On September 11, 2001, 24 years ago, the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York, USA, were hit by two Boeing 767 passenger planes. The buildings caught fire and eventually collapsed in less than two hours, resulting in the tragic deaths of nearly three thousand people. Following this, the United States, citing the 9/11 attacks, claimed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and launched the Iraq War.

Some say the collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers is highly suspicious. The building materials themselves should have been able to withstand fire for several hours. There is no reason for them to collapse in a freefall manner. Doubts have been raised that the collapse of the Twin Towers was actually caused by controlled demolition. Some say that World Trade Center Building 7 did not suffer any attack but also collapsed in a freefall manner. Furthermore, a BBC reporter allegedly knew half an hour before Building 7 collapsed that the building would collapse. Was this event a pre-written script?

Others say that the hijackers performed an extremely difficult maneuver, hitting the Pentagon at a position that had just been reinforced. Some question how hijackers without professional training could achieve such a feat. Or could the truth be that it was not a plane but a missile that attacked the Pentagon?

Still others say that the US government used the 9/11 incident to launch Project Prism, conducting large-scale eavesdropping and surveillance worldwide. Osama bin Laden's body and even the wreckage of the World Trade Center Twin Towers were processed at extreme speed, preventing the world from further investigation. Finally, some say that the 9/11 incident was a false flag operation staged and directed by the US government, allowing them to have a legitimate reason to attack Iraq. The Bush family, the Clinton Foundation, the military-industrial complex, and the deep state behind them profited from the war, earning hundreds or even thousands of billions of dollars.

Viewers who have followed me for a long time should know what happened in my last 9/11 video. Therefore, I need to specifically explain in this intro that the content of this video may not be the complete truth, but it will be based on historical facts and refer to the documentary "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" from a conspiracy theory perspective to analyze the 9/11 incident. This video acknowledges that the 9/11 incident was an extremely serious terrorist attack that caused thousands of casualties. This "9/11 Mystery" is a greatly enhanced version of the video that got me banned from YouTube two years ago. The previous video was about an hour long, while this one has been significantly extended to about two and a half hours. So I am very confident that even if you have seen it, you will definitely find that I have added a lot of new things and many brand-new perspectives.

Hello everyone, I am Di Da. Welcome back to Dimension D. Today, we will talk about the 9/11 mystery again. I will explain what happened on the day of 9/11. I will narrate this chronologically.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 hijackers took control of four civilian airliners. The four airliners were:

American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767, originally scheduled from Boston to Los Angeles, with 92 people on board, including five hijackers.

United Airlines Flight 175, a Boeing 767, originally scheduled from Boston to Los Angeles, with 65 people on board, including five hijackers.

American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757, originally scheduled from Washington D.C. to Los Angeles, with 64 people on board, including five hijackers.

United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757, originally scheduled from Newark to San Francisco, with 44 people on board, including four hijackers.

At 8:46 AM, United Airlines Flight 11, traveling at a speed of 700 kilometers per hour, struck floors 94 to 98 of the World Trade Center Tower 1. This immediately cut off the stairs and elevators to the affected floors and ignited a fire. All 92 people on board, including passengers, crew, and hijackers, perished. At that time, hundreds of people in Tower 1 died instantly or were trapped. Approximately 16,000 to 18,000 people were in World Trade Center Tower 1 at that time. The impact prevented upper-floor occupants from escaping. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) initially believed the incident was an accident and did not yet realize it was a terrorist attack.

Additionally, at 9:03 AM on September 11, United Airlines Flight 175, traveling at a speed of 870 kilometers per hour, struck floors 78 to 85 of the World Trade Center Tower 2. The impact also ignited a fire. All 65 people on board perished. Many people in Tower 2 died or were trapped. After the second impact, the entire incident was reported live by media outlets like CNN. It was at this time that the United States realized this was a terrorist attack. At 9:05 AM, the FAA ordered a nationwide grounding of all aircraft, but it was too late to stop the other hijacked planes.

At 9:59 AM, World Trade Center Tower 2 completely collapsed 56 minutes after the impact. The official explanation was that the high temperatures from the jet fuel caused the building's steel structure to soften, leading to a progressive collapse.

By 10:28 AM, World Trade Center Tower 1 completely collapsed 1 hour and 41 minutes after the impact. The collapse caused more casualties, including firefighters and police officers who were on the scene to rescue people. This plunged the entire city of New York and Manhattan into thick smoke and a massive dust cloud.

At 9:37 AM, American Airlines Flight 77, traveling at a speed of 850 kilometers per hour, struck the west wing of the Pentagon, causing localized structural collapse. All 64 people on board perished. 125 people also died inside the Pentagon, and dozens were injured. The impact point of the plane was precisely at a section of the Pentagon that had recently undergone renovation and reinforcement, so the casualties were relatively lower. However, the flames and smoke still caused damage to the Pentagon.

At 9:30 AM, U.S. President George W. Bush delivered an immediate address confirming that the United States had been attacked by terrorists. By 10:00 AM, the FAA closed U.S. airspace for the first time. However, three minutes later, at 10:03 AM, United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a rural area of Pennsylvania. All 44 people on board perished. Afterward, officials stated that after passengers and crew learned about the terrorist attacks in New York, they attempted to resist the hijackers, causing the plane to deviate from its target. It is speculated that the original target was the Capitol Building or the White House in Washington D.C. During the hijacking, the hijackers used sharp objects to kill crew members and claimed to have explosives. A small number of passengers who knew they were being hijacked contacted the outside world. Therefore, it was certain that there were four hijackers on board. Due to the passengers' resistance, the plane crashed in a rural area of Pennsylvania. The black box also recorded people on board bravely resisting, preventing greater destruction.

By 5:20 PM, World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed due to structural failure after a seven-hour fire ignited by debris from the collapse of the Twin Towers. However, no one was killed in the collapse of Building 7. The collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 is often mentioned by conspiracy theorists, who believe it was caused by controlled demolition.

On September 13, 2001, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell publicly accused al-Qaeda and implied that bin Laden was the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. The FBI then listed bin Laden as a person of interest. At the same time, the Taliban regime, which controlled Afghanistan at the time, stated after September 13 that if the United States could provide concrete evidence, the Taliban regime was willing to try bin Laden or extradite him to the United States. The Taliban regime also denied knowledge of bin Laden's plan.

Furthermore, on September 16 and September 18, 2001, bin Laden issued statements through Qatar's Al Jazeera television network denying his involvement in the 9/11 attacks. On September 23, 2001, then-Secretary of State Powell stated on an NBC television program that the United States would soon release a document proving that bin Laden and al-Qaeda had planned the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Powell emphasized that intelligence indicated bin Laden was directly involved in the 9/11 incident. However, two days later, the White House did not release the document, claiming that releasing the evidence might endanger intelligence sources and therefore they would not release detailed evidence for the time being. To this day, 24 years later, the United States has still not released this information to the public.

On November 9, 2001, Al Jazeera broadcast a video of bin Laden. In the video, he praised the 9/11 attacks as a punishment for the United States and called the attackers brave warriors of Allah, expressing his support. However, he did not explicitly admit to planning the 9/11 terrorist attacks, nor did he detail his role in 9/11, nor did he admit to being the planner of 9/11.

On December 13, 2001, the U.S. Department of Defense released a video clip, claiming it was found in a place called Jalalabad in Afghanistan. The video showed bin Laden and other al-Qaeda members discussing the details of the 9/11 attacks. Therefore, the United States believed bin Laden knew the entire plan. After translating the video content, they believed that bin Laden expected the plane crashes to cause partial damage to the World Trade Center but did not expect the entire World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 to collapse completely. Bin Laden said in the video that the operation was very successful, so the United States believed bin Laden indirectly admitted to participating in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. However, some people questioned the authenticity of the video, believing that the bin Laden in the video looked somewhat different from the bin Laden they knew before.

On October 29, 2004, bin Laden, who had been missing for nearly three years, reappeared in a video, just days before the U.S. presidential election. The U.S. government claimed the video clearly stated that bin Laden was the planner of 9/11. But the strangest event had already happened for a long time. In fact, bin Laden had repeatedly denied being the planner, or his statements were very ambiguous. So the strange point is why he would explicitly state he was the planner of the 9/11 attacks in 2004, just before the U.S. presidential election. This event stimulated American voters to support George W. Bush, as his platform emphasized preventing and combating terrorism. After the video was released, George W. Bush's approval rating rose by 6%, and he eventually won the election with 51% of the vote, securing re-election. Therefore, some suspect that this video was fake, or, as I see it, even if it wasn't fake, the Bush administration might have had this video all along but deliberately withheld it, only releasing it before the U.S. presidential election to gain votes.

I don't know if you've noticed, but most so-called conspiracy theories have become popular only after 9/11. Although topics like the occult existed before 2001, it was the 9/11 incident that truly made conspiracy theories flourish. This phenomenon actually stems from the fact that many Americans and people in other countries at the time believed there were too many suspicious points in the 9/11 incident, leading them to disbelieve the U.S. government's explanation of 9/11. Coupled with the rise of the internet after 2000, people's views could basically be posted online for others to see. Most people no longer believe mainstream media, indirectly leading to the rapid spread of these conspiracy theories. The prevalence of conspiracy theories, especially when an event cannot be explained reasonably, combined with government secrecy and lack of transparency, makes people more inclined to believe in these conspiracy theories. It can be said that, to some extent, the speed of the spread of conspiracy theories is inversely proportional to the transparency of the government. Assuming people have high trust in a government and the government is open and transparent, conspiracy theories are impossible to establish.

For example, there was a place where many strange suicides, or even murders disguised as suicides, were discovered every day. At the time, some said that these things happened every day, but no one paid attention. But after a while, these strange suicide cases suddenly disappeared. These events, lacking a reasonable explanation or having no possible reasonable explanation, gave birth to conspiracy theories.

One of the biggest characteristics of modern conspiracy theories is the direct connection of various mysterious events through conspiracy theories. Before the prevalence of modern conspiracy theories, most mysterious events were independent and unrelated. However, modern conspiracy theories fill the gaps left by unknown or unexplained events. Although the claims made by conspiracy theorists sometimes seem absurd, because conspiracy theories fill the gaps between various mysterious events, the whole thing appears reasonable but is difficult to refute with empirical evidence. Because it cannot be refuted with empirical evidence, conspiracy theories become more like the only explanation for an event.

For instance, the U.S. government's subsequent handling of the 9/11 investigation and the rapid cleanup of the World Trade Center wreckage made it extremely difficult for later generations to investigate the 9/11 incident. These actions indirectly confirmed, from a side perspective, that the so-called 9/11 conspiracy theories might be true. Moreover, due to the government's obstruction and the destruction of evidence, it has become impossible for people to investigate the truth of 9/11. This has led later generations to believe more strongly that conspiracy theories are the only explanation for 9/11.

Next, we will examine what suspicious points in the 9/11 incident led people to no longer believe that 9/11 was a genuine terrorist attack, but rather a massive conspiracy orchestrated and staged by the U.S. government.

At 9:59 AM on September 11, 2001, the 110-story World Trade Center Tower 2 collapsed completely in 10 seconds. Twenty-nine minutes later, at 10:28 AM, Tower 1 also collapsed completely in 10 seconds. By 5:20 PM, the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 also collapsed completely in 7 seconds. These three buildings were the only steel-framed buildings in the world at the time that collapsed entirely due to fire. Even as of today, 2025, these three buildings remain the only steel-framed buildings in the world to have collapsed entirely due to fire.

I have researched many steel-framed buildings around the world that have experienced fires but did not collapse. For example, the Windsor Tower in Madrid, Spain, and the First Interstate Bank Tower in Los Angeles, USA, both experienced fires but did not collapse. The closest examples to 9/11 are likely the following two:

On February 23, 1991, a fire broke out in the 38-story One Meridian Plaza in Philadelphia. The building was steel-framed, with steel beams and columns as the main structure. The floors were concrete with metal decking. The vertical components had a 4-hour fire rating, and the horizontal components had a 2-hour fire rating. The fire burned for 19 hours, starting on the 22nd floor and spreading downwards to the 21st floor and upwards to the 30th floor, affecting 8 floors. After burning for 19 hours, the building did not collapse.

On October 18, 2004, a fire broke out in the 56-story Centro Parque in Venezuela. Centro Parque was also a steel-framed building with steel beams and columns as the main structure. The floors were concrete and metal decking, and it had a fire-retardant coating. The fire burned for 17 hours, spreading upwards from the 34th floor to the 56th floor, affecting 22 floors. The building did not collapse after the fire.

Even taking the Hong Kong Garley Building as an example, a Level 5 fire occurred on November 20, 1996. The Garley Building was not a steel-framed building; it was reinforced concrete with some steel beams and columns and had a fire-retardant coating that could withstand fire for 1 to 2 hours. The fire burned for 21 hours, affecting all 16 floors of the Garley Building, but it did not collapse.

The World Trade Center Twin Towers had fire-retardant coatings on their structures that could withstand fire for 2 hours. Tower 2 burned for 56 minutes, affecting 10 floors. Tower 1 burned for 1 hour and 41 minutes, affecting 12 floors. Yet, these two steel-framed buildings collapsed completely.

The World Trade Center itself was a steel-framed high-rise building, with 47 core steel columns and 236 outer steel columns. Due to the tubular structure of the World Trade Center, formed by the outer steel columns in a square shape, the outermost structure of the entire building was the most robust. If a plane were to hit it, it would be like a mosquito hitting a mosquito net; the plane should not have been able to penetrate these steel structures. In fact, as early as 1945, a B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State Building, but it did not collapse. However, I will not go into detail about this; you can look it up yourself if you are interested.

Therefore, when the World Trade Center was designed in 1960, consideration was given to the scenario of the World Trade Center being hit by a Boeing 707, the largest commercial airliner at the time. This was confirmed by Leslie, the lead structural engineer of the World Trade Center, during the underground parking garage bombing incident in 1993. Additionally, according to 1964 archives, the design team stated that the core and outer columns of the World Trade Center could absorb the kinetic energy of a Boeing 707 impact without structural damage. A Boeing 707 weighs approximately 150 tons and can fly at speeds up to 960 kilometers per hour, essentially the same as Flights 175 and 11 that hit the World Trade Center.

So why were there no problems during the tests back then, but such significant problems occurred during the 9/11 incident? The official explanation is that the complete collapse of World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 was attributed to the combined effect of the plane impact and the subsequent fires. The Boeing 767 planes struck floors 93 to 99 of Tower 1 and floors 77 to 85 of Tower 2. The impacts severed 12-15% of the outer steel columns and 13-26% of the core steel columns, removed 60-70% of the fireproofing, and damaged the floor slabs and fire suppression systems. Each plane carried 34,000 liters of Jet-A fuel, igniting high-temperature fires that burned combustible materials in the offices. The fires continuously heated the exposed steel structures, eventually causing the steel structures to soften and sag by 1.5 to 2 meters, pulling the outer steel columns outward. Consequently, the core steel columns fractured under excessive load, leading to the collapse of the upper structure above the impact point, creating a dynamic load of hundreds of thousands of tons that crushed the floor slabs below, triggering a progressive, floor-by-floor collapse. Thus, it only took 10-12 seconds for the entire World Trade Center to collapse.

Van Romero, a physics professor and former vice president for research at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, specializing in explosives, stated in an interview after 9/11 that he deduced that explosive devices must have been planted inside the buildings after the plane impacts to cause the collapse of the Twin Towers, as plane impacts alone could not cause buildings to collapse in such a manner. However, ten days later, in another interview, he changed his previous opinion, saying that the World Trade Center collapsed due to fire. Why did the professor have a completely different opinion within ten days?

Kevin Ryan, a former manager at Underwriters Laboratories (UL), a renowned third-party testing company comparable to ITS or SGS, stated that, to his knowledge, the steel used in the World Trade Center was certified and met the ASTM E119 standard. Under this standard, steel must withstand temperatures around 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for several hours without any change in quality, such as melting, to pass. As a UL laboratory manager, he confirmed that the steel in the World Trade Center met these standards. Furthermore, they agreed that even steel without fireproofing would need to reach nearly 3000 degrees Fahrenheit before melting. If the steel in the World Trade Center softened or melted after the fire, he was certain that these fires could not have been caused by any type of aircraft fuel, let alone the brief fires within the World Trade Center. These statements were completely contrary to the mainstream media and the official U.S. government narrative at the time. Shortly after Ryan expressed these opinions, he was fired by his company.

So, let's examine how hot aircraft fuel can burn. The Boeing 767s that struck the World Trade Center on 9/11 each carried 36,000 liters of Jet-A fuel. Jet-A fuel is a common commercial aircraft fuel, a type of kerosene. Under ideal conditions, i.e., adiabatic combustion with complete oxygen supply, the flame temperature of Jet-A fuel can reach up to 4000 degrees Fahrenheit. What is adiabatic combustion? Adiabatic combustion refers to a combustion process where the reaction between fuel and oxygen does not exchange heat with the external environment, meaning an idealized combustion state with no heat loss. This represents the maximum theoretical temperature that can be achieved. However, theory and practice are very different. The internal environment of the World Trade Center, including air and materials like steel, concrete, and glass, could not achieve adiabatic combustion because heat would be carried away by the air, steel columns, and concrete. Furthermore, there was insufficient air for continuous combustion within the World Trade Center. Therefore, according to Ryan's research, the 36,000 liters of Jet-A fuel from the Boeing 767 would instantly vaporize into a fireball upon impact, reaching temperatures around 2000 degrees Fahrenheit. The fireball in the impact zone would consume about 40-60% of the fuel and would only burn for 10-20 seconds. The remaining fuel would form a pool fire, burning for 10-20 minutes. The limited ventilation within the World Trade Center would cause the burning temperature to drop to around 1500 degrees Fahrenheit. Subsequently, the flames could only be sustained by burning office materials or furniture, so the flame temperature would be relatively low.

Moreover, if a steel-framed building collapses naturally due to fire, the melted steel should have an irregular shape. However, the vertical collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers contradicts the known properties of steel structures. When any part of a structure fails, the collapse will tilt in the direction of failure, resulting in a non-uniform collapse. But the collapse of the Twin Towers was very uniform, and it is impossible for all the steel to break so neatly. If it were natural melting, some steel would have insufficient heat, would not fully melt, or would appear jagged. However, after the collapse of the World Trade Center, virtually no un-melted or undamaged steel was found. Furthermore, assuming the steel in the upper floors was broken and melted, the lower floors of the World Trade Center that were not broken or melted should still have provided some degree of support. So, how could the floors below the impact point withstand it? Even if everything above fell vertically, the floors below should have retained some structure. However, in the 9/11 incident, the floors below the impact point of the World Trade Center were completely pulverized into rubble. The World Trade Center collapsed at a freefall speed. Freefall refers to the idealized state of an object moving solely under the influence of gravity, without any other external forces such as air resistance or support. Given the height of the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2, 417 meters and 415 meters respectively, the freefall speed from the top should be 9.22 seconds. However, the collapse of the World Trade Center took only 10 seconds, which is extremely close to freefall. If the steel above the impact point melted, it should not have melted down to the steel in the lower floors. Therefore, the structure of the lower part of the World Trade Center, even if it couldn't withstand the weight from above, should have offered some resistance or struggle. So, the entire building's collapse process should have been longer and could not have occurred at a speed of 10 seconds in a freefall manner.

This is why there is a conspiracy theory that the World Trade Center was subjected to controlled demolition, with internal structures pre-demolished, causing the entire building to collapse so quickly. The collapse of World Trade Center Towers 1, 2, and 7 resulted in 1.2 million tons of debris. According to the 9/11 investigation report, the cleanup of the World Trade Center wreckage began that night, 16 hours after the incident. The first batches of debris were transported by trucks to the docks in Lower Manhattan and then by barge to a landfill in Staten Island called Fresh Kills. The entire process was supervised by the U.S. Army, with each truck equipped with GPS to ensure all debris was cleared without omission. The cleanup of all rubble was completed in May 2002, taking 8 months. The total transportation cost was $3.9 billion. Concrete and non-metallic debris, being difficult to recycle and toxic, were mostly permanently buried at Fresh Kills. Approximately 150,000 tons of steel from the incident were transported to New Jersey, where government recycling contractors cut and recycled them, and then immediately sent them to India. The Fresh Kills landfill was closed immediately after the World Trade Center cleanup.

However, the strangest thing is the official explanation that the rapid cleanup of all debris was due to the toxicity of some components, such as asbestos and lead, which are indeed toxic. But what is strange is that five years after Fresh Kills was closed, in 2006, the U.S. government turned the same site into Fresh Kills Park, an ecological park. Subsequently, residents of Staten Island, concerned about the toxic debris affecting their health, complained to the government. However, the government's health department stated that there was no clear evidence that the local land was toxic, which completely contradicted their previous statement that the debris was toxic. And turning toxic materials buried underground into an ecological park is truly unreasonable.

Since all the collapsed debris was either buried underground or sent overseas, it has become impossible for later generations to examine the rubble to see if it contains any explosive components or traces of explosives. This has made the explanation of controlled demolition forever a conspiracy theory.

As mentioned earlier, since a normal fire cannot cause a steel-framed building to collapse, and given that the building collapsed at a freefall speed, some have proposed that the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 were actually brought down by controlled demolition. Controlled demolition refers to the strategic placement of explosives within a building to be demolished, detonated with precise calculations to cause the building's structure to collapse inwards within seconds, minimizing impact on the surrounding environment. This technique is particularly common in the United States, as manual demolition would take at least several months. Controlled demolition, or precision demolition, is widely popular in the U.S. construction industry due to its efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and reduction of worker exposure to hazardous structures.

Controlled demolition companies are usually professional firms, such as Controlled Demolition Inc. (CDI), which specializes in controlled demolition. Before a building is demolished, engineers analyze the blueprints, identify the main load-bearing structures, and then use 3D models to simulate how the building will collapse after demolition. They then place explosives at the main support points to ensure the structure collapses inwards or in a specific direction. For steel-framed buildings, demolition companies typically use an explosive called RDX. RDX is a high-performance cutting explosive that can precisely cut steel columns and other steel components. The entire demolition process involves detonating explosives at the lower levels to weaken the building's support, followed by the detonation of explosives at upper levels, further fragmenting the building.

During the 9/11 incident, many witnesses, survivors, and firefighters reported hearing a series of explosions from inside the building, from top to bottom, before the collapse. Rescue site audio recordings also indicate that multiple firefighters inside the building mentioned explosions, specifically pointing to explosions on the 24th floor, floors 10 to 13, and floors 7 to 8, etc. However, the fire at that time should have been on floors 78. So why were there explosions below? Some call recordings also indicate that firefighters mentioned unknown flashes inside the building before its collapse. Even observers from a distance saw continuous flashes inside the building before the collapse of the World Trade Center. And in the collapse footage, we can see a series of unexplained explosions below as the World Trade Center gradually collapses.

I know many people firmly believe that the collapse of the World Trade Center was caused by controlled demolition and that the flashes of explosions below indicate controlled demolition. However, I personally believe that electrical devices can also produce explosions when subjected to pressure or short circuits. I have seen electrical panels explode, so I am well aware that when electrical devices explode, there are a series of flashes and explosions. Therefore, I believe that flashes below could be caused by controlled demolition, or another possibility is that as the World Trade Center Twin Towers collapsed, the lower floors were subjected to pressure and stress, causing some electrical devices to be squeezed and potentially produce flashes and explosions. If we conclude it was controlled demolition solely based on explosions and flashes at the lower levels, I personally think it is rather hasty. However, we can infer whether these explosions were indeed controlled demolition by examining subtle details from the side.

Additionally, after the collapse, all the debris turned into massive dust clouds that covered all of Manhattan. There are two main scenarios that can cause such large dust clouds: first, volcanic eruptions, and second, controlled demolition. To explain this point, we need to discuss the dust particles produced by controlled demolition. The fineness of dust particles can be broadly divided into three types: PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 micrometers), which can remain suspended in the air for hours or even days; PM10 (particles less than 10 micrometers), which can remain suspended in the air for hours; and coarse particles (particles larger than 10 micrometers), such as sand or concrete fragments, which can only remain suspended in the air for a few minutes or not at all.

The massive dust clouds produced by the collapse of World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2, which covered all of Lower Manhattan, contained fine particles including PM2.5 and PM10, suspended in the air for hours or even days. This is similar to the spread of volcanic ash after a volcanic eruption. This already meets the definition of PM2.5. Let's look at what situations can cause PM2.5 dust particles.

First, if a building collapses naturally, it generally produces more PM10 and less PM2.5. This is because when a building collapses naturally, gravity pulverizes it floor by floor, crushing concrete and gypsum. The energy distribution is slower, resulting in more medium-sized particles, i.e., PM10 and coarse particles. Simply put, in a natural collapse, the fragments are not uniformly or finely broken, so the proportion of fine particles is much lower than in an explosion-driven collapse.

Next, let's talk about controlled demolition. Explosions caused by RDX produce a higher proportion of fine PM2.5 particles because RDX explosions instantly pulverize concrete and gypsum, producing more ultrafine particles. In controlled demolition, PM2.5 can reach up to 40%. From the analysis above, it can be seen that to create the ultrafine PM2.5 particles that floated for hours or even days, as seen in 9/11, it is highly likely that controlled demolition was involved.

Furthermore, according to some investigation reports, an outer steel column from World Trade Center Tower 1, weighing approximately two tons, was ejected 119 meters from the World Trade Center and lodged in the exterior wall of a bank (Barclays Bank). Several other columns were ejected over 150 meters away. If there was no controlled demolition in the World Trade Center at the time, and no powerful internal explosions, is it possible for these multi-ton steel columns to be ejected so far? Or, let me try to explain it: when the plane hit the high walls of the World Trade Center, some steel columns might have been broken, and these columns, due to the impact and being at a high level, were ejected 150 meters away. This is not impossible.

Also, there was a series of strange incidents before 9/11. First, from late August to early September 2001, the World Trade Center received multiple bomb threats. Someone claimed they would bomb the World Trade Center. At the time, it was considered similar to the 1993 World Trade Center underground parking garage bombing. Therefore, bomb-sniffing dogs were stationed at the World Trade Center before the 9/11 incident. However, relevant information shows that on September 6, 2001, five days before the incident, these bomb-sniffing dogs were withdrawn because the security alert was lifted. At the same time, during August and September, elevator shaft renovation work was being carried out in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2. Some claimed that to avoid disturbing others, the work would be done at night. The World Trade Center experienced a power outage on September 8th and 9th, and the security system was temporarily shut down.

Here, I will work backward to infer. First, on September 8th and 9th, the World Trade Center experienced a power outage, and the security system was temporarily shut down, meaning that any person or thing entering the World Trade Center during this period would not be recorded. At the same time, elevator shaft renovation work was being carried out. Could someone have taken advantage of this period to install explosives in the core of the World Trade Center? Later, when interviewed, Trump mentioned that the core steel columns of the World Trade Center were next to the elevator shafts. Originally, these explosives were supposed to be installed at the end of August, but someone who knew about the plan did not want it to happen, so the World Trade Center received multiple bomb threats in early September, leading to the stationing of bomb-sniffing dogs. Thus, there was no opportunity to install these explosives until September 6th, when the bomb-sniffing dogs were withdrawn. Then, they had the opportunity. So, someone caused the power outage at the World Trade Center on September 8th and 9th, and then installed RDX explosives for controlled demolition. Later, as I will discuss, the security for the World Trade Center was managed by a company called Stratasec, which happened to have ties to the Bush family. You will know more about this later.

Therefore, combining the above points, the World Trade Center experienced suspected unknown flashes and explosions. After the collapse, it produced a large amount of ultrafine PM2.5 particles. In addition, steel bars were ejected, and the World Trade Center collapsed without any support from below at a freefall speed. Furthermore, a series of strange events occurred before 9/11, such as elevator shaft renovation and power outages. The way the U.S. government handled the debris and scrap steel also made it impossible for later generations to investigate. Each of these points, viewed independently, makes it difficult to definitively conclude controlled demolition. However, when all these points are combined, the possibility of controlled demolition is greatly enhanced. As for which explanation to believe, I will leave it to you to decide.

World Trade Center Building 7, with a height of 186 meters and a total of 47 floors, collapsed completely in just 6.5 seconds from the start of its collapse. If I assume another object of the same height, 186 meters, as World Trade Center Building 7, its freefall time to reach the ground would be approximately 6.1 seconds. This means that World Trade Center Building 7, like the Twin Towers, collapsed completely in a freefall manner. World Trade Center Building 7 used a steel structure similar to that of Towers 1 and 2, with core steel columns and outer steel columns. It had 58 core columns and 24 outer columns. Like Towers 1 and 2, its steel met the E119 standard, capable of withstanding temperatures around 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for several hours, and would only melt at around 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. Furthermore, Building 7 never experienced a plane crash or any terrorist attack. How could such a sturdy building collapse in a freefall manner, even if hit by debris from the Twin Towers or affected by fire? The entire building turned into rubble. Moreover, although Building 7 experienced fire, it was completely different from the jet fuel fires in the Twin Towers. So how could Building 7 collapse so quickly?

The official answer is that the debris from the collapse of World Trade Center Tower 1 struck floors ten to eighteen on the south side of Building 7, damaging some of its exterior walls and structure. Building 7 also housed the New York City Office of Emergency Management (OEM). I will refer to it as OEM later. OEM moved into World Trade Center Building 7 in 1999 as New York City's emergency command center, requiring 24/7 operation and uninterrupted power supply for communication equipment, computers, and emergency lighting systems. OEM was equipped with independent diesel tanks to cope with terrorist attacks and natural disasters, ensuring critical facilities could remain operational during power outages. OEM stored multiple diesel tanks within World Trade Center Building 7, with a total capacity of 42,000 gallons. The debris from World Trade Center Tower 1 ignited these diesel tanks, causing the fire in Building 7 that led to its collapse.

Let's examine whether the official explanation is reasonable. First, the debris from the collapse of World Trade Center Tower 1 struck floors ten to eighteen of World Trade Center Building 7. However, OEM was located on the twenty-third floor. The diesel tanks were stored in the basement, first floor, fifth, seventh, eighth, and ninth floors. The main fires were concentrated on floors seven to nine and eleven to thirteen, not reaching the basement or first floor. The total capacity of the diesel tanks on floors five to nine was only 825 gallons. What does 825 gallons mean? In the United States, a small residential swimming pool, assuming a length of 4.8 meters and a depth of 1.2 meters, would hold about 5,000 gallons of water when full. So, 825 gallons is only 16.5% of this residential swimming pool, or about one-sixth of a small swimming pool. This amount of diesel would only be enough to burn for ten to twenty minutes. According to expert simulations, this diesel was insufficient to form a major fire source, and the flames produced by diesel are lower than those from Jet-A fuel. Therefore, the actual fire temperature in World Trade Center Building 7 was only around 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, which could not melt or damage the steel column structure of Building 7.

What is most strange is that World Trade Center Towers 3 and 4 were directly below Towers 1 and 2. Although they were also hit by debris, their structural integrity remained intact. Towers 5 and 6 were also hit by debris and experienced fires, but the overall structural integrity of the buildings remained. Let's look at a map. Building 7 is not adjacent to Towers 1 and 2 but is slightly further out. So, even if hit by debris, it should not have been hit as hard as Towers 3 and 4. Yet, why did a few floors of Building 7 catch fire, and then the entire Building 7 completely disintegrated and collapsed, just like the Twin Towers? As mentioned earlier, World Trade Center Building 7 had a total of 82 steel columns, 58 core columns and 24 outer columns. For Building 7 to completely disintegrate and collapse in freefall, all 82 steel columns must have been simultaneously compromised. With fires on only a few floors of Building 7, is it possible to simultaneously compromise 82 steel columns?

Another peculiar point is that when Building 7 collapsed, unlike the Twin Towers which collapsed from the top down, Building 7 appeared to collapse from the bottom up, but in reality, it collapsed from the inside. As mentioned earlier, one characteristic of controlled demolition is the strategic placement of explosives within a building, detonated with precise calculations to cause the building to collapse inwards or in a specific direction. Therefore, the collapse pattern of World Trade Center Building 7 is completely consistent with the characteristics of controlled demolition. Furthermore, since the core steel columns of Building 7 are more numerous than the outer steel columns, if demolition were to occur, it would have to start from the inside.

Based on the above, we can draw the following conclusions:

1. The diesel in the diesel tanks was insufficient to burn for so many hours.

2. Diesel cannot generate such high-temperature fires.

3. The combination of points 1 and 2 means the steel could not have been melted.

4. The collapse began from the internal core.

5. The entire building collapsed from the bottom up.

Therefore, experts with many years of experience in controlled demolition are certain that this collapse pattern must be due to controlled demolition.

Another point often brought up by conspiracy theorists to accuse World Trade Center Building 7 of being a staged and self-directed terrorist attack is that BBC reporter Jane Stanley reported on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 at 4:54 PM local time, but the live footage clearly showed that World Trade Center Building 7 was still standing. The actual collapse time of Building 7 was 5:20 PM, 26 minutes after the BBC reporter's broadcast. This means the BBC knew about the collapse of Building 7 about half an hour before it happened. Furthermore, about 20 minutes after reporting that Building 7 would collapse, at 5:15 PM, the BBC's live broadcast was suddenly interrupted, preventing them from capturing the actual collapse of Building 7. Afterward, BBC editor Richard Porter stated that the reporting error originated from Reuters, which released incorrect information at 4:54 PM stating that World Trade Center Building 7 had already collapsed. Due to the urgency of time, they did not fact-check and broadcast it directly. Whether this was a blunder or a pre-written script, I will leave it to you to decide.

Let me provide you with more information. While gathering information, I found this and thought it would be a waste not to mention it all at once. As mentioned earlier, World Trade Center Building 7 housed the New York City Office of Emergency Management (OEM), which served as New York City's emergency command center to respond to terrorist attacks and natural disasters. I thought such an important facility would surely be reinforced, bulletproof, and blast-proof, like the Pentagon. If I could find such information, it would prove how sturdy Building 7 was and why it collapsed. However, upon searching, I discovered that the OEM, which claimed to be the New York City emergency center during the terrorist attacks, had no evidence of using any blast-resistant glass, high-temperature alloys, or anti-terrorism materials. It also showed no signs of special reinforcement or hardening; it was simply built with ordinary building materials. Thus, the 9/11 incident proved that the terrorist attack command center was completely useless. I wonder where the money for OEM truly ended up. However, this also gives me some peace of mind. It turns out it's not just us who are bad; the whole world is like this.

This section will discuss the suspicious aspects of the Pentagon attack. First, Flight 77, which hit the Pentagon, had a fuselage length of 47 meters, a wingspan of 38 meters, and engines weighing 4 tons each, with a diameter of 2 meters and a length of 3.6 meters, made of high-temperature resistant titanium and nickel alloys. A Boeing 757 can carry 7,256 gallons of fuel. The plane, traveling at 850 kilometers per hour, struck the first floor of the E-ring on the west side of the Pentagon. The initial impact created a gap only 22 meters wide and 5 meters high. However, 20 minutes after the impact, the outer wall of the E-ring began to collapse, eventually creating a gap 36 meters wide and 10 meters high.

The official explanation is that after the plane impact, the nose and fuselage penetrated the C and D rings, causing the deaths of 125 personnel inside the building. However, looking at the actual images, only the outermost E-ring shows a gap. Some experts point out that the plane's wingspan of 38 meters should have caused damage over a much wider area of the building. However, on the left and right sides of the Pentagon's gap, there is no visible damage from the wings. The plane's engines, made of high-temperature resistant titanium and nickel alloys, could not have been completely melted by high temperatures. And after impacting at 850 kilometers per hour, it should have left two very obvious holes in the outer wall. With a fuselage length of 47 meters and a wingspan of 38 meters, such a high-speed impact should not have resulted in a single gap of 22x5 meters. Because if the wingspan was 38 meters, there should have been a horizontal gash caused by the wings on the outside of the Pentagon. However, in the images, there is almost no trace of damage on either side of the gap. This gap appears to have been caused by a small, single, and concentrated attack. Therefore, some have proposed that it was actually a missile, not a plane, that attacked the Pentagon. In fact, at the time of the incident, many people claimed to have witnessed an object resembling a missile destroying the Pentagon. And from the Pentagon's closed-circuit television footage released later, we can see a small, fast-moving object flying by at the moment of impact. Looking at it this way, it indeed does not resemble a plane, especially a plane with a fuselage length of 47 meters and a wingspan of 38 meters.

However, the strangest thing is that a week later, when police and the public were interviewed by the media again, they all claimed to have forgotten that they had seen a missile. And the plane wreckage disappeared extremely quickly after the incident. Media outlets that rushed to the scene at the time said they could not see any plane wreckage. From the images we see now, there is indeed no large amount of plane wreckage. Currently, only parts of the plane wreckage can be seen in photos, including landing gear, engine parts, tires, parts of the fuselage, and seats, etc. But for such a large plane, it is unreasonable to have so little left after the crash.

The official explanation is that during the impact, the plane tilted to the left, with the right side raised. Therefore, the left wing of the plane hit the ground, and the right wing was severed. The fuselage disintegrated during the impact, and the fuselage, along with the tail, penetrated the building. The plane then ignited a fire, causing the fuselage to liquefy. The liquefied fuselage flowed into the interior of the building, so most of the fuselage and wings disintegrated instantly upon impact, breaking into thousands of pieces. Therefore, the amount of wreckage found at the scene was not large. Furthermore, after the impact, the FBI and emergency teams immediately began recovering all wreckage, so when the media arrived at the scene, they could not see large amounts of plane wreckage. However, the plane crash sites I usually see are not like this, for example, like this, or like this.

They also say the plane's left wing hit the ground, but the current images show no scratches on the ground. And they say the plane and wings broke into thousands of pieces; even if broken, they wouldn't break into such small pieces, would they? From the images released by the authorities, a one-meter diameter engine can be seen. The official explanation at the time was that this was a device from the tail of a Boeing 757. However, some point out that this engine is not from a Boeing 757 but from another Air Force aircraft, an A3.

According to the 9/11 Commission Report and black box data analysis, Flight 77 was manually controlled by hijackers at 9:29 AM, and the autopilot system was turned off. The plane then began to deviate from its original flight path. The plane performed a 330-degree clockwise spiral turn 8 kilometers from the Pentagon. The plane then descended rapidly from 670 meters above ground to 15 meters. This means the plane flew at a low altitude for 8 kilometers before impacting the Pentagon, entering ultra-low altitude flight about 300 meters from the building, at an altitude of only 10-20 meters above the ground. Seconds before impact, the plane was flying almost at ground level, only 1.5 to 3 meters above the ground. At this point, the plane's left wing broke five utility poles located on the west side of the Pentagon. Finally, at a speed of 853 kilometers per hour, it struck the E-ring on the west side of the Pentagon. This location happened to be reinforced.

To be honest, this location is quite terrifying. Anyone who has flown before should know that if a plane suddenly jolts due to turbulence, the centrifugal force is quite frightening. Now, to descend rapidly from 670 meters to 15 meters. Air traffic controllers at the time, due to the plane's high speed and maneuverability, initially thought it was a military aircraft. The strangest thing is that the lawn outside the Pentagon shows no obvious plane scratches, indentations, or any signs of the plane being dragged on the ground. Yet, it accurately struck the E-ring's outer wall at a reinforced location. Conspiracy theorists believe that terrorists with simple flight training could not have completed these flight maneuvers. In fact, if the hijackers wanted to cause greater casualties, they could have simply crashed into the center of the Pentagon. But before hitting the Pentagon, they performed a complex turn, flew at a low altitude for 8 kilometers, and without scratching the ground, precisely hit the reinforced location of the Pentagon. Even Tom Cruise from Top Gun might not have been able to do it. Yet, a hijacker who hadn't even completed an aviation course managed to perform such a difficult maneuver. With this hijacker's ability, he couldn't even operate a small plane, but he managed to precisely complete a nearly impossible flight maneuver.

Although some say that the five utility poles that were hit were not broken but uprooted, which is illogical, I can explain here. In reality, the five utility poles were not all uprooted. At least two were broken, and two were indeed uprooted, completely detached from their foundations in the soil. One utility pole actually hit a taxi. So, not all utility poles were uprooted.

After the 9/11 incident, the FBI quickly collected 85 closed-circuit television (CCTV) images from facilities around the Pentagon. These CCTVs could potentially have captured footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. These images included internal CCTV footage from the Pentagon, nearby highways, gas stations, and hotels. They were all collected, not copied. The FBI's reason was national security and criminal investigation. The Pentagon is a military sensitive area, and releasing sensitive images could expose security vulnerabilities. If that's the case, then all civilian facilities around the Pentagon should not have CCTV installed, because any footage of the Pentagon at any time would expose security vulnerabilities. So why was only the footage of the impact collected?

Later leaked footage states that one of the Pentagon's CCTVs captured the moment of impact, but the image showed no plane, only a blurry white object and the explosion flames. The FBI claimed that after reviewing the other 85 collected images, they found no footage related to the impact. In fact, Pentagon officials initially denied that any footage captured the entire impact process, but later the FBI changed its statement and admitted that plane impact was captured. Out of the 85 images, only 13 might have captured the plane. Among these, 9 only showed smoke after the impact, and 4 showed partial plane footage. The remaining images claimed to have captured nothing. However, these images have never been released.

Immediately after the impact, the FBI sealed off the scene and launched the largest investigation in history, mobilizing over 4,000 agents and 3,000 professionals to handle the Pentagon, World Trade Center Twin Towers, and the Flight 93 crash site in Pennsylvania. The FBI conducted a carpet-search at the Pentagon, collecting plane wreckage, bodies, and conducting on-site investigations. The wreckage collected by the FBI was transferred to the parking lot north of the Pentagon for detailed classification. Bodies were sent to Dover Air Force Base.

The wreckage of the later aircraft was kept as evidence by the FBI. The FBI confirmed the recovery of the bodies of 179 victims, including those from the aircraft and personnel inside the Pentagon. Of course, the hijackers were also included. However, as they mentioned before, if something really hit and shattered, even the aircraft wreckage would melt. How did they confirm the DNA of these 179 victims and five hijackers? This part has also not been explained by anyone.

On March 7, 2002, the U.S. Department of Defense and the FBI, through media outlets like CNN, released five static images in response to public and media pressure. Closed-circuit television footage from the Pentagon parking lot captured the moment Flight 77 struck the Pentagon's exterior. However, it only showed a blurry white mass approaching the Pentagon. It wasn't until 2006 that the live footage of these five photos was released. This footage is the only publicly released impact footage from the Pentagon attack. However, it doesn't really show the plane clearly.

According to some independent investigations in the United States, the 85 pieces of closed-circuit television footage previously collected by the FBI certainly contained some that could have captured the moment of the plane's impact. If the government wanted to respond to public doubts, they could have simply released one of those images to show everyone the plane. But the video released by the U.S. government at the end shows no plane at all. Therefore, conspiracy theorists believe that the 22-meter-wide and 5-meter-high hole in the Pentagon was actually caused by a missile.

Furthermore, Flight 77, by sheer coincidence, struck an area of the Pentagon that had been reinforced specifically to prevent terrorist attacks. The Pentagon itself is divided into five zones and has a pentagonal design. The impact zone was in Pentagon Zone 1, the only one of the five zones that had just been renovated. This renovated area had reinforcement facilities, such as steel columns, bulletproof glass, and reinforced exterior walls, making it stronger than other areas. This area had just completed its main structural renovation a few days before 9/11. Renovation was still ongoing on 9/11, but it did not affect the structural integrity. Also, due to the interior decoration, this area had fewer people than other areas. If the plane had hit other parts of the Pentagon, the casualties and damage would have been much greater.

Moreover, there were no signs of the plane scraping around the Pentagon. This means the plane did not hit the ground and bounce off to the Pentagon, but rather approached at an extremely low altitude, without touching the ground, and then hit the reinforced part of the Pentagon. How high do you think this possibility is?

Here's another very strange piece of information: Construction of the Pentagon began on September 11, 1941, exactly on 9/11. At 10:03 AM on September 11, 2001, Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania. At the time, the plane was still 15 to 20 minutes away from Washington D.C. Flight 93 took off from Newark International Airport at 8:42 AM, originally bound for San Francisco. There were 37 passengers, 7 crew members, and 4 hijackers on board, totaling 48 people. At 9:28 AM, the hijackers took control of the plane and changed its flight path towards Washington D.C. Later speculation suggests that the hijackers' original target was likely the U.S. Capitol Building and the White House.

Between 9:45 AM and 9:57 AM, the crew and passengers learned through their mobile phones that the World Trade Center Twin Towers and the Pentagon had been attacked by terrorists. They realized that their flight might face the same fate. At 9:57 AM, passengers began to fight back, attempting to regain control of the cockpit. At 10:03 AM, unable to control the plane, the hijackers crashed it in the outskirts of Pennsylvania, forming an impact crater 40 meters long, 12 meters wide, and 15 meters deep. Some wreckage was scattered within a 100-meter radius, including the engines, landing gear, and parts of the fuselage. There were also personal belongings of passengers and human remains. Other small debris, such as clothing and small fuselage fragments, were scattered 3 to 8 kilometers away from the impact point due to the high-speed impact and explosion.

The 9/11 Commission concluded that the passengers' and crew's counterattack led the hijackers to lose control, causing the plane to crash in the outskirts. The passengers' heroic actions successfully prevented the hijackers from attacking Washington D.C., avoiding greater casualties. Afterward, the FBI recovered 95% of the aircraft wreckage, including the engines, fuselage, and black box. DNA identification confirmed the identities of 44 passengers and crew members.

The point of contention is that the official report states the impact crater was 40 meters long and 12 meters wide, but reporters who arrived at the scene first found the crater to be only 5 to 7 meters long. Furthermore, the FBI stated that DNA identification later confirmed the identities of 44 passengers and crew members and confirmed they were all deceased. However, the coroner who arrived at the scene first said that although there were passengers and hijackers on Flight 93, no bodies were visible at the scene. The passengers on Flight 93 seemed to have vanished into thin air. Based on the current images, there are indeed no objects that appear to be human remains. Or, to be fair, perhaps there were, but they were not released to the media. I don't believe there were no human remains at all, which has led to a conspiracy theory that the crash of Flight 93 was faked.

The actual situation is that Flight 93 landed at Hopkins Airport in Ohio around 10:45 AM. The official report states there were 44 passengers on Flight 93, but conspiracy theorists believe there were only a few agents on board. Also, according to reporters and coroners who arrived at the scene first, although no large amounts of aircraft wreckage or human bodies were found, the so-called red headscarves of the hijackers and their driver's licenses were found. This has led some to question whether this was a normal plane crash, as most wreckage is usually found at the crash site of a normal plane crash. However, some wreckage of Flight 93 was found 6 to 8 kilometers away from the crash site, and all the aircraft wreckage at the crash site was very small. After a typical plane crash, wreckage in the shape of a plane can be found at the scene, but after the crash of Flight 93, there was nothing at the scene to indicate that a plane had crashed there. Not only were no obvious aircraft wreckage found at the scene, but there was also no smoke or fire from the explosion.

Although the official explanation is that there was an explosion after the plane crashed, and the fuel and fuselage burned, producing dense black smoke that rose hundreds of meters into the air and lasted for several minutes, people who arrived at the scene later reported that it was very quiet all around, and one wouldn't know a plane had crashed there. Also, since the jet fuel from the planes that hit the World Trade Center Towers 1, 2, and 7 could cause such large fires, Flight 93 should have been able to cause a similar fire. The scene was an open space with plenty of oxygen, and there were trees that could burn. So why wasn't there a large fire? Unless the plane was shot down. In fact, one resident at the scene said that at the time, he didn't think it sounded like a plane crash, but rather like a missile flying by.

If the plane exploded and disintegrated at high altitude, it could explain why there was no large aircraft wreckage at the scene and why no large fire was observed, as the plane's fuel would have burned up in the air at the moment of explosion. The plane then disintegrated in the air, with the flames spreading in the air, so it did not cause the effect of continuous burning of jet fuel as seen at the World Trade Center. The official explanation is that no aircraft wreckage was found at the scene because the high-speed impact and burning at temperatures exceeding one thousand degrees Celsius caused most of the aircraft wreckage to melt, and 80% had melted into the soil. Therefore, there were not many fragments visible on the surface, but small fragments were scattered within hundreds of meters of the crash site. A small amount of light debris was ejected up to eight kilometers away by the blast wave.

Another point of contention is why passengers on the plane could call their families on their mobile phones. According to the call recordings provided by the 9/11 Commission, before the crash, some passengers used their mobile phones to contact the ground, informing them that the plane had been hijacked and that passengers were fighting back. The investigation report recorded 13 passengers and crew members making a total of 37 calls, 7 of which were from mobile phones.

First, let's talk about whether it was possible to make a call from a plane to the ground in 2001. In 2001, 2G networks like GSM and CDMA were still in use. These names are very nostalgic. The signal range of 2G networks was linear, approximately 120 to 360 degrees, and the signal could reach up to 1 to 2 kilometers above the ground. If the plane was flying at high altitude, for example, above 3000 meters, the 2G network signal could not connect. After 9/11, tests were conducted, and the success rate of connecting to the ground from a plane using GSM and CDMA networks was less than 5%. In the investigation report, one passenger even had to state their full name when calling their mother. This point is somewhat suspicious, leading some to believe that the phone recordings were fabricated.

Furthermore, the military's subsequent dissemination of information was also problematic. At the time of 9/11, the official statement was that no relevant agencies or departments had informed the military about a hijacked Flight 93. However, a year later, the military changed its statement, saying that they had received a hijacking report about Flight 93 early on. The military's contradictory statements at press conferences are similar to what I mentioned before about the Roswell incident, where the military's statements are always contradictory when they try to cover up facts.

Prior to 9/11, the most wanted list did not mention bin Laden as the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. At that time, the FBI stated that there was insufficient evidence to identify bin Laden as the mastermind. Bin Laden was already on the FBI's top ten most wanted list due to the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed over 200 people. However, there is a peculiar detail: bin Laden's wanted list number was 456, the same as the protagonist in Squid Game. After the 9/11 attacks in 2001, the FBI updated his wanted poster in November, increasing the reward from $5 million to $25 million and mentioning bin Laden as a suspect in other terrorist attacks, but still not explicitly including the 9/11 attacks in his wanted notice.

The evidence the U.S. government had was the backpacks of two of the hijackers. After entering the restricted area of Portland Airport, the hijackers surprisingly did not take these two backpacks onto Flight 11, which crashed into the World Trade Center. Inside these backpacks were a video tape explaining Boeing aircraft and a flight manual. The backpacks also contained a flight calculator, a Quran, and the hijackers' wills. The FBI at the time stated that the hijackers' backpacks passed security at Portland Airport and entered the restricted area, but due to a tight transfer time, these two pieces of luggage coincidentally did not make it onto Flight 11 and were left at the airport. This is very strange, as it is rare for carry-on luggage to enter a restricted area and then not be loaded onto a plane. If the hijackers left the two backpacks due to a tight transfer time, it is also unreasonable. So, whichever explanation is given, the whole thing is somewhat problematic.

Furthermore, why would they bring a flight introduction video tape to hijack a plane? And the backpacks contained wills in Arabic that detailed the entire hijacking plan and the identities of the 19 hijackers. Even writing a will wouldn't involve such details. However, later the FBI and the 9/11 Commission treated the hijackers' luggage as key evidence to prove the al-Qaeda organization's plan and the hijackers' plot. Did the FBI not suspect why the wills contained such information? Or was the entire story scripted from the beginning, and people later just followed the script? However, it seems the FBI is so easily manipulated. Do you think if I were to take the FBI exam, I would succeed?

According to reports from the FBI and the 9/11 Commission, the passports of the hijackers on Flight 11 were found on the streets near the World Trade Center on the day of 9/11. The passports were found on the streets of Lower Manhattan, near the World Trade Center. A passerby picked up the passport and handed it over to a New York City police officer. The official explanation is that although the passport had scorch marks and damage from the explosion and fire, the hijacker's identity could still be confirmed. Paper documents might have been blown out by the blast and not directly exposed to the high-temperature fire. However, the passport was burned but coincidentally the identification information was not burned, and it was coincidentally blown out by the explosion. The likelihood of this entire event is truly convincing. However, whether you believe it or not is up to you to decide.

Additionally, more than one U.S. domestic intelligence agency indicated that the U.S. government had known about terrorists within the United States for a long time. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, U.S. intelligence agencies CIA, FBI, and NSA had obtained information on some of the hijackers before 9/11, but they failed to effectively integrate and act upon it. The CIA identified two al-Qaeda members in January 2000, knowing they were involved in the 1998 embassy bombings. At the same time, the CIA knew they entered the United States in Los Angeles on January 15, 2000. However, the CIA did not notify the FBI until August 23, 2001, when these two terrorists were placed on a watch list. Because the FBI did not receive information in a timely manner, they did not track these two terrorists. The NSA did not receive suspicious information until June 2001, indicating that something major was about to happen. How could the United States, known for its intelligence, fail to detect an operation as large as 9/11? Unless someone wanted this to happen. Otherwise, theoretically, knowing that terrorists have entered the country should indicate that something will happen.

The 9/11 hijackers received training at civilian flight schools in the United States. For example, from June 2000 to 2001, they studied the simulated flight operations of Boeing 737 and 757 at a flight school. Another hijacker had been entering and exiting the United States multiple times for flight training since 1996, but due to insufficient technical skills, he was unable to become a pilot. This hijacker was the one who later piloted Flight 77 to attack the Pentagon. Since the hijackers' flying skills were insufficient to control these planes for such difficult maneuvers, conspiracy theories cite U.S. support for the Afghan mujahideen in the 1990s. It is speculated that some members of al-Qaeda received training from the U.S. CIA during the fight against the Soviets, and therefore some knew how to fly planes. The Pakistani intelligence agency ISI has a very close relationship with the U.S. CIA and cooperated with the CIA in the fight against the Soviets in the 1980s, and they were even involved in the establishment of al-Qaeda, supporting Afghan mujahideen including bin Laden.

In 2001, Indian media reported that the director of ISI transferred $100,000 to the hijackers through an intermediary. The then director of ISI, Mahmud Ahmed, visited the United States in September 2001 and discussed counter-terrorism cooperation with U.S. officials, CIA, and State Department personnel, particularly targeting al-Qaeda and the Taliban. According to The Washington Post, the director of ISI visited Washington from September 4th to 13th and met with CIA and State Department officials at the time. ISI funded the hijackers, and they met with the CIA. The CIA stated they received no intelligence indicating a terrorist attack on 9/11. Do you believe it?

There is also information indicating that the U.S. government was aware of the $100,000 funding for al-Qaeda. The U.S. government has intentionally or unintentionally protected the identities of these terrorists. Could it be that these terrorists received training, funding, and protection from the U.S. government to participate in a staged, self-directed terrorist attack?

Furthermore, on the day of 9/11, five hijackers arrived at Washington Dulles International Airport. They had been staying at a nearby motel. The U.S. National Security Agency was located only 8.5 kilometers away from this motel. All five hijackers passed through metal detectors and additional scans, but all five successfully boarded Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon. The entire plane had 188 seats, but only 63 passengers. In fact, on the day of 9/11, the four planes involved in the terrorist attacks had only a 30% passenger load each. The low passenger load on 9/11 seems strange, significantly less than normal. Did someone know there would be a plane crash incident and deliberately reduce the passenger load for that day?

Additionally, on Flight 77, besides the hijackers, there were government personnel from various government departments, including military personnel and some Pentagon-related personnel. They had even received counter-terrorism training, yet the plane was still unexpectedly hijacked. Approximately 31 minutes after takeoff, Flight 77 made an unauthorized aerial turn without any distress signal or hijacking signal, and no obvious signs of struggle. After deviating from its course for 43 minutes, Flight 77 was not intercepted by any air force.

According to the 9/11 Commission Report of September 2004, data from the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) shows that between 1998 and 2001, interception missions in U.S. airspace averaged 100 per year, covering all types of aircraft, including commercial, military, and private planes, mostly in emergency situations. For example, in 2023, during a Chinese balloon incident, NORAD dispatched F-22s to intercept the Chinese balloon, which the U.S. suspected of being a spy balloon. Interception took only a few minutes. Other interception incidents are not detailed here, but they averaged around 18 minutes. It can be seen that intercepting a plane can be very fast. However, on September 11, 2001, none of the four hijacked airliners that deviated from their course and lost contact were intercepted by fighter jets. The official explanation is as follows:

First, on September 11, 2001, NORAD had only 9 alert bases in the United States, with typically 2 fighter jets on standby at each base. This means there were only 14 fighter jets on standby in the entire United States. This number is actually lower than normal. Between 1980 and 1990, possibly due to the end of the Cold War, the number of standby fighter jets was around 40 to 50. In the mid-1990s, there were 20 to 24. But by the eve of the 9/11 incident in 2001, it had been reduced to only 14 fighter jets. To give you more information, after 9/11, the U.S. currently has at least 50 fighter jets on standby on average. Who benefits from so many fighter jets and military spending? I will tell you at the end. Also, due to the insufficient number of standby fighter jets, none of the hijacked airliners were intercepted on the day of 9/11.

Second, the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) notified NORAD very late. Flight 11, which struck the World Trade Center Twin Towers, deviated from its course at 8:14 AM. It wasn't until 8:37 AM that the FAA notified NORAD, but at 8:46 AM, Flight 11 had already crashed into the first World Trade Center tower, a delay of 23 minutes. Flight 175 deviated from its course at 8:42 AM and crashed into the second World Trade Center tower at 9:03 AM. The FAA took no action throughout. Flight 77 deviated from its course at 8:51 AM. It wasn't until 9:24 AM that the FAA notified NORAD. At 9:37 AM, Flight 77 had already crashed into the Pentagon, a delay of 33 minutes. Flight 93 deviated from its course at 9:28 AM. At 9:34 AM, the FAA notified NORAD. It wasn't until 10:07 AM that NORAD ordered F-16s to take off, but without a clear target. This time, the FAA was faster, but NORAD was 30 minutes late in taking off.

Government spokespersons, and even then-U.S. President George W. Bush, claimed that the government had never considered the possibility of hijacking planes for terrorist attacks. However, the 9/11 Commission Report records that a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report in 1999 analyzed the possibility of al-Qaeda using planes to attack U.S. landmarks, including the World Trade Center. For two years prior to 9/11, simulation exercises were continuously conducted. Even the Pentagon conducted simulation training for five months before 9/11 on how to respond if a plane crashed into the Pentagon. A military internal email from April 2001 shows that NORAD conducted an exercise called "Positive Force," which assumed a foreign aircraft was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon.

Therefore, from the above, we can see that either the FAA notified late, or NORAD took off late. In addition, as mentioned before, the four planes had a low passenger load, only about 30% of normal. Also, on the day of 9/11, there were only 14 fighter jets on standby nationwide, which is less than usual. On the day of 9/11, at least four official units across the United States conducted air force exercises. Conspiracy theorists question whether these exercises actually weakened the U.S.'s ability to respond to terrorist attacks. It is difficult not to suspect that the 9/11 incident was an inside job, as mobilizing so many resources within the U.S. would require a very large organization, or perhaps this organization knew about 9/11 in advance and wanted it to happen, or perhaps it was all staged and directed by someone.

This section will discuss some fragmented but suspicious events during the 9/11 incident. As they are difficult to categorize, I will focus on them in this section. The official U.S. explanation regarding the black boxes of several planes is that some were found and some were not. For example, the black boxes of Flights 11 and 175 in the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 were not found. The black boxes of Flights 77 and 93 in the Pentagon and Pennsylvania incidents were found. Although the black boxes were damaged, some data could be retrieved. So, coincidentally, the full situation on the planes could not be known from the black boxes, but a hijacker's passport was found in the wreckage of the collapsed World Trade Center, and this passport was intact. The black box, which is so hard, was destroyed, but the passport was unharmed. It's not impossible, but it's very, very unlikely.

Furthermore, the security level of U.S. airports is considered one of the highest among countries. Even before 9/11, the difficulty of hijacking 4 airliners simultaneously could be described as mission impossible, leading to suspicion that it was not something ordinary terrorists could achieve. Before 9/11, U.S. citizens and Congress repeatedly requested an investigation into the incident, but these requests were obstructed by then-U.S. President George W. Bush. About a year later, the U.S. government finally succumbed to public pressure, and Bush ordered a thorough investigation into the incident. On November 27, 2002, Bush signed a bill establishing the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks to investigate the causes of the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government's preparedness and response, and recommendations for future prevention of terrorist attacks. Bush appointed Kissinger as the chairman of the commission. The commission was to complete its report within 18 months, by May 2004, with a budget of $3 million. The scope of the investigation included intelligence failures, emergency measures, and policy recommendations. However, Kissinger's reputation in the United States is certainly not good. Kissinger is criticized domestically as a war criminal for his involvement in the Vietnam War, the 1973 Chilean coup, the 1975 invasion of East Timor, and the 1976 Argentine "Dirty War." He is known for supporting government covert operations for many years, and he has very good relationships with Middle Eastern elite families. Therefore, many in the U.S. questioned whether Kissinger was a suitable candidate to investigate the 9/11 attacks, considering it an investigation of insiders by insiders. However, to be fair, it's not just the U.S. that does this; many places in the world prefer insiders investigating insiders. Moreover, even if the investigation was poor, at least there was an investigation; some places don't even have the opportunity for an investigation.

The entire investigation budget was only $3 million. The budget for the investigation of the Clinton sex scandal at the time was 10 times that of 9/11, i.e., $30 million. The budget for the Trump-Russia investigation was also $30 million. The budget for the investigation of the 2020 U.S. presidential election fraud was $45 million. This shows how much the U.S. government wants to uncover the truth of 9/11, or rather, how much they don't want others to know the truth of 9/11.

Before the 9/11 incident, a wealthy Jewish businessman named Larry, through his company Silverstein Properties, signed a 99-year lease with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey on July 24, 2001, leasing the management rights of retail space in the first, second, fourth, and fifth phases of the World Trade Center, approximately 39,500 square meters. The lease was for about $3.2 billion. After signing the lease, Larry purchased an insurance policy totaling $3.55 billion. Larry's purchased policy covered terrorist attacks. However, before the 9/11 incident in 2001, the U.S. insurance industry generally did not cover terrorism insurance. It was only after 9/11 that terrorism insurance became popular in the United States. If this is the case, could someone have received advance notice that the World Trade Center would be attacked by terrorists?

After discussing so many conspiracy theories, we must set the record straight. There have been certain conspiracy theories related to 9/11 that are frequently brought up, but these theories are actually incorrect. Therefore, in this section, I will refute some conspiracy theories, but whether you believe them or not is up to you.

One claim is that the Federal Reserve vault in the World Trade Center was found after 9/11, and the gold inside had mysteriously disappeared. However, this claim is incorrect. The Federal Reserve vault is not located in the World Trade Center but at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan, New York, about 400 meters away from the World Trade Center. This vault is one of the largest gold reserve facilities in the world, holding 7,000 tons of gold, primarily belonging to foreign governments and central banks. This vault remained secure after the 9/11 incident. Therefore, the claim that 90% of the gold in the Federal Reserve vault disappeared is actually false. However, there was indeed a vault under the fourth phase of the World Trade Center, but it did not belong to the New York Federal Reserve. Instead, it was a reserve facility of the New York Mercantile Exchange. This facility did store a large amount of gold and silver as collateral for futures trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. After 9/11, the New York Mercantile Exchange reported a loss of $20 million in precious metals, possibly due to damage from debris falling from the World Trade Center or loss during the recovery process. Therefore, the conspiracy theory about the mysterious disappearance of gold from the Federal Reserve vault is unfounded. The correct information is that some precious metals at the New York Mercantile Exchange were damaged or lost.

Another rumor suggests that in the minutes or hours before the 9/11 incident, the World Trade Center's computer systems processed an unusually high volume of credit card transactions, possibly totaling one hundred million dollars. This rumor originated from a German data recovery company that, in December 2001, discovered that 32 computer hard drives recovered from the World Trade Center wreckage showed suspicious transactions before 9/11. However, they did not state the actual amount, only estimating it to be over one hundred million dollars, and did not specify credit card transactions, meaning these amounts could have been other financial transactions, such as transfers or stock trades. Therefore, the rumor that people knew about the impending terrorist attack and kept swiping cards, then not having to pay, is false. In reality, although the terminals and servers in the World Trade Center were damaged, it does not mean the data would be completely lost. In 2001, credit card transaction systems relied on distributed networks, and data was usually stored in multiple locations. For example, credit card transaction data is divided into the front end, i.e., the card swiping device at the store, and the back end, i.e., the network server of the issuing bank. Although the front end in the World Trade Center was damaged, the back-end data was usually stored in data centers and would not be affected by damage to the front-end devices. Therefore, even if the data in the World Trade Center was lost, it does not mean the back-end data would be completely lost. Even if those amounts were actually swiped, the data could still be traced. Therefore, this conspiracy theory is also unfounded.

Furthermore, regarding the crash of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania, some question why crew members and passengers could call the ground, suspecting the call recordings are fabricated. In reality, there was another method of communication at the time, which is now obsolete due to impracticality and cost. Airplanes at the time had a communication system called Airfone, which transmitted through satellites and ground signal stations, allowing passengers to make satellite calls to communicate with the ground. Of the 37 calls made during the incident, 30 were actually made via Airfone. However, due to the extremely high cost and instability of this type of communication, Airfone has now been phased out and replaced by Wi-Fi and 5G. So, to be fair, it was indeed possible for people to call the ground at the time, just not using mobile phones, but using Airfone. As we mentioned earlier, the probability of a mobile phone connecting to the ground was only 5%.

Another conspiracy theory claims that bin Laden uses his right hand in videos, but he is actually left-handed, thus questioning whether the person in the video is bin Laden. First, we will not discuss whether the person in the video is not bin Laden. However, most people refer to videos of bin Laden using his right hand as one of the clips released by the U.S. government on December 13, 2001, showing bin Laden discussing the 9/11 attacks with al-Qaeda members, admitting responsibility for the attacks, and praising the hijackers. In reality, bin Laden can be seen using both hands in different video clips. For example, in a 1997 CNN interview, he used his right hand, and in a 1998 ABC interview, he used his left hand. So, it's possible he is ambidextrous, or there isn't a clear dominant hand. In fact, in Saudi Arabian culture, the left hand is usually used for cleaning, and the right hand is usually used for eating or writing. Therefore, it is difficult to determine whether the person in the video is bin Laden based solely on which hand he uses.

In fact, current U.S. President Trump was interviewed by a television station on the day of the 9/11 incident. When asked by the reporter for his opinion on the complete collapse of the World Trade Center, he said it was obvious that these were not structural defects. If you know a little about the structure of the Twin Towers, you would know why the windows of the World Trade Center are so narrow, because the entire exterior of the building is made of steel columns. He said that ordinary building structures place steel columns on the inside, usually next to the elevators. However, the World Trade Center has these steel columns both inside and outside, so theoretically, it has the strongest structure. Regardless of whether it was a 767 or a 747, how could it penetrate those steel columns? I don't believe the collapse of the World Trade Center was caused by the planes. So when I first saw it collapse, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Trump then asked the reporter if the collapse of the World Trade Center was related to the planes. Therefore, later conspiracy theorists believed that Trump already suspected on the day of the incident that the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 was unrelated to the plane crash. This later led to the theory that the World Trade Center was subjected to controlled demolition, causing its complete collapse.

Furthermore, during his interview, Trump said he personally witnessed the World Trade Center being hit from his Trump Tower. He saw the second plane hit the World Trade Center at extremely high speed, followed by a huge explosion, and even saw some people jumping out of the building's windows. I think everyone knows that before Trump became President of the United States, he was a famous real estate tycoon who built many buildings in New York, so he was very familiar with building structures. Trump also said at the time that when the first World Trade Center was hit by a car bomb in 1993, he went to the underground parking lot to see the scene. He said that underground parking lots are usually the most vulnerable part of a building because that's where the foundation is. However, even after being hit by a bomb, there were no problems. Therefore, he questioned why, on the day of 9/11, after the World Trade Center Twin Towers were hit by planes, the entire buildings collapsed.

Illuminati: The Game of Conspiracy is a card game created by the renowned American game designer Steve Jackson in 1982. Initially, Illuminati cards were only in black and white, and it wasn't until 1995 that it was revised to color and had some cards added. Currently, there are a total of 450 cards. Di has all 450 Illuminati cards. The game's inspiration comes from the 1975 novel "The Illuminatus! Trilogy" and the concept of a "New World Order" intended to manipulate global events, including politics, economics, natural disasters, and terrorist attacks. Illuminati cards are considered to have predicted many world events due to their illustrations and descriptions, such as the 9/11 attacks, the South Asian tsunami, and the Fukushima earthquake, thus attracting attention. Especially in the conspiracy theory community, Illuminati cards are often seen as prophecies, believed to be the script of the Illuminati, and that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by a deep state or secret organization, with the Illuminati cards serving as advance warnings of these actions.

Currently, two Illuminati cards are said to be related to the 9/11 attacks. The first is "Terrorist Nuke," which I call "Terrorist Nuclear Attack." The image on this card shows a tall building resembling the World Trade Center Twin Towers being destroyed by a nuclear bomb, with smoke rising from the center and New York in the background. The explosion point on the card roughly corresponds to the impact point on the second World Trade Center tower, floors 77 to 85. The smoke in the image is also similar to news photos. Also, because the card's title is "Nuclear Weapon," it has led conspiracy theorists to believe that the 9/11 attacks actually involved micro-nuclear bombs. According to FBI reports, the 9/11 attacks were simply plane crashes and unrelated to nuclear attacks. However, in reality, some rescue workers in the 9/11 incident suffered from cancer years later. The official explanation is that certain building materials, such as asbestos and other chemicals, are carcinogenic.

The other card is "Pentagon." The image shows a pentagonal building smoking in the center with a fire, but the side structure of the building is intact. Some believe that the smoke in the card partially matches the facts, but the Illuminati card does not explicitly show the Pentagon being hit by a plane, only an explosion. Therefore, some also believe that the incident inside the Pentagon was not a plane crash but a missile hitting the outer wall of the Pentagon, causing what appeared to be a plane crash.

Here, I will briefly state my opinion. First, I think the World Trade Center Twin Towers card refers to a nuclear attack, and the card does not mention any planes. Given that the World Trade Center Twin Towers were a U.S. landmark in the 1990s, if someone wanted to destroy New York, the Twin Towers would be an ideal target. So, it can only be said that the part about terrorists attacking the Twin Towers is consistent with reality and the card. Another point is the Pentagon card. It is reasonable to infer that in a real terrorist attack, as I mentioned earlier, the plane should have hit the center of the Pentagon for maximum destructive power. But for some reason, the terrorists coincidentally hit a reinforced area, minimizing the destructive power of the attack. Of course, if this terrorist attack was not carried out by real terrorists but was staged and directed by someone within the government, it would be reasonable to take such measures to avoid destroying the country's most important institution. However, to claim that this card is the same as the 9/11 incident, or that the Illuminati card predicted 9/11, depends on what other predictions the Illuminati card itself makes. We need to look at it from a holistic perspective. I will discuss this in detail in the episode about the Illuminati cards.

Finally, regarding the claim that the Illuminati card predicted the occurrence of 9/11, could it be the opposite? Did the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks copy the Illuminati card instead of the Illuminati card predicting 9/11? We have already mentioned the term "false flag operation." What exactly is a "false flag operation"?

A "false flag operation" originates from 16th to 18th century Western pirate and naval tactics. At that time, pirates and navies would approach their targets using false flags to prevent them from escaping or engaging in battle, then launch a sudden attack when they got close. However, with societal changes, "false flag operations" are no longer limited to naval warfare. They refer to a situation where a country, organization, or individual intentionally carries out an action and disguises it as being carried out by another party, including opposing organizations, countries, or other entities, to mislead the public, conceal their true intentions, and achieve certain political, military, or economic goals. "False flag operations" are often used to incite public anger, amplify effects through the media to manipulate public opinion, thereby justifying war, suppressing opponents, and diverting attention.

"False flag operations" have occurred in many places, including Hong Kong. The following two are historical "false flag operations" that actually happened. The U.S. government itself has admitted to considering or actually implementing such plans. For example, in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964, the U.S. manufactured a controversial incident in August 1964 to escalate the Vietnam War. The U.S. claimed that North Vietnamese warships attacked the U.S. destroyer Maddox on August 2nd and 4th, prompting the U.S. to push Congress to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, authorizing military action against North Vietnam. Declassified documents in 2005 confirmed that the alleged attack on August 4th never happened, and the U.S. government confirmed it was a "false flag operation."

Another example is "Operation Northwoods" in 1962. It is said that in 1959, Fidel Castro established a communist government in Cuba and allied with the Soviet Union. By 1962, at the height of the Cold War, pro-Soviet Cuba and the United States had tense relations. Therefore, in 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed "Operation Northwoods" as an action plan for military intervention in Cuba. This operation planned to stage fake Cuban attacks to generate public support in the U.S. for war against Cuba. However, this plan was vetoed by then-U.S. President Kennedy. So, this "false flag operation" was indeed planned, but the U.S. government never implemented it. The plan initially included CIA agents posing as Cuban mercenaries to attack the naval base at Guantanamo Bay, including bombing the ammunition depot, causing U.S. casualties and property damage, and then blaming Cuba. Another plan was to use public funds to bribe Cuban commanders under Castro and have them launch a fake attack on Guantanamo Bay. This fake attack included bombing a U.S. warship, which could have been empty or had a small number of casualties, followed by a fake victims' funeral and then publishing the casualty list in U.S. newspapers to stir up public anger towards Cuba. Another suggestion was to blow up an unmanned ship and disguise it as a Cuban attack. Another proposed action was to carry out terrorist campaigns by communist Cuba in Miami, Florida, Washington D.C., or other cities, including bombings and attacks, and then blame Cuba. These attacks were to be carried out by CIA agents, with the goal of making the American public believe that Cuba posed a threat to the U.S. mainland and was carrying out actual terrorist activities, thus prompting public support for military intervention in Cuba. Another suggestion was to accidentally shoot down a U.S. civilian airliner, with the passengers being impersonated by CIA agents. The agents would pose as students going on vacation to South America, and then blame Cuba. The plan included using an unmanned aircraft disguised as a civilian airliner, with CIA agents posing as students boarding at a public airport. The plane would then be secretly replaced and shot down, creating the illusion of Cuba attacking a civilian airliner. Alternatively, simulate Cuban fighter jets attacking U.S. military or civilian aircraft.

In 1992, the U.S. Congress passed the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act, requiring the release of classified documents related to the 1963 assassination of JFK and establishing the JFK Assassination Records Review Board. On November 18, 1997, the board declassified 1,521 pages of documents as part of the JFK-related archives. At that time, the board found in the documents that the U.S. government had indeed considered "Operation Northwoods," so this is not a conspiracy theory but a historical fact. This document has now been placed in the U.S. National Archives. However, it must be reiterated that this was only a plan. The U.S. government did consider implementing this plan, but it was eventually withdrawn by President Kennedy, so it was not actually implemented.

Before 9/11, the U.S. Air Force had already conducted terrorist attack drills similar to 9/11. For example, in 1999, the New York City Office of Emergency Management (OEM), which we mentioned earlier, conducted an anti-terrorism drill that included the World Trade Center. In October 2000, a Boeing 757 airliner was simulated crashing into the Pentagon. From September 6 to 11, 2001, NORAD conducted an exercise called "Vigilant Guardian," simulating hijacked aircraft being used as weapons. In June 2001, another NORAD simulation exercise, "Amalgam Virgo," simulated hijacked aircraft and missile attacks. Some of these exercises assumed al-Qaeda was planning them, and bin Laden was considered the planner in these exercises. It is rumored that the cover of the planning documents for these exercises, in their non-public versions, featured bin Laden as the cover image. However, the publicly released files from NORAD do not show bin Laden as the cover image. But the assumption that al-Qaeda would carry out terrorist attacks was indeed in the planning documents. Were these real exercises, or rehearsals for false flag operations?

Furthermore, in September 2000, a think tank founded by future Vice President Cheney and future Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld published a report advocating for the U.S. to maintain global military hegemony, such as increasing defense spending. One sentence in the report reads: "The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, can also be a long one, unless a catastrophic, catalyzing event occurs, such as a new Pearl Harbor." Did someone here indicate that they hoped for a new Pearl Harbor event? Because there was a Pearl Harbor conspiracy theory that the U.S. already knew about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor but chose not to act, allowing it to happen. Afterward, the U.S. used the attack on its mainland as a pretext to enter World War II. Could it be that in the case of 9/11, the U.S. already knew that bin Laden would attack the World Trade Center but deliberately did not prevent it, allowing it to happen, so that they would have a pretext to attack Iraq and gain control of its oil resources? Does this event prove that the so-called deep state has been orchestrating various actions behind the scenes all along? False flag operations have always existed in American history. Of course, there may be actions that were taken without anyone knowing, which I will discuss in a future episode on American conspiracy theories. As for whether the 9/11 incident was a false flag operation, I will leave it for you to think about.

Crisis actors are referred to in conspiracy theories as actors used in false flag operations as disaster witnesses to create fake news and solidify the government's authenticity in false flag operations. In fact, crisis actors do exist and it is a profession. They are usually trained volunteers, professional actors, or personnel from other government departments. They typically play victims, witnesses, or even criminals in simulated disaster exercises. You can find more than one crisis actor company online. Foreign government agencies and security companies often hire these actors for disaster exercises. However, conspiracy theorists believe their purpose is not so simple. Conspiracy theorists believe that crisis actors are professional actors hired by the government, mainstream media, and the deep state to impersonate victims, witnesses, and emergency personnel in certain real events, such as 9/11, the Sandy Hook school shooting, and the Boston Marathon bombing, as part of false flag operations to advance politically motivated goals, such as gun control, domestic and foreign surveillance, and the justification of war.

Throughout the entire 9/11 incident, you will find some people who seemed to know exactly how everything would unfold. They would play the role of bystanders in specific locations. For example, there is a classic clip of a film crew interviewing firefighters on a street in Manhattan. The 9/11 incident had not yet happened, meaning the first plane had not yet crashed into the World Trade Center. As they were filming, a plane happened to fly overhead, and they happened to capture the plane flying directly into the World Trade Center from the ground's perspective. You will also notice that the angle seems to have been measured beforehand, otherwise, it wouldn't be so perfect. The plane flies overhead and then crashes into the World Trade Center. The entire process is filmed with the plane flying past, with almost nothing obstructing the lens. If you weren't told it was a real event, most people would think this angle was from a movie scene.

The second person suspected of being a crisis actor is a passerby randomly picked up on the street for an interview. This passerby actually knew that the fire inside the World Trade Center would cause the entire building to collapse. How could an ordinary passerby know that after the plane hit the World Trade Center, the jet fuel would leak out, causing a fire that would affect the steel structure of the World Trade Center, leading to its collapse? It's as if someone had already written a script for these crisis actors and told them to walk around at specific locations on the street, and then they would be interviewed by news reporters who rushed to the scene, providing fake testimony from a citizen's perspective about the collapse of the World Trade Center. The government's words might not be believed by citizens, but if you pick up a random passerby on the street, citizens might be more receptive. It's like in Hong Kong, there have been several major livelihood events where a major media outlet interviewed local residents, and these residents would say very positive things. But not long after, when another livelihood event occurred, you would find the same resident appearing in another location. And it's not just this incident; many past events in Hong Kong have been related to crisis actors, so crisis actors are not unique to the United States.

The third suspected crisis actor is BBC reporter Jane Standley. During a live broadcast, she reported that the seventh building of the World Trade Center would collapse half an hour before it actually did, even though the seventh building could still be seen standing in the background. How could a reporter observing from a distance know that a building would collapse in half an hour? Even for a professional, unless they were inside the seventh building and knew the internal damage was severe, it would be difficult to predict the building's collapse. So how did this reporter know that the seventh building of the World Trade Center would collapse? And it was 26 minutes earlier than the actual collapse time. Of course, as we mentioned earlier, the BBC later explained that they received incorrect information and reported it without verification. But the seventh building was not attacked by terrorists. When they received this information, wouldn't they have found it suspicious? If I received this news, I would find it unreasonable and wouldn't report it immediately. So, was this a genuine mistake or a pre-written script?

The U.S. government also used the 9/11 incident to conduct large-scale surveillance on the public and the world. This involves the subsequent Snowden incident, which emerged from the United States, and his mention of the "Prism program." After the 9/11 incident in 2001, as the U.S. government propagated the idea that the nation was attacked by terrorists, many young people wanted to join the military to serve the country. Snowden was one of them. Snowden joined the U.S. Army Reserve on May 7, 2004, and participated in special forces training with the goal of participating in the Iraq War. However, during training, he suffered a leg fracture due to a training accident and was unable to complete special forces training. Later, in 2006, he joined the CIA as a technical information technology specialist, working in the global communications department at CIA headquarters, responsible for computer systems and network issues, until he discovered the existence of the "Prism program."

The "Prism program" is a secret, large-scale surveillance program launched by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) in 2007. Under the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, by cooperating with technology companies such as Microsoft, Google, and Apple, it directly collected international network data of foreign users from their servers, including emails, chat logs, uploaded files, etc., for counter-terrorism and domestic purposes. This included U.S. citizens and non-U.S. citizens, meaning it included you and me, to identify terrorist and other national security threats. The NSA could request data from technology companies without user authorization. The "Prism program" began under the Bush administration after 9/11 and continued into the Obama era. The Bush administration passed the Patriot Act in October 2001, strengthening the NSA's surveillance powers and laying the legal foundation for the "Prism program." Later, Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 was passed, allowing for the international network surveillance of foreign citizens, directly leading to the establishment of the "Prism program." The "Prism program" officially launched in September 2007. The program involved listening to and monitoring all information on the network, including real-time and existing data. The monitoring included all software and services manufactured in the U.S. Therefore, Facebook, Windows, Instagram, which we are all familiar with, are all within the scope of the "Prism program's" surveillance. So, anyone who has used IT products, software, or services manufactured in the U.S. is essentially being monitored and listened to by the U.S. for everything they do on these services and software. All emails, voice calls, videos, photos, files, and passwords are nakedly known to the U.S. government. Of course, we often say that it only affects a small number of people, and if you haven't broken the law, you don't need to be afraid. I'm not afraid.

Snowden, like David, who spoke at the UFO hearing, was ashamed of the U.S. government's actions. Therefore, after discovering the "Prism program," Snowden downloaded approximately 50,000 to 200,000 classified documents from the NSA facility in Hawaii between March and May 2013, using a USB drive and internal network tools. These included a 41-page PowerPoint presentation on the "Prism program" and data from other surveillance programs. He stored the data on encrypted SD cards and external hard drives. Then, using his administrator privileges, Snowden bypassed NSA monitoring and copied this data to his personal computer equipment. On May 20, 2013, Snowden took leave citing epilepsy treatment and flew from Hawaii to Hong Kong with the encrypted data hard drive, staying at the Miramar Hotel in Tsim Sha Tsui. On June 1, 2013, he met with reporters from The Guardian and The Washington Post at the hotel, revealing the U.S. government's "Prism program." On June 14, 2013, the U.S. government accused Snowden of unauthorized copying and transmission of defense data, constituting theft and violation of the Espionage Act. However, Snowden claimed he did not steal but collected evidence to expose the NSA's illegal activities and did not sell the data to foreign countries, only handing it over to reporters. On June 23, 2013, the U.S. revoked Snowden's passport and requested Hong Kong to extradite Snowden to the U.S. One point is quite interesting.

Hong Kong and the United States had extradition treaties at the time. The United States claimed Snowden committed the crime of disclosing official secrets and demanded Hong Kong extradite Snowden back to the United States for trial. Snowden hid in Hong Kong in various places, including the Mira Hotel in Tsim Sha Tsui, the Sri Lankan Refugee Home in Lai Chi Kok, and subdivided flats in Sham Shui Po and Sai Wan. In the end, Hong Kong stated that the United States had not submitted sufficient documents, so there was no way to extradite Snowden. During this period of tug-of-war between Hong Kong and the United States, Snowden took the opportunity to flee Hong Kong and head to Russia. He left Hong Kong on an Aeroflot flight. After arriving at Moscow airport, he was stranded there for 40 days due to not having valid documents. Later, he received political asylum from the Russian government and has resided in Russia ever since, never leaving.

After the 9/11 attacks, although there was no conclusive evidence, the US government insisted that the 9/11 attacks were meticulously planned by Al-Qaeda, led by Laden. At this time, Laden became the world's most wanted criminal. But did you know that the rise of the Laden family and Al-Qaeda can be said to be entirely caused by the United States itself? The whole story is really long, so I will try to focus on the key points. Otherwise, this part alone could be a whole video.

It is said that in the 1930s, global oil demand surged due to industrialization and the widespread use of automobiles. As a major oil-producing country, the United States produced about 900 million barrels in 1930. Therefore, they urgently needed to seek overseas resources. Saudi Arabia possessed rich geological potential, but at that time, they lacked capital and technology. Thus, the two countries hit it off and searched for oil together. On May 29, 1933, Saudi Arabia and the American California Standard Oil Company signed a concession agreement, granting Standard Oil Company exclusive rights to explore for oil in eastern Saudi Arabia. This right was valid until 1999. In return, the Saudi royal family would receive £35,000, plus an annual rent of £5,000. Yes, you heard that right, I didn't misstate it. That was the amount used at the time to sign this exclusive right. Finally, in 1938, they discovered the Ghawar oil field at Well No. 7 in Mandah. After exploration, the reserves were estimated to be up to 70 billion barrels. Saudi Arabia and the United States subsequently extracted a lot of oil. Laden's father, due to Americans mining oil in Saudi Arabia, transformed from a mere worker into a billionaire. The Laden family was not originally wealthy. It was through Americans mining oil in Saudi Arabia that the Laden family, by chance, obtained construction contracts. Later, their business grew bigger and bigger, and they began to have close ties with the Saudi royal family. With the support of the royal family, the Saudi Arabian Construction Group of the Laden family undertook more oil-related infrastructure projects, thereby making the Laden family billionaires.

By 1979, the Soviet Union, in support of the Afghan communist government, sent 115,000 soldiers to occupy Afghanistan. Afghan Muslims viewed the Soviet Union as an invasion by infidels, so they launched a jihad and formed jihad organizations. Laden, then 23 years old, went to Afghanistan in 1980 to fight against the Soviet invasion. He used his personal assets, estimated at $200 million, to support the jihad organization and build training camps. Furthermore, as the United States and the Soviet Union were mortal enemies at the time, the United States, through the CIA, provided $3 billion to support the jihad organization and Laden's training camps, as well as weapons and training for Laden to fight the Soviets. Some of this was guided by American and Pakistani officers. It was also because of this that Laden founded Al-Qaeda, with the goal of continuing the jihad and resisting foreign interference in Muslim lands. Therefore, it can be said that the United States played a part in the establishment of Al-Qaeda. This also gives rise to a conspiracy theory that Laden was actually a CIA asset because he received training from the CIA. This explanation also accounts for why some of the hijackers were able to perform some high-difficulty aircraft piloting maneuvers, which is related to the CIA training at the time. The Soviet Union finally withdrew its troops on February 15, 1989. Laden was considered to have played a role. Because Laden successfully resisted the Soviet invasion, he returned to Saudi Arabia and became a national hero. At this point, Laden was not yet anti-American. It can be said that he still had a certain relationship with the United States, as his family's rise, his successful resistance against the Soviets, the founding of Al-Qaeda, and his becoming a national hero could all be attributed to US support behind the scenes.

I believe the turning point began around the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. In 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait, threatening Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the Saudi royal family allowed the US-led coalition forces to be stationed in Saudi Arabia to protect the oil fields and expel Iraq. However, Laden viewed this as desecration of holy land. In 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed. In the year after the collapse of the Soviet Union, he was expelled from Saudi Arabia. He then lived in Sudan from 1992 to 1996. As mentioned earlier, the bombing of the World Trade Center's underground parking lot on February 26, 1993, was planned by Al-Qaeda. Laden attempted to provide funding. On March 5, 1993, The New York Times mentioned Laden for the first time, calling him a Saudi financier suspected of funding terrorism. It was also from this point that Laden gradually came into the spotlight and entered international view. On August 23, 1996, Laden issued a declaration of jihad against the United States in Afghanistan, calling for attacks on American military and civilian targets. Due to the United States' long-term support for Israel and the Saudi regime, Laden's declaration was broadcast through Arab media. Laden began to be referred to by international media as an anti-American leader. On August 7, 1998, Al-Qaeda simultaneously attacked the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Laden was considered the planner of the attacks. US President Clinton publicly condemned his terrorism. On August 20, 1998, the United States launched cruise missile airstrikes on Al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan and Sudan, but Laden escaped and became the world's most wanted criminal. On June 7, 1999, Laden was listed on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list with a $5 million reward.

By October 12, 2000, one year before the 9/11 attacks, Al-Qaeda attacked the USS Cole, a US Navy destroyer. Laden was suspected of providing funding and planning. In August 2001, Laden released a video through the Arab satellite television station, threatening to launch a major attack on the United States. Until September 11, 2001, the world-renowned 9/11 attacks occurred. After the 9/11 attacks, Laden did not reappear but communicated through videos and audio messages, with fewer major actions than before. From a modern perspective, Laden was practically a contemporary YouTuber. After 9/11, Laden returned to Afghanistan. On October 7, 2001, the United States launched the war in Afghanistan. In fact, the CIA had established the Laden Group as early as 1996 and had been tracking his whereabouts, but had been unable to capture Laden until then. By December 2001, Laden had fled to the tribal areas of Pakistan. Later, from 2003 to 2005, the United States captured one of Al-Qaeda's high-ranking members. They knew that Laden avoided electronic communication, for example, he did not have a mobile phone or use the internet. He would use 5 to 10 highly trusted couriers to convey his messages. He returned to the northwestern border of Pakistan. Later, the US NSA, through the PRISM program, identified one of the couriers and placed him under 24-hour surveillance. Finally, in August 2010, the CIA discovered a tall man in a three-story house in Abbottabad, Pakistan. This man would walk in the courtyard every day but would not go outside. Thus, the CIA confirmed that this man was Laden.

In January 2011, more than 10 years after the 9/11 attacks, Obama ordered the planning of an assault. Joint Special Operations Command developed an operation called "Operation Neptune Spear," executed by 24 members of SEAL Team Six. On April 29, Obama approved the operation in the White House Situation Room. One of the biggest problems with the operation was that the compound was only one kilometer away from the Pakistan Military Academy. Moreover, since the US operation would not notify the Pakistani government to prevent leaks, there was a risk of Pakistani military intervention, leading to diplomatic disputes. This was because the US government entered another country's territory without permission and illegally killed people within its borders. Finally, on May 2, 2011, the SEAL team successfully killed Laden. Laden died on the spot. The SEAL team then took all evidence from the scene and Laden's body. Four hours after the raid, the team conducted DNA identification at a military base in Afghanistan, claiming to have used samples extracted from Laden's sister when she died in Boston in 1998 for comparison. The comparison showed a 99.9% match, confirming that the person killed was Laden. The United States wrapped the body in a white shroud and weighed it down to 100 kilograms. On the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson, the body was buried at sea according to Islamic rituals to prevent Laden from becoming a martyr due to his religion, which might have led his grave to become a pilgrimage site and potentially inspire more anti-American terrorists to become his successors. However, no photos were taken during the entire sea burial process. If you search for "Laden Dead body" online now, you can find photos of Laden's killing at the time. I have seen them myself, but whether that person is Laden or not, you can judge for yourself. The entire process of the raid and sea burial took less than 24 hours. After Laden's death, Al-Qaeda's operational capacity significantly decreased, so I will not discuss it further.

In fact, there are many unreasonable aspects to Laden's death, primarily concerning the US government's handling of his body. The US government, to prevent future followers from making pilgrimages to Laden's burial site, threw his body into the Arabian Sea. Furthermore, citing the body's appearance as too horrific, they did not release any videos or photos related to Laden's death. The only publicly released photo showed a group of high-ranking White House officials and military personnel watching the entire live operation with tense expressions. Later, to give the world a visual understanding of Laden's killing, Hollywood produced a film called "Zero Dark Thirty," released the following year. Ordinary people gained a clearer perspective on the entire process of killing Laden. However, whether this is the truth or the version of the story the government wants the world to know is debatable.

Therefore, from the rise of Saudi Arabia, the emergence of the Laden family, Laden becoming a national hero, to the founding of Al-Qaeda, it can be said that all of this is related to the United States. Thus, the United States directly or indirectly facilitated the establishment of Al-Qaeda. Was the rise of the Laden family and Laden becoming a national hero orchestrated by the so-called deep state behind the scenes? Even the so-called 9/11 attacks, could they have been a staged terrorist attack by the deep state using the Laden they created? It is very clear here that Laden's anti-American sentiment began with the collapse of the Soviet Union. If we interpret this through a conspiracy theory, why did this behavior occur? It has a lot to do with the United States' false flag operations. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States needed a national-level enemy. Such a common enemy could distract the public's attention, reduce dissatisfaction with domestic policy failures, and serve as an outlet for national anger when there were instances of unfairness in the domestic system. This would be beneficial for the United States' domestic governance and control. In fact, the same method has appeared in different countries around the world. Some countries deliberately guide their citizens to hate other countries and regions, thereby finding an outlet for various unfair phenomena within their own country, which is beneficial for their governance. You can refer back to my in-depth review of Squid Game Season 3, which mentions how systems create contradictions, and then people focus on these contradictions, forgetting the various systemic injustices. Could this whole thing be a super large-scale false flag operation? And could Laden be a crisis actor playing the role of an enemy? Or was someone guiding him to become an enemy of the United States? This would fit the deep state's plan, as they needed a national-level enemy.

However, one point remains unexplained: before the 2004 US presidential election, Laden tended to deny that he planned the 9/11 attacks. He repeatedly denied it and expressed himself vaguely. If he considered the 9/11 attacks a victory for jihad, there would be no reason for him to deny it. Could it be possible that 9/11 was indeed unrelated to Laden and was a false flag operation carried out by the United States itself? That's why Laden didn't admit it before. The later claims that Laden was the planner of the 9/11 attacks were solely the US government's narrative. But with the end of Operation Neptune Spear, the truth also sank into oblivion. Besides distracting the public, who else benefited the most from a national-level enemy?

In 2012, a US military helicopter was shot down by terrorists with a missile in Libya. Later, US soldiers found the serial number on the missile wreckage and discovered that the missile was supposed to be stored by the CIA at a military base in Qatar. They found it strange why it was shot down by their own weapons. This led to a conspiracy theory that the helicopter was actually on a secret CIA mission, transporting weapons from the Qatar military base to Libya, to be handed over to Syrian rebels. In fact, this operation itself was problematic. Later, WikiLeaks' Julian Assange incident revealed that Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, knew that Saudi Arabia was funding ISIS but chose to conceal the truth and deliberately approved the transfer of weapons from Libya to Syrian rebels through a secret CIA base in Benghazi, ultimately leading the weapons into the hands of ISIS and causing chaos in the Middle East. The Stinger missile used by terrorists to shoot down the US military helicopter was originally stored by the CIA at a military base in Qatar. Later, those missiles disappeared for some reason and ended up in the hands of terrorists. Later, through the "email gate" incident, 1,700 emails leaked by WikiLeaks in 2016 revealed that the missiles were arranged by the Clinton Foundation for someone named Stephen to deliberately sell them to the black market through private arms dealers, and then indirectly sell them to a terrorist organization loyal to the Taliban. The Clinton Foundation, supported by the deep state and the military-industrial complex, profited from selling arms to terrorists while also destabilizing the Middle East and causing more wars. The more chaotic the situation and the more wars in the world, the more money military-industrial companies make. Furthermore, arms, like food, have an expiration date. If military-industrial companies produce so many weapons and no one uses them, they will expire. To sell arms, they will constantly instigate conflicts and incite wars in other places so that they can make money. This led to the situation where US military helicopters were shot down by weapons provided by themselves, and their own weapons were used against them. Hillary and Obama knew that the Clinton Foundation was being investigated. This matter was quickly covered up. They knew that in this whole affair, there was one person who was most likely to break silence during the investigation: Stephen, who had previously been sent to sell missiles to the black market. Therefore, without congressional approval, they immediately appointed Stephen as the US Ambassador to Libya. The stated reason was for him to go to Benghazi to find the missiles that had been sold to terrorists, but in reality, it was to silence him. Ultimately, Stephen was suddenly attacked by terrorists at a US military base. Initially, Obama said there were only demonstrations in the area, but these terrorists clearly attacked the US military base with a purpose. Stephen could have escaped. He hid in a safe house at the base. At that time, the terrorists left the base after failing to find Stephen. However, after the terrorists left, Stephen provided his hiding location to Hillary, hoping she would quickly send someone to rescue him. After all, it was Hillary who sent him, so it was normal for him to seek help from Hillary for his location. But after he told Hillary his hiding location, the terrorists suddenly returned and clearly knew the location of the safe house at the base, as if someone had tipped them off and told them the correct location. Finally, terrorists killed Stephen. With the intermediary of the black market transaction dead, it became impossible to investigate, and the Clinton Foundation concealed its crimes. Afterward, Obama changed his statement, saying it was not a demonstration but a terrorist attack. Various parties also questioned how Hillary, as Secretary of State, could not have known about the attack on the US military base. Furthermore, intelligence indicated that Stephen had contacted Hillary multiple times before his death, but Hillary claimed she was asleep at the time and unaware of the incident, and also unaware that Stephen's safe house had been discovered by terrorists. This incident later became known as the Benghazi incident.

Not only that, but at that time, Qatar and Saudi Arabia were financiers of ISIS, and they also funded the Clinton Foundation. Later, in Hillary's 2016 presidential campaign, she received funding from them multiple times. According to financial reports from the Clinton Foundation, the foundation did receive donations from Saudi Arabia and Qatar between 2001 and 2015, totaling over $30 million. You can imagine that the same group of financiers was simultaneously funding terrorist organizations and also funding someone who could potentially become the President of the United States, while also selling arms to both sides, allowing them to fight each other. This shows that the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and so-called terrorists might be just a thin line.

The military-industrial complex refers to the symbiotic relationship between a country's military and private military industrial organizations due to overly close political and economic interests. This symbiotic relationship includes a joint monopoly formed by defense contractors, the Pentagon, and legislative and executive branches of the US government. For example, the military relies on private arms manufacturers for advanced technology and weapons, while private arms manufacturers hope that the military, within the government system, will ensure sufficient budgets through political and economic means. They even encourage senior government officials to wage wars against other countries to promote the weapons of arms manufacturers and digest weapons that have already been produced but are about to expire. This leads to an abnormally large military expenditure for a country, or they incite wars between countries so that these arms manufacturers can profit from war. Eventually, these military-industrial complexes can dominate government policy. If you watched my episode on the Roswell incident, I mentioned that Eisenhower publicly stated in his farewell address that one of the things the US government would have to worry about in the future was the rise of the military-industrial complex. The 9/11 attacks proved this. Before 9/11, the US Department of Defense's base budget was $287 billion annually. After the 9/11 attacks, the US significantly increased its defense budget, reaching $886 billion annually by 2025, an increase of nearly 300%. The US military spending has been the highest in the world for many years, accounting for 36% of global military spending. To provide more information, the second and third places are: the second place is our great motherland, $296 billion, accounting for 12% of the global total. The third place is the old best, Russia, with $84 billion annually, accounting for 3.4% of the global total. The United States has also been the country involved in the most wars since World War II. The following wars include actual US participation, excluding proxy wars: the Korean War in 1950, the Vietnam War in 1955, the First Gulf War in 1990, the Bosnian War in 1992, the Kosovo War in 1998, the War in Afghanistan in 2001, the Iraq War in 2003, the Libyan Civil War in 2011, the Syrian Civil War in 2014, the Iran War in 2025, and the potential involvement in the Ukraine War. Do you see? From the 1950s to 9/11, in 50 years, the United States participated in only 5 wars. But after 9/11, in the past 25 years, there have been almost 6 wars. Do you begin to understand why some people wanted to use the 9/11 attacks to launch the Iraq War? If the 9/11 attacks were a staged false flag operation, who were the biggest beneficiaries?

The Bush family is a very prominent family in American business and politics. The family has produced two presidents, namely the elder Bush and the younger Bush, as we often say. Before becoming president, the elder Bush had served as Vice President under Reagan. However, the Bush family was not originally a wealthy family. Their great-grandfather, Samuel Bush, was just an ordinary person, not particularly wealthy. But later, he married a very good wife, Flora Sheldon. The rise of the Bush family was largely due to Flora Sheldon. The Sheldon family itself was not super wealthy, but they were local elites, belonging to the upper-middle class in the Midwestern United States. However, Flora Sheldon's nephew's grandfather, Philip Livingston, was one of the signatories of the US Declaration of Independence, and William Livingston from the same family was one of the signatories of the US Constitution. Moreover, according to many historical records, Flora herself had excellent social skills, which undoubtedly helped Samuel Bush a lot. Later, Samuel went to work for a steel company owned by Rockefeller. Later, Samuel was appreciated by Rockefeller and was directly given the entire steel company to manage as CEO. Rockefeller was one of the thirteen families of the legendary Illuminati. Although there is no evidence to suggest that Rockefeller's appreciation of Samuel was related to his wife, Flora's Livingston lineage may have elevated Samuel's status in elite circles, facilitating his connection with Rockefeller. Later, due to World War I, the demand for steel surged, especially for the manufacture of gun barrels, shell casings, and railway equipment. The United States entered the war in April 1917, and steel demand further increased. Samuel's steel company began to focus on producing military gun barrels and shell casings in 1917. A year later, Samuel was appointed to the War Industries Board as the head of the Ordnance, Small Arms, and Ammunition Division, responsible for the liaison between the government and arms companies. For example, Remington, which we are very familiar with, was actually controlled by Rockefeller at the time. Conservatively estimated, Samuel accumulated millions of dollars in wealth between 1901 and 1927. Adjusted for inflation, this is about 3 to 5 billion Hong Kong dollars today, directly making the Bush family truly upper-class. His wife Flora was indispensable. At this time, the Bush family had made a name for themselves in the business world. It can be said that the Bush family's rise was based on profiting from war. Later, Samuel's son, Prescott Sheldon Bush, the grandfather of the younger Bush, took the family to the next level. Prescott married Dorothy Wear Walker in 1921. Dorothy's father, George Herbert Walker, was a Wall Street investment banker. This marriage directly led Prescott into the Wall Street financial circle. Later, Prescott and two of his Yale University classmates jointly founded an investment bank, BBH. Due to his father's good relationship with Rockefeller, BBH had a very deep cooperative relationship with Rockefeller's Chase Bank, making BBH a top investment bank at the time, allowing the Bush family to move from the industrial world into the world of Wall Street. By the way, Prescott and his two classmates were also members of Skull and Bones. However, the topic of Skull and Bones will be discussed another day if there is an opportunity. Also, Prescott ran for Federal Senator in 1952, and Nelson Rockefeller became Governor of New York in 1959. Both supported Eisenhower and Nixon. If you remember my episode on the Roswell incident, I mentioned that Nelson Rockefeller had intricate connections with the later military-industrial complex. However, I will not elaborate further, and you can look it up yourself. Later, BBH, in which Prescott was involved, financed various entities around the world. One of the financing recipients was Fritz Thyssen, a German steel magnate. While Prescott managed Fritz Thyssen's US assets, he also provided financing to him through BBH. Fritz Thyssen supported the Nazi Party with money and effort in 1923 and publicly joined the Nazi Party in 1931, supporting Hitler's rise to power. It can be said that the Bush family helped finance Hitler, and with the money, Hitler obtained a large number of weapons, contributing to World War II. His father entered the industrial world, and his grandfather entered the banking world. As the father of the younger Bush, the elder Bush attempted to enter politics. Before the age of 39, the elder Bush founded Zapata Oil Company and received financing from the Rockefeller family's Chase Bank. Leveraging his family's wealth and connections, the elder Bush was elected Chairman of the Republican Party in Harris County, Texas, at the age of 39, beginning his political career. He successively became a Congressman, then the Director of the US Liaison Office in China, and served as Vice President in the Reagan administration from 1981 to 1989, participating in the Cold War. After Reagan stepped down from 1989 to 1993, the elder Bush naturally became the 41st President of the United States, leading the Persian Gulf War. The elder Bush himself had a strong background in business and Wall Street, with steel mills, arms dealers, oil companies, and Wall Street, plus the support of the Rockefeller family behind him. When all these parties united, they formed a military-industrial complex that combined resources from various sectors. It can be seen that each generation of the Bush family has been almost entirely related to war. So, do you begin to understand why 9/11 occurred during the younger Bush's presidency and why the Iraq War was launched afterward? At that time, the Bush administration accused Iraqi President Saddam Hussein of possessing weapons of mass destruction and having ties to Al-Qaeda, posing an "imminent threat." The final conclusion was a 10-year war in Iraq, but no chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons stockpiles were found, meaning no weapons of mass destruction. After the Iraq War was launched, several American oil companies entered Iraq. Originally, American companies were not allowed to participate in Iraq's oil industry. With the Iraq War, these oil companies were able to enter Iraq. Conservatively estimated, the profits obtained by American companies from Iraqi oil after the launch of the Iraq War ranged from hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars. The presidential campaign funds of the Bush family were largely funded by these oil companies and the military-industrial complex. During the younger Bush's presidency, several military-industrial companies received tens of billions of dollars in government contracts. So, do you begin to see the connection? Let's use an analogy. Suppose a military-industrial complex believes that Di Da has great potential. Then they continuously support Di Da to rise in politics. During this process, Di Da will constantly implement policies that benefit these military-industrial complexes. One day, when the military-industrial complex has supported Di Da to become president, Di Da will use all sorts of means to trigger domestic and foreign wars, or wars between foreign countries. If there are wars, the military-industrial complex makes money. If there is world peace, they have nothing to do. If a war is won, Di Da will use maintaining public order or reconstruction as an excuse to arrange for the military-industrial complex to undertake these projects, allowing them to make another profit. At the same time, the military-industrial complex will continue to act as kingmakers, allowing people they deem promising to enter American politics, thus perpetuating this cycle.

Besides politics, what other connections does the Bush family have with 9/11 in terms of actual actions? First, the World Trade Center was managed by a security company called Stratasec. Stratasec obtained a $8.3 million contract for the World Trade Center in October 1996, responsible for the building's electronic security. Stratasec's clients included the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport, United Airlines, HP, EDS, Gillette, MCI, and others. Have you noticed that their clients are all related to the 9/11 attacks? First, the World Trade Center was hit, and flights 175 and 93, which were hijacked, were both United Airlines flights. The hijacker who crashed into the Pentagon was on flight 77, which departed from Dulles International Airport. And the younger Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was a board member of this Stratasec. Stratasec was funded by another company, Kuwait American Corporation, and was its main investor. Coincidentally, Marvin was also a board member of Kuwait American Corporation. At the same time, Marvin served as a director of an insurance company called HCC from 1999 to 2002, which provided some insurance for the World Trade Center. So, Marvin Bush was not only involved with the insurance company of the World Trade Center but also with their security company. However, it seems that becoming a director is quite easy. I also see that some investment company directors are very beautiful young girls. In fact, I am also talented and have some talent, strong analytical skills, and am now somewhat famous. I wonder if any company would invite me to be a director? And the Kuwait American Corporation, which we mentioned earlier, is itself an investment company of Kuwait in the United States. Coincidentally, one of the masterminds of the 9/11 attacks, Mohammed Atta, was also a Kuwaiti. Mohammed Atta grew up in Kuwait and went to the United States in 1983 to study at North Carolina State University. Mohammed Atta participated in the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan in 1980. Do you remember what we said earlier in the section "Who is Laden?" about Laden's jihad organization and Al-Qaeda receiving CIA training in their early years? Could this Mohammed Atta also have received CIA training? Furthermore, Mohammed Atta planned several terrorist attacks in 1990, including the bombing of the World Trade Center's underground parking lot in 1993, which we mentioned earlier. One theory is that in 1996, Mohammed Atta proposed the plan of crashing planes into the World Trade Center to Laden. In 1999, he received Laden's approval and executed it in 2001. Just Stratasec and a few parts of the 9/11 incident have such a significant connection. Even if he wasn't involved, he should have been investigated. However, Stratasec and Kuwait American Corporation were not thoroughly investigated by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission. Stratasec suddenly delisted in 2002 due to financial problems after 9/11. Marvin Bush also resigned from the board of HCC Insurance Company in the year after 9/11.

There is also a rather peculiar point here. When I was making this video, I tried to find the company logo of Stratasec, but I couldn't find any images. I know this company delisted in 2002 after 9/11, but normally, it's unlikely that there would be no images at all. I even searched for their prospectus in the US in the 90s, and there were only text records. I haven't been able to find any images so far. Given their involvement in security in so many places, it's hard to believe there are no pictures. This point is a bit strange, but perhaps it's just my own inadequacy in not being able to find them. I tried using several search engines and couldn't find them.

Also, do you remember when I talked about controlled demolition, I mentioned that before 9/11, from September 8th to September 9th, the World Trade Center experienced a power outage, the security system was temporarily shut down, and bomb detection dogs were withdrawn? Also, the elevators in the World Trade Center were renovated. These are all related to Stratasec, as Stratasec was responsible for the security of the World Trade Center at the time. If I hadn't found information about this security company, looking at it from the perspective of 2025, Stratasec would have simply disappeared from the face of the earth.

Finally, you might notice that a family name is frequently mentioned in this video: Rockefeller. The thirteen families of the Illuminati are a modern conspiracy theory that claims thirteen elite families control global wealth, politics, and economics, driving the so-called New World Order. The list of thirteen families is often inconsistent, but Rockefeller and Rothschild are the most common. While redoing this video, I discovered many clues related to the Illuminati or Rockefeller. I deliberately did not mention them earlier, saving them for here to focus on them, as a sort of punishment for those who haven't watched the entire video. First, regarding Laden: as mentioned earlier, in the 1930s, Saudi Arabia signed a concession agreement with the American California Standard Oil Company, granting Standard Oil Company exclusive rights to explore for oil in eastern Saudi Arabia. Standard Oil Company was none other than the Rockefeller family's. In other words, the later rise of the Laden family had some connection with Rockefeller. In 1914, Standard Oil Company monopolized nearly 90% of the US oil market. This means that all of America's oil, and even most of the world's oil, actually served the Rockefeller family. Later, due to antitrust laws, Standard Oil Company was broken up into 34 companies, such as ExxonMobil and Chevron. Although these companies are now said to be independent, they are still actually related to the Rockefeller family.

Next, regarding the military-industrial complex: this part is somewhat related to the episode on the Roswell incident. If you don't understand what I'm saying here, I suggest you review it. I won't repeat it here. As mentioned earlier, there was an organization called MJ12, and its member list included Nelson Rockefeller and the elder Bush. It is generally believed that the military-industrial complex includes Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon, but Rockefeller has invested significantly in many of these military-industrial companies behind the scenes. For example, Rockefeller, through some investment companies, invested in Lockheed Martin and Boeing. Furthermore, a 2016 report indicated that the Rockefeller Foundation and Bill Gates' foundation both invested in Raytheon, influencing global agricultural policy. So, the reason the military-industrial complex is called a complex is that it encompasses politics, business, and military-industrial enterprises, forming a symbiotic relationship due to overly close political and economic interests. Given the close relationship between the Rockefeller and Bush families, would the US government be influenced to wage wars, such as the Iraq War after 9/11? Before launching a war, there must be a reason, and that reason was the 9/11 attacks. As I mentioned earlier, in his final term, Eisenhower deeply regretted allowing Rockefeller and private institutions to participate, realizing that the military-industrial complex was gradually becoming more powerful than the US government and increasingly uncontrollable, even influencing the government in return. This is what we call the Deep State. And Rockefeller's method to achieve this was to become a kingmaker. Rockefeller facilitated the rise of several US presidents. During Eisenhower's term, Rockefeller was able to join MJ12 primarily because Eisenhower received his support during his campaign. Therefore, Eisenhower made an exception and brought Rockefeller into the MJ12 system. This is already very clear, indicating that Eisenhower's kingmaker was Rockefeller.

By the time of the elder Bush, Nelson Rockefeller first helped the elder Bush win the position of Ambassador to the United Nations in 1970 through funding and Republican figures. In 1976, he again helped the elder Bush become Director of the CIA. Both the elder Bush and Nelson Rockefeller were members of Yale University's Skull and Bones. In 1980, when the elder Bush ran for the Republican presidential nomination, Rockefeller provided funding and endorsement from behind the scenes, enabling the elder Bush to become Vice President under President Reagan after withdrawing from the primaries. Later, after Reagan stepped down, the elder Bush naturally became the 41st President of the United States.

Moving on to the younger Bush's era, the younger Bush's presidential campaign in 2000 had a total expenditure of $193 million, nearly $200 million. The main sources of funding came from the oil industry, such as ExxonMobil and Chevron, and military-industrial companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and JPMorgan Chase. These companies provided funding for the younger Bush's campaign in 2000. These companies were either under Rockefeller's umbrella or had Rockefeller's investments. Therefore, if you try to find direct evidence of Rockefeller directly funding the younger Bush, it might be difficult to find, and even if found, the amount might not be large. But the real funding was done through his affiliated companies, directly supporting the younger Bush and his government. As everyone who works knows, would the boss do it personally? Of course not, it's done by subordinates, but who decides the direction? And during the younger Bush's administration, the 9/11 attacks occurred, followed by the launch of the Iraq War. After the fall of Saddam's regime, the coalition established an interim Iraqi government responsible for reforming the oil industry. It is estimated that Iraq's oil reserves are as high as 143 billion barrels, ranking fifth globally. Therefore, after the Iraq War, the reform of Iraq's oil industry immediately became a target for international companies. Rockefeller's ExxonMobil participated in Iraq's oil reform. Originally, Iraq's oil did not allow American companies to participate, but after the Iraq War, American companies were able to get involved. Additionally, Rockefeller, through JPMorgan Chase, provided financial support to the interim Iraqi government and subsequent governments during Iraq's reconstruction, including trade financing, banking systems, and oil export settlements. However, if you search now, it is difficult to find direct connections between Rockefeller and these companies like JPMorgan Chase and ExxonMobil, as their families have long "retired from business" and shifted their focus to more positive industries like healthcare, education, and agriculture. The companies mentioned earlier have long since become independent companies operated by professional management and boards of directors. Rockefeller, under the guise of being an investor and shareholder, has shifted focus. But as we see in Hong Kong films like "Young and Dangerous," when a leader of a triad like Hung Hing makes enough money, they also transition to legitimate businesses. But in reality, are they still controlling the operations of the triad from behind the scenes? You can think about that for yourself. I believe that anyone with independent thinking ability will understand what has happened after watching this video. Who are the masterminds? I believe that any viewer who watches from beginning to end should have sufficient independent thinking ability to distinguish what has happened. If you don't know what a three-dimensional viewer is, please go back and watch my UFO hearing video.

Furthermore, we often say that the Illuminati are legendary beings. Does the Illuminati exist in this world? What is the origin of the Illuminati? Which are the thirteen families of the Illuminati? How many of the world's major events have been directly or indirectly participated in by the Illuminati? And Dimension D. will be XXXXXXX explaining "The Mystery of XXX." Please stay tuned.

Finally, regarding the US intelligence network, it is basically impossible for a terrorist attack to occur on their own soil without them knowing about it beforehand, unless there was collusion within the government or the entire event was staged and orchestrated by themselves. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain so many unbelievable things. For example, why did the hijackers, who had no training, manage to control the planes and deviate from their flight paths without being intercepted by US military aircraft? The Twin Towers collapsed in a completely unreasonable manner. Even WTC 7, which was not attacked by terrorists, collapsed inexplicably. Furthermore, after the plane crashes in Pennsylvania and the Pentagon, no relevant wreckage was found. Multiple crisis actors, as if they knew the script in advance, spoke in the direction the US government wanted to steer public opinion. However, the US government has no reasonable explanation for so many unreasonable aspects. For example, the US government's investigation into the 9/11 attacks and the handling of the debris and remains after the collapse of the World Trade Center clearly indicate a desire to prevent others from investigating the ins and outs of the 9/11 attacks. This makes it impossible to refute the 9/11 conspiracy theories with empirical evidence, leading the world to believe that conspiracy theories are the only explanation for the event and fostering distrust among the American people towards the government, thus giving rise to the 9/11 conspiracy theories. I believe that the current so-called 9/11 conspiracy theories were initially just a set of arguments based on doubts that the US government could not explain. If the entire event occurred naturally, there should be more reasonable ways to explain it. But if it cannot be explained, it is difficult to blame people for leaning towards conspiracy theories. I have also said many times before that the speed of conspiracy theory propagation is inversely proportional to the government's transparency. The less transparent a government is, the faster conspiracy theories emerge. And the so-called Deep State and the military-industrial complex people, who are conspiracy theorists, have repeatedly fooled the American people and made huge profits. The military-industrial complex and the Bush family part, we have all seen how they make war profits. How they constantly instigate wars between their own country and other countries, and even wars between other countries, to make huge profits. Because they are the ones who instigate wars, they are the ones who sell arms, and they are the ones who enter other countries after winning wars to obtain their resources. So, they are the players, they are the goalposts, they are the referees, and the entire game is played by their people.

Furthermore, after 9/11, the PRISM program was launched, massively surveilling communications of people within the US and even in other countries. The US needed a legitimate excuse to eavesdrop on other countries' information under the guise of counter-terrorism. By obtaining this information, they could more easily launch information warfare and manipulate the citizens of other countries and their own country. In today's world, whoever has this information can more easily control the world. For example, in the 2020 US presidential election, didn't many media organizations and social media control the information about the presidential election fraud? Many people in this world do not have the ability to think independently and analyze information. Basically, they eat whatever you feed them. Therefore, by monitoring the information of people worldwide and across the United States, the US can obtain big data, and then they can more easily steer public opinion, and many other places will be more easily manipulated by them.

Speaking of which, was the 9/11 incident a conspiracy theory or a real terrorist attack? I think you have your own conclusion. Finally, originally, a part of this video was intended to discuss the Stargate in Iraq and the remains of Gilgamesh. However, the entire video is presented from a historical and conspiracy theory perspective. Suddenly adding mysticism seemed inappropriate, so I finally removed it. In fact, I also mentioned it in my video on the mystery of Sumer, so I won't elaborate further. You know that I originally had this intention.

First, I need to thank the viewers who have supported me over the past few months. Your donations have been particularly important for my recent videos, as several of my recent videos have been demonetized. Demonetization means no advertising revenue at all. Although YouTube's advertising fees are not much, they are one of my motivations for creating content, like pocket money for the hard work of making videos for one or two months. Since I don't earn much fame or profit on YouTube, and I don't have membership programs or Patreon, if YouTube even takes away this small advertising fee, I can only continue with passion. You will notice that I have used a lot of video clips in this video because I knew that talking about 9/11 on YouTube would definitely be demonetized. So, before uploading this video, I anticipated that it would be demonetized. Since that's the case, I'll go all out and include all the news clips! Why do I usually use more pictures than videos? Because using videos can easily involve copyright issues. So, if you see me using videos, it means I have already anticipated that this video would be demonetized. However, even so, I would not casually make this video because friends who have followed me for a while know that I always strive to meet my standards. If I know I can't meet my standards, I'd rather not do it. Therefore, I put more effort into making this 9/11 video. I now have two videos with over a million views: "The Mystery of Sanxingdui" and "The Mystery of Sumer." But in the early days, if I had to say which video I put the most effort into, it was the first 9/11 conspiracy theory video. That was my most dedicated work. On the other hand, I have mentioned "The Mystery of Sanxingdui" and "The Mystery of Sumer" many times. They were not my most dedicated efforts, but for some reason, people love watching them the most. Because of YouTube's algorithm, if a video is demonetized, it is not suitable for advertisers, meaning YouTube will sell fewer ads, so they will not promote demonetized videos. If I remember correctly, the first 9/11 video had less than 100,000 views. So, I guess the viewership for this 9/11 video might also be surprisingly low. If you haven't noticed, my last video, "The Mystery of Zombies," was the same. Because that video had too many bloody elements and the pictures were quite gruesome, "The Mystery of Zombies" was demonetized as soon as it was uploaded. Some viewers even asked me why I hadn't released videos for so long, and then they realized they had missed "The Mystery of Zombies." Because YouTube didn't notify them that I had released a new video, YouTube won't promote my videos once they are demonetized. You will notice that the viewership for that video is particularly low. I think this "Mystery of 9/11 RE" should also be of good quality because I have done a lot of research, from scientifically analyzing the reasonableness of the building collapse to the rise of the Laden and Bush families, and identifying who made a lot of money behind the scenes. So, I spent a lot of time doing research. I don't know if you think it's good or not, but at least it meets my standards because I really put a lot of effort into it. If people can't see it because YouTube doesn't promote it, then my hard work will be in vain. If you feel satisfied after watching this episode and are quite pleased, please share it with friends who also enjoy mystery and conspiracy theories. This version is almost half an hour longer than the first one. The first time I made 9/11, it was about an hour and a half, but this time it's almost two and a half hours, with much more content. I hope you will enjoy it. As for future topics, I have a certain plan. I know what you like to hear, but I will control the choice of topics to ensure the long-term operation of this channel. That's all for this episode. See you next time, bye!

Also, please remember to follow my IG. My IG follower count has now exceeded 4,000. Although I haven't updated my IG, thank you all for your support. Dimension D.'s YouTube channel will continue to discuss mystery, movies, anime, and live game streaming. If you want to understand Di Da's life, such as what good food he has eaten, or things related to cultural trends and art, remember to follow my IG.

Also, I want to talk about the backup channel, Dimension D.'s second channel. Although I haven't finalized it yet, my initial idea is to put gameplay videos there. Although not many people watch them, I hope you can support me, so I have opened a Dimension D. Channel 2. I will put the link in the information column below. I hope you can subscribe to my second channel. Another very important use of the second channel is as a backup for the main channel. If anything happens to the main channel in the future, and the entire channel is gone, you will still have a second channel. Otherwise, if the main channel is shut down or closed by YouTube, you will permanently lose Dimension D. So, in addition to gameplay videos, the other main function of the second channel is as a backup for the main channel, to prevent any problems in the future. As you all know, I often talk about things like murder, arson, and aliens. YouTube dislikes these things the most. Currently, there is only one second channel, and it will not upload videos. Videos will only be uploaded to the main channel. The current positioning of the second channel is first as a backup channel. So, if you don't want to permanently lose the Dimension D. channel, remember, remember, remember to subscribe to my second channel in the information column below.

Also, I have noticed that although I have passed 100,000 subscribers, many of you are still calling me by the wrong name. My name is Di Da. The first part, "Di," is from Dimension D. The second part is "Da," meaning "big." Many of you call me "Di Di" or just "Di." After passing 100,000 subscribers, can you please call me by my correct name? I also found something outrageous: almost 90% of people who watch my videos do not subscribe. It's unreasonable. You say Di Da's videos are high quality, you say it's rare to have Cantonese mystery content from Hong Kong, and you say it's a heavenly injustice if Di Da doesn't get subscribed. Yet, no one subscribes to me. So, you can't blame me for only making one mystery video a year. Therefore, I urgently appeal to everyone: if you still want to see my mystery videos, remember to subscribe, like, comment, and most importantly, share with three friends to expand my subscriber count. That's all for this video. See you next time!

Get Our Mobile App

911 之謎 RE | 各種超乎常理的疑點 | 光明會家族 | 布殊家族與軍工複合體 | 偽旗行動 | Crisis Actor | 稜鏡計劃 | 誰是拉登 |【CC字幕】| Dimension D.

Transcription