Transcription
Well, hello there. How are you doing? Had a lot of fun in live stream last night.
It's uh, telling a story about uh, my renter that left. I can't tell it here, but if you come to live stream, I can tell you. It's it's really very, very funny. Very funny. Kind of unbelievable, but it's totally believable because I could never make up something like that. How are you doing? I hope you don't hear like a light humming noise in the background. I'm charging up a large uh, lithium battery with a charger and the little fan on it running.
I'm going to do a video on the codeex of the universe. It's like been one of the busiest weeks of my life. Really busy. Someone actually gave me a a thing of uh, this foam that you shape. It didn't turn out all that well, and it basically never dries. You know, it was supposed to take 48 hours to dry, but uh, it never dried. It kind of got semi-dry. It's making a Taurus and hyperbooid conjugate system. Um, a negative image of a Taurus is a hyperbooid and vice versa. Didn't turn out all that well. But of course, I've never used that uh, foam stuff. Just wanted to show people the three-dimensional geometry of the uh, conjugate diagram of the entire universe. You can actually also too see that in Charles Proteius Steinmet's diagram, electrical discharges, waves, and impulses.
I have to simplify things basically to the maximum possible. There's only so many steps you can simplify something until you bring it to the level where you've uh, completely cut off everything that would define what it is you're talking about. It's just can't do it. Certain level you reach, can't like only so many things you could take off a car before you make it unsafe and/or unreliable, and other things you take out the creature comforts, and same is true of explaining the universe. This is that diagram too, by the way. This is the uh, cross-section of the Taurus and the hyperbooid superimposed over one another, and they always sit 90 degrees with respect to one another so far as their vectors.
I need to explain cathode and anode, force and inertia, gravity, all fields, and absolutely everything, which of course is the codeex of the universe. I posted a video link to a professor teaching a college course, and it's really very funny. I like to give a synopsis of it, and he does a quote uh, from Richard Feynman. By the way, the funniest video you could ever see. There's like a 100 copies of it on YouTube, and just type in Feynman Explains magnetism, and you know he's sitting in a highback chair and the guy asks him what magnetism is, and he wiggles and squirms and of course he never explains anything, and he talks about an old lady slipping on the ice and never explains anything, but the people and it's a belief system. Quantum is a belief system, and this video is not about quantum. If you believe in something, if you have uh, half a mind at all, you can say, "Well, that's completely irrational and I didn't answer any questions and didn't explain anything." But if you're in that belief system, everything is not to be questioned. And of course, anything that's not to be questioned is the facto belief system.
This is a great one from Feynman 2. He says anybody who claims to understand quantum theory is either lying or cray cray, which is accurate, but uh, I get countless questions and people that actually believe in quantum, and it is just a belief system, and they'll pop in they'll say what about the quantum of this, what about the quantum of that, and of course uh, I posted on my substack a one-page deconstruction of quantum, it doesn't mean anything, and trust me this video is not about quantum, you should see that video I posted on Facebook of the college professor and he's talking to a bunch of students and the class is going to be about uh, quantum mechanics and he says I got good news and bad news. He says the bad news is that quantum is very hard to follow intuitively. He says the good news is is that nobody can follow it intuitively, and uh, then he quotes Feynman who accurately said nobody can understand quantum because nobody does because it's not a thing. There's nothing in nature you can point to and say that's quantum. Absolutely nothing. That's not my opinion. That's a hardcore fact. Nobody can refute that. I put that to people for many years and nobody's ever, you know, tried to step up to the plate because they can't.
Uh, the professor goes on, he says, "Right now," and he's the professor, "I'm the only one who doesn't understand quantum mechanics." And then he says humorously but accurately he says but about seven days you won't understand it either. And he says once you don't understand it either, i.e. quantum mechanics, he said you can go off and spread your ignorance everywhere else. In other words, he's going to make sure you don't understand it either because you can't understand it. And it's not like the face of God or some other sort of weird belief system abstraction. But quantum is a belief system. There's nothing rational about it. And there's nothing that is explainable. You can't understand it no matter how sharp your brain is. My brain is really sharp. It's not that I can't wrap my brain around what they're talking about. It's what they're talking about is completely irrational. They're talking about unicorns and leprechauns and things that don't exist.
I like to make things simple, rational, logical, and make sure that the center holds. And uh, in this short little video, I'm going to do that. I'm going to make it really, really simple. By the way, Walter Russell got a lot of stuff right. He's about 65% accurate. A book everybody should download or purchase. It's called The Universal One. Um, these are uh, there's a lot of things he didn't get. He never understood what a field was and he never explained a field. And that's not my opinion. That's a fact. I digitized his works and uh, he calls centripetal force which is totally upside down and backwards. Anything that's centripetal or towards zero or rest is the opposite of force. Force is expansive, but you know I can forgive him for that error, but 65% accurate is extremely high praise.
Um, well, there is a codeex of the universe, and it's really simple, and I I love the fact of quoting Einstein, but he's accurate just as a broken clock is right twice a day, says if you can't explain it to a barmaid then you yourself don't really understand it, and I can explain all this very simply to anybody and uh, all you have to do is turn their brain on, you know I'm not speaking some foreign language here, I'm not speaking coin Greek or poly or Sanskrit. And there is a codeex of fields. And of course, very simply, as I've said a million times, a field is an ether perturbation modality. And by the way, I have a description in the in the base of this video for all these field definitions and their explanation.
Light, as Nicola Tesla said, is just the soundwave of the ether, which is accurate. And all of quantum, and I'm not going to discuss quantum anymore because it's bunk, is based around, not my opinion, their own statement around what the nature of light is, but they have no idea what light is. They think it's a wave, a particle, wave-particle duality is traveling, it has a speed, and it's none of these things are true. Nicola Tesla accurately defined it as the ratio between elasticity and density of a medium, which is true of sound. Nothing emits sound, but we all think of a speed of sound, and we think sound is moving or being emitted. You know we're emitting sound when we talk, but we're not. We're creating a disturbance in the medium, and that of course is no different than what light is. Absolutely no different. Check out the conjugate diagram as I showed you of a Charles Proteius Steinmetz; that is the key or the clavvis of the entire universe, to keep it really simple, and that's what this video is about is to keep it very simple with very simple language and not to use a convoluted abstruse complicated words, is that everybody takes a shower, at least I hope so, and uh, the entire universe and simplex is a shower head with a drain in its center. Technically, it's a dual shower head and a dual drain. I mean, the water that comes out of the shower head is the same water that goes down the drain, but nobody takes a shower underneath the water going down the drain. They take a shower underneath the force, which is ex uh, expold expulsion of the water from the shower head uh, due to water pressure, and of course uh, gravity takes care of the draining water as it goes down the drain. So everything is either a drain or a shower head. This makes it really simple. The shower head would be analogous to magnetism. The drain would be analogous to the dielectric. Lightning would be the drain.
Um, gravity would be the drain. So-called magnetic attraction, which is not magnetism at all. This is ridiculous. The entirety of humanity ignorantly in its vast, vast ignorance thinks that there is uh, um, magnetic repulsion and magnetic attraction, and that's completely ludicrous. You can't have magnetism at the one in the same time both be centripetal and centrifugal. I said, well, you've said yourself many times that magnetism is a dielectric field, and that's true. I mean, ice is the field of cold water. They're both of course ultimately water, but uh, the entire entirety of the universe is explained by a drain or a shower head. Magnetism of course is the Taurus that blinks around matter. That blinking is called the Larmor frequency. It's literally the three-dimensional force vector of the loss of energy or inertia that we would call rest, right here. You can see actually at the center this hole at the center of this Taurus. It's kind of hard to hold it horizontally like that and see the hole. But I mean there's nothing there in the center. Everything that is out here that is force is zero. Everything that is dead center of the center is zero. And the hole itself of neither side of the polarity just like the hole in the ferro cell is zero. Ultimately, there's three zeros. There's the zero that's rest. There's the zero that's force, like the expanding balloon. And then there's the zero that appears to be the hole, which is increasing inertia and acceleration.
Explaining, you know, the positive side of a battery and the negative side of a battery, i.e. the cathode and the anode, becomes extremely simple. There's no such thing as a negative charge. Thankfully, Walter Russell goes after that. Nicola Tesla never did. Nobody else ever did that other than Walter Russell. He said to say negative charge is completely ridiculous. That's like uh, somebody ate all the pizza and they left the box and you open up the box and you say, "Well, there's negative pizza here." It's ridiculous. There's presence and there's absence.
Um, light of course is a blinking Taurus. But why is it blinking? I've talked about light being a coaxial circuit. But why is it blinking? Because it itself is not matter. Matter of course is a stationary blinking dynamo. All matter, whether it be hydrogen or any other atom, is just an electrostatic dynamo. It is blinking. Every branch of science, by the way, agrees on that. Enough matter eventually collapses in on itself because there is this inescapable conjugate geometry of the entire universe. Ignorant human beings call this collapsed matter a black hole. Human beings, us, we have no analog here on Earth for this specific field phenomena. It's the same reason why there's a larger black hole at the center. Looks like a black hole of a more powerful magnet like an N55 G instead of an N40. You dial up the power of the magnetic field, you're inextricably linked to to dialing up the rest power of that magnet. Magnetism is not governed around a magnet. Magnetism uh, the magnetic field around a magnet is not governed by magnetism. It's governed by the rest locus of that magnetic field which is the dielectric. This is the reason why a more powerful magnet has a smaller spatial field around it. Nature will tell you, if nature could talk because she's a simple chick, is that the smaller the space, the higher the capacitance. And capacitance is just a fancy word for power, for ether, for rest. Humans now, however, are not f uh uh amazed or fascinated by rest. We're fascinated by force. Nobody's fascinated by a softball-sized lump of plutonium. But everybody's fascinated by a million-degree mushroom cloud rising up and you know peeling the paint off of everything and you know vaporizing everything in a microsecond. Everybody's fascinated by that. But that's the impetency of energy. So matter, matter itself is the stationary blinking dynamo, and of course enough matter will eventually collapse in on itself.
Matter and light are one and the same thing. I reconciled that years ago. They're only distinguished from one another by the propagation barrier. The elasticity and density of the ether itself. When a certain capacitance is reached, you reach the barrier kind of like uh, everybody's like slapped their hand really quickly against uh, a flat plane of water or pool or something and it hurts. You know that squishy water that you can drop your hand through no problem. But if you hit it really fast, you actually encounter the surface tension of water. So you actually reach this barrier of uh, elasticity, and that of course is what fundamental matter is. So light and matter are only differentiated and distinguished by the propagation barrier which is reached, and that's several magnitudes above that of gamma radiation, which of course is also too light. Um, is the propagation barrier reached or not? Magnetism is the cathode. It is equal to force. This is analogous to the shower head. Gravity and matter are anodes. These are inertia. These are the drains also to so-called magnetic attraction. Uh, electrostatics is the same thing. Anode is uh, centration is energy and power. The cathode is decentration. I mean literally the toroidal field of magnetism is the decentration of energy. You see the volume of this Taurus actually has space. Space, by the way, I can explain space better than anybody ever has. Neither Kumar Swami nor Tesla nor Steinmetz nor Heaviside or Walter Russell explained space in very, very simple terms that anybody could wrap their brains around. I'll tell you exactly what space is. Space is a shadow of energy and potential is the negative image of pure potential. Well, what's a negative image of pure potential? Well, the inverse image of pure potential is pure impetency. The absence of potential, the absence of energy, the after effect of a divergent force vector. Well, magnetism is the three-dimensional force vector. And that volume of the Taurus is space. And space itself is a shadow of the ether. A shadow is not a thing at all. A shadow is an absence of light. Space is not a thing at all. Space is an absence of pure potential. Nicola Tesla railed on this endlessly against relativity. This idea of warp spacetime doesn't exist. Time is only a measure. Space is not a thing at all. We all think a shadow is the thing and we like to stand in it when it's really hot and sunny outside like, "Oh man, I feel so good standing in the shadow." You're standing in the absence of light. Well, we all think a shadow is a thing. And people think um space is a thing, but neither a shadow nor space is a thing. There is the best explanation in the entirety of human history of what space is. Very, very simple. The expression of anything is never the thing that it expresses. And you should really think about that one, by the way, and it's undeniable. The expression of anything is never the thing that it expresses. Magnetism is the expression of force of power through force because magnetism of course is the force vector, the three-dimensional force vector. Once again, magnetism is the expression of power through force. Motion and force is undeniably and rationally so the expression of power. The expanding cloud of the release of energy is zero. That's holographic. The draining cloud, the the loss of the uh, expenditure of that energy is accumulating, you know, like a bubble or a balloon shrinking down to nothing when you let the air out of it. Well, that's accumulating to zero, too. It's getting smaller and smaller, and eventually you're talking about a zero-point null at the absolute center. And the same is true of the expanding cloud whose center is nothing. If I hold this sideways slightly expanded, which is quite difficult, you see that there's nothing there. The volume itself is nothing. And the center of the absence of the donut or the Taurus is also too nothing. But these are three different nothings. Centripetal nothing kind of like the hole underneath the ferro cell. The expanding nothing which creates the volume or space which the impetency of energy. And there is the nothing at the center of that nothing which is rest. There's nothing there. Well, there's nothing there. Well, nothing is never ever to be confused with not a thing. And that's something most of humanity does not understand at all. Not even a little bit.
Let's explain fields uh, that everybody's familiar with and we've always wanted to know the answer to. Well, lightning is a ground, specifically a desaturation into counter-space. And by the way, one of the million proofs of the ether is the dendritic pattern of electrostatics. Also too, lightning. There's a reason why lightning discharges are dendritic. Also too called the Lichtenberg pattern. When people are hit by lightning, it creates this fern-like dendritic pattern. That specific pattern itself is one of countless proofs of the ether. The ether itself is not objective to have an objective proof of, but people want objective proof for something that is not objective by nature. That's like somebody looking for an objective proof of something that's not an object like the soul. This is the reason we have retroduction to figure out these great things. So-called magnetic attraction, which is not magnetism at all, is a ground. Electricity is a voltage and it seeks a ground. This makes explaining an electromagnet very easy. The dielectric is grounded out leaving the magnetic field. The center of gravity is ether or rest. Vector of gravity of course is always antispatial. And so-called gravity is always of course a vector towards ground, towards rest. If it's antispatial, it is either grounded or is in the process of grounding. And when I say grounding, I'm really not talking about anything more complex than the shower drain. Yeah. Magnetism and the dielectric. The water that comes out of the shower head, magnetism, and the water that goes down the drain towards rest. Don't take that analogy too far. We all know where the draining water goes back to the treatment plant and whatnot. But so we only have spatial and anti-spatial. People say there's multiple dimensions, but length, width, and depth are not different dimensions. They're different vectors of spatiality. Rest is a ground. Mother, Mother Nature doesn't complicate things like human beings love to do. Ground of course is zero, but it's also two potency. We can say there's only two dimensions, spatiality and anti-spatiality. But anti-spatiality is anti-dimensional. This is the dielectric. This is the dendritic desaturation to ground. This is the centripetal increasing inertian acceleration because everything is centrifugal, centripetal force and motion or inertian acceleration. But this is just the conjugate binary of the universe. And it's also too the clavus of the universe. This is undeniable. It's the codeex of the universe. So there's really only one dimension, dimensionality. The other vector is anti-dimensionality or anti-spatial. This is uh, enumerated by the dielectric, gravity, so-called magnetic attraction. It's all the same thing. Fools like to tell me and it is foolish that gravity doesn't exist. Well, the phenomena of gravity is obviously undeniable. We've all seen it a million times. But it's like saying a vacuum of something or a shadow of something doesn't exist. And this is superficially true, but the phenomena is noted by all, but gravity is not a field at all. It is an anti-field. I mean you can't say when you throw a ball up in the air which is expenditure of calories and uh, and uh, force or energy that once it loses that energy it starts to decelerate back towards the earth. I mean you can't say that's an anti-throw. Gravity is the opposite of a field. Gravity itself is not a field modality, but it is always an anti-spatial vector. So they're half right kind of, but more than half wrong really. You'll say gravity doesn't exist. Well, the phenomena does exist. And it's also too number one proof of the ether along with the dendritic pattern of lightning and electrostatic discharges.
This makes the universe really simple. You can explain this to anybody. Even somebody that's still in elementary level classes. They use simple objects like this to flux and uh, you know a rock and everybody understands the shower head and the drain. It's like what's the difference? The same water comes out of the shower heads, the same water that drains, right? Yep. Yep. Yep. We don't distinguish ice and water as anything different other than different temperature and pressure modalities of water like ice, water, and steam. Correct? Yep. Well, nature is this simple. All observed phenomena, even the ones that people think are complex like black holes, everything, lightning, magnetism, uh, the reconciliation of light and matter, because they're both the same thing. Nothing distinguishes one another other than the propagation barrier. And it's so important that people understand the smaller the space, the higher the capacitance. But the smaller the space because space is equal to impetency and impotency is the opposite of energy. Is that not the case? If something has no power, but we think big things have power. Big rocks, big this, big that. In the case of energy, it's the opposite. The smaller the space is, the higher the capacitance. That's true of light, uh, magnetic fields, dielectric. That there's another one of a million proofs of the ether. Did you know that the footprint or the volume if you will of gamma radiation, which is extremely powerful, is I can't remember the exact m magnitude of difference between it and like a low energy infrared radiation. You have many countless thousands of magnitudes smaller spatial footprint in the case of higher energy like gamma, x-ray than you do in low energy light like infrared or visible light, for example. Is your teacher ever taught you that uh, the more powerful something is when it regards energy of nature, the smaller it is? You were never taught that. I guarantee it. How important is that? It's incredibly important. I could teach this in a half a day with little demonstration models so that anybody could understand all the observed phenomena of the universe. What if you could shave countless years of mindless blather and reading garbage? You know, just like I I uh, I learned about the entire codeex of the universe in a half a day today. Did you really? I sure did. Really simple. I understood it. Everything I see now is explainable. Everything is either potency or impotency. Smaller the space, the higher the capacitance. The conjugate uh, geometry of the entire universe. It's the codeex of the entire cosmos. I understand what lightning is, electricity is. I understand what a ground is. I don't believe in multiple dimensions. There's dimensionality and anti-dimensionality. I understand constructive and destructive interference. This explains the double-slit experiment. It explains everything. There's no such thing as quantum in nature. That was dreamt up by fuzzy-haired old crackpots in academia. There's no such thing as as quantum. That's not my opinion. That's a fact. If this doesn't make it simple, then absolutely nothing makes it simple. Because nature is that simple. There's ratios and proportionalities in nature, but no math. Math is a concept dreamt up by men. There is no math in nature, and that's not my opinion, girlfriend. That is a fact.
I hope you like videos like this. Let me know. Any donation is always warmly welcome. I have descriptions and lots of free articles and also two sun tons of free articles on Substack. And uh, thank you so much for watching. Have a lovely day. It's really humid here. Been raining all day. I'm not a big fan of humidity. I don't know about you. Come into live stream. I'll tell you that story. You'll like it. It's really very funny.