Transcription
I was trying to think of the way to I
was trying to think of the right way to
say what
happened because uh I don't buy the idea
that the revolution succeeding and that
uh bashard was
overthrown was forced from Power he was
top holder what have you I think that uh
he wasn't he wasn't taken down he was
let go by the people who who were
holding him up I think uh Russia uh
turkey Iran
uh obviously especially Russia and Iran
turkey no wasn't holding him up but
Russia and Iran were holding him up and
they decided to let him go and
China uh uh that's what happened he
wasn't he wasn't forced out of power by
the rebels he wasn't forced out of power
by the by the so-called Revolution he
was dropped when was the which which
sorry which which is is what makes
me also I I have a a a very different
feeling about it I think than than most
people
which is this could have happened a lot
sooner right uh what what held it back
was it Bashar trying to resist trying to
I think I think that I think that
actually uh I mean people will have
their their analysis and talk about how
Bashar made certain decisions about sort
of reconstituting his military and
corruption in Syria and then also Russia
being weakened by the Ukraine war and
blah blah blah I don't buy any of that I
don't think that any of that is the
reason I think that in fact
the I think that the the development of
bricks and the
uh
coalescing of the regional powers to a
particular uh Regional vision for the
for for the
region uh is what actually brought
bashar's uh regime to an end I said I
said at the time before Bashar was
deposed I mean I made that video and by
the time it was published he was already
out of Syria he already fled but when I
made the video I said that there was
still a way that Bashar could save
himself which was if he were to
genuflect to
Eran uh have a meeting with him and
discuss matters then there might might
be a way that he could uh uh retain
power he didn't do it there was a there
was an
arrangement that could have led him into
that direction right that that bricks
meeting that he there was show up yeah
well no there was a there was a
direction that he needed to go and he
didn't go that direction I think that
that the the direction that he needed to
go was uh to to show just like Iran has
understood I believe that Iran has
understood that they need to try to show
that they can be a team player and go
along with the regional
plan uh and they're trying to show that
they're willing to do that okay Russia
is Russia is wanting to do it China is
wanting to do it Saudi Arabia is wanting
to do it Egypt is wanting to do it uh
everyone is going obviously the a
national OC GFC are backing this plan it
seems to
me and Brits is backing this
plan now there was the uh uh brick
Summit in
Kazan last month I
think uh and Bashar was invited to
attend okay and Russia thought that he
was going to attain Russia was expecting
him and if he had gone to that meeting
he would have been able to meet with all
of the most important uh external
players that have something to do with
Syria we would have been able to meet
with Russians we would have been able to
meet with the Chinese we would have been
able to meet with Eran because Edan was
there uh he didn't go and it it signaled
I think to all of the people who decide
what happens in Syria it signaled to all
of the people that but is not going to
go along with the regional
plane uh and that was in my opinion the
point at which they decided
that uh they have to drop it the same
way that they decided that hasah has to
be dropped yeah and the same way that
they decided that Hamas has to be
dropped uh and that all of the militant
factions have to be dropped they also
decided that there's not a way to
resolve the conflict in Syria with bash
there because he's not going to go along
great so basically Iran just dropped him
I think yeah Iran dropped him and Russia
dropped him yeah they dropped him uh and
they did the right thing right but what
what makes me angry is that you could
have done that 10 years ago
uhhuh uh because that's that that's what
that's what happened and that's what was
always going to decide uh what happens
in Syria which is the agreement between
the external
cers it didn't happen 10 years ago it
happened now which just means that
countless numbers of people had to die
because of people believing that
their Rebellion is the thing that was
going to change
things I mean I'm not saying that it was
completely insignificant because had
there not been any sort of a rebellion
any sort of a civil war or what have you
uh then it would be difficult to
necessarily uh incentivize or motivate
Iran to drop in but I also think that
given the given all of the other
geopolitical and economic Dynamics at
clay uh frankly if you had
waited uh and Bricks took the course
that it has taken and the and the plan
for a a
regional cohesive future had proceeded
as it
has uh Bard would have been out anyway
but you say that it could have taken
taken taken place 10 years
ago are you saying that the rebels
delayed it or the decision
makers no I'm saying that I'm I'm saying
that believing that the armed rebellion
was ever going to win on its own Merit
ah yeah is you're wrong that's not what
happened at all that's not at all what
happened the fact that that like if they
if if Bashar had gone to the meeting in
Kazan I of course depending on how it
went
if he had gone to a meeting if he had
gone to the bricks meeting and uh uh and
understood the necessity of
him uh complying with the regional
vision and signed on to it then there
wouldn't have been a rebel offensive two
weeks ago that wouldn't have
happened if he had if he had said you
know I um uh
like because the result of him not going
to the meeting is the same as him going
to the meeting and saying the wrong
things right and not taking the right
position so it's it's kind of like
making him an offer he can't refuse you
either go along with what we're doing
and Iran is already going along with it
so you you should understand that if
Russia is going along with it and Iran
is going along with it you don't have a
choice he he knows that now yeah he
knows now that he never had a choice you
have to do with the external that's why
I said the only powers in Syria are
external Powers that's the only powers
that there are and the external Powers
always were going to be the ones to
decide what happened how this turned out
the external Powers were always going to
be the ones so I mean they could have
reached some sort of an
agreement before all these people had to
die and all this Devastation had to
happen MH but also but also I mean over
the course of the last 10 years America
has declined in its power and its reach
MH
uh and and that has been uh a key factor
as well because they
were uh they had the they they
instigated and perpetuated the Civil War
yeah the color Revolution the So-Cal
color
Revolution
uh I don't even know you can really call
it a color Revolution because color
revolutions typically are not are not
violent they're not a a a violent armed
overthrow okay but that's that's what
this was they turned it into a civil war
when it started as you could say it
started as a color
Revolution uh maybe they did start it as
a color Revolution although I think that
the the initial protests were genuine
okay but as usual what they do is hijack
genuine they hijack a genuine protest
movement radicalize it and in the case
of Syria they brought in weapons they
brought in arms they brought in
Mercenaries and
militias uh to turn it into what they
Jed
into but then you know o over the last
10 years they they uh
uh interest and ability to continue
doing
that uh Define so you
know it to have made the decision it's
not realistic to say that a decision or
an agreement could have been made to
drop Bashar 10 years ago
okay but it's an argument in favor of
not revolting yeah and having and
trusting in Allah tala to to
resolve and to bring matters to Justice
because had you done that the exact same
thing would have occurred okay so that's
exact same thing would have occur okay I
was trying to understand why why you
make that you know yeah I mean because
my point is that 10 years ago the
external Powers decided were were the
decision makers as to what was going to
happen in Syria 10 years later those
same players are the ones who decide
what will happen in Syria and and uh
they have pursued a
path uh according to a vision for the
region and they are pursuing that path
and they are getting all of their ducks
in a row mhm they're circling all the
wagons uh around this Regional
Vision uh and if Bashar alassad had
taken a a contrary position to that
Vision then the exact same thing would
have been the result yeah okay because
you would he was not driven out out of
power by the rebels period the rebels
are a factor that were being used by the
external Powers yes but the external
Powers could have done it without them
mhm and and in fact they basically did
yes because you didn't drive him out
yeah he was dropped yeah he was dropped
by the ones who were holding him up the
whole time the rebels just contributed
to the devastation and the
wreckage yeah well they created a lot of
opportunities for reconstruction which
the GCC appreciates yeah
the GCC will be the beneficiaries of
that
yeah so I mean I see it this I don't
think allaham it sort of depends
on uh whether the neocons in
Washington can be rained in or not and
whether or not they have actually
properly
learned uh that their age of dominance
in US politics is over whether they've
learned that or not this is the sole
Factor determining whether or not
uh Syria will be
stable uh under whatever new government
is form or whether they they will
continue to they'll try to Pi one Rebel
faction against another and turn it into
a a post Soviet Union
Afghanistan because I think that uh
uh you know either either either put
Rebel factions against another or just
create one just like Isis
send send one of
their you know
customade Islamic extremist groups to
Syria to make to make problems but I
mean you've got you've got the former Al
that was a
the
front the leader of that is now the
leader of this so you really have to
just grow a new one a new radical group
Isis is is more
now just the Isis is now basically the
security guards for the oil facilities
for America in
derz listen to the irony of
that that's what they're there for but I
think that America will pull out
personally I think that America will
pull out of Syria when Trump comes in
yeah so and we're waiting so long for
Trump to actually come into office it
feels like ages it feels like forever
since the since the election before this
guy's going to get in there's a big part
of me that just feels that it's not
going to happen of forboding yeah of
sorts and just to be clear I'm not I'm
not like not because I have I have hope
in Trump specifically but because of the
faction that he represents and I believe
that that faction that he represents is
on board with the regional Vision which
will bring stability to our lands yeah
and prosperity to our lands and an end
to extremist Zionist uhuh uh you
know brutality
and
Allah but it really is showing
also I don't know what you call them I
don't know if they're I don't know if
you can really call them liberals or if
you can really call them leftists but
there's some sort of a weird uh I don't
know what you call them International
marxists Global Marxist or something you
know uh who like the Vanessa bees of the
world and and and others who are not as
blatantly just propaganda mouthpieces
for Bashar
MH generally who fall on the side of
Iran yeah and heah uh and and who who
propagate their
propaganda as being these great Freedom
Fighters these wonderful Noble uh
Anti-Imperialist uh standing up to the
west and so
on uh I can't believe that they're
saying all of these things just because
they're ignorant I think that
they're uh that it's ideological with
them but now you're really
seeing uh very clearly how there's no
difference at all between them and
neocons there's no difference at all
between them and
colonizers because they're they're in
fact they're the only ones that I'm
seeing refer to the the the resistance
groups in Syria the current resistance
groups the ones the HTS as
jihadis okay
yeah yeah it's like a uhhuh
characterizing them as Islamic Islamic
extremists all right yeah and another
feature that I've seen in these uh
propagandist is their over overly over
concerned for all the shrines all the
Shia shrines
yeah yeah Christians they say the
Christians are not going safe in Syria
are not going safe in Syria that that
that now there's going to be sectarian
division violence and so forth right
like this is the this is the
colonizer
rationale for why we have to decide what
kind of a government you're going to
have because you can't be uh trusted
yeah that's the the religious minorities
in your country are not going to be safe
unless we set up a
system uh that that advantages them over
you and actually creates hostility that
never existed before between the the the
sects soall between the different
denominations or or different faiths or
different religions or whatever you
create a system the colonizers always
create a
system uh based on a
prediction with no historical
precedent of uh ethnic or religious or
tribal or
sectarian uh rivalry and violence and
hatred mhm it has no precedent yeah but
you're afraid that we that that that
we'll get along these natives are going
to fall into this their their their uh
inherent savagery so we have to put we
have to make it in Syria that the alwi
have to be in charge even though there
are my a minute sect they're a minute
sect on Earth and and a minute sect in
Syria so we have to make make sure that
they're in charge and that they get all
of the Privileges and all of the
benefits and all of the uh uh corruption
is is to their advantage and so on so
you create sectarianism
MH and now if the
majority is taking
over uh these these so-called
leftists again I don't know what you
really call them because then there then
there are so-called leftists who are
critical of Iran because of the hijab
and whatnot all right but uh the ones
who are who who I don't
know who consider themselves somehow the
uh the online version of chagar or
something uh they love they love they
love Hass right they love
uhan uh and they they they really either
buy into or try to sell the propaganda
of Iran being this great anti-western
power andah being this great resistance
movement that's the only one that cares
about Palestine yeah that that's the
like I like like like I said earlier
it's a common threat between all of them
you know and also again the amusing over
concern for all the precious shrines
yeah that has survived yeah by the way
there hundreds years of Muslim history
Muslim history who protected those
shrines in the first place you have
those shrines remaining today for you to
get scared about and concerned about
this is ridiculous you know exactly
exactly not fooling any thinking
person because again like I said it's
I'm very sorry to to
uh give the bad news to anyone who
believes all of this propaganda but uh
Iran the current regime in
Iran and
heah uh serve the interest of the
colonizers because their function and
their goal is destabilization and
Division and then when we when we talk
about the division and the and the and
the uh the sectarianism and the
disruption and the interference and the
and the instability that they
cause we get accused of
sectarianism because you're only
operating on sectarian basis yeah to
destabilize the Muslims yeah and then
when we point that
out you know we're not doing that to you
you know what I mean M the Muslims
aren't doing that to you we don't start
militant groups in your country MH to
try to make problems for you to try to
compete with the government we don't do
that to you we do that to us and when
you do that to us and we point it out
then you say we're being
sectarian but it's really they're really
showing their colors you know it's I
don't know what they're going to do now
because the last thing that they really
want is
stability uh in the region the last
thing that they want is for the Muslims
to actually
uh control their own
Affairs andah is going to become
extinct uh I I believe that the that the
regime in Iran like I said before the
regime in Iran is either going to be
toppled it's either going to be removed
or it is going to be forced to
capitulate to such an extent in terms of
how it operates that it will be
unrecognizable and according to and
according to uh the way that you all
have understood Iran to be you will be
required to uh denounce them as
sellouts because according to you they
will be sellouts according to us they
will finally stop being sellouts and
actually support Regional stability and
prosperity right if they're able to do
that I'm very
doubtful uh I'm very doubtful that
they'll be able to do it and I'm
doubtful that anyone is really willing
to give them the chance to do it because
there's so much uh
mistrust with the current regime with
the current regime yeah I mean obviously
Iran itself as an entity isn't going
anywhere yeah but but the regime uh has
has
completely
uh built itself on the basis of
sectarian uh division sectarian
animosity in within the region and
causing problems
yeah and posturing yeah that is if they
have if they are allowed to persist with
this religious Theocratic identity that
they cling on to right now yeah that
that is replaced by the old days of the
Sha and just cultural Iran yeah Iran
needs to be secular yeah that Iran needs
to be a secular government that's the
only way that they they need to be you
know like like NBS said that in his
vision the Middle East will be the new
Europe yeah Iran can be France sure Iran
should be cultural yeah the cultural
it's it's very cultural they very very
sophisticated people very oy people you
know Cuisine and whatnot yeah you know
Cinema you can be the you can be the
France of the Middle East uhhuh
uh you know Syria go goes back to its
old days of trading being the trading
Hub you know yeah yeah everything is
returning to its natural state I believe
and I believe that that by the time our
children are adults that's what it will
be and this this one something that
people need to understand when I'm
talking about when I'm making my sort of
forecast or predictions about what's
going to happen in the region I'm
thinking long time I'm not saying this
is going to be this time next year
everything's going to be grand no it's
going to be a bumpy
road but but it's it it will return to
what it always
was and we will see an end into
Israel and we'll we'll be able to look
back on all the things this is why this
is why again why I say when I when I do
analysis I start from the future looking
back at today to try to put it in the
context of the inevitable Muslim Victory
and and it it all makes perfect sense
when you put it in that context when you
understand it in a in a kind of a
retrospect how all of these things that
are happening now are building the steps
forward uh to to that goal yeah to that
to that goal to that achievement to that
ultimate objective yeah