Transcription
This may well be one of the most important videos that I've seen in a long time. You may well have seen that Candace Owens has gone on a trip to Russia, which, uh, from what I understand, was initially kind of framed as like a a family trip. But here she is actually peering at, uh, the, what was it called, the Putin St. Petersburg Economic Forum, where she talks about, uh, you know, her beliefs and, um, presumably, you know, common ground she has, uh, with Putin's Russia, like, you know, being anti-feminist and all of that. And Glenn Beck, in this video here, uh, explains how what's going on with Candace's trip to Russia is about something far more sinister. I mean, we would already consider it sinister, but more, it goes deeper in terms of a cynical Russian plot, uh, that ties in everything that we've been seeing more and more conservative podcasters falling to these, these crazed, uh, positions that mimic the woke left on its dislike of America and belief in America and supporting America's geopolitical enemies, um, moving against the kind of free market capitalist position that conservatives have typically had. And he says that this is part of a cynical plan that's going on that people like Candace and others are falling for. And it outlines this in a way that I really wasn't so aware of with such, uh, specificity. And in particular, there's a man that Glenn talks about, uh, that is, uh, massively influential in Putin's Russia, called Alexander Dugan. You need to check this out because this stuff is, uh, very dark indeed.
>> All right, there is the Russian influence operation targeting Candace Owens and you. It's a story at glenbeck.com. The internet is absolutely on fire right now over the latest revelation that American podcaster Candace Owens, uh, has some undisclosed, uh, activities in Russia with known intelligence and propaganda operatives. Torch Insiders, we have to tip the hat to you because you were critical in unearthing the truth about her visit. But Candace Owens's suspicious trip to Russia is not actually the story. Her trip is just proof of the real story. And I'm not going to reduce this into some a conversation about, you know, her or anything else. You take that on your own time. I think the big story here is that one of the most followed conservative voices in America, Candace Owens, told her audience that she was going on vacation to Russia, St. Petersburg, Orthodox Cathedrals, a little faith tourism with her husband. Great. Nothing wrong with that. Then we started hearing things, um, and, uh, the insiders started showing, uh, some things that were not comfortable. We turned Ryan Morrow on to this, um, and he did something really embarrassingly simple. He just read the program, looked at the facts, followed the breadcrumbs, and read the program. And there she was. She was listed as a speaker, uh, at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. That is SpyF Spefy. This is the Kremlin's flagship event, and it's running this week. And this is the one where Vladimir Putin gives the keynote. Now, you scroll down that same guest list in a few days now, a few names down, you will also find a very dangerous man, a Russian philosopher named Alexander Dugan. She has now said she might meet him, meet with him. Um, but she's speaking on the same stage as he is and Putin is. This whole thing, you know, happens all the time. SPF. It's a hot spot for Russian intelligence. It's organized by the seniormost levels of the Russian government. Top advisers and the first deputy director of the FSB, which is the successor to the KGB, are on the organizing committee. Investigative documents now show that SPICE activity, specifically including its panels, are quote recruitment pipelines for state-directed stop soft power programs. Read that as, uh, uh, propaganda, and it's where they, and I'm quoting, enlist foreign influencers in projects such as media partnerships. The files state that the panels are particularly used for this purpose. Owens is on a panel filled with known Russian disinformation agents in that are sanctioned by the US and the EU. The story is what we found the second we started pulling the thread with Ryan Morrow, because the thread does not lead to Candace. It leads to someone else. A handful of really smart people spent an afternoon doing homework. And what they turned up wasn't gossip about, you know, some podcast or vacation. It was a flare going up over one name. Alexander Dugan. And once you actually read who this man is, you understand why every alarm worth having started to ring.
So, let me introduce you to the most dangerous man you probably have never heard of or studied unless you're a longtime listener of this program. They call, uh, Alexander Dugan, Putin's brain. Putin's brain. He is the philosopher of the modern Russia project. He has been remarkably, uh, honest about the project and what it is. In 1997, before most of us had email, he published a book laying out how to defeat the United States of America without firing a shot. Um, he wrote, "Russia should encourage all kinds of separatism, ethnic, social, radical, and racial conflicts, uh, and support isolationist tendencies in US policies. Those circles who believe the US should confine itself only to its domestic problems." Now tell me that doesn't sound like a weather report for the last 10 years. Let me say that again. Russia should encourage all kinds of separatism, ethnic, social, and racial conflicts and support isolationist tendencies in US politics. Those circles that believe the US should confine itself to domestic problems. That is the story of what is happening with many of our podcasters on the right in the last two years. That's it. That's the strategy. Now, I'm not saying you can't come to that on your with your own conclu, you know, your own ideas and say, "I didn't have anything to do with." But did you make that decision? Did you come to that, or is this part of the propaganda?
What makes Dugan so frightening is the really terrifying theology underneath, because it's even more strange. Dugan preaches that Russia is the, uh, kchon tekkon, I think is how you say it in Russian. It is the force prophesied to hold back the antichrist, and that history is bending towards the final battle between a satanic West and a holy alliance of Orthodox Russia and the Muslim world. So let me just clear, say this clearly. It's going to take us a while to get through all of this. This is so important. Please, please stay with me. The Tekkon, he believes, is Russia. And Russia is the force that he says is prophesied to hold back the antichrist. That there is a, the antichrist is coming in the satanic West, and it will be held back by a holy alliance of Orthodox Mother Russia and the Muslim world. Okay. Okay. So this Tsarist form of Christianity is very similar to Islamism in its dedication to unifying the Muslim world, the, uh, Umma, under a caliphate. Th this Tsarist, uh, theology needs the caliphate to, uh, Katechon is identified with the Roman Empire, the Holy Roman Empire, the church, the Holy Spirit, uh, or a Christian figure. And this is the way he uses it, a Christian monarch. Okay. According to Nazi philosopher, yeah, we get to go back to the Nazis on this philosophy, Carl Schmidt. Um, Tehon represents any strong political authority or empire that maintains order and prevents total chaos and anarchy. It delays the end of the world by holding back apocalyptic disorder, making normal history and politics possible. So he's saying that Russia is that source that is going to hold back the West. Russia's Tsarist Christianity sees Islamism as more than an ally of convenience against a common enemy, but as the permanent partner in a joint holy war against the West. Dugan is suggesting that the final battle, the apocalypse, I know this sounds crazy, but please, it doesn't matter if you believe it, he believes it. And much of this is what he is spreading. This is what this conference is about. Okay. This battle will feature a Zionist and Western coalition led by, get this, a Jewish antichrist facing off against a coalition consisting of the Muslim world, led by the Mahadi, the Masonic or the Messianic figure, uh, for Islam, and Christians led by a mysterious figure or entity called the CCon that is prophesied to, you know, resist the antichrist. Dugan believes Russia is that mysterious figure along with the Mahadi.
Now, this is an operation to get you and your faith and your country to split up. And it is a genius, genius operation. And the payload doesn't arrive in an enemy uniform. It arrives waving our flag. It quotes our scripture. It hates the same thing you hate and are passionate about. Dugan said it himself. The delivery vehicle is the American right. You are the target, and not because you're foolish, but because you're faithful, because you carry real wounds. You worry about our families, our churches, our country's soul, the evil that has become our culture. And a real wound is the easiest place on earth to slip in poison and call it medicine. So I'm not going to stand here and point at those people over there who got fooled, because that would be the single most propagandized thing I could do. I'm going to tell you the truth. The people running this game are praying that I don't figure out, or perhaps I'm not willing to admit, this system was built to fool people first, like me. People like me in my job. It's meant to fool them because it's meant to move through trusted voices, popular podcasters, friends, sincere believers, people who will believe this are sincere in their faith in Christ. They are sincere in their love of country. But they will hear the message that Dugan is giving and saying, and they'll say, because he is right on his analysis on what is happening to the West. It is evil. It's his solution that you must run from. Now, there are going to be people that are fooled. Surely, they have no idea in the current that they're swimming in because they haven't done their their homework. Or maybe they just, I don't, I don't want to judge. And then there are those who will knowingly be a part of this because they believe Dugan's solution is right. Destroy the American church, destroy the American culture, and destroy the American government and throw in line with the Islamists because they want a purified world, too. The line between being wrong and being used is real, and it's not for me to read anyone's heart, but I can read the pattern. This is meant to fool me. So then I knowingly or unknowingly fool you. And the tell is never the complaint. Share every grievance about this culture, and I'll share most of them with you. The tell is the conclusion. When the answer to every single problem seems to be the same. Blame your own country. Distrust your own people. Distrust people who think a lot like you but don't agree. Call them an enemy. Admire a strong man here or across the sea. Stop. Stop. That is not where faith leads. That's where the operation leads.
But surely Glenn, I mean, he's saying a lot of right things. And I don't have to go with all of it. And I'd notice something that's crazy. Would you, would you, would you notice two years ago claiming that Winston Churchill, not Hitler, was the real villain of the Second World War? Everyone, of everyone, two years ago would have said, "You're insane." But then the right podcaster had the right person say it, and enough people with and say it with enough confidence that now it's just an interesting take floating in the discourse that Hitler wasn't the bad guy, Churchill was. And that is the whole machine in one example. A fringe idea doesn't kick down the door. It gets invited in by someone you trust. It takes off its coat, and by the time you notice it's still standing in the living room, it's been there for years.
>> Wow. Wow. I mean, we've, we've known that there's something that it's been this strange occurrence of conservative podcasters falling and turning on Israel and Trump and many basic conservative American principles and belief in America. It's part of this demoralization campaign, as Ben Shapiro calls it, and we've been seeing it happening. But now we're starting to get a sense that this is maybe some kind of concerted effort. And frankly, it makes sense, doesn't it? Because the conservative coalition in America is really the ones that are leading the charge of pro-American, uh, conservative principles that are supporting the strategic alliance with Israel, supporting, uh, American, uh, geopolitical dominance in the in the world rather than appeasement and caving to its enemies. Um, and also showing that you can have that kind of biblical morality that some of the conservative podcasters may think they share with Russia without having Russia's, uh, authoritarianism, alliance with Islamists, and all that kind of stuff. It's really dark stuff. Uh, you know, I, uh, if anyone that's familiar also with some of the end of days, uh, Tanakh Torah texts, some people see that there is some kind of indication that some kind of force in the north, and some people point, think it points to Russia, um, as being involved in this, as being on the bad side of this kind of end of days, uh, like scenario. Very cryptic, hard to really know what's going on. Um, but I've definitely heard it said before that Esau, Asov in Hebrew, the twin brother of Jacob, has like a good part and a bad part to him. Represented by the good manifestation is America, the founding of America, American values, uh, and, and on the negative side, that being, uh, Russia. Also, what's interesting is that after the, uh, fall of Rome, and after the fall of, uh, Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in the 1400s, Russian intellectuals in Tsars claimed that Moscow was the the legitimate successor to Rome. And I just find that interesting because the Talmud says that Rome is destined to rise and fall three times. And I don't know, perhaps is that related to Russia, the Soviet Union? Hard to know exactly. But what is clear is that what people have been saying, and there's been this, these traditions, uh, throughout the centuries of the pillar of Islam and Russia being these key figures in the kind of, you know, uh, final stages, uh, before the redemption. It's kind of, it's definitely something that, uh, seems to be, um, manifesting today in very clear political ways, and it makes sense. Russia's strategy. They see that their primary target with America is this coalition, and so they want to divide it.
Now, the question of course is how people like Glenn, who recognize the insanity of this, want to address it. And he's saying, I'm very cautious and careful to name, uh, people and create, stoke more division, because that's playing into Russia's hands. Now, I can definitely, uh, understand that strategy, um, because when you start naming people and calling them out, you're potentially, you know, strengthening their, their platforms even more and strengthening division, strengthening more people against you, whereas he wants to build a coalition. I do understand that. Um, and I think Glenn's strategy is probably sort of saying, look, I'm going to keep pushing for all the right principles, but I'm not going to name names. Now, from my standpoint, I'm, listen, I, I'd be interested to know your thoughts in the comments section about what you think is the right approach. From my standpoint, um, I feel like these people, Tucker, Candace, and others, have such huge platforms. I'm not really actually amplifying them in a way. They already are being amplified. And so we need to address them head-on, and that's my way of trying to keep this coalition and this moral clarity present. Because if they're making, uh, you know, headlines, the way you approach it is by being absolutely clear and firm. I think JD Vance's approach, uh, to basically, I can, I think he's almost like trying to pander a little bit, give a wink and a nod to the gropers, even though he may not be a fully paid-up groper. Um, to me, the approach of saying, well, we have his approach of saying, well, I have to do that because otherwise we'll lose them. I don't think that's leadership. I think leadership is being absolutely morally clear and firm, and, you know, showing that you don't cave, you don't compromise, whilst also always being open to communication, to dialogue, to conversation, but but not bending for expediency, but showing clear principle. I think that's what has to carry, carry the day. And so the principle that we stoke more division by amplifying or responding to the things that people are saying to divide us. In some ways, I, I wonder, do we even have a choice when you have people with such massive platforms saying all this nonsense? Do we have a choice to respond to them or not? Because the notion that, well, you don't respond, therefore you dampen the division. No, they're pushing the division. It's happening whether we like it or not. So isn't the answer therefore that you have to at least show people whose lives are prepared to be open, whose ears are prepared to listen, what the truth actually is, because many people will resonate to that and are desperate for it and are yearning to hear it? I guess the key question is, do you at the very least, you know, because I, I'm sure Glenn would agree with that, but then the question is, do you actually name these people? Now, look, I don't think, I think there's a legitimate argument to be had here. I'd welcome your thoughts in the comments, what you think. Um, I think you can make the case for either side. You name people because then you can be specific about them, so people know exactly what you're talking about, what, um, argument you're addressing, who you're addressing. On the other hand, it can potentially stoke more and more heat and division and and misdirect the conversation. Um, when you want to be talking about values. But I think the one thing we can agree upon is that we definitely shouldn't be leaning into the personal attacks. You criticize what the person is saying. Um, but getting into all this stupid name-calling stuff and, you know, the stuff like Megan Kelly and others are doing, that I'm, I'm sure we can all agree upon is not, uh, necessary and not right, and is just going to stoke more division. It is not divisive and not going to create more division to call out people who are stoking division, who are saying bad ideas. That's the, uh, uh, the false pretense that I just want to to conclude by by stating. Um, we have a duty to do that because otherwise these people are going to continue to make more and more inroads.
On October 28th, 2023, just days after the Hamas October 7th massacre, Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, stood before the cameras and quoted it. The Israel critics reacted with horror, but almost nobody stopped to ask, "What does it actually mean?" Amalik, the word is thousands of years old. It appears in the Torah, the Bible, in the Talmud, in the writings of the great rabbis. The Torah command is clear: "A malik must be wiped out." And yet, most people have almost no idea what a malik really is. Because a malik is not simply an ancient tribe. It's a force, a spiritual virus, the voice inside civilizations and inside every single human being that whispers, "Nothing is sacred. Morality isn't worth it." And it sees as its greatest enemy, the Jews. 3,000 years of Jewish wisdom says this force is the most dangerous thing in the world. And amazingly, the Talmud, written almost 2,000 years ago, names a place it calls Guramia. And it predicts if this force were ever fully unleashed, it would destroy the world. Gamia sounds familiar. Centuries later, the Jewish thinkers who crawled out of the Nazi death camps sat with that passage and felt the ground move beneath them. In this JTV Plus documentary, we're going to reveal what a malik really is, what the commandment to eliminate a Malik really means, and why its defeat is the condition for the redemption of the world. To watch this JTV Plus documentary and access much more premium content, click on the link in the video description.