Transcription
Yes, we have talked a lot about Trump in recent days, little about Epstein, but at least a bit. But what about Melania, actually? She was so nice and has now announced herself from obscurity. However, neither voluntarily, nor was it in her interest. Melania Trump's legal dispute with journalist Michael Wolff has now reached a point where even the federal judge appointed by Trump himself is trying to talk sense into Melania. As in, stop it, withdraw, you are committing political and social suicide here. But of course, the proud owner of more unfinished degrees than Trump has ended wars knows better and continues to go to the barricades. Now she is even demanding personal sanctions against Wolff. The whole thing has caused such wide ripples that even Amanda Ungaro has spoken out and is also firing in Melania's direction. Yes, you remember, this Brazilian model who once moved in the same circles and, well, has more or less the same life story as Melania, but was now deported because she had threatened, among other things, to publicly hang Melania for her connection to Jeffrey Epstein. So, as promised yesterday, I will bring you up to date here, and I am very curious to see how this will develop further, because a little spoiler upfront, if Michael Wolff were to follow up now, it could become a disaster for Melania, because then she would have to testify under oath about her past to unpack documents that are in Michael Wolff's possession. And while that is happening, there is also a new figure in the camp. A female figure, who flatters Trump with messages like "I want to lick the makeup off your face." Yes, Melania is currently distracted, so over to Donny. Curtain up, it's going to get really wild. So, again, it was quiet around Melania, but that was probably not only because she doesn't even want to be seen in public with Donny anymore or that she is working on the next Oscar-winning masterpiece Melania 2: The Stupidity Strikes Back or something like that. No, Melania has legal worries. Things have been quite hectic behind the scenes in recent days. Melania probably didn't behave very cleverly there, in sharp contrast to her intellect. So much so that even a federal judge has now warned her: "Stop, while you still have the advantage." In other words, you are running your head full tilt against a wall, and your 10 cm layer of makeup won't protect you either. And as hinted in the intro, this was not just any federal judge, but a federal judge appointed by Trump himself, Judge Mary Wisecoll of the Southern District Court of New York, right? So, it's always the Southern District of New York, no matter what topic I'm talking about. So, I think America only has one judicial district, but okay. Judge Wisecoll, in any case, presided over the very proceedings that Michael Wolff, the former biographer of Donald Trump, had initiated against Melania Trump. The background was that Melania Trump had threatened Michael Wolff with a lawsuit for billions of dollars in damages for defamation if he did not retract statements about her regarding Epstein. She claimed that these statements about an alleged connection to Jeffrey Epstein were false and defamatory. Thereupon, Michael Wolff sued Melania, arguing: "You are restricting my constitutionally protected right to free speech and journalistic work under the First Amendment, right? So far, so good." So, Wolff had initially filed this lawsuit in a state court. However, Melania had the case referred to a federal court, invoking so-called diversity jurisdiction. In her view, the case should not be heard in a state court, but in a federal court, right? A bit strange, after showing such a fighting spirit, then first yes, no, then rather before the very big court. Yes, Michael Wolff said no problem. And you surely remember, when Michael Wolff said, all right, right, then we'll do it in federal court. Suddenly, the First Lady of the United States was officially without a fixed residence for months, so that no mail from Michael Wolff's lawyers could be delivered to her. The case eventually landed, right, because you can't flee forever, as if by a miracle, with a federal judge appointed personally by Trump, right? Yes, who would have thought? So, but now it gets interesting, and now the news comes. Ultimately, Judge Wisecoll decided. I can, well, yes, I cannot handle this lawsuit, this case, because I have no jurisdiction over Michael Wolff's lawsuit. This sounds a bit surprising at first, because as I said, she herself was appointed by Trump. Basically, she is telling Michael Wolff, you have to wait until Melania actually sues you for defamation, otherwise I can't do anything. So, and now it gets interesting. According to legal experts, this does not quite correspond to what the Anti-SLAPP Act of the State of New York provides. And it sounds a bit absurd to us non-lawyers that a federal judge can even say, well, no, I have no jurisdiction in this case, even though the case was assigned to her, right? Yes, most likely on Donald Trump's orders. So, but now comes the crux. This move was in Melania's interest, and this judge has now also made it very clear to Melania directly. As in, Melania, if you want to sue Wolff for defamation, then do it outside of court. I am not competent at the moment. So, that's the core of the message. We all know, however, that Melania doesn't want to sue Michael Wolff at all, because she wants to avoid a so-called discovery process. Or, let me put it this way, we all know it, except Melania, apparently. I don't know if she, if she realizes that. Wait for what's coming next. So, let me put it this way, viewed neutrally now, it would not be in Melania's interest to sue Michael Wolff herself, because then a so-called discovery process would occur, where she would have to undergo testimony under oath or an examination under oath about her past with Jeffrey Epstein. Now, remember her appearance, where she, when the topic of Epstein was quiet, suddenly stepped in front of the camera and announced to the world, I have nothing to do with him, right? Or without any reason, and she seemed very nervous. We'll get to that appearance in a moment. Now, just a few days ago, Melania also told this federal judge, after she had informed her, I have no jurisdiction, better leave it. Yes, now Melania is paying her back. Yes, no, she also wants sanctions against Michael Wolff. And to clarify, this judge dismissed the case because, officially, due to lack of jurisdiction, at least as long as nothing more comes from Michael Wolff. And Melania's response to this, to this assistance, was: "No, Wolff should be sanctioned out of court." Just look at this excerpt, where the judge even says literally: "I question, right?" So, translated quote of the highlighted part. I question whether it is in the interest of both parties to pursue this case further. End quote. So, even this Trump-friendly judge has realized what a own goal this whole thing was. I don't want to say shit show. No, I think own goal describes it better from Melania. I mean, Wolff, Michael Wolff, did his job as a journalist, and yes, that Melania had something to do with Chef Epstein, everyone should know by now. Melania still threatens him because it doesn't suit her that he talks about her with a billion-dollar lawsuit. He says, "All right, then let's get in the ring and yes, I'll sue you directly and yes, then she pulls a U-turn and suddenly has no residence anymore." Then this judge says, first rejected, no jurisdiction. And the judge also says, I don't think it's in the interest of both parties to continue with this. She says to Melania, look here. So, essentially, Melania, do you realize that I just did you a favor? I've been letting this case lie dormant since February, right? Which is actually not entirely legal either, but whatever. Until last month, I practically did nothing with this case. I defused the situation, and it became quieter. Do you actually realize what I've done for you, Melania, by not handling this case? My note. No, she doesn't realize it. It's not like Melania understands such a subtle hint. And yes, the judge was really clear enough. If you look at it now, she basically says, if you also demand sanctions against Michael Wolff now, then you have to clearly prove that his lawsuit was completely baseless from the beginning. And we all know that you have no evidence, because he acted within the framework of the Anti-SLAPP Act and generally within the framework of normal journalistic activities. Therefore, Melania, please understand my hint with the fence post and let it go now. I dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction. Just let it be now. Yes, then she said the following quote: I believe that people sometimes get so caught up in the dynamics of the moment that they can no longer pause and consider whether such a request is worthwhile at all and what burden they are imposing on the court. End quote. Another encrypted message from this judge to Melania's lawyers, essentially: "Are you aware of the burden you are imposing on me? I have already made a rather unusual decision that could backfire on me, and I have first postponed and then dismissed the case for jurisdictional reasons, and now you want to reopen the whole thing. What are you lawyers actually doing, right?" Yes, so quote essentially, right? Quote message end. Why Melania's lawyers are going along with it, I would be interested in that too. I could almost imagine that they told Melania the same thing, but well, no, she just has to get her way, or perhaps the lawyers say, yes, well, we don't give a damn, we're getting our money, so we'll just continue, no matter how absurd it all is, and yes, we just hope that it doesn't permanently damage our own careers. Yes, maybe it's all due to stress. Melania has been through a lot, if you look at the last few weeks. Trump, for example, left her hanging again. Here's the flight list, as he was on his way to his rather bizarre speech at Mount Rushmore, where it also hailed. The entire Trump family was there, and even Natalie Harp was there. Donald Trump's "human printer," as she is now called. Other people give her completely different nicknames, which I won't repeat here, but look at this. According to a report, this Natalie Harp sent Trump some very interesting messages that were then leaked. Partly, it reminded me of Prince Charles and his flirtation with Camilla. Pearls were dropped like this: Quote: "I will lick the makeup off your face. You smell like my soul. I had cosmetic surgery to look like Ivanka." Trump's daughter, mind you. And I was waiting in the trunk of your limousine. Yes, especially the part about Ivanka is quite sick. Rose from Tuna Half Man was harmless in comparison, and I'm sorry for giving you such images in your head again, but hey, it's not like the rest of the people in Trump's circle are necessarily enjoying the best mental health, and yes, well, that we now know that Trump is only into men lately. Otherwise, rumors might arise. So, where was Melania when this, in my opinion, somewhat creepy lady was professing her love to her husband, because Melania was no longer visible? Do you know what Donald Trump's schedule has looked like lately? Constantly just Executive Time, then again Executive Time, and yes, in between political discussions. Adam Park Homenko also asks the question, where is Melania, actually? On the eve of the 250th anniversary of the United States, she was nowhere to be seen. If her name were Jill Michelle or Hillary, the White House press corps would be asking incessantly, where the hell is the First Lady? Why isn't anyone asking the same question about Melania now? However, in Trump's family clan, this question is apparently not being asked. Even there, everything apparently revolves around this Natalie Harp lately. Eric Trump, for example, called her a legend here and one of the hardest-working people he knows. Yes, I mean, licking makeup off faces, climbing into car trunks, and constantly going to beauty surgery to look like the daughter of the man you profess your love to, that's definitely harder work than running, and it's still, in my opinion, quite sick. So, if you ask me, yes, I thought Pamela Bondi was a bit crazy, but the MAGA people always manage to dig up the next lunatic. I can't say it any other way, or what do you think? Write it to me in the comments. But now back to Melania. By the way, you always notice when the public's attention turns to her again because she's apparently in trouble or has done something extremely stupid. At the moment, both are the case. Then her crisis manager suddenly appears. Mark Beckman, he's immediately on the scene. Suddenly, Mark Beckman is advertising for Melania and praising her as the greatest First Lady of all time, without anyone asking for it. But well, this Beckman strangely only appears in public when Melania urgently needs support, as is the case again now, when this rejection by the federal judge came out and also this message from the federal judge to Melania, stop this thing with Michael Wolff. Let's take a look at this excerpt. Well, looked this active, the most productive the most um vision for a first lady I think in history of America. On the private sector side, it's kind of interesting right. The country embraced her to create this number one movie Molania worldwide. The book went New York Timeseller. Yes, the term shit show is probably more appropriate here. Such programs are also financed by the American taxpayer. So, quote from the moderator Mark, the Trump accounts are doing great. My daughter's Trump account will also receive deposits starting this weekend. I'm looking forward to that. But please explain to us why Fostering the Future has become an extension of this program and why this project of the First Lady is so important. Yes, and Mark Beckman begins to explain. Quote: "Well, you've already mentioned it. In my opinion, this is the most active, productive, and purposeful vision that a First Lady has ever pursued in the history of the United States." In the private sector, it's also remarkable. The whole country supported her, and as a result, the worldwide number 1 movie Melania was created. End quote. My note. Yes, he really said that. The number one worldwide movie Melania. Let's look at that again. Okay, with a budget of 40 million plus a marketing campaign financed by Jeff Bezos for over 70 million, the film Melania generated a proud revenue of still 16.7 million dollars. I calculated that once. Maybe you remember, at an average ticket price of $16, that's about, well, less than 1.05 million viewers worldwide. Across platforms, I get more in a month, and I'm not that big. Yes, still, why don't I get a show like that and am called a visionary? But well, Mr. Beckman also said that Melania's book also became a number one bestseller of the New York Times. Well, let's look at that too. With 85300 copies sold, it was indeed on the New York Times number 1 list, at least for a week. In comparison, Michelle Obama's book sold just 636,000 copies in the same period, i.e., in the first week. So, a little more than eight times as much. Yes, either the book market was in a real crisis that week when Melania's book was released, or this New York Times list was possibly rigged. In any case, after 3 weeks, the book had sold well over 150,000,000 copies, which would have been extremely bad, but as I said, it was still far less. I couldn't find more precise numbers, but I think I don't need to explain to anyone why hardly anyone in the world is interested in, well, in the written garbage by Melania, just as little as in her movie. But back to this show for a moment. At the end, Mr. Beckman also said, quote: "And now she is dedicating all this energy to the children of America." At the same time, such ridiculous stories are spread about her. End quote. Yes, she is dedicating her energy to the children of America. I would have been very interested to know what he means by that. The only thing that comes to mind spontaneously is this. and ridiculous stories. I don't know what he means by that now, perhaps that what witnesses and journalists always say and what is also largely proven by the Epstein files, even by those where the names were blacked out. These are ridiculous stories. Well, and then articles like this one from Politico come out. Quote: "A look into Melania Trump's ambitious political agenda. I think it's precisely because of such articles that so many people, so many major media outlets, no longer take it seriously and switch to independent ones. So, Melania, Trump's ambitious political agenda. What kind of political agenda? Melania describes herself as an exceptionally successful personality and a visionary. Well, what comes out when you implement this vision, you can see from the sales figures of her books and her film. But yes, what the article meant by political agenda, we will look at that in a moment. Possibly her ridiculous attempts to present herself as a peacemaker in the Middle East. Elania was even supposed to lead her own little NATO peace council. Somehow, however, the defense ministers and commanders had certain objections and doubts about her qualifications. Too bad, I would have liked to have seen a nature zone clip by Melania. So, let's take a closer look at what the Politico article means by her ambitious political agenda. When First Lady Melania Trump wanted to host a bipartisan discussion on Capitol Hill this spring to promote her legislative initiative Fostering the Future, a Republican congressman was initially against it. He wondered if the Democrats would even be willing to sit at a table with her. My note: "I can't blame the Democrats. I would run away as soon as she opens her mouth." However, Melania was not deterred by this. She had been talking about this discussion with a certain pride since November. At that time, Donald Trump had signed an Executive Order on Fostering the Future. Look at this picture, how motivated they both look. Both Melania and Donald. Of course, they were only interested in doing good for young people, not in polishing their image. Actually, they didn't feel like it at all, right? I think the picture speaks volumes. Fostering the Future, to explain briefly, is an initiative by Melania Trump that focuses on young people who grew up in the foster care system in the USA. So, basically white children or those transitioning from this system to independence. So, in itself, yes, a good cause. Of course, the whole thing has to be staged grandly for the media, as you can see in the picture. However, this signing in front of the cameras was, I must be honest, nothing but hot air, because it was just an order from Trump that had practically no legal effect, because an Executive Order is not yet a law. The discussion then took place. Afterwards, about half a dozen congressmen went into a room, i.e., behind closed doors. And Melania explained at the same time, I want this law to land on Donald Trump's desk by August. Yes, because so many laws are being passed at the moment. I'll take as a prominent example this law, which was supposed to secure more affordable housing for US citizens, which was even passed by Congress, but Donald Trump simply refuses to sign it, right? Without giving reasons, and yes, although he recently said that the whole thing is just a bad joke anyway, and currently Congress is practically doing no work at all, because the MAGA people are once again being difficult and yes, are against everything that doesn't suit them. So, call me a pessimist, but I claim that this piece of paper they signed here in a media-effective way will probably not be worth much. And I also believe that this piece of paper, this draft law by August, as Melania imagines it, will not see Donald Trump's signature. But the charitable Melania has at least earned 17 million dollars in recent weeks, as has now emerged. Donald Trump, according to his financial disclosures, which he did not make entirely voluntarily, has earned at least 2 billion dollars in the last quarter. Let's look at Melania's figures now. According to these documents, she earned a total of 17.2 million dollars. Anyone can see this in this disclosure, and it's probably just the tip of the iceberg. Around 10.7 million dollars in revenue comes from the film Melania. Yes, that's the irony of it. The film is a huge financial flop, but Melania still collects her share, of course. The damage is to the studio and the film's financiers, right? Well, it's not just with the film Melania, it's generally like that, but honestly, I don't have that much sympathy. Their own fault if you have to produce such garbage, and yes, I don't know who expected this film to be a success, well, I don't know, they would probably also believe that a new Star Wars trilogy with Ray in the lead role would be a good idea. But back to Melania. Daisy Ridley is not the only one who constantly looks like she has constipation, but still gets leading roles. Another approximately 6 million dollars came from Melania's NFTs. Maybe you remember the Melania memecoin, right? A cryptocurrency that, who would have guessed, was pumped and then immediately crashed. It's a classic pump and dump. Nevertheless, the NFT business brought Melania around 6 million dollars. Of course, money that other investors then lost. She also licensed the rights to her book for another 500,000 dollars. In total, her earnings thus amount to approximately 17.2 million dollars. So, things are actually going quite well for Melania at the moment. And the money she earns herself, right, if she were to divorce Trump after all, she can take it with her. So, why is Melania making such a fuss now? Because of this lawsuit or this legal dispute with Michael Wolff? Why does she stand at the podium and open Pandora's box again, which says, when no one was talking about it anymore? Why does she go to the barricades, even though the federal judge tells her to let it go? Yes, there is an answer to that. One name: Amanda Ungaro. You remember Amanda Ungaro, Paulo Zampolli's ex-girlfriend and mother of his child. She still says that she was brought to the United States by Jeffrey Epstein's circle, just like Melania, and became a victim of human trafficking. She also repeatedly claims that she knows many dark secrets about Melania and Donald Trump and repeatedly threatens to reveal them. According to Mediaite, Amanda Ungaro has now released a short video with the message: "Yes, Melania, why don't you sue Michael Wolff for defamation, as you announced so grandly? If you really believe he defamed you, why don't you take him to court? Instead, you are still limiting yourself to threats." Yes, and that's exactly the crux. And that's precisely why Melania's behavior towards the judge, towards the judge, is now on everyone's lips, who are even remotely interested in the Epstein case. It makes no sense. Instead of suing Wolff, as Melania had threatened several times, she seems to be focusing instead on betting that this judge, whom her husband personally appointed, will continue to fight for her, even though the judge told her, no, I won't do that, or rather, I've done it now, that's enough. Yes, in any case, this judge has, as I said, completely dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction. Although, personally, I am of the opinion that Michael Wolff will probably file his lawsuit again, because the decision, well, the decision to dismiss the case was officially based only on jurisdiction. This means he can refile the lawsuit, and then a different judge will be assigned to it. I at least hope that Michael Wolf will do that. We will see how it turns out. This development is still relatively recent. What is certain is that the judge has signaled quite clearly to Melania, right? Stop it. Do you really want to risk a discovery process? Do you really want your dark past to be fully revealed when you have to testify under oath? Melania has now claimed again, probably triggered by this whole new development and because she didn't understand the judge's warning. Melania claims again. All photos with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as all emails, have been taken out of context and are fake and fake news and blah blah blah, right? And she never really had anything to do with him. At the same time, she explains that her big initiative is to teach children how to use artificial intelligence. Somehow, every initiative of hers now seems to be about bringing AI to children. On the motto: Yes, children cannot survive without AI. Yes, because both children and AI are your absolute areas of expertise, Melania, right? But well, whatever, as long as no one talks about Epstein anymore, after you yourself almost reopened it, and yes, Michael Wolff should be sanctioned. It's an interesting logic that Melania is pursuing. I have a short video from Courier Newsroom on exactly this logic, with which Amanda Ungaro also conducted the interview back then, and yes, this short video from this editor summarizes it well, in my opinion. Here is the complete video in the original. Trump administration in her firstview English language media out amand answered some our questions. 15 years old when first Paulo Zampi a businessman with deep ties to both Donald and Trump. She says he pursued her relentlessly, eventually pulling her into a relationship that would define and control her life. According touro, Zampi was an operator in the modeling underworld, someone who arranged visas, managed models, and moved people through powerful networks behind the scenes. Through him, she met Molania and Epstein and Donald Trump. says had ties to Jeffre although he den and that he acted as a recruit of young women like her. She also suggests that stories about relationships within circle including shaped by influence and longterm planning. Describes years of alleged abuse psychological, physical and sexual. She claims she was surveiled, followed, and controlled. She says their home was filled with hidden devices and that her life became something closer to captivity than partnership. In public, she was close to the most powerful people in America. Zampi was so tight with Trump that the couple sat at the Trump table at both inaugurations and spent holidays with the Trump family, attended events at the White House and gatherings at Marlago. But that proximity to power did not help when say Zi had her deported to Brazil and separated from her son. She is caught in ono legal battle. ign kurztok oder? So, quote: Melania Trump's unusual six-minute statement last week, in which she denied any connection to Jeffrey Epstein, sparked numerous speculations online. Shortly thereafter, a story developed from it that the Trump administration apparently wanted to preempt. In her interview with Courier, her first interview with an English-language medium at all, Amanda Ungaro answered some of the most pressing questions, right? You remember this interview. We've already covered it. Angaro told Ungaro, sorry, Ungaro told, her story began when she was just 15 years old. At that time, she met Paolo Zampoli, a businessman with close ties to Donald Trump and also Melania. She says Sampoli persistently pursued her and eventually forced her into a relationship that would define and control her entire life. According to Ungaro, Zampoli was a key figure in the world of modeling agencies. He arranged visas, managed models, and moved people behind the scenes within influential networks. Through him, she met Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Donald Trump. Ungaro claimed that Zampoli had ties to Jeffrey Epstein, which Zampoli himself denies, and that he recruited young women like her. She also suggests that stories about relationships within this circle, including Melania's relationship, were deliberately shaped by influence and long-term planning. Ungaro describes years of alleged psychological, physical, and sexual abuse. She claims she was surveilled, followed, and completely controlled. Their shared home was full of hidden surveillance devices, and her life was more like captivity than a partnership. In public, she moved in the closest circles of America's most powerful people. Zampoli was so close to Donald Trump that the couple sat at the Trump family table at both inaugurations. They spent holidays with the Trump family, attended events at the White House, and gatherings at Mar-a-Lago. But this proximity to power, according to her, did not help when Zampoli had her deported to Brazil and separated from her son. She is still in an ongoing legal battle with Zampoli. She also stated that Melania completely ignored her pleas for help. According to her own statements, she is willing to testify under oath before Congress. Melania's six-minute statement was possibly intended to silence something. Perhaps, however, it has instead revealed the weakest point of the cover-up surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, right? That is, Melania herself. Yes. And Amanda Ungaro released a long video message from this YouTube account five days ago, dated January 26th. I don't know if it's her own account. In any case, the video is real and shows her. It's over 26 minutes long and is in Portuguese, where she tells her story again with great urgency. I'll show you a short clip of it now. I won't go through the whole video with you, but I will link it in my sources here. até agora para fazer um pedido muito importante a vocês. Preciso que prestem atenção a cada palavra dita aqui e compartilhem com o máximo de pessoas possível. Todos precisam ter acesso a informações verdadeiras. Aqui está a chave inicial, o ponto de partida de quando Paulo decide executar seu plano diabólica contra nós para que eu perdesse a custódia do meu filho e fosse deportada ao Brasil. Antes da minha prisão, já havíamos tido o problema com a polícia. Não porque éramos criminosos, mas porque Paulo enviou policiais da cidade de Sanos para nos intimidar com desculpa de obter informações sobre o meu filho. Mas existem outras formas de saber disto, como uma simples ligação para mim, a mãe de Giovan perguntando por ele, seria o natural. Do dia 7 de março do ano de 2025, acordamos por volta de 6:15 da manhã com 10 policiais esmurrando, berrando a nossa porta com brutalidade desproporcional, comandados pelo detetive David Kennet. So, as I said, you've seen it, it's in Portuguese. You can watch it with subtitles, although the YouTube subtitles sometimes have some very interesting translations, but you can understand the statements, right? Or if you are proficient in Portuguese, you can of course watch it as is. So, yes, if even a Trump-loyal judge says, "Melania, stop it, you're running headfirst into a wall," and Melania stubbornly continues and happily carries on, then I would say it could get really interesting again, because now we are also talking about Amanda Ungaro again. I hope again that Michael Wolff will react and file another lawsuit. I think the chances are very good, because he hasn't let Melania's stiletto heels walk all over him so far. And I'm curious to see if Amanda Ungaro will also get involved again. She always says, "Dear US Congress, I am ready to testify under oath. Please get me out of Brazil, even if it's just for this interrogation." I will of course stay on top of it for you, and yes, I thank you as always for watching, for following along, for supporting my channel in the form of a subscription or by sharing my videos with your loved ones or on Telegram. Whatever the case, we have almost reached 100,000 shared videos on YouTube alone. That's also a nice milestone. Thanks for that. Let's reach that 100,000 mark outside and we'll see you again tomorrow evening at 6 PM, fresh as ever.