Transcription
Hello there. How you doing? By the way, I'll be posting the link with all these diagrams and pictures and quotes on my Substack. The link to my Substack is in the description of every video below. Yeah, keep it simple. It's an old saying called KISS. Keep it simple. I'll leave out that last word, the kiss statement.
You know, books on the ether actually are um repressed works. Um the stuff and I've been through more books than anybody you'll ever meet. I'm not trying to brag. The the point is is that all the stuff on the ether and the stuff that Tesla said about the ether, it's not out there in the community. And if you go to like a university uh library, you usually won't find it there. There are more than a few books on the ether.
Now, this is the important part. There's a million different theories and ideas about the ether. There has been since the dawn of time. There's ideas of stationary mo ether and moving ether and ether drag and ether winds. And so it's just kind of like ideas about religion. You know, there's a million and of course I don't ever touch religion. Million different views and positions and theories. So when I say the ether, woo, I hit the monitor there. I'm not referring to something, you know, it's like, oh, the ether was disproven. No, nutty theories about the ether have been disproven that were illogical and irrational, but it's 100% impossible to disprove the ether.
One of the authors whose works are oppressed and repressed. You can't get a hold of him, but I've already digitized them. This a guy by the name of Carl Friedrich Craft. Let's see. K R A A FT Craft. Kind of like Craft Cheese, but a little bit different. His one book is called Ether Vortices and his other book is called Glimpses into an Unseen Universe. He actually wrote several books, but those are the two primary works on the ether. And he gives you a lot of demonstrable evidences for the ether. And he talks about the ether. And he talk about the anthropomorphization of the ether over time into the fact that it would be sentient. This of course is where we get religions from.
And uh this is true. You never people actually talk about Tesla. By the way, Tesla never won a Nobel Prize. I don't know if you know that or not. you know, the guy that invented the AC generator and countless other inventions and gave us basically the modern world. This guy never won a Nobel Prize. Of course, I have no respect for the Nobel Prize at all. He told you flat out the ether is a substrate of the universe. He did.
The guy that actually perfected his motor, who's even infinitely more intelligent than Nicola Tesla, nowhere near as many inventions as this guy. He was only like 3 foot nine. He had a type of dwarfism. His name is Charles Proteius Steinmets. This is from his book in 1917, electrical discharges, waves, and impulses on page 14. So unfortunately the prehistoric conception of electrostatic charges on the conductors still exists and by its use destroys the analogy between the two not one two components of the electric field that being magnetism and dialectricity.
There's another guy who actually says the same thing down here below. I got quite a few of his books. One of them is down here gravitation and co-ravitation. It's actually this one is causality electromagnetic um uh induction by Dr. Olig DJ Jeff Famco. Here's an image of him and a quote from him. Maxwell's equations which is the basis for basically all modern electrical theory. Neither Maxwell's equations, none of them actually, nor their solutions indicate an existence of causal links between the dialectric and magnetic fields. Therefore, we must conclude that an electric field is a dual entity always having a dialectric and magnetic component.
Dr. Ole, he had two PhDs by the way. Later later in his life, he actually grew a funny little mustache. I'll let you figure out what kind of mustache that is that was kind of not very popular and you'll never see anybody having it today. So, I'm glad I didn't post a picture of him in his later years, you know, with that funky mustache. I'm not going to even say who famously sported that mustache, but nobody today has that mustache for that very reason.
This is also two CP Steinmets from his book. He wrote many many books. The magnetic and the dialectric field of the conductors both are included as meaning the term electrical field and are the two components of the electric field of the conductor and this is very simple. I want to talk about the ether and some ether analogies here briefly briefly and talk about ether wind. I have created these diagrams to make things actually simple for you. And I'd like to take a look at the these two diagrams. Yeah. The dialectric and this is from his book. This diagram is the most important diagram in the whole universe. By the way, it's not my opinion. That's a fact. It's the electric field circuit. These two black spots would be like the AC lines running down the backyard, for example. And this is the conjugate field. The dash lines are the dialectric and the solid lines are the circulatory magnetic and the intersection of these is the coaxial union which makes up that thing that people call electricity and people thought I came up with the word dialectricity until they found out it's like no I'm quoting all the gods of field theory and people today and Steinmets this guy he said the same thing over 100 years ago in 1917 he basically said everybody's nuts they've convoluted What electricity is is the constituent of two things. When you have the intersection of these two things, the two conjugate fields of the universe, you have something that runs perpendicular to those two along uh the line of uh uh of the circuit and that's what we call electricity. The dialectric axis is perpendicular to the conductor surface. Yeah, this is a dash lines. It's perpendicular. It's curve linear as is all fields in the universe. The magnetic is parallel but also to circulatory to the conductors. These are the circular whirlpool lines around the conductor lines. The electric axis is coaxial to the conductor in the direction of the circuit. Voltage which is equal to the dialectric and amperage is equal to the magnetic make up together what is called the electric field or more simply the conjugate pair of the universe which comprises what human beings call electricity. Yeah. And it makes it even simpler. This is a quote from myself if you don't mind. Magnetic field is 90 degrees to the dialectric field. And likewise, the dialectric field is 90° relative to the magnetic. Simple. Yeah. And they are. This is 100% fact. It's 100% impossible to refute it. Okay. We we're here so far. You know, we're halfway through and none of this is refuted. But this is where the important thing comes in. Importantly and necessitatively so due to field pressure as it must be. So the electric field is 90° relative to both the dialectric and the magnetic fields. This electric field is coaxial to the conductor direction of the circuit. Uh all of humanity has absolutely no clue as to the nature of what electricity actually is which is a compound of the dialectric and magnetic field. You have the dialectric here and the magnetic here which you can see in this diagram they are 90° and this of course where you get into look go look up the right hand rule on a Google search or Bing search just look up right hand rule yep this is the dialectric this is the magnetic well 90° uh inverse to both of those is the direction of of the current well the direction direction of that conductor current down the lines if you will is uh the electric field. But the electric field is the composite of the dialectric and the magnetic. Yeah. Dialectric, magnetic, magnetic, dialectric. When you know one, you know where the other two are. This is what the right-h hand rule is about. If I know where the dialectric is, then I know where the magnetic is. And if I know where the magnetic is, I know where the electric is. And if I know where the magnetic is, I know where the dialectric is. On and on. If I know where the electric is, I know where the magnetic is. On. Very, very simple. Well, you only have to know where one is based upon the right-h hand rule, which is wellestablished fact. Yet, given this fact, you can't even talk to I've been an electrician for 40 years. Like, do you know what dialectricity is? I never heard of it. I know what a dialectric medium is. Which I do know, but they think electricity is something and so does everybody else out there.
The same reason everybody thinks light is something which of course it's not. All of these seven things said about light are incorrect. Light is not a wave. It's not a particle. It's not a wave particle. It's not an emission. It's not traveling. It does not have a speed. It is not a duality. Of course, there are no dualities in nature. All wave phenomena require a medium. There are no exceptions to this fact. Likewise, nobody in the universe can imagine a wave phenomena without a medium. It's 100% impossible. So-called C or what people call speed of light is the maximum rate of induction at which a medium can be disturbed. This assumes speed of light as the hysteresus of the ether. This medium hysteresus simply and purely is the lag value of the permeability and permitivity of the ether as against itself or its lag phenomena or what people call speed of light. Well, when someone says speed, everybody in the universe thinks something is moving. But light is not an emission and it's not moving. Nicola Tesla said this. It's 100% undeniable. This ratio between the elasticity and density of the medium, the ether is what the ignorant human beings call sea. Light is very simply a pinch wrinkle of the ether. Yeah. Light cannot be anything but a longitudinal disturbance of the ether involving alternating compressions and refractions. In other words, light can be nothing but a soundwave of the ether. This is a direct quote from Nicola Tesla. Yet the entire world thinks all these things 1 through 7 are true of light and they're all false.
The entire world thinks that electricity is a phenomena but it's not. It's a compound of the dialectric and magnetic. Is it the dialectric and the magnetic and if you know where these two are the third the electric field is this direction. You got these two here dialect magnetic. Therefore based upon the right-h hand rule the propagation of the uh of the of the electric field of the current of the electric field down the the power lines is that direction right-hand rule very simple. They admit to 80% of it yet they think electricity is a thing but electricity is not a thing itself.
Let's get into the ether wind here briefly and kind of quickly. I think this is the quote I just made. Yeah. The velocity of sound wave depends on a certain ratio between elasticity and density for this ether which is called this Nicola Tesla which is accurate. Relativity is a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense. Einstein is a law long-haired crank. It's direct quote from Nicola Tesla. All of this stuff is oppressed. They don't want you knowing this stuff. Just like you can't find Carl Friedrich Craft's books. You may able to find them in a rare bookstore somewhere. But the false assumption of the ether was thought necessary to explain the propagation of light by means of transport vibration which can only occur in a solid. Even today, this false theory has many supporters despite it being the so-called Herzian. He's actually going against Herzian waves. This is a long quote but it's just a reputation of the idea that uh you know light is a herzian wave phenomena. Light propagates with the same velocity irrespective of its source. Such consistency can only be explained that is solely dependent upon the properties of the medium especially its density and elasticity. Which is accurate?
Light This is a quote from Tesla. That which we call matter is merely a vortices or warp pools in or of the ether. All atoms are compounded hydrogen. Hydrogen of course is an inductance barrier of light or the capacitance threshold of light the energy of which then becomes spherical in frequency and propagation is halted. Whereas propagation barrier light this is a reconciliation of light and matter. Makes it really simple. is a direct quote from Walter Russell. There are no nuclear particles at at Adam's center. The concept of the particle is real. It's just not that they're actual particles like little marbles at the center of an atom. This is there's no such thing as an electron. And that's not me saying that. That's Nicola Tesla saying that. In fact, they are holes kind of like the eyes of a cyclone inside of every atom.
I gave people the analogy um Heavyside were talking about early generators that they were quote churning up the ether which is the correct way of seeing things churning up the ether. I was telling people last night in live stream say you had like a an airplane in the front yard with propeller propeller airplane and you knew nothing about air or you denied it existed. I mean of course everybody knows what air is but let's just pretend you didn't know what air was right. It's all still and undisturbed. You have no conception of it. Yeah. You turn on the propeller of the airplane and it starts generating this impulse of air compression fronts. This would be analogous of course to electricity. Now, and of course it has a cycle just as the propeller bays are causing a cycle of uh compression fronts which have a force to them which is palpable and measurable. Would you think that the airplane propeller was generating something or was it disturbing a medium. Say you didn't know anything about the air, you know, to make the analogy pretty perfect. You didn't know anything about it. All of a sudden though, when you turn on the propeller and it's rotated with respect to time, just like a so-called AC generator, which doesn't generate anything, would you think that the airplane or the propeller was generating anything? Well, the answer is no. It's not generating anything. It's causing a disturbance in the medium. Nothing emits sound either. We all think people and things emit sound. But they don't. They're generating a compression front in a medium. This compression front called waves. There's no such thing as a wave. A wave is not what things are. Rather what things do is longitudinal. It's a compression and refraction front of a medium. This is what Nicola This is what also too. There's a quote from Nicola Tesla. Said it's impossible that uh a candle which basically has no power is emitting which is not you know generating and emitting light at the exact same rate as the all powerful sun of ours. You know the idea that the sun and a candle which are like a trillion degrees a trillion vectors multiplicative uh multiplicatives of less power relative to one another are both emitting things at the same they're not emitting anything and certainly not being emitted. I mean he gave that as a near perfect analogy of the fact that this is of a medium. This is the only way you can reconcile candles emitting light, which they're not, versus the sun, which is infinitely more powerful. Nothing as so far as an AC generator generates power. You actually have a rotation and of course uh AC generator if explained simply is an inside out magnet. The magnetic field is in the inside and the dialectric reflectors on the outside. is rotated with respect to time and this manifest power to generate by pure English definition generation is a combination of two or more things. When you generate a cake you cake you take eggs, milk, butter and flour and whatever else and you you mix it together and you generate something. You know I make stuff out of leather. I generate it with my hands and leather tools and the leather itself and I'm generating something. I'm making something. An AC generator doesn't generate anything. It's causing the ether to manifest in the form once again the right-h hand rule between the magnetic and the dialectric with the time variable which gener which uh uh causes the manifestation of the electric field. There's no such thing as a wave phenomena without a medium.
By the way, this is that neat book. He wrote many books. This one's well read. Causality, electromagnetic induction and gravitation by Dr. Olivamco. He said the same thing Charles Freddy of Steinmet said. Here's another analogy. I think everybody did this at some point in their life where you have two pieces of styrofoam or you know whatever else that's in the tub and you pull the drain on the tub. The two objects are not headed towards one another in this premise of gravitation for example or so-called magnetic attraction which is not based in magnetism. They're not. Imagine the water is invisible. So you can't see the vortex when you pull the drain plug on the tub. You know there's a little uh vortex that's created. But just imagine the water is utterly invisible. And this is the way these uh these subg geniuses of academia actually came up with the idea of curved spacetime. But time is a measure which is not a thing. And space has no properties. That's a direct quote from Nicola Tesla. What are they accelerating towards? This is uh dialectric induction. The same thing we call gravity. The same thing uh we call magnetic attraction. The same thing we call electrostatic cling. When like warm socks are stuck to each other when you pull them out of the dry. Those are all the exact same phenomena. So imagine like two pieces of styrofoam in the bath water. You pull the plug. Once again, imagine the water is invisible. You know, if gravity were based upon how academia says they would be actually headed directly towards one another, the same thing is true of two magnets that would be accelerating never towards each other, rather towards a low pressure point between both. People say, well, gravity, no such thing as gravity. It's like, well, the phenomena of gravity is real, but gravity is not a field. It's an anti-field. All gravitational vectors, of course, are anti- spatial and anti- I mean, undeniably so. And by the way, the one thing I'll actually give credit to academicians about is they admit they have no idea what gravity is. They have no clue what it is. They flat out admit they don't know what it is. But if you take two pieces of styrofoam or two leaves or whatever and you pull a drain plug, same thing we actually see in in space between two or more objects, what they'll do is that they're not accelerating towards one another. What they do is they start to uh vortex around one another. Transis around this null pressure point between both. So they're not doing this number. The same thing you actually see when you pull the drain plug. Two leaves, two pieces of styrofoam, whatever floating on top of the tub water. They'll do this number where they start to spin around one one another and it gets tighter and tighter and tighter and then of course it'll vanish down. Once again, we have to imagine that the water is invisible. This vortex and this is just a low pressure point where the water is slipping down the drain, right? It's powerful enough. You take that analogy to its full completion intellectually. You're talking about what human beings call a black hole, which is a super mass with no magnitude. Because the only thing that keeps anything in the visible universe is magnetism. When magnetism is overthrown, we actually have this other thing. We have all the mass still present, but we have this. All the matter is still there, but everything is slipping down the galactic uh bathtub drain hole. Once again, the shower head drain analogy. Gravity is not a force anytime. And there's countless videos that I've seen. You'll see videos saying, "Oh, the force of gravity." Well, gravity is not a force. It's always an anti-spatial vector.
Also, too, they talk about antimatter. No such thing as antimatter. I mean, the hole at the center of a magnet is antimagnetism. But that's the plane of inertia. But it's not antimagnetism. It's the eraser. Everything in the universe of course is this conjugate principle. It's the dialectric. It is the inverse phase matter of a conventional matter. There's no such thing as antimatter. This is where academia ruins everything. If I say antimatter, you think it's the total opposite of matter. Well, it's not. That's like thinking one pole of a magnet is the anti-magnetism of the other pole or vice versa. It's completely ludicrous. Absolutely ludicrous.
We can also too reduce things further. I've already reconciled light and matter which makes it really simple. Every god of field theory said there's no such thing as electron that discovered the principle. St. JJ Thompson said that it was one unit of dialectric induction. I've got the quote in my book and countless other places where Tesla tells you there's no such thing as an electron. Every branch of science says a free it says a free neutron and this has been measured literally. All free neutrons spontaneously become protons. Go look that up by the way. You'll find it on every major academic site. Every one of them says that. Well, if all free neutrons spontaneously become protons, then that thing we call a neutron is just a modality of a proton. Man, this really really simplifies the universe. This means there's only one fundamental particle. A neutron is the different phase modality of a proton. And there's definitely no such thing as an electron. I mean, wireless power induction and 10,000 other observable undeniable phenomena will disprove that because they say, what is electricity? Is the flow of electrons through wires. Yes. Yes, it is. Yes, it is. Well, how does wireless power induction work? Well, ah wireless power induction even in a vacuum works exactly the same. I say, well, it's fields and lines of force. It's like, well, you never define what a field is. Lines of force is a conceptual abstraction. When people ask where the ether is, this is not applicable. A field is an ether perturbation modality. That explains a field really simply. What is the ether made of? Well, it was made of anything. It wouldn't even be the ether. So, we reconciled light and matter. We've reconciled the nonsense of an electron. We've reconciled the nonsense of a neutron. We've combined light and matter as propagation barrier uh light. It's just a pinch wrinkle of the ether. All of these seven assumed things about light are incorrect. Just as there's no such thing as electricity itself. Electricity is the consubstantiality of the magnetic and the dialectric of which its propagation circuit is 90 degrees inverse to both. Unless you think you're smarter than Nicola Tesla and Charles Prodius Steinance. Once again, this is the diagram of the whole universe right here. His books, by the way, will break your brain if you try to read them. Charles Proteius Steinman's books. A lot of them are free download on archive.org.
By the way, there's another proof and I could come up with easily 200 proofs of the ether. It's called the experiment of uh uh Gail Michaelelsson in 1925. Um they actually did interpherometry measurement at the earth's equator versus uh far far away from the equator and they noticed the discrepancy of 230 parts per thousand with an accuracy ratio of plus or minus five parts per thousand. And uh this experiment of course is compatible with the stationary ether since the earth's axis is probably perpendicular to the plane of the orbit around the sun necessarily follows that since the earth's gravitational field remains tied up with that of the sun that the ether around the earth cannot partake of the rotation of the earth's axis but should produce an ether drift of about 1/3 of a mile per second at the equator and much less elsewhere than the equator and such an ether drift actually exists was proved by this experiment in 1925. Do you think any you think you heard about the the Gail Michaelsson experiment and the fact that it proved the ether? No. You think you've heard about Carl Friedrich Craft's book ether vortices or glimpses of unknown world? No. You think you've heard of the quotes the countless quotes of uh Nicola Tesla and Eric Doard and Charles Pro's statement about the no is repressed and it's repressed on purpose. They don't want you they want you believing in relativity and quantum garbage but the universe doesn't work that way.
I'll have all these diagrams for you to look at and study. Email if you got any questions. Um but nothing generates power. An AC generator doesn't generate anything. Explaining how an AC quote generator works is simple. It's an inside out magnet. It manifests power. Whereas Charles Heavyside said, you know, the these generators quote unquote were churning at the ether. That's exactly what they're doing. That's exactly what they're doing. Ether wind. Kind of like the propeller on the airplane in your yard there, you know, like, oh my god, this this propeller and airplane are generating these force vectors of wind that's blowing in my face. It's not generating anything. It's churning up a medium. This is the ether wind generated by a quote unquote AC generator. This is a simple explanation to the universe is the simple explanation of power manifestation. Period. I hope you like these videos. If you got any questions, please check out my substack below. Any donation is always very warmly welcome. Luxas and have a wonderful day to you.