, I probably went on too long.
No, no, keep going. Take all the time you...
It's complex. This is really complex, but your listeners have to understand how thoroughly corrupt the FDA and the CDC was in hiding what they knew. What, what was obvious to those of us who just looked at VAERS. But you remember, they, they were trashing VAERS, right? So, so let, let me do what, what I can only surmise based on this story. So, let, let's put yourself in the shoes of Peter Marks. You, you've gone ahead under pressure, probably granted the emergency use authorization for these COVID injections. Now you're watching VAERS and you are seeing VAERS deluged with adverse events, right? That they have the, the, the contractor that inputs VAERS reports had to hire 290 additional people just to clear the backlog. So, you're freaking out. You just approved this thing. It's killing people. It's disabling people. But you just found out that you get your, your algorithm you've been using for how many years is going to hide and mask safety signals so you can cling to it. And, and you, you say, "We, we have to be consistent. We can't change algorithms in the midst of a pandemic. We have to stay consistent." Just so happens that's going to hide safety signals so you can go to the American public and lie bold face. "We're just not seeing safety signals." What, what adverse events we're seeing are rare and mild. And here's what's even sicker. Also in March of 2021, again, this is less than three months after the start of the administration of these injections, the NIH was beginning to diagnose and treat patients with these COVID injection injuries. About a couple dozen. They told them to stay silent. They said, "We want to conduct, we want to complete our studies so that we can give complete information to the medical community so they know how to treat this stuff." They never released that study until under pressure by the COVID and the injection injured. They finally released it in 2022, but they didn't tell anybody about it. They just put it, they just put it on a preprint server. Kind of, kind of like the Grinch stole Christmas. Saw world hunger, tell no one. So, again, the NIH was treating people vaccine injured. FDA was lying that they weren't seeing these safety signals. And as a result, the American public was not informed. Remember, Oh, Biden was out there saying this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. They're saying vaccinate your children. They got it approved. They got it approved for children. "Vaccinate your children so they don't infect your parents, your grandparents, and kill them." Of course, they, they never tested this. Does it stop transmission? Later on, we found out, "No, it doesn't stop transmission." So, people went ahead voluntarily and took this injection. Children died. We now know children died. This has been confirmed by the FDA when they've looked at the, the child deaths. And again, I think it's way understated. But, people believed the FDA. Millions of people had adverse events. At least tens of thousands died without that information. Past March 1st, tens of thousands more people died without the information that the FDA should have told, not only doctors, but the American public. There was no informed consent on these injections.
And so, where, where does the corruption come from? It's just Big Pharma money and the promise of jobs and the rotating uh between uh regulatory... It's regulatory capture, correct?
There's no doubt about that's part of the problem, okay? The, the, yes, Big Pharma has captured these agencies. They've corrupted them. But again, if, if you're the people pushing this, if, if you're the people that approved it, do you want to admit that something you approved, something you pushed on people, killed them or permanently disabled them? That's why to this day, doctors by and large aren't admitting this. The federal health officials still aren't. The media certainly isn't. I mean, I mean, all these people, members of Congress, they, they cut videos. You know, "Get that jab." And Stephen Colbert, all these people pushed this on the, on the American public, on the global public. So, at this point in time, there's such cognitive dissonance, they don't want to believe that something that they mandated, coerced, recommended, pushed on people killed them or permanently disabled them, which is why I cannot get on a major news network with what I consider is the greatest scandal in government history.
Yeah, I mean, well, we, we went from someone like Chris Cuomo, who was the most popular anchor on CNN, who was repeating Big Pharma propaganda that was lies and FDA, CDC propaganda that were also lies, as you're revealing here. He went from doing that at the top of his lungs and not only that, but discrediting anybody who actually was skeptical or had a question of the official government narrative, which is exactly what journalists are supposed to do. And then he himself got vaccine injured and he got fired from CNN and now he actually tells the truth about it and he talks about early treatment such as Ivermectin and he talks about how he himself was lied to about Ivermectin. So, it takes them to get fired from their job in corporate media to finally be able to tell the truth. And the reason why is 70% of the funding for cable news comes directly from Big Pharma. And the reason why they advertise drugs on television is it because they're actually trying to sell you that drug. What they're trying to do is make the media reliant on their money so then they can control what they say and what they don't say. And that's pretty obvious, right? At this point, we're the only country besides New Zealand since 1997, Bill Clinton signed a law that allowed them to direct market to consumers drugs, which is the craziest thing. No place else in the world except New Zealand is just as corrupt as the United States. So, take it wherever you want on that.
Well, so, so in my former life, I was a sales guy. So, so, plastics, right? You look at those ads that Big Pharma spends billions of dollars on major networks and on cable news. There's no way you'd ever buy that product. There's no way a sales, serious salesperson would put an ad like that and spend billions of dollars 'cause first of all, at the end of the ad, it shows all the adverse events or adverse events that could occur, including death. But you don't even know what these drugs are for. Is it teach you how to throw a frisbee to your dog? So, those ads are absolutely useless except for one reason and one reason only: to buy the media, to, to buy the, you know, the narrative. And so, prior to 1997, you actually had serious journalism. I mean, Mike Wallace had had a serious piece on 60 Minutes about the swine flu vaccine. It's one of the reasons it got pulled. You had, you had Phil Donahue do it. You had other people, serious journalism. But once 1997 occurred, that's it. There have been some journalism on this, but by and large, the, the mantra of "safe and effective," "you know, this is a, you know, pandemic of the unvaccinated," "what adverse events you have are rare and mild," it overwhelms any kind of serious [clears throat] journalism. And quite honestly, you know, people like you who, I'm sure you paid a pretty, pretty heavy price in terms of your career and stuff speaking out. Thank you for doing so. But no, those of us who have tried to tell the American people the truth, you know, we get vilified, we get marginalized, we get ridiculed. Uh, that's again why I'm so appreciative of what you've been doing here on on your show and, uh, having me on here to talk about this.
Well, yeah, we know, uh, completely ostracized. Uh, I, you know, I live in Hollywood, and so everybody completely, uh, ostracized me. I've been dropped from the invite list to everything, and I've been slandered left and right by people I've known for 30 years. Uh, people who've been on my show, people who've been my friends, uh, for 30 years go on social media without ever having a conversation with me about it. Like they would never say, "Hey Jimmy, what's, explain to me what you're saying about the vax. Explain to me what you're saying about..." They just went right on social media and called me a grifter and a liar and the worst thing, even way worse than that. And so, again, without a conversation. So, it's the opposite of how science works. And these people have turned, you know, most of those people are not religious or spiritual or believe in God. And as Carl Jung has taught us, that if you don't have a connection to the divine, your psyche still has a need for it. So, what they've done is they've created science as their religion, and they've created Fauci as a deity. And of course, you can't question religion or a deity, or that makes you a heretic. So, that's exactly what they've done. And, and of course, it's the opposite of how science works. Science works on questioning. There's no such thing as settled science. That's a made-up term. Just like safe and effective. Uh, that's all, again, we find, and we find out that they've been lying about everything when it comes to COVID. They lied about not only where the vac, where the virus came from. They said it came from nature. We now know it came from a lab, and that was funded by Dr. Fauci. And it, even though it was stopped by President Obama, he went through a CIA cutout called EcoHealth, EcoHealth Alliance, to keep that funding, that research going, which is so dangerous that it created this virus. So, they lied about the creation of the virus. They lied about where it came from. They lied about masks. They lied about the vaccine stopping transmission. They lied about the vaccine stopping contraction. They lied about herd immunity. Natural immunity. They lied about lockdowns. Uh, social distancing. There wasn't a thing that they haven't lied about. And every, and you'll see every once in a while, a mainstream publication will admit it. Like now, even the New York Times will admit that, yeah, lockdowns were a bad thing. All the people who were all pushing that, they will eventually come around to admitting it, but it gets no publicity. Uh, and it, clean, including what's going on right now. What are the news? Uh, well, you know, you, you're doing amazing work with your committee. And, and, and I, in fact, I... So, here, there's video. So, there's videos of your hearings, and you have the top doctors in their fields, the most cited doctors in their fields, come and testify at your, and it gets absolutely no coverage in the mainstream media. So, here's the, the plausible mechanisms of COVID-19 injection causing cancer and attacks on scientific publications. And so, they can go... So, they go watch that video, but nobody's covering. So, do you have conversations with the people at the news media, and what do they tell you when you ask to come on?
They just don't have me on. No. I mean, trust me, my, my comms people, we are bugging these guys. I'm calling them out. I was on with Jake Tapper on CNN on another subject, and I said, "Hey, Jake, I just sent you my report. You ought to read this and then have me back on." That was weeks ago. I just recently texted him, "Hey, Jake, have you read it? You going to have me on?" He said, "Well, I sent that over to our health department." So, no. I mean, the major networks won't. I mean, to CBS's credit, Major Garrett had me on their streaming service. Fox and Fox Business is having me on. You know, people like you are having me on, but no, this, this is, you know, I've, I've been holding excellent hearings. You know, Voice of the Vaccine Injured. We, we let people, childhood vaccine injured, finally have a voice to tell their story. And, you know, my ranking member, Richard Blumenthal, who has to be, be bought, bought and paid for by Big Pharma, he literally held a press conference for that hearing and said, "I hope nobody watches this. This, this isn't worthy. This isn't, doesn't have the credibility for people to actually watch this hearing." Again, we're having people whose lives have been destroyed by vaccine injuries, and, and he's telling people, "Look away." So, no. We, we've got a, we've got a real problem here in terms of just the cognitive dissonance. You, you mentioned this is a religion. You know, I, I know you probably had Aaron Siri on. If you haven't, interview him. He wrote the book "Vaccines: What You Need to Know." Which just lays out the facts. And people that, we all understand the appeal of vaccines. You just get a shot and that prevents you from ever getting a deadly disease. Yeah, sign me up. And, and by the way, I, I got all the shots until I started getting educated on this, how, how there's not been proper studies and the vaccine injuries are completely discounted in the, the cost-benefit analysis.
So, let me just play a, a, a short video of one of the leading, if not the leading cardiologist in the world, uh, Dr. McCullough. And he's the one of the top three most cited, uh, published doctors in the world, also. And here's just a brief compilation of some of the stuff he said at one of your hearings, which they will never show on the pharma-funded establishment media.
80% of Americans took a vaccine. 20% did. 20% did not take a vaccine. The vaccine was never safe enough for me to take. Messenger RNA devised by Pfizer, Moderna has been chemically modified to be unassailable to enzymes in the body to be broken down. The messenger RNA is found in the human heart of people who die after the vaccine. It's found in the brain. The spike protein is found everywhere in the body. Three studies now show the spike protein is circulating in the blood for six to nine months after people take the shot. This part of a virus, the lethal part of the virus in the vaccinated, it's circulating in the blood. And then they take a booster, they get more circulating in the blood. It is a killer protein. It cannot be safe. It was not safe by design. Safety trumps efficacy. We cannot tolerate false drug claims. This is in the peer-reviewed literature. This is not misinformation.
Our first witness is Dr. Peter McCul-
So, again, uh, that's a leading doctor, and what he's letting you know that we were lied to, oh, repeatedly. That they said when the vaccine went into your arm, it stayed in your arm and it didn't travel throughout your body. And what he's telling you is that no, there's studies after study that shows you, peer-reviewed studies now that shows you that it travels throughout your body, goes to your, crosses the blood-brain barrier, goes to your heart, causes myocarditis, goes to ovaries, goes to testes, goes to kidneys, goes everywhere in the body. And they're still, most doctors don't know this. And the reason I know that most doctors is because the Democrats had a doctor named Dr. Scott on to as their witness. And here you are asking him about this very point. Let me display this quick video, and it shows you he doesn't know anything about it. Let's watch this.
Mr. Scott, how much do you know about the mRNA technology?
A fair amount.
So, is the mRNA that's encapsulating the lipid nanoparticles, is that true mRNA?
It's a true mRNA?
I mean, true, true mRNA. The messenger RNA degrades very rapidly in the body.
Mhm.
Correct?
Correct.
So, the mRNA in the injection, is, is it true mRNA? Does it degrade rapidly in the body? Do you not know?
I do know. Yes, it, it, it does, but...
No, it does not. It's modified. It's modified mRNA and it's designed not to degrade, and there's studies that show it sticks around the body. We don't know how long. The lipid nanoparticle, do you realize that it was designed to permeate difficult to permeate barriers, like the blood-brain, like the placenta barrier? Did you know that? Did you believe when Fauci told us that the mRNA shot would stay in the arm? Did you believe that? This is simple. Yes or no. I mean, did you believe... Do you believe the, the co-injection stayed in everybody's arm? Do you believe that's what happened?
Uh, primarily.
You, you think so, huh? Were you aware of the Japanese FOIA of the study that was conducted of bio-distribution where in rats it bio-distributed all over the body, accumulated in the adrenal glands and the ovaries? They, they, because the lipid nanoparticles designed to permeate difficult permeate barriers, they knew the designers knew and they did a study that it would bio-distribute all over the body. But our CDC, Anthony Fauci, said it was going to stick in the arm. Now, do you know what the mRNA does? It's, it's not, it's not a traditional vaccine, is it? Do you, do you realize that? It's, it's not an attenuated or dead virus. It's, it's messenger RNA, modified RNA. It's encapsulated in lipid nanoparticle. It distributes all over the body. And when it attaches to a cell, it unloads its mRNA into the cell and turns the cell into a manufacturing cell of a protein that is toxic to it. Do, do you realize that? Are you aware of that? I mean, just, yeah, yes or no. I mean, do you know that or not? 'Cause I talked to a lot of doctors don't have a clue.
He doesn't know anything. He doesn't. And this guy was brought on to testify as an expert, and he's a doctor, and he doesn't know anything. And that's my, been my experience, my also first-hand, is that most doctors don't know anything about it. Because people who become they're, and you're not a doctor, and you would know, you understand it. We, it's not hard to understand these things, right? So, that's the whole point. You don't have to be an expert to read a study and know what they're actually saying. It's not, you know, it's not Latin. I, we can understand it. You understand it. I understand it. Lots of people understand it, but they're never presented in the media. The only people who are presented are people like that who don't know anything, or people like Dr. Fauci who do know things about it and are intentionally lying. Do you think that anyone will ever be prosecuted? Because as you pointed out, they knew this. This, this wasn't like something they discovered later. They knew this and did it anyway and lied anyway.
But let's talk about Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. He, he does a lot of TV appearances, so they kind of brought him in as an expert. I was pretty well shocked that he wasn't prepared to, you know, these things. But fast forward to a couple weeks ago, we held that hearing on plausible mechanisms in cancer, and, uh, the, the person that Blumenthal brought in, eminent oncologist, she's, you know, chair, president of an oncology society, she didn't know it either. I mean, her testimony, she said, you know, this mRNA degrades in 20 seconds, whatever, you know, 20 minutes in the body. And so, I asked her pretty much the exact same things I asked Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and she was every bit as clueless. You would think the Democrat staff would at least warn their witness after what Dr. Jay Bhattacharya went through, you know, the, that embarrassing display of ignorance, they would have at least coached their eminently qualified oncologist to at least be aware of what the mRNA vaccine was. And she, by the way, she was definitively saying there's no proof that the mRNA injections cause cancer. There's no proof. Well, again, there's not going to be proof if you don't look. First of all, you're, you're completely ignorant of what this shot is. And if you, even if it's in front of your face, you'll never, you'll never acknowledge this proof. I mean, we had eminent oncologists that say, you know, in their clinics, they're seeing this. You know, Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, he's the one that wrote the paper laying out, you know, studying 300 cases and laying out the possible mechanism for that injection to cause cancer. All they're saying is, "Let's do more research." But these guys want to shut the research down. So, it's, it's already know. We already know. There's no reason to look at this any further. We know we're experts. There's no proof. End of story. Move on. You guys are whack jobs.
Everybody, come see me on tour. I'll be in Spokane, Tacoma, Los Angeles, special video panel show with special celebrities. And then we'll be in Levittown, New York, Rosemont, Illinois, and Chicago. Go to jimmydore.com for a link for tickets.
[music]