Transcription
Hey everybody, Dr. G here. I'm a clinical and forensic psychologist as well as a body language expert. And today we're going to be doing a forensic analysis of all of the unredacted Epstein files that mention President Trump.
Before we get started with this, couple of quick things. One, I wanted to make sure you know this is not a psychological evaluation of any kind. These are just my opinions. In addition to that, I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, let's go.
What we're going to be analyzing today are all of the different Epstein files where President Trump's name is unredacted. We're going to be analyzing whether or not they maintained contact beyond when President Trump claimed. We're also going to be looking at Epstein's characterization of President Trump and how he felt about him. And last, we're going to be looking at what victims have claimed about President Trump as well as Epstein. I do want you to keep in mind the goal of these videos is to be politically neutral. I'm just providing you a forensic analysis of what I found.
All right, let's just jump right in. We're going to start today by looking at a handful of pictures. Then we're going to get into emails and then some FBI documents. But this right here is a picture that I've covered before. There'll be a handful of things today we've talked about previously because this is meant to be comprehensive, but the vast majority is new. But this picture of President Trump is undated, so we don't know when this is from. But what was so interesting about this, and this was in the Epstein files, was that the picture that followed it immediately was a suitcase full of money. Pictures are typically clustered together in the Epstein files when they are related. So the fact that this picture was followed by a suitcase full of money, I find fascinating. There's no context given. There's no further explanation, but the idea that this and this may be associated feels very strong.
Now, this is a picture that most people have probably seen before. This is of Jeffrey Epstein and President Trump back in the '90s. As we know, they were very close. There's no secret about that. They were good friends back in the 1990s. And according to President Trump, around 2003, they had a falling out. He said it was because Jeffrey Epstein was stealing his employees. Jeffrey Epstein said it was for something else. But after 2003, their relationship did change. But there's no denying that they were close at one point.
Now, one of the things that stands out is how relatively few pictures there actually are of them. Now, there's only a handful of pictures available, but as we know, Jeffrey Epstein takes pictures of everything. If there's one thing he has no shortage of, it's pictures of people that hang out with him. He has hundreds of thousands of pictures available, and that's just what's been released. But the fact that they were so close and there are so few pictures to me says that there are a lot of pictures that have not been released.
What we're going to look at now is whether or not President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein maintained a relationship beyond when President Trump claimed. President Trump has been very definitive that beyond the early 2000s, they've had no contact whatsoever. But there's some emails that suggest that may in fact not be true.
Now, if we look at this, this is from November 13th, 2016. Now, someone is reaching out to him saying, "Are you still in Paris?" And Jeffrey Epstein replies, "Trump Tower." Now, anybody can stay in Trump Tower. So Jeffrey Epstein just being at Trump Tower doesn't necessarily imply that he spent time with President Trump. However, I think as you watch these emails progress, you'll see that I think this is actually when they reconnected back in 2016. So this is when they actually started spending time together again. And I think it probably started right here.
Now you see November 13th, 2016. We're going to go to the next email that mentions Trump. Now we're up to November 27th. So this is around Thanksgiving. Someone reached out and asked, "How was your Thanksgiving?" Jeffrey Epstein replied, "Really fun. I'm in Palm with the Trump crowd." So, at this point, it sounds like he's actually spending time with the Trump family, with the Trump crowd. So, around Thanksgiving, it seems like they actually reconnected enough to spend time together. But it keeps going.
Now, we've got an email from right after Christmas, December 26th, 2016. He gets an email. "When are you back in NYC?" Jeffrey Epstein replies, "Fourth, I'm in Palm with all the Trump boys. Fun." Now, the word fun may have been very sarcastic because as we see, Epstein has a lot of negative things to say about Trump, but right here, he's saying very clearly he's staying with all of the Trump boys. Now, that may have just meant Trump's sons, but I believe that it meant Trump as well, and I'm going to show you why.
Now, we're going to skip a little over a month into February 10th, 2017. Now, in this email, someone's reaching out to Jeffrey Epstein to try to schedule a time to get together. Jeffrey Epstein replies, "Yes, let's start. Yes, we are on. Sorry, with Trump around. It's been very crazy busy." This is specifically mentioning Trump. So, at this point, it sounds like they actually have a relationship again. So, based on what we're seeing, it looks like Jeffrey Epstein had contact with President Trump again all the way into 2017, which is far beyond anything that Trump has ever acknowledged.
I'm going to give you a brief backstory to make sure you can understand the context of this email and why this one matters. Now, part of what, according to President Trump, the falling out was about was that one of his employees, Virginia Giuffre, was stolen by Jeffrey Epstein. Now, Virginia Giuffre went on to make accusations against Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein as well as Ghislaine Maxwell and implicated a whole lot of people. But this email would have been sent shortly after the news started breaking that Virginia Giuffre was making accusations about Prince Andrew. Now, this was April of 2011. Jeffrey Epstein sent an email that said, "Before I call Trump with regard Virginia, are there any other alternatives?" So, it seems like back in 2011, they likely did not have contact. It seems like Jeffrey Epstein did not want to reach out to Trump, but Epstein was so desperate to make this go away. It looked like he had planned on reinitiating contact with Trump because Trump clearly knew something about the Virginia Giuffre situation. So, it looks like he had thought about trying to contact him. It's unclear whether or not he did. There's no other emails that confirm or suggest that he did not, but it shows right here he had planned on it because he felt like that President Trump was familiar enough with the Giuffre situation to somehow get involved.
Now, as I was looking at emails related to Trump, I actually came across this one, which is more about Epstein, but it shows how he speaks in code. So, I thought it was kind of interesting. The way that he mentions Trump is it says, "I think Trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit." He's saying, "Cut the legs off." Obviously, that's metaphorical. We're not being literal here. And then the person replies, "What is your shoe size if you don't mind me asking?" Jeffrey Epstein replies, "Is this some sort of perverted question?" And then puts a smiley face. "12, American, of course." But this goes to show how he thinks in code. The way that he tries to mask what he's saying. Now at this point he was trying to make a joke out of it. But at the same time he gave a very real reply to his own perversions. So when people are saying whether or not Jeffrey Epstein speaks in code, whether or not he says things and says them indirectly, there's a lot of proof that he really does do that.
Now here's a statement by Jeffrey Epstein about speaking in code. Now this was to Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon had sent him an article about the hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. So Epstein says, "Good catch and yes." So the implication of the yes is basically saying that he believes that he gave Stormy Daniels payments. The more interesting thing is that Jeffrey Epstein follows up and says, "Once you know the code, it's all clear." This does go to show that Jeffrey Epstein thinks and speaks in code. Often times when it's something that you're not supposed to talk about, when it's something he doesn't want to put in writing, you do have to understand things on a different level.
As a forensic psychologist, I'm trained to spot blind spots. The details that you can miss that change the whole story. The news has blind spots, too, and Ground News can help you see them. Ground News is a news comparison platform that pulls from over 50,000 sources and makes it easier to understand what's actually happening. You can see the political bias of each outlet along with insights like factuality, ownership, and how coverage breaks down across the spectrum. My favorite feature is called blind spots. It shows which stories are being disproportionately covered by one side of the spectrum so you can see what you might be missing. Here's a story the left is largely ignoring. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that appeals courts must defer to immigration judges in asylum cases. This is a decision that's seen as a major win for the Trump administration. Here's a story that's barely getting traction on the right. President Trump said, "Most of the people we had in mind are dead." When asked about possible successors to the Iranian leader killed in recent US air strikes, obviously a problematic development when we're looking at a price tag over $200 billion. When you click on a story, you can see a summary of how many sources covered it. And if you scroll down, you can see headlines from left-leaning, center, and right-leaning outlets side by side. Ground News doesn't tell you what to think or who to believe. It simply shows you how the news is being covered, so you can decide for yourself. If you want to start spotting your own blind spots, you can subscribe to Ground News and get 40% off the Vantage plan by scanning the QR code or going to ground.news/drg. That's ground.news/drg. The link is in the description below, as well as the pinned comment.
All right, let's get back to the analysis. Now, we're going to look at some emails that show how Jeffrey Epstein characterized President Trump to others. Now, this was an email to Michael Wolff, who is an author. So, Michael Wolff sends an email indicating he's going to be interviewing Trump and says, "Is there anything I should ask?" Jeffrey Epstein replies, "Do you want to be provocative? Trump shuttle, Hawaiian Tropic contests, mortgage on Mar-a-Lago, revenue of golf courses as income, total debt, people don't want to contribute money as he said he's worth over $10 billion. Why should they? California already coming short. Father bought chips in a casino to save off bankruptcy. Chips because it was better than a first lien under gambling rules. Matt, his bagman, his loan from his brother-in-law, judge's husband." So, in essence, what Jeffrey Epstein is doing here is he's focusing entirely on the financial aspects of President Trump. And that's something that you're going to see is that Jeffrey Epstein didn't see Trump as someone who was actually rich. He made fun of him a lot. He thought of him as a fake rich person, basically. And he was trying to give information on what he thought would be pain points for Trump, basically saying, "Here's all of the ways that he's not as rich as he claims to be."
Here's another email exchanged with a similar theme back in 2016. Thomas Lannon Jr. wrote, "It's getting scary. The stories you could tell." Epstein replies, "Wow." After an article was sent, and then Thomas Lannon Jr. replies, "Actually, I don't think he or the voters would care. Being effectively shameless is pretty powerful weapon for a presidential candidate." And then Jeffrey Epstein replied, "But by being a phony rich person." Once again, he's going after him about his wealth and his money. This is something that consistently Epstein feels superior about.
Here's another email to the same person where Epstein is basically talking about that he thinks that Trump is an idiot. "When you read my airplane logs and Hawaiian Tropic contest, have them ask my houseman about Donald walking through the door, leaving a nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in the pool, and he was so focused he walked straight into the door." Now, this is something that Epstein also does frequently. He tries to find ways to describe President Trump as an idiot. Basically saying that he's ridiculous. He consistently says that he thinks he's crazy. He's dangerous. He's stupid. He's all of these things. He's fake rich. Jeffrey Epstein loved to talk about himself as superior to Trump in basically every way.
Here's an email he sent in 2018 to Kathy Rumler. Epstein said, "You might want to tell your dim friends that treating Trump like a mafia don ignores the fact that he also has great dangerous power. Tightening the noose too slowly risks a very bad situation. Gambino was never a commander-in-chief. There was little Gambino could do as the walls closed in. Not so with this maniac." So, he's implying that Trump is dangerous. He's describing him as a maniac. So, it goes back to the idea that Jeffrey Epstein holds Trump in very low regard, but that doesn't mean they weren't still having contact. That doesn't mean that he didn't try to be friends with him. Again, Epstein very much seems like the kind of person who would have all sorts of bad things to say about other people that he feels that he's superior to.
Here's an email he sent to Larry Summers. "Recall, I've told you, I've met some very bad people. None as bad as Trump. Not one decent cell in his body. So, yes, dangerous."
Here's another email where Epstein was asked, "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with Mueller?" Epstein replied, "It also includes Barack saying, 'Not only Donald crazy, but he's stupid. So much fun.'"
Here's another one where someone asks, "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump? Today was appalling, even by his standards." Epstein replies, "My email is full with similar comments. Wow. I'm sure his view of that went super well. He thinks he has charmed his adversary. Admittedly, he has no idea of symbolism. He has no idea of most things. But it continues to be this intellectual superiority because when you think about the way that Epstein was, he loved academia. He loved thinking of himself as intelligent and surrounded himself with intelligent people. He surrounded himself with academics and scientists and so forth. So the idea that he held intelligence in high regard meant that he was constantly going to be talking about the fact that he did not think that Donald Trump was intelligent."
Here's one you may have seen before where he described President Trump as borderline insane and corroborated by some that are close.
Now, interestingly, here's an email that Jeffrey Epstein sent himself as well as Kathy Rumler, but it's him explaining how he believes that President Trump operates, how he believes that he gets his money. So, Epstein states, "It would go something like this. One, Donald doesn't really own very much. He rents out his name. He puts it on building projects, etc. for a royalty or piece of the upside. Then, he claims the asset is his. It's very much like Hyatt Hotels. It says Hyatt Hotel on the front, but it's owned by someone else. Sometimes by Hyatt, but not very often. Hyatt receives 3% per year of revenue and appears of the profit sometimes if the hotel is sold at a profit. And now Epstein claims money launderers need a name to purchase trophy properties. Why? So there's little suspicion if a famous wealthy person buys a property that is likely to show in the press. It can't be Jojo my driver upfront. So they approach wealthy people and tell them for $2 to $5 million for doing nothing at all. Just lend us your name and the person gets the positive press. So and so bought the most expensive painting, sold the most expensive painting, house, diamond, etc. so forth. The Gans's art collection was bought and sold by Joe Lewis. All the publicity was the Gans family estate selling, etc. It seems that he has a very detailed description of this because this very well may have been how Epstein operated. But he says hypothetically, someone approached Trump and said that you can buy the Palm Beach house in your name. It was Trump Properties LLC. Not sure who actually sold the LLC. Donald can get a loan from a bank, but it's guaranteed by an entity controlled by RR that is owned by a family trust, Cypress. Our wife settles in October after Trump announces candidacy. The LLC agreement or the loan agreement allows Donald to get a few million for his name. R in essence is the owner. He was part of the Panama papers release. He also sold the Da Vinci to NBS. If you're a gangster, where and how can you invest your money? Answer, not through the front door. Donald's financial disclosures are the same. He represents his income as the gross receipts of his clubs, meaning nothing at all. Zero, no income as we know it. It is kind of funny that he doesn't spell 'no' right there, but anyway, he lists his assets and their value, but not their corresponding loans against it. So, no net number, hence meaningless." So, basically what he's saying is that if there is a building with Trump's name on it, and it brings in a billion dollars, Trump will say, "I'm worth a billion dollars because that's got my name on it." Where he's saying he actually only gets like 3% of that. So, he'd get a tiny trickle of that revenue, but he'll claim it all as his own. And that's how he, according to Epstein, inflates his assets.
Now, here was an interesting email that came out a while back where Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were communicating with each other. And Epstein said, "I want you to realize that the dog that hasn't barked is Trump. Blank spent hours at my house with him. He's never once been mentioned, police chief, etc. I'm 75% there." And Maxwell says, "I've been thinking about that." Now, this was after the Virginia Giuffre situation started to break. So, that's what this is about. This is about Virginia Giuffre because he's basically saying they spent plenty of time together. Now, the use of the phrase "the dog that hasn't barked" is Trump, that's confused a lot of people because I've seen people talk about this email and it's not quite what people think it means. That makes it sound like it's because Trump hasn't said anything, but that's not what it means at all. It means that people aren't talking about Trump. It's an odd phrase. It's from Sherlock Holmes, actually. But what it means is that Trump should be getting mentioned in all of the police reports, that they should be talking about Trump because he was so close to this case and nobody's mentioned him at all. So that's why he's the dog that hasn't barked, not because he hasn't said anything.
Now, if we go back to 2015, I talked earlier about all the pictures that were and weren't available. This is interesting to me because this photo has never become available. But Epstein had sent Thomas Lannon Jr. an email that said, "Would you like a photo of Donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen, which has not been part of the Epstein files?" Which shows that there are certain things that are being withheld because that's a very specific description, and that is not something that's been released.
Now, this is interesting. This is from May of 2019. Another email to Michael Wolff. Now, the interesting part is down here. So, Epstein says, "Lots of reporter inquiries. Do I think Trump set me up? What do I know about his dealings? Did I speak to you?" So on and so forth. Now, the rest of it goes on to things he's talked about before. But what stood out to me were two things here. One is that this is May of 2019. He was arrested very shortly after this. And the second part is that he said, "Do I think Trump set me up?" So, this is something that's been on Epstein's mind as to whether or not he was set up by Trump in some way because earlier when he was saying that Trump is the dog that hasn't barked, that Trump is not being mentioned in all of this. So, I think that he's suspicious that Trump has said something to law enforcement that he somehow has been an informant in all of this. So, when he's making statements like, "Do I think that Trump set me up?" I do think that Epstein is implying that on some level he thinks that Trump did set him up in some way.
So now we're going to be looking at a couple of FBI documents for people that were interviewed claiming to be victims of President Trump. Now the first document we're going to be looking at is from October 22nd, 2019. This would have been just a couple of months after Jeffrey Epstein had died. So in this FBI interview, they had asked this victim whether or not she wants to go into all of the details despite the fact that the statute of limitations had likely run out for most of these. And she basically said, "What's the point? I don't really want to go into details." Apparently, there were claims previously that she was a victim of Donald Trump's as well. And they asked if she was comfortable detailing that. And she said, "Blank again asked what the point of providing the information at this point in her life would be when there's a strong possibility nothing could be done about it." Now, when we talk about credibility, this is very consistent with what I've heard other people say. This is very much how some interviews go because some people don't want to talk about it because it's too painful to talk about. Some people don't want to talk about it because it feels pointless and it's just frustrating to do. So, as far as the credibility of what she had to say, well, that is not included. Her specific claims and what she said were not included. But in terms of her behavior, this is consistent with many victims. There are plenty of victims who would state this in a very similar way.
Now, that is very different than another allegation that was made, and we're going to look at that. Now, here's a report from July 8th, 2019. This individual states that a friend of theirs had told her that she had in fact been assaulted by President Trump and that she bit him. And there were some wild details. Now, this one is light on the details, but we're going to go to a follow-up report and we're going to get into the specifics of it and talk about whether or not this report is credible.
Now, there's a follow-up interview that was written up on August 22nd. The interview was actually done on 8/7/2019, which is just a few days before Jeffrey Epstein died, actually. And this interview goes into great detail about Epstein and all of the things that he did to this individual. She also claims that she observed a friend bite Trump that he hit her and basically said, "Get the hell out of here." That there were a lot of details about Trump and Epstein. But the problem is with this is that, and I'm not going to go into great detail about the claims that she made, but is that they're very inconsistent with everything we know about how Epstein operates. Saying that he basically showed up at a Rick James concert with her in Savannah, Georgia. He places him in various places that don't really make a lot of sense. Talks about things that he would like that also are very inconsistent with his personality. She said Epstein was starting to say intimate things about himself. He was sharing that it began to make her feel like she had some of the power. He wanted her to take control. She basically talks about how he liked being dominated and liked being weak, that he liked her using kitchen oil instead of various kinds of lubricants. They're things that are wildly inconsistent with everything we know about Jeffrey Epstein. And then she talks about how Trump and Epstein were talking about blackmailing people and doing all sorts of illegal things in front of her. The reality is is that this report right here, while it does have some incredibly wild and shocking details, this does not read consistently at all with what the people that we know are actual victims of Jeffrey Epstein have described things as. So, when we read this and you compare this to what we know victims have been through, it sounds wild. It's completely inconsistent. There was really nothing in here that made me think that this was a credible source. This is something where Trump was unredacted, but I actually don't think that this is a very credible report compared to many of the things that we've read. So, when you compare this to all of the reports from victims that give very specific details, these are very inconsistent and do not really match up with what we know went on on the island. So, I would say the credibility of this one, if you've heard anything about the one about Donald Trump being bitten, I actually think that one has very low credibility.
All right, we'll go and wrap things up here. Hopefully, this is helping you better understand how President Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files. Now, what's being reported is that he has been mentioned another million-plus times that have not yet been unredacted. So, inevitably, there is still a tremendous amount of information out there yet to be uncovered and hopefully in time they will continue to release those unredacted files. If you have any other thoughts about this or if there's anything else you want me to analyze, please let me know in the comments below. Last thing before we get finished up is I do want to remind you to like and subscribe if you want to see more content just like this. All right, thanks for watching.