Round 1 of Fantasy Football is WRONG

We are officially in June, and to celebrate being in June, we are going into our redraft first-round rankings. How the first round should be going right now. We think the first round is completely wrong, and we want to change it. A reminder for those of you guys that are getting into our redraft content. Our season pass, yes, our season pass didn't come out until late July, early August last year. It is out now, early edition. You're going to get access to all of our redraft content on the site from all of your favorite creators. Redraft rankings, redraft tools, start-sit rankings once we get through the regular season. Go check that out if you guys are interested. If you're redraft players, especially, and you're just kind of coming back to the scene at the beginning of June here, that will be, uh, loaded with content throughout the entire offseason. You'll get all the draft guides of all of us and so on.

So, Danny, let's get into the actual first-round rankings. Who do we think should be going off the board in what order? And we'll also kind of mention, like, where's the best spot to pick from and that kind of thing throughout this video.

Unequivocally, the best spot to pick from this year is the top two picks because you have these absolute wagon running backs, Bijan Robinson and Jahmyr Gibbs, in some order. You and I both have Jahmyr Gibbs one. A lot of people, including Underdog ADP right now, have Bijan Robinson one. Let's make the case for Gibbs over Bijan here.

Yeah, the case, uh, for Gibbs over Bijan is pretty simple. Both of them had very identical, I would describe, offseasons where the main, you know, thick running back behind them, sniping the goal-line carry, sniping some short-yardage carries. Well, guess what? Both of them are off those teams. Dameon Pierce now with the Houston Texans. Tyler Allgeier now with the Arizona Cardinals. Kind of what I fall back on is that the split that we have with Gibbs without Pierce is that of like legitimate Christian McCaffrey levels. Like 2019 McCaffrey, well, guess what? Gibbs, uh, Gibbs without Pierce is about that level on a point-per-game equity basis. When I'm looking at both these players, I think both of their ranges of outcomes is probably between 20 to 27 points per game is about where I'd have them. The difference here is that I am much more believing with the Lions offense than I am with the Falcons offense. I am a little bit higher than consensus when it comes to the Falcons offense. Like I do think it could be a passable unit. I believe in Stafansky. I do ultimately believe that how I view the quarterback situation last year versus this year is that I actually think it's a higher floor this year when we compare what Tua Tagovailoa has done in his career versus the post-Achilles Kirk Cousins plus the overall falling out of what we saw from Michael Penix. I have more question marks with the Falcons offense, even though I'm higher than consensus on them, but there's no question marks with the Lions offense. We know what it's going to look like. We trust Jared Goff. We know they're going to play indoors. And let's kick it off as well at the end there. If you're in week 17 with all the chips on the line, name a better offensive environment that game than Chicago versus Detroit.

You can't. You can't. And, uh, yeah, easiest schedule in football, as you made reference to. I'll pull it up really quick. Jahmyr Gibbs with and without Dameon Pierce in his career. These are career numbers. 2023 to 2025. 27.4 fantasy points per game.

Don't grow on trees.

Don't grow on trees. This is, like you said, name the season after him level production. If he were to put this up for a calendar year, again, you could point to, okay, they brought in Isaiah Pacheco, they brought in Brian Robinson. They're like downgrades of Allgeier and Pierce, respectively. Like, they're the same type of running back, but they're not going to be probably as big of a thorn in the side of Bijan and Gibbs. This is what it comes down to for me. It's simple projections here. Jahmyr Gibbs in his career. Let's go back to his his tab here. In Jamir Gibbs' career, he has scored 13, six, and 10 rushing touchdowns, five receiving touchdowns, four receiving touchdowns. Over the last two seasons, we have 38 total touchdowns from Jahmyr Gibbs. Bijan Robinson last year, the stat I like to bring up, Sean Tucker had more goal-line carries than him. Not that I think he's not going to get that work now, because I think he will. It's just how often are the Falcons going to be in the red zone versus the Lions in the red zone? If Jahmyr is getting all of that work that Dameon Pierce left behind, the ceiling here is like a 25 total touchdown season.

You, you want to call for this, Corey? The ceiling would be if you took James Cook's, uh, James Cook's rushing plus touchdown equity and combined it with eight chances receiving equity. Like that's what Jahmyr Gibbs is. Like it's, it's, it's a generational fantasy asset.

Yeah. And this is a decision I'm going to have to make. I have the first, a first overall pick in my home league this year. You guys are going to see me probably do the vlog again with all my buddies. I get this decision. I'm the one who has to decide. So, I am personally leaning with Jahmyr Gibbs at this point in time just because I feel all warm and cushy about the Detroit Lions offense. While Tua Tagovailoa and Michael Penix, like you said, you could maybe copium your way into it being a slightly better quarterback situation.

I do think it is.

And maybe it is. It's unequivocally worse than the Jared Goff-led Lions with the number one easiest strength of schedule in the league who play Chicago in week 17 and have what, 15 games indoors or whatever they usually have.

And Corey, another thing too, obviously, um, people were worried coming into the offseason. Oh, what are they going to do? Taylor Decker, he's not going to be back with the team. He ends up, he ends up retiring. They could have easily spent their first-round pick, you know, on another edge rusher or another linebacker with the uncertainty at the time. Obviously, they resigned Campbell, but they were uncertain at that time. There were some linebackers in that range. You know what they did with that first-round pick, Corey?

Uh, they went out and got a left tackle.

They refortified the offensive line. They know what their strength is. It's on offense and it's through Jahmyr Gibbs.

Yeah. And they also, if you get a bye with Jahmyr Gibbs, which you probably will because he's going to be that good, at Minnesota, you'll skip that game as well, which is nice, which we know last year in week 17 that completely unraveled the Detroit Lions offense and they were terrible in that game. So, um, yeah, Jamir Gibbs to to us, he's the 101 right now. Nothing to take away from Bijan Robinson. He's an absolute monster. The only real concern here is for me, I think Kevin Stafansky coming in is an upgrade schematically to his rushing upside and that kind of thing. I am a little curious how much Zack Robinson influenced the receiving versatility that say that Bijan showed. 103 targets, a lot of receiving work. Not that he won't get that number of targets, but will he be that efficient deployed around the formation, used in the slot? Like, that kind of stuff I am worried he might lose with Kevin Stafansky.

I'm curious, uh, can you add historical players? Like, can you search up Todd Gurley? Because I'm pretty sure seven for 79 for 820 is what 2017 Gurley put up almost exactly.

Um, Todd Gurley, I can't pull up his actual season, but again, the comps for these guys are just absurdly good. Like they're Christian McCaffrey 2019's in the range of outcomes. Todd Gurley 2017's in the range of outcomes. Ezekiel Elliott 2018's in the range of outcomes. Like these two guys, don't worry about what you get in round two, round three, round four, round five is like where's the best spot to pick from. You want these two guys on your team.

So it wasn't quite the same, but, um, Bijan was actually better. Uh, so early in that season, 64 catches for 788 yards and six touchdowns. The reason I pointed those comparisons is how often do you see a running back on that type of volume give you over 10 yards per reception? You don't.

No, you don't. These guys are these guys are elite, man. We don't spend any more time on them.

One thing I do want to see.

What's up?

One thing I do want to see, how is it split on the site? Because I know obviously we're Gibbs one, Bijan two guys, but like how did, how's it kind of divided here?

What are Mason and these guys doing? How? Okay. No, that was super. All right. It's split right either one or two. You and I and Fammy are two. Everybody else is one. And if I go to Jahmyr, I'm sure it's going to be the inverse, I would imagine. Um, but, yeah, everybody's one or two with all these guys.

That's how you make a tier. If those are the only two players and everybody's top two, it probably means the third overall pick isn't as good.

No, but good comp.

The third overall pick is a tier discrepancy. I don't think everybody will because I know like there's some very sharp minds out there doing projections and whatnot going like, it's Puka 103. Like I've seen people. Yeah, it's definitely Puka. It's definitely JSN, or it's even.

I have those two in this tier.

What about Christian McCaffrey? Like Christian McCaffrey is worthy of this pick. If we're redrafting what he did last year, like he absolutely would be going off the board here. So the reason I think it's Jamar Chase 103 because I do have him in a tier of his own as far as how the first round should go. I don't know why it's saying 104. I definitely. Oh, that's again 103. Everybody's got him 103 except for Zack. I'm assuming it's probably JSN that he has 103.

I, I, I'd be shocked if it wasn't Puka based off the conversations I've had with him.

Yeah. Jamar Chase at his age 25 season has now finished as a top 10 wide receiver in all seasons of his career. The only ones in which he's been downperforming, including last year when he had 19.6 points per game, are seasons in which Joe Burrow has been banged up or injured for significant times. So, as long as Joe Burrow stays healthy, Jamar Chase, last time we saw Joe Burrow fully healthy, triple crown winner. Huge, huge season in 2024, uh, 1,700 yards, 17 touchdowns. Like the eight touchdowns last year was a pretty big anomaly and it was largely due to the fact that Burrow wasn't out there.

For me personally, the reason why I view him kind of as the undebatable 103, again, I do have the other two receivers in his tier. Uh, I don't have him as a tier of his own, but I do think you're valid in saying that because when you look at it, uh, Jamar Chase in totality, checks every box. We know he's an elite talent. Arguably, you know, even if you're the lowest on him, he's like the wide receiver two or three in people's rankings. Like realistically, some people are going to have him one. Everybody's going to have him around that top three ranking in terms of in real life talent. Second, every season of his career, he's basically been a top five wide receiver in terms of points per game outside of his 2023 year, which again, what happened in 2023, Corey?

Joe Burrow got injured and missed most of the season.

So, you're looking at a guy who at his lowest when Joe Burrow's been on the field has been a 17.9 points per game, which was, oh, by the way, his rookie year. Aside from that, he's basically been 20 to 23 points per game. On top of that, Corey, how do we project the Cincinnati Bengals offense this year? I think even if somebody is pessimistic on them, when you combine the fact that their defense is going to give up points on the other end, when you combine the fact that they're a fast-paced offense, when you combine the fact that they are also going to throw the football a ton, they're going to be a top three passing offense, top five overall offense in the league.

They also have the third easiest schedule in football as well.

There's nothing to dislike about this. And oh, by the way, week 17, chips on the line in your fantasy leagues, probably going to be the highest scoring over, over under in the entire slate with Ravens versus Bengals. Yeah, probably. And when you, you kind of made reference to it in Jamar Chase's career with Joe Burrow on the field, a five-year sample size, he's a 20.6 point per game producing receiver, including his rookie season, including like just when Burrow's playing, he's a 20.6 point per game receiver, 9.97 targets per game, nearly scoring a touchdown per game as well. Like, he's an absolute monster when Joe Burrow's on the field. Nothing else to be said.

Um, let's move on to the next tier, which again I would say is like the second best spot to pick from of like if you're not going to get a top two pick, you're not going to get the third overall pick. Maybe even like you'd get Chase here potentially like if people are going to take other people over Jamar Chase, Jackson Smith-Njigba, Christian McCaffrey. We could probably start with Puka. Like I said, most of the projection bros are very high on Puka because when you project out the Rams offense, like they project as probably the highest scoring offense in football. Matthew Stafford coming off an MVP season, still playing at a super high level. One thing I will say with Puka is that the whole Matthew Stafford back stuff got swept under the rug throughout the season because he played the whole time, but that is a real concern still. I completely agree. So that is the reason why do you view him after Chase? Because when you look at the overall 2025 seasons, we were talking about Puka Nacua as possibly having the season named after him prior to his injury. Like you look at those game logs specifically, go to before the Baltimore game. Look at those finishes. Five, six, six, or sorry, 56, 515 in his first five games of the year. He obviously misses the or like gets hurt in the Baltimore game, misses the next game. And although he was very good to end the season, especially weeks 14 on, he ended up catching back into the groove. Like you do see between weeks 9 to 13 kind of like the ramp-up to get back to what he was early in the season. If he stays fully healthy, could we be looking at a guy who's a weekly top five receiver each and every week? Like, if he doesn't have that ramp-up period, are we talking about a 25-point per game type of season he's just coming off of where he's probably the 101 drafted off the board?

Yeah, absolutely. He could have easily had the Jamar Chase 2024. Well, I mean, he did honestly in points per game this year. Even despite what we're kind of nitpicking about his, uh, about his, you know, season, he still was an absolute monster. Like I took him in my home league at 109 over Nico Collins and over some of the guys in my league. Major Puka Nacua, and I was like, yeah, dude, Puka Nacua. Like the whole offseason before we bitched out and moved Justin Jefferson back ahead of him, we would have taken him over Justin Jefferson last year, who was like the 105, 106 off the board.

You know who also would have was Nathan. Nathan literally debated it on the clock and then see that's the one thing I have learned in fantasy is when your gut's telling you that there's a right pick and there's a wrong pick, but then you know, ah, but like this guy's ranked high in consensus, like I got to just trust my [ __ ] intuition. I got to just make the pick and not worry about it because I swear the picks that I regret most in my life are the ones that I make based off what other people think.

Exactly. Yeah. The, the only caveat I would put on that is make sure that that guy has also been a wide receiver one before because I tried to project Garrett Wilson over Justin Jefferson when he hadn't already done it. But Puka had already been.

A year too early for you. A year too early for you.

A year too early for me. But Puka had already been a top five finisher before. So it's not really the same situation. Anyways, Puka Nacua, what else is to be said here? He plays for the Rams. He's an MVP quarterback. He's literally a 10-plus target per game receiver. DeVonta Adams going to take away some red zone work from him, I guess, as a downtick. Like legitimately one of the best receivers in the league playing for an extension this year as well. So going to be heavily motivated.

Well, that's the thing. It's like the potential downside point in terms of why I would prefer Burrow. Again, this almost seems like a little like misguided in theory because you would think, oh well, Burrow actually has been the one missing games and Matthew Stafford, despite those concerns, played all 17 games, won MVP. Like in theory, just based off of that fact, you should have more concerns about Burrow. But at the end of the day, when I'm talking about a 30-year-old quarterback versus one that is nearing his 40s, like, yeah, I'm going to favor the 30-year-old quarterback saying more sustainably healthy, especially when the narrative coming into the offseason was, is Matthew Stafford going to be ready week one? Obviously, that ended up being a moot point. Was that ever going to disappear? I mean, they just drafted a quarterback in the first round, which I guess you can even say is, well, for Puka Nacua's, uh, case this year, the floor is higher because if Stafford were to go down, at least you have Simpson. But if Stafford were to go down, he's not a top four fantasy player to begin with.

Exactly. Yeah. So, Huganakua, whoever that, uh, that company that like put him in an echo chamber the entire offseason, I wonder what their stock is at after Stafford played the whole year and won an MVP. So, that's definitely an interesting conversation. But, uh, JSN versus Christian McCaffrey. I actually have JSN at 105 because we've been in lockstep to this point. We've had everybody ranked. You know, we have Gibbs 101, Bijan 102, Chase 103, Puka 104. You have JSN 105. I have JSN 106. And then I have McCaffrey 105. And I believe you have McCaffrey 106 as well. Do you have?

I have him in the tier with my 106. He's technically 108. We'll talk about McCaffrey in a second. Part of that is just.

So you don't have him 106 then?

I don't have him 106 because I am baking in a little bit of concern with the efficiency as a rusher we saw last year, but we'll talk about it.

All right. So JSN, um, offensive player of the year, apparently defensive, according to the NFL awards people. They sent him the wrong award. But, um, Jackson Smith-Njigba, monster season. I think what's most impressive about what he did is that the Seahawks offense was pretty run-heavy the entire season. They were one of the least pass-rate teams in the league. 36% target share. Monster, uh, 1793 receiving yards, 10 touchdowns. This is so narrative-y and so like guttalytics-y. I just don't think he'll be as good as he was last year. I think that the Shaheed being there the whole season, Cooper Kupp still being there and maybe commanding some targets, Tory Horton I like as a sleeper, the offense no longer having Walker and going to Price, a rookie running back. Like I just don't think the flow and dominant level that JSN was playing at is really that sustainable. I think he could still be a 1500-yard, 10-touchdown receiver, but he had 1,800 yards last year.

So my counterpoints would be like, I agree with you in totality that he definitely ran hot last year. Well, we're also talking about a guy that was at 3.71 yards per run. Oh, by the way, the only one that was higher was Puka Nacua. I, I actually, I know mid-season it was Puka. I'm curious, did Puka finish with a higher, higher yards per run than him?

Um, 3.71 and.

Puka.

Uh, what did Puka have?

3.78. So, it ended up being really close. Um.

So, like, we're talking about legitimately one of the three to five best talents at wide receiver, I think everybody would pretty much have consensus-wise, like talent-wise.

Yeah. I, I guess again, my only concern here is is Sam Darnold going to play at this level? Is JSN going to play at this level? And it felt like if you had JSN, every big play connected, every touchdown worked. There was no like regression as far as like, you know, missing plays and leaving them out on the field.

Sure. Again, like I didn't exactly finish there. Um, it worked out in totality from an efficiency perspective, but you also are losing the Super Bowl MVP, even though you're losing Clint Kubiak. Could we see potentially more receiving volume for him? Could we see potentially 33 to 35 pass attempts per game from Sam Darnold? Again, keep in mind, second year with Seattle, not as good of a running back core behind them. Different philosophical changes in terms of the offensive coordinator. Yeah, sure, Brian Flurry did come from the 49er scheme, but maybe he's more pass pro as opposed to what Clint Kubiak was. We saw the extreme of the extreme last year. Could we even get 50 to 75 more passing attempts in totality? And on top of that, I mean, we know how generational the Seahawks defense was. They're still going to be an awesome defense, don't get me wrong. But are they going to be as good as they were last year? There could be some natural regression baked in there. Teams kind of get the blueprint. Oh, this is what they want to do defensively. This is how they're going to utilize him and worry. Maybe we see them go from being the clear best defense to the fifth best defense. And if that's the case, you're getting maybe five to seven more pass attempts. We could see JSN offset maybe a lack of efficiency this year compared to last with just overall more volume. I actually think the opposite's going to happen. I think they're going to be even better this year on defense to be honest because even more he was a rookie last year. Like I, I think I think McDonald's a mad scientist. I think they're going to be really.

He's awesome. A Michigan fan. I know what he's about.

If you're the type of fantasy drafter that never wants to miss on their first-round pick, JSN's the pick for you. That's that's the way I look at it. I don't know if JSN's going to be that one or two.

What's a miss? 18 points per game.

Yeah, that's a miss.

Yeah, that's a miss for JSN. Like what Chase was last year was a miss, for example. Like that's, that's what I see for JSN. You're not going to miss on this pick, but I don't know if you're going to smash a 25-point per game receiver. That's, I guess my point. I think I mean, maybe the only right answer this year in first rounds is Bijan and Gibbs realistically. But I think that, uh, you know, if you hit on the next guy, you'll hit harder than you hit on JSN, I guess would be my point, because he was better last year in terms of.

100%. And you may as well pull him up on the screen because Mr. Christian McCaffrey was undeniably one of the most singular valuable pieces in fantasy. I mean, 24.51 points per game doesn't grow on trees. Unfortunately though, the downside risk is there because we saw when he averaged 24.46 points per game, he played four games the next year. And this has been a theme of McCaffrey's year or career, sorry. And I am a little bit worried with the fact that last time we saw him, he was coming off of a 5.4 yards per carry year and then got hurt. This year he'd be coming off a 3.9 yards per carry type of year. Obviously, we know when he's healthy, how good he is as a receiver. I mean, 129 targets, 102 receptions. Like, you just take his receiving stats and he's a wide receiver one. That's how valuable a healthy McCaffrey is. I guess my pessimism, and I don't really think it's necessarily pessimism because I have them in a tier with my number six and number seven overall player, but the reason I would take the in-prime wide receivers is that I'm a little bit more nervous in terms of the longevity here. I'm a little bit more nervous with the sample size that we've had where when he comes off of these huge workloads, is he going to be able to last the following year? He's 30 years old. His hamstrings aren't getting healthier and there is quietly more target competition, I would say, with San Francisco than there was last year. I don't care.

He's going to get targets. I'm not saying.

I literally don't care. I, I, I can make the argument that he's closer to Gibbs and Bijan than he is to JSN.

If he's healthy, he might be 101.

Yeah. Like, 'cause he was better than them last year. And.

Evans, Purdy, all those guys being out on the field. I just think it helps McCaffrey. I, I honestly do. I think it just means more red zone opportunities.

I'm not betting against Christian McCaffrey anymore until Christian McCaffrey is out of the NFL. I'm going to keep drafting him because I am sick of playing the game of will he, won't he fall off in fantasy football. I'm done. I, at 105, he goes off the board, um, at 107. So as long as I'm a little bit ahead of ADP on him, I'm going to have a crap ton of exposure to him. If you're in a home league situation where you have to pick him 105, 106, and his ADP is 107. Let me ask you this question. Do you want to win your league or do you want to come in fourth place in your league? Because to me, JSN is fourth place in your league. Christian McCaffrey is winning your league. And S proved last year that if you're bold enough to do it, then you can win one of the highest viewed, most competitive fantasy leagues on the market. So, I am going to be very comfortable taking Christian McCaffrey.

Famous last words. He might play three games next year, but I will live with that decision.

So, let me ask you though, do you not think the run-out that he had last year in terms of all the 49ers pass catchers going down definitely didn't work out for him?

It did. It did. But I, I think whatever, let's say he loses 15, 20 targets from what he had last year because of the 49ers pass catchers going down, he'll make up for it with three or four touchdowns for Evans being out there and drawing as much attention as he does in the red zone.

Maybe. But also 311 carries is literally even more than what he saw in 2023. Is he going to have another 300-plus carry year at 31 years old knowing that he was less than four yards per carry last season? Like.

I hope he goes back to Germany or whatever the hell he did last year because whatever it was worked. It's like the biggest workload of his career. Christian McCaffrey, the MMO on him is risk tolerance because obviously if he plays 16, 17 games, you probably got the biggest steal in your draft, but if he plays four games, you got the biggest [ __ ] loss in the entire draft. Like he is so volatile in that range of outcome. Like you could either get the biggest league winner or the biggest league loser and there's no in between. There's no.

I actually hope he doesn't get 311 carries for what it's worth. Hope career high for him at 29 years old coming off a season in which he only played four games.

Exactly. So when I'm looking at McCaffrey, like realistically, if we knew in crystal ball, like, oh, he would play 17 games, everybody in their mother would take him off the board with the first overall pick.

But isn't that what we're projecting for everybody when we take them off the board in the first round?

Sure. But there is more sample size of Christian McCaffrey failing in that regard because we do have three season-ending injuries in the last six years. If he stays healthy, you're getting a top two player. If he doesn't stay healthy, then guess what? You're not getting that trade value back on the market.

So essentially what you're saying is it's a coin flip that I'll get a league winner. I think I'll take those odds.

Which is why I think mid-first round is about the way to appropriate it because again, if he was playing, he'd be the 101, but if he's not playing, he's not worth anything. Like.

It's very polarizing. I'm sure a lot of people in the comments right now are going to be like, "How do you guys have McCaffrey so high?" And the other half are going to be like, "How do you guys have McCaffrey so low?" Like, there's never a right answer for where to rank McCaffrey. Ultimately, the only right answer is where do you feel comfortable taking on that risk?

Yeah, the only person who has the answer is the crystal ball people who are from the future. That's pretty much it.

So, um, the next tier of players I think we can all agree is a pretty significant down tier to the next group in my opinion. I would much rather have JSN, McCaffrey, etc. You said you have McCaffrey in this tier. Um, our consensus 107 is Amon-Ra.

They're tied, right?

We have, let's take a look at where we both have them. I have them 109, you have them 111. And I guess it's.

Oh, whoops. Uh, let's go back to that. Uh, in 2026, I have him 107, you have them 107. Okay, I guess we both have him 107, like you said. So.

Amon-Ra St. Brown, again, very similar to Jackson Smith-Njigba, is the type of player that you take if you don't want to lose your fantasy league because he is pretty as safe as it gets. Just like Jamir Gibbs, easiest schedule in the league, lots of dome games, you know, 25-year-old wide receiver, 26-year-old wide receiver, sorry, who is going into his age 27 season who projects for another 17 to 20 points per game like he always produces pretty much.

Yeah. And if you go to the career, I mean, it's very simple. You want a guy that's going to score between 18 to 21 points per game, click Amon-Ra St. Brown's name.

Yeah. And I guess the strategy of picking near the tail end of the board is going to be, do you want to swing for the fences and, you know, go after, like, let's say a Jalen Wright or a Bijan, or somebody who's like a little bit more unproven, or do you want to swing for two doubles and go, I'm going to take Amon-Ra and Saquon Barkley and I'm going to feel really comfortable with my start, or I'm going to take Amon-Ra and, you know, De'Von Achane, who's been a consistent running back one in his career, and I'm going to feel good about my start. It's really going to all depend, or maybe you want to mix and match strategies. Maybe take St. Brown with one of your picks and Achane with your other pick or something like that.

Yeah, ultimately here with Amon-Ra. On top of that, I mentioned the game environment week 17. In totality, sure, he's probably more of a get on base, hit a double, maybe a triple if he gets up to the 20 to 21 point per game range. But in a one-week setting, if you are able to get to your championship and you're getting that Chicago Bears game on the schedule, you're feeling pretty damn good. Because we mentioned with Jamir Gibbs, this Lions schedule is shaping up to be one of the best in the league. Yeah, I, I would argue that he is a triple, not a double. I, I don't want to use the word double for for a moment right now.

Well, in relation to top eight to 10 picks because realistically like, like we're not talking about the whole field because obviously like when we go a little deeper.

If you think about a 19-point per game producer out of a top 12, like any first-rounder, that's a triple outcome in my opinion.

Fair. Like I would argue like the, the, the, the home runs would be like what McCaffrey did last year, what we project Bijan and Gibbs to do this year, what Chase did in 2024, what Lamb did in 2023. Like to me that's what a home run is. So yeah, between 18 to 21 points per game, I would view as a two or a three or two bases or three bases.

Anyways, let's keep it going here. CeeDee Lamb, the next player that we have.

He's more of a swing than Amon-Ra in my opinion.

He is more of a swing. Yeah, like you have him at 106. I have him at 108. Um.

15 and 16. Come on, guys.

Yeah, I risk tolerance wise, I understand putting him over over McCaffrey. I'm personally just never going to select CeeDee Lamb over Christian McCaffrey myself.

Yeah.

Um, CeeDee has one major concern really, and that's, you know, second-team All-Pro receiver George Pickens, um, eating into his target share. I think even people who are lower on Lamb would probably agree that he wasn't the player that he should have been last year and nobody's really concerned about an ability standpoint of him being that player again in 2026. The only concern that some people have is like, okay, in his best seasons, he had like close to a 30% target share. In 2023, that's like the, the only season in which CeeDee Lamb's been a 20-point per game producer and not just like a 17 and a half point per game producer. He needed to be the guy. He needed to be first-team All-Pro, getting all the targets, getting all the volume, and I think it's very reasonable to argue that he won't do that with George Pickens on the field. He won't have a 30% target share.

Which again, I would counter back a little bit when we look at the game logs from last year. Um, first of all, took a little bit in terms of, uh, ramping back up to his role after the injury. Like we saw, you know, eight and 10 targets, obviously very good, but realistically, we needed to see him get back to that pre-injury level, and I don't necessarily think got to see that because again, once the mid-season portion hit, the Cowboys kind of realized how bad their defense was. There were multiple games in that stretch where he was pulled off the field. The offense didn't even play in the late third quarter, early fourth quarter on, like the Denver game is one that I speak of, uh, specifically. And on top of that as well, in terms of the points per game, is we also have the Lions game factored in there on a 46% snap rate. I was at that game. He literally got hurt the first play of the second half. So, a lot of people are just going to blindly quote his points per game without contextualizing that A, it was after a high ankle sprain, and B, there were multiple instances where he didn't play the full game. Not to mention C, when you look at the overall involvement in the offense, he was still the alpha over Pickens even despite dealing with a high ankle sprain. If we're going into this year and on top of that, you're getting a player that maybe doesn't drop four or five guaranteed touchdowns, who's to say he can't back get back up to that 20-plus point per game range. And obviously, I'm more of a glass half full guy because I believe in the player. I believe in the offense. I ultimately think if Dak is able to stay healthy, this is a top three to five passing offense in the league. A guy that can threaten for 4,500 yards and 35 touchdowns. And realistically, when it comes to George Pickens, we talk about this all the time. We don't downgrade Jamar Chase because of T. Higgins. I kind of view CeeDee Lamb as a worse Jamar Chase and George Pickens as a slightly better T. Higgins in that capacity. Yeah, I think with that being said, I do project Lamb for more of an 18 to 20 point per game season than what I project for Jamar Chase because like you said, you know.

Chase is my 103. I agree with you.

Yeah. I, so obviously you said that the Lions game and that's not taken out of this sample, but he did score 18.1 fantasy points before he left that game. So it's not like it's ruining his game logs to include it. So.

Two and three, but also like that was like the, everybody had him like as a top two or three receiver in that week. Like what if he had the 35-point game? That could have very well been there.

That's fair. Like 27% target share is what he had when him and Pickens were both healthy on the field. Removing those games he left early in other than the Lions game, um, you have a 27% target share give or take. And that's probably when I do my projections for the Cowboys about what I'm going to give him give or take. So I think that generally, if you're looking for a reason to take CeeDee Lamb, it's probably because you don't want to miss on your pick and he's a great receiver, a top three to five talent in the position, and you know the Cowboys are going to project for a top five to 10 scoring unit and probably top five in pass rate as well. So we're looking at a situation where, yeah, there's another guy there, but the other thing could happen too. George Pickens could go down for five games like CeeDee Lamb did last year and CeeDee Lamb could have 22 points per game because in the games that George Pickens is out, he produces 27 points per game in those games. And that's another very good point and why I think like people are just looking at what happened last year between Amon-Ra and Lamb and, you know, they're, they're going to favor Amon-Ra because you see the overall points per game compared to Lamb's 14.35 doesn't look as good as over 18, but I would argue that it ran out very well for Amon-Ra last year. You do lose LaPorta midway through the year. Uh, on top of that, in the first 8 to 10 weeks, Jameson Williams wasn't really a factor. Like, you didn't really see CeeDee Lamb benefit from that. And on top of that, like I said, how many times were we both watching Cowboys games and CeeDee Lamb was wide open down the field and just dropped the football? How many times that he had a walk? That's what I mean. Like, if that gets back up to, I'm not saying it's going to get back up to 12, maybe with Pickens there, but if it can get back up to the 8 to 10 range, like we're talking about a guy that can easily bounce back on a point per game perspective. Like people are kind of overstating the quote unquote fall off of Lamb just simply looking off of points per game without contextualizing it.

Yeah, he's going off the board as like the 109 right now. I have him at 108. You have him at 106. Again, I think 106 is a little bit too high, but 108, 109 is I'm very comfortable taking him in that range.

Um, we could probably move on to Jonathan Taylor who, as we documented in the video we did last week, we are a little bit lower on because his ADP is consistently around that like 106, 107. Um, that first player off the board really after those first three receivers and first three running backs.

Well, Corey, what's the biggest common denominator versus what we're pessimistic about with Jonathan Taylor going into this year versus what the splits on the screen literally show? What is the biggest difference between the end season versus the first 10 weeks for Jonathan Taylor? What happened?

Uh, Daniel Jones went down. So, and the offense kind of crumbled as well. So, whatever you think of Jonathan Taylor, it's got to be kind of predicated on what you think the Colts offense is going to be. The, the Indianapolis Colts last year were the eighth best offense in football in scoring points. If you think they're going to be close to the eighth best offense in football, again, I, I don't. So, I'm going to be more so in the range of like, yeah, they could be like the 16th to 20th best offense, but in Jonathan Taylor's career, the only two times in which he's exceeded 18 fantasy points per game, 20 fantasy points per game, he needed a top 15 scoring offense to do it in both cases. So, for me, I love the workload. He's going to get 80, 90% of his team's opportunities. He had the best opportunity sharing football last year. Nobody had more of a dominant of their backfield. And I'm not going to sit here and say DJ Giddens is going to get more touches. I have no evidence to prove that even though I liked DJ Giddens. So JT's going to get all the work. JT's going to be an absolute monster. But my un, my my inkling is that he's going to be closer to 2024 Jonathan Taylor than he is to 2025 Jonathan Taylor.

Well, that's part of it too, Corey. Like again, I love Jonathan Taylor, the talent, but is there any pick on the board that screams more 2024 to 2025 Saquon Barkley than Jonathan Taylor?

Yeah. And I actually would argue that Jonathan Saquon Barkley is this year's Jonathan Taylor, as I would talk about if we were doing this video for two rounds. I think that Barkley actually could have the season that JT had last year. But either way, JT very good projection. One of those again, yeah, you feel cushy about it. You know, you're going to have a lock down, locked and loaded RB1 for your fantasy roster. I just think that I'm taking the risk on McCaffrey over JT because JT has a lot of touches under his belt too. He has just as much of an injury concern in my opinion that Christian McCaffrey does even though McCaffrey's 30 and he's 27.

Yeah. So full transparency. So you mentioned, uh, I have Lamb at six, I have Amon-Ra at seven, McCaffrey at eight. I believe I had Taylor at 10. I do have a tier after those guys just based off those concerns, like if the offense is 22nd, 23rd best in the league because hey, guess what? The hit rates of an post-Achilles tear quarterback don't necessarily work in Daniel Jones's favor. Like again, that's going to have a big impact on a guy that although his receiving workload did uptick last year, he's never going to be a guy that has 55 targets or 43 receptions, like that's just not Jonathan Taylor's game.

Well, to be fair, he did have 55 fair. So, um, I will historically that's a good point.

Historically, you might be right about that. I do actually tend to think Daniel Jones is the type of quarterback who checks down a lot, especially post Achilles. He's actually not going to argue really that JT's receiving workload's going to go down. I think.

He ran 25 routes a game, I guess, is my question.

Maybe not. Maybe it was that was a function of the offense being on the field a lot and that's why he had so many routes, but I, I actually tend to think that his receiving workload of like three-ish targets per game probably continues.

Fair. Also, I do apologize because literally the stat line I said he won't do, he literally did last year. So maybe he'll prove me wrong again, but I just, I genuinely think he ran extremely hot from a receiving perspective compared to his career.

Yeah. Yeah. Daniel Jones was also.

Good when he was on the field. Like he wasn't just, you know, stabilizing the quarterback position. He was playing like a pro bowler. So that's that's the other part of this as well.

is how well is he going to play and that kind of thing. Um, but I still got to take him nine because I I do still respect his workload and like I said, the receiving stuff I think is going to be fine. Justin Jefferson. Um, one of the riskier picks here, I think. Um, but definitely could pay off to a high degree.

>> Corey, I had two of the guys ranked in our top 12 going into 2026 in the Flock League and I got lost.

>> Yeah, top 10 actually, I believe, in both our rankings.

>> Unless you where do you have uh either 10 or 11?

>> You have met 11. I have met 10. So, I mean, the case is pretty simple. Justin Jefferson for my money is the second best receiver in football. The best receiver in my opinion is Jamar Chase, but I think Jefferson is the second best receiver in football. He had a brutal season last year. When JJ McCarthy was starting games, he was legitimately unstartable at times. Like real people, real human beings were like, "I'm starting Parker Washington. I'm starting Michael Wilson over Justin Jefferson last year." Which is an statement that if you told somebody at the beginning of last offseason that we were doing that, they would have told you you're nuts.

>> Cory, pull up the game logs and I'll tell you exactly the week I traded for him. Yeah, he was garbage down the stretch. Absolutely garbage. I mean, you can guess, but it was after the Detroit Lions game.

>> Yeah, it's bad. It was fun.

>> And Justin Jefferson when he had JJ McCarthy as his starting quarterback. Um, I'm going to pull up the splits right now because I'm actually curious what it was like with WZ because WZ is no prize. Let's be perfectly clear about that.

>> You could take his splits with JJ versus literally any other quarterback in his career and it'll point to something very drastic.

>> Yeah. I mean, he had he had a high target share in all those games. games. I mean, he's 31% target share with McCarthy, 29.5% target share without McCarthy. He didn't score a single touchdown with Carson Wentz and still average 13 and a half points per game. So, like this dude, as long as Kyler Murray is solid, will be great. The problem I have with just assuming Kyler Murray will be Sam Darnold from 2024 is that Kyler Murray is precisely the reason that I'm higher on Marvin Harrison without him. You know what I mean? Like, it's not like Kyler Murray is like this kingmaker who's been unbelievable for fantasy wide receivers. Like obviously that year with DeAndre Hopkins or those couple years with DeAndre Hopkins, he was great, but I'm not going to sit here and say that Kyler Murray is just going to solve this problem and and Justin Jefferson's going to get back to a 22 point per game season. I do think that it's within the range of outcomes that Jefferson has 16 points per game or 17 point.

>> What I don't understand is Jefferson versus Lamb and a lot of people going into this year, they were ranked basically backtoback in fantasy. if not Lamb was going higher Jefferson.

>> Before you finish that point, keep in mind that Lamb is going ahead of Jefferson in ADP. So, you're doing something that is happening.

>> So, I'm arguing it based off the site because I've seen this about split 50/50 between people having Jefferson higher and having Lamb higher.

>> Okay.

>> I don't understand that because we're talking about quarterback continuity. We have one who's playing with his quarterback who he's played with his entire career and we have one that's just getting Kyler Murray this off season. And yet I'm seeing people rank Jefferson over Lamb. Why is that exactly?

>> I guess Jefferson's the better receiver would be the argument.

>> That's the only argument.

>> Yeah.

>> Like, and that's like, oh, the the second best receiver in the league versus the fifth or sixth.

>> Yeah. Again, Justin Jefferson, you got to rank him high because he's Justin Jefferson. But I do think it's reasonable to be like, yeah, the 10th pick kind of sucks this year because we have concern about Justin Jefferson. Like, some people are going to make the take that, oh my god, what a great year for fantasy. I can get Justin Jefferson with the 10th pick in my fantasy draft. If you're pro Jefferson, that's a reasonable take to have. Like, you're never going to get Justin Jefferson this low again probably. But there's a real reason why he's going that low. We don't know what Kyler Murray's going to be. We don't know if they want to get another look at JJ at some point during the season. We have no idea what's going to happen in this quarterback core. On top of that, they added Jawan Jennings. They have Jordan Addison. TJ Hawinson's now three years removed from his ACL tear. It's not like there's no target competition there.

>> I completely agree. Nobody's even talking about that. Like obviously Jefferson is the number one through and through. But if we go to his overall target shares, Corey with added target competition, this is a guy that was at a 30.3% target uh target share last year. Could he be closer to the 27.2 he was in 2023? Now obviously he was a 20 per game uh point per game scorer that year. So if his target share is going to go down, you're hoping the value of targets does increase. But I mean Jawan Jennings, he's been a functional starting receiver. Jordan Addison, maybe he's not the best number two wide receiver in the league. Like he's not George Pickkins level threat, but he can get open deep. TJ Hawinson, he might be dust, but so is Jake Ferguson.

>> Yeah, I the two touchdowns are the thing that would really correct a lot of Justin Jefferson's problems from last year. Like, if he had scored eight touchdowns last year, I don't even think we're having this conversation. He'd probably be the one.

>> 61 yards per game is a little uh

>> It's bad. Yeah, it's bad. I just I I tend to think that he'll be he'll have a bounce back in terms of 16 to 18 points per game, but I don't think we're getting a 22 point per game season smash from Justin Jefferson unless you think Kyler Murray is going to be, you know, signing a year extension with the Vikings after the year because he's a you know, they win 11 12 games or something like that. I that's my my question about it. So that's kind of the tier break for us. We do have a large tier of a lot of running backs here. For example, my 111 is Chase Brown, who doesn't actually make our consensus um first round, but we do both have James Cook in the first round. So, he's our consensus 111. Very straightforward case for him. He has scored a numerous amount of touchdowns, 12 touchdowns rushing this past year, two touchdowns receiving, 16 touchdowns rushing, two touchdowns receiving the previous year. Joe Brady is now promoted to offensive coordinator or from offensive coordinator to head coach. He's still going to be calling the plays. He has kind of been the catalyst of the James Cook breakout, which I think is an underrated thing with James Cook that he could have more like 50 targets this year. Like in my projections for the Buffalo Bills, I gave him 51 targets and his careerhigh to this point had been 54, but since he's been the starter on the ground, he's only had 40 targets as his careerhigh last year.

>> Yeah, this is a guy that's starting in the offseason. I wanted to rank lower. like I wanted to move him down to 15, 16, 17 overall, but once I started doing my drafts, I'm like, do I really want to take the Miami Dolphins offense ahead of him? Do I really want to be taking the projection that is Omar in Hampton? Do I really want to be taking uh Saquon Barkley, who I have concerns with in terms of the age? Like, when I'm looking at James Cook, like I understand I want a little bit more in the receiving game. You're probably going to need a little bit more in the receiving game, but 28 touchdowns in the last two years in the rushing game doesn't grow on trees. You're getting four receiving touchdowns in the last few years. What if he spikes up closer to the 2023 total where he got four as a alone? Like, we always talk about how ambiguous the Buffalo receiving core is. We've always talked about how James Cook is underutilized in the passing game.

>> Yeah. Why can't

>> we all know he's a great receiver, what happens if he you're just free rolling that upside is my opinion. It's like

>> you're getting a guy who's the already

>> What's up? I said, "You're getting a guy who's already worth the pick and then there's the upside where his workload increases in the receiving game."

>> Exactly. Yeah. And I'm not like people I cannot believe people did the touchdown regression thing for for James Cook last year.

>> Yeah.

>> His quarterback scores like 15 rushing touchdowns a season. Like what happens if Josh Allen runs cold on rushing touchdowns and scores eight? Like James Cook could have 20 touchdowns.

>> You want to hear the best part, Corey? Let's just say James Cook all year he's like the RB seven or eight. So he's like slightly disappointing from like a first round asset perspective, but he's giving you between the RB 68 and points per game and then oh guess what week 17 he's rolling out against the Miami [ __ ] Dolphins in championship week.

>> Yeah. Yeah. He could very easily have the Jonathan Taylor 2024 season worst case scenario. But again, I think you're free rolling a 70 target per game upside because here's the underrated thing. When I did the Bills projections, the underrated thing about the Bills projections is that they have been the last two seasons one of the most runheavy teams in football. And now that they have DJ Moore, Khil Shakir, Concade healthy, what if they go from a 49% pass rate to a 55% pass rate? That might just inherently rise James Cook's targets overall just having a lot more pass volume. I have Josh Allen projected for 555 pass attempts. He had under 500 last year. Yeah. And if we look at Josh Allen in his career, like we look at the overall uh season to season, like we've seen him have a season with 284 pass yards per game and 35.8 pass attempts per game. For reference, last year 27.1 attempts per game, 215.8 passing yards. If we get Josh Allen back to the 38 passing touchdown, 4500 plus passing yard type of guy, he's probably going to bring Jake James Cook along in the receiving game.

>> Yeah. Not to mention too, like I don't think that DJ Moore is going to be anywhere close to 2020 to 2022 Stefon Diggs level of impact to the offense, but what if he's 2023 Stefon Diggs? Uh, or like what they were missing like he he can be a capable number one 20% target share guy and that could increase the pass volume overall. So, for me, I think that James Cook is one of the best picks you can make in this range. If I had to uh make a case for taking the risk on Jefferson versus taking a St. Brown or a James Cook, who I just feel so safe about, I would actually take the take the safe player in James Cook or St. Brown. If you want to take your risk, you should take it in round two.

>> Yeah, I think that's totally reasonable. James Cook, he is ranked, I believe, as my 12th overall player. There is one guy that I have ranked in my top 12 that you do not. Not only is he ranked in my top 12, he's ranked in my top 10. I'm taking the swing on Ashen Genty and I understand it was an uneven rookie year. The offense was a complete train wreck. My favorite stat of his rookie season, which I have been telling you off camera, which maybe some of you out there haven't heard, you look at Ashen Genty and you see 3.7 yards per carry and naturally you see 3.7 yards per carry and you think, "Oh my god, he was so damn inefficient." 3.7, you need to at least be 4.0. His offensive line was blocking less than.7 yards per carry for him. He was breaking 3.01 yards after contact per attempt as a rookie running back. And my favorite part about Ashen Denty bar none. Aside from the fact that they added 40% to their offensive line with Colt Miller coming back with them signing a bag to Tyler Linder or Tyler Linderbomb, sorry. Aside from them bringing in the literal architect for the Super Bowlinning team on offense. Aside from all that, why can't he have the the Todd Gurley, the Melvin Gordon, the Bejian Robinson? We talk about the historically great elite rece or running back prospects. Ashton Jensen is part of that group. 14 and a half points per game in totality. Yeah, sure. A little bit less than we expected going into the season based off where we were taking him. He was a one-two turn last year, but 14 and a half points per game as a rookie for a guy that we would argue was in arguably the worst offensive situation in the league. Now we're getting even potential efficiency uptick with him going into year two. I don't want to miss out on the next Bejon. I don't want to miss out on the next Gurley. I don't want to miss out on the next year two Melvin Gordon. I don't disagree with anything you just said. The only reason because I'm actually the lowest on the site on Ashen Genty. I think the reason I can't put him lower is because I love 73 targets as a rookie. I love the receiving skill set. I think he's going to have one of the three to five best opportunity shares in football. Although Clint Kubak is the same guy who said he was going to use Kenneth Walker as a workhorse and then decided to use not saying Mike Washington or any of those guys are going to eat into Gent's workload significantly, but could they be more of a pest than we're thinking? I think it's possible.

>> My number one concern with Ashen Genty is they're talking about starting 38-year-old post Achilles tear Kirk Cousins for multiple games. M I haven't done the projections for the Vegas Raiders yet. Mike Clay has them projected as the 27th highest scoring offense in football. You just use the example of Todd Gurley. The Los Angeles Rams were the number one scoring offense in football that year. So, I think that there's going to be growing pains particularly early in the year with a cousins to Mendoza switchover at some point whenever Mendoza gets in there. He's a rookie quarterback. I think that the scheme he played at Indiana was relatively easy for him to operate as well. I think that um I think that Genty could have his like legendary season in year three. I don't think year two is going to be his legendary season. I think he's going to make a jump. I think he's gonna go from 14 points per game to 17 or 18 points per game. But I don't view him as the type of player that is going to smash his ADP and put produce a 22 point per game season. If he does, it'll be on the back of 100 plus targets. That'd be the only path I see him doing. I don't think the team's going to be good enough

>> because it is very polarized because you go to you're on A22 but if you go to uh second year running backs uh or experience one year like when you got Gibbs Bejon guys like that in your range of outcomes and then obviously you went on to the 22-y old guys and you had a guy like Todd Gurley in your range of outcomes like obviously there is risk with the offense. I'm totally accepting that, but ultimately for a guy that I think could legitimately be selected next to Bejon and Gibbs this time next year, I don't want to miss out on it.

>> I I don't disagree. I again, the underrated thing though, you're like, "Oh, Bejian, he didn't he didn't have that good of a quarterback situation his second year. The Falcons were 13th in scoring that year."

>> Yeah.

>> Like the Raiders have to be a top 15 scoring offense for him to smash his ADP.

>> And I don't think they will be. Yeah, and I would be closer to about middle of the pack than 27th, but you're right, it's probably not going to be the 13th ranked offense. But my basically my range of outcome would be can they get to the top 20? If they can get to the top 20 and this guy's giving you 20 to 25 opportunities per game, I don't think it'll matter.

>> Yeah, I think if I think that's the ceiling case, they get to the top 20, but even in that ceiling case, I think he's an 18 point per game running back, which is still great that you're going to love that pick. That's James Cook last year, but I don't think he's going to smash his ADP the way that some of the other guys in this territory could smash their ADPs.

>> Well, you mentioned top three to five opportunities here. I think he could very easily lead the running back position in totality in opportunities and it won't like it could not even be close. We could be talking about a guy that has 18 to 19 carries and six to seven targets a game.

>> He could. Yeah, he could. Um, anyways, we're not going to go in depth on Chase Brown, on Amarian Hampton, on Achan, on Barkley. We're going to do a running back rankings video very soon where we go in depth on those players. Um, but that was the first round. Those are the guys that we would take in the first round consensus wise. Like I said, I would take Chase Brown in the first round. That's the difference between uh me and you is that I have Chase Brown instead of Genty in my first round. But regardless, that is how we see the first round going. We think the first round is all wrong according to even the very sharp underdog ADP. And especially when you guys start doing reddraft leagues and mock drafts and all that kind of stuff. I think there's a lot to be exploited there. So, make sure if you guys are doing underdog drafts, you guys can get some practice for your home leagues right now. Using our promo code FSE over on Underdog Fantasy will get you access to our reddraft draft guide for free. You sign up on Underdog, you deposit a minimum of $10 and you make a play on the site. Whether that's entering a best draft, a puppy draft, a basketball mania draft, whatever. Basketball mania is live right now. You can get up to $2 million to first place for taking it down. you do one of those drafts, use our promo code FSE and you get our draft guide for free for the entire off seasonason and also our weekly start set rankings and our dynasty draft guide as well. That'll be linked down below in the pin comment as I made mention to at the beginning of the video. The other way to get our draft guide is to get our season pass. Our season pass is live on the site right now. Right now, if you get access to it, you might be like, why would I need reddraft advice right now? Well, if you're doing best drafts, you'll get to use our best ball rankings. And of course, we also have our best ball product that is available on the site that is not included with the season pass, but you can uh select it as an add-on. So, definitely check that out if you guys are interested. Both of those will be linked down below in the pin comment. Like this video if you enjoyed. Subscribe to the channel if you're new around here. Comment down below what you agree with, what you disagree with. Are these the 12 players you would select in the first round? Do you think we're missing somebody? Comment all that down below in the comments. Um, but with that being said, peace out and we'll talk to you soon. You beat me.