Transcription
Hey, make sure to point out I've got a red, irritated eye again, because people like to point that out; stuff like that. I noticed something different—what happened to your eye? For a year or two, I'll get like a dry, irritated eye like that. How you doing, man? It's nasty outside. I can't stand the wintertime. It's okay. It was snowing like crazy last night, and you know, listen to classical music, do some deep studying, and uh, that's that. Part of winter is nice; you know, you open up the door, and the snow flurries, and nothing stuck. But uh, I need to talk about um, the name of God. I'm not actually interested uh, in, even if you are obviously so, in uh, beliefs and uh, religions. I'm only interested in metaphysics. Religion is secularized metaphysics.
But I actually wanted to get into something I've not heard anybody discussed before; it's certainly not so on YouTube. It might exist out there somewhere; you know, there's countless millions of videos, obviously. So, the Orin uh, Origins—hello, did I say Origins? I'll edit that out—of Yahweh, yah. Um, I don't pretend to know Hebrew and know Greek; Latin's pretty darn rusty. I know P really well, in Sanskrit and Russian and Kazak and English and um, but this gets to the heart of things, and this is extremely ancient. And uh, a lot of the uh, Hebrew characters actually came from ancient Egypt. I like to talk about the name of God, and what it actually means is a the speed to sanctum, or the animating principle. Whether you agree or disagree, maybe you could actually listen with an open mind and actually approach things from maybe a different angle than you have thought—thought of before.
First biblical usage of the name Yahweh is Exodus 3, uh, chapter 3, 13-15. It talks about uh, Yahweh has been chosen, remember, throughout all generations. And I know people would actually want to discuss, and it's Elohim, but I think there's some debate on whether Yahweh is a plural or whether it's singular. Getting the actual meaning of Yahweh um, and I know uh, devout followers of the religion will not even say the word; they consider it uh, to be a type of blasphemy to actually say that. They would actually use—and I forget the Greek word for l—I mean, excuse me, not the Greek word, but the Hebrew word for Lord, rather than evoke the sacred name. Yadah—four characters in Hebrew. Yach, of course, is a 10; read U from right to left; that's the tetragramaton. I know about all that; read from right to left. Y is representation for 10, he for five, W for six, and of course, once again, hey um, well, I'll refer to Psalm 15 uh, 6, which is, "Let everything that hath breath praiseth uh, the Lord," so yadah.
Um, it's a declaration, I think, in the Torah that the first uh, thing on the lips of U—any uh, being to be born—is the name of the Lord, and also to the last thing on the lips of uh, any being is also to the name of the Lord. What this is actually in reference to is the animating Spirit. We actually have, amazingly enough, from ancient Hebrew, ancient Egyptian, uh, ancient P—which I read and translate; it's been a dead language now for over 2,000 years—Sanskrit, and also too the same root in English. We have the same reference to the animating Spirit—not literal air uh, but the uh, Breath of Life—the actual metaphysics of that which gives animation to anything. Without breath, of course, something is dead. Um, I'll point out to you a fact; you could agree or disagree, but it is the case that this is true uh, that Yad—let me just actually loudly exaggerate—breathing in, or the first breath of uh, an infant child—way the in breath and the out breath. It's a reference to the animating Breath of Life. Um, let me try that a little bit better: IN breath, out breath; and of course, the division between both. And this actually—actually—and Elohim, I know, is plural; Yahweh, there's a debate on whether that's plural or not. I don't pretend to know ancient Hebrew, but Yahweh literally is uh, the breath of life. This is the same reference in ancient Egyptian; this is the same reference in ancient Pi. Um, in ancient Egyptian, the t is uh, the Aton. I'm pretty sure you've heard of—by the way—the five most important characters in ancient Egyptian are the same five characters um, found in ancient prob; the most important words like Chet and uton. Uton, of course, you know is the suis—the individuation of the sundisk—of course, is the personal Spirit, or Aton, or Soul; speedi—the sanctum—or in Sanskrit, the term is Atman. I did a lot of translations—actually, thousands of translations—and decades of work of ancient poly translation had to get into uh, the animating principle of uh, found within the anapan sua uh, it's called—called the anonos um, aim K 3.82 here in a second and actually bring everything a full circle here. Um, but between the first breath and the last breath, of course, is life excesses. This could be the Hebrew character W, which is six. Every ancient form of uh, of gatri, and including the tetragramaton, in reference to W of Y wah uh, six is always excess. This is also to uh, the meaning—some uh, numbers—big numbers like two-letter numbers and three-letter numbers. I've talked about this before, years ago; are actually a word. So, in staying—instead of saying like 1,256, you would say a word where the characters actually add up to, you know, that number—two two-digit, TW-digigit numbers, three-digit numbers, and four-digit numbers. Um, the actual word uh, and it's the same in English as it is in Latin as it is in Greek—nearly the same sounds, almost identical—is excess. Every form of ancient metaphysics says that evil is excess, and excess is evil. Um, um, King Solomon has 666 talents of gold, and it doesn't say the number of evil, but evil is excess. The number of man is excess, but it—it doesn't say that that's a number. What it is is ancient Greek; it is exus, and in Latin it is accessus. In Latin, in English, it is nearly the same, which is excess. Evil is excess, and excess um, is evil. Anyway, between the first breath and the last breath, life is excess, because it's a consubstantiality spirit, and it's only held together, obviously, so for so long, and it sits uh, between the two halves of God, which in either side of uh, yah, essentially, because Y is completion, or 10. 10 isn't a number, by the way, and uh, it is a number—number—but it's not a number in ancient Egyptian; it's not a number in ancient P, and uh, like the Theology of arithmetic uh, by amus, and who knows before that, it's actually completion. One wasn't a number either in Greek; it was actually principal. Uh, the second was, of course, attribute; nine was the maximum number between one and 10, and 10 was actually completion. 10 was a return uh, to one. So, if one would be the point of the circle where the actual Circle meets itself again—completion—which, of course, one is representative of God, but also too, so was 10, but 10 wasn't the number of man; nine is the number of man. But anyway, that's actually getting into the tetr Graton of Yad wah, but Yahweh literally means the animating Breath of Life. The first thing uh, before any child learns a word, obviously, just as it's born, is it makes a declaration of God, and the last thing on your lips—and this, of course, is the Alpha and the Omega—the animating principle that of course keeps life together. Water, of course, is the third thing that binds the two—but matter and spirit—and of course, the animating principle. When you actually breathe in and breathe out, you're actually making a declaration of uh, of the almighty, from the principle of what is uh, the name of God. The name of God is the in breath and the out breath, the animating principle that keeps you alive. We have the same thing in English, except as a root like atmosphere—atmospheric—that root, of course, is atmo, no different than Sanskrit, meaning not literal air, but the pneumatic principle of life. And people, unfortunately, have taken this literally, and a lot of people do so-called breath meditation. I've been speaking about this for decades now that there's no such thing as breath meditation. In Su, in Sam, there's not—people say, "Well, I—I do it; I feel calmer"—and what you're doing—engaging in a ritual or a practice—it is about being antecedent to the breath—talk about seeking the godhead or the absolute—what people believe in in particular religions. I'm not interested in debating, and I'm not actually interested in at all. I'm only interested in the fundamental metaphysics behind all of this—meaning that the word Yahweh, or—is a reference to the in breath and the out breath of the animating Spirit, the sanctum that gives anything life—the breath of life. I mean, the Breath of Life, of course, is literally found in Genesis uh, several times—no, I think it's two times; correct me if I'm wrong in that; I know it occurs one time early in Genesis. Um, but these, of course, are uh, the first and last words of any living creature, specifically in reference to humans—meaning making the Declaration of the name of God. It's kind of hard to exaggerate, as I'm literally exaggerating breathing. Yeah, are you listening? I hope that thing is coming across to the microphone. Okay, I don't OV exaggerate like a mouth breather, because I'm not a mouth breather, but I'm trying to do it on purpose. That's the first Declaration of a living child is to say the name of God—both the IN breath and the out breath—that would be your last breath—the in breath, which of course is life; the last breath that you breathe out would of course be the Omega. So, the Alpha and the Omega, and it's also to the first thing someone does when they're born, and it's the last thing they do before the spirit Parts the body. But there's no spirit in the body, as I've spoken about endlessly, is coordinate to the body, but that's a matter for another discussion. But this is the animating principle—literally the in breath and out breath—and uh, the unity of both the IN breath and out breath be no different than the principle and the attribute. Everything, by the way, nature is completely mirrored from top to bottom. Um, the dialectric and the Magnetic would be no different than talking about the IN breath and out breath, which are not two different things, rather one thing—light and illumination—the good in principle and the good in attribute—that which is divine and that which the Divine is—and of course, is—is, you know, it's extremely in exacting. There are words in poly and Sanskrit uh, um, for uh, this, but unfortunately not in English. I go on to dig k21 157. This is pre-sectarian, by the way; you know, the term Buddhism didn't exist until the 16th century. Those yellow rope guys running around southeast Asia—those are not original to Buddhism at all; that's like thinking Catholicism is original to Jesus, which of course is completely ridiculous. 99% of everything relative to the Catholic church was completely unoriginal—not 99%, but a lot—you know, the uh, iconography, you know, all the ridiculousness of same is uh, unconnected to the original article. I'm only interested in the original article, by the way—no longer with—this is the Declaration made of the absolute—someone who's obtained to the absolute godhead or the Transcendent principle—no longer with in breath or out breath. So, he who is steadfast in spirit—suasa—inherently quelled from all desires, because desire is a perturbation; the quelling of desires, of course, is the Perfection of wisdom and uh, the cessation of the imper petu of life—not only through this life but through the next. The mighty sage has passed Beyond um, with Spirit, or n or chitta—is the PO term—Limitless; he no longer Bears Sensations um, perfectly illuminated and Unbound, which is what the word nabana means. Naana is a P word for the Sanskrit term Nana; they're both the same term, different languages. His spirit is definitely aut—aut means absolutely liberated or fully liberated—this is taintless uh, anava—in other words, there's no longer taints of false identification such that the spirit or new and has uh, has been thoroughly uh, quenched—quenched From Desire. This is P in the BMA. Um, there's no such thing—there's millions and millions of people across the—and it does have benefits; I mean, just as like saying if your doctor prescribed you a relaxer for your muscles, it's like, "Man, I feel so much better; I'm laid-back, and everything is cool." People will suck about the benefits of so-called breath meditation. Meditation comes from the word m, which means a practice, a ritual. People need to be doing M every time the breath is mentioned; it is a reference to the animating principle, which of course is the core of focus. This ideation of breath meditation does not exist. People—countless thousands of people—have been debating it for decades—say, "Well, I feel so much better when I do it." It's like, "Well, yes, you do, but there's a million things that you could do to do that." These are practices or rituals; this is not about gaining wisdom or or Liberation uh, proximity—self-proximity—or uh, to that which you inherently are—antecedent to the phenomena. The phenomena, of course, is modulation. To say modulation is no different than um, talking about the—isn't the IN breath and the out breath a modulation uh, which uh, brings about the continuation—for however long it exists—of life? Isn't in breath an out breath a modulation of your lungs? The metaphysics of same is the modulation of life; Yahweh being both the IN breath and the out breath. I—the name of God—Yahweh is both and neither; it is the inverse of the modulation itself—the transverse frequency which the absolute sits at—as there's an old saying—"Neither Twix nor tween"—in other words, it's neither here nor there; it's in the middle, and this of course is where we get the idea of uh, uh, maima—the path of the middle—it doesn't mean the middle path; it means the path between—anies—antinomies, of course, are of modulation. In Jim 382—the most important passage um, actually as far as the methodology—which of course is theology—which is anamnesis—which is smti—which is what the Greeks called manem—recollection; it's platonic recollection, and it's not specifically platonic; it's much more ancient than that; it is literally called the ananas Su. This is a combination of two prefixal—an, which means prior to—a is a reference to breath or intake, but not literal breath, but the animating principle. Sati means recollection; it means manem—platonic recollection—it's not a practice or a ritual; it is literally theology, because objective neg leads to subjective synthesis. This literally means—and to a pedestrian who's not familiar with metaphysics—when I actually say what anonos means, it might perplex you, but it's not perplexing at all. He means recollection or anamnesis of the before breath—seeing that which you are before uh, either antinomy of existence—the in—you know, everybody is a breath away, as they save from death, and someone might be uh, say if they're stillborn, for example, and you give CP PR to something, it's a half a—half a breath uh, away from life, and once they start breathing, it's like, "Okay, they're alive," but what's sits between the in breath and the out breath—the modulation—which of course is that which sustains life, because this is the name of God. Um, the mace—which is the Hebrew character W—which sits between he, you know, Yahweh or hewa—hewa he, you know, the midpoint—the—the mid—the midpoint between the modulation of the IN breath of the out breath—once again, way that still point where no modulation is—that is the whole principle of what—in the correct translation—since I'm translating now for 24-plus years—ancient poly—it is—unfortunately, it's what happens when you give things to people that are intellectually deflated; they will read things literally, and really profound metaphysical texts of Sublime Beauty which are telling you what to do—it's not a practice or ritual—which is Mite—which is where we get the word meditation. There's no term in ancient po that makes mention of uh, rituals relative to Liberation or wisdom; there just doesn't exist. If a practice or a ritual could get you there—and by there I mean Transcendence—then you could take an un alive being—someone who's passed away—and hook them up to animatronic uh, you know, string pulling like a puppet and have it engage in rituals, and all of a sudden you could—I mean, if you follow that train of logic—if a practice, a ritual, led to Liberation, then you could take a puppet and make it perform rituals, right? And then, of course, it would—that's completely Preposterous, right? I mean, that's no different than saying you could take a someone who recently deceased and, you know, have a bunch of people move their arms and legs and have it bow and do all sorts of prostrations and um, external rituals—which is where do the word meditation comes from—it's a practice or ritual. That's what we went from the Greek word Mite to the Greek word medito, which became the English word meditation—it's practice or ritual. Rituals and practices can calm you down, but they have nothing to do with either wisdom, Transcendence, or Liberation. I mean, that's not my opinion or feeling or belief; I mean, that's just an irreducible hardcore fact; it's not up for debate because it can't be debated. If you think of a ritual or practice led to Liberation, then I could, you know, see those little articulating puppets that you could get that the art teachers use—it's a little wooden puppet like this, and you know, it can bend his little arms and legs and stuff to help people draw—well, you could just bend that little wooden puppet and like Pinocchio and do the right rituals enough times and—well, sure—Liberation—that little piece of wood might like vanish into the ephemeral ether because it did all the right rituals—that's what people are saying. This is what happens when profane, unintelligent, metaphysically illiterate people translate this—so it means breath meditation—this is the Sutra—Sanskrit word—the Sutra um, of breath meditation. Anyway, this—all of this—is exactly the same—Uton, Otman, Yahweh—the animating Breath of Life—the pneumatic principle which makes life possible. Said, "Well, that's life." It's like, "Well, what is life?" Well, life is when someone's alive. It's like, "Well, that's a nice description." He just said life is when someone's alive versus what death is—not the opposite of Life—Death is the end of life; it's not the opposite. Anyway, the first thing a child says at Birth and the last thing anybody says before they die is the name of God. It's hard—being—I'm not a mouth breather, so it's hard for me to do that—actually, I don't have emphysema or anything—and it's hard to imitate a mouth breather, but I do that to of course exaggerate saying Yahweh—it's the animating Breath of Life—he speed the sanctum—not literal Breath, by the way. I used to use the lack of logic and intelligence against these people—said, "Well, you're focusing on your breath, right?" "That's right; it calms me down." I said, "Is that—that's—can't be any way connected to Liberation or wisdom; it's totally impossible. Because if you're interested in focusing on breath, why don't you just focus on the flatulence coming out your backside when you eat a bowl of beans? I mean, one breath is the same as any other; you're focusing on gas passing in or out of your lips; why not focus on the gas coming out your—your tailpipe—by your logic—which is totally a logical and total lack of metaphysical understanding—you say that you know this is somehow connected to liberate—of course, they deny a liberant—anyway—especially if you're talking about a Buddhist—these people are antithetical to What doctrine actually says—which of course, the oton of the soul is the entire light and refuge—so Chariot here—and they don't even believe in a liberant—like you can't talk about Liberation without a liberant; that's completely irrational and illogical. It's like, "Well, if you think that's something connected Liberation—which of course you deny a liberant—but that's a matter for another debate—which is easy to beat somebody on—then you—you can achieve Liberation by focusing on flatulence because it's just more gas passing out of the body—the in breath of the out breath out of your mouth is just gas; it's just a different variety out of your tailpipe"—and that always usually makes them freeze—kind of like a, you know, a broken record; they stop and think, "Well, you know, makes sense, but I won't concede to it." It's like uh, people that have been uh, learning how to fight dragons for years in school, you know, paid a lot of money and spend a lot of time—it's like, "You know, dragons don't exist; how dare you say that? I've been learning how to fight dragons for years." Well, you've been learning nonsense; you just wasted a lot of time doing something that wasn't actually conducive to what you thought it was, but that's a matter for another discuss—um—all metaphysics gets uh, turned profane—like this is not literal breath. I know I've said that many times in this video, but I keep saying it over and over and over and over and over to people, and people don't get it; it is not literal breath; it is the spiritus sanctum; it's the—it's the chit—it's the new—take your language, take your pick; I'll tell you which word it is—it's not breath; it is the breath of life. We have the same thing; it goes from ancient Egyptian, ancient Hebrew, uh, ancient poly, Sanskrit—same in English—the same root—Oton, Oton, Uton, Uton, Uton—except with yadah, it is the literal sound one makes when one breathes in and one breathes out. This is the modulation of life; life is a modulation; it's a frequency—not literal frequency—but essentially metaphysical frequency. Of course, the antecedent of frequency is right here; you take the inverse of modulation, and you would have God right here, which would be rest, wouldn't it? If anything is moving, undulating, whatever axis—multiple axises—wouldn't rest—true energy and rest—would be just another fancy word for God, would it not? It would be right in the center, inverse to either modulation. This is what anonos means; it means anness or platonic recollection; the Greek word is M and aned—before the breath—what is before the modulation is right there; that would be yadah; that would be God. So, the name of God means the restr point between the modulation of breath—that which of course gives breath—it's life—and of course, life itself, of course, is the absolute—the Transcendent one—take your pick—God—I don't care what word people use—that is the rest point; it is not literal breath; it is the rest point which gives the breath its existence, and of course, breath is existence, because saying existence is no different than saying life. I kind of hope I simplified this—the point being Yahweh or Yahweh is the first word and the last word of any living being—the substrate—nonar artisian—rest point—the Nexus of all modalities—and of course, modality means frequency modulation—which we call breath—which of course is life—so this is the meaning of the word of God—agree or disagree—take your pick—I read every comment, but this is what the word means—luas—have a lovely day—goodbye—what