SAMSARA: Der Grund weshalb du LEIDEST

[clears throat] So, hello. Um, before we get started, I would perhaps be glad if you could quickly type whether the sound is okay today, because I had some problems with my Apple headphones, with which I'm recording the sound here. Good. Well, then let's get started right away. [sniffles] Hey and welcome to another livestream here on the Sonnenvendor YouTube channel. My name is Die bei Pfister and today we're talking about Samsara, the reason why you suffer. You are here on the, uh, currently most important educational channel in the DACH region, and you are invited to participate in the live chat today and make it interactive. So you can ask questions, make comments, and I will respond to them. What's important in this context is that you switch from TopChat to Live Chat at the top of the YouTube chat bar. I've just done that. Uh, yesterday I forgot, which is why I didn't see all the comments, which I, uh, yes, regretted a little. But I think today I should see everything again. Yes, wonderful. If you've done that, a reminder again, please, if you discover any cool moments in the livestream today, note down the timestamp and then at the end of the stream, go through your personal moments again and mark the start and end points, uh, of the theoretical clip that could emerge and post it on our Discord server in the Timestamps channel. under the Livestreams category. Thank you very much for mentioning that right at the beginning so that everyone can take it with them. So, today we're talking about Samsara, and I think this will actually be the most important livestream so far, because although we've already talked about many important topics, the whole thing up to this point has actually been the build-up for this livestream, more or less, and how we will actually cross the Helles together today, after which there is no turning back. Yes, whoever understands that, that was good. So, then I might as well get started. I will make the whole thing simple and accessible so that you don't have to have, uh, all the prior knowledge in the world to follow along today. Of course, it is necessary that you have watched some of the past streams to follow along, to take away the ideas, because I don't want to have to explain everything over and over again. Yes, the whole thing works like a curriculum. We build it up step by step. Accordingly, it is important that you have taken away the previous lessons and have noted things down there. Today, of course, the entire material is relevant for exams. So, remember to put that in your summary for the exam, the final exam before the summer holidays. before I release you into the summer holidays, into the White Boy Summer. Good, wonderful. Uh, we'll start with Samsara, or perhaps an explanation of what Samsara is and why we are all trapped in it, and at the end, how we can escape from it. The escape from Samsara, that is a process that we will undertake together and also accompany with the livestreams and with what you might also contribute to finding the way out together. So, in Buddhism, there is this concept of the wheel of, uh, the wheel of life, so to speak. So, that is, uh, the Bawa Chakra in Buddhism, that's what it's called. And that is actually what is depicted here in this, uh, funny picture, which is also in the thumbnail, on this meme, the wheel of life, and, uh, that is actually like, yes, the, the, the cosmic wheel, yes, so, uh, the, the, the wheel of life, in which rebirth, reincarnation is depicted, and which actually always turns, yes, so from here it goes up. Yes, this half here, that's the ascent, and from here it's the descent again, and that's how life actually works in this world, and life in general as a cycle of suffering. Yes, exactly. It's not like in The Lion King, where, yes, here's the wheel of life and, ah, it's so wonderful and beautiful. Quite the opposite, it is something terrible, something dreadful, and I will reveal the truth behind Samsara to you today, or take the first step in that direction. Yes, so we have the Bawa Chakra, and we are all trapped in it. So, that is actually our life. And this here, this happy dog standing above it, who sees it and is still happy, that is actually the state we need to achieve. That is perhaps what is called Bodi, enlightenment, in Buddhism, the moment when one has overcome it and stands above it. So, I'll give a simple example to get started. Buddhism actually makes it clear that life contains more suffering than joy, than happiness. That means, if we weigh things up on this planet, it's always the case that the little bit of happiness that can be generated always comes with much more suffering. A simple example would be if we look at predators, say, a pack of wolves tears apart a young deer fawn, yes, then it's so that the wolves have enough food, enough nutrients for that day or for the week after they have torn apart this animal. And they are then happy, they have derived some satisfaction from it, while on the other hand, the fawn is torn apart in the most brutal way. The pack of wolves pounces on it, tears out the organs, tears out the intestines, and they actually devour it while it's still alive. The fawn cries out for its herd, for its family. No one is there to help. They are all gone, of course, because the pack of wolves is so brutal. And that's how our world works. Yes, everything beautiful and great that arises is built on a pyramid of suffering. Another good example that just comes to mind is, for example, in ancient Greece. Today we have these remnants of Athenian rule, the dominion of Athens, manifested in marble, for example, on the Acropolis in Athens. There we have the Parthenon and this temple complex and other great achievements that have survived to this day, as well as philosophy and so on. But all of that is only an expression of surplus energy after Athens had secured de facto power in the Greek region or in the world at the time through the system of the Delian League. A lot of resources became free through this dominance, and through this surplus of resources, the Athenians could relax in terms of warfare, and then subsequently create great cultural things like philosophy, theater, architectural achievements that are still visible today, and so on and so forth. But here too, of course, it all happened on the backs of all the subjugated and affiliated city-states, where this did not have to manifest itself, because they had to pay tribute to Athens. Another example would be the British Empire. Yes, in London, Big Ben is built, or, uh, this bridge, uh, over the Thames, all these beautiful buildings and so on and so forth. That is, of course, all on the backs of exploiting India, for example, and harnessing the entire empire to bring everything to this central point. And these are always the dynamics, that these great things, that the happiness, the joy, the beauty, is outweighed by much less suffering. So, it takes much more suffering to generate that little bit of beauty, that little bit of happiness, and that's how it is in our personal lives and in all matters. So, and this is actually the focus that we will now make, away from these big things like the Delian League, the British Empire, and so on, other examples will be the Roman Empire or the French central state, where Paris is this bloom, this beautiful flower, and that, of course, arose at the expense of the rest of France and so on and so forth, or the wolf pack and so on with the fawn, and away from that and towards how this manifests in our personal lives. Yes, this game, this Samsara. And going forward, it is important that we first understand that the whole thing works like Plato's Allegory of the Cave, which we already discussed, last week. And I would like to build on that directly, based on the Allegory of the Cave, because you already know it, because I have explained it exemplary, and use this model to explain this Eastern philosophy, this Buddhist philosophy, which is also connected to Schopenhauer. So, whoever likes Schopenhauer will also go into Schopenhauer and his essay on women in more detail during the livestream, because he is also very strongly inspired by Buddhism. Schopenhauer himself read all the Buddhist texts firsthand, and that was actually one of the foundations for his philosophy. So, one could say that Schopenhauer was the first German to understand Buddhism and bring these Buddhist ideas to Germany, to the German-speaking world. Exactly. Accordingly, one could say, yes, Samsara, this, uh, game that is being played, that is actually the overall concept, that is this whole thing, that is reality. But reality is veiled. We usually don't know, or those who don't watch the Sonnenwende livestreams, they don't know. But you are lucky enough to recognize what's going on here. Yes, this is us. We already discussed this, uh, when we looked at the Allegory of the Cave. And this is the illusion. This is the veil. What the veil is, we'll get to that in a moment. This is Maya. Maya is also a concept from Buddhism. We'll get to that in a moment too. This is enlightenment. This is Bodi, and I want to explain it to you within this concept. Yes, and specifically using the example of male-female dynamics, using the example of romance and love, and this lie under which we all live, and which is imposed on us by nature itself. Yes, this illusion that is presented to us. And it works like this, from this example, I said we will now shift the focus to all of our lives, uh, uh, that we make this simple example. Yes, as I have already explained, how the whole thing works with suffering and happiness and that this imbalance that arises, it is so that when I say that everyone understands rationally and you understand, yes, that's true. Life is actually, one must actually view it pessimistically, because it is more suffering than joy, and it is actually something, yes, terrible, something brutal, something very unjust, and things are not in balance, and one recognizes this, and one sees this, and understands this up to the point where a beautiful woman enters your life, and then you throw everything overboard, then suddenly everything doesn't matter anymore, and you participate in this game, then you can no longer steer yourself away from it with reason, because the strongest force that drives a man at all is his lust, and that is precisely this potential or this emotion, uh, where the man usually has the greatest difficulty controlling and mastering it. And that leads to several problems. Yes, so we have the man who has rationally recognized this, and then a woman enters his life, and then suddenly he starts exploiting other people. He starts, let's say, judging. He participates in the hunt. He kills other animals, other tribes are attacked, plundered, people are enslaved. And in our modern world, of course, it's like this, at work people are exploited. You will, we will also get to that, perhaps betray a good friend of yours, for a woman, or you will argue with your friend over a girl who enters your life, and so on and so forth. I know many such examples from my personal life that I have observed and experienced myself. And I think many of you probably know this too. [sniffles] And that's how it all works. So women make us play along in Samsara. Even if we have rationally recognized it, we throw everything overboard as soon as a beautiful woman enters our lives. And that is, of course, a problem, because that's how women draw us back into the Matrix. Yes, even if we are on the way out, it is women who slowly pull us back into the cave, into the state of captivity, and we then become wage slaves again, because we need money to be attractive to women and to provide for a family, etc., etc., to afford the house, the golden retriever, and the car, and to send the children to a good school, and so on and so forth, and have to participate in this, uh, sick game, in this modern economy, and so on, in this, uh, world, which many spiritual figures like, for example, Jesus or Zarathustra, who recognized this and separated themselves from the world. And especially with Jesus and Zarathustra, it is of course that they also renounced women, and therefore managed to break free from it. Exactly. And that's how one must understand the whole thing. Yes, women make us play along in Samsara. They create this illusion for us, and that is exactly what Buddhism says. There is Samsara, and then there is this entity called Maya. Maya is like a demon. That is, of course, a concept that one tries to, uh, capture this phenomenon, and that's why the Buddhists call it Maya. Perhaps one could say that in a Christian or Abrahamic context, it is the devil, depending on how you look at it. And Maya puts a veil in front of Samsara so that we don't recognize it, so that we cannot recognize the unjust brutality behind the reality of life. And how does that work? Yes, the woman is so beautiful, and this, uh, and this beautiful face, and these, uh, yes, sexual organs, and these things that are so interesting, yes, the beautiful breasts and so on, they completely enchant men and make them throw all reason overboard and actually renounce their inner philosophy, which is very brutal, because it throws them back into the Matrix. So, I hope this is understood up to this point, because it is very important, that women are actually the true carriers of Samsara, by holding this veil before Samsara, like Maya. This veil is this illusion that seduces us and deceives us. Yes, and that's how it all works. And what is the goal behind it? The goal is Maya is actually like nature, it stands for nature itself. And I will explain in a moment what that means at all. Me, we will go into the etymology of this word, which of course also comes from the Indo-Germanic context, because the whole Maya is actually like this, or nature wants us to have children. That is actually the, the, the reproductive command that nature imposes on us, to have children. That is the cycle of life, the cycle of life. And that's how Samsara works. Yes, that's how this circle works. You come into the world as, I'll say from the perspective of a young man, and at some point, when you are 12, 13, 14 years old, you develop something like a sexual drive, and from then on, your life is, uh, because from that moment on, your true focus in life, your central focus in life, is only women and only reproduction. Yes, I've said this before in a livestream. The true motive behind almost everything, or actually everything, that men do, is reproduction and sex. Yes, sex is actually, and that is the sad reality of our world, of our existence, the most important, or the only goal in life for most men, and in the life of all women. And accordingly, it all works like this, the education you get, you go to the gym, you try to build up a hustle, luxmaxing, the Chinese peptides you order to get ahead. All of that is only to acquire a woman and have children with her. Only so that she then gives you the children. She deceives you in her young years. We'll get to that in a moment too. You will have children, and your children in turn will also be 12, 13, 14 years old, and the whole circle will begin again from the start, and they too will be driven into this, into this meat grinder, into this mill of suffering. They will also have to meet this sexual pressure, uh, uh, in their lives, and so on and so forth. They will go to work, they will be exploited by their employer, uh, they might be drafted into the army and have to go to the front and die there, bleed out, because they are simply excess biomass. Uh, keyword of the last livestream we had yesterday. And that's how this whole system works, and women can only do that as long as they are young. Yes, that's what Schopenhauer teaches us in his essay on women, which I will go into in more detail afterwards, that it works like this, that women in their young years have the greatest power to seduce men, because they are still young and fertile and beautiful, and that attracts men extremely. That is actually the most important thing for a man. What is most important for a man in a woman is youth and fertility. And these things, of course, as soon as the woman has had her first child, as soon as she has gone through her first birth, and then of course later, when she enters menopause, she will no longer be beautiful. She will probably get fat and ugly and degenerate into this longhouse mother and will actually reveal her true nature. But then, of course, it's too late. Then you are already a father, uh, already married, already legally bound. Yes, if you want to divorce her, you will lose half of all your property, and you will probably not even see, uh, the children, because we live in a gynocentric system where even the legal system, keyword institutionalized female sexual strategy, will tear you apart. Yes, that is actually the true reality in which we live, and accordingly, the whole thing is an illusion, a trick. Yes, so nature, Maya, has created women in such a way that in these young years they can lead men to a long-term wrong decision and seduce them, trick them, so that they fall into this, uh, Samsara and play along in this game. And that, uh, plays out, repeats itself again and again. Generation after generation, this mill of suffering is driven. So, I hope everything is clear up to this point. I've said a lot and will now take a look at the chat and see what people are writing, whether they have already unmasked me as, uh, a bitter islander, uh, [laughter]. So. Felix H M5E asks: "Is the stream low cortisol?" We are always low cortisol, Felix. Uh, otherwise we're doing something wrong. R.K.763 writes: "We're swallowing the Samsara pill today." That's exactly how it is. We're swallowing the Samsara Schopenhauer Buddhism pill today. And not just today, but, uh, this will be a central theme in these livestreams, in this educational broadcast. That's why I already discussed the Allegory of the Cave with you so early, to introduce you a little to this concept, to look at the whole thing, so that this seed that is planted today falls on fertile ground for you. Siegfried Sammler writes: "Of course, the idea that life is more suffering than joy comes from India." Yes, how do you mean that? Uh, are you referring to the ethnicity of the Buddha? So, the Buddha, uh, came from an Aryan, uh, tribe, so from Indo-Germanic Europeans, and accordingly, very little, if any, uh, genetic relation to modern Indians, if that's what you're alluding to. Exactly. Here, Knorke, and so on, adds another good example of the great suffering and joy examples. He writes, if it's, uh, flag on the moon at the expense of the welfare state in the USA. Exactly. Pennies for the hungry, billions for space. That's how it is. Exactly. And Rellmark reminds you again, please write down the timestamps for clips. Thank you very much, Rellmark, for reminding people again. That is very important and correct. And Jakob writes: "Schopenhauer, very interesting philosopher. That's how it is." Good, I think everything is clear up to this point. Then we can continue. Exactly. So, we have already established, yes, if the man has grasped it with his rational mind, it is indeed the case that at the moment, as soon as a beautiful woman enters his life, he throws it all overboard, because he is subject to his impulses, because Maya has managed to trick him back into it through the woman. Yes, the woman is like Maya's tool and thus forces him back into the illusion, and that's how it all works. So, the whole thing leads to more children, more suffering, and the whole thing repeats itself again and again and again. And that's why the lives of most people on this planet are so miserable, and because they are subject to sexuality, their impulses. That is actually the reality behind the whole thing, the truth behind the veil. Yes, and our goal today is to lift this veil that Mara has hung before Samsara, or at least to make a small crack in the firmament and look through to what lies behind it, to the reality that lies behind it, away from here to here, away from the dark, earthbound, uh, maternal towards the paternal, bright daylight. Yes, that is the idea. And, uh, so, if we look at it like this, then the whole thing is actually just a trick, a huge lie. So, I think things like love, as we classically imagine it, as we have been programmed by pop music, Hollywood, and the media, that doesn't exist, of course. So, love is a lie, because it is not real. It is not real. We project things into it, especially men, women don't. They understand that much better. They are much more rational in that sense. Schopenhauer also says that. But men are very quick to mystify women and completely fall for Maya, and accordingly, the whole thing can also be viewed technically, yes, it's just happiness hormones in a body, dopamine or oxytocin and so on, which actually, uh, yes, drives men into it. Perhaps a very interesting detail, I briefly touched on it earlier, where it comes from. Maya, yes, this entity, this demon that does this, is etymologically related, uh, to the proto-Indo-European word for mother. So, Maya, Mutter, Modar, Mother, and so on. And that, in turn, is related to the word for matter, so Maya, mother, matter, materialism, the material world. That is a primal block. Yes, that's how one must also understand the longhouse, the longhouse mother, the earth mother, the fertility goddess. She is actually the true carrier of Samsara. Of course, the fertility goddess, the fat earth mother. In her young years, she was beautiful and attractive, and then she herself becomes a child-bearing machine and then shows her true face, uh, when she is, uh, no longer beautiful. And as soon as she is, of course, no longer beautiful, men recognize it, and then it's too late. Yes, one can perhaps imagine this like a post-nut clarity, perhaps something like that. Yes, post-nut clarity is like the moment, uh, after orgasm, when one can see through Samsara, because for a moment the sexual desire is satisfied, and one sees the world as it is for a moment, and then all the shame comes upon you, and that is actually the reality, and the goal must be that we are actually in a permanent state of post-nut clarity. That should actually be the ultimate goal. That's what I think the Buddha and Bodi understand. So, enlightenment in Buddhism, the philosophical truth is actually this eternal post-nut clarity. I hope that is understood. So. Yes. And that's how it works, because men project things into it. So, perhaps also regarding, uh, women in their, uh, youth. That is actually exactly what we also looked at in the past livestreams. Yes, women are beautiful in their youth, and if they can attract a man here, can get in here, they will then become mothers and so on, and then they will naturally lose their sexual market value, because they are then, of course, no longer beautiful, and here, of course, at the end of their 20s, they hit the wall, and then they are over, and then they enter menopause, and then it's totally over. And and the man, uh, is actually tricked into this. So, I don't want to tell you today that it's bad to start a family. Quite the opposite, we, especially in the West, due to the demographic situation, naturally need children to maintain our civilization. No question. I just want to give you this so that you look at the whole topic a bit more rationally and don't, uh, yes, blindly fall for women. I see so many such examples that end very tragically, because this is naturally a staged game, an illusion. Exactly. So, if we now go into Schopenhauer's essay on women, he also talks about exactly that. He mentions the so-called "bang effect" at the beginning of the essay. He says that with women, it's like this with a bang effect, that their entire potential lies in their young years, and then for the rest of their lives, they actually no longer have this potential, and accordingly, in this phase of their lives, they have the power to bind a man to themselves. And that's how societies work, and men are naturally so stupid and let themselves be led by this and enter into this, uh, covenant with women. Again, it's not, it's very good to start a family, then you have to do it right, especially with the right mindset, and not to elevate the woman to something she is not. Yes, because the woman loses her beauty very quickly after, at the latest after the first birth, and then it's over, and one should not, when choosing a woman, primarily focus on beauty, although that is also important for the genetic fitness of the children, but it is much more important for one's own well-being to look at other markers, because beauty is such a transient value. Yes, and women hate it when you point out to them that they will lose their beauty. It's a major stress factor in the lives of many women, and they will try by all means to, uh, remain beautiful and great for as long as possible, like these ghastly hacks running around, like Annabelle Schunke or something, who, [sniffles] still think they're young, but are of course already post-menopausal and gruesome, have no children, which is even worse. Imagine, a woman doesn't even use this potential in her young years to have children, but actually uses this time only to play with men and to move them back and forth like, uh, pawns on a chessboard, and to be courted and wooed. And that is also a point about, uh, female psychology or female self-preservation, that women rule indirectly, always indirectly, because women are the weaker sex in all respects than men. So, physically as well as cognitively, on average, women have evolved in such a way that they cannot rule directly. So, these examples are very rare, like, for example, Poetika among the, uh, British, or, uh, uh, Jearque among the French, and so on. These are very, uh, rare examples. Much more often, of course, it is the case that the woman rules over the man. Yes, so the queen, the king has his kingdom and is the, uh, the boss, the supreme alpha in the system. And his only weakness is, of course, his beautiful wife, who seduces him and thus influences the man through her physical attributes, and thus indirectly rules the entire kingdom, and that also works in marriages and so on and so forth. It is increasingly the case that in modern marriages, the woman wears the pants, as they say. And that is, of course, very often indirectly, so not that the woman, that a role reversal takes place, that the woman becomes the man and the man becomes the woman. That also happens very often. We can also get to that, perhaps even today, but much more often it's the case that the woman, through her charms, can make the man do what she wants. Yes, where a man, a man who will never bow to another man, who is the rebel, the doer, the big guy. But at home, he becomes weak when, uh, the woman lets her blouse fall. Yes, so Robi 9147 asks: "What is your stance on antinatalism?" Yes, I think I've already touched on that. I am not an antinatalist, but I am a rational natalist. Yes, so not to rush headlong into such a situation blindly, but always to remain reserved, to always view the whole thing from a distance, to look at Samsara from the outside and not to rush into it, not to be sucked into this vortex of Samsara and perish. That is always important, and that's what I want to convey to you. Then the Her Schriftzeichen here writes, your channel is like Survive the Chive in German? No, I hope not. So, I find Survive the Chive to be a cool YouTube channel, but it is of course so hyper-focused on this Indo-Germanic topic and what goes with it. But I think we need that only as a foundation, if at all, so we need to see what we can take away for our own lives and especially for the future. We can't, uh, keep messing around here and being entertained, learning history and so on. Of course, we need to know where we come from so that we know where we are going. Yes, that's not a question, but it's about much more than that. So, it doesn't do you any good to know everything about the Indo-Germans. And then, uh, uh, you are seduced by a woman, get married, and, uh, three years after you get married, three years into the marriage, plates are flying, uh, in the living room, and she threatens you with divorce if you don't, uh, you are blackmailed by her, so to speak. You are at a disadvantage and have to dance to her tune, otherwise she will take your children and your property. Accordingly, it is important that we look at more than just these early historical and ancestral topics. Early history and the Indo-Germans are, of course, important as a reference point, as a grounding point for how we should perhaps live or where we can orient ourselves, because these people had these modern problems, which I am also addressing here today, modern problems or actually timeless problems, much less.

because we will then go into that at the end of this livestream, how the situation looks today in the modern world and how we actually live in Samsara today in the age. So, www writes, I find inequality great, as long as I'm at the top. Yes, it's not about saying again: "Oh, we are in Samsara and um we are we are practically we are here and they are up there and and that is all so unfair and so, that's not true at all. I think we stand outside of that or that should be the goal, because this pyramid that we see here, that is society, that is the worldly level, that is the material level, the mother, Maya, nature. And we have to see to it that we stand outside of it, so that this pyramid is also related here again to the allegory of the cave. This pyramid is what is happening here inside the cave, but we have to stand outside of it. We have to get out of there and accordingly we don't play along with these hierarchies if we want to break out, if we want to achieve enlightenment. So. Barbaros asks: "Have you read Sidarta? I assume you're referring to Sidarta by Hermann Hesse." No, I haven't read this book yet, but I will tackle it. Probably still this year. Definitely. Mirrors Mind writes: "My girlfriend says I shouldn't watch you because of the feminism." But I'm doing it anyway. Yes. Uh [laughter] greetings to your girlfriend at this point and that's uh cool that you're still watching. One notices that you're not so trapped in Samsara after all. That's nice to see, nice to know. Yes, I hope you can take a few things with you today and let them flow into your personal relationship with your girlfriend. Stay vigilant and stay awake and don't let yourself be ridden into the illusion. YL asks, who do the moderns in India originate from? I already touched on that in the first livestream on this YouTube channel, but I can, if you want, also make a separate video about the Aryan invasion of India. No problem. If there is interest, you can just type it in, post it on our Discord server under video ideas. At this point, all those who are watching, definitely come onto the Discord server. So, Knorke und so writes: "I'm breaking through the veil by removing the like from the 'Therefore you have no girlfriend' video." Exactly, that's how it is, because you probably don't need that at all. You probably don't need a girlfriend at all. I talked about this yesterday with a good friend of mine, after the livestream. We talked about this topic, male friendships in general, and a separate livestream will follow soon, because as I've already said, love, love or this romance that is sold to us, the mythologization of women, that is a lie, that is a trick of Maya to draw us into Samsara. And accordingly, that doesn't exist at all, it's all just hormone-based, happiness hormone-based. True love can only exist within a male friendship, if at all. But as already touched upon earlier, many male friendships are also not real. They only work as long as a woman enters this triangle and then the competition begins. And this is something to overcome, especially. Because what is actually the real reason why many young men are looking for or want a girlfriend? It's not always primarily about the sexual aspect. but it's about needing someone to talk to. Yes, it's actually the case that in modern male friendships, relationships between men, the emotional aspect is completely taboo. So men like to talk about anything and everything, geopolitics, the solstices, livestreams, philosophy and so on, but are very reserved when it comes to talking about their own emotional situation, if there has been a setback or such problems arise. And accordingly, it is of course the case that because a false masculinity is lived today. A kind of crude wannabe masculinity, yes, football, drinking beer, we are the tough ones, we are Vikings and so on, blah blah blah, and everything that is emotional is dismissed as homosexual. And I think that's a mistake, because men need that too. Men also need to co-regulate their emotions. Yes, if you don't have a large enough vessel to hold the emotional intensity of life. Only very few people have that. Some have a larger vessel, like a glass. Yes. If this is already filled, perhaps with childhood traumas and workplace stress, and so on and so forth, and then something else is added, a setback, the father dies, for example, then this glass overflows and then there is an emotional crash. And to prevent this from happening, one must try to co-regulate these emotions. That means pouring it into another vessel, perhaps into this bottle. In this example, this would be you, and this would ideally be your best friend, and he can then take it. But because this is taboo, many young men, especially, seek a girlfriend to talk to her about such things. So, what happens now when you open up emotionally to a woman? Yes, women always say, modern women: "Yes, yes, men, be vulnerable, be emotional and so on and so forth." Doing that, keeping your emotions inside, that's toxic masculinity. And I even agree with these modern women on that, that's true. Only one shouldn't co-regulate it with a woman, but with male friends. And that's not possible because our society, I think also very deliberately and intentionally, has placed a taboo on this topic. Yes, here again, if we look at it in the allegory of the cave, then it is again one of these illusions, one of these programming under which we are, that as a man, so this false masculinity, this hypermasculinity, this menosphere crap that exists here, and the truth is actually that you have to do that with men so that you don't have to do it with a woman. And what happens when you let yourself be co-regulated by a woman? She says, of course, she finds it great, it's so cool and modern and so beautiful when the man is open and speaks openly about his emotions. But she will, of course, get the creeps, because she will then realize, after it has happened, oh dear, my boyfriend or my fiancé, my husband, he is weak, he is like a woman, he behaves like a woman. What is actually going on here? and she will very quickly lose attraction and will then start cheating or finding another man, start monkey branching. So and accordingly, it is important that you don't do that with your wife. That is actually homosexual, let's be honest. And and therefore it is all the more important that we, especially here in the Solstice community, start cultivating male friendship, true love in male friendship for all sorts of situations, especially when it comes to emotional co-regulation. Yes, important, important. So, I'll look at the chat again. Ysl asks: "How should one practically deal with this knowledge?" Yes, well, if I were to say it in one sentence, if I'm allowed to say it in one sentence, then it is: make sure that women are not the focus of your life. And that is the case for 99% of men, that women are the sole focus behind everything, behind every thing, even if it doesn't seem so at first glance, it's the woman behind it, yes, the Instagram page, the examples I've already mentioned, yes, the good job, going to the gym, yes, I go to the gym with my bro because we are gym bros. But I still hope that women will find me attractive if I have the musculature. I still hope that it will pay off and I'll get a piece of the pie. Yes. That a pretty girl will be interested in me. Yes, just take that out of the equation. Um Robi writes: "Should I break up with my girlfriend?" No, don't break up with your girlfriend. So, depending on how the situation looks, it might be necessary, but much more important than breaking up with your girlfriend is overcoming this Samsara, seeing things as they are, and that means in your specific case, for example, take the beauty of your girlfriend out of the equation. Treat your girlfriend as if she weren't pretty, but as if she were just another person in your life. Would you behave the same way? Would you love her the same? Or do you only love her for her beauty? Because that was a fatal mistake, because she will lose her beauty anyway, and then it's over, and is that even a true connection if you're only interested in the carnal? I dare to doubt it. So yes, here Robby, for you. Just take the beauty out of the equation. Rick Frick asks: "Are you gay?" Yes. Um, projection here? No, I think you didn't understand. Exactly, that's exactly the problem. Rickfrick, do you understand that you are the problem? People like you are exactly the problem that we have in our society. You are the reason why this system works at all, because as soon as someone presents solutions in this direction, the delegitimization starts. Yes. Ah, you're for male friendship. Ah, you're not for opening up to your girlfriend. So, you're against this and that, then you must be gay, of course. You just didn't understand. So, your comment is so profoundly intellectually homosexual. I don't know if you get that, but I think that's pretty much the gayest thing I've seen all day. Yes, but yes, super good. Someone writes Maxing to achieve post-not clarity, not at all. Not at all, because that's not sustainable. We will achieve the whole thing philosophically and spiritually, without touching each other at all. Yes, no Fap, we can also do a separate livestream about what that means. We can look at it from this Nietzschean perspective or perhaps from the perspective of Wilhelm Reich and what it means to reabsorb the seed into one's blood and create great things. I said at the beginning of the livestream today, we will cross the Hellespont, like Alexander with his Macedonians. And that is exactly what it means to take this unique step and not go back. And that, of course, is only possible if you have reabsorbed the seed into your blood. So it is all the more important anyway that you really think about the role of sexuality in your life and how you can get it under control and how you can free yourself from this slavery. Yes. Someone wants me to invite Gi Scott to the livestream? Yes, let's see. Maybe we will spend this summer in Italy and then it might be possible, depending on the circumstances. The good Rellmark sends a link into the chat. Exactly. Project Gutenberg, Arthur Schopenhauer's essay on women. Yes, that's homework, I'd like to mention that in passing. So, you definitely have to have read, studied, and marked that. I will quiz you on it in the next livestream, but we will go into it in more detail shortly anyway. IX asks, why does modernity, then, actually want the Western civilization in particular? So, modernity or rather the Western civilization, I think that's what you meant, to tell women in particular not to have children or to be independent. I've already answered that question. You see how everything is structured here according to a curriculum. Yes, it all makes sense. You just have to have watched the previous streams to answer the questions. I've already answered this question in the livestream Feminism, the Truth. Yes, the livestream where we ventured a look through the firmament, through the veil of Mara, for the first time or rather the second time on this YouTube channel. Pxo writes: "In antiquity, young men had to be forced into marriage because they preferred to go conquering. Therefore, the man also had such privileges in marriage up to the actual possession of the woman and children." Exactly, you have to understand that too. There's this meme nowadays: "What women think men want" and then there's this super-sexualized woman, and then "What men actually want" and then it's like, "Yeah, what men actually want is their family and the golden retriever and the two children and the woman who bakes apple pie," but that's the modern man, and the modern man is spiritually homosexual, because the ancient man, as Pako mentioned here, had to be forced into marriage, so in the Roman Republic, if I remember correctly, it was even taxed, so the bachelor life, yes, the life of a bachelor was taxed, because the Roman state had a problem. That was still during the Republic, I think. Piaxo, if you know the example, please correct me if this is wrong, during the Roman Republic, the Roman state, because young men had no interest in women, so in this domesticated life, yes, this broken, domestic, household life. They wanted to go out, they wanted adventure, they wanted to conquer territories, plunder things, they wanted to set sail on the high seas with messengers. The same applies to the Greeks, who colonized the entire Mediterranean region. They didn't want to marry the girl next door and have a happy life, happy wife, or vice versa, but they wanted to go out and take over the world, and the state had to prevent that. It went so far that they had to regulate it by law, because people weren't having children anymore, because they were all leaving, the young men, and seeking adventure in the world. Here again, the Bronage mindset, this Indo-Germanic, this inner hunger. And nowadays, male lust is greater than any hunger. But back then, when men were not yet intellectually homosexual, the hunger for land and power and expansion was greater than sexual desire. You can't even imagine that today, but think how great that was, because women were not mystified in this sense as they are today. The whole thing was actually a gradual process that took place. It might start with the medieval simps, the minnesingers, the Walters von der Vogelweide and so on, who sing about the "Holdenmid" and so on, and then continue through Romanticism until we reach the modern pop-cultural slop that is force-fed to us. Yes, very good comment from you. Thank you very much. Noame asks: "Is there a study on the statement that women are on average less intelligent than men?" Um, I don't know if I said that. I definitely said that, again, the IQ bell curve between women and men is different in the sense that the female curve is steeper and the male curve is flatter. That means you have many more losers, many more failures, prison inmates, junkies, incels living in their mother's basement, and many more CEOs, battalion commanders, and chess grandmasters like Bobby Fischer, and fewer midwits, and with women, you have very few total failures and very, very few highly gifted individuals and many women who are simply midwits in many respects, but especially in IQ, as for the whole thing, whether men, whether the male curve is above that of women, I can imagine that, of course, due to selection pressures, because, as we have already established here, men are selected much harder than women, because practically every woman who wants to can reproduce, but not every man who wants to can reproduce, so only the best men have historically made it through the gene pool. Yes, and now again. So that's the original state. Then came the Abrahamic religions or sexual communism, as I call it, the monogamous system, and now we are falling back into this original state. But because that has been the case for a much longer time, that was actually the selection pressure under which the genders have been subjected all along. And accordingly, men have evolved genetically more than women, because of course all women can reproduce, but only the best men. Yes, then came this pause where it was equal again, and now we are back here again, and in this phase, of course, it is the monogamous societal optimum, but that was never the case. So, so many women cheat and get the seed of the alpha man and then let the beta man hatch the cuckoo child, which also plays into this Samsara, yes, the alpha man is induced by this charming young woman to give his seed there. And the beta man is seduced by the same magical powers of Maya into the illusion that it is his child, even though it is not his child at all, and lives in this illusion, yes, I have my wife and my children, even though they are not his children at all, and lives there. Maybe they are simply the children of the neighbor, who is perhaps half a head taller and has a more positive Kentle tilt and so on and so forth. And accordingly, he too is tricked and will spend his whole life working, working hard, just to raise other people's children, and we are just as much victims of Samsara and haven't even fulfilled his biological imperative of reproduction. It's actually doubly brutal. Yes, brutal. So, then DT, one of the older viewers at 46 years old, writes, but thank you very much for your concrete theses. I can relate to so much, only I always lacked the theories, theses to articulate all of this. Yes. That's extremely interesting. So, I talk to all sorts of people. Yes, I'm an open person. I get into conversations with all sorts of people, and whenever I deal with older men in particular, I like to talk about their romantic lives from their youth to their older state of being. And I always notice the same stories, the same patterns, and I always see how what Schopenhauer and Buddha and so on have taught us is simply true, and how brutal this reality in which we live is, and how we are all lied to, and people say: "Yes, I'm divorced." I mean, 50% of marriages in the West end in divorce. Yes, look at the other 50% of marriages that are not divorced. How do these marriages work? Are marriages, yes, plates fly, or the man has been so beta-ized by the woman that she has lost all sexual attraction to him. There are very extreme examples. Yes, she has broken him so much because he is of course in a marital relationship, therefore vulnerable, dependent on her emotionally, but also legally, because we live in a gynocentric system. Yes, the BRD regime, but also the system in Switzerland and Austria and all of Europe and in the USA works the same way, that the woman always has the upper hand legally. Yes, women are always believed in all sorts of things. So, when it comes to divorce, but also when it comes to rape accusations and so on, the woman always has the upper hand, because the system is gynocentric, because we live in a gynocracy, in a female rule, back to the original state. We are back in the Neolithic longhouse. We are back in pre-Indo-Germanic conditions here, and accordingly, if you are in a marriage and have the shorter end of the stick, then the woman, even if she is already in menopause, even if she no longer has the tool of beauty that Maya has given her to draw men into Samsara. She is already, the flower has already wilted, she has gotten fat, has already given birth, but now of course it is all legally secured, and her family is there, and children, and accordingly, she has the upper hand and can put pressure on the man and can take away his edge, yes, break down his masculinity piece by piece and test him and test him and break him further until a point where she has broken him so much that she has lost all attraction to her own husband, and that can go so far that she banishes him from his own bedroom. Yes, that the man who built a house with all the rooms and the bedroom is banished from his own bedroom and then has to sleep with the dog in the hallway. Many such cases. So. Noame asks: "So does promiscuity make you unhappy?" Yes, why women are promiscuous, I have already explained. I will not go into that again today, just look at the past two streams on the topic, and men, only men up here can be promiscuous anyway. The others can't, because they don't have the options. So this man has unlocked all options. This one too, this one too, the others not. they can't afford it. And does that make you happy? Of course not. You will never find happiness. So, you will never be this dog here if you chase sex and women. That can only make you happy in the moment. That's actually the same as, I'll give a very brutal example. But, think seriously, what is actually the difference between masturbating to pornography and sex with contraceptives? Yes, sex with contraceptives is actually like masturbating with plastic on your penis. Do you understand that? It's actually the same. Neither leads to children, not to procreation, and it's actually like, no difference whether a hand does it or a sterilized vagina does it. Do you understand how sick and homosexual that all actually is? Actually, all relationships and all things you have with women that don't lead to children are actually homosexual, because they are sterile. And and yes, so have you ever thought, I'll take a short excursion as a food for thought, why homosexuality is a sin in Abrahamic religions, I don't presume to know what God was thinking. And yet I've had a good thought about it for a long time. And that is that sex between the same sex and also sex with animals and so on, sodomy and all that, does not lead to children. It's just sex for the sake of pleasure and not for the sake of reproduction. And that sex is only right in the eyes of God if it serves reproduction. And accordingly, alox that does not serve reproduction is a sin. And accordingly, masturbation, yes, that's already a topic in the Book of Genesis. Onan, who lets his seed fall to the ground, read that in the Bible, [sniff] masturbation or sex with contraceptives and all that is actually equivalent to homosexual sex. It's all exactly the same. It's just sex for pleasure and is therefore actually really bad, really deep in Samsara, really blinded in illusion and deceived and simply sick. So, the user with the Japanese characters writes: "I find it very brave of you to talk about these topics. Hats off." Yes, thank you. Look, we don't have time anymore not to talk about these topics. Everywhere I look, I see these problems. I see the same problems everywhere that I want to address on this YouTube channel. People don't know who their ancestors are, where they come from. That's one point. And then I look into all the relationships between the sexes and I see these problems everywhere, because people lack this mindset, because they lack Buddhism or Schopenhauer, or simply this Solstice pill. And that's why I definitely want to make up for that. Yes, because I am convinced that you deserve to experience these things. So, you have written many, many, many comments. I can't keep up at all. Discrepancy writes: "Video games are the only normie hobby that men don't do for women." You probably meant this comment humorously, but I think it's a central point. Schopenhauer also says that life is actually like a pendulum that swings back and forth between suffering, as we have already looked at with Samsara, all the examples, the wolf pack and the fawn and so on and so forth, and how women push us into it, and the pendulum then likes to swing into boredom, and it always goes back and forth between boredom and suffering, which is actually life in Schopenhauer's view. And the only thing outside of that is playfulness. So, when you play, it's like the only moment in life where you can feel it for a short moment. So playfulness can also manifest artistically, if you participate in poetry or music, so in this creative, in the creative sense, but also as a consumer or so that's why high culture is salvation at all, but only temporarily, only for a limited time out of this cycle, and playfulness, of course, when you play video games, then you return to this childlike state. This playfulness, which is incredibly beautiful and makes you forget everything. And exactly, you wrote it very well. I think you intended it that way, perhaps. I don't know. Video games are the only normie hobby that men don't do for women. Very correct. So, someone asks, I can't read your strange username combination of letters, but then he asks, problems in a relationship, better to max out and ignore or address? If addressing, how? So, I am not your relationship counselor, yes, I am giving you the philosophical foundations here. I don't know your relationship, but as a rule, this whole thing from these redpill people, saying, yes, you have to set the frame and you have to tell the woman, if you do this, then this will happen, and you have to say, these will be the consequences, and so on. That's all ridiculous. All ridiculous, because you're just playing along there too. You're giving energy to that, you're just putting more energy into this wheel, more water on the mill. Just ignore that bullshit and chase bigger things, yes, join the Solstice community and free Europe in Minecraft, or maybe in reality, depending on the circumstances. So. Felix asks if we can set up a separate channel for homework on Discord. I can give you homework if you want. Yes, [sniff] that's no problem. If you need that, then we'll do it that way. Hansrei Grenz writes: "I think sexuality/drive is a gift." Um, yes, I mean, it's part of human nature, because we are a sexually reproducing species. We are not robots that can reproduce in a factory or something, but a gift, depending on it, you can have many gifts. Yes, you say sexuality, drive is a gift. The Trojan Horse was also a gift from the Greeks to the Trojans. I'll put it that way. Mirror Mind asks: "Can the woman be the key instead of the trap?" Keyword Tantra/Energy Carrier? That's a very exciting question. I think we're too early for that. So, I understand what you're getting at, but we really have to stick to the basics today. What is Samsara? What does Buddha want to tell us? What does Schopenhauer say about it? Um, good question, but do me a favor and just message me on Discord via DMs and ask the question again, then I can take it up. Then I won't forget to include it in a future livestream. Very good question. Thank you very much. Here WW writes: "The bachelor tax was introduced by Augustus because they already had problems with the birth rate." Okay, then I'll correct that. That was not during the Roman Republic, but already in the imperial era. Thank you for this addition. Felix writes: "Walter von der Vogelweide is actually good because he didn't practice high Minne." Yes, of course, Walter von der Vogelweide practiced high Minne. perhaps not as much as other contemporary minnesingers. Personally, I only know the texts of Walter von der Vogelweide. I am not an expert in High German minnesang. Of course, it is a beautiful art form. No question, I love poetry anyway. Minnesang is also beautiful because it is again this playfulness and again offers an escape from this, as we have already said, Schopenhauer's pendulum between suffering and boredom, but of course, the whole thing must be enjoyed with caution. Yes, the dose makes the poison. So, Piaxo writes: "Married men, even in good marriages, live in constant terror and are dependent on the woman's goodwill so as not to lose everything at any moment." Yes, keyword Divorce Rape. Yes, that's exactly what I said earlier. Yes, and maybe because I'm a bit behind on the comments, you wrote it there too. That's possible. But that's exactly the point I meant, the systematic nature within marriage, the woman, the man who has the shorter end of the stick and the woman exploits it to her advantage and keeps beta-izing and breaking him down until she herself has lost all attraction and then destroys him, banishes him from her own marital bed, and he then is basically just the cash cow, yes, the house pig, who has to go to work and earn money to finance the family vacation in Tuscany and perhaps a Mini Cooper for the lady of the house. So. Now I've finally caught up. Shaman Bra writes in English: "To bear witness to the feminine soul without recoil without realizing rationalizing is the task of the warrior of spirit. He who cannot hold her storm without collapsing into it is unfit to climb the mountain. Yes. Indeed. Shamanbra, can you please also write where this is from? I'd be curious, because I think I've heard this before. But exactly, so whoever can hold this storm of the woman, this woman is a force of nature. Yes, many, many men don't understand this. Men often think, you hear it often, yes, marriage is a tool to civilize the man, but it's actually the opposite. The ancient Greeks understood this early on. It's not the man who is civilized by marriage, but it is the

Woman, who is civilized by the bond of marriage, is kept in check and strengthened. [snort] Because, uh, yes, the man, because, because the woman is a force of nature, she is actually this, as you wrote here in English, I think it's a quote: "He who cannot hold her storm without collapsing into it." To collapse into the storm. Yes, that is the storm, that is the whirlpool and to collapse in here. Whoever manages not to fall into that. Um, only then can one climb the mountain. Yes, then Analytics Synthetic writes. Mishima wrote in essence in defense of our culture that he is not Myogin, but only sees women as they were seen before. That is also my view of women. Yes, I have not read this text by Mishima. I don't like these terms. So, uh, Myogin and so on. These are all propagandistic bullshit terms that are thrown around to keep people in Samsara. Oh yes, don't escape. Just stay in. If you step out of line, then you are a bad guy and so on. That's not what it's about for me. I don't care about all that. Do you understand? I don't care about all these ideological terms. I am not a feminist, not a masculinist, not this or that. I am only interested in the truth. And if I see truth somewhere, if I look into Buddhism and see aspects there that are simply true, that is simply true. Full stop, then we take that on and process it, and accordingly, I reject it entirely. I would also encourage you not to use such terms at all, because they are simply bullshit terms, enemy terms of the carriers of the Matrix. Pure coincidence asks: "Moin." Yes, moin, moin. What do you do outside of YouTube that you have this intellect at such a young age? Yes, well. So this intellect and so on and so forth, I don't think so. Um, I am simply a curious young man. I go through life with open eyes and have now dared to take the step to get in touch with you and contribute what I know. Above all, however, I want you to get involved and to be able to give me things as well. Because just as I have recognized many things, I am convinced that many of you have recognized things that I myself have not yet recognized. Accordingly, I would like to encourage you to come to the Discord community so that we can exchange ideas there in the voice chat and in other channels, so that you can share your ideas with us, so that we can together, as I already said when we looked at the parable of the height, it is a common process. Yes, we are here. We have to overcome this together. Yes, it will be difficult alone, because an individual does not have a monopoly on wisdom. I am convinced of that. Relmark writes: "Reminder, please switch from Topchat to Livechat above." Yes, so that you can see everything. Timestamps for clips, please write them down. Yes, please write them down if you find good timestamps. Thank you, Rellmark. So, good, then I will now look into my notes again and connect back to the beginning, so that we all understand this now. Yes, Samsara is this um, yes, how could one best describe it in one word, perhaps Samsara is the operating system under which our society operates and within this Samsara, that is exactly what is running. Yes, so like a huge ritual that takes place, like a human sacrifice to Baal. Can you imagine that? Yes, children are conceived and, like in the old rituals, these children are then sacrificed to Baal, thrown into this meat grinder? It needs more suffering, more blood, more human lives to be thrown into this mill to keep this system running, because nature, Maya, this primal force, yes, nature doesn't give a damn how much you suffer, how much people suffer, it doesn't matter. So, the show must go on. This thing must keep running. We need more children, more meat for the meat grinder. That's how the system works, and as already mentioned, women are the enablers for this system. That's just how it is. And men are also like that, it's not about, oh, shifting all the responsibility onto women, because women are just women, they exist. They can't help it that they are women, because I would actually say that the responsibility must actually be shared, perhaps even fifty-fifty. And this is not about assigning blame to anyone. It's always the men who are also so weak and fall for it. And we are all here, especially young men and also older men, as we established earlier, who are listening here. We must show this strength in order not to be part of the problem. And only then can we break this cycle, break this wheel of life and, so to speak, if we look at it metaphysically, come into Nirvana or simply stand outside the system, like this dog that is not here somewhere in a stage of Samsara, but is simply outside of it and look at him, how happy and content he is. Uh, that's how we must become. That is actually the idea. The whole thing must go in this direction. Um, medium and long term. Yes. And [snort] accordingly, yes, it is important not to look for blame. Yes, who bears how much guilt for anything? That's all ridiculous. And yes, one must also recognize, so we have now looked at the male side, but women suffer just as much under this system. Yes, they are actually just as much as the tool, as the man becomes the tool of the woman, so the woman is the tool of Maya and thus the veil of Samsara, and for her, of course, she has the bloom in her youth, but of course, over her whole life, she has far fewer happy, joyful years than a man. Yes, because her bloom withers quite quickly, while the man, whose, yes, sexual market value, but also self-confidence, is not based on beauty, but on other values, such as, yes, am I a conqueror? Am I someone who attacks life or not? Status and so on, he will naturally have a longer life in joy, although he doesn't have it at the beginning. But this life in joy can, of course, be destroyed by this long-house mother, whom he might import into his life when she was not yet fat and hideous. So. Exactly. So here again, what Schopenhauer says in his essay on women. Rellmark has shared the link with you. He calls it this bang effect. Yes, for women, this bang is at the beginning of their lives, around their early twenties, and then the air is out. So for men, it's much longer. So Schopenhauer himself says in his essay, that the noble takes longer to mature. I think that's how he articulates it. Yes, and nowadays the situation is actually that Samsara no longer necessarily functions in such a way that men are tricked by women into marriage, but the whole thing is increasingly taking place on a digital level. Yes, so we have all these phenomena like Only Fans or pornography, internet pornography anyway, where actually exactly the same neurons are activated, the same happiness hormones are released as in a real interpersonal sexual relationship, but nothing comes of it. Yes, and these men are also enslaved there, yes, brought into subscription models and so on and so forth. a very grim reality and yes, and they then begin, the man who was actually destined to conquer the world with his young friends, to plot, to go out, to seek adventure, to start a company or to conquer Pacific islands, he is bound there and becomes a sim and a servant and is harnessed there, and nowadays it's all the more sad when it works in the digital world. That's the peak of the nut pastry in Switzerland. Yes, the peak of the nut pastry. Madness, wild. So good, then I will take a look into the chat and afterwards we will answer an interesting viewer question that I received on Discord. So, definitely stay tuned if you want to see that too. Um, Bennet writes: "A channel in Discord for literature suggestions (homework) would be cool." Yes, please, I can't note that down now. Just write it in Discord and then I can look at it after the livestream today. Rellmark is pointing people to it. After every stream, there is a conversation in voice chat. So, feel free to join the Discord server to speak with Sonnenwender afterwards. Exactly. Come to Discord, Rellmark has shared the link, and otherwise you will find the link for the Discord channel and for my other social media channels. Even if you go to my YouTube channel page, you will find these links provided in the channel description. So, Felix asks: "Isn't man civilized by woman in the Epic of Gilgamesh?" Um, yes, if I remember correctly, the Epic of Gilgamesh is also one of those levels where, um, Gilgamesh and his friend kill a snake, right? That is also again the archetype of the snake killer, dragon slayer, myth, for those who don't know it yet, I recommend a look at the second half of the Indo-Germanic livestream, so the first livestream on this YouTube channel. PXO asks, but how do we reconcile leaving Samsara with having children? That's a good question. Very good question. Um, yes, how should something like that work? How should something like that work? As already said, definitely have children. That is important. The most important thing for most people, you need a very good excuse, if I may say so, not to have children, because that is actually what is currently lacking in Western civilization. Important. I think one can already bridge this gap. One doesn't have to become a fundamentalist or fanatical in this direction like the great philosophers, so I think Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, the Greeks and so on, they all had no children, or Jesus or Zarathustra or so. One doesn't have to retreat to the mountains for 10 years or go into the desert for 30 days and so on and so forth, but we also live in this material world. We are indeed bound in this matter, in Maya, Samsara. Everything that surrounds me is matter, is material. The means by which I can communicate with you are of a material nature. So in some way we are also dependent on all of this. We cannot completely remove ourselves from it, and accordingly, how it relates to having children, as I already touched upon earlier. I think it is simply important to always have this distance to romantic partnership. One can or should definitely enter into a relationship with a woman, but only when one is emotionally strong enough to endure something like that. Yes, something like that is not easy to approach. Yes, women will test you, will play all sorts of games with you, and if you are not strong enough within yourself, do not show this self-confidence, then you will perish from it, then you will break under this pressure. Accordingly, it is important that one finds oneself as a man first. Of course, many young men make this mistake, that they enter into a relationship with a woman too early and then their hearts are broken because they have brought all these mistakes, this immaturity into the relationship, let themselves be emotionally manipulated by the woman, instead of with their friends, as one should actually do, as I explained earlier, there will be a whole livestream on that in the future. And if you then throw yourself head over heels into it, yes, into this whirlpool of Samsara, then the woman will tear you apart. So, she will destroy you, and the woman will show you exactly where your weaknesses lie, and she will break your heart. She will cheat, or yes, she will cheat first and then she will break up with you and then switch to the new guy, monkey branch and so on and so forth. So here, a topic we already had in the last stream, so with the orbiters and so on. A woman always has these beta orbiters surrounding her, and she never lacks options. Yes, so a woman will always have options, but or that is actually what men want. So a woman can always have an option, but men then not. And accordingly, it is important that [snort] yes, you show this strength, otherwise your spirit will be broken, and oh, she cheated with Chad, and then you will lie in bed and cry, and in this moment, in this brokenness, it is actually the best moment one can have in life, because then you are at the very bottom, very grounded, and there are men who learn from it, hallelujah. How beautiful. And there are men who don't learn from it. So, I have also met men who are now approaching 90 years old, they are divorced twice and are still chasing women. That is, of course, something, it is to learn from the mistakes of others. So, for example, listening to Sonnenwender when you are young, when you are 15, 16, 17 years old, then you have drawn the golden lot, so to speak. No lie, because if you know these things, you save yourself a lot of suffering in life. This information, the information that I am conveying to you today, is worth several thousand euros. Perhaps half a million euros, depending on how much the divorce will cost you financially. Keyword 50% of marriages end in divorce, or all the effort that goes into a relationship, also financial, temporal, energy, which then goes to nothing because nothing comes of it and so on and so forth. That is very important. Accordingly, it is naturally pathetic if one has already had these experiences oneself. So, it is one thing to learn from the mistakes of others, it is one thing to learn from one's own mistakes, most people do that, including myself, and it is another thing not to even learn from one's own mistakes and to make the mistake twice, for example, to be divorced twice and then still chase women after the second divorce because one is such a low being in spirit, yes, such a degenerate, spiritually degenerate being. a very sad reality, in which, however, the majority of men are unfortunately trapped. Yes, perhaps many of you too. That is no shame if one recognizes it and works on it, then it is no shame. Then it is beautiful and gratifying if one gets out of it. Yes, so to address Piaxo's question again, yes, definitely have children. This can be reconciled with having children. Just maintain this healthy distance when you are in it, when you are not yet solidified in your patriarchal strength, within yourself, in the core. That must be right, that thing must be solid, otherwise, the catastrophe, the fiasco is pre-programmed, the flying saucers and the "I never loved you" exclamations. So, then Rellmark writes: "The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower it comes to maturity. Man hardly reaches the maturity of his reason and mental faculties before the age of 28, from Schopenhauer's On Women." Very correct, that's what I meant earlier. when I said that the noble thing needs longer to mature. That is the corresponding quote, and I think Schopenhauer says before or after that woman reaches her maturity earlier, namely at the age of 18. And yet, of course, it is not the same maturity as in men. So, Schopenhauer says in this incredibly misogynistic text, from which I naturally distance myself, that women actually remain children throughout their lives. Yes, so the maturity of women is also to be understood differently than that of men. So, then Piaxo replies to Rellmark: "So, we don't need to worry about finding a woman until then." About looking for a woman. Exactly. So, exactly. Yes, anyway. Very good point, dear Piaxo, in addition to this quote from Schopenhauer's essay. So, exactly, if man, according to Schopenhauer, only reaches maturity around the age of 28, so that will take a few more years for me, then that is exactly what I mentioned earlier, when I was asked earlier, when should one enter into a relationship at all, or how can it be reconciled? Yes, exactly. So, I would also say, wait and see, because look, women have this biological pressure, yes? Women become infertile very quickly. So the egg cells, that is a limited pool from which she draws every month. And that eventually runs out, starting around the age of 30, complications with births, weak and sick children being born, and then at the latest from the age of 35 and upwards, she becomes very quickly infertile. For men, it's different. So, I have an uncle who was over 50, and he became a father again. So, no problem. Hey, if you are men, no pressure, no stress. I think or it is simply also proven here that a man's bloom comes much later in his life. So, if you believe this chart, which I wouldn't fully support, I would say that the peak sexual market value of a man is actually a bit earlier, but here it's primarily about maturity and not just sexual market value. According to Schopenhauer, it's around the age of 28, so around here for men, and the whole thing is simply later for men and much longer-term and more sustainable. Unlike the bang effect, as Schopenhauer calls it, for women. Yes, and a very good, very good point, dear Rellmark, exactly from this quote, and then yes, Piaxo, who says we should worry about women later. I also think yes, because anyway, young men have no pressure, no stress. You can also marry a 20-year-old at 30, if you want to, if you then, of course, age is not always equivalent to maturity. There are of course many men, especially in our modern times, who are still children in their heads at 30. Many such cases, who never really grow up, never learn to stand on their own two feet, but yes, the earlier you do this, the earlier you go out into the world, gather these impressions, mature, break on women, break on challenges, the sooner you will reach this maturity and the sooner you will be ready. It's like in the Indo-Germanic tribal warrior dynamics, the men's association, the young men between 12 and 17 years old who are expelled from the tribe for a period of one year or longer. Later also, keyword Sparta and Helotenjagd, or in the Persians and Germans, there are examples of these young men who have to band together like a wolf pack and go out into the world and then come back, and after they have gathered experiences in the world, after they have strengthened their masculinity within themselves, are no longer little boys, but have become men, then they can return to the tribe and then take care of these matters of reproduction and so on, and until then, it should not be a topic at all. Yes, so use your youth, and that is also something I tell myself now, use your youth to build things that are sustainable. Yes, in the situation we are all in, our entire continent is in freefall, yes, it is actually racing towards a wall at 200 km/h. We should use our youth, our strongest years, to prevent this fiasco or to generate alternative escape options, and not get lost in Samsara during these years. So, there is still time for that. Yes, as Schopenhauer says, it should not be a topic before the age of 28. So. The user with the Japanese characters asks, should one even try to save a civilization that is doomed to inevitable destruction? Look, that question goes beyond the scope of this livestream, but I can tease it a bit. If we have these two worldviews, yes, overall explanatory approaches, worldviews, the cyclical view of the world and the linear view of the world, so cyclical, the classical pagan or that is also cyclical, death and rebirth, renewal, or linear, as materialists or Christians imagine it, that it all starts with Adam and Eve. Then comes the progression, the flood, King David, Jesus, the end times, the thousand-year kingdom. So, and then is the reign of Christ, or as communists imagine it, that here is inequality, which is brought into the world by the Indo-Germans, and then in the end, yes, according to the Frankfurt School, we all lie on the meadow and can observe clouds and dedicate ourselves to leisure all day long, because we live in an egalitarian, genderless society. That is the linear view of history, and the cyclical is this classical pagan, but also Hindu, which has the same origin, as you already learned in the first livestream on the Indo-Germans on this channel, that these cycles repeat themselves and we are trapped in these civilizational cycles. So, in Hinduism, one knows the concept of Yugas, yes, Satya Yuga and so on. Currently, we are in Kali Yuga, so Gold, Silver, Bronze, Iron, and then comes the renewal, so from Iron back to Bronze, Silver, and then back to the Golden, the Olympian, the Hyperborean age. I think that's too fatalistic. I think that's all cope. Yes, you can, I don't believe in it. I don't believe in this cyclical theory per se. On this YouTube channel, we will look at astrotheology, astrological ages, and how these myths influence the earth and so on. We will look at all of that, we will look at all of that. Only I think we are making it too easy for ourselves to say, yes, okay. So, this is the decline of the West here, keyword Spengler. And yes, we can't do anything anymore. So, it's best if we all stay home and play Minecraft all day. and make jokes on Discord. No, I don't think so. So, I do think so, I am not such a determinist that I think something like free will exists and and we are subject to the will anyway, and I am actually more and more convinced that the linear view of history is the right one, and that we are now, like a huge test, a huge collective competition test, just as feminism is a collective shit test, this condition in which the West finds itself is a huge test, a selection event, a bottleneck, through which our civilization is being pressed. And accordingly, I am very convinced that we must try. So, we must at least try. We, the children of Europe, must take our destiny into our own hands. So, it will not be given to us. I am convinced that the Lord God will help us. But we must tackle it ourselves. We cannot just say, yes, yes, the Lord God will sort it out, we will have to sort it out ourselves. But everyone helps us. You have to imagine, they are all our ancestors, they are watching us. If I look at my ancestors, they are all our ancestors, they are watching us. If I look at my ancestral line, all my ancestors, they are looking at my family, for example, and they probably see me above all, because I am the only one who still stands up for their interests or for what they have built, to carry it on. And it is probably the same for most people who are watching here, their ancestors, our ancestors, the ancestors of Europe and so on. That was a promise. They did all of that only under the promise that it would be carried on. Now, however, the current society, the current regime, does not uphold the heritage of the ancestors, quite the contrary, it actively destroys it, denies our history and destroys everything, and above all, interrupts the bloodline through anti-natalism, under-settlement migration, and yes, of course, we are the only ones who are still acting in the interest of our ancestors. Accordingly, they are there, they surround us and help us in our daily lives. And that may be an abstract thought, but I am convinced of it. I have so much luck in my life. That may be a private insight, but I always have luck. I have a lot of luck in my life. I get out of all situations unscathed where other people would simply, yes, draw the short straw. And I really attribute that to divine providence now. I attribute that to it, and I actually see in it the proof that we are fighting for what is right and true, and we must hold on to that, definitely, because as long as we are used as tools for this will, as long as we act as tools of God on earth and do not follow our own paths or lower interests, sexual lusts or whatever, but pursue this pure divine instinct for truth. There is no higher religion than truth itself. As long as that is the case, things will go well. We just have to orient ourselves to it again and again. Accordingly, I am definitely convinced that our civilization can be saved. We will not be able to turn back the clock 150 years, but as it is, there are many, many actually beautiful stories historically. I find, for example, the history of the Jewish people to be very inspiring. They had their homeland in the Levant in Israel, were then taken into captivity, into Babylonian captivity, and then expelled by the Romans and so on, and then went into diaspora, and after 2000 years they got their homeland back. I say this without judgment, I don't like to talk about Israel and Palestine. Political topics don't interest me. It's not about whether it's just or whether the Israelis are right against the Palestinians or who owns this land. None of that interests me. What interests me is the message of this story, that even when it seems over, it is not over. Because what we carry within us, our blood, that is the heritage of our ancestors. So, that is this spirit. this Indo-Germanic, this Faustian spirit that always strives forward, and that cannot simply be eradicated. They can pack as much propaganda as they want into our heads. It will still shine through. This light breaks through nonetheless. And that is actually the great hope. And I naturally think that if we stick with it, if we fight seriously and don't just lie around lazily, yes, for myself, if I really try hard and try to livestream every day or every other day, then we are all doing our part so that we don't just stand by idly and our ancestors and the Lord God will reward us, definitely. The gym is being discussed here. I will not go into it now because I have lost the whole thread, but yes, then Schaman Bra writes: Carl Gustav Jung. Man and woman do not complete each other. They only meet as whole when they no longer seek each other in the other. Exactly. Very good point. Ah, very good comment. Thank you. So, Shamanbra had written this quote in English earlier. I will try to read it again. I'm reading now. To bear witness to the feminine soul without recoil, without rationalizing is the task of the warrior of spirit. He who cannot hold her storm without collapsing into it unfit to climb the mountain. Yes. And then he writes, exactly, this is from Carl Gustav Jung, very good, a compatriot of mine and Shamanbra's, and accordingly interesting, yes, so man and woman, this idea of we are two halves, yes, it's like Ying and Yang and we complement each other and she is my soulmate, that is all Samsara programming, that is all lies, cope, bullshit that is being peddled to you by women, media, and this whole system and apparatus of Maya, because the truth is actually that man and woman can only work if both are whole. Yes, so a woman who is not whole is also a huge problem. She will become incredibly clingy and will start to love bomb you and try to flee into the man. So women can become victims of this just as much as men. Of course, it's interesting. For women, it works differently because they are not enchanted by men in the same way that men are enchanted by women. Exactly. But a very good comment. I will really read it again. Think about what he is writing here. Yes, so according to Carl Gustav Jung, man and woman do not complete each other, they only meet as whole when they no longer seek each other in the other. Exactly. Yes. We also need to address Carl Gustav Jung in a livestream. Yes, I will orient myself. I have already listened to many things about it and even started reading the book Iron, which is not directly related to this self-discovery, but I will definitely prepare that for you as well, to provide you with this psychoanalytic insight into the whole topic. Hans Ri Grenz writes: "The Bhagavad Gita says one must do one's duty, regardless of the result. Exactly. And yet, if one does one's duty completely and does it with cleverness and dynamism, as we are doing here, then the result will be fruitful. I can promise you that. WW writes: "What the ancestors uphold is also Samsara, isn't it?" Yes, but as I said, so what did you think I was going to tell you, um, let yourselves all be castrated so that you lose your sex drive and then we just give up our people genetically, so that we are then redeemed and so on. That is also not a solution. So, we do live in this reality despite everything. We cannot break out of this material reality with such insane measures. The lesson we must draw from it is also not for some it may be the right thing.

to say that we, like the Buddha or like Schopenhauer or like Jesus, opt out of this reproduction game. But for the majority of people, that is of course still the right thing, but one must have understood these aspects. It's just about knowing what's going on, yes, because it's a difference whether you dance along, spin along in Samsara, or whether you simply sink into the vortex and get plates thrown at your head by your wife in the evening. Yes, uh, a big difference there. Piaxo writes that one can connect cyclical theory with linear theory. It's a spiral that turns upwards, but can also stagnate or even spin downwards. In itself, however, the good above is a very good comment. I've never thought about that before. Let's talk about it on Discord. Message me in the DMs and then we can really discuss this idea of upwards, yes, the connection of the linear and the cyclical is essentially the spiral that moves upwards. A very interesting thought. Does it come from you or did you read it somewhere? Yes, let's discuss this bilaterally. Very interesting. The Analytics Synthetic writes to me that it's too theological. Yes, well. So, this is not theology. We are still in philosophy here. So, exactly. Hans Rei Grenz writes: "Ride the Tiger." Exactly, one must ride the tiger. One can play along in Samsara again, as I said, it's a difference whether you dance along or get caught in the vortex. Plates thrown at your head and this dancing along, that could best be described by riding the tiger. Yes, that's a concept from India, a metaphor, that the only way a fighter, a warrior, can defeat a tiger, because no warrior, not even a Swiss soldier, could defeat a tiger in single combat, but the only way to defeat the tiger is to throw yourself onto the tiger, to hold on to the back of the tiger's head, where it cannot bite you, because it cannot reach there, because its mouth is attached to its head, and then to ride along with the tiger, it turns its rounds, yes, here it turns its rounds, the tiger, the wife or whatever, those actors in life who want to pull you into Samsara, and at the moment when the tiger has completed its rounds and is out of breath, very tired, then you let go and then you take the tiger's bit and tear it apart, rip its jaw off and let it bleed out, and that's how you defeat the tiger. That is this concept from India, riding the tiger. So, exactly, that is actually a very good metaphor that fits how one manages to bridge the gap between Samsara and the hermit's life. Exactly. Barbaros asks: "Isn't justice also a Germanic virtue?" Schopenhauer says in his essay on women that justice is a masculine virtue and explains it accordingly. So, if that interests you, take a look. Good, so we will now slowly come to an end, because the stream has already been going on for over 2 hours. Time has passed quite quickly. I will briefly read through the last questions. Um, someone asks about mixed heritage, what that means. Yes, just write that in Discord, then I can address it next time, because before we come to an end, I will address a question that I received on Discord. Exactly. Will you also generally address Jung? You've already briefly mentioned it. Yes, we will address Carl Gustav Jung, but for that we first need to lay the groundwork. But it's all coming. Don't worry, you just need to stay tuned, watch the livestreams, take notes, write down timestamps, and share them on Discord and recommend these livestreams to your friends and family, young men between the ages of 15 and 21 and everything in between and outside, so that they get the tools to ride the tiger. Do you know the concept of Jung's over-father? Of course, I know it. Good, good. Wonderful. Then we will address this viewer question. So you see, you can simply ask me questions on Discord or here in the YouTube comments, and I will gladly address them, and if I consider them interesting for everyone, then I will also address these questions here on stream. And here the uh, size, strength, and unity on Discord asks. I actually wanted to ask you a question a few days ago regarding your opinion on CLV, i.e., Clevicula. You claimed that women who have had more than one sexual partner are useless, which is objectively true. However, you simultaneously portray Clavicula as a cool guy or rather someone, a being, who has been portrayed as a mega-figure. Whose behavior has been portrayed as mega-figure? There was a typo. Now, it is the case that Clav has sex with two women a day, and is obviously contradicting himself if some guys want as many women as possible, yet reject women with a body count over one. So, I hope you understand the question, and it's a good question. Yes, what role does Clavicula play? When I return to Samsara, then of course, Clav belongs to these actors. Clav is a livestreamer on Kick and he livestreams every day. Probably even at this moment, while this livestream is taking place, and he seduces many women who already have a boyfriend. That's his thing. These are actually the clips that go viral. Some woman is with him in a club, they make out or she comes home with him, and all of that is livestreamed, and all the incels and chats in the livestream chat then try to find out on Pim Ey and other AI search platforms who this woman, this young lady is, who is accompanying Clavicula, and then they find out, find photos of her on Instagram and so on with her boyfriend, for example, and then such dynamics emerge, and of course, it's not good. Yes, CL, I would say, sexually works through the entire mass of young women, if you understand what I mean, I'm not allowed to speak so sexually here in this livestream, but he is actually destroying all these women because he is giving them all a +1 on their body count, and they will then actually all become emotionally unavailable for marriage and a stable, functioning relationship in the future with the next man, who might be less good-looking, have less status, have less money than Clav. Accordingly, that is of course problematic, but I think the benefit and the harm of CLV is that the benefit is much greater, because CL livestreams it to thousands of people, the clips go viral, millions see it, and millions see how women actually function, and thus Clav is actually, and I would go as far as to say, after the solstice, although Clav has more reach than me, he is actually the greatest disenchanter, the lifter of the veil from the Samsara of our time. Because with every livestream, with every time he takes a woman away from another guy like that, he is actually doing that screwed-up guy a huge favor, because he is personally opening his eyes on stream in front of thousands of people that his girlfriend never loved him and that love is not real, but that it's all just a trick of nature, of Maya, to bring us into this Samsara. And Clav is thus actually a, yes, like a prophet, one who speaks the unpleasant truths through his actions. Yes, so a fascinating character, and accordingly, yes, of course, if you weigh it up, he does cause a lot of harm, but because he makes the harm publicly visible, even more people wake up. Yes, I think Clav actually plays the ball to me. Yes, Clav is actually one of the many proofs. I am actually relying on everything you observe around you to prove that I am right about this topic. And Clav is another building block on which the, the solstice foundation is built, because Clav also irrefutably proves that I am right. So, good, then that's it for today's livestream. Uh, thank you very much for listening to educational broadcast number 1 in the DACH region. We'll see each other shortly on the Discord server, in the voice chat, if you wish. Uh, remember, as already mentioned, if you have written down the timestamps, to refine them cleanly after the stream, what is the starting point, what is the endpoint, so that we can clip it and spread this message, reach more young men, and avert the damage where we can, or bring the damaged ones onto the right track, and not let them continue to spin in this Samsara cycle. Also remember to check out the other social media platforms, Instagram and TikTok. There I repost edits and clips of other people about me, and in the next few days, stream clips from myself will also follow. So, be sure to stay tuned. Good, yes, all links can be found in my channel description, and we'll see you tomorrow for the next stream. Thank you.