Transcription
An anti-hero is simply a protagonist who lacks traditionally heroic qualities. This rather broad type of character has a lot of subtypes, from Byronic heroes to annoying YouTube personas, but we are going to focus on a specific type of anti-hero. You know the one. The cool one.
Brooding, dark, alone, anti-heroes are way cooler than normal heroes because they possess a special power that the marketers desperately seek: edginess! Being edgy is the secret to making a good character. At least I think it is? It must be, given how everyone keeps going on about it. Regardless, anti-heroes have a lot of other perks. For one, they are really easy to write! So ready your best flat stare and prepare to brood, or just read nearly any comic from the 90s and get ready to write an anti-hero!
Now, the first thing our anti-hero needs is appropriate attire. Anti-heroes need darker colors to contrast them with the heroes. Basically, have him break into the dark lord’s closet and steal his black attire before shaving off the spikes. Don’t forget the scar that will only make him look battle-hardened rather than ugly, as well as a permanent five o'clock shadow.
Now that we have our anti-hero looking the part, we are basically done because most anti-heroes get like, no characterization. I mean, of course they do, so long as that characterization is brooding and laconic. Anti-heroes speak a special language consisting only of grunts and short, sarcastic quips. In the rest of the scene, he spends his time with his back propped up against a wall and arms crossed. I mean, don’t they ever get tired and need to sit down? I guess being a roughish anti-hero gives them a special power to never get tired. Maybe their stoic glare recharges their energy or something.
What anti-heroes lack in dialogue, they make up for in conflict. Specifically, forced, contrived conflict. Do the heroes have a plan? Well, our anti-hero is going to tell his companions all about how it isn’t going to work, while offering no alternatives of his own. These constant attempts to undermine the leadership of the heroes will always go unchallenged for fear of making our anti-hero look uncool. In fact, why the heroes tolerate such an abrasive individual who constantly disrupts team cohesion should never be addressed. Our anti-hero should never suffer any repercussions for this antisocial behavior. Not that it would matter if they kicked him out. Anti-heroes tend to work best when they are loners. He is his own man. In spite of his constant trash-talking, other characters should still respect the anti-hero because he is beholden to no one, yet still like in every crossover team for some reason.
The only people who treat our anti-hero like a pariah are those with authority because he is a loose cannon who doesn’t play by the rules and should turn in his badge! He’s off the force, which means our anti-hero will have to pursue justice as a vigilante and go on a bloody, violence-glamorizing killing spree. Be sure to downplay the ‘justice’ part of vigilante justice. He will mow down enough minions to fill an entire army by himself faster than you can say “what’s due process?” Our anti-hero will not hesitate to kill or torture people, unlike those goody-two-shoes normal heroes who just don’t have what it takes to get things done, even though larger systemic problems like crime are better combated by organized teams and legal reform rather than punching people.
Speaking of punching people, this is what our anti-hero is really good at. In fact, the anti-hero is one of the few characters who we don’t need to give a ton of super-awesome powers to. Our anti-hero is so cool he can be awesome just by himself, with superpowers being entirely optional. This will in no way be glaring when he is surrounded by super-powered companions and hyper-powerful villains. He will win his fights through sheer grit and massive authorial bias. No need to cleverly resolve the anti-hero’s fights with guile and underhanded tactics that emphasize his pragmatic nature when compared to the more idealized heroes. I mean, writing a cunning hero is like, really hard. Instead, he should hog the spotlight while defeating his opponents with ease and brutality.
However, if our anti-hero is the focus of the story rather than a side character, then we need to go to the other extreme instead and give him a slew of game-breaking powers. He should slaughter all of his foes with relative ease to the point where the only true challenge in the story is for the audience as they endure the anti-hero’s increasingly terrible one-liners. It helps to remember that all characters are simply a collection of abilities and not like actual human beings with emotions. Don’t worry. I am sure the anti-hero’s innate coolness will distract the audience from his complete lack of depth.
Now, adding depth to an anti-hero is entirely optional. I don’t really see how it could make him any cooler, but I suppose it couldn’t hurt. Normally, keeping our anti-hero’s backstory a secret adds mystery, and not just because we are too lazy to give him a motive. However, adding subtle hints to his past can be useful, especially if we suggest a tragic youth full of emotional scars that can only be healed in hurt-comfort fics.
The only motive to drive an anti-hero is usually revenge. Revenge could work as a motive for our anti-hero because it acts a foil to the more heroic character’s ideals and creates a dark shadow of the traditional portrayal of the impartial and objective pursuit of justice. But the real reason is so our anti-hero can drop cryptic hints about his bloody quest for vengeance that we will totally detail and not forget to resolve by the end of the story. I mean, we really don’t have time to actually make up a good reason our anti-hero is a bitter, lone, antisocial jerk, so vengeance is a good fallback. If we actually did resolve his vengeance plot, then how will our anti-hero brood?
Brooding is a very important part of our anti-hero’s coolness because it suggests that he is engaged in dark internal monologue, allowing the audience to imagine that he is struggling with his inner demons when he’s probably just thinking about what he is going to have for lunch. He probably isn’t thinking about the love triangle with the main heroine either, even though the anti-hero always wins the love triangle in the end. And even if he ignores the love triangle completely, you can bet the fan-fiction writers won’t. Nor will they ignore his rivalry with the main hero. Is the anti-hero jealous of the main hero, or is his interest something more? Well, it doesn’t matter because slash fic writers will ship him with the main hero regardless. Hmm… I wonder why?
Could it be because the contrast between the anti-hero and the traditional hero is the one of the reasons anti-heroes tend to resonate with audiences? If that were the case, then perhaps a good way to write an anti-hero would be showcase his vulnerability to maximize the contrast with his strengths. Also, adding a few genuinely heroic traits could also help balance his character while still keeping his darker edge and even make it stand out all the more. Moreover, it provides the author a pre-built character arc. Will our anti-hero become a tragic figure where his character traits ultimately lead to his downfall, or will the anti-hero open up to the others over the course of the story and finally become a good person? Perhaps the anti-hero will overcome his deep flaws and finally become a true hero! But he’s probably not going to have any luck with the ladies after that, though.