Transcription
[music] >> Welcome back to Sarah Gonzales Unfiltered.
Yesterday, NASA launched a massive new mission. It's landing on the moon and then, I guess, creating a moon base. And this is part of this whole new space race with China. So, China plans to send astronauts to the moon by 2030, but now we're like rushing to try and beat them there.
The obvious question here is, like, if we really went to the moon back in 1969, why are we racing China back there now? Like, don't we already? Can we already be like, we already did it? This is a lot of money, billions of dollars. If we were already the first ones, then shouldn't we already then be able to do it? I don't know, but I'm just saying, I've never delved into this topic before. I've always been curious, which is why I am very excited to speak to my next guest. He is one of the leading moon landing skeptics, Bart Sibrel. He is a filmmaker, writer, and investigative journalist, and the author of "Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List." Thank you for joining me, Bart.
Hey, Sarah. You know, it's not actually a moon base there after. It's a moon casino. Moon casino. Is that true?
No, it's a joke. >> [laughter] >> Uh, you know, your skepticism is so sober and accurate. I mean, the truth is right in front of our eyes, okay? Today, with six decades better technology, they are eight years behind schedule just to loop around the moon. When in 1961, after putting one astronaut in space for 15 minutes, they set an eight-year goal to go a thousand times farther than the space station, to land a rocket vertically the very first time in history, even though it took Elon Musk five times to do that with 10 million times more computing power, to turn off the engine, walk around, play golf, drive cars, take back off, go from zero miles per hour, and synchronize with a spacecraft going 3,000 miles per hour, which Artemis cannot even do, all with 1 million the computing power of a cell phone, an eight-year goal ahead of schedule with 1960s technology, and now they're eight years behind schedule just to loop around the moon one time. If they could go to the moon on the first attempt with 1 million the computing power of a cell phone, we would have been on Mars 10 years later, we'd be in another solar system by now, and there'd be bases all over the moon. They cannot have greater technology in 1969. Hello, anyone paying attention? Right. They can't even land on the moon. They can't even orbit the moon, which is more difficult than looping around. The truth is right there. You cannot have greater technology in 1969 than today. They lied.
Now, this is coming from someone who used to literally worship the moon landings, ga-ga fanboy shrine of Apollo memorabilia in my house since I was a kid. >> Really? >> A filmmaker. My job as a filmmaker is to make fake scenes look real. You can prove that the moon landings are fake with one photograph. Over here on the left are shadows in sunlight. Now, the sun is a million times bigger than the Earth in volume. It's about 93 million miles away. It's going to cast shadows in the same direction on the moon or Earth, United States, Canada, wherever. These are two telephone poles on the left. They're about 5 ft apart. On the right is what they claim is the moon, where an astronaut's shadow is going at 12:00, and a rock about 5 ft away is 90° difference. That electrical light is really close. Take it from a filmmaker, and scientifically and mathematically, that picture on the right cannot be duplicated in sunlight, which means it's electrical light, which means they're on Earth, which means they didn't go to the moon. So, you just proved it right there.
And then I was given a million dollars by an anonymous board member of an aerospace company that builds rockets for NASA to produce a film, go to sibrel.com, it's on the homepage for free, called "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon." I'm producing the film under the theory it might be true. You never know, wily mankind, right? Maybe they did fake it, I don't know. I figure we'll never know. We're wrong. We were given classified footage that shows them faking part of the moon mission right in front of your eyes, and they're creating a 1-ft model of the Earth inside of the spacecraft using the circular windows. Apollo 11. Calling in from about 130,000 miles out. That's allegedly the Earth floating in space. We have the unedited version that says, "Do not show to the public." You'll see that's actually the circular window of the spacecraft with part of the Earth outside of it in Earth orbit. There's Buzz Aldrin breaking down the shot, and that is them faking being halfway to the moon from Earth orbit two days into the flight, proving the equipment cannot leave Earth orbit. And then if you go to the clip before it, we have a third track of audio of the CIA telling them to fake a 4-second radio delay because they're really in Earth orbit about 250 miles up, and they say, "Don't answer the question from NASA right away, it'll give away the fact that you're close to the Earth. Wait 4 seconds." So, they have an earpiece in. We hear NASA, there's a 4-second delay, you hear the CIA say, "Talk," and then Neil Armstrong speaks to create a fake radio delay.
>> Hello, Apollo 11. Houston, go full thrust at the TV. Looks so great. Over.
And that's the window of the spacecraft. That is not the Earth floating in space. Two NBC news directors agreed it proves they did not go to the moon. They flew me to New York, put me up in the Waldorf Astoria. They said, "We're going to break the story worldwide. We're going to show that footage." They paid me thousands of dollars for the exclusive rights. They canceled the program. They said they got a threatening call from the federal government to pull their license to broadcast if they showed that footage to the public.
And if that weren't enough, we have an eyewitness who, as he was dying, a guy by the name of Cyrus Eugene Akers was chief of security at the Air Force's secret special operations base, Cannon Air Force Base in Clovis, New Mexico. The first thing he says, he believes in God. The Bible says if you confess your sins, you're forgiven. So, he says, "I got to get something off my chest. I killed somebody back in 1968 at Cannon Air Force Base." The son is there, who we'll show the video of in a second. And the military police come in to investigate. They give the victim's family closure. Who did you kill? Where did you bury him? And so forth. And then they asked him, "Why did you kill him?" He said, "Well, they filmed the fake moon landing there June 1st, 2nd, and 3rd of 1968. My friend thought it was morally wrong. He was going to tell the public. I killed him to keep it a secret."
Take a listen to this. This is the story that my dad told me on his deathbed. In Cannon Air Force Base in 1968, he said, by the time he got there, that there were already two large hangars that were connected to make it look like a lunar landscape. Inside the staging area, the lunar lander, all of the walls were painted flat black. When Dad saw the the moon landing on TV, he cried. He said he knew um that what he had witnessed on TV was exactly what they recorded in that hangar.
Wow. And then NASA says they spent 250 billion dollars to make this miraculous equipment that landed on the moon on the first attempt, and then afterwards, they destroyed the original video tapes, the original telemetry data, and all the hardware schematics and equipment that so miraculously went to the moon. The NASA astronaut says so himself. "I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. Uh, the problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we uh destroyed that technology, and it's a painful process to build it back again." That makes no sense. >> You're ever going to destroy a technology, you might consider the atomic bomb, okay? We used it to end World War II. Let's just not open that genie bottle ever again. But 10 years later, get this, Sarah. 10 years later, atomic bombs are 1,000 times more explosive. So, if they could go to the moon in 1969 on the first attempt, ahead of schedule, within an eight-year goal, then, like I said, there'd be bases all over the moon. And a rocket designer who works with NASA, who says to actually have enough fuel to stop in orbit, to go down, take back off, and come back, you have to launch 30 fuel rockets first. Says so out of his own mouth. But the more I started digging into Artemis, the more I realized there might be some issues. If you say certain things, this might change your relationship with NASA forever. You know what? This is the truth, and this is what needs to be said. I did not understand in order to get the human lander to the moon, we have to launch a bunch of additional rockets to tank up in low Earth orbit. And this is how many rockets it's going to take to fuel up that thing to get it to the moon. I've done the math. If you had any questions?
This is all like very compelling. You're kind of blowing my mind right now. Do you think that this Artemis stuff is real?
Well, as naive and stupid as it may sound, I still give them the benefit of the doubt. I postponed saying they faked the moon landing as long as possible. But when I see that window shot of them faking it right in front of your eyes with the CIA telling to fake a 4-second radio delay, what can you say?
Yeah. Hello [clears throat] Apollo 11, Houston go no go 350 TV looks great. Over.
Then the deathbed confession. Now, NASA, of course, can't be trusted. Maybe they are trying to leave Earth orbit, but there's a lot of problems. The number one issue that they're facing, which is radiation. Most people don't know this, but about a thousand miles above the Earth and extending 30,000 miles beyond that is this thick field of radiation that you'd have to go through to the moon and back through again to land on Earth. You'd be in it about maybe an hour and 15 minutes going to the moon and an hour and 15 minutes coming back. It's called the Van Allen radiation belt. If you go to sabrel.com, he says in his own publication in Scientific American magazine, the radiation level is 250 times greater than a lethal dose. You're going to hear an engineer from NASA saying, "2014, the technology necessary to go through that radiation to the moon and back and survive has not been invented yet." So, how did they go to the moon in 1969?
My name is Kelly Smith and I work on navigation [music] and guidance for Orion. As we get further away from Earth, we'll pass through the Van Allen belts, an area of dangerous radiation. We must solve these challenges [music] before we send people through this region of space. We must solve these [music] challenges before we send people through this region of space. We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.
Wow. >> So, he let slip there, "We must solve these challenges, radiation lethal challenges, before we send people through that region of space." Meaning, the radiation challenge has not been resolved as of 2014, which means they couldn't have gone through it in 1969, which is why they're faking being halfway to the moon from Earth orbit because they can't go through the radiation belt, which is about 750 miles above them and 30,000 miles thick. A really hysterical clip, if you have time, is clip seven, where we have multiple modern-day astronauts accidentally saying, three in a row, that this will be the first time they go to the moon and the first time they leave Earth orbit.
This is going to be an odd answer. It might It might hit It might land wrong, but I'm going to try anyway. Uh to >> [snorts] >> This is the first time we're going to send humans to the moon. This is the first time we're going to send humans to the moon. And this is really the beginning the beginning of human beings leaving lower Earth orbit. >> The moon, Mars, asteroids, there's a lot of destinations that we could go to and we're building these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually. Eventually.
This is the startling thing and that something tells me you're one of the few podcasters who truly understands what I'm about to say. >> [gasps] >> They actually did fake the moon landing. So, what does that mean? One of the greatest events in human history is not landing on the moon and coming back, boy, that was a close one. No, the greatest event in human history is the most powerful nation on Earth that claims to represent truth and justice lying about mankind's greatest accomplishment and murdering people to keep it a secret.
My book, "Moon Man," which is in audio, Kindle, or print, I read it myself, goes into the backstory of the making of the movie. I received a lot of information I did not put in my movie because people told me the information said, "Please publish that after I'm dead." One of which was Betty Grissom, the wife of the man all the way on the left. This is the crew that was going to be the first crew to walk on the moon. The gentleman on the left, Virgil Grissom, took a bunch of reporters to the top of the rocket days before he was murdered. Her opinion, not mine. He hung a lemon on the top of the rocket and said, "They are 10 years, at least, from going to the moon, not two." He did it without permission. People from the Pentagon threatened to kill him to where he was on Secret Service protection the day that he died. I interviewed his wife for 4 hours. She told me that on January 26th, 1967, he called her from NASA and said, "Hon, for some strange reason, the CIA is all over the launch pad today inspecting the equipment. I've been here for 8 years. Why did the CIA show up today?" The very next day, he's dead from faulty equipment. >> Oh my gosh. >> He was murdered by the CIA. Do you understand this? Then we have C. C. Acres murdering somebody to cover it up. And then we have it Ronald Baron who investigated the homicide and he was killed. So, the United States was founded Declaration of Independence when any government becomes destructive of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it. The number one tool to reform the government is to tell the truth about the moon landing fraud.
Mhm. Well, Bart, you've totally blown my mind. Uh, tell everyone where they can find you.
Go to my website. It's my last name.com, Sibrel, S as in Sam, I as in boy, R E L, sibrel.com.
Thank you so much. This has been so fascinating and I appreciate all of your great work. I hope you'll come back soon.
Yeah, thanks for having me on and thanks for keeping an open mind. What does it tell you about our world? The poster child of conspiracy theories is actually true. That's how fallen our world and country is. We need to tell the truth about this or we will never progress as a species or a nation.
Yes. Amen.