Transcription
In this video, I answer [music] an important question. What is currently the easiest and also laziest way to make money online with AI? And before you misunderstand me, lazy is not an insult here. On the contrary, when it comes to business, laziness is actually just another word for intelligence. Because whoever looks for the laziest way to make money is looking for the most efficient way. For the way where you get the greatest possible output, i.e. money, for your input, i.e. your work. But the thing is, online you'll find zillions of different opportunities that promise exactly that. And the truth is simply that many online business models might work for others, but are not the right model for you. Or they used to work very well, but are now long outdated in the age of AI. That's precisely why in this video I compared and analyzed the currently most popular online business models, to see which one offers you as a beginner the best chances of success, and you'll also learn which ideas you should better stay away from. For the winning model of this comparison, I will also give you a step-by-step guide afterwards on how you can earn your first money with it within the next 90 days. Perhaps you're now wondering, who is this bald, tattooed guy anyway, and why should I even listen to him? Hi, my name is Anschu Kögel, and I've been self-employed with my online business for over 10 years. During this time, I've tried almost everything, seen dozens of [music] trends come and go, and was on the verge of going bankrupt a few times. In the meantime, I've also earned over 5 million euros online, for which I received this somewhat clunky award here from my payment provider Digistore 24, and all this, although I only work an average of two to three hours. And very importantly, I'm not telling you all this to brag, but I just want to show you, hey, I know what I'm talking about, but I'm not an exception, because in the last two years I've helped over 300 people build their own and, above all, reputable online business, like for example Habolüdeling. He is a full-time teacher, but with the method that I will also explain to you later, he has built up an online side income step by step and now consistently earns five figures a month with it. He recently had his best month and earned €32,000 in 30 days. And since his business is now doing so well, he's traveling the world and at 22 years old, for the first time in his life, he truly has the freedom to do whatever he wants. Or like Rafael. He uses the same online business model and earned six figures with it in his first year, and just recently he made €50,000 with a new launch in just 3 days. So let's start with the comparison right away. Before we can compare the different business models, we first need to define what makes a good online business. To avoid doing this based on gut feeling, but to keep it as objective as possible, we will set five criteria. In the end, each model will receive a clear score for each criterion, and that way you'll see in black and white which one best suits you and your current situation. The first and most important criterion is, of course, the starting capital. As a beginner, you don't want to use up all your savings or take out a loan to get started. So, the less starting capital you need at the beginning, the better. [music] The second criterion is closely related, because it is the general risk. This means, on the one hand, the statistical probability that your first attempt will fail, but at the same time, what the consequences of such a failure are. That is, can you simply try again immediately, or is the damage so great, be it financially or to your reputation, that you can't recover from it? [music] The third criterion is scalability. Every business starts small, but at the same time, you naturally want to have the opportunity to make something really big out of it. We therefore need to ask ourselves soberly, how big is the market for the respective model really, and does it still have growth potential in the future, and how much competition is there? The fourth criterion is then the profit margin. That is, how much of every euro earned really stays with you in the end, and how much goes towards operating expenses? And last but not least, the most frequently overlooked criterion, automability. This is about what is called fulfillment in the business world. So, what exactly do you deliver, and how does it reach the customer? Can you completely decouple this process, and thus your income, from your own work effort? This is precisely the point that determines how lazy or efficient a business model really is in the end. Let's start directly with the model that is currently experiencing a lot of hype and into which most beginners enter with completely wrong expectations. It's about Faceless Shortform Content. The principle behind it seems quite ingenious at first glance. You create massive amounts of short clips for TikTok or YouTube Shorts without ever showing your own face. Instead, AI voices do the speaking, and AI-generated images or stock footage provide the visuals. The plan is pure volume and virality, to be paid primarily through the platform's advertising revenue. But how does this fare in our scoring system? When it comes to starting capital, this model plays to your absolute strengths. You practically need nothing but a laptop and an internet connection. Editing programs are free, and the necessary websites are often free. You can hardly start a business cheaper, which is why we give it a clear 10 out of 10 points. But this brings us directly to the risk. And here you have to be careful. While you lose almost nothing financially, you risk burning a massive amount of time. Since everyone can start this business, you are fighting against a gigantic flood of competition. On top of that, there's the complete dependence on the platform. YouTube loves to demonetize such channels due to reused content without warning. So you can invest months of work without ever seeing any significant money. Therefore, there are only five out of 10 points here. It looks even bleaker when it comes to scalability. The reality here is absolutely brutal. Since you are paid per view, and often only a meager one to five cents per 1000 views, you need truly astronomical numbers. To be able to live well from this, you would have to consistently generate around 50 million views every month, and this is hardly replicable for beginners. The verdict is therefore a merciless 1 out of 10. When it comes to profit margins, it looks better on paper again, because you have hardly any operating costs, maybe a few euros for editing tools, so theoretically 80 to 90 cents of every euro earned stays with you. But to be completely honest, even a 90% margin of almost nothing doesn't pay rent. Nevertheless, viewed purely proportionally, this is a strong 8 out of 10 points. Let's come to the decisive point for everyone looking for an intelligent business, automability. And this is precisely where the biggest misconception lies. Many think that AI does everything [music] by itself. But the truth is, generic AI garbage is immediately penalized by the algorithm and swept away. To create videos that people actually watch until the end, you spend hours every day on scripts, hooks, and video editing. As soon as you stop posting, the views drop. So you are constantly under production stress. This only earns a meager two out of 10 points. The conclusion is therefore quite sobering. Overall, Faceless Content only gets 26 out of a possible 50 points. It's a nice side hustle to take your first steps online, but it's hardly a real business that can grow big long-term, and above all, it's anything but the lazy way to success. Let's move from the playground to the supposed business league. The next model was sold last year as the absolute gold rush. It's about the AI Automation Agency. What do you do here? Basically, you sell AI solutions to companies. Mostly, these are chatbots for customer support or automated workflows, for example via Zapia, which you build individually for the customer. So you promise other companies more efficiency through artificial intelligence. But let's look at how efficient this is for you in reality. When it comes to starting capital, we are still in a very good range. It's affordable, but not free. The monthly costs for tools like Make, Zapia, Botpress, and the necessary API credits add up quickly, often even before you've earned your first euro, but it stays within limits. Therefore, we give it a solid eight out of ten points. When it comes to risk, we need to differentiate. You won't be financially ruined here and won't incur debt, but you'll fall into a pretty brutal time trap. The probability of failure is quite high because your solutions often become obsolete faster than you can sell them. The risk is not poverty, but that after 12 months of hard work, you'll be left with nothing or very little. No lasting company value, no brand, just outdated knowledge. Therefore, six out of 10 points. It gets really painful with scalability. Here lies the so-called rapper trap. You build your entire business on rented ground. A single update from OpenAI can turn your expensive €2,000 service into a free standard feature for everyone overnight. You are effectively betting against the innovation speed of tech giants like Google or Microsoft. A bet that you can only lose in the long run. Therefore, only three out of 10 points. There is also often a misconception about profit margins. You might see high revenues on the invoice, but as a service provider, you usually have high operating costs. Either you pay expensive freelancers, or you sacrifice a massive amount of your own time. Realistically, you usually have 30% to a maximum of 50% left. This gives us five out of 10 points. And that leads us to automability. And here lies the absolute irony of this business model, because you sell automation to others, but your own business is pure manual labor. Customer acquisition, building the bots, and constant bug fixing require your permanent active presence. You cannot double your revenue without also doubling or at least massively increasing your effort or number of employees. This is the opposite of passive and means only two out of 10 points. The conclusion: In the end, you are basically just a glorified external IT employee. Your business model is threatened every day by AI becoming too good and too simple to operate, so that you are no longer needed as an intermediary. Adding this up, we get a total score of 24 out of 50 points. Perhaps after all the AI criticism, you're thinking, I'd rather do something tangible where real work still counts. Exactly this thought leads most beginners directly into the arms of our third candidate, the classic service business. Here you simply sell your time or that of your employees for money. You take on services for other companies, be it running advertising campaigns, writing emails, or editing videos. It's the classic "do" principle. But how much freedom does this model really bring you? When it comes to starting capital, this business is extremely beginner-friendly. You [music] practically only need a laptop, your phone, and your skills. Since you're not buying expensive goods, but essentially selling air, i.e., your service, the start is almost free. That's a strong nine out of 10 points. But when it comes to risk, there's a danger that many overlook, the fixed cost trap. As long as you do everything yourself, it's okay. But to avoid being a slave to your business, you eventually have to hire employees. And employees mean fixed salaries, regardless of how your revenue is doing. If a major client drops you, which often happens, you suddenly have high ongoing costs that can financially ruin you. Therefore, only four out of ten points. It gets even more difficult with scalability. Here you inevitably run into a wall. To earn more, you need more clients. But more clients immediately mean more work. At some point, you reach your limit and have to hire people. But ask yourself, why should good people serve clients for you when they can do it just as well as freelancers themselves and pocket the entire margin? This is the big catch of every agency and the reason why large profits are extremely difficult to scale here. Therefore, only two out of ten points. This naturally also affects the profit margin. In the beginning, when you do everything yourself, the margin seems huge, but you no longer have any free time. But as soon as you scale and delegate tasks, personnel costs eat up your [music] profits. Often your net margin then drops to below 20% or 30%, while your responsibility simultaneously explodes. This gives a meager four out of 10 points. And if you dream of passive income, I have to disappoint you. Automability here is practically zero. B2B clients pay for individual results and personal support. You can write down processes and use AI for certain tasks, but in the end, you or your expensive staff have to develop the strategy and hold hands. You are the system. Hardly any less automation is possible. Three out of 10 points. So what remains in the end? You quit your job to finally be free, only to find out that now, instead of your boss, you suddenly have ten bosses, namely your paying clients, and they bother you even on Sunday evenings. Plus, you bear the burden of other people's salaries. Believe me, you don't want to sell services. In total, we end up with a weak 22 out of 50 points. Let's now move on to the model that has been sold for years as the fastest way to a sports car, and which is supposedly easier than ever thanks to AI. We're talking about AI dropshipping or e-commerce. The basic principle is probably known. You sell physical products, mostly cheap imported goods from Asia, through an online shop. But what's new is that AI now helps you build the shop in minutes and write product descriptions. But this is exactly the problem, because exactly this can now be done by anyone else. But let's look at the hard numbers. Many are blinded by the starting capital. The shop itself is set up quickly, but that's like a car without fuel. The fuel, i.e., especially advertising, is quite expensive. You have to burn thousands of euros on Facebook or TikTok ads just to find a product that sells. You are making massive financial advances here, completely without guarantee. That's only four out of ten points. This also brings us directly to the risk, and this is extremely dangerous. You can blow all your savings on ads in a single weekend without making a single sale. On top of that, there's the operational nightmare. Blocked PayPal accounts or expensive warning letters because a supplier from China delivered junk or counterfeits. Therefore, only a hard zero out of ten points. Scalability seems better at first glance. Theoretically, you can sell an infinite number of products, but beware, more revenue with physical products immediately means more logistical problems, more returns, and more annoying customer support. On top of that, there's the copycat problem. You sell goods that anyone else can have. As soon as others see that a product is doing well for you, you immediately have ten imitators on your neck. Nevertheless, the potential is there. Therefore, six out of ten points. Let's come to the biggest pain point of this model, the profit margin. Dropshipping is the ultimate revenue spinner, but do the math. Out of €100 in revenue, €30 goes to the product, €40 to advertising, and another €10 for taxes and fees. You are often left with only a meager 10% to 15%. So you move millions, often just to keep pocket change. That's a poor two out of ten points. That leaves automability. Yes, the shipping of packages, the fulfillment, is done by others for you, but the actual business consists of constantly finding and marketing new winning products, because the old product is worn out after 3 weeks. This is a creative hamster wheel that no AI can take away from you. Therefore, only a mediocre five out of 10 points. The hard but honest conclusion here: AI has not saved this already outdated model, but has actually killed it for good. Because today everyone can create a perfect shop with a click, competition has exploded and margins are in the basement. You are effectively fighting against 1000 other lucky devils for the same cheap plastic junk. The lesson here is: You want to sell something digital. Total score 19 out of 50 points. So, if we've learned that physical products are often a logistical nightmare, then the next step seems logical. We look at the big dream of Silicon Valley. The model that has produced the richest people in the world. Software or SaaS. Software as a Service. The plan sounds tempting. You develop an app or a platform that solves a specific problem and [music] rent out access to it for a monthly subscription fee. It's the ultimate dream of passive income through code. But what about the costs? [music] It used to be that if you weren't a brilliant programmer yourself, you had to pay developers, and they quickly cost €10,000 before even the first feature worked. Today, it looks different at first glance. With AI tools like Claude or ChatGPT, you can build prototypes, simple features, or even small apps yourself, and for a fraction of the original cost. But the problem is, these tools almost always reach their limits with real complexity. At the latest, when things get serious, you need developers, infrastructure, and ongoing technical support again. So you might save money at the beginning, but not when building a truly scalable product. All in all, SaaS is therefore not as brutally capital-intensive today as it used to be, but for beginners, it's still expensive enough to slow them down. [music] Therefore, four out of 10 points. It looks brutal when it comes to risk. Most founders fall into a trap here. They develop software for months in a silent cocoon, only to discover at launch that nobody needs it. You invest massive time and money in advance in a product that can become technically obsolete even before it earns its first euro. An absolute suicide mission, one out of 10 points. Why do so many still try it? Quite simply, because of scalability. [music] And here we have to remain objective. This is the only area where this model is absolutely unbeatable. Technically, it doesn't matter whether 10 or 10 million people use your app. The code is the same. The market potential is also gigantic. You are not tied to one location. Your market is literally the whole world, and everyone with an internet connection. So the growth is completely open-ended. Here, there are 10 out of 10 points without discussion. The profit margin is also very strong, because once the software is built, each new customer costs almost nothing more. But beware, the ongoing costs for servers, maintenance, and especially continuous development often eat up more than you initially calculated in your Excel spreadsheet. Nevertheless, a lot remains here. Therefore, eight out of 10 points. The question of automability remains. The delivery is fully automated, but software is never truly finished. You have constant bugs, server outages, or API changes from third parties that crash your app. Furthermore, you often have to further develop the app to remain competitive. So you are not a relaxed entrepreneur here, but a permanent fire chief for technical fires. Therefore, only six out of ten points. The conclusion: SAS is the model that might make billionaires, but usually costs beginners their last savings. It's the absolute opposite of "lazy," and because everyone wants to be the next Mark Zuckerberg these days, you're fighting against the toughest and most intelligent competition in the world. This brings us to a total score of 29 out of 50 points. So, let's summarize: you want to sell something digital to have the margins and scalability, but without having to program and without risking all your money. After analyzing five business models that were rather mediocre, we now come to the really exciting part. So let's start from the very beginning. If we could wish for the perfect business, what would it look like? A business that requires €0 starting capital, where you can spin the wheel infinitely without risk, like at a lucky dip, until a winner emerges. A business that can be easily scaled to five to six-figure monthly revenues because you are positioning yourself in a market with gigantic growth, where your profit margin is 100%, and everything can be completely automated with minimal time investment. Does such an online business exist? Honestly, no, it doesn't. And you shouldn't believe anyone who tries to sell you something like that. Because if it sounds too good to be true, it usually isn't. But in recent years, I've found a business model that comes damn close to these optimal criteria. It's not perfect, and you won't make millions overnight with it, but in my experience, it's by far the best way to earn €10,000, €20,000, €100,000, or even €50,000 a month online, even if you have no prior experience. And if you're already impatient and want to know immediately how something like this is implemented in practice, I've packed my experiences into a compact 30-day roadmap. In it, I'll show you exactly from day 1 to 30 how to build such an automated online income from scratch. This roadmap normally costs €10. But because you're watching this video and are clearly engaging with the topic, I'll cover the costs for you, and therefore you'll get it completely for free. Just click on the link at the very top of the description of this video and download the roadmap for free. Daniel has also proven that you don't need prior experience for this business model. He managed to build his online business alongside his full-time job as a father and earned €8,000 directly in the first month after launch. However, I want to point out one important thing. You can easily start this business model alongside your job, apprenticeship, or studies. However, you will have to invest significantly more time initially than with some other models. But and this is the crucial point, AI can now enormously help you with this. And once your entire system is in place, you will have built an automated business where you can earn a lot of money with little time investment every month. Just like Berry Waren, for example, who generates between €10,000 and €15,000 in revenue every month with exactly this model. And all this is only possible because this business model benefits enormously from a huge societal shift that we are currently witnessing live. [music] Long before there was money, stock markets, or even the internet, we humans traded in one thing that was more valuable than anything else: wisdom. The elder who taught the tribe how to hunt. The master who showed his apprentice how to forge steel. The philosopher who taught his students to think clearly. We have always placed the highest value on the knowledge of how to do something. And now think about all the things that really matter today. How to build wealth, how to get in absolute peak physical shape, how to master social dynamics, how to find the right partner, how to be happy. Did you learn any of that in school? Of course not. The traditional school system was designed for the industrial age to produce factory workers, not independent thinkers. I mean, you were taught that mitochondria are the powerhouses of the cell, but nobody showed you how to build a business, optimize your taxes, or get your nutrition under control. And when I look at my own life, it's exactly the same. None of the skills that I use every day and that have truly advanced me in life did I learn in school or university. Whether it's the strategies for my business, my training plan for the gym, my social skills, or how I optimize my sleep and energy so that I'm even capable of performing. None of that was on the curriculum. Where did I learn these things then? On the internet, from other people, from people who had solved exactly the problem that I might have at that moment. On top of that, alone, while you're watching this video, hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs are being replaced by AI, and that's just the beginning. The world-renowned consulting firm McKinsey predicts that by 2030, about 375 million people will have to completely retrain their jobs. [clears throat] So what is the only way to not be left behind in the future? To educate yourself. And that's precisely why the market for digital education is exploding. Grand Research predicts an unbelievable growth of 400% in the e-learning market from 190 billion US dollars in 2018 to over one trillion US dollars in 2028. The reason for this is simple: people no longer want diplomas and certificates, but they are looking for effective ways to learn exactly the skills they need for their future success. That's why we are currently in the midst of a historic shift. I call this the great migration of trust. Just look around. In the past, we automatically trusted large institutions. If we wanted news, we believed the major TV channels. If we wanted to learn, we looked to universities. If we needed advice, we went to big companies. But those times are over. Today, we don't look for logos, we look for faces. You probably trust a podcaster you listen to every week more than the evening news. You believe a YouTuber who has documented their fitness transformation step by step more than a study from a faceless institute. And you're more likely to buy a product recommended to you by a real person on Instagram than one from a sterile TV commercial. Why is that? Because institutions are sluggish. They are politically correct, polished, and theoretical. But people are real. They have skin in the game. So they have often solved real problems, and we can sense whether someone is just talking or if they have truly walked the path themselves. That's the point. People have stopped looking for general answers from above. They are looking for specific solutions from people who understand them. If we combine these two facts – the huge hunger for real experience-based knowledge and the shift of trust towards individuals [music] – and then put it into our template from the beginning, something amazing happens. Do you remember the criteria for the perfect business? We dissected dropshipping, agencies, and software because they always failed on at least one point. But if we consider knowledge as a product, the math changes completely. Starting capital: your inventory doesn't need to be bought expensively. It already exists because it's in your head. Your acquisition costs are €0. Profit margin: multiplying it costs you nothing. Whether you pass on knowledge to one or thousands of people, the costs remain the same, the margin remains almost 100%. [music] Risk: this is the crucial point. You are not sitting on any goods that will spoil. If your knowledge on a topic doesn't sell, no problem. Then you can acquire new knowledge on a new topic. You can test and iterate extremely quickly without burning money. Scalability: if you package your knowledge correctly, you can [music] sell it infinitely often without any real additional costs for you. Automation: once digitized and packaged, your knowledge is decoupled from your time. It works for you even when you're not [music] working. This brings us as close as humanly possible to the ideal business we were looking for earlier. It's the only model where you create value out of nothing, simply by restructuring your experiences. But this is exactly where the elephant in the room comes into play. A new, powerful variable that seems to threaten this entire equation. I can well imagine you're now asking yourself, why should anyone pay for knowledge today when you can simply ask ChatGPT for everything for free? That's exactly what I call the AI dilemma. And understanding this dilemma is the crucial difference. It decides who will go bankrupt in the next five years and who will build a fortune. Here's the truth. AI has made pure information free, but it has made real wisdom more valuable and more expensive than ever. There is a huge difference between data and real transformation. You can ask an AI, for example, how can I lose weight? And it will spit out a scientifically correct explanation about calorie deficits and macronutrients. That's information. But a person who has gone through the process themselves will tell you, "I know you have cravings in the evening because you had stress at work. Here's the exact protocol I used to fix those psychological triggers. And here's the community that ensures you actually stick with it." That's transformation. And look, the quality of the answer depends 100% on the quality of your question. In the tech world, they call this "shit in, shit out." An AI is extremely good at giving you answers at the push of a button, but it can't ask questions. And if you're a beginner and want to solve a problem, you rarely know what the right question even is. And the next point, how are you supposed to know if the output that the AI is giving you is brilliant or complete nonsense? You completely lack context. Think about what really happens when you read a really good advice book. The true value of that book is almost never the one small question you had in mind before reading it. The true value lies in the things the book suddenly shows you that you hadn't even considered. The new concepts, the blind spots, the ideas that you probably would never have asked an AI about, because you didn't even know these topics existed. An AI gives you sterile tips, but we humans are usually not interested in tips in the end. We are looking for real personal experience. We want to know how this one person dealt with the problem that is keeping me awake at night? Or how did this one person achieve this one goal that I absolutely want to achieve? When you buy knowledge from a real person, you're not paying for the naked "what." You're paying for the nuance, for the experience of someone who had exactly the same problem. You're paying for someone to look you in the eye and say, "I know exactly where you're stuck right now, because I was exactly at that damn point. And here's the exact way I got out of it." The brutal truth is, AI has completely democratized content creation. But that also means that the internet is currently being flooded with generic articles, videos, and guides created by robots. The world has become extremely loud, and in a world of infinite noise, curation becomes the ultimate luxury. People don't buy knowledge because they can't find this information anywhere else online. They buy it because they are damn tired of sifting through soulless AI-generated data garbage for 100 hours just to find the one truth in the end. They don't want data, they want transformation. They pay for the filter, not the source. To put it simply, AI might draw you a detailed map of the jungle. It knows the theory, but only a real person can tell you from their experiences what you really need to get through the jungle safely and quickly, because only they have truly walked the path themselves. But now you have to be careful, because this is exactly where most people disqualify themselves. You're probably thinking now, but I'm not an expert, I don't have a PhD. Who would listen to me? Why would anyone buy knowledge from me? But do you remember what we talked about regarding the
Have you been told that the education system has failed? It has failed: People today are no longer looking for professors, they are looking for practitioners. They don't want a scientist who explains the chemical composition of a bicep or tells them what the perfect training plan is in theory. They want the guy who used to be fat, tried everything, failed ten times, and finally found the one way to build 10 kg of pure muscle mass. Have you figured out how to climb the career ladder as an introvert? Have you raised a difficult puppy, even though everyone said it was impossible? Have you recovered from a bad breakup and regained your self-confidence? Have you taught yourself programming without any connection? All of this, just as an example, is not trivial knowledge, it is a roadmap. And at this very moment, there are thousands of people who are just two steps behind you and who are praying to find exactly this roadmap. And here is the secret that no one will tell you. You don't have to be an expert to sell knowledge. Because expertise is not absolute, it is relative. Let's redefine the word expertise. Just imagine a scale from 0 to 10. At level 10 are the absolute top experts, the world champions, the professors with 30 years of experience. At level zero are the complete beginners who haven't even started yet. The mistake almost everyone makes is to believe, I have to be at level 9 or 10 before I'm allowed to help someone at level 0. But that's wrong. In fact, a level 10 expert is often even a worse teacher for a beginner. Why? Because he suffers from the curse of knowledge. He has long forgotten what the beginning feels like. He skips the basics because they are self-evident to him and often explains things far too complicatedly. And this is exactly where you come in. If you are at level 3 or 4, meaning you are simply a solid user with real results, you are a very good mentor for a beginner. Why? Because you still know the current hurdles exactly. You still know how the fear feels at the beginning. You speak their language, not jargon. So you don't have to have reached the summit of Mount Everest to explain the first climbing steps to someone. You actually only need to be two steps ahead of your target audience. And the best part is, the market at the top is small, but the market of beginners, the millions of people at level 0 to 3, who are desperately looking for guidance, this market is huge. Let's summarize all the important points again. We now have a product with zero marginal costs, namely knowledge. We have a market that is literally hungry for real human guidance because the school system has failed. And we have a technology that can do all the hard work for us. So, what do we call this business? It is the vehicle that allows you to turn your unique life experience into an asset that sells while you sleep. This business is info products. When I say info product now, please immediately delete the image that has probably just popped into your head, because I'm not talking about any useless e-books that nobody reads anyway and that don't really help anyone. Honestly, an AI can write you such a generic e-book in a few minutes today. And I'm also not talking about consulting or coaching, where you have to do cold calling and convince people to spend thousands of euros on coaching with you, only to end up trading your time for money again and constantly sitting on Zoom calls you don't actually want to be on. That's not a business, that's a job with a different boss. If you stop working, no more money comes in. Therefore, be sure to remember our criteria. We need leverage, we need automation. The question is, how do we transfer your knowledge? The transformation we've talked about, to someone else, in a way that builds massive trust but requires zero time from you after creation. Think about it for a moment, to truly change someone's life and justify a good price, they need to see you. They need to hear your voice, feel your conviction, and see you demonstrate the process step by step. We need a format that simulates real one-on-one mentoring, but only needs to be recorded once and then sells thousands of times. We need a digital clone of your best version. Following the logic, there is only one vehicle that meets all these criteria, and that is automated online courses. And now, stay tuned, because this is exactly where the AI revolution has turned everything you thought you knew about this industry upside down. Until recently, you had to put in a lot of energy, a lot of time, and a lot of work to create a good online course. And it often took months. But today, in the era of AI, most of the hurdles have completely disappeared. AI can interview you to perfectly extract your expertise. AI can take your unorganized thoughts and turn them into a perfect, didactically clear learning plan. AI can help you write your scripts. AI can even edit and process your content. And it can also help you create sales emails or landing pages in record time. That's why this is the only business model that currently makes real sense for beginners. I mean, look at the numbers. To make €10,000 profit in dropshipping, you have to sell thousands of cheap products, handle hundreds of returns, and deal with exploding advertising costs. In an agency, you have to work hour after hour to deliver the service you sold. But with a specialized, high-quality online course based on your unique experience, if you offer your wisdom for just €300, which is a really good price for a real life transformation, you only need to sell one online course a day to earn over €100,000 a year. And once your customers buy, you don't have to do anything further than wait for the money to arrive in your account. And the best part is, you can sell this online course completely automated and earn money while you are, for example, at a restaurant, at the gym, with your friends at a restaurant and somehow drinking a glass of wine, or on vacation. You can earn money regardless of whether you are currently working or not. And very importantly, all of this that I am telling you does not come from theory, but from practice. I myself earned my very first million with exactly this model, with online courses in the area of personal development. So, if you want to turn your current knowledge into real money in the next few months, if you want to build an online business that is extremely scalable and in a gigantic growth market, then your own online course is the only logical way. And with the right strategy, we are not talking about years here, we are talking about one to two months. Take Felix Kade, for example. He created his first online course in just under 5 weeks and in the first month alone, he earned €10,000 completely automated with it. Since then, he has consistently made five-figure profits per month, and just recently he had his best month ever and earned €27,000 in just 30 days. So you see, it is absolutely realistic to earn a lot of money in a few months, and completely automated. But so that you can also achieve this, you must pay attention to three important things. Because the whole thing only works if your online course has the right topic, if you know how to market the online course, and if you use a so-called evergreen funnel to sell your online course completely automated. And for exactly this, I have created an extra training for you. In it, I will show you step by step how to create an online course that really sells itself, even if you are still a complete beginner, how to gain customers immediately without any reach, how to quickly scale the entire business to five-figure monthly revenues, and that completely automated. And the best part, I will show you how you can achieve all of this even faster and easier through the clever use of AI. So you get the ultimate step-by-step shortcut. Therefore, click on the link here now and secure the training. But very importantly, you will receive [music] the complete AI Masterclass only for the next few days at an absolute special price. It will never be this cheap again. So click on the link now and get the Masterclass. It will change everything for you. Yeah.