Steven Spielberg's Disclosure Day is today, hitting theaters across the world. I just watched it, and there's a lot I urgently have to warn you about. So, please watch this video here before you instead of watching that movie, or at least before watching that movie.

But don't worry. If you do insist on watching it and you don't want spoilers, spoilers, you will find a note in the description of this video indicating when the spoilers start. Check the description, look for the timestamp.

Some of you might not be interested, though, in the broader context of the deception that Spielberg has been grooming us for for decades now. You might just want the lowdown on this movie itself. In that case, you can skip to the timestamp mentioned if you like. If you don't want the details of this movie yet, then just watch up until that timestamp and stop there. But I hope that most of you will watch this whole video because all of this is very important. And don't worry about this horrible movie being spoiled. You shouldn't watch it anyway. All right.

The broader context here is that Steven Spielberg has groomed you. He has groomed society for decades to embrace the great lie. In this film, Disclosure Day is kind of like the outright assault that all of that grooming was a preparation for. And in this video, my video here, I'm going to provide the counter assault. I've been warning about Spielberg's diabolical promotion of the ET UFO deception for years. And I've been mocked for years for issuing that warning about what Spielberg is actually up to with all of this. But then suddenly, in the last few weeks, promoting this film, Spielberg began admitting himself that he is indeed doing exactly what I've always said he always been saying he was doing.

Spielberg says his alien movie will leave Christians questioning their faith in God. "Creating, hopefully, a belief system that the audience will say, 'This is here. This is happening.'" Another thing that Spielberg said promoting this film: he is trying to create a belief system with it. He says, "This is real." I really believe he has repeatedly said that this is not fiction for him anymore. I don't think it ever really was in his heart of hearts, but now it certainly isn't. He is admitting he believes this is real, and he is insisting that what he's doing is striving to bring it about more quickly. Disclosure itself, that is.

Let's take a look at this clip here. I'm not sure if you'll be able to hear it, but here we go.

>> This is a story about us.

This is a story about us, he says. I'll pause and repeat in case it's not coming through. All of us.

>> Good morning, Kansas City.

>> Up against the most extraordinary event in human history.

He is calling it the most extraordinary event in human history. Disclosure.

>> Wouldn't it be wonderful for people to know?

>> All of this is true.

All of this is true, he says. In so many interviews in the last few weeks, he has repeatedly said that. He says, "This is me. This is real. This is what I believe. Aliens are a guarantee." He says, he he actually said that, "A guarantee that they exist." He says, "They're going to change us. This is going to happen in our lifetimes." And he also insists that this is theological, challenges the faith on and on and on with claims like that. Yes, Spielberg is exactly the man I told you he was. And with this movie, he's done exactly what I warned he would do.

A little background info on this topic here for anyone new to my content on it. Here's the simple fact: aliens do not exist. As Christians, we can know with certainty that aliens do not exist. See my three-hour video on that that I put up last month. And yes, people have been asking. I will be making a short summary of that video soon. Please subscribe, hit the notifications button so you can see when it comes out.

But anyway, the lie that aliens do exist, and especially the lie that they're now here on Earth to intervene, that's not just any lie. I wager that this is the context for the great deception itself, the strong delusion foretold in scripture, the reign of the Antichrist, the day of the beast. I provided my argument for why that is so in The First and Last Deception. I recommend that book, my more recent one, 2025, but also Only Man Bears His Image, my much longer one published in 2023. I'll also be showing it in my documentary that I'm working on, that I've been working on for over a year now, The Age of Deception. Check out the trailer on this channel as well.

So, what does Hollywood have to do with all of this? You might be thinking, "Uh, who cares? It's just fiction." No, it's not "just fiction." Not when we're talking about aliens. Because the fiction about that topic runs in perfect tandem with the continued explosion of claims about them in reality. All lies, of course, lies, scops, diabolical deceptions. But they're now coming from even the highest levels of government and from the most official channels, US Congress. And when it comes to ET contact expectation in Hollywood, that is secular modernity's governing myth. And a society lives by virtue of the myth that it claims for its own. When that myth, moreover, appears to converge with reality, then that's by definition apocalyptic in and of itself.

Let's take a look at what scripture teaches. "For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths." Wander into myths. ET messianism, as I argue at length in my books, that is precisely the myth that scripture warns men will turn towards in the last days after they wander from the truth. We've already been wandering from the truth as a society for many decades now. The great apostasy is well underway. And this myth that we're wandering into, the strong delusion specifically that we will be allowed to wander into by God's permissive will, that's the fruition of it all. That's why my 2023 book even warns that in the very subtitle: "The Biblical Catholic Scientific Case Against Aliens, UFO Deceptions, Sentient AI, and Other Sci-Fi Disguised Demons and Scops Heralding the Antichrist." Sci-fi disguised. That is the myth that all of these things come to us under the disguise of.

You really cannot overestimate the significance of science fiction in providing the context for the great deception itself. And here's what I wrote in The First and Last Deception about that. Uh, actually, real quick, before I read that, my usual caveat real quick here. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with science fiction. Don't worry, I enjoy plenty of science fiction. It can be great. I even enjoy some science fiction books and movies about aliens. Uh, the problem isn't science fiction itself. The problem is when we allow science fiction to become the lens through which we discern reality. And that is happening here with the ET question more than ever before in the history of fiction. And it also happens to a lot of people who think it isn't happening to them. It suddenly becomes that lens through which they start to be to discern events in the real world, or alleged events in the real world, lies in the real world. A lot of people think they're just being entertained, but they're really being groomed, and they have no idea. And that's why I'm making this video.

All right, back to that quote. "Hollywood sci-fi grooming have nothing to do with godless and silly myths." Again, what scripture teaches us there: "Man lives by the stories he honors. If he reveres stories, and if he lives in accordance with the greatest story ever told, salvation history, and he will become a saint. If he instead lives by those godless and silly myths that scripture warns against, then he has only invited the lies that they contain to form his innermost principles." Both the world and the devil understand this. Well, ufologist Jacques Vallee also understands this. He said, "To control human imagination is to shape mankind's collective destiny."

Let me pause on that for a moment. Jacques Vallee, uh, the father of uh ufology. In many ways, Steven Spielberg modeled a main character in his first major ET movie, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, explicitly modeled a character after Jacques Vallee. Jacques Vallee is pointing out here that it is the human imagination, how it is shaped, how uh it is formed, that shapes mankind's collective destiny.

"Sci-fi teachings have, especially for the last 75 years, continuing on the quote from my book here, steadily led the world deeper and deeper into deception while fermenting in the masses an increasing expectation that we will soon either be attacked by extraterrestrials or saved by extraterrestrials or both. This culturewide grooming process we see meticulously undertaken by the steady descent into apostate darkness of the themes found in ET-based science fiction throughout the last several decades. It is a darkness strangling Christian faith and heralding the strong delusion once subtly but now openly, which we must expose."

There has been a grooming process since the sci-fi era began. Society has through Hollywood been gradually exposed to worse and worse attacks on their Christian instincts. But just like all grooming, Hollywood sci-fi grooming steps up the violations of the dignity of the victim over time. It aims to desensitize the victim to what he would have previously automatically known was wrong. And this is to prepare the victim for the assault. And if you don't, if if this would-be victim doesn't have someone to rescue him from the grooming, he might defend it because he thinks it makes him important.

Now, many powerful people in Hollywood have been steering this grooming process. That is the grooming process of preparing American society, and really the whole world which watches Hollywood, to believe in aliens and to long for extraterrestrial contact to change the world. But who is the groomer-in-chief of this decades-long process? You guessed it, Steven Spielberg. By far the richest director in the world, the most prol the the most legendary one, the king of Hollywood, you could really fairly say.

I can't summarize here everything I've said about him for many years warning about what he's up to. That would make this video too long. So instead, a couple more quick quotes from my book. Here's what I published a year and a half ago about this movie itself that's just come out today. I said, "Perhaps most significantly, Steven Spielberg is slated to release a 2026 UFO-themed film entitled The Dish." Uh, that's all that was known about this. It was called The Dish. That was a working title back when I wrote this over a year and a half ago. Um, but it is this is being made out to be his push to make the ultimate case for the day of disclosure. I pointed out then in the book that Spielberg surpasses all other culture curators in heralding the non-human intelligence deception, both in its ET variety and as we will see in part four, its AI quote singularity form. On the forefront of Spielberg's own mind is doubtless the first movie he ever made, Firelight. This amateur film, which he made at the age of 18 in the year 1964, was also about ufology, and his protagonist fought to convince the US government of the reality of aliens. 62 years later, will Spielberg strive to define himself as his first film's protagonist?"

And let's go to the next slide here. Take a look. There it is. Being released at the Phoenix Little Theater premiere movie Firelight. So yes, this has been Spielberg's movie-making mission even since before anyone ever heard of him. 1964, 13 years before Close Encounters of the Third Kind. He was practically a kid, 18 years old, already crusading at that point to have the government disclose, disclose that aliens are here and that that changes everything. And now, 62 years later, he's doing exactly what I speculated there in my book in a quote I just read. He's striving to himself become his first movie's hero. He has openly said that one of his goals with this film is to push actual, the actual UFO day of disclosure to come more quickly. And he's the most powerful director in history, the richest director in the world, as I said, the world's chief storyteller. And it's now clear that his life mission is to be the prophet of the extraterrestrials.

And of course, it's really something we should also acknowledge. He is Jewish, which means he's been waiting for 2,000 years too long for the Messiah as a people. He hasn't been around that long, but his culture, his, it's in his blood. It's in his very bones, you could say, to be awaiting the Messiah. He's ready to welcome a savior, just like Avi Loeb, another preeminent UFO voice here. Let me put him, I've shared this slide before. One of the most popular ufologists in the world, celebrity Harvard astrophysicist, uh, one of the world's top astronomers, also a Jew. And as I quoted in my last video, here's what he says about what's coming with extraterrestrials. It says that it could save humanity. "The Messiah will not arrive riding on a donkey," as suggested in Zechariah in scripture, "but instead might be riding on a spacecraft from an exoplanet." This isn't some fringe blogger. Obviously, Spielberg isn't either. This is one of the foremost astronomers in the world, insisting that aliens are coming. And there is a large contingent of uh Jews, especially, who seem primed to welcome a supposed Messiah under the banner of the extraterrestrial UFO deception. So these are men who mold the world, announcing the most apocalyptic messages you can imagine. And if that's, if what's playing out right before our eyes right now doesn't trouble you, then you need to wake up.

Now, as I said, Spielberg has been a chief promoter of this deception for a very long time. Let's talk about some of the background here. Remember, if you're not interested in this background, you can skip ahead to where I get into the details of the Disclosure Day movie itself. Just look at the description for the timestamp where I get into that.

We've seen that Spielberg's first ET movie was actually in 1964, his first film. But, of course, the first real ET film that was majorly in the theaters and everyone has seen and knows about is Close Encounters of the Third Kind. And no, I'm sorry. That was not innocent entertainment either, just like today's movie is not. That was the beginning of his grooming process. Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Here's what I wrote about that in my book.

"With this film, Steven Spielberg not only directed it, but also wrote it. And his motive was not to provide escapist fiction or an engaging thought experiment or a setting for a meaningful moral of the story." I'll just interject here. Those are fully valid reasons for exploring a counterfactual premise, even perhaps aliens, in a fictional movie. "Rather, Spielberg's intent was clear: to merge ufology, 'reality,' both in its personal and mystical aspects, and in its governmental and scientific aspects, to merge them with those themes that had hitherto been considered in science fiction. Spielberg aimed to immortalize and mythologize the 'heroic conquest' against government cover-ups for UFO and ET truth, to summarize a movement and inspire its continued pursuit, to elicit a pseudo-religious faith and hope whose object is not God but benevolent extraterrestrials."

As I said before, he even modeled a chief character in that movie after Jacques Vallee. And perhaps even more pointedly, he had an actual preeminent ufologist be in the movie itself. The actual man himself made a cameo in the film's climax. J. Allen Hynek. One film critic wrote in The New Biographical Dictionary of Film, a large, respected tome on movie uh commentary. He said, "Close Encounters had a flawless wonder such that it might be the first film ever made. It is as close to a mystical experience as a major film has come."

Spielberg also has alluded to it being his defining legacy. Someone asked him in 1991 to select a single master image that sums up his work. And Spielberg chose one with powerful echoes of his first childhood memory: the shot of the little boy in Close Encounters of the Third Kind opening his living room door to see the blazing orange light from the UFO. Spielberg says, "Quote, 'That beautiful but awful light, just like fire coming through the doorway. It's a lot of promise or danger outside that door.'" It's funny. Promise or danger, beautiful but awful. Even some of the people who are most into this UFO messianism like Spielberg, but almost all of them, they kind of admit sometimes this is terrible and awful, but they always are trying to shove that aside and say, "No, no, no. It's wonderful. It's beautiful. It's great." And Spielberg with Disclosure Day has fully shoved aside the awful part and embraced the supposedly wonderful part of it. But they all at least begin with this inkling in their minds, maybe this is actually really dark and really bad. And the fight is always to push that godly instinct away and give in. Give the anti-fiat to the extraterrestrials. More on that later when we talk about Disclosure Day. So yes, Close Encounters was grooming you in a very dark way, too.

Now, I know I've got a lot more commentary on on Close Encounters in the in the book. Please read my section on that if you're unconvinced so far. This is just a small excerpt from it. But I know what a lot of people are thinking at this point. Okay, they might be thinking, "Okay, fine. Close Encounters was grooming." But ET, which came out several years later, the cute kids movie, you know, right? ET, that was just nice family fun, right? No. Sorry. That was also grooming.

People have said to me, "Daniel, it was just a movie about divorce and how bad that is." No, no, no. Just because a crummy divorced family was the context for the movie doesn't mean that the movie was a movie against divorce. If anything, the movie was about finding a replacement for a father and a and a family in extraterrestrial longing. Now, yes, plenty of that movie was entertaining. Don't get me wrong. I'm not condemning the whole thing, but we need to be honest about what was going on there, too, as a whole. Here's what I wrote about that.

Oh, and there's the ET image there. I'll put that in the screen for a moment here because that's how uh the film was originally promoted. Another perversion of the Sistine Chapel fresco. That's why I have that as the cover of my first book, a unperverted representation of it. But the ET UFO AI deceptions always pervert that image. Anyway, moving on to the quote here.

"The movie's own promotional artwork is not coy in illustrating its message. Depicting yet another perversion of history's most famous fresco, Michelangelo's painting of the Creation of Adam in the Sistine Chapel, ET's cover shows the finger of an alien reaching out to a child's finger on the backdrop of a view of Earth from space. This quote 'children's movie' tugs on every heartstring imaginable in order to ensure that no child or adult who watches it leaves the experience without intimately identifying with the protagonist's fanatical love and longing for ET."

One of Spielberg's biographers describes the result: "a quote universal pronouncement that would send audiences weeping from the cinema." Indeed, it did. Spielberg said of the movie, "It transforms the father-son relationship into something much more cosmic." End quote. And as I point out there, that's a noble thing when applied to God the Father, but it is only a diabolical ruse when applied to the premises of science fiction.

Moving on here, Elliot, when he eventually discovers ET, the alien, finds in him an escape, a friend, and even a savior. ET forms a relationship with Elliot, and soon they find themselves mystically linked. Whatever one feels, so does the other. Elliot begins referring to himself as "we," meaning both he and the ET. The message is not missed by any child who watches this movie. It is a moral imperative that they believe in ET. So much depends upon their belief in the alien. This is reinforced with so many heartstring-tugging images in the movie itself.

After ET is declared dead later in the movie, Elliot is given time alone with the corpse. With tears filling his eyes, Elliot says to ET, "I'm so sorry. You must be dead because I don't know how to feel. I can't feel anything anymore. You've gone someplace else now. I believe in you all my life. Every day, ET, I love you." At that, ET resurrects and communicates to Elliot that the spaceship is coming back to bring ET home. They get there to the spaceship. They hug warmly to rising orchestral music as ET says to Elliot, "I'll be right here." While touching Elliot's head with his finger now to triumphant music. And as Elliot's mother, tears streaming down her understanding face, looks on. After waddling up the craft's ramp, ET is enclosed by its doors while engulfed in light. The ship ascends and creates a rainbow as it departs. Everyone looking on with the same religious awe and astonishment that Spielberg depicted so skillfully five years earlier in Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

Henry Thomas, the actor who played Elliot, said of this scene, "When I did the goodbye scene, I couldn't stop crying because I worked with ET every day and he was real to me." End quote. Elliot's connection to the alien most closely resembles voodoo. And capping it all off is the call to the viewer to identify with Elliot. For in the days that would follow the story's conclusion, Elliot would have to continue his life without ET there physically. Nevertheless, his love and longing for aliens would remain "quote 'right there' in Elliot's head, where ET last touched the boy before spectacularly ascending into the heavens." Just as Christ assured his disciples before ascending into heaven, "Behold, I am with you always." Matthew 28:20. The viewers can be just like Elliot. They can keep the resolute fixation upon aliens ever in their minds and the flame of hope for ET contact alive in their hearts. You think that's not what happened with the young viewers of ET who are now middle-aged and increasingly running the world?

Let's take a look at what has happened. Those who were Elliot's age when ET was released are now middle-aged, and millions of them have since then only nurtured the same desires that this film implanted. They are our leaders in government, commerce, media, and yes, even the church. One theology professor at a Catholic seminary, in fact, dedicated his lengthy 2021 book promoting alien belief to Steven Spielberg. With each passing day, one learns of more and more men and women in positions of power and influence openly professing their deep longing for extraterrestrial contact, as well as their conviction that the time for this messianic contact is finally upon us. This phenomenon is not accidental. It is the fruition of a plan that has long been in place. The grooming process has worked exceedingly well.

All right. ET was a major grooming. It's not a movie you should let your kids watch. Let's take a look at what this seminary professor that I just alluded to there in the book. Let's see what he is saying amid his amidst his Spielberg-inspired crusade for alien belief. Here it is, direct quote from his book promoting alien belief. He says, "Future contact with intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations could call into question certain cherished religious doctrines, result in a reorientation of our limited terrestrial belief systems. Because for 2,000 years, theology has had an anthropocentric myopia, which is at odds with what recent science indicates. Aliens would wholly re may wholly redefine many of our conceptions of God and creation."

This Catholic theology professor says, he says, "Evidence of a second Genesis could drastically call into question certain Christian foundational theological teachings regarding creation, the incarnation, and the redemption. Would establish that humans are neither the biological nor theological center of the universe and present, as it would, new and unprecedented unprecedented information of religious or theological significance, result in a profound reformulation or recontextualization of theology." On and on and on he goes. Spielberg's charm worked quite well on that man, and it has worked quite well on millions of others, including those who are mixing Spielberg's deception with their fa with their Christian Catholic faith now. And that's exactly what Spielberg wants. He made that clear with his movie that came out today. You can keep your Christianity. That's fine. You just need to completely redefine it in terms of aliens. That's all. The aliens are the ones who ones who really love you, and you need to love them.

Just take a look at the promotional artwork for the ET film. And I hadn't even noticed this until one of my Twitter followers pointed it out a couple days ago. There's how they promote the ET film. And there's the Sacred Heart of Jesus, which we the feast day we celebrate today, the day Spielberg releases Disclosure Day. There's Sacred Heart of Jesus on the left. Do they look at all similar to you? Of course they do. This is a blatant perversion in every way you can imagine. The Sacred Heart of Jesus and the supposed compassionate heart of this extraterrestrial pointing to the heart, the finger raised, the moon as a halo even for the ET. Everything diabolically perverted. It is a perversion of the faith. And they're not even trying to be secret about it. They know they don't have to be, because even most Catholics are so blinded by the world, the flesh, and the devil today that they can barely see the diabolical when it's staring them in the face. The less belief and understanding there is of the existence and the power of the devil, as Fulton Sheen said, the more power he exercises. And as St. Augustine said, the strong delusion, the great deception comes when men least believe in the devil, which is also precisely when he releases his greatest onslaught of deceiving signs and wonders yet.

If anybody's wondering if that's a made-up, I I admit I was wondering myself, whoa, that's such a blatant perversion of the Sacred Heart image. That must be AI. You know, some some anti-Spielberg guy like me must have made an AI image. So, I looked it up myself on Amazon to see what the actual cover artwork is for uh the ET movie. It's that very image. It's that exact one. So, yeah, they're holding nothing back. They are surely unleashing this deception.

Anyway, before today, Spielberg's biggest ET films were those two, Close Encounters and ET. But he did keep it up in the 2000s. War of the Worlds in 2005 was also a Steven Spielberg film. And you might not think that's too significant here because it's representing extraterrestrials as a as a threat, but oh no, it's still very significant. First, it still promotes the lie that aliens exist. That lie itself is going to lead you into the great deception. Even if you believe that the aliens are harmful, it might not lead you into it as quickly as the notion of of of benevolent messianic extraterrestrials, but it'll still lead you to the same ultimate fate. The hostile aliens and the benevolent aliens are two deceptions that work in tandem sometimes. In fact, the hostile aliens one is more useful for government scops, although they can use the messianic one aliens as well. Um, the messianic alien part is great for the Antichrist himself, but he can also make use of the nefarious extraterrestrial deception by uh, there's plenty of ways he can do that. The point is you need to reject the lie. It's not okay to believe in aliens just and just think they're a threat. That's almost as dangerous as the benevolent extraterrestrials threat.

But anyway, that that question aside, War of the Worlds still does indeed promote a diabolical, godless view of humanity. And uh, to point out to emphasize that, I'll just quickly quote what one Catholic author wrote about that 20 years ago when the film came out. I found this on the internet. This is from the Weight of Glory blog. Uh, author named Clayton Emmer, Catholic author named Clayton Emmer. And here it is. He points out that this film is lying to the audience about the nature of the human person. It has a disdain for humanity. He rightly says, "There is no God, according to the ethos of the film, except as someone to be cursed. There's no reverence for the human person made in God's image, a being capable of imaging the Trinitarian self-giving love of the Godhead. Everyone is clawing for their own survival. There are no stories that parallel actual accounts of heroic self-sacrifice in the face of catastrophe. There's no room for that. And Spielberg's vision. And no one ever cries out to God except to curse his name." So the film adopts a satanic ethos, suggesting that humans are not capable of altruism or reverence. Equally disturbing is the proposed anthropology. Human beings are inconsequential to the narrative being presented. The aliens existed before humans did, and humanity has nothing to contribute to the defeat of the aliens. That task is left to supposedly higher life forms, bacteria. The movie lies to us about man, about his origins and his possibilities from the first frame until the last. The movie endorses the thesis of the father of lies." Couldn't agree more with that analysis. That is spot on. It is indeed a satanic film, just like the film I'll be focusing on today, Disclosure Day.

All right. The other significant point here is that by making that movie, Spielberg brought H.G. Wells back into the picture. Of course, some of the satanic stuff there is not specifically Spielberg's fault. It's embedded into War of the Worlds itself from H.G. Wells in the late 1800s. He's the original author of War of the Worlds, and he is the father of science fiction. He was also, this is what too few people know, but everybody needs to know. He was a remarkably evil and antichristic man. Here's what I wrote about him in my book, The First and Last Deception.

"Born in 1866, the revered 'father of science fiction,' Herbert George Wells. And I apologize for that horizontal line on my screen. I'll work on getting rid of that. Um, Herbert George Wells died in his native England the year 1946, only months before the onslaught of the UFO craze he helped generate. A fierce Darwinist, atheist, and socialist, Wells also advocated for eugenics and euthanasia, which he hoped would be used for mercy killings of the disabled, the elderly, and non-whites. These views he shared with a woman that he entered a lifelong adulterous affair with, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. Yes, he was. They were uh, that's going to be news for a lot of people, but that's what more people need to realize. These two evil people really went together very well."

Back to the quote here. "Wells extolled Margaret Sanger as 'quote the greatest woman in the world' end quote. And H.G. Wells applauded her nefarious organization as one which will 'quote grow to be a hundred years from now the most influential of all time in controlling man's destiny on earth.' End quote." There's an anti-another anti-prophecy from H.G. Wells. The secular world thinks of him as a prophet. In fact, he is an anti-prophet.

Back to the quote, "Wells wrote among the most popular early novels about extraterrestrials, 1898's War of the Worlds. When that story was read by Orson Welles via radio broadcast in the eve of Halloween in the year 1938, it induced a mass panic. Listeners believed it was actually breaking news describing an incoming Martian invasion." I read the New York Times article. I was able to access that through my faculty account. I read the uh original New York Times article that came out the day after that mass panic, and it's quite, I have to admit, quite amusing, uh, also quite disconcerting what people were willing to believe even back then. Yes, this deception goes way back. But anyway, I've got some quotes from the article in my book.

Moving on here, let's look at the content of what was being read. "War of the Worlds begins by declaring, 'We know now.' That in the early years of the 20th century, this world was being watched closely by intelligences greater than man's, and yet as mortal as his own. With infinite complacence, people went to and fro over the earth about their little affairs, serene in the assurance of their dominion over this small spinning fragment of solar driftwood, which by chance or design, man has inherited out of the dark mystery of time and space.'" End quote.

And then I point out here, "At the onset of ET sci-fi's formal phase, we see Christianity being meticulously, if at first subtly, deconstructed from the ground up. A skilled author, however, Wells conceals his true intent by using only language he knew would achieve his own ends while evading detection by his mostly Christian audience. He begins by assuring us that we are being 'quote watched.' That is ET promotion's most repeated phrase: 'We are not alone.' He immediately adds that the beings watching us vastly exceed our own intelligence, but assuredly are not angels or demons, for they are 'quote as mortal as we are.' Wells could not risk allowing any genuinely Christian interpretation of his story to prevail, which would correctly understand any created non-human intelligence other than angels to be demonic. He subtly mocks mankind's being 'quote busied by our various concerns and little affairs,' primarily impugning religion, which he singles out for ridicule later in the story. Then emphasizing just how ridiculous Wells regards mankind, he labels Earth, which is in fact the theater of salvation, a mere 'quote spinning fragment of solar driftwood, which by chance or design man inherited out of the dark mystery of time and space' end quote. This is not unlike Carl Sagan's later and still more famous denigration of Earth as a pathetic 'quote pale blue dot.' For Wells, Earth is not God's delight as in Revelation 21:3, Proverbs 8:31, Psalm 115:16, and so on. Earth is only an insignificant piece of cosmic debris. The lesson is clear: we are not unique. We are not special. And in fact, we do not matter at all. It may even be just blind chance that brought us here. Wells even satirizes mankind's 'quote serene assurance of their dominion over earth,' rejecting Genesis 1:26 wherein God promises that to man and to man alone."

I want to emphasize that there, both even the nefarious alien lie, just like the messianic alien lie, they both reject God's absolute promise that that man has dominion. The ET deception is always mocking that, and it was mocked even in the 1800s when the ET deception in science fiction began with H.G. Wells. The result of all of this is that readers begin wondering if God's promises might not be absolute after all. They question whether Earth and the human race really have the status that scripture describes. So yes, the deception goes back that far. The late 1800s saw the beginning of the sci-fi ET deception in fiction. I'm only charting out Spielberg's contribution to it here, which is the biggest. But there is also many other extremely important levels, steps of this grooming process that I hope you'll have a chance to read about in the book. If I try to go into them here though, I'll make this video way too long. I got to get a move on here. So, yes, H.G. Wells was an early prophet of the Antichrist. Most modern people have been raised to believe that he's a true prophet and a great man and a great author. And you can thank our public schools for the last several decades for that garbage. H.G. Wells was a monster and a diabolical deceiver.

Okay, back to Steven Spielberg. I am far from the only one who has long spoken about what Spielberg is doing. I'm doing it from a bit of a different perspective than the people I'm about to quote, a theological one. But we can even look at the secular scholars who have said that he is up to something with this pervasive ET themes in his works. They've described it quite accurately, just not from a Catholic perspective. In fact, they're often a lot more honest than some of the Catholic Inc. folk. They'll generally just try to pretend that any movie whatsoever is actually really good and Catholic if you think about it, because they're always trying to just, it's like a really cheap, naive, stupid phony evangelization that's just opening the door to the Trojan horse, as so many have already done with this Spielberg movie. But anyway, I digress.

Let's take a look at what these secular scholars even are saying. Here's some quotes from A Critical Companion to Steven Spielberg. It compiles a bunch of studies from a bunch of scholars who have dedicated themselves to studying Spielberg's works. Yes, there really are scholars who do that as their job. Anyway, this is an academic work from Bloomsbury and it was published in 2019. Here's what they described. This is, they've got a lot of really interesting things to say. I'm just going to run through a few quick excerpts here.

"Spielberg's Close Encounters of the Third Kind in 1977 is described as causing some strange new transformation in which technological wonder had become synonymous with domestic hope. Space and time seemed to expand again with that movie. Viewers have emotional engagement in part in Spielberg's films because of a recurring image of the face in Spielberg cinema: that of a character, eyes open, staring in wordless wonder in a moment where time stands still. The face tells us that a monumental event is happening. In doing so, it also tells us how we should feel. If Spielberg deserves to be called a master of audience manipulation, then this is his signature stroke." And I have a note of my own there in the bottom. This face manipulation of the audience is huge in Disclosure Day. If you see it, please don't. You will realize he is trying to mess with you through simply what the close-up shots of faces of people in response to this all-inspiring disclosure are telling you to do in response as well.

Back to the studies here. Sorry about that. Let me get me off the screen. Okay.

"The aliens of Close Encounters and Indiana Jones." And I forgot to mention earlier, Spielberg also has aliens as the semi-savior in the last Indiana Jones film he did. He didn't do the very last one, Dial of Destiny, that was the time travel deception, which is also a significant diabolical deception. More more on that in a different video. But the he wasn't in that, he didn't do that film. He did do the one before it, I think it was Indiana Jones 4. That was all about these aliens. And that also started with Roswell, just like Disclosure Day started with a scene from the ro of a Roswell alien. He's obsessed with what started in the real world in 1947 in Roswell. Of course, that wasn't aliens. It's also deception, probably a human scop thing, but anyway, point is he's always trying to relate this to the real world. He even did that in his Indiana Jones movie, relating it to Roswell in the beginning, but having the movie's climax be all about these ultra-evolved, ultra-advanced aliens that can give massive knowledge to whomever they please. All right. These aliens are allegedly able to endow humans with superhuman abilities such as telepathy. Disclosure Day is all about that as well. Upon reaching the top of this iconic landmark, now they're talking again about Close Encounters. They either turned into stars or rescued by eagles. That's in the in the lore, the uh Indian lore about the spot, Devil's Tower, where they decided to film the climax of Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Hence, Devil's Tower conjures up images of salvation or the idea of being spirited away. Celebrates the this movie celebrates the arrival of alien life as a wondrous, mystical, near psychedelic event. His message is basically, 'Calm down. We're okay. They can be our friends.' This becomes a central preoccupation for Spielberg when considering the relationship between the human and the non-human. He did that also with his promotion of the AI deception. For this video, we'll focus on just his promotion of the ET deception. He says, 'One cannot be human.' This is a scholar of Spielberg talking about Spielberg. 'One cannot be human unless one is able to recognize the face of another, human or non-human. Spielberg encourages his viewers to stay human by accepting the alien. Having the capacity to identify with the alien other is presented as being instrumental to our evolution as a species.' He seems to have grown even stronger with this in the introduction of ET in 1982. All aliens in Spielberg's works are endowed with some supernatural godlike power. ET, for example, quickly becomes a Christ figure. Close Encounters reflects the assumption that as superior beings, the extraterrestrials have mastered an ethical approach to living that reflects transhumanist principles. This idea that the aliens are calling us to transcend humanity itself, even, is big in Spielberg."

All right, so there you have it. Even the secular scholars studying Spielberg in a completely indifferent way, they're just objectively describing what he's up to. They realize what he's up to and what he's long been up to with all of this ET stuff. A ca a a Christian, a Catholic with discernment should be much more easily capable of realizing what's going on here and more importantly, in realizing it's a bad thing, not a good thing. Spielberg's goal is to portray aliens as godlike and to seduce us into opening ourselves up into friendship with them. He is obsessed with the need for us to give our fiat, the anti-fiat to the extraterrestrials. And now, in 2026, he's being 100% crystal clear that he does not think this is fiction anymore. Not that he ever really did, but now he's insisting this is real and he's trying to make it happen.

So, as I said, I don't want to derail this video too much, so I shouldn't go into the AI question right now. But real quick, the AI deception is the other half of this overarching NHI deception. That is the non-human intelligence lie. This lie that there are other incarnate beings other than man that also have reason. Spielberg is also a chief groomer of the AI deception. His 2001 movie A.I. Artificial Intelligence might just be his second most diabolical movie after this one that he just came out with today, Disclosure Day. And it's amazing how few Christian commenters have pointed this out. Many Christian commentators have said that even the AI movie is a is miraculous. It's like a religious experience. Diabolical. Now, of course, AI exists. It's real. Aliens don't exist. They're not real. But sentient AI, that is AGI, conscious AI, whatever, they're always calling it something new. That doesn't exist and that never will exist. That's just as much of a lie as aliens. And both of those lies together form the two halves of the great deception. Two uh diabolical wings that this bird must fly with. But both require each other for the Book of Revelation to be fulfilled, as I argue in The First and Last Deception. There's a lot more I really need to say about that, but I'll save it for my next video or maybe my video after next. Again, please subscribe.

Okay, on to Disclosure Day itself. Here are the spoilers. So, if you don't want any spoilers, you can turn this video off now and come back after you've watched the movie. But, I hope you don't watch this movie. So, please keep watching this video here instead.

Let's do a quick recap of some of the movie's essentials that are theologically philosophically relevant to the question at hand and in order to show you what Spielberg is doing to you with this film. Film begins early on by showing by insisting that this cover-up began in 1947. And of course, that's Roswell and Kenneth Arnold. That's the beginning of the UFO deception itself in real life. So, right from the start, excuse me, Spielberg wastes no time to remind us that yes, he believes this movie is about what's going on in the real world. And then we're told in the beginning of the movie that, quote, "The world is on the brink." And there's flashes of this throughout the whole movie. It becomes the background music of the whole movie. This constant. There's one scene where people are lining up at the gas station where there's there's constant fear. Everybody thinks the world's about to collapse. Why? Because of World War II, nuclear war. Seems like it's about to break out. That's the backdrop for the whole movie.

Remember, as I've said so many times, the Catechism of the Catholic Church warns that the deception of the Antichrist is a "quote religious deception that offers men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth." And Spielberg's film is precisely that. As you'll see, it's all about religion. ETs are presented in the way that any discerning observer should be able to see this is a religious deception being forced upon us. And it's all about aliens giving humanity the solution, the miraculous empathy and the evolved knowledge and and all sorts of other garbage. But the solution to the crisis of World War II, which incidentally is what I've always said for years is the most likely context for the rise of the deception of the Antichrist. I believe he will come with a supposed solution to avert nuclear holocaust. And it's no coincidence that the ET deception began in 1947. Sorry, the UFO deception began in 1947, right as the Cold War started. Immediately, a humanity right there in 1947 is wondering if it's going to wake up the next morning annihilated. This existential dread of nuclear annihilation is simultaneous with the birth of the UFO deception. They go hand in hand because I believe they'll conclude hand in hand. That's speculation. I don't know the details of the future, of course. All I know is that what scripture says in the future will indeed happen. But it seems very

likely that this is the supposed crisis that the Antichrist is going to come with a supposed solution to. I shouldn't say supposed crisis. It could very well be a very real crisis. We could indeed be on the brink. But that's when we are most likely to accept the diabolical solution at the price of apostasy from the truth.

The catechism doesn't even say apostasy from the faith. The deception of the antichrist may well not require an explicit rejection of faith in Jesus Christ. It'll probably be more subtle rejection of the truth, the truth of creation, the truth, the cosmic truth of how God set up the universe. I believe as we'll see the upcoming minutes here. Anyway, evidently Spielberg agrees with that general outline. He's just mistaking the Antichrist for the good guy here.

Anyway, back to the movie. Big bad guy in the movie is the US military adjacent private company called Wardex. Wardex is the primary entity hiding the truth about aliens from the world. And they've been doing this for decades. But in the beginning of the movie, 12 Wardex employees don't show up to work one day. Why? Because they've all had enough. And they're going to expose it all. They are going to proclaim the truth to the world. The 12 of them, the 12 pseudo apostles.

Anyway, Josh Oconor, the actor Josh Oconor, that is the character Daniel Kel Kelner in the movie, rescues his girlfriend Jane after she was kidnapped. And that's what sets off this whole string of events here. And by the way, yes, I do think it's really weird that I'm Daniel Okconor and that this movie's protagonist is named Daniel and he's played by an actor named Okconor, especially since the last movie I saw Josh Okconor and he was a Catholic priest from Albany, New York, which is where I'm from. And this movie, Disclosure Day, also did most of its filming near me in New York. So that's all kind of weird.

But anyway, back to the movie. So after Daniel rescues Jane, they flee to a Catholic convent. And Daniel didn't know this, but it just so happens to be the convent where Jane was a former nun or a novice, but she left the convent because she couldn't be certain of God. More on that later. Now, the um the another nun there, maybe mother superior, maybe just another sister, she's the first really likable character in the movie, Sister Mora. Uh she winds up being the gentle religious guiding force towards throughout the movie. She makes a few appearances. She's guiding you in to welcoming the aliens. More on that later.

The parallel plot, however, centers on Emily Blunt's character, Margaret Fairchild. She's in her apartment with her boyfriend and an alien appears disguised as a cardinal. A bird, that is, not uh not Cardinal Mroy. See, stuff about him on this issue from my last video. Anyway, uh she sees just this fascinating bird. and she doesn't know it's an alien disguised as a bird, but we later learn that the aliens shapeshift and they appear as various animals because it's easier for us if they present like that.

Anyway, this alien bird bestows the gift on Margaret. It's an anti- Pentecost. From that point forward in the movie, Margaret can speak any language. She can prophesy. She can know everyone's thoughts and everything about their lives. And she has this supernatural ability to empathize with and console anyone. And this superhuman gift of quote empathy, we later learn that it's what the aliens are here to bestow upon us because we no we don't have empathy. We need the aliens for that because they're really evolved and it's actually they evolve to realize that empathy is beneficial. More on that later. We're just pathetic unevolved humans and we haven't recognized that yet. So we need aliens to give us this gift. This gift, however, is very difficult for Margaret until later in the movie. She embraces the aliens by acknowledging her childhood abduction. Of course, if you've studied this at all, you know that so-called alien abductions are just diabolical ruses. They're all from demons. But the moral of this story is that those are actually glorious, luminous, heavenly encounters with real aliens who just want to help our evolution.

Anyway, before Jane has that experience, she's struggling with this so-called gift. In the most pivotal scene in the movie that you've seen already in the trailer, if you saw that, she's doing the most pivotal early scene in the movie. She's doing news on live TV and she starts h having all these weird clicking noises coming out of her mouth which is really just the extraterrestrial revelation coming through her. And what do you know? Daniel is the only one who knows what that clicking says because he alone also has a different gift from the aliens and he can hear it in plain English. What does it say? It says, "Don't be afraid of what you don't know." Don't be afraid of what you don't know. This movie is filled with all the usual platitudes that they give in religious discourse to try and get you to open yourself up to diabolical deception. You just have to give yourself over to it. Just don't be afraid of it. Just give in. Just listen.

So that brings us back to Daniel and Jane. They escape to an old farmhouse in the country. They have quite the discussion. In this discussion, the existence of aliens is referred to as the core truth about the universe. And by the way, I'm sorry, another interjection of my own here. In that sense, a some secular people and some of the UFO nuts are actually a bit more honest than the mainstream Catholic apologists here because the apologists tend to just say, "Oh, whatever. Maybe aliens exist, maybe not. It's fine. Doesn't change anything." Are you kidding me? It changes everything. And yeah, the fact that only man bears the divine image, that is a core truth of the universe. That's why God became man. The entire purpose of the universe is God made man in Jesus Christ of Nazareth. And no, it's not possible to fit aliens into that picture that we definitively have in the word of God, which is complete. Anyway, see my video last month for more on that. The point is, it's kind of true that this question does get to the core truth of the universe. The problem is Spielberg acknowledges the importance of the question, but he chooses the deception side of it.

So, back to the plot. The dialogue continues. Daniel is the is again only the only one able to decipher that thing. So Jane says to him, "Have you considered what effect this will have on people?" He he acknowledges to her that he needs to disclose this thing to he says to her, "I need to disclose this stuff to the real world." He admits that he worked for Warex and he stole this information. He's one of the 12. Um, Jane says, "People will see these as deities, these beings as deities, and they'll stop believing in God, stop believing in God." And then Daniel scoffs at that. And let me put the quote on the screen here. He says, "You left the church." And this is key. What comes next? Here's where Spielberg starts to lecture us. Not because I stopped believing, but because I could no longer say with certainty that God is divine. But I believe profoundly that he's essential. He's how we define ourselves. He's what keeps whole civilizations together. We've been raised to believe in a supreme being, and now you want to show us actual supreme beings." End quote.

There you have it. There's Spielberg's message. It's fine to believe in God. It's just that now that we have the actual supreme beings, that is the aliens, we just have to think of God as important and as what keeps us together traditionally. But he's not a being we can actually be certain in the divinity of. If you want certainty, if you want to really not be alone, if you want heavenly gifts, if you want proof, if you want someone to prove it to you, as this movie repeatedly says, that we're not alone, you'll have to look to the disclosure day of the extraterrestrials for that. They're the ones really here for us. Yes, that is the clear Antichrist message of this film. And I don't just mean Antichrist in a general sense of being against Christ. I mean this film is exactly and explicitly preparing the world for the literal Antichrist himself.

Now after this exchange between Daniel and Jane, Daniel has to leave for a while. And at this point, Jane suddenly gets kind of possessed. Possessed by what? A demon? Well, no, by Wardex, specifically by the head of Wardex, played by Colin Furth, the character Noah Scandlin, there's this special alien device. The bad guys have one. The good guys have one. Wardex, the bad guys, they use it to possess people and to get inside people's heads and to get hidden information and to kind of billocate and talk to them. Also gives you all sorts of abilities.

Now, when this possession type thing starts to happen, Jane realizes that something is going on. So, she grabs her crucifix, but that doesn't help her. The pseudo diabolical possession continues, and she drops the crucifix on the floor in a small pool of her own blood. Spielberg really drives it home that the power of Jesus Christ is fake, but the power of aliens is real. Of course, he is inverting everything as usual. And here's where it gets even more diabolical. The only explicit talk of Jesus Christ in the whole film. Guess where that comes from. Take a minute and guess. Okay, I trust you said it. I'm sure you guessed it right. Yes, the bad guy. The good guy nun from earlier that I talked about before and I'll talk about again. She doesn't talk about Jesus. She just has a few weak platitudinous general vague references to God. So again, she's that coax. She's that guiding that that compassionate warm f soft fuzzy influence making you be okay with aliens and still be religious just in kind of a vague way that you know not like certain of God and it's not worshiping Jesus or anything like that. The guy who really brings Jesus in in a heartfelt, sincere, passionate way. That's the bad guy. Him, Noah, the only one in the whole film who brings up Jesus Christ and honors him. Played by Colin FTH there, Noah Scan.

So after he possesses Jane, he appears to her and he speaks to her. He's trying to figure out where she is and he forces her to admit that she was at the monastery of St. Clare. And he says, "The monastery of St. Clair. Of course, I remember St. Clare from my Sunday school. She was too sick to go to mass, so she had a vision of it instead. She was in two places at once, like me." And he's very like heartfelt and sincere about this in the movie. You like you can tell Spielberg is portraying this guy as a sincerely devout Catholic. So, we're told that this ultra bad guy is basically a devout Catholic who knows about the saints, but it's just it's much more significant than that. He's having this conversation with Jane mystically with alien technology. In part, he's possessing her body just like the demons do to the people they possess. But he's also speaking to her. He's kind of there physically, but not really. As he alludes to there, he's billocating. Of course, billocation is among the most famous miracles of the Catholic saints. Many of them have billocated by God's power. So what is Spielberg teaching us here? The miracles of the saints, they're not from God. They're from aliens. Or at least at the minimum, the miracles today and the miracles moving forward in the future, they'll definitely be from the aliens. They're the ones who give us by location.

So next, it gets even worse. This ultra bad guy, he quotes one of the most powerful passages in the entire gospel. Next, he says, "You may need to stop Daniel yourself, Jane. Any way you can, Jane, what Daniel's trying to do is wrong. It's dangerous. It would tip the balance in an already destabilized world." Then he says, "Father, if you be willing, let this cup pass me by. Yet not as I will, but as you will." And what does Christ say next? He asks that to Jane there. She says, "By my will, thine will be done." That's she doesn't she gets the quote wrong actually, but Noah says, "As the moment comes, I'll be with you and you'll act Jane out of love for Daniel, out of love for the human race." Not my he's he's quoting words of the words of Jesus Christ in his agony and the guarding except accepting the father's will. Quite profound. But of course, Spielberg's going to have only the bad guy do that.

All right, the chase goes on. Mo much much of this movie is a big long extended chase scene basically and eventually this same bad guy finds his way into billocating with the ultimate good guy. The ultimate good guy is played by Coleman Domingo. The character is Hugo Wakefield. And most likely uh Spielberg is modeling him after John Mack, the uh famous abduction researcher who died in 2004. Hugo is this ultra ET truth guy. He's orchestrating all of these efforts. He's an expert in abductees. He's trying to get UFO disclosure out to the world. And uh John Mack became the world's foremost abduction researcher. He was a big shot Harvard celebrity psychiatrist, a pulit surprisewinning I believe. Um, yeah, it's right there on the screen on the Wikipedia page. Um, but he moved away from his earlier pursuits and in the last decades of his life was completely dedicated to extraterrestrials, specifically under the aspect of studying so-called alien abductees. And he used the messages of the aliens to these abductees to promote a completely pagan message. you'll really want to see my chapter on John Mack in my book. He is bad news and um it's I'm quite quite confident that just as Close Encounters of the Third Kind Spielberg was modeling a character off Jacqu Valle, I believe he is modeling this ultra good guy here after John Mack.

So anyway, we've got Hugo sitting down and talking with Noah now via his billocation. And this is the key dialogue where Noah gives his sorry where where Hugo gives his heroic speech in praise of ufology and the decades of heroic efforts by whistleblowers who are fighting for disclosure. And there's nothing particularly huge there. It's just the typical nonsense that you'll hear from just about any ufologist today. But what's even darker is what they get to right next uh sorry actually what they discuss right before that ufology discourse praising the whistleblowers. Here's what's said just before that. Noah the bad guy here says if this is the alien's plan you'd be sure it's in their interest not ours. And Hugo the hero says that's a very lonely way to look at the world. I'm listening to you Noah. something I've learned quite a bit about. Noah says, "From your friends, meaning the aliens that Hugo studies." Hugo, yes, they regard empathy as an evolutionary advantage and as the foremost evolution as the foremost evolutionary advantage. In fact, the core of animate existence. A rejection of this understanding is leading us to our extinction. In vivo 17, that's the name of the alien that Noah is. Sorry, I have that's a typo on the screen. Not Noah's alien friend, Hugo's alien friend. Uh, in vivo 17, the alien is nearer to God, Noah, than you or I. You don't need to fear them. There it is. It's only backwards, devoutly religious people like the bad guy here who are afraid of the aliens. Enlightened people like Hugo, they realize that the aliens are just more evolved than us. so much more evolved in fact that they're closer to God. Whatever Hugo means by the word God in this movie. These aliens have so much more empathy. We pathetic humans are just about to make ourselves go extinct because we don't have the alien empathy. So what do we need to do? What's Hugo's exhortation? Listen. That's his key word here. I have been listening. You know it. You have not been listening. So he's telling us listen. Listen. Open yourself up to the extraterrestrials and listen to them. We'll get back to that theme shortly.

But then the movie changes scenes again. Suddenly, we're back at the convent of St. Clair. Not uh physically so much, but this time, not even mystically, this time via a simple phone call. Cuts to Jane at a restaurant, and she's calling Sister Mora there, and we have a pivotal dialogue happening again. Jane calls Sister Mora to ask her questions about aliens and theology. And right away, we're back into the brunt of this discussion. the religious of this deception. The religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems as the catechism says. Here's the conversation. Jane, does God love us? I don't mean does he love us. I know he does. Does he love only us? Because Genesis says that we're his supreme creation. But do you think it's possible that on earth? Sister Mora interrupts. Jane, what? Sister Mora, Genesis, it says that we are God's supreme creation on earth. I cannot tell you how many times my critics have done exactly what Sister Mora did in this scene. interrupt me to shout that exact phrase on earth when I'm pointing out that man is the only visible creature that can know God. That is the only intelligent material being. Period. They've concocted this bizarre idea in their head that divine revelation. It hits some impenetrable barrier somewhere in the stratosphere. And that everything God said in scripture, that stuff only applies to things under the stratosphere. Of course, that's a lie. I the word of God is eternal and infinite. It has no boundaries at all. But these people are also contradicting what scripture and church teaching explicitly say. Those sources of truth do not restrict man's supremacy to earth. At no way, shape, or form do they imply that there could be beings superior to man or even also having God's image anywhere else. Man's supremacy and uniqueness is over all that God made. And the word all in that context means all. This is made absolutely dogmatically clear to us in so many ways. Let me just quickly race through a few here. Don't want to spend much time on this. Please see my really long video last month for more scripture. Shem and Seth were honored among men and Adam above every living being in the creation. It's right there in in scripture, the book of Sierak. And by the way, uh dominion. Remember man is given dominion. We spoke about that earlier as well. Catechism catechism of the Catholic Church. God created everything for man. Not just everything on earth, everything period. That's what the opening lines of Genesis also say. Even the stars were made for us to mark our signs. Book of Proverbs also divine revelation speaking prophetically here about the Holy Spirit specifically referring to the creation of even the heavens and the sky. But God's delights were to be with the children of men. St. Francis de Sales re reiterating infallible unanimous consensus of all the saints who have ever lived. Man is the perfection of the universe. No, he's not just one of many beings that God made in his image. He is the singular only perfection of the universe. Catechism of the Catholic Church crowned with glory and honor. Man is after the angels capable of capable of acknowledging how majestic is the name of the Lord. There's nothing between us and angels. We are the pinnacle of material creation. The glory of God, this is also the catechism quoting St. um I can't remember which saint this is quoting but I believe it was a father of the church. The glory of God is man fully alive not extraterrestrials fully alive because they don't exist. Man fully alive only um compendium of the social doctrine of the church also magist only man and women man and woman among all creatures not all creatures on earth all creatures period who are made by God in his image. all creatures of all visible creatures. The catechism says only man is able to know and his and love his creator and that's got its own sentence there. Yes, another sentence also teaches about what's the case on earth. But no, that other sentence does not restrict the scope of this sentence. This sentence is absolute of all visible creatures meaning every single solitary material thing meaning aside from the angels man is the only one capable of knowing God. All catechism also teaches man occupies a unique place in creation. He is in the image of God. Nothing else is because there are no aliens. It is also impossible to make the human nature of Jesus Christ work with this idea that the supremacy of man is only about earth. Uh excellent document from the Vatican. Dominus Yus near 2000s def specifically and repeatedly repudiates this idea that there could be others that Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus born of Mary might not be absolutely unique and singular and supreme in the most extreme meanings of those words on and on and on here. There is only one salvific economy of God, the one on earth. Jesus of Nazareth is unique and singular. uh salvation is proper to him alone, exclusive, universal, absolute dogma of the blessed virgin Mary who also has human nature like ours. She was of course immaculately conceived but she shares the same human nature. She is above all men and angels in glory. She is as close to God as is even physically, theologically, ontologically possible. It's not even it's not even conceivable that a greater creature could exist than Mary. and she's a mere human. No, there is absolutely no room whatsoever in scripture, in the fathers, in the saints, in the magisterium, in sacred tradition, in the senses, in anything for the notion of an of a being greater than man. That is always a diabolical deception wherever it rears its head. Okay, go see my longer video for more on that.

Back to the um discussion uh back to the movie here. The other uh real quick one extra point about that actually the other hilariously outrageously facious thing that the Catholic and Christian ET promoters like this none in the movie do. So one second they say God's teaching about man's uniqueness that's just about beings on earth like sister Mora here is saying that's not about the galaxies and everything man's uniqueness in in scripture and church teaching and all that that's just about earth and then in the very next breath they say oh by the way aliens are here on earth and they've been here for a really long time in fact maybe they've always been here and these people are so blinded by their own etianism that they can't even see the flagrant contradiction that they just asserted. And that's even leaving aside the fact that of course we know no it's not talking about just Earth. But even if it was, which is outrageously false, even if we grant that outrageously false uh premise, it still doesn't work with believing Ellen here cuz that would make them on Earth. Okay. Anyway, onto the next thing that uh Jane and Sister Mora here are talking about. The next big Spielbergian fallacy promoting the ET deception is the one that he put on all of his movie trailers from the onset. Let me put it on the screen here. Jane, do you think there could be others, meaning other intelligent beings besides us? Yes, I would think so. Why would he make such a vast universe yet save it only for us? And that quote countless millions of people have heard it by now. That's the um that's the most common false argument, bogus argument to theologically present the case for extraterrestrials. And anyone who would make that case is simply proven he doesn't understand the first thing about God's love for man. Let's take a look at what I wrote about that in my book. Despite being a mere nothing quantitatively in relation to the heavens, earth is given its own category in scriptures opening line. Scriptures opening line. And God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to separate the day from the night. And let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years." Genesis 1:14. The Bible teaches that the heavenly bodies exist for us, for man. Genesis does not imply that these heavenly bodies may also be quote for anything or anyone else. If they were, then God deceives in the book of Genesis by indicating that these very things exist for marking our seasons and years. That would mean that Genesis 1:14 misleads, which of course we can never say because God does not lie. Since God already told us the reason for the existence of the heavens, that is all we can see or possibly could ever see when observing the night sky. No Christian may validly protest. But why did God make all of this if despite its incomprehensible magnitude, it is uninhabited? Wouldn't that be a waste of space? God revealed that he made it for us, for what we can gain as we gaze upon it. No other disparate purpose for this immense creation should be postulated. God could have made the earth become enveloped each sunset only in an endless black void. Instead, he populated the night with the night sky with respendant diamonds whose incomprehensible expanse we discover more and more about with each new telescope built. Whoever supposes that this quote must entail the existence of alien civilizations therein simply understands nothing of the magnanmity of God of his great goodness in imbuing creation with such endless beauty to be enjoyed by man. It is thus that the enormity of the heavens testifies to the eternity of heaven itself. As astronomers rightly note, we can scarcely wrap our minds around the expanse of the galaxies. Similarly, we cannot grasp the expanse of eternal life. It is only right that upon creating the wonders of the starry sky, God would enclose within these mysteries greater and greater expositions of his grander in proportion to how much we discover hidden therein. What pray tell is lacking in this understanding of why God stretched out the heavens like a beautiful tent for us to dwell under? Simply put, the heavens proclaim the glory of God. And if you'd like an image to make that same basic point better, here it is. The Sacred Heart of Jesus. Today, of course, is the feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. The day Spielberg chose to release this film. As Jesus said, revealing this image, "Behold this heart which has so loved men." The answer to the question of why God made such a vast universe is in his sacred heart. It is in that heart's love for the human race. That's why God made such a vast universe for us, for us men in our nature. Our h the human race is the only one in which God became incarnate. And that's why it's the purpose of the universe. And if you think the vastness of the universe means that aliens exist, then I'm sorry, but you haven't even begun to grasp the love of God in Jesus Christ for man. But the ET deception, especially as you'll continue to see as it's addressed in this movie's later scenes, that deception is the ultimate affront to the love of God for man. And it's the ultimate affront to God himself.

Let's continue on with the film's plot. Daniel and Margaret now finally meet each other, the two chosen ones, the two special chosen ones by the by the aliens, the new Adam and Eve. Because it turns out they were abducted together as children, and they were given these special gifts by the aliens. We've already talked about uh Margaret's special gifts, going all around prophesying, reading people's minds, consoling everyone. Daniel's special gift is that he has this amazing ability to understand math and he can understand the language of the animals. But the problem is they can't really harness their gift very well because they haven't embraced their abduction encounter yet. They haven't they haven't given their yes to it and they in fact forgot all about it. So they need to go to Hugo Hugo to have him help them remember just like John Mack. And what follows is so diabolical because in real life I've spoken with many so-called alien abductees. They're hurting. They need spiritual help. They were attacked by a demon. And it's not because they're evil people. The devil often attacks good also. It's certainly not their own fault if this happened when they were children. Now, I've spoken with abductees who found spiritual healing and realized that all those so-called abduction experiences were actually diabolical encounters and they've since become saintly devout Catholics. But I've also spoken with abductees who are still in the deception and it has led them down the path of new age diabolical heretical life destroying teachings. And that's why this next scene in the movie really breaks my heart because it's going to convince so many people to embrace a diabolical attack that they suffered. It's going to deprive them of the healing they need. And it's going to convince them that the aliens really did abduct them and that they have more to do with that and that the aliens really just want to give them a great gift and they just need to give themselves over to the beings that abducted them and open themselves up to it and then they can get this great gift. That's exactly what the demons need to enact full-blown diabolical possession. So, this is serious. Um, anyway, there's no need for me to go through in detail the specifics of the abduction encounter that they recall. I already alluded to it before in this video. Point is, Hugo helps them remember that it was actually the glorious, luminous, wonderful thing, even if it was a bit frightening. You know, Daniel and Margaret were terrified of it for so long. All they needed was this ET expert to show them that it's okay and embrace it.

But here are the words, back to the important plot points here. Here are the words that he used to beguile Margaret into that embrace, to seduce her into embracing the extraterrestrial. Hugo says, "You have the gift, but the only way for you to acquire understanding is to go back to where it all began. To go home. And when you go, Margaret, you'll know everything more than what was ever humanly possible. It's the two of you. It's always been just the two of you. You can direct the alien artifact. It'll be an instrument of your will, but you must give yourself over to it. An instrument of your will. The opposite of course of the supreme pair of Christianity the our father thy will be done the alien instrument becomes an instrument of your will of the self-will which will only be your own destruction and it empowers that if you hand yourself over to the entity that creates it that bestows it upon you the aliens of course the demons but also what else is promised here knowledge of everything more knowledge than is humanly possible so long as you take the alien artifact in your hand and give yourself over to it. At this point, I don't even think I need to explain what's going on here to a spiritually astute listener. This is a repetition of the Garden of Eden. Here's what I wrote four years ago. All the devil wants is a little dialogue to initiate the fall. I wrote then the devil possessed an irrational serpent and used it to dialogue with humanity. Eve's wronghead-headed openness to conversation with that animal is the prototype for the devil's current plans to dialogue with all humanity through the modern world's lies. The devil here, of course, portrayed as extraterrestrials. They also assume the disguise of an animal because it presents easier to us. The devil assuming the disguise of an animal speaking serpent. Same basic form of deception. You need to take this thing in your hand, give yourself over to it, and then you will have knowledge. Where have we heard that specifically before? I have it right there in the cover of my book. I don't know how many people, maybe nobody's recognized this before, but I was very careful in how I put together every little detail of this cover. I'll hold it up physically in this uh that's probably not going to be too in focus for you. Let me put it back on the slide here. We've got the UFO up at the top there. The serpent is now coming out of a UFO as opposed to him coming out of the tree in the garden itself. But the same basic words are still being said. That's right there from Genesis 3:5. For God, I have it in Latin there in the Vulgate on my cover, but the translation there is for God knows that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. Daniel and Margaret are the new Adam and Eve. The aliens are the new God. And this new god just so happens to use the exact same approach with Margaret that the serpent used with Eve in the garden. All in the context of UFO disclosure. It's as if Steven Spielberg took my book and decided to make a movie out of it. Except that what I'm calling a diabolical deception, he's calling the greatest event in human history. In fact, what we're witnessing is indeed the first and last deception.

And then the movie comes to its crescendo. It's day numa. Hugo and Daniel and Margaret and their team. They finally evade the evil Wardex employees. They make it to the TV studio that Margaret works at so that they can do quote full disclosure to the whole world all at once. kind of an anti-waring, an anti-elumination. Daniel manages to patch his USB drives into their hardware. Margaret manages to convince everyone there with her supernatural alien empathy to give her live coverage. She gets before the camera and she tells the world that the aliens are here, that the evil government corporate collaboration has been hiding them from us, and that they've even been mean to the aliens. And here's what she says after that. Yesterday I met with a group of courageous people who until recently had worked to hide the truth. But the truth belongs to you. This is for you. This is for all of us to see and to know. This is Disclosure Day.

And then there's a long montage of clips and it goes on for a really long time that's fed through all the world's major news feeds of UFOs and aliens. There's even scenes of Korean and Russian soldiers in the front lines of war stopping everything watching this disclosure of UFOs and aliens on their phones. Everybody's everybody's just glued to their phones watching this disclosure. The implication is that this is what will stop us from blowing each other up in nuclear war. The disclosure of extraterrestrials. The movie then pans to a bigger news anchor in a bigger studio in New York or something and they're rerouting the stream to all the major networks. They're just in a little Kansas City network there at first. She's reporting live. She's commenting on these UFO and alien videos suddenly coming through the feed. And the climax comes when they pan to footage of an alien body from Roswell. Again, back to Roswell in 1947. The beginning of UFO deception. They show us an alien body, the Roswell crash of July 7th, 1947. And that's when the reporter breaks down. She starts to weep as emotional orchestral music plays. And here's what she says. I don't know what to say. She says, "This is extraordinary. Tonight's international crisis was already approaching the unimaginable." Let me interject there. Remember the backdrop of World War II, the unimaginable, but in the context of this unimaginable destruction comes inconceivable glory. The aliens break in. Back to her quote. But this is now inconceivable. This footage raises profound questions about what is happening in our skies. What is the nature of who we are? Who we are and what our place is. And then she starts crying. Says, "I'm sorry. The world has just changed profoundly. If you are watching this, if you are seeing this, you are not alone. You are not alone." There it is again. We're not alone. now because we have the new god, the aliens, here with us.

And then the movie moves on to its double climax. UFO disclosure has just officially happened, but the movie ends with an even bigger disclosure. Hugo, the real big hero here. He goes out to a truck parked in the back of the studio and he wheels in his friend, the alien itself. They bring the alien on a wheelchair into the studio and it stands up and embraces Daniel. Then the scene cuts to Sister Mora and the rest of the nuns there in the convent. They're of course watching on TV like everyone else. And Sister Mora just smiles. The alien whispers a word to Daniel because he's the only one who can understand the alien language. Daniel tells it to Margaret. Then she slowly walks back to center stage, looks directly at the camera, and she shares with the world the single supreme message of the extraterrestrials to us today. Listen, listen. The end.

The movie ends with precisely that. Listen. Why is the command to listen the final word of this film? Because Spielberg believes this is real. And he believes this is a preview and an encouragement to what's about to happen in the real world. He believes we are about to be given extraterrestrial revelations that will be the greatest event in history and fundamentally change all of our beliefs, including our religious ones, and bring us to the next evolutionary level and give us knowledge of all things. And he wants to make sure that happens. So, he is telling you to listen to these aliens. He believes that that's what we need to do. Open ourselves up to this deception and listen to what the aliens have to tell us. Well, don't listen. Don't even watch this garbage movie. It's the most insidious piece of diabolical propaganda ever made precisely because it's not an explicit attack on the faith. Those are easy to fight. This is much more dangerous than an explicit attack on the faith because it's going to subtly encourage a rewriting of it. And more importantly, it's an invitation to a seductive ser it's it's an invitation to what Spielberg believes is coming next. It's a seductive serenade. It's a serenade for the apocalypse. I started my own book with my own serenade for the apocalypse. I hope a good one. This movie is a serenade for the diabolical inversion of that. Aliens do not exist. As Christians and especially as Catholics, we can know that fact with certainty. Again, see my video from last month. There are no aliens. But there are demons. And this ET UFO deception provides demons by far the most convenient ruse, the most convenient disguise that they have ever had in the whole history of the world since The Serpent in the Garden. And Steven Spielberg has just given that deceptive disguise its biggest promotion yet in the imaginations of the masses. This is going to have absolutely devastating effects on the souls of its hearers who believe it. And it's also going to hasten the great deception. Our job is to save as many souls from that as possible. So fight it. God bless you.

>> Interviewed some of the most popular authors and podcasters on aliens and UFOs. I interviewed so-called alien abductees and ET contactes.

>> I'm a an abductee. They investigated my case. It turned out to be one of their best case, if not the best case from last year.

>> Disclosure is the very opposite of what everyone is telling you it is. It's not the beginning of the era of the extraterrestrial. It's the beginning of another era entirely. For decades, we've been treated to a constant stream of UFO documentaries, all saying the same thing.

Just a quick addendum to this video. The UFO deception managers are trying to deplatform me again. News Nation, it's the biggest news outlet that focuses on promoting the UFO deception. They tried to get me taken down last year with a bogus copyright claim and uh I fought that and fought it and eventually I won. But now the age of disclosure documentary people are trying to get my content taken down. Uh, they know full well that the claims they're filing against me are bogus. I am 100% within legal fair use copyright law. And they know that I used a couple minutes from their 2-hour long movie to provide commentary that's fully legal, 100% under fair use copyright law, but they see me as a threat cuz I am. And they're trying to silence me. Yesterday, they got one of my clips deleted uh from my Twitter account where I pointed out how diabolical their message is. and they even got my Twitter temporarily suspended there. As you can see, I did get back on it. Um, anyway, the point is I'm going to fight this to the bitter end. I'm not going anywhere and I'm not giving up ever, but it's always possible that they'll succeed in getting me deplatformed. So, please subscribe and click the notifications button so you get my content right away. Uh, it might not always last long because whenever I put something new up, they always try to find another way to get my stuff taken down. And if they succeed in getting my whole platforms deleted, like my whole YouTube channel and my whole Twitter account, which they might, uh, then I'll have no way of getting word out except I'll have no way of getting word out through social media anymore. So, please subscribe with your email address on my blog. The only way they really can't silence me is if I have your email address. I'll never share it with anyone. You can unsubscribe any time, but please do subscribe with your email address at dsdocconer.com. d s o n o r.com. I do think there are some bigger plans against me in the works by some individuals. That is bigger plans than just getting me deplatformed, but those won't stop me either. So, I'm praying for you all. Please pray for me. God bless you.

Get Our Mobile App

"Disclosure Day" & Spielberg’s 50-Year-Grooming Exposed

Transcription