Transcription
All right, Memphis. So, in one of the more publicized portions of LeBron James's new show, "The Shop," which debuted on HBO last week, it was a portion in their conversation, the "quote-unquote cypher," where LeBron James started to delve into his views on the racial disparity in regards to how he would be perceived if he were to utilize a certain tactic when asked to sign an autograph for a fan, or to take a photo with a fan, as opposed to how a very prominent Caucasian athlete would be received by the media if he were to turn a fan down for a photograph or an autograph.
And to me, when I watched that portion of "The Shop," the only thing that I thought to myself is that this guy is trying so hard to be "quote-unquote" racially relevant, and it's so sad. It's so silly. It really just comes off as another entitled, so-called black athlete trying to act as if he's with the people, he's one with the people, or he's this. Let's understand something. For LeBron James, just life, he's been pampered. He had a very dicey portion in his life when he was a child, but from the time that he's been 11, 12 years old, he's been feted, he's been looked out for. He's gone to the best schools. He knew that he was going to be the number one draft pick in the NBA Draft at 17 years old. His life has not been that rough.
So for him to try to act as if all of a sudden he's going to be this racial savior for so-called black people, it just seems to me like more corporate branding. Many of LeBron's fans come on my channel and they try to act as if I "quote-unquote" don't like LeBron. I cannot say this enough. My channel is not about like or dislike. It's about evaluating various perspectives that are put forth by the mainstream media so that we can assess exactly what is being put forth to the masses, particularly so-called black people, particularly the so-called black man.
LeBron James is trying very hard, but I do think that he has layers to him. That's why I call him LeBron Armstrong sometimes. I used to call him that in a lot of videos that I did a long time ago. I'm going to start bringing that nickname back because he reminds me a lot of Lance Armstrong. He's trying to put forth a certain image, and I just don't think that he's the person that he tries to portray in the image. And I think that eventually, if his usefulness ever stops being as relevant as it is right now, in regards to trying to promote Marxist ideologies to so-called black people, they are going to expose him because he has dirt, like everybody else.
But just getting back to the point, he's trying too hard to become racially relevant, and he's just not as informed on the topic as he needs to be to try to be the person that he's trying to be. And once again, so-called black man, your thoughts and your words are even more important than LeBron James's words in your household. You should not be looking to LeBron James or Michael Jordan to say something racially revelatory to assist you in understanding what's going on. You have to be able to do that on your own, and you have to be able to guide your family, not LeBron James. But anyway, they're going to talk about it, and I'm going to chime in.
Junior and Draymond Green, LeBron had the following to say about the double standard when it comes to black athletes: "The hypothetical double standard, because we don't quite know exactly what the difference would be and how the same action would be perceived. Of course, we can "quote-unquote" assume it because, once again, this is not our arrest, so-called black man, this is our captivity." The reason why people like LeBron James get so upset by the "quote-unquote" racial disparities is because he wants to be "quote-unquote" equal to the white man. Because, as I tell you brothers, pro-black is actually pro-white. That's why you'll see LeBron James talking about, "I didn't trust white people for a long time." But [ __ ] you were all the stage campaigning for Hillary Clinton, who stated that young black men are super predators. That's what she said. I guess you didn't know about that, or maybe it didn't matter whether you know about it or not, because Nike told you to help Hillary Clinton with her campaign.
If it's Peyton Manning, and we're doing the same [ __ ], the same exact [ __ ]. I'm talking about a phone is out, we're like, "Yo, get back out of my face. I'm with my family. I'm with my family." We say that, and somebody posts it. And if Aaron Rodgers or one of those guys say that [ __ ] and they post it, somebody's going to be like, "Hey, you guys should respect Aaron Rodgers." On that note, we will come, we'll came to the conversation. Let me say this, whether it's LeBron James and Rodgers, Tom Brady, or Peyton Manning, and they get approached by a "quote-unquote" friend, and those athletes happen to be out with their families, and they respond back to the fan by saying, "Get that [ __ ] phone out of my face." I don't care what so-called race or so-called color you are, it is going to make the news.
So you do have to be able to operate with a certain level of tact. You are a public figure. You are a "quote-unquote" celebrity. You are, as you claim to be, a "quote-unquote" role model. And let me say this, LeBron James has done a very good job in regards to that role of being a so-called role model, not because of his perceptions or statements on so-called race, but because of the fact that he leads his home, that he raises and leads his two sons and his daughter. That's the best thing that LeBron James does, in addition to the fact that he's awoken many of the players in the NBA in regards to understanding to be loyal to yourself and to your family, and not to an organization. Those are the best things that LeBron James does as a "quote-unquote" leader.
Now, all these gestures in regards to talking about race and trying to act as if he's the new Muhammad Ali, because he's not. He's nowhere near it. It's truly an insult to compare LeBron James to Muhammad Ali because he does not have the wit or the intellect that Ali had in regards to speaking on race, nor the courage. Because, as Stephen A. Smith said so well in that last episode, where he was speaking about LeBron James and many of these other athletes, they don't take any controversial stances. All their stances are the same stances that are pushed by the liberal media, meaning "quote-unquote" equality, feminism, gay rights, all that nonsense. That's what they promote.
Is he right about what he's saying, the double standard? LeBron? Well, of course he is. It's always been the case. You know, and I think that the, the thing that makes it so much more poignant when it comes to LeBron James is that what excuse could you possibly have as a sports fan to hold something like that against him? Too easy. It's inaccurate. How could he go on television and state that there's definitely going to be a double standard if I say, "Get that [ __ ] camera out of my face," as opposed to other athletes? Just the fact that you would use that poor example shows that you don't really have the self-awareness to grasp that in the position that you're in as a modern-day Mount Rushmore athlete.
Over the past 20 years, LeBron James is a Mount Rushmore athlete. They're going to hold you to a very high standard. And I guarantee you, if Tom Brady had cursed out a fan who wanted to take a photo with him, it would be all over ESPN because they talk about Tom Brady almost as much as they talk about LeBron James. And as we all know, Tom Brady is a so-called Caucasian. Let me also say this, Aaron Rodgers over the last couple of years has been all over the mainstream liberal sports media due to the issues, or the perceived issue, that he has with his family. Peyton Manning was all over the news for steroid allegations. When has LeBron James ever been ran through the ringer for steroid allegations like Peyton Manning was? And LeBron James's name was on the Biogenesis ledger. And gives you what he's got, he's a three-time champion, he's been to the NBA Finals. We know what he brings to the table, etc., etc. But he's an incredible role model. He's a contributor to the community. He's very philanthropic and charitable. And his time is effortless energy. He's socially conscious as well. Yet, he gets a home in LA, and his racial epithets preyed on his gate. Yes, allegedly. Still, well over a year later, we have yet to see any footage to verify that there was actually a "quote-unquote" racial epithet sprayed on his gate. It's amazing to me that LeBron James lives in a high-end neighborhood in Los Angeles, and there's no surveillance footage of this person, this magical mystery person who supposedly sprayed the word "[ __ ]" on his front gate.
Why is that, Stephen A.? Maybe it's because that was part of a publicity stunt led by LeBron James and a lot of the Marxist sponsors that he has, his corporate backers, to help promote him as the modern-day Muhammad Ali, which is what they've been trying to do for the last two years or so. Ever since LeBron James saw what Colin Kaepernick has been doing and how much attention he's been getting, he said, "Wow, this could work for me. I could possibly use this to eclipse Michael Jordan and make my name a global brand, associate me with greatness on the basketball court and also social relevance off the court." It's a great business move for LeBron James to try to create this atmosphere around him as a "quote-unquote" Malcolm X basketball figure. That's why I call him LeBron X. And that's why I stated that he dressed up in the Malcolm X costume for the opening of his "quote-unquote" school, aka his tax write-off, his "quote-unquote" Ponzi scheme, allegedly. And for those of you brothers who are paying close attention, in the lower left-hand corner of the screen where they have the image of LeBron James, they have his left hand in the form of the Monocore Newt Oh. A lot of this [ __ ] is a big charade. These TV shows and his talking points, they know what LeBron James is really about behind the scenes. They know that these top-level athletes, they worship by Al, they Luciferians, and they're well embedded in the craft. Because I certainly know that Max and Will and many, many folks in white America would never condone the kind of things that he's been subjected to. But I throw that point out to point out that, you know, once again, I have yet to see any footage verifying that that actually was done to his front gate. And certain pro-blackity black brothers got upset with me when I stated this. Many of the larger-scale so-called racial situations that occurred back in the 1950s were actually staged by the Marxist/communists to bring a certain level of sympathy to the civil rights cause. Of course, were there real lynchings and real racial situations where brothers got killed or shot down or hung? Absolutely. But most of the highly publicized racial situations that occurred in the deep South in the 1950s were staged events by the Marxist and communists to bring a certain level of simpatico, a certain level of sympathy to the cause of the civil rights Negroes who were in league with the Marxist Caucasian liberal Jews that were actually running the whole situation. And they're still doing the same thing today through LeBron James, allegedly.
All right, do you have to do as a human being and as a professional athlete? I've made money. I've given back to the community. I've brought others, or brought others up. I've reached out not just with my friends and in a circle, but with desolate and disenfranchised communities at large throughout this nation to make a contribution to our society. All those are great things. But once again, this is the building of a cult of personality. I can't stress this enough. So-called black man, real change starts with each one of us within our home. Whether you live by yourself or whether you have a family, when you preside over your home and you make better decisions, that's how change is gonna happen. It's not going to happen from grandiose gestures by LeBron James or Michael Jordan or Floyd Mayweather. These athletes are not leaders. They're not. And when they try to be, it's because of corporate branding, professionalism. And I am a global iconic brand. And so I say all of that. That's the most relevant portion of your soliloquy. Stephen A., say that I would point this question to Will and to Max, in all fairness, and I'll, and I'll give you the incentive behind me asking you both this question, and then I'll do a red thing and I'll step back here and allow you both to have it. I remember Chris Rock years ago told me that he was once asked to host a town hall about, you know, racism in America, etc., etc. And Chris Rock said he was absolutely, positively not interested unless the audience was white. Of course, because Chris Rock is another so-called fake pro-blackity black who's actually pro-white. He's infatuated with why the so-called white man does not like him. Why would he want to get into a town hall meeting with all so-called black people? There's no fun in that. He wants to be able to antagonize the so-called white man because he cares about the so-called white man so much. Why is that? Because behind closed doors, the so-called white man, particularly the so-called white liberal Jew, is who he's bending over for, allegedly. Chris Rock is another Saturnian, another Luciferian. But that's another video for another day. But all these prominent participants in the entertainment industry, and they're all Saturnians. Chris Rock is not really concerned about so-called race relations. He's a minstrel. He's a jester. His job is to make fun of, or really to monetize, a lot of the dysfunction in the society. That's why he talks about race so much because that's how he keeps his act going, his jokes going. Oh, meaning black folks in America complaining about the same old, same old. I'm sick of it as well. That's why we need to stop complaining and we need to start conversing. Once again, brothers, I say this over and over and over again. Change starts with you. It's not going to start with the so-called white man. A lot of our people have to come on the internet and talk a lot of this fake revolutionary [ __ ]. First off, for you to be a real revolutionary, you have to have a point-by-point process in which things are going to come to fruition. The so-called black man no longer really effectively knows how to lead because, number one, there's no trust in his decisions because he's being raised in a matriarchal background. The average so-called black woman is a Luciferian, i.e., a liberal black woman. She really only wants to use the so-called black man as a drone and as an inseminator. Once she's been inseminated, she wants to send the so-called black man on his way, force him out like a praying mantis. Praying mantis engages in intercourse, and then the female eats the male. That's the mindset of the modern liberal black woman. All these issues are things that the so-called black man has to understand before you start talking about revolutions. We have to learn how to take back over control of the household. Once that's done, and that process begins, and that's really not going to begin in this society. This society has to be destroyed. But once that mindset starts to enter into the mind of the so-called black man, you'll find that a lot of the problems that you have with relationships and with people, they go away because you start to be able to assess who's in your life for your benefit as opposed to who's in your life to be a detriment, a liability. When we start inseminating the right women, or the right woman, a lot of these problems will go away. Stop trying to wipe up hoodrats, people who are low level. In order for us to do that, we have to raise our level so that we make greater demands of the people around us. It had nothing to do with town hall meetings for white people and LeBron James and all this other silly [ __ ]. So-called black man has to understand that he's as important as LeBron James is. The average so-called black man has to understand that LeBron James is no better than you. And until you understand that, you stop looking to these athletes to lead you, while people are never going to make any advances to these things. Why do we have to go about going through these things? And maybe, well, maybe instead of looking to the so-called Caucasian to ask you why our people are subjected to these things, maybe we have to turn towards a higher power. Or maybe that's a problem. Maybe so-called black people always want to have these conversations with the Caucasian because they look at this so-called Caucasian as a higher power. Americans in this country. Well, you know what, Stephen A.? Maybe you're answering your own question. If you're someone who's the recipient of vitriol from all sides, when you feel like you've never done anything, maybe it's because they know something about you that you don't even know about yourself. Maybe they know that you're special in a way that they can never be special, and they hate you because of it. Maybe we have to stop looking for their acceptance and start understanding that when you're a king, even when you don't have a crown, the pauper that's in your throne is still going to hate you because they're going to hope that you never remember who you actually are. Because once you do, they're no longer going to have the throne. People have to start to resume a ruling class mentality, especially the men. That's a major problem. Stop looking to the so-called Caucasian to give you back your history and your knowledge and your understanding. It's never going to happen. The world everywhere in the black community, and I'm going to ask my buddies, both Max and Will, to sit he among yourselves as white guys in America and try to give us an explanation as to why LeBron James [ __ ] has validity to the kind of things that he's saying, and why do black folks have to go through some of the things that we're going through now. Did you see what Stephen A. Smith just did there to Will Kane and Max Kellerman? He put the onus on them to agree with LeBron James. He presumed that they would both agree with LeBron James. Now, what if they don't agree with LeBron James? Now, suddenly, they look "quote-unquote" racist. And that will allow Stephen A. Smith to do what liberal blacks and bougie blacks and pro-blacks love to do so much, which is go back and forth with the white man in this toxic rapport. As opposed to our people saying to ourselves, you know what? Maybe we have to clear our heads. Whenever somebody needs to become a better person, what do they do? They go to rehabilitation. They go somewhere where they can be by themselves. They don't still try to be Confederate with the people that they claim are trying to hold them down. And what dynamic is it okay for you to try to work with people that are trying to hold you down? If you're a prostitute and you're trying to get out of that lifestyle, you have to get away from the pimp. You don't go to the pimp and say, "Why do you keep pimping me?" That's what he does. He's a pimp. Why is it that so-called black people continue to try to look for answers to their problems from the [ __ ] Asian men, if supposedly the Caucasian is the one oppressing you? That makes no sense.
I, Chris Rock, what that triggers in my mind, Stephen A., is what Chris Rock said about black people. People have made so much progress. What? Like it would make so much progress. It goes, "Another white people have made the progress because you started treating us better." Right? Let me say this very quickly, and I'm probably going to lose a lot of pro-blackity black to come on my channel with this. Actually, the Caucasian has not progressed in his treatment of so-called black people. They've actually lost power. The peak of the Caucasian's power was in the mid-1800s. That's what you call the age of imperialism. That's when they had full control over all the other darker people of the earth. Since World War I, which is about where they reached their absolute peak, they've started to lose power incrementally because the other races have become empowered incrementally because of their dealings with the international bankers. So the international bankers, who are comprised mostly of so-called Jews, almost almost exclusively of so-called Jews, to make more money, they have empowered the other darker races, particularly the so-called Asian, and they've allowed the so-called Arab to attain a certain level of power because of the natural resources in that land, particularly the oil. But the Caucasian, just to get back to my point, has actually lost power. Or what Max Kellerman calls "has started to treat people better" because they've lost a lot of the rulership power that they've had over the last 60 or 70 years. That's why all of a sudden they want to be a so-called black man's friend. "I say, you know, we're all in this together." No, we're not. You're just white trash. And you understand that there are higher-level Caucasians that have their boot on your neck as well. So no, I disagree with that. Do you Caucasian and I started to treat our people better? It's just that they've lost power because disenfranchising the other, brutalizing the other, has kept the other down, has created, well, that's part of the slave narrative. The slave narrative and the white man's burden mentality, which Max Kellerman thoroughly embraces, is that, "us white people, we've swung the hammer too hard on the other races, especially the so-called black man, because we're so great. We've been in authority and in power all the way from antiquity. We were the ancient Egyptians, we were the ancient Greeks, we were the ancient Romans, and we've had power all the way through the Middle Ages. We've just brought light to the world, and we've been too hard on you Negroes, so we apologize." That's part of the super liberal mindset. That's why I state when you deal with the liberal Caucasian, they try to act like they're your friend. They're more like a bully who feels guilty, and that's why they try to push that guilt dynamic on a lot of lower-level Caucasians or lower-level thinking Caucasians. They want to push that "quote-unquote" white guilt mentality. On the one side, correcting the inequality, that racial injustice, even social interaction, still exists beyond doubt. I've lived in America for 45 years. It's obvious. Yes, it's known as rulership. Let me say this also, and I'm probably going to lose a lot of people with this as well, especially a lot of the so-called pro-blackity black. They're very fond of using that term, white supremacy. What we live in today is not a system of white supremacy. What we live in is a system of white rulership. And that's what a lot of our people don't get. I'm going to say it again. This is not white supremacy. This is white rulership. Now, white supremacy is when they go back in time and they try to make themselves everybody in history that's white supremacy. When the Caucasian tries to say that they were the ancient Egyptians, and the ancient Greeks, and the ancient Romans, and they, they ruled in the medieval time period, that's white supremacy because they're actually trying to change history. What we're living in now is rulership. They're in their rulership. They're supposed to prefer their own. They're not supposed to prefer you. They're not supposed to make you equal. Power's taken, it's not given. Once again, when the so-called black man reclaims his ruling class mentality, he's gonna stop looking for equality. He's gonna start looking for rulership. But first, we have to be fit to rule.
To which it affects interactions, maybe unknowable. But I will say this, Will, and then I'm sure you and I could chop it up. We don't have to hold forth for too long here because there are things to get into. But what I have noticed about what LeBron said, specifically what he said, the way he may be treated differently than a famous white athlete, is there does seem to be a difference in terms of the burden of proof here. You know, well, that's the point. There is a burden of proof there because LeBron James has to establish precedent for his statements. He has to understand that he's a top-level athlete. He's a worldwide famous figure. So for him, I said, "Well, I be treated differently from Tom Brady? I be treated differently from this person to that person?" Let's understand something. LeBron James has been treated with kid gloves by the media, especially since he's gone back to Cleveland. They hesitate to say anything bad about this man. So for him to get on TV and claim that he's a recipient of this double standard, and that double standard, to me, all that reeks up is more corporate brand building, more race talk, more circle of race talk that goes nowhere. Because I have to make the average so-called black man and woman in America understand that I'm their new leader. No, sir. You're not qualified to lead me anywhere ever in life. You're a great basketball player. You're a great entertainer. Leave it at that.
She must show that he or she is one of the good ones. Well, you know what? The only way to erase that dynamic is our people need the restoration of their culture. We need our own land, our own government, our own educational system. We need our own armies. Things that are nature. That's what we need. With so we need to be building towards, at least in regards to the mentality, because it starts in the mind first. Once again, that's not going to happen in this kingdom because this kingdom has to fall pursuant to Daniel the seventh chapter and other scriptures all throughout the Bible. But that's the whole of the topic. That's a whole other video for another day. The point being is that the so-called black man has to start to prep his mind and his spirit, was known as rehearsing the righteous acts, yakked, they start thing going a higher level so that we can start performing on a higher level. And one thing that I'll say about LeBron James, he does have a ruling class mentality. The problem with him, though, is that he's a pawn to his corporate sponsors. You see that? Well, Cain sniffed out is that Stephen A. Smith is trying to put him and Max Kellerman on the griddle, and he's trying to force them to agree with LeBron James. Will Cain sniffed that out, right? And here's the thing. Our African-American is a black athlete treated differently than white athletes? There is zero doubt. There is very little room for debate that the answer to that question is yes. However, I do not think the example that LeBron James gives you as an illustration of that is a good one. I, I agree. What you saw, I thought that it was a terrible example. But that really was him trying to convey that he could speak a certain way in court, for black colloquialisms. Yeah. But I said, "Get that camera, the [ __ ] out of my face." And then Tom Brady say, "Get that camera, [ __ ] out of my face." Like that's why I say that he's not really built to be who he's trying to be. He's not built for that. He's too concerned with trying to prove to so-called black people that, you know, "Yeah, I'm a [ __ ] from running away just like you, son. You know, I could talk like you in the barber shop, son." That's not going to get you taken seriously. But you know what? I don't think that he's truly trying to be taken seriously on a serious level. I think he's trying to be taken seriously by his constituency, that being Twitter Negroes, liberal Negroes. He wants to be taken seriously there. He wants them to walk up to him and pat him on the back and say, "You did a great job, you kept it real, son." But when it comes to him actually being able to engage on racial topics with Caucasians and media pundits, he has no intention of doing that. That's why I stated that if he was really serious, he would have went on Laura Ingraham's show and debated her. I had a couple of the pro-blackity black scum on my channel and say, "Well, why would he do that? Why would he give her show ratings?" Well, if you're trying to be the new Muhammad Ali, that's what Muhammad Ali would have done. Muhammad Ali would have went on her show. He would have stated, "This is why I say what I say. Here's what I have to substantiate and back it up." He'll leave on everybody's show in the mid-sixties to the late seventies, everybody's show, because he knew that he actually was standing on a platform that he truly believed in. There was nobody putting a battery in his back other than arguably the Nation of Islam. But at least that was an ideological backbone for him. That was not a corporate backbone for him. So that's why I state, you can actually trust LeBron James in regards to what his overall motivations are. Do I believe that he loves his people? No doubt. But do I also believe that he's going to play character and play a role in order to magnify, to amplify his overall global brand? Absolutely. That means he cannot be trusted because whatever Nike tells him is what he's going to do. That's the bottom line of it. And that's why I call him LeBron Armstrong, just like Lance Armstrong. Remember, there was a time period about ten years ago, you could not say anything bad about Lance Armstrong. They tried to MIT, they tried to act like Lance Armstrong was, was Christ-like. Lance Armstrong, he's racing all these other cyclists who are on performance-enhancing drugs, and he's beating them every race, and he's not on any drugs, and he's curing cancer. Then they came out, Lance Armstrong was a damn devil. Haven't seen the man since. And that he was running a Ponzi scheme. Remember that? He had the Lance Armstrong Foundation. Nothing but a damn Ponzi scheme. So it is what it is. Everything comes to light in the end. Thank LeBron James encountering somebody wants to take a picture of him. And even in the language that LeBron used, "Get that blanking phone out of my face," is a good example. You see, for that matter, I don't think Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady are good examples because I think in any of those athletes, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers, LeBron James, acted the way the LeBron James described in the situation he laid out, for they would be called, be judged harshly and criticized. That's all. Absolutely. I completely agree with that. Because there's precedent for all those athletes being harshly criticized on ESPN or Fox Sports One in the past. To hang up on a radio show, we do it with the white athlete. Hold on now. I don't want you to hear that and say there's Will rejecting the idea that we treat black and white athletes differently. I'm not. I just think this athlete, in this situation, in this example, is poor. And Stephen A., one time, you and I were on your radio show, and we talked about something like this, and I told you, if you see racing, everything undercuts it. Just words. Obviously, I completely agree with that. Let me say this, brothers. When you're always trying to pick a fight with someone over every little thing, it quickly becomes apparent that your issue is not with the topic that you're trying to argue about. Your issue is with the person themselves. If you're in a relationship with a female, and she's always trying to pick a fight with you, it's very obvious that the problem that she has is not with the topic at hand, it's with you. So when you're always trying to go back and forth with the so-called Caucasian over every little thing, what, what is very apparent, what is very obvious, is that you have an issue with the Caucasian. You don't necessarily have an issue with this instance or that instance. You have an issue with them. That's why I say the level of toxicity between so-called blacks and so-called Caucasians in this society is so bad that it's very clear that our people need to spend more time concentrating on themselves. And if your intention is that we have to change the laws and change these rules because they're unfair and they're unjust to so-called black people, then we have to strategize on how to do that properly. It's not gonna happen by screaming and carrying on and having the lower levels of our community, so-called community, lead these protests because, no disrespect, a lot of liberal black women and reformed thugs, they're not really going to be the people who are at the avant-garde of so-called black change. I mean, every once in a while, you have a stellar character like a Malcolm X was able to reform his life, but he always had those gifts. For the most part, the people who are projected as being leaders of the so-called black community, they're intellectually inept, and for the most part, have been compromised by corporations, whether it's the so-called Black Lives Matter movement, really the Black Lesbians Matter movement, or Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, or what, or what have you. All right, so we have to build from the grassroots. If you're truly concerned with changing things politically, we have to start raising certain children to engraft themselves into the political sphere so that they can pass certain legislation and understand that they, that they represent the wants and needs of their so-called community. But that only starts when we start to work on ourselves and we start to change the culture. That means the Iraq, that means the eradication of anything that is deleterious to our community. That means gangs, that means the promotion of alternative lifestyles, that means liberal black women, that means dysfunctional, weak-minded so-called black men. A lot of these brothers have to learn how to be leaders. It does not mean that you have to be able to lead a whole group, but first, you gotta be able to lead yourself. These are things that we have to work on before we start talking about the so-called Caucasian. Of course, they're gonna be issues that we have to make known that we're not going to tolerate. But our people always want to make the Caucasian the focus of our ire, and that's, that's really not going to be profitable.
Perceives or dictates how we and we perceive these athletes. Well, I don't disagree with that. But what I'm saying to you is, I, I think it's important, well, that you recognize that sometimes you and I are in the communication business. We get paid to communicate, right? And it's not to sit there and undermine the intelligence of the brilliant LeBron James or anything like that. But LeBron James is not brilliant unless you're talking about his ability to utilize certain sentiments to create an atmosphere around himself or then create a cult of personality around himself. To me, brilliant is when a person could sit down and speak on a myriad of topics, or at the very least, one topic with a level of expertise. Now, LeBron could do that in regards to basketball, but he cannot do that in regards to race or in regards to any societal issue. He just can't do it. And he's trying to cast himself as that person. And I think that that, one more time, is just another attempt by a corporate-sponsored athlete to lead our people astray and to lead them into a lot of Luciferian ideologies. And we just can't allow that to happen because they don't enunciate, articulate their positions with the degree of clarity that us and others might do. So we use that to try and feign as if we don't completely comprehend what their point is. A winner come. Let me say this, Steve. You make a valid point. Sometimes people will try to claim that the message is not valid because the level of someone's ability to articulate their point, it's not up to par. You make a semi-valid point. But at the same time, if LeBron James does not have the ability to articulate himself properly, he should not be trying to cast himself as a leader. Because there's also quite a possibility that maybe he did articulate himself in the way that he intended, and he's just awkward, he's just clunky, he's just somebody who thinks that he could say anything if people are just going to buy it. And that's not the case. Hey guys, go ahead, man. LeBron used that. You, LeBron used a bad example. Will, I agree. That's why I think the global question is more interesting here rather than, I want an interesting specific example. Yeah, the global question is what I said. I think we, the burden of proof is different. The black athlete must show he's one of the good ones. The white athlete, one of the bad ones. Before we make those, before we assume those things about that, we assume different things to begin with. Let me say this real quick. In regards to the Max Kellerman statement that the so-called black athlete has to show that he's one of the good ones, and the so-called Caucasian athlete had to show that he's one of the bad ones, their validity to his statement. But let me say this, we have to be worried about our own standards more than the Caucasian man's standards for propriety. As long as we're keeping the laws of the land, that's what we should be concerned with. But the main thing that we have to start to promote is the forsaking of that culture of criminality that we tend to embrace wholeheartedly in the so-called black community, which leads to, or really I should say, comes from that mentality of dysfunction. We have a tendency in a so-called black community to extol people who are from the street dysfunctionality. Supposedly, they're the ones who are "quote-unquote" keeping it real, as opposed to the higher-level intellects in our community. And we have a high amount of higher-level intellects in a so-called black community, but oftentimes they're rendered obsolete, they're rendered inert because when they speak, supposedly, it's because they don't know what the hood feels. Look, there's no disrespect to the so-called hood, but the so-called hood is not a functional construct. It's not something that we can afford to perpetuate for much longer. We never should have tolerated it in the first place. And really, that whole mentality, that hood mentality, that has to go. People have to start to extol functionality. That's how we're going to rise up and stop worrying about the Caucasian man's standards for propriety. We have to set our own standards for propriety. And that, that does not just mean getting rid of the, the embracing of criminality and saying, "Oh, well, you know, they're just doing what they have to do to survive." No, to survive, you can be functional. You must be functional. As a matter of fact, or you have to go. And that takes me to my next point. A lot of these [ __ ] got to go. All right, a lot of our people, they either have to be reformed or removed. Because when you have a cancerous tumor, the cancer has to be removed, or it's going to spread to the entire body. But you know, that's a hard decision. But kings have to be able to make hard decisions. I'll probably be covering that sentiment in another video later on down the line. What can white people do to continue with the cause of racial progress and social justice? Will, and well, white people really can't do [ __ ] because at the end of the day, you guys in your rulership, the so-called black men has to be thinking, "What must I do to attain a certain level of rulership and autonomy without having it have to be linked to the Caucasian rulership?" That's where that's where brother's mind should be at. That you aggressively or even really participate in white grievance politics. It's not. You and I don't think you are racist at all. I do think at times now, just the fact that Will Cain is allegedly the topic of conversation in regards to possible Karen, hope, racist leanings, shows you that they're trying to imply that they feel like many of his takes are off kilter because they're not liberal enough. That's really what they're doing. It's a roundabout way too. Okay, right now. Did you see Steve Naismith's face change when Max Kellerman said that? Let me wind it back a little bit. Think at times you can be not always aware of white privilege, and I think that's an important distinction. But I think it's awesome. Steven A. Smith said, did you just say that? Did you just say what I think he said? [ __ ] particularly in the case, for example, of the NFL protest. I just want to read one quote. You see that? Max Kellerman had to sneak in his little Marxist NFL protest. He's upset with Will Cain for not supporting the Marxist aspect of the NFL protests. The embracing of chaos. Joaquin is pretty much caught up, and he allowed himself to fall victim to being cast as the resident "quote-unquote" racist Caucasian male to subscribe to the internal "quote" white guilt dynamic by saying, "I know you're going to say here's, well, not, not wanting to be sympathetic or compassionate or, you know, not understanding, you know, I'd be worried about that to be quite frank." You and your rulership, you should be enjoying it. It's up to our people to figure out how to regain the rulership. And if, once again, I know that I'm going to lose a lot of so-called Pro-blacks with this because a lot of so-called Pro-blacks, they have so much invested in the constant back and forth with the Caucasian, like they live for it. And you know, if the conversation were to turn to another direction, as opposed to always focusing on this silly conversation that they want to help with the Caucasian, they'd lose their mind because, to be quite frank with you, most of them don't have much mind. Once again, the super liberal Caucasian, the Caucasian in general, but particularly the super liberal Caucasian, will always refer to Martin Luther King as a control mechanism over so-called black people and as a guilt tactic over Caucasians. That's why I tell a lot of you brothers, Martin Luther King was a Luciferian pawn. That's all he was. And he figured it out at the end, but by then it was too late. When rewind is back a little bit, past few years, I've been great of the NFL protest. I just want to read one quote, and this describes of how I feel about it all. Right, this is from Martin Luther King: "I must confess that over the past few years, I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion, almost reached the regrettable conclusion, that the Negroes' great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the white Citizens' Council or the Ku Klux Klan, but the white moderate who is more devoted to order than to justice, who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice." Now, brother, why did Martin Luther King make that statement? Because that was a tactic that was taught to him by his super liberal Caucasian Jew backers to try to push that white guilt dynamic. From back then, for those who don't know, one of Martin Luther King's main strategists was a Caucasian Jew by the name of Stanley Levinson. You could look him up. Once again, his name is Stanley Levinson. He was Martin Luther King's guru, his spin galley, at least one of his gurus, who instructed Martin Luther King on a lot of the Hegelian dialectic tactics that Martin Luther King would use. So, well, during his time period as a "quote-unquote" civil rights leader, religious Marxist trying to get others to to embrace Marxism. So, Martin Luther King was speaking about what's the so-called moderate Caucasian, meaning the Caucasian who would not pick a side, did not want to get involved, just wanted things to maintain at the status quo, as opposed to getting involved either on the right hand or on the left hand. And they still utilize the same tactics today. Once again, MLK realized near the end that he had been used, but he was trapped by then. He tried to rebel by making certain statements in regards to the Sanitation strike and also his last speech, which was a great speech, by the way, his last speech. But it just goes to show you why they always just promote the "I Have a Dream" speech because that's a control mechanism. They don't play his last speech. But by then, once again, it was too late. So he just say, you know what? I'm just gonna let it all hang out because I know they're gonna kill me soon anyway. He knew he was going to be killed. Keep in mind. Okay, let's leave it right there because I was a powerful statement to say that Will is a totally understand white privilege. I want to give him a chance to respond. And Stephen A., after the break, more birthdays. Stay right here. Anyway, that's going to be the end of part one in the LeBron James "quote-unquote" racial double standard issue. Peace.