Emergency Discussion #2: The Blackmailing of Spain

Okay, good morning, um, everyone. Welcome to our second emergency discussion. And, um, we will mainly discuss Spain, what is happening in Ceuta, which is a, uh, Spanish enclave on the African, uh, continent. And, uh, as you know, what's happened these past two days is anywhere between 50,000 to 600, uh, 660,000, 50,000 to 60,000, uh, migrants have streamed into Ceuta from Morocco. And, uh, this is one of these world-changing events. And what I will do this morning is first of all, explain to you what's happening, um, what's causing it, and why it's a world-changing event, and ultimately, what are the geopolitical repercussions of this, uh, event.

This is meant to be a discussion, and so, um, I look forward to your comments and to your questions. So please stay muted until I finish my presentation, and then we will open, open the floor to discussion. We have a lot of time this morning. I've allocated three hours to our discussion, uh, because I think it's that important. Um, there are some other items on the agenda that we will briefly touch upon, um, once we finish this discussion on Spain, but I want to focus the bulk of our, um, attention on Spain because it's really important that we understand what's going on there. Plus, we also have a lot of information as to what's really going on there. So, what I'm going to do first is I'm going to share my screen and show you some, um, visuals of what is happening, uh, there. Okay.

So, so let's first look at some visuals as to what is happening. This is, of course, from, uh, YouTube. And, um, these, these are, uh, visuals of these migrants streaming into, uh, Ceuta, both by the sea, they swim across, and by land. And the thing to remember is that Ceuta, it's a very small Spanish enclave. It's only 80,000 residents, and there's been reported anywhere between 50 to 60,000, uh, of these migrants, many of whom, most of whom are young men in their 20s. They have basically invaded and they've overwhelmed, um, from Morocco. Um, and, um, these are pretty horrifying images. And if you're European, not just if you're just a Spanish person, right? But if you're a European, you're looking at these images on TV, and you are freaking the hell out. Because, uh, remember back in 2015, Europe allowed a lot, millions of Syrian, Libyan, Iraqi, Afghan, uh, refugees to flow into Europe, and Europe's never really recovered from that experience. And it traumatized Europe. And I, and there are a lot of Europeans, most Europeans are watching these images, and they're really afraid of a repeat of 2015, the social convulsions that happened because of this massive, uh, migration into Europe. And, um, these are all these images. And, um, right.

Okay, so, um, what I'll do next is, now having shown these images, I, I want to show you that there is, in fact, some coordination going on here. Okay. So, I'm not sure if you see this clearly. >> Okay. But what's happening is that a lot of these migrants are being loaded onto trucks and then export, uh, sorry, let me, um, make sure. Okay. All right. Okay. Sorry. I, I need to, um, Okay. All right. So, I, I'll show you another, um, video. Okay. So, I hope you guys can see this clearly. But what I want to show you is this. It is clear that many of these men are being loaded onto trucks by the police in Morocco, by the military in Morocco, and they are being sent to the border where they are then offloaded like cattle and being told to rush into Spain. The Moroccans will not prevent them from rushing into Spain. All right. So, you can see there is clear coordination here. Again, the man in front, the man in the gray, he is a police officer, and he's basically telling the young man, go to the border. Okay. And clearly, this truck, it is government. Okay. Let's watch this again. All right. So, this truck is >> Uh, sorry to interrupt, Jung, but uh, this, the screen isn't being shared of the >> Oh. Oh, I apologize. Okay. Thank you for, um, for, um, Okay. Sorry about that. Okay. Thanks. I, I'm sorry. I, I'm completely new to this, but, um, yeah. So, can you guys see the screen now? Yes, professor. >> Okay. All right. So, again, I want you, I want, this is like really important. You watch this, okay? This is really key to what's going on. You see there's a police officer in front. You see this is a truck. Okay? This is not a truck rented by the migrants. This is a truck that is government rented or that that has been, um, allocated for this particular purpose of transporting these people to the border between Morocco and Spain. And you can see how jubilant they are. >> Okay. And the police officer, he is clearly directing them, right? He's making sure they get off the truck and he's making sure they're going in one direction. They're not turning behind. They're not going behind him. They're going in front of him, right? He's directing them like, you know, like keep on going, moving forward. Okay, let's watch this again. You can see how this is clearly, clearly being organized at some level. This is not organic, okay? You don't organically have 50,000 people stream across the border in one night. Okay? So, that's the second video I want to show you.

Now, the third video I want to show you is Donald Trump, who three weeks ago, okay, this is like, again, three, three weeks ago, getting really pissed off at Spain because Spain is not allowing America to use its air bases, uh, to strike Iran. Spain has wants nothing to do with this war. Um, and at the same time, Spain has always been a vocal critic of Israel, of Zionism. And so, this is basically Donald Trump, um, telling the, uh, Spanish, "Hey, watch out, man." Okay. >> Ah, the Spanish members of NATO, but not very good members of NATO. They say no, we don't want to help other people. What are we doing? Huh? They, uh, they are not behaving nicely. But they will learn soon after they relinquish their grip on Cuba and Guam, the Philippines and Puerto Rico, and they were all ours. They all we got. >> Okay. So, Donald Trump, the thing about Donald Trump is he speaks his mind, okay? And he's a very direct and honest person. So you can glean a lot of information from just a few sentences he speaks. All right. So, let, let's replay this again. >> Ah, the Spanish members of NATO are not very good members of NATO. >> Okay. So here he's saying the Spanish are not very good members of NATO. What this means is the Spanish do not obey the American Empire. The American Empire wants to use Spanish airspace and Spanish air bases in order to construct strikes against Iran, and the Spanish refuse, which forces the Americans to use British airspace, which is too far away. Okay, so that's what Donald Trump is complaining about here. >> They say no, we don't want to help other people. What are we doing? Huh? They, uh, they are not behaving nicely. They will learn soon after they relinquish their grip on Cuba and Guam, the Philippines and Puerto Rico, and they were all ours. They all we we >> Okay. So, Donald Trump, he's a real estate developer. He thinks in terms of real estate, right? So, the Spanish have been losing a lot of territory to the American Empire. They lost Cuba. They lost the Philippines. Now, they're going to lose Ceuta. Okay. That, that's what he's implying here. Now, the Americans are going to take over key strategic real estate from the Spanish. Okay. So, keep this in mind. All right. Let's, um, keep on going.

Okay, so this man, uh, is named Wally Rashed. Okay. I hope I'm pronouncing his name correctly. Um, but he did a great, uh, TikTok right after, um, this migrant surge into Ceuta, explaining to us what's going on. And I think he has a fantastic understanding of the geopolitics of this event. Okay. So, we'll just watch the video really quickly. This, it's a TikTok video. >> happening in Spain, city Ceuta, right now. Take a listen to this. It was planned by the Trump administration and Israel. This guy right here is Michael Rubin. He's a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. Since March of this year, this think tank has been heavily lobbying the Trump administration, especially Marco Rubio, to recognize Ceuta as territory of Morocco. The reason for this is because Morocco is part of the Abraham Accords, it's pro-Israel, and they want to punish Spain for not allowing the United States to use its airspace during the Iran War. This is an established US think tank, by the way. Moroccans should gather, send bulldozers to the border, and then enter Ceuta and Melilla unarmed to raise the flag. Sanchez and the Spanish press bleat, but they have no grounds to act, nor for that matter would NATO, even if Moroccan forces enter the towns to restore order and organized dispatch of settlers across the strait and back to Spain. These two Spanish towns represent illegitimate beachheads and are home to approximately 170 Spanish settlers. They are weak spots for European security since African migrants regularly rush to the fence to claim asylum. Gets much worse. Just wait. Republican US Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, who's very close friends with Marco Rubio, wrote a report back in April stating, for the first time, the committee notes the historic alliance between the United States and Morocco. The committee notes that the Spanish-administered cities of Ceuta and Melilla, Ceuta and Melilla are located in Moroccan territory and remain the subject of Morocco's long-standing claim. Goes on to state the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio should encourage diplomatic engagement between Morocco and Spain over the future status of the two cities. American Enterprise Institute has been pressuring the Trump administration on this for over a year. They want to bolster the Abraham Accords and they want to punish Spain. This is why this is happening. It's not because Spain is a left-wing government that can't control its borders. The United States and Israel are doing this together because they no longer want Spain to control those cities. Okay, this is a brilliant explanation. This is exactly what's going on, and it makes perfect geopolitical sense. And so, I'm going to take Wally Rashed's points and then elaborate on them. Um, now, what I want to do next, okay, is show you a, a geopolitical repercussion of, um, of what's been happening. And so, to do, to do that, I'm going to show you an, um, article from Reuters that just came out, okay, a few hours ago. And it basically says that Italy is going to reimpose border controls on Spain after Ceuta migrant surge. Okay. It doesn't sound like a big deal, but if you think about it, it is a huge deal. Why? Because the idea of free movement of goods, um, and people is, is the most important pillar of the European Union. So, let's imagine a situation where, um, Spain, what's happening in Ceuta, it's just a pilot program. It's just a test case to see how the Europeans react. And the Americans and the Israelis watch what's happening, and they re, recognize that, wow, the Europeans are freaking out over this. And so, what we can do in the future is use migrant blackmail to coerce European nation-states into doing our bidding. But not only that, but the migrant issue threatens to tear apart the European Union. And Donald Trump really hates Brussels. Okay? Both Israel and Donald Trump, they just hate Brussels. So, they really want to see the European, uh, disintegrate. Not only because they hate the bureaucracy there, but also because a united Europe, um, is much more able to defend, uh, Europe against American imperial and Israeli imperial interests. Um, and so, what, what the United States and what Israel want to do is break up, um, Europe into different nation-states, start competing against each other, very much like World War II or pre-World War II. And the migrant issue is the best way to do that. Because if you think about it, if you have like these millions of Africans streaming into Europe, then it's every man for himself, okay? Like all the Europeans like, screw this, we're imposing borders. Because the thing to remember is these migrants are going to Spain not because they love, um, Spanish ham, and not because they think, "Wow, Spain is a great place to retire and, you know, I love, you know, going doing a siesta every day." No, they're going to Spain because it's an easy access point into the rest of Europe. Their real goals, the, the real destination, um, are Germany, France, uh, England. And if they can't get anywhere else, they go to Italy, right? That's why Italy is doing this because they know that from Spain, these migrants are now able to access everyone else, everywhere else. So, this is a huge issue for Europe, and this is going to be an issue that's going to basically tear Europe apart. There's really nothing, okay? And I, I hate to repeat this, but there's absolutely nothing the Europeans can do about this. If, um, the United States and Israel are intent on tearing apart Europe, forcing it into competing nation-states that only want to protect their own borders, then this migrant issue is going to do that. And that's why Morocco is so key, because Morocco is a very easy, um, access point into Europe, as we're seeing from this, um, uh, Ceuta mess. So, my prediction is the Spanish are completely screwed in this scenario. The Spanish have absolutely no choice but to withdraw from Ceuta and cede that territory to Morocco. Okay? There's really nothing the Spanish can do about this. If you have 80,000 settlers or 80,000 residents in Ceuta, and Morocco can do a surge every two weeks of like 50,000 migrants, that's going to overwhelm your social services. That's going to overwhelm your, uh, security services. That's going to overwhelm your resources. And so, what's going to happen is that a lot of these residents are just going to choose to return to the Spanish mainland and say, "Screw this. I don't want to deal with these migrants who are every night stalking the streets, and it's intimidating, um, and it's traumatic, right?" And then the last, um, and then you reach a point where you might have like, I don't know, 20,000, 30,000 holdouts. But, you know, if you have like 50,000 migrants who are mainly, again, men in their 20s, these 20 or 30,000 are going to be eventually have to be forced out. Okay? Just because it becomes too expensive and too problematic for the Spanish to hold territory in Ceuta. Okay. So, this is a lost cause for Spain. And this is important because once Ceuta is ceded to the Moroccans, then now the Israelis and the Americans have another strategic maritime choke point called the Strait of Gibraltar. Okay. Um, and this is all part of America's national defense strategy. So, this has been, this has been planned for many years, and, um, there's tremendous funding, there's tremendous organization, uh, behind all this plan, and it's being executed right before our very eyes. And this is going to really, really fundamentally rechange or alter the global landscape that we know.

Okay. So, um, having shown you these videos, what I want to do now is do a PowerPoint presentation, uh, to show you, um, to give some background as to what's going on. Um, but again, I can't emphasize enough, this is a real problem for not only just Spain, but for all of Europe. And unfortunately, there's nothing, absolutely nothing they can do about it. Um, okay. So, I'm going to share my, uh, PowerPoint now. Okay. All right. All right. Let's do it. The crisis in Spain. Okay. So, this is the Spanish prime minister coming out, um, and saying to the Spanish public, "We will respond to the situation in Ceuta and we will mobilize all necessary resources, and we will work with the Moroccans to ensure a return to normalcy as soon as possible. We will solve this problem. We will build solutions by working with our stakeholders and by galvanizing our resources." Okay, guys, this is bureaucratic language of saying, "We are so completely screwed." Okay? This situation is something that we were afraid of, and this is a situation that could have, that could arise at any point. And so, what we did as bureaucrats, as your government officials, was put our head in the sand for years, hoping that this would never arise. And now that this problem has erupted, well, we know we don't know what to do. And we are completely screwed in this situation. So, what I'm going to do is I'm gonna put out these pointless social media posts that do nothing to help the situation, and which honestly are not even helping, um, the Spanish feel better about the situation. And then I'm going to go to Ceuta and do, uh, follow-ups and, um, some video just for a few minutes of social media, and then I'm going to get the hell out of the situation because, like, this is a, this is, um, a complete dumpster fire. Okay? There's nothing I can do about it. There's nothing anyone can do about it. But hey, um, um, let's, you know, go take a siesta or something and and party tonight. Um, okay. So, this is the Spanish prime minister saying on social media, "We are so screwed. There's nothing we can do about it." Okay. And a lot of it, okay, is a lot of this has been premeditated. But really, what's really clever about the American and the Israeli strategy here is they're taking advantage of really unpopular, um, um, policies that this left-wing Spanish government has implemented over these past few years. And one of them was a surge of immigration into Spain, mainly in response to the aging crisis. Right? As your population gets older, you need, you need to replenish it with young workers. And so, there were a lot of young workers from Latin America who were not documented, but who they gave, uh, legal status to in order to, um, fill positions in the economy. And what's happened now is, if you turn on right-wing, uh, television, and talk shows in England and other places, they're blaming, uh, what's happening in Ceuta on the left-wing Spanish government policies of lax immigration. Okay. So, this is also part of the, uh, Israeli and the American empire playbook, where clearly it's a land grab. Clearly, this has been planned for many years, and I'll show you all the documentation that proves this. But, uh, these right-wing propaganda outlets are doing the bidding of the empire and focusing attention on left-wing liberal policies that favor legal, uh, immigration. If you just go on and watch some right-wing talk shows on YouTube, they're very clear about that, that it is not a land grab. It is just, uh, stupid left-wing, um, immigration policies that take no, that that are just betraying the ordinary people of Europe.

Okay. This is Ursula von der Leyen, and she's saying, what many Europeans are feeling right now, which is, uh, "We're freaked out about this situation. Okay? We're really freaked out about the situation." But you can see that what's really important is they're not blaming the Israelis or the Americans, or even the Moroccans. Okay? Because it's the Moroccans who let these migrants into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta. Um, instead, she's saying that, "We're really angry about this, and we need to resolve it as quickly as possible." Look, the Europeans are just freaked out about this because, again, look at this, 2015, the European migrant crisis. And so, like, this is a, um, um, a map that shows you what happened in 2015. And there are certain things I want you guys to, uh, like, key in on. Okay? First of all, is that there were multiple entry points into Europe, including Greece, including Italy, including Spain. And so, these border countries, Spain, Italy, and Greece, were the most traumatized by the surge of, um, millions of migrants, primarily from Syria, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Albania, Iraq, Eritrea, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine. So, that they come from all over the place. The second thing that you do need to appreciate is the migrants who enter Spain, Italy, Greece, do so because the real, in order to access other parts of Europe, basically northern Europe, which is the more wealthy, more generous, more open, uh, areas of, uh, Europe. And, um, as you can see from this map, most actually end up in Germany, uh, because at that time, Angela Merkel, the, the Chancellor of Germany, says, "We can do this." Meaning like, we, as Germany, as, as Europe's greatest economy, as most open society, we can absorb these refugees fleeing war into our economy and become a much stronger Germany. That has not worked out well for Germany, okay? It's, it's like, again, this migrant issue has become a ticking time bomb for Europe, especially as the aging, especially as the young people refuse to have children, especially as this war in Ukraine has destroyed the German economy. Europe is in a lot of trouble. Europe is finished, uh, basically. And, uh, what will emerge from the ashes, we don't know yet. But the Europeans are freaking out about this new wave of migration that's that's about to hit them. Um, and it's going to hit them, okay? Why? Because you have this demographic issue in Africa, where if you look at Sub-Saharan Africa, the population is just exploding. It's the fastest-growing region of the world. At the same time, Africa remains extremely corrupt, very war-torn. And the, this crisis in, uh, the humus, where fertilizer is not able to get to Africa, the Africans are going to suffer the most. Um, so, yeah. In the United States, you have $4 a gallon gas, or $5, and maybe even $6. Okay? That's going to piss a lot of people off. But in Africa, uh, people, millions are going to starve. And when, when that happens, you're going to have war, revolution, and that's going to force a migration into Europe. And where's the easiest place to access, um, Europe from? Spain. Okay. So, again, uh, Ceuta is just done. There's just no way that they could, that the Spanish, with an enclave of 80,000 residents, are going to be able to deal with this surge of millions of African migrants in the next few years. There's absolutely no way. And the Europeans know this, okay? And, um, and the European bureaucracy, their response is to put their head in the sand and put out these tweets showing how concerned they are and pray, uh, for the best. And then go to their, uh, uh, lunches, two-hour lunches, where they can sip rosé for two hours. Okay? That is the European response.

Okay. So, um, the key thing to remember is that for us geopolitically, this is a new weapon that can be used against the Europeans. Okay? The Israelis and Americans have figured out a new way to blackmail Europe into doing the bidding of the empire. Okay? Uh, you guys remember the London Blitz? Well, this is basically the new blitz. Okay? So, Hitler, um, sent bombers, uh, against London, hoping to destroy the morale of the British people, and that didn't work. Well, the Israelis and Americans have got a better weapon than torpedoes and bombs and nighttime raids. Refugees, right? Let's just pack millions of refugees onto these boats and send them to England and to France. What are you going to do? Like, is the British Navy going to come out and start shooting at these defenseless, um, migrants who are just seeking a better life? They can't do it, right? So, what the Europeans are going to do is say, "Hey, can you get the Moroccans to go kill these people?" Okay? All right. So, the Europeans don't care if these people die or not. Okay? All the Europeans care is they don't come to our borders where we're forced to kill them. So, let's bribe the Moroccans or the Libyans. Who cares? Okay? To kill them before they come to our borders. Okay? That, and, and that's the blackmail, the ultimate blackmail that the American Empire can now use to coerce the Europeans to do their bidding, which basically means the Europeans continue to fight the stupid war in Ukraine, which basically means the Europeans send men to die off in the Trans-Ukraine, which basically means the Europeans continue to buy US dollars, which means the Europeans continue to buy, uh, US weapons, um, bribe the Israelis, the Americans to, uh, intervene on their behalf against these refugees. This is a huge issue for Europe. The Europeans are completely and utterly [ __ ] Okay? There's no other way to describe this. There's nothing the Europeans can, can do about this.

All right. So, uh, Larry Loomer, uh, sorry, Laura Loomer. Laura Loomer. Sorry. Um, I, I didn't mean to say Larry Loomer. It's her name is Laura Loomer, guys. Okay. So, what she's saying is, "The invasion of Spain by Islamic third-world parasites is bad for society, but good for the acceleration. We need to make the general public understand Islam is the real enemy." Okay. So, um, this is the talking point that these right-wing, uh, pro-empire Zionist forces will use throughout this, that this is to, this is an Islamic invasion. This, the Islamists have been planning this for centuries. This is how they will destroy Western civilization by, by, um, invading Europe with, um, their young men. This is all part of the diabolical Islamic conspiracy to take over the world. We've got to stop them. And now we know what a threat there is. Okay? So, stop talking about Israel, guys. Okay? Stop talking about Zionism, because Zionism is our friend. Zionism is the only force that can, uh, counterbalance Islam. Okay? Only Israelis understand the real threat of the Islamists, of of Islam, of the Muslims, and only Israel has the balls to fight, um, the Muslims. And so, the rest of the world should just follow the lead of Israel. Europe should be now be begging Israel to come over and take over Europe so that the leadership of Europe, finance these ballsy, uh, guys to, uh, take on these, um, Muslims. The Europeans should stop doing, should stop criticizing Israel and start learning from Israel. Okay? Let's put these Muslims in concentration camps. Let's deport them, and let's, you know, put microchips into these, um, Muslim animals like we would do dogs, so we can track them, and we can monitor them, and we can prevent them from from committing crime. Okay? That's the message that's going to come out over the next few years, or next few months, really. Okay. The Israelis have been saying this for the longest time. And so, Laura Loomer is really a spokesperson, uh, for, um, the Zionist forces in the world. And I, I don't understand like who she is. Like, she's not charismatic. She's not that smart, and she's just really annoying. But for a reason, she happens to be a very powerful person who can go to Ukraine, meet with President Zelensky, and redeem herself in the eyes of, um, the Ukrainians, because she initially opposed the war. Also, what's really funny is that now she's going to India and trying to create a rapprochement between herself and India, and the Indians really hate her because all she does online is trash the, uh, Indians. Okay.

Um, so, what, what's the evidence that this has been organized for many, many years now? Okay. This is Mariel Nafo, and he points out that in 2018, the son of British Prime Minister, the son of Israeli Prime Minister Ben Netanyahu, put out a tweet saying, "Let's make a deal. We won't fund any deals in your country," um, calling for the taking away of Ceuta, and you will stop funding NGOs in our country that give that cause us to give away Judea and Samaria. Okay. So, what he's saying is, guys, we know how this game is played. You have NGOs, we have NGOs. You have NGOs calling for the West Bank, um, for settlers, for Jewish settlers to stay away from the West Bank, and our NGOs are calling for Ceuta and Melilla to be returned to Morocco. So, let's just stop playing this game. Okay. So, so this, so clearly, there's a lot of organization, uh, behind what's going on, uh, these past two days. Um, he puts out another tweet, and again, this is information that his team has, um, consolidated and collated from other news sources. Okay. So, so he's not the one telling us this. He, he's just, uh, repeating this from other places. Um, but what this post tells us is like, this is an organized thing. This invasion, there is a lot of organization behind it. Okay? You have groups with tens of thousands of members who are sharing maps, who are sharing telephone numbers so they can coordinate this. Okay. And, um, the plan, the plan again is to reach Ceuta and then from Ceuta, get on a boat to the mainland, register for asylum, which they can do according to Spanish law, and then basically be a burden on the Spanish welfare system. Okay? That's the plan. And they're going in with this intention of being freeloaders on the Spanish system. Okay. And again, what's really important is not only are the Israelis and Americans organizing this, but they want us to know that they're organizing this, and what the plan is, because they're trying to traumatize Europeans. They're trying to blackmail the Europeans. Okay? That's the real plan. Okay. And this is Yair Netanyahu, um, who, who again, is the son of the Israeli prime minister, who hates the Arabs and the Muslims, but they're encouraging the son is now encouraging Arabs and Muslims to go, um, invade Ceuta. Okay. Yep. Um, Yair has had a long-standing beef with Spain. He really, really hates Spain, right? Um, he thinks that the Spanish have unfairly criticized the Israelis for committing genocide in Gaza. Um, like, why, why would the Spanish have a problem with this, right? I mean, like, like if I, you know, if I have cockroaches in my basement and I call off an exterminator to come and kill all the cockroaches, why would my neighbor call the police on me? Why would the neighbor complain? Clearly, this is personal. Clearly, it's because, you know, my neighbor doesn't like me. Clearly, the Spanish don't like the Israelis. Well, you know what? Um, the Israelis are not going to put up with this crap anymore. Okay? So, "I do not intend to allow any country to wage a diplomatic war against us without paying the immediate price." Okay? That's what Yair Netanyahu has been saying. And also, like, um, what's really funny is, remember last week was the World Cup, and the World Cup was between Spain and Argentina. And, you know, Yair Netanyahu was rooting really heavily for Argentina. In fact, the entire nation-state of Israel was rooting heavily for Argentina. And again, they really, really hate, hate the, the Spanish. And the Spanish won. Okay? And now, a week later, you have this mass migration from Morocco to, um, Spain. And this is not at all petty. This is not like, like there has, I mean, like, like I think the Israelis and the Americans are are petty enough to do this right at the World Cup to, to basically get vengeance against, uh, Spain for winning the World Cup. And look, I mean, like, like we can argue about this back and forth, but like, in my opinion, the World Cup was rigged in favor of Argentina. And why they, they lost, I'll explain later on. Okay. All right.

Um, Morocco, just a few days before, renames their highway after Trump. Okay. Well, that's interesting. Remember, Morocco was, um, was one of the most enthusiastic supporters of the Abraham Accords. Morocco was one of the few Arab nations to sign the Abraham Accords. In return, uh, the United States recognized Morocco's control over, uh, the Western Sahara, which they wrested from, uh, Spain. Um, so, yeah. So, this is a confirmed news. This is Al Jazeera saying that, uh, Morocco named a highway after Trump. And again, it's because this is part of Morocco's larger ambition to control, um, North, uh, Western Africa. Okay? Which is strategic for many reasons. Um, so, we watched that video, uh, from Wally Rashed, explaining to us what's going on. And this is an article written a few months before March 16, 2016, by Michael Rubin. Uh, I, I'll explain who Michael Rubin is later on, but he writes this article laying out the strategy of how Morocco can take over Ceuta. And the answer, and his solution is really straightforward, really simple, and saying like, "Just, just march in there, right?" There's 80,000 residents, um, in Ceuta. You've got millions of people. Just march in there and claim it for yourself. Just like how the, the, uh, settlers, these Jewish settlers, march into the West Bank and claim what's theirs. Okay? Take action, be proactive, show some balls, and it will be yours. Okay? Um, and this is, this, this is a strategy that he lays out. "Moroccans should gather, send bulldozers to the borders, just crush the border, and then enter Ceuta unarmed. And are they going to shoot you? Good luck, man. Right." Um, and there's nothing the British, the Spanish can do about it because their laws, institutions, their culture prevent them from shooting unarmed civilians. Okay? So, they criticize us, the Israelis, for shooting unarmed civilians, but let's, so let's use that against them. They think they're so high and mighty. They think they're so virtuous. They think they're better than us. Okay? Well, then let's use that against them. Okay? Show us how virtuous you are when millions of cockroaches come into your country and, um, take it over. Okay? Show us how virtuous, virtuous you are, uh, Spanish people. Okay. Uh, Michael Rubin is a neocon. Okay. And, uh, he studied, uh, at Yale. And guys, I went to Yale. There were hundreds of guys like Michael Rubin at Yale. I took history class with them. I took political science class with them. They are the most pompous, the most idiotic people you will meet. They speak with pure confidence, but there's, but they don't actually know anything. Okay? That's, that's what Yale does to people. Yale teaches you how to speak with absolute confidence and hold your point. Uh, and that's what Michael Rubin is. Okay? That's what these neocons are. They are clearly Zionist, and, uh, they use, uh, the idea of democracy, human rights, freedom in order to promote their Zionist agenda. Okay. So, Michael Rubin is like, "Well, we're doing this because we are, we are anti-colonialist." Okay? The Spanish have colonial territories in Morocco. They stole this land from Morocco, and therefore, we have a historical responsibility to reclaim this land for the indigenous people. Okay? That's why we're doing this.

This is a Moroccan, uh, Yael, who is supposed to be a poly analyst and writer based in Morocco. If you read what he writes, he's clearly a Zionist asset. He's clearly an Israeli, um, asset, even though he's probably, uh, Arab, but, you know, he writes this article. If you actually read this article, it just spells out exactly what the plan is. Okay? They're not even bothering to hide it because they want people to know what the plan is, right? So, "We're going, we're going after Spain because Spain sucks. Spain is supposed to be a NATO ally, and they refuse to let the Americans use the, um, the air force bases." Um, wait, sorry. So, Mask, did you, do you have a comment or question? Could you >> Um, yeah. Yeah, professor. I just have a comment. Um, um, couple of things. I think the Ceuta takeover might have economical reasons behind it. I think you'd touched on that already, but Morocco is a major exporter of, um, minerals and fertilizers and a major hub for EV batteries. So, there could be a bigger plan here with the, um, with the island takeover. The second point is, I think the Jews were expelled in the 1400s. I'm sure you know that, um, from Spain. They went to Morocco. There's lots of Jewish people, um, in Morocco. So, I'm not surprised with their bias. Just a couple comments there. Thanks. Yeah. No, no. Thank you. No, no. Um, um, yeah, for a lot of people, this goes back to the Reconquista, right? So, before the Christian Reconquista of Spain, which happened in, I, I believe the, um, 15th century, um, Spain for 100 years was called Al-Andalus. And this was really an extremely prosperous, progressive, wealthy area of the world that made Europe look like a [ __ ] hole. Okay. So, you have this enclave, Muslim enclave in Europe, in Spain, in, in the Iberian Peninsula. And the thing about the, um, uh, this peninsula, the, uh, Al-Andalus, was it was really open towards Jews. In fact, Jews rose to the highest ranks of, um, society. And that's contrasted with how Jews were persecuted in Europe. Persecuted so much, in fact, that they almost were annihilated. They were forced either to immigrate or to convert, and eventually, a lot of them were starting to die out. Okay. So, Al-Andalus was a major embarrassment for the Catholic Church, for Europe, and that's why they launched this massive campaign to, uh, destroy that Muslim area. And as you point out, that just forced a lot of people to go to Morocco. And so, there's, as you point out, there's historical animosity that dates back hundreds, hundreds of years, but they won't point this out. Okay? But, but you're right, it is, it is there. Um, you're, you're also absolutely right in that there's an economic factor, there's an, uh, to this, and, and we'll discuss this later on. Okay. But I, I first want to point out that there's a lot of documentation that this was premeditated, and this is being executed. Um, and this, and this is really well organized. Okay. And this has high-level, uh, support, mainly from Israel and from the United States. And this article just gives you, it's a roadmap. It's, it's a plan, and it basically tells exactly what the intention is. And if you read the last sentence, okay, the last sentence reads like this: "For Israel, implying Yair's claim is not charity. It is strategic investment in a partner that across Gibraltar holds the key to one of the world's most vital maritime choke points." Okay? This is the point of all this is for Israel to control trade access into Europe. Gibraltar is crucial to trade. Um, and once, uh, Morocco has control over Ceuta, then the United States and Israel have control over maritime trade in the Mediterranean. Okay? That's the real purpose. This is why they're going to all this trouble. Okay? Just economic.

This is from the New York Times, guys. Okay? The New York Times is supporting that they talked to these migrants, and the police officers told the migrants to cross into Ceuta. Okay? They want us to know this. They want the Europeans to know this because the Israelis and Americans want to use this as blackmail against the Europeans. I cannot emphasize this enough. You know, this is like the sort of, okay, what, what the Americans and the Israelis are saying, like, "We know your society, the Europeans, you're most afraid of illegal migrants, refugees from Africa, from the Middle East, from Asia. And guess what? We can, we can turn on the tap anytime we want. We can open the doors and flood your society with millions of Africans, of, uh, Arabs, if you do not cooperate." Okay? They want the Europeans to know exactly what's going on. That's why this is so blatant. That's why there's so much documentation. That's why even the New York Times is reporting this. Okay? New York Times didn't report about Nord Stream. New York Times didn't, didn't, uh, didn't report about a lot of things, but he's reporting that, "Oh, the Moroccans are helping, um, these, uh, migrants access Spain." All right.

Again, the choke point is key. So, right now, um, as you can see, the Strait of Gibraltar, it's basically divided, um, um, it's basically managed by three different nations. You have, you have, um, uh, England, which controls Gibraltar, the Rock of Gibraltar. Okay? That's the pink. Then you have the Spanish, of course, and then you have the Moroccans. Okay? Now, according to maritime law, uh, no one has control over these maritime choke points. They're, um, uh, basically free for everyone to use. But this strait, for example, it's going to set a precedent where if, if you want, you can actually take control over the, uh, a choke point. There's really nothing anyone can do about it. Okay? So, the key now is, okay, if Iran sets a precedent where a nation can take control of a choke point going against established maritime law and collect tolls, right? Then who controls these other choke points, including the Strait of Gibraltar, including the Strait of Melilla? And the answer is, well, whoever is willing, willing to take control. Okay? Ceuta is really important for Morocco to establish, uh, sovereignty over the Strait of Gibraltar, which would be like an economic boom for the, um, for Morocco. Okay? Um, and it's pretty obvious. Okay. So, you've got a lot of people, um, on Twitter, pointing out that Israel is calling on Spain to hand over Ceuta to Morocco. Okay? Um, this is really interesting. This is the Vox leader. Okay. So, Vox is the right-wing populist party of Spain, and the Vox leader is blaming left-wing, uh, policies of the current government for all that's happening. Okay? And what he said is, "The Iranian and Venezuelan regimes have financed the far-left in Spain over the last 15 years. That's why Pedro Sánchez is at his best friend in Europe and Maduro's best friend." Really strange thing how these right-wing, uh, political parties in Europe, including Vox, including Marine Le Pen's party in France, they're really good friends of, of, of Israel. Okay? These are Zionists. Uh, you also have Tommy Robinson in, um, in England, who is essentially a, uh, puppet of Zionists. Okay? But basically, uh, another really important, um, objective of what's going on is to destabilize the current government of Pedro Sánchez and replace him with this guy, Santiago Abascal. Okay? And he's, and he's, and once, once he's in power, I guarantee you he will completely reverse, um, Spain's policies. Okay? Spain will basically become a US, um, colony if he were to obtain power. And again, I hate to say this, but Spain is in a lot of trouble. And I, and I think there's a very good chance that he comes into power, especially as this migrant issue becomes worse. But basically, the Israelis and the Americans have figured out the Achilles' heel of the Europeans, which is migration, and there's nothing the Europeans can do about it.

All right. Wall Street Journal may have says, um, yeah, the end goal is for Morocco to lay claim over Ceuta. Okay. And then there, and then I, and then control the Strait of Gibraltar. Syrian Girl, um, who's very good, by the way. I, I like her posts a lot. But she also points out the same thing. Um, Bruno MacKay is saying the US has come out and saying that Ceuta and Melilla are not part of Spain. Okay. Yeah. So, it's all being coordinated. Even Nick Fuentes. Okay. I mean, like, I'm really confused about Nick Fuentes because sometimes he says things that are so on point that I think he's brilliant. Okay. And then, of course, there's some, sometimes he makes these really silly, absurd comments, like, you know, like the Charlie Kirk assassination was committed by this lone wolf guy named Tyler Robinson, and, yeah, okay. So, so, so he's not consistent. But here, he's very, very, uh, direct, very clever. It's brilliant what he says. This is all part of this grand alliance between Morocco, Israel, and the United States. What Nick Fuentes says is, "The reason Republicans support the invasion of Spanish cities is that they're doing this on behalf of, uh, Israel." That's exactly correct. Yeah.

All right. Wally Rashed points out that, um, the Americans have been planning this for a long time. They've been planning to take over Ceuta and Melilla, uh, from the Spanish for a long time. Okay? And again, there's a lot of documentation. They want you to know this. Okay? They're not hiding this. They want us to know this. They want us to discuss this because, um, this way, we recognize that we have absolutely no power to stop this. Okay? When I mean us, I'm not saying us, you and me. I'm saying the Europeans. Okay? Okay. They want the Europeans to know this because for the Americans, this migration issue is a sort of the Machiavellian tool. Okay? It, it's what allows them to control, um, uh, the Europeans. Okay.

So, um, I did some ChatGPT research, and I wanted to know what's going on militarily between the United States and Morocco. And it turns out there's a lot. Okay. So, April 2026, at the Pentagon, uh, these two countries, United States and Morocco, sign a 10-year agreement on long-term military moderation. Okay. So, the goal is this. The goal is Morocco will lay, will lay claim on the Strait of Gibraltar because they have the most, uh, legitimate claim to that area, but it's the American military that will be responsible for controlling the Strait of Gibraltar. Okay? So, basically, this is a silent takeover of the Moroccan military by the American military. Um, and, uh, now Morocco will just become a proxy of the empire. Okay. If our analysis is correct, then another, there should be, then there should be other two other major flash points, all both of which are major maritime choke points. Okay? Obviously, the most major maritime choke point is the Strait of Melilla. Okay. And again, April 13, 2026, Indonesia and the United States sign an, um, alliance. Okay. And what, what can we expect is that this alliance is going to expand over time. What's really interesting is, and the sign was this alliance, this happened in Washington D.C., but it was the Indonesian defense minister who went, not the

Indonesian president and so, um, what this is telling us is, um, this is a cooperation between these two militaries, and there's nothing any, there's nothing that the civilian leadership in, in, uh, Jakarta can do about this. Okay, they don't care what the people think. This is, this is the, the, uh, indigenous military is independent, and now it will become a proxy of the American military in, um, um, um, in Asia. And, um, eventually, they'll manufacture a crisis for the Indonesians to exert control over the Malacca. Right now, they, they share control of the Strait of Malacca with the Malaysians. Okay. The Malaysians are also very anti-Zionist. So, we can expect, okay, this is a prediction, but if our analysis is correct, we can expect some flare-up between Malaysia and Indonesia, where Indonesia, for the sake of, you know, global trade, exerts greater control over the Strait of Malacca, all supported by Israel and the, um, American military. Um, China. Okay. So, China recognizes this, and it's something called the Strait of Malacca dilemma, meaning that China recognizes that most of their trade passes through the Strait of Malacca. And so, for the past few years, they've been trying to develop something called the Arctic route. Okay. So, basically, just trying to access Europe through the Arctic. And with climate change and with this growing alliance between Russia, they can do that. Okay. And that's why, um, the Americans want Greenland. Okay. So, that's a major flashpoint where at some point, the Americans will just take over Greenland, and there's nothing the Europeans can do about it. Yeah, the Europeans will [ __ ] but again, this was the Mley's the sword, right? You piss off the Americans and they're going to let in millions of Africans and Europeans into, um, Europe, and they're going to make their way to Denmark. So, play along, Denmark, or we will use these migrants against you. Okay. Um, so eventually, the Americans will take over Greenland. And this, it's important because going back to this map, it will strangle China. Okay. Greenland is meant to block access, um, into Europe. Okay. And once you have these, um, three choke points in place, the Strait of Malacca, the Strait of Gibraltar, and the Arctic route, uh, the Chinese are completely blocked from Europe. Okay? And this, again, is all part of the national defense strategy. And, and, guys, it's a very short document. It's only about 33 pages. Okay? So, you can go on, uh, you can go to the Department of War website and you can download this for yourself. And it, and it, and it, and it's really important that you read this because it lays out very clearly what the American plan is moving forward. Okay. And, uh, this is ChachiBT just summarizing for you what the important points are. And, uh, the, the key, I, I, I want us to focus on is one major aspect of the national defense strategy is to keep critical sea lanes open. Okay. And how do you do that? Well, you take over them, right? You maintain control over these maritime choke points like the Strait of Gibraltar, Malacca, and the Arctic route in order to maintain peace and prosperity in the world. Okay. So, uh, this is double speak, right? All right. So, let's summarize what we've learned so far. Um, one really important takeaway is we're seeing how the United States and Israel are really joined at the hip, how their policies, their strategies align together. They basically work in unison together. And one, uh, clear outcome of what's happening is the creation of Pax Judea. Okay. So, think about the 20th century where Britain and the United States worked together to create Pax Americana, right? Where Britain, uh, removed itself from the imperial scene, and then America came to become the empire. And now the same thing is happening, um, where America and the United, and, and Israel. What are you talking about? Why would Britain surrender its empire to the United States? And why would the United States surrender its empire to Israel? Okay. And the answer is transnational capital. Okay. So, you think these places, um, Britain, United States, Israel, are controlled by the people because they're democracies? No, guys. Okay? They're controlled by transnational capital. And transnational capital has this insatiable need for growth, for capital accumulation and consolidation, right? And that's why they do empire. Empire is not something that the people willingly agree to do. It's something that's forced upon them. The problem with empire is that eventually it exhausts the nation-state. Okay? So, transnational capital is a parasite on the nation-state, and they force a nation-state to engage in empire to expand transnational capital. But eventually, at a point, the, the people just get exhausted. They're like, we're sick of this crap. In which case, screw this, screw this, we're moving somewhere else. Okay. So, basically, the parasite then basically kills the host. The host moves somewhere else. So, it went from Britain to America. Now, the parasite, international capital, it's killing America. Okay? It's creating political polarization. It's creating all this inequality. It's, it's, it's created, um, all the ingredients for civil war. In which case, transnational capital is like, screw this, we're moving to Israel. Okay? Because Israel will be the new center of, of the world. And, um, do the Israelis want capital? No. The Israelis are pretty happy being, being Israelis. But screw them. We're going to, we're going to impose ourselves on Israel and be a parasite on Israel and turn Israel into Pax Judea so we can control the world. Okay? So, think about this where, you know, for the past 20 years, the Middle East has been destroyed. It's all intentional because now that you've destroyed the Middle East, you can now rebuild the Middle East. Okay? And by rebuilding the Middle East, that's how you grow transnational capital. Right? Okay. So, that's all this, this is the plan, and this, and, and this is the way transnational capital behaves. I don't think it's a conspiracy. I think it's just common sense, man. Okay. Just look at history and, and, and see how, uh, and how Britain and, and America have behaved. Um, uh, Henry, can you unmute yourself? Did you have a question? Hi, Henry. Hi. You're unmuted. Can you speak, please? Sorry, hear me. I can't, I can't, I can't hear you. Are you speaking? Okay, you're unmuted. Okay. All right. Anyway, okay. Let's move on to point two. Um, uh, Anthony, yeah, can you unmute yourself? Hello, professor. Thank you for this privilege. Really, I'm joining from Armenia and I was born in Iran. So I have the best of both worlds. I can, I have some experience about this refugee thing. Can I talk about this refugee system that was created by the Jews in the first place because I had an experience? >> Um, okay, well, I mean, like, um, yes, but like, I wouldn't say this was created by the Jews, right? I mean, like, but, but, yeah, but, but, but go on. >> Uh, okay. We Armenians used to live in Iran for, for a long time. After the Islamic revolution, uh, some, suddenly a Jewish company started to take Armenian refugees to America, called, it's, it's called Hayas. It's not focused in Armenia. It's focused in minorities in Islamic countries. Uh, and something like, uh, 2 million Armenians or more than, I, I forgot the number. It took refuge to the USA, and literally free. You just had to pay $3,000, go to Austria, and they take you refugee in the USA. What I understood from this point of refugee is that refugees are going to be your vassals and your slaves in the new host country after some years. Right now, we are seeing that in America, people started to rise against the system, the system which was their, their thing, and the refugees are replacing the people in America. If you see all the politicians, like these New York mayors, they were refugees once, they were refugees, and now they are part of the system. So, they are replacing the people of the country. This is the point of refugee. And why I'm saying Jews, I don't have anything against the Jews, but, uh, it's a fact. It's a Jew. It was the Jewish company. All the NGOs were controlled by Jewish entities. I have lots of things to say, but before we were moving from this topic, I just had to say this thing. Thank you very much. >> Okay. So, thanks so much. Yes. Um, so I'll point out that yes, there may be Jewish companies involved. Uh, there may be Jews at the head, but this is transnational capital. Okay? And throughout history, there's always been a strong alliance between transnational capital and the, and the Jews. Uh, because the Jews have a diaspora network that they can draw on. They're like everywhere in the world and they keep very close ties, which facilitates trade and which facilitates, um, exchange and also intelligence. Okay, spying. Uh, so during the Cold War, these diaspora networks are very important for both the Soviet Union and for the, for the United States. But it's really transnational capital, and the issue of transnational capital is they have absolutely no loyalty to any nation-state. Okay. They think the nation-state is just something to be, um, exploited and to prey to be preyed upon. They absolutely, and they see human beings as, um, energy to be harnessed. Okay. And, and I completely agree with you, like the most, like the idea of immigration. Think about it, um, especially with refugees, it's, it's like modern-day slavery, man. You know, you're, you know, you go from a place where you speak the language, where you have friends, where you have family, where you know the culture, you're transplanted to a different environment where you're completely, and then you're basically a slave. How is this different from like slavery? And like, you know what? Throughout human history, we're doing this. We were going to other nation-states, uh, we were going to other territories, and we were capturing people and then transporting them back to our, our territory where they were forced to be slaves, and they could only be loyal to us because they only knew us. They were completely dependent on, on, on us. Okay. So, this is slavery. The idea of, like, you know, refugees, let's, let's let them be refugees because we're humanitarian and because we're virtuous, that's [ __ ]. Okay. It's slavery. It, and it's, it's these corporations, the international capital that wants to harness cheap energy for their own, uh, uh, ends. And this is personal for me because, you know, my dad was a high school teacher in China. We were poor, but he had status. And then, you know, uh, because of the Cultural Revolution, because of the politics in China, he immigrated to, uh, Toronto. And we were a very poor family. Like, my dad was a dishwasher for like 40 years. It was a stupid system because my dad was a dishwasher and he worked like 10 hours a day. He had two managers who didn't do anything. Okay. So, so, so that's what Canada is. Canada is like a modern slave system pretending to be multicultural, where they bring in like these millions of refugees and poor people, and they exploit the labor so that, you know, these middle-class Canadians can go to the cottage every weekend. It's a disgusting system. All right. I believe, and I think that, um, we should call it for, for what it is. All right. Uh, BA, uh, sorry, BA, can you unmute yourself, please? >> Uh, yeah, thank you, professor. Can you hear me? >> Yes, I can hear you fine. Yes. >> Uh, yeah, I just, uh, wanted to ask about Europe and especially Germany. You said that, uh, Europe was finished because of migration, but, uh, yeah, I wanted to ask, do you believe in the potential of like socialist parties or socialist power being, like, relief being the last hope or having any chance in Europe? I just wanted to hear your thoughts on that. Thank you. >> Um, yeah, I think Germany is done. I, I think that it's not just the immigration issue, but it's also their social structure, their dependency on NATO. There are a lot of issues in, uh, in Germany. There's also the aging crisis in Germany. But these, like, advanced Western civilizations have become very complacent, have become very corrupt, um, and just full of hubris and very bureaucratic. Okay. And so, it's very hard for me to see how Germany, um, sort of navigates the situation. But what's interesting is like Germany will be asked to fight this war against Russia. So, it is in the best interest of the Israelis and the Americans to encourage social and political and cultural revolution in Germany. Okay. So, the idea is like, the problem with Germany is like they've been nurtured, nurtured away. They've been lobotomized from their culture, their history, the force that gives them pride, um, and which gives them motivation to do things. Okay. Um, but if, if the Germans are to fight the Russians, then you need to re-summon this nationalist energy in Germany. So, that's a great hope in Germany where the AFD is promoted to power by the American Empire and the Israeli interest, the Zionist forces, and they, um, they start to remember or re-summon the nationalism that once made them great. Okay. So, that's Germany. Henry, uh, could you unmute yourself, please? Henry Pong. >> Yes, I'm back. Do you hear me now? >> Yes. Yes, I can. Yes. >> Okay. Sorry about that before. Yeah. Uh, Professor John, I just want to ask about, um, cuz you're talking about transnational capital, and I think it was in one of your, uh, lectures before, and maybe some, some research, uh, elsewhere, that it goes back, it's just not like recent, uh, Israel or, um, Zionist, it goes back even farther, right? Like, you, you know, we talk about like Rothschild, Rockefeller, and even even beyond that. So, do you, would you be able to talk a little bit more about that? Because it seems like if they're moving away from the US and going to Israel, and you're saying that, you know, Israelis themselves, they don't want it, because it's even beyond that. Who are these people? Like, are they able to maybe go away? One, one of these days, or they're going to be here forever? >> Yeah, great question. Okay. All right. So, let me provide some history as transnational capital and where it comes from. So, transnational capital, it's a recent phenomenon. I would say only the past 500 years. Okay. It starts with the Protestant Reformation. So, what's happening is that at this time, the Catholic Church is in control. It's a very authoritarian society. Sorry, it's a very authoritarian institution, and it demands the complete obedience of all Christians, and its main mechanism of control is the idea of heaven and hell. Right? So, if you obey the Catholic Church, you are sent to heaven, and if you don't, if you disobey the Catholic Church, you're sent to hell. Basically, the Catholic Church, the main weapon they can use against people is excommunication. Okay? Just thrown, thrown, um, abandoned by the church, and you're just, um, you know, you were just burned in hell for all eternity. So, the Protestant Reformation was a response to the authoritarianism of the Catholic Church, and the main doctrine established at this time was called Calvinism or double predestination. And he proposed the idea of double predestination. Okay? And his argument is, screw the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church does not have the authority to send people to heaven and hell because God, at the beginning of time, at the start of creation, has already decided who's going to heaven and hell. Okay? It's called double predestination. Everything has been decided at the beginning of time. It's all fate. It's all God's part of God's plan. And so, this negates the authority of the church because the Catholic Church doesn't have the authority now to decide who goes to heaven and hell. God has already decided. But now, what this does is create a central dilemma in people. Like, how do you know if you've been picked by God or not? Well, the obvious answer is, well, it depends on how fortunate you have been in society, right? If you became very wealthy, then it means that God favors you. So, the way to resolve this fear and anxiety is you become rich. But, uh, once you become, once you become rich, you can't actually spend the money because otherwise, you would be virtuous, right? Otherwise, God wouldn't favor you. So, the idea of Calvinism is you have to become very rich, and even richer, to prove God favors you, and you can't spend the money, you can only invest it. Okay? And this creates the, um, impetus for capitalism because this is unique in human history where, like, now that you have money, you don't spend it. You don't, you just go invest it. You just go put it in the bank. And this creates the modern financial system, right? Because if you think about it, throughout most of human history, if you had money, the first thing you would do is give it to your friends and family because that's how you build status in your society, right? So, when the Vikings went to conquer, so when the Vikings went to raid England and Ireland, they brought back all this gold, and then they, they gave it to their friends and had all these major feasts to celebrate because all they were interested in was the status that came from wealth, not the wealth itself. The Calvinists are unique in that they were only concerned about wealth itself and not the status that comes from wealth because wealth was their ticket into heaven. Okay. So, is that clear? All right. Now, what this happens is Calvinism gives birth to the Dutch Republic. The Dutch Republic becomes the wealthiest era of the world at this time because imagine a society where everyone's just obsessed with wealth accumulation, right? Well, it becomes very wealthy over time. The problem with the Dutch Republic, though, is well, they're wealthy, but the Spanish, the Habsburg Empire can come and just steal it from them. So, what they do is this. They make an arrangement with England where the Dutch Republic transfers their wealth to England for safekeeping. This is what we call the 1688 Glorious Revolution. Okay. And as part of this agreement, they store, they create something called the Bank of England, which is started in 1694. The Bank of England is unique because it's the first time in human history where, um, all the private deposits, the private capital, is guaranteed by the state, by Parliament. Okay? So, before, if you were rich, you would lend money to a prince or a king to fight a war. That's problematic because the prince could die. The prince could say, "Screw you, I'm not going to pay you back." Or the prince could lose the war. It was very risky. But if you're lending money to Parliament, to the nation-state, well, you have nothing to worry about. Okay. Um, and this is what gives rise to the idea of transnational capital, where, um, a nation will take money from overseas, and the nation doesn't really care where the money comes from. It came from the Vatican. It came from the Habsburg Empire. It came from the Dutch Republic. It came from everywhere. Okay? Because at this time in history, England, because of its system, was considered the safest place to invest. And all this money would be guaranteed by the nation-state, by the people of this nation-state. And this gives rise to the British Empire. And again, the idea is, once, once the capital comes into your country, capital comes into your country, it can, it can now dictate policy because not only do you have to guarantee the transnational capital, but you also have to do the bidding of, of the transnational capital. And what the transnational capital wants to do is expand, right? You start wars, you go to India, you go into China, you start selling drugs, you start, you start to steal from, um, India. And then what happened was they recognized that the best place to invest the money was actually the United States, right? So, all this money that they stole from India and China, they went over and invested in the United States, and then, and then this gave rise to the Federal Reserve, which is a model of the Bank of England. Okay. So, that's, that's the history of transnational capital. All right. So, is that clear, Henry? >> Yeah. Yeah. No, that was great. I, I remember a lot of what you said there. Uh, I, I just want to say one quick thing. Uh, I don't want to take up other people's hands up. Uh, I think because of that, like, I feel like capitalism, I think in the last class or last discussion, another person brought this up as well. I feel like because of that, like capitalism as a religion is, is like taking over society all over the place. So, that it's not just transnational capitalism. I feel like it's society as a whole has latched onto it, and it's causing a lot of issues, whether people know it or not, because they fall into it when you're born. So, that's just my, my little insight on that. But thank you. >> No, you're absolutely right. So, you asked, um, the question, like, who, who's actually controlling this? And the answer is these families. Okay. These families have, have been around for generations. These families coordinate through secret societies. Okay. And what, what they know is eventually you're going to exhaust a nation-state. Eventually, the people are going to rise up and rebel against you because you're just exhausted by empire. This is exactly what's happening in America today. And so, you need to find a new host. And the new host will be Israel. And, um, and so we're, we're seeing a gradual shift of power from the United States to Israel. And, and the most clear evidence of this is something called the NDAA, okay? Where Congress will pass, um, an amendment to the NDAA, which allows the Israeli and the American militaries to merge together, and this is basically a way for Senate committed over to Israel. Okay. All right. Uh, JD, uh, could you unmute yourself and ask your question or make a comment? Yes. Uh, so I just have a similar question to Henry, but I just want to understand the current state of transnational capital. So, like the people and institutions that, uh, make up transnational capital, they don't all think alike or coordinate directly. Like, they have obviously different leadership incentives or, uh, strategies. So, how do their interests end up converging? Like, is it because of the structure of the global capitalist system, or is there a greater degree of conscious coordination? Like, what do you think? Yeah, you're absolutely right. Brilliant question. Okay. So, the first thing to remember is transnational capital is huge. So, you're talking about basically the pension funds of Japan, Germany, the sovereign wealth funds of the, um, of the Gulf States. Okay. Uh, you're talking about like these private, uh, hedge funds. You're talking about like institutional investors like, uh, BlackRock, Blackstone, State Street, Vanguard. Okay. Um, you're talking about also like private, um, capital as well. Okay. So, transnational capital is huge. It's basically capital that's able to move, um, from nation-state to nation-state. Okay. But according to game theory, certain people will win out. Okay. So, if you behave a certain way, then transnational capital, then, then your transnational capital programs or system will win out over other systems. And, uh, the main mechanism of winning is to secretly coordinate together to cheat. Okay, that's the secret. If you're able to secretly coordinate with other investment funds to cheat the market, basically to control the market, to control government policy, to basically, um, co-opt governments, then you'll win out. If you're not able to do this, then you'll lose out. Okay. So, you're right in that there's competition, um, among different aspects of transnational capital, but those, um, institutions or individuals who are able to secretly coordinate together to cheat, to collude, to conspire, will always win out. Okay. So, um, how, so the main mechanism are these secret societies that are Zionist in aspect. Okay. So, you can have these different secret societies, but those that adopt Zionism as their bedrock will win out because Zionism happens to be eschatological. Okay. It also happens, which combines all these different, uh, religious energies, Christian, Judaism. Um, but also Zionism allows you access to the Jewish diaspora, which traditionally in human history has been the most effective mechanism of transnational capital. Okay, the Jewish diaspora. All right. I'm not saying this as an anti-Semitic comment. I'm just saying, like, traditionally, uh, the Jewish diaspora have been very good at working together to promote their financial interests. Okay. And this is a historical fact. This goes back to medieval Europe. All right. So, is that clear, JD? >> Yes. So, it's basically money first, and like religion second, and the religion second is first to Zionism, and they kind of collude together, is what you're saying? >> Right. Okay. All right. So, let's be clear. Okay. If you put religion first, that's how you make the most money. Right? If you put money first, and then second, and then religion, a lot of people do that, you lose money. But if you put religion first, then you make the most money, if that makes any sense. >> Okay. Yeah. Thank you, professor. >> And the reason why, the reason why, okay, is like, ultimately, transnational capital, it's a parasite. It doesn't have people. It doesn't have energy. Okay. The, the energy comes from the people. So, you need to create a force that's able to harness as much energy as possible from, um, as many different people as possible in different nation-states. And that force is religion. Okay? So, if you put religion as your priority, you're, you'll be, you'll be much more likely to make more money than if you just put money as your priority. If that makes any sense. Okay. All right. So, look, look, look historically, okay, there are three ways you can make a lot of money. War, revolution, and religion. All right. That's why Zionism is so powerful. All right. Uh, Toros. Uh, can you unmute yourself, please? Toros. >> Hi, professor. Hi, professor. How are you? >> Good. And how are you? >> Um, I have a question about sort of information flow, I guess, and, and sort of going back to, uh, Spain and, and Gibraltar. Um, so last year, there was a video game released called Battlefield 6. Um, it's a war game, very popular, and, uh, one of the, the main locations in that game is literally, uh, Gibraltar. Um, and you mentioned that this, uh, Ceuta invasion, and you mentioned Gibraltar, it's been in the works for years. And I've been curious for a while now, how that, like, it can't be a coincidence how that sort of information trickles down basically to a game developer. >> Right. >> If you have insight on that. >> Okay. So, we don't know, but I'll show you my theory. Okay. My theory is this. Um, I talk a lot about the collective unconscious, right? That, that's Carl, uh, Jung's phrase, the collective unconscious, right? So, if you have secret societies, if you have government institutions, bureaucrats planning something out, okay? They are focused on a particular objective. Well, that seeps into the collective unconscious, right? So, the information is now embedded in the collective unconscious. What do game developers do? What do poets do? What do writers do? Well, they tap into the collective unconscious for inspiration, right? So, the information is there, and they just tap into it, and they're inspired by it, and then they create a product that is very similar to actually what actually happens. And so, you think it's a conspiracy. It's not a conspiracy. It's like, you know, there are different people who are able to access the collective unconscious. And there are lots of people who are feeding information into the collective unconscious. And this goes back to a lot of things like 9/11, like why is it like there's so many things that are able to predict 9/11? And the answer is, well, 9/11 has been in planning for like, you know, decades, years, and a lot of people were involved, and so the information was there. And so, um, this writer, you know, who's maybe drunk or high, or he's doing psychedelics, he just accesses this information one day and then uses it as a story plot. Okay. And the, and the classic example is, um, it's called, uh, The Lone Gunman. Okay. And the pilot for it is just the plot of 9/11. And you're like, wait, how did that happen? There's no way that these guys are going to share this information with like a writer or Hollywood producer. That's just [ __ ], right? But again, these writers, what they're able to do is they're able to, uh, tap into the collective unconscious and figure out what's going on. Quite honestly, that's what I do as well. Okay? Okay, like I'm a writer, um, uh, intellectual, and so, and so what, what I do is I use my intuition, and what my intuition is doing is basically channeling the collective unconscious. Okay. So, it's not that I'm predicting things will happen. I'm just saying, like, but, like, I'm able to access what the priorities are in the collective unconscious, and I'm, I'm able to figure out how things will develop because if you have, like, you know, secret societies that are planning this, who are planning this, well, it'll probably work out. Okay. >> So, this is sort of it becomes expressed as a game developer having, uh, his finger on the pulse, basically. >> Exactly. And, you know, like any cultural figure does the same thing, you know, whether you're a, uh, social media influencer, or a writer, or a journalist, or a game developer. Okay. Game developers are basically our modern-day version of novelists. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. Uh, Samuel, can you unmute yourself, please? >> Yes. Can you hear me? >> Yes. Go ahead. >> Yes. Uh, so you say transnational capital will move to the Levant. Does this mean that America is a good candidate to eventually have a renaissance of some sort, whether spiritual or intellectual? And since you say Americans are the most energetic and entrepreneurial people in the world. Also, what is the best way to be a part of this potential renaissance as a regular civilian with no political power? >> That is a great question. Okay. And something that I've been struggling with for a long, long time. What's going to happen to America once all this capital shifts to perhaps Judeaica, and, um, there are two possibilities. Okay. The first is the most optimistic is you have this renaissance where, um, the Americans return to the revolution, 1776, the spirit of 1776, and they rebuild a society that is a republic. Um, that's one possibility. Another possibility is America just cascades into civil war and destruction for the next 200 years. Okay. So, um, both are true. The latter is probably much more probable. It has to do with, with a particular characteristic of how humans behave. All right. So, let me tell you about an experiment. Okay. Conducted by psychologists. And so, what, what psychologists did, and they've been doing this for a long time, is they divide people into two groups. In the first group, they ask you to play a game for free. Okay? You just play the game for free. You, you, you just play it because you're interested in it. And the second, uh, group, you, um, pay the group to play the game, and you give them a bonus for playing the game really well. Okay? And they, they've done this experiment for like decades. Okay. The results are always the same. And every instance of this experiment, the first group that does things for free, yeah, at first, you're not that interested, but as the, but some stick with the game, and the more they play, the more interested they get, they come into the game, and they keep on playing the game for a long, long time, and they become much more motivated. Okay, that's the first group. The second group, it's pretty stark what happens where, in the beginning, everyone is focused on getting the best score possible, and they work, they work really, really hard. But the moment you take away the incentive, they lose all interest in the game, and they don't survive. Okay. So, let's translate this into geopolitics. What is most likely to happen is all of America right now is a society dedicated towards making as much money as possible. That's all it is. That's, that's the glue that keeps everyone together. And because of this, people are exhausted. And the only way to get people to keep to maintain motivation is by paying them more money. Okay? So, the example is maybe when I was growing up, um, in the 1980s, we, we thought $80,000 was a lot of money. You know, if you became an engineer who made $80,000, that was a lot of money. Nowadays, young people think that $600,000 is a lot of money. $600,000. There are not that many people in the world who make $600,000, right? Right? So, you have an absurd situation where if I pay you $100,000 to be a factory worker, most American guys are like, I don't want to do that, man. Because that's not a lot of money. And like, how am I going to be able to afford a house? How am I going to raise a family on $100,000 a year? So, so, so what do they do? Well, they listen to entertainment and gamble on cryptocurrency and try to scam, um, money. And the really smart kids, what, what do they do? They do AI because AI, in their mind, is not the future, but it's the quickest way to scam money in the short term. Okay. So, transnational capital understands this, understands that, you know what, you know, America's been a good ride. We, we were here for, for 100 years, and we made a lot of money, but, you know what, this place is going to burn down. So, let's just move and go to, uh, Israel. If Israel doesn't work out, let's go to Argentina. Okay. So, um, I'm not really sure what's going to happen, but the evidence suggests that America will probably descend into civil war. Okay. All right. Uh, do you want to ask a follow-up question, Samuel, or, um, comment? >> Um, I guess my follow-up question really quick would be, um, which communities do you see in America most, uh, or better equipped to prosper in the long term? What are the main, uh, qualities that they need to, I guess, have or, uh, focus on in order to prosper long term in, in America? >> Great question. So, um, I would bet all my money on Texas. Okay. Texas is, um, very religious. It's very independent. People there are very hardworking. Um, Texas is part of the future of the United States because, like, you know, a civil war doesn't mean the United States goes away. It just means that certain regions prosper, certain regions, um, suffer. Okay? So, if you are in California, New York City, um, Boston, you're basically in Sodom and Gomorrah right now. Okay? These places are dead. They're, they are finished. They're just, I mean, there's no future to, to these places. The South, I would say Texas is, um, has the best future, but I, I would say any place in the South, um, any place where people have like good family values, and they're very religious, and they're very, um, family-oriented, and they're very hardworking, they'll prosper in the future. Okay. So, Christian nationalism is really the future of the United States. If, if there's a place which embraces Christian nationalism, then it's probably going to prosper. If a place embraces multiculturalism, liberal values, it's dead in the water. It won't survive. Okay. All right. Uh, yes, Samuel. >> Yes. Thank you, professor. >> Okay. HH. Uh, hello. John, can you hear me? >> Yes. Yes. Go ahead. >> Yeah. Uh, thanks for watching again. Uh, always happy to wake up to one of your emergency lectures. Um, I'm from Melbourne, Australia, again. Um, so, yeah, this ties back to the, uh, transnational capital question. Um, I was really wondering this as well, and I think, uh, you know, many of us are wondering, you know, because you speak about transnational capital as it is like a unified, unstoppable, or even like omniscient force, but is that really true? Like, is there infighting, um, you know, in terms of transnational capital? And also, um, I watched your lecture on the, you know, the Protestant Reformation and the birth of the spirit of capitalism. Um, I have some concerns though, and, you know, obviously, as they say, right, the best student always questions his teacher, you know, the disciple questions his master, right? So, I want to challenge you as well on this, because there's evidence to show that like, um, profit-seeking and, you know, like making money or like these sort of activities, it predates the Protestant Reformation, obviously, of course. The Dutch took it basically, you know, and it up to like 100 or 1,000, but, you know, like the Catholic Church was making a lot of money as well. You know, the Franciscan, Franciscan, like ideologies, you know, Peter of John Olivi, these people, like, you know, kind of like very profit-driven as well. And they say, "Okay, well," and what's kind of weird is like, okay, well, you say the printing press, right, like Gutenberg and all that. It increased literacy and got people to like actually read the Bible. Well, doesn't the Bible say that like Jesus says that, you know, it's, uh, harder for a rich person to enter heaven than it is a, what, like a camel to go through like a string? I forgot what the exact quote is, but something like that. Like a camel to go through a, uh, string knot or something like that. Basically, impossible for a rich person or a, um, businessman to go to heaven. So, if that's the case, then why are you pursuing money then? Right? Isn't John Calvin, like, sort of like going against Christ then? Because Jesus says, okay, well, if you're rich, you ain't getting to heaven, but then John Calvin's like, okay, well, no, you have to get rich in order to be considered, um, able to get rich. So, there's a lot of conflictions, conflicts happening here. And also, what's interesting is like, you know, cuz you've been in Japan and you talk about the Meiji Restoration. Well, Japan didn't really have any reformation, and they are sort of like, you know, well, that they, they are indeed the only, um, uh, nation or sort of a community, nation-state didn't exist before, but like a community or culture that has, you know, sort of really went full on in capitalism, you know, the Meiji Restoration, and how they took on, like, central bank and all that. Uh, even, even, you know, before the Meiji Restoration, before imperial capitalism, before the Japanese became imperial, uh, have you heard of like the, the, uh, Dojima, I was like, Dojima Rice Exchange? This is a very niche kind of thing. Uh, because I study Japanese, like Japan a lot. >> They were like the first futures market in the world. >> And this is like the, uh, you know, before the Dutch. >> So, this is like the, um, maybe 16th century, something like that. And, you know, obviously back then it was like rice stipends. So, there wasn't like, it wasn't like, you know, obviously market capitalism or consumerism wasn't, it was nowhere near that, but they were the sort of merchants like near Osaka who were like really gambling on rice. So, it's like humans have a habit of, you know, like just taking anything, basically, and taking whatever at that period of time allows them to sort of like gamble on, you know, money-making and profit-seeking. I was like, you know, um, the Shogunate, the Tokugawa, once they said about, they didn't really like that. So, they kind of like cracked down on it. Because they want, you know, like, you know, the Confucian is like, okay, well, merchants are at the bottom, right? You know, the ladder is scholars, slash, in Japan, is like the samurai warriors, then you have, you know, craftsmen, and you have peasants and serfs, and then you have merchants, but parasitic force. So, this existed before Protestantism, and Japan took on, you know, capitalism very well. I mean, you know, um, Mitsubishi and Mitsui, they basically just monopolized the entire East Asian shipping, and in about 30 years, like after the Meiji Restoration. So, like, how do you explain this? Um, and, yeah, so, like, you know, there's a few questions about, you know, first question is, uh, like, just, just to reiterate, um, do you really think transnational capital is a unified force? And also, actually, my, my real question is this. Okay. So, most people in the world, I think maybe you and me, basically everyone, is cool, included, like, we sort of earn money because we have to, right? Like, I need to put bread on the table. I need to buy coffee in the morning to stay awake. I need to buy shoes to, to walk. I need to buy a house to, you know, have a roof over my head. What is transnational capital's goal? Because these [ __ ] have so much money. These [ __ ] have like so much money. What are you going to buy the world? You going to buy like the universe? Like, what is their goal? Because like Jared Kushner, like, you know, Epstein, whatever you want to call it, Zionist capitalists, they're like, you can get anything you want. You can buy like 15 Porsches, you can buy 2,000 Mercedes. Like, what is the point of money-making like at that point? And there's this like almost hypnotized state where they just cannot stop, like until, you know, as Emile Durkheim, the intellectual, says, until it reaches a point of insatiable thirst and eventually collapse. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, John. >> No, thank you. Okay, so, like, again, you make a great point. Like, let's be clear. Let's be nuanced about all this. Okay. So, you're absolutely right in that transnational capital, it's not a monolith. Again, it's a huge system which includes Japanese pension funds, which includes, um, you know, family offices, which includes, uh, sovereign, uh, wealth funds of Norway. And so, it's a huge, huge pool. But the point I'm trying to make is like, there's certain, um, individuals in the system that always win out, and they're able to win out because they're able to coordinate together, uh, across borders secretly, um, and civil society's eschatology allows them to coordinate, especially Zionism. Okay. Now, we need to differentiate between transnational capitalism and capitalism. There's a huge, huge difference. Okay. So, you're absolutely right in that throughout history, that we've had capitalism before. Um, every, um, you know, this goes back thousands of years. You look at Babylonia, you look at the Roman Empire, you know, where, where Jesus was, they had capitalism, right? And what they recognized is like, once you reach a certain stage of capitalism that destroys society because people become too greedy, they become too materialistic, there's too much debt, there's too much corruption, there's too much inequality. Okay. What's unique about our time is transnational capital. Okay? Capitalism and transnational capital are not the same thing. Capitalism, well, you're stuck where you are. So, if your society collapses, you're completely screwed. Okay? So, think of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. You have the, like, these families that have been in charge since the founding of the Roman Republic. And when the Roman Republic, when the Roman Empire collapsed, basically the, um, Visigoths came and conquered your territory, you're completely screwed because, like, where are you going to go? You have like all this gold, but, like, uh, you try transporting your gold anywhere else, they're going to kill you. All right? There's nowhere, there's nowhere else for you to go. What is unique about our time is the seamless, frictionless, frictionless, uh, uh, movement of capital from one area to the next. Okay. So, you talk about Japan, the Meiji Restoration. Well, what allowed for the Meiji Restoration was all this capital investment from Europe, especially, especially the British, right? So, that's what's unique about our time. Yes, we've had capitalism before, but the idea that, you know, like capital can be independent of the nation-state, can just be independent of community, it can just move seamlessly from place to place. That is unique, and that's a source of a lot of issues, especially wars today where, you know what, if there's a revolution, if there's a war, we don't really care because we'll just move somewhere else. It's absurd to think about, right? You're not invested in your community anymore. So, so that's what's unique, unique about your time, about our time. But you're absolutely right in that historically, we've always had capitalism, finance, money lending, merchant cooperation, and a lot of societies recognized the danger of capitalism, and that's why they developed Confucianism, that's why they developed Christianity as a mechanism to constrain capitalism. Um, and but now we live in a very special time where capital has become transnational, and therefore, it is impossible to ever restrain capital, and in fact, a nation-state that most embraces capital will thrive, and those nation-states that turn away from capital will be under assault. Okay. So, the classic example is Argentina, uh, which is now embracing transnational capital, and so a lot of money is flowing into the country. And then you have Iran, uh, and Russia, which resist capital, and therefore they are under attack. Okay. Uh, does that make

Sense? HH. Yeah, it definitely makes sense. Uh, my apologies, all the fellas here yapped on too much for me. Uh, but yeah, so just closing off this remark then, uh, what's your opinion on, you know, why they do what they do? Because again, as I said, most, I mean, 99% of people in the world, maybe, like, we're just sort of peasants, right? We're just like serfs. We we go to work to earn money to pay the bills. Um, transnational capital, they have so much money already. So what is their point? Because they cause so much trouble and destruction. Yeah.

And you know, chaos across the world and so much suffering and evil. What is their point, right? Because they can buy like 10,000 Ferraris in one day. What's the point? You know, like, like, yeah. Yeah.

Okay. So, um, the point is power. So, capital by itself is worthless. Capital as a way to organize human society is what gives you power. Okay? So what you want is you want to just sit back and enjoy your life while others do the work for you. This is a problem that the powerful people have been trying to solve for all of history. Okay? Right? The most natural societies are these communal, egalitarian societies, um, where that are egalitarian. And throughout most of human history, we've been like that. But once society reaches a certain scale, then you need centralization, then you need stratification, and this allows an elite to come into power that basically becomes parasitic. Okay? That just basically, um, survives on the energy of everyone else. So what's really important to appreciate is that power is not capital. Power means using capital to harness the energy of other people. But what this means is, like, you need people to submit to the capital system. You need people to think that capital is actually valuable. Okay? That that that's why religion is such a problem for you because, like, if you're religious, you're like, I don't care about having gold. I don't care about driving a Ferrari. That that's why historically, capital has seen the family, love has seen, um, religion has seen monarchy as major constraints on its its growth. Okay.

So why capital, uh, is invested in starting these wars is to force people into poverty so that in this wealth destruction, they are desperate for capital. Okay. If everyone's wealthy, the capital is worthless. It is not worth anything. All right? So, you need to start wars to destroy wealth, subjugate new populations, and in order to harness their energy. Okay? Does that make sense? The capital is worthless. But making people believe that capital is valuable and then using this capital to harness their energy, that's what's important. And that's why you you need to start wars. Okay. All right.

Uh, Samuel. Sorry, maybe my hand was up still, but I don't have anymore. Okay, fine. Okay, that's fine. All right.

Hey, Kitty. Hello, professor. Um, you have spoken a lot about, um, the empire falling at some point because of hubris and how they are kind of fighting too many wars on different fronts. But as we have seen in the Moroccan crisis, they have prepared different fault lines, um, so that they can either blackmail their way into other people's minds or, um, it's like a game that they can play for a long time. So do you still think that if they continue to play this game, that the power will shift? Because if if the same people keep moving from one country to the other as transnational capital, then is there any actual shift in power? And if there is not an actual shift in power, is the empire really falling?

Yeah, great point. So, um, we are not just witnessing the end of the American Empire. What we're really recogni- what we are really living in is the collapse of transnational capital. Okay? That that's my big prediction. The plan is to move, um, the capital, the empire to Israel, and then once Israel falls, then you move to Argentina. Okay? Like that seems to be the plan, and it makes a lot of sense. But we need to figure out what period we're living in. Okay? And guys, it's not like the run-up to World War II. It's not the Great Depression. It's not World War II. That that's what the trans capitalists believe is the period we're living in, which is like, okay, we'll start a world war and like a lot of people die, but then Israel will reemerge, will reemerge triumphant, and they'll just rebuild from there. And like, you know, it worked out great for us in World War II after World War II. So, why won't it work out now? And the answer is because we're living in a different time. The period that we're living in that, um, um, that has the most similar historical analogy is the Bronze Age collapse. Okay? And the idea of the Bronze Age collapse is capital basically was able to extend itself throughout the world. Um, and so there is now a growing human discontent against capital. Okay? More more people recognize that the enemy is not Zionism. The enemy is not Israel. The enemy is not the United States. The the enemy is not empire. It's actually capital itself. Okay? And so the force that, um, is emerging that's going to challenge the power of trans capital is religion. And we're seeing this throughout the world where, um, Russia is embracing the Orthodox religion, where, um, Iran has is embracing Shia eschatology in order to win this war, um, and where in America and the United States, there's a growing movement of Christian nationalism. And I believe religion will just surge in power over the next five years. And this this is a real threat to transnational capital. Religion will destroy the power of transnational capital. But the response of transnational capital is not to be like, "Oh, well, you know what? Religion is more powerful than us. Let's just give up." No, the world, the solution is to burn the world down. Okay? Like like the next 10 years, next 10, 20 years, we're going to see the world burn down because capital refuses to surrender its empire. Um, does that make sense, Kitty? Did you want to ask a follow-up question?

Thank you. That that is interesting. Do you also see any other fault lines in the development that will be probably the next, um, move by the, um, whoever the powers are currently?

Yeah. So there there's something that they can actually control that they cannot control, and which is very pressing, which is environmental change, climate change, uh, a geophysical event. Okay? And we're already seeing this where the weather is getting hotter and hotter, where the global supply chain is collapsing. And so if you combine global economic collapse with, um, um, you know, environmental damage, this leads to famine. It leads to drought. This is something that they can't actually model in their systems. And they're kind of freaked out by it, right? Because it's just like, well, transnational capital, um, um, is like, you know, if we're not happy here, we'll just move somewhere else. But like, let's just say there's no place you can move to. Let's just say the entire world is burning. What do you do then? Well, you're completely screwed. Okay? I mean, like they they can't model that. And and it's something that they can't admit to themselves. And that's that's actually a fundamental weakness. They can't appreciate that, um, we may be moving towards the end of the world, and there are really no safe havens. Okay. All right.

Um, NC. Hi, Professor Jang. Hi. Can you hear me? Yes. Go ahead. Hello. Hi. Uh, I just wanted to say I'm a 17-year-old from Singapore, and I just wanted to thank you deeply for all the knowledge that you have taught us. Your game theory videos have given me a clear view of the world and more hope in a time where I didn't understand the world and where I was going. You have truly changed my life for the better by giving me a better understanding of how things work. Especially because I'm from Singapore, and it's just a constant rat race for money, which you have proven is just a bunch of numbers on a screen and it's just used for population control and some sort of, um, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh,

>> Okay. So, um, yeah, you've taken a lot of what I said I've said and you put it together. Um, and I'm not that and I would never ever be that deterministic. Okay. I'd be like, "Okay, well, China is going to give the United States a trillion dollars for sure, and Iran and the United States are going to sign an MOU in mid-August for sure." I've never actually said that, uh, United States and Iran will stop this war in mid-August. What I've said is that it is perfectly possible that they, uh, try, it's perfectly possible, um, sorry, could you guys, could you please, could you please unmute yourself? Okay, please, could you please mute yourself? Okay, so what I've said is it's perfectly possible, it's perfectly possible, wait, uh, what? Look, look, it's perfectly possible that, um, there's some stoppages to this war, but I see this war as continuing for a long, long time. It's perfectly possible like, okay, well, you know, in many they stopped this. Sorry. Commissioners, uh, wait, I will check. Okay. Um, okay. Uh, guys, could you please mute yourself? Okay. Yeah, please get muted. Zero. Okay. Z. All right. So, yeah, I said that it's perfectly possible that, um, some starts and stoppages this war as this war, uh, continues. Um, but, um, sorry, I I have to mute this person. Really annoying. All right. All right. Sorry. All right. Yeah. So, I'm not that deterministic. I look at probabilities and I look at different, um, um, um, things that could happen. Okay. But, um, you also have to have have take into account that in this game, the people that are playing this game are human beings. Human beings get very emotional, right? And and so the example is this this game between Spain and Argentina. Look, FIFA thought for sure Argentina would win the game because all Argentina had to do was show up and play like Argentina. Even though Spain is the better team, even though Spain had to work harder to get to the finals, officiating would favor Argentina. Okay, guys, it's a really simple strategy. Argentina shows up, just plays like Argentina has played in the past five games, which is decent. Not great, but which is decent. You don't have to be great if the officials are going to favor you. You just have to play decent and you're good. Okay? But the reality is not only did Argentina play terrible, but they were making stupid, stupid mistakes. So, for example, uh, the decision that caused the Argentina game was when, um, uh, one of the players red-carded a Spanish player. It was so blatant, the official had no choice but to hand that player a red card, and that's what caused the game. And so what happened was the Argentinians went into the game thinking like, okay, well, we know in our hearts that this entire tournament has been rigged in our favor. Okay? We've had the easiest teams. Uh, we went up against the easiest teams and, uh, officials clearly favored us. Not one major VAR decision went against us. Uh, you can claim that some games were actually stolen, right? So this game where we played Egypt and the goal was overturned. Well, I mean, like, clearly the officials are favoring us. And what this leads to is hubris, complacency, and guilt. So if you actually watch the Argentina team as they enter the stadium, there's a sense of unease because they were like, well, you know, they cheated, uh, they cheated for us, and they'll cheat for us again, but do we really want to win like this? And also like, what if we don't win? Okay? So there's fear, there's anxiety now built up in them. And so when they played the game, they just played terribly. They were not the team that played every other game in, uh, in a tournament. And after they lost, what happened next was anger. Okay? The Argentina team literally wanted to start a fistfight and beat the crap out of the out of the Spanish team. And guys, this is a human tragedy. Shakespeare could have written this, um, game. Okay? Right? And the idea is, and I see this all the time in China, right? In every Chinese corporation, you have these guys whose fathers are rich, who are well-connected, and they put these guys into these companies, and they're promoted very heavily, and they behave like complete [ __ ] because, um, first of all, they think that they have this superiority, but they also have a deep sense of guilt where they know in their hearts they're not really, they're not supposed to be there. Everyone knows they're not supposed to be there. And when things don't turn out their way, their response isn't like, "Okay, I should do better." Their response is pure anger. I'm going to burn on the world. Screw you guys. Okay? I'm the prince. You guys are the peasants. Right? So, this is what's going to happen to the empire. This this this is what's going to happen to the, um, uh, to the United States, right? So, this is a game that's being played by humans. And yeah, you can plan it all out perfectly, but humans are going to behave the way that humans are going to behave. And the reality is that we're very complex, emotional beings, very complex, emotional and spiritual beings. And when you set things up so blatantly for, um, your son, your son's going to screw it up. Okay? And that's the same thing we're we're seeing happen with CBS News with Bari Weiss, where Bari Weiss is screwing things up. And this is probably the same that's going to happen to Israel, where Israel, oh my god, it's so blatant. There's a Pax Judaica for Israel, but Israel will find a way to screw it up. Okay? That's why I'm not very optimistic about about Pax Judaica. All right. So, this is something that to keep in mind, guys. His like ultimately things are not deterministic. We are human beings, and we will behave like human beings, and certain things will create, um, adverse behavior in us. Okay? Argentina, there was no way Argentina could have screwed up this game, but they found a way to screw it up, right? Okay. Um, is that clear, NC?

Yes. Um, so how would you say, where are the points of failure? Would you say, um, that this crisis would unfold and when do you think the US ground invasion will occur?

Um, okay. So, look, the reality is, first of all, the American military is fighting the stupidest war it could possibly ever fight, okay? It's screwing things up. Is it intentional? Is it accidental? Who knows? Okay, but the Iranians aren't just embarrassing the American military. That's point one. Point two is you have this tremendous opposition towards the war in the United States. So, let's just say you introduce a military draft. First of all, you're gonna have thousands, hundreds of thousands of young men who are going to resist the draft. Second of all, even if you were to draft them into the army, they're going to rebel against you. They're going to sabotage their weapons. Uh, they're going to sabotage their ships. It's going to be a complete dumpster fire. Okay? So, the idea of the United States this war in Iran, I mean, this war is basically lost. It's only a question of like, how badly do you want to lose it? Then you have Israel. Well, Israel is supposed to be the Pax Judaica, right? But you have already have IDF soldiers mutinying against your commanders, just walking off the base. You have mental breakdowns in the IDF. So the idea that you have like this small designation of like 9 million people who's who's becoming a new empire, it's kind of silly. Okay? So Israel is going to fracture. And, uh, then you have like just the people of the world. I I mean, like the fact that Spain won the World Cup, I think it's a turning point where the young people of the world is like, "Wow." I mean, like it is possible for the empire to lose. It is possible to rig a game so badly that you lose. So there is hope. Zionism is not invincible. It's not inevitable. History is not invincible. It's not inevitable. There's something that we can do about it. So, so I think the World Cup marks a turning point in, uh, our history. I will also point out that yes, it does look like America will take over CO2, um, and control of Gibraltar, and that's all part of the plan. But is that a good thing in America in the long term? Right? Because you want to rule by, um, you you basically want people to agree to your rule. That's called soft power. You don't actually want to, uh, militarily control anything because, like, eventually you're going to exhaust your military. So, um, there are many different fault lines, but the idea that you will have Pax Judaica, that we'll be able to, that the empire will just transition easily from is America to Israel, I think it's very far-fetched. I don't, I don't think it's, it's going to happen. All right.

Uh, Jackson. Uh, Jackson. Hello, professor. How are you? Good. And how are you? Can you hear me? Yes. I'm good, sir. All right. Um, so we've talked a lot about transnational capital tonight, and we can all feel a little depressed talking about it. Um, I had a little bit more of a a different question. Uh, I wanted to pick your mind on, uh, some of your hermetic philosophy.

Okay. Um, we live in a world where I think a lot of our mainstream religions are run by the pineal gland. The pineal gland. And we live in a place where prayer, meditation, some of these psychoactive drugs kind of bring out dimethyltryptamine and lead to people going into these alternate spaces of consciousness or the astral realm. Something for me that I think is important is reading some of these Eastern philosophies about the snake and the serpent, and I think, you know, obviously being kind of the key of knowledge, Eve herself being tempted for knowledge and godhood. In Hinduism, you talked about Kundalini a second ago. In Hinduism, they call it the coiled serpent at the bottom of the spine or the base of the spine that rises up when you have a Kundalini experience going through the seven chakras. For me, I I've watched so many of your videos and when you speak about the monad and you speak about kind of the higher self, you never, you never talk about the pineal gland. You never point or gesticulate to your mind. You go to the heart. And that's something that I think is interesting. Um, do you, is there a way or is do you think that maybe these religions are the people in the cave, and the heart is the way out? I don't know if that makes sense. I just thought I'd ask.

Yeah. Okay. So, first of all, I don't know much about the about the pineal gland. So, could you enlighten me, please, as to what it is and what its significance is?

Yeah, I mean, it's the eye of Horus, right? So going back to the Egyptian mythology, it's the eye of Horus, and a lot of the, uh, the belief is is that when you go and meditate, either sleep deprivation, meditation, all of these things, it it comes alive in a way, and a lot of people call it God. You go back into the Old Testament when they asked when Jacob asked, uh, when Jacob saw God or the kingdom of heaven, he called it, uh, pineal. So, a lot of people kind of can interpret it as maybe a way to tap into some sort of frequency that gets you closer to the divine source. For you, on the other hand, I've noticed so many times when you've spoken about the monad, you've kind of reacted to the heart. And I'm just kind of curious if you feel intuitively that it is, that you feel the connection to the source through the heart, if that makes sense.

Yeah, I mean, like I mean, for me, it's not really about a certain location in the body. I think that we are first and foremost energy fields, right? So, we're vibration, we're energy fields. And so, I I can't really say what the mechanism is, but I feel like, um, the energy field is absorbing and interacting with the monad in some capacity. And if you just focus on your consciousness and and it could be like you, and it doesn't really matter what, what the actual mechanism is, um, you will still feel feel the monad. But, you know, it's really about making sure the energy that you emit is positive. So, do so living a life of virtue, living a life of harmony, living a life of justice and truth, that's that's what brightens your energy field in a way that allows you to harmonize with the monad and therefore allow you to absorb more information from the monad. Does does that make sense?

Yeah, that perfectly makes sense. Thank you so much, sir.

Okay. Um, NC, oh, sorry, Max. Sorry, sorry, Max. Can you unmute yourself?

Hi, professor. Thank you for your time. Um, you've previously touched that Germany, after enough nonsensical war, may realize it has more to gain an alliance with Russia, being like the heartland. Do you see any other European nation or non-Western countries besides Germany and Japan that may be sufficiently capable of self-reflection during or after the next couple decades of crisis? Uh, perhaps due to spiritual or cultural basis, or do you figure that this itself may be poisoned enough by these pulses of population displacement that can help prevent cohesion and creativity in and small communities?

Yeah. Yeah, that's a great question. And the answer is, as you point out, those nation-states that are able to keep cohesive throughout this time. Okay? So, basically Austria, Hungary, Poland, as long as they're able to keep, um, cohesive, meaning like they reduce the level of immigration, they have a really strong ethnic identity, then they will survive what's coming. Okay? So that's the key, nationalism, religious nationalism, right? Um, and I think that Germany will return to religious nationalism at some point. I think the Scandinavian countries, Northern Europe, will survive. I think that countries that have very strong ethnic identity and who are very proud of their ethnic identity, including, um, Hungary, Poland, Austria, but other nations as well, right? Will will survive and they will adapt. Okay. All right.

Uh, thank you.

Yep. Okay. Um, Peter Theo. Uh, sorry, is Peter Theo here? Hey. Hi.

It sounds like you're saying two things, and I'm hoping you can help reconcile this. Uh, you describe the transfer from the British Empire to the American Empire as, uh, a seamless transition. You know, there was some loss during this time, some turmoil, but this was also a period of great technological advancement that's continued through today, and our population has increased throughout the world throughout this time. How can you say that transnational capital, as you call it, is unable to continue this? And isn't it to the benefit of humanity to have control over the transfer of power?

Yeah. Um, so, um, first of all, the transition from Britain to the United States was, uh, it seems, um, harmonious from our perspective, but as you can imagine, it was a very long process that took a couple of decades before Britain recognized that, you know what, we're no longer an empire, um, and so we should seed a lot of authority to the United States. And, you know, there's a lot of people who think that no, actually, the City of London is still in charge. Okay? The City of London, uh, is really the real power of trans capital, and America is just a resource colony of the City of London, and Wall Street is just a franchise of the City of London. Okay? So, um, there's still a lot of debate as to this. And then your point that, um, wouldn't it be better for humanity,

if, uh, ring it?

Okay. Okay.

Sorry. Um,

sorry. Um,

wouldn't it be better for humanity if we just facilitate, facilitate these seamless transfers of power? And certainly people in charge think so. I mean, certainly people think that, you know, what they're doing sounds terrible, but it's really in the benefit of humanity because ultimately, it is that is that we're the ones causing all this war. We're not, we're the ones who are causing all the destruction. This is part of human nature. This is part of human society. But what we figured out is a system to accelerate, um, the decline so as to accelerate the rise. Okay? To basically shorten, um, the period of decline of collapse so that a new empire emerged. And this borrows from the idea of psychohistory, right? Isaac Asimov's Foundation. You know, Elon Musk has said that he's a huge fan of Isaac Asimov's Foundation series, psychohistory. And it's a very telling comment. Okay? People like Elon Musk and, um, um, Donald Trump, they just speak their mind. Um, and the idea is, look, look, there's there's certain patterns to human history. There's certain movement of civilization, and we can never ever stop the movement, but we can accelerate the movement. And so wouldn't it be better for humanity if we shorten the pain from like maybe 100 years to 10 years to because like eventually Israel will emerge as the new empire, and, um, um, this process, process take 100 years, so let's let's make it five, let's make it five to 10 years as to lessen the pain on everyone. And that's that's true. But again, I think that we as humans, uh, once we adopt hubris, we will destroy ourselves. Okay? So the Greeks believed this. The worst thing that a human can can do is have hubris. And the leadership that we have today, the elite that we have today is nothing has nothing but hubris where they think they can dictate the course of human events. I think that another point that the Greeks will make is the moment that you think that, um, you can dictate human events is the moment when you lose all control. So, um, I'm not really sure how confident you are in the elite, but I'm not confident in the elite. I think they're full of hubris. I think they're incompetent. I think they're just morons. And we are, and they're going to lead us to destruction, even though they think that they're the ones who actually trying to save us. Okay. Um, did, did you want to follow?

Yeah, go ahead.

Wouldn't you say the Global South is suffering today? And if we transfer wealth to the South, such as Argentina, that would actually be to the betterment of humankind? You've advocated in previous lectures that, uh, the the outskirts, the, uh, the outer societies have greater energy and cohesion. Wouldn't that lead to a better society with greater energy, faster technology development, and correction of the majority of people on the planet?

Okay. Um, that's a great point. Okay. But your assumption is, is like, what the metric that we should use to examine human progress is one that is fundamentally materialistic. Right? So the the Global South is suffering a lot. If we transfer the empire to the Global South, maybe Argentina, this would raise the standard of living for the people in the Global South, and then this would raise the overall, um, level of progress for all of humanity. And, and I think again, that's a very materialistic way of seeing the world. But if you take a spiritual way of seeing the world, okay, which is basically saying, like, the point of human progress is spiritual enlightenment, uh, human creativity, uh, upgrading the collective unconscious, connecting ourselves better to the monad, and you ignore the material aspects, then like, who cares if the South becomes wealthier if it just means a more authoritarian system that uses AI to control everyone, right? Um, that that that is something we can argue back and forth about for of eternity, where, you know, the Freemasons believe that we are capable of of perfection. We are capable of creating a perfect society, and we should strive towards that, whereas, um, I and other people like Dante and Homer would argue that human society is fundamentally diverse. It's chaotic. It's it's spontaneous, and this is what enables human creativity. So we just focus on our capacity to be creative as opposed to just focus on order and control. And what this fundamentally means is to basically do away with centralization. And, and the powerful people, uh, are the elite, the powerful elite are actually just an obstacle to human creativity. Having an elite is, um, in conflict with human creativity because the elite are fundamentally parasitic forces. I understand that they believe that what they what they're doing is for the is they're doing is for the benefit of humanity, but really all all that's happening is they're trying to organize society in a way to maximize their own benefit. Okay. All right.

Uh, Nicholas, can you, uh, unmute yourself, please, and ask your question or make a comment?

Um, yes, professor. Greetings. Um, in Secret History number 19, you had predicted that there was going to be a major divorce between America and Israel. And earlier in this call, you said that there's currently a gradual relinquishing of power, a transfer of transnational capital to Israel. Manufacturing and tech companies are starting to move to Israel. So in this context, do you see a major divorce between the American public and Israel, or with the political factions migrating there, or politicians, rich American elites, Silicon Valley, all divorcing from Israel, um, or or moving to Israel? How do you see that progressing?

Yeah, that's a really interesting question. So, um, transnational capital controls the world, but what controls transnational capital are secret societies that are very Zionist, very eschatological, and it's part of their agenda to engender as much anti-Semitism in the world as possible. Why? Because, um, it allows for the return of the Jewish diaspora to Israel. So, um, according to eschatology, it's very important if the world were to end or the world were to repair itself or redeem itself, that all Jews return to, um, Israel. You can't do that right now because the Jews are very comfortable in Europe, in the United States, and Canada, and Australia. So you have to like engender, you have to create a lot of anti-Semitism to force the return. That's why you have have all these anti-Semitic voices like online that are growing in popularity. It's all part of this agenda. The second reason why you want to create anti-Semitism is like in this eschatology, what will force the return of the Messiah, what will, um, allow for the coming of God is a war between Israel and the world called, uh, the war of Gog and Magog. Okay? So, um, and so that's the second point. The third point is, uh, in this eschatology, there are certain countries that are not involved. So, China, United States are not involved in this war. So, how do you remove the United States and China from the equation? Okay? So, this is something to keep in mind where, yes, they're only interested in making money, but what allows them to make a lot of money is to focus on the eschatology. So, this eschatology to us sounds absurd, but for them, it's real. For for them, it is a priority. So that's why, um, we should expect a lot of anti-Semitism in the United States around the world, and eventually, there'll be a major divorce between Israel and the United States. In fact, it's already happening. Okay? So the best place for information today is actually Israeli media because they tell exactly what they think in Israel. They're very direct people. And, uh, the major, uh, point of conversation in Israel now is, why is Israel the pit bull of American empire? Why is it that when Israel, when America tells us to go bomb Iran, we have to go bomb Iran? Like, shouldn't Israel put its own national interest before the imperial interest? Okay? So that's telling you like on both on both sides, both the United States and in Israel, there's a growing consensus for a divorce. Okay. Um, and it, uh, goes back to something called the Clean Break Memo. The Clean Break Memo, which was authored by Richard Perle, uh, and Doug and Douglas Feith in 1996. Okay? And it was presented to, um, Benjamin Netanyahu. And basically his argument is, let's achieve the Greater Israel project. But to achieve the Greater Israel project, we have to de- we have to reduce our reliance on, uh, the United States. And Richard Perle and Douglas Feith are important because they are the architects of the Iraq War in 2003. Right? They're the ones who convinced, uh, George W. Bush to go invade, uh, Iraq and start the war on terror, which has created the world that we live in today. Okay. Does that make sense?

Yes, absolutely. That actually makes a lot of sense.

Okay. Um, and follow-up question on that. Um, so they're forcing the hand of the Jewish diaspora to move back to Israel, but I remember you stating in one of the Secret History lectures that the founders of Israel were actually the Khazar Jews who were converts? So, why do you think they're trying to to force the diaspora who were the original people of Israel back into Israel to gain legitimacy in some sense, to kind of?

Yeah. Okay. First of all, I mean, like I mean, I might have said something similar to to those were not my exact words, okay? But I have said something something along the lines of like, you know, if the promised land was promised to the Israelites, and that's what the Bible says. Well, the Palestinians have probably more claim to to the land of, uh, Israel than the Israelis. Okay? Right? Because if you, if you do a DNA test, and you're not allowed to do DNA studies in, uh, Israel, then you'll find that the Palestinians there have probably have more DNA of the Israelites than the, um, um, the, the Israelis. Um, and yes, there is a lot of evidence that, uh, the Ashkenazi Jews are in fact Khazarians. So they're basically Ukrainians or, uh, white Europeans, and they don't have much, uh, Jewish blood. Um, but the thing though, which I kept on, um, emphasizing is that it doesn't matter what your blood is. It's just a matter of what you believe. Okay? So, in their minds, all Israelites believe that they are descendants of the Israelites, and the Israelites, um, um, all were are descendants of Abraham, and Abraham was pro- was, um, given the promised land by God. Okay? And the promised land extends from the Nile in Egypt to the Euphrates in modern-day Iraq. So that's what they believe, and the belief is actually more important than the genetic reality. Okay? In fact, the genetic reality doesn't even matter. Um, so, um, but, but, you know, the thing that makes the Jewish religion so powerful is that it's ba- it's it's based on a book. Okay? It's based on, and what's the book? The book is the Bible, which is a collective history, uh, a collective mythology that becomes a collective consciousness of a people. So there were many times when, uh, throughout history, when the Jews basically died out as an ethnic people, but then they were adopted by other people, and their collective memory, uh, enabled them to become the Jews. Okay? So it's perfectly possible that maybe, okay, just talking in hypotheticals, in 10 years' time, because of nuclear war, we're all wiped out. Okay? And then there are a few survivors, and then a hundred years from now, uh, we go back to about a million people throughout the world, and then a thousand of them are like, you know, like they discover a book called the Bible, and then in the Bible, they hear about the Jews, and they say, "We're the Jews now. We are the, um, chosen people." And the religion that that they practice at that time, 100 years from now, will not be will not be recognizable to any Jews today, but they still think as Jews and behave as a people. Okay? So the religion practiced by the Israelites about a thousand years ago, 2,000 years ago, is nothing like the Judaism practiced today. And, and, you know, there were probably like major shifts in the Jewish religion in these 2,000, 3,000 years, but in their minds, it's all been continuous. It's all been, um, consistent these two is the these 3,000 years. And, uh, that's that's what they believe, even though it's complete nonsense. Okay. Um, does that make sense?

Yes. Thank you, professor.

Okay. Uh, Le or Lei Lee, could you unmute yourself, please?

Uh, hi, professor. Thank you for your, um, discussion. Um, I've just got a question, uh, in relation to, um, uh, when you talk about the nations, the nations or the cities that won't survive the change in the new world, um, what do you mean by won't survive? Like, could you give us a description to what happens to the places and the people there?

Okay, so let's just use California and New York City and Boston as examples. These are places that have in the past 20 years become fabulously wealthy because they've embraced globalization, which includes, um, multiculturalism, which includes liberalism, which includes, um, um, AI technology and all that. Okay? The problem that they don't recognize is that everything is based on their ability to to to, uh, basically exploit resources from the surrounding area. So New York City and California and Boston are not capable of growing, growing their own food supply. There's just too many people. They're just too industrialized. They're too urbanized to grow their own food supply. So, let's imagine that there's an environmental crisis and, um, there's a massive drought. Well, the cities have to be abandoned right away because the cities cannot actually feed themselves, right? Let's just, let's just imagine global supply chains break down. Well, you know, where are you going to get your food and your energy? Imagine if you have a place like Singapore, right? Singapore is not self-sufficient. It just isn't. So, what are you going to do about it? Well, you're going to, you're going to cease to exist as a society. It's that simple. Okay. Does that make sense?

Um, yeah, sort of. Um, so, if you were to live in those, like, big me, um, is the, sorry. Sorry. I I can't hear you. C, can you repeat the question? I can't hear you.

Um, I was just saying, like, if if those places are, uh, if you were people who live in those cities, those places, the best call back is just to move to another place.

Well, the problem is you cannot move to another place because your entire expertise is based on that city, right? These are people we call the professional managerial class. They're bureaucrats. Well, they don't have any expertise to go move somewhere else, right? So these global cities, like whether it's Singapore, Dubai, Hong Kong, they're nodes of global, of of globalization. Okay? They exist because of globalization. Once globalization ceases to exist, these cities cease to exist because they have no other function. And the people within these cities, millions of white-collar workers, they have actually no skill whatsoever. I don't care if you are good at creating spreadsheets. What's what what good does that do you in a world that's collapsing, right? Can you fight? Can you farm? You can't. Okay. Well, you're going to die off. It's that simple.

Okay. Yeah, that makes sense. So, I guess, um, this sort of ties in with your, um, uh, I guess advice to, um, us on what are your previous discussions or lectures? So, yeah. You used to mention the best course of action is to create your own community. Yes.

So, does this include like having like the small business to your community through your, I guess, real skill sets like health, for example, or like services, something like that?

Look, the idea is you have to shift your priorities, your values from from one that's focused on achievement on material accumulation to one of making people around you, um, making their lives better off. Okay? Think, think about how to share yourself with other people, and once you start developing that mentality, then the community naturally consolidates around you, and then you're much more likely to deal with any crisis. Okay? So I can't map out to you what the plan is, like, you know, I I can't draw you a memo and say, like, you should do this step by step, but what, what I can tell you is start taking people seriously. You know, prioritize human relationships, uh, above material accumulation, and then you'll naturally develop a lot of friends, and then like, if there, if a crisis were to emerge, then as friends, you're going to figure out how to deal with this crisis. And I, I don't know what the crisis is, I don't know how you'll deal with it, but you'll figure out a way because we're all human beings, and the imagination, our intuition is what our real power is.

I see. I see. Okay. Thank you, professor.

Okay. Uh, Patrick.

Yes. Hello. Can you hear me? Yes. Yes, I can hear. I can hear you fine. Yeah.

Yes. Okay. Okay. So, um, again, complimenting for your work. It's really great. I'm in Spain currently right now in Alicante. And I'm originally from Berlin. So, we're on holidays, very early, 4:00 in the morning or 5:00 now. Um, yeah, great what you're doing. So I have, um, some some topics I would, um, um, I want to talk about. Um, and first of all, thank you. Uh, you've been in the Secret History lectures, you've been talking about the cave paintings, and I've been, as a small child, I've been to Lascaux, and this time I've been in the Chauvet, uh, in the Chauvet paintings. It's, it's, it's even, they say it's more, uh, it's better paintings than in Lascaux, and it was really incredible. So if you go to Southern France, I have to tell everybody, like, to go there. They've constructed the cave, and it's, it's amazing. And then it really put myself in question about like, what have been the values of these people to really create these beautiful paintings? So I put it in the chat. Please, um, Google it. It's amazing. It's incredible. It's really. And they're 35,000 years old. Very great. Um, you've been, we've been talking about a lot of capital. And, um, so maybe you want to talk about, um, Bitcoin a little bit. I know we've been talking about this little, uh, already, um, about this topic, but, um, I know you're a little bit very skeptical, and I'm too. Um, what do you think about putting value into this asset? This is, um, a thing. And what is also crazy, um, second question, there's this obvious corruption in the politics and like, for example, in SEO, um, I've been a little bit late to the party, but, you know, in there, 90,000 people, and they invaded by 60,000. So this has been planned. So it's so obvious. And what I'm sometimes like, really doubting about is like, people, uh, they are not daring to speak out that there is something really wrong. They're like, they cannot, they don't dare even to talk. It's like not speaking out being public or on Twitter, but even to friends, they they don't dare to think in this way that it can be planned. So this is sometimes what is really concerning me. So I'm, I'm going to stop talking here. No, thanks so much. Um, yeah. Could you, could you actually just summarize the question for me really, really quickly? Can you just say?

In one sentence, what question is? Yes. >> Yeah. We've been we've been talking about um transactional capital and putting capital moving capital. So I would like maybe have your thoughts about Bitcoin here uh as like as an investment or what do you think about this? Maybe you can put this again.

The shave uh um cave paintings was just an idea for all the other people being in southern France to really see this is amazing. Um and yeah and sometimes and the third thing was about like the society really not daring to speak out the the obvious truth that there's corruption just of the the like the politicians they get worse and worse and worse and you see that the quality of the leaderships is worsening and so clear. Where's the where's the point why people don't dare to speak up the truth that it's all like a bigger uh picture behind all that?

>> Okay, thanks guys. I need to use the restroom for a minute. Okay, like like one minute. Okay, I I'll be back. Where did Peter Theal go? Guys, we got to see if this is the real Peter Theal.

>> He's still in prison.

>> Yeah. Where's Peter Teal going?

>> Where'd he go, guys? Where'd he go? We got to see the room.

>> Lee stand up. Please stand up.

>> No, Jason. I mean, I What is Jason doing? Like,

>> hey guys. Sorry. Sorry about that. I've It's been almost three hours. Uh- w to finish soon. Okay. Um, but uh so I I'll respond to your questions. First of all, Bitcoin. Um so I think there's a lot of misunder about bitcoin but bitcoin is it's a it's is a technology uh that require that is based on glorization okay so only environment in which you have access to the internet and which uh information is able to flow freely across the internet you have bitcoin so imagine a situation where we're at war and internet cables are being cut and where there are these emphasities um would the Bitcoin in infrastructure survive these attacks? I don't know because I I don't know where the servers are. And then people are like, well, it's all decentralized. Okay, then my question then is okay, in a time of war, in a time of global collapse, what can you do with Bitcoin? I I I I don't understand. I mean, like, are there things you can do with gold and silver and maybe um your skill, right? If you're able to grow food, if you're able to lead people, you're able to imagine uh new possibilities, that's useful. So, I I understand that um people think that the world is going to collapse and that's why they invest in Bitcoin. But if you think the world is going to collapse, what you should do is invest in yourself. You should try to develop your knowledge. You you try to develop a skill set that is valuable and which allows for you to become much more self-sufficient and which allows you to trade uh to to work with other people. And guys like the people who who are going to die out the first in the in the coming revolutions are the professional manage management class. Okay, the PMC's they don't they don't do anything first of all. Second of all, AI is going to replace them. And third of all is like they are like they're not really um useful. Uh they're kind of useless. Okay. All right. And and then your question then is why is it people are not speaking out? And the answer is well they did speak out during COVID and what happened to the people. Right. So COVID was a major turning point in our world when people were like I think um the lockdowns is a bit absurd. I think that kids being forced to stay at home and sit at the computer screen for eight hours is absurd. I think that um being forced to take vaccines that are not tested that were rushed into production are is not a good idea. And these people were punished severely for speaking out across all of our society. And that shows you that the people in charge are the boomers. that this shows you that the pe that society was re-engineered to make boomers um the genery much more comfortable and much more safe. Okay. So again like the best um the nation that dealt with the COVID epidemic the best was Sweden. And what their epidologist said at that time was guys we cannot stop an epidemic. It's never been done in human history. It's impossible to do so. So, what we're going to do is live life normally and protect our most vulnerable people, including our senior senior citizens, including um uh the el including the sick. And you know what's going to happen is that the elderly are going to lose five months a year of their life. And that's terrible, but that is a lot better than creating mental health crisis among the young. It's a lot better destroying our our economy, right? And that's what Sweden did. And it worked out well for Sweden. But but the West, okay, North America, Europe were like, "Screw that. I have money. I want to live another five months." Okay? The elderly were like, "Screw that. I'm not going to die. I'm I'm not going to lose five months. I'd rather society burn than to lose a year of my life." Okay? And we've been living with the consequences of that time ever since. We don't know it, but we live in an authoritarian society now. Okay? Throughout the world because of COVID. Does that make sense? Okay. Thank you.

>> Thank you. Thank you. Um, so Karina, uh, did you have a did you have a question or comment?

>> Uh, yes. I had a question. So given that the, um, you know, Western Hemisphere here is, you know, making decisions that are showing its dominance, you know, with what you stated earlier with Spain. But don't you think that in a way this is going to cause some unforeseen circumstances where for example yes they um produce all these like you know immigrants to flood Europe and I know some European countries will fall in line but there are certain countries that might see this as like a a warning sign that you know the US isn't to be trusted you need to make some back background deals for example Germany comes to kind um and it could potentially flip and take sides with Russia um given you know like geopolitics at its most reductionist viewpoint with land versus sea. If Germany were to partner up with Russia and then you have Indonesia that you're saying that is going to make a partnership with the US to take the straight of Malaca that's going to really piss off Japan. And right there you have a continental block between these three countries, not including Iran, not including the fact that if you close off Europe with the straight of Jialter to China, that's going to really piss off China. And then you're starving the African continent. So you have Eurasia right there, just through their hubris alone could create their worst nightmare.

>> Exactly. You're exactly correct. And this is what exactly what happened during the pelletian war when the arrogance of the Athenians were so bad that the entire world united against the Athenians including uh Sparta, including Persia, including the former allies of the Athenians. Okay? The entire world basically united against the Athenians because the Athenians were so corrupt, so arrogant. And then we're seeing we're seeing a similar situation play out uh in the world today. uh where I think in the next five to 10 years the world is going to unite against um the United States um and Israel and I think that the people are waking up to um how malignant the American empire really is and like so question then is like why is this little um in affair in why is it getting so much national attention or international attention why are we discussing And u it's because people are waking up to how the empire does things and you know it's it's it's almost like cheating in the World Cup. It is not necessary to do things this way and it is very in your face and like honestly what America and Israel is doing against Spain is dunking on Spain, right? Just shoving in their face like saying you see we can just do this to you. There's nothing you can do about it and we're going to tell you exactly what what we're going to do about it and the world can't protect you. Okay, it's stunking and people don't like that. So I think absolutely right in that yes we we are seeing a sh global shift in not just public opinion but also in how these nation states will respond strategically to these crisis in in the future.

>> Okay. Thank you.

>> Okay.

>> Um just could I have one more question?

>> Sure.

>> Um okay. So I just wanted to give it out since it's probably my last one. Um, so I I don't know if you saw the pre uh the recent uh video with Tucker Carlson where he talks about the war on energy >> and um he makes a really interesting argument that energy equals prosperity. Basically the country that's civiliz um civilians are able to pay the most for energy is the wealthiest. And you know, taking that one step further, could this war on energy actually be like a war on people? More specifically, do you think the war on energy is being driven by the fact that our current electrical grid cannot simultaneously support widespread AI data centers and existing consumer demand without massive infrastructure upgrades? They just don't have the money or the time to upgrade everything. So I mean know if if so could reducing public energy consumption which is basically you know depopulation be a deliberate strategy to make a future AIdriven surveillance state technically possible.

>> Yeah I think that we shouldn't give too much credit to the elite. Um the elite are first and foremost focused on maintaining power. That's point one. Point two is there's a lot of conflict among the elite. Okay. So saying this is we should expect an economic collapse because the elite benefit from an economic collapse and but like to say that it's conspiracy among the elite to collapse the economy is not accurate. What what what I think is like there are different factors of the elite and they recognize that whoever is able to time the collapse uh best will benefit them best. So like you know let's engineer the collapse before anyone else. Um, but we have to do it in a way that um allows us to cop the economy because you know another thing that can happen is you you a certain faction elite you're trying to collapse the economy but then um um another faction goes long on the collapse and so they they rescue the economy which which destroys your short positions. Okay. So there there's a lot of complexity. So that's second point. Okay. The first point is that um the elite are not that organized. They're not that smart. Second of all is that there's a lot of conflict among uh the elite. And the third point is um as you point out is is that people don't like being manipulated. And so uh the world is going to respond to to this in a certain way that maybe that may that may be uh counterproductive or go goes against elite interests. So maybe there is a plan, but I doubt if there's a plan. I think a lot of things are happening is because of something called the path of least resistance. Okay. So why is there so much investment in AI not because they want to create an AI surveillance state is because they don't know where else to put their money. Like where else can you put your money um and um and and um see the growth that we we've been seeing in AI. Okay. It's just speculative capital just chasing the quickest buck. That's what AI is. Then you have, you know, the United States choking off uh like like going after these maritime choke points. And it's because the United States military is severely degraded. The the United States cannot win this war against Iran. The the United States can't even win a war against Russia and Ukraine. And like everyone knows the United States is not going to win a war against China over Taiwan, right? So what is the path of least resistance? How can the US military maintain control by doing the least amount of work uh that will cause the least amount of casualties? The answer is you control the trope points. Okay? So, and so it's not that there's a grand plan in place. It's not that the elite are conspiring. It's just like this is just the easiest thing for these guys to do to maintain their wealth and their power. And it's laziness. It's hubris. It's complacency. It will lead ultimately to the downfall. Okay? Does it make sense, Karina?

>> Yeah, it definitely does make sense. Um, I think it, you know, it kind of plays into what you were saying before about elite over production because I was, you know, kind of expecting more of a fight between like, you know, the financial elite and the technocratic elite. And I sometimes wonder if this is in a way that fight that, you know, maybe they're being lulled into this war with promises of short-term gain, but actually it's a trap.

>> Yes.

>> You know, No, no, you're actually right. Yes.

>> Okay. Thank you. Okay. So, we have 10 more minutes left. Okay. So, um so if you guys could just ask questions relevant to our topic, which is Spain. Okay. And the immigration crisis in Spain, that that'd be great. Okay. Like like like I know there's lots of things we can talk about, but let's just focus our discussion on Spain. Okay. So, Zach, uh could you ask your question, please?

>> Um yeah. So, uh, unfortunately I wasn't I kind of raised my hand not about Spain, but um Yeah. Okay. So, I'll just I'll just step back. It's been a long day.

>> Yeah.

>> Or Yeah. Okay. Well, it's it's quick. So, it's just uh I'm in the US or I'm from the US, but I'm in Australia now studying mental health. And what I found is like

>> everyone you need to like want to be helped if you want to um if you want to like whatever like it it's up to the person. So, like I'm just wondering your thoughts on like when you're when we're speaking about like Dante or like enlightenment and um all these things like from the people that I speak to it seems like they're kind of um like uninterested and like I agree with you that I think there's a general sense of like it's getting better and people are um there's like a shift coming but just from what I see it's still like very dominant for the other perspective where they're just kind unw worried and just want their life to stay the same that it is now and like kind of okay with the status quo. So I just wanted wanted to hear your thoughts on that.

>> Yeah. No, I completely agree. Um so I mean the e the thing thing I would say is like if you focus on helping yourself, you'll help others. Okay. So try try to like if you really want to help others, try to be a good role model for them. Okay. Try to like constantly educate yourself, ask deep questions and be open to conversations. Um and then that example, your example will influence others to themselves open up open up their hearts. But I completely agree with you in that the greatest problem facing the world today is there's a major shift coming and people choose to put their head in the sand because it's the easiest thing to do. Okay. Um but I also agree with you in that there is a spiritual awakening coming our way. It might take some time, maybe five, 10 years, but it is coming our way. And quite honestly, if you wake up, you'll survive the calamity coming our way. You you will you have absolutely no problem surviving because you will want to survive. But if you have your head in the in the sand, you're you're probably going to die off. And unfortunately, that's that that's just the situation that that we're in. Okay. All right. Um

>> Okay. Thank you.

>> Okay. Um Okay, guys. So, another seven minutes. Um I'm really tired. It's been a great day but this is pretty exhausting. Um so Oscar uh your question please. Uh sorry professor uh my question is not related to span the today's topic but uh it's related to one of my observation from this week's news I observed um I don't know if you pay attention to u some Chinese social media but I do um I do see the topic of covid recovery um like it's getting trending on lots of those media like way or u the rat But um I am just feeling um yeah I'm just feeling a little bit confused um there because I also saw like in United States we had the ha virus and the uh diarrhea like a few weeks ago or a few months ago. So I don't know if there is any connection and uh um I heard you said in one of your previous podcasts um you're saying like the co is about uh experiment or control uh I don't know it like if it's related somehow there and if it's even related to the oil crisis coming uh down later in the year that government may may feel this way it's better for their control. That's just my uh some of my thoughts and I definitely want to hear your thoughts on this.

>> You know, I don't talk about co I I don't remember saying anything about co Oscar and you might have seen a AI video um of mine uh that that is not me. Okay. So, please be aware that there are a lot of AI um videos of me that imitate me. But I don't talk about COVID. I mean like I think CO was an accident uh a lab leak and um the governments around the world used CO as a pretext to impose authority and control over the population because it was the path of least resistance because the boomers were scared to death of COVID and they pressured the governments to act. Okay. So so that that's that's my impression of what happened. But guys, please, okay, I can't emphasize this enough, okay? But please use um be please be careful about these AI videos. There's just so much so many of them online and um they're misinterpreting uh what I say and like you just have you just have to practice common sense and like there I only have one YouTube channel. I only post to one YouTube uh channel. Okay guys, so um so thanks Oscar. Okay, MacBook Pro. We have time for three more questions. Okay, guys. Um MacBook Pro, I'm sorry if I can't get to you guys. Next time when we do this, could you just please stay on topic, okay? I know I know like we have a great community, lots of questions, lots of curiosity. Let's just focus on the topic because we because like it's really important we figure out what's going on. Okay, MacBook Pro. Sir, I had a question regarding transational capitals. Uh right now, uh the Spain thing is that are act trying to get to Spain are basically uh in their mindset they have a quite a very conservative mindset, but they want money and they won't really be very easily get chips in their brains and everything. and the those people who will actually these chips will be those liberals who are actually kind of worship techn uh I think this is going to be a big problem future and another thing I going to be a personal question is

>> uh for any 18year-old who's just going going into the universities when parents are really forcing him to imply in US or England what should be think that he can.

>> Yeah. Okay. Okay. So, we have three more minutes left. Okay. And like I I I mean like so for future discussions we really want to focus on the topic. Okay. This is why we we're we're trying to have these discussions so that you know we can figure out what's really going on and we can debate and discuss amongst ourselves. So um in the future please keep this in mind. Okay. Um Max did did you have a question related to Spain? um not Spain but the list of topics that you had on the agenda about the expansion of war but happy happy to leave that uh if someone else has a question to Spain.

>> Yeah. Yeah. So let me um um Yeah. So I I there's some other topics but unfortunately we just ran out of time but

>> leave it leave it there. Perfect. Leave it there.

>> Sorry. Sorry about that. Colin, sorry Colin will be the last. I'm really sorry I if I didn't get to you but like it's been three hours. I'm pretty exhausted and um we we'll continue this another time. Okay. So, Colin, you you asked you have the last question.

>> Lucky me. Can you hear me? All right.

>> Yeah, I can hear you fine. Yes.

>> Okay. Um I've noticed that you're very vocal on uh like the implementation of AI being detrimental. And to the most part, I agree because of the social controls and whatnot. Although I'm curious what you think um about the development of that technology just being like a natural movement that proceeds with time. And to kind of explain it, I guess I'll reference to one of Plato's stories that he wrote called the Fadus where essentially a god presents this human king with a gift which was writing. But then to this the go the king denies the gift from the god and he explains that the reason he denies the gift of writing is because he believed that it would kill people's memory

>> and their ability to tell stories orally and whatnot.

>> Yes.

>> And that their imagination would diminish.

>> Yeah.

>> So I kind of see like a similar thing happening. Although obviously it's not exactly the same. But I'm kind of just curious as to like what the connection of that age with this age and cuz we can see that something obviously was that was human before which was like orally telling stories was lost which we we would identify with being human. Um, but then we gained another aspect of humanity which was reading and writing that maybe Plato couldn't have foreseen or in that story the king couldn't have foreseen. Um, I'm just wondering like do you think it's possible that something analogous to that could happen with like transhumanism where we lose some part of humanity but we gain something that we can't imagine?

>> Exactly. No, that's a great point. Okay. So, so for through for most of human history, most societies were resistant to the idea of writing for the very same reason that you point out, right, which is like um the oral tradition forced us to have really strong memories and it forced us to focus on the beauty of our own voice, right? So like uh the druids for example, they refused to allow for writing because their spells, their poetry required certain intonation, incondenses that were not possible in writing. So, so writing allowed for mass dissemination, but it it really destroyed the aura of the spoken voice. And so that's why most societies actually refrain from um writing and it for and a lot of societies develop writing at for for artistic ceremonial purposes, okay? For for symbolism and that's why they never really develop a systematic system of of write of of writing. Um, but you're actually right in that uh once we did develop writing then that that radically changed the human mind and it's possible the same thing happens with AI and I think that things will happen with um with AI and so I I think that's a really important lesson to end on which is like change is neither good or bad. Change is just change which leads to new possibilities and it's ultimately up to up to us to take advantage of these possibilities. Okay, so I will leave it there. Um, thank you so much for for today and I will see you guys next time, okay? And I will upload this to YouTube if you want to review what we learned today, okay? Thanks a lot, guys. See you next time. Bye-bye.

>> Thanks, professor.