Transcription
All right, we're here in downtown Seattle at Westlake Park. Easily more than 300 people for Charlie Kirk's vigil. People are asking tough questions only hours after the shocking death of American conservative commentator and Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk. What really sparked attention was not just the attack itself, but a strangely cryptic message from none other than war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu. A news service and Benjamin Netanyahu had made a comment and made the announcement that Charlie Kirk had passed, that he was, in fact, uh, dead, that Charlie has died. Um, they made that announcement roughly 20 minutes after the shooting. Uh, US News reported nothing of that; that he was, um, stable. Some reports said that he was in surgery. Of course, obviously, I've talked to people.
Unlike other world leaders who usually issue measured condolences or stay quiet until more facts are known, Netanyahu rushed out a statement that raised more eyebrows than sympathy. His eagerness to respond so quickly feels less like compassion and more like a deliberate move, almost as if he wanted to shape the narrative before anyone else could. And that alone should set off alarms, especially when US law enforcement, including the FBI, has already admitted they still do not know who the attacker was.
Again, hundreds of people here this evening for Charlie Kirk, and, um, just a lot of emotions.
[Music]
The accused remains at large, which makes many people who are familiar with the shadowy ways of MSAD nervous. The fear is simple: if Israel's infamous intelligence network has a hand in this, then the real killer may never be found. Now, let me be clear. I was never a fan of Charlie Kirk. His unapologetically pro-Israel stance, even as Gaza bleeds under genocide, made him an uncomfortable figure for me. But let's also be human here. I don't celebrate his death. Watching the video of that brutal attack, seeing his helplessness as blood poured out, it moved me to tears, not only for his family who now face unbearable loss, but also for Palestinians who face this kind of sniper-style assassination on a near-daily basis. What happened to Kirk in an instant is the grim reality Gazans endure constantly under Netanyahu's criminal war machine. It still baffles me that someone like Kirk, a Christian who claimed to stand for truth, could be so easily deceived by Netanyahu's lies. Yet, towards the end of his life, cracks began to show in his once blind loyalty. Take a moment to like and share this video if you haven't already. Kindly subscribe to support my work. Thank you.
The fact is, now BB and the Israeli hard-right government has a mandate. I've got to be careful the way I say this: they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza.
Yep.
I mean, that's that, and I don't use that term lightly. Okay. They're talking about basically removing 2.5 million people from there, okay? And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. The, there is, they, this idea that they need to have a truce or a peace treaty—that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets. But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last 5 years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, our guts are usually right. So, I've been in Israel many times. The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You, you cannot go 10 ft without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier, right? The whole country is surveilled. And so, so let me, let me just kind of go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, they were, there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because BB Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration, right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets. That's all gone. Patrick, Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not, I'm not willing to say, to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here. But I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a standown order? Was there a standown order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's 45 minutes. Wow! Six hours? They're live streaming the killing of Jews? Was, did somebody in the government say, "Stand down"? That is a legitimate nonconspiracy question. The whole country is the IDF.
The whole country is... and you're trying to tell me that they're going to concerts and kabutzes and schools, and, by reports, six hours? Let's say it's three hours.
That's suspect.
Go ahead, Rob. It's also not like a right-wing, uh, reporting. This is from The New York Times: "The long wait for help as massacre unfolds in Israel." I can't think of a more liberal news outlet than The New York Times.
And, and by the way, I, I'm actually very pro-Israel. So, let me be very... I mean, so I'm not exactly...
I think we all are.
No, no. I just want to make sure my position is clear here. But I would... So, Patrick, there are other explanations. It's possible that the Netanyahu government was double-crossed by bad agents. Okay, that's dark, but it's not as dark as what we're talking about.
He suggested that Msad may have allowed the attack to happen deliberately to give Netanyahu a blank check for his ethnic cleansing campaign. That's not something you say without making enemies in Tel Aviv. And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical, opener, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews. And they're like, "What on earth happened?" And it's not just the colleges, it's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it. It's like, "Time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me." Kirk also openly supported Candace Owens, one of the rare conservative voices willing to call out Netanyahu by name. For someone at his level, that was risky. We put them in power. We displaced the Sha. We displaced the democratically elected leader Mosday and put in the Sha, which then, of course, led to the Iran... the Ayatollahs of Iran. And then finally, is a nuclear weapon against Iran a threat to America? Probably could be a threat to Israel, but is it a threat to America? I mean, India has nuclear weapons. Pakistan has nuclear weapons. So, is it worth, is it worth a potential another war with Iran? And the people that are, let's just say, advocates for preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, by all means necessary, they're the same architects that were perfectly fine with the Iraq war. The same designers of the Iraq war. The primary way Iran can hurt this country is by sucking us into another Middle East quagmire. And they know it. And Iran would have the potential to be the worst Middle East quagmire of all time. Iran has 90 million people. That's more than three times as big as Iraq was when we invaded 22 years ago. It's larger than both Afghanistan and Iraq combined, both in population and in area. Iraq was at least mostly a flat country. It's a bunch of cities along a couple rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates. Iran isn't like that. It's almost all mountains. Iran has spent decades preparing specifically for war with the United States. Their military has lots of weapons designed for fighting a much stronger adversary. They have a lot of drones, a lot of speedboats, a lot of cheap, expendable weapons. They're far more formidable than Iraq or the Taliban were. And I, I seriously want your thoughts. Email me: freedomcharlark.com. Would you say it's a good idea to use military force to strike potential Iranian nuclear targets? My whole life I've been told that Iran is getting a bomb. Iran is getting a bomb. Iran is getting a bomb. Iran is getting a nuclear bomb. And yet, here in 2025, they do not have a nuclear bomb. So why should we trust the American intelligence without verifying it?
A few months back, an exac account run by Harrison H. Smith claimed that Kirk confided to someone close to him that he feared for his life. The post read, "I'm not going to name names, but I was told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against them. Now, if you hear that and still think Zionist influence in America is some fringe conspiracy, then you're not paying attention." This was coming from Kirk's own inner circle. I don't have much to add to it other than, basically, like a month ago, I watched a interview with Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk, and I thought they looked scared. And I commented on that, made a video out of it, and then, like a day or so later, I was, uh, talking to this person. And the way I remember the conversation going was that we were just talking about, sort of, Israel and Zionism and Zionist influencers, and Charlie Kirk came up. And I remember the other person saying to me, "Well, you know, Charlie Kirk, Kirk says he's afraid to go against Israel 'cuz he thinks they might kill him." And I said, "Uh, that's crazy 'cuz I just made that video about how Charlie Kirk seems scared. That's, that's crazy that you're saying that right now." That context makes his sudden silence on certain issues more understandable. Many, including myself, are starting to believe that Kirk's pull back from questioning Zionist power wasn't a change of heart, but pure fear. When you connect the dots, it becomes chilling. He still spoke occasionally about Zionism in tones that were skeptical, even while broadly defending Israel.
Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now, I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true: the Anti-Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left-wing, anti-white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer, um, going to be administered to colleges, right? Mark Rowan, Leon Copperman. Can we get that full list? Very powerful. The part of the TW. So, that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So, I'm going to kind of... It was quite a day on the internet. Tucker Carlson was, uh, interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour. And Tucker Carlson mentions that, uh, Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came... We actually said it in a different way. We said, "I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism." And people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti-semmites. But listen to this: Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.
And let's not pretend we haven't seen this before. From journalists silenced after exposing Israeli war crimes to activists smeared or criminalized for supporting Palestine, the pattern is clear. Anyone who dares question the Zionist agenda risks retaliation. For Charlie Kirk, dabbling into those dangerous truths may have been enough to paint a target on his back. His death leaves haunting questions that Netanyahu's cryptic message only makes louder. Was this just another random act of violence? Or was it a carefully calculated warning to anyone left, right, or center who dares to expose the lies propping up Israel's apartheid regime?