Transcription
Palestine update 67, 1st of June 2025.
Over to you, professor.
Yeah. Well, the events—we'll come to the events—but the general perception in the West…did anyone say something? Okay. So we have significant change in intellectual status in the West, like Japan or like Scott and these who are commenting. Although they have relatively limited fellowship of 400,000, 4-500,000, half a million followers, but this is concerning the intellectual caliber compared to the shallowness of the general discourse in the West. Just to give an example: He had over half a million followers, most likely intellectual heavyweights, thinkers, university, and so on. But if you go, for example, to the site of Shakira, which—she's very skilled in shaking her her her butt—you get maybe 20 million, I think it's even more followers there. So show you the which which problem they have in the West, but also in the Muslim world, also. But in the West, it's even more more accentuated: the the the shallowness and the trivialization and the brainwashing of the public is unbelievable.
But now we have Scottita, we have I think Colonel Lawrence Wilkinson and others saying clearly about Israel that—it is said several months ago—about what is as a nation is a demonic nation. But now I think another one, I think is Wilson, said called it a satanic satanic movement and the satanic state. So we are getting really to more real moral judgment. Demonic means demonic could be evil or not evil. It could be yeah, like like something like a gin, but satanic is a gin which is evil. So that's that's really a breakthrough, and there's a general agreement between that this this entity is a is a entity. And not only in the time past, like six months ago it was always Netanyahu, the right wing, but now everyone mentioned the polls uh in in the entity in Israel, which shows that almost 80% approve what's happening in Gaza, the killing and so on, at establish regarded as okay and perfectify, no problem. Only 10, maybe 5%, are objecting to that social issue. It will come, and they say we are—America is is is a is a co-instigator, is corresponsible for genocide—and even some of them say we should call also Trump genocide donut genocide don, as they people have used to Biden Jon. So it's getting there; it did not reach yet the depth really of the Phil, which need really—I don't think maybe the Raza issue will be over, will be gone—maybe then the source sales sourcing and so on, soul searching will start and so on, or the people look deeper in themselves. The zest moving so on is the outcome of the West, the disease. The satanic attitude is the Western attitude. That's that's where it originates.
So it's not it's not even the Jews have have the predestination and and their their their talmudic interpretation, but that they are chosen people, that covenant is eternal, that they are liberty to exploit their enemies and to even use them as animals—that's in the Talmud, is is there—but that's inactive, cannot be activated. And most Jewish rabbis and so on, until the beginning of the '90s or end in the 18th century, were saying that's that's in the divine hand. This will be done by the Messiah when he comes, and he will bring enough miracles to show that we know this will never happen. It will be the—but of that—it's shifted to the future. Okay, no problem. So it's not activated. What has activated it is the satanic acceptance of such ideas as as they are in the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible by the so-called evangelical Christian who became Zionists. By the way, the issues with with this like amal and things like that—exterminating the others, fighter, men, women, children, babies, animals, donkeys, and exterminate everyone—is written back into the Hebrew Bible; that's in the Hebrew Bible, stated like that. So it's not only the Talmud; the Talmud did not bring something from so in the Hebrew Bible. And those who believe in the Bible to be—especially the the non-Catholic or the Catholic—are taking more like an allegorical standpoint, that's symbol to be symbolically interpreted and things like that, which does not save the day, but at least it saves them a little bit; they can be easily sucked into such extreme Zionist and and genocidal ideas and philosophies. But the Protestants did not have this safeguard. They have denounced the pope and the sh, and many of them say clearly the pope is the antichrist way. So they're not going to follow the allegorical way, and they're quite literalist. So they will regard that as permissible for is as the chosen people, and they believe also the covenant is eternal. But the problem is that these guys are active. They have the power in American time past, like in the 19th century, 18th century, they were the majority. So they shaped the fellowship, so they shaped the country. And when they got the power to do to work in the world, that has expressed itself.
Luckily, now the Zionist Christian are evangelical are really a minority, but they—not a small minority—but a third of the population, that's not really underestimated, significant, and they are staunchly organized and devoted. And the Zionist who are mostly atheist and European oriented and following a philosophy of nationalism—which obviously nationalism that was the philosophy and and and supreme subreist arian supremacy and so on—was really initiated and brid in Europe, where all these nationalistic movement, extreme patriotic movement and so on, initiated Germany and around her and master of the especially. So they adopted that. Most of them were atheists anyway, and they say okay, and and many of them are having a relation with the bankers with the Roshad and so on. We need—as Jews—and Jews were obviously marginalized in Europe, will never be really a leading class in Europe, will not be integrated in the in the elite, in the ruling elite. Maybe one will be there, one or two, because they gave loans to the king of England three centuries ago. It's just spotty situation, but we as a class, as intellectuals, as table people, we never learn. So we—the country of our own—and who is having no country which we can move them along the line are the Jews. So they—the Jews—as the right donkey essentially, the common Jews recognizing the Jews having these ideas but not activated, waiting for a Messiah, they say no, we activated now, we activate now. And those who are not willing to be activated, we cooperate with whatever extreme nationalists and so like the Nazis to prosecute them and kill them, so they would be forced to run to Palestine or whatever place we establish our state. They don't care about any other place, but no other place have the emotional attachment and so like Palestine or the holy land. So they settled that our state should be in the holy land. It can't be in Uganda or in South America. These ideas have been discussed in the 19th century. Yes. But they were not attractive enough. You can't move the Jews to go there. So they said on Palestine, not because they pal believe anything at all. There's even a joke that Benorian said, I don't believe that God exists. He said that almost—I don't believe there's God. I don't believe in God. But God promised us this land, and he swed with his eye, meaning who know how to f the commist and the minded people. That's been gor was an atheist who was a leftist, the socialist. So that's that's that level of self scrutiny and self analysis in the West. We are not getting there; most likely we get there only if the major wars and they really the life standard sinks, and we have then civil wars, we have America spittling in sub countries and something like a civil war here, something dramatic. Only such a calamity will move the people to think deeper about themselves and about destiny, as may move—not necessary; it can happen—so, but we are on the way there. So until now, some people start say, actually, what did on, yeah, maybe they attack civilian, that's not good, all the is fabrication, but they—the attack against Israel's military—is legible because occupation force, so they have the right to attack. So they are coming to that conclusion which is established by international law and by the decision of ICG anyway. So there people are getting there, the intellectual, the opinion maker, but not the one in the the American Congress and the one in the ruling elite in America yet, or even in Britain or France, not yet, because represent the big financial interest and so on. And for them, God given—not given—that's not—we need control, we need to control uh the the trading rules, we need to control the oil field, we need to control the minerals and so on, we have to control it, it's that we can trade with the other soul equips. No, no, that's doesn't work. They will be forced to do it one day by by the on the edge of the sword. But without the edge of the sword, they will regard themselves as superior. They're the superior race. They are the wasps, and everyone else has to accept the leadership. They are the chosen people. So we did not reach that yet. That's for the intellectual. But I noticed that really this week many commentators are really getting to that level. All many of them admit that all attacking civilians did allegedly on is not—we we we we condemn that—but many most of them say that's is fabrication anyway. The attack is also legitimate simply because uh because is an occupation force. So this becomes now in the general discourse, and the governments and the regimes and the agents of of big capital of the oligarchy are now cornered, and they try to they try to spin the matter and play again.
You may have noticed that the BBC is starting to cover what's going on in Palestine a little bit much more than time past. Until two, three weeks ago there was no coverage, nothing. Recent scandals about the so-called solution of of humanitarian aid which has become a disaster—first one, second one, even the one today is also a disaster—there was shooting and killing, and the Israelis have groomed some gangster and some thugs of and some uh big big trader and business who are also traitors so that they can steal the goods and claim this is Hamas. So they show pictures of the stealing of armed gangs. They don't interfere obviously, although they see that they shoot shoot some pictures and claim, oh, this Hamas stealing the the goods and try to spin that, but that spinning seems to be a fail. It's not going to work. It definitely is not going to work. But for few days they can play that game. So that spinning which sometimes took for them took to be exposed like six months, 10 months, one year, is now being exposed the next week, essentially even today that's happening, and they daily—they killed 10, 15, 20, 40 and so on—but all witness statements and so on and all United Nations represented there and all even western diplomats there, they are having one witness statement clearly that the iss are deliberately targeting civilian, killing them and starving them, and these are all war crimes and also part of a genocide, the way genocides are coming down almost everywhere. So that's concerning the media and the coverage which is has it own significance, cannot be under under, but is not getting there yet to where it should belongs to make a real change on a civilizational level, but it will come. That's number one.
Concerning the various events and what's happening, um, it's quite confusing and uh it is very difficult to distinguish but what's true and we being bluffed and so on. For example, concerning Yemen, everything is clear. The campaign is continuing. The Americans have given up. Actually, the uh the harman is back to uh to the page. I think it's it base is in the eastern uh in the Atlantic, in the eastern United States of America. Uh so it's back to the base, and and there are photos of the planes departing the the aircraft carrier and going to to land bases for defation and maintenance and things like that. So this clearly has—and it seems to me there's no American ships fighting ships in the in the sea—and I think also in in the Arabian Sea, the the was it Crown Vincent, the Crown Vincent, I think is back to the Pacific. This one did not was not engaging for a long time. So this one is still on battle station around Taiwan and between Taiwan and Guam and all these areas, not going yet to to Long Beach and and and Los Angeles and San Diego, and these are not yet where the base is there for the Pacific, the home base. So that's that's true. They are they have given that up; they are defeated. And Yemen are still fighting; sending most of these missile have been intercepted. There was a recent announcement which must be terrifying for is that they have now a new missile—I think I don't know what's the name, maybe—but will be called Palestine 3, is an hypersonic, but it has multiple warheads. So that one, if it comes close and warheads are scattered, that will be catastrophic. Intercepting scattered warhead—maybe 10, 15, or maybe more uh sub subheads. Each one is maneuverable. This is very catastrophic. Intercepting will be of extreme difficulty. And if one or two just go through and cause even a small fire in a building, this will undermine the confidence of the is public and motivate many people to start packing their language, and that's one of the intentions. So that's the side concerning what's happening in Lebanon.
There are confusing signals definitely in the last election for municipal elections in the southbah with they have they have like a coalition; they won essentially all seats; they they outrone any, which means that the public is supporting for the—no doubt about that—that gave them some encouragement, no doubt, that—but there's a an isi story being told now; it could be fabricated. But it may have a core of truth is that that has been essentially disarmed is south of the the Lebanese army together with Isra was capable of disarming and weakening considerably; essentially become ineffective. And northern of the have some assets, but 70% is gone. I think it's exaggerated. I think this exaggerated as usual is lies by five to 10. But if 20% is gone, that's extremely painful and worrism. But the Muslim and most dangerous story they are telling which is possibly only a bluff and part of psychological warfare is that they claim that Hezbollah could not use some of the heavy rockets. They never use it even in the last part of the campaign before they were attacked by Israel because these are uh cannot be used in unless you have the necessary encryption encryption keys to to ignite them at startup, and Iran refused to hand them the keys. Now this sounds quite outlandish, but if it's true, it exposes Iran, and it's catastrophic. If it's not true, then clear the intention of the is clear to make a wedge between Iran and isah and alienate the public there from Iran and Iran from the public and expose Iran. And I am inclined to regard that to the most part as as as being a bluff and and being just spinning a story. Although you can't prove that some special rockets with high effectivity with heavy warheads like in the ton range and so on may have been prevented from launching by encryption, some few which is not not even the way, not even 1% of—but if that's true, that would be would be exposing Iran really and destroying its reputation and in all Shia organization around the—They obviously they will deny and so on. But enough information will come day on day to to—but these ransoms also have another effect beside between the leaders leadership and their their rank and fight because many of—how come the brigades and regiments did not persuade at all, and they just got killed in their in their bankers and so on. They originally designed and trained to invade northern Isra, exact like did, and if they done that in the right time, is would be fighting them in Tel A, not fighting them inside. Where are they going? How come that they are got eliminated or a good fraction of them getting eliminated? That will be really a wedge between the leadership and the rank and fight. But also spinning that story this way would encourage at the time the Christian fangist—this is a fascist group modeled after group—and also the group of I don't know what of—encourage them to come forward and show teeth and work arrogantly. This way they may be encouraged to start some activity against and then initiate a civil war. Does is want a civil only by all means. Does will they succeed in defeating and most likely not—just lead most likely to destruction and defeat of the Christians. Does is welcome that by all means; they would have to destroy everyone—Christian and Muslims and everyone—that's then they receive an empty country, the great news for them. The do not care about Christian; actually they had Christian more than they had Muslims anyway; they got Christian and arc anymore, and they are happy to use them in any occasion. So it has it has various purposes, but question who will will accept that and who will believe it and act upon it. Most likely these stupid and theist and family they are sufficiently idiotic and and dimwitted that they will they will swallow the bait and they will get themselves in trouble.
And it seems to be also that the current president and his his security council security council are going really into into a dangerous road because the recent recent meeting of security council and some minister and so on to look at the issue of of of disarming the Palestinian camps, but there's plenty of refugee camp there, starting with the Palestinian what the older—All the people visit there were only Christian, but this is not how Lebanon is structured. At least some Muslims—even even if they are traitors—should be there to to to appear nominally multicultural, multi-religious and so on, even he doesn't care about that. So the situation may develop into a dangerous direction and uh so he's playing this card. They succeeded in playing the card with with the with the Drews and split their ranks, and quite a substantial number and important faction of the Dus are already migrated towards Israel, waiting to come back and liberate their own country etc. they living in the dream web also still. So that's that's one uh what's developing there concerning the recent ceasefire suggestion of of is—this is was a mockery of same human beings, and Hamas studied for a long time, and they make the counter proposal; it seemed to be all that has failed because uh and the counter proposal is very accommodating; it's not ending the war forever; it's just five or seven years ceasefire, all forces out, unlimited uh humanitarian aid, and even the management in in Raza would be after that given to Abra to to a committee of of technocrats to no Hamas, but obviously the Israelis and America know all technocrats, so he's playing the game quite well and still tweeted saying the answer of Hamas is not acceptable. And this means we will have no resolution; will continue situation continue as it is; the war will continue. I don't think I don't think we can expect anything from this in in the—
The most interesting what's on going on at the moment really in the last week and the coming week possibly in the coming week is that the situation with the with the Iran negotiation as as I said several times—Iran has they have seen that Iran is a low step and they're stepping over it and pushing it back more and more and more, and it seems to be they are willing to go more and more back. So now it's not America now. I think it's the British and the oligarchy, the banking oligarchy, the globalization oligarchy. They moved uh because they have sufficient weight in the international atomic atomic energy commission. Uh in that one is I think it's is it in Geneva or it is in Switzerland or it is in in Austria? I think it's maybe it's in Geneva. Anywhere it is doesn't matter. They have more voices and more representative than America. Obviously, America have one or two representative. Britain has one, France have one, and the British are the one the master of English. So, they come now with a with so-called intelligence reports claiming it's coming from the from some sources. They claim it's from the Austrian intelligence. You cannot make that up since the Australian intelligence is so deeply penetrating more than the CIA and is most likely from—they claim they have intelligence that—and also the international the international energy international atomic energy commission uh they claim that during the the time Iran is continue enriching, they have reached now 400 kilogram, 400—they give them 409 point something very accurate kilogram of 60% uh enrich uranium. This means if you want to continue to 100%, meaning if you want 6 just as approximation, you don't need to go to 100; 90 would be enough great, but the higher is the better, then you have a a smaller amount of critical mass; this mean 6 time 4 400 say
6,240 uh, kilogram you can make from that quickly, in a few days, and 5 days maybe uh, 240 kilogram. And assuming that for a standard good nuclear device, uranium, uranium 235 nuclear device, you need something like 20 to 25 kilogram, that's enough for 10 uh, nuclear devices. Actually, you need much less; I think 10 kg is enough, most likely. So you can easily make uh, make 20 plus nuclear devices from that. You can make more small bombs, but the problem making small logs is much more difficult and it will be a waste, waste for for your, so it will be it will be something like the size of the Hiroshima and things like that, and that's quite easy to make and and they claim also they made some nuclear tests and so on with small devices, very small devices, so that way cannot be detected.
And essentially the explosive, because of uranium, all what you need is just to have two pieces of viranium, obviously, like a probably the side and the explosive sh, and you push one into the other. One is hollow and the other is like an arrow, with if the exploded charge is showing properly and ignited properly, then this come with extremely high speed and go all the way internally, and when it's reach the maximum enter the the this mass become critical and then you have the nuclear explosion starts, the m start, it becomes a sh action and you build all the uranium essentially if you design properly as well, especially case probably and so on. So um, that's quite the design is quite trivial. All what you need is to design the device and do measurements with without know without uranium and see what would which which speed is achieved and so on, and then you can do that calculation. So you don't need really for the uranium uh new you don't need to do a test; what you need to what have was needed in time past to be tested first to make sure it works is the plutonium very like board which is subcritical, but you make it critical by explosive around it to distribute it properly and it sit at the same time with high precision, so it collapses in itself and in the enter the density become three times than the usual density without explosion without which let's say the density of plutonium is quite high, let's say it's 20, I think it's less than 20, uranium is about 18 or 20 g per cub cm, but the plutonium is but plutonium is soft, can be compressed, so it will compressed until let's say the density is 15, someone can check it in any book, this is public knowledge, and it increases three times, it becomes 45. Then the small amount which is itself not critical becomes now critical in the center and the sha action starts.
This is so tricky that you have to test it really to see it works or calculation, you cannot rely on calculation. Now people can do the measurements. So on the equations are well known as things are advanced. You don't need real testing with plutonium. You can design the device, get ready the way to get the plutonium ball manufactured properly. It has to be near perfection and so on. But that's all feasible. That's a standard old fashion technology. But the first time in the in history that America needed to do a test. And this is the so-called test. The one tested in in Los Alamos, near Los Alamos, was a plutonium bomb. That one was tested. The uranium one, I think the plutonium bomb was tested. They have two plutonium. One was tested and one was I think was was dropped on either Nazaki or on the other city. Let's say the plutonium was the plutonium one which was the very big boy they called fat boy. The fat boy, I think it was on the jazak or was it Firoima, whatever, let's say just for a case we can shake it easily, the other one the other city was a Iranian one that was not test, they just calculated before and then it was a long one they call called I think they called it long man, long man did not need to be tested, you can calculate in advance and the technique of making making like like a barrel of of a of a gun and shooting that's well established centuries or hundred hundreds of years before and even decades before I pre you just take the information there and just calculate according and both work.
So it already works, the first test it say calculation proven say, but it needed to be tested because you cannot trust really with this very intricate mechanism that it will work for the uranium, no need for testing, calculation is easy, all what you need is probability of making a gun like the usual guns of tanks and how and if you have this industrial capability which is almost everyone in the world has and you make it properly and shoot the amount it's two piece probably and the exclusive amount sufficiently good to push it at the necessary speed until it gets deep enough. With sufficient speed will become critical at the end point and then the rest will be taken care of of the nuclear reaction which is extremely fast goes into one over 100 million or 1 billion second. You don't need to worry about that after that. Everything is over. So, so they say they have tested and so on and they maybe they have already weapons and all is drumming the drums and all the obviously the the new cons and and the pro-Israeli and all the people around Trump are pro-Israeli are drumming the drum. Why they negotiating with you? They are fooling you. They're playing that trying to play with the ego of Trump. They negotiate with you just to gain time etc. And they are never going to get to stop it. And now we have to do some military action.
And on the other hand, Trump said several times that enrichment is a red line. It has to be zero. And until now, Iran has stated always continuously that enrichment uh, there must be enrichment in the country. They cannot rely on someone else enriching for them and giving to them. The maximum they can offer is that to make a consortium between them, Saudi Arabia and Emirati, try to get Saudi Arabia and give them open their appetite for this uh, and that would be most likely located in Iran and maybe a branch in Saudi Arabia and so that you have some sweet now. So they will cooperate, that's the maximum until now. Now will the drumming and the pressure the incre increment of pressure uh, push them further back? Their behavior until now has shown that they are reasonably pushed back. No doubt about that. They didn't show the firmness and the strength and the characteristic and the courage to stand because the only way to deal with a bully like state of America as a country and the government and Trump specifically, sorry to say that, but the only way to deal with the school bully is to kick him with your knee in the balls, but kick gently because if you kick too hard you may kill him; it gently then he will veer clear from you with the rest of you stay in the school, that's the only way to deal with bully, if you step back he will come closer, if he step back he will come closer, there's no way, that's the nature of bullies is that well known, luckily in the case, but the problem is that Iranian they could could not develop this mentality, they missed a chance in what's so called true promise one and two, promise two and true promise three is still suspended until now, nobody know when it will ever come, so this is essentially a shock and the other side say how we analyze that, how we tab that is that wisdom is that courage is that diplomacy or is it fear, the standard interpretation is the other side is afraid of us and Trump tend to make that because he himself is a coward internally, that's the reason he's a bully, usually the bully is having an internal weakness which is covering up by arrogance and bullying, that that's it, if you IC psychology you all know that the one who is arrogant and and appear to be self assertive and bullying is you the one who has deeply inside some kind of weakness, so Trump has this additional he has an inflated ego to the level I don't think it's narcissism they talk most people say narcissistic, no he's actually ego maniac, ego maniac it's dangerously level but this is also covering us some deep deep, so he's internally weak but he's trying to appear strong and bullying and he's ignorant. No doubt he's he doesn't know what's going on in the world. His ignorance is is shocking and this all these encouraging the people around him to do things behind his back. For example, the attack against Putin helicopter. He seems to be unaware about it. That's what he said anyway. Although later on he made a tweet which does not show that he did, but most of people told him if you say about the people think that you things are done without your permission and things like that you have to cover up so they play with his psychology. I think it's better but I think he's they do things behind his back without his knowledge because they recognize these characterist character problems with him.
Luckily he is he not a man of peace but he doesn't like wars, he especially he's afraid of nuclear war, that's good, that's the only good aspect in the world despite the way, so if things come to the level of war which is destructed by nuclear war he is shocked and and steps back, he's afraid, you call it sensibility, you call it reasonability, you call it call it whatever you, but this is the only light at the end of the tunnel. If it gets to the level of real war or a war with the United States can can lose than like in Yemen like he has always condemned the war in Afghanistan by the way in the early century. Not not that he arranged for the withdrawal from Afghanistan later. No no, he said from the beginning we should not have gone to Afghanistan. The same invading Iraq. He was always against this. I think America should use its economic muscles, its financial muscles. No need to go to wars. Just keep the military ready to terrify everyone into fear and submission. Bully the people by strength. But I never had a deepility of attack and so that may be a question. Do the people in Iran recognize that? The problem is very difficult to recognize if yourself weak inside. If you lack the courage, the only thing in your mind if you assume they that the main main policy maker are sincere and not just concerned about power and their own position, let's assume they are sincere, they in some sense they are patriotic or nationalistic, leave the Islamic aspect, I think this has been explored, they are not motivated by an Islamic aspect maybe the in some kind of a mythical way for the or someone from in a tunnel or somewhere that's all mythical, does does not work in politics, but he has no concept of how how it really is Islamic politics and confronting the kufur should be and what the red line and he himself admitted that he will now consult the Quran to see how God and I commented on that, now you are waking up to comment consult the Quran, what happened to the 30 40 years past and you are the the leader of the revolution you never consult the Quran all the time what we are consulting marks maybe or some some western educated diplomas and are you doctoring the consultation you need, they will never think in that way in that direction, but I mean the other one the president is most like a good man in himself but he he's a surgeon, he should have stuck to his surgical hold, he doesn't fit in politics, he's not qualified to do that honestly with the whole respect, assuming he's a sincere man or he is to be simple minded goodhearted man but that's it.
But people around him like Zarif and so on. They are very sophisticated agents. I wouldn't you put behind them that they don't they do not mind to go back back back until until even the regime collapses and they then go their their way which is most likely some kind of a nationalistic area regime even inviting the the son of the sha to become a nominal head of state and things like that. I wouldn't be put it behind them and I I I I don't I don't trust them. I don't trust them at all. But whatever it is, there's one variable. We still of some importance there is that we have the revolutionary guard sufficiently power and capable. But the problem and has control of the missiles and the rockets and these deep underground facilities out of nuclear program. The question is the leadership there capable of taking metal in their hand if things become very hot because the so-called civilian wing, not the president but the vice president the advisor the minister and so on these guys are most likely gone, they are ready to give everything up they think if this way we'll get sanctions lifted we'll get the people the bread will end we will have some economic progress and everything is peaceful and we have served Iran and the way it should be served according to secular mindset and that's it what they at best striving for and we keep the power that's it, they don't care about Palestine, they don't keep even about Shia everywhere and they never about and and let it down they let it down definitely clearly when was being hammered Iran could have stepped and done something similar and they never did anything. So it's very clear we don't need we don't need even to believe the Israeli stories that that could not use set of rockets because they they didn't have the encryption keys, we don't need even that but the let down is very clear which which form it has taken various forms, so that's now the only thing which which we have to watch carefully.
Next week Raza will continue as it is will be continuous international condemnation, pressure will be increasing everywhere, public pressure. Even was it yesterday or today? I think it was yesterday when Paris San German won for the first time the European Cup, the people supporting the the club took that opportunity to make a demonstration for last time most likely Algeria but also other fresh and they have they have caused because the government and the police major grief, they attack the police and police in the run the s and picture like that. So the public public pressure is increasing. So but is not enough to have any really resolution in the next week. Next week we may have some resolution of the of the nuclear issue because I think uh, I ali is scheduled to talk on Wednesday. I don't know which case it is but he his talk on Wednesday and it's almost certain that he will address that maybe he will address the issue of uh, the tracker strike and tracker strike is happening because of the following reason that most more trucks run on diesel and the diesel prices are are supported and has granted them a reasonable income and livelihood. So they were relatively happy. But then someone in the government, not from the anybody else, someone in the government said these low prices which we are we are supporting, the government is supporting uh, are encouraging that some of the diesel will be smuggled outside the country and sold to the national common prices outside and we should stop that. The way he when the intelligently solve that is by lifting this support for the for and the price increase threefold and then the trucker cannot make any living this way. So they went on strike, question this guy who or the the ministry or whatever authority in the government who did that, they did really in good faith that they want to protect the country with and prevent smuggling or they did it mischievously and deliberately to cause internal problems for the regime for the mas, I keep the question open, these people cannot be trusted, maybe kami will address the issue on Wednesday and say no no we retain that. Because the track the tracker strike seems to be now spreading almost in every major city in Iran and the tracker are very important for supplies getting things from the villages to the cities from the storage but if the tracker strike then we we may have a beginning of a of a nasty nasty anti- regime movement so they have to manage that somehow, but anyway manage it or not managing honestly myself I don't care. I don't care if the regime stays or collapses. From human perspective, I wish that the revolutionary god will take matter in their hand and hammer that's from a human perspective. But we don't know what Allah has decided or decision is still suspended. We know that suspend his decision obser but they already decided that Iran doesn't deserve to continue existing because they have caused so many problems and so many failure they don't deserve to continue and they should disappear that's their punishment it may be we don't know Allah is compulsive so all that we can say like the usual Arabic word oh Allah manage for us because we are bad in management that's all that we can say at the moment but for perspective I wouldn't mind if the regime goes because if the regime goes yes they will be apparently the other side will be jubilant and start moving but this will be there and you will see this will backfire against them badly like backfired against them they thought is now weak after the demonstrations of the Arab string and so on we can eat him alive and so on and that's how it cooperated with Houthi initially against they have valid grievances. Then they turned with against the Houthies and then they engineered their own downfall in Yemen and they are in downfall in Yemen. Yemen could have both done for longer if they have listened to advice. But they were still starting to walk really in in diplomacy and so on. And they listen to Iranian advice in that collapsing the regime, break the America, they will invade the Arab peninsula, endanger everyone and they believe this fairy tales. All the result they are still now causing problems and they may cause problem in the near future almost certainly. But now I think the army has has graduated after that and they know they know how to balance things cautiously and nicely and whom whom to target and whom to leave for the moment. So, so even if if if you see which appear to be like like an asset taking all circumstance from human point of view, you see that collapsing, you think, oh my goodness, we are have been weakened. The Muslim world is now under under siege and about to be defeated. That may be that one which will bring the resolution. But let's wait and see. Let's wait and see. So that's that's the summary.
So this week will be quite crucial because uh, the attempt to postpone things and draw things in the length which the Iranian played relatively well is being cut short by by the mean Britain uh, directing and guiding of France and so on and they becoming recently quite active and quite aggressive. For example, the some of uh British fighters, I think typhoons have been spotted flying, not spotted, they they flow such a way that the viewer can see them carrying under their under their belly uh bombs which is clearly it can be seen that these are nuclear device, nuclear bombs. Why? Just to demonstrate we have them. We know that so so for that is a signal just to show we are here don't don't think we are out completely, it's a hint we are here and we are active and they're moving the French and moving the the German possibly to their own demise, they fighting fight fast they used to fight until the last French soldier now we fight until the last French German and American and soldier if they can and they may be able because Trump is dumb. He's still stuck. He thinks can get the money. But with the money he got from the Gulf, he said I got several trillions. What we what we lost in in Ukraine is only 300 400 billions. We have covered that already. No problem. So it can't go. He may take for can go. But they they will spin it. The British will and the oligarchy will spin in such a way that he got stuck and the people around him are not not honest. Most of them are not honest and then drag him in situation which cannot be fixed. It's very interesting. No, this will all not work out next week. It will take longer. But next week we'll see what says and and if he says something firm then expect an um clear is attack or attempt to drag American attack because in that case they will tell you you see your red line has been violated. They they're not giving up investment and we have the report of the of the international energy and energy nuclear energy commission. We have all of this on the table. Now it's the time to strike. You cannot delay it. They can have always for five days now according to these leaked quote unquote legal documents and they can
Drag him, and because of his inflated ego and his stupidity, he can be directed, and then you would see things which you never expected. But let's wait and see; let's get surprised. Let's get surprised. Okay.
Um, continuing on from that, what you said so far in terms, um, in terms of Iran and being a failed entity—I mean, no doubt, in Islamic terms, for Iran internally, they may have achieved considerable development in the Islamization, even considerable progress in certain areas. They are dealing in the world in their own technology; they are selling it to Russia, and Russia is adopting and further developing it. They have in rocket technology and hypersonic—I think that's good or even better than Russia—in certain areas of medicine. Like most medical medication, they produce better medication and cheaper than America. In areas of stem cell, they're number one in the world, so they have considerable advancement. The economic situation of the people, obviously, with the hammer—that's the people are suffering and so on—is exaggerated. The economic situation is bad, but not extremely bad. The people are doing fine; they have their income, they have their bread, they have their basic living reasonably and so on. It's not that extremely bad. But the sanctions are definitely biting. They could have been much better without sanctions, no doubt about that. But not—not so—there's no comparison, for example, they achieved in 40 years with the failure of the Egyptian state. This state is a catastrophic failure. Only recently, the military feudalism—because Egypt is a military feudalism—is not a dictatorship of a single man; no, the man is just a front end, and they left him in place while the generals are dividing the economy of the country. Sixty percent of the economy of the country is in their hand; they're dividing it between themselves with the justification that we have to keep the army strong, we have to defend Egypt, and we have to be cautiously watching Islam. But until now, they did not really make any real breakthrough. They have some innovation. It's not that Egypt has not developed industrially; they do produce some of the parts of the airplanes. They have some licenses and so on, but minimal—no comparison to Iran. Definitely no comparison. And they have longer time because they started—they became independent earlier times. So they have almost 20 years more than Iran, but failure—complete failure compared to Iran.
Look at Saudi Arabia. If they started 40 years ago, when, after the collapse of the dollar and the gold surge in the mid-70s, if they have any reasonable policy, development of the rulers are interested in making a country which at least stands on its feet and strong, they could have been competing now because there's enormous capital available. They could have been now easily competing with China, in the level, not only in the volume but in the level with the Islamization. We wasted 40 years; if we started 40 years ago, we would have been as far in industrialization as China and India. They failed, so it's not a failure in that sense. I would say that achievement generally is comparable, even better than the achievement of Pakistan—I would say much better, even. Yes, Pakistan has achieved; they produce, I think, F-16s locally on license; they produce—they have considerable industrial capabilities, mostly in textile, but other areas. They have heavy industry; they have these things, but I doubt that they compare the time or compare the—I doubt that they—if you compare in a percentage wise, not in absolute terms, I doubt that they that you can compare the achievement to the achievement of Iran in the 40 years. There's no comparison. So there's no doubt about it.
At least that's—may intercede for them a bit. At least they can see what they will. But their problem is that they send it outside. They pretended to be supporting the resistance and so on, and they were fooled by Assad, motivated most likely the Ba'ath wing—what they call the Ba'ath—they have become a well-establishing wing—fooled by them that we have to have a strategic advantage. You have this, and instead of the principle of the constitution to support the oppressed all over the world, just strike that out of your constitution; forget about the oppressed, focus on your own country. Nobody will blame you; nobody would account you on that ground. But that's not what you did in Syria and not what you did in and Hamas and and his—at least pretend that resistant front—and ultimately killing people with bombs and so on; first claiming it's existent, then fooling the simple-minded pedestrian Shia by protecting the graves of the imams and all this, and then ultimately nothing. How can you build out and let everyone drown or run away? Actually, it's not bad to run away. That's not good. If you are focused on your own country, nobody will blame you. Certainly, nobody will blame you. But you have to say clearly what you want. What's your position of Muslim concern with Iran only? Don't ask us for more than that. Fine, we'll deal with that. So that's—so it's not a fair state. I would say it's reasonably successful relative to what we see in Muslim and successful despite all western sanctions and also quite considerable amounts of Islamic solutions. I think they don't have US banking, the US bank, I think, and I'm not sure 100%; I think they don't have US banks and things like that, which is an achievement. You could say, for example, Malaysia outran them in that. But Malaysia outran them by being integrated in the west, becoming a financial center and tourist center and maybe some electronic industry and things like that. But nothing was really—maybe they never planned for that, or they never regarded the time is not right yet, or whatever, or they were not caring about that, saying the western umbrella is enough for us, and they would not be able to defend themselves against any attack like Iran. No doubt about that. The same with Indonesia, considerably, but again proportionally compared to Iran. Iran had a per capita, per conditions, and so on, is much bigger than a ship. There's no doubt about that. But concerning the issues of Palestine and the resistance, that what have been proposed to lead the Muslim world or to mislead the Muslim world turns out to be fake. That's the problem; what they do in their own country is just our choice. We account the people according to what they say.