Transcription
Here is the translation of the provided Thai text into English, following your rules:
This, this is part of the plan of the United States with Israel, isn't it? My meaning is, I'm asking about the matter that, recently, it appears that Israel has disappeared from the cycle of fighting with Iran. That is, they are busy with Lebanon, with Palestine, Hamas, and so on. It turns out that, this time, Iran cannot fire into Israel as before. And, because it turns out that now Iran is a direct enemy of the United States. What Iran can do is only fire into US bases located in the Gulf countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan. That's all. Firing like this cannot remove Israel from the world map or anything. This is part of the plan, and it is believed to be a plan of the United States with Israel, isn't it?
>> Not a plan, my dear. This time, it's divided into 3 boxing matches. The first match is the US-Iran. The second match is Hezbollah with Israel, which is Lebanon. And the latest boxing match is Saudi Arabia with the Houthis. They have already paired them up to fight, Mr. Patchara. This is even more frightening. Back then, it wasn't a mob fight, it was a real clash. So, there will be wins and losses, right?
>> Uh-huh.
>> Uh.
>> But now, what Iran can do is only fire into Gulf countries. That is, only fire into US interests in Gulf countries.
>> No, no. The fact that Iran is firing at Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan now, it's firing strategically. You ask why Kuwait? Kuwait, Mr. Patchara, do you know it's a major supply base for the US and all its bases? And it's a center for the US. Bahrain is the command of the 5th Fleet that controls the entire Indian Ocean. Jordan is a major US base. Now it's in Jordan. It's not that Iran is firing randomly. Because the remaining countries are all finished. They've been destroyed completely, right? Those 20, 23, 28. Now Iran is taking the rest.
>> Ha.
>> Ah.
>> But it can only take the support parts of America. Not the...
>> Both the support and the forces.
>> Ah, ah.
>> But even if the US, the US has to attack Iran's homeland, Mr. Patchara, this time.
>> Ha ha.
>> That means it's a complete breakdown, right?
>> Is that enough? That's the meaning of my question. I mean, when Iran attacked US bases in Gulf countries, if they were all destroyed, is that enough? Is that appropriate retaliation for being attacked on its homeland?
>> No, it depends on the US whether the US stops or not. If the US attacks Tehran, and next week it happens, it depends on what Iran will do. Because if you allow your enemy to attack your homeland, it means you are about to be finished. Therefore, you must counter the game to make them stop, right?
>> If you say attacking Tehran, let me show the map to the viewers. Let's zoom in on the map. Tehran is in the north. Here, if we talk about the red dots that have been attacked, they are to the left and right of Tehran. They have already been attacked. Ah, Tehran is still remaining. If they enter Tehran, is that a symbol, Mr. Rangsi?
>> Correct. Isfahan was the old capital of Iran. It's a very beautiful city with many ancient sites. Is it finished yet? Next week, they have announced that they will attack Iran even harder than today. And their target is Tehran. So, it's a test of courage this time, Mr. Patchara. It means the US wants to end the game. Because attacking the homeland gives the right to say that if Iran really cannot fight, Iran might have to agree to negotiate, to open the strait. Because, don't forget, the people are suffering. It's the same form as when Israel destroyed Gaza City, right? Exactly the same. Now, it depends on how Iran will counter the game.
>> If it ends like that, Iran loses completely. It's not like when Iran signed the MOU the first time. That was like Iran winning.
>> Ah, Iran won. Because Iran fought decisively at the Strait of Hormuz. Any ship passing through was fired upon, they didn't care. This time, let's assume, no, it's not an assumption, now the US is attacking Iran's homeland. If Iran has real police, Iran fires back at the US homeland, that's when there are wins and losses.
>> But if it's just a few pops here and there, that's just within the region. This is not yet at the stage of being a turning point, is it?
>> Simply put, if Iran only attacks US bases in the Gulf, it cannot stop Iran from deciding to fire missiles into the US homeland. That would stop it. I believe the American people would never accept it. The phrase "never accept" means they would never accept continuing the war. Because they are suffering, it has reached them directly, right? And Americans are number 1 in humanity, right? And it's a complete democracy. If the American people rise up in protest and chase them out of the country, what happens? It's difficult to live.
>> Uh.
>> Ah, it depends on today's test of courage with Iran, right? If Iran continues to act like this, and thousands or tens of thousands of people die like in Gaza, then Bahrain will also be in trouble, Mr. Patchara. We are talking about reality now, right? Like, you can kill US soldiers, but they can kill civilians. They can attack infrastructure, destroy power plants, destroy drinking water and tap water. Do you think the government can survive? Let's put it this way.
>> Most recently, the Tehran government has requested cooperation from the public to use air conditioning less, because the power plant is broken.
>> Hmm.
>> Oh, so the public is suffering. The reaction will increase.
>> Uh, no. And if the US, if the US attacks Iran's homeland, and Iran only attacks US bases, I ask, [sound of inhaling] what will the Iranian government tell its people? But if the Iranian government decides to fire missiles into the US homeland, I think it will win the people's hearts. Ah, the people will say, "We are suffering, but you are also suffering." Right? But this is like Iran is suffering alone. That is, the soldiers are fine, the soldiers are fine, Mr. Patchara. But today, Iran only attacks the US military, but the US military attacks Iranian civilians. Ah, but if Iran dares to fire into the US homeland, it's equivalent to the people saying, "Okay, let's fight on." Right? Because the people will see that, "Oh, Americans are also suffering like me." Right? And the Iranian people will feel brave. That is, last time, when they said they would go to protect the power plants, many people went. They said, "Let's make the world a better place." I said that if they do that, the Iranian government will survive and win the people's hearts. Because the Iranian people will ask, "Why are you letting them bomb us? Why don't you go bomb their people too?" Right, Mr. Patchara? It's a different context, I'm telling you.
>> In the past, the hardliners in Iran have been trying to communicate to the government through their media, saying, "Don't sign the MOU." After signing the MOU, they said, "Tear up the MOU. Don't negotiate anymore." That is, only revenge, only revenge. Only revenge. This has a seed of it, doesn't it?
>> No, that's why I said, if they do that, it's a different context, Mr. Patchara. It wins hearts, right?
>> Uh.
>> But if you let the US attack the homeland, and Iran only attacks military bases, the people will have to ask, "So when are you going to fight? I'm screwed, right?" I'm confident that if Iran fires into it, I believe they won't be able to stay.
>> Hmm.
>> And if I were Iran, I would take the gamble. If I were the Iranian government, and they did this to me.
>> Yes. It's like now, there are some maps that look like America wants to occupy the islands and reefs in the Strait of Hormuz to guarantee that Iran doesn't fire at oil tankers and so on. Because now they are attacking the strait very heavily. The ports, the ports of Abbas, the ports in the Strait of Hormuz. Is it possible that the US will conduct operations to completely eliminate them and then land troops to occupy those areas instead of occupying islands, as previously discussed?
>> As long as Iran still has drones and missiles like this, I believe no one would dare to send troops to occupy them. If they go up, they will all die. Unless Iran's drones and missiles run out. We see from what? If they run out, there will be no retaliation. That's all, Mr. Patchara. But if Iran still has drones and missiles, who would be crazy enough to send troops to die? You face kamikaze drones and accurate missiles like this, do you think they will survive? I'm just asking. Right?
>> I saw an image released by CENTCOM two days ago. There was a surface vessel, a drone, unmanned, that drove under an Iranian bridge and exploded. Wow, it seems effective. It seems effective. I don't know if it was the first time it was used.
>> This, this is a new batch, is it? Or what?
>> Today, unmanned vehicles have emerged. You know, China, do you know? Their planes are also unmanned now. And the bombs they use, they use bomb robots. Underwater ones also exist, unmanned. Today, it has developed to that point. They are all unmanned aerial vehicles, Mr. Patchara. You see those Chinese robots? Do you know they can kick and punch like humans now? They can run, do somersaults, and get up to kick. I've seen it with my own eyes. And their new version, their robot, is a robot that does housework, Mr. Patchara. It can take your dishes, open the microwave, and warm them up for you. It can bring you water to serve guests, do you know? It will be released next year. I've seen the real thing in China. The price is 200,000. I even want to buy one. And the government officials said, "Don't buy yet. Wait for the new version to come out." In 2027, they say it will be many times better than this one and cheaper than this one. I said it can run, it can walk, and it walks. It somersaults like a human, rolls around, and when it stands up, it punches and kicks. The punch and kick are strong enough to knock someone out, Mr. Patchara. I've seen it with my own eyes. They say the 2027 version that is coming out is exactly like a human, and cheaper. They say to wait to buy that one. It can guard the house. It can guard the house all day and night. If a thief comes, it calls the police or it sounds the siren.
>> It doesn't cry.
>> And it doesn't sleep, except when the battery runs out.
>> Uh-huh.
>> See, it has gone that far now, Mr. Patchara. Look at Shaheen, look at Shamal, look at the hospitals, they are all gone now. We need to study this. We need to change our army structure urgently. Outdated weapons are unnecessary and may need to be disbanded. We need to increase drone units, missile units, anti-drone units, and so on. Because in the future, I believe they will fight like this. And what they are thinking about now is Universal Soldier. An army of robot soldiers that can fire missiles, missiles attached to their bodies, like the robots we saw in old movies. They can shoot guns, throw bombs, deploy smoke to hide themselves, and run faster than humans. They have developed to that point. They call it Universal Soldier. It won't be long before they use it, believe me.
>> Looking at the objective of this invasion, at this moment, it seems like various factors are overwhelming Iran. Previously, it seemed like Iran was the aggressor, firing at Israel, firing at Gulf countries, attacking US bases, forcing them to retreat, to store them on ships, to flee to Cyprus, and so on. But now, the latest situation is that Iran seems to be pressured more and more.
>> Not pressured, not pressured.
>> Ah.
>> Meaning the US is playing unfairly now. There are no rules for war anymore.
>> Ah.
>> The US playing unfairly this time, how far do you think the goal will go?
>> Ah, the goal is likely to be to pressure Iran to talk again and sign a new MOU, where Iran will have to concede more, Iran will be at a greater disadvantage, or America will regain the advantage and control Iran, or go to the extreme until they surrender and have to pay reparations.
>> The US has chosen many paths. But attacking civilian targets in Iran means a complete war. Mr. Patchara, and the US doesn't care about the rules, doesn't care about the UN, or anything. They will do everything to win. Whether they win through negotiation or through destruction. It could reach the point of Iraq, it's all possible now. Because the US has no choice. US oil reserves will run out in August. Therefore, today the US is playing like it doesn't care about humanitarianism, rules, or rules of engagement anymore. It depends on how Iran plays from now on. How will it retaliate?
>> Uh-huh.
>> So, there should be no limits either, as I said.
>> Uh-huh. Uh-huh.
>> Well, Iran is threatening. Yesterday, Iran threatened that if there is no other choice, Iran will not let any oil leave the Persian Gulf, not even a drop.
>> No, I'll tell you this. After this, closing the Bab el-Mandeb Strait will be the turning point of the war. If Iran decides to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, I believe a decisive battle will surely occur in the naval battles in the Indian Ocean and on land. That is, this time, they will attack without holding back. Therefore, the whole world must prepare to face this destiny. Because if they close the strait, I believe, and especially with oil reserves running out, oil prices will skyrocket. They say the worst is $200 per barrel. If calculated for Thai oil, it means you'll be filling up with 80-100 baht per liter. And the supply chain will collapse worldwide. Because if it can't pass through the Suez Canal, it has to go through the Cape of Good Hope. And I believe that when it passes the Cape of Good Hope, cargo ships won't be able to enter the Indian Ocean. It won't reach the Strait of Malacca. It will have to pass through the Arabian Sea. Both sides are full of forces, right? And if Britain, France, Germany join in, ah, China, Russia open their fronts, this is it. World War III, full scale.
>> This is the closing of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, this is the turning point of the war, the turning point of the war.
>> Yes. If the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is closed, it's possible that US naval forces will have to attack the Houthis in Yemen. It's the same. They will force it to open, but it will be a decisive battle, really. This time, it means missiles and attacks without holding back. Ah, all aircraft will be in operation. Aircraft will bomb 3-4 times a day, whatever it is. Because closing the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is equivalent to closing the route for Europe as well. Because the Suez Canal has to pass through the Suez Canal into the Red Sea, then through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait to exit into the Indian Ocean. And then it will pass through the Strait of Malacca and so on. So, if they close that, it will be an immediate paralysis. And another key point of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is, my dear, don't forget the 7 underwater cables that are in the shallow waters of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. If they decide to destroy them, Asia and Europe will be paralyzed.
>> Cut off from each other.
>> Even if satellites are used as a replacement, it's said that they can only compensate for 30%. Because of the speed and capacity, they cannot match. Financial transactions, money transfers will be paralyzed immediately. That means oil trading is over.
>> Hmm.
>> Which is possible. If the US breaks down like this, the Houthis will cut the underwater cables, blow them up, and it's over. Using underwater drones to ram into the cabinets, boom, it's done. It can all happen, Mr. Patchara. Because both sides are cornered. The US cannot let Iran gain influence in the Middle East, and Iran cannot let the US regain influence in the Middle East. Gulf countries that support the US, Iran will say, "You support my enemy, so you will be destroyed together." It's possible, Mr. Patchara.