Transcription
Stephen Hawking's time travel conjecture.
Yeah. The chronology protection conjecture. He said that whatever the underlying laws of physics are, they have to prevent time travel into the past, which is to say that causality.
Protecting causality. Right. Exactly.
But I think we're absolutely miles away. We're miles away. This might not be right. This idea of spacetime emerging.
How is that different from Stephen Hawking's time travel conjecture?
If things can go faster than light, then you can essentially build a time machine and go into the past. You can send messages back into the past. If you can go faster than the speed of light.
Basically, my guess is that that's absolutely fundamental. If you could skip beneath relativity, so to a deeper picture of spacetime, I still guess that causality will be there.
Will still be there. I, I now, I'm not aware of anyone who's really, who's proved that or I'm not aware of any, any other anyone's opinion on it. It is my opinion. If