The Terrifying Mystery Of The Moon…

On the 20th of November in 1969, 3 days after Apollo 12 landed, NASA crashed the lunar module into the moon at 6,048 kmh. The impact released energy equivalent to 1 ton of TNT. Seismometers 72 km away recorded the collision.

Then, what happened after that was pretty surprising to a lot of very smart people. You see, the moon, it rang like a bell. The moon, the rock in the sky. I might get exiled from Athens for saying that, but the moon rang like a bell because a piece of metal crashed into it. That seems really strange. And you know why it rang like a bell? Cuz the moon's hollow.

[Music]

After the Apollo 12 lunar module crashed into the moon, it began to ring. Not for minutes, not for an hour, but 55 minutes, so close to an hour. Of course, they expected some level of resonance and some seismic activity. But the moon vibrated like a struck bell. Neil Patrick Harris is even quoted as saying this in regard to the the bell Neil Armstrong. It's a it was a joke. The Neil Patrick Harris thing was a joke.

Anyways, Dr. Maurice Ewing, co-principal investigator of the Apollo passive seismic experiments and God in the geophysics world, struggled to explain and interpret the events. He said, "As for the meaning of it, I'd rather not make an interpretation right now, but it is as though the one had struck a bell, say the bell fry of a church, and it reorated it and continued for over 30 minutes. Thanks for coming on the show, Dr. Euing. May God rest your soul."

30 minutes of ringing would have been extraordinary, but what they recorded was 55 minutes of ringing from the Apollo 12 lunar module crashing into the moon. But the 12 was just the beginning. Apollo 13 is next. 4 months later, Apollo 13's third stage, a 14,2016 kg behemoth, slammed into the lunar surface with a force of 11.5 tons of TNT. Bigly, by the way, uh, Aquarius, we see the results now from 12 seismometers. Looks like your booster just hit the moon and it's uh, rocking it a little bit over.

The vibrations there lasted for 3 hours and 20 minutes and penetrated 25 miles deep. How do they know this stuff? Well, they were just nice. And they asked the moon what it was feeling. Just kidding. There's seismographs all over that some [ __ ].

As a result of both of these crashes, both of these incidents, NASA scientists and geniuses all over the world said the moon rang like a bell or reacted like a gong. That doesn't really make sense for a big rock, does it? Maybe it does. It doesn't though, does it? Maybe it.

You ever find yourself reaching for that habit? Well, I often do. I love to pinch and pull and twist on various parts of my body. Maybe it's the stress. Maybe it's boredom. Maybe it's just having to keep your hands busy. Have I got something for you, Fume? Today's sponsor will come in great handies. I've already got my little buddy down here, the Holy Rella kitten, on that thing. He likes the uh the uh maple pepper flavor the most. What you think, man? I'm not mad about that at all. You can still reach for something that's satisfying without having any downsides at all. It's cool. There's a ton of flavors. It's beautiful. It's fun to fidget with. It's got an adjustable airflow dial, which is really cool. I like sometimes I blow in it. Little spit on it. My personal favorite flavor is the crisp mint. It's delicious. This is currently cinnamon. There's no batteries. There's no charging. You just put a little stick inside of it and you start sucking. It's amazing. It's uh really cool and it's a product that I've stood by for a long time. I love it and it's awesome and you can break a bad habit with it. Over 500,000 people have made the switch to fume as a part of their habit change journey. You should join too. For a limited time, if you use my code oompil, you can get a free fume topper with a journey pack order. Go to tryfume.com/ompavville. Use my code, scan the QR code on screen. Trust me, it's cool. It's awesome. I genuinely love the flavors and it's fun to mess with. I've had so many of these things. I think I've had six now, different ones. Uh, I just give them away. Uh, you know, cuz I care about them and stuff or whatever. Thank you to Fume for sponsoring this video.

Ken Johnson, a very reputable source from NASA's data and photo control department, observed something even more disturbing. The moon didn't just ring, it wobbled. The entire lunar body shifted with a mechanical precision. And Johnson described it as almost as though it had giant hydraulic damper struts inside. Uh, comment down below other voices I should do for guests of the show.

That's also freaky, though. I've done a lot of research on conspiratorial topics, and none have ever made me more puzzled, I'll use the word puzzled, than the moon. Between 1969 and 1977, NASA's Apollo seismometers recorded over 13,000 different seismic events, and each one revealed the same impossible characteristics. The moon behaved like a seemingly hollow, maybe artificial structure. Certainly not like a large rock. Don't exile me from Athens. Okay, guys. Comment down below if you get that reference. That's right. I said it. The moon is not a goddess. It's a rock. A hollow one.

Press like after 12. Every subsequent Apollo mission deliberately crashed their SIVBB third stages into the moon and every single impact produced the same or similar result. The moon rings like a bell. It vibrates for hours and it wobbles with a bizarre mechanical precision. Now I'm very uncomfortable. Praise be unto the whole. His shoulders look a little tight. Try to loosen them up. What's he doing in there? Probably jacking it. He's probably jacking it in there.

These weren't anomalies. These weren't measurement errors. They were consistent, repeatable phenomena. That's probably why we don't go back up on that moon anymore, too, because it's scary. That's weird and scary, dude.

So, there's a question that emerged from NASA's own data. What if the moon is hollow and has aliens living in it? During the time American scientists are struggling to explain their seismic moon data, two researchers on the other side of the Iron Curtain were asking the unthinkable question. Not just saying it's ringing like a bell. Sorry, it's ringing like a bell. That's very odd. They're saying it's hollow.

In July 1970, Sputnik magazine published a paper that would shake lunar science across the Iron Curtain. The authors Mikail Vassan and Alexander Sherbikov from the Soviet Academy of Sciences titled their work, "Is the moon the creation of alien intelligence?" This is in the 70s. And I'm not saying that just because Soviets wrote something in a magazine makes it real, but it is odd that they let him publish that, let them publish that because they banned a lot of things and they didn't exactly have freedom of speech. And it's kind of bizarre that that's like a that's I mean it seems weird, doesn't it? Doesn't it seem a little strange?

The opening statement of this work cuts straight to the point. Although people although although people long ago um uh suklid although people although people how do you do a Russian accent? Although people people although people long ago began to wonder whether the canals on Mars were creation of cosmic engineer for some odd reason it does not occur to look with the same eyes upon the polarities of the lunar landscape much closer at time that's like nine different accents in one.

The Soviet scientists had studied the same Apollo data that baffled NASA but reached a radically different conclusion. The moon wasn't just behaving strangely, wasn't something we can explain. It's an artificial construct. Aka a spaceship. That's what that's what they were that's the point. A hollow sphere created by extraterrestrial intelligence and deliberately placed in Earth's orbit so we can have cool fun maps and COD zombies. Basin and Sherbacov presented detailed calculations, architectural blueprints, and engineering specifications for their spaceship moon. They also made this fun little song. The moon so hollow. The moon so hollow. Oh.

[Music]

Oh, they didn't make a song. That wasn't by them. They didn't write that. That's uh that's uh I don't know who wrote that actually. It's weird.

The analysis of these two smart Soviet men began with the crater depth anomaly. Despite impacts from meteorites ranging from small rocks to objects over 60 mi in diameter, every single crater maintained the same approximate depth. That is 1.2 to 2 m. The craters varied tremendously in width, some spanning hundreds of miles, but their depth remained bizarrely consistent. To me, that's freaky.

These two men came up with an architectural explanation for the reason behind this. The moon, you see, possesses a protective hall. Exactly 2.5 to 3 m thick. So no matter how large the impact, meteorites can only penetrate this outer skin before hitting something far more substantial beneath, preventing there from being much variation in the depth. But that anomaly is just the beginning. Beneath lay a secondary armor layer and inner hall that's 20 m thick, protecting the hollow interior. You have a small thin layer on the tip and then you got a big gigantic layer on the on the bottom and then you have a hollow center where people live. So the Soviets weren't describing a natural satellite. They were describing an alien spacecraft, hollow moon.

So we have the Soviet theory which you could say is academic speculation or you could just buy it wholesale. But what about NASA whistleblowers? How do you feel about that? This chapter is fairly interesting because we're going to talk about some incidents involving the moon. Not just from NASA this time, but some interesting stuff from throughout history. Some activity, I guess you could say, in regard to our buddy in the sky.

If the moon were truly the dead, lifeless rock that losers want us to believe, scientists, it should remain perfectly static. There should be no changes, no lights, no activity, just an ancient cratered sphere that reflects sunlight and looks like Jesus. But for over 450 years, we have astronomers, amateur stargazers, and even NASA's own astronauts that have documented something unsettling and disturbing. The moon is alive with unexplained phenomena. These are not isolated incidents. There's a systematic pattern of activity that has been documented in official government reports, peer-reviewed scientific papers again and NASA technical publications. This isn't just data and the moon ringing like a bell. This is people seeing weird unexplained [ __ ].

In July of 1968, just months before Apollo 11, NASA published a technical report R277, the chronological catalog of reported lunar events. This document represented the most comprehensive official acknowledgement that the moon exhibits unexplained activity. The report covered 427 years of observations from 1540 to 1967 and documented 579 separate instances of anomalous lunar phenomena. This isn't just folklore. There is some, but this includes observations by the world's most respected astronomers using the finest telescopes available. Later expanded catalogs would document over 2,254 individual events, which creates a database of lunar activity that defies explanation, especially if the moon were truly a dead planetary celestial beautiful little sexy body up there.

NASA classified these phenomena into five distinct categories. One, gaseous mists and obscurations. Two, reddish colorations. Three, green, blue, or violet colorations. Four, brightenings. Five, darkenings. Makes sense. Thank you, NASA. Each category suggests active processes occurring on or within the lunar surface. Gaseous emissions implies internal activity. Color changes suggest potentially energy releases. Brightenings and darkenings indicate controlled illumination systems. Maybe the aliens turn their lights off and on like uh no feratu and Spongebob.

Plus, the patterns aren't random. They're clustered around specific lunar features and occurred at predictable intervals and exhibited characteristics consistent with artificial lighting in some atmospheric control systems. And one location in particular dominates the transient phenomena reports more than any other. That is the Aristarus crater, a relatively young impact feature measuring 40 km in diameter. By 2007, astronomers had documented 122 TLP reports from Aristarkus. This makes that crater more than 30 times more active than any other young craters of similar size. And the activity at Air Starkus wasn't subtle. Observers reported dramatic color changes, intense brightening events, and gaseous emissions visible through Earth-based telescopes. And the phenomenon occurred with such regularity that experienced lunar observers knew to monitor Aerist during periods of enhanced activity.

Air Stark's most significant moment came during Apollo 11, which was humanity's first lunar landing mission. On July 19th, 1969, as Apollo 11 approached the moon, Neil Armstrong made an observation that NASA would record in official mission transcripts, but never fully explained. While orbiting the lunar surface, Armstrong reported unusual illumination in the Aristarus region. Armstrong noted area considerably more illuminated than surrounding area seems to have a slight amount of fluoresence. Fluoresence Neil Armstrong on an airless world with no atmosphere to create aurora effects, no electrical storms to generate plasma phenomena and no volcanic activity producing glowing gases. Neil Armstrong, are you sure you're describing a light bulb then? Or artificial lighting? Neil Armstrong, don't punch me in the face.

Now, what is particularly significant about this is that Aristarus lays on the moon's far side during the orbital pass. So, it's shrouded in lunar night. Any illumination Armstrong observed had to originate from the lunar surface itself or from within the moon, not the sun or someone on Earth shining a really bright flashlight at it or something like that. So, that's pretty interesting.

Now, how about William Hershel, the astronomer who saw lunar volcanoes? This is one of the most dramatic historical observations uh and that comes from Sir William Hershel, the astronomer who discovered Uranus and revolutionized our understanding of the solar system as we knew it in that time. Hershel possessed some of the finest telescopes of his era and meticulous observational skills. And this all made him one of history's most respected astronomers. On May 4th, 1783, Hershel observed something that knocked his weave off. Something that challenged everything science thought it knew about the moon. Through his telescope, he watched a red glow emanating from the Aristarus crater, bright enough to register magnitude 4, visible to the naked eye under ideal conditions. That's substantial, and Hershel's observations continued over several years. On April 19th to the 20th in 1787, he documented what he described as three active volcanoes on the lunar surface, including another intense brightening event at Aristarus. Hershel published his findings in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, lending this some level of scientific credibility to reports of bizarre lunar activity. We know now that he was not observing volcanic eruptions because the moon lacks the geological activity necessary for volcanism. So yeah, that's not possible, Hershel. Sorry, dumbass. What he was witnessing was controlled illumination events from an artificial source. It was no feratu.

So NASA's documentation of lunar transient phenomena represents both a form of disclosure and a form of concealment. By officially cataloging the events, the agency acknowledges that they occurred, but by classifying them as transient lunar phenomena rather than evidence of hollow moon. NASA maintains the fiction that the moon is a rock or whatever. Yeah, yeah, yeah. This being just months before Apollo 11 suggests NASA was preparing the public for astronaut observations of lunar activity and by establishing an official framework for unexplained phenomena, the agency gets to acknowledge astronaut reports without having to actually admit their true significance, which is what the government has done with the UAP stuff in all honesty. Just just pointing things out here. So yeah, basically the moon has been watching us and at certain points in history, it wanted us to know by turning the lights on and off like Noatu and Spongebob.

These aren't conspiracy theorists. These aren't shovel chin Chads like myself on YouTube speculating. These are NASA employees, military technicians, and contractors with security clearances who claim to have seen evidence that NASA or other government agencies were covering up lunar discoveries. First comes Don Wilson, the popularizer. In 1975, Don Wilson, an author, published our mysterious spaceship moon, which was the first comprehensive English language exploration of the hollow moon theory. And Wilson didn't just rehash the Soviet work. He claimed sources inside NASA confirmed his theories, which, you know, I could also say that. But Wilson's most explosive allegations involved secret communications during Apollo missions. According to his sources, astronauts regularly encountered unexplained phenomena, but were instructed to use coded language. And in his 1979 follow-up, Secrets of Our Spaceship Moon. Wilson published what he claimed was actual dialogue between Neil Armstrong and mission control, and it reads as follows. Armstrong says to mission control, "What the hell was that? Those babies are huge. Enormous. I'm telling you, there are other spacecraft out there lined up on the far side of the crater edge. They're on the moon watching us. I'm Neil Armstrong." Wilson insisted that NASA privately admits that this is true, which what that exactly means, I'm not totally sure. Wilson also insists that the Apollo missions were routinely followed by alien spacecraft, which I believe that [ __ ].

So, the moon wasn't just hollow, it was also aliens. Corroboration, we've got the Soviets. We've got Don, genius author. Now, how about Carl Wolf, the technician who saw a bit too much? On September 11th, 2001, something terrible happened. But at some other point in the year in 2001, during Dr. Steven Greer's Disclosure Project press conference, former Air Force Sergeant Carl Wolf stepped forward and shed some light on something quite interesting. He shared a testimony that had the UFO research community ringing like a bell. Mr. Wolf served from 1964 to 1968 with a top secret crypto clearance, which is even better than a normal top secret clearance because you get access to different cool authentication stuff and lots of crypto secrets. Not really. This is the 1960s. Carl was working as a precision electronics photograph technician at Langley Air Force Base. And in 1965, 4 years before Apollo 11, Wolf was sent to work on equipment processing NASA lunar photographs. So this guy got to see some [ __ ]. This is what he said at that press conference in 2001, September 11th. Just kidding. "We walked over to one side of the lab and he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the moon.'" Wolf recalled. The technician then showed Wolf a mosaic of photographs revealing structures that defied any logical explanation. Then he pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes. There were towers, spherical buildings, even something phallic, the shape of a penis. They were very tall towers and things like that. They looked somewhat like radar dishes, but they were very large structures.

So, Wolf was looking at photographs of artificial structures on the moon that were taken in 1965 before any human had supposedly even set foot on the beautiful celestial body of the moon. And that's for next. We have a NASA scientist, a fellow by the name of George Leonard. Now, George claimed to be a former NASA scientist who had analyzed thousands of official NASA photographs. And in 1976, George published Somebody Else is on the Moon, which is a scary scary title for anything to publish. That's freaky. And George presented photographic evidence of massive artificial structures covering the lunar surface. Now, of course, he doesn't attach any of these images, but he describes them. And his descriptions read like science fiction. But he insists on his reputation that every claim was based on careful analysis of NASA imagery. Immense mechanical rings, some over a mile long, working the lunar surface. He cataloged vehicles, tracks, towers, and more pipes, conduits, conveyor belts. He also described motors on the moon surface as big as the Bronx, which we can look at the moon now. So I feel like maybe that's maybe that's not true. You can just like look at it and you can't see any of that stuff. But there is a dark side of the moon as well. And that's where all this stuff apparently lays. So yeah, the author of There's Somebody Else on the Moon, an ex-NASA scientist who used to look at photographs for NASA screams that he's seen evidence that the moon has life on it and that there is no denying the truth. The moon is occupied by an intelligent race of aliens. That's right. The moon is not only hollow, it's also a functioning base for extraterrestrials with moon operations and massive machinery working on the surface. Sounds like Factorio to be honest.

Then we have Donna Hair. And you're going to notice a bit of a pattern here as all these people saw photographs. Nobody actually went to the moon and saw this crazy ship, but they saw photographs and they're like, "What?" Donna worked as a technical illustrator for Filco Ford at NASA for 15 years from 1967 to 1981 and she received the Apollo achievement award from NASA in 1969. So she had full-on access to NASA's photo laboratories and that gave her a front row seat to the systematic manipulation of lunar imagery. So the theory here is that Donna witnessed all of the images from the moon being doctored and changed to prevent us peons on Earth from seeing green people and factorial saves that are incredibly impressive. Hair testified that she regularly witnessed photo technicians airbrushing UFOs and anomalous objects from lunar photographs before public release. But I realized at this point that it's very secret that it was kept secret because I asked him, "What are you going to do with this piece of information?" And he said, "We always airbrush these out before we sell them to the public." So, they're piss pesky little creatures uh appearing on this uh photograph they wanted to get rid of. And according to her testimony, astronauts use the code word Santa Claus when reporting UFO sightings during missions, which is unbelievable. And most disturbing were her claims about astronaut testimony. Hara alleged that astronauts were threatened to stay quiet about their encounters and that NASA maintained strict protocols to prevent public disclosure of any anomalous discoveries. The Apollo astronauts saw craft on the moon when we landed and that is what he told me. And he also was afraid. He said that the astronauts are told to keep this quiet. They're not allowed to talk about it.

But what about the story of Ken Johnston, the archive manager? Ken is seen as one of the more credible whistleblowers in the Hollow Moon theory. I'm sure people are going to get really mad at me saying that, but from my research, this is what this is what we gathered. Ken worked for the NASA contractor, the Brown and Root Corporation from 1969 to 1972. By the way, I'm not going to just move past the Brown and Root Corporation. That is the worst ever that has ever existed. Kin was a manager of the data and photo control department at the lunar receiving laboratory and Johnston's role gave him unprecedented access to the complete photographic record of the Apollo missions. And according to his testimony, he was ordered to destroy five complete sets of Apollo photographs, but he secretly saved one collection, one complete collection. And Johnston claims that these preserved photographs contain clear evidence of artificial structures and that he personally witnessed strippers or people who systematically remove anomalies from images before they released just like Donna did.

So, we have some corroboration here. This is how the truth is found in the photos. Johnston claims to have saved allegedly show the same structures that were described by Carl and George way back in the past. Geometric buildings, towers, and clear signs of artificial construction on the surface of the moon. So yeah, these aren't just random internet people making wild claims. These are people making claims a long time ago that are wild. And these people have experience and track records in these worlds. So it's more like a bunch of Bob Lazars instead of just a bunch of MIS. These are people with security clearances, NASA credentials, and direct access at some point to the source material that they're basing their testimony on. And their testimonies paint a consistent picture. And the picture is that NASA knows that the moon is hollow and they are suppressing that information to protect us. I guess.

Beyond the testimonies and theory lay cold hard data. [Music] I guess I haven't used this camera yet. Beyond the testimonies and theories lay cold hard data. You guys didn't expect me to have a camera like this, did you? That I'm whipping out all the way in chapter 4 while I do. For our cold hard data, we have measurements taken by NASA's own instruments, calculations performed by respected scientists and numbers that don't add up unless the moon is fundamentally different from every other planetary body in our solar system, which is possible because it's hollow. And this evidence wasn't hidden. It's not hard to find even. It was published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific conferences, and recorded by the most sophisticated instruments humanity had ever sent into space. And the mystery wasn't that the data is secret. It's that most scientists refuse to consider what the numbers are showing or telling them.

Part A of this is the density paradox. The moon doesn't weigh enough. It's too skinny. The density of the Earth measures 5.5 g per cubic centimeter, which is typical for a rocky planet with a substantial iron core. The moon's density is just 3.34 g per cubic centimeter. So, the moon is 60% of the Earth's density. And for a body supposedly formed from the same primordial material as the Earth, it's a pretty big discrepancy that defies some level of explanation. Rocky planets should have similar densities. Mars is 3.93, Venus is 5.24, Mercury is 5.43. And all of these fall within the expected range for solid planetary bodies. The moon is an outlier. It's a 2,162mi diameter sphere that weighs far less than it should.

Something even more puzzling is the moon's moment of inertia factor, which is this. This number suggests an almost uniform density throughout the interior of the body, which a solid sphere of uniform rock should have a factor of 0.4. But if the moon contained a dense core like the other planets, that factor should be significantly lower. This measurement suggests that the moon's interior is remarkably uniform, which is exactly what you would expect from a hollow sphere. Its walls are consistently thick. Dr. Gordon McDonald, a NASA geophysicist, published a statement in 1962 saying, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon be less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow sphere than like a homogeneous sphere. May God rest his soul. He passed on. Um, so that guy said it. He isn't a fringe theorist. He's a respected NASA scientist analyzing official data, the data that they had available at the time. So, Dr. McDonald, a well-respected guy, unlike maybe some of the whistleblower people, this guy is legit. He's a real geophysicist. And he was analyzing official data and coming to a conclusion. The conclusion is that the moon's interior was less dense than the exterior shell, which is pretty unusual. It's like the opposite of a Ferrero Rocher. It's like one of those eggs. Those like eggs you get on Easter where it's real soft in the middle and the exterior is hard and [ __ ]. Bro is not like a Ferrer Rocher with a with a hard nutty core.

In 1968, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory made a discovery that was fairly interesting. They discovered that the moon contained massive gravitational anomalies called mascon, which is mass concentrations that create gravitational fields up to 200 mals stronger than expected. So, this sounds like crazy insane [ __ ], but it's pretty sciency and it does make sense. Get this. These mascons were so powerful that they could pull a plumb bob 1/3 of a degree off of vertical. Can you imagine finding an area where you got a little piece of metal on the end of a string and it's and it's like, huh? Because of a massive concentration of [ __ ]. That's so confusing to me. More significantly, these mascons made low lunar orbit completely unstable. So spacecraft attempting to maintain a circular orbit around the moon would crash than months as the mascon gradually pulled them off. Of course, these mascons clustered beneath the moon's largest impact basins, the Mare Imbrium, the Mar Serinitatus, and the Marchium. But also, the gravitational signatures of these mascons made no sense for natural geological features. They're too massive, too precisely located, and too geometrically perfect. Traditional planetary science suggests that these basins should show gravitational deficits. For example, there should be less mass where giant impacts had excavated material, but instead they show the opposite. Concentrated masses as if dense material had been deliberately placed beneath each impact site, aka the hollow moon. So, the mascons pretty sketchy. Pretty odd. What is that? Could be pillars holding up the hollow shell. I'm not exactly sure.

So anyways, let's circle back a bit on the crater depth conspiracy that was first introduced that that we first introduced from our Soviet friends. Every large lunar crater tells the same bizarre and seemingly impossible story. Regardless of the size of the impact that's created these, regardless of the speed or angle of the meteorite, every major crater maintains virtually identical depths. The Tao crater is 85 km in diameter, only 4,800 m deep. The Copernicus crater 93 km in diameter and 3,800 meters deep. On Earth, crater depth varies dramatically with impact size. For example, a meteor capable of creating an 85 km crater would excavate far deeper than one creating a 10 km crater. The moon's craters are bizarre. Every impact was hitting at the same barrier at the same depth between 1.2 and 2 mi below the surface. Exactly the depth predicted by Vasset and Cherbikov's hall thickness calculations, which is kind of odd. It's almost as if every meteorite is striking an armored shell rather than a solid rocky body like my solid rocky body. Go to Powerboys. Power Boys, sign up. I've been working out a lot with my friends with my friends. Check that out. Guns. Welcome to the gun show.

So, you've got that. Now for one more circle back. The Apollo seismic network, the network of seismometers that were set up to measure vibrations back in the 60s and 70s. This network revealed properties that defy conventional planetary science. For example, the moon's Q factor, which is a measure of how efficiently it transmits seismic energy, measures approximately 3600. Now, this number probably means nothing at all to you, but this indicates extremely low energy attenuation, meaning vibrations could propagate for extraordinary distances without losing strength. Uh, no solid planetary body that we know of exhibits such properties. Earth's Q factor rarely exceeds 600, Mars, Venus, and other rocky planets show similar damping characteristics as the Earth. And for your information, high Q factors are associated with hollow or highly structured materials, bells, drums, engineered resonance chambers, you name it. Things that are made by aliens. So that's kind of odd.

Deep moon quakes originating from 600 to,000 km below the surface provide another anomaly. These occurred deeper than any earthquake on Earth and exhibited characteristics suggesting that they originated at boundaries between different materials. And the depth and regularity suggests that they were occurring at the interface between an outer shell and an inner cavity, aka somewhere in the hollow moon. And mysteriously, moonquakes showed remarkable periodicity clustering around the times when Earth's gravitational pull was strongest. And this suggests that the moon's interior is responding to tidal stress in ways consistent with a hollow structure under strain. So, uh, odd, very odd.

The seismic data paints a picture that hollow moon theorists find impossible to ignore. A hollow sphere with walls approximately 25 mi thick, exactly matching the Soviet scientists architectural specifications. Remember those guys that sang that song earlier? Those guys, they're right. Every measurement, every calculation, every piece of data points towards the same bizarre and impossible conclusion. The moon isn't behaving like a natural satellite. It is exhibiting characteristics of an artificial construct designed and positioned by intelligence far beyond human capabilities. And the best part is the evidence isn't hidden in a government vault. Some of it probably is, but it's published in NASA technical reports and analyzed by university researchers and confirmed by independent space agencies around the world. The scientific community has the data and they simply refuse to believe that the moon is hollow, but they do acknowledge that it is strange, that the moon is really a weird thing. I hope you guys see what I'm doing with this video, by the way. I'm not I'm not a crazy person. I'm going to debunk all of this at the end.

More than 50 years after the Apollo missions first opened the can of worms, that is the moon, modern technology is continuing to reveal more of the moon's anomalous properties. Is that right, guys? We have advanced space technology right now. Since 2020, a new generation of lunar missions equipped with sophisticated sensors, ground penetrating radar, and precision sampling equipment has produced discoveries that would have even seemed impossible to previous generations of scientists. In spite of what the they were finding, China's Changi program, Chang'e, Chang'e, I don't know how to actually say it, has, let's just say, completely revolutionized lunar science through a series of increasingly sophisticated missions that have culminated in the first successful sample returns from the moon's dark side, the far side of the moon. And these samples are deeply troubling, right? Changi 5, which returned samples from Oceanus Procellarum in 2020, brought back the youngest mare basalts ever analyzed. Rocks dated to just 2 billion years old. This represented volcanic activity far more recent than models predicted for a body supposedly cooling and dying since its formation 4.5 billion years ago. Changi 6 went in 2024 and its return from the far side revealed something even more extraordinary. A dramatic compositional asymmetry between the moon's near and far sides that defies explanation through natural process but artificial process. Hollow moon.

There were water content measurements that were striking. Near-site examples contained approximately 200 micrograms of water per gram of rock, which is surprisingly high for once again a bone dry body that formed in the inner solar system. But far side samples contain only 1 to 1.5 micrograms per gram, which is more than 100 times less water than the near side. And this asymmetry makes no sense for a naturally formed body. And if the moon had formed from Earth debris following a giant impact, both sides should exhibit similar water content by logic and rationale and science. Has the artificial inhabitants of the moon been conserving water on the near side? I don't know. Let's ask Changi 7.

Japan's Selene mission, also known as Kaguya, provided crucial data about the moon's internal structure that has challenged general assumptions in the way that planets are formed. In 2014, Dr. Yuji Harata's team discovered what they described as an extremely soft layer deep inside of the moon. And according to their analysis, the interior of the moon has not cooled and hardened and is still being warmed by the effect of the Earth. That's what they said. That's crazy. A solid rocky body the moon's size should have completely cooled billions of years ago. Okay guys, the discovery of soft warm material deep within the lunar interior suggests it is very comfortable and nice and cozy inside. And it also suggests there's active processes maintaining elevated temperatures, exactly what you'd find from an artificial facility with ongoing energy systems. So yeah, you heard this right. According to the Japanese, the moon's interior is fundamentally different from other planetary bodies. It's not a cold dead rock. It's a soft, comfy, warm facility brimming with alien life.

In 2024, scientists confirmed the existence of a massive cave system 150 m beneath Mare Tranquillitatis, measuring approximately 80 m long and 45 m wide. Ground penetrating radar had detected the cavity and subsequent analysis confirmed it represented only a small section of a much larger underground network of moon caves. Mainstream science interpreted these as lava tubes, which are natural tunnels formed by ancient volcanic activity. But people like myself see something far more significant. Access points to the moon's hollow interior.

Then take 2022. Director Roland Emmerich releases Moonfall, a 138 to 146 million blockbuster depicting the moon as an artificial Dyson sphere built by an ancient alien intelligence. Clever Hollywood fiction or soft disclosure? You tell me.

Before we get into the debunking, I would like to say that there are some coincidences about the moon that do make it seem strange, unnerving, if you will, coincidental. It's it's, you know, there's a miracle. The big bangs, right? There's a lot of things that just don't make any sense that we cannot wrap our minds around. And it's weird when it's like a little bow up in the sky up. It's like, we don't really understand all that. Are you kidding me? I look at that one second. And I totally understand it. But then I start thinking about it. I'm like, "Wait, the tides? You mean the water be everywhere if the moon wasn't here? That's scary. Maybe I don't understand it."

Let's talk about the human eye for a second and how it relates to the moon being created artificially. Science people have acknowledged for decades that the human eye wasn't designed for our current atmosphere. The prevalence of myopia, astigmatism, and other modern vision problems suggests our visual system evolved under different atmospheric conditions. And research shows that the human's eyes spectral sensitivity is optimized for wavelengths around 550 nm, aka the green lightsaber from the prequels. Studies also indicate that human vision would be better suited in an atmosphere with different composition and density. The higher rates of vision problems in modern populations affecting between 30 and 40% of people in developed countries point to a fundamental mismatch between our eyes and our environment. What I'm saying is that before the moon showed up, the Earth was bigly different and the atmosphere made our eyes happy and we lived in that atmosphere for such a long time that our eyes evolved for that atmosphere.

This nonsense I'm saying becomes more significant when we examine ancient accounts from civilizations worldwide that describe dramatically different atmospheric conditions before the arrival of the moon. It's a bug in here, dude. Come on. Many ancient civilizations preserve remarkably similar accounts of atmospheric transformation that coincides with the moon's appearance in the Earth's sky. The Epic of Gilgamesh is amongst those. I love the Epic of Gilgamesh and other flood stories. Let's get into it. These aren't just isolated folklore incidents. These are incidents that represent consistent testimony across continents and cultures and periods of time. Aboriginal people of Australia and various African tribes, including the Doon, maintain oral traditions stating that women never experienced menstrual cycles until the moon appeared. And these accounts describe the moon's arrival as fundamentally altering human biology and the natural rhythms of the earth.

Ancient texts from civilizations across the globe describe a world before the moon where the atmosphere was dense with mist creating a greenhouse effect that filtered sunlight differently and made everything green like that lightsaber from the prequels. The air was described as being more humid, thicker, uh, jungle-like, old, and if this were reality, it would create optimal conditions for the human visual system. And we apparently evolved under those circumstances according to the ancients. And the biblical account of the great flood correlates with many of these traditions as well. Ancient sources describe that when the moon appeared in the sky, this misty canopy collapsed and that caused torrential rains that lasted for extended periods of time. My favorite, the Sumerian epic of Gilgamesh, Hindu Puranas, and dozens of other flood narratives from unconnected cultures all describe identical atmospheric collapse events and conditions. So, put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Now, how about tidal lock? Ever heard of that? You've probably been to the beach and you've seen the tides go in and go out and you're probably like, "Mommy, why does the tide go in and go out?" And then your mom's like, "Why do you sound like Jerry Seinfeld, you ugly weirdo?" And then your just egos hurt for years. But the moon presents the same face to Earth with absolute consistency. That's why people talk about the dark side of the moon. This phenomenon is called tidal locking, and it occurs when a satellite's rotational period exactly matches its orbital period. And for the moon, both measure precisely 27.3 days. Convenient for hiding things. The moon's tidal lock is mathematically perfect. There is no wobble, no drift, no decay. It maintains this position with the mechanical precision of a, you guessed it, engineered system rather than the gradual approximation of natural gravitational forces. Okay. Now, for an artificial spacecraft, perfect tidal lock would be essential. It would keep sensitive equipment, entry ports, and observation posts on the far side permanently hidden from Earth-based detection while maintaining optimal orbital position. So that's right, tidal lock in regard to the hollow moon theory has nothing to do with the beach. I just wanted to tell you guys a fun story.

This next thing is puzzling and very interesting. Puzzling genuinely in a sense of like I'm trying to be rational and understand this and it doesn't make a lot of sense. Not in the sense of um trying to explain to you guys the hollow moon theory and give it as much credence as I possibly can before utterly debunking it massively at the end of this video. The most bizarre mathematical coincidence involved with the moon is the relationship between the moon, the Earth, and the sun. During total solar eclipses, the moon appears to be exactly the same size as the sun when viewed from the surface of the Earth, which is where we live. The sun measures 1.39 million km in diameter and our beautiful sexy moon measures 3,474 km. So the sun is approximately 400 times larger than the moon. So it should appear 400 times larger than the moon in the Earth's sky. Right? The sun also sits approximately 400 times further from the Earth than the moon. So we have two 400 to1 ratios that cancel each other out perfectly which creates a nearly identical angular diameter of approximately a half a degree. Isaac Azimov called this coincidence remarkable back in 1965. It's a mathematical precision that is so exact that it defies probability calculations like many other things in regard to the moon. Jokes aside, there's a lot of weird stuff going on with the moon. Guys, no other planet, moon or star system in the known universe has exhibited this characteristic that we have that we are blessed with on this planet that we live on. Hollow moon people think that this is a deliberate placement. Um, that's been the moon's been pre precisely positioned there at the correct distance to you know our solar system contains 293 confirmed moons. Astronomers have discovered over 5,000 exoplanets many with their own satellite systems. And in this vast catalog of celestial mechanics, not one moon exhibits the Earth-moon proportional relationship. That's right. The moon measures 27% of Earth's diameter. And the next largest moon-to-planet ratio in our solar system is Charon-Pluto at 12% or less than half our moon's proportion. So most moons measure less than 5% of their planet's diameter. And across thousands of exoplanets and their satellites, none approach our moon's massive size relative to its primary. The Earth-moon system is literally unique to the known universe, which is pretty shocking and pretty remarkable and fundamentally a headscratcher. And this impossibly large moon just happens to be positioned at exactly the right distance to create the perfect solar eclipse. A also a level of precision that astronomers acknowledge has no parallel anywhere else in the cosmos, the known cosmos. So bizarre.

Now on to the debunking. So, as excited as you might be by the hollow moon theory, turns out mainstream science offers fairly reasonable explanations for every single anomaly and every coincidence and every piece of evidence that seems to point towards artificial construction of the hollow moon. It really comes down to what are you willing to believe and how how far are you willing to look and in what direction? Because if you look in one direction, you're going to find that it's hollow. And if you look in the other direction, you're going to unequivocally find that it is not. And these people are stupid. But somehow if you're looking over here still, you'll still you just like you're you believe that even though there's not as much evidence and it's that doesn't make as much sense. I don't really know in all honesty, but I want to give some respect to both sides. I love science and I don't actually think the moon is hollow just in case you guys are wondering. Let's go through and explain some things that I think are important to explain. Uh, the seismic explanation, for example. What are those extended vibrations that made the moon ring like a bell? Well, NASA scientists point to a surprisingly simple explanation. The moon is dry. It is bone dry. Earth's rocks contain water that acts like a natural shock absorber which dampens seismic waves within minutes. Uh, but lunar rocks, which are subjected to 4.5 billion years of solar radiation and cosmic bombardment devoid of atmosphere. The moon is I said that like Yoda. The planetary body is completely desiccated. It's totally dry. It's like a big piece of beef jerky. And when you strike a completely dry, rigid structure, vibrations can propagate for extraordinary periods of time without the rapid energy loss seen on water-bearing planets or planets with atmospheres. Dry rock exhibits what scientists call extremely high Q factors, meaning vibrations continue much longer than in earth-based materials. And if you add in the moon's fractured upper crust, pulverized by eons of meteorite impacts into what geologists call a megaregolith, and you get intensive wave scattering without energy absorption. So you just get crazy bell ringing. Seismic energy bounces around like a light in a hall of mirrors and creates extended vibration periods that so mystified Neil Patrick Harris and the other Apollo astronauts. And also modern seismic analysis reveals something pretty bad for the hollow moon theorists. Both compressional and shear waves propagate throughout the lunar interior and that is measurable. We have the data that backs that. And this is impossible in a hollow space. The wave patterns map a solid differentiated structure with distinct layers. Exactly what you'd expect from a natural planetary body. But maybe it's a little dry and it rings a little too long. And that's what seems like the the end of story in all honesty.

Now, as for the formation of

The moon and the density. The moon's low density and unusual characteristics make a bit more sense when you understand how the moon formed. Around 4.5 billion years ago, a Mars-sized object scientists called Fya slammed into the early Earth with unimaginable force and violence. Kind of like when I sit down too hard and I crush my ball and it goes and it's, you know what I'm talking about? Does that ever happen to you guys? You know when you sit down too hard and you crush your ball and it goes like Thea and the way that it slammed in the earth with unimaginable violence 4.5 billion years ago.

This collision primarily ejected material from Earth's silicut mantle and crust, which is less dense rock, while both iron cores merged into the earth's core. The resulting m aka the moon inherited earth's lighter materials but not its heavier iron core. And this explains the 60% density ratio without requiring hollow spaces. The moon's moment of inertia factor. This funny little number matches predictions for a solid body with uniform density. And a hollow sphere would produce a factor of 67. So very different.

Recent computer models show this giant impact could have formed the moon within hours and not years, which is mind-boggling and unbelievable. And isotopic analysis reveals subtle but measurable differences between Earth and moon rocks, supporting a violent and logical origin story that explains what we're talking about. So what about the eclipse coincidence, the title lock precision, and the geometric crater patterns, guys? Well, comment down below what you what you think happened, and I'll let you comment down below.

Scientists have acknowledged that these are remarkable coincidences, but they are coincidences nonetheless. Uh, according to them, the moon's tidal lock occurs naturally through gravitational forces over geological time. Most large moons do exhibit this characteristic. And the eclipse ratio is temporary. The moon gradually recedes from Earth, meaning total solar eclipses will become impossible in about 500 million years. So, you know, while we're alive, while humans exist, it's perfect. But as soon as humans are gone in 500 million years, which I'm betting on that, praise be, the eclipse won't happen anymore. So, luckily it was around while we were here. And the crater depth consistency results from fairly well understood impact physics. Now, um, maybe not so much in the late '60s and early '70s, but on a lowg gravity world like the MP, large impacts naturally produce similar depth to diameter ratios due to gravitational collapse during crater formation. And the same patterns appear on Mercury, Mars, and my anus and other cratered bodies throughout the solar system. So yeah, pretty it makes sense. It's really not that big of a deal.

Depending on whether or not you believe technology exists, this could be the most damaging to the hollow moon theory. Modern technology has thoroughly mapped the interior of the moon. Uh, NASA's Grail mission created gravitational maps accurate to within microns, revealing mass distributions consistent with natural planetary formation. Uh, there's no large hollow spaces that exist on the moon. If you believe that that's real, if you believe in that, there's like only the only images on the moon are are composits and stuff. The Earth is flat, my penis is round, and it curves to the left. We also have high-res images from the lunar reconnaissance orbiter that shows Apollo landing sites in stunning, beautiful detail, equipment, astronaut tracks, and even individual footprints that have been preserved in airless atmosphere conditions with no rodents running around causing rodent erosion. And these same images reveal no evidence of obviously they could airbrush it out or whatever, you know, but um, yeah. And also Chinese, Indian, Japanese, and European missions have all, and I think Iranian, no, I think they launched a monkey into space. I don't think they went to the moon yet, but they've all independently studied the moon using different instruments and techniques and with different cultures and governments and some of these countries being completely at odds to one another, and they've all come to the same conclusion. The moon exhibits characteristics of a natural satellite formed through cosmic collision, but it's still funny and odd and there are some things that are confusing about the moon that you know, some coincidences that need to be acknowledged.

So, what about all the whistleblowers and all the people who used to work for NASA and all the scientists who talked about this? Well, the whistleblower accounts that seemed fairly compelling contain some credibility issues. For example, Carl Wolf's testimony emerged decades after the alleged incident with zero corroborating witnesses. Ken Johnston's claimed NASA position and academic credentials have been thoroughly debunked by space journalists. He's very much a um Bob Lazar type of character where, you know, he came out of kind of nowhere and maybe he's telling the truth. Maybe he's being heranged and maybe there's like that's why I say there's a bit of credence to that because there is other people who I do believe more. I believe Bob Lazar more than I believe these hollow earth people. I mean hollow moon people. So think of that one and what you will, but uh George Leonard's photographic evidence relies on paridolia, which is just seeing patterns and random shapes and shadows. Uh, which is hilarious, or at least that's what it seems like to me. And by the way, no other Apollo personnel have corroborated claims of alien encounters or systematic coveredups. So, India, China, Japan, Europe, every person who's ever been on the moon, they all are working together to prevent us from believing that there's a hollow moon. Seems like I don't really know.

So, the moon could be hollow and it could have been made by aliens and they park it here and they communicate with us and they, you know, they turn their blinkers on and no feratu is up there flicking the switch. Or the moon could have formed in cosmic violence, sculpted by billions of years of impacts, and is now an incredibly important part of our daily lives that keeps water in the right place. And you know, both things are really crazy to be honest. Both things are wild and unbelievable, but one of them is probably true. So yeah, after 55 years of accumulating evidence, denying the moon's artificial nature requires greater faith than accepting it. In my opinion, the anomalies aren't going away, science people. Each new mission uncovers additional evidence supporting artificial construction while providing no data that definitively proves natural formation. Aside from all the data we should we just talked about, to be honest, the moon rings like a bell because it's hollow. The craters maintain consistent depths because there's armor underneath. The rocks age backward because the moon was constructed, not accreted. All right. The photos are censored because they show artificial structures. The proportions are impossible because the moon was deliberately sized by some guy. The orbit is perfect because the moon was positioned and not captured. 55 years ago, NASA crashed a spaceship into the moon and it rang like a bell for nearly an hour. And that was humanity's first hint that our closest celestial neighbor might not be what it seemed. Every piece of evidence point towards it. I'm on it. We all about that hollow moon theory.

The moon is odd, but like not really though. To be, I mean, it is, it is odd, but it's not odd in that way. It's odd in like a totally different, more spiritual, beautiful way. Anyways, thank you all for watching. If you enjoyed, press the like button down below. A lot got cut out of this. So go to the Gump Club to watch the full uncensored big long epic vision version of the video. Go to the Gump Club also to support the channel if you want to see more longer videos like this. I wrote this. Took me like four [ __ ] days straight of research and then like six days of just writing and I just can't. I don't know. I'm so bad at being a YouTuber, dude. I just the rafters are calling my name. Anyways, go to sour.gg2, buy some candy. We've got new flavors in stock. Four flavors a month. Go on there, go to sour.gg. Thank you'all so much and I'll see you in the next video. Also, leave some ideas on what you want to see me cover next. Thank you to Fume for sponsoring this.