Transcription
If you're not already subscribed to this YouTube channel, go ahead and hit the subscribe button now, along with the bell icon, so you can be notified whenever a new video is posted. And if you're already subscribed, check and make sure that YouTube hasn't unsubscribed you. And of course, be sure to give the video a like, as well as share it on your social media.
The white supremacist hate that. And now the Sunday address. Family, don't ever let anyone tell you that your voice is meaningless or that what you do doesn't have an impact. Cuz when you start looking at where the bootlicks are these days, especially the ones in political circles, these guys are looking and seeing that their days are numbered.
You had an interview, so-called interview, between Eugene Daniels and Negro Jim Klyurn, America's favorite sharecropper. This 85-year-old professional do-nothing dinosaur being interviewed by a pathetic moist clown. And Clyburn himself said that Daniel's roots run deep in the state.
"We've talked about this for for years now. My family has deep roots in South Carolina. Um, I saw one of my aunts this week."
"South Carolinians, as you know, your roots run deep in this state."
This is one bootlick attempting to bestow legitimacy on another. That's how they operate. That's what they learned from these white supremacists on the left. This is bootlick overload here. I could smell the stench of fish grease and stale busy through the computer screen. I swear the devil himself must be in charge of MS.
Now, this kind of nonsense doesn't drive ratings. It only drives people away. Obviously, this little interview was part of somebody's rebuild Clyburn shatter credibility scheme because Daniels asked Clyburn, "Why is it that there seems to be such discontent from the Democrats' own voters?" And this is what Clyburn said.
"We've got to listen to those people who wear those boots that we trying to put on the ground. I don't think we listen enough to them. I've said this and I really believe it with all of my heart. We pay too much attention uh to the consulting class and not enough attention uh to those people, our constituents. Our constituents know what they feel and we have to pay attention to people's feelings. I don't care what is said about their conditions. people respond emotionally. Uh and um my experiences uh tell me uh that we do not spend uh the kind of time, energy and resources uh with uh our ground operation uh that we need to."
"Yeah."
"I don't know why we got away from that. Um, but I think a lot has to do with these consultants who don't get uh their percentages uh out of ground operations."
"Yeah."
"They get off how much uh money they spent on on television."
Did you get that? We pay too much attention to the consulting class and not enough attention to our constituents. Our constituents know what they feel and we have to pay attention to people's feelings. H. Now listen to that. Their constituents, he says, their constituents know what they feel and the Democrats have to pay attention to their feelings. Now that's very interesting that Negro Jim, of all people, would say that Democrats need to listen to their constituents because if you follow my content, you know that up until this weekend, Clyburn was saying exactly the opposite.
"This focuses about you got to be this progressive or that progressive. That phrase defund the police cost Jamie Harrison tremendously. I want everybody in my caucus to be as practical as I am."
"If you could have a caucus meeting right now and you would or or tell folks what they should do differently given the losses that we have, what would you say to them?"
"Stop sloganaring. Sloganarian kills people. Sloganarian destroys movements. Stop sloganarian and let's go about the business of representing people and and building uh hopes and aspirations for people."
He was excoriating that very constituency, giving a tongue lashing to those exact same constituents. Now, those boots on the ground that he was talking about, those were the very young people who were fighting to have a future years back and are still fighting right now, literally fighting for their lives against racist white cops, and Clyburn was fighting against those boots on the ground.
The entire reason that Democrats like Jim Clyburn hated the phrase "defund the police" is because it did the very thing the Democrats have been desperately trying to avoid, and that is to draw a clear, bold distinction between themselves and the Republicans. The Republicans stand for state brutality. They stand for the immunity of bad actors like the police to carry out murders with impunity. Democrats are supposed to be standing in opposition to that, standing for state accountability, that no one is above the law and having a badge is not a license to kill. That's exactly what the voters were demanding. And yet Jim Clyburn, he said there was a problem with that. No, it's not that these ideas are unpopular with voters. It's that it's unpopular with the donor class that the Democrats answer to and with the Democrats' own desire to be part of that illiterate, illicit donor class.
And we know that the Democrats are lying to themselves and people like this woman on Axios, lying when she's trying to claim that, oh, this doesn't resonate with voters. This doesn't work with voters. Because when Democrats decided to do what Jim Klyber wanted, when they took his boy Jamie Harrison and made him head of the DNC, what happened? Democrats got the brakes beat off of them in every election since. They were much better off in 2020 when people were saying "defund the police."
But I've been telling you for the longest time, for the Democrats, this is not about winning elections. It's about winning elections the right way. And the right way means in a way that's expedient and beneficial to the dictates and interests of white power. The only reason Democrats had the ground swell of support that they had in 2020 was because of those very young people out in the streets who Clyburn was attacking and whining about and attempting to wag his finger at them and lecture them. So what happened between then and now? What happened is those very young people stayed home in 2022, then again in 2024, and now Democrats, in what should be the single biggest, easiest political landslide in American electoral history, are struggling to get their own voters to support them.
And this shows what Negro Jim knows. He knows that this is the problem. He knows he's part of the problem. Oh, they can try to blame the problem on so-called consultants if they want, but those white people that they hire to help them con the black vote, those white consultants, they're not the ones who are on the ballot. Those white consultants aren't the ones who the voters are demanding policies from.
And throughout this sloppy, wet kiss, calling itself an interview, Clyburn used other copouts and deflections. I won't bore you with all of them, but this interview demonstrates that he doesn't seem to be in the mood to give lectures anymore. Gee, I wonder why. Perhaps it's because the white media is reporting that Clyburn, who is South Carolina's lone Democrat in Congress, has only survived the South Carolina GOP's plans to eliminate his district by a hair. But it does let Clyburn know the GOP's definitely gunning for his seat. And remember, this crotchety old fogy is hoping to hand his seat over to one of his brats, I mean children, or to some other handpicked puppet like maybe Jamie Harrison. So if and when Republicans do redraw the map so they can split the black voters up into majority white districts, Clyburn knows that none of those white voters are going to vote for him or whoever his handpicked would-be successor is. He's managed to hold on to his seat by the skin of his dentures. I mean, this shows how intellectually bankrupt the bootlicks and negro misleaders are.
In order for Clyburn's words to resonate, he has to have credibility. But he doesn't. And when Klyburn claims that the Democrats are paying too much attention to the consulting class, that means white people who think they know it all. Wouldn't it be nice if Jim Klyburn was one of the leaders of the Democratic party then? I mean, wouldn't it be great if this guy was the most powerful black politician in America or something? Oh, wait. That's exactly what the white media has called him for many years now. And yet here he is complaining about how the party needs to make changes, as if he's not part of the problem. And this pattern on his part of trying to blame everybody and everything else except for himself. This is pretty much what this so-called interview was all about.
Eugene Daniels only gave a passing mention to the fact that the party needs to stop having all of these geriatric fossils like Clyburn in charge. Then maybe it's time for a changing of the guard. Of course, he tiptoed all around it.
"Did you talk to Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer when you were making your decision about?"
"Not one bit."
"Not at all. Because they made the decision to kind of back out and and let some fresh faces get."
"I've said this before and when I say it, I really mean it."
"Mhm."
"I met my late wife in jail."
"Yeah."
Clyburn went straight past that as he was supposed to. It wasn't a serious question. This was the entire reason Biden had to drop out of the presidential race to begin with. He was clearly too old and senile to run again. In fact, he was probably too old and senile to have run the first time. But like the rest of the decrepit crypt keepers running both political parties, they spent all their time mobbed up with billionaires who have helped them cement their position to the point that it's all but impossible to remove them. And Negro Jim Clyburn is the same pathetic type.
Oh, and one more thing. Eugene Daniels, in this puff piece, couldn't help but mention that Negro Jim's fish fry was this weekend.
"Um, the fish fry is tomorrow on Friday. Um, you have uh lots of Democrats who are flying in who will be there."
See, this is the kind of step-and-fetch-it plantation picking-any politicking that white power likes to see black folks engaging in because it shows black people acting like a bunch of fools on a sharecropper's farm instead of acting like a serious constituency. The reason these political parties like these senior citizens to be their political base is because these old people live in the past. So they're more likely to support an empty nothing like Klyburn or Pelosi or Mitch McConnell or Biden or whomever. And also, these old voters basically, they're one-issue voters, and their one issue is usually Social Security. They want to preserve their retirement checks and that's about it. Most of them screwed around in their youth, built nothing for future generations, left nothing for future generations, and destroyed what chance of prosperity the community had. And now, in their old age, they want someone to take care of them. Politicians figured out a long time ago that they could keep the political fraud going a little bit longer by pretending to cater to these old folks, but the boomers are dying out finally. And not enough of the Gen Xers are as dumb and lazy and corrupt as the boomers. And the millennials are understandably cynical about the status quo. And Gen Z are outright distrustful and hostile toward it.
This is why catering to the olders is so important to both political parties, but especially the Democrats. When the young people began protesting against the Israeli government, they didn't even pretend to want to listen to them. Instead, the Democrats led the charge to bring in the police to try to beat the youth back into their place. They're seeing a preview of where the political landscape is tilting, and it frightens them. The boomers allowed and perpetuated this status quo to exist for 40 years to entrench itself until it's gotten to this point. The political rot has become endemic, and creeps like Negro Jim Clyburn are key part of this degeneration. And you got Eugene Daniels smiling like a punk.
Yes, the Democratic party is in big trouble. With all the failures and mistakes that Trump has committed, any politician with an R in front of their names should be toast. It should be a foregone conclusion. Instead, any Republicans who aren't named Trump aren't really feeling the heat. They don't really feel like they're in danger of losing their seats because of him. That's what's happened. It's basically the inverse effect of how Trump was able to make his political star rise regardless of how separate individual politicians were doing at the local level. But now what's happening is those individual Republicans at the local level, they're recognizing that their own political fortunes are not necessarily handcuffed to Trump's. So just because Trump is going down, or at least he's in the middle of a political storm, that's not going to be necessarily hurting them.
Even Eugene Daniels had to admit that Democrats realize that they have low approval ratings. How is that possible when Republicans and their policies are so profoundly disliked? It's because Democrats aren't offering the voters anything. Pointing out how racist Republicans are has not distracted voters from the fact that Democrats aren't offering to do anything about the people's problems. They're not proposing any genuine counter policies to the GOP. They're just running the same playbook they've run for the last 50 years, and especially bad in the last 10. "Vote for us because we're not Trump." This is the very thing that the DNC's own 2024 autopsy report told them that they have to stop doing. They have to actually address the voters' concerns.
But oh no, Negro Jim Clyburn sticking to the party line, that Democrats are getting things done. That's what he said. 70% of voters, according to a New York Times/Sienna poll, within the Democratic party are dissatisfied with the Democratic Party, including 54% of people who voted for Vice President Harris. As someone who fully understands the um backbone of the Democratic Party, black voters who are also looking at the Democratic Party with some side eye, not very happy with what's going on. What do you say to the black voter who looks at those numbers and feels like their loyalty to the Democratic party has not been rewarded?
"Well, one of the problems we have is that people think that you're making progress when you're making headlines. You make progress when you make headway. And we have been making headway all across the board. And then we get a lot of criticism because the headlines aren't there."
Oh, they're getting things done. You see, it's just the fact that what they do doesn't make it into the headlines. You see, uh, yeah, because everybody knows that CNN, MS, NBC, ABC, NBC, and until recently CBS, as well as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and other outlets, all of these guys, they hate the idea of giving the Democrats any credit for anything, right? They've got some sort of unwritten media embargo not to give the Democrats any sort of credit, right? Because that's what you would have to believe in order to give Clyburn any sort of credibility for that lie. The ideal we're getting things done is just not making it into the headlines. This is just another of the DNC's favorite lies to tell. The whole perception lie. Well, it's not that we're not getting anything done. It's just that you aren't seeing it. You see, I mean, we're having all of these wins, all of these victories. We're making all of this progress. It's just that you're not feeling it. That's all. See, the problem isn't us. The problem is you. It's that you're not feeling it. It's not that we're not getting the job done. They're blaming you for thinking that they're not doing anything. It's the old political Jedi mind trick. You Democrats haven't done anything that we told you to do. Well, we've done all kinds of things. You just haven't seen any headlines about it. Yes, you've done plenty of things. We just haven't seen the headlines. Who the hell are they trying to fool? This is them blaming you for their failures. Oh, it's all perception. You see your phony perception, your false perception. See, the problem is you're just not sharp enough to realize all the great stuff that they're getting done. You seem to think that they failed. That's just a perception issue. They're talking to you like they think you're stupid. These are the kind of talking points they picked up from their white consultants, by the way.
Well, then explain this to me. Have we gotten reparations, or is that just a lack of headlines? Did the Democrats get reparations for us, and we just missed it 'cause the headlines weren't written? Have we gotten an anti-black hate crime bill? Or is that also something that got done but it just didn't make it into the headlines? Biden promised a raft of policies: the George Floyd Policing Act, a White House-level police accountability commission, that "Lift Every Voice" scheme, the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, etc. So, did Democrats get any of those things done? Do nothing policies that they were? Or is that also just another case of it just not being in the headlines?
The problem for the Democratic leadership is that since at least the 1980s, Democrats have leaned hard toward catering to the exact same white wealthy donor class as the Republicans. You look at who Democrats hobnob with, who they do private fundraisers for, who they get big donations from. It's the exact same corporate crooks as the GOP. I've laid out for you how Jonathan Gray, the president of Blackstone, America's largest landlord, bought up entire neighborhoods, then declared that all of those houses were no longer for sale. They were only for rent. And then he gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Kamala Harris's campaign alone. And people had the nerve to wonder why Kamala Harris didn't say anything about these institutional investors wrecking the housing market or what she was even going to do about it. They were using that here as a sock puppet. She did exactly as they told her to do and just evaded the issue altogether and let these billionaire criminals do whatever they want. Now tell me, how the hell is that any different than what you would expect from a Ron DeSantis or a Greg Abbott or a Donald Trump?
Thanks to the efforts of groups like the black media, you got a lot of black voters who are finally realizing that Democrats spout left-leaning rhetoric only on things like transgender bathrooms or illegal immigration. Anything that has nothing to do with white pockets. Because when it comes to anything that challenges the billionaire investor class who the Democrats get their campaign cash from, they go silent. And that's what their constituents are demanding that they address. And the Democrats are trying to talk their way around it. That's the problem the Democrats are having. The voters, especially black voters, especially black young voters, are seeing through the word salad and they're waiting to see when the Democrats are actually going to address the real problems they face and then what they're going to actually do about it.
Democrats know this. They've known it for many years. The Democrats got caught red-handed years ago sending out that memo about Black Lives Matter where the DNC leadership specifically explicitly told their people, "Do not tell these activists that you're going to do anything. Oh, go ahead and give some phony sympathy, push, nudge, claim that you care, but do not actually promise to do anything." The DNC's own autopsy of their 2024 defeat. Democrats said that they knew exactly what their voters want, but it's the party's official policy that they're not going to do it. And that's why even though Trump is as unpopular as jock itch, Republicans are still neck and neck with Democrats when it comes to these midterm elections. Democrats should be favored to win these upcoming midterms by a landslide, no contest. But they're not. In fact, the Democrats are only slightly favored to win the House, and that could change easily between now and November. And they're not favored to take the Senate at all. How could the most unpopular president whose approval rating is in the toilet, who has antagonized many in his own party, and who has sent gas and grocery prices skyrocketing, how could his party still be competitive in an election where he's supposed to be losing by a landslide? How could that be possible? It's because the voters recognize the so-called opposition party is not really opposing anything. The voters are demanding policies regarding the money, and Democrats are desperately trying to see how they can do anything other than that.
So Jim Clyburn's hot air about not listening to their constituencies isn't fooling anyone. Democrats have never listened to their constituents. They already know what the voters are demanding. They've known it for decades. Their game has been to use the Republicans' racism as a distraction. Focus on how bigoted the GOP is and tell the voters, "Well, you have to vote for us. Sure, we're not going to do anything for you. But the Republicans would be even worse. So don't you dare demand anything, 'cause that would be dangerous."
Well, time for the bootlicks' report card. What have they done for the people these last 50 years? Hell, what have they done for the last 10? The people, their constituents, have lost their homes. The young have given up on ever getting one. They've lost their jobs. The cost for everything has skyrocketed. And this trend began before Trump's war with Iran. Sure, the orange man definitely greatly exacerbated it. He certainly turbocharged the problem, but he was not where the problem began. It's excruciatingly obvious that the corporations are being allowed to gouge the public. It's organized corporate theft, and it's being allowed to happen by both parties who will not even acknowledge that it's happening.
And where is ground zero for the Democrats' voters to be losing their homes? Where are the Democrats losing their homes at the most? Is it in Texas? Is it in Ron DeSantis' open-air cesspool of Florida? Is it in South Carolina? Is it in Louisiana? No. The main place where people in general, and Democratic voters in specific, are becoming homeless is California. And it's been that way for a very, very long time now. California went from being one of the most affordable states in America to being the most unaffordable. California is supposed to be a Democrat stronghold, by the way. They dominate there. So, if any place should have been the last place to become unaffordable, you would think that it would be California, but it's not. It was the first and worst. They brag about how wealthy their state is. If California was a country, it would be in the G10, etc., etc. But we know that's a lie. The vast majority of the population is just barely getting by there. The cost of housing is the number one problem in the state, and the costs are beyond outrageous. Even well-to-do media people have left the state due to the cost of living there. It's only the wealthy white interests who are making money in California. It reminds me of the old joke that if you have four homeless men in a bar and then Bill Gates walks in, you could truthfully say that the average net worth of everybody in that room was $30 billion. See, that's the play on words, or rather the play on numbers, that the Democrats are doing. This is what Democrats like Gavin Newsom mean when they say how prosperous the people of California are. The people are broke and homeless, and the rich are taking it all because the politicians have put policies in place to expedite the transfer of wealth from the working class who produces the money to the corporate class who only knows how to waste the money.
And what have Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Kamala Harris and Gavin Newsom and Jim Clyburn done about any of that? And no, I don't think it's any coincidence that when you talk about the most influential people in California politics, the people who are the most responsible for running the party into the ditch, almost all of them are from San Francisco, which is also where Silicon Valley is based out of, the tech bros. They've created their own political bubble for themselves, and they're trying to take refuge inside of it. They've been trying to run their game, but the hustle's running dry. This is why Negro Jim's singing a different tune now. And he's not alone. Other Democrats are also starting to feel the heat. People who thought to themselves that they were untouchable. People who thought to themselves that the game was never going to run out. People who thought the power of incumbency was invulnerable. Just take a look at our friend Karen Bass out there in LA. Polls have her only ahead in the Democratic primary by one percentage point. There are two Asians in the race, and it's clear who the liberal white media would prefer to see as the next mayor of LA.
The California political machine gave hope to the black misleadership class when it elevated low-down Willie Brown, mayor of San Francisco, Speaker of the California Assembly. So, in the otherwise empty minds of the self-interested Negro politicians, not just in California, but also across the country, they look at low-down Willie Brown as proof positive that these white supremacists on the left really love them. I mean, just really deep down they do. Or at the very least, they could be made to love them if they kiss their rump extra sweet. To be a bootlick is to live in your own codependent imagination. They're creatures of aspiration, not observation. They're simple-minded because that's what lazy brains are. And even when NASA kicks them in the teeth repeatedly, they still can't accept it or rebel against NASA because kissing NASA's racist rump is their entire plan. For the bootlick, there is no plan B.
It's obvious the white powers that be tolerated Karen Bass, but they never liked her. Hell, they're practically celebrating the prospect that she might be out of office. The white DNC leadership is making it clear they're not going on the warpath for any of these bootlicks. Hakeem Jeff is an empty suit. I'd call him a figurehead, but that would be to imply that he's the head of something, and he's not. This is what happens when you're arrogant and stupid and you think you can get away with insulting the people that you rely on. It's not the big donors who the Democrats choose to get into bed with who are the ones who decide the elections. And it's not these white consultants either. It's the voters, stupid, who the Democrats have spent decades trying to run game on and trying to distract them. And when that failed, they began insulting them and talking down to them, like we saw Michelle and Barack Obama doing. That's what the Democrats did wrong. And now they're seeing the results.
Eugene Daniels did mention the Democrats' political problems and their lack of support. Predictably, he didn't mention the one institution whose approval rating is even lower than the Democrats, the media, who Eugene Daniels works for. And crap like this so-called interview are the reason why. When a reporter or a journalist talks with a politician, it's supposed to be adversarial. It's supposed to be confrontational because otherwise, it's not an interview at all. It's just them repeating whatever the politician says. It becomes nothing more than an on-camera press release. The reporter merely sets up one opportunity after the next for the politician to give their same old canned talking points. They become nothing more than an extension of the politician's own press office, which is exactly what the so-called White House press corps is. Sure, they have clowns like Eugene Daniels give them softball interviews, but everybody laughs at that. Eugene Daniels has no influence. He doesn't represent those boots on the ground, as Clyburn called them. But then again, Clyburn doesn't represent them either. Eugene Daniel's job is to maintain the phony facade of the status quo, to pretend as if, oh, there's like a difference between these politicians and the media that they deal with on a daily basis.
Voters are dropping out of the process because they've seen time and again that their votes do not and will not translate into the policies that they're demanding. When they tell the Democrats what they want them to do, the Democrats give them excuses why they shouldn't have to do it. Or, as we've seen in recent years, they just outright tell them, "We're not going to do it." And now the Democrats are seeing the result. They're underwater when they ought to be riding high. And that's because the people see that there is no difference between the two major parties because both parties are beholden to the same forces. But more importantly than that, they have the exact same contempt for the people who they claim to want to be representing. And the Democrats, they brand themselves as the party of the non-corporate people, the working class. You see, we're not part of the investor class. No, they are the main mouthpieces for it. Nancy Pelosi and her husband, they became rich off the stock market. You think that's some sort of coincidence?
And puff pieces like this are not going to change anything. There's not going to be some ground swell of black voter support just because you put this decrepit old fossil Jim Clyburn in front of a camera pretending as if self-interested clowns like Clyburn somehow are some sort of men of great importance when the reality is more and more people have contempt for them because they see right through them. These are the individuals who basically are going to find themselves thrown in the trash heap of history, assuming that there's a country left to observe that. But it just goes to show, all these decades the Democrats have been refusing to do what black voters have told them to do and telling themselves all the while that they were somehow winning and trying to convince people that, oh, your discontent is the result of your own lack of perception. It's a "you" problem.
As the black media has been telling them for the longest time, if you think the political price of reparations is high, wait till you see the price of not doing it. Good evening and be one. I'd like to take a moment to mention some of our contributors: Vala Hollands, Amir Miller, Mark Brown, Ronald Weights, and Wesley Monroe. Salute to them and thank you to everyone for listening, liking, and sharing this message. Black empowerment only exists because of