Transcription
Almost everything they said has either happened or is in the process of happening.
Well, the world is much more dangerous and they said because of terrorism. They said, "Oh, well, the Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore." But in 1991, the Soviet Union disappeared. They said there is going to be a series of pandemic. Then of course in 1981, AIDS came.
So, I thought, "Well, I'll go forward 10 years to 2060. Between 2040 and 2045, something really significant is going to happen. It's going to change culture very profoundly." I got all of this information from them, the viewers, and A, almost everything they said has either happened or is in the process of happening. But B, many of the things that they told me were simply unbelievable at the time. I'll just give you two examples.
Uh I asked him if there was a nuclear war because of course that's what I was really worried about. And they said, "No." And I said, "Oh, well, then the world must be much safer." And they said, "No, no, the world is much more dangerous." And I said, "Why?" And they said, "Because of terrorism." Now, in 1978, 79, the only terrorism that was going on that we were paying much attention to was the Protestant conflict in Ireland. You know, the Protestants and the Catholics. So, the idea that terrorism would become a massive problem uh just I couldn't make any sense of it.
And they Then I said, "Well, you know, what about the Soviet Union? What's happening with the Soviet Union?" And to my astonishment, these people and again, it's not an individual single viewer, what we're talking about here is I interview a lot of people and what I'm looking for is consensus where they a number of them agree. They said, "Oh, well, the Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore." And I went to a friend of mine who was on the National Security Council with whom I'd been working and said, "Can you think?" And he said, "You know, I don't know. No, no, that's not going to happen." Because of course we saw the world in those days in these two big superpowers. But in 1991, the Soviet Union disappeared.
And the other example I'll give you is I said, "Let's talk about health care." And they said to me, describe health care. I would get to that a little later on, but the thing that really stood out for me was they said, "Well, there was a series there is going to be a series of pandemic." I said, "Pandemics?" You know, I'm thinking 1918 Spanish flu, right? And they said, "Well, the first one will be a blood disease that crosses over from primates in Africa to humans and kills millions of people." And I went to a friend of mine who was then the deputy director of National Institutes of Health and said, "Do you know anything about a blood disease that's about to spread all over the world and kill millions of people? And it crossed over from primates to humans and and he said, "Whatever it is you're smoking, Stanton, quit. Because that's crazy talk." >> [music] >> And of course in 1981, AIDS came. And but they said there would be a series of these which was even stranger to me. But then of course, comes SARS and >> [music] >> H5N1 and and now we're going through COVID. You know, talking to somebody in '78, '79 that '81, '82, that sort of thing, telling you that there're going to be a series of pandemics that are going to kill millions of people all over the world just didn't make any sense.
So, anyway, I decided there was an outstanding question which I could not answer. That was when a person gives you a remote viewing uh data gives you remote viewing data about an event in the future, are they giving you a fixed future, or are they describing the highest probability at the moment you're asking the question? And uh we don't have an answer for that. So, I thought, well, I'll go forward 10 years to 2060, and I will see if the 2060 data materially differs from the 2050 data because that will answer that question.
I have gotten out of 2060 a number of things which are basically continuities of the 2050 data. Um climate change particularly in in the 2050 data, I would talk to people, let's say you were in Los Angeles, and I'd say, well, what's Los Angeles like in 2050? And they would say things like, "Well, you know, a a lot of it is underwater." And I thought, underwater? They said, "Oh, yeah, you know, Santa Monica, uh Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, that that's that's all underwater." And when I would interview people who were in Virginia Beach, they would say the same kind of thing to me, right? Or in Norfolk. Or when I was um in coastal areas in Europe, and I would do the cuz I did it with thousands of people, and they would tell me the same thing we're in Japan. So, I didn't know it I didn't know anything about climate change until 1991 when I read an article in American Scientist. That was the first thing I ever read about climate change. And when I went around and talked to another friend who was one of the directors of the climate weather research and said, you know, can you tell me about why large parts of Los Angeles would be underwater? Uh he said, no, I can't tell you that. >> [music] >> Where do you get this kind of stuff?
The 2060 data uh continues the same sense of climate change that the 2050s began and I now see that as a much more significant than most people realize or are preparing for. When I planned the 2060 data, I thought uh what I will do is I will create a questionnaire and I got a thousand people to specifically not In fact, I tell them this, don't give me your intuition, don't give me your speculation, give me your intellectual assessment based on what you know of what the future will be like. And one of the things that I am comparing is do the rationals, that's what we call them, do the rationals have a different view of the future than the people who use non-local consciousness? And um the answer is they do. That is they're not the same. That the rationals have different views about this than the um than the people who are doing remote viewing.
I just got a hint out in 2050 and didn't get it all from the rationals, between 2040 and 2045, something really significant is going to happen. It's going to change culture very profoundly. Now, I'm not quite sure what it is. It could be uh the European Union has just committed to exiting uh carbon-powered vehicles by 2035. Um before it was 2040. The climate change uh projections also look like they're going to become very dramatic in the 2040 to 2045 range. And the 2060s, or whatever it is that happens between 2040 and 2045, by 2060 it's over. Or the culture has accommodated for it. Because the what stood out for me in the 2060s is they would say, "Well, you know, things are back to back to some kind of normality and and I said, "What do you mean they're back to?" Well, there was this thing that happened in between 2040 2045 that >> [music] >> really changed the whole world. And uh but now we've we've sort of adjusted for it. And um and we think uh we we we we think we've gotten through it. So, I don't know what that is. I suspect climate change or maybe the exit from uh carbon-powered engines. Um but happily at least uh 2060, they figure themselves as being on the other side of it.
For instance, I just to give you a an example of this is from the 2060 data. In 2060, I have been for some years, as you know, very concerned about what I've called the great schism trend, the separation of the blue states and the red states. Uh I mean, I really see that as a as a crisis. And when I talk to the 2060s, they they tell me that the things that are creating so much crisis for us, the LGBTQ uh phobias, the white supremacy stuff, that no longer seems to be a big issue, nor does gender equality seem to be a big issue. They tell me in the 2060s that the United States still exists, but real power has go gone to the states and combinations of regional groups of states, although there is still is a federal government. But in the sense that you get from the 2060s, which is quite different than you get from the rationals, who mostly see things sort of continuing with the United States and in leadership, is that from the 2060 remote viewing part, they're now talking about the United States no longer being the world leader in everything, either technology or uh uh that it's a country that is that still exists, cuz I was concerned it might not even exist, but it still exists, but is very different than it is today.
People are living in smaller communities. There is a kind of minimalist, if I guess that word would work, minimalist culture. The descriptions of houses, [music] for instance, that where people live, seem much simpler than the rationals describe or um than most people anticipate. So, what I see is a country that doesn't have Not a single person says there's a a gas vehicle on the the everything seems to be run by electricity. Um they describe that it goes through phases, and I now can see these phases emerging. The first is building um charging stations. That's the sort of the gas station model. But, what they mostly describe in 2060 is that roadways uh charge the vehicles that drive on them. And they're powered not uh they're powered by solar and wind. And that vehicles are quite different. People aren't traveling as much. Air travel still exists, but is There doesn't seem to be as much travel.
Um People health care has radically changed. Um Not only do we seem to have in 2060 universal birthright uh health care as opposed to the kind of system we have now. I call it the illness profit system. Um but, there also has just been a change in the technology of medicine because the hospitals they describe seem very different than the hospitals that you would go to today. One of the major trends I would say in general with the the 2060s is that the things they describe seem more not just organic in the but there seems to be an increased recognition that we live in a matrix of consciousness. That all consciousness is interconnected and interdependent. That agriculture has changed radically. >> [music] >> That chemical industrial poison based monoculture agriculture seems to have been replaced by communities growing more of their own food. I'm That's just what I'm working on right at the moment. Is Is looking at that particular material. The descriptions that they give is that people A, don't move around as much. B, they live in smaller communities. And C, they seem to provide for themselves better locally than having large long distance shipping.
But one of the things that I personally was concerned about so I asked about it is the development of the CRISPR technology for genetic manipulation genetic engineering. And my concern I've written about this several papers is the is the emergence of another hominin species Homo Superior. And so I'm trying to find out I didn't ask it quite the way I would have asked it if I had known more about it when I started this several years ago. But I'm So I may get some more do some more remote viewing because I can see that the development of another hominid species would be very dramatic.
In general, all of my projects, the archaeology and criminology projects, you got a you there is a significant share of the data, 35 to 40%, that there's just no way to evaluate. For instance, if you're finding a sunken ship and uh the remote viewer says the captain was thinking about his children uh and his wife as his boat was sinking. Well, I mean, that may be true. That's perfectly logical, but there's no way to ever check that unless he left a message or, you know, unless some kind of data that you could check. So, I as you know, I I'm only interested in data that can be objectively verified. And so, uh again, yes, you're correct. Between 35 and 40%, I don't know what to do with it because it's about feelings, it's about um how people's attitudes about something change. Well, you know, I just there's no way to do that. So, but of the 60 65% that remains, uh if this data is consistent with the other experiments, I expect to see 75 to 85% of it be correct or partially correct.
Remote viewing is not a magic bullet. It's not a you know, it's not a it's not a a thing that avoids work. It's a it's a technique like any technique that assesses information. You know, basically, I got this idea that consensus uh protocol, not only from cardiac but also because I've been an investigative reporter. And you know, if you're doing investigative reporting, you don't rely on one source. You go around you interview a number of sources and you see, you know, where do they agree, where do they disagree? And in the intelligence world and I was in that world as well, they do the same thing. You know, you have human intelligence, you have electronic mechanical intelligence. So you don't you're looking at all of the pieces and trying to figure out where the consensus is are. And so I'm doing exactly the same thing. It's just that the data is sourced from non-local consciousness.
And what I'm coming away with from both the 2050 and the 2060 data is that in our future we are going to have a culture which is grounded on the idea that we live in a matrix of consciousness. You know, I've just been looking at papers over the last couple of weeks that talking about how dependent we are on animals and insects and other things. And we don't we don't think about that. You know, I mean, how how often do most people think about bees? And yet 70% of the food we eat is dependent on pollination that occurs because of bees. And the bees are under enormous threat. So when you recognize that you live in a matrix of consciousness not the Abrahamic idea that you know, we have dominion over the earth and it's a kind of like we got left a bank account by a rich uncle and instead you begin thinking in terms of what I'm doing and what other people are doing is having an effect all across the matrix of consciousness that changing consciousness, which is what I'm seeing particularly in the 2060 people, that they they talk about the world when they describe it from a different perspective. And that perspective is this idea that we're all interlinked and that >> [music] >> we are all interdependent.
As we move into the future the kind of world we want to have needs to be based on well-being. Not profit. You can have profit, but you need to focus first of all on well-being. And I think when I get through with the 2050-2060 data with the analysis, that may be the biggest takeaway that we get. [music]