Transcription
In 1987, former President Ronald Reagan approved a project that was so big it could have changed science forever. Development of a particle collider buried beneath Texas, nearly twice the size of Washington DC, and designed to smash protons together at energies that no one else on Earth could touch at the time. This wasn't just science for science's sake. This was the Cold War era, and Washington wanted to prove that American technology, not Soviet, would shape the future. The project was called the superconducting super collider and it carried a price tag in the billions. If it had been finished, the SSC would almost certainly have beaten Europe to the discovery of the Higs Boson, the so-called God particle. Instead, after years of cost overruns and political battles, the US walked away, leaving behind half a tunnel, billions of dollars in sunk costs, and a question that still lingers. Why did America abandon its shot at scientific supremacy?
Just before we continue, have you ever thought about and rebuild civilization from scratch? No. Well, maybe you should. What's the first thing you'd reinvent? The wheel, electricity, the printing press. Show those off to people. You be like, "Look at this. I made a wheel. What is the out? It's so fast." Well, that's where the book, The Ultimate Guide to Rebuilding Civilization comes in. Check this out. This thing is an absolute beast. This arrived by the FedEx man, and the people who who made this, who sponsored this, they were like, "We're going to send you the book." And I'm like, "Okay, cool. 400 pages." I was expecting like a novel sized thing. Nope. This thing is massive. And this isn't your typical history book. I really feel like if I was going to make a book, like a book for my channels or whatever, this is what I'd make. It's just dope. You open it to any page. Oh, this is what I'd like. How to make wine. Is that forget the wheel, forget electricity and the printing press. That's what I want. A fine beverage that warms the body and heals the soul. Although every drop of wine is made from fermented grape juice. Not just any grape is worthy of becoming a wine, you goddamn right. So, not only that, you'll be making good wine. Every I'll open this at a random page. It will have a beautiful illustration. I'll open it at another random page. It will have a beautiful illustration. It's full of cool information and beautiful illustrations. 400 pages of it. I look forward to taking this home and showing it to my kids, even though they won't understand it, but they'll like looking at the pictures. Uh, look, this isn't your typical history book. It's 400 pages. It's like a beautifully illustrated look at fridge. How to make a fridge? Does it? It's really cool. It's beautifully illustrated. I'm way off the talking points. And a heat pump. You're making an energy efficient fridge. Wait, are all fridges run off heat pumps? I'm learn I've had this sitting by my desk for like the last couple of weeks and I'll just pick it up and I'll just open it to a random page. In fact, I've looked at this mining page before and you just it there's always something interesting. It's a mix between engineering blueprints and medieval art except way cooler. This was a Kickstart project originally raised $3.2 million. And uh it did that because it's awesome. And it became a bestseller. So that's cool. Highquality handmade illustrations, clever paper engineering. This is a book that is just a bit special. So use the link in the description below. Use my code mega project 10 for a discount. Go grab the book. You won't regret it. You you just have this sitting by your desk for ages and you'll just enjoy diving into it. I promise it's great.
And now back to today's video. The big idea, its promise. Well, you see, in the mid-1980s, America's particle physics scene was riding on decades of breakthroughs. Fermy Lab had smashed records. Brook Haven and SLAC had cracked open the subatomic world, revealing quarks, bosans, and the deeper architecture of the standard model. With all of these significant breakthroughs, the US was leading the world when it came to science, and it intended to keep it that way. A new home run in physics would show the world that the United States was way ahead in the quest to understand reality, which was significant because the Apollo program had proved the technological breakthroughs were just as potent a signal of national strength as any missile or submarine. So in 1987, President Reagan threw his support behind a machine that was buil as the most ambitious experiment in physics history. And the Department of Energy with guidance from the high energy physics advisory panel started sketching the outlines. Their goal was a proton proton collider capable of smashing particles together at 20 trillion electron volts per beam. That's more than twice the energy of anything else on Earth and light years ahead of all other related ambitions at the time. And this wasn't just a bit bigger. It was a whole other category. The machine which would be later christened as we mentioned the superconducting super collider badass name by super super would require a circular tunnel 54 mi long dug beneath the Texas countryside over 10,000 superconducting magnets chilled to within a few degrees above absolute zero would bend and accelerate protons until they were hurtling at wait for it 99.99999% the speed of light which is quite quick at full tilt. Two beams would slam into each other with such ferocity that for a fraction of a second, the conditions inside would mimic those just after the Big Bang. The detectors that were to capture and measure the collisions were multi-story buildings stuffed with electronics, sensors, and computing power that were far beyond what you'd imagine the tech in the 1980s would be able to handle. An entire injector complex of smaller accelerators would feed the main ring. And above ground, research campuses would be built to house the thousands of scientists, engineers, and technicians who would run the accelerator. The dream was magnetic. Leon Lerman, fresh from his Nobel Prize, promoted the SSC as the next great leap for humanity's understanding of the universe. Roy Schwittz of the University of Texas at Austin was selected to lead the project. And in the scientific community, there was a sense that this was the chance to go after the big questions like, "What gives particles their mass? Is the expos real? What's the nature of dark matter? Could there be entirely new forces out there waiting to be uncovered?" In Washington, the sales pitch was just as compelling, but a bit more strategic. The SSC was pitched as a national project that would cement US leadership in physics well into the next century. Politicians talked about it in the way Kennedy had talked about the moon. An audacious investment in science and engineering that would inspire a generation, fuel economic growth, and send a signal to rivals that the US still knew how to dream big and deliver. The initial price tag came at around $4.4 billion. It's a lot of money, but in the context of cold war budgets, not exactly unthinkable. And the cold war urgency combined with the agreement of opposing political parties carried it through Congress. By 1988, after an intense nationwide bidding war, Waxahi, Texas was announced as the winning side. Texas offered land, political muscle, and a vision to turn the farmland south of Dallas into the heart of global physics. And so it began. Ground was broken and surveying crews fanned out to mark where the 54 mile tunnel would curve beneath the soil. But even as construction started, the winds had already started shifting. The Soviet Union was loosening its grip, and without the Cold War as a backdrop, the SSC project would have to justify itself on science and economics alone. Mer had also begun inside the scientific community. Some were worried that pouring so much of the US physics budget into one colossal machine might starve other areas of research, and others wondered if the US should be partnering internationally rather than just going it alone. At that moment though, these concerns were just background noise. The SSC had momentum. It had money. And it had the backing of the most powerful nation on Earth. And the race was on to build a machine that could quite literally recreate everything we understood about the universe. No pressure.
How the machine was supposed to work and why it was so audacious. Now, the problem with building a machine like the superconducting super collider is that protons don't exactly like being told what to do. At 20 trillion electron volts, they'd much rather fly off into the Texas countryside than be polite and stay on track. So, to keep them in line, you would have to either make the ring absolutely enormous or make the magnets ridiculously strong. The SSC decided that it would do both. a giant ring and superconducting dipole magnets pushing close to 6.8 Tesla, which is about 132,000 times stronger than Earth's magnetic field. But the catch with this is that not every meter of the tunnel bends the beam. You still need long straits for experiments, service areas, and access points. This meant the curved sections had to work even harder, cranking up the field strength just to keep the protons circling. And all of this hinged on the superconducting cable. The SSC used nobbium titanium wire bathed in liquid helium chilled to just 4° above absolute zero. At that temperature, you could shove thousands of amps through it without resistance, generating the magnetic muscle needed to tame 20 TEV protons. Each magnet was about 15 m long with an aperture barely 2 in across. By the early '90s, prototypes were already hitting the target field strengths in testing, which was a huge technical win. Of course, bending the beam, that's only half the battle. You also need to focus it. Think of it like a garden hose. If the nozzle's loose, the water sprays everywhere, but if you tighten it, the stream stays sharp. Particle beams work the same way. Without precise focusing magnets, the protons would spread out and miss their collision point entirely. So there was a need for thousands of other magnets, quadripoles, and sextopoles to fine-tune the proton stream to prevent it from smearing out. Instead of cramming two beams into a single giant magnet, the SSC stacked them vertically. You had two completely independent rings running through the tunnel, one above the other. That choice simplified construction, but it also meant the tunnel had to be 12 ft wide with room for both cryogenic pipelines and even a small transport vehicle. Getting the protons up to speed wasn't just a matter of switching on the big ring. It had to be step by step. First, there was the linear accelerator, then progressively larger booster rings. Each one tightening and accelerating the beam before handing it off to the next. The last stop was the high energy booster, a 10 km ring that prepped the protons before they even touched the main collider. Once they were injected into the SSC proper, where radio frequency cavities, think giant oscillating electric fields, gave the final push. The chosen system ran at 360 meghertz with superconducting cavities spaced around the ring. And the result was tens of thousands of little buckets of protons around 17,000 per beam. Each spaced a few meters apart. Each bunch carrying billions of particles. When you add it up, that beam current was enough to generate collision rates high enough to make rare events routine. But those collisions, they came at a cost. Even at 20 TEV, protons radiate X-rays as they bend. a phenomenon called synretron radiation. So each beam dumped several kilowatts into the cold vacuum chamber at room temperature that is trivial but when your magnets are sitting at 4K every extra watt is a nightmare. To handle it the SSC was divided into 10 cryogenic sectors each more than 8 km long with its own helium refrigeration plant. It was one of the largest cryo systems ever designed where even half a watt per magnet could translate into a massive power bill on the surface grid. Compared to Fermy Lab's Tevatron, the SSC was a canyon leap. The Tevetron almost reached 2TV and the SSC promised 20 times that. Its magnets were set to hit over 6.5 Tesla and its detectors were supposed to dwarf anything built before. The whole design balanced on three pillars. the magnets which were powerful enough to bend protons racing near light speed. The radio frequency systems which would define acceleration and the cryogenics which would keep miles of machinery cold enough to actually survive the strain. On paper, this is a really elegant design. But balance can also mean fragility. If the magnets fields ever drifted, luminosity would fall. If cryodes crept up, costs would explode. If a detector ballooned in size, the optics had to be redesigned individually. Every piece of the SSC was based on proven technology. But multiply those challenges by thousands, stretch them across a 90 km ring, and suddenly proven turns into precarious. And that is kind of where the trouble starts. Not in the physics itself. That part was absolutely sound. but in just the brutal arithmetic of trying to build, operate, and pay for thousands of flawless machines, all working perfectly in harmony.
Engineering reality and mounting problems. On paper, in 1987, the superconducting super colliders construction cost sat neatly at $4.4 billion. By 1992, the Department of Energy had pushed that bill to 8.25 billion. And just a few months later in mid-1993, the Government Accountability Office walked into Congress with a message saying they expected it to quote exceed 11 billion. A lot of money, ain't it? This 1990s billions. There weren't that many back then. So why were costs getting so out of hand? Well, there was the fact that two of the most important pieces of the whole machine were missing. These were the cathedralsiz particle detectors. Without them, the collider was just a tunnel with some fancy magnets. Mittally, it's impressive, but scientifically, not so much. Neither detector had been factored into the original cost estimates. But why? And each one would chew up another $500 million. That's a billion dollar right there tacked onto the bill. Then you've got to add up the cost of every challenge they faced and the ones that they also didn't see coming. The way the project was run also didn't help. University's Research Association or URRA managed the lab under DOE oversight, but aspects such as cost, schedule, tracking, were not strictly followed. By February 1993, GAO was telling Congress that the prime contractor still hadn't implemented a working control system, and the DOE solution was a strategy that delayed components to stay in line with a budget, which ran the risk of sabotaging the project before the machines even turned on. And then there was the design. The SSC's Magnus system went through a major redesign after launch. And every change meant retesting, retooling, and re-qualifying suppliers across the country. For a project this size, even the tiniest ripple of change translated into millions of dollars. And as if this wasn't enough, there were also delays in funds. With inflation rising, every delay meant that whenever the money came through, it wasn't enough anymore. The rescue plan was supposed to include outside money. Texas had pledged around $875 million in state support and by the time the project was cancelled, it had delivered about $400 million. DOE also penciled in 1.6 billion from foreign partners by 1993 with Japan as the main target. But by late 1992, GAO reported that Japan was still studying the merits and hadn't committed a yen. Europe and Russia weren't in for cash. The only concrete international support was a modest inkind offer from India worth about $50 million, which is a lot of money, but it's also not. The first time the House of Representatives voted to cut the collider off, it only survived thanks to a rescue from some loyal supporters in the Senate. But it was a sign that things were getting shaky and the SSC support wasn't as strong as it used to be. And then came the hit that really damaged any credibility that it had. In a 1993 audit, the DOE's inspector general found that $60 million already spent and $128 million planned on subcontracted expenses were deemed unnecessary, excessive, and poorly controlled. $128 million, guys. Don't know where it went. Another $143 million in spending and $46 million planned lacked sufficient documentation or justification. The cost of the super collider are too high. There was just no way to justify spending all that money on catered lunches, office plants, and holiday parties. And if the project couldn't document its spending, Congress would definitely not trust its cost projections. In June 1993, the House voted again to kill the SEC project. And this time, the votes were 280 to 150. President Clinton tried to intervene and on June the 16th he sent a letter to the House Appropriations Chair warning that cancelling would signal a retreat of US leadership in basic science. Basic science. In August 1993, Energy Secretary Hazel Liry announced a management shakeup. Urra would keep the science side, but construction control would shift to a new contractor with worldclass project management experience. It was the right idea, but arriving 6 years in, it kind of looked like an emergency transplant after years of chronic illness. Meanwhile, investigations kept poking at the project's spending. None of it was a smoking gun, but combined with costs getting out of control and unmet schedules, the project was beginning to look like an unsafe gamble. By October, the SEC had exhausted all of its chances. On the 19th, the House rejected funding again, 282 to 143. And this time, all rescue efforts proved insufficient. On October the 30th, Clinton signed the bill that officially killed the superconducting super collider. He called it a serious loss for science.
So, what made it die after all these years of the US fighting to stay at the top of innovations in physics? Well, for one, the Cold War was over. The collider's soft power argument that it kept America ahead of Europe didn't quite land the same way without a Soviet rival breathing down the neck of US science. Second, the fiscal climate was brutal. In 1993, the federal deficit was $255 billion. Every dollar in the discretionary budget was under scrutiny, and a decadel long multi-billion dollar science project was always going to be an easy target. That deficit these days, you're like, that's it. That's all. 255 bill pocket change. Third, even the scientific world wasn't united behind it. Big names in condensed matter physics, including Nobel laureates, told Congress the collider was hogging resources that could go to much more practical research. And finally, the project simply kept tripping over its own feet. From costs going up constantly to schedules not being met to political opposition to lack of foreign support, it was just clear that the project had lost steam. and it looked right to just kill it.
What the SSC could have been versus what it was. Now, if it had been finished, the SSC would have had two enormous detectors, each the size of a small office block, sitting at collision points with layers of sensors, calorometers, and tracking chambers. They'd sift through hundreds of millions of proton collisions per second, plucking out the rare, precious events from the torrent of noise. The data flood would then pour into an on-site computing facility built to process volumes no other lab could touch. Around it all, a new research campus would rise, housing thousands of scientists, engineers, and technicians. Waxahi would have been the Texas twin of CERN's Geneva campus, or perhaps even grander. The local economy would boom with tech parks, housing development, and other infrastructure. Construction alone employed over 4,500 people during the construction phase. So if the project had gone on, perhaps double that number or more would have been employed. And of course, hundreds of highly skilled jobs would be remaining for decades. The SSC would have been the first to hunt down the Higs Boson, search for super symmetric particles that might explain dark matter, probe why the universe favors matter over anti-atter, and probably even stumble on particles or forces no one had yet imagined. Unfortunately, by the time Congress pulled the plug, the project was a long way from that vision. Only fragments of the tunnel existed, roughly 14 mi of the Plan 54, scattered in disconnected segments. On the surface, there were only a handful of buildings, including the main campus with offices and labs, the central utility plant to cool the superconducting magnets and warehouses for components. The magnets themselves, the heart of the machine, were left unfinished. Some had been built and tested, but many were still mid-manufacturer at facilities across the country. Several never even made it to Texas at all. The detectors lagged even further behind. Building sensors that could survive and measure 20TE collisions was a challenge in itself. And by cancellation day, no full detector had been installed. Particle prototypes existed, but the rest of it would forever be sentenced to life on paper alone. In total, about $2 billion had been spent that covered tunnel boring, sight prep, magnet R&D, land, and staff. The contrast was wild. On paper, it was an 87 km ring that could unlock the deepest secrets of the universe. On the grounds in Waxahi, the only thing to be seen were unfinished tunnels, empty buildings, and crates of magnets that would never hum with current.
Europe, the LHC, and the SSC's aftermath. For a lot of American physicists suddenly out of a job in Texas, the message was so clear. If you wanted to keep chasing the Higs Bosson, your badge was going to say CERN. Some went overseas to work on the LHC's detectors. Others left physics entirely for Wall Street. Really? [Music] Turns out the same skills you need to model particle collisions at 40 trillion electrovolts are pretty handy for modeling markets. Has anybody seen the movie Margin Call, fantastic movie, will know. So, you're a rocket scientist. In the mid-'90s, firms like Dehore and Goldman Sachs started scooping up XSSC talent. And you can make a decent argument, as Oxford University Press, bloggers, and Scientific American have that SSC's death helped feed the quant boom. Not the only factor, but definitely a part of the story. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, Europe smelled opportunity. Within a year of the SSSE's demise, CERN, sitting on a perfectly good 27 km tunnel from the LEP collider got the green light from its member states to build the Large Hadron Collider. It wasn't going to be as long as SSSE. 27 km versus 87. Wow, that's a huge difference. But it had one crucial advantage baked in from day one. It wasn't just Europe's toy. It was everybody's. Costs, components, headaches, all shared. That meant when the budget wobbled, there wasn't a single parliament or Congress that could strangle it in one vote. With the new collider project came another opportunity for the US to be a part of history. The only difference was that this time it would be taking a smaller portion of the pie. By 1997, Washington had signed on as a major LHC partner, kicking in hundreds of millions of dollars worth of hardware, detectors, and computing systems via Fermy Lab, Brook Haven, and Berkeley Laboratory. America went from we're building the world's flagship collider in Texas to we're a key contributor to Europe's flagship collider. And when the LHC found the Higs Boson in 2012, you can imagine how many SSC veterans quietly did the math and realized their machine would have found it years earlier. And it wasn't just hindsight. The SSC's planned collision energy was nearly three times higher than the LHC's. And physicists point out that with that much headroom, the Higs would have been squarely in range and likely confirmed well before the turn of the millennium. But it was too little too late for regret because in politics and science, the machine that could have been doesn't matter. What mattered was that leadership in high energy physics at the time had shifted from the US to Europe. And the way CERN pulled it off has become the template for big science. split the cost, split the credit, and spread the industrial contracts around so everyone's home country gets a taste. That model has been used in proposals for future colliders, giant telescopes, and even fusion projects. Because the SSC taught another lesson. If you go alone on something that costs billions and takes decades, you are one election cycle away from the guillotine. Today, the superconducting super collider is remembered in physics circles as the ultimate whatif. Europe ended up with scientific prestige, the discoveries, and the working machine. The US got an abandoned tunnel in Texas and a generation of lost opportunity.