Americans Are Officially Out Of Money To Spend — We Had To React

This is a guy named Jeff Snyder. His YouTube channel is called Euro Dollar University, I believe. Uh, it'll certainly come up on screen in a second. And, um, he's doing a breakdown of the CPI that we just saw. And should people be excited because obviously inflation has come way down? Should you be excited about this, or should you be paranoid?

>> Big results from the CPI. In fact, what we're going to hear a lot of as we go through the numbers is since 2020 because there's a lot since 2020. And by the way, this is not all gasoline. In fact, the most important parts since 2020 are not gasoline. In addition to that, and actually similar to it, there is a twist, a major twist going on in the oil market and on the oil futures curve. So, we've got a literal twist and an unexpected twist.

One of the things that I think is very important for people to understand, this is a drum I've been beating from time immemorial. There is a difference between crisis-led deflation and innovation-led deflation. Now, people are going to try to tell you that deflation is always bad, and it just isn't true. Things should get cheaper over time. The thing that people are afraid of is if you're in an environment where people are paranoid that they begin holding their money. This is what happened to Japan. So, the everybody starts taking out unimaginable amounts of debt because their, um, their property market is just red hot. It finally overinflates. The bubble bursts and then everybody is left scrambling. A lot of people lose their wealth because they're overextended. And so people start going, "No matter how much, dear Japan, you start inflating the currency, I'm just not going to start spending money again. I'm going to pay down my debt and I'm just going to be fiscally conservative or, um, conservative in my own house since fiscal technically means government spending. So I'm going to be very conservative with my wealth." And so now you get the stagnation in Japan. Okay? So there is that's a real thing. And I get why and prices, by the way, start coming down because nobody's spending money. And so they try to entice you by making things cheaper. I get why people are worried about that kind of crisis-led deflation because it gets very hard to get your country going, growing again. And when you're not growing, there's not that level of optimism, enthusiasm, investment, and so your country literally just sort of stagnates.

Now, listen, Japan is an amazing place. So even in the middle of stagnation, it's not like they became a hellhole for cultural reasons that we're not going to talk about today. But I get why people are worried about that. However, just as a PSA reminder, there is a positive type of deflation. And so, what Jeff is trying to parse for people is this is going to get a drum beat of this is the good, uh, deflation. So, you guys should be excited that inflation is going down. This is wonderful. And the reality is that this isn't, at least if Jeff is correct, this isn't the kind of deflation that you want to see. This is being brought on by something that's crisis-driven. Remember what central bankers are after here, what they're what they what they keep talking about, why we need to hike rates. And there's a good chance the Fed is still going to hike rates, though, with the CPI report, there's less of a chance they may do it more than once. They're going to themselves. But remember what the Fed is actually talking about. They're not talking about oil prices directly. What they're saying is that oil prices are going to spill over or they're afraid maybe there's a positive chance that oil prices spill over into other prices. So they're really looking at the core rate or the core core rate or the super core rate or basically services prices.

>> It drives me crazy that, um, there's so many different ways of slicing and dicing the in, uh, the inflation rate. And I think a big part of this is some of it is look, especially traders need to understand what what's really happening, what's the signal from the market. But I also think that the government uses it to manipulate the life out of you. Um, but for people wondering, so core, if you're looking at core CPI, you're trying to remove energy and food because those can fluctuate rapidly. Um, they're also two of the most important things that people spend money on. Uh, so for the average person, that matters a lot, but for a trader, less so because over time, um, those fluctuations tend to wash out.

Let's talk about CPI. CPI for the month of June came in shockingly weak. Analysts were expecting a a small decline in the monthly rate because of gasoline prices, energy shock. You know, the in June oil prices were down. Gasoline prices weren't down nearly as much as oil was, but at least energy prices retreated. And man, I really hope you guys are looking at your screens. So, he's got mapped out here the what he calls the phase shift. So, when I say that, that's a phrase that I got from Jeff. You'll see it in the interview. We talk about this. um the when you see the inflation rates for basically COVID and you realize that the subsequent inflation rates are, um, those are not like, oh, prices have dropped back down. That's just it's growing off of that elevated number at a slower rate, but you're still at the peak, dude, where those numbers like skyrocketed to. That is wild. Like it really seeing it that starkly, I think people forget that COVID bumped prices up massively and they never came back down.

Yeah. >> And so that's why, dude, I am so mad at myself that I was just not economically literate when COVID was happening. And so I remember when they said, I think this is going to be really hard on kids, like they're going to have, you know, whatever amount of time, um, out of school, it's going to be really damaging and we're not really going to see the effects for a long time. And I just thought, I don't know, that doesn't seem like you're either going to see it right away or you're not. If if kids are fine in the moment, they're going to be fine long term. And the same is true of the economy. It's like, okay, well, prices will go up for a minute, but they're going to come back down. Like, I don't understand why people are talking about, oh, it's going to take years to play out. And now I'm realizing this [ __ ] takes years to play out. It takes years for you to see, dude, when you're a 9-year-old, two years is an ungodly amount of time. And so two years of not being able to see somebody's full face actually does have a knock-on effect that we don't know what it's going to be and it will take years to find out. Um, doing your senior year in high school from home is going to have a knock-on effect. It's going to take years to find out and we'll see. But it's like we're all products of our time and those play out in some of the weirdest ways possible. And so the way like I I wouldn't have told you that people's response to this was going to be first of all to print money like [ __ ] mad. I didn't see that coming. I didn't even understand what money printing was. And then I certainly wouldn't have told you, oh, people are just going to credit card spend and they're they're not going to reduce their monthly bills. They're just going to go crazy, which they've done now for years. And the thing that I think people lose sight of is costs jumped way the hell up. And they're still going up from that new astronomically high rate. They're going up from the high rate when we're in all these tax debates and I'm like, uh, people are like, we just need a little more tax and everything's going to be fine. I'm like, back to this. You're you Gary have understood, yes, there's a problem. This is your problem. Your problem isn't that you need more tax dollars. The problem is you just made everything more expensive while disempowering the worker like systematically for the last 20 plus years through globalization and technology and some other things. But it's like they everyone is like, what what easy thing, who win, they bat? Like it's the [ __ ] dumbest lowest resolution not even tied from a cause and effect perspective. And so I'm like, you have a glaring problem. It's a real problem. You've got to fix this [ __ ] problem. And if you don't fix this problem, either by making the middle class richer or by finding a way to bring these down, which by the way, don't [ __ ] keep inflating the currency and suddenly you can take advantage of technology actually making things cheaper. Dude, it drives me nuts. And when you see a graph like this and you're like, "Oh, found my problem." It's like everything is [ __ ] astronomically straight vertical line more expensive.

>> Yeah. PI fell by nearly half a percent in the month of June alone, which is the most since April of 2020. And it's not even close. This is the biggest monthly decline since April of 2020. And one of the very few monthly declines in the last, you know, many years that, uh, are very near that rate. So again, a marching band full of red flags here. It's not just motor fuel. We're talking about something else. And of course, the Fed's talking about, hey, we need to worry about rate hikes or we need to hike rates because inflation's out of control or it could potentially be out of control. They were not expecting this at all, even though they should have been.

Now, I know he's trying to do YouTube hooks here and keep people engaged, but I will just give you the spoiler alert. This is all about demand destruction. So, uh, when you have people going, I just can't afford [ __ ] anymore. Then apparently Americans at least will just try to credit card spend their way through it. They'll spend their savings. Uh, but eventually you reach the end of that road. And by the way, this is a precursor of what you can expect when the US government reaches the end of its road from a debt perspective. Eventually you are forced into austerity. And that does not go well. Um, was down a little bit. In fact, the dandel rate declined. Like I said, it's not just gasoline. The annual rate slid from above 4% back to around 3 and a.5%, well below expectations. is moving in the right direction though again for the wrong reasons. Uh, the core rate, which is important, like I said, what the Fed is really talking about, this their economist speak and their econometric models, what they're saying is what happens is energy prices go up, as we know, and as energy is such an important input into all sorts of businesses, whether it be goods, good goods economy businesses or services businesses, energy costs go up. Say a service provider, they like to focus on service providers. Service provider sees their electricity bill go up, some of their diesel fuel costs go up because, you know, they're driving around, probably so they got diesel fuel. Fuel costs go up, energy costs go up, input costs go up, and what does the service provider do? Well, in a ceteris paribus world of economists, the service provider is going to raise their prices. They're going to try to get back as much, if not all of that increase in energy cost from their customers. And as a service provider raises their prices, that leads to another service provider raising their prices, which leads to a goods economy producer raising their prices. Next thing you know, if our brave, heroic Federal Reserve officials don't step in with their >> laughably irrelevant quarter point rate hikes, somehow that's supposed to put the brakes on all this. Without their rate hikes, it leads to this spiral, this runaway of second-round effects. The second-round effect is energy prices go up. That's the first round. Then say service providers start raising prices as a response. And then third-round effect is it gets broader and broader and broader. Next thing you know, you're in the 1970s. That's the fear. That's at least what they're saying. And you already know it's crap because we went through this last year with tariff inflation, which the market said there would be no tariff inflation. And guess what? There wasn't tariff inflation. Yes, the cost of some goods went up, but broader inflation did not break out. And there was zero chance it was ever going to break out for the same reasons we're seeing here, which is businesses are seeing their input costs go up. That is absolutely true. But they're also finding out, as if they didn't know, they cannot pass those costs on to customers because their customers can't afford it. And if the customers can't afford it, only one of two things happens. One, they raise their prices and volumes fall off, which is what retailers have been telling us, including Walmart. Walmart said, "We're going to cut our prices, not raise them." Or the second thing is they just have to absorb the higher input costs. And in response to that, rather than leading to further consumer price rates and consumer price increases, those businesses who see the margin squeeze, especially smaller and mid-size businesses, start cutting back on their own cost. Cutting their own costs, which usually means trimming hours of workers, maybe converting them to part-time instead of full-time, and in some extreme cases, getting rid of them, which by the way, is exactly what the labor data has been showing through the energy shock, not just the establishment survey recently, but more so all the rest of the labor data.

>> Policies have consequences.

>> Mhm.

>> So, if people start mentally mapping this in the right way, here's what happened. We engineered a virus in China. That virus got loose. People started getting sick. Governments the world over were all like, "Never let a good crisis go to waste." Because I don't think they released the [ __ ] on purpose, but never let a good crisis go to waste. Let's use this as an opportunity to really lock people down. Let's take control of social media. Let's shut people up. There's only one argument and it's ours. And we're going to tell you what's true and we're closing things down for two weeks just to slow the spread. It's like, just kidding. We're closing down for [ __ ] two years and we're going to arrest you even if you're out on the beach and you're not near anyone because we [ __ ] told you to stay at home and you're not doing it. So, we're going to arrest you. Um, you own a gym. Sorry, tough break. Your gym goes out of business. We're going to come padlock the door. Uh, all kinds of absolutely insane [ __ ] that none of us should have ever stood for and they leveraged fear against everybody and just took all this draconian control. Now, unfortunately, because of the way that economies work, that policy is going to have absolutely staggeringly large consequences that are going to last for a very long time. That psychotic desire for power on behalf of the government is why the middle class is getting the [ __ ] kicked out of them now. And they're going to [ __ ] try to blame billionaires until the end of time. But the reality is they made everything more expensive by locking everything down.

He walked through it. He went through it kind of fast. So, I don't know if people really think about it. Uh, the reason that a cancerous tumor is so difficult is because it's not like the tumor is just stuck on the side of um your healthy tissue like a frozen piece of gum and you just peel it off and take it out. It's like [ __ ] worm gum in your hair. And now, good luck disentangling all of that. The show will be right back in a second. But first, let me tell you about something that happened to me. I was traveling abroad. My phone got hacked. It was a nightmare. That was the moment I really understood exactly how exposed we all are. The hack is just the entry [music] point. Once your data is out, it gets sold to data brokers who then sell it again and again. Your name, your address, your phone number, your social security number, sitting on hundreds of sites available to anyone willing to pay for it. You can try and remove it yourself, but tracking down every site, submitting every removal request, repeating the process every few months as your data reappears is [music] designed to be impossible. So, Incogn does it for you. You authorize them once, they track your data across hundreds of broker sites and remove it automatically. And when it reappears, because it will, they remove it again. Plus, with custom removals, you send them any link where your information shows up and their dedicated team takes it down. Go right now to incogn.com/impact and use code impact for 60% off an annual plan. You can try it risk-free for 30 days. Let's talk about the first thing you eat or drink in the morning. It's actually not a small decision. Whatever you take first sets the tone for how your cells are going to perform all day. I've spent years obsessing over what actually moves the needle on long-term health. And the thing most people overlook is [music] just consistency. That's why I'm a huge fan of Nandica from Peak. Nanda is the Rolls-Royce of coffee alternatives for longevity. Fullsp spectrum reishi including spore powder for cellular resistance and immune support. Fermented [music] pu-erh tea from 250-year-old trees for metabolic and gut health and ceremonial grade cacao that actually helps your body absorb all of it. It gives you calm energy, no jitters, no crash, and it can elevate your mood and help you focus. Set your longevity goals in motion. Get 20% off right now at peaklife.com/impact. Now, let's get back to the show.

That's how price rises that become broad happen is one supplier has to raise their rates. So then the next supplier in the chain. So it's like you might have three or four steps more, seven, eight steps of all these different product and suppliers feeding you things before your end product makes its way to the customer. And I know this firsthand. A drought in California impacted the cost to us of almonds, which impacted our profit margin on protein bars, right? And it is a never-ending string of a thousand things like that that influence the cost of something to a customer. And so even if I as Walmart or the end person, I actually thought about this with video games. Even if I go, oh, I'm going to outsmart the market. I'm going to take smaller margins and I'm going to put something out that's cheaper. So, hey guys, you can come to me. Don't worry. The cost is lower and now I should be able to gobble everything up. The problem is that I my margins have probably just gotten thinner and thinner. So, me trying to quote unquote outsmart the market by lowering my cost may put me into where I have little to no margins. Like Xbox literally has 3% margins for other reasons. But I'm just saying, like, you can get yourself into a position where your margins are so low you're in actual like >> um danger of going out of business or you may put yourself in a position where you're losing money on every sale that you make because of all the people that are selling you things, all of their prices went up. So even if I try to lead the charge on lowering prices, I've got to get all of them to lower their prices. They're not going to want to do it because they've got people feeding them. And so it it's the the fact that the government did not understand economics well enough to go, we can't shut down the global supply chains. We can't do it. We can wait and see how many people die and there is a point at which, okay, [ __ ] we're like losing 30 million people. Uh, you know, you're losing 10% of the population. Then obviously at some point people are just freaking out so much like, you you've got to do something. But just as a reminder, uh, please look up the exact number, Ryan. The Spanish flu of 1918 killed something between like 30 and 50 million people globally on the back of World War I. So World War I killed however many millions. We lost that many more to the, um, Spanish, uh, flu, and still you didn't have the kind of like draconian lockdowns that we had during COVID. Like that [ __ ] crazy. So the the knock-on effects economically are not easy to unwind in the same way that a tumor is not easy to cut out. So [ __ ] these kids for what they did. That [ __ ] is wild. Not exactly surprising. The Fed is looking at the possibility of second-order effects of inflation that the markets, the economy, common sense, basically everything has said not really going to happen. So, they're surprised when in the month of June, the latest numbers that just came out this morning, the BLS says the core CPI rate was down fractionally. As you can see in the chart here that I'm showing you, it's the first decline in the core CPI rate since May of 2020. So, once again, we've got a marching band full of red flags because the core rate, this is not about gasoline, this is not about food, this is everything else. The core rate is where you would see second-order effects show up if second-order effects are showing up. And the thing is, second-order effects are showing up. They're just not inflation second-order. They are demand destruction second-order effects. That's why we're seeing weak prices in the CPI, in the core CPI, and all the rest of the channels as well. So the core rate year-over-year slipped again, down a little bit. Never really got much out of control, which is consistent with the TIPS market, as we'll get to that. But all the rest of the CPI details, they say the same thing. The Fed is, um, like I said, focusing on services were for a target. If there were going to be second-order effects, you'd see it in services. So the services, let's rent of shelter, which isolates the services part of the economy that's not susceptible to the imputations of shelter. So we're not getting into all that fakery. And again, negative.

>> The reason he's putting so much attention on this is if your services are declining and you're not talking about shelter, you're not talking about gas, and that's still going down, you have demand destruction. People just aren't going and buying the things that they used to buy, whether that's, uh, uh, a massage or going into a restaurant or whatever. It's just, you, you're getting a pullback.

>> To your point, when we first announced it was like, "Oh, well, that's because of the Iran war, the gas price went down." So, that's where it's driving. He's like, "No, you take that out, this is down. You take that out, this is down." And seeing those other, uh, ramifications of it. He, he's going to get to the long tail of the, um, oil curve in a second. Uh, which is very important to understand because it, it is a weird discrepancy. If you're not, if you're just trying to map this as a supply disruption, the long tail of the curve will be very confusing.

>> Red flags. It tells you that there's there is more demand destruction in the inflation numbers than there's anything resembling inflation. Let me say that again. Across the entire CPI, the inflation numbers for June, there is much, much more evidence for demand destruction than there is even a hint of evidence for second-order inflation or even any inflation for that matter. These are red flags because they speak about the macroeconomy and macroeconomic weakness while the Federal Reserve and right now the Fed chair up on Capitol Hill saying we're still worried about inflation, uh, because of oil prices. Again, making the mistake that the Fed did or the ECB did in 2008. That's why we call iting and the Fed is increasingly committed to that course. Though these numbers are going to be strong enough that maybe some of the on the fence FOMC voting members are going to have to straddle themselves off the fence or fall off the fence from straddling it.

One of the things I think might be worth a deep dive is how did economists miss 2008? Was it a private debt question? Is it misunderstanding what's actually driving inflation? Um, and so you get the people that are putting the economic policy in place, they're misreading the signals. Um, there's another economist that I pay attention to, uh, Professor Steve Keen, uh, I believe is his name, and he's talking about that. He was like, 2008 is really a story about failing to understand how money is created, uh, and how private debt impacts the economy. And so it'll be interesting to see these two. I don't yet know if they agree or disagree. Um, but looking, they've both mentioned 2008 is a was a misread of the signals. Um, and by the way, on behalf of the people in charge of your economy, uh, this is where Q that video of Biden's, uh, senior economic advisor who doesn't understand modern monetary theory.

>> The government definitely prints money and then it lends that money by, uh, by selling bonds. Uh, is that what they do? They, they, um, they, uh, >> Same thing when you look at all the rest of the consumer price numbers excluding food, energy, and shelter. So again, if you were expecting second-order effects from higher energy prices, this is exactly where it would show up. So you got services prices in there as well as some good prices. We don't have the energy stuff, we don't have the food stuff, we don't have the shelter stuff. So not the volatile stuff. This is where the inflation the Fed talks about, this is where it would be if it's there. But it's not there. Instead, you have more demand destruction indications in the rest of the CPI than you do inflation. Again, weakest in this part of the bucket, which is the rest of the CPI experience since May of 2020. This is this should be an eye-opening red flag moment.

Let me let me say what he's saying in a a different way. The reason he keeps banging the drum about worse since 2020, what he's trying to say is remember COVID, remember how psychotic that period was? You're now seeing things approaching being as bad as they were in 2020, or at least they haven't been anywhere near this bad since 2020. So this is not something that's mild. This is if you want to understand why everything feels so broken. If you want to understand why like, hm, the war is not causing energy prices to move the way that you were expecting them to move, this is because you have something even bigger than the war in Iran, which is causing a disinflationary impulse. So imagine the war is is disrupting supply. So you have upward pressure on prices, but the downward pressure is so extreme that it's it's not entirely neutralizing it on the, like right now in this moment, the the front side of the curve, as they call it. I remind me never to even as I understand all of these terms, not to use them if I can avoid them whenever possible, but like the immediate moment when you're buying the oil, like [ __ ] I need it today. That what they call the front end of the curve. Like sure, that's going to go up a little, not nearly as much as people thought it was going to. And then the sort of near-term long tail, people are like, meh, it, it's all downward pressure from here. That is that's a statement, man. And if he, listen, I think the signals are there. I know better than to think that, oh, he's got it right or I've got it right. It's like, this is be very humble in the face of data and data interpretation. But it is pretty interesting for anybody who's looking at their screen, like between where we're at in 2020, you don't get a lot of these downward beats and you don't get one as big as this.

For the general public who's thinking the economy sounds resilient because the payroll report is positive and maybe GDP is too, this is not a positive sign. And of course, most consumers, the K-shaped economy nonsense, but most consumers who are in the bottom part of the K understand this intuitively, understand it with common sense. So this is why we see consumer surveys all over the map, incredibly pessimistic, not not happy about job prospects and income prospects because they know the demand situation is weak. Not that they know it in some kind of top-level macroeconomic, uh, context, but from their own personal experience. The numbers match up with what people are experiencing and telling surveys. So whether it be the University of Michigan or the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's own survey of consumer expectations, which do not show inflation, they don't show inflation expectations among consumers. What they do show is fears over jobs and incomes. The kind of stuff that is consistent with weak demand, the kind of weak demand that would show up in some of the most negative CPI rates since 2020. Lots of red flags over the CPI report and not inflation red flags, the other kind of red.

All right, think about it this way. When you get inflation, what's going on is people are feeling rich, man. Money's everywhere. Money's flush. You've got more money chasing the same amount of goods. You have a discrepancy between what's actually available to buy and the amount of people chasing with money. So, you can get that by hurting supply. But if you haven't hurt supply and people are feeling flushed with cash and they're going out and we're getting inflation because everyone's getting excited, that does not feel like right now. So that's why people have been like, "Oh, well, we've got a supply shock. That's that's really got to be the problem." No, that was the phase shift in COVID that created that problem, and that's why everything is now elevated. But the problem is right now, people are not feeling flush. People are not feeling like, "Yo, let the good times roll." That is not the vibe. I don't see anybody saying that. So if you know, other than oil, which we are stripping out of these numbers, other than oil, there's no supply disruption on the things that we want. So what exactly is making the deflation happen? The answer is people don't feel flush. They don't have the money. There's less money chasing the same amount of goods. When you have more money, when you have same money chasing less goods or more money chasing same goods, uh, you're going to get inflation. But if you have less money chasing same goods, you're going to get deflation and crisis-led deflation. And so that is like, if you just want to get it from a vibes perspective, you can feel that the vibe is not, yo, these are the good times. And because it's not, yo, these are the good times, both psychologically and the fact that people, because they've burnt through their savings now and they've burnt, racked up their credit card debt, there just really isn't enough. People don't have enough money in their personal wallets to go out and make the good times roll. And that's what you're seeing in the numbers.

So, from a consumer standpoint, he mentioned it in the presentation earlier, Walmart dropped their prices. So, I can get way more Twinkies than I could have gotten last month. So, this is a win for me, but what should we be worried about? Because it on on mass, on the individual level, again, it's like, yeah, this is this is actually supposed to happen. Forget the greedy corporations. Let's make more money. You know what I mean? What is something, what's that other shoe that's going to fall that we might not see in the short term? So, if you think of people are going to buy the amount of Twinkies that they plan to eat. I don't know how this became about Twinkies, but you're gonna buy the amount of Twinkies that you're going to eat. Walmart is saying, "We, the reason that we're changing the price here is because people stopped buying them. So, now I'm just trying to get back to my normal volume of sales to get back to my normal volume or maybe at least try to move in the right direction. I'm gonna lower price, but that means that I'm now making less money. And that corporation is going to try to do something to maintain their profit margin. They'll eat some of it, but they're not going to be able to eat all of it because there are just certain margins. I know everybody gets in a twist about the family has all this money. Again, these companies are at a size that the amount that they're pulling out on an annual basis just isn't isn't enough to change the outlook of the company. So, we can talk about whether they should be paying the workers more. It's a different story. But in terms of like the actual profit margins, what they end up doing is going, [ __ ] The only thing that we can control because we can't control the inflation on the incoming goods that are hurting my profit margin. So I've got to do something with my labor costs. And so they start, they reduce their price to try to get people in. That squeezes their margins more. And then they've got to start letting people go. And then that person gets let go. Then they can afford less things, like less shoes, less whatever at another store. So then that store is like, "Fuck, now I'm in a bad spot. I can't, um, I'm not getting the revenue that I used to be getting. So, I'm going to lower my prices now. But to do that, that's eating my margins again. So, they first got eaten because the person got laid off at Walmart that now isn't shopping at my store. So, I lower my prices. That hurts my margin. Now, I'm trying to get that back. So, I have to let somebody go. And so, then that has a knock-on at another store. And that's how this burns across the economy. So, it's like, yeah, for a minute, we were talking about this earlier. For a minute, it's like there's a discrepancy. You haven't lost your job. You're still making money. You're feeling good. You go, "Oh [ __ ] Twinkies are back down. Love it. I'm gonna get my Twinkies." Not realizing there is like this cascade of people losing their jobs, which then hurts the economy because people don't have the cash. They don't feel flush. They're not going out. And so everybody just constricts. And when it constricts, what they're really saying is people lose their job. So they lose their income, which then means they're not buying from somebody, which means somebody else is going to lose their job. And then that's just how this spiral starts.

Just to throw this out there, we just scheduled this. I'm having another webinar on August 9th, which is a Sunday. And to Eurodollar University fans and people who watched this channel for a long time or just people who understood what happened in 2008, yes, >> August 9th. I picked that date for a reason. Tune in to figure out why that is if you're not if you're not sure already. We're also going to continue from our last webinar series, which proved to be really popular. Talking about how to use these Eurodollar signals, this Eurodollar information, the curves, the esoteric signals in a portfolio management context, how to look at where to place your money, allocate money based on whichever conditions the marketplace is telling. Again, we we focus on the market. In the last webinar, I went through what the methodology is here at Eurodollar University, why we focus so much on the signals that we do. I also went through why the mainstream doesn't focus on those signals. And it's it's a story you got to you got to check that out. the the the webinar the the last webinar from June just a couple weeks ago was on the YouTube channel. So if you want to check that out, highly recommend that because it goes through the history of where we went from, we took a different path than the rest of the mainstream and history shows that they chose the wrong path. Plus went into the over the background details about portfolio management and using the stuff in a portfolio management, uh, context. We're going to go further into that to talk about pivot points and phase shifts and how to, uh, how to, how to, how to really, uh, put dial this stuff into, uh, the, uh, overall portfolio management investment framework that we talk about. So yeah, >> Sunday, August 9th. We'll have fun on August 9th. We'll talk about what August 9th really means. Uh, as well as, uh, it's 5:30 p.m. Eastern time. Link in the description to sign up.

>> Can't learn too much about the >> Let's get back to what we got today though. The told you part. Um, none, nothing that the, uh, CPI reported should have been a surprise because we saw it coming in the TIPS break-even rates. And remember, TIPS break-even is nothing more than a relative measure of demand for inflation protection. It's not to be taken literally. The break-even rate at 2.30 basis points doesn't mean the 5-year break is like 2.32 basis points. That does not mean the market expects the CPI is going to average 2.32% over the five years of that of that security. That's not what it's saying. These are relative measures. When you see the break-even rate go up, that just means that there's more demand for inflation protection through the CPI that's paid out, uh, by the Treasury Department than there was before. And if break-even rates fall, that means there's less demand for CPI protection because the marketplace doesn't think the CPIs are going to be worthwhile investing in the TIPS security from inflation if there is no inflation. And when you see break-even rates fall quickly, that tells you the market is looking at inflation conditions or what goes into inflation conditions and thinking something big has changed here, which means I need less inflation protection, which is consistent with the inflation numbers that we just we just went over. So first of all, the TIPS market has said for the last several years, there is no additional inflation risk. Whether it be last year we talked about tariff inflation, the TIPS market said not happening, and of course it didn't happen. Whether it was in 2024 when everybody was talking about sticky inflation, higher for longer, the TIPS market said, nope, not happening there. But more importantly, more recently, the Iran conflict, uh, the TIPS market, first of all, even though the even though the break-even rate got to a multi-year high, as you can see in the chart, it wasn't that much of a multi-year high. It wasn't really that much different than early last year. So, the marketplace said, "Yes, there's going to be some direct impact from oil prices on the CPI, which makes the TIPS, uh, security a little bit more valuable." So break-even rates went up, but they didn't soar ahead as if the market was pricing inflation risk or any substantial inflation risk. And since the middle or the end of really the middle of May, end of May and through through June, break-even rates have been absolutely plummeting. And they've been plummeting quickly and made a huge move in doing so, which is a key red flag signal that we are consistent with everything that we just went over.

>> All right. What I love about all of this stuff is what he's making clear is once you know where to look, then there really are answers to some of your biggest economic questions. When tariffs were coming down the road, um, I wasn't looking at this like, oh, there's going to be signals in the economy. I can go check and see what in aggregate the crowd of very well-educated investors think is going to happen. Now, it's not a guarantee that that's how things are going to play out. This is why the market is best understood as gambling. This is people placing bets. But if you want to know what people actually believe, you can see where they're putting their money. So again, these things are not positive. It's not like the market going and and saying, "Oh, we don't think that we need TIPS protection." Uh, means that you don't need TIPS protection. However, it does allow you to like, if you're on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, you get to ask the crowd. You get to find out what is the group of people who are putting their actual own hard-earned dollars against this bet. What do they think? And so you get an aggregate answer. It's very, very interesting. And man, part of the reason I'm so into this is I'm constantly thinking about what what should I be doing with my own money? I talk about this stuff all the time. I was just quizzing the guys the other day. I'm like, do you guys, okay, you hear me record all this stuff? Do you see me write all this stuff? You know, how my thinking's been evolving. Do you guys do anything with this? Like, are you actually managing your money differently? Because it's actually influencing how I manage my money. And so having a deeper understanding of the signals that you can look at so that you can actually do something different with your own money is very freeing. It makes me feel like this is way less of a black box and I have somewhere to go. I'm, trust me, I always approach this stuff with humility, knowing that there are things that I can't see, that there are way more variables than I understand, certainly at this point. Um, but man, is it very empowering to start to build a map of where to look when you see a certain concern looming on the horizon.

>> Especially you being a cause and effect person, it's it's interesting now to actually see the economic data that will prove this cause and effect.

>> What the media is saying one thing, but the people who are actively putting their money to protect it from inflation, they think the other thing. And just like with the prediction markets, once you follow the money, you start to see the people who will bet on it are the people that actually have that information versus the people who, you know, talk about it.

>> So true.

>> Yeah.

>> Whether it's the 5-year break-even rate or all the rest of the break-even rates, the marketplace has been saying this entire time, yes, there's an energy shock, but the energy shock is more likely than not to lead to demand destruction, not to inflation. Nothing is ever zero, especially in a complex marketplace like this. But the market, the TIPS market was pretty clear. It's not a 0% chance because nothing is zero, but it's as close to zero in a complex system as you're going to get. And of course, that's exactly what we're seeing. The 10-year break-even, similar, maybe even a little bit more forceful in the downside. And one of the one of the things that you can do and one of the things that we often do here at Eurodollar University, part of our methodology is you compare the 5-year break-even or other maturities too, but you compare the 5-year break-even to the 10-year break-even. And what that told you was not only is the 5-year break-even saying that there was very little chance of inflation risk, broadly speaking, the 10-year break-even rate was less than the 5-year break-even rate, which meant that whatever CPI effect there was going to be from oil prices, it wasn't going to last very long. Of course, that's exactly what we're seeing show up yet again. So, the TIPS market is sort of taking a victory lap here. Even though June is just one month, June was such a shocking month that it's going to it's going to resonate beyond just, uh, the month of June or just the month of July that we're in as we move forward here. Even though the CPI is likely to rebound with oil prices next month, it's the underlying mechanics that maybe you don't see when the CPI is up based on oil. And that is the weak, uh, weak demand conditions that are consistent with the demand destruction part of it. Again, the C, the TIPS market was saying nothing, none of this should be a surprise. Weak demand conditions, nothing was, none of the ingredients that were that should have been there for inflation, second-round effects, all that stuff were present. Especially when you look at some of the longer-term numbers like the 5-year, 5-year forward rate. As you can see, even going back to 2022, the 5-year, 5-year forward rate, which is sort of longer-term inflation expectations, structural inflation expectations, longer term, the marketplace has said, even back in 2022, this was not the 1970s all over again. This wasn't inflation. It was a supply shock, a phase shift. And then every energy shock that we've experienced since then, whether it was in 2023 with OPEC and its, you know, Saudi Arabia's lollipop, their stupid lollipop that backfired big time. 2024, the Yemeni rebels, oil prices surged again. 2025, tariff inflation. 2026, Iran inflation, the long run.

Inflation expectation from the marketplace has been consistent. It's not inflation. There are short-run impacts on the CPI, sure, from each of those things, but the demand situation, the monetary situation is not consistent with any type of inflation risk whatsoever.

So, here's a big part of why I think this is playing out because you do have to reconcile with you've got the 1973 oil embargo has massive supply disruption and it doesn't lead to demand destruction. And so not not in um energy related things, but it is leading to demand destruction now outside of um energy and energy itself. And so you have a response now that's different to what happened in 1973. And so the question becomes why is this playing out differently?

I have a feeling though I have not checked the data so this could end up not being true but I have a feeling that what you're looking at is as we're coming into the 1970s we um had real wage growth through the 50s and 60s and so there was a cultural sense of like okay I'm feeling good I'm getting richer we hadn't yet been clobbered with the inflation in the 70s and so people are coming into that with just a totally different mentality than we have now which is the exact opposite um my real wages haven't grown in decades or not much. And so there's a lot of anxiety around that. And so now that people have burned through savings, they've burned through credit cards. We're getting hit with these disruptions at a point whether you're talking about COVID or you're talking about the Iran war where it destroys demand instead of pushing people to be like, well, we got to keep all the things that require energy going. It's like, no, it's the economy is so weak because of that um weakness in real wage growth that people are just like, I'm just out of cash, man. I'm just tapped out. Even if I wanted to pay more for this, I just can't. I don't have the money. Um again, that's a that's very much a hypothesis as opposed to a thesis. Um but I wouldn't be surprised if that ends up holding true.

>> Keep chasing the inflation ghost up the some kind of tree. What? Some kind of haunted tree or something. I don't know what the correct analogy is here. So that's the tips market. Now let's talk about what's going on in oil because it's really interesting what's happening here today. Now as we know uh the Iran conflict has flared up again which is should not have been a surprise either because the >> what's going on in Iran and this is something by the way that I talked about with Brent Johnson yesterday and that's something I should bring up too. I've started a couple other channels here at Eur University including a channel to talk about Euroll talk. Uh did did some conversations yesterday with Hugh Hendry and Keith Weiner, our good friend Keith Weiner at Monetary Metals. Uh if you don't know Keith Weiner, you should. Tremendously smart guy knows his history, knows the gold market in and out. And of course, Brent Johnson. I'm going to talk to Ken Moy today. Got Ed Dow, got you know Mike, I mean tons of people over at Eurog Talk. Check that out. You subscribe to that channel as these these conversations will be coming out in the very near term. But we were talking about how Brent and I, we're talking about how complex the situation is in the Middle East. And so this is going to linger on for quite some time and as it's flared up again, as you would expect, you know, supply situation becomes questionable again, especially with the blockade, oil prices are responding. So you've seen front month contracts in WTI futures go from the 60s up until almost the it got into the 80s earlier this morning. It's right around 79.50 today. But today, look at look at the price changes that are going on today. So, front month contract, August delivery up a $1.42. It's it was up more than that, but $1.42 almost 2%. Uh September delivery, not nearly as much, only up a dollar. October delivery only up 30 cents. But then look beyond that. November delivery, the three-month benchmark down. So oil prices are up near-term and they're increasingly sold off further into the future, which is, as Clown Waller is pointing to, demand destruction. So what the market is saying is that yes, the flare up in the Middle East is there's a good chance it's going to disrupt supply again in the near term, which is going to raise the desperation or at least urgency to buy oil in the short run. but selling contracts further into the future because the market is saying uh oh the situation in the macroeconomy not good despite what the the Federal Reserve says or politicians or the stock market or at least small segments of the stock market uh the the oil market is saying look we were on thin ice to begin with this with this energy shock an increase in oil prices that keeps gasoline around $4 wholesale or $3 wholesale or higher it's actually three three and a quarter today that keeps retail gasoline up around $4.20, $4.30, maybe even $4.50. It's going to lead to demand destruction in the US, in Europe, across Asia. Therefore, we're going to buy oil in the near term because there's going to be some desperation for supply. But we don't need to buy oil for a very long time because we're thinking oil is going to become cheaper down the road as demand continues to fall off further and further and further.

What's going on in China is a big part of this equation. And you have right now the two biggest economies in the world both uh sick and not doing well. The US for reasons that we've been talking about here largely an echo of COVID. What's going on in China is tied to their housing crisis. Certainly that's my belief. And so you've got the two biggest economies in the world in bad shape. Um looking at what's going on with the oil prices and China for one is not doubling down. um they were drawing on their reserves briefly but they were actually even with the disruption from the straight of Hormuz they were able to at the beginning able to keep building um into their uh reserve tank. So that's pretty extraordinary that tells you that the what happened in the housing crisis has caused a massive downturn both in diesel and consumer um needs for regular gas. So when you get into a position where you can actually destroy energy demand, which has for 50 years been considered inelastic, you know that you're in pretty rough shape.

All right, with all of this, first of all, shout out to Jeff Snyder. I'm so grateful I found him. He's utterly fascinating. Uh be very thoughtful. Always approach the stuff with massive amounts of humility. But the story that you're being told about what's going on in the economy just isn't the story. I think the vast majority of people just don't understand it well enough. Um, and so be very careful. The more you can get towards what are the actual signals, what can we look at, where are people betting their money to get closer to ground truth, the better off you're going to be. Uh, but these are very complex systems. So, I for one, I'm going to walk away from this saying, okay, this is my thesis of what's going on right now, but I'm very actively going to seek disconfirming evidence because I'm making all of us are making every day a bet based on where we put or don't put our money on what we think is going to happen in the future. And in the inflationary environment that we all live in, um, don't be confused by a momentary downturn. Remember what happened to all of us during COVID, uh, you've got to find a way to be able to make ends meet by putting your money to work. So, just be thoughtful about all of it. Um, another shout out to Straight Arrow News. Love those guys. Thank you so much for supporting everything that we're doing here on the channel. The QR code is on your screen. Go to s.comtomillu to get the unbiased truth on the stories that matter. Um, that's very important. Making sure that you are not getting uh spin, that you're not being propagandized. That is hugely important. And if we want to keep this sponsor and keep doing what we're doing here, we are trying to get to 100 app downloads, guys. So, if that speaks to you and you want news that's truly unbiased, go check them out. That would be amazing. It'd be a huge way to support the channel. My next AI master class is coming up Wednesday, August 5th at 1 p.m. Pacific for free. I'm going to teach you guys how to launch a company using AI. The link to sign up is in the description. Until then, be legendary. All right. Peace. If you like this conversation, check out this episode to learn more. Boys and girls, things are popping off in China, and they have a goal to get out from under the dollar. I don't think anybody's confused about that. They also want to be the global hegemon. The more you read about Xi Jinping, the more