La vérité mensongère

Good evening to all and to myself. So you know that in this parasha we will read about this major event where, as we know, he will pretend to try to get it, and that Rebecca is the one who will advise him to do this stratagem, to put on his father's clothes and to pretend to be him, in the end, to deceive his father, there is a lie and to receive the blessing. And that is something very complicated to understand, because Yaakov, his main quality, his principal quality, is truth. Because it is written "V'Yakov Ish Tam" (And Yaakov was a simple man). Because the quality of Abraham was primarily kindness, that of Isaac was strength, mastery, and that of Yaakov, truth. Now, it is interesting that Yaakov, the man of truth, had to lie to get the blessing. First question. Secondly, what kind of blessing can one have through lying? It makes no sense that when someone lies, they will obtain something good, especially since the Gemara in Shabbat tells us "Emet Titzuk, Sheker Lo Yitzuk" (Truth will stand, lies will not stand). Everyone knows that lying is something fragile, something not solid, something that evaporates, because lying is based on illusion, and illusion is like special effects, it disappears, there is nothing concrete. So when someone tells a lie, the thing disappears. Because, on the contrary, when someone tells a truth, yes, you said it, you said it, you said it ten years later, you said it twenty years later, you said it thirty years later, it doesn't move, it's a truth. What he says, the truth, it stands. "Emet Titzuk, Sheker Lo Yitzuk." And the Gemara explains why. Because the word "sheker" (lie) is written with a Shin. Okay? And in the Torah, the Shin does not have a flat base, it has a point. Okay? Like this, with a point. The Kuf is one foot, and the rest is one foot. So all "sheker" is unstable, it doesn't stand. On the other hand, "emet" is written with an Aleph, with two feet. The Mem is flat, so it stands well, and the Tav has two feet. So you see, truth stands, lies do not stand. But no, if we push the reflection a little, if lies do not stand, then now, does the liar stand? That is, if lies do not exist, does the liar exist? Truth does not stand, which means that the man of truth stands, and the man of lies does not stand. Now, "lo yitzuk" does not mean it doesn't stand, it means it doesn't exist. A liar doesn't exist. It's normal, why? Because since he pretends, the pretense will disappear, since it is only in pretense. Yes. And what he is has never appeared, so it doesn't exist. So the liar doesn't exist. It's interesting because we can say "sheker" for the liar, but we cannot say "amtan" for the man of truth. There is no such word, do you understand or not? "Exem" is the stubborn one. "Atlan" is the lazy one. So it's the quality of laziness. "Atlan" is the lazy one. Now, there is no "ramtan". The word "ramtan" does not exist, a bit like the sister-in-law. Yes. No, there isn't. Why? Because the only one who is entirely "emet" whom we could qualify as "emet" is God. He is, He is, He is, He will remain. Whereas man, even when alive, is not entirely true, because he is in the process of dying, he is in the process of disappearing, he is in the process of changing, he is in the process of passing. So man cannot be entirely "emet". He can tend towards "emet". Yes. But God, He is "emet". Indeed, one of God's names is "Emet". He took this quality of "emet". Now, you need to know something very important. You know when we say "Elokei Yaakov" (God of Yaakov), it's a bit hard to understand. Well, because also "Elokei Avotai" (God of my fathers), "Elokei Ima" (God of my mother), "Elokei Saba" (God of my grandfather), it's a lot of Gods in the end. Yes. The idea is, what does "Elokei Avraham" mean? It means the facets of God that were revealed by Abraham. Do you follow me? "Elokei Yitzchak" means the facets of God that were revealed by Isaac. "Elokei Yaakov" means the facets of God that were revealed by Yaakov. As if you yourself had a very religious grandmother, and you always saw her with her head covered, and with the fear of God, and lighting the candles with the intention of what you understood of God thanks to her. That is "Elokei Saba" (God of your grandmother). And in the absolute, in the absolute, every Jew is there to reveal a facet of God, and the sum of the facets revealed by the man of God gives the face of God. It's beautiful. I could have been a poet, but maybe not at that level. Poet, maybe. So the idea is what? It's that this is "Elokei Avraham" (God of Abraham), this is "Elokei Yitzchak" (God of Isaac), this is "Elokei Yaakov" (God of Yaakov). But there is even more. We say that in truth, the patriarchs were "merkabah" to the Shekhinah, meaning they were like supports for the divine presence, and that they took on divine attributes that they then applied on earth. So that means that in truth, who makes the world? By kindness. The world by kindness. So God is kindness. When Abraham comes, he says, "Now I will do kindness." Listen well. The commentators say that this means that the dose of kindness that was necessary for the world to subsist, which should have been given by God, was given by Abraham. It's as if a child says to his father, "Dad, rest, I'll do your work." God wants that man, in truth, takes on the role of God, but not like some who wanted to completely dismiss it, but in the sense that he will be the continuation of God. And it's logical, why? Because we say that we must learn from Isaac, how? And so it is said, "V'Yitzchak m'alef k'malach Hashem" (And Isaac resembled an angel of God). Yes. Now, what is an angel? An angel is when God formulates a will, this will, so to speak, materializes in the form of an angel. But it's true that it's a bit paradoxical to say "materializes" when the angel is not material. But let's say it is realized in reality in the form of an angel. This means that an angel is the continuation of God's will. That's why it is said that every time God sends, He sent angels. Okay? Like to announce a birth, like to announce the destruction of Sodom, and all that. We say that each angel is created for a mission. And in truth, what is the logic? It's that an angel is called in the effect, it is called what? What is it? It's a force. Okay? To give you a human illustration so that you understand, because imagining the divine is difficult. It's like if, for example, in the laws of damages, I get up and punch the glass and break it with my body. In the laws of damages, okay? That's called "gufi" (my body). But if I take a stone and throw it, and the stone flies and breaks the glass, that's called "kohi" (my force). So, what is my force in truth? It's the continuation of my will. In the same way, an angel is a force, so it's a continuum of divine will. Does that make sense? But no, you understand well that just as I am responsible for the breaking of the glass because it is my gesture and my act, and especially the expression of my will that caused the glass to break, then in the end, the link between the broken glass and me is my force. Does that make sense? Now, the link between the angel, the link between the event caused by the angel, and God is the angel, since it is the continuation of His force. Does that make sense? Great. So when I say that Isaac must resemble an angel, it's not that he has wings and that... Yes. It's that since he has nullified his will to God's will, and that the main thing that motivates him is God's will, he becomes the continuation of God's will in the world, exactly like an angel who is only the realization of God's will in the world. Does that make sense? Great. So normally, God will bring kindness into the world. For that, He will create billions of angels who will realize it. That's why it is written in the Psalms that behind every blade of grass there is an angel telling it to grow. And what does that mean? It means that in truth, God has a global will that the world exists, which is then parcelled out into billions of micro-wills, called "mazal," which are in truth the redistribution of God's will in the world. Now, behind every blade of grass there is an angel. This means that behind every blade of grass there is a will for this blade of grass to grow, just as there is behind every particle, behind every fiber of the fabric of the jacket. I understand. So that means that the reality you see is only the projection of God's will. Now, normally, who realizes that? It's the angel, since God wants it, and this will is realized in the form of an angel who will then act to create reality. Does that make sense? Great. If I say that God must bring kindness into the world, and that the righteous person, so to speak, becomes the continuation of God, then when God brings kindness into the world, he plays the role of God. There you go. It's me. Good evening. I started too early. I don't know what came over me. Is that okay? Is it clear? Is it not clear? Can I repeat? No, but it's very important to understand this, because you'll say, "Well, frankly, what are we concerned with, God, angels?" The problem is that God created man in His image. Does that make sense? And just as for us, God is an immense will for the world to exist, because it's nothing else. If you imagine, not Christmas or anything, or God sitting on a throne, it's not Him, that's another religion. So what is it? For us, it's an immense positive will for the world to exist. That's a great definition that the Rebbe gave at the time, which will then be parcelled out into billions and billions of micro-wills. Okay, great. Now, since God created man in His image, what is man? You still have a family, hair, a house, a car? No, those are accessories. What is man? It's a will. That's why it's always said, "Be careful, it's not the will," meaning the orientation you give to your existential flow. No, the will itself is man. That's why it's said, "Adam ha'adam" (man is man), "oto" (his essence). The essence of a man is his will. What do you have a will for? Does that make sense? Now, in the same way, this will then expresses itself, realizes itself, how? Through the expression of wills. Now, the will through the mouth is called speech. The will through action is called action. The will through thought is called thought. But these are all forms of expression of the person. Just as God creates a will that will realize something somewhere, man also develops wills that will realize something somewhere. That's why when Yaakov was supposed to meet Esau, yes, it is written "Vayishlach Yaakov malachim" (And Yaakov sent messengers). And Rashi says "malachei memshala" (messengers of dominion), because the word "malach" means angel and it means messenger, and it's quite normal since the angel is the one who is sent, and the messenger is the one who plays the role of the angel. Does that make sense? So if I say that Rashi, in fact, when he sent messengers, it actually signifies that he sent angels, and that we ourselves are made, just as He is made in the image of God, and we are made in the image of Yaakov. Does that make sense? So that means that when you have a word, it's an angel you create. When you have a will, it's an angel you create. When you do an act, it's an angel you create, and the angel will act. Does that make sense? No, if you say, "But how can one create angels?" I say the opposite. How can a word act? How can an act act? But what is an act? It's a movement of air in space. What are you? What is a man? A man is a mass of elementary particles, unevolved, accumulated in a confined space, yes, and redistributed infinitely in the cosmos, without limit and timeless. Voilà. I couldn't repeat it, but there you go. In a word, for those who speak English, what is it called? Can you tell me that a man's actions make him? But the man himself does nothing. It's like if I tell you, "Well, what is the influence of this blade of grass that is moving at the very top of the Himalayas?" Well, it's nothing. Firstly, because there is no grass at the top of the Himalayas. It doesn't matter. No, but let's say it's something lost. You wouldn't imagine that it has an effect. So man, do you think that in the universe he is less than a blade of grass in the Himalayas? He is nothing. So how can he act? I'll give you the secret. Given that man, once again, contains a will, and that this will comes from God, then a man, like God, is a creator through his will. Man is a creator through his will. So in truth, it is not man himself who acts, it is man who uses God's creative will that acts. So you have no reach, but your will has reach. That's why when someone says "I want," the "want" is human, but the "want" is divine. Does that make sense? So every time you convey your will through your act, it becomes powerful, because what makes it move, the electric current that makes it work, is the will that comes from the soul. Does that make sense? It's the energy of life. So when you put your will into an act, it's called determination. When you put your will into speech, it's called conviction. When you put your will into thought, it's called concentration. When you put it into your feelings, it's called love. When you put it into hate, when you put it into your depression, it becomes chronic. When you put it into your joy, it overcomes all obstacles. It's normal, because the nature of the energy that carries you is infinite. The only problem is that man is finite. What is the second name of man that he took? Because you see, you are so serious, and that's the whole paradox, is that man is finite, but the energy of the soul is infinite. Does that make sense? But as a man, he is in control of this energy, which I vulgarly call the existential flow. Nothing can stop him. But if he hasn't developed a "game" that can control this existential flow, and since nothingness doesn't exist in nature, then we don't know who manages it. Is that it? Now, what is Beelzebub, Lucifer, the mother-in-law? No, thank you. A copy, but the original. I have nothing against mothers-in-law, but we know that Adam Harrison didn't have one and he lived a long time. Let everyone draw their own conclusions. What's funny is that even mothers-in-law joke about mothers-in-law. That's why I always tell daughters-in-law, don't make fun of your mother-in-law, because one day you'll be a mother-in-law too, and we wish you that. Okay? As the SNCF used to say, "One mother-in-law can hide another." You're a bit relaxed. So come on, let's try to do this book, this course that I can't manage to do. I'm going everywhere to avoid doing it, but I'll be forced to do it. It's okay. You'll always hear something interesting. Yes, but since my head is upside down, concentrating and being concentrated can be written in two words, so it completely changes the meaning. So what's happening is that we said Abraham, Isaac, so to speak, took over from God to bring kindness to the earth. Isaac took over from God to bring rigor to the earth, the Gevurah. But when we say that Yaakov took over from God, it's "Elokei Yaakov" (God of Yaakov) to bring truth to the earth. I don't know if you understand. Did you understand or not? No, he took over from God to bring truth to the earth. And now, to obtain his father's immense blessing, as a great Moroccan author said, because when Rebecca told Yaakov, "Put on the clothes, pretend to be Esau," what did he say? He said, "Oh, it's hairy, maybe my father will hit me." Yes. And yet, and it was very, very hairy, but Esau and Yaakov had hairy hands. And Esau also had hairy hands, but Yaakov had hairy hands. So what did Yaakov say immediately? "My father will grab my hands, he will feel that I have hairy hands, he will say, 'Oh, there's my son,' maybe my father will touch me truly, I will be like a liar in his eyes, and therefore I will receive a curse and not a blessing." I'm coming to get a blessing, to receive a blessing. But if I lie, if they realize I lied, the blessing becomes a curse. It's like someone who found a super cheat sheet, they got, I don't know, they got the exam subject in advance, so it's a blessing. But unfortunately, at the last moment, they changed the subject of the exam, it becomes a curse. Why is stealing forbidden? One of the reasons is what? It's that money is the tool of blessing. So for him, it's a blessing, but for you, it's a curse. The same money. It is said that money has no smell, but that's false, because He has already predicted the trajectory of every particle. So, all the more so, He has predicted the trajectory of every euro. So if you divert someone's money to yourself, you are not only diverting the money, you are also diverting the beneficial nature of the money. Thus, money from a blessing becomes money from a curse. It's true. I saw, for example, you should never buy a car from a thief. Never. Because it runs by miracle, because he's a thief. You say, "Wait, I tricked him, I bought it for 3000 euros, quickly, 5000." But you buy it, the first week, you burn the engine, you don't understand. But it ran by miracle. After that, he knew nothing, he didn't even put oil, not even gas, and the car ran. Baba Salé, okay? You, one week, the guy, to take his fiancée, you got her. Okay? After that, your whole life, misfortune. Maybe she would have been nice to him, with you. Death. Why is it not adapted? It's not adapted. So the logic is what? "Emet" is "matim" (adapted). Truth is adapted. Okay? Like you say a truth that is not adapted to someone, it's a lie. But it's the truth. It's the truth, but it's not adapted. The laws, according to the Arizal, are true. It's true. The Rebbe said that. But since it's not adapted, it's a lie. It's true that it's very complicated. When they do balls, you see, and two weeks later the guy is eating pork. How do you tell him? "Well, there are 14 intentions for washing hands." Already explained. Already that you have to wash your hands. Yes. Then explain that he has to stop hitting his wife. Okay? And that smoking joints is not part of the preparation for entering Shabbat. And then maybe you'll tell him a little about tobacco. A little bit. But you start with the intention. It's not adapted. A guy who identifies with evil strongly, because his "ani" (self) is evil, they become one. That's called "ani". You can't, all of a sudden, do a racism. It takes a little, wait, 5, 6 years of head cleaning, of purification, and then of mentality, because the guy is not there. He becomes, he becomes righteous. Tell me, it takes time. You have to get everything out. You have to empty the attic to bring in new merchandise. We'll do it. We'll put the two. It's called a compromise. But the compromise keeps its promises, because it was promised to you, and you see, one day it comes out again, and the guy, in a fit of alcohol, of rottenness, all of a sudden he starts saying bad words and gets angry. Bam! He has a impulse, he leaves with the good one, who is not necessarily the bad one. You say, "Yes, all these years of self-improvement, it takes time." The tart takes 40 minutes to bake. You say, "I'm in a hurry to eat." You'll burn yourself and it won't be cooked. Let it cook. All life is like that. Yes. Now, this is also "emet". Why? We've already explained several times that the word "emet" here, which is three letters, "alef, mem, tav," but no, that's man. You've recognized him. Inside him, he has a potential called "Aleph," because "Aleph" is the smallest letter, numerical value 1. But on the other hand, "Aleph" is "aluf," it's the chief. That's why the Torah begins with a "Bet," not to say who it addresses, "Bereshit." No, it's because before the "Aleph," and "Aleph" is who? It's God. So what is the origin of the Torah? God. So "Bet," "Bereshit." The "Bet" is "bracha" (blessing). So inside man, there is the "Aleph." He must become a "Tav." The "Tav" is the outside. The "Tav" is the realization. So the "Aleph" is the potential. The "Tav" is the realization. Well, I've already told you 30 billion times that life is about going from potential to reality. So I won't repeat it. Otherwise, you can read my book. Too bad for you. For those who believe it's a mezuzah, yes, you have to read it, it's important. Okay? So when you go from "Aleph" to "Tav," in fact, you become the person you are supposed to become. Does that make sense? But this change, this transformation, this metamorphosis from a girl to a responsible woman, "alef, tav," it passes through the "mem." What is the "mem"? The "mem" is the middle letter, the letter in the middle of the alphabet, it's the letter of balance. So your change, your studies, your personal construction, your couple, the education of your children must always pass through balance. Does that make sense? If you go directly from "alef" to "tav," it doesn't work, because you have to go through the "mem." Does that make sense? The problem is that the "mem" is not the same for everyone. Everyone has their "mem," meaning everyone has their line of balance. You have to read, I don't know, two hours of Torah per day, otherwise you can't hold on. But you have to do two hours of sport. That's your balance. Now, I've done unemployment with sport. Okay, that's good. But you're depressed. But it's true, because I need to let off steam. I need to... Okay. The other one loves sweets. Ah, no, "gashmi." Okay. But she's in bed, crying all day. After that, you exaggerate. It's one thing, but you know what you need. Yes. You know you need to put on a little makeup. You put on makeup. Well, if you play Cleopatra, ah, that's bad. Yes. But if you say, "No, it's over, I am the daughter of God, the daughter of God." Every time you cross the hallway, you shout. No, you have to consider a minimum, a minimum of hair removal, because it's borderline ape. Even if your husband is nice, because he said, "Oh, no." But you're not going to teach a monkey to do that. It's a perfect couple. So it doesn't matter. So the idea is that we must go from "Aleph" to "Tav" by passing through "Mem." We must. And that's "emet." But no, if you don't realize your potential, you don't reach the "Tav." You remain "Aleph." "Mem." "Mem." It's "em" (mother). Certainty. Still in the fetal position. Everyone says, you know, it's someone who has great potential. You say, "Yes, at 8 years old, that's good. But at 68, it becomes heavy." Yes. Like one time I told a woman, "You know, your husband is, deep down, a good person." She told me, "I'm not going to live with a diver in the deep end." Reactivity is extremely low. Life will be a problem of tension. Or it's repeated pregnancies. I don't know. It seems there are women who push so hard that at the end of their brain, it goes away. But everyone knows it's much more serious. So, it's to wake you up. Anyway, I don't come often, you're quiet. What are we saying? If you don't realize your potential, you remain in your mother's womb. If you destroy your potential, "I am nothing, I am worth nothing, I am worth nothing, I am nothing, I want nothing." You remove the "Aleph," what remains? That's death. They think death, death, death. The Cadillac Varga Benamou, the candles. No, no. The death of the dead, the poor. It's not serious. The death of the living is serious. Take the metro in the morning, it's called the Night of the Living Dead. So if you understand that, in the end, if you think about it, it's the process of realization. Does that make sense? That's why people who are afraid of reality can't realize themselves, because they can't reach the "Tav." Yes. And very often, these people are also afraid of the truth. So you understood that truth is not a certain objective nature of transmitting information. A nice definition of truth. Yes or no? Truth is a posture of life. You live in truth. It's not just that you tell the truth, that you think the truth, yes, that you express the truth. No, it's that you live the truth. So when you don't live the truth, what is called "racham amitim" (living dead), you are not alive. [Music] But it's okay. You're fine because you're not true. True is joy. Sadness brings "ranma" (suffering). Or were you hit in the hallway? No, sadness is that you are not in coherence. For example, when we listen to a sad story, why do we feel sad? In your opinion? For the story? No, for us. Because we say, "But I'm like that too." Because I haven't become. The fact of not having become, of not having realized, this non-coherence, this non-existence, generates sadness. To know that we are all great egoists, by the way. It's a bizarre phenomenon. Every time you talk to someone, when you talk about yourself, they talk about themselves. It's true. "Oh, my foot hurts." I didn't ask you anything. I was in Italy. I don't care. Very bizarre, as if the person is afraid of losing the monopoly of existence. "I am the center of the world." It's bizarre. But what does that mean? It means that you said you were in Italy because I was in the United States. So you didn't react to what you feel. You reacted to what I said, and not to what you are. Does that make sense? Because there are two ways to exist. Either you will exist from the inside out, which is, a priori, the definition of existence. External XTX. Or you will react to someone who exists. I told you that at the time, but well, at the time, you already took me for a madman. So if I was 15 years old, I told God, I told God, "I don't want to be reactive anymore, I want to be decisive." It's not easy at 15. It's "I don't want anymore" because my wife compliments me, I'm happy. And because someone makes a remark, I feel sad. I don't want anymore. I want to build existential autonomy, and I want my flow to come from my interiority, and not to be a reaction to the other, to the situation. Yes. To impulse, to fear, to anger. I don't want to. But it's work. It takes about thirty years if you're full-time. Yes. Because in truth, the logic is that people react. Three-quarters of people react to someone who acted. So the other one acted, and you reacted. Now, to not react, either you are in a coma, and therefore you don't react, or your existential pressure is stronger than the social pressure. It's plumbing, actually. It's easy. You have a pipe. Okay? On this side, there are 4 bars. That's what you have approximately in the tap. On the other side, there are 70 bars. In your opinion, which way will the water go? Towards the 70? Do you follow or not? Not in the direction of the 70. Well, it's exactly the same. You are not convinced. The other is convinced. Who will you follow? The convinced one. You are sure of yourself. The other is not sure of you. Who will follow? The one who is sure of you. So in truth, all of life is a confrontation of motivations. Motivation comes from will. Will comes from the soul. The problem is that the focus that makes this motivation pass is you. So if your objective is small, small, it releases a tiny bit of energy. If your objective is big, there is a lot of energy. You say, "Yes, but he has a strong personality." That means you have a small one. A big objective, but it must be true. Because "focus" can be written without an "s." Okay? So if someone has a large existential flow, meaning the guy is a locomotive, the girl is a fighter, the girl pulls the whole family, she pulls the whole community, she pulls the whole city. You will have trouble destabilizing her. So in truth, you have this: is it that you want to be a dust particle? Is it that you want to be a comet? Now, there will be comets and there will be dust particles. What people don't understand is that they think that being a comet or being a dust particle is a fatality. No, it's a choice or a non-choice. Okay? The non-choice of being a fighter makes you a beaten one. Like among men, there are the fighters and the beaten ones. The fighters are people who fight to succeed, and the beaten ones are the ones who fall all the time. So if you want to be "emet," that's why you couldn't say anything to Rabbi Akiva, because he was "emet." You can't say anything. You'll tell him, "Spirituality is good." No, not because he is "rare," but because he is "emet." If someone has a discourse of "emet," if someone has an aspect of "emet," but someone hasn't resolved this problem of "emet," strangely, the message doesn't get through. Incredible. Do you understand or not? I say, one time I made a mistake. I was young, and he told me, he told me, "You know nothing." I don't understand why people don't come to your classes. Well, people don't come to your classes. Okay? So, like an idiot, because I thought the guy had already resolved all his psychiatric problems, because how can you be like that if you're a psychopath, unless you're Ravaged, but then it's not interesting. So I told him, "But really, without any life or anything?" I stopped. I learned from my parents. You speak sincerely, you speak clearly, you don't speak taboo. I'll tell him, "So that I can put pressure on him and then manipulate him with a compliment." I left that aside. You buy it. So, so I tell him, "But maybe you should..."

Tie up your hair first. Oh dear, what do I have? A diligence. My students, they don't do your things, and I tell him, but first, you should make your choices. He got angry, but who do you think you are? What are you judging me for? Who, who are you? It's interesting, isn't it, zoologically? Because you have an elephant in front of you, you don't know if it's a real elephant, so it's still 6 tons of flesh that will tear you apart, or if it's a balloon inflated with air. How can you know? Take a pin, prick the elephant. If it bursts, it's an elephant. If it bursts, it's a balloon. Are you following me? And the balloon is filled with air. Do you know how to say "filled with air" in Hebrew? "Mele achir." And "mele achir," it's beautiful, no? You understood the link. It's filled with air. There's only air, okay? But air is air. So it looks like it, but it isn't. Why? Because "to look like" takes 5 minutes. You buy it, you buy it, you take the right size, you practice in front of your mirror. I've seen it. I've seen people, real, real ignorant people. The guy, one time, he gives a lecture, and he says, "So, in Pirkei Avot, chapter 22." So, you should know that in Pirkei Avot, there are six chapters. So, after that, it becomes purely intellectual speculation. To fabricate, anyway, one chapter of Pirkei Avot. In truth, the guy is ignorant, but it doesn't bother him. Why? It's like influencers. You can influence people who are dumber than you. And since he found someone dumber than him, it's okay. That's what makes influencers successful: even if they're idiots, they've still found three or four million people dumber than them. And it works. So, this idea that the rabbi must be a liar, the parent must be a liar, the spouse must be a liar, the Jew must be a liar. Now, since you understood that "to lie" is not, once again, an objective quality of information tending towards truth, no, "to lie" is a relationship to life. Because "to lie" means to realize. So, when you are not alive, you are at home. And as we said, the one who is alive is the one who realizes himself. So, the one who doesn't realize himself is forced to be a liar. Because a liar is someone who is forced to create a discourse to replace the fact that he doesn't exist. That's why the basis of lying is the gap between what you say and what you do. To the next one, when you say one thing and do another, you are a liar. When you claim a capacity and you don't achieve it, you are a liar. So, in truth, "liar" means "unadapted." You tell a child, "If you do that, I'll give it to you," and you don't give it to him. You've taught him to lie because you lied. You've taught him to lie because you weren't in agreement with what you said. But the child, you told him, "You do good, you receive good." You give him the good. You say, "No, but since you hit your sister, I'm canceling the reward." No, you give him the reward because he did good, and you give him the reward because he hit his sister. It can't be mixed. But if you cancel one, the other, the child understands that words are worthless because you can always adapt to circumstances. So, the guy says, "I'm cheating on my wife because, thanks to me, I made an unhappy woman happy." Yes, but she's married, she has four children. That's a detail. People talk like that. I know she's Jewish, I know she has 5 children, I know I'm also religious, I know I have 5 children, okay? But she wasn't fulfilled, that woman. Okay? She was with a husband who mistreated her, she didn't have confidence in herself. Now, look at her smile, she's strong, she's going back to work, she's going back to her studies. So, somewhere, haven't I done a... he won't say it. I'm waiting. Yes. And I haven't created a situation that destroyed two families? He destroyed parents, in-laws, he destroyed the generation, he destroyed children for two or three generations. But he convinced them in a single word that he did a good deed. It's a phenomenon. Why is that strong? So, "convinced" means the person is convinced. So, since I said that truth is coherence, then when someone manages to be coherent with their incoherences, they are sincere. In fact, that's called a mythomaniac. Why a mythomaniac? You believe him because he believes it. No, but it's powerful. Did you understand or not? Once again, lying is incoherence. Truth is coherence. Now, someone who reaches such a level of mental perversion that they are even coherent with their incoherences, you can't perceive the incoherence because they are coherent. I'll tell you about a guy, for example, for years he spread the rumor that he was sick. If you knew him, and we collected money for him, even I made appeals, I collected. There was a rabbi who collected a lot of money for him to treat his illness. But in fact, he wasn't sick. And one day, among the people who knew him, one of them said, "You know what? Where are you being treated?" He was so fed up that he said, "Well, Lariboisière." The guy, what did he do? He went to Lariboisière. He said, "Hello, could I know where this gentleman is being treated, in which department?" Cancer, blah blah blah. Nothing. But do you know how many thousands of people he fooled? He was sick, in truth, he plays poker, he plays casino. So, it's another illness. Yeah, it's okay. But on this side, you don't hear anything. Here, you have the sound, but not the image. Is it better now? And I'm going to get a stiff neck. [Laughter] So, the worst is yet to come. So, in truth, you understood that the mythomaniac, in truth, is true in relation to himself, but he is not true in relation to... he is not true in relation to the other, he is not true in relation to the Torah. Now, in the same way, the true false. Yeah, the true false. It's true. What one must understand is that Rabbi Akiva was fooled by, what was his name, by Korach. Now, you know that Rabbi Akiva was the counterpart of Moses. So, how could he have been fooled? Perhaps the belief was so strong that he didn't catch the signs, or he didn't have the intuition of things, or he didn't receive, he didn't receive the message that... okay. And in all these devices, how can you love a child so much that you don't see, you don't see his flaws? As he was convinced that everyone knew he was a monster, and you idolize him, isolated. Everyone knows, everyone understands, and he was mistaken. Well, that's the whole course of Ben-Tzvi on the complexity of the divine project, the necessity of "itzrak" (to err) so that "yitzchak" (Isaac) receives the blessing. Okay. We would listen to the course. I understood. That was the idea. The problem is that Yitzchak didn't know he had reached the point of no return. Because when someone violates, kills, and steals on the day of his grandfather's death, it means he's a bit of a "hadash" (new). Imagine what he was doing on days when he was in good shape. It's like people who say, "Well, we only knew Hitler during the war. Outside of that, he must have been a good guy. His only flaw was that he wanted to make a fuss, that's all." Okay, it's not a big deal. So, if that's the case, we arrive at a rather strange dimension: we said that since he was forced to lie, the question is, did he lie? He didn't really lie, okay? He implied something, he let people think that, okay? He didn't say, "I am..." And even when his father asked him, "Who are you?" he said, "I am the one who brings you food." Vs. "I am who I am," and that's your elder. But when you listen, he said, "I am an elder," like the swindlers. [Music] A small studio. Listen, it's actually a very, very, very small studio like this, and then you feel really well surrounded, and then, well, the guy says, "Yes, but you didn't tell me that when you open the window, you have to close the door." We were in the dining room, but you didn't say that. Well, yes. Well, how is she physically? She has very beautiful eyes. Well, that clearly means she weighs 120 kg. Well, yes, because why would you talk about her eyes otherwise? You would have said, "She's magnificent." They are very, very attached. Ah yes, sometimes they ask me directly, "Don't you have a photo?" That means moral qualities, and it also means measurements. So, it's exactly the same. He says that Yaakov Avinu, yes, he transgressed something very serious. Because the Gemara in Sanhedrin says, "Amara, whoever changes his word is as if he had served idolatry." And why? Because what is idolatry? Idolatry is not idolatry, in fact. It's the capacity given to man to divide his own will. Together, if you're not afraid of getting a stiff neck, yeah, you take a piece of wood. It's a piece of wood. It's there. It's a piece of wood. It was on the ground. You carve it, you give it the shape of a face and a statue. You put it in front and you say, "Oh my God, oh my God, oh God of wooden checks." Okay. But how did this piece of wood become God? Now, does it matter if you carved it yourself, or if you bought it from a factory, yeah? Whether it's made of plaster, bronze, or gold, it was still made by a man. So, in truth, when man makes an idol, what does he do? He divides his own will. Because it's he who says, "What does God say?" It's strong. He's the one who says God said, "Extraordinary." So, that means he made his will, which is God's will, pass. That's why there are no images of idols. There are no illustrations. And also in the Torah, there are no images. And finally, the relationship with God is entirely in "emunah" (faith), through the spirit and through belief, okay? So, in this idea, when you create an image, in truth, the image allows for something extraordinary: the reflection. When you, for example, look in a mirror, if you've noticed, often when you look in a good mirror, the mirror reflects the image of the person in front of you. Have you ever had that experience? No? Yes, no? You'll tell me, "It must happen often, statistically, it's true." No, it's false. Because sometimes you look at yourself, and what do you see? The other. You are in a situation. The reality is the reflection of who you are. And yet, you accuse the other. Why do you accuse the other? Because it's your reflection that's in front of you. So, that means you refuse to see your part in the situation. Anyway, you're crazy. You're crazy. Anyway, Mom, you don't understand me. Anyway, you've never loved me. But my darling, if we didn't love you with Dad, we would have actively prevented your birth by using contraception. But we didn't. We were together, I got pregnant, I was nauseous for 9 months, you cried for 3 years, you had reflux for 4 years, you had diarrhea for 5 years, you repeated a grade three times, you ruined my life with the two years you were with Christian, I was going to die. Yeah. And now you come and say, "Anyway, you've never loved me." I tell you, the child is a ingrate, even when he's thin. True gratitude is an attitude. So, the person must be loved. To say, "Come on, I'll take the time. What do I owe my parents?" Come on, I'll take the time. "What do I owe my children?" If you have to remember that we become adults thanks to our children, because there's nothing to do being a kid in front of a kid who's 14 years old. So, you're forced to be an adult. So, the child, in fact, forces you to become an adult. With another adult, you can be a child. You say, "I don't want to. I don't care. That's it." Well, that's how it is. When you're 32 years old, it's not a big deal, it's a "gan" (garden). But when you start acting like a kid in front of your 12-year-old daughter, and she looks and says, "Mom, can you pull yourself together a bit? Please, suck in your abs." So, the child condemns you to become an adult. And the funniest thing is that the more people push back the appointment with adulthood, the more appointments are sent to them. Children, parents, grandparents, the police, doctors. All these people are inviting you to adult appointments, and you don't want to go. Diabetic, by eating candy. You say, "No, I can't manage." So, diabetes explains to you that you are a baby. "Dalon," we say, "diabetes or what?" You supposedly follow the diet, but you eat four slices of pizza. Your thinking is a bit strange. You say, "Yes, but I'm hungry." Or you eat pineapples for 2 months, then you have a fit of nerves, you eat six chocolate bars while watching a movie. Jennifer, no, it's Myriam. But do you know why you don't gain weight? Because you're not eating. Because you're not loved. Because if you were loved, you know what you would do? You would live fully. And when you live fully, you are at the limit of calories. But when you pretend to be, you keep them. You say, "This, I'm keeping it." And you have all your wealth on the sides. It's called the "bouée" (lifebuoy). It's true. You see Derf FIFA, she eats, she eats, she wants to curse them. It's true. She eats the whole pizza, she loses weight. You have a glass of water, 4 kilos. You say, "Well, it must be the thyroid or, as Confucius said, 'couloir de Mademoiselle'." It's not a big deal. Do you understand or not? I remember when I was young, I ate, I did three workouts, I didn't eat. But when I went from 8 to 9 hours a day before the Shiva, I thought, "Is this a disease?" No, because I had a striped pajama. So, I would leave the room in the morning, the guys would look for the gas chamber. When I lay down on the bed, people didn't see me, they climbed on me to get on the shelf. "Excuse me, I didn't see you." Well, in the meantime, thank God, I have... let's say I have a pregnancy in progress that I can't finalize, but okay. But what's the idea? The idea is that when you are in... when you are in... you consume, you consume. But when you consume without consuming, you conserve. Well, in all of this, it's the same. If you consume, you consume your bad ideas, you get out of your anxiety. When you conserve your bad ideas, you maintain your depression. How does it work? When you consult your laziness, you become hardworking. But when you maintain it because you say, "It's not my job to do everything," and "it's not easy," and "I'm going to break my back," "thank goodness I have the good one." Okay, but remember your grandmother never had a good one in her life. At 88, she had energy. You, "blénara TD" six times a week, you have back problems, you have last problems, you have baby problems. Because in fact, you've become an invertebrate mollusk. Yeah. It's not easy. Three pregnancies. Why didn't your grandmother give birth 14 times? You say, "Yes, but when a baby isn't well, we're mentally fragile." Why didn't we lose 8? Do you understand or not? So, it's not the difficulty that causes weakness, it's the relationship of weakness to difficulty that maintains the weakness. Now, the relationship of weakness to difficulty is called "sheker" (lie). On the other hand, the relationship of maturity to difficulty is called "emet" (truth). Because you say, "Well, it's my life. It's my body. Well, I love it. Yeah. And it's my husband, I'll make do with it. That's how it is." They asked, "It's not easy. I deserve happiness. I'm fed up. I can't take it anymore." Okay, okay. Now, you're single, divorced, you go to parties, you can't take it anymore. All the crazy people come to have fun, all the unserious ones make you strange propositions. You say, "But I was good with Parlou. Oh, he had his character, he was a bit laxative, but somewhere, I had no digestive problems." It's okay. We'll see the particular cases later if you want. So, in this logic, when Yaakov Avinu presents himself, and his mother tells him, "Go get the game, bring it to me, I'll cook it for you." He's dressed in the clothes. Look at the language of the Midrash, how serious it is. It says that Yaakov didn't want to go. He said, "Enervated, there will be words." He went. He went and took the two lambs. "There will be words." He brought them to his mother. "Ounu sakhof" or "bourré"? In force majeure, yeah? He was forced, he was crushed, and he was crying. That means Yaakov was crying from lying. He was dying from lying. He was dying from pretending. He had the guilt of lying. Even worse, it says the Midrash sent two angels, "rad miamine" and "radismol," right and left, holding him by the armpits. Okay. It says, "Who is tearing?" The water that doesn't fall. It means he was so uncomfortable having to lie that he was going to faint from weakness. Okay? That's how you recognize the true man who is forced to lie. Because the liar who is not forced to lie but has the opportunity to lie, he has so legitimized his lie that he is comfortable and lies with pleasure. The other one says, "I lie for the heat." Autism. "I steal for a share of chance." "I cheat for business." "I do tramways to flirt with my wife's girlfriend." You say, "But I don't understand. Don't you feel uncomfortable?" And this is a strange phenomenon. People believe that when they have a reason, it's true. "How did you manage to cheat on your wife?" He told me, "But I was unhappy." "I got angry." Okay. "Why do you steal?" "It's a share of chance." But your father never stole a euro in his life. He never exceeded 400 euros to avoid stealing. And you, thank God, you earn 30,000 a month. But you know very well that you'll end up in prison. Because it's not just the clients who fall into the trap. What you sell them are traps. Okay? It's not a money-making machine. So, every time there will be, there will be the temptation. But again, it's not because you can legitimize it that it becomes a mitzvah. It's not because you can explain it that it becomes truth. Because that's indoctrination. The Nazis, since they were little, were told, "The Jew is a rat, he's vermin, he's filth. So they are invading, they are here to destroy. So it's a mitzvah to eliminate them." How did you do it with cockroaches? They did it like that with the Jews. So, after that, what does the Nazi do? He says, "But I only obeyed orders." Have you seen the film about the Shoah? Do you remember? It lasts three hours, but you have to see it. You have to see it. Now, three-quarters of it is testimony. Now, when you have guys who are 90 years old, and they are asked, "But do you regret it?" He says, "No." He says, "But do you still hate Jews?" "Yes, but they deserved it. We had to." He said, "How did you do it? You were a guard in the camp. You saw children going to the gas chamber. You saw pregnant women. You saw..." "Well, listen, they were vermin. We were just dealing with the problem." That's why, by the way, the Nazis, in all the language of the camps, never spoke of extermination, but of treatment, management, organization, final solution. Yeah. Why? Because they were proud, they were the superior race. When in fact, they were just words. [Music] And there, if I remember correctly, he said that it was noticed that the deportees never asked for mercy. That is to say, the guy beat him, massacred him with blows from a truncheon, hung him by the arms. Never did you see a deportee on the ground saying, "I beg you, stop. I beg you." No. On the other hand, when there was liberation, and they caught the guards and the camp leaders, and they said, "Now we're going to take care of them." Then the Nazis were on all fours, crying. So, who were they? Poor fools. Beyond hell. A very good book. I really think it must be hard to find, but maybe, maybe on eBay or on Amazon, because I don't think it's been reissued. But it touched me a lot, a lot. I had many because, unfortunately, the death camps were laboratories of horror, but also laboratories of will. The will is that the people who survived were either those who had faith in God or those who had faith in man. But all the people who lost faith, even if they survived, they came out dead. Indeed, a few months or a few years later, suicide. But what's the idea? What is a death camp? Yeah, maybe you see the Nazis, you see the crematoria. No. In truth, a death camp is a camp organized by the angel of death. A reminder for those who have just arrived: the angel of death is also the "leterain" (the one who leads astray). So, instead of being locked up in a death camp, you're locked up in your fears, you're locked up in your pride, you're locked up in your psychological rigidity. It's in the death camps. If you burned yourself on the altar of your pride, it's like being in a crematorium. If you suffocate from having to question yourself, in fact, you've gone through the gas chamber. The watchtowers, what are they? They are people who ask you to grow, and you don't want to, and you feel trapped. And when the guy says, "I do what I want," when in fact he's just listening to his Satan. I've noticed statistically that three-quarters of the people who claim to do what they want are precisely the people who don't do what they want because they don't have freedom. Someone who says, "I do what I want," when in fact they are listening to their Sarah, or listening to their fear, or listening to their pride, or listening to their ignorance. So, how many times have I heard, "I'll answer you, but just one thing: admit you're ignorant." How many years of "diba" (study) have you done? Zero. Yeah. So, if you ask a question about the Torah when you are ignorant, it's like asking a question about atomic energy when you don't even know how an AA battery works. What are AA batteries? Because how does it work? So, if you know nothing, do this mitzvah accessible to everyone. Shut up. No. Yes, I have a question. Why God? Why the Torah? Why? Listen to me. If a question is not motivated by reason, it is not reasonable. If it is not reasonable, it is a pretext. So, instead of asking yourself why God did that, and starting to get upset, and it's not normal, you should rather try to measure within yourself what is the rate of FDG contained in your person. FDG, not studying psychology. FDG: "foutage de gueule" (bullshit). It's when your mother tells you, "Help me tidy the room," you say, "My back hurts." And when your friends say, "Let's go out," you go out like a rocket. Who, would there be a mutant in you? This logic, where Yaakov Avinu, yes, he was forced to lie, and he experienced it badly. That's the only circumstance that makes lying acceptable and permissible. That's why there's an incredible "RAF dessert." I'm reading to you because it's been an hour and ten minutes, and I think half the room is praying for me to choke. Oh, it feels good to hear. No, no, no. So, look what he says sometimes. Precisely, change. That is to say, change the word, change the interpretation, change the addiction. Why "kasha" (difficult) is "emet" (truth)? The truth will not bring good, and "zik" (difficult) will do harm. "Ki hashen" (because it is difficult) "car" (because) "machnir" (to bring down) and "ki emet" (and because it is truth). What appears as truth or "chez kler" (clear) is a lie for me. Or "machnir" and "chez kler." But "mevilles" (bad) and "hamech" (the man). Because when what you're going to do is "moïse" (bad), it leads to bad consequences. It's called lying. But when the lie leads to truth, it's truth. I'm translating for all those who will say now, "From now on, it's a mitzvah to lie." No. A child is bad. Okay? On his report card for the first quarter: mathematics 0, average, I don't know, drawing 0, French -4, -4 average. Negative averages are rare. But how did you get a -4 average? He says, "Yes, the teacher can't stand that I make mistakes in my first name." But your name is... So, he writes "Dawn," which always means going down. So, solution: either you find a plastic bag his size and get rid of him quickly, which is called the "hole method" in Belgium. Or... it's okay. No, but it also allows you to measure your culture. So, either you lie to him, you go and say, "Listen, my son, I have confidence in you, I know you're going to succeed. You were in a bad patch. We'll get private tutors, you'll eat fish, we'll learn to concentrate, we'll go see a professor who will give you 142 exercises, he'll give us the profile of your shortcomings, and we'll fill them with pedagogical specialists who will even teach you to organize your work." And voilà, at the end of the year, the kid is the best in the class. Question for a champion: was it true that he was bad, and you lied to him that he was good, and he became good? So, in the end, is he truly good or falsely good? It's okay. Now, if you tell him the truth at the beginning of the year, you say, "Listen, my son, you're screwed. You need people to wash the floor. You weren't born with the brain you needed. You have the IQ of a bird. The IQ, "cui cui cui." You're not a light. People generally extinguish themselves when they die. You extinguished yourself while alive." It's a way of speaking, okay? So, you told him the truth, but because of that, he died. So, you're going to lie to him. You say, "Yes, but if you tell a lie, it opens up, and he becomes good." For example, I see people who have real problems. Okay? Okay. What I do is, I tell them they have fake problems. It's okay. So, they say, "What should I do?" "You should do a program." So, the person does a program, she learns real solutions. The real solutions won't solve the fake problems, because you need real solutions for real problems. You need fake solutions for fake problems. So, how did I say it was going well when it was going badly? It's a fake solution. But on the other hand, it pushed the person to say, "I'm going to take charge." When does "take charge" work? The program I give her, she increases her maturity. As she increases her maturity, the problem disappears. So, it's false, it's true. That's the problem. Did you understand or not? So, that's what he says. He says, "When the truth is the same, when 'mevilles' (bad) is 'tov' (good), the truth is what leads to 'tov' (good) and the will of Hashem." Once again, you have to be very, very careful, because this type of lie that is permitted, you understood that it is permitted for people who are killed by it. But people who feel completely legitimate to lie because it's for the good, they don't have the right to lie, because they are liars. It's okay. Once is not a problem to say personal things. It's what engages other people, and it could be poorly received. Good. The objective is good. But is it good? Lying is what gives success to the occupations and projects of the angel of lying, which is impurity. Because truth is what gets you out of error, but what keeps you in error. Now, whether you maintain yourself in error because you lie, or you maintain yourself in error because you traumatize the other so much with a truth that is impossible to bear that you keep them in error, so they will remain in error. That's why he said, "Ni sacha ou moche et mevilles et tov." That the truth is what leads to "tov" (good). "Tov." Remember, we explained this hundreds of thousands of times, that "tov" always means complete. Do you remember that or not? So, "adam tov" doesn't mean a good man, it means a complete man. Well, "act tov" means a complete act. But since "tov" means complete, then my root "tovine" doesn't just mean complete actions, it also means actions that complete me. So, when I grow with reality, I become complete. When I complete the lacks of reality, I create complete acts. Now, if my acts are incomplete, they are not "top" (good). Okay. We say it too, "It's not there, it's not top." Yeah. And the opposite: if I don't become complete through actions, the action didn't have its utility. So, it creates falsehood in the problem. It's that as we are in the process of becoming, okay? So, the guy of today is false compared to the guy of tomorrow. Why? Because the truth is to be, the false is to appear. But no, you need to appear to prepare to be. That's why it's called "appear," because we hope you will eventually be. But if someone uses appearance and is content with appearance, because she was covered, she arranged the button and the long skirt, but she's been doing "launarde" (gossip) all day, she has a hatred for the other, you have no idea. But in what hell is she dying? And then she says, "Ah, you're eating. Ah, it's passed. Ah, it's passed. It's not hidden." Do you understand or not? Because there is being and appearing. Now, appearing is called "lolita," being is called "ishma." But no, to arrive at "mi-chema" (listening), you have to go through "logement" (housing). Because "mes torchella" (my torah is for her), so from the disinterested to the disinterested. For example, it's not good to give gifts to children, you say, because they will do things for the reward. When they are little, it's good, so you give them the gift. But you always have to give gifts. So, he will be able to do it when he's an adult. So, you offer him a bike, you offer him roller skates. It's rare that a guy at 32 years old roller skates. On the other hand, if you offer him a video game, be careful, because at 35 years old, he's enjoying it.

FIFA, how will he open a camera when he has FIFA at home? It's like the other one, how will he do it? He will clear the table, even though he got married. That's it, everyone doesn't care, okay? So now, if that's the case, then it means what I was talking about just before, I forgot. Thank you. There's only one who follows, I notice. So, you have to do things out of interest, and then you will achieve doing them in a selfless way, okay? It's like someone will say, "I want God, and I don't want to calculate you, I don't want any interest, I want, and I want to gain nothing." So you take the nice path, it's not a big deal. After your nice path, you will improve it. The girl and the finale, she finished sanctifying him, who will become rich. Understand this logic. And if you go and say, "Yes, but still, in the absolute, it would have been better to go directly to the path." I'll give you a personal secret: it's that, in fact, becoming rich is because, you know what it is, you have thoughts from my place, yeah. On the other hand, water, slowly, we know what it is. We know what it is to do out of interest, to do for the gaze of others, to do out of vanity, to do because it brings good luck, we know how to do that, yeah. Now, listen carefully to this sentence: it's easier to move away from what you know than to get closer to what you don't know. Okay? So, you do it out of interest, you do it, and then you move away, you move away, you move away, you move away until you do it selflessly. But if you say, "No, thanks to God, it's selfless." No, in fact, thank you very much. He takes you on Thursday, yeah. He doesn't say thank you. I thought, I thought you were doing it for the birth. Thank you. They are not capable of saying thank you. But what does "thank you" mean? It means that you do it based on the "thank you." So if he doesn't say thank you, you don't do it. But I think he was doing it for God. So you do it for recognition. Demanded recognition is a form of communication because by giving gifts, you develop your reputation for generosity. So if the result is not achieved, if people don't say to you, "Oh my, you're going to change, you're so generous," then you say, "What was the point? People are ungrateful." But in truth, it's not that they are ungrateful, it's that they refuse to enter your game. And what is the punishment for someone who lies? It's that they are not believed. So if you do this for thanks, precisely, people don't thank you. If you do this for vanity, precisely, people don't give you cash. If you want to know everyone's life, people flee from you. If you say, "Listen, there's no need to know," people run after you. I have to tell it, I have to tell you. I've never told anyone. I haven't even told my mother. I haven't told her, even if I don't need to know. I try to keep a clean toilet bowl. I don't need to pick up all the radio in the world. I have to, I have to tell you. I had tendencies when I was young. I had attractions. I think that's why my son chose the wrong detergent. Frankly, I didn't have any. So you understood that, in truth, H&M and Loketm, and H&M and Lokeren, and met. Think carefully. H&M is where? Where is he going to do it? He is behind nature. That's why we are not allowed to pronounce his name as the witnesses of vanity pronounce it, okay? So we see Hude who is doing, but we pronounce it with help, with help, Nude. We say Adonai. Why do we say Adonai? Because he is Adonai. Now, the dimension Adonai, the chain, is just the projection of the will into the world, okay? So, in fact, the arm, in quotes, of God is Adonai. But the energy that carries the arm, the will, that's why he is called Luttech, because we put "avec être col à vaillotte." It is he who makes everything exist. That's OV. OV is being. But "avec" is doing being. So, in fact, H&M, he doesn't do, he makes exist. It's like the difference between beating and pedagogy. Beating makes donkeys move forward. Pedagogy makes children intelligent. Only with pedagogy, you can't express it with beatings, because when you hit, you make the donkey move forward. When you are a pedagogue, you inspire in the other the idea that they need to move forward. So, the pedagogue will create a climate, he will create circumstances, he will create encounters, he will create a king, he will create a family, he will create a husband, he will create parents who will inspire in you the need to be. So he will make the person exist. Diana, yeah. So, what is that? It's HM. Attention, how can a dog act in you? Because you accept him as God. How do we say it? He is our God. And so, okay? But for that to work, for God to send you a flow of evolution, and for you to receive it as God, it must be "Maître." And we said that "Maître" is what? It's not, once again, a nature, an objective orientation of a language, no. And "Maître" is a way of living. You are "Maître." So H&M and Lokeren and "Maître." In fact, it's the process. You can take the opposite meaning. You will be "Maître" when you are truly "Maître," you see that you can be forced to get rid of your bed of Sarah. So you will seek the yoke of God, yeah. So you will understand that being a servant of God is the only way to achieve freedom. Because if you say, "Yes, but the constraints of religion." But when you are a slave, do you think you are freer when you are forced to wear a miniskirt at 60 because it's the fashion? When you are forced to open four buttons because that's how you dress? When you are forced to tell disgusting jokes because it makes the guys at the table laugh, yeah? When you are forced to drink red wine because today you are a trendy person, do you think you are free from what? From being an animal? So, are you a slave to your lacks, or are you free from your lacks? Now, when the Torah obliges you to grow, it obliges you to free yourself from your lacks, since the only way to find God is to free yourself from your lacks. So when you seek the "Maître," automatically you will come to understand, and therefore, "The Eternal is our God," yeah. And when you understand "Eloquet Rennes," which is the realized part of God, you can believe in "Youtube," who is invisible. So whether you take it in one direction or the other, that's HM and the coffee Mouna, that HM is him, and Lokeren, and you understand him because you are stupid, or you develop the "Mec" in your life, which makes you receive the divine juice from "Hello Keren," and at that moment, you live with "Youtube." We have equations, okay? That's it. You really impressed me with your concentration, because even I didn't know where I was going, and we arrived somewhere anyway. As they say, cats always land on their feet. So, two things. Firstly, we will dedicate this lesson for the comfort. Well, already for the consolation for the parents of the victim who was killed, that massacre, that it turns around. I saw his face, I shouldn't have. Everywhere Jewish, I see him, it's very bad. Then for all the people who were injured, because there are people seriously injured, hidden. We send them a blessing. After that, if God wills, all the people who are preparing attacks, may the bombs explode on them. It's not a big deal, it's an accident at work, it's even reimbursed by social security. Thirdly, also for the faith of filtration. [Music] And also for my South Ben Kabra, and for Abishimones, and for all the sick people you are thinking of, Maurice Mochez Ben Ester Cohen. That's the first thing. Second thing is that you know it's written in the Gemara that whoever brings a Jew back to the Torah, his prayer is heard. His prayer is heard. So those who want to, yeah, maybe you are motivated for that. We brought some books here, they are here. Those who want to, buy a book. Well, it's still 20 euros, okay? And I'll give them a blessing inside. I know it looks like I'm asking you for money, but if you came to my Gaal, it was 3000 for the blessing. So you are largely winning. That's it. Razakobaro.