Transcription
As South Korea's tax settlement season kicks in, major issues are surfacing across K-pop. From Chaun Wu's massive tax case to CL's legal troubles over her agency. So, here's a quick rundown of the biggest news you might have missed recently.
With Blackpink finally gearing up for their long-awaited return, the excitement around their new album has been intense. But that anticipation has now been mixed with frustration after alleged leaks began circulating online. The group officially confirmed on January 15th that they would be releasing their first full album in 4 years titled Deadline with a release date set for February 27th. The response was immediate as every version of the album sold out in under 25 minutes during pre-sales alone. The album is expected to include five tracks, one of which is Jump, a song fans already heard when Blackpink kicked off their tour back in July, making the comeback feel even more special given how long fans have been waiting.
However, as the release date approaches, rumors have started spreading that parts of the album may have surfaced early, causing concern among fans. One major talking point came after fans noticed that an album sales website appeared to briefly show a full track list, including a rumored collaboration with BB Rexa along with four songs that are said to be entirely new rather than remixes, instrumentals, or live versions, though none of this has been officially confirmed, adding fuel to the speculation. Some fans examined a blurry image of what's believed to be the album CD that was shared online and claimed the track names could be seen, leading many to believe the leaks might be real, even though there is still no solid verification. On top of that, one song has allegedly surfaced in full, but with AI generated music becoming more convincing by the day, it has been nearly impossible to tell whether the audio is legitimate or completely fabricated. For now, everything remains uncertain, and the only way to know what is true is to wait for YG Entertainment to officially reveal the track list and for Deadline itself to finally drop.
Cats Eye have found themselves at the center of intense online push back following a recent announcement tied to the Grammys. Back in November, it was revealed that the group had earned two Grammy nominations, one for best new artist and another for best pop duo or group performance for their song Gabriela, which immediately caught people's attention and sparked a lot of discussion. Many questioned how a group that has only been active for around 2 years could already reach a stage that usually takes artists much longer to get to. Things escalated even further when it was confirmed that Cats Eye would be performing at the ceremony alongside other best new artist nominees such as Olivia Dean, Addison Ray, Sombre, and Lola Young. That news alone reignited debates, but the reaction grew even stronger once fans pointed out that Cats Eye would be the first girl group to perform at the Grammys in 24 years, with Destiny's Child being the last to do so.
For some people online, that milestone felt undeserved, leading to accusations that Hive had bought the group's way in and claims that the Grammys had lost credibility by inviting a group like Cats Eye onto its stage. [music] Comments on social media said things like, "Narly an internet girl at the Grammys. Is this not supposed to be an event of prestige and class?"
At the same time, supporters were quick to push back against that narrative, arguing that the group's influence over the past two years cannot be dismissed so easily. Fans stressed that judging Cats Eye based on just one or two songs ignores the bigger picture of their growth, performances, and overall artistry. To them, the group earning a performance slot at the Grammys makes sense, especially given their reputation for strong live stages. And many are genuinely excited to see what they bring to such a historic platform. So, good luck to the girls.
To keep up with all the latest K-pop updates, don't forget to like the video, subscribe to the channel, and turn on notifications.
Cha Yun Wu is currently dealing with allegations that could have serious consequences for his career after reports surfaced claiming he was investigated for possible tax violations. According to a media report released on January 22nd, Yunw was audited by the National Tax Service [music] last year and later informed that he owed more than 20 billion1 in additional taxes, which is roughly 13.6 million US including income tax, an amount that reportedly ranks among the largest ever assessed to a celebrity. The audit was said to have taken place before he enlisted in the military in July of last year, with the final notice delivered after his enlistment process was completed at his request.
The core of the issue reportedly lies in how Inu's earnings were handled. While officially signed under Fantagio, he is said to have been connected to a separate company established by his mother, referred to as Corporation A. Reports claim that Fantagio and this familyrun company entered into a service agreement allowing Yunw's income to be divided between Fantagio, Corporation A, and himself. Authorities allegedly viewed the structure as a way to reduce overall taxes as corporate tax rates are typically lower than personal income tax rates. Following the audit, the National Tax Service reportedly determined that Corporation A did not provide meaningful services and classified it as a paper company, concluding that more than 20 billion one in taxes had gone unpaid. Industry sources further claimed that Corporation A's registered address did not match what would be expected of an entertainment management business and that there was no clear evidence of independent operations. While company expenses were allegedly recorded through luxury vehicles registered under the firm, investigators reportedly found no proof that the company carried out any role separate from Fontagio's management duties. As a result, the authorities refused to recognize the company as a legitimate independent entity. This decision also reportedly affected Fantageio which was reportedly issued an additional tax assessment of 8.2 billion1 last August after being accused of processing improper tax invoices connected to corporation A with an appeal failing to reverse the outcome.
After questioning both Yun Wu and his mother, investigators reportedly concluded that any financial gains from the company ultimately benefited Yun Wu himself. These findings have drawn comparisons to other recent cases involving celebrities who were accused of using personal or familyrun agencies to lower their tax burden by splitting income across entities. [music]
In response, Unwide pushed back against the claims, explaining that the company was set up due to ongoing instability and leadership changes within Fantagio with the intention of directly managing and protecting his career. They stated that his mother formally established and operated Corporation A as a registered entertainment management business. His representative stressed that the key issue is whether the company should legally be treated as a taxable entity, adding that the matter has not been finalized and will be clarified through proper legal procedures. They also emphasized that Yun Wu and his tax advisers are fully cooperating with authorities to resolve the situation as quickly as possible.
But even if that were true, the damage was already done. In South Korea, issues like this are taken extremely seriously. So the reaction toward Yun Wu has been swift and unforgiving. Netisonens flooded online forums with comments like, "To be honest, he can't sing or dance. He only did everything through his face. He should have never gotten into a scandal." And he's probably going to come out and be like, "I wasn't aware of anything. It's obvious. Just pay your taxes [music] and retire." Even fans outside of Korea have acknowledged that if the allegations are confirmed, it could effectively end Yun Wu's career in the country and erase his image as the nation's golden boy. However, since the situation is still unfolding, more updates are expected to come out, so stay tuned.
While Chaun Wu's situation has drawn major attention, he is not the only high-profile figure currently dealing with legal scrutiny, as 21 CL has also found herself facing criticism over a separate issue. In September, reports revealed that CL and several other celebrities had been operating personal management companies for years without properly registering them as cultural content or entertainment businesses, a requirement under South Korean law. The revelation sparked renewed attention toward oneperson agencies and how strictly they follow industry regulations. CL established her solo label, Very Cherry, in 2020 to independently manage her post21 career. However, industry insiders later pointed out that the company had never been officially registered as a popular culture and arts planning business despite actively handling artist management and entertainment related activities.
Under the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act, any company or individual above a certain operational scale that manages artists is required to register. And failing to do so can lead to serious consequences. The penalties for non-compliance include fines of up to 20 million one, which is close to $15,000. And in more serious cases, the possibility of up to 2 years in prison if the issue is not properly resolved. Several celebrities named in similar cases argued that they were unaware of the registration requirement and moved to complete the process with many expected to finish registering by the end of 2025.
In CL's case, a representative from Very Cherry acknowledged the mistake in a statement to Tenasia saying that the company had only recently confirmed its unregistered status and fully recognized the seriousness of the matter. They added that the registration process was being handled as quickly as possible to bring the company into compliance. A few months after the issue first came to light, the situation escalated further. On January 22nd, Yongan Police Station announced that CL would be referred to prosecutors without detention on charges related to violating the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act, with her company also being sent forward as part of the case. The move comes as authorities have begun enforcing the law more strictly, especially toward one-person agencies after the December 31st, 2025 deadline for completing registration and mandatory reporting had already passed.
This tougher stance quickly reignited public debate with reaction split down the middle. Some placed the responsibility squarely on Cell, arguing that as the face of the company, the oversight ultimately falls on her. Others came to her defense, saying the failure was more likely due to mismanagement by her team rather than an intentional decision on her part.
What do you think? Share your thoughts on these issues in the comments, and thank you for watching.