Transcription
Welcome back. I'm Shad. We got ourselves another video. We got ourselves a s and center video. He's about to have a debate with a well, a person who clearly can't get their camera on. They're about to have a debate about should stepfathers exist. That's what the debate is. And, um, I guess the caller seen a clip of his where he says something. He, you know, he said that, "I think stepfathers should be," they're going to say in the video. All right. Don't even worry about it. He don't think they should be here. But then I, in this conversation, it's going to get heated. It's going to get pretty heated, but, you know, we're here for the debate cuz I'm here for the conversation. I'm fly in the room and y'all can see it. I got the bald head out again. Mhm. I ain't going to lie, y'all. Man, when you get a fresh shave, like when you shave your head, it feels great. Feels great. But when you forget to shave multiple days, it still feel great. But, oh boy, you look like you have seen some things. You look like you can tell some war stories and you just just don't shave. But this is irrelevant. So, in this video, we're going to just hear how this go back and forth. Um, like I said before, this is going to get pretty heated and words going to be exchanged that, like, words that I don't know if they're YouTube friendly and stuff like that. But still, we're just a fly in the room and I'm here to hear the conversation. But hold up, just hit this video. Need to hit the like button, hit subscribe, hit notification bell in the comment section. Give me a thumbs up or heart just let me know that it's real. Before we get to the video, if you a supporter of saying the center, hit the like button. If you don't support the center, means nothing. Just hit the like button, like the video, >> anything if you just if you support the bald head movement. I forgot that bald head song. Whatever. If y'all know the bald head song, put it in the comment section, but hit the hype button after you put in the comment section. But let's waste some more time. Let's roll the clip. You know who that was? Oh, that doo baby.
>> We are back with a conversation based on the Instagram post that was made today. There were a lot of overweight harlots, single mothers, beta male providers, stepfathers, and all the rest of it who felt the need to uh suggest that it's a-okay and in fact a good idea, it's normal to step into the shoes of another man. In fact, step into the underwear, step into the bed essentially of another man and try to pretend to be him and provide for a woman who is dysfunctional and unruly. H very strange. Anyways, we have Anthony here who uh is interested in discussing this. So, I will yield the floor Anthony for you to make your initial argument.
>> Okay. Thank you for that. And uh I'll start off by apologizing. I'm not sure what's going on with my camera. We had it, then we lost it, and I'm trying to get it back as we're speaking here. So, um, first of all, let me what you said earlier, let me agree with you. I think, uh, being a stepdad is not a good idea. Um, from my own personal experience, it it did not work out uh, the way I wanted it to. U,, looking back, it was not a very good idea to try that or to do that. And I don't recommend anybody else trying it as well. Uh, and I do put a lot of emphasis on the women that make the decisions about who they lay down with and have kids with. I think there should be a stronger vetting process. So, I agree with you in a lot of what you're saying. Um,
>> So what did you say in the comments that caused you to be invited for a debate?
>> Right. So, so what what you said in in your um in your thing on Instagram, something about men who are stepdads and men who lay lay down with women who have kids with other men should be sit down and return to the or something like that. It sounds like you basically said basically say stepdads should be for being a stepdad or even trying to be a stepdad or just getting in bed with a woman who has a kid with another man. So, I just wanted clarification on that. Okay. Do you understand the sentiment of that? Do you understand the purpose?
>> Uh, no. Because you're calling for someone to be returned to the soil.
>> Okay. So, are you suggesting that there's never a case where anyone should be returned to the soil? It's like it's
>> No, no, not No, no, no, not at all. Not at all. Okay. In fact, one of I'm I'm a fan of yours because the first time I saw you, you were giving this this Jewish guy the business and
>> Well, we're not and you were letting them have. So, a lot of people should be returned to
>> Yeah. Okay, cool. Right. So, what I'm saying,
>> Do you understand the sentiment of what I was saying?
>> The sentiment?
>> Yes. Do you understand the purpose of why I said that?
>> No. No. No. That's why I wanted you to to go deeper into it and expound on what you what you were talking about.
>> Okay. Sure. So, for those who are new perhaps or those who've yet to catch up, my work online has been chiefly focused on cultural improvement, if you like, and spreading a functional culture around the world as a civilizing force. Every now and then you'll see that I have particular emphasis on the black peoples of the earth for obvious reasons. To change a culture or to modify behavior, you're generally going to use two drivers. You'll use something that is motivational, pushes you toward it, or you'll use something that is uh creates a stigma, you know, shuns you away from certain behaviors and certain thinking. Pleasure drives us. Pain pushes us away. You know, seeking pleasure drives us. Avoiding fear pushes us away from good or bad behavior respectively.
>> So, if I mention that it's for the purpose of driving certain behaviors. So, are you not comprehending that to have punishment for a particular violation would serve to push people away from committing that violation? Is that not clear?
>> No, I understand that. So, what would the violation be?
>> The violation is to create uh to Okay, so let me let me rewind this. I'm a systems thinker. So, I want everyone to understand that what I'm the ideas I'm sharing fit into a larger system. So, the family is a sacred structure which is the basis of all things. Happiness roots from it. Prosperity roots from it, safety roots from it, and much else. The family is sacred. Can we agree that a nuclear family or a patriarchal family wherein all of the children are blood related to the man and the man is the leader of the family is the ideal structure whether he has one or two w one or more wives.
>> Absolutely.
>> Okay, great. So, we agree on the outcome. Now we move on to deviations from the ideal and methodologies to achieve the ideal. So the moment that you have unruly women, women who are disobedient, loud, disagreeable, incompetent, overweight, these women are those who will not make good wives. And what's worse than them not making good wives, they'll poison young women, which is their competition, such that they too don't make good wives. So these women must be marginalized so that they do not poison everything and stop us from procreating in happy, healthy families.
>> Mhm. Now, when women behave in an unruly manner, when they violate, when they have no discipline, when they're dishonest, when they're rude, when they're overweight, we must shun them and cast them away. They must get no benefits in civil society, which is a patriarchal society, which is to say that you cannot sleep with, you should not sleep with them. Let's say you should not sleep with them. And under no circumstance, no circumstance should you procreate with a woman who has already procreated if you're not the original father of those children. And under no circumstance should you stay with her, get into a relationship with her, or take care of her under no circumstance. Hence, the males that do that provide a safety net. They provide a soft landing for a woman who is a despicable character whose behavior goes against the very ideal that we both agreed on. Hence, at the point in which a beta male or a stepfather supports this kind of woman, he is validating that her behavior is okay, acceptable, and will allow her to thrive and succeed in society. And thereby they destabilize the natural normal existence of nuclear relationships. Is that clear?
>> Understood it. Yep.
>> Okay. So, we must the beta male. We must scare the beta male such that they do not create the behavior or rather allow for and validate and support the behavior of the unruly woman that leads to more single family households, more broken families and ultimately the kids are at risk and they suffer. So that is why the beta male must suffer serious for these filthy violations. Okay. So So you talking more of um uh like a medieval time, drag him into the street, beat him, stone him.
>> Wait, what
>> type thing for? Um
>> There's nothing medieval about it. I'm just saying that when you violate the laws of a given society,
>> you experience consequences. Medieval is a an opinion and a perspective generally eurocentric. But the fact of the matter is when you engage in filth, there should be punishment. Uh in this society, which is overwhelmingly sick, a white supremacist society, you observe when the Epstein class has engaged in filth, which is video recorded, there are no consequences. This is an immoral society. Um, so I'm suggesting that we abide by a culture different than the one that dominates in this country and in the West uh, broadly. And I wouldn't describe having consequences for behaviors that we deem unethical to be medieval. I would describe it as being clear. I'd describe it as being serious in as much as it addresses the seriousness of the violation. And it is a great violation to upset the cultural order of a society. When beta males do this in an upright society, they're actually attacking the very basis and structure, the root of the society, which is the family. Okay, see what's happening right now. He clearly does not understand what saint and center is saying. He clearly don't understand that. So the easy way for me to try to make it understandable, which is it shouldn't be hard in a very simplistic form. They're enabling. That's what they're doing. If you're a stepfather, you enabled a lady in you you're enabling ladies to believe that they can break a family structure and be saved. That's technically what he keeps saying. He's he's just telling you that yo, you're creating their own social system thing right now. You're creating this thing. Everyone knows that if you have a child, if a lady have a child with this guy, she should be with that guy. If she breaks up with that guy and a another guy shows up and says, "I'm going to protect you, provide for you, do all the things THAT THE THAT GUY IS supposed to do." Now, any lady who's looking at her, thinks that, okay, so if I leave the guy that I'm currently with, who I had a child with, I can find myself that guy who going to show up and do this thing. So the thing is you have to actually somewhat chastise or discipline the guys who are making it like a possibility in women's heads that they can do this thing. Now you saying that this is a medieval thing. I don't know why you said that because based off you said that if a guy commits any any harsh crime that you deem as harsh, any one of those crimes, you will be perfectly fine with dragging them out into the middle of the street and and doing something to them. You'll be perfectly fine with it. So that's why based off what you're saying, you're just saying that you're just stating your opinion out loud instead of just understanding his point of view about these these men are actually causing future harm to the family structure. But you think that's perfectly fine. That's all I just heard. Even though that right there is very that right there is almost as bad as the other thing. Tell you truth, I would say this one over here, them enabling them are worse than almost any heinous crime you can think of. Unless you talk about genocide, if it ain't genocide, I you can almost make an argument that what's happening over here is almost or equally as bad as that one.
>> So, in in what culture is it is it law? Because you mentioned law. In what culture is it law that a man should not um lay down with a woman who has a kid already by another man?
>> If you were following, I'm talking about building culture. I stated that from the very beginning. You see a lot of blacks because they're not very strong mentally, strong physically often,
>> they have trouble coming up with their own ideas. And what really scares people, whites especially, is when you find a black man, who can think of ideas such as yours truly, which is why I'm hated and marginalized. And so what I'm doing is something unique. I'm introducing you to ideas. And sometimes it's hard to accept new ideas and to change. So, so you would have a society where it is law that single mothers uh or or men should not engage in any kind of personal relationship with a sing a single mother, a woman who has kids by another man. That would be a law punishable by for the man if violated. We would have a law around men procreating with women who have already procreated with another man.
>> Okay.
>> So, is that part clear?
>> Yeah.
>> You might poke her guts. We look down upon it. We frown upon this kind of thing. We think it's low behavior.
>> But it's it is immoral but not illegal. But what is illegal is to procreate with a woman who has already procreated with a man. So, let's look back prior generations. Like a lot of our grandparents had multiple um baby daddies, baby mamas, whatever you want to call them. So, in my own family and other folks family that I know of, it it only became a trashy situation it seemed recently in this society. Before it was never frowned upon. It was always
>> Is that true? I don't think that's true.
>> Uh, as far as I know, yeah, it seems like the man was always commended for raising another man's and men even wanted, especially if it was a boy. Well, hold on, let me finish. Especially if it was a boy, a man would love to take that boy under under his wing. I'm not advocating it or promoting saying as good or bad.
>> You definitely are. Like, that was wild. Did you just say you that you're not advocating for it? Well, first off, you're making the argument against him about creating a culture where we should not do this thing when now we actually have how many generations? We have so many generations to show you that this thing right here is actually catastrophic. Like it's was catastrophical. I don't know, man. You know, I don't use words. S do that. He's good with it. I like we already have so many so much history now to prove that this is a horrible thing. And you're trying to say that, you know, this thing didn't become a bad thing until like a certain time. It's like, what's your argument? Are you saying that we should be all right with it because at once upon a time men and them were good with this thing? Is that what your argument is? Because at once upon a time, people were all right with slavery. That don't mean what was being done is actually good for society. Is that your argument? Because I I need to know now. And you you confusing me right now, brother. I'm just being honest with you.
>> No, no. I'm just saying the differences in the times. The difference in the times may be what is making it look worse than what it is or worse than what it has been.
>> So what's your point? What's your goal here?
>> So my point is, let's say 50, 60 years ago, a man would love to raise a boy if something happened to that boy's.
>> Well, that's a lie, though. That's my whole point. That's true. That's a lie. So can you first validate that and then we can proceed from that premise?
>> Uh well my validation is from my own personal experience.
>> Okay. So are you aware that your personal experience is not reflective of the general society? For example, if I were to tell you that you know what
>> I love driving because when I go out my driver uh who's you know driving my Maybach is they always put on my massage seats and they put on ambient lighting and then they put on the airrated seats with just sends like cool breezes through my body. Driving is such a such a pleasure. I don't know why people get bothered about traffic. I don't mind traffic. I just open the panoramic ceiling and let the air flow in. Why do people get bothered by by driving? There's nothing wrong with traffic. I enjoy it.
>> No, that would be foolish because my personal experience is not reflective of the average person.
>> So that's why anecdotes are not useful.
>> Well, that's what I was about to say. This is from my own personal experience. I I can't judge or gauge for the entire country from my own personal experience. I only know what I know. And I only have seen what I've seen. So what I'm saying is in the in the current society, we have these terms baby daddy, baby mama. I'm saying what has happened in our society makes it look a lot more negative than what it really is or what it has been.
>> 50 years ago,
>> it's not negative.
>> 50 years ago,
>> not negative.
>> Well, hang on. 50 years ago, baby daddy, baby mama was not a term. It was just it if a woman had kids and the father was not there, if she dated another guy, the guy would raise those kids with no problem. And there was no social and there well stay with me. There was no social um I guess like what you're talking about um stepdaddy uh raising someone else's kids. That's a trashy situation. It wasn't looked at that way back in the day. So I don't understand. You keep having you keep having this like weird thing about how it looked at. It's not about how it's looked at. What is about is what it's doing. You like that's what the conversation is. Them doing that thing that's it's perfectly fine. It's perfectly fine that they was doing it. It was still causing a negative thing to happen. And I want you to know what they were doing back then got us here. That's how that goes. What they were doing back then got us here. people accepting, you know, people saying, you know, like let's say the the the military, everybody say, you know, don't ask, don't tell, or or any of those things. All these things, they led us here to where, you know, if I go throw if I go throw a wig on, it don't even got to be it don't even got to be like expensive one. It could be a shot out wig. If I go throw one of those on, I can just go into a bathroom that I'm not supposed to be in. Now, I'm not saying anything. I'm not trying to make this political, but I'm just telling you that where we are now back then, the the people doing what they were doing got us here. So, your argument is just showing that, oh, this is what they were doing before they is. And now we're here and I'm trying to tell everybody to not do what what they was doing because what they did got us here. Do you understand now?
>> But now it it's a trashy looking situation. And I and again, I agree with you. I don't like the stepdaddy stuff. I tried it, didn't like it. uh wouldn't promote it to anybody, wouldn't advise anybody to do it.
>> Doesn't sound like
>> each own woman that doesn't have kids.
>> So why take the affeminate position of trying to create a balance perspective when we know that the alternative to what I'm describing is less than ideal?
>> Well, no. My whole thing is when you talk about uh a law that's punishable by if it's if that law is broke broken, I think that's very extreme. Uh because we have like
>> I did not say that sir. You said that. I've never said that in this conversation. No sir, you are incorrect.
>> You said hunt it down and return to the soil.
>> That's what I said in the Instagram video. I did not say that during this conversation and I did not state that that should be a law during this conversation. I didn't even say say it should be a law during the Instagram video,
>> which is mind you a one minute reel.
>> Right. So that's why we're having this conversation because you said that on the Instagram video and earlier in this conversation you did say part of your ideas because you're a person who has ideas. Part of your ideas would be a law uh punishable by
>> Again, you're lying. Why do you keep repeating your lie? You're actually lying sir.
>> So you need to repeat it. If you repeat the lie it does not become the truth. It just shows that you are repeating a lie. That's it. It does not transform into the truth.
>> For for for clarification, you did not say
>> I already said I didn't say it. So why do you need to clarify it? I've said three times I did not say that and the record will reflect that I did not say that. I stated that there should be a law and there should be serious punishment when the law is violated. I did not say that the punishment should be capital punishment.
>> Okay. So you're not saying that now. Okay. But the whole premise of this
>> I didn't say that before either. So,
>> the whole reason I came on his Instagram is because you said return to the That only means one thing.
>> Let me see if I can find this Instagram thing. Okay, let me just see. Buddy, keep it keep bringing this up.
>> But I love my kids so much I gave them all they own daddy. You got a daddy? You got a daddy? You got a daddy. Don't ask me. Ask your daddy. Any man who would have intercourse with a woman who has a child by another man is a bottom feeder. You are one who eats out of the garbage. You're a disgusting person. And you're even more a fool to have a child with that female. You are the true definition of a beta male. One who can't get a woman who has not been planted in. You can't find a woman who is fresh and ready for you to make a future with her. Instead, you find a woman who is discarded by another man. A woman who is so dysfunctional that a man wouldn't stay with her even though she has his child.
>> Is it true?
>> You're a disgusting character. And it is my hope that all of you will be down and brought back into the earth. And I So yeah. Yeah, you're wrong. You're wrong. He He has not said what you keep saying. He He never said it should be a law. He said he he hopes this thing happens. He never said it should be a law. So I don't But I don't know where you keep You keep repeating something where now he's trying to build a culture by saying that we should have this thing so guys wouldn't do it. Yeah, you're conflating. You're conflating the conversation you're having right now and the video you heard and you're just putting them together. That's all you're doing. He has not said this thing. has not said it. So, you should you should probably you should probably tell ask him, "Hey, could we play the clip so I can know exactly what you said again? You know, that's going to look bad because you had all the time to world watch the clip." But, you know, that's the best thing you got right now. Best thing for you to do is to try that. If he hang up on you, it makes sense cuz you came to argue something you didn't even know.
>> That means one thing. Do you think that perhaps because you were living as a beta male stepfather provider that this offended you so much because of that?
>> It's funny, but it's not funny, right? Because we're talking about your actual life experience in this case,
>> right? Right. Yeah. So, my life experience going going through that um it it triggered me because I wondered how can one person have like I said in the in in the response, how can you have the nuts to say somebody needs to be returned to the for something that they did? How how can you be so judgmental?
>> How can I be whoa whoa wait? Hold up, hold up, hold up, hold up. People do that all the time. People do that all the time. You be returned to the soil. People say that about rapists. People say about PDFs. People say uh people say that about people who who harm elders. People say that about people who just besides PDFs, people who just say that about people who harm children like people say this thing you just said. You you don't need the nuts to say it. People just say that. People say about terrorist so many time people just say it. So for you to say how does someone have the nuts to say that? Don't really take nuts at all because a lady will say it. Women say it too. So they don't really take no nuts at all. Okay. You're clearly you're clearly emotional now. All right. I can see I can see where this about to turn. They're about to get real They're about to go left real fast.
>> So judgmental.
>> Yes.
>> That sounds very effeminite of you. I like that.
>> Yeah.
>> How can you be so judgmental? Do you notice women say things like that a lot? Women hate to be judged. That's why they wear makeup to cover over their blemishes. In other words, to cover over the truth because by their nature, they they hate to be judged.
>> No, I've already agreed with you.
>> You're displaying the same nature. How can you be so judgmental? I'll tell you how.
>> Men are the leaders in the society.
>> The laws are defined by men. The consequences are deci uh decided by men. And the consequences are enacted by men. The leaders are the ones who judge.
>> Right.
>> That's how I'm a man.
>> But you cannot judge when somebody should be returned to
>> I cannot.
>> Yes, you can.
>> You cannot. I already have.
>> No, you you No, you Jesus Christ. Jes J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Jesus, sweet baby Lord Jesus. Sir, what are you doing right now? You You can't do that. What's the capital What's the capital punishment? Execution. They do men do it all the time. We do it all the time. You know, sad. We do it. We do it sometimes and we do it sometimes and we're wrong. There's people who's been who's been given the the needle or the electric chair and we've been wrong. So yeah, you definitely can't do this. What's What's your argument about to be? Are you about to just go on like a a type of like emotional tangent right now?
>> You cannot do that.
>> I already have.
>> That's just an idea in your head.
>> I already have. And I can enact it, too.
>> How How can you enact it? You going to kill yourself?
>> You cannot enact it.
>> Yes, I can.
>> No, you cannot.
>> Do you know who Dylan Roof is?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay.
>> Do you know who Dylan Roof is?
>> I know who Dylan Roof is.
>> Get a gun. Listen. Stop it. Who is Dylan Roof?
>> He's a white guy that went into the church and nine people.
>> Nine people. Can we be more accurate?
>> Nine black people and took and took him to the church.
>> Now, let me help you. Now, let me help you.
>> I know that.
>> Let me help you. He decided on something and then he enacted it. We all have the power to enact consequences if we so choose. You'd be a fool to tell me what I cannot do. You have no control over that. You don't even have control over your own libido, which is why you sleep with low women and then raise their children from another dude. So, what you need to do is, don't tell me what I can do. Bosses do what they want. Peons do what they can do.
>> You can't.
>> Just as Dylan Roof decided that he didn't like black folks at that church. He took an action. He took an action and they were no more. They were no more.
>> So, what you're saying is false. You wish you wish I couldn't do certain things.
>> Go get your rifle.
>> But your wishes will not be delivered on. My dear boy shoot.
>> So what I want you to know what I want you to know is that you're a weak beta male, which is why you're here arguing on behalf of beta males. No real man would argue on behalf of stepfathers because they're not a stepfather and they don't sympathize with it. No real man who has morals and was in that situation would pretend as though it's okay.
>> You're not listening. Okay. Can I talk?
>> You've been talking, but you've not said anything.
>> Can I say something?
>> You've been talking, but you've not said anything.
>> Can I say something now without being interrupted?
>> I've already agreed with you on on the step.
>> Why are you here then? You know, this is for debate, young man. Why are you here?
>> Because you said return to the soul. That means one thing. You cannot judge and say and say who needs to be returned to the
>> I can. Yes, I can. In fact, the only people who can make who who makes that determination. Who makes that determination if not men?
>> Let me finish, sir.
>> No, sir. You're you're not very intelligent at this point. So, I'm going to cut you off and I'm going to ask you a question to try to pull out some meaningful information.
>> Go get your rifle.
>> Men, if men cannot make determination, who makes it?
>> Who makes it?
>> Go get your rifle like Dylan Booth.
>> Young man. Young man, who makes that determination if not men?
>> God. That is That is That is crazy. That is crazy. I guess I guess we're not going to have a logical debate. I guess this this is not going to be a logical debate. It it's now just became something where you just say words. That's that's just crazy. You you can't do this thing. But you keep saying out your mouth out your mouth that Dylan Roof did it. You You're saying a person who ain't even a man. It was like a boy. You keep saying Well, no, no, no. I think he was old enough where they would classify him as a man. You keep saying you know a man that did this thing, but then you say a man can't do this thing. I know a guy who did this thing, but you as a guy, you can't do this thing. And it's not even like a thing where I need like I need a bunch of tools. Like if I if I see a [ __ ] if I see a [ __ ] and I use these, I could do it. It just you can't do it. Like he he thinks it's logical. Oh, go get your rifle. And if I did this thing, then I could do that thing based off of what you're saying, sir. You know what? Let's let's go into cruise control. This cruise control is this this this a fake this fake debate because a man who keeps saying that he agrees with you, but then continues to disagree with him. Crazy. I agree with you, but you know, I disagree about this thing. That [ __ ] didn't say that about this debate. That [ __ ] say he he would like for this to happen to people. But he never said that this is the law. Never said that. But you know, you know. Oh, of course we have a religious fool. Another religious fool. Why didn't God help you during 400 years of slavery of the black Americans? Where was he?
>> Oh, he wasn't there.
>> He wasn't there.
>> God decides who lives and who dies. What I'm saying?
>> Did you say he wasn't there? Is that right?
>> What I'm telling you is
>> So, let me ask you a question. If God decides on that, are you telling me that Dylan Roof is God?
>> One second. Is Dylan Roof God?
>> You talked enough.
>> Is Dylan Roof God? Young man, is Dylan Roof God?
>> No.
>> You said God decides who lives and dies. Is Dylan Roof God?
>> Can I say something?
>> You can tell me if Dylan Roof is God.
>> Can I say something?
>> You can tell me if Dylan Roof is God.
>> Because you're getting very disrespectful. This is no longer a debate. Now,
>> is Dylan Roof God?
>> This was never a debate from what I'm listening.
>> It was never a debate because you're a weak male, which means you don't stand up. So, you came in playing games off of I agree with you. I agree with you, but I'm still here to debate you. That's not manly. If you're a man, you stand up and say, I disagree. This is what I disagree with. You don't play both sides of the fence. You're a fence sitter. You were sitting on the fence
>> to the soil.
>> You were sitting on the fence to the soil. Is Dylan Roof God?
>> Who needs to be returned to the
>> Is Dylan Roof God?
>> Man can get a gun and goof is not God.
>> So you said, but you said that God decides who lives in. So if Dylan Rof made that decision, how's he not God? Data that you know.
>> One second. You said
>> Give me one second. Give me one second.
>> Hold on one second. Give me one second.
>> You stated that Dylan Roof decided who lived in that day. You also stated that God decides who lives in. So how is Dylan Roof not God if that's what God decides? Unless you're saying Dylan Roof empowered you mean God empowered Dylan Roof to do that?
>> No. A man
>> Well, explain to me. I'm I'm very curious. A man a a man can decide who that day with a gun or a knife or or a strangling or whatever the uh
>> But you said God decides,
>> right?
>> Okay. Connect it for me.
>> Right. God decides who there is no there is no punishment for God somebody. God cannot be punished.
>> Okay. So did God send
>> hang on. If you go get your rifle and go every stepdaddy that you know, which I believe is what you're saying. No, that's not what I've said. But carry on.
>> Yeah, you don't have the right to do that. So, you will go to prison or you will get
>> Focus on the actual point, Dimwit. I'm asking you, did God send Dylan Roof to a black people?
>> Bro, don't start the name calling. Are we talking? Are we having a discussion?
>> Your mind is very, very feeble. You're having trouble staying focused on the topic at hand.
>> The question is, did God send Dylan Roof to kill eight black people?
>> No, I don't believe so. Then if God didn't send him to do it and God is in full control, how did it happen?
>> Because he got himself a gun
>> and decided I want to go get some black people today.
>> He decided
>> You said that God controls who lives in Did you say that? Yes or no?
>> Yes, I said that.
>> Yes, you said that. Okay. So, if God controls who lives in and Dylan Roof takes out eight black people, then that had to have been decided on by God. So the caveat to that the caveat to that anybody can anybody
>> have a caveat have a caveat
>> anybody can anybody
>> Yes. Okay.
>> At any given time
>> you actually verbatim verbatim told him you told Marquette that he can't. So you you can't do it. You you kept saying he can't do it. And he said yes I can. Guess he he keep this what happens when you have an emotional debate. This is what happened. Well he clearly he clearly was not here for a debate. that guy came here to say that hey yo hey yo I agree with you but I'm perfectly fine with stepfathers even though that was literally that was like the actual that was like the actual the actual argument the actual debate was about Marquet disagrees with stepfathers he disagreed with it but then you tried to hop on or like continue on this the hyperbolic thing where he said that's not even that's not even what the argument is that was something I said I said because that I that's how I feel and that situation about stepfathers. But what I believe should actually happen is this thing right here. Do you disagree? Cuz if you do not disagree with this thing right here, cuz technically you're saying you this you you agree that stepfathers stepfathers shouldn't exist cuz you keep saying you agree. So you agree with that. But how do you make them not exist if they're here? So you don't you know this is ridiculous.
>> Like I said, you can go get your rifle
>> but by permission of God. Correct.
>> Oh my god. Can I can I finish a sentence? You're repeating yourself. See something new in me
>> because you keep interrupting me.
>> Is it by permission of God or not?
>> I would say no.
>> Do you realize you don't make sense? This is why I don't debate religious people because none of you are intelligent. I'm not religious.
>> You don't make you don't make any sense. You have a limited comprehension. That's why you believe in things that are not real. That's why I don't debate you all. You do not understand logic fundamentally. You've contradicted yourself eight times.
>> I see what you do. I see what you Okay. I see. I see.
>> Do you think you're not intelligent? But you think you are you're the height of arrogance.
>> The same with you, sir.
>> You couldn't even You couldn't even sign off.
>> You are exactly what you
>> We can't see your face cuz you don't even know how to turn on your camera. You cannot operate basic technology.
>> All right. Okay. So now
>> that's how slow you are. You can't operate basic technology yet you have arrogance.
>> Well, you're full of
>> And that's why you I asked you not to curse before you came on and here you go.
>> Man, you full of
>> a These beta males. these beta mails that nobody wants. I got some more things for uh to review with you all. Let me acknowledge the folks supporting the work. Big screen. Well, there you go. There you go. Well, like when I when I was actually I was actually hoping hoping to hear a real debate cuz I know y'all know I'm I'm out. I be out here. I listen to some chaotic some chaotic podcast, but I actually enjoy listening to debates. That right there don't know what the hell that was. Like the [ __ ] sound like he was going to have a real one. Then out of nowhere, he he did a he did a phonuski. I was like forki.
>> She doesn't have the ball forki forki. He just he stood up and started running.
>> Like that's you should have did that to me, sir. All right. What you should have said, what you should have said was in the beginning like, hey yo, I'm here to have a debate about I Well, you can't you can't debate a [ __ ] saying that he would like for this to happen to people. How you how you debate with a [ __ ] that this is what this [ __ ] want? The debate could only be about the law thing. Do you disagree that people who are guys who are stepfathers should actually face up a punishment? And then it wasn't even he said procreating with a lady who already procreate with a guy. He made this thing very detailed. Very detailed. Hey yo, you sleeping with uh you sleeping with a baby mother it looked down upon. It is it's frowned upon. Okay. you having a child with one. That's the problem. He l He did a great job. He did a great job trying to cut out this this thing where um people are creating broken families and like the children are all messed up. But you know, that's what happens. That's what happen when you talk to like a person who who who don't listen. I like, "Oh, you're full of shit." Like, don't say that. Like like he's the one that's that's causing the problem right now. Sir, you do know. You do know like right now you you made me lose more hair. Mhm. Just let that sizzle in your spirit right there.