NCCI SAPS Master Class on Personification 1.14.24

[Music] Just let your soul glow. Just let it shine through you. Just let your soul glow, baby. A feeling, oh so still. Get smooth. Just let it shine through. Yeah. Just let your soul glow, baby. All sugar. Just let your soul glow. Just let it shine through. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Just let your baby put it all so. [Music] Silk. Just let it shine. Woo! Yeah. Just let your soul glow, baby. Oh, sugar. Break it down. Let it glow. Let it glow. Let it, let it glow. Let it glow. Let it, let it glow. Let it glow. Let it, let it glow. Let it glow. Let it help me out, fellas. Let it glow. Let it. It said I want you. [Music] Oh, oh, oh. I want you. [Music] Baby. Woo. [Music]

Shalom, brothers and sisters, and welcome to a special edition, a master edition of Satic Apologetic School's SAPs lesson. So glad that, uh, so many of you have decided to join us this evening. Uh, previous SAPlings, our first cycle of SAPs graduates, our second wave of SAPlings to begin their studies in a couple of weeks, and our Satic Light brothers and sisters, those who want to kind of get their feet wet before they jump into this sea of knowledge and information. Um, let your soul glow. We always lead off with this song because we're supposed to be a reflection of Elohim's image. We're supposed to allow His light to shine forth through us. That's Matthew chapter 5:14 through 16. And I'll read it to you as a reminder. This comes from our Master Teacher, Yeshua.

"You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven."

And this is the reason that we're here. This is why, uh, New Covenant Congregation of Israel Tabernacle Elohim is here. This is the purpose of our ministry. It is to learn how to image the Father so we can, um, reflect and disseminate His righteousness, His truth, His light. Let's go ahead and open up with prayer, and we'll get started with this evening's SAPs review.

Holy and gracious Father, Yah, in the name of Your Son, Yeshua the Anointed, our Priest and King, we come before You, Father Yah, to praise Your name. We want to thank You for this community, Father Yah. We want to, uh, thank You for the blessings that You so generously bestow upon us. Although we are not worthy of these blessings that You give to us generously, You bless us, holy and gracious Father Yah, with compassion, with mercy. You give us, um, time and opportunity to embrace Your truth so that we might use it to renew the spirit of our mind. You bless us with prosperity, stability, and security. You bless us with the ability to articulate, um, Your words to those who are interested in understanding Your truth. We appreciate these blessings, holy and gracious Father Yah, and we fully embrace them for the purpose of glorifying Your Holy Name.

We do apologize and we repent, Father Yah, for falling short of these reasonable and attainable, obtainable expectations that You have set before us. We ask, holy and gracious Father Yah, that You forgive us for missing the mark and that You repeal the wrath that You have promised to place upon those who oppose Your beautiful commandments, the edicts, the precepts, the tenets of eternal life. We are Your children, Father Yah. We are learning, we are growing, we are being strengthened and renewed by Your Word. We ask, holy and gracious Father Yah, that You continue to be patient with us as we continue our transformation into the person, the people that You desire us to be.

Father God, today we petition You for the necessities of this life. Father God, we petition You this evening for peace, for wisdom, for knowledge, and for understanding. We petition You, Father Yah, for, uh, prosperity, stability, for security. We petition You for protection from the uncleanness of this world, protection from the wicked. We petition You, holy and gracious Father Yah, for Your intervention in the lives of our brothers and sisters who are experiencing various trials and tribulations, very various illnesses. Our brother Canard, who is, um, entering surgery within the next few days. We offer intercessory prayer on his behalf that he has a successful operation, that You watch over him and his family, and that You allow him to fully recover so that he may, um, stand at the post that You have assigned to him once again, to be a light, a reflection of Your truth, a reflection of Your holiness. We ask that You intercede on behalf of all of our brothers and sisters and our elders in this capacity.

We offer intercessory prayer on behalf of our Adamic brothers and sisters, those who are outside of the Covenant, yet they're seeking to worship You and to follow You according to the intrinsic righteousness that You have endowed all men with. We call upon Your name, holy and gracious Father Yah, because there is no other name to call upon. We ask for the special gift of discernment so that Your holy name will be glorified and Your people edified. We call upon Your name in the name of our King and Priest, Yeshua HaMashiach. B'shem. We pray. Amen.

All right, brothers and sisters, we're going to go ahead and get started because we have a lot to cover this evening. Um, this is a very important, um, disquisition. And, um, you know, many of you have, have asked, um, for the, for, for the lesson. Those who are newly enrolled in our SAPs program. And, um, the challenge with making this lesson available to you is that there are approximately 18 to 20 lessons that precede this one lesson on personification that you have to study in order to segue into this, um, higher Christology composition. And so there's a lot to it. Uh, this evening, we're going to go over several parts. I'm going to get, uh, Shalia to kind of work with me, um, on some of these, um, on some of these arguments, and we're going to see how Elohim is going to bless us today. I wanted the Satic Light community to, uh, observe, and certainly you can ask questions at the end of this, uh, review. Um, you know, our, our, our second, um, cycle of, uh, SAPlings, uh, you can ask questions as well. Anybody can ask questions as it relates to, uh, what we're going to be presenting today. And I know it's going to be somewhat challenging for you because you didn't have the composition to actually read when we do our review. What we're actually reviewing is a composition, but we're reviewing the summation part. So I'm reading the summation, uh, parts of our, uh, SAPs lesson. Okay, let me see if we can go ahead and get started here.

Okay, so just remember, um, there's a lot of substance here. And, uh, a number of people have, you know, talked to me about SAPs and even Satic Light. They've gone through some of the material and said, you know, Arya, I think this is a bit much for me. Brothers and sisters, we don't have the spirit of fear. Um, we're not challenged with anything that is spiritually and theologically progressive. Uh, you know, this is new ground for most of you, and it's okay. There is a lot to learn, but I will argue, brothers and sisters, we have to learn it because this is our culture. This is not only about enlightenment, divine enlightenment. This is also about liberation. And, um, it is extremely important for us to understand that our liberation, uh, comes through the procurement of knowledge. And we're talking about right knowledge, biblical knowledge, Hebraic knowledge. Our community is, is a Hebraic institution. We do our very best to keep everything, um, exposited within a Hebraic framework. And so this is what we're going to be covering, um, this evening. So I am going to ask for a little bit of patience because this is an extremely substantive composition. But if you take notes and you listen, um, I promise you, you're going to learn quite a bit. If you're enrolled in SAPs, which I think perhaps, you know, a number of you are, and, um, and or Satic Light, um, you, you're going to be experiencing something radically different from what you have learned in church, what you've learned in Black Hebrew Israelism, Messianic Judaism, various forms of Judaism, respectfully. The difference between what we teach and how we teach it, um, is that everything is underscored with methodologies that you can test and that you can measure. That is extremely important. And so let's go ahead and get started this evening, and I'll demonstrate to you what we are speaking about.

I want to start with education. Education comes from the Latin word *educere*, um, and it means to lead out, take out, bring out, lead forth. I spoke about this yesterday. *Ex* means out, *ducere* to lead. We believe that it's necessary that everyone has a proper theological education that is orthodox. Orthodox, *ortho* is right, *dox* teaching, right teaching. For what purpose? So they may be led out of ignorance. That's a killer for us. We just don't know some things. The things that we should know, uh, theological things that are spiritually related to our relationship with the Creator. Uh, we have been caught up in misinformation, disinformation, myths, and just plain lies. Um, and this is, is a result of, of a poor education, a bad education. So the education that we are looking for is, um, is an orthodox education that is solely predicated upon Hebraic bibliology.

Let's start with Deuteronomy 6:4-9. I'm only going to read part of this because what we're covering this evening has a direct impact on what we refer to as the Shema. And we read it every Shabbat, uh, before we begin our Sabbath disquisition. Deuteronomy 6:4: "Hear, O Israel, Yah is our Elohim, Yah is one." The Lord is one. "You shall love Yah your Elohim with all of your heart and with all of your soul and with all of your might. And these words that I command you today shall be on, on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children and shall talk of them when you sit in your house and when you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you rise. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates."

Very first thing, we need to recognize that there is only one God. The Shema, here it is, to ratify and to codify into law that Yah is alone. Yah is one being. These sentiments, brothers and sisters, are expressed in the New Testament. Paul says, "For although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth, as indeed there are many gods and many lords, yet for us, for Israel, there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Master, Yeshua the Anointed, through whom are all things and through whom we exist." Through whom are all things, as relates to the Messiah, is specifically referring to the new creation through Yeshua, who guides the creation through the church. What does Paul mean when he says, "through whom we exist"? He is specifically referring to our new lives in Christ as a new creation, both spiritually and physically in the resurrection.

So what I am arguing, brothers and sisters, is that from the Shema that's given to us in the 16th century, uh, BCE, approximately 1500 years later, Paul affirms the very same maxim: that there is one God, and that's the Father. That's never changed. It's contiguous. This is the proclamation in the Old Testament. It remains the same proclamation in the New Testament. It's not until we step outside of the New Testament Apostolic era, uh, that this faith is co-opted by the Gentiles, and something radically different, radically new is presented, um, to mankind that has become the global phenomenon. Brothers and sisters, and, and what we're here today is to say that, um, um, um, that is wrong. The theological premise that there are, uh, multiple gods, that there are two gods, that there are three gods, is wrong.

I want to show you how this came about. The origin of this fallacious doctrine. Although the Old Testament testifies to there being one God and Him alone as God, as well as a New Testament reaffirming that there is one God alone and now one Master. This is to say, Yeshua. Neo-Christians assert that there are at least two Gods. We refer to this as trinitarianism. And supposedly, this is what the Judeans also believe. The supposition is, there is God the Father and His Son, God the Son, who pre-existed as God. So, um, this SAPs lesson attacked the premise that Christ pre-existed as a God. And there was a lot of groundwork that we needed to, um, that we needed to lay down in order to intelligently engage this, this argument, so we can actually see what the Bible is saying pertaining to this topic. This assertion is patently false. There is no God the Son who pre-existed as God. This assertion is patently false and arrives from a misinterpretation of Jewish literature. There are no passages in either the Old, Intertestamental, or New Testaments that will sustain such a proposition. Even seemingly ambiguously written passages such as John 1:1-13: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. All things were made by Him. There was nothing made that was not made by Him." I'm talking about that John. This is the thrust of this apologetic, but we have to lay a groundwork to understand why the supposition that, you know, Christ is the, is the protagonist, he is the, uh, feature of John's prologue. John 1:1-13. And so we're going to have an opportunity this evening to engage that idea.

Once again, even seemingly ambiguously written passages such as John 1:1-13, when they are read contextually, yields a monotheistic affirmation of Yah as His Word, thus personification. This is what Dr. Ben Witherington III. We have this in our last review. It's so profound for me. I want to, uh, present it again because this is a Neo-Christian Trinitarian scholar. Um, I study some of his work. There are some things that I, I certainly agree with. There are a number of things I disagree with, and I believe in giving credit to whom credit is due, when credit is due, and I have to give him credit for his observation, which we're going to review here in just a second. But anyway, uh, Dr. Ben Witherington III, Professor of New Testament Interpretation at Asbury, believes that the church, herein referred to as Neo-Christendom, with approximately three billion people, have not been taught the Bible as it was intended to be taught. Witherington believes that the pastors are biblically inept. They are not equipped to teach the Bible. And this is what we have been arguing in our community for over 30 years. Congregants, led by these pastors, are scripturally obtuse. They don't understand what they're reading from the Bible. So, and I don't mean any harm whatsoever. I'm just being very, um, transparent and honest. Um, religious leaders make things up, and they're able to do it successfully, brothers and sisters, because amongst their constituency, you really don't have anybody to challenge your suppositions. So if it sounds good, that's what we're going to present.

Anyway, Witherington believes that the pastors are biblically inept, and congregants, led by these pastors, are scripturally obtuse because of their pastors. Witherington believes that congregants have a very low Bible IQ because the pastors do not challenge them to think critically about what they are reading. In other words, most pastors are not training their congregants. So let's just hear from Witherington ourselves, brothers and sisters.

"I have been a pastor. I've pastored six churches, and, uh, what I would say is that unfortunately, during my lifetime, the church has become more and more biblically illiterate. And to me, this is heartbreaking. They don't even know their own source material very well. And much of what they have learned, they need to unlearn because it's really not biblical. And so I think that going forward in the 21st century, we need more teaching pastors who are prepared to unpack the word of God in detail. And, you know, one of the things I'd say to pastors is, don't insult the intelligence of your congregations. There are undoubtedly many well-educated people and bright people, even if they aren't real well-educated in your congregation. Tease their minds into active thought. Tease, challenge them with the big ideas, the big ticket things that you see, for example, in the Gospel of John, right? Challenge their faith to embrace a broader and bigger vision of Christ and the Godhead and salvation and so many important things. And, you know, and show your own enthusiasm for all this material. You know, if you get up there and give a turgid discourse, and, and, and it comes across as dull as dishwater, well, this is not going to get the job done. And the other thing to say is, you don't need to put the cookies on the bottom shelf. That's right. You don't need to water down everything to pump. I'm not going to do. Not necessary. It ain't happening. If anything, they need to be challenged to think higher and better and more deeply about these matters."

Going to do that. Going to do that. And this is the problem, brothers and sisters. This is what needs to take place. Congregants who are trying to procure an understanding of, of who Elohim is and how to serve Elohim have to be challenged because of the system we live in, because of how we have been taught and trained. Um, it's, it's, uh, uh, egregiously wrong. Um, it's unbiblical, and it is extremely challenging to unlearn those things that you have been taught over the, over the course of your lifetime. And this is the reason why we are so emphatic about Hebraic bibliology. And what we're going to do this evening is demonstrate to you, brothers and sisters, somewhat comprehensively, you know, why there is such a problem, an issue in Neo-Christendom amongst Bible enthusiasts, people who are desiring an understanding of the scripture, why it's so difficult for us to get there. Dr. Witherington is correct in his assessment of the modern church propagating a Neo-Christian faith by leaders who do not know their own source material. That is a problem. Witherington has observed that the church, or the congregants, are biblically illiterate. Very few pastors know their Bibles, which represents their source material. Yet these people are called teachers, they're called your spiritual advisors, they are called your pastors. And what they are advising from, what they are teaching from, what they are using as a pastoral template, is the Bible that they are not very familiar with. You think they are, but they are not. Pastors in the church need to unlearn what they have learned because what they are teaching is unbiblical. Four, the church needs more teaching pastors, professional expositors, and biblical exegesists. Is what Witherington is talking about. The church needs to have pastors who know how to unpack the Bible in detail.

This is a comprehensive study. So our brothers and sisters who requested personification of Word and and and Wisdom, which is this master class study, um, it is impossible for us to give you this 70-page composition, uh, because there are approximately 18 to 20, maybe 24 compositions that you have to read prior to this one. So everything is process-oriented. In order to get to this stage, you have to have, um, um, readings that come prior to this composition. Six, pastors have failed to challenge their congregants to think theologically. I agree. And one of the problems, brothers and sisters, I'm giving you my experience. When you try to drive congregants to think critically about what you're reading, to think theologically with a special nuance that would be Hebraic, you are going to experience some resistance like you've never seen before. And I don't think that this resistance is with malice and forethought. I think that it is a matter of, um, uh, how would you say it? It's a matter of trying to retain comfort. This is what I know. This is what I've been taught, and I like for this to, to work for me. And my position as a *moray*, as a congregational overseer, is that no, that's not going to work for you because you're going to have to dump what you have been taught because what you have been taught, and I know that I'm speaking in a very generalized, uh, uh, manner, don't mean to offend, but I'm being honest. What you have been taught, because we all grew up in this system, we've all been taught by the system. And so I can tell you as a credentialed theologian that what we have been taught is radically, completely, emphatically unbiblical. Pastors have failed to challenge their congregants to think theologically, critically, and to think on a higher level. Pastors are merely pacifying the congregants because this is what most congregants want. Most congregants, brothers and sisters, and again, I say this respectfully, do not want to be challenged to, uh, to, to think, to worship, to serve, and to read on a higher level. This is Witherington's argument. And when you have scholars who were once pastors making these proclamations, brothers and sisters, um, it helps you to understand and appreciate why they left, not so-called the, the, the church, but why they left pastoring. Because these are scholars, these are academics who want to help you understand the Bible from an academic perspective, and most people are not receptive to that.

So let's get into our lesson this evening, brothers and sisters, and let's have some fun. We have quite a bit of reading to do. If you want to get yourself a bag of popcorn and some Mountain Dew, that's fine. Open up your Bible, but certainly grab your pen and, uh, paper. You can take some, uh, notes. Um, when it's time for you to get to this apologetic sometime in the future, um, you know, you'll be, I guess, maybe 10% there. Here we go.

The objective of this study is to demonstrate that Proverbs chapters 1 and 8, along with John 1:1-13 and 1 Corinthians 1:24-3, are passages that specifically address personification, not the so-called pre-existence of Christ. That is a very bold claim because it challenges Neo-Christian Orthodoxy. Neo-Christendom teaches that Proverbs chapter 1 and Proverbs chapter 8 is about Christ pre-incarnate. It is not. Neo-Christendom teaches that John's prologue, John 1:1-13, is about how the incarnate Word, which is the pre-incarnate, uh, Christ, uh, came to Earth as the incarnate Word. The Word took upon flesh. The Word as a, as a personal being, a literal being, came to Earth and took upon flesh. 1 Corinthians 1:24 is going to be an extension of John 1:1-13. What I'm arguing is that this is a patently, a patent misreading of these passages. And we need to understand why nearly three billion people read it in this errant fashion.

Every place in the New Testament, brothers and sisters, where Yeshua or the New Testament writer seem to state that Yeshua pre-existed as God or is God, comes from ambiguously written New Testament passages or passages where literary and rhetorical devices are deployed but overlooked or dismissed in scholarship. There is not one, not one. There's not one clear passage that states that Yeshua pre-existed as God. All these passages that seem to suggest such a position have been argued in critical scholarship for decades with more scholars rescinding previously held positions on Christ's pre-incarnate existence based upon selected scriptures. And I also have to state that although they rescind their position that this is a passage dealing with the pre-incarnate Jesus, it doesn't change the fact that they are still Trinitarians. But what these Trinitarians are saying is, we can no longer use certain passages such as Proverbs chapter 1, Proverbs chapter 8, John 1:1-13, and 1 Corinthians 1:24-3 as proof texts for Christ's pre-existence. We have to canvas the New Testament to find other passages to make this argument more persuasive. But upon further consideration, we can no longer use these passages. There is a swath of scholars and, uh, pastoral theologians that are continuing to use Proverbs 1 and 8, John 1-13, 1 Corinthians 1:24-3 to argue that these passages specifically talk about the pre-incarnate Christ. So, um, a, a small group have stepped away from that notion, where the clear majority retains it.

The argument we have before us is one that presumes that John is stating that Yeshua was the Son of God before creation, also known as the Word and Wisdom. In Greek, Word is *logos*, Wisdom is *sophia*. So we're going to see this quite often: *logos*, *logos*, and *sophia* as the Word and Wisdom of God. Yeshua came to Earth and took on flesh, thereby becoming God the Son in the flesh, the Incarnation of Word and Wisdom. John's prologue is used to sustain this premise. So the support and the anchor for this proposition is really John's prologue. John's prologue is used to sustain the pre-incarnate, um, Christ argument that emerges from Proverbs chapter 1, Proverbs chapter 8. John 1 is used to, to, to ratify that supposition. What I am submitting to you is that you can't, it doesn't work. Uh, when we have theologians calling our Tabernacle making this argument, I know exactly where they're going to go. And once we have an intelligent discussion, brothers and sisters, the response is always, "Well, you know what? That's something I got to go back and, um, and perhaps look at." You know what? Thank you. All right. I just, you know, I appreciate it, etc., because you have to follow the data. And you have to follow the data that the children of Israel left before us. We're going to talk about that this evening.

John's prologue is used to sustain this premise along with Paul's epistle on Christ being the Wisdom of God. The objective of this study was to determine if this was John and Paul's intention. This is to say, to convey to the audience, audience that the so-called second person of the Trinity, Jesus Christ, came to Earth as incarnate Wisdom and Word. Pho states that there are three ways to obtain wisdom, brothers and sisters. Three ways. One is derived from teaching. Another of natural wisdom. And the third of that which is derived from practice. However, there is a fourth derivation of wisdom that Pho knows of but does not mention in this discourse. Brothers and sisters, there is divine wisdom that reflects Yah. Yah gives you wisdom. Yah makes you the embodiment of His wisdom. And when we are reading certain scholarly journals, and books, and materials, often time this is left out, and we need to talk about it. This wisdom comes from Yah and is imputed as a gift to the wise who desire to become wiser. It is also given holistically. Very important to empower Elohim. Elohim gives wisdom to empower an agent so that they might personify Him, to make His presence tangible amongst humanity. Very important that we understand this. It is this wisdom that this treatise will develop to understand personification within a Christological role and how the philosophical term *hypostasis* has been misused by the Patristics in their formulation of the Godhead. So *hypostasis*, brothers and sisters, is a very, very important term. It is a term that has been misused, abused, and misunderstood by the church, which is why we are in this predicament today. So we're going to talk about *hypostasis* a little bit later. Elder Yanna said, "Arya, you gave us 10 more questions." I did, because when I went back to look at the quiz, I don't, I don't think I have anything in, in the, um, in the first 50, um, um, Q Q&A, uh, question and answer sheet that dealt with *hypostasis*. And being that *hypostasis* is such a technical term, um, a Greek term, a theological term that has been misunderstood, we have to spend some time talking about it. It's very important.

*Hypostasis*. From Greek *hupostasis*. Originally, originally, and I hope all of you have the time to stay, uh, with this presentation until the end. I'm going to try to get us out here as quickly as possible, but this is a comprehensive lesson. That the summations are thick, but it's very important that we understand how Neo-Christendom emerged with the doctrine, the dogma that it has today, that is, that is unbiblical. There is a reason why, brothers and sisters, and one of the reasons has to do with *hypostasis*. So, Arya, what is a *hypostasis*? What, what is *hupostasis*? What, what are you talking about? Originally, it meant sediment. I'm going to talk about the sediment. It meant foundation. It meant subject matter. Later, ecclesiastically, theologically, the church defines it as a substance, defines it as existence, defines it as essence, defines it as a personality. From as Koop below, this comes from the Oxford Dictionary. *Hypostasis* means the substance or essential nature of an individual. Now, this is what Elder Yanna brought up yesterday. And Elder Yanna, I got to give you credit. Elder sister, your game is tight. I mean, you know, when I ask you a question, right off the bat, something that you don't know, coming there, there hasn't been a time that you've missed a beat. And I just want you to know, elder sister, that I appreciate you. I respect you. You motivate me. You inspire me. You are a good elder. Yanna said yesterday, when I asked her to tell me what *hypostasis* is, she took about two seconds and she says, uh, the substance or essential nature. And this is, is the ecclesiastical term, but it is a term that has been adopted by the church from a philosophical perspective, and it has been abused in the sense that it's applied to Christ to mean something outside of its etymology, outside of its origin. So we're going to talk about that tonight. I hope most of you are off on Martin Luther King's Day tomorrow.

Well, this thesis has concluded: that John's prologue has been misread and misunderstood by the Neo-Christian Church, beginning with the Patristics of the 2nd century. They have introduced the idea that John and Paul are speaking about how the Son of God existed as a divine being with God before the creation of the universe. So let me just make sure that we are clear. Israelites did not present, in any of their literature, Old Testament, New Testament, how a pre-incarnate being, uh, was commissioned by God to come to Earth and to take on flesh. Um, we're not going to find that in the Old Testament Bible. We're not going to find that in the New Testament Bible. So then the question is going to be, well, Arya, where does this come from? It comes from the Gentile Church, brothers and sisters. It comes from Yah, the Father of the Gentiles. It comes specifically from the Patristics. It comes from the Patristics who were once philosophers and pagans who co-opted Messianic Sasis. We're talking about the Messiah's version of Judaism. They co-opted it and they introduced various unbiblical thesises, brothers and sisters, to deify Him as God. And if we're going to make a claim of this magnitude, which is going to challenge, um, the, the, the pseudo-veracity of Neo-Christian theology, then you better bring some weight behind you. And so this is the reason why we have this, this, this composition, and we have, um, what was it called? Precursor? Maybe it's a pre-precursor, but there are a number of compositions that you have to read before you read this one.

The Son of God, previously known as the Word, Wisdom, and Angel of God, Lord, was sent to Earth by Yah in the flesh to redeem humanity. Yet the supposition derives as a patent misunderstanding of the Word, Wisdom, personification model used by the Israelites since the 10th century BC, and has become the impetus for an unbiblical Christology. In this composition, you will be able to see when and how Jesus became God. We want to show you this. And who proclaimed Him as God against prohibitions from the Torah, from the prophets, and the New Testament.

So today, we're going to review chapter one, Proverbs wisdom. Chapter two, intertestamental wisdom and the Word of God. Chapter three, summation, extra-biblical wisdom and personification from Philo, a Jewish theop philosopher and a historian. Chapter four, summation, Yeshua as the Wisdom of God. Chapters 1, 2, and 3 become the conduit that we walk through just to get to chapter 4. You won't understand chapter 4 unless you have chapters 1, 2, and 3. Then, of course, as, uh, Elder Yanna said, we got 10 more questions in our quiz. This is the bonus section: understanding ecclesiastical *hypostasis*. And then we'll close out, and we'll open the floor for a question. So let's get into chapter one summation, brothers and sisters. What did we learn in chapter one? We learned that wisdom is an abstract, highly valued, multi-dimensional virtue that serves as the qualitative function of Yah. In other words, wisdom is an abstract quality of Yah. Wisdom is Yah. Wisdom is nobody else. Wisdom is nothing else. No one else. When Solomon speaks about wisdom, Solomon is talking about Yah qualitatively as an abstract virtue. Solomon has been commissioned by Yah to serve as, as His virtues. Remember, wisdom in Greek is *sophia*. To serve as *sophia's* voice, to relay on His behalf, Yah's behalf, His desire to build a relationship with His people. To accomplish this task, brothers and sisters, Solomon uses the rhetorical speech device called prosopopeia. So this is the very first error that's made amongst, um, our leaders, let's just call them our leaders, our teachers, is not understanding that within the Hebraic culture, writers use various literary devices and rhetorical devices to convey a message from Elohim. And what happens is that we, as Westernized people, we look at the Bible through a Western European lens because this is where our training and teaching, uh, comes from. It comes from them. And you are reading an Eastern document, composition from brothers and sisters who lived in Israel, right, in antiquity, North Africa, who have their own culture, their own methodologies, their own devices for reading, relaying, and interpreting data and information. And what has transpired is that the Greeks, who co-opted this faith, they dismissed all of these rhetorical and literary devices, brothers and sisters, and they read into the text something that is literal, and this was not the intent of the authors who were commissioned by God to give us a message.

So when we look at Proverbs 1 and Proverbs chapter 8, what has transpired? Solomon uses the rhetorical speech device called prosopopeia. What is prosopopeia? It's a figure of speech in which an imagined or absent person or thing is represented as speaking. So when we look at, uh, an imagined or absent person or thing, this thing is an abstract virtue of Elohim called wisdom. And Solomon has been commissioned, has been ordained by God to give wisdom a voice. I'm going to read this to you. I'm going to go over to Proverbs. I'm going to go over to Proverbs. I'm just going to read Proverbs chapter 8, uh, where, see, Proverbs chapter 8, and I'm going to start at, um, verse one. Proverbs 8:1: "Does not wisdom cry, and understanding put forth her voice? She stands in the top of high places, by the way, in the places of the paths. She cries at the gates, at the entry of the city, at the coming in at the doors." So this is Solomon narrating. Now Solomon is going to go into character. Solomon is now going to talk as the embodiment of wisdom, who is God Himself. "Unto you, O man, I call, and my voice is to the sons of man. O ye simple, understand wisdom; and ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart. Hearken, for I will speak of excellent things; and the opening of my lips shall be right things."

Then we go into the *creme de la creme*, which is verse 22: "Yah possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was. When there was no depths, I was brought forth. When there were no fountains abounding with water, before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth. While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world. When he prepared the heavens, I was there. When he set a compass upon the face of the deep, when he established the clouds above, when he strengthened the fountains of the deep, when he he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment, when he appointed the foundations of the earth, then I was by him as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him." That's Jesus. This is what the church has taught for 1800 years. This is Jesus. And it's not what this composition argues, brothers and sisters. Is that Solomon was given the gift of wisdom, the wisest man upon the earth. He is the embodiment of wisdom. So Yah ordains him, commissions him, and makes him the embodiment of His wisdom so he can speak as Yah's abstract virtue. And he does this through the rhetorical device called prosopopeia. Brothers and sisters, and some may say, "Well, Arya, this is just a lot of information." I know it is. A lot of information, but it is needed information, brothers and sisters, to properly understand the Bible. Our ancestors used various rhetorical devices because the Most High inspired them to do so. They are trying to appeal to their constituents, their consortium, their peers, their countrymen in their era. Brothers and sisters, we are several thousand years removed, and we have the audacity, the hubris, the arrogance to impose the way we read literature onto their literary works, and you cannot do that. Follow me. Follow me.

Yah has spoken to His people through prophets, relaying to them His concerns about their disobedience and rebellion. Through all His lamentation and plea for repentance, reconciliation, and restoration, His people Israel still refuse to hear Him. So Yah deploys a new tactic: that is to speak to them poetically, to show them what they most lack as humans, which can resolve their issues. We pray for it every Shabbat. Israel lacks wisdom. Humanity lacks wisdom. Through wisdom, they will be able to make better decisions in life and come closer to mirroring the Creator and being accepted by Him.

To make this thesis even more interesting is the fact that several interpreters have begun to see Proverbs 31. We look at Proverbs 31 as the virtuous woman. We have some scholars, they're certainly more, uh, uh, uh, proficient and thorough than I am. Um, their specialization is Proverbs. So they, they've noticed something in Proverbs 31. The virtuous woman is a personification of wisdom. Seemingly, the author responsible for the poem of the virtuous woman introduced a bilingual Hebrew in 31:27 where the Hebrew word *sophia*, which means "she watches over," sounds extraordinarily like the Greek word for wisdom, *sophia*. Now, brothers and sisters, um, as a teacher and expositor, uh, there are some things that I present that I'm not necessarily sold on, but I, but I like the supposition. And because we learn as a community, if I have perhaps a little information or data that, um, again, you know, I'm not ratified through my own thesis, but yet I think that is very interesting, um, I'll put it out in the community. And if that's something that, you know, um, um, that, that SAPlings in, in the community, you know, would like to take upon themselves, a lot of times Shalia and Aquila will look at certain things in the, the, the composition and they'll go out and research it and break it down, whatever and so forth and so on. So, uh, you know, again, this is what SAPs and Satic Light is for. This is what we are about. It is about data. It is about the procurement of correct data, good data, and testing that data with the Word of God, the canonicity of Elohim's voice, brothers and sisters. All right, so let's get back on, on ask here.

Therefore, several experts on Proverbs opine that the poem in 31:10 through 31 is a depiction of Jewish women in the Persian period being personified as the embodiment and incarnation of personified wisdom. And that might be the case. Dr. Leo Purdue, Professor of Hebrew Bible at Brite Divinity School and a leading scholar in biblical wisdom literature, observes that "she becomes the human incarnation of what woman wisdom teaches." Now, I use this in my thesis, brothers and sisters, because when we are dealing with specialists, these are Hebrew scholars. The training is going to be very different from New Testament, um, New Testament scholars and theologians. I don't know if Narcissus is is here with us on this, um, in this presentation this evening. I believe I believe Araniel is. We have a number of brothers who have gone through seminary and, you know, some, uh, you know, oversee their own congregation and community. So they are, you know, uh, uh, qualified to speak on an academic level about these things. Brothers and sisters, uh, and so some scholars have a specialty. And Purdue sees, um, Proverbs 31 as personification. The Book of Proverbs is about personification. The New Testament is also going to be about personification. And we'll get to that at some point in time this evening.

What has transpired? Solomon has personified wisdom at Yah's behest. Wisdom is not separate from Yah. Wisdom is Yah. And it is Yah whom Solomon is urging, through a rhetorical device called prosopopeia, to encourage Israel to embrace Yah's commandments. Thus, what Judeans are gathering from Solomon is that the Law is in view as Yah's wisdom. Let's see if we can find some, maybe primary or secondary sources to support this proposition. There's a gentleman that I spoke to some, some time ago, and, you know, he took, um, I guess he took offense, uh, to some of the things that I said with regards to his, uh, position. Um, and as I told him, hey, you know, look, I, I meant no harm, but, um, you know, uh, I, I teach it like, like I see it. And, you know, we have a lot of support, academic support, primary support for the formation or for the formulation, if you will, of our suppositions. And he asked me, he says, "Well, are you familiar with the, with the ArtScroll Tanakh?" And I told him, "Yeah." Um, and he says, "Well, are you aware that Proverbs chapter 8 views, views the commentators of Proverbs chapter 8 in the ArtScroll Tanakh, not view Proverbs chapter 8 as the development or the identification of another being, a separate being, a God? Are, are you familiar with that?"

Brothers and sisters, let's just read the ArtScroll Tanakh and knock ourselves out. And one of the things that you learn, this is what I try to talk to Brother Ma about. Um, there are some people you can talk to. There are some people you just need to be quiet and just listen. Just say, "Okay," and then hang up the phone. Brothers and sisters, I have the ArtScroll Tanakh. I use the ArtScroll Tanakh as a Jewish source. This is what the ArtScroll Tanakh says to me when I read it. Um, "Torah was the blueprint of the universe." This is the commentary for Proverbs 8:22-36. You tell me if you see a sentient being, a literal being, a, a spiritual person in their commentary. Quote: "Torah was the blueprint of the universe." *Bereshit Rabbah* 2:1. "God created the Torah before the universe. It is manifest in creation, preserves the world, and is a guide to all mankind. Only one path can lead to fulfillment: hearken unto discipline and grow wise. Only by unswerving obedience to the Torah can we succeed." This is what the commentators have ascribed to Proverbs 8:22-36. I'll read 22 again in Proverbs: "Yah possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old." The commentators are saying that here Elohim is talking about the Law, the Torah. And I don't think that we can read Genesis to Malachi and that there's a brother running right here with the name Torah, or there's a spiritual being running around here with the name Torah, unless we're talking about a personification of wisdom that is identified with the Torah, which is what the Israelites are saying. Brothers and sisters, what the Gentiles have done, and what this individual whom I call Joe, have done, is they have followed a Gentile pattern of biblical exegesis outside of its Hebraic framework, and you're going to miss the mark every single time. And so I'm saying to myself, when he is making the statement, "I don't know what stone edition Oscar Tanakh you got. I know what I have, and it ain't talking about no spiritual being. It's talking about Elohim's law." In Better Street Rabbah 1, which predates the medieval commentaries used by the ArtScroll Tanakh, let's just see if we have further affirmation of what Israelites understood Proverbs 8:22-36 to be talking about. "The Torah is saying, 'I was the tool of craft of the Holy One, blessed be He.'" "The way of the world is that when a flesh and blood king builds a palace, he does not build it based on his own knowledge, but rather based on the knowledge of an artisan. And the artisan does not build it based on his own knowledge, but rather has plans on sheets and tablets by which to ascertain how he should build its rooms, how he should build its doors.'" Here we go. "So too, the Holy One..."

That's, yah. Blessed be He. He looked in the Torah, the first five books of the Bible, and created the world. Let's see what they cite.

The Torah says, "Bereshit Elohim created." Genesis 1:1. And "Bereshit" is nothing other than the Torah. As it says, "Yah made me at the beginning of His way." And notice what they cite, brothers and sisters. They cite Proverbs chapter 8, verse 22. So again, I don't know what Joe is looking at with regards to his resources, but you, I have the very same source, and the source is saying something radically different from what he is trying to propose to keep a gentile patristical fallacy alive that does not work.

Here is a scholar who specializes, brothers and sisters. Narcisus. This is from your Alameda. Dr. Maran May Thompson, Professor of New Testament at Fuller Theological Seminary, writes, "All the wisdom," very important, "all the wisdom can be personified as having independent reality." I'm going to repeat that. Although wisdom can be personified, Proverbs chapter 1 is about wisdom. Proverbs chapter 8 is about wisdom. Although wisdom can be personified as having independent reality and existence apart from God, how? Through personifications and depicted as inviting people to eat. Wisdom invites people to eat. Wisdom offers people life. Wisdom is searching for a place to dwell in Israel. Listen, this wisdom is not, in the end, separable from God. Brothers and sisters, it's a personal affront, offense to us as Sosis, to listen to a doctrine that is separating wisdom from God. Outside of personified terms, you cannot do that. None of the, uh, Israelites, none of our brothers and sisters of antiquity did that. Are you? How do you know? Because we're reading their literature.

Listen, wisdom is not, in the end, separable from God, but rather the concrete manifestation of God's own ways with and in the world. Listen, wisdom does not exist unless God thinks it. And Solomon's proverb, the Torah is the embodiment of wisdom, which cannot be separated from Yah. Yah's wisdom, which is now His word, thus law, was the instrument that Yah used to make and sustain the world. Solomon has been commissioned by Yah as the embodiment of wisdom to reveal her in a Torah-centric manner through sapiential metaphors. Sapiential is wisdom. So through wisdom-type metaphors. So we're looking at things symbolically, metaphorically, rhetorically, not literally. This revelation will continue in deuterocanonical texts and extra-biblical literature.

Let's move, move on to chapter 2. Looks like we're making some good headway here. Go ahead and still get your popcorn, um, some Cheetos, or some pastoral theologians such as MacArthur. We're talking about John MacArthur. He is, um, uh, uh, an evangelist and a pastor, uh, in, I think, Pastor Dana, California. Pastoral theologians such as John MacArthur argue that Yeshua is the word and wisdom of Yah, who is also known as the Angel of Yah, the Angel of the Lord, speaking and reflecting Yah's wisdom. Often, this deduction comes from the idea that there are, here we go, "to Yahweh," brothers and sisters. I get hit with this all the time. "All you, are you familiar with the two Yahweh theory?" Yep. "Do you believe that there are two Yahweh?" No. Nope. "There's Yahweh the Father, and there's Yahweh Jr., Jesus." Because of the writers' or speakers' use of a literary device called, and illeism, brothers and sisters, third-person speech. This is the consensus in most of Neo-Chrum, and that is that Yeshua pre-existed as Yah's Archangel and His word. Archangel, "angelos," "ar," ruler, first, proto, but more so ruler, a ruling angel, a ruling angel that is also representative of God's word. This is who Yeshua was before He came to Earth. Patently false, unbiblical to the 10th degree, brothers and sisters.

Most Neo-Christians argue that it was Yeshua as an Angel of the Lord who appeared to Abraham. Everything that you all are learning this evening and hearing this evening, you all have either propagated it or it has been presented to you. If you have not received these proclamations, these theorems, brothers and sisters, rest assured it is coming. How do you respond? "It was Yeshua as the Angel of the Lord who wrestled with Jacob and blessed him with the name Israel." This is what Neo-Christians teach. "It was Yeshua as the Angel of the Lord whom Jacob asked to bless his children." "It was Yeshua as an Angel of the Lord speaking to Moses in the burning bush." "It was Yeshua as the Angel of the Lord who led the children of Israel in the wilderness." And it was Yeshua as the Angel of the Lord in Mount Sinai, given the Commandments to Moses as a word of God.

Here, here's a problem. This supposition is biblically untenable. For no New Testament writer conveyed to the readers that Yeshua was the Angel of the Lord and the word speaking to and providing instructions, care, and provisions for the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and David. It's not there. It's not there. No place in the Gospels does Yeshua intimate what He, as Yah's word and wisdom, as well as Yah's Angel of the Lord, was doing with and to the patriarchs before His earthly ministry. He's never conversing about His pre-existence, His pre-early ministry. I mean, if I was the Angel of the Lord talking to Moses, talking to Abraham, talking to, you know, um, uh, Adam, uh, talking to, to, talking to, to Jacob, Isaac, to Hagar, and then I came to Earth, I mean, unless I have been told by God the Father not to make mention of my existence and my interaction with the patriarchs, oh, I'm talking, and I got a big mouth. I'm saying a lot of stuff, brothers and sisters. But yet, Yeshua, not one time intimates any of His deeds that He performed amongst the patriarchs before coming to Earth. There's a reason for that, brothers and sisters. Such a testimony does not exist because Yeshua did not exist prior to His earthly creation, as the New Testament writers conveyed to the readers.

Very important. Listen. Stephen, a martyr, a Hebrew. He's going to give testimony. Very important for us to pay attention to his testimony. Stephen stated that it was an angel who spoke to Moses in the burning bush. It was an angel who spoke to the elders in Mount Sinai. And it was an angel that gave the Ten Commandments and the Torah. And Stephen's defense, in Greek, we say "apologia." In his "apologia" to the priest, as one who spoke under the auspices of the Spirit of wisdom. Go read it for yourself. Acts 6:8-15. Stephen has the gift of wisdom. This is the personification of wisdom and word. Lesson today: Spirit of wisdom is given to Stephen for his defense. He's also referred to as an angel. Stephen, nobody would ever argue that Stephen pre-existed as God's angel, Archangel. Nobody would ever argue that Stephen pre-existed as wisdom. He is personifying both statuses. Brothers and sisters, we are talking about personification. Listen, Stephen never gives a testimony about Yeshua's pre-incarnate existence and interaction with the patriarchs, which would have been appropriate in his "apologia." We never hear Yeshua, we're talking about any of His pre-early deeds and interactions with Israel because He was not there to interact with the patriarchs as most Neo-Christians suppose.

Furthermore, his evidence, the author of Hebrews, says that Yah spoke to the patriarchs through the prophets. Brothers and sisters, the author never says that Yah spoke to the patriarchs through His Son, Yeshua. The author says that Yah spoke to Israel during His earthly ministry through His Son, whom He anointed and appointed as His spokesman in these last days. We're just reading text and comprehending with simplicity what the writers are presenting before us, and we can capture the author's intent if we remove any type of presuppositional theological indoctrination, brothers and sisters, and say, you know what? Let me, let me, let me, let me try this organically. Let me just try doing something that perhaps I have not been very good with, and that's just reading, brothers and sisters.

Let's look at Dr. James Dunn. Dr. James Dunn, brothers and sisters, is deceased now, but he's a giant in New Testament scholarship, world-renowned. And I'm interested in his observation. Dunn says, "There is no evidence that any New Testament writer thought of Jesus as actually present in Israel's past." It's not my words. It's my thesis. It's my argument. And like I said before, if we submit something like this, um, under the canopy of three billion people who believe something that is radically different from what I'm arguing, then you probably need to have some, um, some heavy support. We're going to look at a number of scholars and see what they have to say about our argument, brothers and sisters.

Dunn says, "There is no evidence that any New Testament writer thought of Jesus as actually present in Israel's past." I completely agree, brothers and sisters. He says, "Either as an angel of the Lord or as the Lord himself." It's not present. Dunn continues, he says, "So far as we can tell, then, no New Testament writer thought of Christ as an angel, whether as a pre-existent divine being who had appeared in Israel's history as an angel of the Lord, or as an angel or spirit become an angel. The Angel of the Lord in the early Jewish text is most obviously a way of speaking about Yahweh himself. And when the Angel of the Lord reappears in the writings of Luke and Matthew, there is no real possibility of confusing him with Jesus. The idea of Jesus as an incarnation of an angel never seems to have entered the head of any New Testament author." And, and while there was evidently a high regard for angels, perhaps even angel worship in some of Paul's churches, there is no clear evidence that any first-century Christian community actually thought of Christ as an angel. Any attempt to set the exalted Christ merely on the level of the angels was resisted with great vigor, particularly by Paul in his letter to Colossians, by the writer to the Hebrews. Dunn has rightly argued against there being an idea in first-century Jewry that angels could be born as incarnate beings, not that they could not appear in human form, but that their composition as such was not transferable to a terrestrial state, that is, an earthly state, such as the incarnation theory. Thus, it is most implausible to assert that Yeshua was the so-called word of God, wisdom of God, and pre-incarnate Archangel of God. The Lord descended to Earth to establish an earthly ministry. The evidence is not there, brothers and sisters.

Dunn's position is supported by the late William G. R. McDonald and Ian Marshall, Professor Emeritus of New Testament Exegesis at the University of Aberdeen, who writes in the current issues in biblical and patristic interpretation, "Just as sound Christology gives no ground for a worldly view of Jesus as a superstar, a heightened human, but only a human, so it would be the thesis defended here that neither does a biblical Christology support a view of Jesus as a super angel, either as angel-man or God-angel-man. Man, there being no hint of an angel Christ view in the New Testament." Brothers and sisters, these are Neo-Christians. Are they writing against their own interests? If your interest is to sustain a fallible doctrine, most certainly, because they're not supporting this, and they're right to argue against it, brothers and sisters, because you cannot read Matthew to Revelation and say, "Oh, okay, so I'm reading here that Jesus existed in the Old Testament." Not if you are using a higher level of biblical criticism to actually read and comprehend what the authors are saying. And this is what we need help with. We need to be in a community where we're dealing with honest exegites, honest brothers and sisters who have, uh, a biblical IQ that is able to appreciate the simplicity of God's word. It's not complicated in its organic form. It's complicated in its co-opted form, the form that has been presented to us for the past 1,800 years. That is complex, without question. And the reason that it is complex is because it is unbiblical. That's why it's so complex.

Look at this, y'all. "There being no hint of an angel Christ view in the New Testament." Okay, we must search elsewhere for its providence, for its origin. So where does this stuff come from? If you have a myriad of scholars who are saying, "Guys, we got to back up. Um, there ain't no place in the New Testament where we can argue successfully that Jesus pre-existed anywhere in the Old Testament." We got to move off that premise. Okay, so you do that. If you take something away from the people, you got to replace it with something. Oh, not a problem. You take away a lie and you replace it with the truth. So what is the truth? Where does this doctrine come from? Why do we have three billion people of our brothers and sisters worshiping Jesus Christ, which violates the first two commandments of the Decalogue? And we have brothers and sisters in academia and brothers and sisters in the pastor, in the church, that's continuing to teach a fallacious doctrine. Why? There are a number of reasons. But where does it come from? Listen to your scholars. This doctrine is not to be found in the writings of the Apostolic Fathers. It don't come from Mark, brothers and sisters. It doesn't come from Matthew. It doesn't come from Luke. It doesn't come from Paul. It doesn't come from Barnabas. It doesn't come from the author of Hebrews. It doesn't come from James or Peter. Here, your authors are saying, "We have to search then for the origin." Only Hermas made reference to "angelos" to "iro," which means Angel of the Lord, but he used the term when writing of the great and glorious Angel Michael. I got to know where it's coming from. I mean, y'all, brothers, got to help me.

Let's continue to read. In the post-apostolic period, that means after the death of the Apostles. After the death of the apostles, somebody eating some popcorn around there. I see y'all. I, I, I, I, I was, I was just, I was just somewhat being figurative. I was just driving. I ain't really mean for you to go out and pop no popcorn. But anyway, in the post-apostolic period, Christian apologists scrambled for all available materials to defend Christ's authority and deity before Jews and pagan intellectuals. Let's make sure we look at this again. In the post-apostolic period, after the death of the Apostles, Neo-Christian apologists, this would be Irenaeus, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Tertullian. This would be, uh, Jerome, Augustine, Origen. Neo-Christian apologists scrambled for all available materials to defend Christ's authority and deity before Jews and pagan intellectuals. Here's one of your first Neo-Christian apologists, brothers and sisters, Justin Martyr, who wrote in the middle of the second century. Pioneered the way for succeeding apologists. In other words, other apologists came after him, but he laid the foundation for the deification of Christ. He laid the foundation for making Christ God. He laid the foundation for placing Christ in the Old Testament as a pre-existent being. He did this. Listen, Justin Martyr, who wrote in the middle of the second century, pioneered the way for succeeding apologists. Shakala, hey, Shalom, brother. How you doing? Even, brother. I'm doing great. You see this? Oh, I see it. I see it. I see it. This is one of the best compositions, too. I've loved it. But Shakala, here's the problem with we talk to our brothers and sisters, and we tell them there ain't but one God because God told us that it's only Him as our Sovereign power. God cannot lie. It's impossible for Him to lie. So we have all of these people who are saying, "Well, well, Christ is God. Christ pre-existed." So then God is a liar? Well, no, God is not a liar. Well, then obviously He is if you're telling me that Christ pre-existed as God, that He is ontologically God. So then you have their scholars telling you what the ancients have done, the patristics, the Neo-Christians. And even with that, Shakala, they still refuse to believe it. You know, though, with the trickery that we've seen with the use of John's prologue, those first five verses, with the use of those first five verses to tie it, in my opinion, here, to tie it to wisdom literature, not just biblical wisdom literature, but the other pieces of biblical literature that you see, you got him. It's ingenious because it gives them a semi-foundation to say that, "Yes, He pre-existed." Yeah, don't, don't worry about the fact that they're talking about wisdom. Don't worry about that. Okay? That's not what you see. I know your eyes think you see it, but that's not really what you see. Right? What you see is the Messiah here. You know, and, and I love the piece that you put in. I know I'm jumping ahead. I'm sorry. Okay, but I gotta say it. But the piece that you put in where you have "logos" is a masculine word, right? Really and truly, they wanted to put in "Sophia," but they thought if we put in "Sophia," it would be confusing because we're trying to transition from something to a man, right? So why put in "Sophia"? However, if we had, we would have to use those same feminine pronouns. It would have to be "she" all the way through until we get to verse 14 in John's prologue. I thought that was great. To me, that was like, I sat back, crossed my arms, oh, crossed my arms behind my head, kicked my feet out, and just stayed there for a while because that was beautiful. Yeah. Yeah. This is where we are.

Justin Martyr, who wrote in the middle of the second century, pioneered the way for succeeding apologists, Shakala, to find a second God. To find a second God in the Old Testament under the title of an Angel, as well as under other names. In other words, the glory of the Lord, firstborn, power, logos, Son, Man. Justin elaborated four instances, in other words, with Abraham, Genesis 18; with Jacob, Genesis 28; with Moses, Exodus 3; with Joshua, Joshua chapter 5, that he interpreted as pre-incarnate appearances of Christ under the guise of an angel. For succeeding angel-Christ advocates, these episodes became standard proofs. Standard proofs. And you have to ask, brother, you've been knowing me for a long time. This is an issue. My grievance and umbrage, as it is, I believe, with everybody that's in this, this, this, this, this form. You, you got to test the data. Will the data withstand critical analysis, scrutiny? And what are you testing this data with? We're testing the data with the canonicity of scripture. Exactly. And when you have scholars that are just honest guys, we don't have what you think we have here in the Bible with regards to the deification of Christ, that presents a major problem.

Then the Old Testament and the intertestamental books have regarded wisdom and word as the mind of Yah that materializes when He speaks. In Hebrew, we say "devar." In Greek, we say "logos." They do not view it as an actual person, such as an angel or Yeshua pre-incarnate. McDonald goes on to say that Philo generally regarded the logos as impersonal reason. And Shakala, the brother Joe called me back and said, "Okay, well, Arya, do you realize that Philo, uh, believes that there are two gods? He speaks of two gods." I said, "Yeah, because there is no, no, no, um, intelligent discourse that you can have with people unless you learn to humble yourself, man." Yeah. Philo generally regarded the logos as impersonal reason, but once, but he once hypostatized the logos as God's senior Archangel. So, brothers and sisters, here we are with hypothesis. So this is the reason why we had to circle back around and say, you know what? We need to do a little bit more work on hypostasis because this is an issue. We're seeing where the Gentiles, where the patristics are gathering their data to create a second God. And what people fail to realize is this: we, as the children of Israel, we worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob because He told us to. He told us that He created the universe and all that dwells within it. He told us that it is He and He alone that sustains our lives, that gives us life, that bestows blessings upon us. He has told us that we are to revere Him, venerate Him, worship Him, um, give Him accolades and praise for all that He has done, not just for you as an individual, but for the world as a whole. To give Him praises. And so when we enter into this, this, this, this philosophical term of hypostasis, and then how it has been been modified and changed to, um, modified and changed to fit a Greco-Latin, um, mythological religious ideology, and you infuse it with our literature, you set the world on fire. You then begin to distance man from God. That's a problem.

Philo generally regarded the logos as impersonal reason, but once, but he once hypostatized the logos as God's senior Archangel. It was but the next short step in the development of this view to expand Justin's logos-angel into the biblical expression, the Angel of the Lord, Yahweh, or the Angel of God, Elohim, equating the angel with the second factor in the synonymous expressions. Justin was not the only patristic, brothers and sisters, who saw a necessity to create another God and introduce this God as a pre-incarnate angel, Jesus, the Angel of the Lord, the word, and wisdom. So a number of our scholars are telling us, he laid the foundation for an excellent work. Justin Martyr is, uh, revered as the, uh, foremost expert of John's prologue. So it is, it is just a martyr's interpretation of John's prologue that three billion people have adopted. What they are arguing about today, what they're proclaiming and propagating today, Justin Martyr laid the foundation, and succeeding patristics embraced it. Clement of Alexandria, Neo-Christian theologian and philosopher, propagated the Yeshua pre-existed as God or an angel of God before coming to Earth. So did theologian and Neo-Christian apologist Tertullian, along with Novatian, biblical scholar, priest, and theologian, and Hilary of Poitiers, Bishop of Poitiers in France, and a Doctor of the Church. The patristics removed Yah from being the central focus of Old intertestamental and New Testament worship. Israelites didn't do this. The Gentiles did this. The patristics removed Yah from being the central focus of Old intertestamental and New Testament worship.

I want to make sure that you understand what intertestamental means. When we say testamental books, we are talking about, uh, the books such as Maccabees. We're talking about the books such as Bel and the Dragon, Sus, second Ezra, the Book of Wisdom, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus or Sirach. These are intertestamental books. These are books that were written between the fifth century BC and 1st century AD. So the Old Testament books are the books that you're familiar with, Genesis to Malachi. Then we enter the intertestamental books. These are not inspired books. God did not inspire these books. These books were written by the "kadim," uh, a sect before they broke off into the "parim" what we call today the Pharisees, and the Essenes, Sadducees. So they wrote these books, brothers and sisters, because there was nothing coming from God by way of prophets over the course of 400 and some odd years. So they wrote these books. The pseudo-apocryphal books such as the, uh, Apocalypse of Abraham or the Book of Enoch was written during this period.

The patristics removed Yah from being the central focus of Old intertestamental and New Testament worship to the worship and veneration of Jesus as God. Any place in the Bible that one could spiritually read Jesus into a passage as God, they did so. This is the reason why we are saying respectfully, there are no places in the New Testament where you can read Jesus as God. In other words, ontologically God. We're not talking about His exalted status as a divine being in which Thomas refers to Him as "Elion" and "Eli, my Master and my God." Here he is talking about status, brothers and sisters, but this is an exalted term used after His resurrection. So we understand where the plain terms are, and then you have to establish the context.

So let's go back and see what McDonald and others had to say about this subject. McDonald says that Clement of Alexandria fueled the allegorical mind of North Africa with his crisp identification of the Angel who wrestled with Jacob as God the Word, the instructor. Tertullian, the North African theologian, contended for the true and solid substance of the unborn flesh in Christ's supposed visits to the patriarchs. Novatian, the noted Roman presbyter, supplied the notion that the Son was accustomed to descend and be seen as an angel prior to the incarnation. Hilary of Poitiers represented the literalist attempt to pinpoint the reference of Jesus' words, "Abraham saw my day" (John 8:56), as the occasion of Abraham's or Abraham's hospitality to the three angels, one of whom was supposed to be Christ. Then McDonald says, "You actually need to read the text. Actually, Yeshua said, 'Abraham saw my day.' He didn't say, 'Abraham saw me.'" Again, people read it as, "Abraham saw me." No, no. We've already litigated this. I'm not going to go back over. But Abraham saw my rule, he saw my age, he saw my era. Critical scholars can identify the development of a deified high Christology formed by Neo-Christians, not Jews. These views are imposed upon the Judaic culture by pagan Neo-Christian Platonic philosophers for the purpose of creating a God-Jesus, deified, which has led billions into idolatry.

So now we're getting to the crust here, brothers and sisters. What are we dealing with? We are saying unequivocally, absolutely, and emphatically that we have been brought up in a system, and we have been taught, programmed, and trained to be idolaters. Now, this isn't going to come from me. So pay attention. This is what the biblical scholar James Dunn refers to as "Jesus idolatry." Dunn says, "For if what has emerged in this inquiry is taken seriously, and we do take it seriously, it soon becomes evident that Christian worship can deteriorate into what may be called Jesus idolatry, that is not simply into worship of Jesus, but into a worship that falls short of the worship due to the one God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ." What is he saying? The worship due to God is absorbed by the idol. Violates the first two commandments in the Decalogue. "You shall have no other God but me. You should not make unto yourself a graven image and bow yourself down to it." Brothers and sisters, this is the very first thing they did in the second century after the death of the Apostles, and they are continuing to do it today. As we all know, because we come out of that system. If we come out of that system, we now need to be retaught. We now have to be retooled. We have to be resourced. We have to learn. What are the resources? The Bible and Jewish literature. You got to master that before you start tinkering with other things. I digress.

This is what Dunn says. "The danger of Jesus idolatry is similar, that Jesus has been substituted for God, has taken the place of the one Creator God. Jesus is absorbing the worship due to God alone." "I love you, Jesus." "Thank you, Jesus." "Help me, Jesus." "Anybody seen my, uh, my crucifix with Jesus on it?" "Jesus, I need a job." "Jesus, I need a husband." "Jesus, I need a wife." "Jesus, will you help me get pregnant?" "I need some children around here." Jesus, Jesus, Jesus. I get it. I understand it. What we are saying respectfully is that that is idolatry. Whatever you need in this world, whatever you need in this life, whatever you need for you, you ask the Father. And where does that come from? That comes from Jesus. That comes from Yeshua. He said in the Book of John, "Anything that you ask of the Father in my name shall be granted unto you." Look, Jesus is absorbing the worship due to God alone. So the danger with the worship that has become too predominantly the worship of Jesus is that the worship due to God is stopping at Jesus. This is coming from Neo-Christians, brothers and sisters. The worship of Jesus is that the worship due to God is stopping at Jesus. Brothers and sisters, that's called idolatry.

When Yah first spoke, abstract wisdom appeared as His word, as Philo will argue, an impersonal being, a personification of God himself. Try to hang in there with me, brothers and sisters. I'm trying to get through this as, as, as, as fast as possible, but I'm very passionate about Messianic Sosis, this faith and culture. This is about us being properly resourced through divine enlightenment. This is understanding divinity and God and His emissary and ambassador through Elohim's word, brothers and sisters, and it takes some time to methodically, you know, traverse the plains of God's word through the Law, the Prophets, and the Brit P, the New Testament, because I, I want us to get to the meat here in a second, but you got to lay a foundation. Where does all of this misinformation, disinformation come from? Follow me.

When Yah first spoke, abstract wisdom appeared as His word. In other words, remember Dr. Thomas Thompson said, wisdom does not materialize unless Elohim thinks it. So it comes from God. It is God. Just like each one of you, every time you speak a word, you are the word that you spoke. That comes from you. Remember Yeshua says, "Out of the abundance of the heart does a man speak." David says, "Protect your lips, for out of your mouth are the issues of life." What you think, what you feel, what you believe, what you desire, etc., etc., etc. It's representative of you. This is what our ancestors understood about God himself. Follow. Here we go.

When Yah first spoke, abstract wisdom appeared as His word, as Philo will argue, an impersonal being, a personification of God himself, which He established as His Torah. Remember, Yah said in His Torah, "These are my ways. The, you know, the, these, these, these are my ethics. These are my virtues. This is my personality." If Yah did away with the Torah, Yah does away with Himself because He is His Torah. Look at this, y'all. Let's go to Jewish literature. God said, quote, quote, "God said to Israel, before I made this world, I prepared the Torah." Thus, wisdom, speech, and behavior resemble that of a prophet. Hence, wisdom, word, and Torah are synonymous. Brothers and sisters, there can be no word from Yah without it embodying wisdom. Let me help you to appreciate this. We know a person by the words that come from their mouth, whether we're dealing with somebody who's wise or whether we're dealing with a fool. How do you know if you're dealing with a fool? Listen to the conversation. Look at the antics. Our ancestors are saying is that the same discernment is what we have been given with regards to the Creator. Yah's word. His word. Shakala, probably, I may give Shakala an opportunity to speak on this. I don't know.

Yah's word, brothers and sisters, is representative of His wisdom. How do I know that? There's wisdom unless I speak, unless I act. In theology, we refer to as speech act. There can be no word from Yah without it embodying wisdom. And since Yah exists as an eternal being, here we go. So does Sophia. So does wisdom. So does logos, the word, whose utterances are verbalized through a "maloch," an angel. In other words, when you hear Elohim's word, whether it's through a vision, a dream, a trance, it's being conveyed by one of His messengers, but it's Elohim's word. Watch this. Whom Neo-Christians are saying is a pre-incarnate Jesus. Yah created all things through wisdom by His word. In other words, Elohim thought of something in His mind, and then He spoke it. When He spoke it, it came to be. Yah created all things through wisdom by His word, which is called in Aramaic the "memra." The Targum Neofiti, dated between the 1st to the 4th centuries AD, says, "From the beginning with wisdom, the memra of Yah created and perfected the heavens and the earth." Hence, with Sophia, the logos, word, "memra" created the heavens and the earth. I say again, with Sophia, with wisdom, the logos, the word, they work in tandem. They are synonymous. Tell me what's on your mind, and I speak. Whatever is on my mind is conveyed through a word, and that word is representative of my thought, and my thoughts is representative of me. There is no separation. We want to understand how did our ancestors understand what we are reading today that so many people are confused about. There is a reason that there is confusion, brothers and sisters. I want to help you to appreciate this.

Look at what Yah says. Isaiah says, "For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven and do not return there, but water the earth, making it bring forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater." Listen to what Yah says, brothers and sisters. "So shall my word be that that goes out from my mouth. It shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it." This is what's interesting in this passage. Yah has personified His word as an impersonal, neutral pronoun called "it." Let's look at the story of "it." And I'm not talking about that clown Stephen King's clown. One of the reasons for our Neo-Christian chaos and confusion is the omission of Yah personified as an "it," which is the English neuter pronoun ascribed to the masculine Greek "logos" or Hebrew "devar" for word, which is represented in Hebrew as a "he." Just follow me. Let's look at this. I want to make sure that we understand what's going on because we have an exchange of pronouns that have complicated things. One of the reasons for our Neo-Christian chaos and confusion is the omission of Yah personified as an "it." Y-A-H personified as an "it." Yes. How is that? Be patient, I'll show you. In English, it's the neuter pronoun ascribed, ascribed to the masculine Greek "logos," word, or Hebrew "devar," the word, which is represented in English as a "he." Here's our issue. Hebrew does not have a neuter pronoun, brothers and sisters. Only masculine and feminine pronouns. For "he," in Hebrew, we say "hu." For feminine, for "she," we say "hi." Yah's word is an "it," and is an abstract virtue representing Himself, stemming from His mind, will, reason, thought, idea, thus wisdom, that will perform His deeds. Here we go. Therefore, the text properly reads Isaiah 55:11 if we are looking at it from a masculine and feminine as opposed to neuter. "So shall my word be that goes out from my mouth, he shall not return to me empty, but he shall accomplish that which I purpose and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent him." So the way Hebrew works, brothers and sisters, our ancestors are saying, well, Elohim is talking about Himself, but He is personifying Himself via His word. And His word, right, is, you know, since we only have feminine and and masculine, well, "davar" here is masculine. Elohim is masculine. And so His word is representative of what God is doing. That's looking at it verbally. Our Neo-Christian brothers and sisters interpret it differently, which has created mass confusion. Let's, let's look at this. Yah is speaking about what He is going to do through His word. Remind you, Greek "logos," Hebrew "devar." So Philo rightly ascribes masculinity to the "logos," the word, where in English the "neo" pronoun transitions to an impersonal pronoun "it," yet both represent Yah and no other being. The psalmist writes, "By the word of Yah, by the word of Yah, the heavens were made, and by the breath of His mouth all their host." Yah is creating. Yah is building. Yah is constructing. And the way it is written in our literature is that Yah is doing this by His word, brothers and sisters, and you can't separate Yah from His word. "It" and "word" are synonyms for Yah.

This observation is critical to understanding John's prologue. Proverbs says, "Yah, by wisdom, Yah, by wisdom, founded the earth. By understanding, He established the heavens." Jeremiah writes, "It is He who made the earth by its power, who established the world by His wisdom, and by His understanding stretched out the heavens." "It" and wisdom are synonyms for Yah and serve as personifications for His presence. Yah planned to create the heavens and the earth, and this plan was always with Him. I'm going to repeat that. Yah's plan from His mind, His thought, His purpose, His will, His agenda to create the heavens and the earth, and this plan, this idea, this thought, this agenda was always with Him as an initiative formed through His wisdom. When Yah decided to create the heavens and the earth and all that dwell within it, brothers and sisters, He spoke it. He spoke it, and it was done. He spoke His wisdom. He created by His wisdom, and it was done. Is what we call "creatio ex nihilo," creation out of nothing. Yah spoke His word, the "memra" of "logos," and His word did not return to Him until it, or He, had accomplished all that He planned through His wisdom, His emissary and agent, Sophia, wisdom, conveyed verbally by the inspiration of an angel or Holy Spirit. This is the reason why you read in the Book of Genesis and you see the Spirit hovering above the waters, etc. Elohim creating. After Yah created the heavens and the earth, He established a people for Himself and sent His agent to dwell amongst them. He sent Sophia embodied in His Torah to raise a nation of imagers who would reflect His brilliance, but they rejected Him. In other words, they rejected Yah's word. They rejected His wisdom. They rejected His Torah that had come to them. This is what John is telling us in John's prologue 1:1-13. The rejection of Yah's wisdom, His word, and thus His Torah, led to the destruction of Israel. But it was the same word that judged them, brothers and sisters, that would also rescue and heal them.

We have to see what the psalmist says. "Some were fools through their sinful ways, and because of their iniquities, Israel suffered affliction. They loathed any kind of food, and they drew near to the gates of death. Then they cried to Yah in their trouble, and He delivered them from their distress." How did Yah deliver our ancestors who were in tribulation? Listen to our Father David. "He sent out His word and healed them and delivered them from their destruction." Word is impersonal. Word is an "it." But we don't have the "neo" pronoun "it," so it's in the masculine case, "he." Then, if it's "he," who is the "he"? Attached to it? It's attached to God because God is the one who is saving. This is the reason why Yah says, "Look to Me and be saved throughout the ends of the earth." Brothers and sisters, "Let them thank Yah for His steadfast love, for His wondrous works to the children of man, and let them offer sacrifices of Thanksgiving and tell of His deeds in songs of joy." "He sent out His word and healed them and delivered them from their destruction." David is telling you that Yah is His word. So give thanks to Yah for delivering you, for saving you, for stabilizing you. Don't try to separate Him from His word and make His word into into some other being called Jesus pre-incarnate, brothers and sisters. That's not how our ancestors understood these passages.

The author of the Wisdom of Solomon, this is an intertestamental book. The author of the Wisdom of Solomon adopts his narrative and writes, "For neither herb nor poultice cured them. What cured them? It was Your word, O Yah, which heals all men, so that Your sons whom You loved, O Yah, might learn that it is not the production of crops that feeds man, but that Your word preserves those who trust in You." Yeshua embraces this concept, brothers and sisters, when being tested by the devil. And after fasting for 40 days and 40 nights, He was hungry, and the tempter came and said to Him, "If you are the Son of God, command these stones to become loaves of bread." But He answered, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God shall man live.'" Brothers and sisters, you cannot separate God from His word. We are talking about personification, is all we're doing.

Hebraic, the word of Yah is His wisdom embodied in His Torah. This is what Second Temple Judeans understood and wrote to their countrymen, local and remote, to impress upon them the necessity of embracing the Torah. The psalmist writes, "The law of Yah is perfect; it gives us new life. His teachings last forever and they give wisdom to ordinary people." The psalmist then says, "Young people can live a clean life. How? By being Your word." David says in Psalm 18:28, "For it is You who light my lamp; Yah my Elohim lightens my darkness." He says in Psalm 27:1, "Yah is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? Ain't scared of nobody. Yah is a stronghold of my life; of whom shall I be afraid? I ain't scared of nobody." Finally, David confirms that the word of Yah is His Torah that gives light and wisdom to the simple, those whom Sophia has been reaching out to. In Psalm 119:105-17 and 130, David says, "Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path. I have sworn an oath and confirmed it to keep Your righteous rules. I am severely afflicted; give me life, O Yah, according to Your word. The unfolding of Your words gives light; it imparts understanding to the simple." You cannot separate God from His word. You cannot tell me that Jesus pre-existed as God's word because no Israelite understood that. The Neo-Christian Church, that assertion and declaration, and the community in their ignorance, the naive in their illiteracy, didn't know any better other than to adopt Him and to be the evangelist of this doctrine that defies the first two commandments. There's more, brothers and sisters.

Yah's word embodies His wisdom, and He has sent it, or Him, to create, destroy, rebuild, heal, redeem, instruct, nourish, judge, acquit, and restore life. Yah does all these things alone and commissioned Solomon in the Book of Proverbs to give voice to His wisdom through "pria," which became the model for the Wisdom of Solomon and the Book of Sirach. So we have intertestamental books. We have intertestamental writers. The author of Wisdom of Solomon and the Book of Sirach, they are looking at what Solomon wrote and they're saying, "We're going to present the very same thing. We're going to develop it further."

In conclusion, brothers and sisters, there is, and when I say in conclusion, I'm talking about conclusion of chapter 2, so don't get happy, okay? In conclusion, there is no divine agent in the literal sense. There is no literal, there is no literal emissary or intermediary that is a God. These are imaginary entities from Yah's abstract attribute called wisdom and word that are representative of His qualities. This is to say, it is only Yah speaking of Himself anthropomorphically and using angelic and human instruments to personify His word, which the Gentiles have erroneously ascribed a literal personhood. This is to say, a hypostasis. And we're going to get into hypostasis in a second. I want to show you what hypostasis really means, brothers and sisters. Chapter 3. One more chapter in the conclusion, and we're done.

The wisdom narrative begins with Yah endowing Bezalel or Hilab, Joshua, and Daniel with wisdom. Yah then commissioned Solomon to personify wisdom through "prosopopeia" to express the necessity of pursuing her, capturing her, embracing and loving her, so that she can freely provide instructions and guidance in life. The intertestamental authors pick up where Solomon leaves off and now reach the exploits of Sophia and Sirach. Takes it upon himself to personify her through "prosopopeia." Remember, these are rhetorical devices. Philo takes a different approach and narrates a story about Sophia and how she is personified through several notable and reputable women. This is what Krueger, another scholar, says. Krueger notes that Philo allegorized the marriages of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as being the beginning of their spiritual maturity. Very important, brothers and sisters. Their wives symbolize heavenly wisdom. Let's pause for a second. Arya, what have you just presented here? What I am presenting to you, brothers and sisters, is that before Yeshua came, our ancestors such as Philo, Wisdom of Sirach, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, Sirach, understood that people were personified or could be personifications of wisdom. So when we look at Philo, Philo allegorized or used Eve as a personification of God's wisdom. Sarah as a personification of God's wisdom. Let me, let me read this here. "Their wives symbolize heavenly wisdom, and the consummation brought divine enlightenment. Sarah, for instance, represents virtue made perfect through teaching. Rebecca's name is allegorized as wisdom, the daughter of God, who is the firstborn mother of all things. Her function as drawer and carrier of water symbolizes carrying eternal wisdom of knowledge from the divine spring." Dr. Robert Bowman observes that in Old Testament wisdom literature, the personification of wisdom is a literary device for speaking of God himself. I'm going to repeat. Bowman observes, "In Old Testament wisdom literature, the personification of wisdom is a literary device for speaking of God himself acting in His wisdom among His people." So when this gentleman, whom I called Joe, says, "Okay, well, Proverbs chapter 8 is is speaking about..."

A Divine being and you disagree with that, ARA? Absolutely. So, so you're, well, okay. So, so who, so who is talking in the Book of Proverbs chapter 8? Solomon, where it says wisdom. Yeah, of course, it does. You ever seen wisdom with a voice, brother? Wisdom is an abstract virtue. How does wisdom have a voice? Wisdom has a voice when you give it a voice. Solomon is giving wisdom a voice. So, what is wisdom representative of, ARA? God himself.

And then, brothers and sisters, you got to shut down the conversation because you realize that this is over some people's heads. Look, these were the sentiments expressed by McDonald and Marshall, who states that Philo generally regarded the Logos as impersonal reason. It was a way of Philo speaking about Yah abstractly. Personification and anthropomorphizing Yah's word is vital to explicating Yah's will. Dismissing personification, hold on, let me drink my drink here. Personification and anthropomorphizing, morphing Yah's word is vital to explicating Yah's will. Dismissing personification as an effective tool to articulate Yah's essence has been doctrinally fatal in Neo-Christianity and has led many astray.

I am not God. I am no judge. I am simply saying, brothers and sisters, is that there is a problem, and that this could come back and bite you. Understanding the Bible requires one to identify devices the authors are using to convey a message to their respective audiences. In most cases, this has not been the case. Thus, the writers are not writing about how wisdom became incarnate. This is to say, someone in celestial or incorporeal was made into flesh. They are writing how an abstract quality was humanized. This is the same methodology the New Testament writers are using about Yeshua.

Chapter 4. Oh boy, we're making some good time. I think after reviewing this data, how can one draw a supposition that Yeshua pre-existed as an archangel, wisdom, Sophia, a word, Logos, then entered Earth in the Incarnation? In the sense that the word and wisdom came to Earth and took upon flesh and learned to eat, walk, talk, maintain proper hygiene, etc. All that Solomon, Sarak, Philo, Enoch, Baruch, and Wisdom of Solomon, we cite all of these books in this composition. We cite Sarak, we cite Philo, we cite Enoch, we cite Baruch, we cite Wisdom of Solomon. All these authors had to say about wisdom has been reduced by Neo-Christians to an Incarnation narrative, and none of these writings, excuse me, none of these writers are writing about an Incarnation narrative.

Some may say, "Well, ARA, why should they? The Incarnation doesn't take place until the New Testament." My rebuttal and refutation to that statement would be, even the New Testament writers are not writing about an Incarnation narrative in the sense that you have a pre-existent being coming into the flesh. We have God's spoken word coming into the flesh and then being personified, or being the personifier of wisdom. The Incarnation narrative does not accord with any book in the Old Testament, intertestamental, or New Testament.

Listen to me. Dr. Michael Heiser, schooling the fields of biblical studies and the ancient Near East, says it best: "The truth is that Christians affirm the Incarnation because they have to. It defines Christianity. It is a separate theology from the biblical theology, the Hebraic theology that Yeshua and the apostles left for us." So, they have to create a theological doctrine, a theological template that, that, that resembles the apostles' doctrine. Brothers and sisters, and if you are illiterate, as we have all been, brothers and sisters, naive and ignorant, right? Then it's going to seem plausible because they are your teachers, they are your leaders. And I will say that some are doing it unintentionally. These people have, um, arisen to the level of scholar, um, by continuing to regurgitate what they have been taught by their teachers. In other words, their supposition has never changed. Although they have concerns, and we have brothers, you know, in this forum who've graduated from seminary, who have had conversations with their professors, and their professors have told them, as they have told me, "Look, I know that some of this stuff is not in the Bible, but this is part of the curriculum, and I get paid to teach it." So, some of us who come from the academy, we know that this exists out here. But our brothers and sisters who are sitting in the pew, they don't know. The ones who have noble intentions towards understanding Elohim and are evangelizing what they think is the truth, they really don't know what the truth is. So, what we're trying to do in Saps and Socratic Light is to level the playing field. At least you're going to have the resources. You can no longer claim ignorance.

Listen, this form of Christianity is not biblical. No Jew in antiquity knew or thought of an Incarnation. The Judeans did know, know, and thought of Yah in personified terms. This is to say, a Divine being manifesting himself through and by his word, such as, look at this, look at this. He sends out his command to the Earth. His word runs swiftly. I ain't never seen no word with no legs, brothers and sisters. So, we're talking about personification, we're talking about symbolism, we're talking about metaphors. It is Yah who is running swiftly throughout the Earth through his word.

This changed with the introduction of Neo-Christianity, who has introduced a fallacious doctrine promoted by nearly all denominations within Neo-Christianity and so-called Hebrew Israelism, based upon their interpretation of John 1:1-5. "In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God." Right? John is talking about the word as a person, which he is not. This is the supposition. This is not a person. This is an impersonal, uh, attribute that is representative of God himself.

Let's look at what Dr. Roger Hay says, and I wanted to cite him, brothers and sisters, because he's a critical scholar, but he's also a Trinitarian, a Neo-Christian professor of theology at Union Theological Seminary, J. Theologian, a former president of the Catholic Theological Society of America. So, I'm very interested in what this brother has to say. He says of John's prologue, "Remember, in the beginning was the word, and the word was with God. The word was God. All things were made by him. There was nothing made that was not made by him. And in him was life, and life was the light of man," etc., etc., etc. ARA, this is talking about Jesus, and it is not, not at all. Hay says, "Even John's prologue, which is the single most explicit affirmation that seems to begin from God's side with a pre-existent Logos, must be understood as being grounded in an ascending experience. It is a poetic rendering of an insight whose logic ascends from Jesus. It says that the human being Jesus was the one in whom God was present and active for salvation. The symbol used to express God present and active in Jesus is God's word, a symbol so richly laden with tradition that it cannot be interpreted neatly without remainder. But one thing is certain, brother and sisters, one thing is certain: the prologue of John does not represent direct descriptive knowledge of a divine entity or being called Word. No such a thing who descended and became a human being." To read a metaphor as literal speech is misinterpretation. To read a symbolic statement in terms of direct descriptive representation is to reduce, distort, and finally trivialize the dynamic, searching character of its meaning. Brothers and sisters, Hay understands of the word of God, thus the Logos of God, is a metaphor for God and should not be taken as a literal person apart from God.

When we go back to Dunn, Dunn says that the Logos poem prepares the reader for the dramatic disclosure about to be made in verse 14. You all remember that? "And the word became flesh." Well, if Yeshua doesn't become flesh or enter the so-called Incarnation as the word, brothers and sisters, until verse 14, then what is John talking about from John 1:1-13? If Yeshua doesn't make his presentation until verse 14, let's look at this for the dramatic disclosure about to be made in verse 14, the, the third decisive stage of God's saving purpose. The Logos revealed previously in the world and through the Torah, but now as the man Jesus of Nazareth. The point for us, however, would again be that in the earlier stages of the point, that's John 1:1-13, we are still dealing with the wisdom and Logos figure of pre-Christian Judaism, that is not as a personal being, but as the wise utterance of God personified.

Dr. Robert Funk, theologian, biblical scholar, and executive secretary of the Society of Biblical Literature. He's going to follow this template that our ancestors left for us, brothers and sisters. He is going to provide us with a translation of John's prologue. "In the beginning, there was the Divine Word and Wisdom." This is called the Scholar's Version, the SV. "The Divine Word and Wisdom was there with God, and it, it is relative to Word and Wisdom, and it was what God was." I agree with that. "It was there with God from the beginning." I agree, absolutely. "Everything came to be by means of it, and without it, not one thing that exists came to be. In it was life, and this life was the light of humanity. Light was shining in darkness, and darkness did not master it. There appeared a man sent from God named John. He came to testify to, he came to testify to testify about the light, so everyone who believed through him. He was not the light. He came only to testify about the light, genuine light, the kind that enlightens everyone. Here we go, y'all. Was coming into the world, although it was in the world, and the world came to be through it. The world did not recognize it. It came to its own place, but its own people were not receptive to it. But to all who did embrace it, and here, remember, he's talking about the word, y'all. He's talking about the word in personified terms. What Solomon laid down before you, what Philo laid down before you, what the author of Sarak laid down before you, what, um, Wisdom of Solomon laid down before you, what Enoch laid down before you, what Baruch laid down before you. All John is continuing with the same tradition. It came to its own place, but his own people were not receptive to it. But to all who did embrace it, to those who believed in it, that's the word, it gave the right to become the children of God. Still the word. They were born not from blood, not from physical desire, nor from male desire. They were born out of God. The Divine Word and Wisdom became human and resided among us. We have seen its glory, glory appropriate to a father's only son, brimming with generosity and truth. John testifies about him and has called out, 'This is the one I was talking about when I said the one who is coming after me ranks ahead of me because he was before I was by way of station and preeminence.' Let's make sure that we're clear. From his richness, all of us benefited, one gift after another. The law was given through Moses. Mercy and truth came through Yeshua, the Anointed One. No one has seen God. The only Son, close to the Father's heart, he has disclosed him." And Funk got it right, but he is using a Hebraic template to do it. He is not using a Patristic template. He is not reading it as Gentiles have written it in the, in the 17th, 18th, in the 19th century or the 18th century. And I'll, and I'll support this here in a second. Your, in other words, your earliest Bibles read in this fashion. It was changed, and when the Gentiles changed it, brothers and sisters, it created challenges for everybody. What we're saying is that we need to come back home. We need to read this the way our ancestors intended us to read it.

Here we go. Funk's translation is strictly about personification. This to say, how Yah's spoken and prophetic word was made flesh through divine conception. To personify Yah's wisdom and his word. Dr. George Bradford Kard, professor of the Exegesis of Holy Scripture, the University of Oxford. Now, let's see what this scholar says. "Thus, we come to the central question: how is John one to be translated? And here, one thing is certain: the idea that the Logos and God are identical, gained only by taking the last clause in vacuum, is ruled out by the second clause. In fact, both may be held in logical tension by offering the solution that Logos for John primarily means purpose. In the beginning was the purpose, the purpose in the mind of God, the purpose which was God's own being. It is surely conceivable, thought, that God is wholly identifiable with his purpose of love, and that this purpose took human form in Yeshua of Nazareth."

Brothers and sisters, look at the number of scholars who are saying that John's prologue has been misread. And because of the misreading, we created another God. And the creation of this second God has, has brought us in direct conflict with the Creator, with Yah. What it has done is forced us to operate in the form of an apostate religion. To make this proclamation, this declaration, brothers and sisters, sends major undercurrents of, major undercurrents of mainstream Neo-Christianity today. Them be fighting words. But if you have data where you can argue it unequivocally, absolutely, you're going to, um, see that your argument will be sustained. Because what comes from this, brothers and sisters, when I argue this with scholars and theologians, is now, we, we want to engage hypotheticals and say, "ARA is not going to do that." I'm not going to play no games. You either believe what the word says, what God says. You either accept the rhetorical devices that are being used to personify God, or you just move on down the road, brothers and sisters, because time is too short for us. Tomorrow is not promised. The next second is not promised. And Elohim is going to give us credit for pursuing righteousness, pursuing truth, doing our due diligence to get it right. And this is what we're doing. It is very important.

This is what David D. Silva says, professor of New Testament and Greek at AS and Theological Seminary. "The sages of ancient Israel praised the wisdom revealed by God, how? Using the technique of personification to give life to the subject of their paying. Yeshua is the wisdom of God, Sophia personified, because Yah made him so by using him as an instrument to convey his wisdom. Therefore, Yeshua becomes the avatar of God's wisdom, just as Solomon had become. John sees this parallel in the exalted Messiah and further develops the wisdom motif from Solomon, Sarak, Wisdom of Solomon, Enoch, Baruch, and Philo. So, we can see in these wisdom parallels a precise correspondence to the Yanim Logos. John portrays Yeshua as the word of God personified in the Book of Revelation and his gospel, which draws a parallel to Philo's personification of the high priest as a word of God." This is very important. The New Testament continues to speak about how Yah is personifying his word through human agency. John and Paul portray Yeshua as wisdom manifesting itself through Yeshua during his ministry, just as Yah uses Solomon to become the personification of wisdom, just as, just as, just as Yah uses Solomon to become the personification of wisdom during his ministry. As a poetic prophet, Sarak manifests Sophia through Pripoia, and Philo assigns personifications to Eve, Sarah, and Rebecca as Yah's wisdom.

What we're saying is that what Elohim did with Yeshua is nothing new. It is nothing new. But if you enter the New Testament presupposition as if Jesus Christ pre-existed as an archangel or as God's word of wisdom, then you're going to miss it. The Sophia Christology, what we refer to as Wisdom Christ, is about personification. It is not about Incarnation. In other words, Sophia coming from heaven to take on flesh. The idea and plan of introducing the Messiah was from all eternity and came down to Earth in the manner of a divinely conceived act. This explains that I am saying specifically, "I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh." Yeshua was conceived as Isaac. How is that divine conception? God-initiated and was protected and sustained by Yah, with him fostering his growth and developing his senses as a vessel to be used by his Spirit. All of this, we can read. It was his Spirit who imparted God's wisdom, Sophia, to him. It was his Spirit who imparted God's wisdom to Yeshua. Yeshua was birthed as a human being endowed with the Spirit of wisdom. Was brought up in wisdom. Luke says, "The child grew in wisdom." When Yeshua was baptized, he received the gift of wisdom. I'm giving this way, I'm moving ahead of myself because ARA is excited. Be patient with me, please.

Here we go. After his Mikvah, Yeshua spoke parabolically. There was no strange verbiage with Yeshua from the time he was born up until the time he was 30. He was just one of the homies hanging around Nazareth in the hood. And y'all do remember, Naz is indeed the hood. So, there was nothing strange about this brother until he got baptized. When Yeshua got baptized, he received a spirit. His whole language and speech changed because God is using him to personify his wisdom. That's why, brothers and sisters, I'll show it to you. Yeshua spoke parabolically as a manifestation of God's wisdom and argued that he was greater than Solomon. Solomon, who was a forerunner of personified wisdom. Yeshua speaks as personified wisdom, just as Solomon spoke. But the greatness of Yeshua as wisdom personified was that he could give peace, he could give prosperity, he could give life. Everything that wisdom said that she could do in Proverbs chapter 8, that Solomon spoke of through Praxia, Yeshua could actually give as the embodiment of God's wisdom. Yeshua, as the embodiment of wisdom, becomes the physical conduit that Solomon and Sarak wrote about, which is why Paul says, "Now we can understand 1 Corinthians 1:30: 'And because of him you are in the Anointed Yeshua, who became, who became to us wisdom from God, righteousness and sanctification and redemption.'" All that wisdom could do as the law was done and fulfilled in Yeshua. This is to say that the law makes one wise, but the nation rejected it. But one man fulfilled it and became it. Moses says, "See, I have taught you statutes and rules as Yah Elohim commanded me, that you should do them in the land that you are entering to take possession of it. Keep them and do them." Keep and do my laws, my commandments, my statutes, and my ordinances. Why, Yah? Why would I want to keep them and do them? Yah says, "Because that will be your wisdom. My Torah is wisdom." This is the reason why the commentators of the ArtScroll Tanakh are saying that Proverbs 8 is talking about the law. They are inseparable, brothers and sisters. They are all synonymous. "Keep them and do them, for that will be your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the people, who, when they hear all these statutes, will say, 'Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.'" What Paul and the Judeans understood about wisdom since the 10th century BC is that God developed in the flesh as wisdom, Yeshua. He is the embodiment of wisdom, the Messiah, King, Priest, Son of God, Intercessor, and Rabbi. Yah has imputed in him all the virtues that represent the fullness of himself. As Philo and the Judeans saw in Moses, uh oh, here come a big boy. This is very important. Remember, ain't nothing new under the sun. But we got to read Jewish literature to understand. Look at what Philo says about Moses, and I want you to think, draw similarities, do your contrasts with Yeshua. "Moses will be seen not only to have displayed all these powers, I mean, the genius of the philosopher and of the king in an extraordinary degree at the same time, but three other powers likewise, one of which is conversant about legislation, the second about the way of discharging the duties of high priest, and the last about the prophetic office. And it is on these subjects that I have now been constrained to choose to enlarge, for I conceive that all these things have fitly been united in him." I'm very familiar with that language. That's in the book of Colossians. Y'all look at this. "For I conceive that all these things have fitly been united in Moses, in as much as, in accordance with the providential will of God, he was both a king and a lawgiver and a high priest and a prophet." Isn't Yeshua your king? Wasn't Yeshua the lawgiver? We're talking about the New Testament dispensation of explicating the law as Elohim gave it. We're not talking about anything that has been amended or appended by man. Remember when the question came up about divorce, and the brother says, "Well, Moses said that we could divorce our wife for any reason." Yeshua said, "Moses gave you that law, but I say to you that from the beginning, that was not so. For no man can divorce his wife except it be for adultery, sexual perversion. Those are the grounds Elohim has given you to exult your woman, to divorce her. Moses was the one who gave you a license to say, 'If you feel like there is something unclean in her, then come to me, and I will write you a bill of divorce.' But I say to you, from the beginning." So, Yeshua now becomes the dispensational lawgiver of Sinai in its purity. A king, lawgiver. Yeshua is now the priest, the high priest, the only priest. Yeshua is the prophet. And because in each office, look at this, very important. This is what I'm talking about. "And because in each office he displayed the most eminent wisdom and virtue, we must now show how it is that everything is fitly united in him." Moses fulfills the powers that Yah has bestowed upon men. Philo views Moses as king, lawgiver, priest, and prophet. Thus, all power and virtue from Yah are embodied in Moses before Yeshua. Moses represented the quintessence of Yah's wisdom. Since Moses is the Messianic type, Paul uses the same model in Colossians 1:19 for the antitype, Yeshua, as he says, "For in Yeshua all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell." That means all authority, which merely speaks of Yah's authority residing in Yeshua, as it did with Moses. Moses was the embodiment of the law by personification, a representation of Yah's oracles. Thus, he was the living law, what we refer to as Nomos Moses.

Dr. Guy Stroumsa, professor emeritus of the study of the Abrahamic religions at the University of Oxford, will support this. When he says, "Philo describes Moses as a Nomos Moses and an animated law, using a term usually reserved for Hellenistic kings. Philo understands that Moses was destined to be the embodiment of Yah's power and authority amongst Israel as a part of Yah's notional plan." Very important. One of the things that Neo-Christians leave out is Noism. You cannot do that. That is a death knell. Noism is written all over the Old and New Testament, brothers and sisters. It's a, a major staple of Hebraism. Moses was brought forward to execute, you like this, Shakala? Moses was brought forth to execute this divine plan, just as Yeshua was brought forth by Yah's will to achieve his divine plan. Philo writes about Moses, very interesting, per. "But perhaps since Moses was also destined to be the lawgiver of his nation, he was himself long previously, through the Providence of God, a living and reasonable law, since that Providence appointed him to the lawgiver when as yet he knew nothing of his appointment." No, you're not going to know about your appointment if your conception is with Elohim. Notional. Elohim has planned what you were going to be in his economy of redemption and salvation within the nation of Israel. All of this is notional, according to Philo. Moses pre-existed notionally with Yah. In other words, in Yah's mind, in Yah's plan, he pre-planned by his Logos plan, mind, reason, purpose, thought, idea, will, desire to make Moses his legislator and manifested him at the proper time to be his word and law.

Philo speaks of Noism and personification in the context that John will narrate Yeshua's personification of Yah's word, wisdom, and law. The New Testament writers are following a tradition of personification. They are changing their heroes, brothers and sisters. When Yeshua comes along, what was stated about Solomon, what was stated about Moses, what was stated about David, and some of these other heroes, right, are being transferred to Yeshua. Yah has been setting this up for approximately 1600 years. So, Yeshua becomes a culmination of the personified of antiquity, and John writes about it, and Paul speaks about it. But when the church, uh, receives it, the church modifies it and makes personification to literal existence, which then leads to the deification of Christ, thus idolatry.

Let me go back. The New Testament writers are following a tradition of personification. They are changing their heroes, Moses to Yeshua, as well as transferring and applying all their metaphorical designations to Yeshua, who is the consummation and ratification of Yah's divine will. Hence, it is a patent mischaracterization of the Yanim Gospel and the Pauline Epistles to assert a non-contextualized premise that Yeshua pre-existed as God who was introduced in Proverbs as wisdom, or Jesus pre-incarnate. Yeshua is the ultimate personification of Yah's attributes and his divine will, which has been the message conveyed by the New Testament office.

So, when we analyze Proverbs, we analyze John, we analyze Corinthians, what we can capture from these passages is that Proverbs chapters 1 and 8 are about how Yah is personified through his wisdom and word. John 1:1-13 is about how Yah is personified prophetically through his wisdom and word, which then becomes flesh. This to say, what Yah spoke was made flesh. Thus, what we refer to in theology, a speech act. 1 Corinthians 1:24 and 30 is about how the Judeans viewed Yeshua as the embodiment of God's wisdom, like they looked at Moses as the embodiment of God's wisdom, they looked at Solomon as being the embodiment of God's wisdom, as they looked at Eve as being the embodiment of God's wisdom, Sarah as the embodiment of God's wisdom, Rebecca as the embodiment of God's wisdom. All of these are the forerunners, brothers and sisters, before we get to Yeshua. And so, there's intertextual parallels that you have to consider when you are exegesis and interpreting scriptures. There are intercultural parallels that you have to draw from to understand Hebraic bibliology in full.

Look at this. What this lesson has affirmed is that the Gentiles, the Gentiles, the children of Yah, beginning with the Patristics, co-opted Messianic Siasai, or Yeshua's version or iteration of Judaism. That's Siasai. Solid. Don't add nothing to Siasai. Don't, don't take anything away from Siasai. And live Siasai in the faith of the Messiah. This is what Yeshua told us to do. Co-opted Messianic Siasai, or Yeshua's Judaism, and introduced a new God named Jesus in the second century. The Patristics then introduced Sunday convocation of worship in the second century without biblical precedent, nullified the holy days without biblical precedent, and then nullified the law. Everything that Solomon and Philo and and and and and and Wisdom of Solomon and and and and and Enoch and Baruch, all the Hebrew Israelites, what they are talking about is Elohim being personified by his law, his word, his wisdom. They took all that away, brothers and sisters, thereby introducing a new form of Christianity, what we refer to as Neo-Christianity. From what Yeshua and the apostles practiced, and accounting is coming, then the church, led by the Patristics, adopted Greco-Roman customs, such as philosophy, whether it is Stoic philosophy, Platonized it with their version of Christianity. What we see today, does the version of Christianity that nearly three billion people practice today is an iteration of paganism that has been humiliated? In other words, they have taken the pagan doctrine, pagan theology, paganism, philosophy as a whole, and said, "You know what? We're going to massage it into Apostolic Orthodoxy. We're going to massage it into the Faith of Christ. We're going to massage it into the faith of the Apostles. We're going to make what Elohim has called, uh, bad, what has referred to as being demonic, unclean, and perverse. We're going to make it good by ascribing it to Jesus Christ." What does a bunny rabbit have to do with Jesus? What does a Christmas tree have to do? See, you got to be thinking about these things, brothers and sisters. There is a problem. There's a problem.

Does the version of Christianity that nearly three billion people practice today is an iteration of paganism that has been amiliarized by the Neo-Christian Church, Hebrew Israelism, and Messianic Judaism to keep a fallible doctrine vibrant? John tells us what's going on. "And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent who was called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world." How does he deceive the whole world, brothers and sisters? This is the thrust of this special edition of Saps, the Master's Class, brothers and sisters, to show you how we have a second God that was created by the Gentiles, how they infused all of their pagan customs and practices into something that God specifically told us not to learn or practice. That's Jeremiah 10:1-12. Brothers and sisters, I want to analyze this as I get ready to close out, brothers and sisters. Shazam to Messiah. I think Tovia and, um, some of the old heads in here would be able to appreciate this. We can analogize this disquisition in this manner. Billy Batson, who was a mortal being, a man selected by the Council of Elders to endow him with gifts so he could be their champion on Earth. So, the council bestowed upon him the gift of wisdom from Solomon, strength, Hercules, courage, Achilles, power, Zeus, speed, Mercury. All Billy needed to do was to call upon the name Shazam, and he would become Captain Marvel. A mortal being endowed with divine gifts bestowed upon him from the gods. Still a man. Still a man, brothers and sisters. Yah prophesied the coming of his earthly champion, brothers and sisters. This is the analogy. Yeshua, who will be born at the House of David, endowed with special gifts from God, not no gods, but from God, so that he can exemplify Yah's power throughout the Earth. Isaiah writes, "We got to read the scriptures. Out of the stump of David's family will grow a shoot, yes, a new branch bearing fruit from the old root. And the Spirit of Yah will rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of Yah. He will delight in obeying Yah. He will not judge by appearance, nor make a decision based on his say. He will give justice to the poor and make fair decisions for the exploited. The Earth will shake at the force of his word, and one breath from his mouth will destroy the wicked. He will wear righteousness like a belt and truth like an undergarment." The angel said to her, "We got to bring in this champion. We got to bring in this champion, y'all." The angel said to Mary, "Do not be afraid. You have found favor with Elohim. You will conceive and give birth to a son." This ain't no divine word called wisdom coming incarnate, coming from heaven as a little baby. That's paganism. And all we're doing is just reading. We're reading our ancestors' literature and we're having faith in what our God told us to do and not to do, and we're fully embracing that. Praise Yah. Look at this. "Do not be afraid, Miriam. You have found favor with Elohim. You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Yeshua. Here we go. He will be future tense great and will be future tense called the Son of the Most High. Yah Elohim will give him the throne of his daddy David, and he will reign over Jacob's descendants forever. His kingdom will never end." "How will this be?" Mary asked the angel. "Since I am a virgin?" The angel answered, "The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the Holy One to be born will be called the Son of God." At 30 years of age, upon Yeshua's Mikvah, that is his baptism, he received the gift of the Holy Spirit promised in Isaiah. John writes, "Then John testified, 'I saw the Holy Spirit descending like a dove from heaven and resting upon him.' This Spirit from Yah endowed him with the Spirit of wisdom, Spirit of understanding, Spirit of counsel, Spirit of Might, Spirit of knowledge, and Spirit of reverence for Yah. And when he called upon the name of Wukmir, he became the Messiah, Yah." Okay, here we go. Luke affirms that Yeshua was a man endowed with gifts from Yah, whom he chose to use to both exalt and glorify him through his ministry and miracles. Luke writes, "Fellow Israelites, listen to this. And I just love this. Fellow brethren, fellow Hebrew Israelites, listen to this. Yeshua of Nazareth was a man accredited by Elohim to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which Elohim did among you through him. Look at this, as you yourselves know." Our ancestors weren't talking about no Incarnation, no angelic being called Word, Wisdom, Logos, called Captain, called Archangel, coming to Earth as a baby, brothers and sisters, as a baby God, as a Yahweh Junior. This is something that was introduced by the church, and it is the clearest form of apostasy, brothers and sisters, and there is an accounting for that. Yeshua says before he ascends to heaven, "Now I am departing from the world. They are staying in this world, but I am coming to you. Holy Father, you have given me your name. Now protect them by the power of your name so that they will be united, just as we are."

Here's a conclusion. In closing, to argue that Yeshua is the pre-incarnate God in Proverbs chapters 1 and 8 is irresponsible scholarship. That's just the bottom line because it negates the cultural context the author establishes with his readers. In other words, the readers are familiar with the transmission vehicle Solomon is using to convey God's message to them. Thus, it is the job of the interpreter to identify these vehicles so they may properly exposit the author's message. Forming a premise that John 1:1-13 is about the pre-incarnate word coming down from heaven in the body of Jesus is erroneous and misses the point of John's message. Such a proposition is formed because an interpreter is omitting the rhetorical and literary devices John is using to speak about how and why Yah turned Yah turned Yah turned his word, his idea, his plan, his agenda into a person and then used him to personify his wisdom. This is what John is telling us, and this is what every Jewish writer has written on with regards to personification, and John has picked up on it and done the exact same thing.

Finally, to argue that Paul views Yeshua as the pre-incarnate Jesus, wisdom incarnate, come in the flesh, according to 1 Corinthians 1:24 and 30, I'm going to tell you what it is. It's sloppy exegesis, and I've been there, brothers and sisters. I feel victim to it, and this is the reason why I'm passionate about it. We have to read things within a Hebraic framework, and it's not popular because we live in a Western, Eurocentric society that is diametrically opposed to it. But I can guarantee you, brothers and sisters, when you submit the data, all you're going to have in response to the opposers is a hypothesis, is philosophy, what about isms, and nobody got time for that foolishness. It demonstrates a lack of cultural and literary insight into how Judeans saw Yeshua based upon Old Testament and intertestamental narratives. I was asked during my doctoral dissertation, El bear witness to my words, brothers and sisters. I was asked during my doctoral dissertation, "How do I prevent from reading Christ into Proverbs and other Old Testament books?" For an examiner to ask you that question during your dissertation, brothers and sisters, in theology, it immediately suggests to me that scholars have recognized that there is a problem. So, if you are going to become one of us, if you're going to have a doctrine in theology, an apologetics, how do you prevent from reading Christ into Proverbs? Why Proverbs, brothers and sisters? Because this is what Neo-Christians have made a living off of doing for the past 1800 years. And most of them have realized that you can't do it because Solomon is not talking about a pre-existent being in the literal sense. Solomon is actually talking about God himself. My answer to my examiner, who was a New Testament scholar, was, "By reading the Old Testament within the historical, prophetic, and poetic context it was written in." It was just that simple, brothers and sisters. And you think I got any pushback on that? All I got was an acknowledgment. That's good.

It is vitally important to understand the genre in which Jewish literature is written because the genre helps to identify what rhetorical and literary devices are being used to convey a message. Identifying the genre assists the reader in determining if the passage was written to convey a message through figurative or literal speech. If you are going to be a biblicist, a student of the Bible, you are going to have to be trained in figures of speech. That's just a fact. Missing or missing or misidentifying the genre could lead to an isogenic conclusion and thus proposal and finally dogma. You have just dogmatized. You have made a doctrine from misidentifying the genre, by not recognizing rhetorical devices, by literalizing, if you will, a rhetorical device that is being used to convey a figurative message, something that is metaphorical or symbolic. And this is how ancestors wrote, brothers and sisters. No questions about it. Critical scholars are telling you that. I presented to you a small sample of them. This is what we have in this argument. We have some Neo-Christians who have overlooked the rhetorical devices in Proverbs, its genre, and thus its message, and created a high Christological doctrine that is unbiblical and idolatrous.

There are five biblical theological methodologies that a scholar will or should deploy to ensure that they are extracting the author's message. One of these methodologies is BT1 methodology. This is to say, what is the historical and cultural setting of a biblical passage? You have got to start rebuilding your suppositions, brothers and sisters, organically now. And so, we teach all five methodologies, but the ones that we lean upon are BT1. This is going to be our historical and cultural methodologies. The second methodology is historical distancing or literary hermeneutics. The scholar takes into consideration the author, the genre, lexicology, the etymology of words, words that are polysemous, historical and cultural attestations and interpretations, and intertextual parallels. Then the scholar deploys a BT2 to 3 methodology to identify a continued theme from its historical antecedent. And I know that this is over, over you guys' heads. I get it. Be patient. What I'm demonstrating to you is what you are going to learn because it is vitally important for you to learn this to break the chain of ignorance, to open the sails of captivity, so you can be liberated from all of this misinformation and disinformation that we inherited from our fathers. And I'm talking about from our parents, our parents' parents, who, uh, in many cases, chose, in some cases, didn't choose to be indoctrinated in this theological, uh, uh, dynamic, brothers and sisters. So, what I'm doing is presenting evidence that we have to come out of the entire system because this system is diametrically opposed to who God is.

Then the scholar deploys a BT2-3 methodology to identify a continued theme from its historical antecedent. This is to say, thematic congruency or incongruency between Testaments. This culminates in a scholar introducing a plethora of information based upon empirical data that interprets itself. It is what we refer to as explanatory power or scope. In other words, brothers and sisters, I didn't force anything. In a 70-page high Christological composition, everything interprets itself without having to force an interpretation by engaging in lexical gymnastics and exotic isogenic formulations due to a lack of social acculturation of the people's culture in view. In other words, I shouldn't have to play around with words. We call that lexical gymnastics. We shouldn't have these, you know, "I think, I feel, I believe, my opinion with this is, what I think, this is how I look at it." That's isogesis. And we have some exotic, we have some extraordinary stuff that comes from the imagination of men that they formulate some amazing stuff. And all of it is due to the fact that they have not become socially acculturated with whom Arya, whose culture should we learn, whose culture should we know, whose culture should we be practicing and identifying ourselves with? The righteous remnant of Israel. Elohim chose them. Elohim ordained them. Elohim commissioned them. You got to learn their culture, and you have got to embrace it and practice it because Elohim used them to send us a message of what his expectations are to receive salvation, everlasting life, peace, prosperity, and stability. The Gentiles have refused to do this for 1800 years, and I'm telling you this for a fact, and still to this present day, they refuse to do it.

This has been the methodology of this study. I've not given you anything that's forced. Everything that I've given you interprets itself, is underscored with primary data, with secondary or secular sources, brothers and sisters, from people who are experts in the field, who I remind you are Neo-Christians in many cases, Trinitarians, but they are being honest with what you can and cannot do in some passages. This has been the methodology of this study, which yields to the conclusion that Yeshua was not wisdom come in the flesh, but wisdom personified in the flesh. What we have in this treatise are antitheses who introduce forced interpretations of what and who wisdom is, that originated from the Patristics. The doctrine that's being practiced today, brothers and sisters, did not come from the Jews of the first century. We have primary sources from the Judeans of the 10th century BC to the 6th century AD informing us of whom they understood wisdom to be. We have to listen to them. Ain't nobody in this forum, including myself, been anointed, appointed, right, and and and and commissioned to speak on God's behalf. The prophets and Yeshua have been ordained, commissioned, anointed, and appointed. Elohim in the days of old spoke to us, um, uh, through the prophets. And in these last days, have spoken to us through his Son. What's the Son saying? What's the Apostle saying? What's the Prophet saying? Do you believe what they're saying? Second Temple scholars are generally unanimous in their conclusions that Sophia, Logos, wisdom, word, is actually Yah expressing himself through his law, through personification, which Moses and Yeshua personified. What we are left with, to a lesser extent, are undeveloped pseudoscholarly circles with recycled propositions from the Patristics that are transparently forced, thereby retaining an impotent position in critical scholarship. Yeshua is Yah's wisdom from God because God made him so in his era, doing his ministry. He carries his persona from the time of his Mikvah, from the time of his Mikvah to the present day. The Judeans of antiquity used Yah's words to build a hypothesis and personify this hypothesis as Sophia Logos. This Sophia Logos that's going to be wisdom and word is what John calls an "it," which he then personifies to the person of Yeshua. This is to say, the word became flesh.

Here's corroborating evidence, brothers and sisters. When we look at 16th-century, 17th-century Bibles, such as the Great Bible, this is how the Bible's read in the 17th century, in the 16th century: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by it, and without it was made nothing that was made. In it was life." So, your scholar, several hundred years ago, knew the proper pronouns to use for John's prologue. Today, when you read, "is he, this, and he, that, is he, that," and we understand that Logos is masculine, so it can be a "he," but it's very misleading, brothers and sisters, and you need to have scholars give you that testimony. The 16th-century Bible translator provided the correct translation for John 1:1-13. It is an impersonal pronoun that takes upon flesh in John 1:14, becoming the personal pronoun "he." This is to say that Yah's prophetic word, the words he began to speak about salvation and redemption, was made flesh. The flesh then began to personify Yah's wisdom in the person of Yeshua. The J.B. Phillips New Testament Bible reads, "At the beginning, God expressed himself. That personal expression, that word, was with God and was God. And he existed with God from the beginning. All creation took place through him, and none took place without him." In Phillips' version, Yah is personifying himself through his word. Word. You have the Scholars' Version of the SV of the Bible, written in 1988 by Robert Funk, reads precisely as John may have intended it to be interpreted: the impersonal pronoun "it" as a metaphorical hypothesis was personified by Yeshua. Dunn has already commented that in John's prologue, John is not writing about the Son, but about the word of God, which is an "it" that is made flesh in John 1:14, thereby becoming a "he." In other words, impersonal to personal. There's a transition. Thus, John 1:1-13 is about the word, not about Jesus. Brown concurs when he says that it is improper. This is Brown. "It is improper to read John 1:1-13 as if it is speaking of Jesus, thereby placing him by."

Is of Jesus, the second person of the Godhead. Brown is saying, "You can't do that. That's not what John is intending to convey. What John has presented to us is what we refer, brothers and sisters, is called a midrash, wisdom Christology, on how Yeshua became Yah's agent to personify His wisdom and word."

This is to say that this is a Christological narrative of how Yeshua embodies Yah's word and wisdom, written within a midrashic manner. Neo-Christians have misread the prologue as an incarnation of a pre-existent being or person called Word and Wisdom, whom the Old Testament and intertestamental writers are merely personifying as God or His Torah.

In closing, I want to terminate this disquisition with a large citation from Heiser, who summarizes this thesis perfectly. Although it is unorthodox to include such a lengthy citation in a closing, this citation will solidify this study's argument. So, here's one of our scholars who wraps up, um, our thesis. Um, he tightens everything down. He says, "From a historical perspective, one can understand the genesis of the problem of Jesus' relation to God by the hypostatization of symbolic language about God. In this case, the symbols wisdom and word."

Hypostatization generally means making an idea or a concept into a real thing. In its broad sense, the term hypothesis means the individuality of something. A hypothesis is an individual instance, instant, which means to represent an abstraction by a concrete instance within a class or species. To hypostatize is to interpret a concept as an existing being, to concretize or materialize an idea. It is to reify, that is, to make something abstract more concrete or real. In which process, reification means to construe the object of a figure of speech as a reality.

By contrast, the symbols wisdom, word, and spirit, with which are found in the Jewish scriptures and refer to God, are not hypostatization, but they are personifications. Personification is a figure of speech in which the symbol is consciously or deliberately treated or spoken of as a person. Again, personification is a figure of speech in which the symbol, in this case, word and wisdom, are symbolic representatives of God Himself. But he says there's a problem. Personification is a figure of speech, speech in which the symbol is consciously or deliberately treated or spoken of as a person. Look where he goes, brothers and sisters. Proverbs 8 contains a clearly intended personification of God's intelligence or wisdom as a pre-existent person and agent of God. As a figure of speech, it does not intend that wisdom is a distinct or discrete, a discrete entity or being.

This thesis has argued that Proverbs chapters 1 and 8 are poetic narratives about Yah. It is a narrative about how Yah causes people to receive the greatest gift that can be given to a mortal being besides eternal life: wisdom. Proverbs 8 is about Yah manifesting His wisdom through His Torah, which He begs humans to embrace. The hypothesis, as Heiser points out, is a personification of God, not an actual pre-existent being whom Neo-Christians call Jesus. Pre-incarnate Yeshua has become God's wisdom, and all who receive Him and His teachings are able to capture what Yah has been offering. In Proverbs, Yeshua is the embodiment of Torah, the embodiment of wisdom, and the embodiment of the word of Yah. To receive Him is to receive these characteristics of Yah.

Heiser continues by saying, "A major development occurred when a personification became transformed into a hypostatization station. That is, when what was a figure of speech became intended as a figure of speech, intended not as a figure of speech, but as referring to a real being." He says, "We run into a problem. Wisdom is no longer a linguistic symbol referring obliquely to an attribute of God, but a real being. Logos is no longer a figure of speech, but a distinct being. Spirit is no longer a constructive exercise of the human poetic imagination that metaphorically depicts the effects of God as the invisible power of the wind, but a literal something."

The hypostatization of pre-existent logos and wisdom, look at this, creates a problem. As long as logos and wisdom remain what they were originally, and that is personifications, that is figures of speech used to say something about God Himself, it makes sense to say that God's wisdom was actualized in Jesus, and that Jesus embodies God's wisdom. But when the logos is understood to be a reality in itself, distinct from the Father, and yet somehow divine, and as a divine entity to have assumed flesh, a far different assertion is being made. Look at this, brothers and sisters. This language becomes analogous to the thinking of the polytheistic culture we're talking about, more gods, which was familiar with hierarchies of divine entities populating the invisible world. Was Jesus the incarnation of a second God? And yet, how else could Christians, who were monotheists, express their distinctive experience in worship that Jesus was a god?

When this development is placed within the context of the objectification of Christian language that occurred with the writing of the New Testament and of the decisive influence of John's prologue in Christology, one can understand the problem that was to be taken up in the second century. They said, "This has been an issue. They began arguing it in the second century, brothers and sisters." Heiser has rightly observed that beginning in the 2nd century, the rule of the Gentile church, that the Gentiles who divested themselves from Messianic Judaism, began to argue the nature of Christ because of how they were interpreting Jewish literature. They were misreading Jewish texts and using a Western European philosophical, philosophical interpretive methodology upon Jewish texts to understand the nature of Christ, which they could not agree to because they are trying to interpret it outside of the Hebraic construct in which it was written.

Brothers and sisters, Heiser rightly points out that this was not the issue in the first century amongst Jews and Hellenists because they were trained in poetic literature and understood. Our ancestors understood proia. This is what we're trying to do. We're trying to get back to our ancestors' understanding of the Bible. Brothers and sisters, they understood proia, they understood ethopia, they understood elm, and personification as transmission vehicles used by the author to convey Yah's message. For the Israelite, there was no confusion about what Solomon wrote in Proverbs, and what John wrote in his gospel, and what Paul wrote in his epistles. These problems arise when the Gentiles take it upon themselves to interpret these Hebraic passages outside of its cultural and literary context.

This is what Heiser says as we close out. "We've been trained to think that the history of Christianity is the true context of the Bible. We talk a lot about interpreting the Bible in context. We sure do. I hear it every day. Well, we got to look at the context, whatever. But Christian history is not the context of the biblical writers. The proper context for interpreting the Bible is not Augustine or any other Church Father. It is not the Catholic Church. It is not the Rabbinic movements of late antiquity in the Middle Ages. It is not the Reformation or the Puritans. It is not Evangelicalism in any of its flavors. It is not the modern world at all, or any period of its history. The proper context for interpreting the Bible is the context of the biblical writers, the context that produced the Bible. Every other context is alien to the Bible writers and therefore to the Bible."

Heiser is correct. The issues that lie in Neo-Christianity are, in most cases, a lack of thoroughness in biblical exegesis, that is, reading out of the Bible what the author intends to convey. That's exegesis by deploying or considering Jewish hermeneutics and interpretation to convey theological points to the author's readers. Heiser goes on to say, "It would be dishonest, brothers and sisters, for us to claim that the biblical writers read and understood the text the way we do as modern people, or intended meaning that conformed to theological systems created centuries after the text was written. Very simply, our context is not their context."

You got to come back home, y'all. You got to get out of your system. You got to get this, okay? The Bible was written by Hebrew Israelites for Hebrew Israelites, to Hebrew Israelites, and those who are grafted amongst them, the Gentiles, why? To benefit humanity. And it can only be understood within a Hebraic framework. So the problem is clear: East, the Israelites met West, Greeks, and the West imposed their philosophy and pagan mythologies upon the East text, as well as changed the vernacular of the culture. The results culminated in a concept and idea that the Platonic Word and Wisdom existed as agents of God, sentient beings separate from God, who were agents and co-architects in the creation of the universe. This literal concept is not Jewish in origin. It is pagan, Platonic, philosophical, and idolatrous. A Greek concept imposed upon the Israelites of the first century, which the modern church defends against what Yah has said of Himself. And every Old Testament, intertestamental, and New Testament writer affirms: there was no God before Yah, there is no God with Yah, and there will be no God after Yah. Yah says, "You are My witnesses. Israel declares, Yah, you Israel are My servant. You Israelites are whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe Me and understand that I am He. Before Me, no God was formed, nor shall there be any after Me."

The reality, and we're very disappointed to say, most Neo-Christians do not believe God. Here's our closing slide. Would Jesus or the apostles recognize that definition of Christian? If you denied the like cross, in my view, is that Jesus and the apostles would not recognize an Evangelical Christian as a Christian. That's right. My view is because Evangelical Christian, it is so far removed from anything Jesus ever preached. That's my point. That is the point. All right, we done. Let's go ahead and go with our quiz, brothers and sisters. Let's go with the quiz. Uh, let's see. We got 60 here. Um, let's get six on the board. Shakala, you got the first 10. Brother, hey, Shalom, brother. I gotta say, I say you doing. I know I let you finish. I know I didn't. I gotta say, I love this composition. I really enjoyed this one. I mean, I took my time on it. I really enjoyed it. You know, one of the key points that I saw with Philo, even though we're having this discussion on wisdom and how wisdom was there at the beginning, Philo says, "Slow down. He says, uh, one of the reasons why we're gonna make wisdom a female, even though we know it's really about Yah, and that wisdom is Yah, he said, we're gonna make it female anyway because he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he, he,

term is used in Stoicism that is to create another literal being and Neo-Christendom. This has led to the deification of Christ, thus idolatry. Dr. Roger Hay said, "said the symbols wisdom, word, and spirit, which are found in the Jewish scriptures and refer to God, are not hypostatizations but personifications."

You on 51. "Brother, yeah, the only reason I even brought up that term ousia is because they, you know, in order to drive that point home, they tried to, I guess, differentiate between those two terms. When at one point, you know, after they changed the definition from sediment to substance, at one point they were the same. So, *lū* and *huppostasis* were the same."

"Yes, and now they said, 'Well, nope, can't have that because we need some way to to figure this thing out.' So they made *huppostasis* kind of, um, I guess, a subset of *ousia*, so you can have these individual pieces making up this whole."

"Okay, okay. That's the only reason I brought it up."

"Like, well, I'm glad you did, brother. That's excellent because these are the little nuances, brother, that we need to master. I mean, it's sad that we even got to do it. You know, *chalilah*, I mean, our ancestors didn't struggle over this stuff, but it's only because we've been Westernized and taught this stuff. And you're trying to pull people out of the system, out of the Neo-Christian system. And, um, individuals are are are reading a bunch of stuff off of you, you know, YouTube websites and different things of that nature that is, you know, well-articulated, but it's it's patently wrong. You know, and and and and and and, you know, how how do you demonstrate to them that it is wrong? You got to meet people where they are. So *ousia* and, um, uh, *hupostasis*, these things may come up on a, on, I guess you would say, a high level of criticism when we're talking about, um, you know, Yeshua's nature, these high Christological conversations."

"No, I'm glad you brought it up. It's excellent. All right. 51. Divine hypostasis. Hypostasis is from the Greek word *hupostasis*. Originally, it meant sentiment, foundation, subject matter. Later, it began to mean substance, existence, essence, personality. From *hupo* below and *stasis* that personality. Because they constantly tell you that, you know, three hypostases, what hypostasis in one *ousia*."

"Yes. Constantly. What is the difference between hypostasis and personification? The difference between hypostasis and personification is that with hypostasis, the settlement of the substance is literally being separated and given an identity apart from the substance, thereby becoming its own person or being. However, with personification, the substance is the sediment. I, I like this example here. The substance is the sediment, and the sediment is the substance. So it's one and the same."

"Yes. But through personification, the sediment adopts the persona or nature of the substance, which is the whole point of personification, right? To give something that's immaterial, to give that immaterial thing a voice or human characteristics."

"Yeah, that's right. See the persona or nature of the substance to act as an intermediary, intermediary, or spokesman. Thus, the sediment is speaking as if it is a separate entity from itself, the substance."

"That's right. 53. Who uses hypostasis to speak about Elohim in a metaphorical manner? And that's Philo. Yes. Uh, 54. What is the danger of using Stoic hypostasis to execute biblical texts? The danger of not recognizing how hypostasis is used Hebraically as a synonym for personification is the *aesis*. How the term is used in Stoicism, that is, to create another literal being. Again, because of that term hypostasis, right?"

"Let's see here. Uh, again, this has led to the deification of Christ."

"That's right. 55. Who said the symbol of wisdom, word, and spirit, which are found in the Jewish scriptures and refer to Elohim, are not hypostasis but personifications? Uh, Dr. Roger Hay."

"True or false? Hypostasis is a Hebraic term used by Solomon to explain the second person of the Godhead."

"You have to give my voice. It's kind of going in and out a little bit, okay, on this bad code. But, uh, false. Hypostasis is a Greek term used by Stoic philosophers, adopted by the Patristics to explain Christ's deity or Yeshua as pre-incarnate El or God."

"True or false? Hypostasis is a Greek term used by Stoic philosophers, adopted by the Patristics to explain Christ's deity or Yeshua as pre-incarnate God."

"And that's true. 58. What author uses hypostasis to represent Yeshua being the substance of Yah? That's the author of Hebrews, yes, 1 and 3."

"Yep. 59. In what context does the author ascribe hypostasis to Yeshua? And do you agree?"

"I have the author of Hebrews uses the term hypostasis in reference to Yeshua to demonstrate that Yeshua's glorified body is made of celestial or divine substance, yes, which the Father."

"I can only agree with this in the broadest sense of the word, meaning Yeshua's body is indeed celestial, yeah, which makes him divine. But it, but it's the limit of his divinity. Yes. Yah is a being uncontained, and as such, is unique. All other divinities, angels, or glorified humans are created with substances that can be corralled and bound."

"That's right. Excellent. 60. How many times is hypostasis used in the New Testament? And that's five times in the New Testament. Five times, brother. Five times."

"I now open up the floor for any questions here. Yeah, go ahead. Um, Shalom, everybody. Um, this is Cia. I just wanted to make a statement about, um, the new SAP students that will be coming on board next week. Please don't get discouraged by this class. This was a super long class. This is also titled a Master Level class. So generally speaking, and I do mean generally speaking, the SAPs classes are not this long, um, on Friday nights. Um, also, they will be recorded, so you can go back. Don't get discouraged. Remain motivated. Be encouraged and move forward, um, with these classes. It seems like a lot, and this class was a lot, but it is not your typical class. So please continue to move forward with this journey and don't get discouraged. Thank you."

"Kai, I appreciate that. And, you know, look, you're absolutely correct. I know a lot of people are saying, yeah, I think I need to think I need to go to catechetical. Yeah, this ain't gonna work. We've been up here. We started at five o'clock. Here it is. What time is it? It's not. I ain't gonna be able to go through this. No, no, no. You're absolutely right. Cia is stating that, you know, look, our normal SAPs class, right? Um, uh, hour and a half, two hours, and then we are gone. Brothers and sisters, uh, this is a master's class. And and you know, saplings have had about 24 high Christological classes before, uh, this one. And this is something that they can relate to because they've already studied much of the data. And what's taking place is we're tying all of this together. And, uh, it is a very, in, in, enriched, uh, composition, brothers and sisters, because we have a lot to discuss, a lot to deconstruct by way of argumentation. And if you are engaged with, uh, people who are, what I like to call, uh, pseudo-theologians, aspiring theologians, they've come across this information. And what happens, brothers and sisters, is that these people call, and they're presenting these arguments as if we're not familiar with it. We teach all of this stuff, and we teach it on an academic level. Um, and so it takes a lot of time and training, a lot of deconstructing extra-biblical Jewish literature, as well as canonized literature, to actually see what Elohim is talking about, what the prophets are talking about, what the apostles are talking about, and what the writers of antiquity are talking about. This is an extremely important lesson. And, um, you are going to come across, I promise you, some individuals, especially those of you who are ipox, you're going to have people who will enter your pod. They play a lot on the computer, so they're going to be trying to introduce these things to you. So I wanted to make sure that especially the ox are trained in this, so you're familiar with the terms. Uh, go ahead, brother Narcis."

"Thank you, Kai. I appreciate that. Yeah, so, uh, new, new saplings, certainly no need to, uh, feel defeated because our compositions are not this, um, this intense. This is a master composition, so it's very different. Well, ain't too much different, but it's a little different from the others. Brother Narcis, Narcis, Narcis, I can't hear you. Narcis."

"Okay, we'll move on. Okay. All right. Let's, uh, go to Adam. If he has a question. I don't really have a question. I did write a short essay."

"Okay, all right. Yeah, let's go over there, Adam."

"Adam, can you unmute yourself?"

"Okay, there you go. Okay. Oh, you've got some distortion. I'll come back to you, sister for name. I'm sorry. I, I had a few questions, but if you..."

"Here, go ahead. Could you go to 25? Mac and I were thinking that answer was false. Okay. You both wisdom and word are personified as as angels, right? Did, did Amaria say that was true?"

"Uh, let me see what I got here. Number 25. Number 25. That answer is true. Yes. Yes. True. Okay. Okay. That's fine. Right. Well, and and you, you don't have the, the composition, but what, what happens is that when you are reading Philo, Philo refers, uh, to to wisdom and word as Elohim's most, uh, ancient angel. He refers him as as as his archangel. He refers him as his word. He refers to him as Elohim's wisdom. So that's the reason why she selected true. You would have to read that in Philo's writing. Okay. Okay."

"Also, the scholars that you've been using, like Dunn, yeah, did I consider like secondary source?"

"Is that secondary source? Yes, ma'am. It is. You're absolutely correct. It's a secondary source."

"Okay. And just to clarify for the uninspired books, you said that you can use, well, you didn't say it, but I didn't realize that you can use that as a support for your argument. I thought you just, if it's not inspired, you couldn't use it. But you can still use that as a source to for proof text when you're, you know, having an argument with the Neo-Christian."

"That's an excellent question. Okay. So, um, Apocrypha books and Pseudepigrapha books can be used as extra-biblical Jewish literature, which is going to fall in, uh, the category of, um, historical attestations and cultural attestations. The reason we consult these books is because we want to understand what Israelites were thinking, where Israelites were, um, what they were practicing, what they were teaching outside of the Bible. Um, not that it's inspired, but it gives us a taste of the culture, and sometimes we're able to, you know, draw, uh, support from them for what we are arguing in the Bible. So you don't use the non-canonicity of the Apocryphal and Pseudepigraphal writings to establish an independent argument from the Bible. The Bible has to be used as your primary source, and then you get to say, not only do you see Solomon using *proia* to give a voice to wisdom, but, you know, this tradition continued in the intertestamental period with the Apocrypha writers, such as, um, such as Sirach, or such as the Wisdom of Solomon, right? So, uh, every scholar is going to use Jewish material. They're going to use the Talmud. We're going to use the Targum. Um, you know, we're going to use the Midrash. We're going to use Apocrypha books. We're going to use Pseudo-Apocrypha books to undergird our suppositions that we, uh, that we form canonically from the Bible. That's very important to understand. That's how scholarship works. But you cannot go to any of these books to use as a primary source. When I say it's a primary source, that's going to contradict what the Bible says. Your Bible is the is your first source of inspiration. It is the first testament of who God is. Then you go to your secondary books."

"Thank you. Yeah. Great question. Excellent question."

"Deand, trying to go back to Divine. I, I'm unmuted him and he muted himself back. So I'm trying to unmute. Can you hear me?"

"There you go. Yep. Okay. Shalom, Arya. I said, I think you answered my question, but on, um, number 38, when I wrote down the notes, I wrote down the notes from the video. It said *Proverbia* is the model of wisdom and Solomon in the book of Sirach. But you said you just had Sirach. So is it both or is it just the book of Sirach?"

"I just had Sirach. I just had Sirach."

"Okay. Okay. That's all. I just wanted to make sure that I had it right because that's what I wrote down in the notes from the video. Okay. Just to make sure that I had it. That that was the only question I had, sir."

"All right. No problem. Thank you for your question. All right. Shalom. Shalom."

"Okay. Let's go with to brother Narcis. Let's see if he, if his mic is working."

"Hey, can you hear me now?"

"Yeah, we got you, bro."

"All right. Shalom. Sorry about that. I had some mic issues."

"Not a problem. Great class. Great, great, um, paper. What they to say, say is that, you know, I just noticed the the paganistic framework always seeks to separate Yah's agents into something they could worship. And with that framework, that's why they come with the idea that, you know, the, the one, the all, the, it's unknowable, right? So you can't even get, get a hold of him. So you have to start worshiping the Logos, which the Stoics had an idea. And with the Platonics came through and, uh, developed even further to come up with that idea that you could worship that the Logos and make it to a person. And you see that over and over again with how the the pagans always try to find a way to worship Yah's agent. So just wanted to turn that up when you brought up the *hypostasis*."

"That's right. Yeah. Because they, they, you know, they, what, what I've noticed in studies is that they, they develop one, each other. Like they'll take something from Plato, like Plato, and then the Stoics will come up with something, and then another school will come up with something else, and they'll just continue to develop something. But the framework of everything to develop is paganism. It's the idea that you can't know God, right? So you can only know the the the things that come out of God. So the first hypostasis, the second hypostasis, which is the noun, the noun of the knowledge of, uh, of a word, or the third hypostasis with the world soul. So to develop that. So just wanted to share."

"Good. That's correct. Yeah. Absolutely right. Excellent. Okay. Yeah."

"Canard."

"Okay. Hey, Canard. Shalom. Shalom. How you doing, brother?"

"Me, how you feeling? Nervous."

"I understand, man. Well, look, you know what? You got prayer warriors. You got warriors, you know, back, back, back here, and we're gonna handle business on this end. All right. And I wanted to appreciate, you know, I appreciate you all for that, especially the Tabernacle family. And brothers called me last week, you know, get prayed with me. I just wanted to thank you for your prayers tonight. But yeah, I'm just a little, little anxious. You know, just counting the days now. I've been counting the days for the past month. So."

"It's coming up."

"Okay. Have your earshot. Call me when you, you know, go in to start the procedure and so forth, or, or you give me a call."

"All right. I will do that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You, you can't send me an email because I got tons of that stuff, and you're gonna get caught up, right? So just have, um, you know, just you or your Isa call me because I like to just pray with you, you know, before we go in and handle our business. All right."

"Okay. I will do that. I'll do that."

"Shalom."

"Okay. We got, yeah, we got Jesse. Hey, Jesse. Jesse, we can't, we can't hear you, Jesse."

"Yeah, look like you just muted yourself, brother. Go ahead. You're unmuted, then you muted yourself again."

"I muted him the second time because I couldn't hear him. Okay. As I'm gonna Adam now."

"All right. Just go back to Adam."

"All right. You guys can hear me well?"

"Oh, we got you there, brother. Right."

"Um, okay. So it was a super lot. So I'm gonna just cut to the chase. Um, I'm trying to focus on just being, you know, a spectator, the the core of it. And so, and I just wanted you to kind of see if I'm on the right track here. So in the, what you're presenting is basically that God, Yah, the Most High, um, his thought process about Christ was in totality. Then when Christ came on the scene, dwelt with him, not pre-existent, correct?"

"Yes."

"Mhm. Okay. Which is great. I was able to get that. So that brings up my next question, um, because I'm trying to look at what would be the purpose of deifying Christ according to Neo-Christians or, you know, any other religious group there is. And it seems like, um, would you say that basically the purpose of doing it is to basically supplant the authority that the forefathers of Israel had in the understanding and basically replace Yah and his laws and get rid of him and put a new God up? Because I don't see how you could basically take authority over the scriptures unless you got rid of not only the people that, you know, were able to give you the understanding, but also the guy that came with that understanding by putting Christ up here, which then we see they start saying, get rid of the law. Okay, there's no more law. There's no more basically discrediting and separating like you used in that that vinegar, uh, example, to basically take control over the authority of of the word to then control everything that's going on in in the course we're in today."

"You have the gift of discernment. You've put this together very well. That's exactly what has transpired. In 3:25 AD, you have approximately 333, 340 some odd, uh, bishops who sided with Athanasius that, you know, that Yeshua is *homoousios*, that he is of the same substance of the Father, that he is God the Son, he is unbegotten, just as God is unbegotten. Um, and therefore he is due worship because he is of the same substance as God. He is the hypostasis of God. He is the *ousia* of God. Therefore, he is due worship. And once they voted on this in the fourth century AD, Constantine then says, okay, now we need our own Bible. We really can't use Genesis to Malachi because there was no New Testament at this time, per se. There were no official New Testament. Um, there were letters of Paul, there were letters of people, there were things in circulation where, you know, they were, uh, gathering insight into into so-called Christianity, but they wanted their own Bible, the New Testament canon. And Athanasius introduces in 367 by using, uh, the Hebrew Epistles and the Synoptic Gospels. And so now there's a battle to, um, use Greek philosophical terms to erect another deity. Why is this so important? Because if you worship Yah, if you claim that Yah is the God that you worship, you have no other choice but to bend the knee to the Torah. You cannot separate Yah from his Torah. But if you introduce another deity, another being with another, um, set of legislative edicts, then you give me another God that I can worship while at the same time saying that I'm still a monotheist because I acknowledge, um, the Father of this God. That's nonsense, Adam. Mhm. Doesn't work at all. And so this is the reason why, uh, Ignatius, you know, said, let us keep the Sabbath not as the Jews do it. So here you see the impetus of a separation, a divestment in the second century, the mid-part of the second century, of the nullification of our laws. And we're not just talking about any laws. We're talking about the nullification of the sanctity laws, the dietary code. The dietary code is a sanctification law. The Sabbath is a sanctification law. The, uh, the *soli*, the *mo*, the *moadim*, these are sanctification laws. They set us apart from the world, and they, uh, ascribe Elohim's grace and presence to us. So here you have Athanasius, and then later Irenaeus, and then just a modern, and Tertullian saying that we're going to do away with all of these things. If you do away with that, then you have to introduce another God. So hypostasis, um, is is a Greek philosophical term that is used to support that idea of introducing another God that we can worship that is biblically sustainable in the Synoptic Gospels and the Epistles, and it's not, brother, at all. So, um, your assessment is 100% correct. What Gentiles have done is, and I'm, I'm just gonna be, you know, look, I'm not, I'm not God, but I'm just, I'm reading the text where the Gentiles have done, um, through their paganism against the children of Israel and God, Yah, is they have created a religious system that antagonizes, that antagonizes Yah's righteousness, his culture of redemption, sanctification, and salvation. The alternative is condemnation. There's no question about it. And so they have basically created a religious system that has sent people straight to hell. Uh, that is the truth of the matter. I'm not God. I mean, look, Elohim is going to have mercy. So I'm going to have mercy upon whom I will have mercy. But we are talking about the religious system that has been created, that has been in operation since the second century AD, is radically opposed to what, uh, God has proclaimed from Mount Sinai and what he commissioned Yeshua to evangelize. And so this is the reason why I introduced Dr. Bartman and Dr. Mike, uh, Luna. Whenman says that Christian evangelicalism, the the Christianity of the day, is not the Christianity of Christ, it's not the Christianity of the Apostles. Why? It is so far removed from anything that Christ taught or that the apostles taught. And so you have to ask the question, why? And that is because they refuse to worship this God along with his legislative. That's the issue."

"Yeah, because them laws that he got will kill you if you don't get it together. Yeah. So, yeah, I appreciate it. At this time, there's so much. I'm not necessarily trying to even look at all the terms and words. I'm just trying to grasp with understanding what you're saying because I had to come here and put every, throw everything in the trash and start over. So when I get into SAPs, then I will start, you know, magnifying everything. But as far as right now, that's kind of what I'm, the way I'm approaching it. So I appreciate your time. Thank you."

"Okay. All right. Let's go to Jesse. Let's see if he can hear us. Jesse, are you able to hear us?"

"I need to make an announcement too."

"Are you, go ahead and make an announcement. Jesse's done."

"Oops."

"Okay. Um, I want to make sure that you guys, the SAPs, um, the new SAP folks know to go on ncci.sap.boardhost.com and register. Um, the first class will be posted on the 19th. If you don't register at that board host forum, you will not see your material in order to be prepared for the first class on the 26th. Please do that as soon as possible so you can have your information. That is for the SATs people, SAPs people only. Now, for the catechetical folks, I have sent out tons of emails from Google via New Covenant Congregation of Israel for you guys to sign up for your Google Workspace account through NCCI. You have to accept this, and you have to join the class. There are a number of you that have not accepted the invitation, nor have you accepted the, um, invite to the class. You must do this in order to get your material for your first week. And some of those first week, um, classes will be on, what's today? The 14th. So the 21st. So if you have a class, if your session, uh, if your pod is on next Sunday, it starts on a Sunday, you will have your class on Sunday. So you needed to get your information, your material to be prepared for the first class on Sunday. So I encourage you guys to look in your spam if you don't see an email, but you should have everything that you need. Um, if you don't see it, or if you click on the link and it's expired, email me. Do not call me. Please email me at Kaiya.do, wait a minute, Kaiya@ncci.charlotte.com. And if you haven't received anything at all, send me an email so I can make sure that I have your, um, casting pearls. If I don't have your casting pearls, you will not get an invite because I don't have that from you. So if you think I have it, I don't. Obviously, I know we were having some email troubles for a couple of weeks, so please resend it, and I'll get you guys onboarded as soon as I get the information again. You can go to our website at nccr.charlotte.com, and there is a green place card on our homepage, and it has all of this information on it. So please do so so you guys can be prepared. The facilitators have done an amazing job with getting prepared for you guys. There's already students that, um, are in the class asking questions, excited. So I want to make sure that all of you guys get your information so you guys can move right on into the language and get the party started. Again, if you have any questions, email me at Kaiya@ncci.charlotte. That's all I have. Thank you."

"Let's go to F."

"Okay. Okay. Okay. Um, Shalom, Kaiya. So I went on to the website and I tried to register. Is there a certain username we supposed to be using because I could not sign on when I try to do it?"

"And I just now, you just, you sign on. Um, I mean, you, you're going to have to get approved. You sign, you sign up, and then, uh, it'll ask you some questions that I have there, and then you'll submit your request for registration. I then have to approve that. I have to make sure you have your casting pearls, your SAPs application, and made your tuition payments. And once I verify that, I will approve your, um, your request. Now, I do know some folks told me if you're doing this on the phone, on the left-hand side of your phone, you have to switch to desktop mode so you can create an account."

"Oh, okay. I'll try that then because I know I registered."

"Yeah, but I mean, you probably don't want to go through this whole class just on your cell phone. Uh, you know, having an iPad or a laptop would be would be beneficial. But yeah, you'll have to, you have to create an account, and then I have to go in and approve it behind you."

"Okay. All right. I'll try it on the desktop. Thank you."

"Yeah."

"B, do you have any more questions?"

"I always have more questions, but for the sake of time, I think I'll probably email you."

"Okay. All right. Ain't no problem. Thank you."

"All right. Okay. Sister Arya, you want to talk to us about your essay?"

"Sure. And I just want to let the new saplings know that, uh, at the end of every quiz, Arya has requested an essay. It's it's optional, but it's for your, um, your understanding of the composition and what you've learned. Um, I myself didn't do much the first cycle, but I plan to do it, um, this second time around. Um, and at the beginning of every composition, Arya, uh, really only puts out an outline of what you are to understand from your learning, which is a perfect outline for an essay. But I wrote an essay within 400 to 500 words, so it's short."

"Yeah, go ahead. Love to hear it."

"Okay. Yes. So this thesis has argued for a low Christological doctrine, which is that Yah made Yeshua a man born of flesh and blood, the personification and embodiment of his pre-existent wisdom through the process of learning, transforming, and spiritual endowment to become his wisdom. It has also argued against the Neo-Christian supposition that Yeshua is the pre-incarnate God who speaks in Proverbs chapter 1 and chapter 8, and that the formulation of such a position has been formed due to a lack of Second Temple scholarship on personification and poetic disquisitions relayed through rhetorical and literary devices. Uh, the thesis has demonstrated that the personification of wisdom is a figure of speech, and that it is important to understand the genre in which Jewish literature is written to determine whether a passage is meant to be taken literally or figuratively. In studying the personification of the Word of Wisdom, I have learned several things about the use of personification in the Bible that are explained in this composition. Firstly, in the Bible, personification is used as a rhetorical figure to represent abstract qualities figuratively. Specifically, in Proverbs 8, wisdom is personified to represent Yah's attribute of wisdom in a humanized way, which made it easier for ancient Israelites to understand the abstract divine characteristic of Yah as a relatable, wise helper. Secondly, writing and writing Midrash is an important tool that is used by the Bible writers to interpret and to expand on scripture to show the relationships between the literal, spiritual, and allegorical meanings. John chapter 1, verses 1-13, is an example of writing Midrash, an interpretation of Genesis and echoed by Proverbs that tells the story, tells of the story of the incarnate Word of God, continuing in the story of the creative Word, Yah. Thirdly, one of the most important aspects of studying the use of personification in the Bible is historical distance and literary hermeneutics. This tool helps scholars consider the author, the genre, the lexicology, uh, historical and cultural references, and intertextual parallels that inform scholarly understandings of personification in the Bible. Fourthly, the personification of ideas, particularly in Paul's letters, was used to emphasize the importance of Yeshua in affirming and representing Yah's wisdom and power. In 1 Corinthians 1:24 and 30, Paul says that Yeshua is the power of God and the wisdom of God. This statement is informed by the use of personification in Proverbs that help scholars relate better to Yah in an abstract fashion by giving it more tangible, human-like qualities. And in this case, wisdom personified in Yeshua. Finally, the Midrashic narratives and the personifications throughout the Bible serve as a foundation for later traditions in the Patristic period. This means that the idea of personification in the Bible had a lasting impact on Christian thought and tradition by helping scholars understand abstract characteristics in a tangible and relatable way. In conclusion, studying the personification of the Word of Wisdom has enlightened me about the use of personification in the Bible. It has taught me that personification serves as a rhetorical tool for representing abstract ideas in a humanized way that helps scholars and readers understand Yah's divine characteristics in a tangible and relatable way. Additionally, using Midrash is a vital tool to help readers understand the relationships between the literal, spiritual, and allegorical meanings of complex religious texts. Ultimately, it is clear that the use of personification throughout the Bible continues to have a lasting impact on Christian thought and tradition to this day."

"That's it. I'm just at a loss for words. I mean, well, you gave a lot. You gave us like 80 pages. So you gave a lot. You know, look, you summarized 80 pages. I, I don't know. I understand how I couldn't have done that. I don't understand how you did that, Arya."

"Kai, I'm happy to summarize all of your composition."

"Did you use AI?"

"Did I use what?"

"I'm just kidding. Use, uh, what is it called?"

"Yeah, I, um, that is beautiful. And I'm just, that is. Can you forward that to me?"

"Oh, uh, yes. Yeah, I would just like to have it because I'm going to attach it to this composition."

"Yeah. How, how many pages is that?"

"Oh, it's like between 400 and 500 words. So like a page, maybe a page and a half."

"Okay. Yeah. I need to, yeah. So just send me that so I can attach it because that is an excellent, that is a professional synopsis of what we have spent, you know, four hours talking about, four hours going over. Yeah. And and and, you know, look, this is a master class on personification. So there's no way in the world we can cover personification in an hour, two or three hours for you to understand what's going on. But absolutely not, especially with what we've been, how it's been perverted. And, you know, folks are confused. What the hell are we talking about, right? Well, you know, look, we, we have, we have a clear understanding, a comprehensive understanding. We know what went wrong. We know how it went wrong. Um, we know how to fix it. We know how to get back that which was co-opted. Um, and and just, you know, egregiously, uh, abused. So, so we are back home, and we can prove it unequivocally. You know, there is no, there is no, uh, refutation to these primary and secondary sources that we are using to give and attestation to what has transpired. And you just wrapped it up beautifully. So make sure, if you don't mind, please, I would like to look at that essay of yours and attach it as a synopsis after the conclusion of this composition, as a synopsis written by Arya B. Israel, to this to this presentation. That's an excellent synopsis. Thank you, my sister. Thank you. Thank you."

"Awesome. Bye."

"All right. Do we have anyone else before we close out? As Kaiya said, this is not the normative. Um, and, um, this composition is preceded by probably about 20 other high Christological compositions. And what, what I mean by this is that every place in the Old Testament and New Testament where Neo-Christians have, um, you know, asserted that the passage is talking about Christ's pre-existence, it is not. And, um, you know, you have to be trained on all of those passages. All of those passages. And so there are, you know, at least 24 high Christological, so-called high Christological, uh, passages that saplings go through starting at level six, um, up to level eight. And in some cases, maybe here, we probably put this one in level 12 because this is a supplemental lesson to the first SAPs run, where you all who are just entering in SAPs, you all will get this composition at some point in time, and we'll have the very same meeting. We'll go through it. We'll dissect it, etc., etc. Okay. All right."

"Anything else before we close out?"

"Well, let me first of all thank you all for, um, for joining us. We know that it's long, and, um, I, um, I can't apologize for it because tomorrow is not promised to any one of us, right? So, you know, get all you can get now, if you have the ability, the resources, and, um, so time waits for nobody. We need to understand who created us and what he expects of us, and we're going to be able to capture an understanding of this through right knowledge. It's very important. Okay. Okay."

"If we don't have anything else, let's go ahead and close out with prayer. Holy, gracious Father, Yah, in the name of Your Son, Yeshua, the Anointed, our King and Priest, we come before You, Father Yah, to praise Your name. We want to thank You for this community. We want to thank You for our brothers and sisters, locally and remotely, who are entering in our catechetical Bible study program. We ask, Father Yah, that You, um, that You bless their efforts, that You bless their studies, that You bless, um, their Bible study groups, if they, if they have them, that You bless, um, their initiatives to continue to to learn and understand how to meet the expectations that You have set before us in Your word. We offer intercessory prayers for our brothers and sisters who are joining the SAPs community, a more intense community, a more comprehensive, uh, community. These brothers desire to articulate You in a very nuanced fashion. We are living in the day and age where, uh, we need to have a micro understanding of who You are and how to defend Your truth. So, holy, gracious Father, Yah, whether we are dealing with family members who are in SAPs or catechetical, we ask that You bless us with the, uh, gift and the skill to disseminate Your truth so that Your holy name will be glorified and that our brothers and sisters are edified. We live to serve You, Father Yah. We live to worship You. We call upon Your name, holy, gracious Father, Yah, because there is no name greater than Yours. We live because You allow us to live, and You allow us to live because You're hopeful that one day we will come into the knowledge of Your truth, internalize it, use it to renew the spirit of our mind so that we might be transformed into Your image. We are pursuing, um, this initiative, holy and gracious Father, Yah. Therefore, we continue to pray before You to ask for patience, Your continued mercies to remain upon us, to remain compassionate, um, with us as we take this journey to exercise You properly. Call upon Your name, holy, gracious Father, Yah, in the name of our King and Priest, Yeshua HaMashiach. Amen. So be it. We pray. Amen."

"Everybody, thank you all once again. This is it right now. Uh, the next time we have conversations is going to be in catechetical, and it's going to be in SAPs, and we're going to have a lot of fun. Let's just make sure that we are having fun, brothers and sisters. I believe in in having fun. If you all watch me on the bot every week, um, I'm laughing and joking and whatever the case may be. Life is short. Let's make it righteous, and let's make it fun. Enjoy the rest of your evening. Shalom."