Transcription
The whole world is talking about the killing of Charlie Kirk. They're wondering why it happened. They're wondering who was behind it. They're wondering if there's a greater conspiracy at play.
I want to ask a very different question. I want to consider what it means for the American people now that Charlie Kirk has been killed. What does it mean for the policy maker? What does it mean for changes in your and my everyday life as a result of the violence that happened in Utah?
When you look at the killing of Charlie Kirk, you have to consider it through a lens of time. And there have been three very high-profile political assassinations or attempted political assassinations that have happened in the last 18 months. All three of these violent acts show a very important trend that we need to be aware of as we move forward in the United States.
The first of these high-profile violent acts actually happened in Butler, Pennsylvania, July 13th, 2024, when then candidate Donald Trump was running for his second term in office. A young man named Thomas Krooks mounted a building and fired an AR-15 at then candidate Donald Trump and barely missed him, hitting him in the ear. The assassination attempt sent shock waves around the world and particularly here in the United States. Secret Service was able to immediately neutralize a threat and killed Croakkes while he was still in place on the roof of the building. No motive to this day was ever established, even though a lot was learned about the killer.
The next major high-profile violent act actually happened in New York on December 4th, 2024, when Luigi Manion killed United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in cold blood on the streets in front of his hotel in the early mornings before a conference. Following the killing of Brian Thompson, we saw a very surprising dichotomy in media. We saw some people lambasting the act of violence as unnecessary and inhumane. We saw other people actually cheering for then killer Luigi Manion for his efforts to try to highlight attention on the disparity of healthc care by killing this high-profile CEO who was also a father of two young children very similar to Charlie Kirk.
The third high-profile violent act happened in Utah on September 10th with the killing of Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's killer, the suspect in custody known as Tyler Robinson, again shows some very interesting correlations and trends with the previous two instigators of violent acts against Donald Trump and against Brian Thompson. And that's what I want to discuss because when you look at these three individuals who carried out these three high-profile violent acts, you see an important trend that starts to inform what is likely to happen to you and to me as we continue to go through life as American citizens.
First, let's take a look at some FBI statistics. A 2025 FBI report highlighted that 50% of all violent lethal acts actually originate with men under the age of 30 who are unemployed or undermployed and very intelligent. This is a fascinating metric because it goes against what so many of us assume is true about violent acts. We don't assume intelligent people would carry out violent acts and we certainly don't assume that there's going to be multiple similarities between the perpetrators of violent activity. But in fact, the empirical evidence shows us something very different.
So let's consider what we just learned from FBI as we look at these three violent act offenders. First, you got Thomas Krooks. Thomas Krooks, the man who tried to shoot President Donald Trump, was under the age of 30. He actually scored in the 99th percentile of the SATs, putting him in the top 1% of all students in the United States taking standardized exams for college. And he was unemployed at the time of the assassination attempt.
Fast forward to December 4th with Luigi Manion. Luigi Jangioni under the age of 30, highly successful academically with multiple degrees and advanced degrees, very well known for being a very intelligent student and a very intelligent person. Lastly, let's look at Tyler Robinson, the accused killer of Charlie Kirk. Here we have another individual that formally scored in the 99th percentile, this time with standardized tests known as the ACT, prior to his enrollment in university. So with all three of these gentlemen, you have men under the age of 30 who are highly intelligent and were unemployed or undermployed at the time that they chose to carry out their violent act.
Why am I highlighting this? I highlight this because when you think about the face of threat, the actual image that comes to mind when the average American thinks of a dangerous person, we've seen that face change over time. In the 1980s, the average American was afraid of gang violence. Groups of young people, hoodlams, that would wear some sort of gang memorabilia that identified themselves. And that was the face of violence.
Then as the 1980s ended in the 1990s came in, the face of violence changed again. This time it changed to the face of a domestic terrorist, a middle-aged Caucasian man who was disgruntled with his government or disgruntled with life and and chose to take out his aggression by bombing government buildings with like Timothy McVey.
As the 1990s closed and we moved into the 2000s, we saw yet another change in the face of violence and we started to think that violence looked like an Arab face, a terrorist, some sort of unknown non-state actor who was wearing a bomb or coming in to leave some sort of suitcase that would explode.
By late 2010, early 2020, we started to see that face of violence change yet again. And now we were afraid once again of inner city youth, often times black, with guns. Every time the face of threat changed for America, we started to see an equal change in response by way of policy. With the gang threat of the 1980s, we saw police crackdowns on inner cities. With the change in the 1990s, we saw new policies and new organizations being stood up by the government. CIA believes that all people are born with a spy secret superpower. For some people, that means they can win deals. For others, they can spot liars. Some can even seduce lovers. I built a free threeinut test to help reveal to you exactly what your secret hidden superpower is. All you have to do is click on the link in the description below, take the test, and start using your spy superpower to stay ahead of 99% of people. That allowed for the hunting down of domestic terrorists using individual profiles and digital signatures.
After 9/11, when the face of foreign terrorists became the face that we were also afraid of, we saw incredible changes in policy. We saw the activation of the Patriot Act. We saw the collection of metadata from every American citizen as the federal government worked to try to combat the new face of terror. And then of course in the late 2010s, early 20120s with that face of violence once again changing to be black men in the inner city, we saw a round of very violent policing against black men that cost them their lives unjustly, unfairly.
What I want to highlight here is that each changing threat is responded to with a change in policing policy that often times overreaches the individual liberties and civil rights of human beings of American citizens.
So what does that mean for the future now that we've seen these three high-profile violent acts? All three carried out by white educated intelligent men under the age of 30 who are unemployed. What does that mean for the future? Because the new face of threat inside of the United States doesn't look like any of the previous faces. No longer should we be afraid of black inner city men. The statistics all show that violent activity is not tied to black men. It's actually tied to Caucasian men. FBI metrics actually show that 43% of violent crime is coming from black men and 57% of crime is coming from Caucasian men. So we know that Caucasian men are empirically the new face of violence. On top of that, FBI is also showing us that educated men under the age of 30 are also the face of violence. And when you dig into the personality profiles of Thomas Krooks, Tyler Robinson, Luigi Manion, not only do you find that these are smart people, but you find that they are charming. You find that they are friendly. You find that they are shy and introverted and that they are the average next-door neighbor that everybody's really very fond of. Nobody expected any of these three people to carry out the heinous acts that they carried out.
So that means the new face of danger inside the United States looks much more like your friendly neighborhood kid than it looks like any kind of inner city threat or any kind of weird grizzly looking middle-aged man. It's a completely new face. It's not a face with a beard and a turban. It's a face that is Caucasian that has a smile that's quiet and friendly. It's not a a person walking down the street in a wife beater with armpit stains. It's a kid under the age of 30 walking down the streets and some kind of nerd t-shirt. This is the new face of danger for the United States. And that means that policy will start to find a way to combat that threat. We need to be prepared for new policy, new policing policy, new federal policy, new local defense and protective policies that are going to reach into the middle class home. They're going to reach into the average Caucasian household in an effort to try to identify who these future violent offenders will be.
This is good news for all the black people who have been defending for a long time that it's racially unjust and empirically unsound to accuse black people of crime just because they're black. They are exactly right and FBI findings are proving it. So the faster we can let go of any kind of racial correlation between violent crime and black men, the better off we all are. The actual correlation, the dominant correlation right now is Caucasian, educated, intelligent men at a rate of 57% to 43%. That is the new face of violence. That is the new face of worry and concern. So, we need to be prepared for the kind of policy changes that will adapt to that new threat.
What do I think that means? I can absolutely anticipate a new type of Patriot Act, some sort of widespread AIdriven surveillance effort that is targeting people specifically based off of the profile that FBI has started to sketch for these violent offenders. For the people who consume or comment on particularly far-left or far-right leaning content, it's very easy to create an AI agent that's able to consume, monitor, and surveil those people who are actively involved in those communities. Excessive interest in political commentary is something that is consistent between all three of the recent attackers that carried out these violent acts. I can also anticipate that we will start to see policy changes that allow police officers to reach deeper into our daily lives in an effort to try to identify and prevent these violent offenders before they can be violent.
In addition to the high-profile violence that we've seen, there's also been a lot of lowp profofile violence that we're not necessarily aware of because it's not hitting headlines. School shootings are still happening all across the United States. And once again, the trend that we're seeing in the people carrying out these violent acts are young men who are intelligent and Caucasian under the age of 30. It's a shocking powerful demographic, a shocking fact and piece of empirical evidence that we all need to consume and take on board because it shows that the threat that we should be afraid of is not coming from the inner city. It's not coming from overseas. It's not coming from disgruntled workers. It's coming from our next door neighbors. It's coming from the most unexpected place. It's coming from middle America. It could be coming from your next door neighbor's house.
The federal government is going to be working its way through new policies for the coming weeks and months, specifically tied to the killing of not only Charlie Kirk, but the killing of Brian Thompson and the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. There is a new trend that law enforcement is seeing, and that new trend is something they will be taking very seriously. And as a result, to combat that trend, we should expect to see changes in our everyday life. policy changes that could affect your right to privacy that will affect your daily commute and your information security that could reach into your schools, into your businesses, and possibly even into your household.
This question is the question I'm focused on. It's sad and it's unnecessary and it's discouraging to see that more and more violence is happening all over the United States. And it's also very discouraging to see that there is now a correlation between violence and intelligence. If anything, it makes me wonder, what have we done to land in this place? What have we done culturally that we have communicated to our intelligent young men that violence is a viable solution, a viable action, something that may even come with honor or reward. It's unreal to think how far we've come as a country where we used to die to defend each other to now the place where we are killing each other to try to send a message.
I'll be watching for changes as a result of this dangerous new trend. changes to privacy, changes to policy, changes to policing. If you want to follow this topic with me, go ahead and click on subscribe, leave a comment, like and share this video, and I look forward to seeing you with updates soon.