Transcription
This is Fiji Miner. So, I came across this video from Jake the A-hole. He used to be called the flat earth a-hole. Now, he put this video out before the final experiment. And this is another one of those videos where the individual was claiming that he was expecting them to see a 24-hour sun before it even happened.
Now, I played a video for you a while back in my final experiment playlist from another individual called the tomb of illumination where he had the same prediction. He thought they were going to see a 24-hour sun, and he knew that this was possible on a flat Earth, and he explains why. I'll leave a link in the comment section if you want to check all that out in my final experiment playlist. You'll find the videos there.
Now, Jake has a different angle about this. Now, he was expecting the 24-hour sun in Antarctica before it even happened, but he has a different opinion about what they're seeing. Qinf is 100% correct. What you see here cannot be explained away by perspective. With one circling sun on the equator, it is impossible for every observer on that same line of longitude to see a 90° east sunrise and a 270° west sunset. Qinf modeled this up perfectly. And anyone with a working brain should be able to see that, by Qinf modeling up how it's physically impossible for one circling sun to be in all those locations at once. That should prove to you or anyone watching that a single circling sun over a flat Earth map is impossible.
As you can see by this example modeled up by Qinf, every observer on this line of longitude is going to be seeing the sunrise at the same moment from the same angle. And then over on the other side of the Earth on that same line of longitude, these three observers are going to be seeing the sunset at the exact same moment. But wait, that's not all. You see this guy over here standing on the equator? He's gonna look straight up and see the sun right over his head in that exact same moment. So, how can you have seven different observers seeing the sun in seven different locations at the exact same time? Does that mean there are seven suns? No. What's happening is that each observer sees their own sun, and each observer only sees one sun. So basically, we are all seeing our own sun.
So what does that mean? It means the sun is rising; it is setting, and we are all seeing our own independent local sun. And the angles at which we all see our own independent local sun, they don't triangulate back to one singular circling sun. [Music] The apparent motion of the sun is not uniform. For this reason, it would be difficult to construct a clock capable of keeping this irregular time. Therefore, a mean or imaginary sun is used. This mean sun is assumed to have a uniform rate of motion with respect to the earth. The time measured by the mean or imaginary sun is called mean or civil time and uses a mean or imaginary sun as its reference point.
So in order for celestial navigation to work, a mean sun or virtual sun is used. And the reason is is because the actual observation angles to the sun are irregular, and they don't triangulate back to one singular sun. So the fact that the angles at which we all see the sun are irregular, they don't use the actual position of the actual sun for celestial navigation. They use a virtual sun, as in a not real sun.
So what does all that mean? Well, that means we live in some sort of a hyper-realistic simulation of sorts, perhaps a virtual reality. Well, if you don't like either of those explanations, for lack of a better explanation, this place is a magical mystical realm that defies explanation. So, the notion of one singular circling sun is impossible, and the fact that we are all seeing our own local sun rise and set is a reality. So rather than make excuses and deny reality, I'm going to accept that this is indeed reality, what we are seeing and experiencing.
So, it looks like Jake is saying that it's strange how you can see the sun coming up from these different angles in these different areas on a flat earth. He's saying that kind of doesn't make much sense on a Gleason's map, and how could you be in this area and see the sun moving this direction, and this area you see it moving that direction, and if you're here you'll see the sun above your head. It just doesn't make any sense. He's saying uh, flat earth Gleasons. But you know, like I said, I explain how this can make sense. But it's interesting to see Jake's take on this where he's saying it sounds like he's suggesting some type of simulation theory. Maybe like we're living in some type of world that we just can't explain.
I kind of have explored these options before as well, as far as if we're living in some type of simulation, or the way I describe it is more like, are we living in the mind of God? We could be living in a spiritual realm. You know, that's kind of where I'm getting at with when I say are we living in the mind of God. It's almost like, are we living in God's dream perhaps or something like that, where if you dream and you're walking around, can you zoom out and take a picture of the place that you're in? And you couldn't, cuz you're in a dream world. You're in a realm. You're on the ground. You can see the ground. You can move around, even run around. And does that mean that you can zoom out and see, hey, I'm walking on a ball? Why would you be walking on a ball? Might just be walking in the area that you're walking and seeing around your 360 personal experience of where you are at that given moment. And maybe the world is materializing just where you happen to be or wherever any consciousness happens to be at any time. Like they said, if a tree falls in the forest, did it really happen type thing, you know?
So, I kind of have explored these options, and I find it pretty interesting for Jake to bring that up to where, okay, does that mean that the sun is literally there for each personal person? Like, are we seeing a personal observation when we're seeing the sun? Is it an apparent sun? Kind of like how when you see a rainbow, it's like it's not really something where you can point to where is that rainbow. So with the sun, is it kind of something like that to where is it an apparent sun? Now like I said, I did explore this option. I think he's on to something cuz this information actually goes deeper to explain that there could be a sun in the center. It could even be the Polaris star or something in the north pole area that is where the actual source sun is. And it might even be circling in that area. But what we're seeing anywhere else is the apparent sun because it would be the reflection off of the dome. That was more of kind of the other information I was getting into. There's a lot of options to explore in my final experiment playlist.
This final experiment playlist I'm putting together that I've been putting together is actually coming together quite well. And it's exploring all these different options. That's why I don't understand some people get so upset over exploring options. It's like if you say something or if you explore an idea, they'll say, "No, the the final experiment was faked and it wasn't real and we don't have to spend any time thinking about it," you know, and it's like, hey, I'm just sitting here exploring all the different options and all the possibilities because it was such an impactful experiment, you know, and it wasn't really an experiment. It was more of an observation. But for it to be an official scientific experiment, it would have had to been conducted at least three times. So that's why I continued this push for flat-earthers to go back down there and, you know, get another observation and then do it again at least three times for it to be an official scientific experiment. And then take all of your data and get all the recordings you can during those three times, and you know, take different people each time and come back and let us know what you saw, you know, cuz then it would be more of an official scientific experiment at that point.
But I find this interesting with this personal observation theory of the sun, the imaginary sun. Even the scientists admit that there's something with the sun that you can almost consider an imaginary sun now. You can predict where it's going to be and stuff and you know cuz it's moving as a clock in the sky. So there's predictions that you can actually make and make accurate predictions, but at the same time, is that sun really there? Cuz this video has scientists even calling the sun an imaginary sun that they can actually um prove that what we're seeing in the sky is not actually what you might think it is and it might not be where you might think it is. So, in a mirrored reflection, just think about something like that with the mirror dome perhaps and you know how we're seeing the sun in multiple places like Jake was showing us at the same time. Would it match up? You know, does this even make sense? And instead, are we each seeing our personal observation? Is the sun appearing to us on an individual basis where you're going to see the sun from your angle and how you see it, but someone else will see it the way they see it? I don't know, so it's a pretty interesting hypothesis about the sun and if there is a source sun or are we seeing an apparent sun in the sky and how can these observations be all true at the same time?
So when it comes down to it, it looks like we can kind of piece all this together and maybe come to even more of a better understanding about what's going on in the sky. And so with this whole thing, I mean, I think we're starting to get some better answers. And once you piece all this information together that you're going to find in my final experiment playlist, you see all the different ideas and you kind of can pick some truth out of each one of these ideas and hypotheses and maybe come to a better understanding about what they actually saw during the final experiment. But when it comes down to it, we all know that what's going on in the sky doesn't necessarily reflect about what you're walking on. You know, it doesn't actually have anything to do with whether you're walking on a flat earth or not, what you're seeing in the sky. So I mean, but the thing is it was such an impactful experiment, for lack of a better word, that we do have to explore these different hypotheses and come to some type of understanding about it because if you just ignore it, I think that's just not the best way to research, just to say, well, I don't want to talk about it, you know, and we're going to have other subjects and other videos to talk about in the future because I mean I have plenty of other things to explore about the flat earth that we're going to get back into at another time, but I just wanted to get this collection of videos and thoughts together about all the different possibilities about what this could mean, cuz when it comes down to it, there's other explanations and it's like with Jirenism, it just thinks right away, hey, you know what I saw just I can't explain it, and you know, I'm proving that you can explain this stuff and Jake actually, he was saying this stuff years ago from what I understand, so from what I understand, I mean he he kind of understood there was something going on with the sun a while ago. He's saying that the things that you're able to prove that you can observe with the sun. It doesn't really, he's saying, match up with the Gleasons.
So, in my opinion, I think it does match up with the Gleasons. You just have to understand that there could be a source sun and what we're seeing is the apparent sun. I think that would answer a lot of the questions that some of these people have. But Jake, from what I understand, is actually still a flat-earther. He's still a flat-earther. He's not letting this sun thing take him off of, you know, and away from all of the proofs of of flat earth. And so this is what actually witsy gets it and others have concluded is that this doesn't mean that you're living on a globe just because the sun is doing some things that you can't necessarily explain. But as I continue to dig into this subject, I'm actually able to explain what they are seeing in the sky with the sun. There's actually logical explanations, and you don't have to throw away the Gleasons map as far as I'm concerned because in my explanations it makes perfect sense when you use the apparent sun and the source sun idea with the mirrored reflection and stuff like that.
So yeah, let me know your thoughts in the comments section about all of this. And so I'm going to leave some links for you if you want to do more research with me on this subject. And I'm also going to leave links to my other channels, my social media, my Feed Your Mind store, my free email newsletters, and much more. If you'd like to support this channel, please donate as little as a dollar to help keep this channel online by becoming a YouTube member or a monthly Patreon. Also have a thank you button. So, let's get over 500 likes on this video. Thanks for tuning in. And this has been Fiji Miner signing off.