Transcription
I think people are collectively losing their minds when it comes to the Epstein files to the point where I genuinely think people do not have the ability to look at this with a critical eye without bringing it back to how they feel about it, how it relates to them, how it relates to the celebrities they like. There is no objectivity whatsoever and that has caused people to lose the plot. Eva [ __ ] has anyone asked your thoughts on the Epstein Files? We were talking about it last stream. I'm sure it got clipped. You can probably go to my fan club's page and find it.
But um look at how people treated me when I tried to talk about how men in power they do harm. So today we're going to continue discussing the Epstein files. I'm going to tell you right now there is a lot to get through and given that there are 3 and 1/2 million documents out of the 6 million I'm assuming plus that actually exist there is a lot to discuss. Now today we're going to do a mixture of certain things are Tik Toks because there are people discussing and contextualizing things. certain things I'm going to discuss that come from articles and happenings as in people's reactions to what's going on, namely celebrities putting their feet in their mouth. What is new?
One thing I wanted to touch on, and this is going to be relatively brief. I can always circle back to it later if it's of interest to you, if I find more that is pertinent. What we associate with Epstein, and I'm speaking for myself when I say we here, really. So what I associate with Epstein is again like I've said before the concept of a lot of high ranking people that I've never heard of that I truly have no concept of. So people up here right and then Epstein is down here. And then I think of celebrities and generally just famous people, people with influence.
What I didn't necessarily connect to Epstein are scientists. And this was truly alarming to me because once perversion infiltrates science to whatever degree, you understand that what we're dealing with is so severe because we have someone with very particular goals, right? Malevolent goals, we might say, putting their finger in what is supposed to be pure fact, right? People turn to science to get facts. In a lot of cases, science is black and white. You are A or B. this disease is A or B. The way you contract this disease is A or B. And granted, there's more to science than that, but I'm an English major, so that's enough for me.
Epstein had ties to a lot of different scientists. Here, I'm just going to give you a quick rundown to get an idea of what exactly that means. Epstein files reveal deeper ties to scientists than previously known. Latest batch of documents show researchers consulting the financeier and sex offender on publications, visas, and more. I'm going to skip a lot of parts here just because they're introductory and namely I'm not really sure I completely agree. This says he died of suicide in 2019. I don't agree with that. If anything, he was murdered if you believe he's dead.
Which so the files may include new information about interactions between Epstein and scientists whose links to him were already known. For example, the documents contain correspondence from theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss, whose science outreach organization received $250,000 from Epstein. "I thought we agreed no comment," Epstein wrote in 2018. As Krauss responded to media inquiries about an investigation of sexual misconduct that led to Krauss's ousting from Arizona State University in Tempe, Krauss explained his interaction with Epstein in an email to Nature. That's the name of this website. I sought out advice from essentially everyone I knew. When false allegations about me were circulated, he added that he had no knowledge of the horrendous crimes, the sex trafficking that Epstein was later accused of. I was as shocked as the rest of the world when he was arrested.
So, one thing that you need to need to I say in quotation marks believe if you want to believe what people like this are saying and I mean by people like this people who are involved with Epstein that they had absolutely no knowledge that back in the day I can't remember if it was 2008 Epstein was already arrested and was already registered as a sex offender. So when you say like oh my god I had no idea that's only valid until a certain point. Maybe not all of us Google every single person we meet. At the same time though, Epstein wasn't just some rando like coffee shop barista who just seems to have this regular life. You're talking about someone who has vast and incredible amounts of reach and money. And at no point do you wonder where that comes from, even in a completely wholesome way, right? Like if I met someone who had crazy amounts of influence or whatever and I liked that person, I might look into how they got there in an inspirational fashion, right? Though, of course, if I met someone who had an eerie amount of power, I might look in an investigative way. To not look at all to me is wild, especially when it's someone giving you money. Being financed, for sure, is something that will make a lot of people turn a blind eye. But at the end of the day, if it is your career, don't you think you should look into who's giving the money? So when they say, "I had no idea he was A, B, and C." Okay, I guess. And I mean, you have to know at least something about him if he's giving you money. I can't believe that he'd just give you money. You'd just be like, "Oh, okay, sure. Yeah, great. Whoever you are, let me just I'm not buying it."
Anyway, the files showed that Epstein maintained a list of of nearly 30 top scientists, including Krauss, and revealed previous unknown connections with some of them. One was Lisa Randall, a theoretical physicist at Harvard University in Cambridge, who joked in an email with Epstein about his house arrest following his 2008 incarceration for soliciting sex with a minor. He was under house arrest in 2009 2010. She also visited his private island in the Caribbean in 2014. Randall did not respond to nature's request for comment, but he told the Harvard Crimson, "I am appalled by the full extent of allegations against him and deeply regret maintaining contact."
Among the latest hunch of documents were also correspondences in which some scientists contacted Epstein with funding opportunities. For instance, in 2013, Nathan Wolf, a then viologist at Stanford University in California, proposed that Epstein fund a sexual behavior study of undergraduate students to test our horny virus hypothesis that certain vaginal and penile microorganisms might drive increased sexual activity. In an email to Nature, Wolf says that although he visited Epstein's homes in New York and Florida to discuss the research, Epstein never funded it. Wolf says he regrets not recognizing at the time how inappropriate Epstein's framing was and his association with the financeier.
Now, these are just a couple examples, right? But it does give you the idea that Epstein wasn't just this guy who was having these [ __ ] up parties on islands, but instead actually was involved in a lot of things. And that's one of the things that I think a lot of people are now realizing that a lot of this is more far-reaching than we originally thought. Now the elites exist everywhere in different countries in different respects of elite I suppose. But if we consider that the crown princess of Norway I believe it is is looped into all of this. This expands well beyond the US. I think that much is obvious but I think I should say it out loud just in case. So the fact that he was involved to some extent in science and academia is so concerning especially because as you see here he was trying to have some kind of influence there too with the whole horny virus hypothesis. And mind you I was reading an article about this because I wanted to know how much people who invest in academia in science blah blah blah how much of a say they really have. And it turns out from what I've seen, granted this depends on the person, but for the most part, if you are investing in someone's career, a lot of people have a general idea of what that means. You know, like if you're investing in an author, you know that they plan to write a novel on thing X, Y, or Z, but you're not part of the decisionmaking. You are like a patron of the arts or a patron of the sciences. So even the fact that Epstein was so involved with this whole horny virus thing tells you that he wanted to have control in ways that don't even make sense within the scope of what he was doing. So I think it's important to address that the reach cannot be underestimated even with quote unquote smaller things that you might not think of. So Epstein and the sciences not as disconnected as we thought.
Beyond that, when we're talking about Epstein these days, there is a lot of talk about the Clintons. Now, without getting too far into Clinton lore, or else, God knows where we're going to end up here, there's this article that says, "Clinton set to testify in House Committee's Epstein investigation after contempt threat. Bill and Hillary Clinton agreed to the House Oversight Committee's terms to testify as part of the panel's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, a lastminute change of heart for the pair who had been defiant as they faced a contempt of Congress vote. The panel's chairman said Tuesday. Hillary Clinton will appear for a deposition on February 26th, while the former president will appear on February 27th, the committee said. House Republicans said they will put the contempt proceedings on hold to ensure their compliance. Once it became clear we would hold them in contempt, the Clintons completely caved and will appear for transcribed filmed depositions this month. Republican Rep. James Comr of Kentucky said in a statement in a letter to the committee. The Clintons asked for a public hearing saying, "We now believe that will best suit our concerns about fairness." A source told CBS News, "The depositions will take place behind closed doors." The House was expected to vote this week on holding the former president and former secretary of state in criminal contempt of Congress, but the plans were abruptly put on hold Monday when the Clinton's legal team alerted the committee that they would agree to the committee's terms. Comr appeared to be caught off guard by the news and said he was seeking clarification on what they were agreeing to. The House rules committee then postponed consideration of the contempt resolutions. Over the weekend, the Clinton's legal team proposed that Bill Clinton would sit for a 4-hour transcribed interview in New York City that should be restricted to matters related to the investigation into Epstein. Hillary Clinton would offer another sworn declaration. But if the committee required her in-person appearance, it should follow the same terms as her husband's testimony, the lawyers said. Comr rejected the offer, calling it unreasonable. That led to Monday night's email from the Clinton's legal team saying the pair accept the terms of your letter and will appear for depositions on mutually agreeable dates. The acceptance marks a stark turn for the Clintons who had argued the House Oversight Committee's subpoenas seeking their testimony were invalid and legally uninforcable."
So, I'll link the article down below if you want to read the rest of it. But the long and short of all of this is that the Clintons initially said no. Then they said yes, but it has to be public. then it's not going to be public. Now, the reason why this is important is because I think it shows you not necessarily just how quickly people will flip-flop here and how telling the flip-flop is, but I think instead that this shows just how much people want to avoid any Epstein discussion at all costs. And granted, any normal person would not be excited to have this conversation. At the same time, like I said in my prior video, if you have an opportunity to actually show that you have nothing to hide, why would you not immediately take that opportunity? Now, granted, I'm sure there are plenty of things that can be taken out of context and misunderstood because human relationships are complicated. Realistically, if you are a rational, logical human being and there's a rational and logical explanation for what happened, the only people who will misunderstand are idiots of sorts, right? If it's a plus b equals c, you shouldn't be worried that people will think ah no actually it's d^ squ. So anyway, that's interesting also because this is quite the flip-flop cuz it's not just like we're not going to speak to you at all, but it's like yes, we will speak to you, but only under the conditions we want and we want it to be public, which if I were a conspiracy person, I would say that all of this is a further distraction from what actually is in the files and from what actually the Clintons know. It's a distraction because now we're not talking about the actual content of the files. Now, we're talking about the Clintons being dramatic divas about all of this. So, it does work as a distraction, which makes me think that they're far more guilty than I originally thought, which to be honest, I originally already thought they were quite guilty.
Now, we can move on to Lizo. Now, I became aware that Lizo spoke on the Epstein situation. I wasn't aware she was going to do that, and I had no reason to think she was going to do that. And this goes back to an opinion of mine which may be kind of unpopular. But personally, I don't look to celebrities to speak about things unless they actually care, which for the most part, I don't think they do. And I don't think that they have a concept of what it means to be a normal person anymore because a lot of celebrities have been so far removed from that life for long enough that they have no concept, right? and I really don't need to listen to a millionaire billionaire tell me about everyday life and what I should care about. With all due respect, this touches exactly on why people should opt to shut the [ __ ] up more often.
Now, there's a video of Lizo appearing to defend men in Epstein files. So, this video was swiftly deleted for obvious reasons because you act like a [ __ ] and realize you are being a [ __ ] Guess what? you have a moment of illumination where you're not a [ __ ] and take the video down. So, we're gonna look at that video and I'll let you come to your own conclusions. I have to It's really [sighs] frustrating to me because there are 3 million files, right? three million documents in the files because over the course of however long this man has been doing these crimes, every email, every text message, everything just in general about this man's life has been put into these files to scan for illegal activities, right? Every text message you sent to somebody. If you stole an apple from Walmart and you were on trial for stealing an apple from Walmart, is every person in your phone an accomplice, is every person in your phone, is every email you sent to a person or speaking about a person, does that does that make that person complicit? Does that make that person a bad guy? No. No, it doesn't. And that's the same thing with the Diddy stuff. That was so I told y'all I told y'all the media is so smart. They're going to make you so distracted with celebrity names that you're not going to focus on the problem. You think every party that Diddy ever threw was a freakoff and people were [ __ ] and slipping and sliding on baby oil. No, that man had birthday parties. That man had Easter gatherings. That man had Super Bowl parties. That man had Christmas parties, Halloween parties, regular parties. And so now they're saying mom Donnie's mom who's a filmmaker, they're like, "Oh, she's she's on the Epstein list because Gain Max, she was on a guest list for Gizlane Maxwell's like showing of a political film once." Hey. Hey. Hey. That's You're distracted. You just want mom Donnie to be a bad guy or his mom. A girl can go to a movie premiere. You think Gizlane Maxwell woke up every single day trafficking children? No. We're losing the plot. And it's just it's just like the like people the American people in the comments. I knew she was wrong. Jay-Z I knew he was What did it say Jay-Z did? He was there in 1996. Come on people. Like y'all are falling for it. It's the easiest, oldest trick in a book. And honestly, I'm losing faith in the average intelligence of the American person because come on, just cuz somebody's name is mentioned in a 3 million document file of a person's life who's been lived over a span crimes who've spanned decades doesn't mean that every single person isn't an accomplice. He could be mention he referenced Jay-Z once. He was like, "Oh, we could learn from Jay-Z's business model. Why are y'all where's the crime? Focus."
So, I'm going to say one thing. I agree to a very small extent in the sense of just because someone is in the documents, it doesn't mean that they're guilty. It doesn't mean that they did anything illegal. Everyone, I think, on Earth at some point has associated with someone who maybe did shitty things, right? It's obviously different when it comes to oh they attended the same party once which is a big nothing burger compared to they used to speak via email via text this person went to five parties 10 parties those are two very different situations right I will say however I find it very very weird to run to the defense of someone when I don't think pardon if I'm wrong I don't think you Lizo have read all of the 3 million plus documents. So before you run to say that Jay-Z is a saint even though he is known for going after minors, including his current wife, but I guess whatever about that, who cares? It actually is not that surprising to me that Jay-Z is there because if we're talking about the Epstein files, what we're really talking about is minors and the abuse of minors predominantly, amongst other things. Oh, what do you know? Jay-Z used to go for minors. So, if he's in there, actually, contrary to other people like Mani's mom, actually with Jay-Z, it's automatically more suspicious. Does that mean he's the devil and committed god knows what crimes? No. But I think it's dumb to run to defend him because what? Because he's a musician? Because he's someone you know slash look up to? Why him specifically? Are you defending anyone else in there? Because from my perspective, you're quote unquote defending two people, which are Mundan's mom and Jay-Z, right? If according to your logic, being named in the files doesn't mean you're guilty, do you have that same stance with people that you don't like, do you? Because I tend to think not. I think that if someone that you didn't like were in there, you'd be like, "Oh, they're in the Epstein files. They're terrible." Whatever. So, I think that this is biased, but more than anything, I don't need you, millionaire musician. I don't need you to tell me how to read these, okay? Because if we're going to talk about being biased, these are people in your cosmos, like in your Hollywood world. So, realistically, do I need a millionaire who may very well be connected to some of these people telling me what to think? No. And by the way, when I say connected, I mean knowing the people. That doesn't mean she's guilty or anything. The art of celebrities shutting up about things that they're not qualified to talk about has been truly lost. Truly lost.
Now, let's look at some of the things I've saved from Tik Tok because there are a lot of photos and documents that we can go over. There's also a crazy amount of misinformation circulating and part of that, I think, is also part of the big distraction, if you will. Now, there are so many Tik Toks. This one has 165,000 likes. Mind you, straight up misinformation. It says Galain Maxwell's sister owns Amber Alert. Think about that. Epstein files. That's not true. Galain Maxwell's sister does not own Amber Alert. Throw that one out the window. Was an interesting theory for the two seconds I considered it, but that's not true. So, moving on about that. There's also a thing going around about Galain Maxwell's sister being married to Dr. Fouchy. I believe it is also not true. The one thing I will say about these two false statements is that they connect to how far the reach goes, right? Because when you think of Dr. Fouchy, you're thinking, okay, so there is a connection between Epstein and famous doctors. And again, we go to the sciences. The important thing to hold on to amidst that misinformation is that as much as this stuff is made up, it's not far off from true in the sense of, like I said before, Epstein had connections with scientists and scientists that have a big pull on how everything is dealt with in the world.
In the Epstein files, and I haven't gone into this part as much, there is reference to pandemics and simulated pandemics. And then Bill Gates was in there. The conspiracy of COVID being fake or something along those lines is not a far-off conspiracy from what's in the files because Epstein was very intimately connected with a lot of people who have to do with science which then connects to medicine which then connects to I guess you could call it global policies especially during pandemics. So you understand how all of this is very farreaching but nonetheless there's a lot of misinformation out there. Please check and do your homework because I saw so many Tik Toks about the Amber Alert connection to Gileain Maxwell. That first second I actually believed it cuz I was like I it can't be that I just saw five Tik Toks that all say the same thing with a lot of likes. Turns out it's all [ __ ]
Okay, so on the note of cannibalism, we touched on this last time. There is more that has come out about that and this is very much a recurring theme. You throw away the head and keep the body. In this disturbing [music] conversation, Epstein seems to be referring to the women that he's trafficking as an aquarium. [music] You can see he's having this conversation with a Olivier Colom Olivia. I don't know how to say his name, but I'm going to read this to you in warning. It gets really disturbing. You can see Epste wrote at the bottom, "No problem. A friend that built the Beijing airport asked [music] if I knew a bank that was interesting. I thought I'd run it by you if it were good for you. I'm not involved in any way, nor [music] would I expect to be. Then this guy Olivier or whatever says, "Thanks. Very nice of you. Where [music] are you now?" Then I've seen writes back on my island in the Caribbean with an aquarium full of girls. [music] So keep that in mind. An aquarium full of girls. He is making these women out to be fish or [music] as you're going to see shrimp in a few moments. And that's when it gets disturbing. Then [music] this guy writes, "The king of Saudi Arabia has a few white sharks in his at his Jedi Palace. I totally prefer [music] yours. Sure, I would enjoy the view." And then again, as two are Russian, I guess some might refer to them as white sharks. [music] So then they start obviously here referring to these women as shrimp. He says, "I like shrimp, but not so much if it's too pink, although I'm definitely more into white than into any other color. [music] I like your philosophy." Then right here we get the infamous now message. No. Some are like shrimp. You throw away the head and keep the body. So what that means, we don't necessarily know. Is this actually Epste and this guy referring to decapitating a woman, keeping the body? Are they talking about mutilating a corpse after death and preserving the body? [music] What does that even mean? throw away the head and keep the body. There's I mean it's physically impossible to throw away or toss out a living thing's head with its body still remaining and it' [music] be alive. I mean, it's impossible obviously. So, yeah, this is some really deeply disturbing [ __ ] to me. Then they continue on. As long as you don't have any hammerhead ones, I like white sharks. And then they say, I can't even think of the smell of [music] black shrimp. Uggh. So clearly this seems to also not only be a conversation about potentially murdering and mutilating women, but there's also plenty of casual racism throughout this entire string of messages as well with them saying, "I can't even think of the smell of black shrimp Ugg." But keep in mind, the DOJ, the FBI, Trump himself, they claim that no investigation is needed at all whatsoever. This is all done. Everybody's been held accountable. None of these people talking to Epstein should ever [music] face any sort of music. Let me know your thoughts in the comments section below. What do you think of all this? Please share out these videos, like and comment to spread the [music] word.
>> So, none of this is particularly surprising, especially if you've been on social media. Even if you haven't gone over the files yourself or you haven't been up to date on everything, there are a lot of allegations that there are women children buried on Epstein's property. one of the properties at least. So, all of this conversation stops being surprising if you already knew that. I also think that considering the gravity of these crimes and how heinous Epstein's crimes are and those connected to him, death is not a far-off thing. Murder is not a far-off thing. If we're going to delve into this knowing that there are some weird kind of ritualistic, low-key sacrificial, rough sex, perverse [ __ ] type of activities, is murder that far off?
>> So, this is one of the most disturbing things I've ever read in my life. And it raises the question, was Jeffrey Epstein impregnating young children in order to force them to have kids that would then be brought into the world of sex trafficking and pedophile rings from a newborn or I should say from the age of newborn or whatever you'd say. So these are screenshots from a journal of one of Epstein's victims. And the girl talks a lot in coded language. As you can see here, this is kind of how she wrote and she writes in these journals, but it's a pretty easy code to decipher. I deciphered a bunch of these pages, but the really disturbing thing throughout these journals is that she talks about multiple perpetrators. She names perpetrators like the executives at AOL, Leon Black, a good friend of Epstein's. There are many more, too. But this girl constantly talks about death, about murder, about her babies being taken away from her, about her being forced into these traumatic procedures that were extremely gruesome and bloody. There are also pictures of what I can assume are potentially [music] her babies, her sonograms. And yeah, I mean, you can pause and read all these pages. There are so many of them. I just spent the last hour reading through these journals for a video that I'm producing on my channel, and I was I was on the verge of tears throughout most of I mean, it's really really this is horrific stuff. Some of the pages she has drawn to and splattered with ink like this or like this with some of her code. Here are some of the pages translated, though. Tomorrow is the halfway ultrasound for Jeffrey. This one stuck. After they took the first baby who survived in the early miscarriage, I think it was called. I no longer feel like a person but a vessel. Will they take this one too? Who has the first one? Where did Galain go? I can't let myself get attached. My body feels so tired. Will I ever be free? So then in another page of coded writing, she writes, "I am such a monster. I didn't console her. I can't unhear her screams. They haunt me. I couldn't even bring myself to look at her. I am a monster. I deserve to be haunted by her screams. I am so sorry. I am so broken. Another page here, she describes the doctor who was from Israel. And she describes the procedure. This was different. A shot and those rod-like things had a hook and so much pain. Blood and water all over the bed. And she was right. Like a feeling when your tummy hurts and you have to push. I saw her fingers. This tiny head and body in the doctor's hands. It reached up its it reached its tiny arm up and had a tiny foot. I closed my eyes and no more. No more cries. I don't understand. Just say these things happen. They yelled and screamed and he said it will be the same in a couple of months. I don't understand what is going on. I can't go to school like this. I can't stop shaking. Yeah. So, to me, it sounds like this girl was being impregnated over and over again, starting at the age of probably 13 or 14. And then when she was having these babies, they were being taken from her and immediately brought into the world of a pedophile ring or sex trafficking organization. There are so many things in these journals that are so twisted. Let me know if you want me to talk more about these entries because yeah, it's really really really heartbreaking stuff.
So, this is also an addition that is in to me no way surprising though it is particularly haunting to hear from a victim and their journal and what they endured. The fact that she even had to write everything in code is so tragic because it's like there's not even the possibility of self-expression without having to hide and shield yourself and protect yourself, right? Because I'm sure if that journal had been found by Epstein or anyone connected, she could have been murdered, she very well probably would have been murdered because it's like, hey, you can't tell the public this or they would assume that she'd take it to a public to the public, a journalist, so on so forth, right? So, the fact that everything is so in some ways quote unquote redacted, even in terms of these journals for the victim's safety at the time, is wild. In terms of the content, it would not surprise me that they had an operation going on in terms of impregnating young girls and then doing god knows what with the babies. There is a big conversation about eating babies amongst other things. And if you do believe that, then this makes sense with that in the sense of you have young girls/women, if there are even any women that are getting impregnated in order to basically be a copy of supply and demand in the most perverse way possible, where people connected to Epste or Epstein himself want to have these babies for whatever purposes and then these girls/women are the ones who have to supply that at the cost of their own psychological well-being. which in this case there's just trauma here all over the place because at this point it's almost like they're making the victims to some degree quote unquote complicit or making them feel complicit, right? Cuz here it seems like there is a lot of guilt and I can't even imagine the difficulty of being in a position like that where you feel guilty for something that was forced upon you. So you had no choice in it really. But at the same time as mothers of children, they also feel the responsibility to take care of those children even though they can't. So, it's this back and forth between guilt and blaming oneself and then acknowledging that what else could you do under these circumstances? If you have to write your journal in code, do you really have a lot of freedom? I'd say no.
>> Did Jeffrey Epstein and his friends consume human meat? Did they eat babies? Well, I have some shocking new things to show you. First of all is this email exchange sent in July of 2009. I do not know who this was sent to and who Jeffree was talking to, but as you can see, somebody at the bottom writes Jeffrey and says, "Lol, I don't know if cream cheese and baby are on the same level." Then they talk about a schedule and a fuel explosion. I don't know what that even means, but yeah, disturbing. I don't know if cream cheese and baby are on the same level. I mean, babies are babies. Cream cheese is a food that you eat, obviously. And then above that, Epstein writes back, "There are millions of babies, very little good vegetable cream cheese." So, you can make of that what you will, but to me, it really seems like they're discussing eating babies. I mean, I don't I don't really know what to make of that. There's also a lot of what seems to be coded speak in the Epstein files dealing with muffins. For example, here's one email found in the files that says, "Hey Lynn, can you please make sure I have some muffin batter and baked muffins to take with us tomorrow to the ranch? Thanks." Then here's another email. Tea passed on your rude Easter creature movie. Thought you might like Nutty. I doubt he is up to your normal muffin standard. Hope to see you soon. Whatever that means. Here's another one you can pause to read if you'd like. The other thing he would like to change is the size of his muffins. Could you please bake the muffins for Mr. Epstein? Make them smaller in size. Your muffin proportions are good. However, they should have no brown sugar on the top. Then again, woohoo, I'm so happy for you. Gobble down a muffin, take a nice long shower, and crawl into bed. Just such a strange email. And this one's pretty bizarre. Hi, Sonum. Jeffrey might come back to New York June. Yada yada. I think we should get the muffin ingredients on the airplane this Friday, June 8th, just in case. Do any of the ingredients expire quickly or will all be okay until June 20th? Then in response, there's nothing that will expire quickly and all the ingredients will be ready by tomorrow and will get in airplane this Friday. Then super. Thank you. So what the hell kind of muffin are they talking about here? What kind of muffin do you have to fly in ingredients for from god knows where? What type of ingredients to get into an airplane? What's up with all the speak of muffin? There's tons of mentions of pizza, tons of mentions of muffins in these emails. And to me, and many others online, this looks to be code speak. Obviously, I don't think they're talking about actual muffin ingredients here, unless there's some super bougie, incredibly sensitive muffin that only the super elite uber rich know about and eat on a regular basis. And yeah, it goes back to messages like this. Millions of babies, very little good vegetable cream cheese. And it really makes you wonder what all these people were eating when they were hanging out with Epstein and his gang of ghouls.
>> So, there's a common theory relating to all of this food speak between cream cheese muffins, so on and so forth. There's a comment at the top of this video that says the cream cheese they're talking about is the white vernick babies are born with. And then someone said that's one of two options. It could also be intestinal matter because the infants are only processing milk and stomach acid which would kind of ferment it, I guess to say. I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying I don't think there's a limit to these men's depravity. I obviously don't know what the [ __ ] the cream cheese is in reference to, what the muffin is in reference to. However, I think we can all agree with, you know, a collective one brain cell needed. We can all agree that this is most certainly some type of code. But the interesting thing is that it is so overtly a code that it almost doesn't work in the sense of the whole point of code words is that you can pass it off almost as a normal conversation. Right? I think we all to some extent have spoken in code words and the point is for it to be kind of seamless where nobody else would really notice that you're saying something strange. The point of code words is for the code words to blend in with the rest of your sentence. So, it's not like you're saying, "Hey, Mom. I heard you wanted me to pick up diamonds at the grocery store." Because guess what? Now, we know that diamonds aren't diamonds, and we want to know what the [ __ ] you're talking about. Now, on that same note, it's clearly code, but at the same time, a lot of these things are so incredibly vague that obviously we can't guess what that means. What I will say is that I think code gave them a false sense of security that they could just say whatever via email, which I still am so I still am so thrown that all of these people felt comfortable speaking by email, which thank God they did because that's how we have all this information now. But it's really like the false sense of security there is so profound that they really couldn't conceive of, oh, this could bite us in the ass. Granted, depending on when some of these were written, technology wasn't as advanced as it is now, and even hacking wasn't as it is now. But still, these people seem to have no concern about others finding this information.
So then part of what's coming out with Epstein are also videos, things from his camera roll. There is this one video where it seems like he's chasing, I can only assume, a young girl around a kitchen island. >> [music] [laughter] [laughter] [laughter] [music] >> It sounds like there's laughing from whoever's filming and then but it also sounds like kind of like breathy crying like someone trying to catch their breath while they're crying. So, I don't know what to make of that because the context is deeply unclear. But again, we return to the main question, which I think we all know Epstein is guilty by now. God, I hope. But it's also the question of how is it that he was always surrounded by children? And how is it that seemingly everyone failed these children over and over and over? Which then leads me to the next part of my conspiracy is that he had something on all of these people even before they gave their children to him, so to speak, right? I feel like there are some people who were using their children or children they knew as payment to essentially not have him blackmail them with other stuff he had on them or other stuff that other people had on them. People higher up in the pyramid, right? Cuz I said that he's down here. It could always be possible that you have someone up here who hates you, who has stuff on you, and to appease them, you'll give Jeffrey your children. But that's just a theory.
A chilling email released in the latest Epstein files [music] claims Epstein ordered the burial of two foreign girls near his ranch after [music] they were strangled to death during rough fetish sex. The email sent by a person claiming to have worked for Epstein was first sent to a man named Eddie Aragon on November 21st, 2019 before being forwarded to the FBI. [music] It alleges the girls were buried on the orders of Epstein and Madame G, believing to be Galain Maxwell at Zoro Ranch, the [music] sex offender sprawling New Mexico property, which has long been reported to have served as one of his private [music] playgrounds for trafficking. The shocking email was released as a part of the 3 million documents from the Epstein files [music] published by the US Department of Justice on Friday. So, the interesting thing here is that if you pause on this video, you'll see that there's the email that's brought up, right? If you look at the email, it says, "Here are the video footage of Jeffrey Epstein." Then it says, "13 minutes sex video with a minor. 27 minutes threesomes." Another threesome. Then it says, "Underage girl sex video, underage girl Matthew Melon video, underage girl rape fantasy video, girl from the Bay Area suicide attempt confession to Madam G audio." So this goes back to what I was saying earlier. It is completely completely easily in my mind conceivable that Epstein, Galain Maxwell, whoever else is in that circle were involved with murders, right? And on top of that, it almost seems like one of the quote unquote easiest ways to deal with a person with not being concerned that they're going to tell someone, that they're not going to take pictures or write things down or accumulate any type of evidence to use against you. The easiest thing to do would be in fact to kill them, right? Aside from, you know, the easiest thing which would be to not be a sexual predator. But that's neither here nor there at this point. this is being brought up and that now we're not just discussing sexual abuse and all of that, but we're discussing sexual abuse that results in deaths, suicides, so on and so forth. None of that is particularly surprising. Again, what remains surprising this whole time is how much is documented. Even with the code words and all of that, it still remains documented. And that is what makes me believe that in the rest of the documents or other documents that aren't accounted for in the six million there is worse. I tend to think we have not seen the true darkness quite yet.
>> So I asked for help a few days ago in trying to identify who these children were that were seen in the newest Epstein files. And you guys actually gave me a very good answer. This appears to be Glenn and Eva Dubin. So Glenn Dubin up here is an American billionaire hedge fund manager. And his wife Eva Dubin right here, who used to go by Eva Anderson, according to all reports, dated Jeffrey Epstein from 1981 to 1990, right before he met Galain. So I knew this story and I knew the Dubans, but for some reason I didn't connect the dots. I just didn't recognize them. But this definitely seems to be them in these images. And it's already concerning to see somebody like Jeffrey Epstein hanging out with kids, having kids sit on his lap, playing around with children. But there are so many disturbing, bizarre, and incriminating messages shared between the Dubans and Jeffrey Epstein that will have you shocked to say the least. For example, here is one of the messages that I found in the exchanges released in the Epstein files. So, as you can see here, this is one of the examples that I found. Jeffrey Epstein in August of 2010 sent a message to who I can assume was Eva Dubin and his email read, "I'm at the ranch blank." Then that same day, just about 2 hours later, Eva wrote Jeffrey Epstein back. And creepily, she said, "Come and visit next week. Selena, their daughter, their very young daughter, will have five friends over." So, what the hell are we supposed to make of that? So, keep in mind, this is in 2010. This is a few years after Jeffrey Epstein was all over the news after being arrested on charges of sexually abusing children. And that's when he had the sweetheart deal in Florida. He had all those court proceedings. He was all over the news. And he was officially a sex offender. I mean, there is no way that one of Epstein's best friends wouldn't have known that he was a pedophile at this point. So, not only do these pictures appear to have been taken after Epstein was released from his very, very short stint in prison, but these two definitely knew that Epstein was a pedophile. And yet, here they are allowing their child on Epstein's lap. And this one's even more damning. Eva is inviting Epstein over to their place, saying that their young child is going to have five friends over, knowing full well that Jeffrey Epste is a convicted pedophile and sex trafficker of children. So, make of all that what you will, but I have to say it doesn't look very good on Eva Dubin. I might as well start calling Eva and Glenn the dubious Dubans because they they seem to be [ __ ] evil. If you want to join me on my journey to expose predators like this, please consider checking out my channel, The Conspiracy Files, where I post weekly, hour, 2hour long deep dives into some of the darkest subject matters on Earth. You can also listen to the podcast on any streaming platform like Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And I actually just interviewed an Epstein/Trump survivor named Beatatric last week. She was absolutely incredible. I would highly recommend you check this video out to get a further understanding of the Epstein story.
>> So on the note of the Dubin family, it says that Eva Dubin invited Jeffrey Epstein to home when her daughter Selena was 15. And then it touches on the email that we just saw in the Tik Tok saying, "Come over next week. Selena will have five friends over." So really what we're talking about here, we can only assume, right? We don't know. But we're talking about here is a parent, Eva Dubin, kind of pawning off her daughter, selling off her daughter and
Those friends that are coming over. Because in what world does it matter to Jeffrey Epstein that your kid who at this point is 15 years old has five friends over? The only reason that that would really matter is to say like, "Oh, I can't because these people are coming over." Or, "Oh, you know, it's going to be loud and not private because these people are here, you know, like there are reasons to bring this up, but in the context of Jeffrey Epstein and what we saw in this email, it's unclear at best because anything that is clear would point to something negative, much like I'm going to pawn these girls off to Jeffrey. I'm going to use my daughter as a way to bring in other young girls that then I can then quote unquote give to Jeffrey or his associates, whomever they are this time around.
So, we also have to acknowledge that as much as all of this is deeply tragic, we also have to hold the parents accountable because in some of these situations, I'm sure parents had no idea. Parents thought A, B, or C. Like the parents of Selena Dubin's friends, right? Those parents might have thought, "Oh, they're just going to Selena's house. Everything's fine." Turns out Epstein's there. I can't blame those parents. However, Ava Dubin, what are you doing? Why are you mentioning your daughter to Epstein at all? Why is this relevant? There are no answers that come to mind that are not creepy and honestly criminal.
So, another thing that has deeply disturbed me amidst all of this is the fact that I'm seeing some people try to turn this into a political thing. And I don't think that the abuse of children in any which way is political. However, here people tried to turn it political in the sense of they're complaining that Ghislaine Maxwell is the only person who's in prison for this and she's a woman. So, what they're implying is that a woman is taking the fall for all of this and all this stuff related to feminism. I can only assume. And honestly, I find that really dumb. We can all talk about the fact that people are not being arrested and that is a valid conversation. However, Ghislaine is in prison the same way that Epstein was in prison. So, it's not just like they blamed everything on Ghislaine and [ __ ] women. No, no, no. At the very beginning, as far as I understand, they really thought that Epstein and Ghislaine were their own bosses, so to speak. It has turned out that they're not their own bosses and that they aren't necessarily even that high up on the food chain. So, what do you do? You start by arresting the two people you know for sure are guilty. Ghislaine and Epstein. Epstein is either dead, depending on what you believe, or out and about somewhere. I do think that there is a possibility that he is alive. So to make it sound like it's just about Ghislaine being a woman, this is a deeply deeply perverse and [ __ ] up woman. So even if she's the only person in prison right now, that is exactly where she should be. The people who are minimizing her involvement and turning this into a woman's issue thing are off their [ __ ] rocker because realistically this person is an abuser, this person's a sex trafficker, this person is dangerous and unwell. So when you go to defend her because she's a woman and men should be in prison, you are not making the point you think you're making. Okay?
And on the note of Ghislaine Maxwell and her actions, listen to what this person says. This is the same woman [music] that grabbed my arm and forced me into a room to be raped by Jeffrey. [music] It was brutal. And I remember limping from Jeffrey's bedroom to the bungalow where the survivors slept. And I remember [music] looking at Ghislaine and she had this evil smirk on her face. You can't escape. Jeffrey made it very clear [music] from the very first rape. If I ever told anybody, if I ever went to the authorities, if I told [music] my parents, I would be taken out. My family would be taken out. So, after hearing this victim's account, if you think Ghislaine shouldn't be in prison, or if the big problem is that she's in prison as opposed to other men, I think you're missing the point. Because the big point is there are a bunch, way more than I'd like to think about of people who are involved, who are complicit, who are part of all of this quote unquote operation. Higherups even. Those are the people that we should be bringing in that should be locked up forever, even death penalty if we want to go there. So, let's focus on that as opposed to turning it into a political thing about a woman being in prison and all these people. We're talking about large-scale corruption, right? [clears throat] At the very base, what is this about? About corruption, right? The fact that they're not releasing all the files. The fact that I think a lot of people were aware of this, people who weren't exactly involved and that could have had some kind of intervention. I think there are a lot of people who knew things. I think there are a lot of people here who are kind of relying on being able to say, "I had no idea." There's no proof of that, so I had no idea. So, if we're really going to go there, let's talk about things we can actually do something about. People being arrested, talking about the large-scale corruption, talking about people higherups that none of us really might even know know the names of, all of that. So, when we talk about Ghislaine Maxwell and the fact that she's the only one in prison because she's a woman, the picture is way bigger than that.
Anyway, that's where we're going to stop for today. If you have other things that you think I should look into specifically, I'm going to try and continue and have a large view of things so we can get through as much and aggregate enough information from this seemingly endless source of information that is these 3 million plus files that they're trying to flood us with. Thank you guys so much for watching. Thank you to my patrons as always and I'll catch you guys next time.