📱

Get Our Mobile App

Take your business learning on the go!

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Gregg Popovich Leads LeBron Down the RABBITHOLE To WAKANDA!

ChroniclesOfJudah 14435:26

Transcription

Hi man, peace. Hey, your brother's. I'm sure the vast majority of you have seen the film, The Black Panther, which was released by Marvel Studios, of course, which is a subsidiary of Disney. Please keep in mind that ESPN and ABC, who broadcast the NBA, are also subsidiaries of Disney.

What is very obvious to me is that the film, The Black Panther, which was a major psychological operation that was released on the masses of so-called black people, particularly here in America but worldwide, for the intent of instilling a sense of globalism in the subconscious of the so-called black man by trying to align him with a quote-unquote superhero that is an advocate for globalism, meaning the coming together of quote-unquote all races and to be a magnanimous, benevolent superhero for all races, as opposed to being concerned for his own. That is an attempt to invade the the subconscious of the so-called black man and to modify his behavior, and it's going to work for the most part, other than for you select few brothers who see to it.

Why do I bring that up? Because the image of the Black Panther is going to be a major, major trigger for those who like to try to manipulate the so-called black man. That being primarily who? The liberal Caucasian and liberal black woman. You're going to constantly see them try to call upon the the trigger, the image of the quote-unquote Black Panther, to try to get the so-called black man to do what they want them to do by associating him with the quote-unquote superhero, which is exactly what Mr. Gregg Popovich tried to do with LeBron James.

And I'm on record, I've stated this numerous times on this channel, that Greg Popovich has a CIA background and he loves to use psychological manipulative tricks, and he's doing it here on LeBron James, as I've been telling you guys for the longest time. He plays the woke card to try to woo black athletes to San Antonio because he knows that he cannot bring free agents, free agents into San Antonio. And the other way he's working hard on LeBron. But anyway, they're gonna talk about it. I'm gonna chime in.

By quite a few measures, physically, the man has done things that most folks wouldn't even dare to dream about doing. But there's so much more to Bron's impact, according to Spurs head coach Gregg Popovich. It really is a First Amendment, and I can't have opinions as a coach, as a plumber, as an astrophysicist, as whatever. You know, opinions are what? And that's what's amazing about this. When you look at this guy, how many millions of dollars, tens of millions of dollars, tens of millions of kids that see him now.

Did you see what he did there? This is why I stated in the two-part Black Panther review that I did, that Wakanda is meant to be a wonderland, Neverland for so-called black people. It's a method of disassociation from reality. These are our psychology terms that are utilized in the implementation of mind control. Okay? There are certain triggers. Like, for example, you have what was called Disney programming, where when the subject is put under mind control, they're made to memorize entire scenes in Disney movies. And if they get even one tidbit, one iota wrong in the scene, they get put under electroshock treatment or some other form of torture. Of course, that's the most extreme end.

On the other end of the spectrum, you put forth a quote-unquote benevolent superhero like a Black Panther, and you get scores and scores and masses of so-called black people and other races to go see it, and they can associate him with a messiah figure. And Greg Popovich understands the correlation between a superhero archetype and a cult of personality, which is what many of these app of mega athletes, superstar athletes try to create amongst themselves. They want to create a cult of personality. That's why I told you guys that many of these top athletes, they love to go on Twitter and Snapchat and Facebook and see how many followers they have because that represents the cult of personality.

So he's catering to LeBron's ego by aligning him with the Black Panther. He knows that that is a psychological trigger for LeBron and many other prominent so-called black men to be aligned with, to be correlated with the Black Panther. It's like how it's like how you would try to correlate a Caucasian with Superman or someone like that. They know now that it is, it would not be intelligent to try to link a prominent black athlete with Superman or Batman anymore, now that you have the Black Panther. So he's going to use the Black Panther as a way to try to woo LeBron. It's very, very transparent for somebody to be in such a childish way.

Gregg Popovich is very shrewd. He knows that LeBron and many of the other woke black athletes in the NBA believe that he's woke. He's gonna play off that to try to woo some of them in San Antonio. Of course, Gregg Popovich is referring to Laura Ingraham and the little back-and-forth that she had with LeBron. Was her response to him childish? Pretty much. But it was more in reference to her book and her trying to self-promote. It was no more childish than LeBron's statements about Donald Trump, no more childish than many of Donald Trump's statements about society at large. We live in a very childish and silly society with low-level thinkers. Let's just be for real. So it's just two-dimensional thinkers going back and forth about for volunteered.

No, you mean you listen to them all. I believe that there are things that LeBron is is capable of speaking on with some form of expertise, and there are many things that he speaks on that he really shouldn't be speaking on. Not because he doesn't have the right to, but because he's not informed. Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. Trevor thinks so. As you just heard, they're Pop defending LeBron, ripping the arrogance of the Fox News host. Even talk to me. Well, first of all, I completely agree with great Popovich. But I also don't think that great Popovich realizes that that's one of the very, very reasons you can actually get very annoyed at LeBron James.

The reason I say that is because of the passive aggressiveness, the incessant need to control the narrative and what-have-you, which is something that I've spoke about at nauseam. Yes, but in this case, that's not really relevant. Stephen A., you're trying to turn this into an issue where you can rant about your own frustration at the fact that LeBron will not give you a sit-down interview. Please stick to the topic at hand, because by and large, when you look at LeBron James, he's one of the greatest ever, not just on the court, but off the court. His greatness on the court can't be denied, but his greatness off the court, in terms of the the residual impact that's all that that's primarily positive that he has on our youth and beyond, is unquestionable.

This is a guy that was a star before you know, during his teenage years. He was on the cover of Sports Illustrated at age 17. He was labeled the chosen one. And one could easily argue that he spent a vast majority of his book. This is what they need to be paying attention to right here. When I say they, I'm talking about many of these pro-blacks who think that LeBron James' statement about Donald Trump makes him informed or makes him someone that can be considered a serious, quote-unquote leader, whether it be literal or figurative. Over the internet, you see how locked-in he is with Hillary Clinton? I don't think that he has the foggiest idea who Hillary Clinton is. But then again, who knows? Maybe he does.

A lot of these elite level athletes are in the know. They attend these spirit cooking, spending the the fact similes of cannibalism, high-level Lucifer's like LeBron James practice pansexuality. They're there, they're knowledgeable of MK assets and how to access their keys, things like that. Those of you who don't know, Hillary Clinton is a grand dame. That's what she's considered in MK ULTRA circles, meaning she has access to the keys of many of these assets, particularly a lot of these young women. She prefers females, all right, allegedly. Just like Bill Clinton, he prefers young men or boys, allegedly. Hillary Clinton was heavily involved in the trafficking of low Haitian children, forged for sacrifice, and other forms of pedophilia. That is why she is associated with Mr. John Podesta and many of the other more wicked aspects of Washington D.C. But you know, that's neither here nor there.

Exceeding expectations, his philanthropy, his charitable works, his willingness to help kids, his social consciousness, the position that he's taken, how he's uplifted so many people, it's just unquestionable, it's undeniable, and it's incredibly inspirational. LeBron James is one of the greatest athletes we have ever seen. I agree with that. It does not mean that he's a leader, though. For them to be standing there with that female, he's not a leader. Sorry. He's very confused. Oh, a willing pawn. One of the two or both. I'm talking about off the court, not just on the court. He is somebody I bet that would have marched on the bridge in Selma. He is somebody that would have been invited and would have shown up when Jim Brown, a Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and Bill Russell, and everybody stood by, stood or sat beside, by side, or stood over Muhammad Ali.

Well, I agree with that. He may have even marched in Selma because most of the people who led the march in Selma were a bunch of pansexuals like Martin Luther King, etc. Now, if we're talking about the athletes that met at Jim Brown's office to allegedly support Muhammad Ali, I've gone over this numerous times on this channel already. Bob Arum already exposed that whole, that whole meeting convention that was allegedly staged or organized by Jim Brown was a facade. It was really meant to be a method to try to convince Ali to no longer rebel against the U.S. government and submitting himself to the to the draft, so that Bob Arum could hopefully consider make his money staging Ali's fights. Bob Arum paid all those athletes to appear at the convention in Cleveland, in Jim Brown's office, said they could try to wear down Muhammad Ali, who was a staunch believer in the ideology of Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam and did not want to participate in the Vietnam War because he registered as a conscientious objector. Bob Arum was trying to get around it by utilizing affluent black athletes to try to convince Ali to subject himself to the draft. That's what that was about.

So Stephen Smith states that if LeBron James was around back in 1967, he would have been one of those athletes to try to convince Ali to, or according to the narrative, to try to understand what Ali was really doing and to support him, but really to try to convince him to not go to the war. I agree with that because as far as I can see, LeBron James is about his money. And if Bob Arum would have put money in his pocket back then, he would have attended, just like all those other, just like all those other athletes did when called upon. He would have answered the bell. That to LeBron James is, and a lot of times when you're dissecting or being critical of something here or there as it pertains to his game, he leaves on something else to remind you of his greatness in other areas. As we don't know, and B, we haven't articulated that position time and time and time again. What we do it every day, and we have to do it again today because if you are great Popovich with the military background and the CIA background, and you also happen to be white and socially conscious, allegedly, quote-unquote socially conscious, whatever the hell that means, all that really means is that he understands how to manipulate the quote-unquote black brain.

See, Gregg Popovich, much like Skip Bayless, he understands so-called black people very well. He knows, just as I always stated on this channel, that many so-called black people, they just want to hug from the white man. They want to hug the white man and have the white man pat them on the back of the head while he's hugging them and tell him, "Don't worry, Raheem, everything's gonna be alright. Daddy's here. I love you. We finally reached the mountaintop. We're free at last." That battle that youth in the minority communities in particular have to fight and battle over every single day. LeBron James is somebody that has bumped and shoved aside all the, you know, the stereotypes and everything else that come along with it. I agree with that. As I've stated numerous times, I believe that he's the greatest story in professional sports history in America, in regards to where he came from to where he is right now. No doubt about it. He has conducted himself in a class fashion, and he has been a class athlete, and he is a treasure that will be sorely, sorely missed when he is gone. I just wish that he knew that we all know that, and it's something that we never hesitate to say about him.

Well, if Steven A. is trying to say that LeBron keeps reminding people of his greatness, he's right about that. LeBron has an incessant need to constantly remind people about his accomplishments and what he quote-unquote brings to the table, which tells me that he himself is very insecure about what his legacy will be. As I've already stated, LeBron's legacy is that he was the transformative figure involved in the awakening of the NBA athlete to the understanding and the comprehension that he has to put himself and his family first, not a team and not a city. Gregg Popovich's record on this and other important subjects recently, especially, but really always, is impeccable. He is actually, when you think of every high-profile leader in this country, I think Gregg Popovich is the best example of American leadership we have today, anywhere.

Well, that's very sad, and that's very telling on what American leadership is. They have Gregg Popovich is the best leader in America. He coaches a damn basketball team. And I do wonder, Stephen A., that said, is Popovich courting LeBron at all? Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir. Not to trivialize this subject, not to say that Popovich wouldn't say the same thing anyway, because he's been saying it. But playing the Cavs, it's brought up to him, LeBron would be a great fit there, and Popovich is supporting him. I wonder if he's not courting him, does LeBron hear that and say, "I'd like to play for that guy"?

Well, look, the LeBron James, the Kobe Bryant's, many of the more affluent athletes in the NBA have claimed that they want to play for Popovich. I think that that's something that people like to say, and then when it's time to put that name on the contract, they're thinking, "Wow, I'm actually gonna have to play in a real offense. I'm gonna have to set picks. I'm gonna have to have weak side motion." These are all things that LeBron really doesn't want to do. He talks [ __ ] all day about one play with Popovich. But saying, but saying that and actually doing it are two totally different things. If he would have go to San Antonio for the first time in his life, he'd be playing with the coach that actually has him running a real system, a real system. Like in Miami, they ran a system. I'll give Miami credit for making him run a system out there, but they implemented part of the LeBron system for him. That's why the team really was not successful until Dwyane Wade handed the keys over to LeBron, because LeBron has to run his system in order for them to feel comfortable. And going to San Antonio, I think that Popovich will put in some sets for LeBron so that LeBron could feel a little bit more comfortable, but they're gonna be running the San Antonio offense. LeBron is gonna have to actually do [ __ ] without the ball.

So to make a long story short, a lot of these affluent athletes in the NBA, they like to talk a lot of [ __ ] about how much they want to play for Popovich, but the proof is in the pudding. Very few top-level free agents, and with San Antonio, I mean, you have Aldridge and how many others? Basically just him. I like that guy to coach me. I'd like to be that the best player of the generation should be with the best coach of the generation, especially when both are socially conscious. I wonder, it seems to me about the content, you know, if you take the content of what Popovich said, Laura Ingraham, and we've talked about Laura Ingram's comments about LeBron, seemed to be based on the idea that since he has more formal education than he does, than LeBron does, that LeBron should shut up.

No, actually, I think that her statements were more based in the premise that she assumed that he has no knowledge about what he's speaking about. Yeah, she'd do some, she'd do some low blows about him not graduating high school and things of that nature, but it was, it was more implicitly based off of her belief, her understanding that he didn't know what he was talking about. And nothing in his comments contradicted that sentiment, unfortunately for LeBron. But in fact, she's arguing the point of view of the less educated first. In the first place, I really hate the idea, and Popovich is echoing this sentiment, I think we're expressing this set of it. I don't understand. She could be arguing from the perspective of the quote-unquote less educated when the extent of LeBron's comment is that Donald Trump doesn't care anything about the people and he's a bum. Laura Ingraham responded back with something equally frivolous and silly by stating that LeBron shouldn't be speaking because he doesn't have a high school education, he should just stick to basketball.

Unfortunately, though, even though it was equally a silly, her point was actually more relevant than LeBron's, because it's just the truth. If you don't know what you're speaking about, you really shouldn't speak about it. And I know that a lot of people might not like that, they may not accept it, but we live in a society where people think that the right to say what you like means that you should just say whatever you like. Words have power, and if you don't truly understand what your goal is, what the focus is behind your words, you really shouldn't speak. There should be some intention of improving your overall environment, your atmosphere, when you let words come out of your mouth. In some way, shape, or form, you should be trying to inform somebody, you should be trying to enlighten someone, you should be trying to bring forth some type of revelation, whether it be through humor or to being serious. But there has to be some intention. If you're just spewing empty words or words without information or terminologies and and and jargon, showing that you're speaking on a subject that should not really adapt, that you're wasting your own time and you're wasting everybody else's time. Sociology before we can talk about sociological topics, even if we don't come from that background. So LeBron James is a basketball player, he's not an academic.

Well, the real issue is, as I already touched on in the two-part series that I did on the quote-unquote beef between LeBron and Laura Ingraham, there's not so much that he stated his opinion. It is that he's LeBron James. He's not the guy working in the mailroom stating his opinion about Donald Trump. He has millions of quote-unquote Twitter followers, Snapchat, Instagram, whatever you call it, whatever you want to name it, he has a lot of followers. So the things that he's, that he says have influence. So that it's going to bring a repercussion whenever he decides that he's going to speak on topics outside of basketball. That's how it goes. He's a big boy, I'm sure that he can take it. But you have to understand that the higher the mountaintop that you stand on, the easier that it is for you to be seen. So he has to deal with the consequences of his words.

Gregg Popovich, he looks at LeBron speaking and he says to himself, "This guy didn't know what the [ __ ] he's talking about." Believe me, that's what Gregg Popovich says. But he covets LeBron James for what he can bring to the San Antonio Spurs. When he calls LeBron the Black Panther, he's not speaking about the super, the superhero aspect of what LeBron can do for so-called black people. He's speaking about what LeBron can do for him as a superhero, right? Correct. In this country, I believe, which is a PC culture run amok, can actually work against a healthy public dialogue. Because if you need it, if every, if anyone misspeaks at all, they're not up to date with the most cutting-edge academic thought on a subject. If that disqualifies the speaker from expressing an opinion, we are all the poorer for it. We're in power, our public dialogue is impoverished. And if Laura Ingram's point is that LeBron is just spewing pure nonsense, well, in fact, that would be hard feelings, pure nonsense. Well, I agree with that. She was spewing nonsense in response to his nonsense. So what does that tell you about the level of public debate in America right now?

Clearly, no, no, you just happen to agree with him. He's not speaking truth. He's speaking something that you agree with. And that is not the definition of the the the crux of the debate pertaining to political correctness. The crux of the debate pertaining to political correctness, as the so-called right sees it, is that they feel like they are not allowed to express themselves in a way without offending someone. That is how they feel. I don't think that anyone was offended by LeBron James's statements. I believe that certain people thought that he was woefully misinformed or uninformed or ignorant, quote-unquote. So she called him on it. She also utilized many tactics and dirty politics or dirty political debate. She made statements to allege that he was not educated properly. These are things that happen in political debates. If you can deal in that circle and in that world, then you shouldn't speak correlated with the less educated position. Formally, then LeBron's, even if he is formally less educated than her. And I think Popovich's point speaks to that. Good for Gregg Popovich. Um, and really, why did she do that? Because LeBron disagrees with her. So she wants to silence dissent from her own point of view. And the larger issue, which I brought up in a final take, is she's trolling. She's, yeah, the same way that you trolled Donald Trump. The same way that Donald Trump has you losing your mind. You know how many of these super liberals are on antidepressants because of Donald Trump? That's that's real, man. That is real as hell. Many of these super liberals have been forced to become addicted to antidepressants because the specter of Donald Trump haunts them. They can't handle it. These trolling, and LeBron is leading back to the point. Thank you, sir. You can't say that and then in the same breath ask a question, is Popovich trying to lure a good LeBron of San Antonio? I mean, which one is it? The fact that it matters, you know, you say he's leading, but in the same breath, you're asking the question back about a great.

She ate himself with LeBron James. Well, weeks one is it? Well, I would say this, if two people, one is the greatest coach of the era, the other player, and they are like-minded on social issues, and they both have the courage of their convictions, is that not a good match? And might not playing each other? No, no, no. You don't get away with that. I am not saying I recognize the fact that you think they're great. Popovich is the greatest coach, and LeBron James is the greatest player, and I agree with you with that. I also understand the correlation that you're throwing out there. They're both of them are socially conscious. What I tried to say is that if you're saying that Popovich is socially conscious and he's a great leader, I'm making the point that's all it's about. Because the great Popovich that I saw was speaking about LeBron James yesterday, it's the same Gregg Popovich that I've known for years. He's spoken that he's spoken out about anybody that he was, especially he spoke with reverence about Michael Jordan. He spoke with reverence about Tim Duncan and others. I mean, Gregg Popovich is as real as it gets when it comes to that stuff.

Yeah, but let's be honest. He could speak with reverence about Michael Jordan. Who doesn't speak with reverence about Michael Jordan when they're on camera and you're involved with the NBA? They have to because they have deified Michael Jordan and they worship him as a false god. In regards to Tim Duncan, yes, he's spoken with a great deal of respect and admiration for Tim Duncan. How else is he gonna speak about him? Tim Duncan's the greatest power forward of all time. When it comes to LeBron James, he's not speaking about LeBron as a basketball player. He's speaking about him pertaining to what he does allegedly off the court, and he has assisted in mythologizing LeBron James as a superhero. I think that it's very transparent what he's trying to do. He's trying to woo him by catering to his ego, by associating with, by associating LeBron with a mythological figure, a mythological character, which is something that's very common in mind-control circles.

If he tried to lure LeBron, well, I don't know if I don't know if I consider and he has that kind of agenda, and that was the motivation behind him saying what he said, which you seem to be applying that. Me, I am of a mindset that's not great leadership. Well, that's depending on what your definition of leadership is. If you believe that great leadership is always being as sincere as possible to everyone that you're leading, then yeah, then you could say that that's not great leadership. But if you're someone who subscribes to the to the methodology of the ends justify the means, and you're someone from the Machiavellian school of leadership, then you say that it's a great job by Gregg Popovich. Once again, Stephen A., this is a man, Gregg Popovich, who comes straight out of the CIA School of psychological manipulation. Just because Gregg Popovich offers you a glass of wine and shakes your hand and asks you how you're doing and how's your mother doing, and I'm sorry about your loss, it doesn't mean that he does not have any type of agendas. And as I've already stated, oftentimes people associate the word agenda with something negative. Sometimes an agenda is just an agenda, meaning they have, they have a goal and they have a method to achieve that goal. It doesn't necessarily make him a nefarious person that we see on TV.

If I ask you a question, quieter, we don't talk on the phone sometimes when when you're watching a game, flipping out about something that's Stephen A. Smith. People ask me all the time, "Does Stephen A. really like him?" I'm saying, "What you see is what you get. This dude is a genuine dude." Right? Does it not also, is it not also in your best business interest to be that way on camera? But just because you perform this way on camera, does that make you somehow your intentions less sincere or genuinely? Do I get, do I get to answer that? Do I need to answer that? Please. I'm not this way because I'm on camera. I'm on camera because I'm this way. How would Stephen A. long before the camera ever let me put it in a different way. Some people were stars because they're on TV. Other people are on TV because they're stars. Right? That would be me. That laughs. Jamie, yes, I agree with you. So Gregg Popovich can put it out there that LeBron is a good fit on the Spurs and not do anything disingenuous. Say this is me, and by the way, that is you, and that's a good match. You guys are making this we're complicated. Why can't it just be a little bit of both?

I agree, Molly. I agree. It's just, you know, they're like two old ladies arguing over dumb [ __ ] at the end. It's very, very obvious that yes, Gregg Popovich, he may actually have some type of admiration for LeBron James as a basketball player, and he may agree with him on a couple of ideological issues, but it's very clear that he covets LeBron as a basketball player. He wants to bring him into San Antonio. LeBron is a transcendent, a leap, transcended basketball player, someone who's never gotten into any trouble off the court, at least any trouble that has been revealed to the public, and who would not want him on their squad? Gregg Popovich understands that he is one coach that LeBron will respect and will listen to. He'll be forced to listen to him because at the end of the day, Gregg Popovich is the only coach in the NBA who's had more success than LeBron James has. I can't believe these things about LeBron. And also, well, that's what I'm saying. The reason why Stephen A. cannot believe it is because he is deifying Gregg Popovich. And if he was to acknowledge that any aspect or facet of Gregg Popovich, maybe even slightly perceived as disingenuous, then it would be an affront to the image that he has created in his mind for Gregg Popovich.

This is why I called Gregg Popovich a mind control handler. Okay, he damn near has the keys. When you create that cult of personality and you have a quote-unquote fan base, it's very difficult for quote-unquote fans to accept certain aspects of your character or, you know, certain portions of who you are that may be a little bit quote-unquote unsavory or perceived as unsavory or less-than-stellar. As Stephen A. is mind, if Gregg Popovich is saying good things about LeBron only to bring them to San Antonio, that makes him a fake. Because remember, fans think in extremes. There's very little nuance in how fans perceive things. That's what Stephen A. is battling with right now. A great Popovich represents the quote-unquote good white man to Stephen A. Sincerity or motivation in speaking out. He, of all people. I just ate menhir then. But what does that mean? That it doesn't, it might not be a good match with LeBron, and it may behoove the Spurs to have it after question those two things aren't mutually exclusive. I'm saying on certain issues, there should be no agenda. You should speak from the heart, and that's what I believe.

I agree with you, Molly. There's always an agenda. There's always an agenda with everything that we do. It's just that once again, people hear the word agenda, and they naturally have a negative connotation. Just because you have an agenda does not mean that it's necessarily negative. But everything that we do in life, there's an agenda. You get out of bed, you have an agenda. You have to accomplish something that day. You sit down and eat, you have an agenda to satiate your appetite. So on and so forth. You know, things that are that that we might consider, you know, just just miniscule in the overall scheme of things, but they are agenda-driven. Stephen A. is another person who worships himself. Unfortunately, it is what it is. It's very common amongst boules Negroes. They like to act as if they exist on mountaintops. That's why they associate people like Gregg Popovich as pristine characters that could not possibly be saying something to, you know, in order to to attain a goal. But anyway, that's it on that. I see what Gregg Popovich is doing. I see what he's been trying to do for a very long time, and I believe that it has a good chance of working. LeBron will certainly meet with them in the offseason to see if they if they're going to make a good fit, and he'll consider it. I don't think he's going to end up signing there, but he'll certainly consider it. But it's a possibility. But once again, brothers, please watch out for the the potential and flagrant use of the character of Black Panther as a control mechanism over so-called black men. But anyway, peace.