NCCI 11 | The Strength of the Covenantal Identity

Okay, so we are proceeding here. I had an interesting dream this morning. Okay, okay. Was that from the, do you think that's related to the routine or the path that we've started? Has been a blessing to set aside a time to reflect upon and consider our Father. Amen. All right, all right. We'll hold on to that dream and later on, once we finish this, um, we, uh, we will actually open the floor to hear that dream, rather. If you open, just sharing it.

All right, so we are moving on tonight. Got a great blessing today. Amen. Amen. Right, so we are moving on tonight with the new cing, and we're moving on. We covered last week. Last week we covered the different covenants in the Bible. We took a look at some. We took a look at oaths in the Bible, vows in the Bible. We took a look at, we also took a look at the common factors, right? And right after the session, we pretty much, um, shifted into starting a routine, a daily routine to reveal your spirit as your spirit as a son of Elohim.

All right. Now, when we say Son of God, we are sons of God. Please remember that the word God there is not defined by itself in the New Covenant. I, I find that this, the spirit has me. The spirit has been pressing me a lot recently to emphasize this. I said on the live recently, last, our live last ancient keys of healing live on Tuesday, I want to say it here again tonight, that God, if you're using the definition of God as in, just is all-powerful, even though God is all-powerful, but if you're just using that definition, you're saying of God, it doesn't mean anything. The word God is actually a translation of the Hebrew Elohim that is in the Old Covenant, in the Old Testament. The Old Testament, it's, it's, it's meant Elohim used to refer to the one of authority or power. And Elohim is someone who has authority and power. Therefore, to say a Son of God is not to say the son of the infinite God. Many have been using that for a long time, and they have zero results. It's not, it sounds nice, but it's useless. Literally, to say Son of God, therefore, in the context of the scriptures, is to say the son of authority or son of power, right? Is to be a son of authority, a son of power. And therefore, to be in the family of authority and power, one must function from authority and power. Yeah.

So the, the routine that we started was actually a routine of authority and power, so that you could begin to live the reality of authority and power, to be a son of authority and power. So we also covered in, in the last session, which was also started in the previous session, we, we, um, we, we also covered the fact that the covenant has various components, it, right? And we took a look at those various components within the respective sessions, various components. And we took a look at all these common factors, these common factors that are not considered in the West that you've been looking at in the scriptures, and on how these things are all, it all constitutes part of the covenantal experience.

Today, what I would like to do is to move on from that. Since we've actually taken a look at the covenants in the Bible, I'm actually going to be from this point to, and I'm going to be focusing on specific components of that covenant that you need to know to be able to settle down in your covenant and to make sure that your covenant remains functional, right? The last thing you want to do is that you do all of this, we speak about covenant, you, you engage this, and you're still struggling to see the results that you want to see. And therefore, because the New Covenant, particularly its condition, is that you take on Jesus's name as your own, which you put on your name, we are going to be speaking today about the definition of your covenantal identity, which is what your covenantal identity is. We will take a look also, well, let me just put that on your screen here as you move along. We take a look at the components of covenantal identity, and not, not the components of covenant, components of covenantal identity. And the last thing we're going to do is take a look at validation of the validation of your covenant. If, if, if it is one thing you all have heard me emphasize the name a lot, and, and taking on a name, and which is the spirit of God, to, to put on the name is to put on the spirit. You've heard me, you've heard us speak a lot about the name, what the, the dynamics of the name. One of the things in particular that I, I just recently decided that needs to be really emphasized is the validation of the covenant. Without validation, you are doing a lot without doing anything at all spiritually. And I truly believe, I truly believe that the validation of the Christian life has been lost. And many of us have learned doctrines and use doctrines as validation instead of what the apostles repeatedly, and I am emphasizing that with an elevated tone, repeatedly speak about in the New Testament. That you are blind to West. The Western culture has been blind to that. He speaks that he's speaking about regularly. And that is what validates the covenant. And why that is what you need to know to be, to be successful for God's sake. That validation is everything. It, it was invalidation of what God said that caused man to fall, which means falling, the fall from Adam, from the Adam in the garden, the fall from the garden was invalidating God. The fall was as a result of invalidation. One God. And if it was invalidation and caused the fall, trust me, it is validation that towards you. Does that make sense, everybody? And most of us, in particular, may be struggling to see what you want to see, or you find you end up in a space where you may be feeling fearful, or you're not really seeing what you, what you want. And this has nothing to do with her. This has nothing to do with any, any idea of, in any form of fashion, that you, that you and God are not in the right place. It's very, very much centered around the fact that your, your validation for what you're doing could be mis, is most likely displaced, right? As I say, 99.9% of struggle of fear, of anxiety, of lack of manifestation is because you are not clear on what validates you, and you're not functioning validated. And if you're not functioning validated, you're not arriving at all, right?

Now, I use our analogy recently, and I want to also repeat here today. I used it on Tuesday, and, and the analogy is actually specific to Elohim. One of the definitions of Elohim in the, in the, in the concordance concerning the word Elohim is magistrate. Everybody here knows what a magistrate is? Yes. In our culture, everybody knows what a magistrate is. If you know what a magistrate is, type MG in the comment section right now. When st's one, everybody else, if you, if you know what a magistrate is, type, type MG. Good. The example that I use on Tuesday is the same example I want to use here tonight in my own way. We actually going to have a slight twist, but nothing much, probably a slight tweak. A magistrate is, is actually that person that you're seeing, um, what do you call them, judge in the court. And let's, let's just, since we're moving forward, had with definition, let's just put up a definition here for you, right? The magistrate defined here as a civil officer who administers the law, especially one who conducts a court that deals with minor offenses and preliminary hearings for more serious ones, right? A magistrate is also, is, is pretty much a judge here. Definition: an official and trusted with administration of the laws, such as a principal, a principal official exercising government powers over a major political unit, a legal officer exercising administrative and often judicial functions, right? You see that person in the court as a judge. Now, here's, here's what we're talking about. Whether you want to use judge, if that's what you're familiar with, or you use magistrate, we are using this analogy to get started here because this is exactly what you are in the creation. I don't know if, if you've ever thought about it. What are judges in our society? Um, and a son of Elohim, or Elohim, is in, in the context of the divine order of the, of the scriptures. Has anybody ever made that connection before? Have you ever heard that connection before? The only thing is that you're not sitting in a, in, in a courtroom, but you, as the high priest, priest of Christ Yeshua, is no different from a magistrate in a court. No. All right. The word Elohim, in its definition, includes the word magistrate. You can grab any concordance and you look at it, and you notice that the word magistrate is there. In the Old Testament, the judges of Israel functioned as magistrates, but they were also military leaders. The priests of Israel are no different from magistrates today, right? They administer justice. And in justice, they administer Yahweh's perspective concerning things. When you heal the sick, raise the dead, cast out devils, you are a magistrate at work. Somebody who has been given charge, and whatever you say, the state follows. Prophet, yes, depending on what the prophet does, he's also functioning as a magistrate. Once he's making decisions, it's also magist, like it's very much falls into the category of magistrate. We could also say the only persons in society today that links, I should say the magistrate, or, or a judge, is the only person that actually looks like the high priest making decisions for creation in the old, in, in the Old Testament scriptures. But, but the priests in particular had two functions. He had to represent God to the people, and the people to God. What, when he was representing the people to God, he functioned in the same, in the capacity of what we know today as an attorney, which is, he knows what God says, he hears what the people says, and he's representing them, and he can create an argument. When God speaks to, when God is actually speaking to, sorry, when Moses, for example, is speaking to, to God on behalf of the people, when the people were, were doing all of the things that they were doing, that is no different from an attorney. What we call prayer to God in the scriptures, what we see you like, you're praying for someone, that's no different from an attorney presenting his case to the judge. How many saying that for the first time? There is a reason why Moses, Moses uses a legal context for the covenant as well, and he, and he, he keeps it within a very legal sense. This, this is actually because there's a, there's a great similarity with a law. And that now, it, it does not work with the same condemnation, but the system, the way things happen, is one is also one and the same. You can also see, you can also say that a magistrate is the person who is the person as the state, this, or the state as a person speaking to you, or speaking to the person in it, that he's actually making judgment for. The magistrate, in particular, also represents the priest when he is speaking on God's behalf. So when he's speaking to, to the people, he's a magistrate, he's in the role of the magistrate. And when he's speaking to God for the people, he's in the role, he's in the role of attorney. Now, get this right. I'm going to use this analogy, and then we're going to move forward with just filling in the, filling in the pieces here. So what I said on Tuesday was, let's say, for example, because the priesthood is literally employment, coming into crisis is, is very, is, is very akin to an employment contract, which is why the religious arena doesn't really see much results, because religion is more of philosophizing of the covenant and speaking about it from the perspective of being morally validated by God, instead of actual employment. If an employment contract doesn't morally validate you, the covenant of God does not morally validate you. It is one and the same thing. But in this covenant, you come into the name of the Lord Yeshua, and you inherit his position, which means you become a Lord Yeshua, if you want to put it like that, just for your understanding. It's, you become a Lord Yeshua, just like someone who's become a magistrate. You don't, you don't really know the person's name personally, but once they step into that function, they're called a magistrate. And if it is being cited in the newspapers, if it's being cited elsewhere, it will say that the magistrate made a decision. It doesn't necessarily take account of the man's name, because the man who is actually carrying out the role is not really important. It is the role that is important. Is this making sense? Type sense from these. All right.

Now, in this sense, in this sense, let's say this magistrate wants, no, let's put it in, in the sense of employment. I use this on Tuesday, and I'm repeating it here. I'm saying that for the third time, so you can also listen to the session on Tuesday and get more context to this as well. Let's say, for example, this person came to the employer. The employer could be government of your country, the prime minister, or whoever it is. Prime minister or president. This person comes to them. This person, you may not be directly involved with the president or the prime minister, but you are involved in a system where you come to them, and you're seeking employment as a magistrate, which is you coming to Christ, coming to God. And they actually ask you for your curriculum vitae, or your resume, right? Once they see your, your curriculum vitae and resume, they give you the job. They give you the job. They give you a contract, and you sign this contract. So let's say you are a very accomplished judge, just for the sake of the example. You see, you see this person, you, you give them a curriculum vitae or your resume. They see that you're equipped for the job. They give you a contract, you sign the contract, and you sit, you begin to function as a magistrate. So you take the seat of this magistrate, sitting in this court. How many of us could have ever seen a magistrate second-guess himself functioning as a magistrate? So anybody ever seen that? Please respond. Never seen that, right? On a job in general, after you sign that contract, does anybody get up the next morning and say, I don't feel like the, like the, like the post that you have been given? Do you think that someone who is a magistrate, with arising any morning after having signed the agreement, after, after signing the agreement, they give them the powers of the state, right? They may anoint them, which is an anointing ceremony, which is where they give you the power of the state, and that person gets up next morning and says, I don't feel like a magistrate today? Has anybody ever seen or heard that? Or do you think that, that they will do that? No, right? And why wouldn't they do that? Tell me why, in your own understanding, why wouldn't the magistrate get up next morning and say, and say he doesn't feel like a magistrate today, and they know their position? What, what validates their position in the, with regards to the example that I just gave, the scenario? What, what in that scenario validates the position? And what, what validates the job title? Not the contract. Yes or no? Their previous acceptance of what the agreement they have been assigned that power by a, by a contract, right? They sign the contract, and then they anointed them. Yes or no? I want you to follow this. If you follow this tonight, tonight, all of your lack of manifestation will change. If you follow what I'm saying here tonight, all of the lack of manifestation or all of your struggle is going to change dramatically. This person never gets up and actually says he doesn't feel like that. As a matter of fact, he gets up and he might look outside and think about what his life is like as a magistrate. Yes or no? It never crosses his mind to say that he doesn't feel like a magistrate. Or if you had a job, it never crosses your mind after you sign the agreement to get up and say, you are not feeling like the director today. What has to take place? What has to take place for you to, what has to take place for you to get up one morning and say, I don't feel, or to even to remotely second-guess or think about something different from the identity that you've been given? Notice what I'm saying, the identity that you've been given. What has to take place for you to think differently about it? Not that the employer nullifies the contract. Yes or no? Yeah, the employer has to nullify the contract, right? So doubt would come from what then? If we say doubt, what is doubt coming from? If the, if the magistrate arises in the morning and says, I don't, I doubt I'm a magistrate, what is that? Where, what could cause that for the magistrate? Well, the reason why we're doing this, and the reason why I'm actually posing this question, these questions here, believing a lie, all right? So, which magistrate have you ever heard doubted his position because he believed a lie? And if he is believing a lie, what is the lie? And I want you to keep it within the area of actual employment. Stay away from the abstract Christian foolishness. I'm calling it foolishness tonight, so it registers, it registers in your mind, that what you've been taught that is abstract is a bunch of, is a bunch of creative perspectives that comes from Rome. Your covenant is an employment contract. Look at it as an employment contract. And a magistrate has been hired to function in the high court, in the Supreme Court. What could possibly cause the magistrate to question his position? And if it is a lie, tell me what is the lie in the actual employment contract identified for, what, what has to be the lie? What lie does he believe in an actual contract, an actual employment contract? He has been, he signed a document. What could cause him to get up in the morning and doubt that? What could cause him in the morning? What can cause him to get up and say he's not too sure or he doesn't feel? Is it, is it not the only thing that can cause that? That he receives information, probably an email that says that he has been relieved of his position, yes or no? Yeah, right? Or which is the same thing as the, which is the same thing as the agreement coming to, to not, or the agreement being nullified by the employer, yes or no? Yeah, right? Okay, if this is the case, all right, 100. Follow, follow, follow where we're going. If the, if the magistrate starts to doubt, and as was written in the comment section there, he believed a lie, does that not mean that the only lie that could possibly exist that causes the magistrate to doubt is that the covenant or the contract that he signed was a false contract? Yes or no? But true or false, like, what, think about it. What is the, what other, what lie can possibly exist to determine that it is a lie, or to determine that that the magistrate is actually, he's believing a lie? What is the only lie? It's only one lie that could ever exist there. And who determines? Exactly. That's a good question. Who determines that? Yeah, only one lie could exist. Only one thing can cause him to doubt. No, the government, the employer validates it, not him. Like, if you're hired right now, who can determine whether that contract was true or false? Not your employer, yes or no? Do you pick up the, the contract and deem it true and or false, or does the employer, or someone who represents the employer, looks at the contract and deems it legitimate? You, or the employer, or, or the representative of the employer? Which one? The employer. Great. So if the government gives the, the magistrate the contract, he signs the contract, and the contract is legitimate, what could possibly cause the magistrate to doubt or to, or to, what? And so two questions here: what could cause the magistrate to doubt? And number two, what lie could he possibly believe that could cause him to doubt his position? One, his contract is canceled. We're in the right direction now. The contract has been canceled. If he's canceled, then he can get up in the morning and say, well, I am not a magistrate today. False contract is the only thing that can cause, cause him to possibly doubt, because that is the only thing that validates it. Yes or no? If the false contract is the only thing that, the only possible lie that can cause him to doubt, then are we not saying that the only thing that validates the, the position that you have been given, or validates the magistrate in his position, is the, is the, is the contract, or a false government rep? All right, great. Lovely. Everybody on the same page here? If, if you, if you are agreed that the only thing that can possibly, that the only thing that validates the employer, the only thing that validates the employer, um, sorry, the only thing that validates, the only thing that can validate or invalidate, respectively, the magistrate's position, is the, is the, is the contract that he signs. If you agree to that, type contract. That's the only thing. Good. Lovely. Nice. Let me show you something here now. So the contract validates him. He, therefore, once that contract is valid, whether he gets up in the morning and he feels like he feels a magistrate, does that change that he is a magistrate? Absolutely not. And if he believes, or I shouldn't say if he believes, because the contract is what validates it, which means the contract is what his belief is in. Yes, his contract is his contract is what his belief is in. Once he signs the contract, they call him, and they, then let's say they, they, once he, he, um, signs the contract, he takes an oath, and once he takes the oath, then they know anointing. So let's say the anointing for the sake of the example, the anointing is a robe that they put on him, right? And once he puts on that robe, he's officially seen as magistrate of the, of the high, of, of the Supreme Court. When he goes in and he sits down on his chair, have you, what does he need to know to be able to make decisions? Yeah, in his black robe, let's say they put the black robe on him. Soon as he puts it on, he's in magistrate mode. What is he need to know to make the decisions? So he has power. The robe gives, the robe is identification that he has the power. He needs to know the law. Do you know that when he makes a decision based on the law, he is, he is actually functioning in faith? I want to slow your mind down and think about it. His status is validated. He signed it, it's validated. They give him an oath, he is then anointed, the robe is put upon him. He sits in the seat and starts to make decisions. First case comes before him, he hears the case, he cites the law, and he makes a decision based on the law. Do you know that that decision right there, that law is what he's using to make decisions? That decision right there is the magistrate functioning in faith. Think carefully about what I'm saying. Every judgment that magistrate makes is an act of faith. What is the faith based in? That he signed a contract, and then when he signed the contract, they, he, he made an oath, they anointed him, and he now has faith because he signed that contract that he represents the state. And his faith is that his judgment is going to be fully, um, fully implemented by the state. Dropped the mic. Right? If you, if you're following, if you're tracking what I'm saying, type faith. So they have faith in his qualifications. Who has to have faith in his qualifications? The government, or the people he's judging? The government, right? The government is what watches the qualifications, gave him the job. Once he does that, he, they take him, and he makes an, he takes an oath to the, to, to, to the position, or to the position of magistrate. He takes an oath, then they put a robe on him, so they anointed him, and they're done. They're done him with the robe and say, you're now magistrate of, of the, of the United States of America, or state of Canada. Then he sits on the chair. First, first situation comes before him, first, first, what do you call it, first case comes before him, and he sits, he, he hears the case, he remembers the law. The law says so and so. He tells the person, according to the law of Canada, according to the law of the United States of America, according to the law of England, according to the law of Australia, according to the law of Trinidad and Tobago, what you're seeing here is against the law, or according to the law of, of, of, of Vanuatu, this, this here is actually contrary to the law. This is the judgment. And once he makes that judgment, his faith is, which is based on the covenant, the contract. The contract is what validated him. His faith is what caused him to make that judgment. And he knows he makes that judgment, and because of the contract that gave him that, because of the contract, he can make that decision, and the state will follow through and execute that decision. Does anybody need to know his name? No. All they need to know is that he is a magistrate of the state, and whatever he says, the state will follow. The whole police force will take action because of what that man says, and the state will lock you up, and they will keep you there based on what that man says. Why? Because he signed a contract to represent the state. Do you know that? I say, I'm asking you again, do you know that him sitting in that seat and making that decision is faith in action? And do you know he's a physical representative of the state? Do you know that when he makes a decision and he slams that gavel, he has entered into rest? Next case. Is this making sense?

Now, let's bring it to your covenant. Let's bring it to your covenant. Now, I, I'm saying this again, if you grasp this tonight, all your struggles over this is as straight as it gets. As soon as he slams that gavel, he has entered into rest concerning his judgment. Now he expects the state to do its job, to do its job. You can see the state as a person. Let's say the state, do its job, whilst he, as a representative of the state, the physical, visible representation of the state. Can you see the state, or is the state an invisible concept? You can't see the state, right? It's invisible. You know it's there because they say this is the state of so and so, this is the Republic of so and so. Can you see the Republic? Can you see the state? No, you can't. It's invisible. What you have is laws that represent the will of the state, which is not so. The laws represent the will of this Republic or the state, and the laws are written. We could say that the laws represent the promises of the state, or the promises of the Republic, yes or no? Okay, all right. Now, let's bring it to you and, and, and, and Christ Yeshua. So we, first thing that you said is that the, you came to the employer looking for a job. The, or somebody came and told you, hey, you can, you can actually have a job. That is the preacher. The preacher came. The preacher came and said, hey, do you know you can be saved? That's the, the preacher is the representative of the state. Comes and says, do you need to be saved? Now, unfortunately, the correct message didn't go out, but technically, the preacher is telling you, hey, can, do you know that you can become a member, a citizen of the kingdom of God? Okay? And then they have you, um, so coming. So, so the preacher is like an employer of the state, let's put it like that. And you say you want the job. So the preacher, who is the employer, now, who is the representative of the state, he says, what's your qualifications? Do you know what, do you know that the equivalent of the qualifications, what the qualifications are? Listen very carefully to what I'm saying. The qual, what the qualifications are for the magistrate to be considered for the job, Jesus's sacrifices are to you. Let me say that again. What the resume or the curriculum vitae is to the magistrate looking for this job, Jesus's sacrifices are to you as your qualifications. That's your qualifications. Jesus, Jesus has sacrificed, removed all these things from from you that made you who you are. He removed five sacrifices that removed five things from you. So the employer, God, considers you because Jesus's sacrifice made you worthy for this job. You are magistrate. You follow what I'm saying? No, Jesus is not your robe. Hold on. Let me walk it through the analogy here. Jesus is not the robe here. Hold on. Jesus resurrected humanity through the sacrifice, which means those sacrifices are the qualifications for you to be a magistrate, for you to be a Son of God. This is why you don't go and tell anybody that they're in sin because Jesus qualified everybody for it. So the employer sees, which is now God, God, he has the employer, he sees his sacrifice, he says, you have the job. You're now magistrate. You're now a Son of God, right? Then he tells you how. So then, then, then the employer gives you a contract, and you sign the contract, right? The employer gives you a contract, and you sign the contract. The preacher tells you, believe in Jesus, and you'll have the job. Believe in Jesus in you, and you'll have the job. So you know, confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, that, sorry, that you've taken on Jesus's name. So you confess about it, and then you believe in your heart that God raised him, the spirit, you from the dead, and you are saved. So you have the job, right? After that, you make an oath. So we said, after the man signs the contract, he's, he's taken, he's given an oath, he takes the name, and then they put a robe on him. What, what making the oath is that you taking an oath to the name, to be the person of that name. And what the robe is, that's the Holy Ghost. You're anointed, given the fullness of the Holy Ghost. Just like the robe is given for him to sit in the seat to do the job, the Holy Ghost is to you, the promise of the Father. Making clue to the spirit. Everybody following? Making sense? Okay. Anointed and empowered. That's what we're saying. Okay.

Now, now that you have that, the first case comes before you. Somebody needs healing. You cite the promise, just like the, just like the magistrate cites the law. The law of the land is the promises of the Republic, or the Republic, the promises of the state. You cite what Jesus says. Sorry, what Jesus, what the scripture says. What validates you to make that decision is Jesus's sacrifices. The promises, just like the, the, the magistrate is validated to make judgment because he signed the contract. Jesus's promises, the promises in the scriptures are now validated by Jesus's sacrifices. And when you identify with Christ, you sign the contract. So now you have to now begin to function as the Lord Yeshua, just that the magistrate sits as the magistrate, you now sit in the court of creation as the Lord Yeshua, the magistrate. And you now make decisions. And what is validating those decisions? The fact that you have identified with Christ. And what validated you to identify yourself with Christ? Jesus's sacrifices. Your qualifications. Because the sacrifice is what cleansed you. Is this making any sense at all? What is your faith supposed to be based in? Faith in the name. And what qualifies you to have faith in the name and know that what you speak based on the promise will work? The qualifications. What are the qualifications? Jesus's sacrifice. Is this clear? Is this clear? What happened to this body? Is this clear for everybody? No, you have faith in the name. Therefore, to have faith in the name is to have faith that when you speak as him, just as the magistrate, he sacrifices his body. No, the sacrifice is what took place 2,000 years ago with his body, right? Yes, right. Now, if this is the case, okay, okay. H, you mean no, no, C, your dri. All right, so here's my question. Simple question. What, what you supposed to have faith in the name, which means that when you speak, you have faith that it is the spirit of that name that is speaking. And what validates you to have that name? The sacrifices. Good. Good. It's sinking in. So if the sacrifices were done 2,000 years ago, at what moment should you doubt that you have that name and that you are that name? The only time you should doubt this, or let me ask you, let me ask you a question. Is there any, is there any, how do I put this? Is there any Rick jump in front of him with the question with the answer there? Way? Well, I still ask you a question. Is there any possible reason that you could have if this sacrifice is historically completed? Is there any possible reason that you could have to doubt that that name is yours once you decide to function? It is no. And if there was a reason, does it not mean that the only possible reason is if God himself appears in disguise and says that your covenant is nullified? And if God's word is established in the heavens forever, and God plays in the sky, is that God, or is that a devil? Listen, question. If something had, look, if God, the sky and said, this covenant is nullified, and God's will is established in heaven, is that truly God, or is that a devil? H, God said. All right, all right. We get the drift. It's a devil. It's a devil. Therefore, if a case is in front of you, and you have to make a decision based on the covenant that is a historical fact, and something that is done and complete, it is finished, and you have no reason to doubt the name that you have, this name, is it not therefore logical that if you make a judgment based on a promise in this title, the Lord Yeshua, that you can therefore make that decision, just like the, the magistrate in the court, and have faith that the Holy Spirit, which is the spirit of the state of the New Jerusalem, is going to fulfill what you have been given the authority to do? Does this not mean that if you, if you speak as Yeshua, which is the title that you have been given, that Jesus qualified you to have by the sacrifices, that the Holy Spirit is bound to you, just like the state is bound to the magistrate? Does that not mean that this is why Jesus says, these signs will follow those who believe? So then there is no reason therefore for you to second guess, unless your covenant has been invalidated, and for your covenant to be invalidated, the title to be taken away from you, then you will have to go back in time and take Jesus off the cross, or stop him from going to the whipping post, and stop him from going to the cross. Peter tried it, and Jesus rebuked him. What do you think he will do to you? Question. Does that not mean that you'd have to go back and stop him from going to the whipping post and stop him going to the cross? Peter tried it. He said, far be it from you, Lord. And Jesus rebuked him and called him out to be Satan. Does that not mean that you will receive the same words if you try to, to nullify those sacrifices? The Apostle Paul says in Hebrews 10, anybody who shows disregard to the blood is insulting the Holy Spirit of grace. Go read it. So if you make, if you cite a promise and make a decision based on that promise, is there any reason that the state, the Holy Ghost of the state, should not fulfill it? Last question. Is there any reason that you should not rest after you make the decision? Okay. Therefore, there's no more wiggle room for you. What I just did there was back into the corner and take out all the wiggle room that you were using. So my question to you now, are you going to be a delinquent magistrate, or are you going to become a productive magistrate? That is a straight and real question. I need an answer to that. Are you going to be a delinquent magistrate and sit down there whining, or are you going to become a productive magistrate? Good. That's the answer I'm looking for. That's the answer that Jesus has been waiting to hear from you. And if you don't see the results immediately, do you question? Do you turn around and step into doubt? Or do you wait patiently for the state to do its work? In this case, do you wait for the Holy Ghost of the state of the New Jerusalem to do his work? And this is why the disciple says that faith, with patience, faith, with patience, and to be patient is to be godly. Now, do we understand? If you understand, type understand. Good. Let's move forward. Let's move forward.

So, what is your covenantal identity? Now that we have, now that we are clear, I'm going to use this now to confirm everything that we just, that you just agreed to. Covenantal identity. A covenantal identity refers to an individual or a group's sense of self that is deeply rooted in and defined by a covenant or a set of sacred agreements or promises. Your covenant is a sacred covenant. This concept is often associated with religious or spiritual traditions where a covenant is established between a deity, in this case, Lord Yeshua, Father, and a group of people, which would be called the believers, binding them to certain obligations, beliefs, and behaviors. Yeah. Are key characteristics of a, of covenantal identity? One is the sacred agreement, which should be your covenant, which is called a New Covenant. At the core of a covenantal identity is a covenant, which is typically seen as a sacred or solemn agreement. This covenant may involve commitments made by individuals or communities to live according to specific principles, laws, or teachings. Second is divine relationship. In many religious contexts, a covenant identity involves a relationship between the individual or community and a deity. This relationship is defined by the terms of the covenant, which often includes promises of blessings or protection in exchange for faithfulness and obedience. Let's take a look at what this is. The first is your sacred agreement. Where is the sacred agreement even spoken of? Romans chapter 10, it reads, but what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth and in thy heart: that is the word of faith, which we preach: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, so you confess here is it, is it a translation of the Greek word that means to covenant or to make an oath, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him the spirit of Christ in you from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For those of you who were part of the session early on tonight at 6 p.m. EST, we spoke about the cup. The Bible actually means to confess with your mouth means to call on the name inwardly, meaning you see when you called out to God in the heavens, you call out to God inwardly, meaning that you invoke him, you call upon him as the spirit of your body. It goes on to say, for with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the scripture saith, whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. As their spirit, for whosoever shall call upon the name of Yahweh in the name of the Lord Yeshua as their spirit shall be saved. Is this clear, or do we need more, more evidence? Type which one, in, in, in context, please. Is this, is it straightforward and clear, or do you need the Holy Spirit to give you more evidence? So a sacred agreement has been established, and the agreement requires you to simply call upon your name, which is to call upon Yeshua inside of you. When the Old Testament authors say, "Arise, O God," do you think they're speaking about God in the sky? No, they're speaking about, "Arise, O God," they're tending the spirit of Yahweh that is that they identify with as their own to arise and, and to do it. It's not out of you, it's in you. Christ in you.

Second, the second component we just mentioned is the divine relationship. Yeah. This, this is found in first, in second Peter chapter 1:1-4. Don't mind I say Romans at the bottom. Let's pay attention to it. Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: Grace and peace be multiplied unto you through the knowledge of God, and of Jesus our Lord, which are the promises of God. In that is explained in verse four, just like the law of the magistrate is the knowledge of the state, the, sorry, the law of the state to the magistrate is the knowledge of the Republic. In the same way, the promises of God are the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord, which is our spirit. And what is the knowledge according as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue: colon. What do, what does colon mean? What does colon mean? Expansion. What is the expansion called? The knowledge of him whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises. Whoa. Did it just say that the knowledge of him is the precious and great promises? Just like the, the knowledge of the, the knowledge of the Republic is the laws of the land, okay? That by these you might be partakers of the divine nature. Isn't the magistrate functioning by the laws of the land, functioning by the nature of the Republic and the will of the Republic? Yes or no? That's the promises of God for you. So if your promises, if you're functioning by the promises of God, then your promising, then you are functioning by the will and the nature of Christ, the nature of the state, the nature of the New Jerusalem. Is that clear? Type clear. Do that not straightforward? All right.

Next two components, next two characteristics: collective identity and moral and ethical framework. What's the covenantal identity? Covenantal identity often extends beyond the individual to encompass a collective group, such as priests, which means you don't have an individual identity, you have a collective identity. The Lord Yeshua is high priest, and therefore identifying or faith in, in him, identifying with the Lord Yeshua makes you high priest of the New Jerusalem, which by the way, is the king of the New Jerusalem. So sharing kingship. Says, covenantal identity often extends beyond the individual to encompass a collective group, such as a religious community or nation. The, we, we are called the royal priesthood, the holy nation. The group's shared covenant becomes a central part of the communal identity and purpose. Wow. So if you're the holy nation, the royal priesthood, this gives you identity and purpose. Type clear. So you need to get off. No, I'm going to put this in a very, it could be, it could sound a little, a little strong, but hear my words. You need to get off your individual high horse and submit yourself to what God has called you. We understand because taking on individual identity, listen very carefully to my next statement, taking on individual identity and allowing your personal individual qualifications to get involved is called pride and arrogance in the Bible. I'm rubbing, I'm rubbing my chest for you because that could come across as harsh, but it is a simple truth. Humility is submitting to what God has called you. You getting involved and allowing you and your things, and not Jesus's sacrifice, to validate that you're using your own thing to validate what God says, or to invalidate the power, the work of the spirit, is pride and arrogance before the name. Pride and arrogance before the Father. Humble yourself before God. Take on the title that Jesus paid to give you and function from.

There, get off your individual high horse. The third statement might really hit your heart. You're not that important because all of us are important. True. Jesus, again for you, you're not that important because who is really important is Yeshua, and you have been given that title by Yeshua's sacrifice. Get off your individual high horse and function, be productive, and stop being delinquent, and stop looking for reasons to invalidate it. The only thing that can invalidate it is if you stop Jesus from going to the cross. And what did Jesus tell Peter? "Get thee behind me, Satan." What do you think Jesus may tell you if you try to invalidate the same sacrifice that Jesus, that, that, that, that Peter tried to stop? Would he not call you, call you out and say, "Get thee behind me, Satan"? I just say, get off your original high, get off of your individual high horse. You're not that important because Yeshua is important, and you have been given his name. You have his importance. You do not have your own importance. Let me say it differently. You're not that special because you have his specialty, and therefore you're special because of him. You don't have your own specialty. You're special because of those sacrifices. Get off your individual high horse. Cry, Christ in me. You're exactly, oh gosh, right there, holy sister. I wish I could pin what you just said. Let me give that, let me give that a heart with a fire. Your name is in shorty Bible. His name is short the Bible, and therefore your name is not important, and your acts and your holiness is not important. You have been given that through, through, through the sacrifices. Be careful to not invalidate the sacrifice of Yeshua. Unless your name is the name.

Exactly. Next, moral and ethical framework. The covenant provides a moral, ethical framework that guides the behavior and decisions of those who identify with it. This framework is often seen as divinely ordained and central to the identity of the covenantal community. Do you know what that moral, ethical framework is? It's, I, it's called integrity and equity. Integrity for of life for all. Integrity to the name. Every time you try to get you and your personal invalidations that the teaching Church involved, you're showing a lack of integrity to the name, and it's supposed to be equitable to all. That, that's what is called love in the New Testament. Equity is love. Love is equity. Equity of life for all. Let's take a look at what that is here.

Collective identity. This is found in John chapter 3:1-6. "Behold, what manner of love the Father had bestowed upon us." That could also be read, "What manner of equity the Father had bestowed upon us, that we should be called the Sons of Elohim." Collective identity, sons of Elohim, which are priests of Elohim, not God, as you were taught. The great and powerful and infinite God. No, sons of authority and power, priests of authority and power. Therefore, the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Behold, sorry, beloved, we are the sons of Elohim, of authority and power. And it does not yet appear that we shall be, but what we shall be. But we know that when he shall appear, we shall be like him, for we are, for we shall see him as he is. And every man that hath his hope in him purified himself." Wait, wait, wait. Slow down. So if you get off your individual high horse, you purify yourself, even as he is pure. Yes, sir. You read it right. Get off your original, your, your individual my horse.

"Whosoever committed sin transgresses the law, for sin is the transgression of the law. And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins, and in him is no sin. Whosoever abided in him sinneth not. Whosoever, whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." What is this referring to? Meaning that if, if you're identifying with Christ, you have no sin. The only way you could have sin is if you deliberately do things that are contrary to him. That means that you are arrogant, and you are normalizing things that are lack of equity. I don't think any of you here are standing there. If you were standing there, you would not be in the session. Yes, sin is an identity, right? That's how you could sin, because sin, because you have the identity of sin. If identifying with Yeshua, you cannot sin, because Yeshua's identity does not reproduce sin. So let me frame that a little differently so you can understand. If you choose to normalize something that is not equitable, then you have taken on a different identity. But if you're identifying Yeshua and your heart is all for Yeshua, the same action is seen as missing the mark, and you gaining wisdom as to how to not do that like that anymore. The only time you are held responsible for it is if you're doing it because you've normalized it, and you're treating it as though it is okay to be inequitable to others. Does that now make sense? Everybody following up? Type "sense."

Good. Moral and ethical framework. This is actually found in Proverbs. "For the Lord giveth wisdom; out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding." Which means from the name comes wisdom. Out of his mouth come knowledge and understanding. "He layeth up sound wisdom for the righteous; he is a buckler to them that walk uprightly. He keepeth the path of judgment and preserveth the way of the saints." What is the way of the saints? "Then shall thou understand righteousness, and judgment, and equity; yea, every good path." Equity is called the good path. The good path is called the path of the name. Everybody seeing this? Is this clear? "When wisdom entereth into thine heart, and knowledge is pleasant unto thy soul, discretion shall preserve thee, understanding shall keep thee, to deliver thee from the way of the evil man, from the man that speaketh froward things." Froward things would be anything that is contrary to what God said. Forward things would be saying anything that is contrary to what he promises. Say froward things will be saying anything contrary to what the promises say. "Who leave the paths of right uprightness to walk in the ways of darkness; who rejoice to do evil, and delight in the frowardness of the wicked." Is this clear? Can this get any clearer? All right.

Next, two key characteristics. Right, we have two more after this, and I'm not, I'm not adding anything to this. You need to let it settle down. Historical and cultural continuity of your, of your, of your identity. Covenantal identity is often tied to shared history and cultural heritage. See, get off your individual high horse. Shared history and cultural heritage passed down through generations. It creates a sense of continuity and connection to the past, while it's also providing a vision for the future. Collective history and collective identity. Sense of purpose and destiny is the next component that comes with your covenantal identity. Those with a covenantal identity often see themselves as a part of a larger divine plan or mission, which is why Paul has them, he calls them the body of Christ. This gives them a strong sense of purpose and destiny rooted in the fulfillment of the covenant. Let's see what that is.

Historical and cultural, um, what you call it, historical and and cultural continuity. What is that? Let's read. "Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?" Wait, come on. "Death therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death, that like Christ, that like Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we should walk in newness of life." "For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall also be in the likeness of his resurrection." "Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. For he that is dead is freed from sin." Everybody here has one. Have a common history. We all dead. We are all dead to the world. We all dead to external validation. Notice what I just said. You're all dead from external validation. The, the sacrifices is what validates the name that you have. You have faith in that name because the sacrifices qualified you to have that. For you to change that, you had to go back and stop it. Dead toll contracts. Get off your individual high horse. Yeah. And if, and this doesn't stop hearing. Know, I'm showing you this here because this is what binds us together. We have died and we have identified with Christ. Therefore, we have died to the world, to the things that anything in the world says, and we are alive to righteousness. Likeness of his resurrection. It says to the likenesses. It says here, verse, verse four, that you were buried with him by baptism unto death, that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so also we should walk in newness of life. What is the newness of life? The newness of life, the knowledge of the newness of life is the promises of God. But if we've been planted again in likeness of his death, we shall also be planted in likeness of his resurrection. Death to the knowledge of good and evil. Death to external validation. Our actual historic event. Stop looking all around.

Historical and cultural continuity. Now, your sense of purpose and identity. Where is this found? By, by, by the Lord Yeshua. This is, um, Genesis 2. "And Yahweh formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul." Wait, did God breathe the spirit back into Yeshua? Same breath of life. What? "And the Lord God planted a garden in Eden, and there he put the man whom he had formed." Didn't, didn't Jesus walk out from the tomb into a garden? This is your history. "And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it." This is your common sense of purpose, to dress the garden and to keep it, to cultivate and to keep it. "And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat, but of the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil thou shalt not eat of it." Do not eat of the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil. It was put to death with Yeshua. The identity that man got from it was nailed back to the tree. Leave it alone. Stop looking for external wisdom. Christ in you. Is this clear? Or do we need to get clearer? Clear. All right.

This is real simple. So simple as is. And I included another verse from Revelation 12 with regards to sense of purpose and identity. "And the Great Dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, which is the same thing as the Garden of Eden, cultivating and keeping it, and the power of is Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, the sacrifice." These fellow saying it over and over. "And by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death." Unto the death. Same kingdom of God being established. Is this clear? Oh, okay. I hope I, I hope everybody gained that. Shock. We could see that tonight. I'm hitting you with a spiritual defibrillator, rubbing the Holy Spirit together on another relator and hitting it in your chest. Come off your individual high horse. Come off that individual high horse. Leave, leave it. Leave it alone. Leave it. Let it. Leave it in its death.

All right, last two of the key characteristics of the covenantal identity. Covenant obligations. Adherence to a covenantal identity. You are bound by certain obligations, such as following specific laws, rituals, or customs. These obligations are seen as expressions of loyalty and commitment to the covenant. Then you have covenantal signs and symbols. Identity is not often marked by signs and symbols that serve as remind, sorry, it's often marked by signs and symbols that serve as reminders of the covenant. These will include ritual ceremonies or physical symbols like circumcision in Judaism or baptism in Christianity. I'll do, I'll help you out with something better. Your covenantal obligations. Isaiah 61. "The Spirit of Yahweh Adonai Yahweh is upon me; because Yahweh hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound." Didn't Jesus tell that to do that? He, the sick raised and cast devils. That's your covenant obligation. "To proclaim the acceptable year of Yahweh, and the day of vengeance of Elohim; to comfort all that mourn; to appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called Trees of Righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified." What does God want here? That you glorify him. Get off your individual high horse. You've been made the Lord Yeshua, given the Holy Spirit to do the job. Now all you need to do is to have faith in the name, and that is validated by the sacrifices, and start making judgments, and let God be glorified. You are hindering him from being glorified when you start to get involved with your little personal things and using it as the invalidation. Is this making sense? Is this clear? We clear, right? Type "clear." Finally. All right. Amen. We striking the mark tonight. We draw the line. I only seeing two. All right. Three. Nice.

Covenantal obligations. Now let's look at your covenantal signs and symbols. Verse 23, 1 Corinthians 11. What's the sign and the symbol of the covenant here? I, they mention baptism. I'll give you something better. "For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread; and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me." There's a sign to remember him in you, not him in the sky, him as your spirit. The communion is meant to remind you by the breaking of his blood and his blood that was shed, that he, that that sacrifice. The communion represents the sacrifice so that you could remember what validates the name that you have, which is Christ in you. Even the communion he gives you to remind you of what validates you. Could this get any clearer? "After the same manner also he took the cup when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, ye do show the Lord's death till he come." Which means you are reminding of what died so that those five things that would take, that were removed, so that you have that name, and that validates it. "Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord." Wait, did he not just say that if you do not show those sacrifices, it's just awareness? You are guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. Don't play with the validation because this is what Paul said. If you shake it, do you understand what I'm saying? When you start to play with the validation, it's like playing with the, the qualification. If you shake the qualification, you're shaking. If, if you say, when I say shake it, if you treat it as though it is not important, like it, it is not validating everything that you have, you yourself will condemn yourself. Do you understand what I just said? How important are the sacrifices? Therefore, in percentage, how important do you think those sacrifices are? 100%. I don't think there's enough zeros that you could put to that to say how important those sacrifices are. Exactly.

All right, here's another covenantal symbol for you that is mentioned in Isaiah 54. Post-resurrection. 53 is the resurrection, the death, the burial, and the resurrection. Chapter 54 is post-resurrection. "For this is as the waters of Noah unto me: for I have sworn that the waters of Noah should no more go over the earth." "So have I sworn that I would not be wroth with thee, nor rebuke thee." What? "For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but my kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall the covenant of my peace be removed, saith Yahweh that hath mercy on thee." What was put in place to show as the proof that the waters of Noah will no more go over the earth? What was the symbol? The rainbow. Everybody agree with that? If you agree with that, type "rainbow." Good. This is Isaiah 54 that speaks of the New Covenant, post-resurrection. And he said the Lord, by the out of Isaiah, said that the resurrection, the symbol that represented that the waters of Noah will no more go over the earth, will now be represented for the New Covenant, which is also called the Covenant of his peace. Which means when the rainbow comes out, it's a symbol onto you in the New Covenant that what Yeshua did, the sacrifices worked, and because of that, you have his name, and God will never rebuke you. How many of us hearing that for the first time? Which means you don't, you're not only have you, you don't only have the communion to remind you of the sacrifices, but you have the rainbow to remind you of the results of the sacrifices. Do you need more confirmation, or is this not clear? Type "C." So you could see now that the, that the rainbow is a, is a reminder of the results of the sacrifices, and therefore the rainbow is a reminder of the resurrection, that Jesus is resurrected, and because of his sacrifices, you now have his name.

And finally, we spoke about validation. That's the last thing that we're covering here tonight. Remember definition, components, validation. What is validation? Just to make it clear. Validation is the noun that comes from the word valid. It means to make valid, which is to have legal efficacy or force. Legal efficacy or force. It also, next definition, implies being supported by objective truth or generally accepted authority. The sacrifices is your legal efficacy. It is your force. The blood of the sacrifice is your legal efficacy and your force. Which means no promise, because of that sacrifice, is no. This is what Paul is trying to tell you when he says, "All the promises in the name are yes and amen," because the blood was his legal, is, is it legal efficacy or force? It also, the, the sacrifices of the blood implies being supported by objective truth, that is a historical fact, objective truth, and genuinely accepted authority. That is what gives the authority for you to be validated with the name, for you to have faith in the name, and therefore for you to take promises and make judgments, and the, and the Holy Spirit of the state of the New Jerusalem takes action. He is bound to your position, as the Lord Yeshua. Is this clear? Let me, let me, let me frame this differently for your mind and your heart to understand. Is it not the same God that spoke the laws of physics into existence, like the laws of gravity, whose words are written in what we call the Holy Bible? Yes or no? Yes. Good. If it's the same person, and we call the laws of physics, like laws of gravity, laws of physics, does that not mean that every promise in the Bible is a law of physics as well? Yes or no? When was the last time gravity stopped working? Never. Was it, was it not the same God that gave the instructions for the sacrificial system? Yes or no? Yes. Good. Does that not therefore mean that if everything that God speaks is a law, we call it a law of physics, does that not mean that the sacrifices of Yeshua are laws of physics? Yes. Everybody saying yes? Okay. When was the last time gravity stopped working? So then, when will the sacrifices stop being, stop validating you? I rest my case. Therefore, having the name is a law of physics, right? All right. I hope we're clear. The word validate also means to support or corroborate on a sound of authority or sound or authoritative basis. Does this not mean that the sacrifices is an authoritative basis for you to have the name? Yes or no? All validated. So therefore, every promise of God, once you make that judgment, is established like a law of physics. Yes or no? As him that is okay. So let me, let me listen to what I'm about to say here. What the energy of gravity is as a law of physics, intolerance is to you as a spirit. When was the last time you saw gravity permit anything to not be under its power? Listen, the question. When was the last time you, gravity permit anything to be not under its power? Never. Okay. Therefore, we could say that the energy of gravity that keeps everything on the earth is the same thing as saying that gravity does not tolerate any anything contrary to its law. Yes or no? Which means what? The energy of gravity is as a law of physics. Tolerance is to you as a, intolerance is as to you as a spirit. If it registered, type [Music] intolerance. Intolerance is what the Bible calls the zeal of the Lord. All right.

So we, we say the sacrifices is the validation. Let's be clear on what the sacrifices are here. The, the term Qorban is commonly interpreted as sacrifices or offerings. Yet these translations imply a sense of loss or relinquishment, which while inherent in the ritual, does not fully encapsulate the literal meaning of the Hebrew term. That's how we treat sacrifices in the Western world. How should we treat sacrifices according to scripture? Ancient Israel. Qorban originates from the root Qof, Resh, Bet, signifying to draw near, highlighting the fundamental objective of these offerings to bring us closer to God. Let's read. Which means the sacrifice of this, of this, of Yeshua on the cross and the whipping on the post was actually for you to get the name, and through the name, you are close to God. Humble yourself to God. Let's read. Three fundamental principles underlie Qorban. Firstly, there's the notion of giving, offering a Qorban, relinquishing something. In this case, you're relinquishing the knowledge of Good and Evil. You're relinquishing death. Um, right. Something owned by the individual making the offering. Thus, sacrifices typically involve domestic animals, as wild animals aren't owned by anyone. Similarly, food offerings usually consist of flour or meal, requiring considerable effort to prepare. Remember Yeshua's bought, Yeshua's physical, historical event was this sacrifice, this offering. Another significant concept, of significant concept, is substitution. Here, the offering serves as a surrogate for the person making the offering, and the actions performed on the offering parallel those that should have been done to the offerer. Wait, what? A surrogate? Let's use for example, a surrogate mother. A surrogate mother isn't a surrogate mother carrying a child on behalf of another, yes or no? I want you to take that same concept and look at Yeshua. That carried sicknesses, diseases, and infirmities, death in all of his forms and passions, poverty, danger. Who carried it for you and put it to death? And by that purchased the name that you should have, which is the resurrected Yeshua. If the surrogate mother carries it, and the mother that is functioning, the mother that she is functioning for is untouched, is that not mean that you, in the name, are supposed to be untouched by faith in the name? Yes or no? Yes or no? Yeah, 100%. Does this make sense so far? If that is the key, then what you need to do is to become one, one single-minded. How do you become single-minded? You become intolerant to that which was carried. Is this clear? Type "clear." All right.

The offering, in a sense, reaps what the offerer had sown in place of the offerer. Listen to it. The offering, in a sense, reaps what the offerer had sown in place of the offerer. Which means Yeshua reaped what you sowed. Notably, whenever Qorban is discussing the Torah, the name of God used signifies divine mercy. What, what mercy? What more mercy can you have that somebody could reap what you sowed on your behalf? Why would you want to move away from that and put your own holiness and your own personal invalidations in place of that? Is that not just illogical? If you think that's illogical, type "illogical." And the last is, are looking for illogical. Any, everybody type "illogical." If that is illogical to you, type "illogical." If you don't type "logical," we need independent pride. Exactly. Is that not illogical? Getting your personal things involved and invalidating what God has validated. Remember, Paul says if you treat it as though it is not important, you will condemn yourself. Stop condemning yourself. Next, the third crucial concept is drawing closer. The essence of sacrifice is to facilitate a closer connection between a person and God. How do you become close to God? You, you receive the name, which is the spirit of God, the title, which is the, the spirit, and the person draws nigh to God by putting on a mindset of that name, and He will draw nigh to you. Meaning you already once that that sacrifice given him like a law of physics, and therefore you are as close to God as you could get by being God himself with God. Remember, in the sacrificial system, the animals were used as the helpers in the garden. Animals called helpers were made to carry thoughts. This is used the same outside of the garden. The animal carried thoughts of life in the garden to the sacrificial system. The animal s carried death. Yeshua carried death for you outside of the garden so that you can be back in the garden with the name. The sacrifices is not to please God. The sacrifices was to purge you, the offerer, as we just read. They use helpers to carry the death, the death thoughts of the offerer on his behalf, purging you. This is why in Hebrews chapter 1, it says that Jesus sat down in the right hand of the Father, having purged you of sin, which is death, death. And the sacrifices revealed decisions. Remember, the sacrifice is the death of a particular thought, and you, as, and you put on the sacrifice, or you benefit from the sacrifice by putting on the opposite. Which means, for example, if sadness was sacrificed, when the sacrifice is finished, the sacrifice meant the death to that thought, to that perspective, to that posture, and you put on life. Which means you behave, you put on, you put on happiness because sadness died. You put on happiness, and now you live with happiness as your posture, as your mindset, as your emotional status. In the same way, Yeshua's sacrifice reveals a decision, a decision to cease and desist from using external reference points, and cease and desist from death, because death died. Therefore, you're supposed to put death to death in your mind and put on life. And that means put on joy, give thanksgiving to God. You have to put on life, put on joy, put it on, put on the name. Is this clear? Type "clear." Right.

Sacrifice here is a visual representation of how to make decisions in the spiritual realm. The thought is eliminated and no longer giving, or no longer is alive. Remember, there are five sacrifices in the Bible. Main sacrifices are including number six as the red heifer. Remember, burnt offering is actually the death to death. The animal n here, that's what Abel started. That's also what you see Abraham doing. Peace offering, Shalom, that covers health, safety, prosperity, which means poverty, danger, and sickness in all of its manifestations died. Burnt offering, put death to death. Its will, its title, its nature, its wisdom, and death in the body. Peace offering, put together, put out all all sicknesses, diseases, and infirmities, all danger, and all poverty. Sin offering, all sin. Guilt offering, all guilt. Food and drink, thanksgiving, which means a lack of gratitude was put to death. Right? And the red heifer, we won't mention that one here tonight specifically. The titties, right here, which by, by the way, actually involved the body as well, which means the cleansing of, of the body. So you should be intolerant to anything on your worth. Jesus fulfilled all of these offerings, all of the sacrifices, and they are historically accomplished, a law of physics. And that brings us to the end of our session tonight. Think I did in good time, which is very good time. Two hours. Boom. And right here, I'll actually just open up the floor about 15 minutes to just stop recording here.