Noah's Flood Decoded: Ham 2

[Music] Long. [Music] Ro. Every day. That's a few for this. I want to see the. That's what I'm in. Pure hard. Narrow path. 10 to. Can't be in it for yourself. That ain't how it go. Get this message to his people. That make them will make. That's what I'm got. A we can't miss. Yeah. Box me in. Threw a seed in the ground and we boxed it in. Put the law on my line. Trying to reel them in. Yeah, my people at the bottom. Wilding in their s. Got to pull them up. They prize. Tell them that they special. Eyes wide open. Lost a light when they cross the waters on the boat. Yah. The Real's brother. He get all the V. Our high value price. Check y strap the S right now. Life's best preparation for the feast. We going to make a toast. Branded us in be sheet. Send us to our coast. I want to see the fire. That's what I'm in it for. Pure heart. Now path 10 to. Can't be in it for yourself. That ain't. Get this message to his people. That make. [Music] Make. We can't miss. Victory. Open the scriptures. Read. Open your eyes and see. To the prophecy. We from the chosen seat. You want to get all the glory. You just a piece of the story. To is mandatory. Got to keep moving forward. Prayer. Fear the vo. I can't stress enough. Got to stop messing up. Got to start tightening up. Stay on a narrow path. The light are brighten up. For real. Got to give them praise. Even on bad days. It's going to be better days. That's need a change. You got to change your ways. P down. I stand. I'm embedded to this truth. I get my right hand. Lay my life down. Understand. Keeping the to the very end. I want to see the. That's what I'm. Pure heart. Narrow path. 10 to. Can't be in it for yourself. That ain't how it go. Get this message to his people. That make will make me. That's what I'm in. Got a GL. We can't miss the show. I want to see the father. That's what I'm in it for. Pure heart. Narrow path. T to. Can't be in it for. [Music] Yourself. Two. Two things are the same. I was wondering why I felt like I had a bigger uh thing. So uh here right here. We about to go into uh something. I know the people ain't going to like. They ain't going to like what they. But uh Hao group E1 B1 A1. Which is ours. Is not indigenous to West Africa. I know a lot of people ain't gonna like this. They ain't gonna want to see this. But it is what it is. Let me check something real quick. Because I feel like I'm I'm missing some uh. Oh no. That we 41 slides in. I feel like that was too quick. How much time we in right now? Just you about an hour and 12 minutes in. All right. Well, before I going into this part right here. Is there anything you want to add, brother man? This right here going to be a bombshell. But uh, you know what I'm saying? Like powerful information. We got 40 people in the group. You know, some of our haters is watching. You know, we want the haters come in. Hit that like button. While you while you here. Hit that dislike button. Uh, with that being stated. What what the brother's bringing out is is powerful and impactful. And it's like I said, it's flipping a paradigm on its head. Because you've been told your whole life that you came from Africa. Um, a few things I would want to add into it. Is uh, the fact that the Sahara was devoid of of of human populations until about the last uh, the end of the last glacial uh, maximum. Um, so that's just even more proof. And going to the point that E never had a reason to even travel down south. And you brought the DNA. Um, about the components that were present in Southsan Africa. And none of those components are us. We not a. We not B. We not Kon. We not the forest people. We none of people, man. We not J. We not that R. That R1b that they finding over there in East Africa. We not uh E1 B1B. You know, even though it's our brother Clay. It ain't us. Exactly. Exactly. So, I mean, excellent job. Excellent breakdown, man. Very powerful information. Poignant information, man. Who said Israelites ain't got scholarship? Yeah. But let's go on ahead and roll this out. I got about 10 more tops and we done with this right here. Again, hlo group E1 B1 A1. Which is us. Is not indigenous to West Africa. All right. Garfield, y'all need to let that go. All right. That that just ain't what it is. Because we evidence right here. All right. Our knowledge of ancient human population structure in subsaharan Africa, particularly prior to the advent of food producers, remain limited. Here, we support genome DNA data for four children. Two of whom were buried approximately 8,000 years ago and two 3,000 years ago from Sham Locka, Cameroon, one of the earliest known archaeological sites within the the probable homeland of the Bond to language groups. Notice they say probable. They not speaking in definit like a lot of you pseudos be speaking. One individual carried a deeply divergent Y chromosome H group A. Which again, is these AB H Group. Which is indigenous to Africa. It ain't you. Which today is found almost exclusively in the same region. However, the genome-wide ancestry profiles of all four individuals are most similar to those of present-day hunter-gatherers from central Africa. Which is pretty much saying we kicked them up out of there. We took over the land. And we and like the brother J always said, we needed that metal urg and stuff like that to clear out them dense F fores. So we can start set up farming and grazing for our cattle. And that's exactly what we did. And it just is what it is. The history is the history. I ain't gonna hide. I'm not going to run from it. My ancestors were conquerors. That's what they did. Which um, which implies that the populations in Western Cameroon today, as well as speakers of Bond to language from across the continent, are not descended substantially from the population presented by these four groups. We infer an African wide philogyny that features widespread admixture and three proponent radiations, including one that gave rise rise to at at least four major lineages deep in in the history of modern humans. All right. Uh, the oldest human occupied layers at the site date to about 30,000 calendar years before present. But the special are artifacts and skeletons dating between the end of the latter Stone Age, about 8,000 years ago, and the beginning of the Iron Age, about 3,000 years ago, which is about a thousand BCE. Which we keep telling you, this is when we have Israelites in places like Carthage. Uh, not saying that they all Israelites, but just saying there was a migration from that region of the world into that regions of Israelites. Canaanites. Which and Canaanites was a catch-all term for anybody living in the region, not just the descendants of Canaan. Which is why you have J markers included. You had some T markers included and stuff like that. Um, so uh, this is when we had a lot of different um, colonies all across North Africa during and around this time period. Um, and from peoples who were uh, like I said, some of them were they argue may have been in Arabian Peninsula or places like that that migrated into this area, brought these different skills into the region. And we know the Zabu cattle was found in ancient Israel. And it's the biggest one in the region today. So these pastoralists, they do have links back to um, ancient Israel. And and I like to push that forward so people would know. We did have a demic diffusion down into that region. Uh, this transitional period, sometimes referred to as the stone to metal age, features a gradual appearance of new stone tools, as well as pottery. Subsequent evidence in the rock shelter during the stones to metal age points primarily to foraging, but with an with an increasing use of fruits of Camarini. I don't even know how to say that word. They coincide with the developments of material culture and serve as a found for L agriculture. So slowly this agriculture moving in. These cultural changes and their early appearance as Sham Locka are particularly intriguing. Because during the late Holocene Epoch, the area around the present-day border of Cameroon and Nigeria was probably the cradle of Bond to language group and of populations of those descent would spread across much of the southern half of Africa between three 3,00 to 15,500 years ago, resulting in the vast Q3 range and diversity of Bond to languages today. And I have to go back and say this. Herodotus. I know you know they run with Herodotus when they like them. They throw them out when they don't like them. When you talk about how them ancient Egyptians were having sex with them goats. Now they don't believe Heras. But when they like but when Heras saying something, they like they run with it. But Herodotus talked about Nico the 7th telling the Phoenicians to take a lot of these Assyrian refugees and Po and populate the interiors of Africa with them. And that is seems to be when you're seeing a lot of these Bonto languages being developed. And I think that we got to recognize that there there were a lot of migrations into this region, especially towards that time period, that were not always from the interiors of Africa. Hold on. James. Hold on, man. Hold on, brother. Put the brakes on it real quick, man. I got you. So what we're implying here with this data. Nico II, according to Heres. It's saying that um, it says that Nico II sent Assyrian refugees. Am I hearing you correctly? Yeah. He commissioned the Phoenicians to take Assyrian refugees and to populate the interiors of Africa with these Assyrian refugees. Because, you know, Egypt was getting such an overflow from people in the Levant running down into Egypt trying to get away from these Assyrians. To the point that's why them Egyptians came up there and start fighting them. Because they they was overflowing their population. They like, hold up, man. We need to retake control of this area. Because um, N, we can't be having this. But they had to get rid of him. Get them up out of there, bro. And that's just that's just what that's what the historical records say. And according to this, I mean, these Bonto speaking peoples around, you know, a thousand BCE, they just start flooding into this region. Which caused a real quick and sudden population overturned from these A and B groups more into these E1 B1A groups, man. James, the explanatory power of that. Because that would explain why they had so much. What we bring up all the time. Southwest Asian material culture. They the agriculture. Uh, the coconuts. The the the watermelons. The chicken seeds. The glass beads. And we can go on and on on the terracotta. That explains all of it. The Zabu cattle. Palm trees. Palm trees. Uh, the the technology to do uh, dug in wells for irrigation. Like, man, like it it explains all of that. Because like you're bringing up, it was a stone to metal age. Subs Africa. They was using stone tools, man. We brought the metal. The metal. We brought the uh, Iron Age into Africa. Facts. Great job, brother. Awesome information. Awesome information. All right. A total of 18 human skeletons have been discovered in Sham Lock and comprising two distinct burial phases. We attempt to retrieve DNA from six petus bone samples and obtain working DNA from two individuals of the early Stone and metal age and two of the late bronze of the late Stone to metal age. Oh. [ __ ] I said two individuals from the early stone to metal age and two from the late stone to metal age. About 8,000 and 3,000 years ago, respectively. All of the mitochondrial and Y chromosome ha we observe at Shlocker are associated today with subsaharan Africans. The two early individuals carry mitochondrial haplo group L0A, specifically L0 A2 A1, which is widespread in Africa. And the two latter individuals carry L1C, specifically L1 C2 A1B, which is found among both farmers and hunter-gatherers in Central and West Africa. And uh, again, here's more image of Hao Group B. Like I said, we don't descend from these people. Um, individual 2 SE1 and 4A have Y chromosomes from macro Hao Group B. See, ain't no E1 B1A. Ain't no E nothing there. They got from macro Hao Group B. Often found today in hunts and gathers of central Africa. And 2SE has a rare Y chromosome Hao Group A0. Which was discovered in 2013 and is present at appreciable frequencies only in Cameroon. In particular, among the umbo and the Bang Banga in the so in the western part of the country. So again, these to the left is an image of the images they used to show us on Discovery Channel and make us not want to associate ourself with Africa whatsoever. They were showing you hunters and gatherers. They weren't showing you your people. They don't. They didn't want to show you agriculturalist societies, kingdoms and stuff like that. No, on the Discovery Channel, they want to show you these hunter-gatherers and people living in dung huts and stuff with these pop belly malnutrition scavenging for food. That was not our ancestry, man. We brought kingdoms into the region. Because again, going back to what you said, what we was talking about with Nico the second commissioning the Phoenicians to populate. This is the same time we start seeing these kingdoms, these early city-state start to pop up in what we call West Africa today. This is when we start seeing this. So um, I did a presentation on Maab Bees TV, talk about Hebrew Israelites in West Africa. And I showed in that presentation about the quote-unquote Syrian refugee event that Derek Lang was talking about. That showed that a lot of these West African oral traditions was pointing to this event taking place. We got Nico the SEC. We got Herodotus with Nico the II. Shan and bringing in the uh, DNA evidence and archaeological evidence to show, wait a minute, there was a sudden population change in this region about a thousand BC. And they led to the Bond to expansion. Um, we visualize the we visualize the genome-wide relationship between the Sham Locka individuals and the diverse and diverse present-day and ancient subsaharan African using principal component analysis. Initially, we compute AES of East and West Africans and hunters gathers from Southern Africa and Eastern Central Africa. The Sham Locka individuals project to the present-day West African population and Bond to languages. Here, a Bond to speakers and our closest to present-day hunter-gatherers from Cameroon, Baka, B, Bola, and Bedan. And the reason this is is because a lot of the a lot of the West Africans mix with the Bakas. And a lot of the people that we pushed into Central uh, into central Africa, we took their women and admixed with them. So they will still pull closely with us. But like I said, when we talked about those Y chromosomes, we had A's and B's. Um, and the Central African Republic Baka. We then carried out a second principal component analysis using only West and East Africans and AA to compute the axes. And again, the Sham Locka individual project in the direction of hunters and gatherers from Western Central Africa. So again, these people are more closely related to these hunter-gatherer groups, not our ancestral pastoralists and agriculturalists. And right here is a chart directly reflecting exactly what I said. So this is a direct reflection of the empirical data showing and proving what I what I've been saying or at least what the article's been saying. And what we've been bringing forth to y'all talking about at times. But right now, we showing y'all directly what the article's saying and giving y'all the sources so y'all can go read these articles yourself and see that we telling the truth. All right. The Sham Locka individuals showed a large positive and a couple of my images missing off here, man. I might have to pull it up on my phone and go over a couple things. The Sham Locka individuals show a large positive static that is comparable to that of hunter-gatherers from Western Central Africa. Whereas others West Africans, for example, Yuba and M yield smaller but still significantly positive values, as do East African hunter-gatherers. The Hada from Tanzania, as well as ancient individual from Malta Cave in Ethiopia, hitherto multi individual dating to approximately 4,500 years ago. Uh, we also obtained consistent results from analogous statistics using different reference groups. All right. The Sham Locka individual showed a large positive statistic statistic that is comparable with that of hunter-gatherers from Western Central Africa. Whereas other West Africans, Ruba, well, pretty much that's the same thing I just read. But the biggest thing is right here beneath here. Um, in the article. This is from table one right here. You can see the Y Hao groups. The Y Hao groups here is B, A0, B2A. And the fourth one is a female. And she's L1C. And all of these go back to hunter-gatherer groups that occupied Southern subsaharan Africa before any pastoralist agriculturalist came in carrying these E markers whatsoever. All right. Our analysis show that the four sample children from Sham Lock can be modeled as admixed with 35% ancestry related to hunter-gather groups from central Africa and 65% from a basal West African source. Or alternatively, as a mixture of ancestry related to hunter-gatherers plus two additional components. One from inside the clade of present-day West Africans and one that split between East and West Africans. The first component possibly represents ancestors that has been present in the area since at least the late Stone Age. And this is the basal what they call basal West African ancestry prior to 8,000 um, 8,000 years ago. Whereas the second component, or the third in the alternative model, may have its origins farther to the north. Given the geographic and pheny of the other populations we study. Mean of course, I agree with the further to the north. As I already brought up Carthage. And you can go to Morocco, different places like that, where we can find these E markers. But we ain't gonna find them southern in subsaharan Africa. Um, the chronology of the archaeological record of Shamaka also suggests a possible Northern influence on cultural developments during the Stone to metal age. These developments include changes in stone tools, which can be interpreted as a fusion of local tool-making traditions of the later Stone Age with a new working traditions in the Sahara and the Sahel. However, most populations in Cameroon today are more closely related to other West Africans than to the group the group presented by these individuals. Which means again, like I always say, we pushing them about the area, man. Present-day hunter-gatherers in Cameroon are also not descended substantially from this specific group, as they lack the signal of basal West African ancestry. Which is why I'm more towards the north. Because they should have this basal West African ancestry if it was there already 8,000 years ago. There's no reason for them not to have it. But they don't. So that brings that into question. Why don't these indigenous populations that didn't do much admix have this? We do observe elevated levels of all sharing between the Sham Locka individuals and present-day populations of the grassland region. So the genetic discontinuity is not absolute. Additionally, the adolescent male 2s 2 SE2 carried an A Y chromosome, which suggests that the concentration of this Hao group in Western Cameroon may have a long history. And that the A0 was formerly more diverse. Given that the Sham Locka sequence falls outside the known present-day variation. Which is pretty much saying that, man, it seems like West Africa may have been dominated by A Z, especially in Chad and more uh in these other regions like Nigeria and other regions like that. So I mean, it's just pointing out and highlighting what we've been saying this whole time, man. We not indigenous to this area. These what our ancestors would call Hamites are indigenous to these areas. And a lot of them, even to this day, is living in dungus. Is not to knock their culture. They live their culture however they they see fit. But it's not as clean of a culture. It's not as healthy of a culture. It's not as sustainable of a culture. And it's hard to have large families and groups in order to protect yourself when you're living when you're moving from region to region to region. Which is why a lot of the Europeans didn't come in and and mess with these populations too much because they weren't a threat of growing too massive to be able to control. Um, all right. And this right here, I'm going to get into. Because, you know, uh, this presentation was mainly focused on the peoples we would call Hamites with with Hao group A and B. But um, real recently, there has been an article come out challenging the Out of Africa for modern humans hypothesis. And they're coming with some empirical data that's going to call this into question. And I'm going to highlight that in my last about four or five slides. And then I'm done with it. And we can do whatever you feel like doing. I'm I'm will to take questions, whatever. I'm ready. Uh, two compelling models of multiregional and recent Out of Africa have long been proposed. The multiregional model considers extant people of any given region, example East Asia, to be largely descended from ancient humans living in the same region 200 to 2,000 years ago, such as the Peking Man, with some gene flow having occurred between populations in different regions. The has support has support from fossil and cultural remains, but molecular evidence has been lacking until recently. Analysis based on a more complete molecular evolutionary framework, the maximum genetic diversity theory suggests multiregional origins of autosomes, but roots both uniparental DNA in East Asia. In this model, of an East Asian or origin of Homo sapiens modernity, modernity in defined by individuals carrying modern uniparental DNA. Migration of modern humans from East Asia to other regions would result in mating between modern and local archaic human, and hence the gradual dilution of the autosomes carried by early modern po modern humans from East Asia by the autosomes of populations already inhabiting these regions before admixture of migration. Co-evolution of admixed autosomes and unipar DNA would result in some reversion of archaic alleles in the modern unipar DNA carried by the admixed modern individuals, as well as some mutation to modern alleles in the archaic unipar DNA of admixed archaic individuals. Co-evolution of unipar DNA and autosomes is to be expected and is well supported by experimental studies. Well, what this is pretty much saying is that archaic human DNA and modern human DNA didn't mix in Africa. So a lot of the early divergent groups, if they are carrying this archaic DNA, they had to be outside of Africa. And one of the groups they're going to use is Denisovan. And Denisovan leans more toward towards East Asia. And that's why he's presenting this. Me personally, I would like to see the rebuttal. Because this is a Chinese scholar. I would like to see the rebuttal by the European scholars and see what they have to say. And further expound on the subject. And I'd give an update to it when we get it. But right now, I have to go with the evidence that I have. And that's what I'm going to be pushing. Um, the rooting of the mitochondria tree in Asia independently confirms an earlier paper and has been verified by ancient findings regarding mitochondria DNA that shows that early appearance of Hao group R and compared to in which challenges rooting of the human mitochondrial tree in Africa. The rooting of the Y tree in Asia has also been supported by findings in the Y chromosomes of ancient modern humans. All right. The Out of Africa model posits that modern humans originated Africa and then migrated to Eurasia, largely replacing local archaic humans with limited genetic mixing. When the model was originally proposed, it assumed no admixture between incoming humans from Africa and the human population in habit Eurasia at the time. But in recent years, we revised to account for hybridization between modern and archaic humans, as revealed by sequencing analysis of Neanderthals and Denisovans. The rooting of uniparental DNA in Africa relies on the assumption that neutral mutations occur throughout the entire genome, which, however, is known to be a poor explanatory framework for evolutionary phenomena. The infinite sight assumption emerges from the neutral framework, which states that mutations appear only once in evolutionary history. Which again, we know is ridiculous. Because just in um, that um, EP2 only mutated one time. I I find that ridiculous. Because EP2, some I mean, you still have people today like carrying D0, like they still carry D0 today. So at any time, they could get have a child that would mutate and carry a different branch or a subclade of D0. This could happen. So that assumption right there makes no sense to me. And it is why, you know, remember when Garfield was talking to who was that? I think was it Anonymous Hebrew? When he tried to tell him his Y chromosome was too old to exist today. So yeah, was that him? Yeah, that was Anonymous Hebrew. Yeah, yeah. But that's because, you know, archaic DNA can linger. And like I said, a mutation can take place from him that would be any one of those subclades. So just assuming that mutations take place only once in evolutionary history, that was wrong. But they needed that in order to fit these models with these extremely long dates that we always talk about. And it also leads to the related inferences of derived alleles underlying the Y tree typology and rooting of the African model. However, mutation saturation and natural selection is far more common than initially thought, which would invalidate the currently accepted inference of derived alleles. The model, in fact, lacks self-consistency. For example, certain haplogroups contain a large number of derived alleles that define other haplogroups. Example, A has many derived alleles for BT, 42.4% of the information sites. And A and B have many derived alleles from CT, 18.9%, which violates the method underlying the African model in the first place. So he's showing based on the DNA evidence that, wait a minute, the African, the Out of Africa model is being undermined by the DNA evidence. In another article, I'm going to show where the Out of Africa model is being undermined, especially when it comes to dealing with us today's modern humans, Homo sapiens sapiens. We did not come out of Africa. Most of the evidence is pointing to the Near East or some reason I say Asia for the moment being. In contrast, haplogroups in Asia model are defined by alleles shared by all members within the haplogroup, regardless of whether these alleles are derived or ancestral. The rooting in the Asia model of uniparental DNA relies on the reasoning that the original haplo type should be the common type shared by most individuals, since mutations leading to alternative types should be rare events. The ancestor type carried by the first modern individuals should have many alleles different from the outgroup to qualify as a modern type. As modern humans migrate to new places and admix with local archaic humans, co-evolution alongside admixed autosomes may have caused certain sites in modern human uniparental DNA to mutate back to archaic alleles, or certain sites in archaic uniparental DNA to mutate into modern alleles. Such co-evolution is a fundamental part of the Asian model, but is not acknowledged by the African model, given its neutral and infinite sight assumptions, which rule out co-evolution. We here examined four previously published, two Denisovan, two Neanderthal Y chromosome high coverage sequencing data sets to see whether these archaic wild chromosomes may carry modern alleles in sites where there are no supposed to or not supposed to according to the African model. Alternatively, random neutral mutations or natural selection may account for these modern alleles in archaic Y chromosomes. However, random neutral mutations would be expected to hit most haplo types uniformly and in a similar manner, which is not observed. Natural selection is expected to affect different individuals of a population similarly and may find it difficult to account for the low levels of modern alleles in Mesa Maya 2 compared to Spy 94A, which were Neanderthals. Thus, the result of a best account for is best accounted for by co-evolution alongside admixed modern populations, as assumed by the Asian model. Which again, if you look at a lot of these archaic humans, you can see like Denisovan is admixed with Neanderthal. But Denisovan occupied East Asia. Um, same thing with Denisovian. 8A0 is admixed with uh, shoot, it has Denisovan DNA and Neanderthal DNA in it. A1B has Denisovian DNA. BT even has some Neanderthal DNA in it. So the only way this is possible that they had this is if they were uh, close to Denisovan like in East Asia or Neanderthal. But me, and this is my me giving my from my studies and stuff, what I assume is you you did have the Altai mountains, the Neanderthals, which were already admixed with Denisovans. And they were more towards the northern Near Eastern region. So if they were in that Near Eastern region, they would have ran into Denisovan and the Neanderthal DNA. And that could possibly explain the admixture. But this scientist right now, he's saying based on his, which he's far more astute than I am and see far more researched than I am, this is his livelihood. He's arguing for an Out of Asia model. These results are difficult to reconcile with the African model and its assumptions. In this model, the original archaic and the original modern Y chromosomes carry the same alleles as sites that define all modern haplogroups, except for the sites that define the mega haplogroup A-T. The African model therefore can only explain via the co-evolution idea the mutation of A-T alleles in the archaic Y as observed. See, because even the um, the uh, I think believe that was the Neanderthal or the Denisovan, whichever one it was, they even had double double A-T alleles in them. Which means that hold up. They're found in these regions in East Asia. So that has to be explained for. Other for other alleles, such as those defining haplogroups A, Z-T, A1B, BT, CT, and F. The autosomes in the first group of modern humans from Africa were coupled with the archaics of these haplogroups. And one therefore would not expect any effect of admixed modern autosomes on the archaic alleles of the archaic Y chromosomes. Like I just said. Also, there would be no reason for enrichment in mutation in sites of certain haplogroups, such as A, Zot, but not others. Furthermore, the infinite sight assumption and the neutral the theories assumption underlying the African model preclude any processes that would involve co-evolution or adaptive mutations to explain the allele patterns of Y haplogroups. Moreover, if archaic Y already had modern alleles at some sites that define that define haplogroups, such as BT and CT, two hypothetical haplogroups, it would invalidate the infinite sight assumptions inference that mutations in in such sites can only occur once and only in the BT or CT branch of the modern Y. So the results here showing the presence of modern alleles in archaic Y chromosome, which is best accounted for by co-evolution alongside admixed modern autosomes, are inconsistent with the African model. And the results here on the archaic Y chromosomes provide evidence in favor for the co-evolution of the archaic Y chromosomes and admixed modern alleles and admixed archaic individuals. And thus strongly support the Asia but not Africa model for the origin of modern human paternal lineages. Ancient Wild Chromosome Confirms Origins of Modern Human Pastoral Lineages in Asia Rather Than Africa by Chin Hong Yao in 2020. And right here in this chart, you can see in the Out of Africa model, uh, and it three different how Out of Africa model was show where you don't see much admixture there. Out of East Asia model without the admixture taking place. But he's this is saying or before the admixture took place. But they're saying after the admixture, what you're seeing like with the Denisovan, you find modern human alleles in it. Like A0, A quadruple Z, A, um, a quadruple zero. You're finding throughout these. And only way this makes sense is if they were in a region where the Denisovans was. And according to all most scholars, we know what know Denisovans in Africa for this admixture to take place. And with that, I'm done, bro. Yo, let's get it. We gonna end with my brother Jeremiah. Please say to Yah. Put some respect on his name. Love it, man. The we over the take over cuz Judah's back. Rolling down the boulevard in the Cadillac. Yes, we here to kick much ass. So what you smiling at? Understand your reign is ending. Like a CAC. Uplifting my nation is my motivation. Don't get contaminated by the radiation. I never let you change my thoughts from high to basic. I'm here to tell you downfall like the prophet. I'm always throwing up the F. No, we go hard. I'm here to let them boys know. Know we going ride. And I mean for can't handle Judah. Judah to. We the illest nation. A target for all the hate. In a spark for innovation. They follow no hesitation. Stop you complaining. We just invade and picking up all of the labor. They never going to fade us. Coming together no matter the price. We. [Music] Window killing out the lies. Yeah, the truth get exposed. Life of an Israelite. Staying on the path. Bruise. Pulling up. Dress code. Hold. Stays daily. We stay draped up. And friends that know what I'm talking about. Judah from the south. Y Zorus come out my mouth. Leaning on the promised. Double cup of living waters. Yahwah lead the charge. Waking up sons and daughters. Sticking to the scripts. I ain't talking about no movie. Ecclesiastes 12:3. Call of Duty. Room full of shooters. Streets full of runners. Calling sinners to repentance. We hear the roaring thunder. We banging on the enemy. Yah howah is the remedy. Perfect with the judgments. To slum you like a kitty. I represent the South. Right with when I'm talking South Kingdom. Then I'm talking. [Music] About them. [Music] Up. Jah on the he. Trying to press. I roll your play. Shine. I pay haters no mind. Hamashiach is light. Jacob's trouble is bubbling. So you to get it right. Repentance I'm teaching. Open books so no cheating. Stop trying to find a reason. Cuz Christ will live your body leaking. Your order is wreaking. Yeah, the kingdom I'm seeking. Yeah, this is the fishing season. Next up is killer season. Put on the whole armor. Ephesians 6 and 1. If you're trying to make it to heaven, you got to pray at 11. Go ahead and check your re. Drop your idol. I mean, Reverend. I ain't taking shots at Reverend. But really check your re. J have been led astray. Watch now. Repent and pray. Store up treasures in heaven. And Christ will love it, man. This is all facts, no fiction. Lal. [Music] Talking. I'm talking. [Music] About them. F up. Throw them. F up. Throw them. F up. Throw them. F up. All right, man. SE seven gang. Source gang over everything. We will be back tomorrow live and direct. You know how we rocking, man. And yo, it ain't a debate. It's a stick up, gang.