Transcription
Hello everyone. Welcome to a special Saturday wrap-up, joined with Barbara Boyd. We're going to be doing the show live today. Uh, we have a discussion planned for you about the deep state now collapsing. They've showed their plan in the Munich Security Conference. It's still going on.
So, to, to do a little bit of setup here, I'm just going to go over a quick thing about what's going on with Munich Security Conference. So, this is actually the 62nd edition. This is the world's largest annual gathering of the intern of the "quote unquote international security policy." I'm going to, I'm going to, whoops. [cough] Yes, [clears throat] I'm going to pull up the website right now.
So, this is the website for the M Munich Security Conference. And you can see that the title of the security conference is "under destruction." Okay. And this is going on till the, the, the, uh, until the 15th. So, this year is the theme is "under destructing," reflecting concerns about the erosion of the rules-based international order. Major topics include European security and defense, transatlantic relationship, and the Ukraine Russian war and multi-ateralism. Okay, which is another name for globalization.
So, the Munich Security Conference is going on right now with globalization. But this is where Barber's angle comes in. You have a bunch of Democrats that are attending this security conference. So, some of the big Democrats that are attending are Senator Sheldon White House. And Barbara's going to go into this in just a moment, in a little bit. We have senators White House and Wicker. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi is going to be there. So is Hillary Clinton. AOC is there. Gavin Newsome is there. Gretchen Whitmer is at the, is at this conference. We're going to play some of their speeches for you. And Senator Ruben Galligo is also reported as going.
So, there are no Republicans. I believe the only Republicans that went to this is Secretary of State Marco Rubio. We're going to be playing Marco.
>> Adam, Adam, Adam, Adam. There, there are Republicans from the Senate. All right. The House didn't go. And there are people in the Senate who I'm going to really royally roast, uh, in my discussion here.
>> Okay. Thank you for the correction. So, there are some Republican senators that are going. Uh, Secretary of State Marco Rubio is there. So is, uh, UN Ambassador Mike Walls, is also going to be there.
So, as people are coming in, I'm going to play the, the, the actual, they made an intro, like a teaser video for, for the show today. So, I'm going to go ahead and play the teaser video so you can get a sense of the flavor that they wanted people to feel when they came into this thing.
Heat. Heat. [music] [applause] [music] Very [music] [music]
Okay, so I'm now looking at the chat. Thank you, everyone. Uh, we already have somebody that said, "AOC made a fool of herself." We're going to be, we have, we have a few, we have a minute of it lined up. We agree. Uh, thank you, everyone. Ruben Cruz, thank you for joining us. Thank you, everyone. Jennifer Johnson, thank you for reposting us on x.com.
>> Yes. Okay. So, um, Barbara, I'm going to open it up. I'm going to open the floor up to you. Um, so, yeah, what, what, what, what's motivated the show today?
>> Well, it's really simple. When I started watching this thing yesterday, just so people know, this, what, what you might call this thing is the Davos of the Deep State. In other words, this is where they all get together, or used to before Trump, and plan out how they're going to deal with their enemies, um, every single year. All right?
And right now, they're all Europe, as you may know, is all in a complete kathuffle because Donald Trump has called them out on several levels. And last year at Munich, JD Vance gave a rip-roaring speech in which he held up the mirror to the Europeans and said to them, "You are destroying Western civilization through your open borders policies, your censorship policies, and your surveillance policies." And that just set them off because in reality, it was true.
But what was really upsetting to me last night as I was looking at this is these damn 12 Democrats and errant Republicans who went there and directly criticized the president of the United States on foreign soil to foreigners. Now, people know that is just not done. I just got really, really, really angry.
Just listen to this some of this crap coming from, uh, you know, some of the centers senators that, that are there. Tom Tillis, who you may know, has been really holding up Trump's entire program. He says, uh, that basically tariffs are bad policy, and he quotes, you know, basically, "I'm not really after Trump. I'm after the people who convinced him that this is the right way to move forward."
Roger Wicker of the Senate Armed Services Committee appeared with Sullinski and wants to continue the war and says, "What we need is to unleash the tomahawks and send that message to Congress."
Then we have Sheldon White House, the draft dodger. And he says, "Trump has submitted totally to Putin's murderous regime, and he's enriching himself off his foreign policy and degrading America's stand in the world."
You know, Richard Blumenthal, same thing: "At this critical moment of our national defense, I'm eager to talk to you guys in Europe because President Trump is dead wrong."
Chris Coons, Biden's buddy, he says, uh, basically, "We're going to be meeting with the heads of state of Europe and reassuring them that Trump is not the big deal, that basically most Americans actually disagree with him."
That should never have happened. And it only happened because we're in an election inferno here in the United States where the war is on to actually convince you, which is what they're trying to do, that Donald Trump has sold out to the billionaires. That's what all this cy has been about. And you, you have people literally who think they're free to go to Europe and join with a bunch of oligarchs to criticize the sitting American president. That just really ticked me off.
Um, but I was saved this morning, and we're going to take a look at it, by actually looking at Senator, at, at ex-Senator and President Secretary of State Marco Rubio's speech to these Europeans. And it's a real organizing speech. It's really taking them through why Trump is actually doing what he's doing in the best way possible. So, let's get going on this. First, I want to look at crazy Gavin Newsome.
Adam, you know, here he is essentially asserting that California is not part of the union of the United States and saying that it has a separate climate policy from the United States. As you probably know, Trump just ended the climate regime. And here's what he says about Donald Trump.
>> Okay, I think I have this queued up to the right spot. Uh, let me make sure the volume's up good, too. Okay. I hope if there's nothing else I can communicate today, Donald Trump is temporary. He'll be gone in three years. California is a stable and reliable partner in this space. And it's important for folks to understand the temporary nature of this current administration in relationship to the issue of climate change and climate policy. But—
>> Governor, many have called—
>> That's it. [applause]
>> That's it. Many have called.
>> We're separate. We're not part of, of the union here. We're California.
>> All right. And then let's go on and, and, and take a look at AOC. Uh, just briefly, also happens to be the Republican majority. But really what we are seeing over the last eight years, I think, has been a growing recognition that of those past errors that go back, that include military interventionism in the Iraq war, that include a recognition of NAFTA as a failed policy for many rural and working-class communities. And now I think we are moving in this direction of increased recognition that we have to have a working-class centered politics if we are going to succeed, and also if we are going to stave off the scourges of authoritarianism, which also provides political sirens, political siren calls to allure people into finding scapegoats to blame, uh, for rising economic inequality, both domestically and globally.
>> Okay.
>> The reason why we'll stop. The reason why I'm playing that is because a lot of the ways the media has built this is potential presidential candidates, uh, for 2028, doing a cattle show before the world's oligarchy as to, uh, what's going on, uh, in the United States. That's not really what's happening here. What's happening here is the people who've been running the coup d'eta against our country, uh, for 10 years, are getting together and planning out the next steps against Trump.
Now, why I had AOC come on is not because I think she's really a viable presidential candidate, but she just gave you essentially what the Democrats are about to do. What she's saying to the de this entire oligarchical crowd is, "You admit in your pamphlet that you actually put out for this conference that your populations absolutely abhore you. They hate you." And the reason why Donald Trump won, which she goes through when she names all of those points, is because he promised to deliver for the working class of the country. That is, in fact, what he's doing, but you'd never know it from the censorship in the media.
And what she says is that you can have your oligarchy if you can figure out a way to pretend that you're delivering to the working class and the middle classes on in the same way that Biden was. And not only that, you can, you can pretend to do that if you can convince the Trump base that Trump is controlled by the billionaires who the working class thought they elected to fight. And that's what's been going on on social media. That's what's been going on in the entire trashing, uh, in social media of the president and everything else from people who claim to be, uh, in his base.
So, I was really quite thoroughly upset about all of this. I thought she was really being an effective signaler of what is the Democratic Party strategy at this point in time. And that's the only reason why I put her on there.
So, um, then we essentially have the salvation in all of this, the dynamite speech by Secretary Rubio. And he took, you know, Donald Trump says Rubio is a little bit more diplomatic than Vance. I think he's a little bit more of a poet than JD, uh, from this speech, but I'll let you judge by we'll go through it and actually listen to what Secretary Rubio said. Give me a second here. Pull this up. 2649. Okay.
Prevailed, and a continent was rebuilt. Our people prospered in time. The East and West blocks were reunited. A civilization was once again made whole. That infamous wall that had cleaved this nation into two came down, and with it an evil empire, and the East and West became one again. But the euphoria of this triumph led us to a dangerous delusion that we had entered, quote, "the end of history." That every nation would now be a liberal democracy. That the ties formed by trade and by commerce alone would now replace nationhood. That the rules-based global order, an overused term, would now replace the national interest. And that we would now live in a world without borders where everyone became a citizen of the world. This was a foolish idea that ignored both human nature.
He's essentially pointing to the period, the start of the period we're all now living through, the fall of the Berlin Wall and what happened after the end of the Cold War, so-called, between the Soviet Union, uh, and the rest of the world. A British manipulated cold war, by the way. But what he's talking about is that what they, what they strive to do at that point is they set up this illusion of one world government. This is what came out of, uh, the reunification of East and West Germany. Then you had the creation of the, the full creation of the current EU, which is a City of London satropy in essence. All right. And, and was actually set up as the center of the global empire. And that's what he's talking about. This is the beginning of what we've all been living through, uh, right now in the present nature. And it ignored the lessons of over 5,000 years of recorded human history. And it has cost us dearly.
In this delusion, we embraced a dogmatic vision of free and unfettered trade. Even as some nations protected their economies and subsidized their cuh companies to systematically undercut ours, shuttering our plants, was resulting in large parts of our societies being de-industrialized, shipping millions of working and middle-class jobs overseas, and handing control of our critical supply chains to both adversaries and rivals. We increas—
What he's describing there is everything that happened in the Bush and Clinton administrations, that what, what we all know, uh, essentially as the great job drain out in the United States into a China and other locations, uh, where we essentially de-industrialized and there was nowhere really, uh, for the working class to— Oh, except in a crazy gig economy.
>> Outsourced our sovereignty to international institutions while many nations invested in massive welfare states at the cost of maintaining the ability to defend themselves. This, even as other countries have invested in the most rapid military buildup in all of human history and have not hesitated to use hard power to pursue their own interests. To appease a climate cult, we have imposed energy policies on ourselves that are impoverishing our people. Even as our competitors exploit oil and coal and natural gas and anything else, not just to power their economies, but to use as leverage against our own. And in a pursuit of a world without borders, we opened our doors to an unprecedented wave of mass migration that threatens the cohesion of our societies, the continuity of our culture, and the future of our people. We made these mistakes together. And now together, we owe it to our people to face those facts and to move forward to rebuild. Under President Trump, the United States of America will once again take on the task of renewal and restoration, driven by a vision of a future as proud, as sovereign, and as vital as our civilization's past. And while we are prepared, if necessary, to do this alone, it is our preference, and it is our hope to do this together with you, our friends here in Europe.
He's challenging them on the most fundamental aspects of their entire ideology and identity at this point, uh, and that's what you just heard.
For the United States and Europe, we belong together. America was founded 250 years ago, but the roots began here on this continent long before. The men who settled and built the nation of my birth arrived on our shores carrying the memories and the traditions and the Christian faith of their ancestors as a sacred inheritance, an unbreakable link between the old world and the new. We are part of one civilization, Western civilization. We are bound to one another by the deepest bonds that nations could share. Forged by centuries of shared history, Christian faith, culture, heritage, language, ancestry, and the sacrifices our forefathers made together for the common civilization to which we have fallen heir.
And so, this is why we Americans may sometimes come off as, uh, a little direct and urgent in our council. This is why President Trump demands seriousness and reciprocity from our friends here in Europe. The reason why, my friends, is because we care deeply. We care deeply about your future and ours. And if at times we disagree, our disagreements come from our profound sense of concern about a Europe with which we are connected not just economically, not just militarily; we are connected spiritually and we are connected culturally. We want Europe to be strong. We believe that Europe must survive because the two great wars of the last century serve for us as history's constant reminder that ultimately our destiny is and will always be intertwined with yours.
What he, what he means right there, is, is the great thing which does unite us, which is a common history and a common civilization, which Europe has largely abandoned as of 1989, 1990, and our country did too prior to President Trump.
>> Because we— Oh, [applause] because we know that the fate of Europe will never be irrelevant to our own. National security, which this conference is largely about, is not merely a series of technical questions: how much we spend on defense or where, how we deploy it. These are important questions. They are, but they are not the fundamental one. The fundamental question we must answer at the outset is what exactly are we defending? Because armies do not fight for abstractions. Armies fight for a people. Armies fight for a nation. Armies fight for a way of life. And that is what we are defending: a great civilization that has every reason to be proud of its history, confident of its future, and aims to always be the master of its own economic and political destiny.
>> Think about that.
>> Think about what he just said, all right? Which is that you can't talk about going to war, which we've done repeatedly, uh, since 1989, without knowing what you're fighting for. It's not democracy. You never go to war to fight to make another nation conform its culture to your own. What he's saying is, if you go to war, you only go to war to defend something fundamental: something which is a culture of a nation, something which is a nation-state. And that's what Europe, in its present globalist form, has largely lost. While he's being very gentle with them, he is really kicking them, uh, in the hide.
>> Where the ideas that planted the seeds of liberty that changed the world were born. It was here in Europe where the world, which gave the world the rule of law, the universities, and the scientific revolution. It was this continent that produced the genius of Mosart and Beethovven, of Dante and Shakespeare, of Michelangelo and Da Vinci, of The Beatles and The Rolling Stones. And this is the place where the vated ceilings of the Systeine Chapel and the towering spires of the great cathedral in Cologne. They testify not just to the greatness of our past or to a faith in God that inspired these marvels; they foreshadow the wonders that await us in our future. But only if we are unapologetic in our heritage and proud of this common inheritance can we together begin the work of envisioning and shaping our economic and our political future.
De-industrialization was not inevitable. It was a conscious policy choice, a decadesl long economic undertaking that stripped our nations of their wealth, of their productive capacity, and of their independence. And the loss of our supply chain sovereignty was not a function of a prosperous and healthy system of global trade. It was foolish. It was a foolish but voluntary transformation of our economy that left us dependent on others for our needs and dangerously vulnerable to crisis. Mass is not, was not, is some fringe concern of little consequence. It was and continues to be a crisis which is transforming and destabilizing societies all across the West.
Together, we can re-industrialize our economies and rebuild our capacity to defend our people. But the work of this new alliance should not be focused just on military cooperation and reclaiming the industries of the past. It should also be focused on together advancing our mutual interest in new frontiers.
Just want to give, give a quick recap. I see a lot of confusion in chat. We're trying a new format for our, our political updates. Today we decided to try a live format. So, I'm here with Barbara live, and we are reviewing and watching Secretary of State's Rubio's speech at the Munich Security Conference because a bunch of Democrats showed up there and were literally trash-talking President Trump, which is what we started off with. But now we're getting into Rubio's speech, which really gets to the heart of what the Trump administration's trying to do. Barbara, do you have any comments so far in, and what we've seen with Rubio?
>> He is. Well, it seems like he's being very nice to these guys, and not like JD really, you know, out front, "You're a bunch of jerks." Um, you know, he is going at the most fundamental questions which deal with why do we have states? What are governments really all about? And if you're going to have an alliance with people, what is it actually based on? And right now, our alliance with Europe is not based on any common shared understanding anymore. You've got people who are saying, for example, that the United States is built on stolen land; that, you know, basically, we are, you know, white people, white Caucasian Christians, are essentially the people who ruined everything. Uh, that is more than prevalent in Europe. Um, and, you know, he's really going straight up after all that stuff. So, I think when you hear, uh, towards the end of this speech, what he actually says about the next generation, you're going to see how profound the speech actually, unshackling our ingenuity, our creativity, and the dynamic spirit to build a new Western century.
Commercial space travel and cutting-edge artificial intelligence, industrial automation and flex manufacturing, creating a Western supply chain for critical minerals not vulnerable to extortion from other powers, and a unified effort to compete for market share in the economies of the global south. Together, we cannot only take back control of our own industries and supply chains. We can prosper in the areas that will define the 21st century. But we must also gain control of our national borders. Controlling who and how many people enter our countries. This is not an expression of xenophobia. It is not hate. It is a fundamental act of national sovereignty. And the failure to do so is not just an abdication of one of our most basic duties owed to our people. It is an urgent threat to the fabric of our societies and the survival of our civilization itself. Boom.
>> And finally, we can no longer place the so-called global order above the—
>> Did you want to say something? Sorry about that.
>> I said, "Boom to that!" All right. I mean, just think about all the crap which we're seeing in Minneapolis and all the ideology being strung about, about that. He just demolished that argument. The vital interests of our people and our just an abdication of one of our most basic duties owed to our people. It is an urgent threat to the fabric of our societies and the survival of our civilization itself. And finally, we can no longer place the so-called global order above the vital interests of our people and our nations. We do not need to abandon the system of international cooperation we authored, and we don't need to dismantle the global institutions of the old order that together we built. But these must be reformed. These must be rebuilt.
For example, the United Nations still has tremendous potential to be a tool for good in the world. But we cannot ignore that today, on the most pressing matters before us, it has no answers and has played virtually no role. It could not solve the war in Gaza. Instead, it was American leadership that freed captives from barbarians and brought about a fragile truce. It has not solved the war in Ukraine. It took American leadership in partnership with many of the countries here today just to bring the two sides to the table in search of a still elusive peace. It was powerless to constrain the nuclear program of radical Shia clerics in Thran. That required 14 bombs dropped with precision from American B2 bombers. And it was unable to address the threat to our security from a narot terrorist dictator in Venezuela. Instead, it took American special forces to bring this fugitive to justice.
In a perfect world, all of these problems and more would be solved by diplomats and strongly worded resolutions. But we do not live in a perfect world. And we cannot continue to allow those who blatantly and openly threaten our citizens and endanger our global stability to shield themselves behind abstractions of international law, which they themselves routinely violate. This is the path that President Trump and the United States has embarked upon. It is the path, path we ask you here in Europe to join us on. It is a path we have walked together before and hope to walk together again.
For five centuries before the end of the Second World War, the West had been expanding: its missionaries, its pilgrims, its soldiers, its explorers pouring out from its shores to cross oceans, settle new continents, build vast empires extending out across the globe. But in 1945, for the first time since the age of Columbus, it was contracting. Europe was in ruins. Half of it lived behind an iron curtain, and the rest looked like it would soon follow. The great Western empires had entered into terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and by anti-colonial uprisings that would transform the world and drape the red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map in the years to come.
Against that backdrop, then as now, many came to believe that the West's age of dominance had come to an end, and that our future was destined to be a faint and feeble echo of our past. But together, our predecessors recognized that decline was a choice, and it was a choice they refused to make. This is what we did together once before, and this is what President Trump and the United States want to do again now, together with you.
And this is why we do not want our allies to be weak, because that makes us weaker. We want allies who can defend themselves so that no adversary will ever be tempted to test our collective strength. This is why we do not want our allies to be shackled by guilt and shame. We want allies who are proud of their culture and of their heritage, who understand that we are heirs to the same great and noble civilization, and who together with us are willing and able to defend it. And this is why we do not want allies to rationalize the broken status quo rather than reckon with what is, what was, what is necessary to fix it. For we in America have no interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West's managed decline.
>> We do not seek to separate.
>> Again, Adam, I mean, what, what, what he basically said there just drives a stake, uh, through the heart of everything that first document you saw there is talking about. What they said is what he just said in terms of nation-states, in terms of national cultures: that's the enemy. That was the initial document being put out by the Munich Security Conference about what they wanted to do at this conference and what their main theme was. They called Trump a wrecking ball against the rules-based order and really called for its revival. Rubio here is saying, "Screw that. We ain't doing it." Okay. Not only that, they took the one guy in Europe who is actually defending Western civilization and western culture, Victor Orban, and made him an enemy in Hungary, uh, in that particular report, saying he's just like Trump. Not only that, they said in essence that the United States, uh, under Trump, uh, is more authoritarian than either Russia or China. So, you see what Rubio is doing here is he's actually putting torpedoes into every single one of those arguments and blowing them up.
>> Thank you. I'd like to take a quick detour here to give a quick shout-out. Thank you, David, for joining us. He says, "Barbara knows where all the money's gone. The EU is crumbling and they're trying to pretend they're winning. More tariffs to split the EU, please." Thank you, Dave, for joining us on this little. Thank you, David, for joining us on this little test today. And also a big shout-out to Doggo. Thank you for joining us for this little test. Marco Rubio speech of peace, history, culture, and alliances. Kier Starmer spoke of getting toolled up for fighting, says it all.
>> Yeah, they basically decided that they wanted to go it alone. That hasn't worked out so well for them. But what the Brits are saying, "Hey, the way you do that is by gigantic defense spending and preparing for a war with Russia," uh, which the EU should be undertaking. In fact, prior to this conference, they were even talking about a separate independent nuclear shield for Europe between France and Britain. Pretty scary concept.
>> But to revitalize an old friendship and renew the greatest civilization in human history. What we want is a reinvigorated alliance that recognizes that what has ailed our societies is not just a set of bad policies, but a malaise of hopelessness and complacency. An alliance is what the alliance that we want is one that is not paralyzed into inaction by fear: fear of climate change, fear of war, fear of technology. Instead, we want an alliance that boldly races into the future. And the only fear we have is the fear of the shame of not leaving our nations prouder, stronger, and wealthier for our children. An alliance ready to defend our people, to safeguard our interests, and to preserve the freedom of action that allows us to shape our own destiny, not one that exists to operate a global welfare state and atone for the purported sins of past generations. An alliance that does not allow its power to be outsourced, constrained, or subordinated to systems beyond its control. One that does not depend on others for the critical necessities of its national life, and one that does not maintain the polite pretense that our way of life is just one among many and that ask for permission before it acts. And above all, an alliance based on the recognition that we, the West, have inherited together, what we have inherited together is something that is unique and distinctive and irreplaceable. Because this, after all, is the very foundation of the transatlantic bond. Acting together in this way, we will not just help recover a sane foreign policy. It will restore to us a clearer sense of ourselves. It will restore a place in the world. And in so doing, it will rebuke and deter the forces of civilizational erasure that today benis menace both America and Europe alike. So, in a time of headlines heralding the end of the transatlantic era, let it be known and clear to all that this is neither our goal nor our wish. Because for us Americans, our home may be in the Western Hemisphere, but we will always be a child of Europe. [applause]
Our story began with an Italian explorer whose adventure into the great unknown to discover a new world brought Christianity to the Americas and became the legend that defined the imagination of our pioneer nation. Our first colonies were built by English settlers to whom we owe not just the language we speak, but the whole of our political and legal system. Our frontiers were shaped by ScotsIrish, that proud, hearty clan from the hills of Olter that gave us Davy Crockett and Mark Twain and Teddy Roosevelt and Neil Armstrong. Our great Midwestern heartland was built by German farmers and craftsmen who transformed empty planes into a global agricultural powerhouse and, by the way, dramatically upgraded the quality of American beer. Our expansion into the interior followed the footsteps of French fur traders and explorers whose names, by the way, still adorn the street signs and towns names all across the Mississippi Valley. Our horses, our ranches, our rodeos, the, the entire romance of the cowboy archetype that became synonymous with the American West. These were born in Spain. And our largest and most iconic city was named New Amsterdam before it was named New York.
And you know that in the year that my country was founded, Lorenzo and Catalina Geraldi lived in Casau Montarato in the kingdom of Pedmont, Sardinia, and Jose and Manuel Arena lived in Sevilla, Spain. I don't know what, if anything, they knew about the, uh, 13 colonies which had gained their independence from the, from the British Empire. But here's what I'm certain of: they could have never imagined that 250 years later, one of their direct descendants would be back here today on this continent as the chief diplomat of that infant nation. And yet here I am, reminded by my own story that both our histories and our fates will always be linked.
Together, we rebuilt the shattered continent in the wake of two devastating world wars. When we found ourselves divided once again by the Iron Curtain, the free West linked arms with the courageous dissident struggling against tyranny in the East to defeat Soviet communism. We have fought against each other, then reconciled, then fought, then reconciled again. And we have bled and died side by side on battlefields from Kem from Capyong to Kandahar. And I am here today to leave it clear that America is charting the path for a new century of prosperity. And that once again, we want to do it together with you, our cherished allies and our oldest friends. [applause]
>> [applause]
>> We want to do it together with you. With a Europe that is proud of its heritage and of its history. With a Europe that has the spirit of creation and liberty that sent ships out into unchartered seas and birthed our civilization. With a Europe that has the means to defend itself and the will to survive, we should be proud of what we achieved together in the last century. But now we must confront and embrace the opportunities of a new one. Because yesterday is over. The future is inevitable, and our destiny together awaits. Thank you. [applause]
>> [applause] [applause] [applause]
>> Go ahead, Adam. We can kill it at this point.
>> Mr. Secretary, I'm not—
>> I hope you see why we took the time out to actually give that speech to you and establish his background. Uh, because I think, you know, he's challenged them totally, and he's made very, very clear to all of the retards who came over from the Congress how the Trump administration is going to confront this. You know, we're going to talk about American culture. We're going to talk about American history. We're going to talk about Western Christian civilization. And I hope you are as inspired as I was at watching this speech after I got so damn mad at watching all the traitors the day before. Um, and so that's how I basically, uh, end the sequence.
>> All right. Thank you, everyone, for tuning into our little experiment. Let, I'm going to open it up for some questions. I know there have been some retards in the chat. Um, I've been following it. I already banned a few of them. So, not looking for questions; I'm looking for serious questions on topic. Drop them in the chat here. I hope my software is going to actually pick up the comments today.
Okay. So, let me take one here from David. Thank you, David, for the super chat. The speech is full of subtext warning that the USA will defend itself, anti-climate funding, offering the opportunity to join prosperity and peace. Barbara, your thoughts?
That's exactly right. And that's what President Trump does all the time. You know, they portrayed him in this evil opening to this conference as a garbage man in essence. Uh, and I might respond that, well, he, he just took out your garbage. Secretary Rubio just took out your garbage. All of the crap about, uh, you know, "We're basically awful, awful, awful. US European originated people from Western civilization." Uh, the ideology which Europe has actually forced it on itself. Uh, so, you know, you're absolutely right. It has enormous subtext. He's saying very firmly, "Hey, you know, we're going to defend ourselves. We're going to defend ourselves on this basis which truly moves people because this Western civilization is in our bones."
Thank you. Let me just, excuse me. It's kind of dry in here. Just want to remind everyone that we do have a free newsletter. If you've been watching us for a while or if you're just tuning in, we actually do three political updates a week, uh, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. We also do a live show every Thursday, and we're going to send you every, we're going to send you something every day on a newsletter. We just have so much to say. So, you can get our free newsletter. The link is in the description, and subscribe to our channel.
Okay. Uh, let me take a question here from x.com. It says, "How would you introduce this whole situation between US bank cartels working against the United States to a lay person?" I really like this question because this is, this is kind of at the heart of what we have to do for the midterm election. So, Barbara, how would you introduce this idea of like the British financial empire to somebody like who's never even thought about that idea before?
I think you can't underestimate the intelligence of the American people. Uh, you know, I think that that's a problem right now, quite frankly, in terms of how, uh, the Republican party is approaching all of this. Um, you know, that wasn't just a speech which Rubio was trying to make to a bunch of highly educated elite jerks about the future. When he talks about the theme of, you know, "We have to leave a future for our children which is better than our own future," he's talking about something very fundamental in terms of your identity as a human being.
Um, the British, on the other hand, in terms of your question about the UK banking cartels, believe that human beings are animals, that all we have is basically pleasure and pain, and we respond to that, and, uh, we live in a zoo which needs to be controlled, and the way you control us is by how you actually control monetary policy. Uh, Rubio is saying something very different. No, human beings are made in the image of God the Creator, and we participate in actually perfecting his creation. That's what really human work is all about. If you really think about it, that's what the dignity of work is all about.
So, I think you can. I, I have people who've never talked politics before who watch our videos, and I'm surprised because sometimes we talk at kind of a high level, and you say, "Can't you bring it down to a lower level?" I'm surprised at how much they actually get, and then they ask very intelligent questions. I think most people are just looking for how do you fit this picture together? And I happen to think that that speech was a key part of actually doing that.
Thank you very much, Barbara. Yeah, and once again, my software here has stopped bringing in the comments. I want to. So, let me just give a quick shout-out to Paul Hill. Thank you very much for the super chat. We have plenty of supporters from Australia and upside down world. So, thank you very much for your support from down under. We really appreciate it. Uh, I really wish the YouTube, the YouTube comments would coming in. Um, there's again, thank you, everyone, for putting up with the chat. Um, I know there's a lot of people that are still dog whistling in it. I don't appreciate it. We're not trying to attract that audience.
Thank you, David. Okay, so David says, "If, if the president cannot run for president again, he has Scottish heritage, and we need a change of prime minister. Thank you." Okay, so I think, I think we're pretty, I think we kind of said what we needed to say today. Barbara, do you have any closing words for our audience?
>> No, I think this was a pretty fundamental turning point, to be blunt. Uh, and, you know, what's, what's clearly what AOC did there is something we all have to think about, is very, very dangerous. Uh, you know, what she's talking about is, "Let's make a broad appeal to the workers, okay, on the basis that it's the billionaires who are actually screwing us over, and you can achieve everything you need to achieve by simple handouts." That was Biden's policy. That's a Democratic party policy, and it denigrates human beings. What Marco Rubio is saying, what Donald Trump is saying, on the other hand, is, "We're remaking the country, and we rely on a heritage which is really quite dense and has been lied about by most people."
And, you know, what happens, what's happening with Trump, is he's split the elite. That's what people don't realize, and that's what they don't cover. Uh, and he's taking those who are with us to help him rebuild the country. The targeting, for example, of Howard Lutnik around the Epstein files is completely indicative of what their game is. Uh, this guy is the guy who has actually told the Europeans, told the Ukrainians, told all these other people that, you know, "We're building a new system here." All right? And we need to basically, uh, you know, get all of these people who are the builders and the millionaires and everybody else on board with doing that.
Just like World War II under Roosevelt, that's what he did. And they, you know, basically all the industrialists and the manufacturers at the point of the World War II mobilization thought that Roosevelt was a communist, and he might very well have been so, uh, in his heart of hearts, but he went out and organized them. And that's exactly what President Trump's doing. And it's the exdemocrats. It's the trade unionists. It's all the people the Republican party was formerly allergic to who are going to determine the midterms. So, I'll leave my comments at that. We got a big battle ahead of us.
>> Uh, thank you, Paul Paul Hill, for the super chat from down under. And also, thank you, Dawn Girl. Please make sure you get our free newsletter. The link is in the description, and stay subscribed to our channel because we're going to be trying some new formats. We tried this today, but, uh, the, the response seems to be pretty good. Barbara said, "Not, I put a question in the chat. 95% of our people voted, said that they like this format." So, this is definitely something that we have to keep doing in the future. So, thank you, everyone, for joining us today and our special format. We might be exploring these more in the future, and we'll see you again on Monday for our next video. Thank you very much.