Inside the Pandersphere, An Analysis on the Pander to Simp Approach to Social Media

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a special announcement. Thanks to Chicago's very own DJ the Money Coach, we're celebrating the sponsorship for Ask a Brother podcast and the grand opening of our luxurious resort in Zanzibar, Tanzania. DJ's giving away an incredible grand prize in March. A 7-day, six night stay in paradise, complete with ground transportation, incredible excursions, your own personal chef on the white sand beaches, and breathtaking sunsets. All you have to do is text brother ba to 972-640-9572 or scan the QR code for your chance to win. Pack your bags and we will see you in paradise. Again, text brother B R O T H A to 972-640-9572.

>> I don't want to be a leader.

>> Man, you could pay for that babysitter one or two days to give her, you know, some time off.

>> The level of hatred that you have for women is a little alarming.

>> It's scary.

>> We did have a girl get hit with a brick a couple of months ago and a bunch of [ __ ] online called her a liar.

>> I think that women have a higher ability and better ability to regulate and control their emotions.

>> Let's talk about Kevin Samuels. If he didn't make fun of black women, you wouldn't know who he is. You can call it pandering.

>> America power comes from the black womb. Which means without black women or the black womb, American American economy does not exist.

>> A real woman ain't never been hard to keep happy. We just been hard-headed and seeing the benefit of doing it until after the fact. But you know, if you use your head, you won't lose your girl.

>> Black women are hurt and suffering through the way in which they try to love on us as men.

>> Do I simp for black women?

>> Yes.

>> Yeah. No. Life is better when you just kind of like shut the [ __ ] up and listen to women.

What's going on y'all? Welcome to another episode of Ask a Brother podcast. I'm your host, Jeff Saint James. And listen, man, your boy is excited. Your boy is excited. We are going to delve into the pandasphere. The pander sphere. Yeah, that's that that that's going I'm going to start using that a lot more often. So, with that said, I highly highly recommend that you get your coffee, your tea, your snacks, get your slippers together, get comfortable because um I don't have a time limit on what this is going to look like. Some of you may have to watch what it is that I'm going to be covering in multiple chunks, but I'm going to recommend that you share it with every person that you know. So, thank you to everybody. Thank you to our sponsor. Um, I'm I'm excited. I'm excited to see uh what it is that we're going to be going over and covering tonight. Uh, one of the things that I noted and kind of observed um over the last week or so was this this this constant, you know, the Netflix series with the guy who doesn't know how to cover the manosphere correctly. And man, you know, I I observed some very interesting reactions and responses and I was like, it just seems like this thing happens in cycles where people that aren't in the manosphere but want to talk about what it is and what's wrong with it. And I realized that there just as much scrutiny as it's been about men talking and sharing and engaging their perspectives of their experiences. I'm noticing there there was just a this quiet thing. I've seen it here and there different content creators kind of talk about pandering or talk about sing. I felt like this was one of those episodes where it's about time that a lot of the guys who love to talk about relationships, the experts, the the the the panderexuals, uh the synthologists, I I think it's time for us to go over why it is that I feel how I feel about them and that perhaps by the end of today's uh session, many of you may start to understand why I have such strong feelings about them. Um, and maybe that I have just as much intensity and negative feelings about what they're doing and how they're contributing to the uh, gender war, so to speak, as perhaps all the guys they claim that are doing it on a man is fair side. So, real quick, if everybody can, please make sure you like this. Please make sure that you share um, and send this to at least two, three, four, even five people. Um, I won't be getting to comments very much unless I see it as a super chat because I have so much stuff to share with you guys. I have a PowerPoint of course. Um, I have pictures, I have videos. We are going to go into a decent amount of depth of what I think is going on and um how many unqualified individuals when it comes to talking about relationships and interexual dynamics have um kind of taken the market in a way to where they are damaging the lives of hundreds if not thousands of women upload by upload.

So, real quick, um, just as a brief little reminder, um, my name is Jeff St. James. Welcome to Ask a Brother podcast if this is your first time. And shout out to our 51,000 plus subscribers for this channel that we started as of last January. Uh, thank you to all the supporters, all the goal swatchers, and all of the people who want this program to continue to grow. So, I'm going to say this maybe a couple times throughout it. Um, this is going to be one of my longer form content. um totally comfortable if people have to leave and come back at different points, but I just hope that you get to watch it in its entirety and that by the end of it, you'll understand why I think it's time for us to really really get into the weeds of this. Um this is actually part of the reason for why I got into this space in the first place. Um it wasn't just about some frustration about things that I was seeing in the manosphere. It was also about the flip side, the guys who were pandering and sing to women both on social media and in real life and how they've been unknowingly kind of contributing to what it is that I think is going on. So, last but not least, guys, please share, please subscribe, and I highly recommend if you're a fan of any of these men, if perhaps you haven't thought about some of these things, or perhaps you're going to wake up and realize some of the things that I'm going to bring out may be your own experience. It's not meaning that you need to run to red pill hate or red pill rage as much as it is a realization that this is something that probably has affected all of us to a degree. And it seems that perhaps the men that now realize what it is that I'm going to show you um have found out about this sooner. And maybe there's a reason for why there's a so-called quote unquote divide even amongst men.

All right y'all. So with that said, um let's get to the elephant in the room. there is a dynamic that's happening and there's been a shift in the dating market for quite some time now. Um, and I think the big cities are the first ones to starting to realize it. Uh, we're starting to see more and more videos, um, comments, uh, status posts of women acknowledging that there seems to be a shift in how men are engaging with women or really a lack of engagement. Something is in the water. something is changing and I don't think the panders panderers and simps have been accurately diagnosing what it is that's going on. So, like I said before, this is going to pre be a pretty decent lengthy um presentation. Uh I'm going to have a lot of examples of what it is that we're reviewing. And a couple questions are, you know, to the degree are you still or are you exhibiting signs and traits of someone that's suffering from still seeking the need to pander to get access to women's attention and validation? Are you sing? Are you currently sing? Um, and what are the consequences of that? And last but not least, what are the consequences of what panderers and simps do in a dating market where they're perhaps propping up women that they shouldn't? and they're telling women halftruths or outright lies. I wonder what that's going to do to a dating market and relationship dynamic between the sexes. So, uh, thanks to Righteous Perspective for pulling up and for and for gifting the memberships. Um, so like I said guys, um, I'm going to be super super locked into this cuz I have so much material, so many things that I'm going to cover. Um, and despite popular belief, um, I am going to try to approach this fairly objectively. Um, but we'll still acknowledge how I feel at the end of it. All right. So, um, like I said, get ready. Um, get focused, get locked in, because once you see what me and many other men have seen and known, you can't unsee it. Um, this is something I've probably been thinking about for months and was wondering when it was I was finally going to do it. And I think tonight is the night for us to really, really, really get in the weeds of what's going on and what's happened to these men. What's happened to these men and how they got this way and why they do what they do. All right, y'all get your notebooks out, get your screen records ready. Um, I think this is going to be interesting.

So inside the pander sphere um an analysis on the pander to simp approaches in society and the impact of feminization on these men as I stated earlier with the recent discussions about the manosphere and men laughing about Kevin Samuels and more specifically his death of course um and the the interesting uh overreaction I think to the inside the manosphere hit job piece on men behind microphones talking about men's issues, men's perspectives. Um, it's going to be very interesting, I think, as we kind of delve into what this is and what this looks like. So, I broke this down into three, well, really three primary parts, um, with a kind of conclusion at the end. And thank you, Roger, for your $5. I greatly appreciate it. Obviously, I'm going to start with a brief critique of modern feminism, feminization of culture, and social behavior. I'm going to then uh kind of wrap things up with the results of feminization leading towards creating two types of men, panders and simps. And then last but not least, if those are not the only alternatives, what then is next on the plate when it comes to, you know, what then is the alternative of how men should proceed with this? So, we're just going to play the clip one more time and then we're going to hit the ground running into going into what's happening and what it looks like in terms of modern feminism, how it's expressing itself, how it's feminizing the actual culture and changing social behaviors in a variety of settings, and how this feminization ends up manifesting and changing the way in which men kind of show up both in social media and in public and even in their everyday lives and relationship. ships often resulting in pandering and sing and if there is indeed another alternative in contrast.

Second, I don't want to be a leader.

>> Man you could pay for that babysitter one or two days to give her you know some time off.

>> The level of hatred that you have for women is a little alarming. It's scary.

>> We did have a girl get hit with a brick a couple of months ago and a bunch of [ __ ] online called her a liar.

>> I think that women have a higher ability and better ability to regulate and control their emotions.

>> Let's talk about Kevin Samuels. If he didn't make fun of black women, you wouldn't know who he is. You can call it pandering.

>> America power comes from the black womb. Which means without black women or the black womb, American American economy does not exist.

>> A real woman ain't never been hard to keep happy. We just been hard-headed and seeing the benefit of doing it until after the fact. But you know, if you use your head, you won't lose your girl.

>> Black women are hurt and suffering through the way in which they try to love on us as men.

>> Do I simp for black women?

>> Yes.

>> Yeah. No, life is better when you just kind of like shut the [ __ ] up and listen to women.

Jesus. Um, there obviously is a significant interesting thing going on as it relates to uh, you know, why are men acting like this? Why are they talking like this? And how did they end up turning into this? Like what happened to them? What happened to their masculinity? What happened to their um maleness that they have these type of interesting views both about themselves and their own group? As well as what it is that they're kind of expousing when it comes to almost speaking and being the mouthpieces for the most wounded and hurt and damaged and fearful women. for sure. All right. So, like I said, get comfortable and you'll see why it is that I think this may be a very interesting and thoughtprovoking exercise.

A brief critique of modern feminism. Um, a serious critique of modern feminism has to separate core feminist principles like equal rights, legal protections, and autonomy from how the movement is currently expressed in culture, media, and online spaces. Um now in regards to you know some of the strongest critiques uh this is you know I'll acknowledge like the strongest critiques tend to focus on the modern iteration not the foundational goals although there is a growing subculture of men and some women questioning the validity of core equality principles and societal results show most proponents only wanting convenient and advantageous forms of equality avoiding selective service, not wanting equal sentencing, not wanting to mandate the 50/50 custody, etc., etc. It was a whole host of different areas I could have gone in terms of this initial brief critique of how modern feminism or really just the expressions of it in regards to culture, media, online spaces, and even in some relationships, how it is that is actually manifesting and showing up. But these particular six areas I thought were kind of exactly what it was that I thought kind of hit home on what's going on, why there's even a quoteunquote issue between men and women. And once we kind of get through these six things, how they manifest and how they show, it's going to start to make sense to you why it is that I think as much as there's been so much attention on the quote unquote manosphere, men talking on microphones, uh, being in the quoteunquote red pill space and how dangerous and how evil and how toxic it is. Um, I think that there's been something that's been going on um under the radar that's maybe as damaging if not more so than the minority of cases that these individuals who are choosing to kind of prop up this issue um are willing to acknowledge.

So the decentralization of goals, equality and purpose, i.e. moving the goalpost, selectively being egalitarian, picking and choosing when something counts as empowerment, avoidance um in terms of the overall topic relating to career success versus relationship outcomes and how one does not always lead into the other. The antagonistic slashinccomplete framing of men. We're definitely going to get into details on what that is and why it is that men are now contributing to that view of men. The tension with biological realities and the neglect of male issues.

All right. So the first three uh decentralization of goals, equality and purpose, i.e. moving the goalpost. Um this is a very interesting one to me for a variety of reasons. Uh but to start with the movement, one of the the uh obvious obvious almost non-debatable critiques of modern feminism or at least how it's showing up and how its proponents are showing up is that the movement sometimes shifts between whether or not they actually want equality or equity. It often seems like when they push for equality, it's when they believe rightfully so that women are at a disadvantage and they therefore want to fight for therefore equality. The problem is is there instances where some things are not even or even to the benefit of women and they'll either want things to stay the same or when they do advocate for a change, it's always at the advantage women. This creates confusion about whether um not what they're actually wanting is something that's fair or really it's just about it being about women advocacy, women's rights, or even women women's privilege and or power. And we're going to get into that more in the near future when it comes to how I think simps and panderers kind of function when it comes to the concept of the matriarchy and the need to dismantle one but not the other in regards to the patriarchy. This is going to be you're going to see how deep in the weeds this stuff gets. So, as the result of not having a central goal of locking into are we going to choose and focus on equality? Are we going to lock in and choose on special advantages for women? Uh people feel or at least the critics that the rules and the standards and the things that women are stating that they want are at best inconsistent. Usually it's based on the woman based on the situation and whether or not it is an advantage to her or women in general. That's more often than not the initial issue of what it is that we're seeing in terms of the modern expression of feminism.

Secondly, kind of related, the selective egalitarian approach, picking and choosing when it is that they want this equality to exist versus when it is that they want to be quote unquote empowered. And it's encouraging women into higher status careers. Nothing wrong with that. but not equally encouraging them to go into dangerous and undesirable jobs and positions. They're advocating for independence while still expecting traditional male roles in the confines of a relationship. The results and impact of potentially even deeper issues. This creates a hybrid expectation model where women gain modern freedoms but men are still judged by traditional standards. So, for instance, when you see all these modern women who are doing modern things, saying, "Where's all the masculine traditional men?" It's going to eventually make sense why it is that they're even asking that question and how they helped contribute to why there's less and less of those men going on. He has to bring things to the table and her existence is the table. She is allowed standards and his standards are conditioned when if she a agrees with them, chooses them, or is even able to meet them. And if she can't agree, doesn't like them, or can't meet them, then he's not allowed to have those standards. But of course, she does.

Number three, avoidance. The career success versus relationship outcome discussion. Panderers, specifically individuals who work very, very hard to market specifically to a primarily or exclusively female audience, tend to avoid aspects of the reality of this discussion that at best there is a neutral effect when it comes to women's success, career success, uh, educational acumen, uh, career endeavors. At best, it's probably neutral. When it comes to overwhelmingly if it's going to help them in the dating market, it's probably neutral at best. And more often than not, less to do with whether or not all these men are just insecure. But usually, you know, ladies standards when they kind of go up in their careers, they go up in their standards, they go up in their degree acumen and their salaries, uh, their standards typically don't go down. Um so although people want to constantly deny the idea and the existence of hypergamy and how frequent it is more often than not as time passes and as women's uh personal uh economic status goes up um their standards tends to get inflated and go up with it. And of course the problem with that being that their career uh career success has absolutely damn near nothing to do with how attractive they are to the majority of men. you know, if my significant other, you know, if she had a bachelor's degree versus a master's versus a doctorate, that probably wasn't going to change or make her get extra bonus points on whether or not I was attracted to her or liked her or wanted to marry her or even thought she would be a good to great mother. However, the same can't be said when it comes to how women are seeing men. And there in lies the initial problem. The panderers are going to admit the fact when they're praising women and saying, especially in the black community, black women are the most enrolled and most degrees and most educated this, this, and this. But is it translating? Is it translating? More often than not, more often it isn't. But the reason is because when you put so much time and energy in something that isn't necessarily going to move the needle and making you more attractive and you downplay the need of putting your energy and focus in the things that you should that would and the panderas are telling you that that degree and that career is sufficient. They're giving you a female metric for how they measure and look at men and saying that men view it the same way. And then when it doesn't translate, you end up with all these famous, well-off, iconic, Hollywood famous women and celebrities who've checked off all the boxes that the sisters and the and and the sisterhood is working so hard for. And then when they get to the end, many of them end up looking like Melissa Ford and so many of the other ladies who I'm not even going to mention at this time, but some of the criticisms is like delayed formally family formation is an obvious one that as the time period of when they are often going to get the most access to the most amount of attention from the most amount of men, that's when they have a low priority or no priority when it comes to starting a family. Additionally, as a result of prioritizing their career success and not at least equally the desire and and and putting themselves in a really good position when it comes to prioritizing relationships and long-term relational outcomes, many of these ladies that kind of prioritize the career a little bit too much end up having relationship dissatisfaction for long, lengthy periods, potentially even to the part of where they even just flat out give up. Additionally, the messaging that unintentionally devalues traditional roles. Of course, we're, you know, talking about how, you know, there's a lot of talk about stay-at-home wives and and and how when you describe and label everything as slavery and oppression, uh the men that are interested in wanting to provide a lifestyle for that, when they hear women and see women talking about and making fun of any of the traditional components that would make her more attractive in his eyes as a potential long-term wife and or mother of his children, the devaluing ing of the traditional role of why it is that men would even want to associate and interact with most men anyway, especially in the age range when women have uh you know the most options that they probably could. They're saying and acting and sharing many of the talking points that's devaluing the view of what he's looking for in the market, which means she's not wife material. and then the dep prioritization of the role and need for men, kids and family, which we of course will get into what this is and how this is showing up. And as a result, what I think the consequences are for this devaluing and prioritizing of of a greater prioritization of career success versus um many of the things that translate and should be shown and expressed and offered up front when it comes to a relationship.

So the results and impact the deeper issues the underlying tension success in the marketplace does not automatically success and when I say marketplace I mean career success academically success with your career particularly as a woman does not automatically translate into success in relationships with men.

Last three, antagonistic and incomplete framing of heterosexual men especially. We'll get more into that if when I give you a couple of examples and uh the purpose and role of men. uh a frequent criticism that the modern feminist discourse sometimes frames men as quote unquote inherently inherently problematic, inherently toxic, or even inherently evil. And there's they use this generalized language when they talk about men. Men ain't blank. Men aren't this anymore. Men aren't that anymore. Men are trash. General, general, general. Cool. Treating male behavior as collectively suspicious or oppressive, which obviously explains why they don't feel that male leadership should even be on the table in terms of discussion. And then, of course, we're going to get to uh me too at the bottom, but it says, "And men only are the ones that are often used with this inherent negative fill-in- thelank. So, it's only men that are inherently flawed. It is only men that are inherently problematic. It's only men in leadership that we need to quote unquote dismantle. And more often than not, the framing is to view men as the only ones that could be potential predators. And then when it comes to me too, wof, if you have this type of view of men that's so critical, suspicious, viewing them only through the lens of oppress or oppressor lens, it's obvious then that all men are going to be viewed as guilty until proven innocent. And even then after we already know when we maybe reference a couple examples that that's still not going to be enough impact. It creates defensiveness rather than cooperation between the sexist. It undermines potential allyship. Reinforces gender polarization. And obviously I mentioned it earlier, male leadership is just rejected, overly scrutinized and viewed as inherently oppressive. This is just kind of letting you setting the groundwork, guys, that this is, you know, what modern feminism is. That's how it's expressing itself. We can obviously acknowledge the early parts at the beginning in terms of equal rights, legal protections, the the ability ability to be able to to pick and choose who they want to be with in terms of autonomy, how they want to live and move. Cool, cool, cool. But more and more people are starting to wake up and realize that part of what's creating the gender divide and the level of misandry that's kind of being rampant are these type of attitudes and thoughts that's being expressed and shown in culture on social media even in various interpersonal everyday relationships.

Tension with biological reality and this is a good one man. Some critics argue modern feminism downplays or rejects biological differences between men and women or we'll just for the sake of argument male and female areas of conflict dating preferences with and and there's a whole bunch of confusion now on what's the role and what's the expectation of who is supposed to do what and when. mate selection dynamics are now completely off. Because if you don't see any difference between the sexes, perhaps you're going to struggle with understanding why it is that they're going to get radically different results when it comes to how they go about approaching mate selection. Same risk takingaking uh behavior uh drastically different results. I kind of related to that as well. Even when it comes to sex and how we engage in it, emotional expression patterns being significantly different. And again, when this isn't acknowledged, there typically is an expectation that one is superior and that the sex that is apparently able to express their emotions better, that's now the desired result of all the men that we're going to classify as emotionally intelligent. And then confusion over gender specific spaces and protections which I mean it's quite obvious that the more and more that you remove the barrier when it comes to biological differences you could imagine that maybe uh there being be some changes in the bathrooms and the female only prisons and spaces that was specifically designed to protect the sex. When you ignore some of these realities, you're going to have to deal with the political and social consequences. So, results, policies, or narratives that assume identical behavior across genders can feel out of sync with real world outcomes. Blank slate theory and practice can lead to disastrous outcomes when an individual, cultural on the individual, cultural, and societal levels. Perhaps this is one of the reasons that why female inmates are now getting pregnant while supposedly being in all women's prisons.

And then last but not least, the neglect of male issues. Now, with this one in particular state stated, I'm just going to state that this is probably the one that we're going to sit in the most on and and hopefully kind of delve into why this explains very very well how we even have how we even have these sense and panders to begin with. A growing critique that is that modern feminism often overlooks or minimizes is uh educational decline amongst boys male specific mental health strategies which are lacking. Many of them didn't even know that this was probably needed or necessary i.e. because of the lack of understanding the biological reality of differences above. uh family court biases and not wanting to address it or change it for the sake of equality. And of course, the legal bias and seriousness and sentencing when it comes to issues between the sexes. What's the results? Some men feel alienated, demonized, and forgotten in a variety of different spirits throughout life. The rise of counter movements. Uh-oh. What's in that? Is that say for example the red pill space? So when you neglect male issues and concerns, they're going to go to the places where at least their issues are that sounds like 2024 with the Oh, let's continue. Let's continue, man. Increase in single mother households. dropout rate, fatal self harm, decline in men getting married. Well, we're going to talk about how this is eventually contributing to why it is that men are now having less children. Less and less of them are getting married because they're seeing a society and culture that isn't interested in making things fair and more equitable for men. As a result, man, many of them are starting to not play the game or at least playing the game differently. And the results, man, we'll get to it. And a reduction in the methods of approaching and interacting with women. Man, that's going to be a good one. That is going to be a good one. when it comes to what's what is the result of an environment where for so long women have um and society as a whole has decided to dep prioritize Wait a minute. Yeah, this this this is real. This is not a one-off. For those who have been trying to warn ladies that you can't keep showing up with your hands open, bringing nothing and listening only to men that tell you what you want to hear. And you thought men, the internet exists, guys. all the bragging, all the all the post, all the sharing and saying, you know, you know how to move with men, how to take advantage of men and and and what to withhold and this this and that and play the game. Everything y'all are sharing, we're also watching. We're also learning. men are also taking notes. And we're seeing that when the media and celebrities and and many influencers and specifically all the uh token um panderers and token simps get behind microphones trying to say this is a this is a travesty. It's because they all hate women. No. Yes, there's definitely men that exist that hate women, but there was a market where we were acknowledging, man, men's issues aren't being addressed. Men's issues and needs and problems are being ignored. And now it's creating the reptill space. It's created the manosphere. And as a result, as more and more men wake up, marriage rates decline, less and less men are having children. And if they are going to be interested in either of those, they may have to date out of their culture, community, or even the country. Oh, this is going to get good, guys.

But stage two, like I said, is not just about the modern ways in which um you know, feminism is kind of expressing itself. It's about how it's actually changing and shifting culture in society, especially in terms of um especially in terms of what's happening between sexes. Feminization is the sociological or biological process where roles, sectors or physical characteristics become associated with or transition towards the feminine or female. It also describes the increasing participation of women in formerly male dominated areas, not necessarily a problem. labor, education, and psychology, or the adoption of characteristics such as feminine in general. In academic context, feminization is a multi-dimensional concept that describes the process by which individuals, roles, or sectors acquire characteristics traditionally associated with women or see a significant increase in female participation. Now, I'm going to state this on the front end that women being present and women increasing in numbers into certain spaces isn't inherently problematic, I think, but the same reason it wouldn't be inherently problematic if it's more men than women. But the people that we're going to be talking about don't see it as that. They only see when spaces are dominated by men as inherently problematic. It's going to when we get to feminization, you're going to understand why it is that when women dominate an environment, they don't want to change that, address that. But when men do or have that needs to change that is the first sign of a feminized environment and feminized person where they genuinely believe that more women versus more men is fine instead of just strictly fighting for equal equal 50/50. No, no, no, no, no. The problem is when there's too many men there. When there's too many men in the space. That's the thing. That's the issue. I'm like, "Oh, okay, guys. Okay, guys. We're going to we're going to get to what this looks like and shows up as, and once I show you the videos, once I show you the the the number of screenshots I went through, it's going to start to make sense of when you have a feminized and gyocentric perspective, especially as a man. Oh, it is Jesus. It's bad. It is bad when you will not acknowledge that this is going on and that you've been holding on to a double standard when it come you've been potentially looking at things through a feminized lens. So the different aspects that we're going to touch on in terms of feminization, what it looks like, how it shows up, and how it changes both men and so and environments, you're going to go, "Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa."

So for starters, reward systems change. Modern social environments, especially online, reward agreeableness, validation giving, and non-confrontation. Boys are increasingly taught, don't offend, don't challenge, be emotionally supportive at all cost. Meanwhile, assertiveness is often reframed as toxic or risky. What's the result of this? Some men learn that the safest path to social acceptance, disagree, validate, and avoid tension with women. That's the psychological foundation of pandering and simp behavior in males. Some men have learned that the safest path, especially for social acceptance on social media, is to almost always or always agree, validate, and avoid tension even when there should be, even when truth is involved with women. That is the psychological foundation that many men both online and offline are approaching when it comes to their lives. Happy wife, happy life. We'll get into that. And even social media with their platforms.

Point number two, suppression of competitive masculinity. Traditionally, male socialization emphasized competition, status building, risk-taking, rejection, tolerance. What's the results and impact when that's now discouraged? When those are discouraged without being replaced with equally strong identity anchors, you might get less masculine men in the dating market and in society as a whole. greater dissat dissatisfaction from women with the quality and amount of men fitting these traditional masculine roles. Men become more risk averse which impacts interactions and interpersonal dynamics between the sexes. Didn't we just look at a picture of what's happening in the dating market when it comes to more and more women are starting to state that things aren't adding up. that that you know the demands are not being met and and more and more women are stating like what's going on? Where's all the men? They're not showing up. They're not showing up to these dating events. They're what the heck is what's happening? I thought we could do what we want. I thought we could make up the rules and I thought men were always going to see us as the prize. Like what the what the heck is happening? How do we go from men are always paying to now we're having to pay to try to meet men? Isn't that my Derek Jackson told me but the other panderers told me? Listen y'all, I'm going to tell you when we get through with this lady, ladies included, you're going to realize you were duped. You were lied to. And these ratios potentially can get worse if ladies don't realize real quick what they've been doing wrong and who they've been allowing themselves to be influenced by. Obviously, we covered reward systems, the suppression of competitive masculinity. Oh, but this is a good one. This is the good one.

A shift in institutional values from masculine to feminine patterns. Oh my. Oh my. Oh my criticisms. One of the things that seems to kind of consistently come up is that male verse female approaches to expressions, how they handle things, what they prioritize, it's noticeable, significant data on it. By the way, empathy over rationality seems to dominate when more and more women are given access to certain spheres and domains. The prioritization of emotional impact heartstrings over objective rules or logical consistency. Safety over risk. An emphasis on emotional safety and the protection of perceived vulnerable groups often at the expense of open debate or high stakes competition. Then lastly, indirectness and conflict avoidance, the tendency to avoid hard conversations or direct negative feedback in favor of more passive um I think it was more I think it was more agreeable and relational forms of control impact and results. Helen Andrews, for those who, you know, haven't been aware in terms of the feminization of culture, she kind of covers it pretty well both in video and in her article. She warns that these traits are particularly damaging to specific fields where subjectivity varies neither are the soft sciences law. She argues that the rule of law may not survive a majority female profession because it requires rules even when they lead to outcomes that feel uh and sympathetic. sentencing, uh, prosecutorial prosecutorial discretion, biased or and usually based on biased and gender. We see examples of this with false allegations, sentencing differences between men and women for the exact same crime. When this shows up, when this feminization shows up in academia, uh-oh, uh-oh, trust the experts. say we talking in these fields. She claims the pursuit of objective truth is being undermined by a therapeutic tone that prioritizes social cohesion and identity based affirmation. And you got to wonder when it comes to mainstream media, big content creators that have a primarily female audience and even amongst academia, if indeed this is happening, which group and which gender and which identity is being affirmed and which one is being shunned and reduced and ostracized. And when this shows up in education and psychology, it's a pretty much given everybody's fully aware of the extremely high rates of of women in the education field and especially in psychology, well over 75%. The elevation of feminine social patterns which can marginalize boys and men and decrease engagement and participation. Now realize this. If men have slowed down or even stopped going to therapy altogether and if boys are dropping out of education or not even continue to pursue it post high school, the answer's always been when it comes to those that sees that this is not a problem and just want more and more women to dominate and run certain industries or spaces. Well, the problem is the boys and the men. Now, I'm from the school of thought that if you have an industry or more specifically a company, it's one thing to say you have a bad product. It's another thing to only look at it by blaming the customers for why it is that the customers aren't showing up for what you're selling. If more and more boys and men are not finding these fields helpful are even acknowledging that they see a a bias and you're not acknowledging it or seeing it yourself, chances are it's because you're agreeing with the feminized view of the way in which things are being framed and messaged. As feminization increases institutionally, concerns over diversity, some professional organizations such as the APA I'm quite familiar with have raised concerns that the lack of male counselors may quote, listen, deter some clients from seeking help or result in a loss of male specific perspectives in clinical practice. So when we think about this for a second, I distinctly recall some some people and experts and my wife disagrees with you and this psychologist or this therapist uh uh uh perhaps your therapist or psychologist wife or girlfriend or homegirl wasn't aware of the fact that when black people look into a particular space like psychology and say, "I prefer that the therapist to be black. In your head, that makes sense. If somebody says, "I have I'm coming from Asian descent. I would prefer that somebody has that background." That makes sense. When women say, "I would prefer to talk to another woman." That makes sense. But you've never thought about the possibility that boys and men might also feel the same way about their needs and wanting to see someone in that space that may potentially be able to relate with them. Something tells me that if you didn't understand the need and importance of a field like psychology to be much more balanced with men and women. You may have just assumed that when the field got feminized and dominated by women, men not showing up anymore, and the lack of male specific perspectives, the clinical strategies to help those boys and men. Your conclusion was just to blame the boys and men for not showing up or leaving. Huh, that's an interesting conclusion. What is happening to boys in school settings in terms of outcomes educate? Oh, you're right. We're just going to blame the boys. It's interesting when it comes to intersectionality. You know, this group that talks so much intersectionality, intersectionality, why are these feminists not nearly as interested or concerned? The ones that's so much about equality. Why are they not caring about the mental health outcomes and educational outcomes of boys and men? It's almost like they were only ever only interested in how women were benefiting from it. As feminization increases socially, boys and men's needs are minimized, criticized, and often flatout ignored in most domains. We've already mentioned them. Rise in social astrization. Helen Andrews describes cancel culture as a feminine form of social reinforcement using gossip, relational influence, and exclusion to manage descent rather than direct hierarchical discipline.

Point number three, an increase in pathalization of traditional male traits like the ones we have sitting there and a loss in polarity in relationships. So as women have dominated, as they've dictated, as they've decided more and more spaces without factoring in what men need, what they want, what boys need, and they've decided that the feminine or female approach and style is the only method in these spaces. It's pretty obvious that those that are feminized and are functioning off of the modernized expressions of feminism aren't even going to see it as an issue outside of it just being an issue that men have inherently that's a part of them or an issue that men need to fix and resolve even when women are the ones dominating this space and ultimately responsible for the outcomes. So whether it comes to parenting and single mother households, the dominance of women in the education setting, the dominance of women in the psychology space, all of these fields, all of these spaces where women are dominating and boys and men are suffering or checking out or not even engaging at all. A feminized environment is going to only blame the men for why those outcomes in those areas look how it is. And then in the environment that normalizes the harmful and modern expressions of feminism. Remember what I said at the beginning, guys. This isn't a 100%, you know, um just be anti any and everything that the feminists went for, advocated for. There's literally things at the top that are totally acceptable to most men. Equal rights, legal protections, autonomy. But the modernized expression of it, oof, decentralized goals, equality and purpose, constantly moving the goalpost of what it is that women are actually pushing for and wanting. Do they want men to approach them or they don't? Do they want men to be the providers or do they not? Do they want men to take the lead or do they want an equal partnership? Do they want to be in charge? Do they want a patriarchy? Do they want a matriarchy? Do they do they want equal lefts and equal rights when a woman puts her hands? Do they want equal penalties and consequences? Do they want to be a part of the draft? No, they selectively egalitarian. Picking and choosing when they want equality versus when they want to be empowered. avoidance of the overall discussion of a hyper prioritization on career status, academics, and not nearly enough emphasis and focus on the traits and behaviors that will make them more compatible for long-term relationship outcomes. the antagonistic and incomplete framing of men, which we're definitely going to get into when it comes to the pandas and sims. The tension of of the lack

Of acceptance of the biological reality of the differences between male and females and neglecting of male issues while simultaneously attacking, demonizing, and ostracizing traditional masculinity will result in a reduced number of men that are masculine. Where's all the real men? Where's all the real men in an excess number of men now adopting the feminized blue pill perspective in this environment? So, what's the result when there's less masculine men and more panders and simps that's popping up everywhere? That's what's overwhelmingly going to be dominating the dating pool. And that's who the men are that are talking to women, preaching to them, and constantly getting them to submit, support their channels, and submit their super chats. Brilliant. Brilliant idea, man. Rinse and repeat. Tell the ladies they're the prize. Tell them there's nothing they need to improve on. Tell them they deserve Michael B. Jordan because they they they make 70 or $80,000 and own their own home and got a degree. And if things aren't working out, always put the blame not on themselves, not on their own decision-making, but on the men. Not the men that they chose, just men. And when they go out there and try it again and again, and it doesn't work, the final conclusion is they circle back to the same thing that doesn't actually change it. It's the men. It's the men.

And for those that's in the chat that's watching right now and even later, you're going to see, no matter what you try to say, if I show evidence that not all women just want to simply be respected and supported, but that perhaps they want the power, they want to dominate, and they want to be able to have the right to speak and disparage men all they want. Perhaps we're going to have to acknowledge and call a spade a spade. So, all right y'all, we kind of got through two of the things that I said that we need to and now we're going to get to some the creation of the panders and simps. I'm going to state this, you know, plainly that once we see this, you're not going to be able to quite unsee it. Once you see it, you're not going to be able to unsee what it is that I'm going to show you. So remember this environment that we're talking about, this feminization of culture that's now changing entire environments that's leading to poor outcomes that's negatively affecting boys and men while demonizing and blaming the boys and men for how we got here and why things are what they are. You are eventually going to see what the end result is going to be. Modern feminism as expressed in culture, media, and online spaces and pervasive feminization has created the environment women and feminists are complaining about. Rise in boys and men seeking spaces where men's needs, concerns, and perspectives are welcomed. Congratulations ladies. The greatest advertisement, the greatest promotion, the greatest reason why men are even coming to the space in the first place is your own behavior, your own actions, how you move and show up in society, your quest to dismantle the patriarchy while not acknowledging the reason for why a matriarchy could potentially have some flaws as well. In a feminized environment, men and boys aren't allowed to be honest about what they're seeing and experiencing that's not favorable or beneficial. Doesn't make women look good in a certain light. So, as you're not supposed to talk about certain things, you're not supposed to ask about certain things. You're you're just supposed to take all these women at their word at the time of when they're in front of you, especially when they make accusations in an environment where it's believe all women, men ain't. We'll we'll pick the we'll pick the bear. Uh, what else? What else are do we even need men? Are boyfriends embarrassing? Who wants to be a slave as a wife or a mother? H, where are men going to go? Where are boys going to go in an environment like that? It's not rocket science, ladies. The way you act, the way you've been showing up. We're now in a space where men felt like they need to find other men that are a little bit more honest. Red pill about your nature, about what you're capable of, about what to be mindful of, and about how to engage with you in smarter ways. Of course, there's men in the in the space that's toxic. Of course, there's men in the space that's grifters. Of course, there's men in a space that's being dishonest. My issue and concern is that did we ever think about the possibility that all the panders and men that you do like the people that you do love, did you ever wonder A if they're doing the same and B that by demonizing men every single time they point out hypocrisy issues, double standards, flaws in the system, the feminization, the the over prioritization of what women want and what they're looking for and how they're viewed versus their male counterparts. When that's not allowed from an intellectually honest way, they're going to come here. They're going to go where at least they can be heard. And in 2024, you would have thought that the people would have realized that if you don't prioritize men or boys and you shame them and you disrespect them and you talk down to them, they may not show up for you at elections. When you do that in everyday life in general, they're not going to keep showing up and waiting for you to acknowledge what they're seeing and experiencing their own lives. They're just going to go to the spaces and places where it's the least acknowledged, whether the information on what to do about that is right or wrong. More simps, panders, and males both in the dating pool, women's spaces, and on online platforms. When we now have this discussion about people um biological males identifying as this and and and and going into women's spaces and where's all the real men and da da da da da da da. Yeah, ladies, who do you think killed chivalry? Who do you think killed chivalry, my guy? Ah, y'all gonna see, man. This is going to be good. This is going to be Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Less men stepping up and becoming fathers, seeking marriage or even stepping in to be stepfathers to avoid a legal system that has become feminized. Yes, sir.

So the reality is in the past it was actually pretty honorable and normal, especially you know previous generations. It wasn't unusual cousins, different shades of skin colors, and somebody came from this family or that. Like it wasn't the worst thing ever. But when we're seeing ladies talk about getting the bag and settling for the guy that you didn't want when you had more options and didn't have the kids, and we're seeing what's happening in the legal system. My god, my god, my god. Did y'all ever think when you kept posting and sharing all the ways that you get away with things in society that at some point, did you think all men were just going to stay perpetually stupid? But did you ever consider the possibility that as that um continued and and was shown and displayed that it would start to create this environment? This environment came about as a result of feminization. Now, as single mother households increase, as less and less men are stepping in to intervene, the environments where single mothers dominate educationally, psychologically are failing and they're less safe. Which community that does this the most, shows this the most, probably has when they're in the super concentrated areas, probably has higher rates of violence, higher rates of dropout rates. Is that the patriarchy? Remember, who's the teachers? Who's the heads of the household? Remember, my body, my choice. So I think a lot of people choose in this situation, increased burden on women in this state to step in where men are now missing or were replaced. Jesus, man. We about to I can't wait for the video clips because now we're about to delve, guys, to the differences between the results of feminization. Panders verse simps. Let's define the terms in a grounded way. And guys, if you're currently watching, if you haven't, please make sure you subscribe and like this particular video. So, all that I ask is that you share it with both men and women and send it to as many people as you can. Let's see if we can clear 200, even 300 people concurrently watching. Let's continue. Panders. Honestly, I would argue they might be. It's a toss-up of who's actually worse and more disgusting when you get done going through what it is that I'm going to kind of hone in on why they're so problematic. Panders. Men who shape their opinions and behavior to gain approval, especially from women or social groups, even if it's not authentic or true. Simps got two different definitions. A, men who overinvest attention, validation, or resources into women without reciprocity, often hoping it will earn attraction. And we're definitely going to look at an example of a public offender. I mean, a public offender and how when more and more men move like this, it actually does the opposite of what it is that we're actually looking for in the dating market. Number two, men that feel the need to overcompensate due to the elevated status they believe she has over him positionally and relationally. So panders shape their opinion and their behaviors trying to gain approval from women. So it's not about whether or not they actually believe it or think it's true. It's always based on who it is they're trying to market to and what it is they're trying to glean and get from women even if it's not authentic. And then simps overinvesting in women that they're not even getting those investments back in return. Or two, feeling the need to overcompensate due to the elevated status of seeing her above him. We've already discussed how feminization can change the reward system of how men can access women's attention, approval, and their money, as well as it leading to suppression of traditional male socialization standards. Therefore, let's examine the other ways simps and panders may operate. Women are the leaders. Women got the plans. They have the wherewithal. They have the education. They have the desire. They have the drive. They have the the um the the attention span. They have the concentration. They have the focus. All those things, right? Like women are just superbly driven in my estimation. Like they just are really driven people to to do what's best. It's not just that they're driven because men can be driven, too. But it's women are driven to do what's best for everybody. They're they're driven to do what's best for the collective. >> Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Feminization. What did he say? Go back a little bit. What did he say? It's not just that they're driven because men can be driven too, but it's women are driven to do what's best for ah, remember when you have that lens that we talked about earlier that overly negative and pessimistic and negatively skewed bias against men and all of that's missing when it comes to what women's actions and motives and reasons for showing up is and looks. Okay. The assumption is is that if a woman's in place, if a woman's there, it's going to be at the best interest not of herself or women, but everybody. This is a feminized male, ladies and gentlemen. Of course, he's talked about in the intro, and I think it may show up in this clip. I want my woman to lead me. I don't want to be a leader. Yeah, we know. We're not surprised, buddy. Nobody is. >> Everybody, they're they're driven to do what's best for the collective, right? Men are not inherently. We're not. We're not. We might be innately. I don't know. Inherently inhering. The framing men he doesn't know are inherently unable to do this. And women who he doesn't know or, you know, engages with his content, he assumes that they can do it well. Right. Innocent until proven guilty is for women. Guilty until proven innocent for men. Believe all women. Assume with accusations. I'm telling you guys, you're going to see it. So each man that we show, you have to decide as you listen to them, do they sound more like a pander? Do they sound more like a simp? And am I doing this? Am I showing up this way? And is that explaining why I'm getting the reactions and interactions and quality of women that I am to where the only woman that would get with something like this has to be one that wants to lead and not be led. O, Jesus, feminization. Let's continue. >> But it's been beaten out of us right now. So I am I am I truly believe that it looks like on paper at least scientifically, right? It looks like women men need to just support women. Women should be running the show. We got to change. We got to we got to shift a little bit. Focus on supporting the women as opposed to supporting the patriarchy, right? Support the matriarchy, not the patriarchy. Oh, so it's not about there being an issue in terms of a disproportionate amount of power being given to one group or the other. That's not the issue. It's the issue when men have it. I totally respect the actual feminists that genuinely want an egalitarian society and egalitarian relationships. They'll ask men out. They'll offer to pay every so often for dates. um, they pick and choose amongst themselves working out who's going to do what in the home, and I think most modern actual relationships are a lot closer to that than not. But this, what is the theological reason? What is this? What is the sc? What the data? The science? What are you you talking about, my guy? So it's not that we will get ourselves out of the situation together. It's the ones who are leading in all the areas where the stats are the worst when they continue to maintain that power and get more power. We're going. What's the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing and expecting different results. In what culture, in what community in this country where women get more say in the home, more say in politics, more say in culture when they are their most expressed in terms of leadership roles and positions. Often when the man is not even there at all, you would assume that guys that talk like this, he would be looking at the data and the stats that would say, you know what, when it's just women in the leadership role, when it's just women present holding it down, they have the best stats. Their kids are graduating at higher than above average rates, or at least the same as as same-sex couples. When a nuclear family intact, you would assume that these the these panders, these simps that are so smart and know so much. I I'm a sociologist, I'm a this, I'm a that, but my guy, if you're pandering to a group and telling them that they're the prize, they don't need a man, that most men are beneath them, and there's nothing for them to conform to or change to to make themselves more appealing and attractive to men, let alone the men that they want. H, feminization. Everybody is winning now. Everybody is eating. B, I'm really committed to that at >> Whoa. This not the Everybody's eating. Everybody's doing better when women are in leadership roles and position. So when the single father households, are their stats the same, better, or worse than when women are in the lead? This is feminization, y'all. These are far-left feminist extremist talking points coming out of a male's mouth. Feminization. That's what it looks like. Let's continue. At this point trying to get men to understand that we should be in support of women. We should be supporting women. We should be supporting their needs. We should be supporting their rights. We should be supporting them getting educated. We should like we should just be supporting women because when you think of women as a collective, what are women doing that doesn't deserve our support? um, misandry, false allegations, uh, demonization of the nuclear family, the role of being a wife, the role of being a mother, uh, mate poaching, um, uh, etc., etc., etc. The deprioritization of all the traits that men actually want, prioritizing and elevating white liberal women in their politics over the voices of their men, uh prioritizing uh uh gay and effeminate men over heterosexual men that they actually have to do life with, etc., etc., etc. Like what we talking about here? When there's an elevated view of women not as equals, but as superiors, and not just superiors, but ones that can't be critiqued, can't be challenged, can't be told that they're doing things in error that's harming them and harming the women that look like them. When you put something up that high and you can't critique it, you can't question it, you have to trust it, you have to assume its inherent goodness. Doesn't that doesn't that status and doesn't that belong to God? Feminization is about elevating women to a spot of in place of idolatry. And when you hold women as idols, this is what you look and sound like. This is what it sounds like. This is what it looks like. Name the thing. Name the thing that women are doing collectively that doesn't deserve the support of men. I can't think of one thing. So, if you don't have anything, then how about we just support the women, right? Aka the matriarchy. Yes, cool. Let's flip this patriarchy, turn it into a matriarchy. I am all for it. I don't want to be a leader. Like, I have no interest in being a leader. Um, >> Yeah, we know. We know. We know. We know, my guy. That's not surprising. That's not shocking. You know, um, y'all, when you all grew up, you had that that now gay out in the closet friend or family member, right? And those of us who are really familiar with like people and how people show up when they finally come out the closet all late and after the fact, it's like not a surprise. It's like, "Guys, I got something to tell you. I'm coming out the closet and we're like, we know this guy having those talking points saying he doesn't want to be a leader even in his own home and marriage. I wish we could be shocked. I wish I wish. I wish. But how many men act like this? Cuz as funny as this sounds and as sad as this sounds, where do you think happy wife, happy life comes from versus happy, happy spouse? He's saying out loud how a lot of you men actually live. And when you have an elevated, unhealthy, elevated view of women, not a realistic one, not a practical one, not a realist, but an overly inflated, elevated view of them. One of the concerns, ladies, is that the man that says he wants the matriarchy, not the patriarchy. He doesn't want to be the protector. He doesn't want to be the leader. He doesn't want to take accountability of what comes with that and the responsibility that comes with that. But then you're simultaneously ladies complaining about all the men that are exact opposite of this and how few there are. Why is this? What's the size of his platform? And what's the what's the demographic ratio you think of people who's paying for a lifestyle, an audience? I think it's a bunch of men that's being influenced and signing up to listen to the public offender, I mean, uh, public offender to learn how to not be leaders and to get with women that don't want men to step up as leaders. So when you elevate effeminate men, simps, panders, homosexuals, by and all is all in between over heterosexual men, healthy masculine, heterosexual men that have no problem acknowledging that women are perfect and they have the capacity. And I'm going to eventually show something that kind of hones in on what's actually missing from this conversation. This is, ladies and gentlemen, symbology 101. It's not just that he's pandering, which is worse, which is worse because he's one of the few gentlemen in this space that I would argue he is when it comes to the incarnation of Christ and we talk about um, you know, how Christ was both fully human and fully man, fully man and fully divine, and that you can't separate those two. I don't think I've ever seen a human being that's both fully simp and fully pander. Usually it's like one or the other. My man got lucky with getting getting off the market when he did. Jesus. >> But I am so not in I don't want to be a leader whatsoever. >> Look at the manisms, y'all. Look at the mannerisms. Watch. Look at the hands. >> Ever. And I've been like trying to get other men to be like, "Bro, just sit down. I have enough self-awareness, thank goodness, to know I'm nobody's leader." Oh. So why are you speaking on the lives of men and women in relationships? You don't want to be a leader unless you're pandering for a reason. Aren't you trying to influence men to think like you and sit down and let women lead? Isn't that what the black community has already been doing? Isn't that what a lot of black men are already doing? Isn't that what now two consecutive generations of black men are already doing? And ladies, this is the product. Congratulations. Got this. You got the red pill. >> I'm nobody's leader. I'm not fit to be a leader whatsoever. It feels good. It feels good for a good reason, too. Cuz you know that's what you're supposed to be doing. I actually think he believes it. That's the worst part about it, man. I actually think this guy believes it. I genuinely think this guy believes it. And that's the worst part about it. That's the worst part about it. This guy believes it. He genuinely believes that what women want overwhelmingly while they're simultaneously saying, "Where's all the real men and where's the chivalry? And why aren't men approaching us anymore? And why are marital rates what they are? And why aren't men wanting families anymore?" He genuinely believes his method is how to answer that feminization. Man, I tell you, man. I tell you, man. Let's Let's get to the super chats. Let's get to the super chats, y'all. Guys, we are eight people away from getting to 200 plus people concurrently watching. So feel free to kind of uh share this with two, three, four, even five people. Let's definitely get more and more people into this space. Thank you again, Roger, for the $5. Uh, King Julia, my guy, thank you. Thank you for the memberships for sure. Uh, Angel, thank you. Thank you. $20. Back in the '90s when I was homeschooling my littles, I read that most men couldn't afford to pay their wives the going rate of $86k a year in 1985. That was the value of all the jobs she did, laundryress, cook, etc. Well, I would argue and it's true, which is like, but I wonder if as again, it's the '90s, so this isn't, you know, '60s, '70s, '80s when many men in order for them to even get into certain roles and positions, especially the further back you go, where they just had to be able to afford that. As the workforce doubled and wages stagnated and didn't adjust to inflation and the cost of living. Kind of makes sense that by the time we get to the '90s and 2000s, this is going to be a lot more apparent. But who's to blame for doubling the workforce? Who's responsible for the cost going up? Who's who's added to why it is that the tax base doubled overnight? And who then reduced the pool of men that could afford that? Feminization would say it's somebody, it's always men's fault. I wonder who this individual would blame and other feminized individuals I think as well. Thank you, Nas. Appreciate you. And hey, legend in the building himself. Thank you, Dr. Tasan Johnson, for stopping through. Appreciate you do, brother, for the $10. Um, and hey, the celebrities are pulling up for sure. Thank you, BGS, for the $10 as well. And Angel. Again, women are too busy looking for a man instead of preparing to be found. Woo. They've created a market where now women have to look because it's harder and harder for them to be found. But what's worse is they may have already been found and not wanted. Oh, we going to get to that. We going to get to that. We going to get to that. Lemmie, thank you, sir, for the $5. Happy wife, happy life. THE MOST. I ain't never seen that spelling before, man. Thank you, sir, for the $5 for sure. Listen, man. If you are not currently subscribed, please become a subscriber. Please make sure that you like um and share this. And listen, we're at 199 people concurrently watching, by the way, y'all. So, feel free, please, please, please send this to every man and woman that you know for sure. All right, so obviously, uh, shout out to Pubic Offender, man, for, uh, kind of giving us just a sample of what it is that we're going to be going through when it comes to examples of what this is and looks like. And even the staunchest feminists, the ones that still like men, that still want to be in relationships with men, deep down, is that what you want? Is that, ladies? Let's be honest for a second. It's just us. It's just me. It's just It's just your nephew. It's just your cousin. It's just bro. It's just bro. Come on. Come on. Come on. Is Is that really what you want? Is that Is that what stimulates you? Is that what excites you, ladies? Is this it? Is this the version of masculinity that you ladies really want? This is what y'all want? Really? Because if it's not, probably explain, I don't want to be a leader. I just want to sit down and be led. Strap on. Strap off. All right, y'all. So, let's continue because this is fun and uh I'm going to enjoy this thoroughly very much. So, back to the work. Why is this happening? Gyocentrism. Once we do this, the pander sphere will make sense. Why simps and panders exist and what the end result is going to be on a societal level. Gyocentrism is a scientifically proven fact that almost every man, woman, and child has been raised and instilled with a woman's point of view. Men are taught to give women special treatment from birth and women are taught to expect preferential treatment from men. Let me read that again. Gyocentrism is the scientifically proven fact that almost every man, woman, and child has been raised and instilled with a woman's point of view. And men are taught to give women special treatment from birth. And women are taught to expect preferential treatment from men. You look at that last sentence in the first paragraph. Imagine if you reversed it. If women were taught to give men special treatment from birth, boys and men, and if women were taught, sorry, and if men were taught to expect preferential treatment from women, they're not. So when one group is being shown to be viewed with this elevated status in terms of treatment preferentially, this is going to show up in a whole host of ways. This isn't equality, ladies and gentlemen. This isn't equality. Let's continue. Gyocentrism is the definition is by definition sexist. However, it has become the default social model for most of the planet. Men are trained to suppress emotions and always be considerate of women's feelings. Men are trained to sacrifice work and die to provide for women's happiness. Probably explains the divorce rates to a degree. When women aren't taught at least to sacrifice and be willing to work, die for their family's happiness. Men and women are trained to always take the woman's side over a man. So in the crash out in the comments like my homegirl Jazz Noel and others, they've been trained in this so long to where discussions about this will always get rooted back to shifting the blame and perspective on men and somehow viewing it still through a woman's lens and siding with women over men, even when they are heavily the contributors for what the issue actually is. Women are taught to support each other and view men's pain and suffering as less important. They will devalue, they will lower, they will make fun of all the things that men are bringing. Why? So, so, so just change it. Why do you even care? What are you complaining about? But realize they'll never say that in the reverse about a woman's issues or pain. They will laugh at hearing about men's loneliness and men's mental health issues and they'll be concerned about women's going through that those situations. Men are discouraged from supporting each other. We already see the output when it comes to discussions about this space and how they don't want men apparently talking to each other. They don't want men engaging in these things and they don't want men doing this without women's approval. Because as more and more men encourage each other, support each other, and educate each other about the types of women and people who function this way, less and less women are now seen as wife material. That's why they are always stuck in situationships and long-term situations that never lead to the long-term desired outcome. Give a man 10 years after wanting to get married and say, "I didn't want to get married anyway." Men are taught that fighting, dying, and sacrificing themselves is noble. But women experiencing any emotional distress is terrible. This sexist attitude and maternal brainwashing has seen men literally dying to protect women who quite often take the sacrifices men make completely for granted. This is real sexism and it is taught at a very early age and reinforced in our society all through the media, education, legal system. Oh man, when you have a gyocentric approach to how you view people, this makes sense. Go ahead and read that before I read it out loud. Then I want you to see this. For those who can't read it clearly, it says Kevin Samuels died. So the same group that can pray and have concerns and mourn on the behalf of a woman suffering or losing a loved one will laugh and make fun of a man dying. And in a feminized environment, you'll have men sitting in a room with younger men making the same type of comments and remarks like this and are completely desensitized to how insane it is. It's one thing to find women or bitter angry women hating on Kevin Samuels and him as a person and laughing at the fact that he died, but when you had males doing it, feminization. Yeah. Yeah. So when you get men that are now doing this who again, those same men would never ever despite the toxic things that Sheryl 7 was saying, insane, damaging, insane things that's going to get these women hurt or worse, taking advantage of men economically, extracting all you can from setting love aside. What could go wrong? Same women that are sad for her. We're laughing about this. And then you have men and males specifically who are either simp in their everyday life or just panders on social media kind of. They're only looking at it through the female lens and it's always the worst of the worst of women's perspectives that they're choosing to hold and it's being mouthpieces for carnal misandry. Jesus. But you know, they're educated. They got them degrees. They they they they they know so much. They they they. How does it show up, man? How does it look? How does it look when we move this way? Now, of course, I put the arrows in because I think some of these spots are a little unaligned. I think the straight men definitely need to be at the bottom. People can have debates between black men and white men from a societal lens of who gets to take turns being at the bottom, but this is feminization, ladies and gentlemen. This is feminization. This is feminization. When you have this, you're going to have this. When you have this, the panders and simps that trying to work their way up in the hierarchy of acceptance amongst liberal circles are going to not see a problem with this feminization. Gyoc. Jesus. So, when it comes to this approach to sexism, this is an initial question I'm going to ask you guys. Are you aware of how this shows up in your life, behaviors, and relationships, your views of the patriarchy versus the matriarchy? The more feminized you are, the more gyocentric you are, the less you're able to critically analyze both of these ideologies. You may be overly critical and pessimistic of one, overly optimistic, or in denial of the potential issues that can manifest in the other. How might this show up in your relationship? Do you have a balanced view of yourself and the woman that you're in relationship with or trying to pursue? Or do you have an overly elevated view of women and their feelings and their wants and their preferences and their standards to the point of where you aren't even allowed to have one? Happy wife, happy life. Sound familiar, folks? Standards in a form of sexism like this in a feminized environment. How might a person who prioritizes women in general and individually view the issues concerning body count, their preferences versus his? Whether or not he needs to accept or acknowledge or own whether or not her children is going to be a barrier and whether or not her weight is an issue. How would a gyocentric or feminized environment, what would the standards be, if any, when it comes to standards for women? I'm going to speed you up on the process. There are none. There are no standards, but they're allowed to have them, not you. That's why they can judge you on height. You can hear women with children say they won't deal with a man who has children because they're gyocentric by nature, ladies and gentlemen. They have standards. It's just for men and the men that they want. The elevation of her feelings, emotions above facts, reasons, and reality, including all of those that pertains to his intersexual dynamics only ever applies when it's in the favor for them. So, what's an example of this? Give you an example, man. When Tommy Sotomayor came on, a different guest have kind of come on my platform and we discussed the hypocrisy of how women, especially black women specifically, seem to have such a sharp issue when it comes to seeing a black man with anyone that's non-black. And we said, but we noticed they they talk about his blackness. They talk about he doesn't love his mother. They talk about he's a sellout, etc., etc., etc. They may have never had a conversation with this man. And he may have never ever said anything publicly, especially in this environment, that's overly negative about women or specifically black women, but yet he'll be demonized, scrutinized, called a [ __ ] and sellout and all this other stuff just based on the fact that he's with a non-black woman. But then you see it on camera, video after video after video of women saying, "When I see a black man dating a woman that's non-black, I feel offended. I get angry. I'm saying, 'Why aren't we enough?'" But when I see a black woman that ends up with a white man, good job, sis. She can finally rest. She did that. Y'all see that? Y'all starting to see how this stuff manifests, how it comes about in an overly feminized and gyocentric environment. That girl math makes sense. And the feminized men are not upset at the hypocrisy and the double standard that her and women like her hold. Whether it's about who's deaf to laugh at or make fun of, when it comes to who's allowed to have standards, when it comes to interracial relationships, that she can be modern but he needs to be traditional. The feminized environment will produce men that will now be their attack dogs saying, "Why does this even matter? Why are you even talking about it?" Because it exists, dummy. Or have you never thought the idea of there being a problem with women being able to have double standards, treated differently, viewed differently, and always assumed to be better, smarter, according to Pubic Offender, and deserving of the assumption of innocence and optimism and their ability to to manage and handle power, privilege, and to view men in those roles and positions in the reverse. Never saw it as an issue, really. Whether it's an absent father, whether it's a father that was there but never turned into being a man himself, whether it's just being overly surrounded by women. Who knows? All I know, man, is that the more that you're enmeshed in this, these are the ways it's going to show up in your life. Crime and victimhood. We'll get to for sure, man. Like I would argue that the more a person really adopts and fully walks into this, you're going to see example after example after example. I'm going to show you guys that they only view domestic violence through the lens of male towards female and that they ultimately don't even really see men as victims. It's because they have a skewed lens. It'll be confusing for those that aren't fully aware that men can actually be the victims and women can actually be the perpetrators. And even if they'll acknowledge that a woman may be in the wrong or be the perpetrator, what's the question that they often ask when a situation involves a woman crashing out? Well, what did he do to her? What did he do that caused her to act that way? Because you know that when you got a gyocentric approach, you're going to look at this stuff radically different. They will double and triple down with not viewing men as victims. So much so that when it comes out later that a man was actually innocent, that he was lied on, rather than acknowledge, you know what, bro, you're right. You could have been wrong in this area, that area. But man, lying on somebody to the point of trying to affect their life, their ability to be free, destroying the the their finances that they probably built up over the last 10, 20 plus years, man. Man, in a gyocentric feminized environment, men are always going to be blamed for being accused and then being ignored, even if they're proven right. So even in cases where women are proven liars, even in those situations, they're still going to side with the women and find a way to point back the blame to men. >> As for that, because I shouldn't have played with nobody's lies like that. I just felt like I've been with him a long time. I felt like I've been through a lot with you and you was ready to give up on me with ease for me cheating on somebody. I mean, for me cheating on you for somebody, and I felt like you could have gave me another chance. And that's just the honest truth. And if consequences was involved, I definitely wouldn't have wanted to go to jail from falsifying a fake report that was so unladylike. Of me. I don't know where I get that from. And I know I'm not in fear of Ryan Bradstreet. Like, I know his whole family, his whole family know me. That is diabolical. Not ladylike is certainly one way to put it. When you send your ex-boyfriend back to jail by lying because he's dumping you after he catches you cheating on him. Yes. She cheats on him. He catches her. Does the right thing. Dumps her. And what does she do? She >> apologize. Man, if people actually looked into the stats when it comes to domestic violence and sees how often it's it's it's dual in nature, how often it's actually initiated by women who just happen to be weaker, how often men don't report it. People don't know. People that have this skewed view aren't interested in any data that shows that as women become as an environment starts to become more egalitarian initially and as women begin to get more rights, the violence against women actually decreases, which is a good thing. But the violence against men from women actually increases. Oh, you know what? Because I'm not a sociologist. Because I'm not a re You know what? Let's do this. Let's do this. Let's do this. >> Society becomes more gender equal. Violence against women diminishes. That's a well-known axiom in domestic violence. But one of the things you were talking about was as a society becomes more gender equal, violence by women increases. >> Yeah. And our data on that comes from one of your countrymen, John Archer. He did a really impressive cross-cultural study where he looked at domestic violence measures. I think he had 52 countries. And he found that as women's socioeconomic power increased, violence towards women decreased. Violence by women increased. Here's something that nobody can explain. When you get up to a point of 67, where women's power is roughly 2/3 of men's power. From that point on, they're more violent than men are. Nobody really knows how to explain that. >> I've heard it described as the millennial shift. I'm going to read some data actually. The percentage of men and women who used pressure to force sexual contact. Men of the boomer generation and Gen X was 5.9%, and for women it was 3.1%. And then for the millennial generation, it dropped for men to 4.1%, and for women it went up to 7.9%. So it's actually crossed over. Percentage of men and women who used emotional coercion in post-refusal sexual persistence. For boomer men and Gen X men, it went from 28.4% down to 19%. Women, it went from 7% up to 13.8%. It's also intergenerational. We're seeing that same phenomenon where it seems like millennial women are far more likely to try and coerce sexual intercourse than Gen X or boomer women. It's amazing, man, when panders and simps that don't really have an expertise in much of these things are the ones with the loudest voices telling us that the only problem in the dating market, in the gender war dynamic is coming from the side where men are acknowledging these things exist. In the things that I'm showing you, educating those that don't know and aren't aware. Remember that public offender individual? Women leadership, women power. Hear me roar, women. Yeah, that when women get to 2/3 of power, what happens? How does abuse rates and violence rate changes? Again, this isn't like things are declining in terms of men and their output of violence towards women, which is good and it should be, and those men should be taken care of. And naturally, every man that I know, when we're told about a family member or or a friend or somebody that's involved in a situation, we we jump up and get ready to intervene. We're doing what we're supposed to do. And if anybody ever watched the show, what would you do? Type it in on YouTube and look up the episodes when a man fakes act like he's attacking a woman and then watch what happens when you see when a woman's fake attacking acting like she's attacking a man and watch the audience, the people, the everyday people sitting there watching, listening, and what's the radically different reactions you could imagine in a feminized gyocentric environment where men can't be victims? Laughing, pointing, even questioned after you. Why? Why? We noticed that you didn't intervene when you. Oh, I just I assumed he did something to earn why she was attacking him or slapping him. I figured, what did he do? Is that Is that victim blaming? Jesus. So one of the issues, ladies and gentlemen, is that in the manosphere space, in the red pill space, and individuals like myself who isn't telling men to lie, isn't telling men to sleep with the world, isn't telling men to unlike some of the men in the manosphere and on these panels there's like, oh, you got to lie to women. You got to lie. I'm actually on panels challenging that and acknowledging that so much of what's broken in this space is because everybody's lying, not being honest about who they are, what they want, what they're looking for, and what they're willing to offer. The women who think this way, those are the women you can't see as long-term partners or options. And I would argue they are some of the most riskiest women in the country, in society. Why? Because they don't recognize your full humanity. They only recognize their own. And just like that video we showed earlier, when your humanity isn't a factor for me, what won't I do if I'm angry enough? If you're going to leave me, if you're going to replace me, if you're going to fight for 50/50 kids, I I. So no men have had women threaten to weaponize access to children or or lie to DHS and saying, "I'm going to say you touched these kids if you fight for custody." Nobody heard of this. The declining marital rates. Women don't propose to themselves. Overwhelmingly, the majority of them not getting on knees. Oh, the way to cope against that when you're going to all the dating events and talking about men aren't approaching you is because we don't want to be married and we don't want to be wives. Now, uh, that's why rich, wealthy, famous women that are more beautiful, more successful than any of you have also been unsuccessful in the dating market for the last 20, 30 years really. And they don't want long-term stability and commitment from men that they're sleeping with and giving children to. Indefinitely, not just through the 304 phase, but like for 30, 40 years. Jesus. And of course, in a feminized environment, this applies not only to whether or not men can be viewed equally in terms of being victims or not, or if women can do wrong or mishandle uh power and and and privilege. But in a feminized um environment such as this, sort of makes sense. Look at this. Same magazine, same website. Look at the framing. Look at the framing, ladies.

and gentlemen. What did I say? When you see it, you can't unsee it. It's everywhere. Education, body positivity, dating standards, legal, you name it, bro. Feminization and the men that are allowed to thrive most in this space in regards to female audience acceptance being everywhere and being accepted are the men that exposed this nonsense. That is until Oz came along. The great equalizer, the great truth teller drug if you ask me. Yeah, man.

So, the same group that's being taught, let me go back to it so you can see it. The same group that's being taught this is showing up like this. Look at it carefully. Look at it carefully. When one group is being taught to view themselves as getting preferential treatment, elevated status, more important than the other, their feelings being above all else and not the other way around or even equal, it's always Germaine's fault. When you create an environment where both sexes are like this, you end up with foolishness like this. And this is how people actually are showing up. So now we have women who are average at best having elevated senses of ego not being able to understand the male attraction triggers and traits and deciding they can dictate what it is that men would want to be attracted to and think that they can command that in return. This is what you get.

>> Minimum yearly income to be your future husband. I put 150. I didn't know what to put, but I put 200. Oh my god. Does this look like a $250,000 face, bro? I'm sorry. I'm sorry cuz I I knew I have to make it through this clip. I know I gotta make it through this clip, man. These ladies are throwing out numbers that models and extremely beautiful women who get paid for their aesthetics could throw out there and doesn't sound that unusual. A4 million dollars. And this is the prize. Oh, this going to be good, man. This going to be good. Listen y'all, please, if you haven't, please make sure you share this, like this to see that. We're already at 200 plus people. Um, please send this to two, three, four, even five people for sure. This isn't Viva A. Fox in her prime dating a millionaire who makes a quarter million, 300K year. This is an average woman at best talking this way. But when you're in a gyocentric feminized environment, girl math, this equals out because I wanted and I feel like that's what I deserve. That's what I should expect and be willing to demand and wait for. And we shouldn't say how delusional it is because it would hurt her feelings. Really? How's that working out? I got to show the picture again. All the women showing up at all these events, hitting the wall, having now to settle, which is really actually coming down to where they've always been.

Feminization >> 50k. If I fell for someone and if he's a really good guy, then it's negotiable. But at least whatever I am making but ideally like half a million. >> Jesus Christ. Wait till you find out how old she is. Talk about a half million dollars. Bro, I got a question, man. If more and more women are getting less approached, not getting the man that they want, ending up with the man that they want, not walking getting able to make it down the aisle, but they doing a whole lot of dating and sleeping with men for women that don't want that. And then they talk this way. It's only in a gyocentric feminized environment that this makes sense. Who is in their life beyond just women that may be reinforcing why they think this way. Panders and sense. So now when you have a market filled with average everyday women throwing out a4 million to a half a million dollars, wait till we find out how old Shorty is. And it's seen as normal. Normal. Jesus. My god. My god. See what else we got, man. So guys, if you're currently in the chat, um, feel free to kind of hit that super chat and let me know if you're in if you got any particular funny comments or remarks. But let's continue cuz this is good. This is good.

When you say if he's a really good guy, >> if the chemistry and everything, >> but you wouldn't date a guy who works at McDonald's. Correct. >> Uh, I cannot date. You would go lower, but I'm suspecting it >> lower than my salary, >> which is what? >> 200 plus. Yeah. >> Jesus, man. I can't wait for this. Wait till we find out how old Shorty is talking this way. This isn't Halib Berry or or Vivigay Fox in her prime on the screen. This isn't even uh uh Lorie Harvey 10 guys ago. >> If you really like the guy, 200,000 he has to make >> At least he gets a discount if she likes him. >> Yeah. >> Um I think I put 100k >> ma'am. Come on, man. Come on now. The first two. We're not even trying now. This is now a default setting, ladies and gentlemen. And the panders are the ones that's encouraging it. And the simps are the ones that's signing up and offering it. They're creating the market that they're complaining about and stating it's red pill and a manosphere fault for acknowledging this is happening and then not playing to the delusion. Wow. >> In there >> 500,000. >> Yeah. Because he will be at least 3 years something elder than me. So when I will be his age, my salary might be. >> You got to make half a mill a year. >> You said you were in your 40s, right? >> 47. >> You're 47. >> And you have kids, right? >> Yeah. I have a daughter in college. Do y'all realize what's going on? This sounds like it makes sense for them because in their world view how she feels, what she wants, and what she quote unquote brings to the table shouldn't affect her actually getting it. Elevated status, inflated ego, hyper elevated standards of what it is they think they can command and want and deserve. And that the panderers won't acknowledge the issue when it comes to uh time, body, children, that all of these things can obviously affect them. But a pander will will will lie and not acknowledge the truth that all of those things can obviously affect them. Really? Really? Really? Panderers are hurting women by feeding and fueling their delusion and making them think that they have all the time in the world, that they have all the leverage, that they can depprioritize or not value men's perspectives, needs, and standards at all. She is the table and that there will always be a market not of male attention but the attention from the men that they want. >> Do you think a man that makes 500k is going to want a 47year-old single mom? >> You can't make this [ __ ] up, man. >> Shout out to Kevin Samuels, man. Shout out to Kevin Samuels, bro. Like the harsh reality was is we all know this is true. Why do you think the ladies put on the makeup and get Oyic as soon as they can and get the BBLs? Why do you think they're trying to look younger? Because age doesn't matter. Please don't be 60 plus, y'all. Please don't be 50 plus still talking about what you deserve and what Woo! My god. My god. This is the effects of feminization and let's continue. Panders. Oh, about to get good. We about to watch some examples of a couple brothers and how what this looks like and shows up as. Oh, this is going to be good. Now, let me get those videos ready. Key traits for panders. Oh man, this is gonna be good. Um, should I start with panders? Yeah, I'll start with panders. Uh, panders, you know, a man who says whatever benefits him in the moment, especially things women want to hear without necessarily believing it. Highly agreeable on on the surface level. Mirrors female talking points for approval. Remember remember we are we already got an example of that, right? When you're seeing a man or male that mirrors female talking points, that my friends is a pander avoids accountability conversations as it relates to women. Feminization leads to this. Gyocentrism leads to this. When you don't have to prioritize and understand what men need and want in order to do what life well with the right man, listening to these men will lead you to here. or settling for a man that you would have never gotten with if you didn't have as many children, as much weight, or went up there in age. These men are creating this. And when they're convincing you to not prioritize marriage and male leadership and when you find yourself dissatisfied with what your options are based on how you presenting yourself and what you've been communicating, these men will continue pushing their platforms even at your expense or even worse when they're not even living up to it themselves. Man, if you could spend $100, $200 on a date because you want to bring smiles to this woman's face, you want to show yourself approved or whatever, gauge interest, whatever you going to do, man, you could pay for that babysitter one or two days to give her, you know, some time off. Or if you know she got to run errands to go to Target and all this other stuff after work, you can get something sent to her house for them kids, uh, school supplies or whatever. You ain't got to do everything to do something for somebody who has kids and you want the full package in your life. If you want the full package in your life, >> this is why I believe 40 and 50 year olds are the dopest generation. At least today's 40 and 50 year olds. I can't speak for everybody else, but y'all are probably the first group of women, especially mature women that have the wisdom and the cooking skills and the natural maternal instincts of the previous generation. No, they don't. No, they don't. >> Not even looking like the generation that you're in. You know, maybe because you ain't been in no relationship that's beat you down, you know, over the years, y'all are able to go and pursue your own dreams and all of that instead of basically being so subservient. You know, you don't even look like most most women I've seen 40 and 50 years old, they could pass for 10 years younger or even more regard. >> Who was he sleeping with? How old was the woman he was sleeping with that wasn't his wife? Was she 55 or did she look better than the woman he was married to? What about the women after his wife left? Was he looking for Lizos? Was he signing up to deal with the women that he's saying doesn't have to worry about their weight and their age and all their issues and baggage that they bring to the table? Was he actually doing that? Cuz at least if you cheated with those types of caliber, listen brother, at least he's living it out. This is ladies, you played yourselves. Listening to liberal white women and listening to jokers like this and accepting the false narratives and messaging in a feminized and gyocentric environment, you don't even know what men to listen to. What if it's the reverse? What if it's the men that are saying the things you don't want to hear that are true that you should be listening more to and actually engaging in versus arguing non-stop in the damn comments that's trying to explain to your hard-headed asses. Why did his viewership go up? Why? Why did this Hold on. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. No, ladies. Not the Not the ladies that want men to be honest. Not the ladies who say they want men that are emotionally intelligent. Not the ladies they say they want men that walk in integrity. Protect black women. No. No. No ladies. No. No. No. No. No. Ain't no way. Ain't no way that his viewership went up. So when that joke about like nice guys finish last and that women want the men that other women want, that's those are just tried and true things that we see both experientially in the red pill space. We talk about it and we engage in it. So, you got to become the man that has options so that you can pick the best option that you think most aligns with you as a man and disregard and not date or waste your time with women who are stuck in this headsp space. So when you overlook this because you like what he's saying, imagine what lies and pandering techniques that you actually live in and walk in to where you start looking like all the delusional women who been hit the wall and don't realize that the number actually supposed to go down, not up. When your weight's going up and your age is going up and your ability to have children's going down. And each year there's a new couple men who emotionally you'll have to get over before you're ready to settle down with me. >> Jesus. Let's continue. >> What society says if you in your 40s and your 50s, you something special. And when you something special, you don't let just anybody play with that. You don't let nobody play with it. So for those women that you know talk like >> really nobody's playing with it, what happened to the 304 phase? What happened to prioritizing marriage and children later? Oh, it's because they're all abstinent. It's because they're not dealing with toxic men. What did Ari Lennox just come out talking about? This is who y'all This y'all king. This y'all king. This is y'all king. Wow. >> They're ashamed of not having a bae or a boo on the weekend or somebody to take them out, you know, to on a date or to text they phone is dry and not get no attention online. Like that's nothing to be ashamed of. Don't wear that like it's a badge of shame. If anything, it should be a badge of honor that you're not for everybody. That a lot of dudes feel like they can't even approach you or they feel like they wouldn't stand. >> Listen to their approach as they get older. It's because men can't even approach me. They don't want to, sis. You had to run. They don't want to. They wanted to when you were more attractive. They wanted to when you were more agreeable, were able to get along. They wanted to approach you more when you were aesthetically pleasing, still soft, not jaded, and haven't had so many experience with men and so much validation online and in person to where he's going to try to live up to a standard to keep you happy that only social media and panderers was ever going to be able to produce in terms of validation. That's the game. Feminization >> a chance with you because they would have to step their own [ __ ] up just to be entertained by you. Like if any >> step my game up to deal with a 40, 50 or 60 year old women woman I can step my I can step my game down. I know I know I know that we all have the same internet. I know that we're seeing it now. All these welloff, established, famous women who are now talking about dealing with 22 year old men. They stepping their game up and stepping down. That's because that's what your options are, sis. Regardless of what uh Derek uh Jackson is saying, >> thing that should be a badge of honor. I want to encourage you to continue to know your worth. Continue to stand on that because long term you're going to get exactly what you deserve. >> And what if there's nothing? >> How long do you got to wait for what you deserve at Biblica a Fox age? Where the pitch at? Where the pitch at? I got to find it. I got to find it. Oh my god. This going to be This is so good. This it the material writes itself. It It's crazy. It's sad. It's self-inflicted. And I'm like, "Bro, y'all don't just want to tell the truth to these ladies, man. Y'all lying. Y'all leading them into to to insane unknown territory. More and more women are ending up looking like, "Bro, so she deserved this." Going on talk shows in her early 60s, talking about it. Girlfriend, if you got if you got a uh if you got a recommendation, is this what she deserves? Oh, she got to deal with that 22 year old that want to blow her back out, but she can't build with don't. And she got to probably support and [ __ ] Yeah, job Derek. Good job, Dererica. Pandering. Pandering. Pandering. Damn. >> I do believe we act like a woman's heart is a [ __ ] Rubik's cube and we just color blind or something. Like behind every dude that's saying, "Shit, I don't know what she want from me," is a woman who's tired of repeating herself about all the [ __ ] she's tired of and tired of him playing dumb whenever he gets caught doing [ __ ] again. The reason why common sense seems like a PhD these days, cuz most of y'all don't use it. But it's simple. If a girl say don't cheat, that mean don't [ __ ] don't send hints that you trying to [ __ ] and don't catch feelings for another girl. >> My guy, do are you listening, brother? My guy, women damn near cheating as much as men. You know what? Let me pull it up. Let me pull it up. Where them STD thing at? I know I got it somewhere up in here. Where is it at? Where is it at? Where's it at? Because this is the topics. These are the things that the panders won't discuss. These are the issues, man. And and and the way ladies moving now. Yeah, man. This the Dating Mark. This is the Texas rodeo. This is what was happening during spring break in Florida. This is why men are starting to not show up in certain spaces or engage with women to the same degree that they were. They completely went black pill or magttow. And luckily, most men aren't probably doing that. But for the men that are, they lack enough emotional intelligence to still engage with you and have sex with you, but they have enough to know to not marry a lot of you. Let's see who else. Thanks again, Lammy. Uh, proud of the lion. Delusion is the new religion. Thank you good brother for the 199. Let me again into why all why men sell dreams. Miss man. When you lie, women buy. These men are becoming millionaires for telling women strategies and approaches of how to view men, how to approach dating, and how to devalue the men that are actually at their level. It's not leading towards the desired outcome. And it's rinse and repeat. It's because it's the men's fault. Oh, man. I tell you, man, my view count probably will be through the roof if I was following what these panderers are and and and simps are doing. Man, man, can you imagine me just, you know, lying to women on stages, touring, making money off of not letting women know the truth, and men and women are not the same. Their dating experiences aren't the same, and their standards are not going to be equal. Let's continue.

>> When she tells you, "Respect us. Don't have me out here looking stupid. That includes whenever you mad or when you out with your boys and they trying to make you feel weak for being faithful. And when old girl got a fat ass but you BEEN trying too hard. Trying too hard. In the red pill space, believe it or not, and this includes a lot of men in the manosphere, not all men are in agreement. There is no uniform discussion on this. Whether it ranges from some men that are more traditional still pushing traditional marriage i.e via through the state or whether through religion um coming up with lifestyle contracts. The men that are in this space to have integrity are saying as long as you're upfront about what it is that you're willing to offer and if she's willing to accept it and offer what you're looking for in return. One woman, two women, three women, irrelevant. Can you handle it? Can you take it? Can you deal with it? Can you manage it? And are the women. Imagine if he had approached it where he told his significant other, I want two wives. We wouldn't be having this discussion unless you're going to be greedy. Tell you man, dudes get a chin strap and a tight t-shirt and they can just man. Action Jackson. Action Jackson. >> All night all. When y'all ain't together and she hitting your phone up, texting and calling with no response, it's my guess she'd be really happy if you let her know, hey, I can't talk right now. Instead of having her guessing what got you so uncomfortable, you can't pick up. Cuz let her be out and not answer your calls. you going to be hitting her friends up, interrogating them, driving around looking for, accusing her of cheating just to feel stupid later on and act like you was just scared for her safety. But you get the point. Look, the list goes on. But to sum it up, hold her down with everything you promised in the beginning. Build her up the same way you would anything else you proud to have and you want to keep. And give her the same regard you want in return. And for those saying, "Well, it's just man bashing." No, it's man distinguishing from [ __ ] boys, which a lot of y'all think are one and the same until your girl meets a man, sees the difference, and leaves you heartbroken saying, "These hoes ain't loyal. Yo, imagine if you took you close your eyes and imagine a woman talking. One that's hurt, cheated on, damaged, doesn't have a healthy view of men or masculinity. Would there be any difference in what she says? But would it sound word for word, bar for bar exactly what action Jackson is saying? Pander mirrors female talking points for approval. Avoids accountability conversations from both ways. Performs good guy behavior for access to status, sex, and a positive image with women and with a female audience. The really good panders are able to kind of switch that based on who's in front of them. Core motivation, say what works, get what I want. Reality check can often be socially successful. Often seen as a safe or progressive but lacks authenticity and backbone when it comes to being honest with women women. Pander doesn't believe what he says. He believes in the results. Pander is psychologically very different and he's not than a simp and he's not really driven by fear of losing women but by the desire to control outcomes. Internal wiring external calibration constantly reading the room adjust beliefs tone and personality for maximum acceptance. Performance-based identity doesn't ask what do I believe it's really about what do they want me to say that I believe would rather ask what works right now cognitive empathy without emotional investment understands what women want to hear doesn't necessarily feel it or even try to live it out core psychological drivers man this is important outcome orientation. The strategy for acting this way, for talking to women and engaging with them to the degree that they do, it's not really out of care for women. It's actually out of the access to sex, status, and approval that they're going to get as a result of marketing and branding themselves to women that they do. Women are actually a means to an end to get to those things. Social survival intelligence very high. By the way, they learned that in regards to honesty, they would rather nyx that or at least be half honest about what's going on in the market. Constantly adapting depending on the trending topic to whatever it is that the women want to hear so that they can maintain an ad advantage position over all the undesirable red pill evil sexist men while they're performing their own forversion and form of sexism. Got to add controlled detachment doesn't overinvest emotionally and keeps leverage by staying slightly disconnected. Simps. Ah, yeah. It's going to be good. This going to be good. Let me get this ready. Let me get this ready. This going to be funny. Oh, before I forget, what would Action Jackson say about something like this? Wouldn't the panders basically agree with this? When a pander leads with women being more educated in a market involving dating men, that's feminization at work. Ladies and gentlemen, that's feminization. Ladies and gentlemen, you know what? Who's another pander that we got real quick? Let's see who else we got on the list. Uh, let's let's let's pull this board with this young boy. Let's Let's get that. Let's get that. Let's see. Where's it? Here it is. Here it is.

>> Got to make patriarchy look not attractive. Yes. >> I think that right now our community is experiencing a red pill pipeline. Conservative alt-right pipeline that's really really appealing to a lot of young black boys and I think that because they got they catching these I'm saying boys they 12 13 14 >> patriarchy and misogyny and sexism that [ __ ] is really like it's it's it turned them on >> yes >> black women birthed the plantation the plantation bir cotton king cotton thrusted America into the global economy which means America power comes from the black womb which means Without black women or the black womb, American American economy does not exist. A lot of ways that we have the gender wars this uh manifest themselves. It's to sustain black women being seen as breeders, field hands, sexual labors, and property. And a lot of men that push back against this are seen as simpl and whether we're talking about goddamn dare you right all these all these songs to me are are wonderful masterpieces that's capturing the way in which hyper patatriarchal control happens and the way that black women are hurt and suffering through the way in which they try to love on us as men. >> You know what I'm saying? Was we talking about intimate in the bed or was >> which types of men are they picking to love? >> What's their type? >> Are their fathers picking for them? Are the STD rights rates rising solely because of the actions of men? Who's having more children, men or women? Especially in the black community, when it comes to my body and my choice, who's choosing all the abortions, too? Listening to this foolishness brings us to this. You could keep thinking that you want to be the lead and dictate and decide everything, but you can't make all the men that are not simp they don't want to do. You can't make them marry you. You can't make them unsee what they see. Y'all, you told on you to on yourselves digitally. You outed yourselves in terms of your motivations. The data shows you ain't in it to the degree that you you want men to be in on it. And you constantly tell us, "Can't no man tell me what to do. Can't no man tell me what to wear. His standards are sexist. Mine are default. If it is a divorce, it's his fault. If there's accusations against him, believe the woman. Take the bear. Woo! Talk about doing everything possible to be completely unattractive, especially to the men who have options. Y'all not going to realize, man, but men that are really healed and men that have options, the last thing they do is argue. Last thing they do is go back and forth. What panders are lying about show you is this only simply men who don't have respect for themselves or their women or their children won't know the difference bodily autonomy, sexual liberation, rights, privileges, access to do whatever they want doesn't always translate into a happy ending where they end up with the Russell Wilson at the end of their lifelong or early 20s or 30s or 40s era of bad decisions. So, who actually loves women and who actually cares about black women? I'm interested. Who actually is concerned about their image? The people who say no matter what you do, no matter what you wear, no matter how you display yourself, doesn't matter. It won't affect you. But the people that say there is a uniform that could potentially explain, there is an ideology, there is talking points, there is an approach to how you're moving and carrying yourself to where eventually your desire and decision to be a mother won't be up to you. The leverage that you have to be able to get married to the man that you want may not be yours in the future. Listen, man. It's very interesting to see the level of brainwashing that's convinced women to do this, to pick the right, and end up like this. Panders, simps, feminization, gyocentrism. The community who's exhibiting these traits the most. It's the crazy part, bro. This could be unknowingly leading to this. Take out the racial component. By the way, cultures or countries where there's higher standards in this area are more likely to end up with the other sign and actually get it. Can't make this up. The level of brainwashing. My god. Incredible. Incredible. Millennia and millennia and millennia of women with less education understood these things. And now with the internet, you got people and women who still don't get it. Action Jackson. When we normalize sexual devian, hookup culture, casual sex or or porn, we stop seeing people as humans to love and start seeing them as objects to use. I wonder women objectifying themselves of using all the talking points that's completely antithetical to any relationship with men who actually want to feel both wanted and needed. I wonder I wonder panderers man are going to shape and view anything that women want always through the lens of how women it is that women see it. So even in domestic violence when she's cheating, when she's not responding to you, all the excuses Derek and all, it's always a caveat, a built-in default excuse for why she did something, why she allowed something, or why she gave up on something. Has nothing to do with her immaturity. Has nothing to do with her bad poor decision-m, bad coochie management, um inability to recognize good men versus bad men. Apparently, uh giving men access to things that other men would have had to to to, you know, do so many other things in the past to obtain. It's now available for $3.99. Only fans link is right above the picture with her kids and her grandmother. You want to be treated like wives. Sorry. Oh my god. This is just I know I prepped for this, but just re-watching this stuff, I'm like, "Oh man. Oh man. Jesus. Who else we got?" Oh yeah, man. Man, cuz you know I got to spread the love around, bro. Got to spread the love around. Let's Let's see what this about. I think when you describe men as the protectors of women, uh you're just describing men as less valuable than women, right? Because in all these circumstances, the protectors are always those with less value. Another good example would be like my phone with my phone case. Uh the phone case protects my phone. Uh but my phone case is also significantly less valuable than my phone. And I also just don't think that it is true that men are the protectors of women. Uh since men are the ones who perpetuate what women need to be protected against, right? Like I don't really think that men should get a gold star for throwing their [ __ ] on the wall than trying to clean it up. It is unequivocally false to suggest that women are more emotional than men. It is unequivocally false to suggest that men are more rational than women. And honestly, I just think it's dumb to gender these things. Who's more neurotic? And if it's dumb to gender those things, let's see if he says anything that's gendered that's at the expense of men and the benefit of women. Let's set aside the mannerisms and the raising of the voice and tone that often men men do, especially in the workplace. Um, there's actual articles and stuff about this. When men start to mimic female talking points, especially ones that are harmful, misandrous, limited, half true. They see very little good inherently in men. When they have to make a choice and they can't and they don't want to choose equality or fairness, they're going to choose to put women in the elevated position and role. >> I think it's dumb to place a gendered expectation on emotional reactions, on leadership ability, on levels of rationale. But if you put a gun to my head and you force me to, I would say that women could actually be expected to do better at these things than men. I believe that that gender war is completely a one-sided issue. Man, they got another one. They got another one, man. Feminization is real, bro. Simp is real, man. This is bad, man. Men that talk like that think like this. And it doesn't matter the category. They're going to side with women. I think it's dumb to gender it, but if I am, I think what my guy or you have a bunch of chud misogynists like yourself saying men better, men better. >> What in all reality? >> He thinks women are better. By the way, it's kind of honest. I mean, it's it's pretty obvious. He's not approaching this in a nuanced way in which all men have some strengths, women have some strengths, men have some weaknesses, women have some weaknesses. There's an egalitarian integrationist approach of how we're handling these discussions and topics. No, no, no. Men bad, woman good. Men that think like this and talk on platforms. I'm going to encourage men, actually encourage women to end up making really stupid and foolish decisions that ultimately hurts them and the panders will not come to their rescue. So it we are at a point in place man where I would argue as much as we talk about the manosphere and the red pill space, these men are the ones that's actually creating much of the environment that everybody's claiming that they're so upset about. These people, these dudes are wrecking our society. They are wrecking relationships. They are creating the picture that you're seeing on the screen. Women that can only find men that have sex with them, but can't live lives that's compatible for long-term relationships. This is the market that these panders are helping to create. Shout out to Media Man where he tries to explain this concept that when you're trying to hold black men or men specifically responsible for women's behaviors and actions and how they're showing up in society without being allowed to be leaders. This is what it looks like to the left. No relationship situationships, baby mama issues, no responsibility. They got responsibility. She receives it. She accepts it. Now you get an actual relationship. One that includes both authority and responsibility. It is a package deal. How do we know it's a package deal? Because when pubic offender said, "I don't want the responsibility. I don't want to be a leader." Prove the point. If you want a man to be responsible, he has to have some varying level of authority. And if he's going to have that, does that apply to how you present yourself? Does that apply to how you carry yourself? How you speak? How you represent him and his children and family or is he just a placeholder for your bad decisions in contrast to what it was that you really wanted? Cuz I honestly don't think there's a whole host of women who's honestly running around. I know that their actions and their behaviors say one thing, but then they're not staying with the simps. That's plenty. A lot of them not sign up for pubic offender. Let's be honest, they're not because they know that they would be settling into a leadership role that they don't even want. But they've been conditioned to think that they can pick and choose what parts on the chart they want when it's actually a package deal and a medium man. And in this attempt to hold black men accountable for the behavior of black women, Dr. Umar often frames black women as if they are acting without guidance. Woo. I thought this was the emotionally intelligent, super educated uh uh woman's intuition. Just trust their leadership and all will work out. But then when problems arise, who gets the accountability and the blame? Implying that they lack judgment or accountability. Why are they choosing who they date then? Why are they even dating? Why are they having sex? Why are they engaging in so many of these things if the only one who gets blame and accountability is men? If that's the case, then who should get the authority in those things? Implying the lack of judgment or accountability while simultaneously placing the responsibility on black men to correct or govern that behavior rather than directly criticizing black women or women in general, which is what the panders do. They redirect the blame onto men. Y'all see how it works when it comes to feminization, gyocentrism? It doesn't matter what a woman does, says, behaves, or acts like. It is the consequence. It is the blame and is the fault of the men that failed her. So the group that wants to pride themselves on becoming more equal, more autonomous, more sexually liberated, wants the ability to still sherk the blame and responsibility onto someone else when they're the most liberated women that's ever existed in the history of humanity. Feminization not make it up. So for Sims, this is their approach. They have a slightly different strategy. Yes, they are indeed um the other side of the feminization coin. In a simp is a man who overinvests in a woman for validation, attention or hope of affection, often with no boundaries or a man that has a overestimated and elevated view of a woman above himself in status and relation. Key traits: leads with feelings over logic. Overgives time, money, reacts, and attention resources. Avoids conflict to keep approval. That's important because they're less likely to be honest with women about the things that they're doing that's hurting and harming the relationship and negatively changing how she's perceiving him because he's allowing it. Falls in love with potential but not the reality. Core motivation. If I show her I'm good enough, she'll choose me. Even if I wasn't her first, second, or third choice, I should be grateful for the honor, according to Action Jackson, to get with a woman that's overweight and older. I should be honored to end up with a woman who's bringing kids from another man to the table. I should be honored to be graced to deal with her bad attitude and wanting to struggle with who it is that gets to lead the relationship. They're operating from a place of scarcity, ladies and gentlemen. Attachment driven identity, internal wiring, validation. Self-worth is rooted selfworth is rooted in identity and it's outsourced to female approval. If she's happy, he feels valuable. If she withdraws, he spirals. Anxious attachment style. Fear of abandonment. Hyper attuned to her mood swings. Overcorrects to avoid rejection. Covert contract thinking if I do then she must give. Blah blah blah. It's not necessarily even manipulation as much as it is unspoken expectation. Core psychological drivers, emotional scarcity, believes opportunities with women are rare, and treats one woman like his only shot. Getting dominated in the bedroom, getting dominated in their homes, getting dominated in politics. Women are embarrassing them left and right as soon as they get on behind microphones. Scarcity. I got to tolerate it cuz you know how women are. You know how they be. Idealization loop projects fantasy on to her. Ignores the disqualifying traits for simps. Women aren't disqualified if if she if she wants to deal with you. They don't think about if they want to deal with her and whether or not there's things that she's do. They don't even talk that way about disqualifying traits. We going to get to uh FD who's now trying to clean up. FD Simplifier who's now trying to clean up and act like, "Oh, I guess there are some disqualifying traits." I mean, there's certain women that we know we shouldn't deal. Brother, don't wait 5 years to now start talking about the types of women because we we've been talking about this for years. Don't jump on the wave now. Good brother. Don't try to act like you're not who you said you are, that you aren't sing. Falls in love with the role and not a person. Conflict avoidant associates disagreement with loss and likely conditioned based on family upbringing, past rejection, keep the peace at all costs. So when we look at the two types, these are the consequences of feminization. This is how they move. This is how they're different. The simp is obviously operating more so out of emotional need. Self-awareness is fairly low. Boundaries are weak. Authenticity may be genuine but needy. The outcome often ends up being that they end up being used and drained. Whereas the panderer, their motivations are probably more strategic. Their self-aware awareness is probably medium to high. The boundaries are situational and flexible. Their authenticity, calculated, but often fake. And in terms of outcome, usually they get the benefits on the short term. Here's the uncomfortable truth that nobody wants to acknowledge. Women usually don't respect either. The women who have either of these individuals usually don't respect either. And this is how you end up like this. This is how you end up gentlemen with this because you can't respect truly a simp and definitely not a pander. Because when you don't check bad behavior and you reward it with relationships, when you reward it with kids, when you reward it with access to your resources for 18 years or life, how can they respect the man that they dominate? Dominate. Dominate. Jesus. The hidden connection that most people miss is that these aren't opposites. They're cousins. Both censor women in their decision-making. They lack internal grounding. They seek external outcomes. Love verse advantage. And the difference is is how they cope. For the simp I'll get more. I'll give more to be chosen. For the pander, I'll adapt more to win. And this is their prize. And this is their prize. Jesus. What the heck is going on happening in America? Unfortunately, there's a wakeup call that's happening as more and more men, thanks again, Media Man, for this. So more and more men are waking up and realizing they don't want this. And they're actually listening and not going off of simply how she looks, but how she thinks, what she's offering, and if it's actually matching what it is he's wanting and looking for. It turns out every pretty face is not a wife and every woman isn't worth pursuing. Now, some in the red pill space will advocate just, you know, recreational use only. I personally don't recommend that because I'm learning in hindsight that when you increase your body count, you increase your chances of being accused of something. You increase your chances of dealing with unhealthy or mentally unstable women. You increase your chances of getting a woman pregnant that you never wanted to actually wife up. There's a whole host of problems when you keep dealing with women that you've only reduced to their sexual anatomy. And if they're willing to offer that and accept that, I wonder what her reduced view of you might be like. Since she's not viewing you through the lens of a lifetime, lifelong option either. That's why she keeps offering and doing what she's doing. What won't she do? Huh? We are almost done, ladies and gentlemen. So, if you're currently still watching, please make sure you like this, share this, and um you know, uh share this with more people. Reality is, and this and I actually saw this today, and I'm so grateful that I found it. This was a comment in reference to the video earlier about the female violence increasing as women get more rights and equality in societies. It's unpopular to say, but in many ways, violence by women is just another part of women's autonomy. And if you don't acknowledge such acts by women, then that's exactly what you are denying. Yes, women's autonomy, as we are reminded, is the choice to be breadwinners, CEOs, world leaders, but so too it can be to be the choice of being violent, to be abusers, and to be bullies. And that's what autonomy is. The ability to choose. Simply put, women are human beings. Human beings who are, to quote Margaret Atwood, capable of the full range of saintly and demonic behaviors, including criminal ones. And the science finds this, too. This is why domestic violence rates are often going both ways. We all know that and often female initiated. Let's not even get into whether or not children and the elderly are are most safe around women versus in contrast to men. We all know that as society becomes more gender equal, violence against women decreases. But as far few know or even care to admit, as societies become more gender equal, partner violence by women actually increases to become roughly equal to that of men and factor in all the men that are not reporting. And we don't even get to just the physical violence. We can get to We just saw the Mount Rushmore of all the different ways that they can show up and dominate a man. Jesus, man. This is getting ugly. Let's get to the Let's get to the elephant, man. Because the brother, you know, bless his heart, man. But trying to pretend that he's not watching, trying to pretend that he's not paying attention, trying to pretend that he's not engaging. But now, little old me and my brand new 14-year-old 14-month channel and people with 500,000, 800,000, a million plus subscribers are reacting and responding. What's coming out of this old little channel? Little old me. I know an aunt that doesn't bother me. I'm not even going to pay attention to her. I wonder if they're worried that their audience may start to learn that these things are true. Compare what they're hearing on that end to what I'm saying now and see which one is more

reflecting their actual reality. Who's more likely to have women's best interest? A person or people who do couples counseling, who help women out of DV situations, who help people to restore their relationships and marriages, who got training to do it, or people who get paid to tell women what they want to hear, that had that sounds smart because they got a degree. "I'm an expert, ladies. Listen to me. Don't worry about my weight as a woman. Don't worry about my weight or my aesthetic as a man. I'm just telling you what you want to hear." Who's more qualified to talk into these spaces? I wonder. Lot of credentialism going on. Elitism. A lot of stuff happening, man. Not seeing the translation. Maybe one of these days I'm going just show screenshots blurring out the names of reviews from couples that were on the rocks and ended up making it where divorce was on the brink where wives initiated contact with made to become better wives to their men. I wonder who's more qualified. Let's take a look and see.

>> Address this sing allegation. Do I simp for black women?

>> Yes, I love black women. I don't like y'all [ __ ]. Uh, this is easy decision to make. Sorry.

The biggest factor in the change in dating dynamics that seems to be actively avoided or more accurately attacked by maner folks is the fact that women need men less today than they ever have. And they will need men less in the future. And if you pay attention to a lot of the undertones of Manosphere rhetoric, a significant portion of what they're saying is basically crying and whining over the fact that now that a woman can get a job, he has to take more showers and learn a skill and maybe read some books. Feminism did not create patriarchy. It only named it.

Let's talk about Kevin Samuels. In a way, Samuels, through his admittedly good presentation, incisive wit and tell it like it is church pastor persona, plus his good looks, managed to do something that I wouldn't have thought possible. He turned hundreds of thousands, if not a million black men and women into simps for antilack conservative talking points, something that nobody has been able to do to the level he did. It's been like one huge public L. It's embarrassing. I've had numerous dudes tell me that Samuels inspired them to be better. And like I want to hold space for that. And I'm sure that is real to a handful of those dudes. But Samuels didn't get a million and a half subscribers for his inspirational quotes. He didn't get a million and a half subscribers for the moments where he gave good advice to people. He got there because he embarrassed black women. If he didn't make fun of black women, you wouldn't know who he is. And most of his fan base wouldn't have cared. He'd be like the other thousands of well-dressed black men on YouTube offering fashion advice. And very few of them have over a million subscribers. And it deeply saddens me that this man was celebrated for this nonsense, for these regressive messages to black men and women that basically told us that we weren't good if we weren't aspiring to a way of life closer to whiteness as possible. I don't rock with anyone who says they're pro black, but they're prolackness comes with an application process. If you're not pro black man, pro black women, pro black ghetto, pro black queer, pro black trans, pro black children, pro black immigrant, pro black working class. If your blackness excludes black people in any form or fashion, then it's not pro black, it's antilack. And I'm rooting for everybody black except black Republicans. [ __ ] y'all. I don't [ __ ] with y'all.

Samuel suddenly passed away. >> Oh, it's very interesting to see the antilackness. Missandry and the lopsided approach to engaging in discussions about relationships in an environment with these women that are so much better and freer and have all these options that are simultaneously what is it? Schroingers feminists. It's very interesting. Unlike a lot of the people that's watching this right now, I actually had somebody that was in my wedding that I knew personally who actually called in to Kevin Simmons. We actually watch listened to listen to it. Conversation came and went was fine. Didn't go viral. But who were the people that were calling in? Women. And if so many women were feeling so disrespected, why were so many of them still signing up to call? And why was it that most of the women that called and acted like the woman that was in my wedding did conversation came and went. It was fairly reasonable and respectful. And it was only when she started to cross lines and was disrespectful or delusional, he was letting her know that she was delusional that when they didn't respond well to it, nine out of 10 times they would escalate and he would elevate and match their energy. And all the while these free autonomous beings are calling. I know if if I felt disrespected, if I felt like people really really disrespected and hated me, I don't know that I'd be calling into their platform to take the lashing on purpose and I got the freedom not to do so.

The test when it comes to individuals like FD Simplifier test like this, let's pay attention to this. If you can't read it, um, if you got your phone, you'll probably zoom in a lot more than I could zoom in here. I probably should have cropped it a little bit better, but in essence, he's apologizing for the misinformation in regards to temporarily not uh siding with Amber Herd sooner. And just like earlier in the video with the brick lady, another common tactic, the Simpsons and the panders when it comes to public discourse of how women are showing up is that when they recognize and realize that a woman was at fault, as long as she's not a Republican or a conservative, once they realize that, they go silent. But before they realize that, they tend to side with the woman more often than not. And if their audience lashes out enough, they'll put the tail between their legs. They'll run back out there and they'll side with the woman, even if she's the aggressor and even if she's did something outright disgusting, especially on the left, because they don't want to get too knocked down too far off the peg with those types of women. This also includes good and bad women too. People with good motivation and not the people who pride themselves on intersectionality and nuance and diversity tend to not separate this group very well of which women to believe in and which women to trust and which women to avoid and which women to stay and run away from.

Releasing a rush job review talking about all the types of women like Erica Vadu and this person's toxic. A brother, it's too late, my man. We we stats are there. Facts are there. You already said clearly of course I'm a sim. I hate you words. We don't. Which is why you're subservient to them and scared to come back out and point out all the times when you sided with women that were proven legally to be lying or outright abusive. But you had no retractions for that because your default position was to side with who or not wait for the evidence.

Feminization. A feminized environment means you won't understand when you're being disrespected and dehumanized and talked down to because you can't question a party that's doing that to you, that's racist to you, that's sexist to you, that doesn't even value you. you won't see it. And the worst part is that they'll think that they're so above everybody and they're they're at the bottom of the rung on on on the on the political aisle. They're at the bottom of the wrong in social dynamics. They're at the bottom of the rung in a gyocentric society and culture, especially in our community. And they'll get angry when men start pointing it out. But they'll act so big and bad and so above when the rage bait happens. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They going to pull up in the comments. Million plus subscribers. Nobody's falling for it, bro. The debate is there. But listen, brother. You ain't got to you ain't got to challenge the rookie. The rookie with the amazing stats. that's coming in with light speed that was watching and studying you and all of the the uh the panderers and the simps for years. How y'all move, your tactics, how you're affecting the dating market. At least y'all acknowledging it now. At least it's obvious. And at least men are starting to wake up and realize being a pander and a scent isn't worth my masculinity and my truth. It isn't worth the hundreds or thousands or millions of women that's listening to me and ending up alone because they bought into far leftist feminist talking points that's anti-men, anti-f family, anti-nuclear family and anti-male leadership. Jesus. Shocking that the men that don't want to be leaders, a lot of them actually aren't married. And a lot of the men that do want to be leaders and are are no longer signing up to pull from the pool of women as part of your market. It's perfect. Perfect. Won't blame black people for this. That's why we got to keep saving folks.

>> And black men have been emasculated in the Democratic party.

>> That's real. They don't see themselves. Because to lift up black women is beautiful. We should, but not at the expense of black men. We have achieved what we achieved so far in this country because we are together. And we can't pick up other people's bad habits. Now, white women may be able to leave a white man by the side of the road. Sisters can't do that. And the way that in this politics, the way the Democratic Party, the mothers of the movement and black women delivered and black women saved, black men do not vote much differently than black women. So don't do that. Probably need to change that now. We might have to change that now because it's not helping us. It's not working. Listen, brother, opportunity is there. But if you're going to step up, if you're going to challenge, if you're going to appear, perhaps you should start with the veterans that's been open to the communication for a while about the full effects of feminization of gyocentrism and modern feminism and the toxic components of what happens when women have the capacity to act just like men when they get access to power. Pandering and ignoring the worst traits in women is contributing to gender war to men feeling ostracized and men running to red pill space. It's fascinating, isn't it?

But then we got to get to a brother that's confusing. A brother that out of all the different examples that I have covered so far tonight that I would say is a little bit harder to nail down because at best I think he's inconsistent. And there's moments when he's spitting the truth and there's moments when it's like a man the pander the pander the pandering has returned. Let's check them out. Black men kind of get into the same bags as white women sometimes where we don't want to take accountability for our actions or the actions of our brothers.

>> Mhm.

>> You know what I'm saying? You you may not harass women. You may know how to take rejection. The majority of men that most women deal with do not.

>> Yeah.

>> And you are accountable for that as well. And it's perpetuated against us young to look at women as objects. you know, to look at women only through the lens of a sexual desire and not as the human being that they are. And when you understand how to deal with women on a human level, you understand how much women will enrich your life.

>> It's a privilege, bro. It's a privilege. You know what I'm saying? We we often disregard the power of our black women.

>> Um the the spiritual essence that they going to bring to things, the knowing, the seeing, you know what I'm saying? Let's just be honest.

>> You can call it pandering, but if I was up here caping for white women, you wouldn't even mention that word.

>> If I was up here caping for Hispanic women,

>> you wouldn't even call it pandering.

>> Only when we talk about this, only when we take

>> take pride and show love to black women do you call it pandering. Like the the the level of hatred that you have for women is a little alarming.

>> It's scary. M

>> we don't go for that [ __ ] Facts.

>> We don't go for the misogyny. We don't go to the for the homophobia. We don't go for the transphobia. We don't go for none of that [ __ ] Cuz that cuz that's not how you build community.

>> You don't build community by constantly excluding people. If you want a he woman haters club, say that. You have to stop listening to men who hate women but desire women for their sexual validation.

>> Black black women are lowhanging fruit for black men. Do we have to stop listening to men that have an unhealthy view, tolerance, hatred, or misandress understanding of men? Because if they had a full perspective of the full spectrum of human expression in men and women, it would be fairly balanced. And it's frustrating because out of all the people that I've covered so far, I've listened to enough of uh this gentleman's work, Deontay Kyle, to realize that he has moments when he kind of slips up, especially during live appearances where he kind of is pretty raw. And then other times when he's in his wheelhouse, in his space, bro, are they all the prize, man? Is it really an honor? Is it an honor, is it always an honor, ladies and gentlemen? That's all I want to know. Is it always an honor no matter what? Or is there some certain behaviors, actions, appearances, approaches, expressions that are not honorable, that are distasteful, that are disqualifying, and are probably going to increase your chances for being disappointed. That's what red pill is. for you to just see and use your eyeballs, use this thing up here and not elevate all women to honorable status when their behaviors and actions don't warrant that. That's the whole point of the red bill. Yes, there's definitely men that try to make certain prescriptions and I'm going to acknowledge it. A lot of the men as was shown today are accurate that there are men that do that. The proportion of men that do versus the proportion of men that's just more so reporting data and information and personal anecdotal experiences is not even close. But if your reference point is Andrew Tate and a handful of potential grifters that may legitimately hate women, by the way, but you're functioning in and operating in a gyocentric feminized environment where the women overwhelmingly are rocking with you. Chances are these type of discussions you're avoiding. you're avoiding is is is what we see on the screen. Who's who's behind the tickets for this? Who's buying tickets for these artists? Who's pushing and telling these women that that that that there's nothing to change? That it should be honor for us to drink their damn bath water? Who's telling us that no matter how they dress or how they show up or behave, it's an honor? Is it it's a privilege? It's special from political pandering to relationship pandering man. This the the racial lies forms of pandering man is sick. It's sick. And the worst part is that when you're being pandered to and you agree with it, you'll ignore the harmful things that they're doing and pushing. People calling everybody else sellouts and coons and being told you ain't black unless you vote for me. Hot sauce in a purse. Indian woman cooking collar greens in a god bathtub. And I relate with y'all because I can't read. And the sellouts and the people stuck on the plantation are the ones that seize this. Frustrating, man. It's frustrating. I actually think he's very smart and he knows better. He knows better. You do this much brainwashing, man. Now, you're going to start seeing this more and more and more. Women that don't realize that they've been sex zone or that they're disqualified until it's too late. The market is flipped and the women who had a monopoly on male attention in their respective jurisdictions, neighborhoods, and cities are now competing with women from all over the world. And many of them think that there is no competition that they're still saying that they're the prize. I have never found something to be a prize that gets ignored and left on shelves, keeps being returned to the store and depreciates over times in terms of more and more people wanting it. As men move away from the simpish pandering approach to interacting with women on social media and in person, more and more of these ladies are going to experience this. It's happening. These are the types of men that are going to be willing to sign up and be on the other end of your horrifically bad list of decisions. In the end, man, it's like they're lying. They're lying to women. They're lying about this space to a degree. They're being disingenuous. They can't steal man anything about half the stuff we're actually talking about. And in the end, man, we wind up with an environment like this.

>> Remember, women spend 80% of the money in this country. Women are more than half the v voting block in this country. Once women started taking over all the male spaces, they became and and now they're becoming the majority. So, it's getting worse. But how did we get here? I think once HR departments and um and just this whole shift from women into the workplace which people always go on is great. Yes, but there's also downsides. What are those downsides? Well, rather than everybody acting like well we used to have a frat house going on. Well, now it's become a kindergarten monastery. Okay. Everybody is a Karen now. So, and and women have been um I think what's happened is there's this there's like this idea that women should still be held as women. They're still privileged. So, they have their cake and eat it too. They've got we have this, you know, these are women. We have to treat them delicately, but at the same time, they're empowered. And with men, we still treat them exactly the same. Men are still supposed to be that same, you know, under the old contract that Myron Gaines talks about in his book, Women Deserve Less. A lot of people don't like Myron Gaines, but I do think the book he wrote, Women Deserve Less, has a lot of validity to it. I think what he says about dating and um and and women and men is a lot of it has a ring of truth and that is that the old contract is still enforced for men. Men are supposed to be providers. Men are still supposed to do all these things. I think the other thing that happened is politically we moved all those jobs overseas so men don't have any leverage anymore and we totally changed the millu of the United States to make it a more global one for those global elites who are into and I hate to you know it's it's totally political. I mean I can't say that the the right is that great but the truth is people on the left it's so indoctrinated that who are their voters? They're women. they're um they were minorities, but we're seeing, as we saw in the election, more and more minority men, black men voting on the right um because they know that the left doesn't like men and they're struggling now. The left is trying to put out there that, oh, we we want men back on, you know, when they saw how this election went with these silent male voters, they're trying to pull men back in with like, oh, you know, we we sort of like plating men, but you know, it's not true. there there's nothing there for men. In what way has is anyone on the left helping men like I mean traditional men now some men yes but tra men who are not even traditional just if you're a male and you are a straight male you are on on the left side of the spectrum are not going to get anywhere. It's very difficult. Which way to go? This is what I ultimately think is what the dating market has turned into. We've overly scrutinized and demonized men to the point of where we're questioning their ability to lead in any respect. And we've championed, celebrated, downplayed, or flat out ignored the worst aspects of what's happening on the female side. And now we're in an environment where men are expected to be traditional with women who have the capacity to act like animals, selfish ones at that. And the only ones that they seem to be able to conquer are bettas who want to be led and dominated, pandered, and and these ladies want to be pandered to. In the end, I don't I don't think the choice is that we only have to choose between these two options.

Final thoughts. The pander doesn't lose himself for women. He just never fully formed himself to begin with. A pander doesn't believe what he says. He believes in the result. The simp doesn't lead women. He submits to them. S isn't weak because he cares. He's weak because he abandons himself to be chosen. Both both are dangerous men. Look at the quality of the type of women. what's being reproduced when you elevate uh uh ego, suppress humility, remove shame, tell them they can have standards out the out the wazu. They are the table. They are the prize. They can sleep with the best men but can't lock them down. They're getting older to where even those men start not wanting them. They're having ch children with a majority of minority of men, some of which already have children with other women who they're also not in relationships with, but potentially not even in the lives of their children. And their leadership, their style, and their approach, when you remove men as much as possible, the outcomes are the worst. And the panderers, Simpson panders, I think are dangerous. I think I think perhaps it's time for us to warn and raise the warning signs about men that are continuing to build entire markets, lifestyles on keeping women stuck in an emotional loop of re receiving external validation and praise from him. Telling her everything that's wrong in her life is the result of men and not the types of men she's choosing. which includes the men she's overlooking. And that if she's not aware of or cares about men's needs, wants, and desires in any of the major domains, she could end up raising one of them that ends up resenting her. ends up demonizing and and and making the environment unsafe, dropping out and adding to the market the very thing that she's complaining about. And when they function not from a balanced lens, but from a gyocentric one, and when they surround themselves with feminized men that only tell them what they want to hear, actual masculinity, they don't know what to deal with. They'll try to attack it, disparage it, frame it as inherently sexist and inherently toxic and inherently this and inherently that. and all the while always siding with the women when a male is involved. Unless, of course, she's Republican or conservative. Of course, got to factor that in. I don't think these are only two options, gentlemen. And I don't think these are the only two options for women that actually want to see the dating market change. I don't see this as just a difference of opinion anymore. I actually see these men as somewhat dangerous to varying degrees with Deon probably being the least dangerous. Social media rewards pandering. Dating culture exposes singing something that the ladies are saying they want but they don't respect. And many of the men that are doing this one camera and behind the scenes, many men will fluctuate depending on the audience and women in front of them to appear in one of these two approaches to women. Same man, different strategy depending on how desperate he feels. And the goal isn't to be a simp or a pander. It's to be a man who's grounded, honest, and selective. Because the moment you stop performing for women and are truthful with them is the moment you actually start to see them not as someone that is supernaturally godlike and above criticism without flaws or things to manipulate or to conquer. You see them as human with all the capacity to do good and bad like any person living as if they aren't and don't have the capacity to be uh has created the environment that they are now complaining about. One where too many women have overinflated egos, unchecked pride, who never feel the need to apologize and have default justifications that blame all men for their sexual and relational past decisions. decision-making and are surrounded by men that pander and ignore this behavior, men that simp. It is in this context that as boys and men wake up from the effects of feminization and gyocentrism, they run to the only places where they are allowed to discuss and explore these things, the manosphere and repill because the panderers aren't acknowledging that this exists. They use the framing. That's how they frame all situations involving men versus women. That's all their talking points. Panderers and far-left women are the greatest form of marketing for why they have to make now multiple documentaries trying to squash this movement and are now trying to cover it on all these platforms that they try to suppress leading all the way up to 2024. Now, we can't get away from it. I thought this was irrelevant. I thought this was small. I thought this was was just a bunch of insults. No, no, no, no, no. A lot of the men that's complaining aren't men that don't have access to women. It's actually men that experience them and not their best qualities. Many of them. Some will become bitter and angry and see women as adversaries to avoid. Others as objects to possess, conquer or dominate, which what I would include, panders are semi-doing. But some will realize the truth and place standards and conditions on the women they choose to interact with. and and and and nothing women, panderers, simps, feminized males, hit piece documentaries or articles say will change that. The cat is out the bag. We can unsee what we've seen and the answer key is being shared in no documentary shaming or attempts to cancel or going to stop it. The endgame for me, true modern masculinity, the integrated man, the goal isn't either, is to become emotionally aware without overinvesting, honest without being naive, strategic without being fake, able to differentiate the types of women and men to build, connect, and be influenced by, and which ones to avoid. and men and a man with the options to responsibly exercise them with the right woman or women. This is what the panderers are setting you up for. This is how an integrated man should move in a marketing environment with women that may not understand or see his full humanity. The red pill manifest fair space I think for years now and and to a degree rightfully so has a segment a subculture of some men that truly do want to dominate men. They want to be pubic offender with his wife. They want to they they want they want that dynamic. They just want her in his position. Jesus. I think the days of trying to necessarily be overly controlling and dominating, like of course you got to lead, you got to have authority, but I think men are waking up that like either she's on your program or she's not. Either she respects you and sees the humanity in you and other men or she doesn't. Your social media is telling them. How you describe your past decisions tells them. who you follow and whose concerts you keep propping up and going to and who are you celebrating getting pregnant while they're still marrying or getting pregnant by mar men while they're still married. I think men are just starting to observe and pay attention now. That's all. And perhaps what they're realizing is that in the market that's now including a global market, westernized women with all their potential advantages are now coming with some major major setbacks and risk to a point where it's a legitimate discussion of whether or not a lot of them are going to end up having to just date other women, settle for simps, start dating down low men, being in relationship with down low men for the optics. This is the first generation of men to be honest with women about our thoughts and feelings and they hate us for it. That, my friends, is um my presentation this evening. And I hope it was helpful. I hope that You know, it was enough to at least get people to think and realize that perhaps the over demonization of men who aren't liberal, who aren't affeminate, who aren't identifying as feminists, who believes that there are some helpful components for why the patriarchy lasted. And it wasn't strictly through the lens of because men were just dominating, but because there potentially could have been certain things that would have prevented a lot of the issues that we're having now in culture and society. Instead, there's an environment that's so feminized that now women are convinced that men men that don't talk like these men are the ones that hate them. And the men that tell them everything they want to hear and literally acknowledge, sing, and pandering to them are telling them the truth and have their best interest at heart. H interesting. Mhm. I hope everybody um with this analysis uh and the pander to simp approaches in society and impact of feminization on these men and how they obviously are feminization and gyocentrism literally turns men or conditions blue pill men into basically choosing one of those two tracks to a degree. And I'm saying that there may be a third way where we don't have to ignore the bad behaviors in men. And we don't have to downplay or ignore the bad behaviors in women. We can be honest about both sexes. What both sexes are capable of when they're given too much power. And what does an approach where men can either lead, where we can have varying degrees of what leadership looks like and what capacities between both sides seems like a much more realistic option than trying to get the rest of the country to look like the damn black community. maybe wanting a nuclear family and a wife that, you know, or woman who doesn't show everything to social media and doesn't know the difference between how she's marketing herself to be a potential wife or or 304, maybe that's not too much to ask for. Is it okay to acknowledge that if black women are the least married, not getting engaged as much as they should, aren't getting a lot of global prospect, not all these millions of men or billions of men from all over the world checking in to try to identify and get with these women. Maybe telling them that all their issues and problems are just the result of racism and men isn't sufficient anymore. Maybe telling them that their degree means so that they're so much better than all the men that are actually their equivalent relationally. Maybe we can explain to them that's great for you and it could be great to build together, but that's not a trait that's going to make you necessarily super duper attractive. The difference between associates and a bachelors is like, oh, you were a two with that associates, but now that you got a bachelor's or masters, now you're eight or nine. That's not real. That's not real. And while they're thinking delusionally and their standards are going up and they get to act like this and they're shocked that their outcomes are what they are and the panderers are telling them it's just the men. I think there's a special place in hell for men that realize this and continue to do it anyway. Be fair or balanced. Or maybe you should kind of get out of this wheelhouse when it comes to talking about interexual dynamics, relationships, reunifying, trying to get people to come together. Do you actually like women or are you a pander that just likes the status and attention that you get from them? Do you actually love women and want to protect and lead them or you just want them around so they can lead you? Where is all the real men? now on the left. So guys, I hope that this was helpful. Um, feel free to clip it up, feel free to tag me. Um, all that I ask is that you guys share it and I'm very interested to see what the reaction and results are going to be as a result of this. So, let's see real quick um if there's any additional comments or super chats that I might have missed. and I'm going to close things out. Uh, appreciate you, brother. Growth Talk for the $4.99 just for the love. Thank you, good brother. Um, Diggy, appreciate you for the $5. The irony is I don't think these Yeah, man. Yeah, man. Uh, uh, this was obviously in relation to uh what's his name? The white boy, I can't remember. Dean uh Dean Withers. Uh, yeah, man. It's it's it's sad to see, bro. It's sad to see mimicking and acting like women to get them to pandering to them to get them to this is so grateful to not be a guy who had to do this before getting on a public platform, man. Cuz this is this is sad. Uh Barry Hamilton, thank you for the 199 Quebe needs needs his drones and plenty of them. Let me appreciate you again for the two bucks. It was an entanglement. Guys, if you enjoy this type of work, all that I ask, you know, between people being subscribers, liking and sharing, of course, with a few people is become a member. That's the easiest way to kind of show support and for me to kind of continue doing this for real. For real. Joe Buddton's vocal coach. Appreciate you're going to have to run this episode back. We'll see, man. Um, there's so many different things that I kind of want to cover uh very soon. And I want to go into detail about the perception I think of American women in contrast to a lot of women in other respective countries. And it's not that the women abroad aren't also strategic and don't also have motives and also want resources for men. But it seems like they at least understand many of the things that American women are conditioned to no longer bring to the table or no longer offer. Those women at least still offering. Then Michael Malice, appreciate you, good brother, for the super sticker and for the $5 as well. So, listen y'all. I literally did over three and a half hours. Um, I'm tired and I need to get something to eat. And, uh, I got a few shows lined up for the remainder of this week. And I think a lot of you already knew that I lost a family member yesterday. And, um, now more than ever, I think I'm motivated to live a life that I think he would be proud of in terms of wanting me to speak truth in this space to men and to women. have episodes where I talk about what men need to change, what we have problems with, what we need to brush up on, and who we need to disassociate ourselves with if men aren't getting their ish in order. And regardless of what's said and how it's framed, whether I'm critiquing women, men, political parties, the truth is the truth. Men and women aren't the same. Our dating prospects aren't the same. our windows of of primes are not often aligned. And um it seems like the people who are in denial of that, I would argue, are the ones that's hurting not only the community and and the country as a whole, I actually think that they're hurting women, hurting them. And I'm going to say this, but guys, I think you need to be careful in an environment where men are constantly demonized, where women's behavior is always excused, and you're not willing to vote or change any policies to kind of address that. What do you think men are capable of if society goes too long deciding to function in a feminized gyocentric way? It's just a thought. This may just be the warning. And if they start to realize that there's men that's contributing and responsible for why things are also as bad as they are. Be careful, gentlemen. I think you're playing a shortterm strategy with long-term outcomes. You may get to a point to where one of these guys that realizes a lot of your content that's pushing women to move in ways that aren't helpful to long-term relationships and keeping relationships and marriages together. I would hate to be the guy that's blamed for my wife or girlfriend being indoctrinated enough to disrespect me, abandon me, or destroy me after all that I've invested. Who wouldn't want to be that kind? Just a thought. So, listen y'all, thank you for your time. Uh, we'll see where this goes. All I ask is that you share it and let's uh let's see what this turns into. Thank you for your time. Thank you for checking out Ask a Brother podcast and uh I'll see y'all soon. Peace.