Transcription
Since the murder of Charlie Kirk, there have been a lot of different theories about what really happened that day. I wanted to explain all the main theories and put them into one concise video. We're going to perform a meta-analysis of all of them, and the results are going to shock you.
Number one, the lone gunman theory. This is the official FBI narrative. Tyler Robinson is currently on trial for the murder of Charlie Kirk. The prosecution is arguing for the lone gunman theory. They claim that Tyler Robinson acted alone. He was motivated by his love for his furry homosexual lover. He used a .30-06. He carried the gun down the legs of his pants, went up to the roof, put the gun together with the screwdriver, took the shot, and jumped off the roof like Spider-Man.
If you watch my channel, you know that I find the lone gunman theory ridiculous. Even if Tyler Robinson did it, it seems extremely unlikely to me that he was working alone. We have to acknowledge that this is the official FBI narrative. They have put their stamp of approval on claiming this is what happened. The biggest problem with this theory is that the wound on Charlie Kirk does not match a .30-06. This is the reason why there are so many alternative theories, because people just do not believe that Charlie Kirk was shot with a .30-06. People are searching for some other explanation that makes sense.
Number two, the second shooter. This is the theory that I think is the most likely. The shooter on the roof was a decoy, and there was actually a second shooter. This mirrors what most people think happened in the JFK assassination. The most accepted conspiracy theory for JFK is that there were multiple shooters involved. I think the same thing happened with Charlie Kirk. The idea is this. The worst thing that can happen in an assassination is a failed attempt. You want to make sure you get the kill. You can use a long-range sniper, but it is more accurate to have a shooter at close range. There were people standing behind Charlie Kirk's tent, so if he really was shot by a sniper, the bullet should have killed the people standing behind him as well.
Here is the second shooter theory. The shooter on the roof was just a decoy. The person on the roof actually shot into a target in the back of a van. This creates a distraction, so that a shooter in the crowd at close range can take a shot, most likely with a small caliber gun with a silencer with an infrared laser, so they do not miss. This could be done with a modern version of a palm pistol. The shot from the rooftop lets the real killer escape without being noticed. The other benefit of having a decoy shooter on the roof is that anyone could be made a patsy. All you have to do is drop a screwdriver with anyone's DNA on it on the roof. You could blame the murder on anyone you want. We do know that a bullet fragment was recovered from Charlie Kirk's body. The ATF was not able to match this bullet fragment to the .30-ought-6. So, it makes sense that this could have been from a different small caliber weapon. This would also be more consistent with the smaller entry wound on Charlie Kirk's neck.
I have discussed this theory before and pointed out that Rick Cutler was a member of Charlie Kirk's security team that was in the crowd and doing strange movements with his hands at the moment that Charlie Kirk was shot. He is directly in line with the bullet wound. It is my understanding that Rick Cutler was added to the security team around 48 hours prior, and then he disappears again shortly after. It is believed that he has fled the country, most likely to do missionary work in Central America, which is where he has lived in the past.
>> Really fulfilling the next calling in my life. Obviously, policing, military, and then policing for 32 plus years of my life, now into full-time missions. Um and that's really what I ended up here in in Guatemala in December of 2019, and been here ever since full-time. And so, he called me and says, "Man, what do you think about coming to the Dominican for about 10 days to do some training and some operations?" And I was like, "Yeah, I can do that." And that's how it started. So, I ended up contracting part-time with Underground Railroad while I was still with my disaster relief organization. Contracted part-time with Underground Railroad while I was still with my disaster relief organization. And then and a year ago, this month, uh the central uh two be the country director for Guatemala for is anti-human trafficking um here in Guatemala in Central America.
>> You know, it's it's so heartbreaking that an organization like yours can be in 40 plus countries. The fact that the need is there is horrific. I mean, the people who can least protect themselves, take care of themselves, or have a sys- uh a system of justice and care um to serve them. It's horrible.
It all seems pretty suspicious to me. I think the second shooter theory is the simplest explanation. It claims that Charlie Kirk was shot by a second shooter at close range. This theory also does a better job of explaining the entry wound more than a .30-ought-six.
Number three, drone shot. The next theory is that Charlie Kirk was shot from a drone. This technology currently exists.
>> A new species of drone is taking flight. One that doesn't just observe or explode. This one aims and shoots. They are called gun drones and they're rewriting the rules of combat. Unlike missile-armed drones, gun drones are far more terrifying. These are flying platforms equipped with traditional firearms. That is your machine guns, assault rifles, even submachine guns. Their job is simple. Hover, aim, and shoot.
There were reports of drones in the air that day above UVU campus. This is strange because we know that UVU was not officially allowing any drones to fly. We also have flight data for unusual military aircraft that were circling above Utah. This jet, N1098L, is specifically used in the Hades program for military intelligence. The Hades program turns luxury business jets into high-tech spy planes for intelligence gathering. Don't you think it is strange that this specific plane was flying circles over UVU campus during Charlie Kirk's assassination? It is possible that a military aircraft could have dropped off a drone midair and we would never have known the difference. This drone could have flown down and shot Charlie Kirk. This theory is actually the best match for the bullet trajectory. We still have not seen Charlie Kirk's autopsy, but we have been told that the bullet traveled in a downward trajectory damaging bones in his neck and traveling down towards his chest.
>> So, in the very graphic video of him being shot, you can see the wound coming into his neck right around where I'm indicating. And he tips backwards right after he's shot. He brings his arms up, but actually when he's bringing his arms up, he is exhibiting what we call decorticate posturing, which means his spinal cord has been severed from his brain and it's no longer communicating with the rest of his body. So, he was incidentally rendered a quadriplegic. So, that movement you see is actually just a reflexive movement by his nervous system trying to figure out what's going on. Then you see him tipping tipping to the side and blood start gushing out of his wound on his neck, which to me means it's an artery that's hit, more likely than not the carotid artery and the jugular vein. So, he's hemorrhaging heavily out the side of his neck as he's falling to the ground. Now, this spinal cord being severed at this level could be below C5 C6. So, he could still be breathing and still be alive for a period of time, which he was when he was rushed to the hospital and died. But, the damage that was done was so severe, even if he had survived, he probably would have had a stroke and he would have been a quadriplegic.
>> We also halfway through that heard that the bullet had hit his C2 down to his C6. Like this weird trajectory that goes through your face. Like the spinal damage that the doctor the surgeon was apparently reporting was completely inconsistent with the wound that we had all seen in in multiple ways. And so, with the changing narrative about the damage to his neck and the changing narrative about the bullet that did the damage to his neck, it it's And And now we can't trust anything that any of them have said.
>> Yeah.
Just for context, here is C2 through C6. The bullet is traveling downward. This could only be explained if Charlie Kirk was shot by something above him, like a drone in the air.
Number four, electrocution. The next theory is that Charlie Kirk was electrocuted. The idea is that when Charlie Kirk was shot, he clenches up. This is an unusual reaction because you would expect him to instantly drop his microphone. People are claiming that he was clenching up because he was being electrocuted through his microphone. This has been promoted by Baron Coleman.
>> What did Charlie's hand look like holding the microphone mere seconds before the shot went off. Or the loud noise went off, we'll call it now. What did his hand look like? That's a good image of his hand there. Notice the hand. Look at the hand. Examine the hand. This is a picture taken 20-something seconds, I think 22 or three I counted out. Uh and I wasn't sure exactly when it was taken, so I gave like a 2-second window. This is his hand taken immediately after. What does that look like to you? That's not blood. That's not blood. And there's something else about this. You see these two dots up here? What are those? For those saying bruise, he just died, like instantly. You see how shiny that knuckle is right there? Have you ever burned your hand on the stove? Have you ever burned your hand on a pan when you when you reach in and grab something and you see a little shine on it and you start to rub some butter on it or you put some water over it? So, that's his right his left arm as he's being carried off. It kind of looks charred. That's his left arm. Now, his left arm in that image that I showed you, and I can go back to the video, his left arm was what was holding the microphone, and I'm not going to show the point of impact, but he brings the microphone down and and holds it then with both hands. It's at that moment when he grabs it with both hands, the shirt flies up, and he gets he gets tense. And I'm going to tell you what kind of led me down this path, and I'm going to show you a few more pictures. But that hand looks crispy. I'll be honest. The right hand looked like it had been tased or something, but the right the left hand looks just fried in my humble opinion.
This second photo is of Charlie Kirk's arm as they are carrying him to the car. It was not enough time to form bruises. It is more likely to be some kind of burn. Candace Owens has been doing her own investigation into the Charlie Kirk murder. She has emphatically dismissed the electrocution theory.
>> Central 848 writes, "Candace, please look into the possibility that Charlie was electrocuted and that the hole in his neck was made by the currents passing through his necklace and out of his throat. The images of his charred hands are conclusive and compelling. Please, for love of God, look into this." I did watch that video that Baron Coleman put together. First of all, I want to say Baron Coleman has done some incredible work, and I actually told him that we should get together and collaborate because I had watched video of his where he was building on Camp Wawbeek. And he made me notice some things, then we started researching some other elements. That's where we're going to move on to tomorrow. I can tell you definitively that's a weird camera angle. They do look charred in the photos that he showed, but I can tell you that his hands were not charred when he was buried. And so, what you thought they like people were like, "Oh, this was like makeup and stuff." It was a very compelling theory. It just wasn't so, and I very much trust the person that told me that.
I have always found her comment very strange. Why does Candace Owens refuse to consider this theory? I don't think it is the most likely either, but I'm not going to dismiss it. I agree that I cannot see bruises on Charlie Kirk's hands in the casket. But to be honest, it looks like his hands are covered in makeup. The criticism of this theory is that anything involving electricity is extremely dangerous. If anyone touched him, they would also be electrocuted. We know from the video that people rushed over to him immediately, and they do not seem to be worried about getting electrocuted.
Number five, exploding microphone. Something that has always bothered people is that Charlie Kirk's shirt moves in a very strange way. It puffs up as if there is a burst of air underneath it. People started looking into the theory of an explosive coming from his lapel microphone under his shirt. This theory was started on x.com by John Bray. Candace Owens has also said she thinks this is the most likely possibility. The idea is this. You've probably heard about Israel using exploding pagers to fight Hezbollah. The attack wounded more than 3,000 people. This theory claims the same technology was used to rig an explosive in Charlie Kirk's microphone. The explosion could have been directed to send a bullet fragment through Charlie Kirk's chest to make it look like he was shot with a .30-06. This theory also claims the device did not work as expected, which is why the bullet came out his neck. There is also this photo showing Charlie Kirk's chest and what looks like burn marks in the outline of the road microphone he was wearing. This theory explains why it looks like there are shattered pieces of the road microphone on the floor of the SUV that Charlie took to the hospital. This theory also explains why the FBI immediately paved over the crime scene. This would have been necessary to cover up explosive residue left in the soil.
Personally, I've never bought into the idea of the exploding microphone. We have video of the exploding pagers in Israel. I cannot show the video on YouTube because it is too violent, but you can go watch those videos. They look nothing like what happened to Charlie Kirk. They are full-on explosions. Charlie Kirk's shirt had no markings on it. There was no blood on his chest. It did not sound like an explosion. I don't think the wound is consistent with an explosion. I also find it hard to believe that a bullet fragment entered Charlie Kirk's chest, somehow changed direction, went up his neck, and then exited out the opposite side of his body. That path seems to defy the laws of physics. I also think that explosives are really unpredictable, and I don't think someone would choose such an uncertain method to carry out a high-profile assassination. Now, I'm not counting it out as a possibility. I just don't think it is the most likely.
Number six, he is alive. There is growing speculation that Charlie Kirk is still alive. This theory was promoted by Jesse on Fire. Jesse on Fire is an expert in jujitsu. And I never say anything bad about him, because quite frankly, I'm worried he could beat me up. So, I am not making fun of you, Jesse. But you have to admit this is one of the more crazy theories. It stems from the fact that if you watch the moment that Charlie Kirk was shot, there is so much blood that it does not look real. I'm not going to show the moment Charlie Kirk was shot because this is on YouTube. But blood bursts out of his neck. There is so much blood, it does not look like it is possible. This theory suggests that it was fake blood. Charlie Kirk was rigged with some kind of fake neck that burst open and shot out fake blood. This would explain why the area was paved over because they would not want anyone to be able to test the blood and discover it did not belong to Charlie Kirk. The reason this is so compelling is that any good Hollywood makeup artist can do this. They can simulate exactly this kind of wound. A lot of interest was generated by this photograph from that day. You can see a strange bulge in Charlie Kirk's neck at the same location as the wound. He could be wearing a prosthetic neck. YouTuber Jordan Henshaw also believes in this theory and he has done multiple tests duplicating the blood spurting out.
>> I'm saying we're not counting gang violence.
>> Great.
>> violence
>> Great. Great. Great. Great. Great. violence Great. Great. violence Great.
When you compare this with the other theories, no one has been able to perform a test that duplicates the blood spurting out other than this theory. This is the only theory people have been able to duplicate. The other piece of compelling evidence is there was no blood trail. With the amount of blood coming out of Charlie Kirk's neck, why did he suddenly stop bleeding as they carried him to the car?
>> No blood trail by the way. Here we go. I'm sure the guy No blood trail.
>> rushes Charlie
>> No blood trail. And then this is where the paramedics come over try to help them and they're like, "Nah, it's cool. We got it."
>> Just been shot to Charlie
>> No blood at all. None. No blood at all. Ask your paramedic friend if that's possible.
>> He's a
The reason I'm not convinced about this theory is because it would be the most difficult to pull off from a practical perspective. When you murder someone, you just have to pull off the crime once. But when you fake someone's death, you have to keep the cover-up going forever. It is a logistical nightmare. If Charlie Kirk is still alive, where is he? If you really think about this, it gets really dark. Does this mean that he is still alive and being kept in a cage in the basement of Erica Kirk? Because if that is what Jesse on Fire is saying, that is really dark. I have been pretty critical of Erica Kirk, but I have never suggested anything like that. Because if Charlie Kirk is still alive, that means he's being held somewhere.
Number seven, strangulation. The next theory is strangulation. I mentioned earlier that there was damage to the bones in Charlie Kirk's neck. I want to emphasize that we do not have the full autopsy, but some people have speculated that the damage to the bones in his neck suggests that Charlie Kirk was strangled in the car. If the shooting was fake, there could have been two outcomes. They could have faked the shooting to keep Charlie Kirk alive, or they could have done it to get him in the car where they could have killed him after the fact. Let us look at who was in the car. This is an AI image shown on Candace Owens' show. Charlie Kirk was lying across the seats with his legs hanging out the side of the car. We have Davis driving, Dan Flood, Rick Cutler, Brian Harpole, and Frank Turek in the back. One of the major questions is whether there was anything strange on the ride to the hospital. If Charlie Kirk was not fully dead, did they do anything to try and kill Charlie Kirk? I will admit that this theory has the least amount of evidence supporting it. However, these people involved keep lying about what happened. Why do the people at Turning Point keep telling lies about Charlie Kirk's death? They are an alleged Christian organization, and they keep being caught in lie after lie after lie. That makes what happened in the car ride very suspicious.
Conclusion. Those are the seven major theories about Charlie Kirk's murder. But we have to consider something else. What if they tried multiple methods at the same time? If they really wanted to make sure they got Charlie Kirk, they could have done all of them. It is possible that there was a second shooter, they shot him with a drone, they electrocuted him, they exploded his mic, they strangled him, and they managed to keep him alive in a cage in the basement of Erica Kirk.
I think the main point here is that people do not believe the official narrative. They do not think that Charlie Kirk was shot with a .30-06, so they're looking for answers. I do not know for sure what happened, and I'm open to all the possibilities. I think at this point it is helpful to perform a meta-analysis. This is when you look at multiple studies and see if you can draw any correlation about what people have uncovered. I think there is something really important here. There is a common thread among all these different theories. In every single theory except the FBI narrative, someone at Turning Point USA had to have been involved. Think [snorts] about it. The lone shooter theory is the only one where Tyler Robinson acted alone. All the other theories would have required some level of coordination. That suggests that someone close to Charlie Kirk betrayed him. This is true of every single theory except what the FBI is telling us. You have to start to wonder, is someone from Turning Point USA involved?
This raises a bigger question. Why isn't the FBI looking into any of these theories? Isn't that strange? To my knowledge, the FBI has not brought anyone in for questioning from Turning Point USA. Why is that? Wouldn't that make sense? When you start going through these theories, there's a lot of unanswered questions. Isn't the FBI curious about why people from Turning Point USA keep lying about what happened that day?
Here's the post from Kash Patel on x.com where he says, "As the director of the FBI, I'm committed to ensuring the investigation into Charlie Kirk's assassination is thorough and exhaustive, pursuing every lead to its conclusion." It is clear that he is lying. Besides the FBI narrative, he has not shown any evidence that he has investigated any of the theories I've laid out in this video. Why is the head of the FBI lying about this investigation? Are they potentially involved in the cover-up?
Now, I want to hear from you. What do you think is the most likely theory? Do you believe the FBI? Let me know in the comments down below. And if you like this video, don't forget to hit that subscribe button so you don't miss out on future videos. If you want to support independent journalism like this channel, consider signing up for a membership on my website wolvesinfinance.com. For $6 a month, your support helps me to keep making these videos. Thank you to everyone who has signed up. I'm Zach from Wolves of Finance. Thank you for watching.
>> [music] [music]
>> Mhm.