Transcription
Hey everybody, Dr. G here. I'm a clinical and forensic psychologist as well as a body language expert. And today we're going to be doing more forensic analysis of Jeffrey Epstein during his last days in prison. Before we get started with this, couple of quick things. One, I wanted to make sure you know this is not a psychological evaluation of any kind. These are just my opinions. In addition to that, I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, let's go.
What we're going to be analyzing today are new Epstein files that I've found that continue to prove a cover up related to Jeffrey Epstein's death. Now, if you've watched my channel before, you've probably seen this is something I've covered extensively. There's a tremendous amount of evidence of a coverup, but I continue to find more. Part of the reason I decided to revisit this now is that I've noticed in the media that recently people have been talking about that one of the correctional officers, Tovan Noel, was in fact googling Epstein's name very shortly before they found his body. This is actually not new information. This is something that I covered months ago, but I went back and revisited that and I found some additional information that's very, very interesting and pretty compelling. In addition to that, we're going to be looking at the first time that Jeffrey Epstein was intact in prison. We've got more information on that now.
All right, let's just jump right in. So, what we're looking at right here is one of the new Epstein files that's been circulating in the media because it shows that Tovven Noel, who's one of the correctional officers, was actually looking up Epstein in jail about 30 minutes before his body was found. Now, I covered this a long time ago, so this is not exactly new. And we've known for a long time that she looked up Epstein, but this shows what time she did it. That is relatively new. What we're going to do though is we're going to do a deeper dive into what some of these Google searches are because there's a very strange connection with one of these names. It's very, very weird, but we're going to get into that in a second.
First, I'll show you this was Michael Thomas's Google history. This is what he was doing on the computer. Michael Thomas was the other correctional officer. So, there were two correctional officers working that night. Michael Thomas, Tova Noel. This is Michael Thomas'. Pretty straightforward, pretty boring. Looking up motorcycles, looking up ESPN. But beyond that, there was no recorded usage between 1 and 6:00.
But now if we look at Tova Noel's computer usage. So the first few things she did up here, she looked up EP insurance. USA jobs. This is all government related stuff. This is all job related stuff. USA jobs in the US is where you find government employed jobs. So if you're going to search for a new job, that's where you'd look. So maybe at that point she was actually looking for a new job. It's an interesting thing that she would have been doing that morning. But after that, you'll see she was looking up furniture for a while and then took about a 45-minute break.
Now, this right here, just so you know, we're going to look at the actual computer logs. This is a summary by the FBI. So, what we have here is Tova Noel's computer usage. This says user Tova Noel, and it goes through and shows everything that she did that morning. Now, around 5:27 a.m., it said that she looked up Kenyatta Testee and then looked up Kenyatta Khan. And these are both apparently the same person. It's someone who's incarcerated but is also a performer in New York. At least that's what it looks like. And it looks like that she she did a little bit of searching related to this person. Then at 5:42 did another search for Kenyatta. And then at 5:42 directly after that, then she searched latest on Epstein in jail. Now from there she actually looked at a CNBC article from that day because it says 8/9/2019 documents released about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. And then about three minutes later, she she clicked on another Google search. And then at 5:52, she ended up looking up latest on Epstein in jail again before she went onto a different search.
Now, I want to show you how this timelines up with what we've seen on the video camera. So, this said that she did a Google search at 5:27:54. All right, let's just keep that number in mind. Now, we're watching the footage that covers that same time period. As you can see, it says 5:27:18 right here. What we just looked at was 5:27. Clearly, she is not on her computer right now. So, what does this mean? Well, this means that something's off. Either the time is wrong on this or the time is wrong on the internet searches. But these are things that should not be wrong. This should be something that's hard locked in there. And clearly, it isn't because, as you can watch this right here, it's 5:27:30. That's the exact same time she should have been making Google searches.
Now, I also want to point out because I pointed this out on a video last summer, but I just find it sort of staggeringly interesting is watch this right here. That is pointing exactly to where Jeffrey Epstein's cell would be because his cell is way back here. So, this continues to be strange because after this, just a few minutes after this is when she apparently Googles Jeffrey Epstein's name. So, the fact that she may have been referring to him right here seems very, very possible. And I know you can't see it well, but she even looks back at the camera. And then she doesn't come back in until 5:29 and 30 seconds. So now when we go back to the logs and we can see that the times that this reports were times that she was actually up and walking around, it goes to show that something was manipulated at some point. It looks to me more like it was the video that was manipulated. I've talked extensively about how I think the videos were manipulated, but I think that this proves it because the times cannot line up. Now, they could be close, but they're not exactly the same, which is majorly problematic for something automatic like what time it is. That should be universal and synchronized everywhere.
But now, I'm going to show you something even stranger. Now, I want you to keep the name Kenyatta in mind. So, as I said, she looked up one of the prisoners that was there. But there was also a piece of paper found in Jeffrey Epstein's cell. And this just seems too coincidental and too strange. But let's take a look at this. Now, we're going to go back to Jeffrey Epstein's cell. I have extensively covered all of the pieces of paper, every scrap of paper, every note that has been in Jeffrey Epstein's cell, but this one I had not previously seen. This one must have been redacted in the other files that I'd looked at. But here we have it. And this is not written by Jeffrey Epstein. This is not his handwriting. So, what this says is it says author Donald Goins. Then it says books and it lists some of his books. Two of those books being Kenyatta and Kenyatta's Revenge. The Kenyatta book series is actually a very influential urban crime series from the early '70s. A lot of it had to do with overthrowing political and criminal organizations that were exploiting black communities. Ironically, Jeffrey Epstein is exactly the kind of person that would have been a villain in the Kenyatta books. Wealthy, politically connected, operating in elite circles, has a global trafficking ring, exploits young women. This is exactly the kind of people that Kenyatta would be fighting against. One of the biggest themes in the Kenyatta series is being able to abuse power and then being connected and protected from accountability. So the fact that this was given to Jeffrey Epstein, the fact that this was in his cell cannot be a coincidence. Based on everything I know about Jeffrey Epstein, he most definitely was not the primary demographic of this book. This is not something that he would have enjoyed. So I find it exceptionally strange that one of the correctional officers was looking up one of the inmates whose name was Kenyatta while at the same time Jeffrey Epstein had a note in his cell written by somebody else suggesting books about Kenyatta, a different Kenyatta but had but was being recommended these books that he absolutely would never have read where he would have quite literally have been the exact archetype of the villains in these books.
Have you ever Googled your own name or email address? Before I had Aura, I did. And wow, it was my full name, my old address, phone number, all sorts of information I did not want people to have. That's why I started using Aura, today's sponsor. If you've ever wondered how scammers get your number or why your inbox is drowning in spam, this is why. They're companies called data brokers that collect and sell your personal information to marketers, scammers, and yes, even stalkers. They do it without your permission. The good news is they're legally required to remove it if you ask. The only issue is that it's time-consuming and they make it as confusing as humanly possible. This is where Aura comes in. They take care of the hard part for you. Automatically requesting removals from these data broker sites and keeping your info off of them over time. In the first two weeks, you'll see exactly where your personal data is exposed and start watching it disappear without you lifting a finger. It's an all-in-one digital security tool that gives you alerts if your personal info appears on the dark web, real-time fraud alerts for crediting and banking, 24/7 identity monitoring, a secure VPN, antivirus, password manager, and more. Plus, a $5 million identity theft insurance policy, and US-based fraud experts available around the clock. You can try Aura free for 14 days at aura.com/dg. That's enough time for Aura to start scrubbing your info off all of these data broker sites automatically. I'm not leaving myself vulnerable, and you shouldn't either. Go to aura.com/dg and get started with your 14-day trial today.
All right, back to the analysis. Now, something else that I've seen reported is that Tova Noel in fact had a deposit of $5,000 or something like that shortly before all of this happened. But I found a document that shows the FBI already knew about this. I'm going to read it to you and we'll talk about it. So it says on November 22nd, 2019, JP Morgan Chase provided a suspicious activity report regarding 12 cash deposits made by Tova Noel which occurred between 4/10/2018 and 7/30/2019. Now as you can see this was actually part of Jeffrey Epstein's death investigation. It was done on 12/5/2019 and apparently nothing ever happened from this. So I presume that they felt like it wasn't worth following up on but it was noted by them.
Now what's even more interesting is a document from 8/29/2019. And so this would have been just a couple of weeks after Jeffrey Epstein's death. So now I'm going to read you a segment from this. Now this is from an employee of the MCC of the prison. And this person worked at the back gate. And here's what they had to say. They told this to the FBI. They reported this to the FBI because they thought it was so significant. Owner about August 15th, 2019, which would have been 5 days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. At approximately 10:30 a.m., Lopez approached Blank's post at the rear gate with approximately three large bags of shredded paper. Lopez told blank that they are shredding everything back there. Lopez said that there was a white man with a southern accent who was involved in the document shredding. Blank was unfamiliar with anyone at MCC that fit that description. Blank surmised that since he did not know who the white man with the southern accent was, he must have been part of the BOP afteraction team related to the Jeffrey Epstein death. Lopez told blank he heard someone say, "Make sure you get that box over there, too." And he went on to say that this that there were more shredded documents than usual during this incident. But he did not with his own eyes observe people shredding Jeffrey Epstein documents. He couldn't say for sure that that's what was being shredded, but he presumed it was because of the timing of it all and because of the volume of it. But ultimately nothing ever happened from this because this individual did not physically see them shredding Jeffrey Epstein documents and so they just moved on. So nothing was ever done about this either, but it was noted by the FBI.
What I'm going to cover very briefly is a report made by one of the inmates. Now, I've talked about this before, but once again, I'm starting to see this pop up in the media. This is something I covered forever ago. Just in case you haven't seen it, I wanted to cover it again because I do think this is brief and it's relevant and it's kind of interesting. But the night that Jeffrey Epstein died, one of the big problems is that the correctional officers were not doing the counts. They were not counting how many inmates there were. They weren't laying eyes on them. That's what their main job is, and they weren't doing it. And it says according to this that Tova Noel, one of those officers, actually came in and said that they are not going to do normal rounds. She actually told the other correctional officer, "We're not doing the rounds tonight." And it wasn't just a matter of ignoring them. She outright said, "We're not doing them tonight." And then the next morning, according to this inmate, when they were walking through with breakfast, Lieutenant Blank served food and dude said, "You killed that guy." She said, "If he is dead, we're going to cover it up and he's going to have an alibi, my officer." And according to this inmate, they this was said loud enough for the entire cell block to hear it because it says the whole H tier heard heard that being said. And the the H tier would basically be like eight, I think eight or 10 different cells. So, this would have been heard by more than just this inmate.
Now, we're going to go back to July 23rd, 2019. This was the first time that Jeffrey Epstein was hospitalized and it was reported that he was found with a piece of linen wrapped around his neck. Now, what was reported previously was that Jeffrey Epstein initially said that he was attacked and then he just said he couldn't remember. There was never a description given of what happened until now because we have found in his own words exactly what he said happened. We're going to get to that, but I'm going to show you a couple of pictures first. They took pictures of him after the incident. As you can see, if you look at his lower neck here, you can see down there, it is pretty red. Okay. Something else we notice right here is there appears to be a bruise on his arm. He had talked about having a hard time moving his right arm, and it looks right here, and I know it's possible it's a shadow, but I really don't think it is. I feel pretty confident that that's a bruise. You can see a bruise on his forearm right here. Now, this is what was reported to have been found around his neck, but I want to go through and read you what happened that night. Then, we're going to come back to that, actually. So, there are two different reports we're going to look at. The first one basically says that Epstein thought that it was likely that his bunkmate had tried to kill him. Epstein also had stated that Bunky had tried to extort money from him and stated that if he didn't pay him, he would beat him up. He also stated that he had been this had been going on for a week. I asked inmate Epstein if he told the staff about this and he told me no, that he'd only told his lawyer.
But now let's look at what he described as actually occurring. So this was an interview given by one of the doctors. During the interview, Epstein stated that he did not have any sleep in approximately 20 days and he was extremely tired the night he was found on the floor. Epstein stated that he got up off the bed at approximately 1:30 a.m. to get a drink of water. And all all he can recall is being on the floor and hearing someone snoring. That's when he realized the snoring was coming from him. Now obviously I wouldn't put it past Jeffrey Epstein to lie about something. However, the way this reads actually reads pretty consistently with someone who does not remember something happening. The kinds of details he provided because he didn't provide too many details. He didn't provide extra details and he also didn't just say, "Well, I don't remember anything." He specified he got up to get a drink of water and the next thing he heard was his own snoring. That very much sounds like someone who was choked out. So, as he describes this, this is incredibly consistent with someone who would have experienced something like this, particularly given the detail that he heard himself snoring and that's what woke him up and he didn't realize it was him. There's an authenticity about that type of detail that sounds very real. Obviously, Jeffrey Epstein's capable of lying. No question about that. But the way this is described sounds very consistent with how you would actually expect someone who had been choked out to recall a situation like this. Now, that doesn't mean that it was the person that was his bunkmate. So maybe somebody else came in and did it, but he was found with a linen wrapped around his neck. And we're going to get into more of those details as well.
Now, this right here are the linens that were reportedly tied together that was found around his neck. The noose as they described it. Now, this was loose enough to where they were able to just pull it off of his head. They didn't have to cut it off or anything. So, I want you to think about just how red his neck was. Look at this right here. If you can see that towards the bottom here, how would you do that to yourself without a tightening linen? The knots were just plain knots. They're they're called granny knots. It's basically just tying two pieces of fabric together. This was not a a noose that would slide. So, how is it that you could do that to yourself with just a piece of fabric that was easy enough to slide off your head?
Now, I also want to point out something that was described from the medical exam. So according to the doctor during the assessment Epstein was identified with a circular line of erythema at the base of his neck reaching 2/3 of the neck circumference 2 in wide sparing the back of the neck. Additionally one section of the erythema in the front has marks of friction. So friction would mean that it was rubbing back and forth on the neck. And all of this to me points to someone that had been through a struggle, someone that had been strangled. And as I said before, Epstein would not remember that. When you lose oxygen to your brain, you do forget what happened before and after for a certain period. So, it wouldn't be surprising at all that he actually wouldn't remember the incident and wouldn't remember the the specifics of what occurred. But what we're supposed to believe is that he somehow gave himself friction marks just on the front of his neck right here and nowhere else. Now, this does not have this has a granny knot. So, it's basically just pieces tied together. It doesn't have some slip knot where you can actually slip it on and make it tighter. So, we're supposed to believe that somehow he tried to make it tighter on himself, but yet it only left friction marks right here in the front, not anywhere else on his neck. The back of his neck was totally fine. The front of the neck was not. He was not suspended. He was laying down. So, to me, that sounds a lot more like a struggle. It sounds a lot more like somebody cutting off his blood supply than it does somebody who is twisting it or trying to do it themselves because then you're going to have those those rub marks, those abrasion marks in other places aside from just the front here. So to me, this seems extremely implausible. And you can see right up here, the back of his neck has no marks on it. Whereas if you look at the front of his neck, the lower part of his neck, it's quite red. So how is it that he would have just given himself marks in the front and not in the back? Doesn't make any sense.
Now, before we wrap things up, I've talked about his autopsy a number of times, but there's something else that stood out to me. After I went over covering what we just talked about, I decided I would take one last look on it. Now, there are two things that really stand out here. One, we're going to start with the head. It says the scalp is without contusion or or laceration. So, in other words, his head had no marks on the back of it. Now, I want you to keep in mind the claim was that he was leaning up against this right here. that his head would have been smack up against this gigantic sharp piece of metal right here, the bed frame. So, what was said is that he would have been right up against it. And when somebody is losing oxygen, their body spasms violently. So, we're supposed to believe that he was straight up against this, that his head didn't touch it at all. That there were no bruises, no marks, nothing. And yet, if we look right above that, internally, there is a deep muscle hemorrhage of the left deltoid muscle. So the explanation by the medical examiner was just that he must have done that when he was spasming. So he can spasm enough to have a deep muscle hemorrhage in the left deltoid muscle, which is up around the shoulder, but his head to have no marks on it whatsoever. That makes absolutely no sense. Now, how would you get a deep muscle hemorrhage like that? Because that is not anything small. That's not like a bruise. A deep muscle hemorrhage would be significant trauma to the left deltoid muscle. Now, something like that could happen if he was slammed up against a wall or if someone had grabbed his arm really hard or someone had struck him in the arm, but something like this is not there's really no other good explanation for it that he would be clean everywhere else. His head would be fine and yet he still has a deep muscle hemorrhage of the left deltoid muscle. At some point I'm going to go through the entire medical report so I can because I've done it over several different videos. But I think when you look at it all together it's much more compelling because you're going to see it doesn't really make a lot of sense in quite a number of ways.
I've previously covered the escape plan that we found in Jeffrey Epstein's cell but it turns out there were a couple of other notes that were impressions on the pages below. So in other words, that someone had written something and you could see a little bit of what was written on the page below it. But the actual notes themselves were gone. These couldn't be found. These are pretty impossible to read. And apparently the FBI couldn't figure out what they said. But I went through because I hadn't seen these before. And I cleaned them up a little bit to see if we can actually read anything because it's the same page over and over again. As you can see, the FBI noted it here. Very difficult to read. I cleared it up a little bit. They found something right here as well and something right here. So, all three of these boxes are different impressions they found on a notepad. Now, I did the best that I could to clean it up a little bit. I'm surprised the FBI didn't do more in this document to actually show it better because this looks a little bit easier to read, although still very difficult. But, if we're to look right here, you can see it says doctor. Dr. Somebody. The name itself is very difficult to read, but it clearly says doctor. It looks like an R or a P and then a Y like Percy or Ready or something like that. And then after that, you can see this looks like an M O N G. I can't get the first few letters here, but it looks like a doctor's name right there. Now, as you can see right here, this looks like a J and the first part of an E. So, and then there's a little bit of an S. So, I do think that this is Jeffrey Epstein. J. Epstein. I think that's what it says right here. Now, the end of this becomes too difficult to read. It looks like a C and then either an L or a K afterward. The next line, I can't read anything here. To me, that's totally illegible. Now, if we're to look at this word right here, it looks like we should be able to read it, but no matter how I adjust the letters, it doesn't make an actual word. It looks close to there's a a blood pressure medication that looks similar to that, but it's not that because it looks almost like it says F or T O P A R O L. But that can't be the whole thing because that doesn't make any sense. So, if anybody else out there as you look at this can clarify this or figure out what this says, I would love to know.
Now, if we go below this, this is where it gets a lot more interesting. Now, there's a couple of ways you can read this. This is clearly S and a T. There's clearly an A and an L and a K. So, the question is, does that say stalk like S T A L K or stalking or stalk something? the the the last letters are a little bit too hard to read. Or is it steel? Cuz that could be an S, a T, an E, an A, and an L. This is Jeffrey Epstein's handwriting. I feel very positive that his handwriting is abysmal, but his A's very much look like this. What the only thing that's hard to tell because of this line is if there's a really weird E here and then an A or if that's just S T A L K. But this these words were nowhere to be found. So, I don't know what happened to this sheet of paper. I don't know if Jeffrey Epstein ate this piece of paper, but it was gone. These things, the actual writing was not there. These were indentations on a page below what you saw a minute ago.
Now, this one's much easier to read, and this is cut off, so you can't really see it. But over here, it says unaccounted for. So, basically, the FBI could not account for this page. They could not figure out where this was, but this was not written by Jeffrey Epstein. It was written to him, obviously, and it's also not his handwriting. But, it says, "Jeff, I want." And then to me it looks like it says over or it could be it could be a ver. It's wrinkled up so it's hard to say but it clearly says Jeff I want. Now this one is entirely illegible. The only thing I could make out here is a two right here. The rest of it is impossible to read. But there continue to be mysterious notes that that were found in Jeffrey Epstein's cell. And as far as I can tell this is the last of them.
All right, we'll go and wrap things up here. Hopefully, this is helping you better understand everything that I've observed in the Epstein files. I continue to uncover more and more evidence of a cover-up and if when you really put it all together, it is profound. There is just so much. Now, what's been reported is that the correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas are in fact going to have to speak to the House Oversight Committee. If that is true, because that is what people are talking about now. If that happens, I can tell you now I know the questions they need to be asked. I need someone that I can tell exactly what to ask them because this is extremely complex and no one has read more of this than I have. So, if that happens, if they end up getting deposed, I certainly hope I have the opportunity to speak to a lawmaker and let them know exactly what to ask. If you have any other thoughts about this or if there's anything else you want me to analyze, please let me know in the comments below. Last thing before we get finished up is I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, thanks for watching.