كشف شبهات أهل الإرجاء | الدرس الأول - يمان الهاشمي

The forum of "Nuzhat Al-Ahbab" presents a series titled "Exposing the Doubts of the People of the Regions," like cattle lost, their executioner drives them, and all of them are rejoicing, until the time of salvation comes, you see them rejecting salvation and preferring to be gathered with a thousand slaves, the whips of humiliation of every oppressor, and they refused the path of honor and were hindered. Like cattle to perdition, they are led. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and peace and blessings be upon the one sent as a mercy to the worlds, and upon his pure household and his noble companions, and the ultimate outcome is for the righteous, and there is no aggression except against the oppressors.

After that, today's lesson will be, God willing, about what follows, and it may be a series about a series to expose the doubts of the people of the regions, the people of suspicion and misguidance who confuse the beliefs of Muslims and defend the tyrants, may Allah curse them. And we, in turn, are concerned with these lessons because of their immense importance, as many of our brothers are often exposed to them. I remember a few years ago, a brother called me, and he was worried at the time. I said, "What is wrong, my brother?" He said, "When the tyrant of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, was overthrown." He said, "By Allah, my brother, the doubts of the people of the regions are tormenting us." He said to me, "The doubts of the people of the regions are tormenting us." I said to him, "What is wrong, my brother? What are you saying like this?" He then recalled their doubts about the issue of disbelief without disbelief, and how they use this doubt and this narration as evidence for the Islam of a democratic, national, infidel ruler. So I began to explain to the brother at that time, and praise be to Allah, his chest opened to the truth. Then I said to him, "Go and bring this one who defends Al-Mubarak so that we can see, so that you can see where the truth lies." So we went to them and asked them for a debate, but they fled. And this is their habit. Few of them agree and accept debate, discussion, and deliberation because they target a specific group, the group of common brothers who do not understand these issues and do not master them. So why do we do these lessons? Because the brothers need them, and also to solidify these principles in the brother so that they are firmly established, and he is knowledgeable about these issues and capable of responding to the innovations of these criminals who transgress the limits of Allah, the Almighty.

So, the issue we are discussing regarding loyalty or disavowal of the disbelievers and not taking them as allies is a very important issue. Of course, we said that these people say that their states and governments, which they claim are Islamic, can assist the disbelievers against Muslims in demolishing their homes, destroying their mosques, desecrating their holy places, and killing their men, and yet they do not declare them disbelievers until the criterion of disbelief is met for them. What is the criterion? They said the criterion is that they love the disbelievers for the sake of their religion, and even the expression they use is a malicious expression that indicates the confusion of the people with Muslims. So they did not say love of the religion of the disbelievers, they said love of the disbelievers for the sake of their religion. What is the validity of this doubt? I do not want to delve into the verses that indicate the prohibition of taking disbelievers as allies and that indicate that whoever takes them as allies is a disbeliever. Why? Because it is known and clear, by the grace of Allah, and abundant. But when I reviewed one of the books written by a brother, this is a delightful book, and Allah benefited me with this book, I found that the brother touched upon a very important issue. Brother Abu Osama Al-Nuaimi, who wrote the book, I think its name is "Muwakaba." So, when we return to the Sharia or to the language, is it correct for the meaning of alliance to be heartfelt love? This is not correct at all, and this is what we will talk about, God willing. They distorted this meaning. They said that the meaning of alliance or the meaning of loyalty is love, and that taking disbelievers as allies is not disbelief until their religion is loved. They qualified it like this. Is this correct? Does "loyalty" in the Arabic language mean love at all? When you browse the books of linguists, the books of Arabs, you will not find that they say that the meaning of love or the meaning of loyalty is alliance. "Alliance" is mentioned in the dictionary "Mukhtar Al-Sahah," and this is a great dictionary. The scholar said: "The freed slave, the freed slave's son, the cousin, the supporter, and the neighbor, the ally, and the alliance of the freed slave, and loyalty is the opposite of enmity." It is clear. He said: "And it is said that there is alliance between them, and it is said that there is alliance between them with a kasra, meaning a follower. And do these things in succession. And two months passed in succession, and he took over the land." Ibn Al-Sikkit said: "Al-Wilayah with a kasra is authority. Al-Wilayah with a fatha and kasra is support. Al-Wilayah is excuse." He said: "With a kasra, Al-Wilayah is authority. Al-Wilayah with a fatha and kasra is support." And Sibawayh said: "Al-Wilayah with a fatha is the source." So, from the linguistic perspective, it is clear that the meaning of loyalty in language does not include love at all. Go and review the books of linguists, you will not find that they interpret the meaning of loyalty as love at all, neither love of their religion nor love of the persons of the disbelievers. This meaning is not correct at all.

So, I repeat, what did the people say? They said that if we help the disbelievers to destroy the homes of Muslims for their salvation from the Khawarij, as they claimed, and we opened our bases and our lands and our military bases to them so that the planes could take off and bomb the Muslims, they said this is not a criterion for disbelief because our rulers did not love their religion and did not intend to manifest their religion. Is this statement correct? Voice, brothers, is there a voice? Is there a voice? Yes, the voice is clear, Sheikh. Yes. So, from a linguistic perspective, what they said is false and not correct at all. It is not correct at all to say that loyalty is love. And also, from a Sharia perspective, it is false. Why? Because a Muslim may love the persons of the disbelievers. For example, your parents may be disbelievers, and you love them. This is a natural love that you cannot help but love your parents. This contradicts nature. Likewise, your son may be a disbeliever, and you have a natural love for your son. Allah, the Almighty, has permitted a Muslim woman to marry a chaste Jewish or Christian woman. So, does Allah, the Almighty, mean that a person loves his wife with a natural love? So Allah, the Almighty, commanded you to marry, and after marriage, you know that there will be a necessary love that will occur. So their words are not correct from a Sharia perspective or a linguistic perspective, as we have explained. And another evidence is that the Prophet, peace be upon him, loved his uncle Abu Talib. And the evidence is that Allah, the Almighty, said: "Verily, you cannot guide whom you love, but Allah guides whom He wills." So, if the intention was "whom you love," meaning "whom you love to be guided," then the Prophet, peace be upon him, loved guidance for all people, not just his uncle. And there is no one who loves guidance for whom and not for whom. Meaning, the Prophet, peace be upon him, did not want guidance for Abu Talib, and he did not want guidance for Abu Lahab. No, he wanted guidance for Abu Talib, and he wanted guidance for Abu Jahl, and he wanted guidance for Abu Talib. He wanted guidance for all of them, peace be upon him. So, the intention of the verse is that the Prophet, peace be upon him, had a special love. Was this a natural love? Does this contradict their interpretation of alliance or loyalty as love? So, can it be said that the Prophet, peace be upon him, allied with his uncle out of love? No, this meaning is not correct. And this is established by the text of the Quran, as we have said.

Then, as for their saying, of course, this is in response to the condition of disbelief with love of the persons of the disbelievers. We said this is not correct for what we have mentioned. Likewise, their saying that whoever allies with disbelievers to fight Muslims is not considered a disbeliever until he loves their religion or intends to manifest their religion is not correct. From a linguistic perspective, we have mentioned that this is not correct. Also, the Arabs previously, the Arab tribes, used to fight among themselves. The Arab tribes, and all of them worshipped idols, and their religion was one, polytheism. So the Arabs were of one religion. No one used to object to another. Nevertheless, what did they call them? They called so-and-so an ally of so-and-so, and such-and-such a tribe is allied with such-and-such a tribe, and they are of one religion. So how is it correct to call them "so-and-so is allied with so-and-so" or "such-and-such a tribe allies with such-and-such a tribe" when they are of one religion? This is not correct. I repeat again so that the brothers understand. Did they not say that whoever allies with disbelievers to fight Muslims is not considered a disbeliever except with the condition of loving their religion? Except that he loves the Christians, loves the Jews for their religion, loves the Rafida for their polytheism, loves their religion? We said that this is rejected from a linguistic perspective, and we have mentioned some of the linguists' definitions of the meaning of loyalty. This is the first. Secondly, we also said that the Arabs were of one religion, and they all loved one religion, and they were all of one religion, and they were of a common religion agreed upon among themselves. One was not of one religion and the other of another religion, and yet fighting and war occurred between them. So they did not say, and they used to say, "So-and-so is allied with so-and-so," and "such-and-such a tribe is allied with such-and-such a tribe." So, if religious love were a condition, they would not have called such-and-such a tribe allied with such-and-such a tribe. Is it clear or not, brothers? Is it clear or should I repeat? If it is not clear, the brothers should write "clear." If it is not clear, I have no problem. Yes, yes. So, from a linguistic perspective, this is absolutely not correct, by the grace of Allah, the Almighty. This is the refutation from a linguistic perspective. Yes.

Secondly, loving the religion of the disbelievers contradicts the origin of religion and faith. This in itself is disbelief. This in itself is disbelief. The origin of Islam is belief in Allah and disbelief in Taghut. And belief is affirmation with love and approval, and disbelief is disavowal, hatred, and denial. So how can a Muslim love "There is no god but Allah" and say "There is no god but Allah" while allying with those who say Allah is the third of three? This is unimaginable. So this is a negation of an essential belief. Meaning, you stipulate that whoever fights, whoever helps disbelievers to fight Muslims and to remove their state or their rule, that he is not considered a disbeliever except if he loves the religion of Christians or loves the religion of Jews. This is a false condition, rejected linguistically, as we have mentioned, and by Sharia evidence, including what we said: loving the religion of disbelievers is in itself a contradiction. So whoever loves the religion of disbelievers has not disbelieved in Taghut or believed in Allah. This is the second. Thirdly, alliance in the Quran, as we have mentioned, is from outward actions, not from the actions of the heart, but from the actions of the limbs. And the evidence for that is His saying, "You see those in whose hearts is disease, hurrying among them, saying, 'We fear that a disaster may strike us.'" So these hypocrites, the Quran is clear and explicit. This verse, "You see those in whose hearts is disease," comes immediately after His saying, "O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies." After that comes His saying, "You see those in whose hearts is disease." Who are these people with disease in their hearts? They are the hypocrites. Why did they disbelieve? Because they allied with the Jews and Christians. What does "allied" mean? Did they love their religion? No, because Allah, the Almighty, says in the Quran: "You see those in whose hearts is disease, hurrying among them." Why are they hurrying among them? Why are they allying with them? They say, "We fear that a disaster may strike us." Meaning, fear of punishment and the victory of the Jews and Christians. So they fell into disbelief. And yet, these hypocrites did not love these disbelievers, did not love their religion, did not love the religion of the Jews. Rather, they fell into allying with disbelievers and taking disbelievers as allies out of fear that they might punish them. And this is the situation of many countries that rush to participate in alliances with the Crusaders, or the Jews, or the Rafida, for fear that these countries will punish them with the known economic sanctions. So this is evidence for the falsehood of their saying: "Until he loves their religion, they are considered disbelievers." So it is not permissible to interpret alliance as loving the religion of disbelievers. Likewise, it is not correct to interpret alliance as loving the persons of disbelievers. So, if they say, "Alliance is support with heartfelt love," what do they say? This is another point. They said, "What is the disbelief-inducing alliance?" They said, "It is to ally with disbelievers with heartfelt love, support with heartfelt love." Meaning, I support them against Muslims, and in addition to that, another condition is that I love their religion. So we say, do these two conditions have to be met for them to be considered disbelievers, or does one of them suffice? If they say, "Both conditions must be met," then we say, what is the benefit of mentioning support if loving the religion of disbelievers is disbelief in itself? Meaning, today, for example, someone loves the religion of Christians. This is disbelief. This is disbelief, may Allah protect us. This person loves the religion of the Rafida. This is disbelief. This person loves the religion of the Magians. This is disbelief in Allah. This is disbelief. It negates his faith. So what is the need for mentioning support if both conditions must be met? This is, may Allah protect us, meaning we say to them, "O man, if he loves the disbelievers and does not support them, is he considered a disbeliever or not?" If they say, "He is not considered a disbeliever," then they have disbelieved, because they say that loving the religion of disbelievers is not disbelief in itself until he supports them. Is it clear or not, brothers? Clear. So, if they say, "Both must be met," then we say, "If one of the conditions is met, he is considered a disbeliever." Then we say, "Why do you accuse us and deny us that we have declared your rulers disbelievers because they allied with disbelievers against Muslims?" So, if either of the two conditions is met, he is considered a disbeliever. And we say that loving the religion of disbelievers is disbelief in itself. It is disbelief in itself. And alliance can be love, and it is not necessarily that alliance is out of love. No, I may love my mother and father, but I do not support them in their disbelief. I may love my wife, but I do not support her in her disbelief. I may love my son, but I do not support him in his disbelief. Do you understand, brothers? So, alliance does not always equate to love. It is not necessarily that if I ally with someone, I love him or love his parents. The evidence is that the hypocrites, as in His saying, "You see those in whose hearts is disease," allied with the Jews and Christians, not out of love for them or for what they have, but out of fear. Fear of punishment.

So, it is not every love that necessitates the existence of affection and alliance, and this is a false condition rejected against them in the text of the Quran, by the grace of Allah, the Almighty. So, Allah, the Almighty, in His saying, "You see those in whose hearts is disease," clarified that they deserve punishment, or that the hypocrites allied with the Jews and Christians not out of love for the religion of the Jews and Christians, but out of fear of disasters. They were seeking their own interests, and for that reason, they allied with them. Yes. And there is another verse in His saying, "Have you not seen those who were hypocrites, saying to their brothers who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture, 'If you are expelled, we will surely leave with you, and we will never obey anyone against you. And if you are fought, we will surely aid you.' But Allah bears witness that they are liars." Who mentioned this? Brother Abu Osama Al-Nuaimi mentioned this in his book "Al-Tajlis wa Al-Zhahira fi Mas'alat Al-Muwalah Al-Mukaffirah." What is the evidence from this verse to refute this heretical condition that the Murji'ah of our time stipulate? These hypocrites did not ally with the disbelievers except in seeking honor with them. The hypocrites did not say to the Jews and Christians, to the People of the Scripture, "We love your religion, and we want your religion to prevail over the religion of Muhammad." No, rather they assured them of mutual support, meaning, "We will support you." So this is evidence that this condition is heretical and not correct. These hypocrites did not say to the Jews and Christians, "By Allah, we love your religion, and we want your religion to prevail in the city and so on." No, rather they promised them support, to fight with them against the Muslims. And by this, they became hypocrites, meaning their hypocrisy is major hypocrisy. So this is a refutation of their heretical stipulation from the language of the Arabs, from the Sharia, and from a Sharia perspective, by the grace of Allah, the Almighty. I hope the brothers pay attention to the lesson, as it is an important lesson, so that they know how to respond to these doubts.

Now, what do we do? The next stage, after we have clarified, by the grace of Allah, the Almighty, the falsehood of stipulating the love of the religion of disbelievers to consider as disbelief those who help disbelievers against Muslims, from a linguistic and Sharia perspective, with the evidence we have mentioned. We move on to the sayings of the scholars. And I mentioned the sayings of the scholars in the previous lesson, but I will mention them again for reinforcement. And I have brought other sayings. Imam Al-Qurtubi, may Allah have mercy on him, said regarding His saying, "And whoever allies with them among you, then he is of them." I deliberately brought sayings of scholars that do not contain the word "alliance" only, but I brought sayings because the sayings of scholars say that whoever allies with disbelievers, meaning this is a disbeliever, meaning their words. So when they address us, they say, "We also consider disbelief in alliance," but what kind of alliance do they consider disbelief? They say to you, "The intention of Ibn Taymiyyah, or Al-Baghawi, or Ibn Kathir, or Al-Tabari, by alliance is to love their religion." So now you possess the tools and the responses to their words, both linguistically and from a Sharia perspective. In addition to that, we will now bring the sayings of scholars that refute what these people claim.

First, he says, "Look, I have brought these verses that state that whoever helps them, meaning with his person, or his money, or just money, or person, or opinion, is considered a disbeliever, and there is no condition for that, neither heartfelt love nor any other love, nor love of their religion at all." Al-Qurtubi, may Allah have mercy on him, said regarding His saying, "And whoever allies with them among you, meaning he supports them against Muslims, and it does not mean loving their religion." Do you hear about heartfelt love or religious love? You will not hear it. He said, "Meaning he supports them against Muslims, and his ruling is like their ruling." This is an issue. A saying we use as evidence for what we have mentioned.

We also come to what Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him, said. Listen to what Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him, said. His sayings are explicit in this matter. Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him, said: "So it is established by this that whoever joins the land of disbelief and war of his own free will, excluding the coerced who are coerced. He said: So it is established by this that whoever joins the land of disbelief and war of his own free will, fighting those who are adjacent to him among the Muslims, then by this act he is an apostate, and he has all the rulings of an apostate. He goes to the disbelievers and fights with them, fighting the Muslims, going of his own free will and not coerced. This is a disbeliever." Then Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him, clarified: "As for whoever flees to the land of war due to injustice he fears, meaning he was in the land of Islam, then he left the land of Islam and went to the land of disbelief because of injustice that befell him or will befall him, and he did not fight the Muslims, nor did he help them against them, and he did not find among the Muslims anyone to protect him." He said: "This person has nothing against him because he is compelled and coerced." So, there are two men. A man joins, for example, the land of the Rafida, allies with them, and joins the Hashd to fight the Muslims. This is a disbeliever, an apostate. This is the meaning of Ibn Hazm's words. A Muslim man goes to the land of the Christians, goes to France, goes to Holland, goes to Germany, goes to these Christian countries, and these countries are at war with the Muslim countries. So he sides with them, then he is considered a disbeliever by this act. Ibn Hazm said: "So it is established by this that whoever joins the land of disbelief and war of his own free will, fighting those who are adjacent to him among the Muslims, then by this act he is an apostate, and he has all the rulings of an apostate, including the obligation to kill him when he is apprehended, and the permissibility of his property and the invalidity of his marriage, and other things, because the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, did not disavow the Muslims until the end of his words." This is the first scenario. The second scenario is that this Muslim goes to the land of disbelief because injustice will befall him or he wants to prevent injustice from himself, but he did not do more than this migration or this migration from the land of Islam to the land of disbelief. He did not help the disbelievers, nor did he assist them, nor did he fight against the Muslims. He said: "This person did not find in the land of Islam anyone to protect him, meaning to protect him from injustice." He said: "This person is not considered a disbeliever." And he says, and he says, may Allah have mercy on him, regarding His saying: "So here, Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him, did not mention loving their religion, nor did he mention heartfelt love, which the Murji'ah of our time talk about. So, is Ibn Hazm a Kharijite? Where is the way out of the words of Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him? Now we want to find a way out of the words of Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him. Please. He did not mention their love, nor did he say, "By Allah, whoever allies with disbelievers is a disbeliever or this is correct." He said, "Whoever joins the land of disbelief and allies with disbelievers." So that you bring a way out and say, "The intention of alliance is to love their religion or heartfelt love." He did not say that at all, may Allah have mercy on him. And praise be to Allah. So we want an answer to this question: What do you say about Ibn Hazm? Is he a Kharijite because he said what we said? And where is the way out of the words of Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him? This is the second question.

Now he says, may Allah have mercy on him, "And it is established that the saying of Allah, 'And whoever allies with them among you, then he is of them,' is only on its apparent meaning, that he is a disbeliever among the disbelievers, and that is the truth that no two Muslims disagree on." So here he mentioned what? He mentioned the word "alliance." "And whoever allies with them." He said, "It is on its apparent meaning." So, how do we know that Ibn Hazm's intention by alliance here is not heartfelt love and not love of the religion of disbelievers? Because the preceding statement explained the meaning of alliance for him. It explained that disbelief for him is whoever fights, whoever fights the Muslims and is with the disbelievers. This is disbelief. And the verse is on its apparent meaning. Yes. And also he said, may Allah have mercy on him, in another saying: "Likewise, whoever resides in the lands of India, Sindh, China, Turkestan, Sudan, and Rome among the Muslims, if he is unable to leave there due to heavy baggage, or lack of money, or weakness of body, or impassable road, then he is excused. He is excused." So here is a Muslim man who cannot migrate from the land of disbelief to the land of Islam. This person is excused for the reasons we have mentioned. This is the first scenario. The second scenario: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service A, or service B, or with writing, then he is a disbeliever, an apostate." Imagine, according to Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him, if he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. So, according to Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy on him, if he helps the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, he is a disbeliever. So, how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said: "If he is fighting the Muslims there, helping the disbelievers with service or writing, then he is a disbeliever." Imagine he helped the disbelievers against Muslims with writing, so he is a disbeliever. The issue is clear, brothers. So how is it that whoever helps them in bombing Muslims, helps them in destroying their homes, their mosques, in removing the rule of Allah, the Almighty, from His land, is not considered a disbeliever? Ibn Hazm said:

What these hypocrites say, these logical thinkers, they think that, by God, you do not think with a distant perspective. You just say, "We fight America and we battle America." My brother, let us create some space between us and America, and let there be friendship and cooperation. And thus they speak. Meaning, and he thinks that helping America in the war against the Muslims is a good opinion. Or, meaning, if he had sought America's help in fighting the disbelievers, we would say, "No harm in that." But America does not provide him with aid, nor advice, nor assistance, until they are pleased with his religion. And the Jews and Christians will not be pleased with you until you align with America's opinion. He said, "Then how about him who takes reliance on them as a religion and a good opinion, and aids them with what he can of wealth and opinion?" See how this wealth, opinion, and body are repeated in the sayings of the Imams of the Da'wah, so that you may realize that whoever aids the disbelievers with his wealth to fight the Muslims, he has committed disbelief. He said, "Then how about him who aids them with wealth and opinion, and desires the demise of Tawhid and its people, and the dominance of the polytheists over them?" Then this is of the greatest disbelief. And reliance, meaning, aiding them with wealth and opinion, this is disbelief, and more than that, he desired the demise of Tawhid and its people. They want this state to be removed so that the Rafidites can establish their state. Meaning, this is disbelief, and we seek refuge in Allah. And many people have fallen into it. He also says, concerning the Sheikh, of course, he has a book, "Al-Muwalah wal-Fikak" (Allegiance and Separation), on the ruling of showing allegiance to the polytheists. I believe that is the name of the book. He said, may Allah have mercy on him, of course, this is a beneficial book. Brothers, refer to this book. It contains his most important and strongest sayings, may Allah have mercy on him, and his commentaries on the verses. He said, "Then Allah informed that these apostates, whose breasts are opened to disbelief, even if they are certain of the truth and say, 'We did not do this except out of fear,' then they have the wrath of Allah, and for them is a great punishment." In His saying, "except he who is compelled." He said, "Then Allah informed that the reason for this disbelief and punishment is not due to believing in polytheism, or ignorance of Tawhid, or hatred of religion, or love of disbelief." Ah, so it is invalidated that these people have disbelieved not because they loved the disbelievers, or loved the religion of the disbelievers, or hated Tawhid. No, rather, its cause is that he has a share of the worldly gains in it, so he preferred it over the Hereafter and over the pleasure of the Lord of the worlds. So Allah said, "That is because they preferred the worldly life over the Hereafter, and that Allah does not guide the disbelieving people." So Allah disbelieved them and informed that He does not guide them, even though they make excuses by loving the world. So, the one who shows allegiance to the disbelievers may not love their religion, and may not hate Tawhid, but he disbelieves. Why? Because he loved, or rather, he did it for the sake of the world, to preserve his position, his authority, his authority, his state. This is disbelief. So, by this, the invalidity of what the Murji'ah of this era have used as evidence is clarified, that aiding the disbelievers in fighting the Muslims and warring against the Muslims does not constitute disbelief unless one loves their religion or loves the prevalence of their religion. And listen to what he said, may Allah have mercy on him, as well: "So if the polytheists promised in secret to join them, support them, and go out with them, then this is hypocrisy and disbelief, even if it is a lie." Meaning, a man communicates with the disbelievers, with the Rafidites, with the Nusayris, with the Christians, saying, "I will be with you when you enter this village, and I will support you," and he is lying, he will not support them, and he will not be with them. He says this, if this is disbelief, then how about him who showed that truthfully, presented himself to them, entered their obedience, called to it, supported them, submitted to them, became one of them, and aided them with wealth and opinion? Pay attention, aided them with wealth and opinion. He aided them with wealth and opinion again. He aided them with wealth and opinion again. So, he said, meaning, we have two scenarios. The first scenario, what is the first scenario? That there is a Muslim. There is a Muslim who promised the disbelievers that he would support them and be with them, and he is lying, not truthful. Meaning, if the disbelievers entered, he would not support them. So, if this is disbelief, he says, then how about him who aided them with wealth and opinion? He gave them wealth and opinion. This is more deserving of disbelief. And how about him who supported them? And how about him who went out calling to elections, calling to the obedience of the Taghut, and how about him who went out on the pulpits saying, "Join the crowds, join the crowds of the Taghut in the war against the Muslims"? This is more deserving of disbelief. He said, may Allah have mercy on him, after that. This, he says, this is what he says, may Allah have mercy on him. Wait, glory be to Allah. He says, "This is the state of many of these apostates in this tribulation." So, if their excuse is this, then this is the excuse that Allah mentioned about those in whose hearts is disease. No, the meaning is, I forgot the saying before it. He said, may Allah have mercy on him, meaning, these people who supported the disbelievers against the Muslims, supported the disbelievers against the Muslims, fell into disbelief. Why did they fall into disbelief? He said, "The hypocrites did not do that except out of fear of the turns of fate." Meaning, these hypocrites, when they showed allegiance to the Jews and Christians, they did not show allegiance to them out of love for their religion, or they desired through this support and this allegiance and aid for the religion of the Jews and Christians to prevail over Islam. No, rather, it was out of fear of the turns of fate. Meaning, they wanted to preserve their blood and protect their families, so they showed allegiance to the Jews and Christians against the Muslims. So, he said, may Allah have mercy on him, "This excuse, this excuse, this impediment," he said, "this is the state of many of these apostates in this tribulation, and we seek refuge in Allah." So, if this invalidates their argument based on loving the religion of the disbelievers, then praise be to Allah, the Almighty. So, now, Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, was also asked this question. He was asked, may Allah have mercy on him, in "Majmu' al-Fatawa," "What do you say, O scholars, Imams of religion, all of them, Imams of religion, all of them, and aid them in clarifying the clear truth, and uncovering the depths of the striving and straying ones, regarding these Tatars who come to Sham again and again, and they have spoken the two testimonies and attributed themselves to Islam, and they have not remained in the disbelief they were upon in the first instance? So, is it obligatory to fight them or not? And what is the evidence for fighting them? And what are the schools of thought of the scholars regarding that? And what is their ruling?" Here is the point of contention. "And what is their ruling? And what is the ruling of him who was with them?" Meaning, Muslims who joined the Tatars. "And what is the ruling of him who was with them, from the Muslim army, commanders and others? And what is the ruling of him who was taken out with them under compulsion? And what is the ruling of him who is with his army from those who attribute themselves to knowledge, jurisprudence, and poverty?" What did Ibn Taymiyyah say? Of course, Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, answered all these questions, then he said, "See the criterion upon which Sheikh al-Islam based disbelief. This criterion upon which Sheikh al-Islam based disbelief was not found in it at all: the heart's love for the Tatars, nor their religion." He said, may Allah have mercy on him, "And whoever jumped to them from the commanders of the army and others, then his ruling is their ruling, and among them is apostasy from the essential tenets of Islam to the extent that he has apostatized from the essential tenets of Islam." Meaning, the one who jumped to them, this is an apostate. And if the Salaf said, may Allah have mercy on him, they named the refuser of Zakat an apostate, even though they fast and pray and did not fight the Muslim community, then how about him who became with the enemies of Allah and His Messenger and fought the Muslims? So, whoever jumps from them to the Tatars, he is more deserving of fighting than many of the Tatars themselves, because the Tatars include the compelled and the uncompelled. And the Sunnah has been established that the punishment of an apostate is greatly increased compared to the punishment of an original disbeliever in several ways." So, now Ibn Taymiyyah says that this is an apostate, because he mentioned that the punishment of an apostate is greater and more severe than the punishment of an original disbeliever. He also said, may Allah have mercy on him, "And by this, it becomes clear that whoever was with them, meaning, whoever from the Muslims was with the Tatars, who was originally a Muslim, is worse than the Turks who were disbelievers. The one who was originally a disbeliever, if he apostatizes from some of his laws, he is in a worse state than one who has not yet entered those laws, such as the refuser of Zakat and his like, whom Abu Bakr fought." So, what do we understand from this? That Sheikh al-Islam holds that whoever was with the Tatars in the war against the Muslims is an apostate, and he is in a worse state than the original disbeliever. Is it clear, brothers? Is it clear, God willing? Yes, is it clear or not? Okay, I want someone to say no. Okay, someone said no. I will repeat it again. Okay, now Sheikh al-Islam, may Allah have mercy on him, says he was asked that there are some Muslims who joined the Tatars. The Tatars are a disbelieving group that took over Sham, as well as Iraq, these regions, and Khurasan, and they appeared in them, and the Rafidites aided them. These people used to say, "No to Allah," and they used to show some laws. The scholars declared them disbelievers. So, there are some Muslims who joined the Tatars to fight the Muslims in Sham. There are some who attribute themselves to Islam who joined the ranks of the Tatars to fight the Muslim community at that time, during the time of Sheikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him. So, Sheikh al-Islam was asked, and they said, "O Sheikh, these are Muslims who became with the Tatars against us. What is their ruling? Do we kill them or not? Are they Muslims or disbelievers?" So, Sheikh al-Islam says, what does he say? "So, whoever jumps from them to the Tatars, he is more deserving of fighting than many of the Tatars themselves." Meaning, this Muslim who jumped to the Tatars to fight the Muslims, he says this is more severe and greater than the Tatars themselves. Is it clear? Yes. So, he says this is an apostate, and this apostate is in a worse state than the original disbeliever. This apostate, he says, is in a worse state than the original disbeliever. Yes. And there is also another saying by Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who said that the evidence for the disbelief of a Muslim if he commits shirk with Allah or sides with the polytheists against the Muslims, even if he does not commit shirk, is more than can be enumerated from the words of Allah, the words of His Messenger, and the words of the reliable scholars. What did Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab say? He says, the one who sides with the polytheists in war against the Muslims, he says this is a disbeliever. He says this is an apostate. He did not mention love of their religion or love of the prevalence of their religion. O brothers, we will not fly, God willing. We have only two more sayings, and we will finish the lesson, God willing. Sheikh Sulaiman ibn Abd said, "I want to convey this principle to the brothers. I want to convey this principle to the brothers, because in the next lesson, we will talk about seeking aid. Now we are talking about who aided the disbelievers in fighting the Muslims." Sheikh said, "The fourth type is one who is safe from all of this, but the people of his land openly declare enmity towards Tawhid and follow the polytheists and strive to fight them. And his excuse is that if he leaves his homeland, it is difficult for him, and he fights the people of Tawhid alongside the people of his land and strives with his self and his wealth. So, this is also a disbeliever. Because if they ordered him to abandon fasting Ramadan, and he could not do that except by leaving his homeland, he would do it. And if they ordered him to marry his father's wife, and he could not disobey them except by doing so, he would do it." What is the meaning of my words? The people of his land, for example, like Karbala, a Rafidi, polytheistic city. There is a Muslim among them living in this city. This city is known for its enmity towards Tawhid, enmity towards the people of Tawhid, and enmity towards the Muslims. And they want to eliminate any Muslim group fighting in the cause of Allah. So, this Muslim lives in Karbala. He could not leave Karbala because it is difficult for him to leave his homeland. "By God, I cannot leave my homeland, and separation, and this is my homeland, and I cannot leave my homeland." So, what did he do? He entered the ranks of the Rafidites to fight the Muslims with his wealth and his self. He says this is a disbeliever. And why? First, he entered their obedience and aided them against the Muslims. Second, may Allah have mercy on him, what did he say? "Because if these disbelievers asked this Muslim to abandon fasting, and he could not leave his homeland, he would abandon fasting. And if they told him, 'Marry your father's wife,' he would marry her because he could not leave his homeland." He says this is a disbeliever. So, is it clear, brothers? Is the meaning understood, God willing? Yes. Beautiful. Also, with this saying, we will conclude. Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Latif, Sheikh Sulaiman ibn Sahman, Sheikh Salih ibn Abd al-Aziz, and Sheikh Muhammad ibn Ibrahim ibn Abd al-Latif, and all the scholars of Al-Arid were asked about Al-Ajman and Al-Duwaish and those who followed them, as they left the lands of the Muslims, claiming that they were following the example of Ja'far ibn Abi Talib and his companions, as they left Mecca for Abyssinia. These are a group claiming Islam, who left with some disbelievers. So, what is their ruling? What did these scholars answer? So, they answered, "These whom the questioner mentioned, namely Al-Ajman and Al-Duwaish and those who followed them, there is no doubt about their disbelief and apostasy. Because why? Why are these disbelievers? Because they sided with the enemies of Allah and His Messenger, and sought to enter under their allegiance, and sought their aid." No mention of heart's love, nor love of their religion, nor love of the prevalence of their religion. They became disbelievers. Why? Because they sided with the disbelievers, they joined them, entered their allegiance, and sought their aid. So, they combined, he said, may Allah have mercy on him, in completing his saying, "So they combined leaving the lands of the Muslims and joining the enemies of the creed and religion, and their disbelief of the people of Islam, and their deeming lawful their blood or their wealth." They left the lands of the Muslims first. Second, they joined the disbelievers. Third, they disbelieved the people of Islam. Fourth, they deemed their blood lawful. And after that, these sheikhs used the words of Sheikh al-Islam as evidence. And Sheikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, said in "Al-Ikhtiyarat" (Choices) - this is a book by Sheikh al-Islam - "Whoever jumps to the camp of the Tatars and joins them, he has apostatized, and his blood and wealth are lawful." So, if this is for merely joining the polytheists, meaning, merely by joining them to fight the Muslims, you become a disbeliever. He said, "Then how about him who believed, in addition to that, that their jihad and their fighting for Islam is a religion by which they are guided?" Then this is more deserving of disbelief and apostasy. Meaning, like those who go out, such as Sulaiman Rahilan and Adel Al-Kalbi or others, they see that fighting with America, on America's side, or not on the side of the Rafidites, is a religion to eliminate the Khawarij, as they claim. This is the greatest disbelief. They see that jihad with the Rafidites to remove this group is a religion, and we seek refuge in Allah. Glory be to Allah. The same people are repeated. The same situation is repeated. The same people are repeated in another way. Then he was asked, then he said, "These sheikhs said, 'As for Al-Dahina, or Al-Dahina is not precise with me, and Al-Khudri, and Ibn Faisal ibn Hamid, and their followers who came from Ibn Al-Sharif, calling to his allegiance, then there is no doubt about their apostasy, given the situation mentioned, because they are callers to entering under the allegiance of the polytheists. So, it is obligatory for all Muslims to fight them and battle them, and likewise, whoever shelters them and supports them, then their ruling is their ruling.'" Ah, so the one who calls to entering the armies of the Taghut, this is disbelief, and we seek refuge in Allah. Because he enters to enter under the obedience of the polytheists. The Taghut are polytheists, no doubt about it. Likewise, he said, "And the one who sheltered them and supported them," he says, "these are also disbelievers." So, these sheikhs say that whoever shelters these polytheists and supports them against the Muslims, he says these are also disbelievers. So, from what we have mentioned, it becomes clear to us that allegiance, its meaning does not require that it be with the heart, nor heart's love, nor is it synonymous with heart's love. It has absolutely no relation to heart's love. There may be love, and there may not be. There may be love, and there may not be. We mentioned that at the beginning and clarified the sayings of the scholars, may Allah have mercy on them, that aiding the disbelievers with opinion, or wealth, or self, this is disbelief. And Allah knows best. And may peace and blessings be upon Muhammad and his family and his companions.