Why Bitcoin Is Going HIGHER This Year

The only way to get out of this situation with the debt and the deficit is to reflate your way out and to debase your way out. And I think it's good for gold. It would be at much higher levels and send it off. And at the same point, it would be massively bullish for Bitcoin as well.

Last thing I want to talk to you about is uh there's a rumor that the government's going to take a stake in Intel. Um there's a lot here. Um what's going on guys? Today we got a great episode with Jordy Visser. In this conversation, we talk about the Treasury buying more Bitcoin. What's going on with the CPI and the PPI? Are we going to revalue gold? How should we think about earnings growth? AI is accelerating everything. And there is so much happening so quickly. Should we actually be changing anything inside of our portfolio? Jord's here. He doesn't disappoint. Here's my latest conversation. Enjoy it.

All right, Jordy, we got a lot to get into this week. It seems like things are happen fast and furious. The first one is that the Treasury Secretary went on Fox Business and off-hand comment said, "We are not going to be buying more Bitcoin." World freaked out. Couple hours later, tweet goes out that says, "We are going to be buying more Bitcoin in a budget neutral way." What's your take?

My take on everything regarding Bitcoin is just how much uh day trading is involved with the uh with the space. I don't think you and I have ever really spent much time on the Bitcoin, the strategic Bitcoin reserve. And if we've mentioned it, it's not the reason why I care about this or or got involved. Um, so I think it just shows on the one side for for ALOS and for anything that is quantbased, Bitcoin gets bucketed into something which is about trading an asset that has higher volatility and higher beta. So, when something negative comes out on it, it's immediate sellown, you get retail that's involved. And I think based on the fact that we broke out technically, you got Bitcoin up to new all-time highs. People were leaning long. And so, any kind of news item that seems to be counter to what people might be hoping on or embedded in there leads to a sharp sell-off. But it's funny, VA is declining rapidly in Bitcoin. You we've continued to go lower in terms of the daily trading V. think the implied balls or at least the realized VS somewhere in the low30s now as opposed to we've been going from you know 40s down to high30s and now down to low30s. So when you get these moves now they tend to be at a time where a lot of orders come in at the same time and there's got to be a clearing price and the clearing price was lower and then we stabilize and we go through it. But I think there was already fears and you had already weakened the thing because of the PPI being higher than expected and people thinking that maybe the Fed wasn't going to cut rates in September because PPI was higher. So when you put it all together, I think it's again just another short-term trading overreaction and a great time for people that believe in the long-term story, which we both do. And I absolutely believe that we're at the uh beginning of a very very important story that's that's happening between the Fed, between PMIs, between a lot of different components which I think is going to fuel Bitcoin in the in the uh latter part of the year.

Let's talk about the PPI, the CPI. Um I think I've been very clear with people. Uh I don't believe the data. Um I think that it's very antiquated in terms of the data collection. The methodologies of calculation are wrong. Um, and maybe directionally it can tell you, you know, kind of how they think it is going, but I think that there are alternative real-time metrics that are much more accurate like true inflation, etc. Uh, but my personal opinion doesn't really matter to the market. The market still looks at CPI and PPI. Um, CPI seemed to come in right below expectations. PPI came in scorching hot. How do you read through some of this economic uh, announcements and reports that came out this week?

Well, I think the CPI was important. Um, let let me take them in reverse order because uh the PPI comes out hotter than expected. A lot of that was from portfolio management fees. So, when you strip that out, it wasn't as important and that's certainly not a tariff situation. When you go through the guts of the PPI for finished goods, there's no doubt that the numbers have shown up on the PPI for tariffs, which had to happen. Um, so PPI got people focused on the fact the Fed won't cut. And I will tell you from my dealings with, you know, hedge fund people, um, because I have a view that we're on the beginning of a reflationary boom, not an inflationary boom in the in a bad context, but a re reflationary boom, uh, where using the kind of the gav call four quadrant time, the Fed is 100% or 95% as we get on here to cut rates in September. the PPI comes out, we were actually slightly above 100%. So they had started to build in the possibility of 50 and that was because you got a couple people saying 50. You had Bessant talking about the fact that theoretically you could argue the Fed could go 150 to 175 basis points. That got people hopped up. You have a lot of the quote unquote 11 finalists for the Fed chair, of which a lot of them seem to be Scott Besson's friends uh from the hedge fund community who went on TV this week and talked about the fact that the Fed should be cutting rates. I mean, it was a parade of people who've been rumored for the job coming out to say the Fed was going to cut rates. So, the way I interpreted this week for me was that the White House is telling you they're going to put a Fed chair in that believes rate should be lower. At the same time, the market is now discounting that because the labor market has weakened enough and you've even had some of the Fed uh officials, Musulum, the St. Louis Fed governor actually came out, one of the more hawkish ones or on that fence and basically said the inflation data and this is after the CPI over the last 6 months has clearly had a sign which shows there isn't persistent inflation. At the same time, the labor market is weakening. So he took his inflation fears down a little, his labor market fears up a little. So the Fed is leaning towards doing 25. The market has built in 25. Pal hasn't given any kind of clue, but I do believe Powell will follow the committee, which seems split at this point. But to me, there is no doubt that if they were to cut this time, the market would respond knowing that this was the beginning of more cuts coming forward because the White House has said they want to run things hot. And to me, if you put it all together, without announcing this, they've basically raised the inflation target from 2% to say 3%. And the reason I say that is we are about to have a period where if the Fed were to cut rates, they're cutting rates with the core CPI above 3%. Now, that's only happened one time in the last three decades, and that was September of last year. Now, for everyone who gets bearish on bonds, I'm going to remind you again, the Fed in September of last year did more than what was expected. There wasn't 50 built in. I think it was about 50/50 between 25 and 50. So, they did surprise by doing 50 last September. that led to a sell-off in the long end of the bond market. I actually think the surprise is going to be this time. Biden was in place last year. Trump has shown without any question that he does not want rates going higher on the long end. So, if we see something happen on the short end, I think they have a plan in place of how to deal with it. I don't think you're going to see a spike in tenure rates. That's not the trade. I think this is a reflationary boom. I think there's an implied inflation target that's being raised with the next administration. If that had happened and the Fed had announced it, the markets would go crazy. There'd be massive change. I believe it happened this week. I believe the rolling out of all the next Fed chairs basically said, "We want to run things hot." And I will remind everyone if they go back and listen to Scott Bessent on the All-In podcast, recent one, not the one from the beginning of the year, but the most recent one, he literally said, "We want this to be like the 1990s. And we want the Fed to absolutely not be academic and data driven off things of the past, but have a forward-looking mindset like Allen Greenspan." And that's because they've invested in the deflation, most deflationary technology of all time, which is not the internet, which is what the 90s were about. This one's about AI. And they want to make sure we're making policy decisions based on where AI will be driving things 3 years from now, not where the most recent PPI number was.

So what's interesting to me is as we are getting these economic data points um some of the conversation online is that the decisions the Fed is making actually does have an impact on the market which I think you know is kind of a rational way to view this. Um but it seems like even when the Fed is doing things that the market wants or not doing things that the market wants we just keep going higher. I mean, yesterday we hit another all-time high in the Dow in the S&P 500, right? We just keep going higher and interest rates are already at sustained levels that I think people are like, "Hey, they should be cut. The president's calling for that, etc." Is it as simple as saying if we already are at all-time highs? If unemployment is where it is, if GDP growth is where it is, and they start to cut, we should expect asset prices to just explode higher. And AI is a tailwind. interest rate cuts are a tailwind. Like all of this is just one big trade where asset prices and this reflation idea are going to drive everything significantly higher.

Everything that you mentioned there was related to the US stock market and the Fed. And let me just make sure everyone realizes globally um this week the DAX made an all-time high. The Footsie made an all-time high. The Footsie MIB for Italy made an all-time high. You've got the Shanghai Composite about to break out for a 5-year high. The Nikkei made all-time highs. The Cosby, the Tyax, it doesn't matter where you go, global markets are going higher. Okay? And this is all with tariffs. Like tariffs are a global event. So, let's just forget the fact that when people go, I can't believe why the US stock market's going up. It's not just the US stock market that's going higher. It's everything around the globe. The banks, the BKX are about to make new highs. When you have a reflationary boom, banks go higher. When you have a deflationary bust, banks go lower. There is no doubt that the market is implying that there's reflation that's happening. And the central banks around the world are cutting rates. We have had 88 cuts I think this year around the globe. And the Fed's not participating right now. So I think the reason the Fed side matters is because our inflation is not falling like the rest of the world at this point. I mean, you still have deflation in China or they just came out of it on the CPI level. PPI is still in deflation. You've had Europe inflation come down. The US stuff is kind of stabilizing here in this 3% level. And there's no way you can look through the CPI and not see that the sticky side of things has hooked up. So, we're going to be above the inflation of the of the 2010 to 2020 period. So, for people that want to focus on, oh, this means that the market should go down. The reality is there's something very important happening. And we talked about it last week, but I'm going to keep saying it over and over. Everything is justified based on what happened last quarter in earnings. I don't know how people don't realize that we had capex sentiment at levels only associated with a recession in the surveys. Remember all the soft data was so bearish. Consumer confidence collapsing. We saw the airlines fall because nobody was booking long-term trips. Uncertainty index was above where it was during COVID. And somehow or another, the S&P 500 posted earnings year-over-year growth of 11%. four times what was expected at the end of June. So somehow or another, every smart person got it completely wrong cuz to get to those numbers, this is a lot of analysts taking their revisions lower, strategists, everyone. So no one wants to admit they were wrong. But earnings don't lie. And here's the thing about earnings. I do not believe that GDP can be can measure AI and the benefits that come in it. In this week's video for me, I will be highlighting what chat GPT says should happen at the different stages of AI. The AI we we are leaving the infrastructure stage, but you can't measure the benefits that come from profit margins during the adoption phase. I don't think GDP is going to show the explosive growth that like the economist talked about and that we kind of went through last week. Is it a possibility? Yes. But I think the labor versus capital debate is showing up more and more where revenue per employees is driving the S&P 500 and it's driving every place around the world because Seaman's energy is a foreign company selling into the hyperscalers which are uh basically buying infrastructure for the data centers to fuel this AI move. The whole globe is benefiting aside from their need to onshore things and do the same build defense everything else. So there's a justification for stocks to go higher based on earnings. There's a justification based on the fact that I think PMIs are going to go higher because during the adoption phase of AI. I see this as involving three new categories which kind of get past the infrastructure stage. One we've talked about extensively which is power. But during the adoption stage you should be seeing industries not just tech not just Nvidia benefiting as they roll out AI into their own side. The way that you measure that is through token use but also through the cloud revenues with inside the hyperscalers. So the hyperscalers get a tax benefit for spending money. They get the cloud revenues from everyone around the globe using AI more and more. And now you're about to enter into the agentic world which means every company can replace hiring with digital employees. And this is the phase that as chati chatbt wrote this is really the most explosive phase when stocks should do the best and that's because people are underestimating the profit margin impact. They're waiting for profit margins to come down. They're watching the labor market which is weakening. And this is why the Fed is actually at the point now where they're going to be forced looks like to cut rates when they're not fully on board with it at least the whole committee. And that's why Wall Street is having a hard time grasping it. And this is why I think stock markets around the globe are going higher. It's not just a US thing. Again, AI is driving this.

So, what's interesting to me is let's go at a couple of these data points, right? So, if GDP isn't going to show the explosion of AI productivity, uh that data may be a little bit harder, you know, in terms of how much um severity you can use on it to to uh include in your analysis. The jobs report shows minimal job growth, but actually the job growth has been explosive. if you include the digital employees. So you get into this weird thing of like no no no human job growth is not exploding higher but job growth across corporations is exploding higher. And so when you start to look at this it goes okay hold on a second again economic data point that is inaccurate because it does not fully actually understand what is the growth that's happening. You can't look at payrolls anymore because guess what you're not paying the digital employees the way that you pay the human employees. So how do you get at that? So, I actually think one of the most important things that can happen and I've been looking for somebody who's going to do this. If they're not going to do it, I'm considering trying to find someone that I can put task with this, fund it, etc. We need a new set of economic data that is going to account for not only the human-driven economy, but also the digital driven economy. Because as an investor, if you are looking at only the human data that is measuring how many people, what is the GDP, all that kind of stuff, you are missing this story. And I think that your point about like the smart people got it all wrong. The smart people are using the data that they're used to looking at, but that data is missing this like we can call it a shadow economy. We can call it a digital, you know, worker economy. What whatever it is, there is a plethora of economic activity and job growth that's happening there. And people are completely unprepared to use that analysis or that data. And I think to your point, earnings may be the single, you know, clearing point where people say, well, look, even if you don't have that data when you look at the earnings, how is it possible that all this other data that you're looking at is saying bad, negative, you know, scary, and earnings is up 11%. Well, obviously something's wrong here. And earnings is like the true truth teller. I think you said earnings don't lie. I love that. Like earnings don't lie, and it is telling you that the economic data that most of the quote unquote smart people are looking at is not accounting for a huge driver of growth right now.

Today's episode is brought to you by Figure. They're the largest non-bank mortgage lender in the United States with over $15 billion unlocked on their lending platform. They've just lowered rates on their Bitcoin and Ethereum backed loans to 8.91%. Improving their already industry low fixed rate 50% LTV loans. They keep building as well, being the only major CBL player to launch decentralized MPC custody to protect against single entry failure. And they just removed interest deferral fees entirely so you can let Bitcoin price appreciation pay for your loan over time. What is MPC decentralized custody? It's a Bitcoin or ETH onchain wallet with multiple key shards to protect you from single entity custody failure. You can always see your crypto ownership in a segregated wallet and verify your collateral hasn't moved. Whether you're funding a major purchase like a down payment on a home, investing in new opportunities, or even buying more Bitcoin, Figure makes it straightforward and transparent. visit their app or click my link below to take out a Bitcoin back loan with Figure today.

Yeah, you know what what you just said and I think for people that um everyone grew up and at some point whether their parents said it to them, their grandparents did or they heard it on TV, a line that every kid hears at some point is there's no free lunches. So let's just go through this. AI is not some everyone wins thing. It's actually concentrated in the winners. So in that little chat PT thing where I went through the stages it talks about the societal impact. So when you hear people that are negative they're like well if we're hiring digital employees that's great for companies but then employees are falling. And so when you see socialism rising in New York City and in the cities and you see kids in not able to afford housing and housing affordability is at all-time uh worse levels. There is a negative side that comes out of this. Um, what ChachiPT says will eventually happen is that there will be UBI. So, here's what I want to tell everyone right now. There already is UBI. It's just in a different form. So, if companies are making more money, then the stock market is going higher. So, for people that own stocks, they're benefiting. They're not getting it through wages, but their net worth is going higher. And we've seen that in the country. Now again that's very concentrated but it does filter down to more than 50% of the people have a pension fund have something. You have about 30 million people that are no longer employed in the country but are getting social security they're getting Medicare uh Medicare. the transfer payments continue to grow and I think they're about 20% of income now which means we have a part of the economy between the baby boomers who are no longer working but are getting paid to not work through pension funds and through other things plus people that are at the bottom end that are getting some kind of aid from the government. You've created this weird form of UBI where the wealthy are getting huge returns. The middle group is getting returns through their investments in stocks through housing prices that are not falling and then at the bottom end you're getting a bunch of transfer payments. It's not UBI the way people think but it's already happening. I think the government has to find a way again to rebalance the economy to some degree. Trump has talked about it. I don't think that game is over in by any stretch of the imagination where he wants to do something for the bottom 50%. And that means house prices have to come down somehow because the affordability is out of whack. He can't force wages higher. He can't run the whole AI thing. I think it's a myth to believe that it's going to create more jobs that it's going to get rid of, especially in the next three years during his term. But that's where this balance comes in. So I want to make sure everyone realizes when we talk about this from an optimistic basis. It's not that there's no there's never free lunch. There's always a negative to things and I do think the labor side is a negative. It is going to lower rates right now and if the Fed has their way, they'll lower them more, but people are going to start to realize that even if you move short-term rates lower, if long-term rates go higher, that doesn't really help people in terms of their borrowing because most auto loans and housing loans are more dependent on the long end of the curve. And that's where I think the government, whether it's yield c curve control or or giving taxes tax breaks to people, there has to be something that's going to have to happen.

So, I want to push back on one thing that you said, which uh I always enjoy the very rare times where you and I can debate something because we usually are on the same page, but um you said that it will get rid of jobs before it starts to create more jobs. I want to change that to say it will get rid of human jobs, but it is actually creating more total jobs. And I'm going to give you a couple of examples of things that I've recently seen that I think have started to like in my head I'm like, oh, I'm seeing the future. There was this video that uh hopefully we can find and and we'll include if we can, but um it was a truck driving in China with no cab. So if you think of most self-driving cars in the United States, it's looks like a regular car that a human could sit in. The steering wheel still moves as if a human was sitting there. It's just like there is no human driver. So it is still designed as if a human is in the driver's seat. This truck had nowhere for a human to sit. it was a fully autonomous thing and it was driving down the uh the road in China. Now, I'm assuming it's some sort of test vehicle that wouldn't be legal here in the United States, blah blah blah, whatever. But what I started to realize was, wait a second, the form factor of the truck outside of the cab looked just like any other, you know, kind of 18-wheeler or, you know, Mac truck type thing. But the cab had been completely deleted and it was just like a computer on the front of the cargo area. And I started to think to myself, I said, "Oh my god, some of these things are going to change in form factor." Which means that now you are actually going to eliminate the job. The human job is no longer like, "Oh, sometimes the the truck drives itself, sometimes a human's in it." It's just like there's nowhere for the human to sit, right? So like that is okay. There there's one part there. The second thing that I have seen now is I have started to see more and more of what I'm going to consider uh white collar displacement AI products. So there is one that does uh Excel. You can in natural language explain what you want. It will go and pull data and it will build entire Excel models. And the joke online is like, "Oh, the investment bankers, they're going to be in trouble. Oh, the, you know, the white collar workers, the entry level." Well, there's a new report out in the New York Times that says that actual job growth in New York City flat. And everyone's like, "Oh, that's a sign of a bad economy." I think it's AI story. Like it's much more AI than it is bad economy. And so you start to look at this and you're saying to yourself, wait a second, how many quote unquote digital employees have been hired inside of companies? That's where all the job growth is going. And so it comes back to this idea of if that is true, how do we start to think about the productivity of them, right? Because human labor, we know how to measure that productivity. What I don't know, and I even think about it for our own companies, how do I measure the productivity? It's not like they give me a weekly report of what they got done, right? And maybe we could code that in, but it it changes the way you think about management. It changes the way you think about how the company's going to grow. It changes the way you think even about the organizational structure. Like these are very big changes underway here that all come off of one piece of technology that now is going to be widely applied across every industry. Right.

All right. So everything that you mentioned, I I don't think we disagree on this, but I'll ask you a question. When you know when you and and your lovely wife and kids go out to dinner for pizza and you look across the restaurant, how many digital employees do you see sitting in the restaurant eating? How many of them do you see on the plane? How many this economy is not built on what you talked about? You the society, government, going back to like the whole um Noah Yaval Harrari book on sapiens. The societal impact from this is the is the issue. Um profit margins are growing. The question is to keep a government in a good position to not have a revolution. Um the cost of things have to head towards free which is where I think they will eventually get to and that's the thing we're talking about. But the path to that point takes a a lot of time. I want to add on something. Um you know I always try to send you podcasts uh that I think are important and and I I I sent you one earlier in the week because I just thought the moonshots one was great. crypto and >> it was amazing on AI but also the collision with crypto but one of the things they talked about which fits in with what you're saying I mean transportation jobs I think are the largest job in the country when you aggregate them all together and they talked about the fact that there would be FSD has reached a point where robo taxis next year there will be millions of them on the road by the end of 2026 um and the reason is because we have finally everyone's heard about full self-driving. They've heard about autonomous vehicles, but those were based on data. Those were based on sensors. Those were based on, you know, not really learning on the job. We've reached a point in AI and in particular FSD where they're talking about we are at the inflection point where everything related to machines and intelligence in machines starts to accelerate and transportation is the first place that this will start to go. humanoids and everything we talked about will come down the road because that's a safety issue that is going to take more time having things working in your house being elderly care stuff like that but we are at the point on transportation side where robo taxis are going to start to have an impact. you remember what happened when Uber went into cities and the societal impact we saw around the globe strikes from taxi drivers this is a much bigger thing so I'm just trying I think where we may disagree a little bit I don't think this is going to be an easy transition and I think we're moving at such such an exponential pace that next year will be when the societal impact will go because the digital employees don't get to vote for the next president, the people spending money in the pizza place do.

I don't disagree with that. I think that there is um there's two tale of uh two stories, right? Uh you've got kind of the the productivity conversation and then you've got the consumption conversation. The consumption in that pizza par 100% there's no digital employees eating anything, right? Um I think that actually the wider that gap becomes in terms of you know think of it as like penetration of number of digital employees. If your 90% of your company is digital employees, well, that's a big displacement. And so now you have a very big penetration of people who are not having a job or fully employed. And then what happens to the consumption side? And so what I actually think is um you know, there's a lot of hedge funds, they do this thing um they're long the disruptor, short the disrupted is like a very common phrase that people will talk about. When you start to think about what is happening in the S&P 500, that's kind of what has naturally bifurcated. The top 10 companies are the greatest companies that have ever been built in human history. They use this technology. They're accelerating. Everything's amazing. The 490 other companies are kind of like, you know, watching from the sidelines like, hey, what the hell happened to our stock? And so, I do think that maybe that's not a perfect analogy, but it is a sign of the disruptors in this case are actually the large companies. they are accelerating and they're using this technology and people I think are very excited about that where there is potential investment opportunity is finding the other 490 companies who are going to embrace this stuff and say well hey listen I'm going to get the same benefit that they are because I'm going to take this seriously and you know I think that there are a lot of companies that are going to be pressured from the outside that you know we were talking before we started recording about open door they got a lot of data and one of the biggest things as I've paying attention there and and uh participating is the retail crowd is saying to them if you are an I buyer, if you are essentially a artificial intelligence market maker for residential real estate, how do you not have a very strong AI strategy? How do you not have the AI, right? Like they're getting the shareholder pressure. And so I've uh referenced online this idea of a digital upgrade. put Bitcoin on your balance sheet and embrace AI. The companies that do that will have a significant advantage in the future over the companies that don't. It's just that we are in not I mean we're not even in inning one. We're in the warm-up for watching this play out. And I think that you see the companies who are starting to embrace this stuff. You have the Bitcoin treasury companies, you have the AI companies, right? But the rest of the of the businesses that are in the public market, if they can start to understand and do the same things, they will, you know, follow suit. And I think it's more of a a trend than it is, you know, kind of these uh single stories that are the outliers.

Hi, I'm Matt Hogan, CIO of crypto asset manager Bitwise. Look, crypto can be confusing. There's so much noise and the space changes so quickly. That's why every week I write a 5-minute memo on the biggest stories impacting crypto in plain English. Why is Bitcoin up or down? What are people missing? Where should investors look next? Get the lowdown every week. Sign up to get the weekly CIO memo delivered straight to your inbox. Go to bitwiseinvestments.com/cio memo. That's bitwiseinvestments.com/ciomme. Carefully consider the extreme risks associated with crypto before investing.

Today's episode is brought to you by Core. You can earn yield on your Bitcoin by just holding your Bitcoin. It's simple. Core, the leading Bitcoin scaling solution, will reward you for not selling your Bitcoin. It's not magic. Here's how it works. Core is a protocol secured by elected validators. You can help elect validators and secure the network by simply locking up your Bitcoin on the Bitcoin blockchain. No bridging, no lending, and just holding. When your validator secures core, it earns rewards fueled by network activity and passes them back to you as yield with a minimum lock up of just one day. When the time lock ends, you get your Bitcoin back untouched. Steal your keys, steal your coins, now your yield. For even higher rates, stake core alongside your Bitcoin and multiply your yield. And if you want to see what your Bitcoin is securing, join millions of others in exploring the largest Bitcoin DeFi ecosystem. There are over a 100 live apps in the network and the deepest liquidity in all of Bitcoin DeFi. Get off zero and start earning yield on even just 1% of your Bitcoin by going to stake.cordow.org/pop. Again, that's stake.cordow.org. org/pmp or go click the link in the description. The rest of the of the businesses that are in the public market, if they can start to understand and do the same things, they will, you know, follow suit. And I think it's more of a a trend than it is, you know, kind of these uh single stories that are the outliers.

Yeah. So, this is a really important point and for people that um don't understand why Michael Sailor did what he did back then, I want to bring in three components of what you said. Um, I want to start with the Bitcoin component because it's it's the dead companies, the zombie companies. And Michael Michael Sailor talks about the zombie company. So, a zombie company is actually one that will just be gone. Like they can't win. They don't have the, let's say, the intangible assets that you're describing from like open where they could be monetized into something real. And I'm going to get into that with the way AI can do that and what happened with China globalization. But what Michael Sailor said and what you're seeing around the globe is if you're a company that's already lost, where you can't possibly get out of this, your only choice is really to come up with a Bitcoin situ. Like that's the only way.

It's a Hail Mary that always. And I think you're going to continue to see more and more places that have the cash on the balance sheet that realize that if I can't grow my earnings at 6% a year and Bitcoin is going up at 50% of the year, how can I turn that into at least, you know, the value the the type of thing that helps Michael Sailor? Will it end badly? Yeah, I'm sure a lot of the Treasury companies it'll end badly if they can't handle it. But let's leave that alone. From the AI side, people remember what happened with private equity buying companies, public companies, and then just redoing their supply chain using China and how much that would bring to the bottom line. You're basically describing a scenario that I'm already hearing about from smaller consultants on the AI side that are focused on it where private equity firms are like, "Hey, I have this healthcare business that is filled with paperwork. um they just they have they don't have any ability to make money. But if we can get the AI in there, we can drive revenue per employee. So it becomes an infusion of technology of artificial intelligence into these businesses to extract value. This is really important. Again, I'm going to go to the Moonshots podcast because I don't know you know how much you listen to it, but they talked about this Doge AI thing. You know, everyone heard about Doge. I think the Doge AI part might be the most important. And they talked about on the podcast about it's about deregulation and about getting rid of as many regulations as possible believing that that will unleash trillions of dollars in the economy. And we all know that's the case. If you can get rid of inefficiencies and friction, that is the easiest way to get the bottom line better. It may not get the top line going any better, but it'll definitely get the bottom line going. And theoretically, if the bottom line's better, you should get more spending to get the top line going. the efficiency side of things like that at the business level is going to happen. So you will have the adopters that are going to do it themselves, the Disney's uh you know the the places that are building agents in I think the financial companies are already doing it. They've got a lot of bloat in terms of the uh expenses on a uh technology and coding. Anything where coding has been a big expense will be dramatically dropped down. Entrepreneurs will compete with those companies. So it's a race to the bottom in terms of the deflationary pressure. But I think there's this other angle where people that may not have the inside technology, they might be purchased from private equity companies and then infused with the AI which will get the efficiency down because they have a good brand, they have a good business. So your your comment about the extraction of value in companies I think is a really critical component and the Bitcoin part this deregulation and the efficiency side from AI is another reason why the shareholder value which is the focus side that you brought up which has been a major story in Japan for the last really seven eight years now but I think it's a a prime story now extracting value out of the intangible assets or in people's business is going to be a major theme going forward because of AI.

Let's switch topics and talk about gold revaluation. This seems to be popping up more and more and uh now this week we got a Fed paper. We've got a lot more chatter online. Um it's unclear whether we're going to do that or not. I think the Treasury Secretary said that we're probably not going to do it. But how do you look at revaluing gold and whether we should or should not do it and whether we are going to do it?

Let's go back to why this is even a story. Stock markets are going higher. Excellent. Um, we still have a fiscal deficit and we still have debt to GDP of 120% in the US and around the globe. It's a massive problem and there's a tremendous amount of short-term debt maturing over the course of the next 3 years. And this is not just in the US. This is an enormous amount. They have to do something. And the one big beautiful bill is not reducing the deficit. And we can hope that AI is going to do this, but I don't think I don't think you can have hope. And the US is clearly focused on if they're going to be inflation targeting, moving it higher without saying it. Okay. Um that means that the dollar is going to weaken. If they're going to find some way to make the housing market more affordable, they're going to have to get involved in in in that business as well. Uh yield curve control comes into something that's in there. If they're cutting rates in the short and they have to do yield curve control, well then that's another weakening dollar trade. That's another situation where they're basically saying we're going to take reflation. So gold is another way and gold fits in with kind of the steer the Steven Mirren piece. He wrote a paper and one of the things in there was the Mara Lago accord to kind of be a topic with the Plaza Accord to go back to what happened in 1971 getting off of gold. We're not getting back on gold. So the gold standard is not coming back. But there's also not another currency that can replace the dollar as a global reserve currency. And so we have these imbalances which the you the white house clearly does not want. They do not believe having the baggage that comes with the global reserve currency which leads in their mind to a greater distribution of wealth problem. They want to redistribute the money in a more equal manner without socialism in some way through capitalism. So how do they do that? So, a gold revaluation that would be agreed upon with China is a story that has been percolating out there this entire year. If you just type in gold revaluation, I think Luke Groman has done the best work on this, and I think he's laid out why China would want this, why the US would, and why all of these weird things that happened in terms of all the gold buying and all the onoring of gold and all this stuff was happening. Luke Ramen even gets to the the point um in one of the podcasts I listened to that do you really think it's a coincidence that JD Vance was at with the pope the day before he died when the Vatican has the US gold there and like all these things going on. I bring this up not because it's necessarily going to happen, but that Fed paper is not the only thing that happened. As of this morning, Michael Hartnett came out with a report talking about gold revaluation. I think there's more of a story here than people realize because when your debt to GDP is at such a bad level, you got to figure out with some way to kind of rebalance things and almost reset the global framework. Stable coins is not the issue at this point and no one's going to agree with it. But moving gold and kind of choosing this avenue is something that I think people shouldn't minimize. I think they should think about and yes, they've said they're they they're not likely to do it. But here's the thing, and I think this is a story that should be getting more attention. In the courts right now is the whole tar the next stage of the tariffs. I think people forget that the court said the tariffs were not legal and it's been forgotten, but it's in the next stage of the courts before it would go to the Supreme Supreme Court. And all news publications are basically saying they're clearly losing at this level. And a lot of people, including um people at 22V, are basically saying in Washington that if they lose this, it's very unlikely the Supreme Court would reverse it. The the White House has come out and used one of the tactics that governments use when they think they're going to lose something, which is say if this happens, the Great Depression will set in. Well, the fact that that is kind of a an issue at this point, uh, if the tariffs were taken off, I think all options are back on the table and they have to find some way to do an agreement with the rest of the world. And I think a gold revaluation is something that people should put in the distribution of possibilities. And again, it leads to the same thing, which is the only way to get out of this situation with the debt and the deficit is to reflate your way out and to debase your way out. And I think it's good for gold. It would be at much higher levels and send it off. And at the same point, it would be massively bullish for Bitcoin as well.

Last thing I want to talk to you about is uh there's a rumor that the government's going to take a stake in Intel. Um there's a lot here. Um I mean, Intel is a whole thing. Uh the government taking stakes in private sector companies. Uh the government taking a stake in Intel. Uh we have negotiators in the White House. If you ask a negotiator whether they want to negotiate, they say yes. Um how do you sift through, you know, revaluing gold is like a macro conversation. Now

We're in like a uh government governance and public equity market, uh sovereign wealth fund. I mean, there's a lot here. What's your take?

All right, I'm going to turn it back into macro regardless of where this is going with Intel. So, uh, let let's go through two weeks ago, 3 weeks ago, Elon Musk buys all of Samsung's chips for the next whatever years. Okay. Uh, the US government is basically taxing Nvidia on anything and AMD that it sells to China. That comes out another theoretically government involvement in kind of what these companies are doing. We all know that Taiwan Semi is responsible for about 60% of the global chips in terms of the most important ones that we need and China is just offshore with Taiwan and believes it's there. So that's a political risk.

Basically, no matter how you go through this, Intel needs to basically make chips for the country so that we can get off of the need of depending on the global supply chain. So this all fits in with the AI arms race. And I have to remind people, whatever you thought when DeepSeek was announced, never listen to people again that basically fade the AI trade. Like here we are now, the government's talking about taking a stake in Intel. And I remind you guys, it's only days after the Intel um CEO came into the White House for a spanking. And the rumors were he owned, you know, Chinese companies and, you know, could be a spy. And this is the government is involved. And I only bring it up to this. If you don't think that this can happen to the AI companies, to the hyperscalers, I want to take it to another level.

This is a much bigger story than just the profit margins. You have the companies of the world, and you mentioned this, the S&P 500 earnings. I said it was, you know, a great great quarter, great year-over-year. The hyperscalers, the MAG 7 earnings grew 26%. The rest of the S&P 500 up 4%. So, when you're looking for a distribution of wealth problem, when you're looking for a problem of employees, when you're looking for those digital employees spending money in the pizza parlor, there's one way to do that, which is to tax the digital employees and give the money back to people so they can go to the pizza parlor that don't have jobs. And even though that's not going to happen um under the White House, everything is about trying to make sure that the US wins the AI arms race. And it is the single most important thing.

And on that same podcast, they basically said, if you're not paying attention, this is now officially the Manhattan project and the race for space. Like the AI arms race is in full boat. We are racing against China. There is nothing that's going to stop. And crypto is the exact same thing. So they talked about the importance of crypto, the financial guard rails. They want that to be US dollar dominated again. Even if they don't want the US dollar, the fiat dollar to be the strongest currency, they absolutely want the stable coins to be dollar backed. And so all of these things all line up the same way. I would take the Intel thing as just a recognition that chips, chips, chips, power, power, power power. And remember in a year, in 2 years when you really start realizing how bad the electricity problem really is and how often we talked about investing in power, it is now is the time to start focusing on this, particularly if I'm right that PMIs are about to go higher.

Are you changing anything in your portfolio this week or recently due to all this news?

Um, the only thing that I'm caring about is adding to positions with inside the energy space. And the reason is because I'm getting more and more convinced once the inflation targeting thing once they got to 100% built into the market of the Fed rate cut. I think people are underestimating what that is from a gateway and a doorway. um if they were to cut to do it at a time when core CPI is above 3%. To do it at a time when PMIs to me are about to go higher. We got an Empire Fed number today. The regional PMIs last month suggested the PMI should have been above 50. Um I think with all the uncertainty over the tariffs in July and wondering what was going to go on, I can see where some of the survey stuff would take a little bit longer to get through. But the reality is that I think we're at the point where you want to be invested in these types of things. I think banks is another great place to be involved in at this point. Like I said, we're close to the all-time highs in banks. This is a reflationary situation.

And I'll just add one other thing. Um I do believe China and emerging markets will benefit tremendously in a reflation theme. uh but also one where the dollar has another leg lower which I think with all the things we mentioned uh especially if the courts rule against the tariffs don't underestimate that is another trigger point combined with feds cutting rates and everything else that this becomes a situation where people really start to go from a a period of only investing in AI companies and high multiple stocks where it reverses and we start to see people looking at a tide that uh that a rising tide that lifts all boats it'll be good for smaller businesses industrial and you'll start to get takeovers of things you talked about and things like open. So, I'm looking more for opportunities that are not involved in the infrastructure build out of AI, but more on the adoption phase.

That makes sense to me. Where can we send people to find you on the internet and watch your great videos on Sunday?

YouTube, they can see me every Sunday at 8:30 a.m. I haven't missed one yet, so it's they've all been going in there and I've I've done them every week. And uh my Substack X, they can always find me on LinkedIn. And then for the institutional um people, I'm doing a lot of conversations on the PMIs and power right now for 22V and ways to participate on that. I will say if I'm right on this, I view this as a major inflection point. We're in the adoption phase. Once we get through the adoption phase, which will take about a year where profit margins grow across industries, next year is about the embodiment phase kicking off because of the robo taxi side. And I think people have to start realizing the world of software is under attack from AI. The world of hardware has been underinvested and as we see this hardware side accelerate, there's just not enough capacity. And if you don't believe me, look up gas turbine back orders, look up transformers, and look up cooling systems. There's just nothing out there for the next five years.

Crazy. All right. Well, we will talk to everyone again next Saturday. Thanks so much for uh for doing this, Jordy. See you soon, bud.