Transcription
Oh my gosh. I think this is someone I always see in the box or in the chat who's like hates me.
"Do you support Trump?"
"Yes."
"You You hate me, don't you? You spam the chat all the time. You're You finally come out to debate me."
"No, I don't hate anybody. I just think Democrats are delusional."
"At the moment."
"We're the delusional ones."
"Yeah, Santana especially. Did you Did you know that Donald Trump said that he drinks diet coke to kill cancer because it kills grass?"
"Yep. Also, he said orange Fanta is freshly squeezed."
"Freshly squeezed. Actually, directly from Florida."
"Do you know that Democrats allow men and women sports in bathrooms?"
"Uh, is that why you voted for a man that walked into the changing rooms of naked women while they're changing without their consent where two 18-year-olds came out and said there were four girls as young as 15 years old in these changing rooms?"
"Doesn't matter. You guys slipped."
"Wow. It doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. You heard it here first, folks. It doesn't matter."
"Yeah, it doesn't matter."
"Look at it. You see it immediately. Immediately when you guys apply that, don't apply that standard to your own cultlike support of Trump."
"And I love how they"
"You talk about this every day. You talk about this every day."
"And yet you still don't have a response, buddy."
"Debunked on it."
"And yet you still don't have a response. How do I talk about it every single day and yet you still don't have the ability to respond to it? It's not worth it anymore. It's not worth It's not worth it to argue this."
"Then why are you on the live debating me right now, bro?"
"Because you guys allow men and women sports and bathrooms. And we"
"Is that why you support a man that's literally bragged about walking into the changing groups of naked women while they're changing without their consent?"
"Listen, America, a majority of America does not agree with you guys on these issues."
"Okay? Do you think a majority of America agrees with you? What's Trump's approval rating?"
"This is why you guys lost the election. What's Trump's approval rating, buddy?"
"You guys have to get"
"Wait, what's Trump's approval rating?"
"You guys have to get this."
"What is Trump's approval rating? I'm waiting."
"What do you mean?"
"What's Trump's approval rating?"
"What does it have to do with what I'm talking about?"
"You said You said a majority of America doesn't agree with you. A majority of America doesn't agree with you. An overwhelming majority of America doesn't agree with you. Mhm."
"This is why you guys"
"Hell, that's why there's like none of you in my my guest box literally because you guys are too scared to debate me and or you literally can't debate me."
"Listen, do you guys you you guys have to understand Listen, my my family is is are Democrats, okay? They support the Democratic party. Well, they don't support it as much as they used to because of what you guys support now, right? You guys have to understand that you have to get these issues correct in order. Actually, let me just clarify you because you have this like straw man version in your head. You have this straw man version in your head."
"Hold on. Let me finish. Let me finish. I'll let you finish. These are 95 these are 95 to five issues. Okay. So, like I don't hate trans people. I don't hate anybody. I don't think no one anybody everybody should exist, right? But you guys can't be letting men biological men and women's sports team."
"You guys are so hyperfixated on less than 1% of the United States population."
"They can have their own They can have their own understand the reason why you guys keep talking about this is because Donald Trump has crashed our economy. He's he's got us back in war. Gas prices are up. Food grocery prices are more expensive. And instead of actually worrying about what's happening in our country and the fact that people are suffering and the the fact that your grocery prices is up and people can't even afford to live, the only thing that you want to talk about is less than 1% of the population because it makes you feel better. Like if you're so hyperfixated on less than 1% of the United States population, it's because you have all else. You don't think it's weird that the only thing that you want to talk about is transgender people when everything else is unafford. The American dream is no more. And and hey, question. Did you know that they're thinking about actually instituting an actual draft this year? Are you have you guys even talked about the fact that they're forcing people into the military? They actually uh passed an act that allows uh uh selective service the auto enrollment for selective service for 18 to 25. They upped the age for enlistment from 34 to 42. Like are you even they they extended the return period another year for soldiers that had got removed during co because not enough people were returning and Donald Trump has no plans for us to actually negotiate a peace plan with Iran. But you think that transgender people is the biggest issue where they're literally trying to force people into the military to fight for Israel. You don't want to talk about that?"
"No. Because we identity politics. Go ahead and talk about it. Doesn't matter. It"
"It does matter. Okay. Because how many transgender people do you know?"
"It doesn't matter how many"
"How many transgender people do you know?"
"Probably two."
"Personally,"
"Probably two."
"Yeah. And are either of them a threat."
"It doesn't have to be a threat. Have to understand that"
"You're men are talk about other things that don't matter because you guys are cook. I'm sorry. Go ahead. Santana, this absolutely matters. This some people some people are one are one are one issue voters. You guys have to understand that"
"If you're a one issue someone who is a 34ount felon, a fascist, a sexist, a racist, a classist, like you you you picked the wrong issue, Bub like you're focused on the wrong issue."
"Trigger words. Let's let's let him explain his whole view real quick and then I want to hyperfixate on the fact that he's a single issue voter. So we'll do that in a second. So, like let's let's make his point here and then I'm gonna do that."
"I'm a single"
"I'm not saying I'm a single issue voter, but around election time when this stuff was going on, right, you guys, you know, emphasizing trans and women's bathroom and sports and not saying like not true"
"And not saying, okay, yeah, men and women are different. Trans people, they could have maybe their own sport, but instead you guys like attack people. You attack mothers and fathers and families for not wanting biological men to compete in sports with their daughters."
"And I have two little I have two little sisters. I have two little sisters that are 13 11 years old and I will not allow them"
"To I will not allow policies to be passed where men can play in the same sport as them. What if LeBron James"
"All you're doing is repeating the same thing over and can I respond now and said he's a woman. What if Sir can I respond now? Can I respond now? LeBron James, if LeBron James,"
"You just keep repeating the same thing. I I want to respond now. I don't know why you keep repeating the same thing."
"Trans. No, because he's not a woman. Okay. So, so LeBron James, LeBron James is a sis man. I don't know why you'd even give that as an example. Secondly, we would say after multiple years of"
"HR was born a man. What is a sis man? What is a"
"Let me know when I can speak about interruptions. I'm just I'm going to I'm going to mute you right now and I I let you speak. I'm going to now try to go on cuz you just literally tried to repeat the same thing over and over again. Okay. So, trans women after multiple years of HRT have no particular unfair biological advantages that would even prevent them from playing in the first place. You won't be able to give me any examples of any trans women specifically that are dominating women's sports. You won't you won't be able to do it. It's it's not a real thing that's happening. Okay? This whole argument about, oh my gosh, uh trans people in sports, it's the worst thing ever. This is a thing that's dealt with in local communities in different sports organizations. they will have their particular determinations on this in terms of what whether they want to do hormones or what they specifically want to base their standards off of for for sports. Okay, that is not a federal issue. That's not something that we do from a federal scale. And the reason why we weren't talking about this is because we acknowledge that. Okay. What we do talk about Oh, you just got Santana, you just got a a flag. Do you want to go in your other account?"
"Yeah."
"Yeah, um I actually have to restart it then because that's my second harassment and bullying flag. But I'll make this point. Um uh so actually you know what we'll come back and then I'll just make this point. Just remind me where the point I was. So hey um um Adam you there? Adam you there? I have to hit a quick restart real quick. Can you be the first uh just be the first guest when I come back up? Is that okay?"
"Yeah."
"Okay, I'll be right back. Like I I think that the inability to focus on the things that are are really like negatively impacting us in our country is is a big thing and I I don't understand that."
"Yeah. So Adam, I guess I I'll go back to my point. The point that I'm making is that the only times we ever really talked about it, which by the way, our party didn't talk about it literally at all. Like especially even Kla Harris, I don't think that she even brought it up once in like at all. Um, now if we're going to talk about uh like what we talked about, it was simply in response to you guys constantly bringing it up. So the fake outrage that was created by people on the right."
"No, but you guys, the thing is you guys, even though Kamla hasn't talked about it that much, you guys put policies in place for this stuff to occur and happen."
"It's not it's not acceptable."
"Can you give me an example?"
"Like you when you swipe out of the app, I can't hear you. What what are the examples?"
"I mean, everyone knows this. You see Democrats on YouTube, on social media, whatever."
"So, social media"
"Like live Congress, congressional meetings. Okay. Kati Jackson Brown."
"Kati Jackson Brown. Ask her what a woman is. She can't define."
"Okay. So, now we're now we're pivoting not to sports. Now we're talking about whether or not people can define the term woman. So, let me just clarify. Um, can you give me can you give me No, hold up. This is Adam. Adam. Can you can you give me this stuff?"
"Watch this. Then I'm going to ask you a basic question. Let me ask you a basic question."
"Let me ask you a basic question."
"Different. You can't You guys can't be like making up different definitions for stuff."
"Okay. Let me know when I can ask you a question."
"Steamroll."
"Expect the host is trying to speak to you, Adam. Why can't you just stop for a second? You're steamroll. Let's just let him finish. Let him let him let him get it out real quick and then I'll I'll"
"Go ahead, man. Say whatever you want. You guys have to be able to define these terms. And I don't hate trans people. I have love for everybody. But you have to be able to separate these terms to win an election. A majority of America does not agree with you guys on these policies. And that's why that it's so easy for them to vote against you guys. Yes. Santana talks about, oh, there's bigger things going on in the world. There's bigger things. Yes, of course there is. But this stuff matters to to families, to to real people."
"Okay. So, let me just clarify. Can you do Can you give me the necessary and sufficient conditions for a chair?"
"No, I'm just talking about allowing men and women's back."
"No, I want Can you give me the necessary and sufficient conditions for the definition of a chair?"
"No,"
"You can't. You don't know what a chair is?"
"I do. I'm sitting on one right now."
"So, then give me a necess give me the necessary and sufficient conditions for a chair. If you can't define to me a basic thing such as a chair right now, I will disregard every single thing that you have to say. You can't even define a man or a woman. Why would we trust you guys? Why would we trust you guys? Honestly,"
"You can't define a chair. Give me give me the necessary and sufficient conditions for a chair. You don't know what a chair is, bro."
"It's uh something you sit on."
"Yeah. Oh. So, so again, that's not that's not a chair. So, by the way, if I if I um I'm not going to give that example. That's not going to be a good a good example. If I if I were to sit on a um on uh the ground, would that mean the ground is a chair? Uh, you could you I mean you could use it as a chair."
"So it's not a chair."
"It's not physically a chair."
"So okay. So what is a chair? Give me the necessary and sufficient conditions for what a chair is."
"Okay, bro. Like what? Just something you could sit on kitchen table. Like what is the point?"
"I I just you can sit on the ground. This the ground is not a chair."
"What is the point? What is your point?"
"Okay. So then yeah, you you said specifically that we need to be able to define certain terms like this that are ordinary things, right? We need to be able to define that. If we can't define that, you're going to disregard everything that we say as people. Okay? So I'm just saying if you can't give me the necessary and sufficient conditions for the definition of a chair, then I'm going to disregard every single thing that you say because you can't tell me what an ordinary thing is."
"What?"
"Wow. You don't you don't realize that I'm using your own reasoning against you and you just don't like it whenever I do that. You literally can't give me the definition of a chair. You can't give me the definition of a chair, dude."
"Okay, we can I mean, we can play these word games, but at the end of the day,"
"Oh, we can play these word games now. Now you don't like it, do you? Huh? Now it's not Now it's not a good argument, huh? Because in the real world, you guys really like seriously in Santana, you like"
"I I've showed my parents your guys' lives and you guys are such race baiters."
"And"
"What? Dude, nice pivots. Nice pivots. Are you going to pivot away from the point? By the way, he realized that he lost on the point that I just mentioned. So now he's going to pivot to some other thing."
"No, this is just I mean this is a 95 to 5 issue. Like"
"Oh, you're going to keep saying that, but then you just got this wrong. You can't define a chair if you rise."
"Can you tell us where you're getting that 95 to 5? Where where are you getting that actual number from? Can you give us"
"95? Probably I would even say 98 to where you getting that from."
"What What actual source are you getting that from?"
"Uh just reality. Just a"
"No, no, no. I need you to quantify that."
"People you talk to on the street, you actually have to have to 100% of Americans."
"No."
"Okay. So then why are you trying to quantify numbers that you can't prove? Hey, did you know that you can quantify this information? Like there's actual studies and sources and surveys like peer reviews uh peerreview studies like people actually quantify these numbers and you sitting here saying 95 to 5 like you we we can verify this information. That's why"
"98 to2 actually 98 to2 even though I've never looked at a study. I'm just basing it on my own position off my own feelings and I wept it right out of my ass. But 98-2 actually"
"Santana, what do you think the percentage of people that agree with you guys on these issues? Give me a give me a percentage. Like I said,"
"I don't we don't know and we don't care. Hey, here here's my point. Here's my point."
"Give me an estimate. Give me estimate."
"Why are you asking me to give you an estimate when this is irrelevant to the conversation? I don't care what% of people 83 to 85% of Americans actually agree that uh transgender people should not only have equal rights but uh it says uh according to the 2026 data 89% of American adults agree that uh transgender people should have the same abilities as anyone uh to get the health care they need. These were actual uh studies and reviews that were completed by Gallup and also peer re pew research. Oh, also the William Institute did a great study on this as well. So like that's why I said when you try to talk about these numbers and you say random stuff, it can be quantified and when you just it's a simple search. There's multiple surveys that have been completed including a survey that was just done by Gallup in February. So like you you saying that this is 95 to five, you're wrong. You're you're literally wrong. You're absolutely wrong."
"Okay. Um, and I I want him to like actually engage the point that I made. You said that you disregarded every single thing that Katanji Brown Jackson said specifically because of the fact that she couldn't define a woman, something that you considered ordinary. I asked you to define a chair based upon those same conditions. You couldn't do it, which means I can now disregard everything that you say. Correct?"
"No."
"Okay. So then was that a bad argument that you made originally?"
"No."
"So that's called hypocrisy. So, it's literally the same argument. You"
"Think a majority of people agree with you guys on on this specific?"
"Do you see how he like he won't address what I said and he keeps pivoting to something else?"
"Adam, I don't give a flying I don't give a majority of people agree with me. Stop bringing that up. That's a complete pivot. That's a red herring. I'm not going to engage with that because it's [ __ ] that you're using to not engage with my point."
"Engage with what exactly?"
"Are you serious? Engage with what? Did you Did you really not pay attention?"
"All you're saying is engage. All you're saying is engage."
"What did I tell you? I literally explained what to engage with."
"To define a chair. Are you still on that topic to define a chair?"
"Because you couldn't respond to it. Every single time I made that point, you just immediately pivoted to do you think a majority of people agree with you on this?"
"Okay. So,"
"Hey, do do you think a majority of people agree with your support for Trump?"
"So, guys, I"
"Do you think a majority of people agree with your support for Trump?"
"Listen, I have two little sisters that are 13 and 11 years old. And do you think a majority of people agree with your support for Trump?"
"They're on they're quote unquote"
"Do you think a majority of people agree with your support for Trump?"
"Right. So"
"A majority majority of people do you think do you think they agree with Trump?"
"You think they agree with your support for Trump? A majority of people."
"Yeah. I mean"
"What would you actually wrong buddy? If you look at the estimates you're actually wrong buddy. Majority of people against him. Actually his approval rating is in it's actually 30%. 30% actually. Did you know that JD Vance is literally the least liked vice president in US history?"
"That's okay. So, if my little sisters are against like biological"
"I like how again he's not going to address the point. I'm I'm going to Do you want me to mute you until you respond to my point?"
"What would you say to them? What would you say to them? Park,"
"Do you want to respond to the point I made about the chair?"
"I'll respond to your points as soon as you like actually engage with my point. The reason why I'm doing this thing with you is because I'm doing the same pivoting [ __ ] you're doing and trying to get you to realize that it's not productive to the conversation. But you know what's crazy? Everyone realizes it whenever it happens to them, but they don't realize it when they're doing it themselves. So, I'm just trying to get you to realize, right, that that's what you're doing. Can you acknowledge that so that we can move forward with the conversation? If not, we're just going to sit here the entire time because I will literally keep doing this. I'm not joking. I will keep doing this because if you are unwilling to acknowledge that you were wrong, how could we move at all in a productive manner within this conversation on any other topic?"
"Okay. A chair is something with with legs that you sit on. Is that what you're looking for?"
"Okay. So, something with legs that you sit on. Okay. All righty. If it has one leg and you're sitting on it, can is it still a chair? Uh, sure."
"Okay. So, it doesn't need legs, just at least one leg. Okay. If if it's something that is levitating off the ground, but it's but it's also going to be like something that you can sit on that has a back, would that be a chair?"
"Say that again."
"Yeah. If there's If there's a levitating chair, is that a chair?"
"So, you're calling it a levitating"
"A levitating chair without legs, is that a chair? Like if you're if you're talking about from like uh what what's that one like futuristic cartoon show?"
"I I can't remember."
"No, that's not a chair."
"Futurama."
"No."
"Yeah. Something like that where there's like a floating So you don't think a floating chair is a chair?"
"No."
"What about a chair that's attached to the wall?"
"No."
"Without legs."
"That's not a chair legs."
"Has to have legs."
"You're serious? You think a a chair attached to the wall without legs is not a chair?"
"Yeah. Has to have legs, buddy."
"Like, are you trying to You're trying to like intertwine this with the trans uh"
"I have a question. Is a is a wheelchair a a chair?"
"Well, it has chair in it,"
"But the but the legs are wheels. They're not ch they're not legs."
"Yeah, but it's called a wheelchair."
"Okay, so it is a chair. What about a stool? Would a stool be a chair? I mean, it's not called a chair."
"Yeah, but a stool has legs."
"But again, so you now you keep changing what is or is not acceptable. And then depending on how you feel, the parameters uh adjust."
"So, do you see how there aren't necessary and sufficient conditions that you can easily outline for a chair? Yet, we can still typically define a chair is based upon certain terms and it can typically be true, but sometimes it might not be the case and that's totally coherent. But like for some reason when people specifically don't have a specific necessary and sufficient conditions for what a woman is, then you act like it's the end of the world. By the way, I can give you a definition that will make it clear. But I'm just I'm highlighting I'm highlighting By the way, I'm highlighting how ridiculous this is."
"By the way, he thinks chairs in cars aren't chairs because they don't have legs."
"Okay. Fine. Whatever, bro. I don't I don't care. All I'm saying is that you guys need to really get this issue correct. We don't."
"I'm serious. You guys know this, too. I know that you guys have You guys, you know, you support the 1%, which is cool. Which is Listen, let me finish. Oh my gosh. You keep saying this, but I've already directly responded. 83 to 85% of Americans agree with us. 83 to 85% of Americans."
"Agree with what? Agree with what?"
"That transgender people should have all the exact same rights and should have access to the health care that they need. Again, this is quantifiable information that you can actually go look up instead of the feifes in your tum tum. You keep saying this based on 80 80% of Americans prove me wrong. Give me a source that proves me wrong, Adam."
"Listen, 80% of Americans would not agree with Adam biological men going and playing in women's. Can you give me a source that proves me wrong?"
"That's just a lie. That's just a lie."
"That's fine. I'm willing to accept it. Adam, should they should they have rights? I'm willing to trans people have rights. What rights don't they have? What rights don't trans I'm willing to accept what you're saying. Can you give me a source to prove it? Can you give me anything trans people have? What rights don't trans people have?"
"Adam, is the answer no that you can't give me a source that disproves what you're saying?"
"I I Yes. I I play on a high school basketball team with 12 guys. I guarantee you 10 10 out of 12 of them with that woman with that man should not be"
"Adam. Have you ever taken a statistics course? Have you ever taken a statistics course?"
"No. So what what you just brought up would be incredibly biased because it's hypersp specific to the area that you are with the friends that you have the people who are playing specifically on that team and it's not representative. Listen pause pause. That's not representative of the rest of the world or of the entirety of the US. What we need is something that's actually representative of the population. If it's not representative of the population, it's specifically selective bias, right? It's around to you, right? You're just picking whatever is around you. Those are those are subject to a bunch of biases. And within the field of statistics, what they're trying to do is trying to reduce the likelihood of that happening. That's why they conduct polls in certain ways which are to represent the population. Okay? Yours isn't representative of the population. Even if you think you have liberal and conservative friends, because again, still you're not representing the majority of Americans in areas in which you aren't are. You aren't representing women. you aren't representing a bunch of other communities and groups, right? So, there's plenty of individuals that you're not representing that are part of this country"
"And"
"That's fine. But you guys know that you guys know, first of all, trans people have rights. What rights don't they have?"
"What rights don't trans people have?"
"What rights don't have?"
"Let me actually respond directly, please. What rights don't trans people have? What do they have?"
"Yeah. So trans people specifically don't have the rights specifically right now medically speaking they literally have the their sex based on uh specifically in their identification. For example, Caitlyn Jenner has come out and talked about the fact that she literally can't go on the plane. She can't go fly because of this because of the fact that it literally restricts her from doing this. Caitlyn Jenner still supports Trump is on your side and acknowledges this. I just want to clarify. Um along with the fact that repeat that repeat yeah because of because of her passport because it specifically says that uh based upon her biological sex and not based upon her gender she literally can't go fly"
"Based upon her literally yes I'm serious literally go look it up"
"Talking about she talked about this recently"
"Anybody can fly today anybody in the world"
"She's talking about how there are limitations in terms of this uh there's also limitations in terms of medical care there's also limitations in terms of being able to be in the military quite literally trans have been kicked out of the military. There should be limitations on these things. I don't understand."
"You think you think trans people should be kicked out of the military."
"There should be limitations on their cognitive uh you know their their mental to be able to function if they want to be in the mil military."
"It does like all the trans people that were in the military, they were functioning for decades."
"Listen, you can't that's fine. I know there's plenty there's probably a few, you know, you know, strong"
"So then why are you okay with kicking all trans people out?"
"I'm not. But you have to understand that these people are mentally"
"Wait, they're not."
"There's nothing in the DSM. There's nothing in the new DSM that says that."
"Well, obviously there's there's a few loose point really quick. Adam, you talked about screws. Obviously, there's a few loose screws. If you want to talked about the 12 people that were on your basketball team, right, Adam, you mentioned there was 12 people on your basketball team, right?"
"I'd mute him. I I was just going to say, you mentioned the 12 people on your basketball team and and all of them say no. Well, the actual study and polls and research that I'm looking at, this was a survey of 10,188 Americans. Um, across the board, uh, a ranging from the age of 18 to over 65, uh, people that were registered Republicans, independent, Democrats, um, people of multiple races and multiple levels of income. And so the entire spectrum of people is where we got this information from as far as the approval ratings and what they think about transgender people. So the question I have is what's more indicative of reality, the 12 people from your basketball team or the 10,188 people that completed this survey?"
"Yeah. So there's a study done."
"Can Wait, can you address what I said, Adam, before you move on to your study, please? We can't hear you when you swipe out of the app. Just letting you know."
"Address what point exactly?"
"The I said, what's more indicative of what Americans think? The 12 people from your basketball team or the 10,188 people across America that actually participated in this uh survey and study by Pew and um Gallup."
"Yeah. Well, there's actually a different survey. probably about 70% of Americans don't agree with trans women and women sports."
"That's fine. I I just have that simple straightforward question."
"I'm confused on what I'm confused on what uh"
"Adam I I like I I promise you we can talk about whatever you have. I just want to answer to my question directly. What's more indicative of the reality, the 12 people from your basketball team or the 10,188 people that comp uh completed this study and survey? uh the survey on trans people having rights."
"Yeah. Which one is more indicative of reality? The 12 people from your basketball team or the 10,188 people that completed this study and survey in conjunction with Pew and Gallup."
"Uh 10,000 people. But that's only 10,000 people. That's like that's nothing. That's like a That's like a That's nothing."
"Yeah. But you understand"
"People that's absolutely nothing."
"Again, he's not understanding. So you can have that you can have that level of a sample size and it can still be representative of the population. That's actually a good sample size."
"Absolutely not."
"That's actually a really good sample size. 10,000 is actually a very good."
"Let me look up Adam. Did you hear the representation that I said? I mean again there's 10,188 people. Uh the ages start at 18 and they go over 65. There are people that are registered Republicans, Democrats, and independent. uh every single race is represented represented and multiple income levels are represented. So like that's a wide spectrum of people to get a complete uh sample set."
"So in order for a poll to be effective, you do not need the entirety of the population. You don't need a majority of the population. You need a population that allows you to represent the entirety of the population. that would allow for you to have a stat like a statistically significant uh uh likelihood of it being an effective uh effective distribution of the population. That's really all it is is does this accurately represent the population. It's not whether or not you have everyone. It's just whether or not it could statistically represent it within a certain level of confidence."
"Okay. And I disagree. So, um, it says here when I look up, do a majority of Americans agree with trans women, women's sports, and bathrooms. Okay."
"Okay."
"I I I can't believe we're still on this. I actually I can't believe I do. This is why I want to throw my head through the"
"You don't have to crash. You don't have to crash, bro. Let me"
"No, it's it's because we're like talking about the same thing for how long? Like, I've had the most insufficient."
"Santana just brought up Santana just brought up whatever statistics that I don't even know like where they're coming from. So it says"
"You the problem that Parker is having is that you won't actually engage with anything and you don't have"
"I just engage. Let me make a let me make a point then we can move on."
"Like I was saying before I love everybody. I have no hate towards anyone."
"You do,"
"Right? I think trans people should exist. They should have rights like they do. But you guys really seriously have to get this issue and be able to answer these questions simply. And when and when you guys say fake outrage, when you guys say fake fake outrage, this is what pisses people off,"
"Right? You can't you can't tell someone they have fake outrage when real people real people have daughters and sons."
"Real people have daughters. Wow. Small small amount of angry people that live."
"The president of the United States of America went up to a 10-year-old girl, said he'd be dating her in 10 years. The president of the United States of America bragged about walking in the changing rooms of naked women while they're changing without their consent where two 18-year-olds came out. There were four girls as young as 15 years old in exchange rooms. The president of the United States was credibly accused by a minor in the Epste files and he tried to prevent the release of the Epstein files calling Marjgery Taylor Green a traitor for wanting to release the Epstein files. Right? He the president of the United States was held civily liable of sexually abusing a woman. Right. Unanimously amongst a jury of nine people the president of the United States was accused by over 27 women of sexual misconduct. Okay. If you care about the effect on women and people's daughters in this country, how the hell could you look past that? This is why we say this is fake outrage and this is why we say that you don't actually give a [ __ ] about women or girls in this country because you're actively willing to promote a person who's a predator to get into the position of the presidency to protect predators from the position of the presidency and then you're going to sit there and like you care like you act about act like you care about women and girls just to be able to literally create fear-mongering against trans people. Yeah, give me a break, dude. Now, yeah, I'll let you respond. I'm not going to say a single thing. I'm gonna mute myself, actually."
"And also, just one quick question for you. Are who's in your profile picture?"
"Why? Why do you care?"
"Is Is that you?"
"Why? Why do you care about my profile picture?"
"Just genuine question. Is that you?"
"No."
"H interesting. Anyway, you can go ahead."
"You think I'm handsome? Nope, you can go ahead."
"Okay. Um, yeah, Parker just rambled off a bunch of just random stuff. Um, but we're"
"Can you repeat back anything I just said?"
"Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We're in 2026. Okay."
"No, repeat back anything I just said."
"What what we're dealing with in today's world is what matters."
"Repeat back anything I just said. Can you repeat back?"
"No one is thinking No one is thinking about [ __ ] from"
"I'm just going to mute you. Can you repeat back anything that I just said because I want to make sure that you were listening. Dude, dude, you said a million things that you say every time."
"Name one thing. Name one thing."
"You said the same thing. Um Marjorie Taylor Green. What? Like"
"What about her?"
"She She doesn't support Trump anymore."
"Wow. That's not even what I said. I said that Donald Trump called her a traitor when she wanted just to release the Epstein files."
"He tried to prevent the release."
"So there's probably more to it."
"You're just making a blanket statement."
"I'm not I'm not That's literally what happened."
"There's three There's three million files that have been released. So, you're just making a blanket."
"There's three million that they haven't been released."
"Trump called her a traitor because he didn't want to release the Epstein files. Like, that's so dumb."
"Wait, I'm sorry. That's literally That's literally what happened. You can you can see what Marjorie Taylor Green says about it. That's literally what happened."
"They probably have in-house other issues that they deal with. Okay. It's not just about the Epstein files."
"No, I promise you that's literally what happened. You can you can see what Marjorie Taylor Green says about it. That's literally what happened."
"Well, first three million files have been released. So, like"
"3 million haven't."
"Yeah, 3 million more, but 3 million have and no one else. They're legally obligated to they're literally legally obligated to release all of them. So why are you saying let's give them a pat on the back for doing half of what they're legally obligated to do? What?"
"Yeah, it's only been one year. Maybe they could release the next million in the next year. Like why are you What do you mean? They already released three million."
"Hey government, give me a pat on the back. I did really good. I paid half my taxes."
"No one else released anything before Trump administration. So, I don't even understand what"
"There there was no legal obligation to release them before."
"You guys are you guys are lucky to even get the files put out because of the Trump administration."
"The there there was no there was no law to release them under prior administrations."
"If Democrats were in office right now, they probably wouldn't release them because they know most"
"Yes, they would because there's literally there's literally a legal obligation to release it."
"They would follow Democrats in there anyway. So, why would you want them all to be released? It's mostly Democrats in there."
"Really? So, what Democrats?"
"Probably most of them. I mean Jeffrey Epste was a Democrat."
"Okay. So you're saying Jeffrey Epstein, right? The notorious notorious Democrat that is literally involved in politics. That's a running for Congress."
"No. So I'm confused. What is the relevance?"
"Epstein was a part of the Democratic party. Most of his friends were Democrats, buddy."
"Okay."
"Trump."
"And is that supposed to mean anything? He wasn't like a politician. He wasn't in a political office. We're talking about the president, not some random Republican."
"Yeah, but what are the epine What I mean, you're just saying Epste files like because you guys think Trump is a"
"Who? Oh, I have a question. You want to talk about affiliations then making that condemnable? You say Democrats association with Epste. Um, who was friends with Epstein for over a decade? Best friends, might I add?"
"Say it again."
"Who was best friends with Epstein for over a decade while he was doing this."
"Um, what's that uh what's that black lawyer that black lawyer's name or the the woman in uh that was uh"
"The answer is Donald Trump, dude. The answer's Donald Trump. It's Donald Trump. That's literally Donald Trump. I don't know why you didn't realize that. You see how he purposefully tries not to engage with the points that I make?"
"Wait, let me look her up. What's her name? the Democratic lawyer that that Jasmine Crockett and all you guys were defending for for helping out Jeffrey Epste."
"You know what's super interesting to me, Parker? I would think that someone who is, you know, a washed up college athlete, someone who actually at least got a summer league invite to the NBA for the Warriors, someone who has access uh to a lot of people and should have more reach, would actually spend more time doing something better for people and worried about more issues than transgender people. instead of making this his entire personality, instead of actually taking what I guess stage that he might have had when he played for uh San Diego State, you know, and like I would think a former athlete would worry about things that are more important versus actually just, you know, sitting on this Tik Tok live advocating against less than 1% of the uh population or the US population especially where you could have reach, right? I mean like I I I understand that you didn't actually make it into the league. I know you didn't actually make it into the league, but you do have on a day-to-day basis. S"
"What do you do on a day-to-day basis, Adam?"
"Yeah. So, what are you talking about? What are you saying?"
"What do you do on a dayto-day basis to advocate against less than 1% of the population? Yeah, I'm looking."
"Do you know how successful I am?"
"I I do. I do. Adam, Adam, tell us tell us how successful you are, Adam. on how successful is the you know I played in the final four national championship so that he averaged 5.8 points in his final season 5.8 points"
"Which is a careerh high and playing 37 games. Yeah 5.85 5.8 eight points uh you know for an entire se season. That's um pretty successful. Anyway, I still fulfilled my dream. Hey, guess what? Guess what? Less than 1% of the"
"Guess what, Santana? Guess what? I still I still fulfill my dreams and I played overseas."
"Sure."
"And I played professional basketball. So, like no one cares about the five points. I know a bunch of players have the opportunity to actually use a bunch of players who could cultivate to actually help people, but you want to spend more time worrying about less than 1% of the population instead of doing something beneficial for people. Like it's weird that that's what you chose to do."
"First of all, I help I probably help more people than you on a day day-to-day basis. Okay. Um"
"Secondly, play in the final four, play in the national championship."
"Okay. You're just like making like random ad homonyms. You don't even know who I am."
"No, I I stated facts."
"You know what I'm saying? So like"
"What random ad I'm the most winningest player."
"You know what's crazy, Santana? It's crazy. It's crazy that like he wasn't able"
"I'm the most winningest player in Mountain West."
"It's crazy that you weren't able to define a chair after you spent so much time on the bench. He shoot. He scores. Parker with the Steph Curry three from deep. Parker hit that from half court. What the Hey, Adam, you got to guard him from that distance. You can't leave leave him that open. You cannot leave him that open. Holy [ __ ]"
"I saw it. I had to shoot."
"Hey, I'm so I'm so happy. being blessed with my career and my and my my life."
"I know. I know. By the way, like I don't I don't want to take away from that. Like playing professional is really good. I just wanted to make that joke cuz I saw it."
"Listen, I can and I could I could take I could take, you know, I could take I don't care. Like at the end of the day, what you if y'all want to judge my career, you don't even know who I am. You know, I'm talking about an issue."
"Dude, dude, if you played professional overseas, I"
Bet you're a very great basketball player. I was just, I saw the joke and I had to make it. I had to make it.
>> The point that I was trying to drill home with this, Adam, is not that like you're like some type of crumb bum. I'm not saying that because you're absolutely right. Like playing college sports is massive. Making it to the final four is huge. Playing overseas is a big deal. But the point that I'm making is that you have an actual baked-in fan base, a baked-in audience, and you could actually be advocating doing something like, even if you even if you wanted to reshape the way that our country does things and you wanted to like run on like quote unquote Republican values and things like that, you could actually be addressing things that hurt and harm everyday Americans instead of focusing on something that affects less than 1% of the population. Like you could, you could actually run on those quote unquote Republican values and want to like shrink the debt. Like our, our debt has continued to grow under Donald Trump to record numbers. Like you could actually advocate for that with the platform that you could have. That's the point that I'm making. I'm not saying that like you're not some, you shouldn't be proud of what you did because you should, like what you did was an accomplishment. The point that I'm making is that you could take what you've already done and parlay that into something that will help everyone. Even if it's not on the, the left side, it could be on the right side and still be something that's beneficial instead of worrying about less than 1% of the US population. That's the whole thing.
>> Okay. I mean, I hear what you're saying on, on, on a few of those things, but I do at the end of the day, like back in 20, 2021, right? 5 years ago or like, I would say around 2020 is when I made that switch over because because of my values. First of all, like this, like, like I said, we can make, we can make things work for trans people. There could, why, why don't we make a different section of sports? Why don't we make a, a, a category for trans people? Would that be better instead of like arguing for them to?
>> No, I just don't think that makes any sense. Instead of arguing for men to compete with women. Like, can you name, can you name three trans people that are dominating women's sports right now?
>> They don't have to dominate. It's the policy.
>> They do. They literally do. They would have to dominate for you to even care. They would have to dominate. They would literally have to be dominating and have to make it so unfair for you to care. If they're not making it unfair, if they're not dominating, then what's the point of caring?
>> It's not about playing. It's like about the.
>> It literally is about fairness.
>> Are we going to, are we going to allow, you know, trans women to go into locker rooms with women and 24-hour fitness? You know what I'm saying? Policies.
>> I'll grant you what you're saying as far as it's not about them dominating. Okay. Like without naming the people, that's fine. Can you name any policy that actually make or allows or demands that transgender people compete in those sports? Can you just name one policy?
>> Uh, name a policy like what?
>> That actually demands or mandates transgender people to be able to play in sports. Okay, give me a second.
>> Okay, so you're going to look it up. The, the point that I'm trying to get across is like, if this is actually something that you care about, like one, you should, you should know these details.
>> It's not the biggest problem in the world, but it is, it is a, it is a big problem with certain policies.
>> That you may allow. Like in California, there was a huge situation. I'm sure you guys saw it where that black woman went viral where there was a man, looked like a man, right? He claimed that he was a trans woman, okay? And he was going, I think it was at a Planet Fitness. And he went to the Planet Fitness woman's uh locker room and the women were pissed. And this black woman, she's a lesbian. She's a liberal. She's a liberal black lesbian. And she was absolutely, these policies are allowed. They kicked her out. They didn't kick him out the gym.
>> Yeah, but that's a private business. That has nothing to do with legislation. Adam, I'm not saying that this isn't something that people aren't talking about because it is, obviously. But you're sitting on the live in front of 5,000. Think about this, Adam. When, how often, how hard is it to actually get in front of a room of like a hundred people to speak, right? But you're sitting currently in front of 5,000 plus people listening to your words and the best thing that you could actually find to advocate for is uh transgender people, right? You, you're advocating against transgender people. How often do you get this amount of reach at one time where you could get a message across? And if there's something that you said this is the most important thing in the world, like this is your opportunity to talk to talk about like the most important thing in the world to you. Like that's why we've been talking about this for like 30, 40 minutes. And if this isn't the most important thing, like if I got this opportunity, I would be sitting here advocating for the things that I really care about that I think are the most important things in the world, not something that I think is like, oh, this is just an issue. Like you're, you're wasting an opportunity. Also like.
>> Okay, we can switch topics. What about what do you guys think about uh Iran then?
>> Obviously, I think that the war with Iran is not justified to engage in because it's literally destabilized the Middle East historically speaking, our involvement, military intervention. It's led to worse conditions. So, I don't think that military intervention in the Middle East is beneficial, right? Specifically with the context of Iran, there was no imminent threat of them attacking the United States of America. Uh, so, this wasn't defensive. It was a war of aggression after Trump claimed no new wars.
>> Okay. So, what about the terror that they've been reigning on our, our allies and and people around the Middle East for decades? Like, why, like what about the, they're literally a terrorist regime? Why would we allow them to stay in power over there?
>> I could say the same thing for the state of Israel. But also, like in terms of this respect, like unless they're under imminent threat of attacking us, I see no good reason to uh to go to war with them. There's really no argument at all because what you're saying in that circumstance is, oh, because they have done things that you disagree with. Well, you could say the same thing about Russia. You could say the same thing about um a bunch of different countries, right? So, I, I just don't understand the point. Do you want to go direct war with Russia?
>> Uh, no. Russia's not. Listen, you have to understand these, these guys are blowing up bases. They're, they're blowing up people overseas.
>> They're attacking, they're attacking our allies now because we attacked them. It doesn't have to be an imminent threat on the US. This is for world peace.
>> Okay. What ally were they going to attack?
>> You guys when you guys are just consistently.
>> Against everything, you don't even say like, "Okay, yeah, this might be good. This might be good."
>> No, wait. There's no evidence of world peace because.
>> That's what you're saying. You don't like, you don't, you don't, you don't look forward.
>> Uh, the process, you know? You just want to the process.
>> Dude, what evidence do you have that it's going to lead to more peace? I, I've already addressed this point. We've actually historically through military intervention not created more peace.
>> We just took out a whole terrorist regime over 40 people.
>> Wait, I have a question.
>> 40 of their terrorists.
>> I have a question. Do you agree with Trump's pull out of Afghanistan? He set up the agreement with the Taliban to leave.
>> No, I'm talking about Iran.
>> No, but I'm asking, do you agree with his pull out.
>> In 2026? I'm talking about today. What's happening in the world today? What happened?
>> But I'm asking you a direct question. Do you think that Donald Trump pulling out of Afghanistan was good? I don't even, I don't even know the details on that.
>> Okay. Well, the Taliban ended up taking over.
>> So, you have to, you have to either criticize his position there.
>> Right? Or you have to say that you disagree with regime change wars forever.
>> No, I don't. No, I don't. I could just, I could actually just look at what's happening in the world today and judge it off that. I don't have to judge off past experiences and uh pulling out of other wars and stuff. What I'm talking about today is that our technology is way better. Okay? We have to take out a terrorist regime and save the Iranian people. And 90% of Iranians agree with this. 90% of Iranians agree with what's going on. But you guys are just, you guys just completely don't like, I don't understand. Like, what about the Iranian people? If they agree with it, why don't you guys?
>> I don't think that we're going to change regime and get a different regime in place to be able to change these conditions for people.
>> Agree. Why, why don't, why don't liberals agree with Iranian?
>> I don't know where you're getting. I don't, I don't know where you're getting the number from. But like, even so, that, that's not the way that I justify whether or not we are going to engage because I have to acknowledge whether or not it will even be meaningful or within our interest to be able to do so in the first place. Right? Because you understand that it has not led to conditions that are better off in the long run. Right? It has been incredibly costly for us. Right? It leads to US service members dying. It leads to us murdering innocent civilians. Right? I don't see any good reason that this is going to lead to better conditions. Now, if your whole argument is is that you think regime change does lead to better conditions, what good evidence do you have that historically speaking that's been the case in the Middle East? Because I think all the evidence shows that it's not been effective, that we've wasted decades of time. We've destabilized the region and we've not created more peace by doing this. This is the constant argument used to justify war in the context of the Middle East. It has never led to better conditions here. Well, we're in a different time today and the world is scared of Trump. As much as you'd like to say no, they're not scared of Trump. Yes, people are scared of Trump. We just, the whole terrorist regime. Okay. Whoever's next up in line, they better get their together.
>> They're still in the regime. Wait, the same regime's in office.
>> No, it's. Well, that, but they're not. But as long.
>> You think the IRGC is gone.
>> No, listen. As long as they're not as radical as they are, then.
>> They were, they are. They're more radical now.
>> Will be better. No, listen.
>> That's just, that's literally just virtue signaling from Trump to make it seem like he did something. No, they know our military will take them out. That's the thing. We're not playing around. We're not.
>> Did they do they not have an idea that the military could do that before?
>> We're not. We're not playing this soft liberal. We're not waiting till people hit us and like say, "Oh, there's no." What do you mean soft liberal? That's a called a war crime. We're not being soft. We're taking charge.
>> What do you mean that's called a war crime? Wars of aggression are war crimes. Okay. You know that, right?
>> We take, we, we control world peace.
>> Hey dude, wars of aggression. Are they war crimes?
>> Wars of aggression. It's been a conflict for 47 years.
>> Do you think a war of aggression is is a war crime?
>> There's been a conflict for 47 years. They've been, they calling us soft because we're against war crimes. You said that we're soft because we disagree with war crimes. Literally, you just said we're soft because we don't want to start wars of aggression.
>> What is a war of aggression? This is a terrorist regime that we're taking out. You guys, do you guys support these people? Like, why, why do you defend? Why do you like, should we not have taken them out? I'm so confused. They've been, they've been slaughter. Gone to war with Iran. I don't see any benefit. What objective have we met? Their own people. They've been slaughtering their own people. Why should.
>> How are we preventing that? Understand.
>> By their terrorist leaders. That's what we did. Okay. But that didn't actually, does that actually prevent that from happening cuz it's the same regime in office.
>> We got control. We got control of the straight and now we're moving direction.
>> That's not true at all. We don't. Iran has complete control of the straight.
>> No, they don't. No, they don't.
>> Like this literally just.
>> Why was Donald Trump, why was Donald Trump, why was Donald Trump actually saying, "Open the damn straight, you crazy?"
>> Yeah. Why was he saying after that the next day or two, we have, we have, we have control of the straight.
>> Why, why is he claiming that Iran has opened it now? Now, let me just clarify like the point that I would want to make here is that they don't even necessarily need control over it. All they need is the ability to make it literally so dangerous to go through that no one will decide to go through it. That's it. That's all they have to do. They don't have to have full control over it. All they have to do is make it dangerous. That's it.
>> And guess, and guess what? That's not going to happen under our watch. It's not going to happen under under American military.
>> Watch. Have you looked at the ceasefire agreement that the United States signed with Iran?
>> Yeah. Didn't Trump also say.
>> That say that again?
>> Did you look at the 10-point peace agreement that um that the United States signed with Iran?
>> Uh, no, I haven't seen all of it.
>> I mean, not the peace agreements, but ceasefire. One of the two, two parts of the ceasefire is number one, Iran has complete control over the Strait of Hormuz. Number two, uh, the United States has to pay $2 million per ship, per United States ship that moves through the strait. And what happened is they, they shut it back down after the conflict between Israel and Lebanon. But as of today, since the Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Lebanon um peace agreement is put in place, they have completely reopened the strait. But the United States is still getting taxed and Iran is still in control of it. Sorry. Go ahead, Parker.
>> Watch this. Watch this. President Donald J. Trump, Truth Social, three hours ago. Iran has agreed to never close the Strait of Hormuz again. It will no longer be used as a weapon against the world. President Donald J. Trump.
>> He said what? He said it will not, what?
>> Say last part.
>> Yeah. Iran has never agreed or has agreed to never close the Strait of Hormuz again. It will no longer be used as a weapon against the world. President Donald J. Trump.
>> Okay. So, is that a good thing? The point that we're making is that you're, you're wrong and even Trump is admitting that means Iran has control. Yep.
>> Does that like, I, I'm confused why I even had to explain to you that that's what it meant. Like, I'm actually really confused.
>> I was doing something. Uh, they could, they could have control as long as they're, uh, they're listening to us.
>> But they're not. But like.
>> No, they're, they're guys, you have to understand here's the thing. We are not letting this conflict. We are not letting Iran have power over anymore. We are taking our oil. They can control it, but we run the show. We America runs the show. Adam, you guys are just fully against everything that we question.
>> Prior to the attacks on Iran by the US and Israel, did Iran have complete control of the straighter horm?
>> Uh, yeah.
>> No, they didn't. They didn't. Prior to the United States and Israel striking Iran, were we paying $2 million per ship to go through the Strait of Hormuz?
>> Repeat that.
>> Prior to the strikes on Iran by the US and Israel, were we paying $2 million per ship to go through the Strait of Hormuz?
>> Okay. Sure.
>> No. No, we weren't. And and since those things, now Iran has complete control of the strait and we're paying $2 million per ship. Does that sound like a good thing to you?
>> Uh, I do believe that there's probably a bigger reason behind it as to why we might be doing that.
>> But the, you guys like, you like, you're making blanket, you know, like, does it sound good to you like this amount of money, you know, but we don't know the details.
>> It's not about the money though, Adam. It's about the level of control that Iran had prior to the attack versus the level of control that they have now.
>> I guarantee you that Iran does not have that much power they did before. They have complete control and they're getting paid.
>> Like, like Donald Trump just agreed to this. This was a part of the ceasefire.
>> The US said yes, you, the US said yes, you can have complete control and we will pay you $2 million for ship.