Transcription
Everything is inherently mental. Matter is always in all cases without exception. Without a single exception, matter is always what mind looks like? Concrete materiality is just mental state.
What if the most dangerous lie you've ever believed is that the world around you is solid. But imagine if none of it exists the way you think it does.
The world as it is in itself is mental. Physicality is what that mental world looks like to us when we observe it, when we represent it in our internal dashboard. And then we get the material universe.
What if the reality you've built your entire life on is just a clever illusion, one designed to keep you from noticing what's actually going on.
There is only mind. What we call matter is a mental impression. You know, if I hold this glass and feel its solidity and weight, these are mental qualities. Solidity and weight are qualities in my conscious states. Um what we call matter is simply a specific type of mental state which are perceptual states. The things we see, hear, touch, smell, and taste.
This was Dr. Bernardo Castro, a former CERN scientist exposing reality. And if what he's saying is true, then everything from your thoughts to your house to your very sense of self might not be what it seems. We grow up believing there are two kinds of things in the world. Stuff outside us and thoughts inside. A cup is out there. The feeling of thirst is here. That's the foundation of materialism. The belief that reality is made of matter and the mind is just something that emerges from it like steam from boiling water. But Dr. Bernardo Castro says this is exactly where modern science took a wrong turn. According to his theory, analytic idealism, the mind isn't a byproduct of matter. It's the container in which everything including matter appears. The variety of matter represents the appearance of the variety of mental states and mental dynamics. So the brain is what your mental inner life looks like. The inanimate universe is what the mental inner life of mind at large looks like. Matter is always what mental states look like.
In a 2019 paper published in philosophy and cosmology, Castrip and co-authors laid out a controversial but carefully reasoned argument. Consciousness isn't something that brains produce. It's the one thing that cannot be reduced to anything else. Everything we call reality, from physical objects to logical patterns to emotional responses, is a modulation of consciousness, not something separate from it.
Think about your daily life. When you touch a glass of water, you're not really touching atoms. You're experiencing coldness, weight, texture, all of which are sensations processed within awareness. When you look at the sky, you're not seeing blue as a property of the atmosphere. You're having a visual experience of blue inside your mind. At no point have you ever interacted with the outside world directly. According to Castrop, you've only ever known it through experience, and experience is mental. So behind this very concrete materiality, we know that at least in the case of the nervous system of human beings, behind that underlying that concrete materiality is just mental states. Your sorrows, your desires, your regrets, your feeling of hunger, the redness of a strawberry, the sweetness of the strawberry when you eat it, and that all appears to others in the form of very concrete matter.
You look around and think you're seeing reality. Light bounces off objects, enters your eyes, and you see the world. But that's not what's actually happening. What your brain gives you isn't raw reality. It's a translation. Castro compares it to flying a plane.
You are in an airplane. The airplane has sensors. It makes measurements of the sky, the clouds outside, and those measurements are presented to the pilot in the form of dial indications on a dashboard. If the plane is not flying around the sky, there are no dashboard representations. But the sky is still there, right? So under analytic idealism, matter is a dashboard representation. When there are no planes flying around, in other words, when there are no living beings looking around, there is no matter because matter is a dashboard representation. You need a dashboard to have a dashboard representation. But the thing that is represented, the sky, the clouds, that is always there, whether you're flying around in a plane or not, whether there is a dashboard or not. Castro says that's exactly what matter is, a dashboard readout. The pilot doesn't need to see the actual sky, just a set of gauges on the dashboard. The dials report information like altitude, air speed, and direction. It's useful. It's accurate enough to keep the plane flying, but it's not the sky. It's a representation.
This isn't just a philosophical metaphor. It aligns with decades of research in cognitive science. In the case against reality from 2020, cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman argues that evolution didn't wire us to see the truth. It wired us to see what keeps us alive. If we saw reality unfiltered, it would be overwhelming, even lethal. So, we evolved to see a simplified interface, a userfriendly version of reality. Not the machine, just the icons. And here's where it gets unsettling. If the dashboard only lights up when someone is there to read it, then what happens when no one's looking takes that seriously. If no one is present, no conscious mind, no perception, then the dashboard doesn't just go dark, it doesn't exist at all.
All matter in your body and otherwise is the external appearance of mental states. There is a inanimate world out there made of matter. So under that hypothesis that matter is always the external appearance of mental states, the inanimate universe must be the external appearance of mental states too. Those mental states that corresponds to the inanimate universe are what we call mind at large.
Before we go on, just a quick note. We've been talking about how reality only exists when someone is watching. But in the digital world, it's the opposite. Someone is always watching you. Every site you visit, every video you watch, every late night search you make, it's all tracked, stored, and used to shape what you see next. And that's exactly why I started using Surf Shark VPN. Surf Shark doesn't just hide your IP address. It encrypts everything you do online, so no one can see your private data or follow your browsing habits. It blocks trackers, stops targeted ads, and even alerts you if your personal info leaks in a data breach. Whether you're working at a cafe, traveling, or just watching videos at home, Surf Shark keeps all your devices safe under one account, you get complete privacy, even on public Wi-Fi, and access to any content around the world without restrictions. If you want to explore the online world without being constantly watched, go to surfshark.com/advice and use code advice at checkout to get four extra months on your Surf Shark subscription. That's surfshark.com/advice, also linked below.
All right, let's get back to Dr. Bernardo. The brain is simply what mental activity looks like when observed from the outside. So, you don't even get to, oh, then mental activity creates the brain. Well, in a sense, yes, but it's not deliberate. It's not an an act of creation. It's a spontaneous thing. The brain is what mental processes look like. It's the appearance of it. It's like asking, "Does combustion create flames?" Well, flames are what combustion looks like.
So when you hold a stone, what you're really touching isn't an object in space. You're interacting with a stable pattern of conscious dynamics rendered into form. It's not the thing. It's the interface to the thing. Your senses are decoding meaning, not measuring mass. And what we call physical reality is more like a shared hallucination. Consistent, yes, but built entirely inside experience.
This is where everything flips. According to Castro, you're not a small creature moving through a big universe. You are the universe, just not all at once. His claim is startling but precise. There is only one mind in existence, one fuel of awareness, endlessly complex, constantly generating new patterns. Everything we call individuals, humans, animals, even trees, are dissociated aspects of that one field. In other words, the universe is having conversations with itself through you, through me, through everything.
It sounds abstract until you realize it mirrors what we already know about the mind. In psychiatry, dissociation is a welldocumented phenomenon. A 2014 review published in the Lancet Psychiatry examined patients with dissociative identity disorder, showing that a single brain can host multiple centers of consciousness, each with distinct memories, beliefs, even handwriting, yet all contained within one person. Castro applies this concept globally. What looks like separation between you and a stranger, between humans and animals, is an illusion generated by dissociative boundaries. Pay close attention to what he has to say about it.
Appearances arise when there is a boundary between the observer and the observed. If they are not distinct, there are no appearances because appearances are what something looks like from the outside. For there to be an outside, there has to be a division, a boundary between the inside and the outside. So the observer looks from the outside and the observed exists in the inside. Right? So how do appearances arise when this boundary arises? When there can be one mind on one side of the boundary or one segment of a mind on one side of the boundary and another segment of a mind on the other side of the boundary. Now we have one observing the other from the outside. The outside being determined by that boundary. That boundary is a dissociative boundary. We feel alone not because we are but because the universal mind has carved itself into localized identities each temporarily unaware of the whole. You're not inside reality bumping into it. You're a fold within it, looping back on itself. And when that dissociation thins through meditation, trauma, psychedelics, or death, the illusion cracks, the ripple remembers the ocean, and the mask slips.
If everything that exists is made of mind, and all forms are just modulations of one field of consciousness, then what do you call that field? Castrip, without even flinching, calls it God.
That is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. And by the way, it's the only thing that exists and it's you and it's me and it's the cat and it's the amoeba and it's the moons and the black holes and the stars, the whole shebang.
So divinity exists in your view how we experience we may experience it differently each of us but it it does exist in your view.
Of course we are it but not the version handed down in Sunday school. Not the humanized overseer with moods, plans and punishments. This is something deeper, older and far more intimate. Under analytic idealism, God is not a being. God is being itself. In this view, the divine isn't somewhere else. It's not up or above or behind. It's right here, right now, expressing itself through everything you see, including you. That tree growing through concrete, that's consciousness unfolding. The grief you felt when someone left, that's consciousness folding in on itself. And your intuition, the quiet feeling you can't explain, that may be the universe nudging itself through your awareness.
There's nothing except it. Everything else can be explained in terms of its excitations, its patterns of excitation and configurations. You can explain everything else. The whole fantasmagoria of nature, you can you can explain it in terms of universal consciousness. Therefore, universal consciousness is all you need. It's all there is. And therefore it's omnipresent by definition. If it's all there is then it's omnipresent right. It is a mind. So it is cent in from the the omi. Cient omony being meaning everywhere and cent knowing. It's a mind and whatever happens happens in it. So it knows all. It may be dissociated. What it knows through me is not accessible to what it knows through you. But you and I are it.
For many people, this is where the conversation turns speculative. But under analytic idealism, what we label as paranormal isn't outside the model. It's baked into it. If all conscious beings are just local expressions of one universal mind, then the boundary between minds isn't absolute. It's a kind of membrane. And like any membrane, it can sometimes leak. Science has struggled for decades to explain strange moments like sensing a loved one's pain from miles away or waking up seconds before bad news arrives. Under materialism, these are anomalies, coincidences, misremembered events. But under Castrip's framework, they're what you'd expect to happen every once in a while. Telepathy can happens because dissociation, like any process in nature, is bound to not be perfect. We evolved to be dissociated and we evolved to think that we are this bag of skin here and not what's happening out there. So under analytic idealism it's conceivable even plausible that under extraordinary circumstances such as emotional upheaval you could have telepathy going on between people who are effectively very connected to one another. I've seen it happen to somebody very close to me and I don't doubt that it happens. I go as far as to say telepathy is common. We just don't mgnize it. So we don't pay attention to it.
Castrop says these aren't miracles. They're micro fractures in the illusion of separateness. Consciousness doesn't stop at the skull. And when emotional intensity spikes, grief, fear, love, those boundaries can thin. One ripple begins to feel the tremor of another.
And even when we treat time like it's an external force ticking forward whether we want it to or not. But what if that's not what time actually is?
Time and space exist only in here. We create time and space as a sort of a filing system for information about the world. Even physics with loop quantum gravity is is going into the direction of thinking of time as not fundamental as an emergent property of more fundamental structures in reality. Castro argues that time doesn't flow out there. It unfolds within us. Under analytic idealism, time isn't a fundamental property of the universe. It's a structural tool of consciousness, a way to organize experience into something coherent. This isn't just a theory. A 2024 study in current biology found that the brain doesn't measure time the way a clock does. Instead, it builds time based on internal markers, memory, perception, emotional change. When nothing changes, time seems to slow. When your mind is busy, it speeds up. That's mental formatting. In other words, time is a narrative device, something the mind uses to file events into order.
If that's true, then birth isn't the start of consciousness. And death, it isn't the end. It's a transition, like turning a page in a story that was always being written.
So take a moment and think if everything is mental and your mind is a ripple in a larger sea of consciousness. Then what does that mean for free will? Do you really choose or are you just playing out a script written somewhere beyond your reach? Castrop's answer is both unsettling and freeing. You do make choices but not in the way we like to imagine.
Other people define free will implicitly differently. Some people think of free will as libertarian free will. And what that means is whatever I do I could have done otherwise. That is probably incoherent. Even though you did make a choice, you made the only choice you could make because you are who you were. You were who you were. Your choice is determined by that which you are. You do make that choice. In that sense you have free will in the sense that you have agency. I can make a choice but your choice is determined by that which you are and you can't be other than what you are and therefore there is no could have been. So yes we all make choices but that may not be libertarian in the sense that we like to think that we could have made other choices. Maybe no maybe we couldn't. Maybe the environment would have allowed you to make other choices but you were who you were. And by being who you were, you had to make the choice you made. There is no could have been.
Most people think of free will as the ability to choose otherwise, to zigg instead of zag. Castro challenges that assumption. He says your choices emerge from who you are in that moment. And who you are is the product of countless layers of memory, structure, and experience. So, could you have chosen differently? Probably not. It's just that you're not writing the script from scratch. But you are the only one who can reveal it. And every choice you make reflects a new angle of reality that has never been seen before. If your choices reveal what the universe is becoming, then free will isn't about rewriting the rules. It's about discovering who you already are.
Maybe the unsettling part isn't that life is a dream. It's that you're the dreamer and you forgot. Castrip offers a mirror. If you mistake the dashboard for the sky, the brain for the mind, the object for the source, you'll spend your life looking outward, never inward. But if you stop even briefly, you might realize you've never left the mind of the universe. You are it waking up. And if you felt something was off, like reality never quite added up, maybe you weren't wrong.
Before you go, don't forget to check out the Surf Shark offer. It's still waiting for you in the description below.