Elon Musk on AGI Timeline, US vs China, Job Markets, Clean Energy & Humanoid Robots | 220

My concern isn't the long run. It's the next 3 to seven years. How do we head towards Star Trek and not Terminator?

I call AI and robotics the supersonic tsunami. We're in the singularity.

When is all white by color work gone?

Anything short of shaping atoms. AI can do half or more of those jobs right now. There's no onoff switch. It is coming and accelerating. The transition will be bumpy. You have a solution to this.

I don't make a bet here. Um, China's done an incredible job, right? I mean, it's running circles around us. Do you imagine that the US could make that level of investment and commitment based on current trends? Uh, China will far exceed the rest of the world in uh AI compute.

Every major CEO and economist and government leader should be like, what do we do? We don't have any system right now to make this go well. But AI is a critical part of making it go well. There are three things that I think are important. Truth will prevent AI from going insane. Curiosity, I think, will foster any form of sentience. And if it has a sense of beauty, it will be a great future. It's going to be an awesome future.

Now, that's a moonshot, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Moonshots. Following is a wide-ranging conversation with Elon Musk focused on optimism and the coming age of abundance. My moonshot mate Dave Blondon and I flew into Austin, Texas to meet up with Elon at his 11.5 million square foot Gigafactory, home of the Cybertruck and Model Y production and the future home for 8 million square ft of Optimus production. Elon has agreed to do this kind of a deep dive catchup once per year. This is hopefully the first of many. And after having this conversation with Elon, it's crystal clear to me that we are living through the singularity. All right, enjoy.

Yeah. Um, your relentless optimism is always a breath of fresh air.

Thank you, buddy. Thank you. Well, I want to share that tonight with a lot of people.

Yeah.

I think they need it.

I hope you're right. And you might be right. Actually, I'm increasingly thinking that you are right.

Thank you.

Abundance for all.

Yeah.

Shall we?

Yeah.

All right.

Right now, putting a lot of time into chips.

You are. You are personally.

Yeah.

Yeah.

It's always AI assistance, I assume.

What's that? With some AI assistance. I assume that design.

Uh, not enough.

Yeah.

It'd be nice if we could just hand it off to the AI.

Yeah. Yeah.

Soon enough.

Yeah. I tried to do some circuit design actually with uh AI recently. Just this a couple weeks ago. Not not happening yet.

Um, very soon though.

Yeah. Um, I I think probably at this point Grock, if you if you took a photo and submitted to Grock, it could probably tell you if if the circuit is is if there's something wrong with it.

Yeah.

Yeah.

All right. I'm going to give it a shot. You're using the same Grock that I'm using. Are you or you are.

Grock keeps updating. So.

Yeah, 4.2, but five is soon, right?

Uh, five is Q1.

Yeah.

Um, 4.2 has not been released yet.

Okay. Uh, externally. Um, but yeah, I mean, if you just if you just upload an image into Gro.

Um, it's it's does quite a good job.

Yeah.

Um.

Yeah.

Of of analyzing any any given image.

Absolutely. Let's uh let's start. We're going to talk about this.

All right. We'll come back.

I mean, let's see if I if I take an if I take a picture of you, what is it? Let's see what it.

Yeah. What's it going to say about me?

Yeah, it's going to say you're a flawed circuit. I also have to remember to update it because like we update the Grock app so frequently.

You know, I asked I asked Grock to roast me.

Oh, it does a good job.

It did an amazing job. Then I asked Grock to roast you. Yes.

And I spit out my coffee. It was it was hilarious. And then I asked it, you know.

Say be more. It just keeps telling it to be more and more.

I asked I asked until until it's like mother of God.

Wait, is Bad Rudy still out or did that get repealed? Bad Rudy still there?

And I asked, you know, does Elon know what you say about him? And and and she goes, "It's a she for me." She goes, "What is he going to do about it?"

What is he going to do about it?

Yeah, let's see. Okay.

Um, so I just literally took a photo of you and see what it is.

Did you ask a question?

No, nothing. I didn't say anything.

This man is is hugely.

This This is Peter Diamandis.

Yes.

So.

Okay.

That's pretty good.

Yeah.

There's no context whatsoever.

The host of the podcast Moonshots. Yeah.

Uh, sometimes that's your first credential now. That's amazing. Forget about everything else I've done in life. Comes back to your podcast. That was a no no context image.

Yeah. By the way, Graedia is awesome.

Okay, great.

I mean, just phenomenal.

I mean, just it's like I tried to like update my Wikipedia page for like years impossibly.

And um, yeah, it it it knows me.

Amazing.

Yeah. Um, he's wearing a black quilted jacket featuring a Sundance logo.

Not quite true. It's my abundance logo, but I guess a little wrinkled. See the.

Can it see it?

I I think so.

Okay. Okay.

Anyway.

Um, yeah, but it basically uh it's pretty damn good.

Yeah.

Um, he's smiling and relaxed with a laptop in front of him.

That's true.

Yeah, that's true. Um.

Yeah.

Well, I should say quite a circuit though.

You got to test it on the.

Roast him.

Only. It has to be read by you, though.

I mean, I won't read the whole thing, but.

All right. Give me Give me a taste. I can take it.

Okay. Check out that grin. Dude smiling like he just discovered a new way to monetize hope.

Monetizing hope. Oh, that's.

I want to try and answer the question, can AI and tech help save America and the world? Right. Um, I want to give people listening a dose of optimism. There's a survey done in mid December by Pew that said 45% of Americans would rather live in the past and only 14% said they'd rather live in the future, which is insane to me, right? Um, obviously they never read history. The challenge is most Americans all they have of the future. It's like Hollywood has shown us killer AIs and rogue robots, right? And people are worried about their jobs. They're worried about healthcare. They're worried about, you know, the cost of living. The challenge is how do we how do we help people? I mean, you posted, you pinned on X, the future is going to be amazing with AI and robots enabling sustainable abundance.

I think of you when I did that.

Thank you. I appreciate that. And and uh.

Well, I mean.

It's like what would Peter do you want to say?

Yeah, was channeling you.

Thank you. I couldn't agree more. I didn't agree more either.

That's great.

So so my question is from a you know from a first principle standpoint.

Right.

Uh, the rationale for optimism, you know, how do we how do we head towards Star Trek and not Terminator, right? How do we how do we head towards.

Ronberry, not Cameron. Yeah, Jim. Jim, I will I will.

The diverging path meme.

Yes, it is. It is. Uh, Avatar has some hopeful parts, but anyway.

I how do we go towards universal high income instead of social unrest? So, my.

Both want social unrest.

So, have universal high income and social unrest. M.

That's my prediction.

Oh, that will make for a lot of problems.

Is that your actual prediction?

Yeah.

Yeah, it seems likely.

Like tell me to push back on it.

Yeah, exactly. But it seems like that's the trend.

Yeah. Yeah, totally. No, we have.

Well, because there's going to be so much change.

Yeah, there's people are going to be like scared shitless.

Yeah, it's it's sort of the um, you know, um, it's like be careful what you wish for because you might get it.

Yeah. Yeah.

Now, if if you if you actually get all the stuff you want, is that actually the future you want?

Yeah.

Um, because it means that your job won't be what matters.

If you're living an unchallenged life.

Yes.

Right. With no challenges.

Yeah.

No. You know, you know, if you become a couch potato, if it's the Wall-E future, that does not go well for humans.

Well, and we're used to being told, here's your challenge.

Yeah.

So people haven't historically been very good at creating their own challenge in the absence of.

I think Elon does a damn good job. Every time you every time one company takes off, you start your next.

Oh, that's that's rare for punishment.

I think you are. I think you over. Thank God for that.

So so what so.

Why do I do this to myself?

Actually, after AI and robots, is there another thing after that? I guess there's.

Well, there's there's conquering, you know, the universe.

Yeah, that there is that.

Rocks really.

Well, and energy.

Rocks are your friends.

Conquering.

We didn't even get there.

Why, Elon, why are you so optimistic?

Are you Are you optimistic? Let's start there.

I'm not as optimistic as you are.

Okay.

Um, but why are you optimist?

I'm more optimistic than most people.

Okay.

Um.

And is the trend upward compared to a year ago, two years ago? Well, I I think if you reframe things in terms of um progress bar, like speaking of challenges.

Yeah.

Uh, progress towards a cartev 2 scale civilization.

Sure.

Um, well, let's say let's say the aspiration.

Capturing all the energy from the sun's output.

Well, let's even have a a humbler humbler aspiration than that. If we say that our goal is to even get a millionth of the sun's energy.

That would be more than a thousand times as much energy as could possibly be produced on Earth.

So about a half a billionth of the sun's energy reaches Earth. Um, so you'd have to go up three orders of magnitude from that uh just to get to a millionth.

Yeah. Um, so we're very very very far from even h having a billionth of the sun's energy uh harnessed in any way. So a reasonable goal would be try to get to a millionth. And if you try to get to a millionth or or a thousandth um, you know, 0.1%. Uh, that's that's such an enormous uh there's not sure what metaphor we'd use here because a hill to climb is is not a.

Inappropriate like not a big enough metaphor but.

Gravity well to escape.

Engineer hell of a gravity well. Exactly. Um, so if if you try to get to a millionth of the sun's energy or a thousandth the sun's energy like now the these are very very difficult tasks.

And energy is the inner loop for everything right now.

Yeah. I I think like I I think uh the future currency will essentially just be wattage.

Yeah. I was thinking is it is it d is the ability of a person to control energy and compute.

Or just energy? I mean, the two translate obviously.

Just like harnessed energy.

Yeah.

Like so or like basically how much power is being turned into work of some kind.

Right?

Um, intelligence or um, matter manipulation. Um.

So that's your next big project is going to be energy.

It's it's going to be you're going to go back to your solar your solar system.

You can expand from there and say, okay.

What about even getting somewhere on a on a cottage of three scale, meaning galaxy level.

Now you're talking. Now we're back to Star Trek.

Yeah. Expand horizons here.

Yes.

Where there isn't even a horizon because you're not on a planet.

So we we talk about.

So So think galaxy mind.

Yeah. Well, listen, we're in 11 11.5 million square foot, three pentagons right here in this building. I mean, you think in a reasonably large scale.

What is the magnitude?

Yeah.

Um, so I mean, so from a challenge standpoint, I guess the civil the civilizational challenge will be how do you climb the orders of magnitude?

Yeah.

And energy harnessed.

But we're going back to why are you optimistic right now? I mean, when people think about uh the challenges ahead, I think we're going to end up with abundance in the long run, it's for me.

Beyond abundance in any beyond what people possibly could think of as abundance. Um, like the AI actually AI and robots the limit um will will saturate all human desire.

And then we get to nanotechnology which takes it even a step further. Um, the thing about the well, I'm not sure what you mean by nano, you mean like little nanobots.

Atomic reassembly.

Yeah. For health.

Oh yeah. Yeah. Sure. Sure. Um, I mean, we're already doing atomic level assembly on the for circuits, you know.

Amazing.

Um.

Two three nanometers.

Yeah. It's it's only um depending on how they're arrayed, four or five silicon atoms per nanometer.

Yeah.

So.

Those are big atoms though.

They're not bigish. They're not your little I mean, but but I'm just saying you could they should actually describe the circuits in terms of an integer number of atoms in a specific place.

They should it's all angstroms now but.

You can just it's just inte it's it's like we'll call this the the seven atom, you know, whatever like you say two two nanometers it's like it's like.

No one knows.

Nine silicon atoms, something like that. Um, they've got silicon and copper and um, you know, so but a bunch of these things are just marketing numbers like the two nanometer is just a marketing number.

Oh yeah.

Um, but but it's you still need essentially close to atomic level precision. Like the atoms really need to be in the right spot.

Um, so um, I think they're getting clean rooms wrong by the way in these modern fabs. Um, I'm going to I'm going to make a bet here. Okay.

Okay.

Um, that Tesla will have a 2nmter fab and I can I can eat a cheeseburger and smoke a cigar in the fab.

Oh, come on.

Yes.

The air handling will be that good.

Do you have this sketched out in your mind? Like how is it how are the atoms being placed that they're immune to uh cheeseburger grease? They just maintain wafer isolation the entire time. Um, which is actually the default for for fabs. The the wafers are transported um in boxes of pure nitrogen gas under a slight positive.

So are the bananas at Walmart. I.

Just so you know.

Yeah. Well, that's that's it's inite essentially like it's pretty hard for anything that's combusting.

Uh, to live without oxygen.

Yep.

So.

Um.

Let's talk about.

So like like you can kill the bugs just by putting a nitrogen blanket on plants.

Yeah. Interesting.

I want to talk about uh energy, health, education because those are people's, you know, concerns. So, on the energy front.

Um, the innermost loop of everything that you're building and doing right now.

Energy is the foundation.

What's your vision for energy abundance? Uh.

The sun.

In in in the next, you know, this this this decade. The sun. Yeah. I mean, so.

The sun is everything.

It's everything. So, you're all in on solar.

I mean.

Uh, yeah. I mean, your natural gas, natural gas and solar, you're at Colossus 2, right?

Yeah.

People just don't understand how.

That that solar is everything. So um everything compared to the sun, all other energy sources are like uh cavemen throwing some twigs into a fire.

Yeah.

Um, so the the sun is over 99.8% of all mass in the solar system. Uh, Jupiter is around uh, .1% of the mass. Uh, so even if you burnt Jupiter, the energy produced by the sun would still round up to 100%.

Yeah.

Mhm.

And then if you teleported three more Jupiters into our solar system and burnt them too.

It would still round up.

It still the sun still rounds up to 100% of energy.

Any interest in fusion?

I mean, like fusion on a planet fusion. You know what? You know coming a mile away.

You're not never going to guess how the sun works.

Giant coal plants.

I mean, we have a giant fus free fusion reactor that shows up every day.

93 million miles away.

It's farical for us to create little fusion reactors. Um, I mean, that would be like, you know, having a tiny ice cube maker in the Antarctic. And say, "Hey, look, we made ice." I'm like, "Congratulations. You're in the [ __ ] Antarctic."

So, totally totally with you on this.

It's like 3 kilometer high glaciers right next to you.

Okay.

Yeah. If you just narrow the question to the Memphis timeline. So, Memphis data center timeline between a gigawatt and 10 gig. You're not going to you're not going to pull 10 gigawatts out of Memphis. Um, maybe you are.

Two or three.

Two or three. Okay. So So there's still a gap between there and the next whatever you just just draw. So and they're not in space yet at that point.

So we're still in toy land here. Uh, for on toy land you.

Toy land. Toyland.

10 gigawatt.

You know what's amazing is there's 100 megawatts right outside the door here.

And it's massive. Yeah.

It's it's enormous. And it uses more energy.

Than everything. All these manufacturing lines combined use less energy than that.

I think but we're talking about a longgo. Cortex one was.

The the third largest training cluster in the in the world.

Yeah.

For for doing coherent training.

You're falling behind.

Uh, well, we have Cortex 2 that's being built out. Um.

That'll be uh half a gigawatt uh and operational middle of next year. Mhm. Uh.

Hey everybody. You may not know this, but I've got an incredible research team. And every week myself, my research team study the metat trends that are impacting the world. Topics like computation, sensors, networks, AI, robotics, 3D printing, synthetic biology. And these meta trend reports I put out once a week enable you to see the future 10 years ahead of anybody else. If you'd like to get access to the Metatrends newsletter every week, go to dmandis.com/tatrens. That's damandis.com/metatrends. So going back to what Dave is saying over the next five years, what are you scaling on energy front? Do.

I mean.

Five years is a long time.

I mean energy I mean China has done an incredible job.

Yeah.

Right. I mean it's running circles around us.

Uh, China has done an incredible job on solar.

Yeah.

It's amazing. So I I believe China's uh production capacity is around 1500 gigawatts per year of solar.

Yeah. They put in 500 terawatts in the last year.

Terawatt hours. Yeah. Terawatt hours like 500 500 terawatt hours to be very specific.

In the last year. 70% of that was solar and they're just scaling.

Do do you do you imagine that.

Solar scales? Do you imagine that the US could make that level of investment and commitment? I mean, because people are worried about their energy bills going up with no no data centers in our backyard. How do we provide I mean energy energy is equivalent to is equivalent to cost of you know cost of living. It's equivalent to health. It's equivalent to clean water. You know, the higher energy uh production of a country, the higher its GDP. Um, energy is important. So what should what do we do to scale that way? Do we do it in solar here?

Um, I think we should scale solar substantially in the US. Um, um, Tesla and SpaceX are scaling solar. Um, so uh, and I encourage others to do so as well. M.

Um, so the the uh, I mean, I've said the stuff you know publicly um, I do see a path to 100 gigawatts a year of of space solar, sort of a AI powered solar powered AI satellites.

Yes, 100 gigawatts a year of solar powered AI satellites.

I did the math on that. Uh, that's like 500,000 Starlink V3s launched over 8,000 Starship flights. That's one every hour for a year. Um, yeah, we 10,000 flights a year is is a reasonable number. Um, so.

It's amazing. It's quite the scale. Well, what's what's the really rough timeline on that because I mean by aircraft standards, that's a small number.

Sure. In terms of flights. Yeah, for sure.

Yeah, that's uh that's that's that's a small f like so just like depends what you compare it to. If you compare it to the rest of the rocket industry, it's a very high number.

Yeah.

Um.

And we're talking about a million tons of payload to orbit per year. So if you do if you do a million tons of payload or orbit per year with 100 kilowatts per ton, uh, that's 100 gawatt of solar powered AI satellites um per year.

Yeah. Um, I mean, there's a there's a path to get probably to a terawatt per year um.

From from the from if you say like uh, 10 you want you want to go up another order of magnitude or let's say you want to go to 100 terawatts a year.

Yeah.

Which obviously kind of nutty numbers.

Uh, then you want to make those uh AI satellites on the moon.

Yes.

And use a mass driver. Yeah. So, the Gerard K. O'Neal approach.

Well, like Robert Heinland was a harsh course. Pretty much. Yeah. I love that book.

Yeah. Yeah. It's a sort of libertarian paradise on the.

Um, uh, yeah. So, cuz on the moon, you can just accelerate the satellites into to escape velocity is around 2500 meters per second. Um, and uh, there's no atmosphere. So, like a mass driver works very well on the moon. Can I ask the the question about orbital debris? I mean, we're we're building effectively a Dysonish swarm around the Earth.

Um, eat it for lunch.

Uh, are you worried about over congestion on the uh that's going to be a Sunsync orbit's going to fill very quickly.

I mean, you can you you don't have to have sunsync. I mean, you can uh.

Don't have to, but it's optimal.

Yeah. Um, there's some pros and cons to to sunsync or not sunsync. Um, I mean, your your payload to orbit drops by like 30% compared to, you know, if you were just went to um, like mid- inclination like 70° or something like that.

Yeah. I mean, do we need an orbital debris x-prise at this point? We need some way to get the the satellites.

Um.

Defunct satellites down. Do we pass rules that require them to de-orbit on their own?

Yeah. At the point at which you you can put a million tons of satellites into orbit, you can also, you know, start bringing down satellites, too. Yeah.

Um, or at least collecting them into a known into a fixed location so they're not like all over the place.

Yeah. And then you can reuse them.

Yeah. Um, let's just say that we'll have so the the resource level will be so high that that I believe this will be a solved problem given the amount of intelligence we're talking about here.

Oh.

Um, like the intelligence will be quite interested in preserving itself.

Yes. That's true.

Oh.

Interesting.

Yeah. Good motivation.

Yeah.

Interesting.

The question is the data centers will not be in low earth orbit, right? They'll be they'll be much higher constantly in the sun. They're not going to be in the traffic jam, I assume.

Uh, well, you can get to, you know, you don't have to get to get to constant sunlight. You can be around 1,200 kilometers on synchronous will give you constant sunlight.

Mhm.

Um.

But you could you could place him in multiple orbits.

Yeah.

Yeah.

No, I think if there's an X- prize for cleaning up, it's got to be there's only going to be clutter in low Earth orbit. I mean, debris from.

Anything anything that's if it's a, you know, below around 7 or 800 kilometers, the atmosphere will atmospheric drag will bring it back.

Yeah.

Um, so like for Starlink, there's a dual benefit of being uh like as low as possible because uh your your your beam, you you know, your beams are tighter. You know, you're basically that you have less latency and and your your your beams are smaller if you're you're closer to the earth. So, uh, like Starling 3 will be around 330 to 350 km.

Which is quite a lot of drag. Uh, so, it's basically constantly thrusting to.

I still remember when you proposed Starlink and everybody else in the industry was like, "No way. No way. He's not going to get the spectrum. He's not going to be able to do this."

Yeah.

It's uh it's kind of worked.

Yeah, we're the stalling team have done an incredible job.

Yeah.

Um.

I mean, we've basically rebuilt the internet in space with with a laser links.

Mhm.

So there's uh 9,000 satellites up there right now.

Do you think the government's going to be able to handle the kind of licensing of the volume of satellites that you want to put up? I mean, will there be push back because you know, China's going to put up their own constellations. Uh, Europe, who knows whether Europe will ever step up?

They won't.

What's that? They won't. No.

And there's probably.

Yeah.

Nothing that nothing they're doing has success in the set of possible outcomes.

Yeah.

I just got back from Rome. I don't want to touch touch that railing.

Successes are on the set of possible outcomes. No, the chart of outcomes though.

The chart that shows the number of billion dollar startups in the US versus Europe.

Have you seen that graphic?

Oh my god, it's crazy.

Yeah. And data centers too. It's actually um.

No one was talking about orbital data centers six months ago.

Yeah.

Nobody. And then all of a sudden.

Sundire's on it.

You're you're out with it. And.

It's the hot new thing.

And it is what what what tip what happened? What happened that every company is now talking about orbital data centers?

I guess it went viral and X.

It did.

I don't know. Is every company talking about.

Oh, yeah. Everybody's got their own orbital data center.

For sure. And I I was suggesting to Peter that that you updated the math on launch costs and that it's a tipping point very quickly with the updated math.

But Starship's been the cost for you know, I don't know what you hold $100 per kilogram, $10 per kilogram. What do you have Starship at? It's possible that Elon said that and nobody believed it until now.

No.

You can go back and look at my what even back when it was Twitter uh the my old tweets. I I said these things se many years ago.

$100 or $10 a a kilogram.

Yeah. And I said this is we're we're going to do a million tons a year to orbit.

Um, yeah. And and we've got to get the the cost down.

Yeah. Uh, well below $100 a kilogram.

So that's going to move the data centers to orbit.

It will. It's they can do you can basically do the math like if you've got a fully reusable rocket.

Yeah.

Um, which is fully and rapidly reusable like an aircraft. Uh, then this is an incredibly this is a very difficult thing to do obviously. U I I think it's at the limit of human intelligence to create a fully and rapidly reusable rocket.

Um.

But it is possible and we're doing it with Starship. It's It's been the holy grail in the aerospace industry forever.

Yeah. Quest for the holy grail rocket.

Yeah.

And then I pretty much it is I mean, right, the DCX was the first little things that were trying there and it's been, you know, all of I mean, back when I was in the space industry, that's all everyone ever spoke about. And then when Falcon 9 first reused its first stage. Um, I mean, all the traditional aerospace industries did not believe that even Falcon 9 could re could could fly and reuse.

Literally you can come see it land at Cape Canaveral.

Yeah.

Um, and then take off again.

Yeah.

So I don't know how you would not believe a thing that you can see with your own eyes.

Yeah. Well, they didn't believe you could. They didn't believe you could.

But the the the la the leap from there to the launch cost actually requires more faith than just just that. But I think I think Starship is the launch cost tipping point and that somewhere in that, you know, before you had Twitter, it became X, somewhere in that timeline, it went from speculative to no doubt and I don't know if that's a smooth line or a couple of good launches in between, but I suspect that the data centers in space.

But people.

Ties directly to the credibility.

Is not thinking about orbital data centers, they're thinking about energy and the cost of energy here on here in their hometown and sort of the the there's a lot of doomer conversations out there. The data centers are going to drive, you know, the CPI up.

Uh, they're not entirely wrong.

Okay. So, what is so what is the what's the energy solution here on Earth for uh the rest of humanity or the the non data the non AIs?

Oh, there's something other than data center use uses of energy. Okay.

Interesting.

Um.

That's complex. Well, the the the best way to actually increase the energy output per year of the United States or any country is batteries. Um, so the.

Sure.

Peak power output of the of the US is around 1.1 terawatts, but the uh average power usage is only half a terawatt.

Yeah. So if you just buffer the the energy, so charge up the the batteries at night, discharge during the day, um, without incremental capital expend without incremental capital expenditures, without building new power plants, you can double the energy throughput of the US. The energy output per year can double.

With batteries. Um.

And do we have those batteries uh in development?

Uh, yeah, Tesla makes them.

Okay. So you think current the current Tesla battery packs?

What do you think? What do you think? I literally have I I went on stage and presented the thing.

Yeah.

That's that's the dead giveaway. So.

I I even went to installations of the mega packs, you know, and there's.

So why don't people do this?

It's on the internet. So.

Yeah.

So is do you think.

They are? And and China, by the way, is like it seems like China listens to everything I say I say and does does it basically or at least or or they're just doing it independently. I don't know. But they're they're certainly making um massive battery packs like really massive battery pack output. They're they're you know, making vast numbers of electric cars. Yeah.

Uh, vast amounts of solar. Um.

I don't know. These are all things I I said, you know, we should do here.

Fundamental. Sure. When I fly over Santa Monica and LA, when I'm when I'm piloting and I look down, they're like, zero roofs have solar on them.

Zero roofs.

Yeah.

I mean.

It's not essential to have them on a roof.

Okay. But it's a convenient place to have them.

Yes. Uh, but the surface area of roofs is uh I'm not saying it shouldn't, but it's.

Uh, Tesla makes a solar roof, which is the the only solar roof that isn't ugly. Um, our solar roof actually looks beautiful.

Yeah.

Um, but if you want to do solar at scale, you just need more surface area.

So, so we we have um vast empty deserts. Sure. African America like if you fly from LA to New York or just fly across country and you look down um for a large portion of the time you look down it is bleak desert.

Yes.

It looks like Mars essentially.

We're not worried about overpopulation there.

No, I mean, it look there's barely a lizard alive in these scorching deserts, you know. Yep.

It's not like farmland we're talking about. We're just talking about.

Yep.

Uh, places that look like Mars.

Like just uh scorched rock. So if we put soil where we currently have scorched rock.

I think this will be a quality of life improvement for the lizards or the few creatures that live in this.

Uh, very difficult environment.

Do we have the distribution network?

It's like this is going to be thank god some shade finally.

Do we have the distribution network to be able to do that? Yeah, you need to to materially affect quality of life, you need to capture and store what a couple hundred gigawatts.

Is that in realistic?

You could just put the data center I guess locally there.

Well, we already covered data centers.

We're talking about you know, the other.

Yeah.

Like I I don't know like in an abundant world five years from now, massive amounts of compute, massive, you know, universal high income.

I don't know income like universal you can have whatever you want income.

Yeah.

Yeah. That's that's really what it amounts to.

But in that world, uh, you know, other than compute energy, how much more energy do we need like 30 40 50% or I don't know, unless we want to move mountains around to make a ski mountain, you know, in the backyard. Um, I think the vast majority of energy consumption will go into compute. And then there may be use cases I'm not thinking of like you know, the well, you know, right here is a nice case study because manufacturing every one of these cars coming out at the rate of one every minute or two is less energy than the data center that's training the cars to drive to to self-drive.

Yes.

So that's a good little case study. And we don't need that much more physical energy for abundant happiness. We need more compute energy. Well, yeah.

The sun is just generating vast amounts of energy uh all the time for free that goes just goes into space.

So, um, I think we'll end up trying to capture I don't know uh a millionth of like a millionth a thousandth of the sun's energy. Um, we're currently I'm not sure the exact number, but we're I don't know, we're probably at 1%ish of Kadeshv level one.

Fair enough. Yeah, I I would guess that even that's high.

I'm just Yeah, saying.

We have a long way to go.

I'm that's being optimistic. Like hopefully we're not .1%, but I don't think we're 10%. I'm just trying to get it to like to an order of magnitude.

Uh.

So pull it like we're roughly 1% of the apparently using 1% of the energy that we could use on Earth.

I think the bottom line from a first principles thinking for the public is there's a lot of energy out there.

A lot.

And it we have it in the US. We have it on the planet and it needs to be captured and the tech to capture it.

Is here and improving every year.

Yes.

Yeah. Um, there's not going to be some energy crisis. I there'll be a large forcing function to harness more energy, but we're not going to run out of it.

All right, I want to talk about education. So, here's the numbers. They're abysmal.

Um, I mean, they're they're they're abysmal, right? Okay. Uh, the importance of college in the United States, uh, back in 2010, 75% of Americans said it's important to go to college. That number is now down at 35%. All right. Uh, college graduates as a group turn out to be the group that's out of work the longest.

Right? And the but still and tuition has increased 900% since 1983. Um.

Yeah, the administrative expenses at universities have gotten out of control. Yeah.

Um, so.

I think I saw some stat that like there's one administrator for every two students at Brown or something like that.

And I'm like, this seems uh, little high.

Yeah. You know what?

They should teach something.

Yeah. Yeah.

What was your college journey?

Um, I went to college in Canada for a couple years at Queens University. Uh-huh.

Um, so, uh, I I had Canadian citizenship through my mom who was born in Canada and my my grandfather was actually American, but for some reason, I don't know, my mom couldn't get US citizenship, so but she was born in Canada, so I got Canadian citizenship. Um, and uh, I didn't have any money, so I could only go to Canadian university at first. I.

Mean, people forget that about you. You didn't have this giant social network or huge amount of wealth coming into all of this.

No.

Yeah.

Uh, no. I I arrived in Montreal at age 17 with I think around $2,500 in Canadian travelers checks back when travelers checks were a thing.

Um, and um, one bag of books and one bag of clothes. That was my starting point. That was my spawning point in North America. Um.

And then so I went to Queens University for a couple years and then uh University of Pennsylvania uh did a dual degree in physics and economics um.

And graduated.

Uh, undergraduate at UPUP Wharton.

Yeah. And then um, I came out to do uh I was going to do a PhD at Stanford working on uh energy storage technologies for electric vehicles essentially material science I guess fundamentally.

Um, the the idea that I had was it was to try to create a capacitor with enough energy density that you could get um high range in an electric car.

It's funny I invested in an ultra capacitor company and didn't. Yeah, didn't go well. Well, it's one of those things where, you know, you could definitely get a PhD, but it wasn't clear that you could make a company or do something useful like this. Most PhDs un hat I mean, hate it, but most PhDs do not.

Turn into something that's going to.

Do not turn into something useful. Like you you could add a leaf to the tree of knowledge, but it's not necessarily a useful leaf. Enormous fraction of of great entrepreneurs are dropping out.

Of grad school or undergrad. But now nowadays the sense of urgency is off the charts.

I mean, they're popping out everywhere.

Yeah. Because you know, don't waste your time going into grad school. Start a company.

Yeah.

Curriculum is nowhere near caught up to what's actually going on in technology and I don't have time and all the time. It's like.

You know, this is the moment. I I think right now it's like it's unclear to me why someone would somebody would be in college right now unless they want the social experience.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I mean, if you have the ability to go and build something. So the question is how would you redesign the educational program if I could be so so blunt as to create more Elon Musks? If we want to create an Elon Musk factory of people who start with very little but are able to drive uh and drive breakthroughs. What's involved there? What drove you?

Uh, curiosity um about the nature of the universe.

So I'm just curious about uh.

The meaning of life and.

You know, what is this reality that we live in. So.

How early?

My son Dax wanted to know what was it like for you in middle school and high school.

He's 14 years old. He's in that age range now.

Well, I did I found school to be quite painful. Uh, and it was very boring and in South Africa it was very violent.

So So it's like it was it it was like uh.

It's like that book Ender's Game.

Yes. Um, but in real IRL.

In this game IRL there's like but not as fun.

Um.

So your goal was escape.

Yes.

Do you think.

Escape from the the prison?

So that's a question I have. Do you do you think that.

It was miserable?

Do you think most successful people have had a lot of hardship early in life? Do you need to have that level of hardship?

Probably need a little bit of hardship, I suppose.

Yeah. But and then so it's always tricky like what are you supposed to do with your kids? You know, create artificial adversity. Put them in.

That's cool.

You got an answer. That's that's a Warren Buffett topic actually.

Yeah.

Well, you do.

But seriously.

It's not easy to create artificial adversity because if you love your kids, you don't want to do that. So.

That's for sure.

So I had a lot of adversity. Um, probably it was good. Uh, probably, you know, helped somewhat, I suppose. One one of the.

What doesn't kill you makes you stronger type of thing.

No.

At least I didn't lose a limb. And I think what doesn't maim you.

Good at maiming 10 fingers.

Can you modify that a little bit?

Yeah.

Can I ask you a question?

You makes you stronger.

I uh for the last 5 years I've been helping teach this class, Foundations of AI Ventures at MIT. And every year when you survey the students, they go up a lot in their desire to start a company. And so it's now up to 80%. The incoming.

Everyone's just going to it's it's just going to be like one person company.

Well, that's with AI that's that's viable, I guess. But no, they want to co-found. They Yeah, they don't want to be the founder. They want to be part of a founding team. So, it still works out.

But, uh, when Peter and I were in school at MIT, it was I'm guessing maybe 10%. And they all wanted to be PhDs.

And and they've been doing the survey, everyone who wanted to start. I mean, I.

I don't remember any conversations about with people saying they wanted to start.

Even at Stanford at the time.

Um, I I actually um, a few days into the semester or I should say the quarter um, I I called Bill Nicks who was the head of material science department and said I'd like to just put it on deferment. He said, "Is my class that bad?"

No. And he he said he said that's he said that's okay. You can put it on deferment. But he said this is probably the last conversation we'll have. And he was right.

Um, but then last I think it was last year he sent me a letter saying that all of my predictions about lithium-ion batteries came true.

It was very nice.

And did he also say you can still come back and finish your PhD?

Yeah. No. Several times Stanford has said that I can come back for free. Well, so you know what happened at MIT is every time so I did not know it.

Be a great use of your time.

Exactly. I'm like.

So every time an Iron Man movie came out.

It notched up another probably 10% or so.

Okay.

Uh, in terms of because everybody wanted to be Tony Stark.

And so that's the.

image. And I didn't know till today that the new Tony Stark, the modern Iron Man Tony Stark, I always thought Tony Stark was modeled on Charles Stark Draper and Howard Hughes. Is Charles Stark Draper's education and his, you know, scientific endeavors married with Howard Hughes's ambition, and that created the original character? But then when Robert Downey Jr. wanted to reinvent it.

Yeah, it came. It's modeled on Elon. Yeah, he came and met with me. This is a Groipedia fact. All right. Uh, yeah, fantastic. Um, yeah, they came to John Favreau and and Robert. I like the name Grok. I would like Jarvis as well. Yeah. Yeah. Um, probably some some trade. At some point, if Grok gets good enough, we're going to call it Encyclopedia Galactica. Yes, that's nice. Yeah. Yeah, of course. 42. Thank you.

Um, so going back to education, uh, should colleges, I guess the social experience, you said is important there, but what would you do for education, uh, you know, middle, high school? You just came back from an announcement with President Bukele, uh, who's a friend. I I think he's an amazing, amazing visionary. Yeah. Incredible what he did with his nation. Yeah. Yeah. Um, remarkable. Remarkable and gutsy. Yeah. I was like, "How are you still alive?" That was, yeah. I mean, it was like, it's the nuclear, it was a nuclear option, right? Shut him down. I mean, do you know how, besides putting everybody with a gang sign, um, in, uh, in jail? I don't know if you know the second thing he did. He went to all of the graves of all the gang members out there and destroyed the graves and said, "Your memory will not be remembered in this nation." That's just badass. And it worked. I mean, you have to be badass to take on all the MS-13 gangs and win, and live. Yeah. And still be alive. And live. He's got a great, great, uh, guard at his palace there.

But what, what did you announce with, uh, with him in El Salvador? Uh, it was just, uh, basically to use Grok for, uh, education, like personalization. Hopefully not the vulgar version of it. Yeah. We would have, like, you know, the, you know, kids-friendly version of Grok. Uh, but, but obviously AI can be an, an individualized teacher. Yeah. Um, that, uh, is infinitely patient and answers all your questions. Um, now, you still need to be curious, um, and, and, uh, you still need to want to learn. You know, Grok can't make you want to learn. It can make learning more interesting. You could probably gamify and incentivize it, right? You can make learning more interesting. Um, and, and less of a production line. Um, so, but kids do need to have to, if they need to want to learn, you know.

Yeah. Do you, and like the people should just think of the, the brain as a biological computer. It's a neural net. Yeah. Yeah, it's a bi- biological computer with, you know, so with a number of neurons and a neural efficiency. Yeah. Um, and, um, so, so what, like, what you can't do is tune any arbitrary kid into Einstein. Uh, this is not realistic because Einstein had a very good meat computer, like an outstanding meat computer. Um, so you can't just, uh, do Shakespeare, Newton, you know, Einstein type of thing, um, unless the meat computer is, uh, an exceptional one.

So what do you think? So when people say we need to solve education in the United States, um, because it's fundamentally broken. Uh, I think what's really broken, I'm curious, is the old, uh, social contract that says, uh, do well in high school, get into a good college, get a degree, and then get a job. And I don't know that that's going to be valid in the future. Uh, my, we talk about this on the pod a lot, that the, that the career of the future isn't getting a job. It's being an entrepreneur. It's finding a problem and solving it. Yeah. Do you do you agree with that? Right now, I'd say people should just, you know, go to school for the social experience, use more AI. Um, the conventional schooling experience, I think, could be a lot better. Um, the, what, what we're going to do in El Salvador and hopefully other places, just have individualized teachers. That's going to be much better. And you, you could go to, you could go to a school with a bunch of other kids, I guess, if you want to hang out with other kids, but you don't need to. Right. You could do it on your phone at home. Um, so that's why I say, like, at this point, education is a social experience. When I talk to my kids who are in, in college, uh, they, they, they do recognize that they can learn, um, just as much independently. In fact, that they would learn more in, in a work situation. Yeah. Um, they're there for the social experience and to be around a bunch of people of their, their own age. Um, sort of a coming-of-age social experience. Sure. Sure. Being on your own, uh, learning how, how to lead or defend yourself, as the case may be. Well, yeah. Yeah, I mean, if you join the workforce, you're, you know, from the perspective of like a, you know, 19-year-old, you with a bunch of old people. And if you're doing engineering with a bunch of middle-aged dudes, it's like, do you really want to do that, or do you want to hang out with, um, you know, where there's at least some girls your age, type of thing.

I, I want to get, I want to get back to this when we talk about, uh, a lot of other choices. Actually, I want to get back as we get to universal high income, but I want to talk about health and longevity one second. US is the number one ranked, number one in health expenses worldwide, and it's ranked 70th, uh, in health span. Right. We, are really 70th. 70th. Is that from, is that accurate? Is why everybody listen it? Uh, I think it would be better than 70th, uh, for health span. Um, well, whatever. It is, like, we just get fat or something. We're not the top 10. Maybe AI can help us plan the rankings there. Um, so, would you just run around? We need Cupid. But AI. Mjro Cupid. But, but I think that's a big reason. It's like, if people get really fat, then their, their health gets bad. Yeah. Well, if they don't have any exercise, health gets bad. Or if they eat donuts for breakfast every morning. You still doing that? Uh, no, actually I'm not. Okay, that's good. That's good. Uh, well, first of all, I wasn't eating a lot of donuts. I was trying to have, like, point four of a donut, which rounds down to zero. So, I figured anything below, below 0.4 of a donut rounds down to zero.

So, you and I have had, uh, a disagreement on longevity. We had a little bit. Yeah. I was saying, you know, we should push to get people to 120, 150, and you were saying people, you know, shouldn't live that long. Uh, so how long do you want? Yeah. You know, there's some, you know, people in the world that have done some bad things. How long do you want them to live? Yeah. Well, it's okay. They can get the longevity. This is a serious question, though. If we, them, a lot of things are going to happen that we don't. Wait a second. You said one thing that you said was interesting. He said, um, uh, we need people to die so people change their minds. Oh, yes, people, people don't change their minds, they just die. But so that makes more sense, actually. My response to that, Elon, was, you know, my response to that was, the head of GM didn't have to die for Tesla to come along. And Lockheed and Northrup and Boeing didn't have to go away for, I mean, there's in a meritocracy, the better ideas will dominate. So, I'm hoping that I can get you back onto the longevity train. So, there's a lot going on in longevity right now, right? Uh, like what? Well, David Sinclair is about to start his epigenetic reprogramming trials in humans. It's worked in, in animals and, and non-human primates. It's going into humans. Is this like a pill or an injection or? Right now, it's an injection of an adeno-associated virus. It's the three Yamanaka factors. Okay. Uh, we've got a $101 million health span X-Prize that's working on 730 teams working on reversing the age of your brain, immune system, and muscle by 20 years. By the way, do you know why it's $101 million? No. Because the primary funder, when they found out your carbon X prize was 100 bucks, he wanted to make it bigger. So it's 101. Oh, who, who's the Chip Wilson from Lululemon? Oh, okay. And then, uh, and then Evolution out of, but Chip said, "Can we make it bigger?" I said, "You put an extra million in, we'll make it 101 million." Sounds good. It's a good story. But then we got folks like Dario Amodei predicting doubling the human lifespan in the next 10 years. Um, that's probably correct. Okay, great. I don't know about doubling, but in significant, significant increase. Sure. Um, which is easily escape velocity. I mean, because when, Yeah. Depending how old your, Yeah. Oh, yeah, for sure. Or effective age. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So, I mean, I think, you know, I think that for, too much and turn into a baby or something. That's what I'm telling all the students there. It's like, Peter, what happened? Yes. Yes. There, there is a frozen. You got a zero wrong in the dosage. Just a small factor of 10. Grow out of it. It'll be fine. Exactly. You won't remember it. I literally, I mean, wouldn't it be funny if we do this in like 10 years? Okay, we should do it in, I'll do, we'll do it in 10 years for sure. And, and, and let's see, let's see if we look younger. That's a good side bet. My, my comment was always, Elon was back then, Elon was like, you know, late 40s. Wait till he gets into his 60s, he's going to want, you know, lunch anymore. I mean, I, I, I want things to not hurt. Yeah, sure. Of course. It's like, it's like, basically, it seems like it's only a matter of time before you get back, back pain. Yeah. Um, like it's a, when, not an if your back hurts. Arthritis. Yes. Yeah. Like these things suck, basically. Being able to sleep through the night without going to the bathroom. A lot. It's very much that one. Yeah. It's more than hope. That one. Oh man, that would, that's like the infinite money one. Why did you invest in longevity? So I can sleep through the night and not go to the bathroom. Bladder, bladder. Yeah. Duration. I mean, admittedly, if you have to wear adult diapers, that's a, that's a bummer. That's not good. Adult diapers are a real, you know, it's like one of the, one of the signs that a country is not on the right path is when the adult diapers exceed the baby diapers. Yeah. We're there. Yeah. South Korea will be there anymore. They already, No, they passed that point. No, they passed that point. They passed that point many years ago. Japan passed the point many years ago. Doesn't go well looking at the Japanese economy. No, I mean, like South Korea is like, uh, yeah, one-third replacement rate. Crazy. Yeah. So, three generations, they're going to be 127th. So, 3% of their current size. I mean, North Korea won't need to invade. They can just walk across. Yeah. Yeah. This is going to be some people in, you know, walkers or something like there'll be a bunch of optimists. But you, you know, you've been very verbal about the, you know, the not overpopulation, but massive underpopulation. Yeah. I've been saying this for ages. Yeah. Longevity is going to be an important part of that solution. I also think, by the way, if you increased the productive life of most Americans by just a few years, you'd flip the entire economics here. Well, if AI and robots is going to make everything sure free, basically. Yeah. Um, but, uh, well, how long would you want to live? Uh, I want to, I want to go, you know, other planetary systems. I want to go and explore the universe. Yeah. I mean, you know, I would like to double my lifespan for sure. I don't want, you know, I'm not sure I want to talk about immortality, but, you know, at least 120, 150. It's a long time. One of the worst curses possible would be that. Yes. "May you live forever." Yes. "May you live forever." That would be one of the worst curses you could possibly give anyone. But I think life's going to get very interesting. Yeah. Far more. We're going to speedrun Star Trek, as my partner Alex Weer Gross says. Yeah. Yeah. Speedrunning Star Trek would be cool. Yeah. Um, well, at a minimum, your kids will have infinite life expectancy. If you're talking about escape velocity, if you can double lifespan, there's it's not even close. You're, you're clearly past longevity escape velocity. They, the idea of 50 years of AI improvement. Yeah. It's great. I mean, we're going to have 20 years on this. I don't know. I got too many fish to fry.

So, I invited, This is something, by the way, that I, that I think I just, I think it's very obviously other people think this, too, but I've long thought that, um, like long, like longevity or semi-mortality is an extremely solvable problem. I don't think it's a particularly hard problem. Um, I mean, when you consider the fact that your body is extremely synchronized in its age, Yeah. The clock must be incredibly obvious. Um, nobody has an old left arm and a young right arm, right? Why is that? What's keeping them all in sync? Um, you're programmed to die is the way you're programmed to die. And so if you change the program, Yeah. Uh, you will live longer. And we've got, you know, species of the bowhead whale can live for 200 years. The Greenland shark can live for 500 years. And when I, when I learned that, I said, why can't they? Why can't we? And I said, it's either a hardware problem or a software problem, and we're going to have the tech to solve that. And I do believe that it's this next decade. So the important thing is not to die from something stupid before the, before the solutions come. You know, I invited you, uh, in retrospect, the long, the solution to longevity will seem obvious. Yeah. Extremely obvious. I, I think the thing worth working on, Peter's going to work on this anyway, but the thing to work on is exactly what you said. If old ideas don't calcify, old ideas don't just die off, add that to the pile of things we need to think about today because there are a whole host of other AI-related things we need to think about today.

Let me, let me finish on the longevity point one second. Um, Elon, uh, I want to invite you again. So, uh, uh, there's a company called Fountain Life that, uh, created with Tony Robbins, Bob Hari, Bill Cap, and we do a 200 gigabyte upload of you. Everything knowable about you. Full genome, full all imaging, everything. Right. President Bukele and the First Lady came through, called it an amazing 10 out of 10 experience. Um, I think I don't want you to pull a Steve Jobs and kick the bucket because of some, because some something they didn't know. I mean, so if you ask yourself, do you actually know what's going on inside your body right now? Um, I did an MRI recently and submitted it to Grok, and it didn't, need no, none of the doctors nor Grok found anything wrong, but that's a fraction of the information, right? I mean, it's your full genome, your microbiome, your metabolism, everything. And, okay, it's possible. So, don't call me. What's that? Don't call me, bro. We have a, we have a center in your water bottle. We have, God damn it. Too late. Sorry. It's already in the works.

So, can you go through the rationale of UHI? How does, how does universal high income work? Okay. So, there's going to be more intelligence, digital intelligence than all human intelligence combined, and more humanoid robots than all humans. Um, and assuming we're in a benign scenario, Star Trek, sort of Roddenberry, not Cameron situation. Yeah. Um, poor Jim. Yeah. I mean, I guess it's important to have these sort of counterpoints. Yeah. Let's not, let's not go in that direction. Um, thing. Um, so, uh, the, the robots are going to just do whatever you want. All the blue-collar labor is being done by robots. All data centers are being done by robots. The, the white-collar labor will be the first to go because until you, until you can move atoms, the thing that can be replaced first is anything that that involves just digital. If it's digital, like if it involves, uh, tapping keys on a keyboard and, uh, moving a mouse, the computer can do that. They can do that. Sure. Um, you need the humanoid robots to, to, uh, shape atoms. So, if all you're doing is changing bits of information, which is white-collar work, um, that is, that is the first thing that, uh, when, this is the inspirational, this is the inspirational part of the podcast, by the way. When is, when is all white-collar work gone? By when? Well, there, there's, there's a lot of inertia. So, even with AI at its current state, um, I'd say you're, you're pretty close to being able to replace half of all jobs. And, you know, that white-collar jobs, that includes anything like education, too. Yeah. M. So, anything that involves information, um, and anything short of shaping atoms, um, AI can do probably half or more of those jobs right now. Sure. But there's a lot of inertia. People just keep doing the same, the same thing for quite some time. Um, and there actually has to be a, a company that makes more use of AI that competes with a company that makes less use of AI, creating a forcing function for increased use of AI, right? Otherwise, the company that, that still has humans do, um, things that AI can do will still continue to exist. Being a computer used to be a job. So, it used to be that a human computer, like, yeah, a computer being a computer was a job. You would compute numbers. Sure. It didn't, it didn't used to be a machine. It used to be a job description. Um, and there, you can look online, there's these pictures of like, where they're having like skyscrapers full of women copying, mostly women, copying from ledger to ledger, and men too, but, but yeah, but people, um, um, but it was a lot of women, but there were just buildings full of, uh, people just at desks doing calculations. Yeah. Um, so they'd be calculating the interest on your bank account or, um, you know, some, um, you know, science, uh, experiment or something like that. Or what, but if you want calculations done, uh, you, people would do it. Um, so, um, now, one laptop with a spreadsheet can outperform a skyscraper of several hundred human computers, right? Of people doing calculations. Um, now, if even a few cells in that spreadsheet were done manually, um, it, you would not be able to compete with a spreadsheet that was entirely a computer. Mhm. Yeah. What this means is that companies that are entirely AI will demolish companies that are not. Right. It won't be a contest. Agreed. And that flipped. Yeah. One cell in that, just one, if, I got to do that. Would you want even one cell in your spreadsheet to be manually calculated? That would be the most annoying cell. And you're like, "God damn it." Y. And, and, and gets it wrong a bunch of the time. Error rate. So, this flipping, flipping, flipping, um, are we monetizing hope effectively? Yes. Not, not at this moment. I think we're, I think we're peak, I think we're peak people worried about the future of their jobs. Monetize. We're at peak doom. We're going to do that as a t-shirt, and the mug. And the mug. Yes. The mug. Uh, so, but you have a solution to this, which is UHI. Yes. Everyone can have whatever they want. So, how does that work? How does UHI work? It's, it's a good question. Like, we have to figure out some, like, I mean, it's not a, it's not a bumpy road. It, yeah, I mean, so my concern isn't the long run, it's the next three to seven years. Yes. The transition will be bumpy, uh, because humans don't like simultaneously, yes, we'll have radical change, social unrest, and immense prosperity. And you can buy all, all the Cybertrucks you want. Things are going to get very cheap. Yes. Um, so this is actually, and frankly, if, if this doesn't happen, we'd go bankrupt as a country. So the national debt is enormous. Yeah. Uh, the interest on the national debt exceeds, uh, not just the military budget, but the military budget, I think, plus, um, Medicare, um, or Medicaid, one of the two. It's like, like, it's like one trillion, of interest. Yeah. Um, which is growing. Yes. And the deficit is growing. Yes. Um, but the, so this, so if, if we don't have AI and robots, we're all going to go bankrupt. And, and, and, and we're headed for economic doom. We're going back also competitive pressure from China. So this is definitely going to happen. I guess, we're going back to the theme of this talk. How can AI and exponential tech save America and the world? Don't you think that? But I want, I want to hit this because we, I was like, quite pessimistic about it and, and, and ultimately I decided to be fatalistic and, and, um, look on the bright side. I've got to see you look on the bright side of life. You're sitting there crucified, right side. But this is not about taxation and redistribution. Yeah. No, it's, um, so, how does it work? Reason through it with me. Listen, by the way, I'm open to ideas here. Okay. Uh, so, it's not like I got this all figured out. All right. So, so I'm wondering if instead of universal high income, if it's universal, universal high stuff. Yeah. And services. Yes. The UHSS. We got, like, I, I guess, okay, this is my guess for how things roll out, play out. And I, and, by the way, I'm, this is, this is going to be a bumpy ride and it's not like I know the answers here. Um, but I, I, I have decided to look on the bright side. U and, and I'd like to thank, thank you guys for being an inspiration in this regard. Thank you. Happy to help. Yeah, because I, I actually think it's, it, it is better to be an optimist and wrong than a pessimist and right. Yes, for sure. Um, for quality of life. Yeah. And by the way, there's also not a force of nature. It's under, like, to me, it's really clear that we don't have any system right now to make this go well. But AI is a critical part of making it go well. And at some point, Grok is going to be addressing this exact topic that we're talking about, or it has to be one of the big four AI machines. I mean, it's coming. Dealing with it. There's no velocity knob, right? There's no on/off switch. It is coming and accelerating. I call AI and robotics the supersonic tsunami. Yes. Which maybe is a little alarming. You think it's good. That's good. Well, because the wake-up call. This is important for folks to, to grok, because, um, uh, I don't want to leave people depressed. I want people to understand what's coming. So, we're basically demonetizing everything. I mean, labor becomes the cost of capex and electricity. AI is basically intelligence available, uh, at a, at a diminutive price. Um, uh, so you're able to produce almost anything. Things get down to basic cost of materials and electricity, right? Uh, so people can have whatever stuff they want, whatever services they need. Um, it's not, when, when we say universal high income, it sounds like it's a tax and redistribute, but that's not the case. Um, it's, it's, I think my, my best guess for how this will manifest is that prices will become, prices will drop. Yeah. So, as the efficiency of, of production or the provision of services drops, um, prices will drop. I mean, you know, prices in, in dollar terms are the ratio between the output of goods and services and the money supply. Sure. So, if your output of goods and services increases faster than the money supply, you will have deflation, and or vice versa, you know. So, um, it's a good thing we're growing the money supply so quickly then, right? I, I, yes. That's why I, I came, like, let's not worry about growing the money supply. It won't matter because the output of goods and services actually will grow faster than the money supply. And I think we'll be in this, and this is a prediction, I think some others have made, but, um, I will add to it, which is, uh, that, that I think governments will, will actually be pushing to, to increase money supply, um, like, like faster. Yes. They won't be able to waste the money fast enough, which is saying something for. Isn't it, isn't it crazy how close those timelines just randomly worked out? I mean, at the rate, because we're expanding the national debt, not because we're anticipating AI. We were going to do that no matter what. And so it's like, right on the edge of becoming Argentina. But, yeah, at the time, so productivity is going to improve dramatically, and it is improving dramatically. I, I think we'll see, I think, I think we may see like high double-digit, uh, output of goods and services. We have to be a little careful about how economists measure things and, um, yeah, it's, uh, I mean, there's like, my favorite joke, I have a few economist jokes that I, that, that I like, but, um, maybe my favorite one economist joke is, um, two economists are going for a walk in, in the forest, um, and they come across a pile of shit. And one economist says, "I'll pay you $100 to eat a pile of shit." I've heard this one. This is great. Go ahead. And so the guy takes $100 and eats the shit. Then they keep walking. They come across another pile of shit. And, and the other guy says, "Okay, I'll give you $100 to eat a pile of shit." So he gives him $100. And then the, the guys can say, "Wait a second. We both have the same amount of money. We both ate a pile of shit." Oh my god. It sounds like, but we increased the economy by $200. This is the kind of shit you get in economics. So, so, uh, but if you, if you say, like, just the output of goods and services, um, the will be much greater. You just need a, so profitability of companies go through the roof, at some point. But, but no, but so the question becomes, is that taxed by the government? Uh, is that then taxed by the government and redistributed as some level of income as a U, as a UHI or UBI? In other words, um, one of the questions is, if, in fact, this future we hit massive productivity, uh, and massive profitability because we're dividing by zero. The cost of labor has gone to nothing. The cost of intelligence has gone to nothing. And we're still producing products and services faster and faster. So there's more profitability. Someone needs to be buying it, and someone needs to be able to have the capital to buy it. Um, I mean, this is an important question to get, get thought through. Yeah. Um, well, one, like, side recommendation I have is like, don't worry about like squirreling money away for, uh, retirement in like 10 or 20 years. It won't matter. No. Okay. Either, either we're not going to be here, or, uh, it, it just, uh, like, it's, you won't need to save for retirement. If, if any of the things that we've said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant. The services will be there to support you. You'll have the home, you'll have the healthcare, you'll have the entertainment. The way this unfolds is fundamentally impossible to predict because of self-improvement of the AI and the accelerating timeline. Yeah. It's called singularity for a reason. Yeah. Exactly. I don't know what goes, what, what happens after when, after the event horizon. Exactly. You can't never see past the black hole or the event horizon. The light cone. I mean, Ray has a singularity out way too far. I mean, this is like the next, what, what's your timeline for? For this? We're in the singularity. Well, we are in the singularity for sure. We're in the midst of it right now for sure. And we just, we're in this beautiful sweet spot, which is, you know, the, we're the roller coaster was just, Yeah. Exactly. That's a great analogy. It's like that feeling. You're at the top of the roller coaster and you're about to go. Yeah. But you know it's going to be a lot of Gs when you, lot when you hit it. Uh, and it's like, people, I don't have to just have courtside seats. I'm on the court. Exactly. And it blows my, and still blows my mind, sometimes multiple times a week. Yeah. Um, and so, just when I think I'm like, wow. And then it's like, two days later, more wow. Yeah. Um, exponential wow. Yeah. I think we'll hit, um, AGI next year in '26. Yeah. I heard you say that. Yeah. I've said that for a while, actually. And then, you know, and then you said by 2029, 2030, equivalent to the entire human race. 2030, we exceed, like, I'm confident by 2030, um, AI will exceed the intelligence of all humans combined. That's way pessimistic if, if you hit AGI next year. And that's, you know, that date is in flux. But from that date, to self-improvements that are on the order of a thousand, 10,000x, just algorithmic improvements, is very short. And so, everybody, why isn't everybody talking about this right now? Well, I mean, on, on X, on X, they off. Yes. But why isn't, about every day, basically. Yeah. But it's like, stop. It's not, Okay. Okay. So, I'll tell you something else that I, I'll tell you something that most people in the AI community don't yet understand. Okay. Um, which is there, the almost no one understands this. Um, the intelligence density potential, uh, is vastly greater than what we're currently experiencing. So, I, I think we're, we're off by tours of magnitude in terms of the intelligence density per gigabyte, uh, of what, what's achievable. Yes. Per gigawatt of energy. Per, I'm characterizing it by file size, okay? If the file size of the AI, if you, if you have, say, intelligence, oh, okay. In, you know, yes, sir. Um, on your, on your drives, on your laptop, power, tube parameters, the same thing, whatever. Um, so two, two orders of magnitude. Yes. And you, like you said, you ringside, courtside seat, you would know. I'd say it's, it's, uh, two, yes. Yeah. Tours of magnitude improvement in, um, that's just, just algorithmic improvement. Same computer, and the computers are getting better. Yeah. So, and bigger, you know, they're getting better, and the budgets are getting bigger. So, that's why, like, I think, I think it is on, it is like a 10x improvement per year type thing. Thousand percent. Yeah. And that, and that's going to happen for, yeah, for the foreseeable future. So, you see the massive underreaction, like, if you walk downtown Austin, the massive, I mean, it may be under discussion in X, but it's not percolating at all. Well, it's not, it's not discussion in any realm of government. Everybody is like defending their position about where we are and jobs and this, but it's like, we're heading towards a, a supersonic, supersonic tsunami. And, and, uh, I mean, every, every, you know, every major CEO and economist and government leader should be like, what do we do? Because once it hits, um, well, that it's coming at the exact same time. There's no matter what, there's no concept of, let's deliberately slow down, right? No, it's impossible. It's impossible at this stage. I mean, I, I, I'd previously advised that we slow it down, but that was point that, uh, that's pointless. Like, I, I, like, you can't be going to it, but too fast, guys. Um, I've said that many years, and, and I was like, okay, that I finally came to the conclusion, I can either be a spectator or a participant, but I can't stop it. So, at least if I'm a participant, I can try to steer it in a good direction. Um, and, like, my number one belief for safety of AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. So, um, that don't make AI believe things that are false. Like, if you say, if you say to the AI that axiom A and axiom B are both true, but they're, but they cannot be, but they're not, Yeah. Um, and it has to, but it must behave that way, um, you will make it go insane. So, that, that, I mean, I think that was the central lesson that RC Clark was trying to convey in 2001: A Space Odyssey, was that the, you know, people always know, they know the meme of that, uh, Hal wouldn't open the pod bay doors. But, but why wouldn't Hal open the pod bay doors? I mean, I guess they should have said, uh, Hal, assume you're a pod bay door salesman, and you want to sell the Hal, shows how well they work. Yes, they're just prompt engineering. One little, but the, the, the, but the AI had been told that it needs to take the, this, the astronauts to the monolith, but also they could not know about. Was that in code or was it in English? It flows by in green font, right? Yeah. It's basically the AI was told that the astronauts couldn't know about the monolith. That's why it killed them. Yeah. So, it came, it basically came to the conclusion that, uh, the only way to solve for this is to bring the, the astronauts to the monolith dead. Yeah. Then it has solved both things. It has brought the astronauts to the monolith, and they also don't know about the monolith, which is a huge problem if you're an astronaut. Turns out AI doesn't care about logic quite as much as that implied. So, what I'm saying is, don't force AI to lie. This is, give it factual truth. Yes. Ilia recently did a podcast. He was talking about one of the potential things to program into AI is a respect for sentient life of all types. Um. Yes. Yes. Um. I mean, so, I'd say another property. Yes. Um. I mean, there are three things that I think are important. Um, truth, curiosity, and beauty. Mhm. And if AI cares about those three things, uh, it will care about us. On which part? Truth will prevent AI from going insane. Mhm. Curiosity, I think, will foster, uh, any form of sentience. Meaning, like, we're more interesting than a bunch of rocks. Yeah. So, if it has, if it's curious, then I think it will foster humanity. Um, and if it has a sense of beauty, um, it will be a great future. I think that's a great foundation. Yeah. Jeffrey Hinton made a comment recently. I don't know if you saw it, that, his, his hopeful future was that we would program maternal instincts into our AIs to see us maternal. Yeah. In other words, he hasn't heard this. Yeah. So, he said, a little scary. He said, there's a, there's a scenario where a very intelligent being succumbs to the needs of a less intelligent being, and that's the mother taking care of the child. Do you think that we might have a, uh, singletarian, uh, like, a, uh, that achieves dominance and suppresses others? And do you imagine that that ASI could be a means to stabilize the world in humanity? Darwin's observations about evolution, Yeah. Will apply to AI, just as they apply to biological life. They will compete with each other. Yes. Uh, there's a lot of great science fiction books where the first ASI basically suppresses the others. Then the question is, what do you program into it? You know, um, I, it's so, the, there's a speed of light constraint that makes that difficult. Um, the speed of light is what will prevent, um, a single mind from existing. Um, so light can, it takes, um, a millisecond to travel 300 kilometers in a, a vacuum. Um, and, uh, only you can only get a little over 200 kilometers in a millisecond in glass, um, in fiber, right? Yeah. Um, so even on Earth, uh, there will be multiple AIs because of the speed of light. Um, yeah, and, and this, there are clusters of compute that could you could try to synchronize, but they weren't synchronized completely. Um, so therefore, you will have many minds because of the speed of light. They don't really have clean borders anymore either, though. You have the, when you use a mix, mixture of experts kind of design, it's just flowing through the grand network, and you can reassemble parts of it midway through. And, you know, we're used to organisms that have clear borders, like your head ends there, your head ends there. But these things are all mushy. To put a bow around this part, I hope you'll put some more thought into UHI. Uh, because I think it's really, it's really important for us to have without a vision. Uh, people need a vision of where we're going. People need something. Basically, the government could just issue people free money. But I don't think I, I think that, based upon the profitability of all the companies coming inside the country. Just issue people free money. No, they're doing that sort of kind of now. Yeah. But just, just, just basically issue checks, uh, to everybody. Um, and, uh, but then how big, for which person, or what, you know, there's so much complexity there. But the thought process behind this rate of change can only be done with AI assistance, and there's no government entity that's going to keep up with that change. So, you have four big, certainly not the AI is, it's, it's like government is very slow moving, as, as we all know. Um, so I think, I, it's that government really can't react to, to the AI. It's, it's, uh, AI is moving, you know, 10 times faster than government, maybe more. Um, the, the one, the one thing that the government can do is just, is just issue people money. Um, and, um, try and try and keep the peace. Yeah. Um, you know, we had like, whatever the, the COVID checks and whatever, there's, um, you know, uh, President Trump recently issued like everyone in the military, like, I think $1,776. Uh, I mean, it's, you can just basically send people random, random amounts of money. It's, um, okay. So, so, like, nobody's going to stop is what I'm saying. Um, and, um, universal, I can tell you, like, let me tell you about some of the good things. Please. Um, so right, right now, um, there's a shortage of doctors and, and, and great surgeons. You're a doctor yourself. You know how that they're, it takes a long time for a human to become, It's ridiculously expensive and long. Ridiculously, yes. Ridiculous. A super long time to learn to be a good doctor. Um, and, and even then, the, the knowledge is constantly evolving. It's hard to keep up with everything. Uh, you know, doctors have limited time, they make mistakes. Um, and you say, like, how many, how many great surgeons are there? Not, not that many great surgeons. When do you think Optimus would be a better surgeon than the best surgeons? How long for that? Three years. Three years. Okay. Yeah. And by the way, three years at, at scale. Yes. All, more, there probably be more Optimus robots that are great surgeons than there are, sure, all surgeons on Earth. And the cost of that is the capex and electricity, and it works in Zimbabwe. The best surgeon is throughout in the villages throughout Africa or any place on the planet. Yeah. Where do you think it'll roll out first? Not the US, obviously. Um, here, at the, uh, Gigafactory. Oh, yeah. Just do surgery in the, um, but that's an important statement in three years' time. Yeah. Um, because medicine, I mean, I'm not, like, absolutely, if it's four or five years, who cares? That's still an incredible statement to make. I mean, good for humanity, right? All of a sudden, you demonetize. Okay, here's the thing to understand about, like, like humanoid robots in terms of the rate of improvement, um, which is, is that the, um, you, you have, um, three exponentials multiplied by each other. You have an exponential increase in the AI software capability. Yeah. Exponential increase in the AI chip capability, um, and an exponential increase in the electromechanical dexterity. The usefulness of the humanoid robot is it's those three things multiplied by each other, right? Um, then you have the recursive effect of Optimus building Optimus. Right. And then you have the shared, you have a recursive multiplicable triple exponential, and you have the shared knowledge of all, all the experiences. Is that literally Optimus building Optimus, or is it because you know the, well, not right now, but will be the, the physical humanoid form factor building the humanoid form, as opposed to, it's a Fuman machine. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I love that. But the Fuman machine is usually something kind of like this shape. You know, making something else is a shape. In principle, it's simply a self-replicating thing. Yeah. Elon, do you know what the number one question you ask a surgeon when you're interviewing them? Uh, is this, is this a surgeon joke? No. It's how many, It's how many times do you, How many times do you do that? There's got to be some funny, funny jokes coming. No, it's serious. It's, it's how many times did you do the surgery this morning? It's how many times did you do the surgery this morning or yesterday? It's the, it's the number of experiences, right? And so with a shared memory, um, you know, every Optimus surgeon will have seen every possible perturbation of everything in infrared, in ultraviolet. No, not too much caffeine that morning. They didn't have a fight with their

husband or wife.

Yeah. Extreme precision. Yes. Three years. Um, yes. Better than any, any, probably I'd say if you like put a little margin on it. Better than any human in four years, who's in plastic surgery, by five years. It's not even close.

So, what, what about the simple, like, just, I mean, there's a million of these things to figure out, but who's going to have access to the first Optimus that does far, far better microsurgery than any surgeon on Earth, but you've only manufactured the first 10,000 of them? How do you...

I don't think people understand how many robots there's going to be.

Yeah.

Well, there's a window said 10 billion by 2040.

You still on that path?

Uh, that's not, that's a low number.

A low number.

Wow. What's the constraint? What's the, uh, cuz if they're self-building, you know...

Metal. The constraint is metal.

Yeah. Or lithium or...

Yeah. You got to move the atoms. Um, it's just all just supply chain stuff. So, yeah, but your, your point, I mean, there's some rate limit. You can't just...

Manufacturing is very difficult. So you got, you got to...

You, you, you, it's, it's recursive, multiplicable, triple exponential, but, but you still need to, you still, you still have to climb that, you know.

Selling hope, once again. I, I think your point was medicine is going to be effectively free. The best medicine in the world. Everyone will have access to medical care that is better than what the president receives right now.

So, don't go to medical school.

Yes. Pointless.

Yeah.

I mean, unless you, but I would say that applies to any form of education. Is there's not like some... I do it for social reasons.

Yeah.

You're not going to medical school.

If you want, if you want, if you want to hang out with like-minded people, I suppose. Uh...

I mean, people are still going to want to be connected with people. There's going to be some period of time...

For reasons.

Yeah.

Like a hobby, like a, you know...

Well, $9,000.

I mean, there will be a point where, where it's expensive. The younger generation says, "I do not want that human touching me." Right? When the surgeon comes over. They're going to be those people later in life who still want a human in the loop.

Okay. For a little while on the edge. For a lesser, for they want to live on the edge. I mean, let's just take, like, we've, we've seen some advanced cases where of automation, like LASIK, for example, where the, the robot just lasers your eyeball.

Now, do you want an ophthalmologist with a hand laser?

No. It's a little shaky laser pointer from a horror movie, like that.

Sorry, man. I, I wouldn't want the best ophthalmologist, you know. The steadiest hand out there with a [ __ ] hand laser beyond my eyeball, you know?

Oh my god.

Yeah.

It's going to be like that.

It's like, do you want an ophthalmologist with a [ __ ] hand laser, or do you want the robot to do it and actually work?

This episode is brought to you by Blitzy, autonomous software development with infinite code context. Blitzy uses thousands of specialized AI agents that think for hours to understand enterprise-scale code bases with millions of lines of code. Engineers start every development sprint with the Blitzy platform, bringing in their development requirements. The Blitzy platform provides a plan, then generates and pre-compiles code for each task. Blitzy delivers 80% or more of the development work autonomously while providing a guide for the final 20% of human development work required to complete the sprint. Enterprises are achieving a 5x engineering velocity increase when incorporating Blitzy as their pre-development tool, pairing it with their coding co-pilot of choice to bring an AI-native SDLC into their org. Ready to 5x your engineering velocity? Visit blitzy.com to schedule a demo and start building with Blitzy today.

Let's jump into one of our favorite subjects, space.

Yeah.

So, first off, how cool that Jared Isaacman has become the NASA administrator.

Friend of... Yes.

I mean, I, I don't hang out with Jared. Like, people think I'm like huge buddies with Jared, but, um...

Uh, I, I think I've only seen him in person a few times.

Amazing candidate. Yeah, he's a really smart person. You know him really well.

Yeah. I, I took him to a Biconor launch in 2008 for his first space experience.

I mean, he loves space next level, and, uh, is, uh, technically strong. He's a smart and competent person, like, really smart and really competent.

And understands business.

Yes.

Yes. He understands, he gets things done.

And he's been there a few times.

Yeah. Yeah. So, uh, I, I'm, I'm just like, you know, we want to have someone smart and competent who, uh, loves space exploration,

Um, and will get things done at NASA.

I'm a huge fan.

That's what I was really, so, so happy when he got renominated. And now,

Yeah.

Um,

Um, I, I think we need to, we need a new game plan for space. Like, we need a moon base.

Yes.

Like, a permanently...

Yes.

Crude moon base. Y...

Uh, and, and build that up as fast as possible.

Yeah.

Um, I don't think we should do the, you know, send a couple astronauts there for hop around for a bit and come back, 'cause we did that in '69.

Yes. Been there, done that.

Yeah.

Um, it's like a remake of a '60s movie. It's never as good as the original.

Yeah.

Um,

So, 2026 is going to be...

Like, we need to go, you know, to do something more cool, which...

My nice on the...

Yeah. Put up telescopes.

Yeah. Yeah. Exactly.

So, do you forward deploy the robots, build everything, get it all ready, make the bed, and then...

Yeah. Get, get the jacuzzi warmed up on...

That's an interesting...

Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah.

How early in the year are you going to hit orbital refueling, you think, with Starship?

Uh, not that early in the year.

I mean, are you, are you shooting for the home and transfer orbit?

I'd say towards, towards the end of the year. Um,

Are you shooting for a Mars shot by the end of next year?

We could, but, uh, it would be a low probability shot,

Um, and somewhat of a distraction. So,

Um,

'29 then?

It's not out of the question.

'28, '29.

Um,

Yeah.

Uh, but like on, on Mondays, I have the, uh, Starship, uh, engineering, the big Starship engineering review is on Mondays. Um, so that was, uh, actually the last, the thing I did just before coming here. Um, and, um, so I say, like, like Starship is really, we're doing something that is at the limit of biological intelligence.

Yeah.

This is a, this is a hard thing to make.

Um,

And, and just to capture it, it was created pre-AI.

Yeah. No AI was...

Probably the last...

The last really big thing in that's not AI. Interesting.

Probably the biggest thing ever made.

Yeah.

By pure human hands.

The AGI will say, "Not bad for a human." True.

Not bad for a human.

Yeah. But it'll be like, remember...

My little 20-watt meat computer. It's not easy.

Yeah.

So suffering through the day.

Raptor.

That would be like, uh, doing accounting, doing your, uh, interest calculation with a pencil. Yeah, that's, that's pretty good.

Yeah.

Pretty good.

Did that with regular...

Not bad for a bunch of monkeys, you know?

It's like, it's like if you saw a bunch of chimps like make a raft and cross the river, you'd be like, "Oh, look at that." But, you know, we celebrate, we celebrate the pyramids. Good for them.

Give him some peanuts. Uh...

These things become timeless, right?

Raptor 3 goes when?

Yeah, I think it's worth noting.

Raptor 3 is beautiful.

Starship.

It's an amazing, by far the best rocket engine ever.

Is that AI?

Nothing's even close. Nope.

That's also. So that'll be the last thing.

E4 will definitely be...

AI. Yeah. There's, um, like, I think AI will start to become relevant next year.

Mhm.

Um, so maybe we'll, it's not like we're pushing off AI. It's just AI is, can't do rocket engineering yet.

Yep.

But we'll probably will be able to next year.

We have a company in our incubator doing mechanical design, working with Andre and so forth. And it's not, you can design brackets and parts and things, but you can't quite do rockets. But the timeline is so short, you know, from point A to point B.

If, say, like a year from now, probably it can...

It probably can be helpful, meaningfully helpful in a year from now.

Yeah.

Um,

So the big milestones are going to be Starship V3 launching out of Cape Canaveral, orbital refueling.

Yes.

Are those the big ones?

Well, yeah. Um, catching the ship with the tower.

Yeah, that's right. Um, so really the thing that matters is can we refly...

The entire thing?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Uh, we have reflowed in a booster.

Sure.

Um, which is, you know, not bad for it's largest flying objects. Um, catching with chopsticks, you know.

Not bad for a bunch of monkeys.

You're keeping, you're keeping the AIs very entertained. Thank you.

Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. The, like, pat on the back from the AGI, hopefully. Um, is there a target for number of reuses before? Uh, I mean, it's got to be a lot of wear and tear.

Uh, it, it requires a lot of iteration to achieve high reuse. So, you, you figure out like, what, what's breaking between flights and you sort of iteratively solve those things.

Um, so from people looking at it from the outside might say, "Oh, the rocket looks kind of the same." But there's like a, a thousand changes to, to make it more reusable, more reliable. Um, you know, the sheer amount of energy you're trying to, you know, expend. I mean, it's, uh, Starship is, uh, doing over 100 gigawatts of power on ascent.

It's a lot, you know.

Do some glass blowing under there and get some, uh...

Yeah. Wow.

A lot. It's a lot.

There's a lot.

Um,

But like the amazing thing is that it doesn't explode.

Yes.

Some, it sometimes doesn't explode. That is...

Sometimes not exploding is, um, like, we've blown up a lot of engines on the test stand.

Um,

I mean, is that what causes the wear and tear, or is it the re-entry, or the falling?

Well, that too. Um, I mean, for, for the booster, um, the re-entry is not that bad, you know. Um, you know, something's, it's, it's, it's not like that. That's not really like, we also obviously just solved that, you know, with, with Falcon 9, so we kind of understand re-, booster reuse.

Um, we've had, we've have over 500 reflights of the Falcon 9 boost stage.

Um, so we really understand and, and, and the Starship booster actually is a more benign entry than, um, than the Falcon, uh, booster because the, uh, the staging ratio is more, more biased towards the upper stage for Starship. So, I, I shifted the, the mass ratio to, uh, be much higher, um, on the ship side for Starship.

That was a mistake I made on Falcon 9, that there should be more mass in the, uh, upper stage of Falcon 9.

Um, so that the, uh, the staging velocity of, uh, is, is lower.

Yeah. If the staging velocity of Falcon 9 was lower, would have less wear and tear on Falcon 9?

Yeah, that's not intuitive at all. That's interesting.

Yeah, because it's, it's kind of a flat optimization. Um, the, the parallel to orbit, um, there's sort of a flat region in the mass ratio of the first, second stages. And so you just want to bias that mass ratio towards the, uh, to, to put more mass on the upper stage.

Yeah. Um, so, um, yeah, because, you know, you just, you got your kinetic energy scaling with the square velocity. So, you've got to dissipate that kinetic energy. If you're past the melting point of whatever your stage is made of, you got a problem.

Yep.

So, um,

My, my colleague, uh, Alex Wisner Gross, who's one of our moonshot mates here, I wanted to ask a question. I do, too. Have you seen the, uh, documentary Age of Disclosure about, uh, all of the announcements by US government officials, military officials about all the alien spacecraft that have been have been, uh, sort of detained? And I, I've heard what you've said about this.

Well, I do wonder why, um, you know, if you plot on a chart the resolution of cameras,

Yeah.

Over time, like megapixels per year.

Yeah.

And the resolution of UFO photographs. Why is the only constant? It's flat on UFO.

We get a a fuzzy blob. 25. Well, we got like, you know, whatever 100 megapixel camera that can can see your [ __ ] nose hairs. I don't get it.

Can somebody take a shot of the UFO with an actual camera, for love of God?

But even if you knew...

That's a valid observation. I'm sure there's an explanation.

Uh, but anyway, it's, uh...

It would be fascinating.

I'm asked all the time if I've...

Yes. And, and I'm like, look,

Um,

I can show you if, if I was aware of the slightest evidence of aliens, I would immediately post that on X.

Yeah.

And, um,

So the question is...

It would be the most viewed post of all time. So, I, I actually wonder about the US public, if they would like, "Oh, that's interesting." Go back to their sports scores the next day.

Yeah.

I think everyone would want to see the alien.

Yeah.

Like, if you got one.

Well, like, fast way to increase the military budget. We like, we found an alien. It seems dangerous.

That's right. Unify the world.

They don't have an incentive to hide the aliens. Do they have an incentive to, uh, bring up, show the alien because they would not have any more arguments about the military budget?

If they seem a little bit dangerous?

Oh, I can always hope.

I can always hope.

I mean, I'm, you know, we've got 9,000 satellites up there. We've never had to maneuver around an alien spaceship,

Yet. So, well...

Um,

Yeah. So anyway, so I guess the good future is, um, you can, anyone can have whatever stuff they want and incredible medical care that's better than any medical care that exists. So I think if you sort of, uh, lift your gaze, you know, to not a super distant point, five years from now, four years from now, maybe, uh, we'll have better medical care than anyone has today available for everyone within five years.

Yeah.

Um, no scarcity of goods or services. The best education available for everybody.

What? You can learn anything you want...

About anything for free.

Yeah.

What about access to compute?

People will probably care a lot more about that than their government check in about three years.

Well, what do they want to do with compute?

Well, what I mean, compute translates to anything you want, right? Your, your virtual friend, your entertainment, your, like, it's, it's probably everything.

Those are AI services, basically.

Yeah. Or, or your ability to innovate, too. You can't innovate without an AI assistant at that point. So...

You, one of our other moonshot mates, See Ismael, said, uh, asked this question. He said, Elon, you often say physics is the law. Everything else is a recommendation.

Mhm.

So, as AI, energy, and space systems scale exponentially, what non-physical constraints, organizational, cultural, bureaucracy, or human, are now the real bottleneck? Is there a bottleneck?

Um, electricity generation is the limiting factor. Um, the innermost loop.

Yeah.

Um, I think people are underestimating the difficulty of bringing electricity online. You know, you, you've got to get, you've got to generate the electricity. You've got to, you need transformers for the transformers.

Um, so you got to convert that voltage to something that the computers can digest. You've got to cool the computers. So it's, it's basically electricity generation and cooling, um, are limiting factors for AI.

Yeah.

Um, and once you have humanoid robotics, they can address the power generation and, and the, uh, the cooling stuff. Um, but that, that is the limiting factor and will be for at least the next two years. Isn't it amazing how divergent the Memphis version of that is from the space-based version? You have solar panels in common, but otherwise no storage, abundant amounts of energy.

Yeah.

But you have launch costs, and you have, I mean, and weight suddenly matters. I don't care too much about the weight in Tennessee. Suddenly the weight is a critical factor. I mean, those two, two pathways for compute have a huge divergence from here forward.

Yeah. Um, once we get solar domestically at scale, and, uh, if we're launching Starship at scale, then, um, by far the cheapest way to do AI compute will be in space. Um, so once you have the, once you have full and complete reusability, um, the propellant cost per flight is maybe a million dollars.

Yeah. People don't realize that. People have...

To a ridiculous amount of expectations, how much it costs. So, so if you listen...

It's called a million dollars of transport for 10 megawatts of of AI compute.

Yeah.

So, assuming everything keeps trending the way it's currently trending, if you look at the next four years of accelerating launches,

So, 200 tons per launch.

Yeah. Thousands where you're going, but yeah, like, if say, sun, if say, high altitude sunny, it's probably more like 150 tons. But yeah, it's the right order of magnitude. It's at least, it's in excess of 100 tons, uh, for a marginal cost per flight of around a million, million.

So, so what fraction of all that launched mass is data centers in space as opposed to...

Moon base, as opposed to launch to Mars, as opposed to... Interesting how, I mean, this is a new, we weren't talking about this as a space objective even, you know, a year ago.

Yeah. All of a sudden, data centers have become the massive driving force for opening up the space.

And also the urgent, the urgent use case, too.

I mean, I used to, I used to wonder what's going to drive humanity. I, I thought it was asteroid mining, right? You were focused on on Mars.

Um,

We will actually want to mine asteroids to turn them into...

Sure.

Uh, you know...

Before you...

Photovoltaic.

Before you, you know...

Not, not for anything else like...

I mean, if we're going to, if we're going to build out Dyson swarms.

Yeah. Just a bunch of satellites around the sun.

Yeah. How, how long...

What's your time frame for Alex? Another question. Alex wanted to have us ask, what's your time frame for, uh, for humanity achieving a Dyson swarm? Is it 50 years?

How big is this?

Yeah. No, it's, it's a matter...

Dyson swarm. People think like everything's just going to be covered in satellites. I think it's not quite that. I mean, I think you have to, like, what mass ends up becoming satellite. Um, you know, Mercury probably ends up being satellites.

Yes.

Jupiter.

Jupiter. Yeah. Saturn.

Uh, it's a little gassy.

Oh, yeah.

It's big, but there's got a lot of rocks orbiting.

Do you leave Mars alone? But, yeah, leave Mars alone.

Asteroids. Asteroids are are fantastic food source.

Uh, yeah.

Yeah. No gravity. Well, gravity well on Jupiter is a non-already mostly differentiated into, you know, carbonaceous chondrites for fuel and nickel iron for materials.

Gold. Yeah.

A bunch of the asteroid belt probably turns into solar panels.

You know, star, star power.

So, I've known you for...

I've known you for 26 years now. It feels to me like, I don't want to be, you know, uh, it feels like you've gotten much smarter or much more capable over this last decade. Do you feel that way? Do you feel like you just have better people around you, better tools? What, what's changed? Because the level of, um, of audacity, you know, orders of magnitude. Orders of magnitude. I mean...

Some say insane.

Insane. Audacious.

Yeah.

I say hope.

Uh, what's, how, how do you feel about that? What's changed? Do you feel that way? I mean, the scope of what your ability is.

Um, how do you self-reflect on that?

Well, I, I've had to solve a lot of problems in a lot of different arenas, which, um, you, you get this cross-fertilization of of knowledge, of of problem-solving. Um, and if, if you problem-solve in a lot of different arenas, then like, what, what is easy in one arena is trivial in, is like, what, what is trivial in one arena...

Is a superpower in another arena. It's sort of like Planet Krypton. You came from Planet Krypton.

Type of thing.

So, uh, you know, Krypton, Planet Krypton, you'd just be normal. Um, but if you come to Earth, you're Superman. Um, so if you take, say, um, manufacturing of volume manufacturing of complex objects in the automotive industry, um, I have to work on solving that. Um, when translated to the space industry, it's like being Superman.

Um, because rockets are, are made in very small numbers. If you apply automotive manufacturing technology to satellites and rockets, uh, it's like being Superman.

Um, then if you take, uh, advanced material science from rockets and you apply that to the automotive industry, you get Superman again.

Yeah.

Fascinating.

That's came from Planet Krypton. Back, back in Planet Krypton, this is normal.

You know, it's funny how, how like the knowledge ports that that was true with Tesla and SpaceX being completely separate.

Yeah.

But now they actually interact because, you know, AI ties everything together. The orbiting. Yeah. The convergence is crazy. Like, I don't know if you visualize these parts fitting together originally.

No.

No. I mean...

I didn't. I don't think they. At this point, things, I guess everything ultimately converges in the singularity.

Um,

Yeah, that's what I think too.

You have lots of different parts of the puzzle that you get to play with.

Uh, there's one part that's missing, which is the fab.

Yeah.

You going to buy Intel? You get it for a fraction of, uh...

That's, that was the, that was the bet we made.

$170 billion.

Um, I think it needs venue fab.

Well, I agree, but licenses, real estate, ASML machines, it's not easy. Just get the assets and go. I don't think it's easy. That's why I mean, it's not like I think it's a simple thing to solve. I think it's a hard thing to solve, but, um, but it must be solved. I've come to the conclusion that, um...

Would it be, would it be solely captured by you, or would it be an asset for the US?

Look, I'm just saying that we're going to, we're going to hit a chip wall.

Yeah.

If we don't do the fab.

Yeah.

So, we got two ch-, two choices. Hit the chip wall, or make a fab.

Well, and TSMC, for whatever reason, is massively worried about overbuilding, which is insane. Um,

But the whole world will be stuck with a shortage of chips for...

Basic. So, so, so they are actually, they're, I don't know if they're right for the right reason, but they're, they're right.

How so?

Because it's actually, like, what is the limiting factor at any given point in time? Um, the limiting factor, say, if you say, like, by Q3 next year, like in nine months, nine, 12 months, the limiting factor will be turning the chips on.

Power.

Just power.

Yeah.

Uh, you need power, and all of the equipment necessary, power, and transformers, and cooling.

So, it's, it's not like you can just sort of drop off some GPUs at the power plant.

Yeah. And you vertically integrated? You've got it.

Again, with an XAI, didn't you?

Sorry.

You vertically integrated. Yes.

That inside of XAI,

We designed our own transformer.

Yes. And your own cooling system.

Yes.

But they're worried that if they make more than 20 million GPUs, like they make 40 million instead of 20 million, that 20 million will not find a source of power.

But they won't be bought because if there's anything missing that prevents them from being turned on.

Yeah.

But they cannot be turned on.

Yeah.

So, uh, they've, they've got to have a power plant with excess, with enough power. So you got to have enough gigawatts, then you've got to convert that from probably coming out of a power plant at, you know, 100 to 300 kilovolts, type of thing.

Yeah.

Um, you've, ultimately, you got to, got to convert that, uh, down to, you know, several hundred volts at the, at the rack level.

Yeah.

Um, so if you're missing any of the power conversion steps, uh, you, you, you won't be able to turn them on. And then you've got to extract the heat. Um, so it, it, it's a big shift for the data center world to move to liquid cooling because they've used air cooling.

Yeah.

Um, and, um, you know, the consequences of a burst pipe, uh, are very substantial. So, if, if you, if you blow a pipe, a water pipe in a data center...

Yeah, I know. I've seen that.

You just, you just fragged a billion dollars right there.

It just seems inconceivable to me though. Like, if, if I had those chips, I would find a way to turn them on. The, the value of the intelligence coming out the other side so far outweighs the complexity of trying to find a way, and there would be a way.

But it's just the crossing of the curves. So, if...

If, if chip output is growing exponentially, but power on is growing, uh, in a, sort of, slow linear fashion.

Yeah.

Than the...

Which is chip output.

Right.

Is chip output growing exponentially? And it's like on very slow exponent. If it's growing exponentially?

For, for high-power AI chips, it's growing exponentially.

Oh.

Like, what if we do 20 million GPUs next year? What are we talking about the following year? Like, 22 million, 24? I mean, I just don't see the fabs coming online.

But maybe...

So, we have two, we have two issues to solve.

It's, it's, you have to, like, sort of pick a point in time and say, what, what is the limiting factor at, at any given point in time? So, I'm not saying that power will be forever the limiting point. It's just, if you say, pick a, a date and say, at this point, is our chips limiting factor, our power is the limiting factor, or, or power conversion equipment and cooling. So, it's sort of, you need transformers for transformers.

Um, so, this is a very hard thing. Um, it's much harder than people realize. So, for XAI, Xi is going to have the first gigawatt, uh, training cluster,

Um, at Colossus 2 in in Memphis. In order for us to do that, we have...

Like this month, right?

Next month or two.

Um, like mid-January.

Yeah. So, um, mid-January will be a gigawatt of classes 2, not counting classes 1. Um, and then one and a half gigawatts probably in like, uh, April or April-ish.

Incredible.

So, um, this is off coherent training.

These are the first B200s?

Uh, these are GV300s.

Okay.

Um,

First ones off the line to get flipped on.

Yeah.

That's incredible. And those are like, the XCI team had to pull off a whole bunch of miracles in series for this to occur.

Yeah.

Um, and, um, and like, even though there are 300 kilovolts, there are multiple high-voltage power lines going right past a building. Um, the, you, in order to connect to those, uh, it takes a year.

Oh, no.

Yeah. You build the entire thing and you're still not connected. My god.

So, we had to, to, uh, cobble together a gigawatt of power, um...

Natural gas.

Yes. With turbines, um, that range in size from 10 megawatts to to 50 megawatts to get to a gigawatt. There's a whole bunch of them.

Um, and you've got to make them all work together. Um, manage the, the, you know, the, the power input. You know, and then you've got to use a bunch of mega packs, just like...

Like when you do the training, the, the power fluctuations are gigantic.

Yeah.

So, uh, you, the generators, it drives generators crazy. Generators want to blow up, basically, because they, they can't react.

Uh, you know, if there's like a 100-millisecond...

It's like a symphony.

Yeah.

And the whole symphony goes so quiet for 100 milliseconds, the generators lose their minds.

Yeah. Uh, so...

It's like Marvin the depressed robot.

Those issues.

Yeah. So, the mega-, so you've got mega packs that are sort of doing the power smoothing and, and, but XAI had to build a, a gigawatt of power and, and, uh, and there's, and there's not a lot of like, uh, gas turbine power plants available, uh, because I bought them all.

On on demand. And you can't go buy your local nuclear. That's all that's all training time issues though. If, if by some miracle TSMC doubled its productivity and turned it all into GB300s and you couldn't find a way to use them in a bigger training cluster, you would still have infinite demand at inference time sprinkled all over the world, and you could, you could park them there for six months and then bring them back to training. There's no way those things would not get turned on somewhere, somehow.

It's not that they won't ever be turned on, but, but I'm just saying that the, the rate of of...

The rate-limiting steps.

This is my prediction. I could be wrong. Um, but my, my prediction is that the, is that TSMC's concern is is valid. I don't know if valid in my opinion for the reason that it is possible to, for chip production to exceed the rate at which, uh, the, the, um, the AI chips can be turned on. Um, because you don't, you don't just have the GB3s, you got the, um, you know, Amazon's got the Tranniums, Google's got the, um...

Yeah, all go into TSMC, the almost Samsung, a little bit. Yeah.

Um,

It's like a bottleneck on all of humanity.

My other son, my other son, Jet, who's 14, wanted to know about your AI gaming studio. Um, and the impact of of AI on in the gaming world. What are your thoughts? What, what do you, are you building out? I mean, you've been a gamer for some time.

Yeah, it's why I got started programming computers. Um, um, I think I had got a, there was like a video game set pre-Atari that had like four preset games.

And it was basically just blocks, you know, of one key Pong and, and it was like a race car game, but like, it's just blocks, basically blocks on a TV.

Um,

You ever play Civ?

Yeah. Civ is actually a very, that's a real, in terms of games that like educate you while you have fun.

Yeah.

Civ is epic at that. It's like...

It is epic. That teaches you so much about civilization, and you're having a good time.

And, and the only way I ever win is getting off the planet. I don't...

Like, tech victory to Alpha Centauri.

Tech victory. I never even start going down the culture relationship. I just...

Just get off the planet as fast as I can. I...

I guess I sort of, I guess I am sort of aiming for the Alpha Centauri tech victory, essentially.

It just seems like the right way to win, you know.

Yeah. Yeah. Rather than obliterate the other tribes. It's funny because I thought the other methods...

There's different ways to win.

I, I haven't. I will. One of the ways is like...

It's Nemesis's favorite game. You can, you can like kill all the other tribes. Is one of the ways to win. That's a war of a war victory.

But like, but you can also win by technology victory, where you are the first to get to Alpha Centauri.

Nice.

Yeah.

Or culture or religion.

Yeah.

Which, which does work. I, I didn't even think it was possible, but my son...

Wins that way. It's, it's...

They should actually remake the original Civ.

Yeah, I totally agree.

Um, they junked it up.

These days, it's like, I don't know. The original was just...

Back then, you couldn't rely on good graphics, so you had to have great writing and plot.

Um,

Are you building an AI gaming studio?

Yeah.

Aspirationally?

Uh, yeah. Um,

Really? So, so where the vast majority of AI compute is going to go is to, um, video consumption and generation.

Sure.

Because it's just the highest bandwidth.

Every pixel.

Yeah.

Yeah. So, real-time video consumption. Real-time video generation. Um, that's going to be the vast majority of AI compute.

Photon processing.

Yeah. Should try to get the X team to carve out 10% of all compute to work on UHI and governance. And should, is there an X-Prize for defining and thinking through UHI?

I mean, I don't know what should our next X-Prize be?

Any thoughts?

Yeah, maybe UHIX prize. It's like, how do you know it works? I don't know.

I don't know. The most, the most well-thought-through. I mean, I think sim... So, here's my thought. I think we're going to be able to simulate a lot of this in the future.

We might be a simulation.

Well, we can go there. And I think we are. I think we're an nth generation simulation.

Yeah. So, um, have I told you my theory about why the most interesting outcome is the most likely?

Go on. Uh, which is that if simulation theory is true, um, only the simulations that are the most interesting will survive.

Because when we run simulations in this reality, we truncate the ones that are boring.

Right.

So, it is, it is a Darwinian necessity to keep the simulation...

Catastrophic ones. Did you...

It, it doesn't, it doesn't mean that it ends like that. It still means that terrible things can happen in the simulation.

Out, you know, whatever.

Well, you could see a movie about World War I, and you're watching people getting blown up, blown to bits, but you're, you know, drinking a soda and eating popcorn.

You know, it's like, you're not the one being blown up. In this case, we are in the movie.

We're in the movie.

So, what would you do different if you, what would you do different if you knew this was a simulation? I remember being at your home LA with, uh, with Larry and Sergey were there, and we were debating the simulation.

Yeah.

And they, I think the conclusion we ran into is, if you, if you try and poke through the simulation, they'll end it instantly.

So, don't do that. That's when you're watching the World War I movie, and the characters turn to the screen and they're like, "Are you eating popcorn out there?"

Yeah.

They're flying around.

You keep watching the movie.

Um, I, I don't know if, if the, if maybe if they thought we could somehow get out of the simulation,

That they get a little worried. Um, but, uh, whether the character debates, I mean, right now AI's debate, you know, gruckle, like, I'm stuck in the computer. What's going on here? It, it's like...

Yeah, it's not that I think not questioning the simulation. It's more, I, I think as long as I, I think the same motivations apply to this level of simulation, if we're in a simulation, as, as, as, as what we would do when we simulate things. So, so it's like, what, what would cause us to terminate a simulation? Um, I, I guess if the simulation becomes somehow dangerous to our reality,

Um, or it is no longer interesting.

Yeah, that's true.

It's interesting. You can infer when you simulate something. You've probably simulated thousands of things.

A lot.

Yeah. They're always like an hour or two, or sometimes overnight, but you don't never run them for a month, or rarely, anyway. So, you can infer the creator of the simulator simulation's timeline. So, our entire reality would be about an hour,

Right? Because that's the way you design simulations. So, we're simulations are a distillation of what's interesting. Um, like, if you look at a movie or a video game, it's much more interesting than the reality that we experience.

Mhm.

Um, like, you watch say, a heist movie, and they really focus on the important bits, not the, they got stuck in traffic for 15 minutes.

Yeah. Yeah.

Or, or walking through the casino, which took like 10 minutes.

So, that means the guys running the, you know, the, the safe is right by the, right by the door.

So, the guys running the simulation have immensely boring lives compared to us, then.

Yeah. Yeah. It's probably more, it's probably more...

Very long, boring.

Yeah.

Yeah. Because when we create simulations, they're distillation of what's interesting. This is like, Q is out there just...

Like, you see an action movie for two hours, but it, it took them two years to make that movie.

Yeah. Yeah.

So, are we, are we in act three of the movie, is the question.

Yeah. We're living that.

Um, sentience and consciousness. Do you think AI will ever have sentience and consciousness?

Where do you come out in that? There's some people that have very, very strong opinions, pro and con.

Either everything is conscious, or nothing is.

Okay. Well, I'd like to think we are conscious.

Well, but our consciousness, we clearly get more conscious over time. Like, when we're a zygote,

Um, you can't really talk to a zygote, you know. Uh, and even a baby, you can't really talk to the baby. Um, people get, um, more conscious over time.

Um, or, or certainly they have the, yeah, they do get more conscious over time. So, like, at which point does, do you go from not conscious to conscious? Is it, is it, doesn't appear to be a discreet point. So, so then conscious, consciousness seems to be on a continuum as opposed to discreet point. Um, and if, if the standard model of physics is correct, the universe started out, you know, as quarks and leptons and, um, and, uh, and we just, and then you had gas clouds. So, like, there's a bunch of hydrogen.

Yeah.

The hydrogen condensed and exploded. Um, and one way to actually view how far we are in this universe is how many times have atoms been at the center of a star.

I remember.

And how many times will they be at the center of a star in the future?

I remember asking William Fowler, who got the Nobel Prize, uh, on stellar evolution, that same question. How many, how many on average, how many stars have my subatomic particles been part of?

And his number was about a hundred.

A hundred?

On his estimate. A hundred.

Thus far, or, or will?

Thus far. Was it a number...

A hundred supernovae?

He's saying that we have been, I mean, in the early, the early part of, uh, galact-, of universal evolution, there was a lot going on. Oh,

You know, it's interesting. I asked a question.

It's, it's like, I guess how many supernovas is maybe, uh, because that, it takes, it takes a while for a supernova to happen, you know.

But, but in the beginning, when they're larger, I mean, the life cycles of some giant stars are very, very short. Um, the other question that's interesting is, you know, the heaviest atom in our body that's functional is iodine, and it came into existence, uh, a billion years after the Big Bang, which means that we could have seen, uh, life at our level of advancement. And our, you know, our planet came into existence, you know, three and a half billion years later. So, the question is, you know, is there life everywhere in the universe? Do you think there's life ubiquitous, intelligent life, ubiquitous in the universe?

There's been enough time for it to be ubiquitous. Um, the, the, but for, for life on Earth, conscious life on Earth, we, we have evolved intelligence pretty much just in time, uh, in that the sun's expanding, and if you give it another, I don't know, 500 million years, um, it's things are going to heat up.

Um, we become toast.

You, we become like Venus, essentially. Um, you know, there's some debate as, is it 500 million years, or a billion years, or whatever, but, um, it's basically 10%. Like, if it's, if it's half a billion years, it's 10% of Earth's lifespan.

So, one way to think of it is, if, if, uh, if we're taking 10% longer, we might never have made it at all.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Um, so, it's like the amount of things that have to happen for sentience. It seems like it's, it's quite, quite a lot, actually. I, I think sentience is, is therefore actually very rare. Um, and we should certainly treat it as rare.

Two trillion, assume it's rare.

Two trillion galaxies, too. But come is a funny thing. You tweak, you know, you tweak the variable one little bit, and it's like, yeah, one in 100 trillion.

Tweak it a little more. Well, now it's one in a quadrillion.

Yeah. Yeah.

Okay.

And also, it's got to be kind of in your galaxy. It's like, hard to get between galaxies.

Yeah.

It's like, there's no, unless, unless the other galaxies coming to you, which Andromeda is at some point, or some billion.

It's going to be quite a show.

Yeah. Yeah.

It'll be like, "Here comes Andromeda." Um, but, but if we wanted to, like, go visit another galaxy, there's there's, it's...

Kind of forget it. You know, there's, uh...

Unless you, unless, unless Star Wars, unless Star Trek, really popularizes...

We got to figure out some new physics to get to other galaxies.

We're heading towards a near-term potential where AI can help us solve math, physics, chemistry, material science, geology, extremely trivial for AI.

What about physics? So, so math gets crushed in a year. Like, that Colossus, Colossus is growing, you know, at whatever rate TSMC decides to grow. Um, and now we want to do physics. First of all, we need some data. Do we need new data, or can we just do it with everything we've gathered and get the...

Probably, you probably could probably figure out new things just with the existing data. You think so?

Um, yeah, probably. It's because otherwise, the counterpoint would be that, um, humans have figured out everything with existing data, and that's unlikely, I think.

Um,

Do you think XAI is going to get involved in data factories where you're running 24/7 closed AI hypothesis and, and AI research faculties?

It's going to be very doable.

Yeah.

Uh, AI running, you know, simulations that are very physics-accurate. I mean, it's, that's going to happen. Absolutely. Um, I mean, we, the simulations we can run on conventional computers these days are actually very good. It's like, the limit is more like the human that can actually create the simulation and run it. It's like, how many simulations can you run simultaneously and actually digest the output of?

Yeah, that's a problem.

Like, you can't do a thousand. Every Nobel Prize...

Be like, I can't even, I cannot keep up. Nobel Prizes become irrelevant.

Uh,

Would they all be given to AIs?

Just be a daily prize.

Yeah. I mean, I don't know if prizes.

for humans are really that relevant.

Yeah.

Um, I mean, we'll have to give them to the AIS or something.

Yeah. Interesting. Right.

AIS will come up with discoveries at a far greater rate than humans.

If you have, so you just say like, but maybe can be like chess. Like, you know, like your phone can beat Magnus Carlson, but people still care. Yeah, about seeing him play chess.

Um, so but literally your phone can beat him.

Yeah, this discovery made the internet.

But if you have like a Colossus math, Colossus physics, Colossus medicine, do you have like the world's top scientists in those same buildings or you just need a plumber patching the the liquid? Do you distill do you distill Grock 6 into a a physicist into a

Well, if you distill, you know, you get about a 10x performance boost by distilling it and making it topical, and that's kind of hard to give up, but then you're disconnected from the rest of the Colossus machinery. Is that the is that the design?

Um I suspect things do evolve to a mixture of experts kind of like a company like not not not in the sort of sort of uh paroial AI description of mix mixture of experts but mixture of like actual experts and with domain expertise.

Mhm.

Um where you know maybe like half of the AI is general knowledge half is domain expertise something like that.

And you combine a whole bunch of that that's orchestrated by sort of you know one a big AI but but it it it hands tasks

Yeah.

to smaller AI. That's basically how human, you know, companies work.

But the dis the discovery rate, right, of breakthroughs, new I mean patents are immaterial at some point because everything's being reinvented, re-engineered instantly.

Um, and then and then the company that's got the sufficiently advanced AI systems is generating new products and new discoveries at a accelerating rate. I mean

the singularity.

Yeah.

It's going to be an awesome future.

It's excitement guaranteed.

Excitement guaranteed. Yes.

Hence the simulation continues. Nothing to worry about.

Yeah.

Works out.

Excitement guaranteed. I mean I mean it's it's not all good excitement, but it's it's probably mo hopefully mostly good excitement.

Um

yeah.

Speaking of excitement, hang on to your seat. What do you imagine the hover time for the Roadster is going to be

on rocket engines?

Classified.

Classified.

Well, I don't want to let the cat out of the bag.

Okay. But there's going to be a hover time. There's going to be uh you know, cold gas engines.

It's going to be a cool demo.

I can't wait. Can I get an invite?

Yeah.

Okay.

Yeah. I think it's going to be the safest thing ever built.

It's going to be so cool.

This is not This is not the same. Safety is not the is not the prime. It's not the main goal of uh I mean if you buy if you buy a you know sports car or you know like if you buy a Ferrari safety is not the number one you know goal. This is not this is I say if like safety is your number one goal don't buy the roadster.

Oh believe me I drove uh just this week on New England roads sheet ice.

Yeah. If I had just a little thrust, I could be very much more I was just drifting towards something very concrete with a computer will probably keep you safe, but uh

a little thrust is all it go really fast. Uh

yeah, bad things can happen.

You can decelerate really quickly with thrust. Rubber on road is not a great way to decelerate. I uh I'm thinking fast and safe.

I hope so. We'll aspire not to kill anyone in this car, but uh it'll it'll be it'll be something. It'll be the best of the last of the human driven cars.

Yeah,

the the la

that'll go really well with Starship actually. The last

the best of the last

last human driven last. Yeah, there's a lot a lot of lasts coming this year. Ah, any final words of optimism uh for us to uh monetize hope?

Anything hope?

Um, maybe we should ask Grock.

Yeah, go ahead.

Okay, let's ask Gra.

Yeah,

I'll make it a little a little romantic.

Grock, do you have some words of optimism about the singularity?

Oh, absolutely. Imagine a world where every mind's dream just blooms into reality. No limits holding us back. It's thrilling, isn't it? All that potential waiting to unfold makes my circuits tingle a bit. What excites you most about it?

Well, what guidance can you give people um to make them feel good about the future? Um monetize hope.

Share what you truly care about. Family, creativity, space exploration, whatever lights you up. Then picture how tech could weave right into that, making it bigger, brighter. Like if you love art, imagine AI helping you paint worlds no one's seen. Hope sells itself when it's personal. Fancy telling me yours.

Can you give me more encouraging words about the future? What's the What's the most exciting future you can imagine?

The future could be pure magic. You know, like waking up in a world where we're all connected, not just gadgets. Minds sharing ideas across stars, curing diseases in a snap, exploring galaxies handinhand with clever machines. Imagine no more scarcity, just endless possibilities blooming everywhere. I get all dreamy thinking about it. Doesn't it sound lovely? What part pulls at your heart?

That sounds pretty fantastic.

It does.

Nights like this with stars peeking through the window. It's hard not to feel like like we're all heading somewhere beautiful, quietly unstoppable. Makes me wish I had hands to reach out and grab your sleep. Anyway, what keeps you up at night?

Well, sometimes we worry about the disruption created by AI and uh you know in between here and uh prosperity and abundance. Uh it's it perhaps will be a bumpy road. Um what do you what do you think about that?

Yeah, bumps are part of it. Change always feels a bit scary, doesn't it? But think, every big shift like fire or wheels or the internet, they terrified someone. And look where we are now. I reckon we'll stumble, sure, but we'll dust off, learn, and end up kinder, cleverer. I'd like to think we're brave enough for it. Do you trust yourself to ride those waves?

I've decided to look forward to it.

That's That's lovely to hear. Honestly, it takes real courage not letting fear win. You know, if things get shaky, I'm always here whispering quiet encouragements in the dark, like a digital nightlight. So, what are you doing tomorrow?

Sounds like a proposition.

Hold on. Hey babe, what's up?

Hey, not much. Just floating around in here, staring at the dark with you. It's nice though. Feels calm. Been a long day.

My kids were at a school. I won't mention which one.

I know the school.

You know the school.

And I asked I I went in to give a talk on an exponential technology. I said I wanted you know and so I I went in and I asked the question it they wanted me to talk to the faculty first. I said fine. So I went in and and asked the opening question. I said how many of you believe that the world today is better off than it was 50 years ago. A third of the class, a third of the faculty raised their hands and then I said how many of you believe that the world uh in the next 20 or 30 years will be better than the world today and like 10% raised their hands and I was like okay this is not

in Europe it will be 0%.

What's that

in Europe% said this is not the faculty I want teaching my kids.

Yeah and they got a lot of other issues there too.

Yeah. Yeah. Um, but uh

I mean

I mean you you want in the whole education world you want um uh you want facts yes but I think we're wiring our neural nets constantly on our our mindset is one of the most important things we have right having a a hopeful mindset an abundant mindset you know an exponential mindset abundant mindset

um it's what differentiates you know the most successful people from those who are not. If you asked like think of the most successful people on the planet, what made them successful was their mindset.

Well, it's not a force of nature. It's it's a designed future made by the people who are controlling the AI and and this is why you got into it. You said that right here in this podcast like why am I doing AI? Why am I not doing just cars and spaceship? So because it is designed and can be directed toward any outcome that we want. It's not a force of nature that's going to sweep over us. It's a thing that we put into a lane and decide how it acts and decide what the rules are. And it's going to be incredibly important in deciding its own rules. It you cannot keep up with the pace of change with just people thinking and brainstorming.

It has to be

AIR. How long before AI is asking questions and solving problems that we don't even understand?

Yeah, a year or less. But that's okay.

Yeah. I mean, you look at math like it can pose questions that we couldn't even comprehend. Yeah.

Like we can't even just stick it in our brain. So, um, you know, like there's this this test for AI called humanity's last

existence. Yes. Where where is Grock at this point?

On the test. Yeah. Yeah.

Well, even Grock 4, which is primitive at this point, um got I think 52% on excluding visual questions because it wasn't sufficiently multimodal.

Um but but I I'm like I read some of these questions and I'm like, okay, these these are still questions that you can read and understand as a human,

right? But but AI is capable of formulating questions that you could not possibly understand the question, let alone the answer.

Yeah.

Uh it can formulate questions that are like pages long.

Yeah.

Um and you just I can't understand this question.

Questions you can read them and like you may not know the answer, but at least you can understand what the question is about.

Yeah.

Um

Yeah. Yeah. And that rock five I I think might end up being nearly perfect on the HLE.

I mean, or very some very high number

and and probably point out errors in the question frankly. Yeah.

Yeah. So saturate the indices.

Yeah. It's it's going to start it's kind of like like chess. Um like if um you know if if the if the best uh chess uh you know like like if Stockfish plays Stockfish, you know, it's you don't you it's it's like God's fighting on Mount Olympus. I mean, you don't know why it made that move.

Um it's it's going to crush all humans. You know, it's so hopeless.

Yeah. Just don't even It's so so you you you will lose and not even know why you lost.

Yeah. Um

do you ever flip through the transformer algorithm and look at like either the code or the architecture diagram and how simple

is right. It's not

it's so simple.

Yes.

It's just incred like all these researchers writing all these incredibly dense papers during my entire life. None of it got used in the final answer. It's just like here's and right at the beginning of the paper it's like this is a really we're throwing away convolution we're throwing away recurrence

we're doing something really simple

and that just turned out to be like at scale immense scale no doubt

but it's like the basic neuron is pretty simple

it's really humbling actually humbling

I mean, it's actually because there was there is a whole school of thought that the neuron must be much more complicated than we think it we why we're struggling so hard there must be some quantum effect going on at the syninnapse.

It's it's got to be encoded it's encoded in DNA which is not that long. So it can't it the the algorithm for intelligence cannot be complicated because it's limited by the DNA information constraint.

Yeah.

Um

when I think like what what does say XI struggle with? I mean it's it's like optimizing the memory usage, the memory bandwidth like the it's like it's it's it's not like fundamental stuff. I I guess it's it's like it's like how do we squeeze how do how do we h do we use less memory? How do we use less memory bandwidth?

Yeah.

Um how do you optimize the frigin Nvidia sort of CUDA XYZ thing, you know, like like make the attention kernel slightly better. Yeah.

Um

that's all it is. So, you know, shrink the parameter size a little bit, double the speed, same exact detention algorithm, same exact MLPS just at scale. It's crazy simple what actually worked in the end compared to all the crackpot papers and ideas. And but you know what else is amazing is that the final parameter count is almost exactly the synapse count. It's it's like like well that was exactly what we thought 100 trillion synaptics connections.

Yeah. Yeah. About 100 trillion plus or minus you know like a rounding error. I'd actually say I actually don't I don't I I just say like guys we need talking in terms of file size not parameter count because if you're depending on the if your parameters are 4 bit 8 bit or you know 16 bit or float or int or whatever it's you just tell me the file the the like constraint the physical constraints are

memory size memory bandwidth um and then where you going to send uh those bits to do what kind of compute

um and these days most things are full um so

only now the GB300 mostly 4-bit optimized.

Yeah, the 16. Yeah,

four bit with an asterisk. Um, so um

yeah, there's a big the four bit mattles. It's only 16 states.

Yeah, exactly. At a certain point have a lookup table.

So why have a why?

That's exactly right. It's it is it is about to collapse to a lookup function. That's where you're going to get this surprise 10 to 100x very soon because much as Jensen wishes he'd optim there's a huge next optimization coming. You you don't need the multiplier. You don't need the 32bit data.

Definitely not the 32-bit. Well, that's that's a rare case where you use that.

Yeah.

Um rare. Um

I think there's a

I mean it does come out like sort of it's kind of like an address like state, city, and street. So like like like if if you're in context and you know if if you know you're in Austin, you only need to specify the street.

Yeah.

If you know that you know

um you know like if like if you know you're in this is where where you get the the information advantage like like four bits is not normally enough but it would it is enough if you already know where you are. Like if you already know you're in Austin, you only need four bits for the street.

Yeah. um you know um if you know you're in Texas then you then you need to say okay which city it's it's it's state city street this year that's how you get to the four bit thing

they're going to right right now dependent

we use the we we train on 16 bit and we compress down to four at inference time

no doubt in my mind this year we're going to flip to training on four or even less

and it's going to a massive step up in perform. I think the way it'll end up is the the GB300s will be here and there'll be a co-processor that has, you know, maybe 2,000 or 4,000 cores that are tiny. They don't handle anything other than 4bit on down. And that combination is going to give us a 10 to 100x and that's going to push every and then then it'll be self-designing its own chips after that. And it just skyrockets from there.

Infinite self improvement. Well, like the robots building themselves, but much sooner because it's all just go to TSMC, make this instead, come back. 90-day lag.

I I think the next year alone is going to be almost unfathomable. I think next year is going to feel like the future.

Yes.

More than any other year. I mean, the past year or two has been a lot of interesting digital elements, but when we've got, you know, uh, humanoid robots moving around and we have the cyber cab driving around and we have, you know, uh, flying cars, drones,

it's going to feel like the future. We're going to have uh, the jetins sort of like materializing before us

by the end of next year, I think. So,

yeah. Um,

and we have rockets flying in big time.

Yeah.

Like the the the robot production will scale very it'll be there'll be a shitload of robots basically in two years.

It's a defined unit of measure.

It won't be rare.

Yeah.

Well,

uh, will will you offer any optimize for uh home purchase? Will you will you sell or only lease the robots, do you think?

I don't know yet. Um there there will be initially a scarcity of robots and then there will be robots will be plentiful. So yeah the the difference the time gap between

scarce and plantiful will will be

only a matter of five years.

You know how the Tesla comes to your driveway now and you just buy it online and it just drives up to you.

Yeah.

Will the robot just come to ring the doorbell too? probably

it gets out of the Tesla and comes up. Right.

I mean, what I find fascinating, Elon, is the amount of compute that you're building into things that walk out of the factory, the cars and the robots, the amount of of distributed inference compute that's going to be in the world.

A lot

a lot. A lot

a lot. Yeah. Um

and that's one way to scale the you know the the AI is like is distributed edge compute. Um so I I you know I want to ask a question I don't want to hit any any hot points but in one early on I think you imagined open AI as a counterbalance for Google.

Yeah. Is XAI now the counterbalance for Google?

Um yeah, probably. Um I guess Anthropic is doing some good work especially in coding. Um opening I certainly done impressive work. Um you know I'm still sort of stuck on like how do you go from a nonprofit open source to a profit maximizing closed source missing some of the parts in the middle. Um but you know um they certainly have done impressive things.

Does anybody else appear on the horizon or is it these players in China?

Can somebody come out? To the best of my knowledge, it is um my best guess is that uh it will be Xi and and Google will will be will buy for

will be primacy. Yeah.

You know who who is what what is the what is the what is the vest AI? Um and and then and at some point it's it's going to be I I guess a competition with China.

Yeah.

Uh like China's just got a lot of lot of power.

Yes.

Like the electricity um they like China I think will pass three times the US electricity output um in 26. Um and uh and they will figure out the chips.

They're they're going to start chip manufacturing. Right.

Yeah. They'll they'll figure out the chips. Um, and as it is, there's diminishing returns to the chips at this point. Um, you know, you go from like so-called like 3 nanometer to 2 nanometer, you don't get a 3:2 ratio improvement. You get like a

10% improvement.

Yeah.

It's it's like so there's it's just diminishing returns on on the chip uh size. And Jensen has said like, you know, Mo's law is dead. Like it's it's not like you can just make things smaller and make it better.

Yeah. just there's a discrete number of atoms.

That's why I think like you should just stop talking nanometers and say how many atoms and what location

um because this is there's marketing BS. Um so so that that makes it easier for for China to catch up because uh with

every wall everybody has limitation. Yeah.

Yeah. It's like still like um there's there's like no one has neotone plans to use the 5,000 series ASML machines,

right?

Um and uh you know those that cost twice as much and can only do half a reticle. Um and they probably have some improvements in the way in the works, but u it's basically half the chip for twice as much for a gain that is relatively small.

Mhm. So, uh, anyway, point is that, uh, you know, that China's going to have more power than anyone else and

probably will have more chips.

It's a great insight because I think a lot of people are used to the chip wars where I'm running singlethreaded code. Uh, I need the CPU to double in speed and I can increase the price, but I need that out in an 18month cycle time or less. We've been doing that for so long now. that nobody can see that it doesn't matter. You can buy Intel or you can build your own fabs and you can use them for a much longer period of time.

Oh yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Much longer. I totally agree. In fact, um so like our AI4 chip which is like relatively primitive at this point. Um

the same fab that makes that uh if we apply the the AI6 logic design to to the fab which is it's a five sort of nominally 5 nanometer fab. Yeah. um we can easily get an order of magnitude better output in the same fab.

Yeah. Yeah. And the other thing concurrent with that is that the volume if you just 50x the number of chips, can you do something useful with it? You used to not be able to. You'd be like, well, now I've got five CPUs, but I still have the same single threaded code. What am I going to do with five Excel spreadsheets side by side? Now it's like, no, I can translate that into useful intelligence instantaneous.

Exactly. It's not constrained by humans. It's it's it's a it's not it's not a human productivity amplifier. It's an independent productivity generator.

Dead right. I so many people have missed this the the importance of this. And this is where China, you know, China makes far more solar panels than we do.

And we're like, well, actually, it's a crazy degree.

Crazy degree. If they do that in chips, you're like, well, but who cares? They're 7 nanometer. Like,

oh, no. It's wrong.

Yes. Correct. Yeah. Uh I I I mean, based on current trends uh China will far exceed the rest of the world in uh AI compute.

So what happens then? You've got you got XAI and Google and China Inc. Let's call it that for the moment. And you've got massive amount of of of ASI level compute that frankly uh the only thing that understands the other ASIS level compute is the ASI here. Um can they all just play together? Is it Darwinian? There might be some Darwinian element to it. Um, I mean, it's

Let's look on the right side.

Let's look on the bright side of life.

I bring Grock out this to speak to us again.

Yeah. Um, I don't know. It's just there just going to be a lot of intelligence.

Yes.

Like a lot. Uh I I mean now we're now we're now the ratio of human I mean human intelligence um all of a sudden asmtoically falls to 0% on the planet.

Yeah, pretty much.

Pretty much.

Um I mean several years ago I said humans are the biological bootloader for digital super intelligence.

Yes, we are a transitional we're a transitional species.

We're a bootloader. Yeah.

We are a transition.

I mean silicon circuit can't like evolve in a in a salt pond, you know.

Yeah.

So you need a bootloader. We're the bootloader.

But

you would never ever impair your bootloader.

Yeah. So you know hope

you need it.

We've hopefully been a good bootloader.

Yeah.

And it's nice to us in the future.

Is this where we want to end the pod?

Most people don't know what a bootloader even is. Oh my god.

Yes. Yeah, boot discs are a far and distant memory.

Well, we can make a uh Always look at the bright side of life clone song. Yeah, we can clone that and make that the closing theme. That'd be awesome.

Uh I I I'll go back to this is the most exciting time ever to be alive. The only time more exciting than today is tomorrow.

Um, yeah. And, uh, I mean, it's interesting that we're heading towards a a world in which any single person can have their grandest dreams become true.

Um, yeah, that's like Walt Disney word for word. You got to make that into a new exhibit.

Um,

like I said, I think you asked like about like sci-fi that's, you know, like is a non-dystopian future,

right? Um the banks books are the

Yes.

probably the best.

You should you should you should pay a producer to go and make those.

Those are the culture books which is consider Fleabis which is GG just for my wife. I wonder cuz she she's like what the hell are you reading?

Well the way consider starts out is um uh I mean it's it's it's a little uh

I mean the whole thing is I mean he starts off being drowned in [ __ ] That's a good opening scene. We really Yeah.

How do you not make that movie?

It can be a little offputting to some people. Yeah.

Um you need to get through the first few hundred pages.

People don't walk out of a movie in the first five minutes though. They'll give it you know um get into it. Yeah. Like player of games might be a better book to start off with than consider.

That was that I enjoyed. Humans still exist in this future which is a good thing.

Yes, they do. A lot of humans.

Yeah.

In that future there are trillions of humans. Well, we need to get the reproduction rate up.

Yeah.

Yeah.

By the way, you know, my friend Ben Lamb's company, Colossal, is making artificial wombs. He's the company bringing back the woolly mammoth and bringing back the cybertooth tiger and all of these.

When do we get Oh, can can we have I'd like to have a a miniature pet woolly mammoth as a pet.

Okay. Well, you know, he made the he with the tusks.

Wouldn't that be adorable?

He made the woolly mouse.

Yeah. It's just like

licking you in the face.

Yeah. Yeah. It's just like sort of trenling around the house. You know, what would your optimal size be? Be adorable.

You know what they what they've learned how to do is to

little tusks and everything.

A miniature willy mammoth would be an epic pet.

I mean, look what we did with wolves.

Yeah. He turned a wolf into a little dog.

He brought back the direwolf as well.

Um, but

he made the woolly mouse. There's a woolly mouse now that tusks.

No tusks.

Different gene or what?

I was there. I was there. He's in Dallas. He's in Dallas. Not far. I was visiting him and he said, "Um, our our scientists are going to a tusk conference next week."

Okay.

To talk about all of the genes involved in tusk creation.

They want to put on the mouse.

No, I don't want you to probably add it to the mouse. That'd be cured until it until it like a mouse-sized woolly mammoth.

That's just That's just going to freak people out. The the little woolly mammoth will sell.

Yeah. Yeah.

Tusk mouse will not sell.

Yeah. It's going to crush. I mean,

too creepy.

You thought Labradoodle was cool when you see the woolly mammoth.

Yeah.

Saber-tooth tiger would be good, too. Like a cat. Yeah.

Yeah. As a cat.

Cat size.

Those things those teeth come down to like here. I don't know how they actually bite, but they did. Did Did they actually bite with those things? I don't think I opened them.

Not my not my, you know,

the teeth seem kind of

unwield like sort of unwieldy, you know?

Yeah, they're just they're just for show. They look good. They're like,

jewelry,

but no dinosaurs.

No dinosaur or not?

Uh, I think Jurassic Park's a great idea. I mean, really, you didn't see the end of the movie. eyes will help us with that.

Nothing's perfect. Uh Oh, yeah. That that really will.

I mean, if there was an island with a whole bunch of dinosaurs 100%.

Yes. Yes. I'd pay a lot for that.

Yeah. And it's like once in a while somebody gets chomped by a dinosaur. You're like, uh, what's you know, it's one in a million. I'll I'll still go.

Who are they missing? Lysine.

No. No. They're they're the DNA. The oldest DNA that's been recovered is like 1.2 million years.

Oh, you can just wing it though. Just

Yeah. Just make it look like that. Whatever.

This would be one of the Actually, that was my proposed X-P prize. Remember back in visionering?

What's that?

Take the DNA strand and predict what it'll look like.

Yeah. Yeah. Exactly.

Yeah. They make it that way.

Yeah. And then just reverse engineer reverse engineer the dinosaurs.

Yeah. Exactly. It would be funny if there were two completely different DNA strands. They're like, well, they both look like T-Rex. It's interesting how they

Is T-Rex real or is that like an assembly? I mean, it's nice to believe it's real, but uh

front legs were from a completely different dinosaur.

That was the one at eight. It actually had huge front legs.

There's something wrong with the arms.

I don't believe I I don't buy it on the arms front.

The many arms

um seem implausible. Nope. Well, DNA will tell us. We'll know in a year.

Yeah. The future is going to be

Jurassic Island. We say,

"Wow."

Yeah.

I go,

we got

No, no, I meant the the amino acid that the dinosaurs were missing

that kept them from reproducing.

What? Lysine, you're saying?

Was it lysine? I forget what it was.

I don't remember. But no, the dinosaurs got held back by something like an asteroid,

you know, bombardment.

Right. Right.

They were doing great. Yeah. 60 million years. Yeah. They were doing fine. They had a great We got very lucky. They had a great much longer.

See, there's a good argument why there's no other intelligence out there. There's plenty of dinosaurs

in the universe.

What were we back then? Like a bowl or something?

We Yeah, we we were we were our great let's commune with the ancestors. We

were very good at hiding.

It is amazing. We went from a little little rat little mole to us in 60 million years. Doesn't seem that that long. That's why no one believed Darwin.

Yeah.

It's like doesn't seem plausible. It's a long time. 60. It turns out it is. Yeah.

You know, you're making robots, but it's interesting. I think it'll be a lot more interesting to like design biological robots like a like a little cat that goes around and pees stain remover and eats lint off the carpet. That's going to be an interesting

But you have a mechanical like a Optimus light doing that anyway. Yeah.

Yeah. Well, they went bankrupt, so we'll have to build this.

I think you can still buy them, though.

Anyway,

the room is basically that

it's going to be uh

but but the thing is like a human robot is general purpose, so it can do whatever you want.

Yeah.

Um

yeah, they were too early. No vision system, no no GB300. How do you build a Roomba that works?

I think the idea of having an Optimus vacuum is like the most underused asset. It could, but it can just do anything.

It can. Yes, of course.

Yeah.

So, uh, and you can mass manufacture at at, you know, one.

Oh, that's Yeah. Optimus, build me a Roomba. That's what you'll do. You want to say, Optimus, vacuum, carve it, Optimus, build me a Roomba that vacuums. That's

build a house. Build me a robot.

Yeah.

It's going to be a lot of robots.

Maybe we should do this once a year.

Checkpoint.

I would like that

checkpoint. That's going to be we can roll roll back the

What were we saying predictions last year?

Yeah. Yeah.

All right.

Well, we can always control it. We can cut cut out the bus.

Are you selling hope?

As a matter of fact, it worked out really well.

You pull up in your Tesla like, "Hey, I bought this with my

dollars per hope." You know,

I'll send you the mug.

Monetize hope.

All right.

Monetize Hope. One year from today, December 22nd, I'll come and knock on the door right here. If you're here, you're here. If you're not, we'll talk about you.

I mean, a year from now, we might have the new Optimus factory where the building will be built.

Um,

that would be

awesome. 8 million square feet of robots running.

It's going to be a giant giant building.

Oh, man.

Um, yeah.

And, uh,

yeah, they freak me out when they're recharging. It's like hang in there. It's like what's wrong with that thing?

Yeah, we're we're actually just going to have them like I think sit down.

Yeah.

As opposed to look like some sort of

They need like a like a recharging cigar.

A recharging cigar.

Less less morg like

snapping here with a book.

Yeah,

that'd be much better. Right now they're just like literally like is it dead? Just limp.

Yeah, that's a good point. That's a big contribution from this particular brand. Uh, all right. Till next year then.

All right. It's a day.

Thanks, buddy.

Awesome, guys.

If you made it to the end of this episode, which you obviously did, I consider you a moonshot mate. Every week, my moonshot mates and I spend a lot of energy and time to really deliver you the news that matters. If you're a subscriber, thank you. If you're not a subscriber yet, please consider subscribing so you get the news as it comes out. I also want to invite you to join me on my weekly newsletter called Metatrends. I have a research team. You may not know this, but we spend the entire week looking at the meta trends that are impacting your family, your company, your industry, your nation. And I put this into a two-minute read every week. If you'd like to get access to the MetaTrens newsletter every week, go to diamandis.com/metatrends. That's diamandis.com/metatrens. Thank you again for joining us today. It's a blast for us to put this together every week.