Transcription
In a bombshell revelation, Donald Trump has been exposed in a new trove of damaging emails in the Epstein files.
In the first email, Epstein writes to Ghislaine Maxwell, "I want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is Trump. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned, police chief, etc. I'm 75% there." Maxwell responded, "I've been thinking about that."
In another email, Epstein wrote, "Victim Mara Lago. Trump said he asked me to resign. never remember ever. Of course, he knew about the girls as he asked Ghislaine to stop."
And finally, in a third email, Michael Wolf said to Epstein, "I hear CNN is planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you, either on air or in scrum afterwards." To which Epstein replied, "If we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?"
And Wolf responded, "I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he hasn't been on the plane or the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you. Or if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt. Of course, it is possible that when asked, he'll say Jeffrey is a great guy and has gotten a raw deal and is a victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a Trump regime."
So, if you were wondering why Donald Trump was so hellbent on burying his involvement with the Epstein files, if you were wondering why Trump, after being told by Pam Bondi, his attorney general, that he was in the files, dedicated FBI resources not to finding out the truth about who was involved in the Epstein sex trafficking ring, but rather to hiding his own involvement by putting a thousand FBI agents on the job of flagging his presence in the files. This might be why.
If you're wondering why Trump sent his little lap dog, Mike Johnson, pious Mike Johnson, out to prevent the House from being in session and engaging in what would ultimately become an 8-week paid vacation. This might be why. I mean, think about it. Why else do you think Trump was so eager to have the government stay out of session? Why else do you think Trump would send Mike Johnson on the job of refusing to swear in Adelita Grahalva so that she wouldn't become the 218th vote on the discharge petition? It's because he knew exactly what was in those files. When Pam Bondi flagged his name to him, he didn't want this moment right here to occur. He would rather have kept the government permanently closed than revealed his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, which we've already found out anyway, right now.
I asked Adelita Grahalva about this exact point. Here's what she had to say. "And so, why do you think that it's so important for Mike Johnson, assuming that that's the reason? I don't want to jump to any conclusions, but I don't know what else it could possibly be that he's okay swearing people in during pro forma sessions if they're Republicans, swearing other people in if they would be the 217th vote for a discharge petition, which doesn't force a vote, but suddenly uh bristles at the notion of being able to swear in the 218th vote. So, why do you think it is that Mike Johnson is so hellbent on making sure that this doesn't come to the floor?"
"You know, I think that he's had some pretty clear direction from the White House to like we don't want to see this because if we remember when Trump was running for office, releasing the Epstein files was a really big deal. I mean, that was something he was going to do on day one, >> right? >> And here we are. And I think what happened is they got a little gander what was really in the files and thought maybe that's not a good idea. And if we notice, you know, Speaker Johnson um ended votes ear a week early, sent everyone home a week early to avoid a vote on the Epstein files. So that seems to be the common denominator. I like you, I'm like, I didn't want to assume. I really didn't know him. Um but it has been fairly surprising how easily um with with a straight face, he can just lie and manipulate facts. It's been really um fascinating to watch."
And she's right, by the way, about Mike Johnson. The reality is that he and his colleagues are solely focused on running cover for Trump and will lie as easily as the rest of us breathe. Case in point, what he said a few days back.
"A leader, they don't have any identifiable set of policy solutions for the problems facing the American people. Their party continues to hit all-time historic lows in poll after poll after poll, and many of you have reported on that. These are objective facts. They're utterly lost as a party, and everybody can see it. So what are they doing? They see a shiny object and they latch on to it. Democrats did not say one word about the Epstein files for the entire Biden presidency. They had all the files in the Biden DOJ. They didn't say a word about it. Four years, not a word. And suddenly now they they somehow convinced themselves that the Epstein files will be damaging to President Trump and Republicans in some way that they've imagined. And so they feign outrage."
How about Mike Johnson claiming the Democrats have convinced themselves that the Epstein files will be "damaging to President Trump and Republicans in some way that they've imagined. And so they feign outrage." Damaging in some way. Dude is in the files. Pam Bondi told Trump he was in the files. The files are so damaging that Mike Johnson hadn't called the House in session for over a month because he was too afraid of allowing them to be released. Damaging in some way.
We got an email today that says, "I want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is Trump. Victims spent hours at my house with him." And of course, if you're waiting for a response from Trump, it's virtually guaranteed to be something along the lines of, "Oh, well, this is all some Democrat hoax because that's what he says every single time some of the drip drip drip comes out of tying him closer and closer to Jeffrey Epstein and his pedophile ring."
"Mr. President, Mr. President, I know you want to move past all this intrigue over the Epstein files, but I do want to ask you to clarify something you said this morning. You said this was all a hoax. Has your attorney general told you this was a hoax? What evidence have you seen?"
"It's not the attorney general. No, I know it's a hoax. It's started by Democrats. It's been run by the Democrats for four years. You had Christopher Wray and these characters and Comey before him. And uh it's a bad group. It's all been a big hoax. It's perpetrated by the Democrats."
"I lost a lot of faith in certain people. Yeah, I lost because they got duped by the Democrats. The Democrats are good for nothing. Instead, they want to talk about the Epstein hoax. And the sad part is it's people that are really doing the Democrats work. They're stupid people. All my supporters want to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. It's some It's unbelievable. It's a disgrace. And I'm going to I remember every one of these guys. They're my supporters and they just they they love it. They love it and they they're it's all induced by the Democrats. The Democrats are the ones that are getting them to say this stuff. It's all the same scam. They could look at this Jeffrey Epstein hoax also cuz that's the same stuff that's all put out by Democrats."
"Sir, what you investigation?"
"I have nothing to do with it."
And remember, all of Trump's protests here might carry just a tad more weight if the guy was not at the center of Epstein's universe. Consider too that while Trump says that the Epstein files are a hoax, I got to ask, was it a hoax when Trump fanned the flames back when it was politically convenient on the campaign trail to do so?
"Nice guy. Uh, got a lot of problems coming up in my opinion with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein."
"You raised the question of Jeffrey Epstein in your remarks about in the Q&A."
"I think he's got a problem. I mean, >> what do you think the problem will be?"
"I I don't know, but that island was uh really a cesspool. There's no question about it. Just ask Prince Andrew. He'll tell you about it. Uh, the island was an absolute cesspool."
Or was it a hoax when Trump's cabinet members were fanning the flames to build their own brands?
"Everybody has everybody in politics has a vice that's much worse than alcoholism is is the way that I put it."
"Um, but we we um >> release the list."
"Seriously, we need to release the Epstein list. That that is an important thing."
"You say that the FBI has Epstein's list. They're sitting on it. That doesn't seem like something you should do. You're protecting the world's foremost predator. That seems like an evil thing to do. Regardless of who may be embarrassed in the release of that list, why is the FBI protecting the greatest pedophile um the the largest scale pedophile in human history?"
"Simple. Because of who's on that list?"
You wondering why we're not hearing more about this Epstein case. I mean, the guy was only connected to just about every major player in the swamp internationally. And yet, you don't hear much about it. And what the hell are they hiding with Jeffrey Epstein?
So, it was real when Trump was exploiting the issue for votes. It was real when his cabinet members were exploiting the issue for votes. But now that the truth about the issue points to him, suddenly it's made up. Convenient, huh?
So, at this point, with the new news revealed that Trump is much, much more involved with Epstein than even previously known, the Republican party has a choice. We already know what's happening. So now, in the light of day, do you want to align yourselves with the guy perpetuating the cover-up of a notorious pedophile ring? Someone who was intimately involved with the guy at the center of that ring, or do you want to stay true to what you told your base when you were pandering for their votes? The coming days are going to put on full display exactly who the Republican party works for. Is it their constituents or is it the guy at the center of a pedophile ring? Although, I think we can all give a pretty good guess as to what that answer is going to be.
Before you go, if you enjoyed this content and you want to see more and support independent media, please subscribe to this channel. The subscribe button will be right here on the screen. But second, the reality is that we are now in a political environment where this administration can lean on any of the social media platforms to suppress certain voices if they don't like critical coverage. That means my longevity here is in the hands of a few tech billionaires who are already making it clear that they are willing to cater to this administration. To that end, signing up for my newsletter is a way for me to reach you directly if that ever becomes necessary. I'll put the link right here on the screen as well. So, please sign up. It's free, but there's also an option to do a paid subscription if you'd like to support me and my team. I really appreciate it. Thanks so much for watching.