Transcription
Thanks for tuning in to Everything Catholic again. In this video, we'll cover Father Ian's recent commentary on Pope Leo's encyclical. He shares a lot of valuable insights, so I hope you'll all take time to reflect on what he says about this important subject.
I wish to address a few current events that have happened and that impact all Catholics. First, Pope Leo and his first encyclical, which was put out entitled Magnifica Humanitatis. This is an important encyclical because it addresses what is perhaps the last major event before the fire comes with the day of the Lord as a blazing oven to purge the earth, its elements, and humanity, leaving a remnant in its wake to reoccupy the earth as in the days of Noah to inaugurate the universal reign of the divine will on earth that is already reigning in individual souls.
Now, this encyclical, Magnificatis, it addresses quite a few topics that the Pope publicly addressed when publicly presenting this encyclical in Vatican City that I watched live and that you could probably find on the internet. It was the Pope's words were published live from Vatican City in the presentation of this first major encyclical focused on the rise of artificial intelligence. Now, this artificial intelligence event will be the last event that will impact the global resources, economy, banking system, and even morals of worldwide Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants, all Christians, and all people of the world, inasmuch as its implications will force individuals to make major decisions.
Let me talk a little bit about this encyclical and why it's being addressed now. Pope Leo wants to warn all Catholics worldwide, the majority of which do not listen to him, the majority of which do not follow church teaching, the majority of which do not go to confession and communion regularly, that AI needs to be disarmed. These are his words, not mine. Now, I know I may sound a little bit harsh when I say that the majority of Catholics do not listen to the Pope, but it's patently true. Do your own research, look up the statistics, and you will find that less than 1%, you heard me right, less than 1% of Catholics worldwide follow all church teaching. This is what is known in theology as an apostasy. And we are living at the peak of the apostasy.
St. Paul warned us about this when he said that this apostasy would enter the church before the Antichrist appears. In his second letter to the Thessalonians, he speaks of an apostasy. In Greek, he doesn't mention the word Antichrist, but he mentions the lawless one, the man destined to perdition. He who sits himself in the throne of God and declares himself God. Now, the throne of God does not mean the Vatican. A lot of people who don't know their scripture or catechism or even theology assume the church, the house of God, is the Vatican. It's not the house of God in scripture. If you read the Old Testament books and the New Testament books, it was the temple of Jerusalem where for thousands of years, Jerusalem anyway, the house of God can refer to many things. And when St. Paul speaks of the man of iniquity, the abomination of desolation, as does Daniel, seating himself in the throne of God, as Miam also mentioned at Lassellet, they're referring to the result of the apostasy that has first entered the church.
What is apostasy? I mentioned this before. I'll briefly define it again. It's a falling away from within the church, not from without. It's an attack from within the church, upon the church. If you go to the internet and pull up any of the popular channels on YouTube, you'll find that many, the majority, attack the Pope, attack the magisterium. And these many are called, they call themselves Catholics, but they're not Catholics because this is contrary to Catholic teaching. Just read the First Vatican Council documents on how Catholics are to approach the office of the papacy and when they have questions regarding papal or magisterial teachings, how they are to go about doing it. And those who on the internet now are openly defying the magisterium and the Pope in showing their disobedience to church teaching, in particular the teachings of the First Vatican Council, show themselves to be fake Catholics.
Okay, back to the AI encyclical. Pope Leo warns AI to be of the need to be disarmed. He states that artificial intelligence needs to be disarmed. These are powerful words, and he says that as well. He says he specifically chose these words to awaken consciences. This is a quote from the Pope. He said, "I deliberately chose these words, meaning AI needs to be disarmed, to awaken consciences, indicate paths forward for humanity. It must be accompanied, that is artificial intelligence must be accompanied by adequate moral discernment and public control."
Now, these AI data centers do not involve the public, do not allow the public to control it. And Pope Leo says they must be under public control. He adds, "Artificial intelligence now demands to be disarmed, freed from logics that turn it into an instrument of domination, exclusion, and death. It must be at the service of all, which it is not, and of the common good. Decisions about technology must never be separated from conscience and responsibility." Disarming, though, is not enough. We must build. Rebuilding does not simply mean replacing what has been destroyed. It means repairing bonds, restoring trust, and reawakening hope in the future. Moreover, no one rebuilds alone.
Yes, these are powerful words, and they are absolutely spot on the money. Why? Well, take for example these data centers that are rolling out on an unprecedented scale throughout the world, in particular in the United States. If you look at, there's a website you could, you could find all the data center maps in the world, and if you compare the United States data centers to all others, there's no comparison. The United States leads the world with over 4,000 operational data centers, while China has about 400, and the other world, and the world, and the other countries can compare. United Kingdom 523, um, Germany 500, 29, etc. So the United States is blowing away the competitors. And the false narrative that has been pushed by the media that the United States must beat China in the artificial intelligence race is completely unfounded when you consider that they lead all other countries, including China, by thousands and thousands of data centers. There's no race. The United States has blown all the countries away already. So why is the US constantly pushing for more centers that are damaging countries? Oh, sorry, cities, towns, villages, displacing people, raising the water bills, utility bills, energy bills, causing protests throughout various states, including Utah, which is going to be the biggest data center so far, Arizona, Texas, Tennessee, South Carolina, you name it. It continues to spread.
What is behind this great push of the AI data center movement that does not consult with the public? And why has Pope Leo issued this stark warning against AI technologies that include data centers? There's a hidden agenda in the open. This agenda is hidden. It's in the open in data centers, but it's hidden inasmuch as recently declared wars, deposition of world leaders, grabs of land and precious metals are all leading to a hidden agenda. What is that hidden agenda? It's obvious. You just connect the dots and you find it leads to a new world monetary digital economic system. The petrodollar is going to crash pretty soon and is going to be replaced by a digital world banking system. What does that mean? It means, in simple terms, you have no control over your money anymore. You can be cut off if you do not conform to the digital AI world surveillance system rules that are being implemented without your consent.
Now, Pope Leo is very aware of what's going on behind the scenes and where the economy is going. So he put out this encyclical to warn those who have ears to hear and eyes to see to know what is coming before it comes. I mentioned last year when talking about data centers that the Bloomberg report stated that due to data center residences, electricity bills have soared almost 300% in 5 years. Imagine what's going to happen in the next 5 years with the increased number of operational AI data centers. You, the taxpayers, are subsidizing, let me repeat that, you, the taxpayers, are paying, subsidizing all of these multibillion-dollar corporations to create these data centers. And the founder of BlackRock recently stated that your 401k will be used to subsidize them as well. And all these centers pay zero to almost no property tax, while your property taxes are constantly increasing because of the data centers.
Now, as mentioned last year on this topic, the 10th Amendment of our Constitution states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the United States, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Who have been excluded from all these payments to data centers?
Okay. So, Pope Leo put out this encyclical, and I encourage all of you to read it. And you all have the time. Make the time and see why he's writing this and warning you. And why do I say it is an encyclical in response to the last great event before the fire? Because AI cannot and will not be done away with if not through fire. And this will bring about a transformation of the economic system, impacting the churches, all property tax of churches, of your own homes, and the moral implications are endless. It's important that we read this encyclical within the context of these end times because the Blessed Virgin Mary has been informing us in ecclesially approved prophetic revelations beginning at Lord that time is short, and we must pray the Rosary, offer up sacrifice for conversion of sinners and in reparation for the sins against God. She has reiterated the same message at Fatima, and she's doing the same today at Magigoria. And for this reason, there have been more Marian warnings and apparitions in the last 50 years than in the last 2,000 combined because time is short.
Okay. >> Well then, that will be all for the video this time. And as always, thank you so much for taking the time to be here with us. And hopefully, all of you have learned so much from this video. And remember, if you ever have any feedback or suggestion, please let us know in the comments below. And from the bottom of my heart, thank you so much for your continuous support, contributions, and prayers. And until the next one, thanks again for watching. And may God bless you. >> No, it does not refer to fallen angels. And nowhere can you find in church literature that the sons of God found in, I think it's Genesis 6:4, refers to angels. Nowhere. I challenge anyone. You'll find it in some pious writings, but these are not canonically approved works of the church. Okay? The church does not teach that. Even though you'll find some Catholic rogue people claiming it like it's Catholic doctrine, and it's not. Don't be duped by these bloggers who don't know their left hand from their right. They don't know their C, they don't know their scripture. They don't know their magisterial teachings, and they don't know their catechetical instructions. The church makes no pronouncement on the identity of these sons of God that's referred to in Gen, in, in Genesis chapter 6 when speaking of Nephilim in Hebrew, which means those that fell from above. What we do know is that they were entities, sentient, rational entities that had relations with the daughters of men.
Now, I put out a three-part series on the church's position of the possibility of extraterrestrial life throughout the cosmos, and I refer you to Vatican sources, people accredited by the magisterium, and even saints, including St. Padre Pio, who said they exist in a work that bears the church's official seals of approval, the *Imprimatur*. Also, you have the Vatican spokesperson, um, Monsignor Corrado Balducci, demonologist, exorcist, and uh, worked for the Vatican for 20 years or so, and there is plenty of evidence to suggest, according to him, that these beings are real and they exist. Now, the Vatican Corrado Balducci gave dozens of testimonies of the reality of rational sentient beings throughout the cosmos, quoting scripture and quoting the statements of saints. And I also, in my three-part series, review the history of theologians, eastern and western theologians, who also support the possibility of life throughout the cosmos. Now, unfortunately, people who deny that there is such life throughout the cosmos don't refer to any of the sources I'm going to now share with you. Why am I going to share them now with you? To expose their ignorance. It's like me telling you the Eucharist is not the body and blood of Jesus because it's only bread. It's only wine. Let me smell it, taste it. How can it be Jesus? And they don't tell you the teachings of Trent, they don't, which are doctrine. They don't tell you the teachings of Aquinas, who spoke of transubstantiation. He got that term from a French bishop before him. And ignore half of these teachings of the church, but just tell you part of what I think. That's what's going on with this whole ET phenomenon on the internet. They're not giving you the facts. So, I'm going to give you the facts to debunk this false theory. I even heard an American uh exorcist say, "Oh, it's unlikely that these things exist." Poppycock, that's not true. He's he's incorrect. Number one, not only did the Vatican spokesperson, exorcist Monsignor Corrado Balducci, state that they exist, but we also have the director of the Vatican Observatory, Father Jose Funes, who also spoke of their existence as a real possibility. And why do these people never mention the devout Catholic who worked for St. Pope Paul VI, Bruno Samachia? This is a fact. Who was visited for years beginning in 1956 in Pescara, Italy, by good, God-fearing extraterrestrials from a different star system. This is undisputed, and people won't mention this. Why? Because it challenges their fake argument. He was visited by beings from another planetary system, and among them was the notable Italian diplomat Dr. Alberto Perego. Now, interesting to note is that Bruno Samachia, who worked under St. Pope Paul VI, put out a book that bears the preface of John Paul II, Karol Wojtyła, and his book was on Eucharistic miracles. Okay.
Now, what did these people also who try to say there were no extraterrestrials throughout the cosmos deny the declassified files recovered spacecraft that contained alien bodies? And these are testified to in writing by Lieutenant Colonel Philip Corso and Sergeant and devout Catholic Clifford Stone. Why don't they do their research on these facts? And why do people not even mention the worldwide millions of testimonies that I've, I've come across dozens upon dozens upon dozens of people who had not only ocular but physical contact, even abductees. I spoke to and the testimonies of naval officer Admiral Richard Byrd and the Canadian Minister of National Defense and the member of the Minister of Parliament Paul Helier, who recently passed away, who testified in Washington D.C., and you can find this testimony on the internet, that aliens are living among us. That is rational, sentient, volitional beings who have mortal souls and physical bodies that die like ours are living among us, and that at least two of them are working with the U.S. government. This is his statement, not mine. The statement of, and he pulled up papers, he says, "I have these papers to prove this reality," in these declassified documents. Why do these people who state that there were no ETs throughout the cosmos fail to mention the testimony of the devout Catholic and military nuclear physicist Charles Hall, who for years worked with extraterrestrials and who received an award for surviving more than 35 communist attacks? He put out a series of books called *Millennial Encounters*, and he went to communion every Sunday, as did the sergeant I mentioned before, Clifford uh Stone, who died recently as well, but Charles Hall is still alive. Why no mention of the historical and archaeological evidence of rational civilizations and structures, pictographs that predate by millennia the creation of the first humans that, according to biblical genealogies, were created in 4,000 B.C., 6,000 years ago? Adam and Eve, like the dis, you know, Pope Pius XII stated in *Humani Generis*, Adam and Eve are the first human individuals, and we know that they only began to exist 6,000 years ago. What explains these discoveries far predating 4,000 B.C., like Çatalhöyük, which is a city found 9,000 years ago, well, discovered to have dated to 9,000 years ago, or the intelligently designed photographs in the Alcastio caves, which have been uranium-thorium dated to at least 39,000 B.C.? So these beings were here long before us. Or just take for example that passage in Genesis where after Cain killed Abel, God put a mark on Cain so that no one would harm him. Well, if there was just Adam and Eve, why would he need a mark unless there were others during the time of Adam and Eve on earth that could harm him that were before Adam and Eve? Why is there no mention of these people who seek to debunk the ET phenomenon of the biblical evidence found in what you just mentioned, chapter 6, verse 4, or Numbers 13:31, 32, 33, Deuteronomy 2:10, 21, 9, 2, Numbers 13? I mean, the list goes on and on. There's evidence of different races of these unusual entities. Some are called Nephilim, some are called Rephaim, some are called sons of God. And the church has no idea who these entities are. It doesn't give a definition to them. And there's hagiographic evidence. St. Catherine of Siena, I'm sorry, St. Catherine Emmerick, Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerick, and Mary Andreas Belrami speak of planetary beings. St. Padre Pio stated in a work, *Parlo così, Padre Pio*, speaks bearing the church's magisterial seals of approval. When asked by a friar if there are these beings on other planets, he says, "Yes, they exist." Okay.
What about St. Pope John XXIII, who opened up the First Vatican Council? He had a personal visitation of an extraterrestrial at Castel Gandolfo in 1961. The Pope had a personal visitation from an ET in 1961. And this is testified to by Cardinal Capovilla. How about St. Pope John Paul II? You know, St. John Paul, Pope John Paul II, the Great, the Polish, the Polish courageous, fearless preacher and universal evangelizer who always said, "Do not be afraid to follow Jesus Christ." With that Polish accent, he said, "ETs are our brothers." He referred to them as our brothers. Why would he do that if they didn't exist? Pope Francis also addressed the question of whether we should baptize these brothers of ours from different planetary systems. So why would two Popes refer to extraterrestrial beings as brothers and one consider baptizing them if they don't exist? And if they're fallen angels, there's no point in baptizing them. They're damned, right? So they're not fallen angels. And Padre Pio said in that work I just quoted to you from that they are without sin. No, I'm sorry. He said they were not affected by the sin of Adam and Eve like we were. That's what he said. He didn't say they were not without sin, but he said they were not affected by the sin of Adam and Eve like we were. And that makes perfect sense because if you think of it, the angels were not affected by the sin of Adam and Eve like we were either. They were not infected like all of Adam and Eve's offsprings with original sin. Each angel had to make its own choice. We instead are all connected to our first parents and we receive their first choice, the effects of their first choice. And that's why we need to be baptized. The ET brothers, I'm putting a book out on this with all questions of whether or not the one incarnation of Christ redeemed them and all beings, whether or not they had a catechizus, a sacramentology, knowledge of the Trinity, and the list goes on and on. I'm going to be releasing this book soon.
Another thing I'd like to bring about, bring up on this subject is Pope, um, I spoke of Pope John XXIII. I spoke of Pope Paul VI. Pope spoke of Pope John Paul II. Then we have, um, William of Ockham, who was a theologian who stated that extraterrestrials exist in other star systems and that they did not spring from Adam as we did and did not sin as Adam did. Well, that's William of Ockham. And then we had in private messages, the Blessed Mother tell the seers at Medjugorje that these cities exist. And then we have Hippolytus of Rome, early church father from 236, who stated that there are innumerable worlds which differ in size. Some worlds devoid of living creatures, or planets, or any moisture.
Now, it's important to note that, um, St. Hannibal states in *The Hours of the Passion*, reflection, that Jesus' love consumed the sins of many. He said millions and millions of worlds. And then Jesus tells Luisa in volume 13 that one act, one divine act of His also consumed the sins of thousands of worlds. Now, why would Hannibal and Jesus to Luisa speak of millions and thousands of worlds if they, they did not exist?
Then we come to, um, uh, the writings of, I spoke of William of Ockham from the 14th century, and then let's talk about, uh, the German cardinal, philosopher, and theologian Nicholas of Cusa, also from the 15th century, for just around 1401 to the 15th century, and he stated in a work called *De Docta Ignorantia*, which means *On Learned Ignorance*, listen carefully: "Life as it exists on earth in the form of man, animals, and plants is to be found, let us suppose, in higher forms in solar and stellar regions. Rather than think that so many stars and parts of the heavens are uninhabited, we will suppose that in every region there are inhabitants differing in nature by rank and all owing their origin to God." Okay? Now, this is a cardinal. This is an exercise of the magisterium, the statement. And, um, uh, almost exactly 500 years later after the statement of Nicholas of Cusa from the 15th century, um, Jesus tells Luisa in volume 20, October 29th, 1926: "After I created everything, I formed man's human nature with my own creative hands. And just as I formed his bones, nerves, and heart, so I centralized in him my love." Here I'm going to get to the point that I wish to convey, which is that even though these ETs with great possibility exist throughout the cosmos based on what I just shared with you, they do not surpass man in nobility and dignity. They surpass man in intellectual prowess, like the angels do. But they do not surpass us in nobility and dignity. Why? Because Jesus chose to incarnate himself only once in a human nature, and he will not incarnate himself again in any other nature. And by virtue of that incarnation in human nature, he elevated it to the status of a god. He divinized human nature. He did not do that with other natures.
Now, I explained in my three-part series on the Vatican and the possibility of life throughout the cosmos that one of the things human beings can do that angels and other extraterrestrials, if they exist, cannot do is multiply God's divine acts throughout the cosmos. And this is because of the incarnation. God transferred, so to speak, to us. God infused within us His own propensity to multiply His acts in all things. Much like when the priest consecrates the host, all the hosts are consecrated with that one consecration. Similarly, with divine acts that we can do throughout the cosmos that other beings cannot do. Okay.
Now, I mentioned this quotation of Jesus to Luisa right after Nicholas of Cusa because Nicholas of Cusa, the German cardinal theologian, states that even if inhabitants differing in nature and rank, all owing their origin to God throughout different solar and stellar regions, exist, "It seems inconceivable that anything more noble and perfect could be found than in the intellectual nature of man that exists on earth." So he's saying that even though these beings throughout the cosmos and in the heavens surpass us intellectually, they do not surpass us in dignity or nobility because Christ chose our lowliest rational form of life throughout the cosmos in which to incarnate himself and in so doing suffer in it, die in it, resurrect in it, and therefore give it the greatest dignity it could possibly have. And that is why St. Augustine teaches, "O happy fault! Through original sin, Christ came to suffer, die, and rise, and in so doing brought us to a greater dignity and nobility than Adam and Eve enjoyed before they sinned."
So Jesus tells Luisa, "I formed man's human nature with my own creative hands. And just as I formed his bones, nerves, and heart, so I centralized in him my love. After I clothed him with flesh, forming, as though, the most beautiful statue that no other artisan could ever make, I looked at him and loved him with such an uncontainable love that it overflowed. Whence, breathing on him, I infused in him life. Thus, we, the Trinity, enriched him with all the perfections of our divine being. The fullness of our divinity was wholly intent on loving him, on pouring itself out in him. From the very first instant of his life, Adam felt all the strength of our love. And from the depths of his heart, he expressed with his own voice his love for his Creator." So you see, man is the pearl, is the jewel in God's hand, is the apple of His eye. Absolutely. Jesus tells Luisa, "Everything you see in creation was absolutely nothing compared to the creation of man. Oh, how many more beautiful heavens, stars, and suns did God extend in the created human soul?" And then he goes on and on.
Now, again, St. Hannibal states in *The Hours of the Passion*, "In this hour, abandoned by his eternal Father, Jesus Christ suffered such a burning love that he was able to destroy all conceivable and imaginable sins and inflamed with his love all souls, even souls from millions and millions of worlds." Imagine that. Hannibal speaking of souls being affected by God's, Jesus' redemption throughout millions and millions of worlds. And Jesus tells Luisa again in volume 11, October 29th, 1914, "My will contains completely accomplished acts. One single act of my will is enough to create a thousand worlds, all perfect and complete."
Okay, I'll stop there. But in answer to your question, no. The sons of God do not refer to fallen angels. Angels do not have bodies. Angels do not have bodies that die. Angels are not bodies. They're pure spirits. These entities that were on earth in Genesis that came after the Nephilim, which means those that fell from above, were sentient beings. They had bodies, otherwise they couldn't procreate with the daughters of men. And there were many, there are many references in the Old Testament that talk about a giant, a series of giant races, tall beings, literally tall. In fact, King Og slept in a bed that was 13 feet tall, 13 feet long. And artifacts have been found from the Old Testament that suggest they were giants by the size of the axes, by the size of the imprints of the feet, and so on and so forth. But what were they is the question. The church does not give us an answer. But there is a theory that is worth considering. It's just a theory. This comes from Polycarp, from St. John the Evangelist to Polycarp to Irenaeus to us. God revealed to Lucifer before he became bad. Lucifer, while he was an angel of light, the lightbearer, which is what Lucifer means, by the way, in scripture, Jesus is referred to as Lucifer as well, meaning lightbearer. When Lucifer was good, before he fell, God revealed to him that the second person of the Trinity would not elevate the angelic nature as higher than any other nature throughout the cosmos, but would elevate the lowest form of rational life, namely human nature, above all natures throughout the cosmos. So Christ would lower himself to dust, to our bodies which come from dust, take upon himself a human nature, and in so doing, elevate it above angels in dignity and nobility. Lucifer refused to serve humans. So he refused God's plan. And he took a third of, what does Gen, what does the book of Revelation say? A third of the stars. Doesn't say angels. Certainly certain church fathers included in that sweep, one-third of the angels. But it doesn't mean just angels. It includes the whole cosmos. One-third of the stars, the Bible says, fell. What are stars? The center of the existence of life. What is our star? The sun. And there are billions and hundreds of billions of stars throughout the cosmos. NASA has identified over 200 billion galaxies, and each galaxy contains billions of stars. So you can imagine how much the world is teeming with life throughout the cosmos.
Now, when these, when this one-third of the stars fell, if they were inhabited, which I believe they were, the one-third of these beings in the star systems fell with Lucifer. So it's very likely that one-third turned with Lucifer, and two-thirds remained with God. And this explains the good extraterrestrials that appeared to Bruno Samachia in 1956, who worked for the Vatican and put out a book bearing Karol Wojtyła's preface. And this also could explain of these abductions that are stopped when invoking the name of Jesus. I spoke to several abductees. I spoke to a woman yesterday who was, who was abducted for years by extraterrestrials. Spoke to a woman in British Columbia a few years ago who was abducted as well. These are real cases. They're not made up, and they have scientific evidence to prove it. They have the marks on their bodies, and they have the metals, the chemicals in their skin that's not from this earth that has been analyzed. So someone can't say they're making it up. And there's one case where a woman gave birth to a hybrid from Italy. She was abducted in Italy, and uh, she was impregnated while she was on board this craft. And it's, it's a crazy story, but rather than go into it, I'll leave that up to Dr. Salha. He goes into all these physical analyses, and Dr. Mack, psychologist, who studies this as well. I limit myself to say that, um, it's possible that the sons of God came here to interrupt the incarnation of Christ, who had to be born in a bloodline. So it's possible they wanted to contaminate. Who knows? But, uh, these are theories. Again, I'm not saying this is church teaching. This is, uh, just one of several ideas that are out there. But the bottom line is that the church does not teach who the Nephilim are, the sons of God are. So people who say this is what it is, they're angels, don't listen to them.