Transcription
All right, boys. Welcome back to the channel. Today's video, female parasites. This is being done by Alexander Grace. This will be a good one to talk through.
For those of you who don't want this video interrupted, please find the original video linked in the video description about halfway down. You can't miss it. Jump over there if you don't want to hear the commentary. For those of you that want to hear it, let's get into it.
Ships between men and women are dysfunctional. But to understand why, we cannot examine them through the lens of emotion or morality. We need to look at something far more fundamental, our biology. If you look at the natural world, you'll see that there are three distinct categories that demonstrate how two organisms relate to each other. The first is competition, where you are fighting over a limited resource. This is the lion and the hyena fighting over the same carcass. One party's gain is the other party's loss. This dynamic is the classic power struggle where one needs to dominate your competitor in order to succeed.
The next model is symbiosis where two organisms cooperate with each other for mutual benefit. This is the bee and the flower where the bee gains food and the flower gains a method of propagation by working.
>> It sounds like Alexander, he's joined the SRRI. He's uh he's become an advanced researcher. So, this is his thesis paper to get him to Monster Hunter rank now. But in all seriousness, I've seen a bit of a change in this dude's um content over the last little while. I think he's beginning to believe he's the one. It's he's in the matrix. He's coming out. I love it. He's going to the dark side of the force and I'm actually here for it. >>
Together, both organisms thrive far more effectively than they would working in isolation. And this should be our ideal model for romantic relationships. But regrettably, modern relationships more often fall into the third category, parasetism. This is the dynamic where one organism, the parasite, benefits at the expense of the other, the host. This is not a competition and it is not a mutual benefit. The host provides the resources and the parasite contributes nothing. It is absolutely crucial to understand that parasetism is not a mistake of nature. Some estimates suggest that up to 70% of all biological life engage in parasetism as a strategy at some point in their life cycle.
>> So, let's talk about that. What's the main resource? Uh money. Okay. I'm sure there's other things they can get out of men, but really, it's money. And I want to talk about he made the point about the host uh sorry the parasite uh exploiting the host more or less for its resources. So, uh not all of women do this, right? I have to say that I had to preface that because it's it wouldn't be genuine of me to say so. But majority of women that I know who are in long-term relationships slash married, you know, doing the de facto or married type thing, uh, they're with guys that are far, far greater than them when it comes to the ability to earn higher salaries and to generate income. So, what women will say is, "No, no, we're a team. We're co-contributing. You know, I'm working, he's working, and all that." Yep. Sure. She's generating money. A lot of the time they are finding ways to spend that money. Uh, and also then dig into that man's part of the pot as well. So, having joint bank accounts, guys, even when you're married, I don't even think you should have that. That's my opinion. After being married and having a joint bank account, like having all of your savings pulled together. Absolute recipe for disaster. Especially like letting somebody have unbridled access to your money, to your savings. You know, people go, "What do you do then, G man? You know, I want to get married or my girlfriend's pressuring me for this." Well, this this is my suggestion is you both have your own accounts and you have a joint account that you are both so co-signitories on and you put your living expenses, your portion of living expenses in there or whatever your arrangement is, but you don't let them have full access to every single dollar you've ever earned and have in your bank account. Like absolute recipe for disaster. The number of guys that have told me uh about women like once once they, you know, abruptly break up with them, you know, the parasites kill the host essentially, it's sucked out everything it can and it's moved on to the next uh, they drain the resources, they take it literally take it all the money out of the bank account. Happened to me. I can tell you. I've spoken to a lot of guys that have said the same exact thing happened to them and you can't do anything about it because their name's on it. It's their money too. They can do whatever they want. >>
Mistake made by many modern men is believing that they are immune to these natural laws. They naturally believe that all romantic relationships are symbiotic in nature. Unaware of the danger that they may have a parasite that is benefiting at their expense. Through this lens, it completely recontextualizes their relationship as it's not merely malfunctioning or broken as a symbiotic exchange, but the relationship is actually fulfilling its intended purpose for the parasite.
This is not to say that parasetism is what is intended for human relationships. Naturally, symbiosis is the most efficient energetic state for two people to relate to each other. The reason why the human species, like so many other creatures on this planet, have divided into the dichotomy of male and female is to allow for functional specialization. Men and women evolve to be distinctly different from each other and to have superior strengths in certain domains. That way, when cooperating, their union becomes more effective than the mere sum of their parts. It is precisely the evolved differences between men and women that prevents competition because when two organisms are identical, there is no need to cooperate. Neither has something that the other desires. True symbi.
>> So, let's talk about this, right? He's talking about symbiosis. Uh, you know, our strengths working with their strengths to make a, you know, a better a better life, I guess, for both parties. Look, let's let's talk about in reality what happens. And once again, I know there'll be guys out there saying, "Well, that's not the deal I'm getting. You're an incel or whatever." Now, for every one guy that says that, 100 other guys will say, "G man, you know what? You're spot on." So, what what's going to happen? Generally, even if you enter into this traditional arrangement uh where, you know, your expectation is uh the woman will manage the household, um, she will manage uh the children, um, and she'll uh, you know, provide you with intimacy uh on a relatively frequent basis. You enter into that and then and then your part is to go out, you bust your balls 12 hours a day, 10 hours a day, five, six days a week, whatever you do, run a business, whatever it is, right? You you got to bring home the, you got to bring home the the moola. And so what generally happens is guys enter into this arrangement and I'm going to say specifically especially when men don't when when you don't have kids, which is even worse. You get a woman who's staying at home, not doing anything, not upholding uh her side of any of the deal. You'll come home, the house will be dirty. She's been lying on the couch all day watching, you know, Stranger Things or Vampire Diaries, you know, seasons 1 to 8 on repeat, doesn't want to cook any food, doesn't want to do anything, uh, or the sex dries up. So, essentially, a lot of guys get left holding the bag and caring for a woman who's providing them with absolutely no benefit. So, quite literally a piece of dead wood. And this happens over time uh, at different frequencies depending on who that person is. Not saying everyone does this, but this is very common, very common. And then what'll start happening is uh that woman will then start offloading her jobs onto the man. Okay? She's going to come up with stuff about mental load. All right? She's exhausted. Uh he doesn't take on the emotional burden of the household. Uh he needs to be doing X, Y, and Z. He should be coming home after work and cooking to take some emotional load off her plate. You know, he should be coming home and putting the dishwasher on and um putting the clothes on and and hanging them up to help her out because what's going to happen is then they get all resentful. And guess what happens then? Once resentment kicks in, [ __ ] goes downhill. No action and you're on the way to the uh the family court. So all emotional load is is this is my opinion on that emotional load. Emotional what they call it emotional fatigue. All that is is a woman getting bored and resentful. That's my honest opinion. Is finding a reason for when they also they've lost interest in a man uh to henpeck him ad nauseam, like just completely critique him. Uh pull him apart the second he walks in the door or just before he walks out to work in the morning, he's already [ __ ] copped a hiding. Kid you not, guys. Uh consider subbing to the channel if you're new. Um if you want to see my exclusive content, my archive stuff, it's over on the Locals. There's a link in the video description and pin pin comment uh that supports the channel also. So go and check that out. And if you want to talk to me, I do 30 and 60 minute um call options. You can also find the details in the Calendly link uh in the video description uh as well. Let's continue. >>
Biosis requires a differentiation that is complimentary. One party provides what the other lacks. The masculine and feminine archetypes in their uncorrupted forms fit this archetype perfectly. This is the lock and key model. The man in the relationship provides structure, stability, direction while the woman provides nurturing and emotional attunement. The masculine protects the feminine while the feminine restores the masculine. It is a closed loop energy system that is self-sustaining.
However, this process of natural symbiosis has experienced a cultural disruption as society has rejected the key notion of differentiation. Suddenly to notice and to encourage differences between men and women is not evidence of natural law but social inequality. Under the ideology of feminism, the goal has been to reject symbiosis as a model and treat men and women as though they are same, which leads to two distinct outcomes. The first is competition. If women begin to adopt masculine traits and act like men, then the two organisms suddenly start to compete over resources. As they see that they have nothing to contribute to each other, there is no need to cooperate. There's no benefit to be achieved. As regrettable as this development is, competition is relatively wholesome as it.
>> So generally what uh will happen is especially if the woman is a competitive kind, the competitive type, the boss babe, whatever it might be, uh she might get with a guy who uh who might be above her at the time when it comes to earning potential or um I guess progress in a career, you know, in the hierarchy. Uh and uh she might catch up to him. She might catch up to him or or exceed him when it comes to earnings, you know, title, uh, prestige, all that sort of stuff. And you'll hear women say, "Oh, yeah, I outgrew him and um, he couldn't keep up with me and all this sort of stuff." And they move on to the next guy. They want someone who to look up to, right? To someone to keep challenging them. So, you get you get this happening in society at the moment. We got women being hyper competitive um, in the workforce. Nothing wrong with that, but their nature generally, they they're going to want someone who's better than them. And they want to look up. And so if they're overachieving, you know, and outstripping men um of accolades and and earning, what happens? There's only a very small percentage of men that they're going to want. And so what happens then? You get a lot of uh disgruntled women um unhappy with the man that they've got who they were very happy with at the start. But over time, depending on how long it takes them to catch up and then exceed, they start looking at that guy like a roadblock, uh, like a rock around her neck. Like she's doing all the work, she's earning all the money now. Uh and she's going to get mad at the guy. You know, men men will their whole life if they've got a woman who respects them, not even respects them, men will just put up with it anyway. But let's talk for what men will do uh to to be happy with providing, right? They they'll put up with BS here and there, but really they want someone who appreciates them um gives them genuine um intimacy and is stable, is stable. That's it. The guy will then, you know, more or less pay for everything for the rest of her life. But men don't get that. Especially women uh of the more recent generations who have been programmed not to want to be uh someone who partners up with the man. They want to be someone who's better than the man. And so there you go. The parasite then outpowers the host and kills it. >>
It's a fight for the same resource and it's reasonably clear what's going on. What's far more insidious is the other outcome, parasetism. This is becoming far more common where women are rejecting feminine duties of submission and nurturing but at the same time actively resisting adopting any masculine responsibilities for provision or protection. It is a hybrid strategy where she demands the autonomy of a modern woman while at the same time demanding the financial support and protection of a traditional man. Such a woman can be accurately described in biological terms as a parasite because she extracts the benefits of both gender roles while fulfilling neither.
When examining key areas of modern relationships with regards to how men and women relate to each other, we regrettably find that parasetism is frighteningly common. Looking at
>> I want to talk about another thing too. Okay, there's also another thing that happens here when you got a parasite on a strong host. Okay, that strong host um he's gonna be out. He's gonna be busy and he's gonna have the pressure on his shoulders that he needs to support and provide for two people at the least if you got a family. Obviously, that's more males to feed and clothe and all that sort of stuff. So, that guy's out. That's his mission purpose in life to make money. All right? To make sure everyone's looked after in all the ways that people need to be looked after in the modern times. These women who are at home, a lot of them get bored. Uh, they're bored uh and they start getting resentful of that man who has to go out maybe get promotions, get higher paying jobs uh to keep up the lifestyle, but he's not home a lot. So, they get their nose at a joint with him and they start getting bored and they want to have uh they want to get action, right? They're looking for something to do because they got nothing going for them because they've decided to be a stay-at-home um stay-at-home girlfriend um or wife. So, they're out cheating while the guy's at at work. Now, I'm not even saying women who don't work who do this. Like, I've come across this bunch of times on the dating apps uh and, you know, Instagram and all that. When you connect with women, uh, you find out pretty quickly, uh, that they're not actually single or they're married or they've got boyfriends. Or the very probably the worst case scenario is you find out after you've been there and done that and she's probably put you in danger of getting a feeling the wrath of a disgruntled sort of blue-pilled guy who's angry that he's busted his wife or girlfriend cheating, he's going to come to your door, isn't he? >>
Stress and tension in a relationship. In a competitive model, this looks like man and woman fighting. Frequent arguments over who is right, keeping grievance scorecards. Disagreements become a war where the objective is to annihilate the enemy. This is obviously dysfunctional as what is intended in nature is a symbiotic model where two people work together using disagreements as an opportunity to learn from each other, to gain new perspectives, and to co-regulate.
But for many men, it is the parasitic model that most accurately describes their relationship, where the woman is granted free reign to dump her anxiety and stress onto the man, regulating herself by destabilizing him. And yet, crucially, this only ever flows one way. He is expected to be a stoic repository of her emotions. And yet, she is not expected to provide the same nurturing and care in return in this instance.
>> And that's the thing, right? Said, "The man's always expected to provide something, but as I was getting to earlier, and I'll probably talk about it again and touch on it because I want to talk about what happens at the end of relationships and how that host gets um discarded, but a lot of these women don't provide anything and they're not expected to. And if the guy tries to pull her up on it or he tries to pull her up on uh overspending money, you know, buying Amazon parcels and all these subscriptions and all these sort of things that women blow money on, you know, wanting holidays and expensive clothes and all of that, then he he faces fierce resistance because that parasite the whole reason for that parasite attaching to that host i.e. that man is that he get she gets access to his resources. So as he tries to take him away or tries to limit those resources that are provided, they're going to get very protective, very angry, very nasty. She is a parasite because the peace that she is experiencing was stolen from him. Beyond the emotional sphere, it's also in the practical details of many relationships that you can see this model of parasetism at play. In a competitive model, a relationship looks like transactional scorekeeping. I did this yesterday, so you need to do this today. There is no good faith, and it results in frequent arguments as each partner is chronically anxious that they're doing more than their fair share. In a symbiotic model, there is no expectation that the man and woman's contributions perfectly match a 50/50 split. Instead, roles and duties are assigned to each person based on competence. If the man is more skilled at generating resources and the woman is more skilled at domestic management, then the relationship naturally maps onto the provider stay-at-home wife dynamic. And though it also features some level of differentiation, the parasitic model, by contrast, features strategic incompetence. In that model, the woman actively exaggerates the level of anxiety and overwhelm that she is experiencing in order to encourage the man to take on a more parenting role where he's >>
Exactly. Right. So, that's what I was just talking about. Uh, women sherking their duties and then trying to offload it onto the guy uh because, yeah, they're emotionally burdened. Responsible not only for his needs but also for hers. Sadly, many men do not realize that they are living with a parasite because on the surface this can look like traditional femininity. When a woman says, "I want a man to take care of things," it can awaken that ancient masculine instinct to care for a woman. But the key difference is that in a symbiotic relationship, while a man does provision a woman with resources and protection, he receives something in return. By contrast, when a woman is a parasite, she will demand the protection of a traditional wife, but she offers only the contribution of a dependent child. Men often see evidence of this early on in the dating process where she invokes traditional gender roles in order to encourage the man to pay for their dates while at the same time invoking modern feminist ideology to explain why she does not owe the man any traditional feminine duties. Again, many men are unaware of the fact that they are dealing with a parasite because from a symbiotic perspective, they believe that provisioning a woman with protection and resources is part of natural masculinity. And they mistakenly believe that their sex life is evidence that the woman is making her own feminine contribution. But if
>> I want to talk about like I talk about this all the time, right? I have a certain view on this. I know people um don't agree with me and that's fine. We all have our individual uh individual opinions. So my view is I don't think men should be dealing with women who want to work from home and not contribute financially uh at all. Well, not sorry, not work from home, stay at home, be stay-at-home girlfriends and kept women because you're just putting yourself uh into the danger seat, right? You're putting yourself into the hot zone. What happens when things blow up? And a lot of the time they do, it's one out of two. It's one out of two times. What's going to happen? You're going to be absolutely castrated uh in divorce court. And there's nothing nastier, nothing more ruthless, more mercenary than a woman who is trying to extract that final bit of juice out of you before she, you know, discards you. That parasite completely killing the host. And now you can see those I'll show you if you guys know what I'm talking about is this parasite and I've seen it on TV or, you know, one of those documentaries. It's like something out of the Last of Us, that show, right? And it um it infects a grasshopper and it quite literally burrows into its brain. Uh and it literally takes it over and then when it decides to leave uh that host, that husk, it quite literally there is nothing remaining inside the shell uh of that grasshopper. It's it's it's quite literally sucked everything out of it and the thing's just dead. And it pops out of the top of its head and it's gone. I know it sounds a little bit extreme, but this is what happens to a lot of men out there. If they examine their sexual intimacy more closely, they'll see clear evidence of parasetism. While they do have sex, it is always the man who is initiating intimacy. Again, he is required to take the active role while she can passively enjoy the benefits of being the one who feels desired and pursued. During the sexual act itself, he is the one who is making more of an effort to direct how the love making unfolds. The length, the positions, the reciprocity of oral sex, and worst of all, outside of the bedroom, the sex life becomes a weapon that she can wield to get what she wants. Sex is held over his head like a hostage in a terrorist negotiation, threatening him that if he does not comply instantly with her desires, then their sex life is going away. She will also pathize his desire if he attempts to initiate sex too frequently, accusing him of being perverted or obsessed with sex. She frames the normal human desire for sex. >>
And that's the thing, right? When these women are trying to lock down the guy or when they're trying to get that guy locked in, he's going to get absolutely flooded with it. Absolutely flooded uh with action. It'll be Bang Bros reenactments. It is on. He's going to think it's the best thing ever. This is going to be the status quo. This is what he's getting every day cuz every time he sees her, it's just on. And she can't wait to see him. And she goes out and she buys all her sexy outfits and lingerie and all that. You move in or you get married with him. Say goodbye to all that. She's walking around with her bloody tracksuit pants on that she's had for she's had on for 4 days unwashed straight. You know, food dropped all over t-shirt she's been wearing for two days. >>
Sexual intimacy as though it is a moral failing in the man with questions like, "Is this all you care about?" What's important to understand is that you can be in a relationship with a parasitic woman even if there is a sex life. But the question that men need to ask themselves is whether or not she wants you or if she simply wants to be wanted by you. If sex only ever occurs at her discretion and she treats your desire as though it is a nuisance that she needs to manage, then this is not a healthy symbiotic relationship. It is parasitic. A lot of men would be completely shocked if they actually did an audit of their relationship and discovered how parasitic their relationship truly was. But the reason for this is because parasetism does not display itself as a strategy openly from the beginning. It's something that occurs gradually. Again, looking at nature, it is the strategy of many parasites to appear harmless or even mutually beneficial at the beginning in order to gain a host's trust. At the beginning of a relationship, a parasite will make themselves Oh,
>> I reckon Alex has probably had a suppository. He's seen the world for what he's got on your mate. >>
appear as though they are offering symbiosis. She will be loving and kind, offering lots of affection. But you would be mistaken to believe that this behavior is evidence of symbiosis that simply turned parasitic later on in the relationship when it is actually the chosen strategy of the parasite to appear symbiotic in order to gain access. What many men discover is that the strategy of parasetism is only revealed after the woman finds herself in a secure place, typically after marriage or childbirth. Once the masculine duties to the woman are legally enforceable, then the incentive structure changes. Before then, she had to earn the commitment of the male host. But now that his continued investment in her is legally mandated and the cost of him exiting the relationship is catastrophic in terms of finances and access to his children. Then the parasitic woman realizes that there's no longer any need to uphold the pretense that she is making an equal contribution to the relationship. Gradually she winds down her feminine contribution. There is less domestic duties. There's less emotion and compassion and nurturing towards him and certainly a decrease in the frequency of their sex. While she withdraws her feminine contribution, she maintains or even increases her expectation on the man fulfilling his duties. She
>> And then she'll dangle it over his head. So this guy doesn't even know what's happening. He doesn't realize that uh she's more or less switched off on him. She's gotten what she can out of him and no longer needs to provide that man with any benefit because there's no uh there's no benefit for her to do so. And so when a woman switches off, you know, the old light switch effect or whatever you want to call it, uh that's it. There's no coming back. Uh that guy is going to be jumping through hoops. He's not going to know which way is up or down. Okay? She's going to tell him, "No, you need to do the dishes, you need to mow the lawn every week, you need to do this, and now you need to pick the kids up from here, or you need to, you know, the list goes on. It doesn't matter what it is. There isn't a real reason that's going to make her want to find him attractive again or want to have sex with him again because that's not going to happen. She just browbeats him into submission and then bails on him anyway and uh this guy doesn't understand why it's happened. That's why a lot of people find my content or similar other creators out there. Try looking for answers. Most guys, you know, in hindsight, you look back, you're like, "Oh, shit." You know, this pattern that Alex is talking about or Gman's talking about, he literally described my experience like word for word, play for play, uh, step for step. Why is that? Because it's so common and frequent. I talked to a lot of guys who have had that experience. I've had a similar experience on more than one occasion, too. We we're sharing information. That's what this content's all about. And you start to see a pattern here. Demands that he spends more time with her, that he offers more emotional validation, that he increase his paycheck. At a certain stage, any pretense of symbiosis is completely lost. We have a full-blown instance of a parasitic woman existing purely off the resources and energy expenditure of a man. It's at this stage that a critical psychological paradox emerges, which is the resentment of dependency. A lot of men would imagine that if they are actively contributing more to the relationship than they are receiving, then this would engender gratitude and appreciation from the woman. However, they find the opposite. Instead of being grateful, the woman is frequently more hostile. This is because deep down she understands that she's the beneficiary of an unequal relationship. She knows that she's not pulling her weight. She is aware of the imbalance, but in order to protect her ego, she reframes the narrative and casts the man as a villain. If she can successfully paint the man in a negative light, casting him as the one who is exploitative or selfish, then suddenly all of the gifts that he provides for her is seen as reparations out of the guilt that he must necessarily feel. She convinces herself that she is not a parasite. She is simply a victim. This self-deception is one of the hardest parts for a man to psychologically untangle. Because if he senses that something is out of balance in his relationship, he might ask the woman about their dynamic, seeking validation of his suspicions. But if the woman has truly convinced herself that she is not a parasite, that she is simply a victim. Then she's going to respond to any inquiry with anger. His concerns will simply be reframed as further evidence of his inherent defectiveness, further validating her requirement of reparations. If the man >>
Sounds good, doesn't it? Get married, fellas. Get married. Alex has basically um said exactly what I was just saying at the start of this video. >>
I think you really need to experience it as well to truly understand it. You know, it's one thing watching videos of people who who who sort of explain it to you. And uh you got, you know, SRRI adjunct professor Alexander Grace um, you know, doing his scientific presentation here. I'm not sure if he's experienced it or not. Sounds like he may have because his content has changed. Now, I'm just speculating here. Uh but but definitely as a man, you're never going to look at women the same way again. You're not going to look at relationships the same way again once you truly experience uh this dynamic and also are able to identify what's happened. You'll never look at women and relationships the same way again. Yes. Because for the most part, there's not a lot in it for a man because what what do you think you're getting? You're getting sex and you're getting a a pleasant woman um who's going to be around and support you. You don't a lot of the time get that. You're going to get someone who starts getting bitter, angry, uh nagging you and you're paying for it and you're getting no sex. You you're not getting anything. You're not even getting I think I think for the most part the sex isn't the main issue. It's intimacy and someone showing you that they actually give a [ __ ] about you. Not speaking uh down to you, being disparaging, doing the absolute opposite of being supportive. I think that's why a lot of men also uh I've done some other videos talking about why men go to Women of the Night. And these women of the night say, "A lot of these guys don't even want to do the physical stuff. They want to hug and uh they want someone to talk to for an hour to feel like they're getting intimacy and that feminine nurturing treatment from a woman. Most men aren't going to get it. And if you do show a woman that maybe you need that, maybe you're struggling, you're having a hard time, maybe a mental health challenge, a lot of the time, uh they're even if they don't admit it, they're going to look at you differently, like you're not going to come across as as strong and uh as a rock like these women want. And that's why you're here again a lot of the time when you need help, when when even if you've been with a woman for a long time, you've been supporting her and then misfortune comes your way. You might get made uh redundant and the job market's bad and you can't get a job and you know you're trying but you you know this is a common thing right and your mental health goes down because we as men uh we really empathize we really not empathize we really identify with what we do for a living and how we spend our time and our structure as to give us self value right and when that's gone obviously things go downhill pretty quick especially when there's not a lot of uh a lot of hope out Yeah. And then these women when it comes to their time after being looked after, uh, having, you know, you as their support network, when when their time comes, a lot of them, they can do it for a little bit, but if it's extended, it's going to wreck things and they're out the door. >>
And ever does try and establish a clear boundary with regards to finances or domestic duties, you'll find that a parasite does not easily detach. A parasite is terrified of losing access to its host. And so if the host ever tries to remove it, the parasite is going to dig in deeper. A leech does not let go simply because the host shakes his leg. It simply clamps down deeper. In modern relationships, if a man withdraws his affection, she's going to accuse him of neglect. If he withdraws money, she will accuse him of financial abuse. Every attempt from him to restore fairness and steer the relationship back towards symbiosis is reframed by her as an attack on her safety. It's at this stage when many men finally accept the truth of their situation. They are trapped. They have a parasite that is feeding off of them and they don't know how to remove the parasite without massive personal cost. It's true what they say.
>> Far out, Alex, mate. You're a man of my own heart here. Very well said. Really? I thought that was really good. That realization, guys, put in the comments if you've had it and if you've made it this far in the video, that realization when you are you realize you're in just a bad you're in a bad position or you're stuck in a relationship with someone or a living circumstance with someone, you don't want to be there. You've realized it's a really bad deal for you. Put in the comments. It hits you like a ton of bricks and you realize at some point you're going to pay. Like, so it can't go on forever. Hey, sometimes you don't know that you're in prison until you try and escape. However, it is important to note that there are some men who will never reach this realization. This is because the woman's parasetism has infected their brains. Again, we can look at nature for an explanation. The most advanced parasites do not simply attach themselves to the host's body. They actually infect their mind and begin to influence their behavior. There are certain fungi that attach themselves to the bodies of insects and then send spores into their brain, influencing how that insect moves, ultimately guiding them to a certain place in the rainforest so that the spores of the fungus can reproduce more effectively. In that instance, the fungus ends up killing the insect. But there are many parasitic relationships that actually require the host to continue to live. If the host organism perishes, then that's the end of the parasite's access to resources. You can see why from a strategic point of view, psychological hijacking is the most effective strategy that a parasite can employ. The host continues to live and to provide resources, but its behavior is now governed by the parasite. What's necessary for this strategy to work is to rewire the neural pathways of the host away from self-preservation. This must be disrupted. Otherwise, there is a huge danger that the host will discover the parasite and try and rid themselves. In human relationships, the most effective form of psychological hijacking is when a female parasite convinces a man that his exploitation is actually an expression of virtue. Men are neurologically hardwired for values of honor and virtue. If a parasitic woman convinces a man that it is honorable that he lived with a parasite such as her, then her continued sustenance is guaranteed in order. >>
It's like David Attenborough. All right, I think that's a good video. Well done, Alex. I'm really actually enjoying, if you ever watch my videos, you never will. I'm sure you're too busy. Really enjoying the new direction. Good stuff, mate. I think uh you'll be helping a lot of men with this type of content. So, keep this up. Keep it up. It's awesome. Uh guys, thanks for watching. If you've made it to the end, see you in the next one.