Transcription
Today, we're examining a proposal buried deep inside the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act that could fundamentally alter the relationship between the United States and Israel. Now, critics warned that Washington is moving beyond cooperation and towards integration. Supporters, if you can find any, outside of Capitol Hill, uh, call it strategic necessity. Either way, many Americans have never heard of it.
The question is, and this is an important question, at what point does an alliance stop being an alliance and start becoming an integration or a consolidation? For decades, Americans have been told that strategic partnerships are necessary. Military cooperation with allies keeps the world stable. And that shared security interests require ever closer coordination between nations. But there's a line between cooperation and integration. And that line seems to now be coming into focus.
So we've got the 2027 NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act, starting to rear its head. Information coming out about next year's NDAA. And buried in the framework of this next year's NDAA is language that appears to move the United States and Israel toward a level of military and technological integration unlike anything previously discussed in public. The proposal calls for synchronization of research, development, testing, evaluation, industrial cooperation, data sharing, and emerging military technologies ranging from artificial intelligence and cyber operations to autonomous systems and biotechnology.
So, is that not the whole kit and kaboodleoodle of the military-industrial complex? Is anything left out from those bumper sticker labels there? It's the whole thing, man. It is the entire military industrial complex. All of it can be wrapped up into those words.
Probably the most disturbing piece of news I saw over the last few days was the United States Trump administration are just uh the US government's occupied by Israel. They're trying to pass if they haven't already, but through using the NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act as a Trojan horse to link the Israeli and the US militaries. So you probably seen the uh the talking point. You have all these sort of navy Netanyahu saying it. We don't need US military aid. We can do it on our on our own. It that's just a political talking point. They're panicking because because the public is wise to this scam that the Israelis have been fleecing the US taxpayer with through a type of extortion racket for decades. And so they're going to have to bring that to a close. That well they're going to bring that program to a close, but it doesn't mean that they're going to stop fleecing America. they're just going to change the grift.
And so what they're trying to do is through the NDAA, which is sort of what you might call a standing order for executive legislation, uh, and it's a problem because it's a way to bypass Congress so they don't have to actually do anything democratically. So you can kind of earmark statutory funding and foreign policy through the NDAA. So you it allows the US to be constantly at war without having to declare war. And most of what's done through the NDA is totally unaccountable. Give you an example. The war on terror that roll over year on year in year out after 911 was NDAA. Okay. It's it's a it's an instrument that needs to be wrapped up and finished in America. It's an undemocratic instrument that allows the military-industrial complex, foreign interests to basically run US foreign policy and US military deployments.
The whole fake war against ISIS, which was fake, that was all run through the NDAA, you know, and you would take these domestic terror events on US soil, which would trigger a renewal of the NDAA and then it add, you know, for instance, deployment to Syria in uh what was it 2015? How did that happen? the San Bernardino shooting or terror attack that wasn't really a terror attack looked like an FBI or an Israeli op on US on US soil. That's exactly what it was. But that gave the green light for the US to be deployed back into the Middle East. a kind of very dodgy, murky, so-called ISIS inspired ridiculous ISIS inspired terrorist attack and in the armpit of uh no offense to people who live in San Bernardino. It's not the greatest place, but I'm sure it's there's nice people there, but we'll call it the Inland Empire. I want to say the armpit of LA. That's just But people in LA say that, so it's not just me saying that. I used to live in California, so I I can take some some liberties in saying some of these things, but it was through it was through the NDA they were able to run that grift, the ISIS grift and jihadi John, the videos, who knows, British intelligence, Israeli intelligence, the CIA or combination thereof, corrupt elements of Jordanian intelligence ran that whole scam.
So, so here we are. Israel wants to basically be subsidized by the US taxpayers on a much higher level than just the military aid. That's what this new legislation is. It's almost to create a merger of the Israeli and US military. I cannot tell you how many different ways this is going to be a disaster. Okay. Past projects that we've done with Israel have for instance uh missile defense uh technology sharing Israel on many occasions okay missile guidance uh all sorts of things they've they've stolen the technology from the US taxpayer and then they've sold it to China. I kid you not. They've done that on at least three occasions. So, you open yourself up to that. You open yourself up to Israelis being able to uh basically create Trojan horses and back doors into your system, lethal systems. I don't think that's a good idea. Working with Israeli tech firms, bad idea. being overrelyant on AI and Palanteer that have very strong links to Israeli intelligence and cyber units like 8200. Bad idea. Bad idea.
Because why is that a bad idea? Because Israel's proven that just listen to the statements from Ben Gavir or from their sort of proxies in the US like Mark Lavine or uh Lindsey Graham. Look at the statements. The US cannot be allowed to negotiate any peace agreement with Iran. The war must continue. That's their that's their that's their position. So, if that's what you're dealing with and there happens to be a conflict, then you're giving these people the ability to sabotage your sovereignty on so many different levels and then build up their defense paid for by the US deficit spending, the US taxpayer. When I say US taxpayer, it's only symbolic because US taxpayer whatever they contribute into the federal slush fund is finished by April. If you're talking about a 12-month rolling year, it's finished by April, maybe March, who knows? But because the US is borrowing two to two and a half trillion a year just to do all the stupid things that the federal government does. So that's why they don't have any money for anything, anything that's good for the people. Plenty money for Israel. Plenty money for the military-industrial grift. Plenty of money to bail out big Agra, big oil, big fracking, plenty of money for that. and plenty of money for uh deploying the US military to go around and basically intimidate people year round. That's what the US uh government do. So, Israel will have a piece of this. So, I I can't tell you this is just a disaster. That's about the most disturbing thing I saw uh in the news cycle in the last couple of days that's worth commenting on.
This article went somewhat wide this week. People are starting to talk about it. Uh Ben Freeman over at responsiblestatecraft.org put this out. Congress quietly moves to integrate US and Israeli militaries. So this has caused a lot of people to look at it uh to look into the document itself. And this is all coming at a time, of course, when there are offthechart levels of distrust of the Israeli government here in the United States. Off the charts. I mean, it's insane. Uh, and finally, about time we've reached that critical mass. But as the US population does start to approach some sort of critical mass on this uh narrative, here here come the legislators. Here comes the NDAA. Here comes the National Defense Authorization Act. The NDAA. My goodness. What are who if if this is a constitutional republic, a representative government, who is it among us that is emailing their senator and their congresspersons, calling them, attending meetings, and saying, "Hey, I really dig the NDAA. I really like what you guys have done with that. I would like one next year that's even bigger. I would like a military budget that's well over a trillion dollars. And myself and my fellow Americans who voted you into office, we want that.
Can you imagine the NDAA for the uninitiated? The NDAA has been the delivery vessel of so much heinous and odious policy, legislation, spending, war spending, war profiteering, removal of constitutional rights. Yeah, these kind of things are all snuck into the NDAA and the National Defense Authorization Act is often referred to as, you know, an omnibus bill. An omnibus. Well, the Sunday Wire is your weekend news omnibus, you know, but hey, we can get through a Sunday wire in two hours, 3 hours, you know. It's uh spoken in plain language, but the NDAA, that thing is a paper beast. That thing is a Trojan horse made of ones and zeros sometimes. Do they even print that thing out? Has anyone ever printed out an NDAA? Probably not. waste of trees.
But I mean, think about the for example, okay, little Trojan horses, little barely describable as constitutional widgets built in baked in to these omnibus bills. This one in particular, the NDAA, that would have been the Smith Reformation Act of 2014 under Obama. That's right. That's uh I'm sure most of you know that is when it was uh officially stricken from legislation that the American government cannot propagandize. You cannot knowingly and openly openly spew pour torrent scops and propaganda straight into your third eye from a information beerbong known as social media or whatever all vectors. So, it's very very difficult for anyone to argue that the Smith Reformation Act of 2014 embedded in the NDAA is a good thing. I don't know of anyone who went and wrote their congressperson or their senator after that and said, "Hey, thanks. Thanks for that. Thanks for that. I really really trust the government and I love it when they lie to me. I love it when they try to trick me. I love it when they pull the wool over my eyes. I love it when they steal my money. I love it when they let foreign countries bomb innocent people. I love it when they make up lies about the geopolitical situation in a foreign country and then send in the color revolution people to destroy that place or change it fundamentally forever to great detriment to the citizens there. That's awesome. Can we have more of that? I don't know anyone who has said that ever. Yet your Congress people and your senators, what do they do? Oh, we need this. Got to have this. Who asked for this? Who did ask for this one? 2027 NDAA.
So recommend um Ben Freeman's article as a good jumping off point here. Again, that's up at uh Responsible Statecraft. Now then you get into the actual document and this is where a lot of people will fall short. So you know it's and it's just the way it is, right? We used to be a, you know, some years ago, not very many, we used to be a population that kind of just read headlines and buy lines, right? Which by the way was a huge boon to those that were behind the Smith Reformation Act. But anyways, um, so headlines and by lines, great way to, uh, put a narrative and, you know, a narrative elevator description basically in someone's brain as they scroll or scan a website of news article tiles. Woo. Remember when we used to do that? Yeah. But these days, uh, we're down to letting blue check marks on X tell us, analyze everything and all this stuff. So, um, it's it's not the best. And, uh, but, you know, shout out to, uh, to Mr. Ben Freeman there. At least he linked to the actual document for those that want to look a little bit deeper here.
Uh so what we're talking about is title two inside of the uh I do not believe this is the complete NDAA. I think it's like the skeleton of it basically that's being worked on. Someone can fact check me on that but I believe this is a living breathing document unfortunately seeing as we are talking about how they've created a monster today. Congress and the USIsraeli warbeast. Okay, that's what we're dealing with here. Um, and in the document here, title two, it's page nine of the PDF, you can find section 224 right here. Now, this is the section in question. Section 224, United States Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative. Now, this is a document written in legal ease and globales. It is laden with legal ease and globales. And you can find even some of the people that drafted this thing nitpicking over certain words, right? So, if you're out there looking at this and you gravitate towards the word merger, uh, you will immediately be told, "No, no, no, it's not a merger. That would be bad. You're not saying it right. It's a cooperation initiative." Oh, I'm sorry. I just take back everything I said. It's a cooperation initiative. But this is the kind of nitpicking you'll get. So, let's uh let's take a quick read on it here.
Um, this section would require the Secretary of Defense. Wait, do we have that anymore? I thought it was Secretary of War. Anyways, this section would require the Secretary of Defense to designate an executive agent responsible for synchronizing cooperative efforts between the United States and Israel, including bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation. industrial cooperation in our military industrial complex. Huh. Okay. So, do we have do we have I can't even ask this with a straight face. Do we have any representatives on Capitol Hill who might say, "Wait a minute." Um, yeah, we do, but he's only there for another few weeks. Thomas Massie, let's see how Thomas Massie responded to this. Massie says if the provision in the NDAA to integrate slashs synchronize the US and Israeli militaries in section 224 makes it out of committee. I'll offer an amendment to strip it from the bill on the floor. We are a sovereign country. So there you go. Uh, you got one person on Capitol Hill kind of thinking the same way I am. I mean, this whole idea of representation in a constitutional republic just becomes absolutely laughable at this point.
And you know what is it about the technology part, right? Like somebody out there watching this might be saying, "Well, this is our greatest ally in the region. We share technology with them and that's good, right?" Well, okay. Which technology is it that has been shared with us? I'm trying to figure out what we, and by we, I don't mean the American military-industrial complex. I mean we the American citizens have gained from this arrangement cuz I'm not coming up with anything. uh I'm really having a hard time and in fact when I think about sharing technology especially high-end military technology that may have I don't know classification attached to it you know maybe you know certain things certain systems certain platforms have aspects to them that are classified and one of the reasons That is is because uh this country used to care about illicit and illegal transfer of military technology to other countries. That makes sense that I can process. So there must be something in the cooperation, right? That's the whole thing about cooperating, or at least it should be. But if we look back a little bit here, like how this has worked out for us so far, well, a couple of projects are worth mentioning. The Lavy fighter jet. After the US funded LAVI project was cancelled, Israel was accused of selling the plans and associated US technology. Oh, okay. Who'd they sell it to, you might ask? China. What about missile technology? We've shared a lot of missile technology with Israel. Specific missile systems such as the Python 3 air-to-air missile technology. Well, that technology was derived from the old Sidewinder missiles. If you were a Gen Xer like me growing up, you saw Maverick shooting side winders off his uh Tomcat F14. Anyways, uh the Python 3 air-to-air missiles were sold by Israel to China leading to the development of the PL8 missile for China.
Um, what about early warning systems? Is Israel making early warning systems and sharing them with the United States? Maybe that's something we could point to and say, "Oh, see it is a cooperation. and we are benefiting somehow. Um, early warning systems, a planned $1 billion sale of an advanced Israeli airborne early warning system, Awax radar if you will, um, which they called Falcon with a ph. uh this sale, this planned $1 billion sale uh to China was cancelled due to US pressure. So almost that one almost went to China. We had to say, "Hey, hey, greatest ally in the region, could you please not sell our top secret Awax radar system to China?" Is that really something you should have to do with a country that you're in a agreement with, a treaty with, an arrangement with? By the way, are is Israel and NATO? No. NATO, you know, North American uh you know, that whole thing. They're not even in it.
Uh, what about drone technology? In 2021, several Israeli individuals and companies faced indictments for illegally exporting cruise missiles and drone technology to an unnamed Asian country, China, uh, without proper authorization. So, let me make sure I understand this. In next year's NDAA, our government is talking about some sort of integration with Israel's military, our military with their military. And this is the same government that used the fear of China as a, you know, campaign point, campaign plank. We got to beat China, right? We got to beat China. We got to beat China in all things military-industrial complex. Okay. Questionable. But even if I was uh rallying behind that little narrative there, how would I feel to know that the country that has sold China much of our technology is going to be integrated into our military where we have more military secrets, institutionalized military secrets. You got to be kidding me. They tell us right now we have to have all these data centers. We need 1,500 data centers here in the United States while China has about 460 so that we can beat China, right? And China's no slouch in the AI realm, in the nanotech realm, in the technology realm, in the military industrial realm, right? this administration before they were even this administration telling everybody, "China, China, China. Watch out for China." Well, maybe watch out for your greatest ally in the Middle East that's stealing your military secrets and selling them to China. What about that one?
The US is it's hard to say but it's either number one or number two probably China and US as it pertains to artificial intelligence cyber security quantum computing robotics all that stuff automation and we're going to officially via the National Defense Defense Authorization Act of 2027 integrate aspects of our military and Israel's military to include data sharing. Data sharing on which platforms? Data sharing on which level of internet? Do these people get US security clearances? Do our people get Israeli security clearances? Is that a two-way street? We are not concerned about the transfer of military technology, the illegal and illicit spycraft style transfer of military technology to what our government tells us is our prime one of our prime nemesis countries. the one we're in an arms race with, an AI race with, a robotics race with, an automation race with. So, we're going to Okay. All right. And we got one guy, one guy on Capitol Hill who's going to stand against that torrent. And I think we all know how that's going to work out. He's got an expiration date basically tattooed on his his office door. So this whole idea transferring technology not even brought up not even brought up. Israel transferring military technology to China and no one in the GOP is concerned about this. Boy, does that beg some questions.
Regardless of where you stand politically, regardless of your views on Israel, Iran, Gaza, or the wider Middle East, there's a larger question here. Who decides when America goes to war? Who determines America's strategic interests? who controls America's military future? Because historically, the American military was intended to answer to the American people through their elected representatives. Does anybody remember this? I know some of you are too young to remember this and some of us have to reach real far back into the memory for a time when it at least felt that way. But, you know, it was not designed to become part of a permanent transnational security architecture whose priorities may not always align with those of ordinary sandwich eating Americans.
Many Americans have spent the last 20 years watching endless wars, mounting debt, watching surveillance expand, and this increasingly powerful military industrial complex. this beast, this monster, this monster of many heads, this hydra. So Americans were promised peace dividends and nation building at home and instead we witnessed a constant expansion of overseas commitments and a vast growing distance between the decisions made in Washington and the interests of the people. Right? the people expected to pay for them. Today, as Washington debates deeper military integration abroad, many Americans are asking a simple question. If our infrastructure is crumbling, our debt is exploding, our very borders remain contested, and our own citizens struggle with rising costs of living. Why does the political establishment always seem to find unlimited resources for foreign military commitments? Somebody want to make that make sense for us? And don't tell me it has to do with 4D chess or a grand scop that is for my own benefit.
So maybe the most important question of all, if this proposal represents such a significant shift in the relationship between the United States and Israel, why are so few Americans hearing about it? But hey, maybe people are really excited about this. Maybe Americans want this and I'm just out of touch or something. Uh, is that possible my friends? I don't know. But, uh, Secretary of War Pete Keg's breath. Well, um, he decided to go and talk to some young American soldiers. I'm not seeing a whole lot of excitement on the faces of these young soldiers here. just not seeing it. Uh but let's see uh let's see if uh Keg's breath here can rally the young troops a little bit. I mean, let's give it a listen.
>> And when you do your job, the adversaries know what's coming for them. And that's when they either step up and meet the fury of the American military or back down and you create a whole bunch of options for America and the president with what he wants to execute on behalf of the American people. So right now, hey, Iran has a choice. Meet at the table with the president and give up their nuclear program. And as the president said, I'm lost on time. Two days ago now in the cabinet meeting, I'm sitting right next to him. He looks in the camera. He says, "Well, Iran can either do it the right way with a deal across the table or they can deal with my guy on the left." That happened to be me.
>> It's not me. It's you guys.
>> It's what you're ready to do. It's what the
>> So, it's what they're ready to do. This guy big up in himself. You're gonna have to deal with the guy on my left. President Trump said that happened to be me. But it ain't me. It's you. You're the ones that are going to go fight and kill and maim, potentially be maimed, potentially be killed for what? I don't know. A couple of those people look like they're uh experienced and ready to do something, but the majority of them look like ROC students or something. No offense, folks. Listen, they know Trump the MAGA is finished. New polling's come out. MAGA is underwater officially with white workingclass voters. Okay. 54% of white workingclass voters will not vote for MAGA or support MAGA. disapprove of Trump, the whole thing, the whole grift. What does that mean? That means that they're going to get trounced in the midterms, beaten badly in the House and Senate most likely. That's what the polling suggests anyway. And this latest polling is bad. So, you know, this whole this whole thing of positioning yourself as a populist that you're going to uh do right for the workingass man, American Joe the plumber and his wife and family and what whatever it's it was all a scam. Okay. Trump's remaining base, I've said it before, I'll say it again. All that Trump has left as a base is the Israel mob, the military-industrial mob, wall, the Wall Street thieves, the Howard Lutnik of the world, the Epstein class. Big oil and big gas and big property. That's all they've got. There's nothing left. There is no more MAGA. That's it. It was a scam. And now you can see the extent of it. Israel knows when Trump goes, they will never Israel will never get anything near the support for its future greater Israel endeavors than it got during this presidency. They won't even get anything near what they got in past presidencies. That's just a reality. So and and and Netanyahu is a keen student of US just going to go under this tree under this uh US politics. So he knows he knows that that's finished. So this is their last uh last chance. So, they're trying to fuse the Israeli military-industrial complex with the US military-industrial complex and make those two one. And know they only have a limited time to do it. And meanwhile, I mean, the the hate and disapproval of Israel among the American public, it's at record levels. I would say it's probably around 70%. And of that 70% that disapprove of Israel in the US in real terms, at least 20% of those can't stand the sight of this uh of Netanyahu and this this rogue state. I mean, it's absolutely incredible. So, anyway, I hate to say it, but we've sort of figured out this the whole Trump uh pantomime. It's kind of boring at this point, but there's no deal. There's no deal because what what Trump thinks is a deal is not an actual deal. It's a it's a one-way imposing your will on the other side, and if they don't accept it, then you're going to threaten to crush him. He just threatened to blow up Oman. Oman's the other country on the other side of the straight of Hormuse. It's been a US ally since well, as long as it's been in existence. But Trump kind of ruined that overnight by saying if they don't behave, we're going to blow them up. No, no basis at all for saying that other than he's just complete idiot, but uh he's probably told something by his degenerate advisor Steven Miller. Sort of interesting. specimen there. Um, but yeah, we're going to blow up Oman. That was stupid thing to say because there that if you would have curried favor with Oman Oman, that would have been half you would have been halfway there to solving the problem. You wouldn't even need to really deal with Iran that much. That's how stupid Trump is. He's ignorant. you know, anything outside of the tri-state area, he's sort and and Florida, he's he's out of his element. He uh he'll visit a country, doesn't even know what language the people speak most of the time. He's not very bright, not very intelligent, not very high IQ. But this is the guy that accuses everyone of being low IQ, which I find to be quite uh quite funny. But so there's going to be no deal for the straight of Hormuse. So it's just status quo. It's uh peace without peace. Peace without peace. Always on the edge of war. It's going to take the US 3 years to to recoup its stock. So it's just kind of by time do intermittent attacks and strikes uh for the duration of this administration, however long they last. And yeah, this I mean completely clueless. Marco Rubio, Trump, they can't be allowed to uh block international waters. Well, they're not blocking international waters because there are no international waters in the straight of Hormuse. There's Iranian territorial waters touch Omani territorial waters. Iran is not a signatory to the convention, the UN convention of the law of the seas in 1982. So it's by by not signing that and neither is the United States by the way. So what the hell is Rubio blowing smoke about? But even if they were, they would have the right in a wartime situation to police and control and set uh terms on ter as far as access to that strait because they were attacked by the US and Israel. End of story. So you know even on international law basis US doesn't even have a leg to stand on. And so they don't even know what they're talking about. You know what's worse about that is the the press don't even know either that Rubio will say something completely stupid like an ignoramus that uh that they cannot hold this international waterway hostage or say something really stupid. It doesn't have any basis in international law, juristpudence, precedent, history, international relations, full stuff. not relevant. He'll say that he's a Secretary of State. He's meant to have a brain. I know it's a stretch for a US Secretary of State. There's been so many underwhelming ones. Blink was smart, but he was evil. He was working for Israel. He was an Israeli agent effectively. Plenty of plenty intelligent, but but evil. Rubio is not as smart as he claims he thinks he is. Uh he's sort of like Trump. He makes it up as he goes along. And if you're surrounded by clowns and fools and charlatans, you might very well be the smartest man in the room. As the old saying goes, in the land of the blind, the oneeyed man is king. That is the sort of maxim of the Trump administration. and this MAGA crowd, this uh strange excuse for a cabinet. Nonetheless, what's worse than Rubio popping off, talking rubbish, or Trump uh saying incredibly crazy and stupid things is that the press don't pull them up on it. So, the press are either equally stupid or afraid to challenge them on camera or uh are going along with it. That's called controlled opposition. Okay? Democrat, Republican, doesn't matter. I'll tell you what, the Democrats are on board with the war. Most of them are on board with the war. Most of them are on board with the genocide in uh Israel. No doubt about that. So that's what you're dealing with.
I don't blame politicians. I've said this before. I didn't blame them during COVID cuz they they are what they are. Politicians by nature. It it literally says it on the tin. If you get a if you get a tin of evaporated or freeze-dried politician and you add water when you want to animate it and bring it to life, it on the it says it on the tin. It says it says genetically predisposed to lie. It says it it's on the instru. It's in it's in the manual. Genetically predisposed to lie will lie, will deceive. will grift and often so politicians will do what they do. Cover their ass, lie and take money from special interests who will fund their next election. That's what they do. So, we can't in some ways you can't always blame the politician. They are what they are. But I do blame the press because the press that are facilitating this fraud, they they don't really have a decent excuse, you know, cuz they're masquerading as being kind of journalists and they're not. And that's that's that's the one you really need to look at and go after. Okay. Mainstream media are still as bad as ever. Slightly better on some issues like uh Israel. Some of them are forced to come around because the general public are like this is so bleeding obvious this is so evil what Israel is doing targeting children for target practice which we saw heard this week hat tip to Tucker Carlson once again for doing a public service to the world by bringing on Dr. Maynard, Oxford physician, giving a firsthand testimony of what he saw and witnessed in Gaza. It's absolutely disgusting. It makes your stomach turn. But thank you, Tucker, for doing that once again. But you know, mainstream journalists are going to do what they're going to do. And I blame and you can blame the public. is the public have a chance to fact check to do some reading to uh you know take an honest take but so many of the public are co-opted but less and less with regards to Trump I think those days are over coming to an end very soon but uh yeah I mean what can you expect from a politician honestly if there's any honest ones in Washington I can literally count them on one and and and and after this year it probably there's probably two maybe three. They're getting the the Israel lobby and our media and some of the corrupt elements there's getting rid of any remaining honest politicians. Even one out of 500 in whatever in Congress is a threat. Even one. They have to like spend 30 million to get rid of the last truth teller, Thomas Massie. That's how threatened they are with one denter. It's like that that children's film Ants. Famous scene out of ants. It's true. So true. So true.
Anyway, those are our That's something to ponder and think about today. And um I'm going to go back to enjoying my walk through these beautiful gardens. You think you're in Versailles. Not quite, but close enough. Thank you very much, Sunday wire. Appreciate you guys. Like and subscribe if you're on the live stream right now. Seeing the comments come through. Amazing. Like and subscribe to this channel. Don't forget. And go to our website or the link below. Hit donate. Support us. Subscribe and become a member at 21wire.tv. That's one way you can support us and help us every week. So check that check all that out. Appreciate you guys. Patrick Hennington signing out.